Esther 4:1-17 (Unseen and Unacknowledged)

Esther 4:1-17
Unseen and Unacknowledged

One of the sub-disciplines of systematic theology is known as Theology Proper. This deals specifically with the being, attributes, and works of God. In the Trinitarian model, which true Christians hold to, this study includes pneumatology (the study of the Holy Spirit) and Christology (the study of Jesus Christ).

Concerning God, it is said that no one can see God. God is Spirit. However, though God is unseen, we also know that God is omnipresent. It is rather hard to imagine that God is everywhere, and yet we cannot see Him. But the two are not contradictory at all. As God is Spirit, then He can be everywhere, at all times, and still be unseen. He is of a completely different nature than we are. And yet, though He is unseen, His effects are not.

In creation, we can see and experience all the things that God has created… out of nothing. They are the evidence that God is. But evidences of God are not limited to the physical things we can see. They are also realized in how things come out. The process may be unseen, but the results are not. If we just pay attention to times and circumstances, we can in fact see the evidences of God in those things.

Israel is a perfect example of this. By all logical processes of thought, they should not even exist anymore. But not only do they exist, they exist exactly as Scripture said they would – as a people, with the language they speak, in the times things happen to them, in the places they happen, and in the results of where they are in connection to their surroundings.

All of these things show us evidences of God, being worked out in our world. We can ascribe to these things time and chance, or we can take them as God has intended for us to take them, and see that He is there, doing what He is doing, for our benefit and hopefully for our choosing to seek Him out. This is what faith is. This is what is pleasing to God. As far as God being unseen, this is how James describes Him in our text verse for today –

Text Verse: “Every good gift and every perfect gift is from above, and comes down from the Father of lights, with whom there is no variation or shadow of turning.” James 1:17 

The word James uses for “variation” is parallagē. It is a word unique in all of Scripture. James reached into the world of the scientific realm to attempt to reveal to us what God is like. The word indicates a parallax. A parallax is where an object appears to differ when viewed from different positions. It can be through the viewfinder on a camera, or it can be where you stand looking at a star from different points on the earth’s orbit.

But if you look at a star from even a millionth of an inch different than another spot, there will be a change, no matter how small it may appear. Nothing can truly be viewed in the same manner except in the exact same spot. However, God can be spiritually viewed from anywhere, at any time, and by any set of eyes… and He will never be different. If we all could look at an atom in the middle of this room, we would all see the atom and yet, we would all be seeing the atom from a different perspective. But when we look to God, we look to that which is completely unchanging.

Why is this important to know? Because God may be hidden from our eyes, but He is there, and He is without any change at all. When He speaks, it is a reflection of who He is. And thus His word IS. We cannot find anything other than the unchanging God in His word. Why is this important to know? Because His word before the book of Esther is confirmed in Esther. And Esther deals with Israel of the past, but God is still dealing with Israel of the present in the same manner. Well, unless you are a reformed theologian, a Mormon, a Jehovah’s Witness, or one of many other groups. Then He is supposedly dealing with them differently, and you are sitting in the wrong church.

And why is this important to know? Because the Lord is missing in Esther, and yet His presence is seen nonetheless. The question is, are you looking for the Lord where He is not to be seen? You should be. But at the same time, you need to not insert the Lord where He is not acknowledged. What does that mean? Keep listening, and we will get to that.

The Lord is there. Just remember that for now. He is there, and He is tending to His word in Chapter 4 of Esther. It’s all to be found in His superior word. And so let’s turn to that precious word once again and… May God speak to us through His word today and may His glorious name ever be praised.

I. A Time to Mourn (verses 1-9)

When Mordecai learned all that had happened, he tore his clothes

The words here take us back to the events of Chapter 3. Haman had plotted against the Jews, and King Ahasuerus had agreed to his scheme. A date for the destruction of the Jews was chosen, a decree was published, and the kingdom was made aware of what that decree contained. In learning of this, and of the behind-the-scenes details as verse 4:7 will show us, Mordecai then takes several very middle-eastern, and more specifically, very Jewish actions. In them, he identified himself openly and publicly as a Jew. He is said first to have torn his clothes.

This is a sign of great distress. A person’s clothes are their outer protection, they are a covering of one’s nakedness, they serve as an adornment, and so on. In tearing one’s clothes, it is a rejection of each of these things in some measure. One’s vulnerability is revealed, one’s nakedness is exposed, and the adornment that was delighted in is rejected. The first time this was seen in Scripture was when Reuben found that Joseph was no longer in the pit that he and his brothers had cast him into. From there, this sign of great distress is seen again and again throughout the Bible. Next…

1 (con’t) and put on sackcloth and ashes,

Sackcloth and ashes, as an external adornment, signifies extreme mourning. Instead of one’s regular clothes, one would put on this coarse material made from hair which was used for sacks. The poor quality of the cloth would be itchy and unsightly. The garments would be both a physical reminder to the body, and to the eyes, of great mourning. It speaks of a state of humility, not arrogance, before God and man.

Ashes add in a second element to the state of mourning. Sitting in or wearing ashes implies that being reduced to ashes is one’s just due. It is, in essence a petition for mercy. “I understand what I deserve, the fiery judgment of God, and I acknowledge that. Thine will be done.” These external actions of of Mordecai are the greatest acts of humility that he could perform. From there…

1 (con’t) and went out into the midst of the city.

One can sit in ashes, as the king of Nineveh did in Jonah; one can also roll in ashes as is noted in Jeremiah 6:26; or one can lay in them as will be seen in the next verse here in Esther. In Mordecai’s case, he put on sackcloth and ashes and then went out into the midst of the city. This was to make his state known to all. Being covered in this way it would be a sign to all that great distress filled his soul. From there, others would hear and follow suit as…

1 (con’t) He cried out with a loud and bitter cry.

The words here are exceedingly similar to those found in Genesis 27:34. After Jacob stole Esau’s blessing through deception, Esau went into his father to obtain the blessing he was promised. However, when it was discovered what had happened, we read –

“When Esau heard the words of his father, he cried with an exceedingly great and bitter cry, and said to his father, ‘Bless me—me also, O my father!’”

There is only a very small change in the words between there and here, from zaaq to tsaaq. The verses are essentially identical. The only difference is the use of the letter zayin in place of a tsadde. The symbolism, then, shouldn’t be missed. Esau was a hairy man who cried out in distress. Mordecai is covered in a hairy garment, crying out in distress. Esau, picturing Adam, had lost his blessing. Mordecai takes on the same picture – representative of Israel having lost their blessing, now facing a curse.

What is obvious however, is what it missing from this external display of mourning. Garments are torn, sackcloth and ashes are put on, and there is great wailing – all external signs – but there is no note of an internal turning to God through prayer and supplication. When priests and prophets such as Daniel, Ezekiel, and Ezra faced such trials, they are shown to have revealed their anguish both externally and through prayer and supplication. Whether Mordecai prayed or not, the Bible specifically maintains silence on the issue. Only the externals are noted here.

The Greek translation of the Old Testament adds at the end of this verse the words Airetai ethnos meden edikekos – “A people are going to be destroyed who have done no evil.” The additions to the Greek translation, of which there are others, do not appear to reflect the intent of the original at all. In fact, they harm the integrity of what the story is actually conveying. If Israel had done no evil, they would not have been sent into exile.

He went as far as the front of the king’s gate, for no one might enter the king’s gate clothed with sackcloth.

The words reveal that a law must have existed which precluded anyone in mourning from entering near the king. This can also be inferred from Nehemiah’s words. He was sad in the presence of the king, and when the king asked about it, it says that Nehemiah became dreadfully afraid. From these verses, it can be deduced that no mourning was to be displayed before the Persian kings.

Understanding this, we can see that Mordecai could not enter, or even sit in, the king’s gate. Instead, he only went to the front of it. This would be as near as he could get in hopes of contacting Esther and relaying to her his message and hopes.

And in every province where the king’s command and decree arrived, there was great mourning among the Jews, with fasting, weeping, and wailing; and many lay in sackcloth and ashes.

As the decree arrived and was posted throughout the provinces, the Jews followed the same pattern as Mordecai. They mourned, fasted, wept, and lamented, employing the same traditional signs of mourning. Here a new word is introduced, yatsa, to lay or spread. It will be seen only four times. It gives the sense of spreading out sackcloth and ashes as a bed to lie in. Still, there is no sign of praying to, or petitioning of, God in any of these words. The Lord is not mentioned at all. The words are purposeful. He may be there behind the scenes, but the word shows that it is self, and not God, who is the focus of the narrative.

This verse now introduces two sets of two’s. First, there is fasting noted here, and then it will be seen again in verse 16. This is voluntary, but in distress. It is throughout the Jewish people, and it is in response to the king’s troubling decree. The next will be mandated, but in hope. It is in Shushan alone, and it is at the queen’s command, and for the queen’s sake. Together they contrast, and yet they confirm fasting as a source of national identification of the Jews through this ancient rite.

The second set of two’s concerns the attitude of the Jews after the giving of an edict. In this one, there is great mourning, fasting, weeping, and wailing, and many laying in sackcloth and ashes. In Chapter 8, after the next edict, there will be joy, gladness, honor, a feast, and a holiday. The two contrast, yes, but they also confirm the unity of the people in both distress and in exultation.

So Esther’s maids and eunuchs came and told her, and the queen was deeply distressed.

It was already known to the royal court, as was seen in verse 2:11, that Mordecai had cared for Esther. It may be that all knew he raised her after her parents died, but didn’t realize that she was related to him by blood. Or, those who attended to her may have known this, though it wasn’t yet widely disseminated. No matter what though, they knew of the relationship between the two and when they saw Mordecai’s distress, they passed this on to her.

When she heard this, it says that she was “deeply distressed.” The Hebrew word is in a passive intensive form, showing that this really troubled her immensely. It can be assumed then that Mordecai was otherwise an upbeat, amiable guy. But something had destroyed his normal demeanor. His misery now became hers.

(con’t) Then she sent garments to clothe Mordecai and take his sackcloth away from him, but he would not accept them.

The reason for doing this is so that he would then be allowed into the gate. Once there, she then could meet him and find out what the problem was. But even this heartfelt invitation was rejected. This would then demonstrate to her the immense grief that he was facing. So much so that he was unwilling to take off his mourning clothes to let her know what had come about.

Then Esther called Hathach, one of the king’s eunuchs whom he had appointed to attend her, and she gave him a command concerning Mordecai, to learn what and why this was.

It is said that one of the king’s personal eunuch’s would be assigned to the queen. He would normally be an older man, of the highest reputation, and who had faithfully served. As her personal attendant, he would be the most logical choice to speak to Mordecai. He would be faithful to find out, and faithful to repeat exactingly what he had learned. 

So Hathach went out to Mordecai in the city square that was in front of the king’s gate.

If your translation says “street” instead of “city square,” don’t panic. The word rekhov can mean either. It comes from a verb meaning “to widen.” Thus Mordecai is in a broad place before the king’s gate. It would be a place where many people passed, and so he is there making his mourning public. It is to this place that Hathach comes to find him.

And Mordecai told him all that had happened to him,

This is Mordecai’s way of showing that what occurred to all of the Jews was a decision based solely on the actions of one Jew. “All that happened to him” then is referring to verses 3:1-3:6 where Mordecai refused to rise for Haman, and which culminated in the words, “But he disdained to lay hands on Mordecai alone, for they had told him of the people of Mordecai. Instead, Haman sought to destroy all the Jews who were throughout the whole kingdom of Ahasuerus—the people of Mordecai” (3:6). To support this, he then tells what more he learned of the matter with…

(con’t) and the sum of money that Haman had promised to pay into the king’s treasuries to destroy the Jews.

In passing this information on, it was intended to show how great was Haman’s resentment at Mordecai’s actions and the eagerness that then resulted in destroying all the Jews. In other words, it is to demonstrate that Haman wasn’t just a narcissist, but that he was truly mentally unbalanced. If he was merely narcissistic, he would have had Mordecai alone punished – probably in a public and disgraceful way. But what has arisen shows the actions of a madman.

As side note, the word translated as “sum” is parashah. It will be used only here and in Esther 10:2 in the Bible. It signifies an exact amount, or a portion. Nowadays, it refers to a section of a biblical book, somewhat like our chapter divisions in the Bible. The parashah forms the basis for reading of Scripture in Jewish synagogues.

He also gave him a copy of the written decree for their destruction, which was given at Shushan,

A written copy, or at least a written note with the substance of the decree, would validate his words, it would show the timing of the events to come, and it would convey to her that Haman’s plan wasn’t just a hopeful wish, but a now-issued decree which bore the king’s approval.

(con’t) that he might show it to Esther and explain it to her, and that he might command her to go in to the king to make supplication to him and plead before him for her people.

It has been noted that the Hebrew of these words is exceedingly strong. There is an urgency in accomplishing the task, and so whether Mordecai is either commanding her as his adopted daughter, or charging her as a member of the Jewish people, he is now asking her to reveal her nationality to the king. She is of the same people as those who are set for destruction, and so her petition to the king is to be based on that premise.

The Greek translation of this verse adds in the following long sentence which is not supported by any other text, nor is it supported by the tenor of the book of Esther as well –

“Remember the time of your low estate, and in what manner you have been nourished, and carried in my arms; and that Haman, who is next to the king, has got a decree for our destruction. Pray, therefore, to the Lord, and plead with the king, that we may be delivered from death.”

The theme of Esther is that of the Lord being unacknowledged by the people, and yet still working in the background for them. The addition of these words in the Greek is surely a later fabrication.

So Hathach returned and told Esther the words of Mordecai.

Now Esther has an understanding of the basis for Mordecai’s lamentation, and she has all of the background information as well. It would be sufficient for her to grasp the magnitude of the situation, and to act in accord with Mordecai’s pleas. However, instead of doing as charged, she follows another path…

Woe to us for we have been sold to destruction
Our hope is gone and we have met our end
The empire will complete the king’s instruction
Death to our people, the royal decree does send

Our hope is lost; our life is dried up
There is nothing but sadness till we meet our end
No water for our lips, no wine in our cup
Death to our people, the royal decree does send

If there is hope, from where will it come?
It feels as if we as a people have finally met our end
If there is hope, we need only a crumb
Or death is assured, since the royal decree is penned

II. A Time Such as This (verses 10-17)

10 Then Esther spoke to Hathach, and gave him a command for Mordecai:

The word “command” here is for Hathach to transfer her words to Mordecai, not for him to transfer a command to him. As far as Hathach, he entered the narrative in verse 5. Now he is mentioned here for the last time in the Bible. So long Hathach.

11 “All the king’s servants and the people of the king’s provinces know that any man or woman who goes into the inner court to the king, who has not been called, he has but one law: put all to death, except the one to whom the king holds out the golden scepter, that he may live.

A law already in place, and fully known to all people, was that no person could ever enter into the inner court where the king sat without being called. This could be in response to a request, approving it and allowing entrance, or it could be from the throne commanding someone to be brought in. Either way, the approval had to come from the throne. Anyone who entered without approval was given one law – death. However, the king could hold out his scepter to the condemned person, granting pardon for the illegal intrusion. Two words found in this verse are unique to the book of Esther – yashat, or hold out, and sharvit, or scepter. They will be used in three verses of Esther and nowhere else.

11 (con’t) Yet I myself have not been called to go in to the king these thirty days.”

Even the queen fell under the law of entry, and she had not been summoned for a full month. She, therefore, may have felt that the king was no longer interested in her. If she petitioned to the king to enter, he may deny her request. If this was the case, then she could not, under any circumstance, come forward and expect to live. However, if she petitioned him to enter and he approved, then she would be compelled to explain herself immediately, even if Haman was present.

Either way, going forward based on a request would possibly be ineffective in resolving the matter. But going in without being requested would potentially be suicidal. The amount of time that had gone by made this a definite possibility. However, the number thirty in Scripture signifies “in a higher degree the perfection of Divine order, as marking the right moment” (EW Bullinger). Rather than being an inopportune time, it is the perfect time to begin a process to bring about a change in the direction of events.

12 So they told Mordecai Esther’s words.

v’yagidu l’maredokay eth divre esther – “And they told to Mordecai words Esther.” The only logical question for me, and which I now ask of you, concerning this is, “Who are ‘they?’” Hathach is the only person who has been mentioned and spoken to since verse 5. In verse 10, Esther spoke to him again to give a command for Mordecai. The Hebrew is 3rd person, masculine, plural. Hathach disappears from the narrative, and in comes a plural verb. Whoever “they” are, they passed on her words to Mordecai.

13 And Mordecai told them to answer Esther: “Do not think in your heart that you will escape in the king’s palace any more than all the other Jews.

There is no “them” in this verse. That is inserted. It simply says, “Then said Mordecai to answer unto Esther.” It makes the “they” in the previous verse that much more perplexing. Despite this puzzling linguistic difficulty, Mordecai’s words are somber indeed. It may be that he suspected Haman knew Esther’s nationality. Whether this is the case or not, the servants, including Hathach now did. With her identity known, it could not be withheld from the king’s knowledge without jeopardizing their own lives. Therefore, she would not escape, even being in the king’s palace, and even being the queen. She was Jewish and her position could no longer protect her.

14 For if you remain completely silent at this time, relief and deliverance will arise for the Jews from another place,

Almost every scholar who comments on these words attributes the words of Mordecai to a strong faith in the belief that God will personally interpose and ensure that things will come out right. This is entirely incorrect. If he believed this, he would have said it, or the author would have stated it for him. But both God, and the Lord, are completely left out of the book – highlighting the fact that He is not on their minds at all.

A knowledge of God’s presence cannot be assumed or inserted into the narrative. It can only be assumed by the reader of the narrative. It is the reader’s job to see that God, despite having been rejected by the Jews, has not rejected them. This takes us back to Leviticus 26 where the Lord stated this –

“Yet for all that, when they are in the land of their enemies, I will not cast them away, nor shall I abhor them, to utterly destroy them and break My covenant with them;

for I am the Lord their God.

45 But for their sake I will remember the covenant of their ancestors, whom I brought out of the land of Egypt in the sight of the nations, that I might be their God:

am the Lord.” Leviticus 26:44, 45

It is for the sake of the covenant to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob that the Lord made this statement. Though the people are dispersed because of their rejection of Him, including remaining in dispersion voluntarily, He is working to preserve the Jews according to His word to the patriarchs.

Whether Mordecai even knew of this promise at all or not cannot be determined. But as a Jew, he knew that his people would find deliverance in some way. This is the same thought of secular Jews to this day. They are sure they will stand as a people, it is practically a national motto. But they do not attribute this to God. Rather, they attribute it to their own ability to preserve their heritage and culture. It is not the Lord, but their Jewishness which continues to drive their overall ideology as a people.

In the words of this clause are two very rare words. The first, revakh, is translated as “relief.” It was seen in Genesis 32:16, translated as “distance.” With a distance, one has an interval, and thus respite or relief. It carries the idea of a breathing space. There, it was used as a picture of an interval between the dispensations of time in redemptive history. Now it is seen for the second and last time. The second word is found only here in the Bible, hatstsalah, or deliverance. Mordecai is trusting in deliverance, but he is not trusting in the Deliverer. Time and chance alone are on his mind.

14 (con’t) but you and your father’s house will perish.

The words here strongly suggest that Mordecai was certain Haman knew of the Jewish ancestry of Esther, or that at least Esther’s ancestry – previously revealed to Hathach and others – would be her demise. She would not escape, and her father’s house – meaning his line – would perish with her.

14 (con’t) Yet who knows whether you have come to the kingdom for such a time as this?”

Again, these words cannot be attributed to the workings of the Lord. They are words of time, chance, luck, and fortune. If Mordecai accepted the Lord’s divine hand of Jewish protection, he would have stated it – clearly and unambiguously – just as King David did numerous times in his life, such as in Psalm 18 –

“I will love You, O Lord, my strength.
The Lord is my rock and my fortress and my deliverer;
My God, my strength, in whom I will trust;
My shield and the horn of my salvation, my stronghold.
I will call upon the Lord, who is worthy to be praised;
So shall I be saved from my enemies.” Psalm 18:1-3

David knew the Lord, he loved the Lord, he trusted the Lord, and he called out to the Lord. This is left entirely out of the words of Mordecai. As words reflect the man, so Mordecai trusted, but not in the Lord. And yet, the Lord included this book in His word to demonstrate that He, while being neglected by His people, remained faithful to them.

When the world looks at Israel today, and while the Jews of today continue to trust in their own might and prowess, the Lord sits unchanged in His being, and thus unchanged in His promises to the patriarchs. Israel will stand because of the word of Lord, and because of that alone.

Despite the attitude presented, the words of this clause are as hopeful as any found in Scripture. They are memorable simply for the truth that they reveal, umi yodea im l’eth kazot higaat la’malkut “and who knows whether for a time as this you have come to the kingdom.” Mordecai sees an opportunity, and he sees that it is about as good as any could ever get. Esther may die coming before the king, or she may be the means by which they are saved, but the opportunity outweighs the risk on all levels. As John Gill states it, “It is better to perish in a good cause than in a bad one.”

15 Then Esther told them to reply to Mordecai:

Again, “them” is inserted here. It simply says, “And said Esther to return unto Mordecai.” Who “them” is goes unstated, but them folks, whoever them might be, sure make a great mystery.

16 “Go, gather all the Jews who are present in Shushan, and fast for me;

Esther’s reply of verse 16 is one of resigned submission. Her words are first for the Jews of Shushan to hold a fast. However, unlike many other fasts in the Bible, this one says nothing about it being to the Lord, or to God. On other occasions when fasting is noted, the same verse, or the context of the verse often includes God as the object of the fast. This is seen, for example, in Ezra 8:23 –

So we fasted and entreated our God for this, and He answered our prayer.”

Here, the object is Esther – “fast for me.” Again, scholars force God into this verse, stating that He is the object of the petition, and that He is the One for whom the fast is made. This cannot be assumed. In Zechariah 7, we read –

“Say to all the people of the land, and to the priests: ‘When you fasted and mourned in the fifth and seventh months during those seventy years, did you really fast for Me—for Me? When you eat and when you drink, do you not eat and drink for yourselves? Should you not have obeyed the words which the Lord proclaimed through the former prophets when Jerusalem and the cities around it were inhabited and prosperous, and the South and the Lowland were inhabited?’” Zechariah 7:5-7

When Jesus spoke to the leaders of Israel in Matthew 6, He corrected them on misdirected fasting as well. People all over the world fast, for a multitude of reasons, and few of them are directed at petitioning God. It very well may be that His divine intervention is what they are seeking, but the author does not indicate it, and the words of Esther do not either. The words leave the Lord out entirely. We cannot place Him there after the fact.

16 (con’t) neither eat nor drink for three days, night or day.

The words here are helpful to understanding what the term, “three days, night or day,” means. Jesus uses similar terminology in Matthew 12 concerning His time in the grave. And yet, the timeline for His crucifixion and resurrection is a total of three days – from Friday to Sunday. This is later confirmed thirteen times when it says that He rose “on the third day.” Such is the case here as well. In Esther 5:1, we will read the words, v’hi b’yom ha’shelishi, “Now it happened on the third day…” Thus, the time-frame here, and in Matthew, means three days, up to the third day.

16 (con’t)My maids and I will fast likewise.

These words show that the fast was one for Esther, not to the Lord. Her maids are not Jewish. If they were, it would indicate this. Instead, she is asking for a fast as a sign of solidarity with her people and among those she is in charge of. This is similar to what Jephthah’s daughter asked for prior to her death –

“Then she said to her father, “Let this thing be done for me: let me alone for two months, that I may go and wander on the mountains and bewail my virginity, my friends and I.” Judges 11:37

These words close out the set of two’s concerning two fasts being held. The first was voluntary, but in distress. It was throughout the Jewish people, and it was in response to the king’s troubling decree. This one is mandated, but in hope. It is in Shushan alone, and it is at the queen’s command, and for the queen’s sake. Together they contrast, and yet they confirm fasting as a source of national identification.

16 (con’t)And so I will go to the king, which is against the law;

After the sign of solidarity and identification is complete, Esther will be encouraged enough to enter the king’s presence without first asking, or being requested, and without first being approved. It may mean her death, but it is the only logical way to conduct what needs to be done.

16 (con’t) and if I perish, I perish!”

Her words are not words of faith. When faced with the fiery furnace, Daniel’s three friends did acknowledge that they might die, but before doing so, they acknowledge, in faith, that the Lord would deliver them –

“Shadrach, Meshach, and Abed-Nego answered and said to the king, ‘O Nebuchadnezzar, we have no need to answer you in this matter. 17 If that is the case, our God whom we serve is able to deliver us from the burning fiery furnace, and He will deliver us from your hand, O king. 18 But if not, let it be known to you, O king, that we do not serve your gods, nor will we worship the gold image which you have set up.’” Daniel 3:16-18

The story of Esther is about the Lord, but it is not about the Lord being the object and adoration of the people. It is about the Lord being faithful to a people who have failed to acknowledge Him. They are to be saved despite themselves. They were given the chance to return to Him, and they did not. They remained in exile. By not acknowledging Him in their words and actions in Esther 4, they are profaning Him. There can be no other way of looking at this without abusing what is presented. Thus, what is going to occur in the pages ahead is reflective of the words of Ezekiel 36 –

“When they came to the nations, wherever they went, they profaned My holy name—when they said of them, ‘These are the people of the Lord, and yet they have gone out of His land.’ 21 But I had concern for My holy name, which the house of Israel had profaned among the nations wherever they went.” Ezekiel 36:20-21

*17 So Mordecai went his way and did according to all that Esther commanded him.

The chapter, though 17 verses long, has gone quickly. The words of quite a few of the verses are generally easy to follow, simple, and without a lot of explanation. Such is the case with this final verse. Mordecai felt that the agreement was sufficient and reasonable. From this point, he would pass the information on, and trust that things might turn out as they should.

Again, it must be stressed that forcing the Lord into the verses of this chapter – although it is that which is almost universally done by scholars – is wholly inappropriate. The words of Mordecai and Esther are completely void of any acknowledgment of the Lord at all, as are the words of the author, who could have supplied them. This often happens elsewhere, such as “But David strengthened himself in the Lord his God” (1 Samuel 30:6). The author notes what is occurring inside of David’s mind for our benefit. Such is not the case here.

For this reason, the book of Esther is one which highlights, and even magnifies, the work of the Lord in a unique way. He is there, faithfully tending to His people, while they are as faithfully unfaithful as ever. As I said in the last sermon, Mordecai is representative of the Jewish people, but he is also a type of Christ. Just as Christ is concealed in the Old Testament, Mordecai had concealed his nationality. However, Mordecai eventually revealed his national ties, just as Jesus came and walked among His people. In this story, Mordecai and Esther are relying on their Jewishness, not the Lord, to save them. Jesus, as a Jew, and who is the Lord, came to save His people. We are seeing types and shadows to help us understand God’s unfolding plan of redemption.

When we come to stories like Esther, we know – without a doubt – that the Lord is there, and yet He is unseen. Unless you were told about the acrostics of His name interspersed throughout the story, you would still know that He is there. It is as obvious as the nose on one’s face. But in order to actually find Him, He needs to be searched out.

This is the lesson we should glean from what we have seen, and what we will continue to see. But that lesson isn’t just for, “Oooh, let’s look for secrets in the Bible that will show us the Lord.” Instead, it is a lesson for our daily lives. His care for us is evident with every step we take, every meal we eat, and every flower we smell. We just have to stop… and look for His hand in these things. This week, don’t rush through life in such a hurry that you miss the Lord who is right there with you. Instead,

take the time to talk to Him,
think about His care,
trust in His provision,
and know that He is there.

Closing Verse: “Seek the Lord while He may be found,
Call upon Him while He is near.”Isaiah 55:6

Next Week: Esther 5:1-14 Will he be an executor, or will he be an accepter? (The Golden Scepter) (7th Esther Sermon)

The Lord has you exactly where He wants you. He has a good plan and purpose for you. At times, you might feel as if he has no great design for you in life, but he has brought you to this moment to reveal His glory in and through you. So follow Him and trust Him and He will do marvelous things for you and through you.

Unseen and Unacknowledged

When Mordecai learned all that had happened
He tore his clothes and put on sackcloth and ashes, by and by
And went out into the midst of the city
He cried out with a loud and bitter cry 

He went as far as the front of the king’s gate, so we read
For no one might enter the king’s gate clothed with sackcloth
———-no one could do such a deed

And in every province where the king’s command and decree arrived
There was great mourning among the Jews
With fasting, weeping, and wailing
And many lay in sackcloth and ashes
———-such mourning they did choose

So Esther’s maids and eunuchs came and told her
And the queen was deeply distressed
Then she sent garments to clothe Mordecai
———-and take his sackcloth away from him
But he would not accept them; he refused to be so dressed 

Then Esther called Hathach
One of the king’s eunuchs whom he had appointed to attend her
And she gave him a command concerning Mordecai
To learn what and why this was, for sure 

So Hathach went out to Mordecai; Esther’s words to state
In the city square that was in front of the king’s gate

And Mordecai told him all that had happened to him
And the sum of money that Haman had promised to pay
Into the king’s treasuries to destroy the Jews
These things to him he did relay 

He also gave him a copy
Of the written decree for their destruction, so crazy and insane
Which was given at Shushan
That he might show it to Esther and to her it explain

And that he might command her to go in to the king
To make to him supplication
And plead before him for her people
Yes, to plead for her sentenced nation 

So Hathach returned and told Esther
The words of Mordecai, he told to her

Then Esther spoke to Hathach, giving a reply
And gave him a command for Mordecai 

“All the king’s servants and the people of the king’s provinces
Know that any man or woman who goes into the inner court
To the king, who has not been called
He has but one law: put all to death, cutting that life short

Except the one to whom the king holds out the golden scepter
That he may live, and not die
Yet I myself have not been called to go in to the king
These thirty days, and I know not why 

So they told Mordecai Esther’s words
And Mordecai told them to answer Esther with his views
“Do not think in your heart that you will escape
In the king’s palace any more than all the other Jews 

For if you remain completely silent at this time
Relief and deliverance will arise for the Jews from another place
———-this point do not miss
But you and your father’s house will perish
Yet who knows whether you have come to the kingdom
———-for such a time as this?”

Then Esther told them to reply to Mordecai:
“Go, gather all the Jews who are present in Shushan
And fast for me; neither eat nor drink for three days, night or day
And then with your plan I will proceed on

My maids and I will fast likewise
And which is against the law, so I will go to the king
And if I perish, I perish!”
So Mordecai went his way and to all that Esther commanded him
———-so he did this thing

Lord God, thank You for Your presence that is with us
Even when we don’t realize that You are there
Because You sent Your own Son Jesus
We can know that You truly do care

And so Lord, be real to us in a wonderful new way
Open our minds and our hearts to seeing You always
Through every step we take, and throughout every day
Be real to us, O God, and to You will shall give all of our praise

Hallelujah and Amen…

When Mordecai learned all that had happened, he tore his clothes and put on sackcloth and ashes, and went out into the midst of the city. He cried out with a loud and bitter cry. He went as far as the front of the king’s gate, for no one might enter the king’s gate clothed with sackcloth. And in every province where the king’s command and decree arrived, there was great mourning among the Jews, with fasting, weeping, and wailing; and many lay in sackcloth and ashes.

So Esther’s maids and eunuchs came and told her, and the queen was deeply distressed. Then she sent garments to clothe Mordecai and take his sackcloth away from him, but he would not accept them. Then Esther called Hathach, one of the king’s eunuchs whom he had appointed to attend her, and she gave him a command concerning Mordecai, to learn what and why this was. So Hathach went out to Mordecai in the city square that was in front of the king’s gate. And Mordecai told him all that had happened to him, and the sum of money that Haman had promised to pay into the king’s treasuries to destroy the Jews. He also gave him a copy of the written decree for their destruction, which was given at Shushan, that he might show it to Esther and explain it to her, and that he might command her to go in to the king to make supplication to him and plead before him for her people. So Hathach returned and told Esther the words of Mordecai.

10 Then Esther spoke to Hathach, and gave him a command for Mordecai: 11 “All the king’s servants and the people of the king’s provinces know that any man or woman who goes into the inner court to the king, who has not been called, he has but one law: put all to death, except the one to whom the king holds out the golden scepter, that he may live. Yet I myself have not been called to go in to the king these thirty days.” 12 So they told Mordecai Esther’s words.

13 And Mordecai told them to answer Esther: “Do not think in your heart that you will escape in the king’s palace any more than all the other Jews. 14 For if you remain completely silent at this time, relief and deliverance will arise for the Jews from another place, but you and your father’s house will perish. Yet who knows whether you have come to the kingdom for such a time as this?”

15 Then Esther told them to reply to Mordecai: 16 “Go, gather all the Jews who are present in Shushan, and fast for me; neither eat nor drink for three days, night or day. My maids and I will fast likewise. And so I will go to the king, which is against the law; and if I perish, I perish!”

17 So Mordecai went his way and did according to all that Esther commanded him.

 

 

Esther 3:1-15 (There is a Certain People)

Esther 3:1-15
There Is a Certain People

The Jewish people are facing real trouble in today’s verses. It seems like a truly calamitous affair as to where they are with the verses we just read. And indeed, for anyone who was to stop at this point in the story, it would seem like a sad end for them.

But they were selected by God, and he made great and sure promises to them. What they need now is not a drop into the pit of despair, but a reminder of the covenant promises made to them, and faith that those promises are true.

And this is true with every person now who is one of the redeemed of the Lord. For the person who has called on Christ, there is no situation too hopeless, no disaster too great, and no loss so complete that good will not come out of it. When one thing is lost, another thing is provided. When one door is shut, another one will open up. When a child dies, someone affected by that death calls on Christ and is born again.

What we think of as impossible, God uses as the perfect opportunity. When we can’t see how things will ever be right again, God has already straightened out that which was broken. I’m not saying this to be cliché; it is simply true. Because of Jesus Christ in the believer’s life, the worst possible thing we could imagine is just a step to something better. Got cancer and are dying? Heaven is waiting. Bad cannot outdo good, and joy lies ahead for those who wait on the Lord.

Text Verse: “I will go before you
And make the crooked places straight;
I will break in pieces the gates of bronze
And cut the bars of iron.
I will give you the treasures of darkness
And hidden riches of secret places,
That you may know that I, the Lord,
Who call you by your name,
Am the God of Israel.” Isaiah 45:2, 3

Long before Israel was in exile, the Lord had already called Cyrus by name to release Israel from captivity. Everything is already known in the Lord’s mind. There is no thing that can thwart His will, and the disasters of exile for disobedience were overcome by favor and restoration for those who wished to return home.

But some Jews stayed in the land of their exile. One might call this disobedience, but God used it as opportunity. That will be seen in the chapters ahead. Many Jews died in the Holocaust, but that set the stage for their reestablishment as a nation. There are still Jews in the dispersion today, but they are being used to both bless and protect Israel that has returned.

God is using all of these things for a good end for them. Though they are not right with Him at this time, He is looking forward… ahead to when they will be. If you look at the world from a biblical perspective, it doesn’t matter how bad things seem, there is always, always something positive ahead. And so as we look into the verses today, and as we end on an otherwise sad note, let us remember that the book is written, the story is complete, good things are ahead, and we are just in the process of getting there.

It’s all to be found in His superior word. And so let’s turn to that precious word once again and… May God speak to us through His word today and may His glorious name ever be praised.

I. The Agagite (verses 1-7)

After these things

The words are speaking of the events at the end of Chapter 2 where Mordecai uncovered a plot to harm the king. This was subsequently passed on to the king who had the conspirators hung. It is after these things that the story brings in the next relevant events to be detailed. The timing of them is between the seventh and the twelfth year of the reign of Ahasuerus. The seventh year is mentioned in verse 2:16, and the twelfth will be seen in verse 3:7.

1 (con’t) King Ahasuerus promoted Haman,

gidal ha’melekh akhashverosh eth haman – “made large Ahasuerus, Haman.” The words are actually explained in the final clause of the verse, but the promotion is stated here in this abrupt way to form a contrasting parallel in the narrative between the exaltation of Esther in the previous chapter, and that of Haman here. One has found the favor of the king’s heart, and the other has found the favor of his throne.

The actual meaning of the name Haman is debated. Some tie it to various Persian words, but the true meaning appears lost to history. From a Hebrew perspective, it is closely associated with the verb aman, which means to confirm or be truthful. If so, then his name might mean “Certainty,” but we can’t say this with certainty. The name of one of the seven eunuchs in verse 1:10, Mehuman, is derived from the Aramaic version of that same verb. And so some have tied Haman in as the same person who is now promoted above the others.

As noted in the first sermon, Esther is a book which is read annually at the Jewish feast of Purim. As the book is read, every time the name Haman is read, all of the people shout and rattle noise-making toys to drown out his name. He is identified then as the epitome of the enemy of the Jews, a title he is actually given four times in Esther, beginning in verse 3:10.

One can almost taste what lies ahead because of the sudden introduction of this vile person. Understanding biblical history, one could then find a reason for what will come about in the story. That begins to be revealed in the next words…

1 (con’t) the son of Hammedatha the Agagite,

The name Hammedatha is almost ignored by scholars as to any known meaning. The closest attempt at explaining it is that it is tied to the word Mahadata, meaning “given by the moon.” And thus it might be inferred that he would be “The son of the one who works in darkness.” The designation Agagite is also of singular note and importance. The name Agag is connected to the word gag, or roof. It thus signifies that which is the highest. This name is directly connected to the names Gog and Magog. Magog goes back to Genesis 10:2 as a son of Japheth. Gog and Magog are found as the great enemies who will come against Israel as noted in Ezekiel 38 and Revelation 20. Agag is first seen in Numbers 24:7 in an oracle given by Balaam the prophet. In his oracle, he blesses Israel with these words –

“How lovely are your tents, O Jacob!
Your dwellings, O Israel!
Like valleys that stretch out,
Like gardens by the riverside,
Like aloes planted by the Lord,
Like cedars beside the waters.
He shall pour water from his buckets,
And his seed shall be in many waters.

His king shall be higher than Agag,
And his kingdom shall be exalted.” Numbers 24:5-7

After this, Agag is mentioned again in 1 Samuel 15. There he is known as Agag, king of the Amalekites. The Amalekites were most notably mentioned in Exodus 17. It is a passage which must be repeated to gain a fuller understanding of the narrative –

Now Amalek came and fought with Israel in Rephidim. And Moses said to Joshua, “Choose us some men and go out, fight with Amalek. Tomorrow I will stand on the top of the hill with the rod of God in my hand.” 10 So Joshua did as Moses said to him, and fought with Amalek. And Moses, Aaron, and Hur went up to the top of the hill. 11 And so it was, when Moses held up his hand, that Israel prevailed; and when he let down his hand, Amalek prevailed. 12 But Moses’ hands became heavy; so they took a stone and put it under him, and he sat on it. And Aaron and Hur supported his hands, one on one side, and the other on the other side; and his hands were steady until the going down of the sun. 13 So Joshua defeated Amalek and his people with the edge of the sword.

14 Then the Lord said to Moses, “Write this for a memorial in the book and recount it in the hearing of Joshua, that I will utterly blot out the remembrance of Amalek from under heaven.” 15 And Moses built an altar and called its name, The-Lord-Is-My-Banner; 16 for he said, “Because the Lord has sworn: the Lord will have war with Amalek from generation to generation.” Exodus 17:8-16

The name Amalek is derived from the word am, or people, and from the word malaq which “means to nip or wring off the head of a bird with or without severing it from the body.” (Abarim) Thus, they are the “The People Who Wring Off.” They are those who are disconnected from the body and strive to disconnect the body. It is a fitting description of Haman and his coming actions.

The Amalekites attempted to wring off the Israelites in Exodus 17 and they were defeated, but the promise was that the Lord would have war with Amalek from generation to generation. There would be an end to this on-going war though. Again, in Balaam’s prophecy in Numbers 24, he pronounced these words –

“Amalek was first among the nations,
But shall be last until he perishes.” Numbers 24:20

This same group came against Israel during the times of the Judges and into the times of the kings. It is in 1 Samuel 15 where the names Amalek and Agag are united, and which become a key to understanding what is going on here in Esther. The entire chapter needs to be read to get this. (Stop and read 1 Samuel 15).

After this story, the Amalekites continued to trouble Israel, including battles with King David. When Saul was injured in battle, he killed himself by falling on his own sword. However, an Amalekite came to David with Saul’s crown and claimed to have been the one to kill him. In this, David had him executed. But the stain of the conflict between Saul and Amalek was deep. It is what is explicitly stated as having cost him his continuing right to the kingship of Israel.

With this understanding, we can now go back and see why the genealogy of Mordecai was so carefully noted in verse 2:5. His ancestors went back to Kish, a Benjamite. King Saul was a son of Kish, meaning that Mordecai and Esther were of the same family within Benjamin as Saul. But they were related to Kish through Saul’s nephew Shimei, who is also listed in Esther 2:5.

As I said then, Shimei is recorded as having cursed King David in 2 Samuel 16:5. Eventually, this same person was executed by Solomon in 1 Kings 2:46.

It is Kish who is the tie between the two genealogies. It is from his house that both King Saul and Mordecai, through Shimei, come. They are both sons of Kish according to ancestry. This Kish is mentioned by Saul, or Paul, in Acts 13:21. The name of Kish is connected to the word qush, a verb meaning to ensnare. Thus it may mean “To Snare.”

And so we can see now that Haman, the Agagite of Amalek is being set in opposition to Mordecai, who descends from Kish, the Benjamite. A double disgrace fell upon this line. First, Saul was ensnared in his failure to destroy Amalek as ordered, and he lost the kingship. Secondly, Shimei was ensnared in his hatred of David who was chosen to replace Saul, cursing this new royal line. Both of these stains rested upon the line of Kish. The story in Esther shows a correction of these failures of the past. As a note, it is assumed that the name Agag is not necessarily the proper name of the person in 1 Samuel 15, but rather a royal title, just as Pharaoh is not a name, but a title. Either way, Haman is described as an Agagite, one who is of Amalek, and who is said to be at war with Israel from generation to generation, and whose name and clan will eventually perish.

1 (con’t) and advanced him and set his seat above all the princes who were with him.

These words explain the first clause which said the king had promoted Haman. However, more is left out of what is said about the promotion than what is stated. We aren’t told why he was promoted, from what position he was promoted, etc. The record simply and succinctly records his promotion above the others.

And all the king’s servants who were within the king’s gate bowed and paid homage to Haman,

The term “servants” here gives the sense of those lower than the princes of the court. As they are said to be within the king’s gate, then it would be the same level of servant as Mordecai who was said to sit within the king’s gate in the previous chapter. This lower class of servants bowed and paid homage to Haman. The same word, ebed, servant, is used when speaking of Messiah in Isaiah 52:13.

The word translated as “bowed” comes from a root signifying, “to bend the knee.” It is some sign of obeisance from a curtsy to a bow to even kneeling. The act then explains the second word translated as “paid homage.” The sign of bowing is what then pays the homage. Once can bow without paying homage, and one can pay homage without bowing. But here one is tied to the other.

(con’t) for so the king had commanded concerning him.

This was the command of the king, just as it would be the command of the president, who commissions officers within the military, that the enlisted ranks are to salute officers. The salute is the act, and the homage is tied to the act. It is the same thought in a salute then, as is the thought in the bowing. As it is the king’s command, then it is expected to be followed…

(con’t) But Mordecai would not bow or pay homage.

It is generally assumed that this is tied in with the fact that he is a Jew, as is explicitly stated in verse 4. From this, it is held by most scholars that because he is a Jew, it would be inappropriate for him to bow in homage to a man, being a type of idolatry. This however, seems unlikely at best. The same word, shakhah, is used many times for a man bowing or prostrating before other men. Abraham did it before the sons of Heth. It is a regular occurrence before kings and others in the books of Samuel and Kings, and elsewhere.

To this day, Jews serve in governments around the world, and they give proper respect to their designated authorities. In the US military, they salute their superiors, and they salute the president and the flag. Further, if this type of salute was required for Haman, then it would certainly be required before the king. If Mordecai refused to honor the king, it would mean execution rather than being someone who sat in the king’s gate.

It appears that as a Jew, Mordecai refused to bow to Haman because he was an Agagite, and thus an Amalekite. This is certainly what is the case. The ancient enmity between these rivals made Mordecai refuse to pay homage to the enemy of the Jews.

Then the king’s servants who were within the king’s gate said to Mordecai, “Why do you transgress the king’s command?”

It is the same word for servants as in verse 2. In other words, those of the same rank as Mordecai were willing to pay homage to Haman, but they noticed that he was not. And so their question to him is obvious, “Why do you transgress the king’s command?”

The very nature of the question shows that this has nothing to do with him being a Jew who cannot pay homage based on religious grounds. If so, then they would have asked the same thing when he failed to honor the king in this way. Even more, he never would have become a servant of the king if he failed to pay him homage. They can tell that there is more involved between Mordecai and Haman, and that it caused Mordecai to refuse to bow to him.

Now it happened, when they spoke to him daily and he would not listen to them,

There is the sense of frustration among the servants, as would be right under any normal circumstances. If a person were in the military, and someone refused to salute an officer because he was black, he would probably say to him over a period of days, “You’re not being disobedient to that guy, you’re being disobedient to the rank he possesses. Despite your hatred of him, you need to respect the position.” Eventually, through continued refusal, the matter would have to be elevated. There is nothing wrong in what is happening here. There appears to be a violation of the king’s command, and they are rightly questioning Mordecai’s refusal to obey it. And so…

(con’t) that they told it to Haman, to see whether Mordecai’s words would stand;

It is Mordecai’s words, not his actions, which are mentioned. Were his words sufficient to support his actions? They check with Haman. It is the logical and appropriate action to take. Mordecai has stated his reasons for not paying homage to Haman. With no other option, the servants then passed this on to Haman to see whether he would force Mordecai to obey, or whether Mordecai would prevail.

Again, the tenor of this matter isn’t that of a Jew refusing to pay homage because of religion, but because of enmity. If it was religion, it would have been seen in any other person who was so designated to receive the same type of honor, including the king. Rather, it is Haman who Mordecai will not bow to because of his genealogy. This continues to be seen with the words…

(con’t) for Mordecai had told them that he was a Jew.

Of this, John Gill, who is in agreement with almost all scholars, says, “He had told them that he was a Jew; and therefore did not deny this reverence to Haman out of pride, or any personal grudge against him, much less out of a rebellious mind and contempt of the king’s authority and command; but merely out of conscience, because he was a Jew, who was obliged to give this honour to none but to God only.” This is exactly the opposite of what is happening.

If this thought was correct, Haman’s response would have been much different. Rather, because Mordecai was a Jew, he refused Haman any sort of obeisance at all. The matter is personal, and its roots go back to the very Exodus of Israel from Egypt. The Amalekites were Israel’s sworn enemies, and it would be loathsome to give homage to one of the enemies of the people of the Lord. This is clearly seen in Haman’s response…

When Haman saw that Mordecai did not bow or pay him homage, Haman was filled with wrath.

The words and actions are taken personally. It is not the king’s command which Haman is concerned about. Otherwise, it would have said that he was angry that he didn’t obey the king’s command. Instead, it is because Mordecai refused him homage.

The ancient enmity is herein brought to remembrance. “Those Jews who almost exterminated my people refuse to give me homage now that I am ruler over them.” The entire thought is that of ancient rivalry, rising to the surface, and then foaming from the heat boiling within. This is exactly what the word khemah, or wrath, signifies – heat boiling over in fury.

But he disdained to lay hands on Mordecai alone,

For Haman, it would not suffice to simply eradicate the offender. It would be too easy, too quickly forgotten, and it would not solve the root of the problem at all. There was a far larger issue that he was determined to deal with, and he was in the position which would allow him to do so with ease and finality. Therefore, instead of laying hands on his immediate enemy alone, he would have them grab and destroy all those associated with him…

(con’t) for they had told him of the people of Mordecai.

With Mordecai’s nationality revealed as to the source of the enmity, there would have to be a cleansing of that very source in order for the enmity to cease. It is exactly the same thing which has been seen countless times throughout history, among many races, and even many times among the Jews in particular.

Even in the Persian Empire, it was only fifty years earlier that the historian Herodotus says that when Darius Hystaspes ascended to the throne, he massacred all of the Magi in the land. It was an event which was celebrated annually during Haman’s time. With such a precedent still in commemoration, his desires would simply be another event for the empire to commemorate. Yes, rather than just killing just Mordecai…

(con’t) Instead, Haman sought to destroy all the Jews who were throughout the whole kingdom of Ahasuerus—the people of Mordecai.

It is common for commentaries to say that the events of Esther occurred during the dispersion of the Jews from their homeland, because the events occur outside of Israel. And it is true, Mordecai and many other Jews were in dispersion throughout the known world at this time. However, it is not true that this was during the period of the exile. The exile had officially ended about 60 years before by the decree of Cyrus in 539BC.

As this is so, and as the land of Israel was now a province of the kingdom, it would mean that Israel would be completely eradicated. The ancient hatred would finally be ended through the annihilation of the Jewish people. Wherever they were, it was within the power of Haman to have them completely exterminated. Any outside of the kingdom itself would be so dispersed, and so few in number that they would never recover from the events he was to plan and execute.

In the first month, which is the month of Nisan, in the twelfth year of King Ahasuerus, they cast Pur (that is, the lot), before Haman to determine the day and the month, until it fell on the twelfth month, which is the month of Adar.

Nisan is the first month of the redemptive calendar for the Jews. In Exodus, it is known as Aviv. However, the name Nisan was adopted after the Babylonian exile. The month corresponds to March/April on our calendar. As it is the twelfth year of Ahasuerus, this is the year 474BC. It is on the 14th of Nisan that the Passover is commemorated. The Hebrew reads, “from day to day, and from month to month, twelfth.” In other words, lots were cast for each successive month, and then each successive day within the month. In doing this, they would determine the most propitious time of the year to bring about the plan. The twelfth month, Adar, is selected.

When the wicked are in power
The people mourn and are afraid
Distress comes hour after hour
Sadness in heart and soul is constantly displayed

But God’s people should never bow to them
We are to stand resolutely before our foes
Though they may threaten, haw, and hem
Let us stand unconcerned that this is how it goes

Because the Lord has a plan, good and upright
For those who are His; it shall in time be revealed
The wicked will perish forever from His people’s sight
Great is the plan that is at this time concealed

II. If it Pleases the King (verses 8-15)

Then Haman said to King Ahasuerus, “There is a certain people scattered and dispersed among the people in all the provinces of your kingdom;

The numbers of those who chose to return to the land with Zerubbabel are recorded in the book of Ezra. They numbered 42,360. Therefore, the majority of the Jews remained scattered throughout the empire. But he uses two words here to describe their scattering. First is a new word in Scripture, pazar, or scattered. It then says parad, or separated. Not only were they scattered throughout the empire, but they kept separated and aloof from the other peoples. Surely other groups were disobedient to the king, but with such a wide scattering, and with such an arrogance of attitude, great trouble was sure to arise in every place because…

8 (con’t) their laws are different from all other people’s, and they do not keep the king’s laws.

It is true that the customs of the Jews were different, and that they had not assimilated into the surrounding peoples. Further, the laws stemming from Moses were also different for many aspects of life, but those laws dealt with religion rather than a conflict with the set laws of other lands. Further, the Jews are always known for obedience to the laws of the lands they live in to the highest degree possible. This was explicitly one of the words from the Lord through Jeremiah. They were to seek the peace of the city where they dwelt. In doing so, they too would have peace. Haman, however, has found one act of disobedience to the king’s laws to be reason to accuse all Jews of total disobedience. And so…

8 (con’t) Therefore it is not fitting for the king to let them remain.

It is a statement of supposed piety. “I’m not doing this for my sake, but for your sake… in order to protect your kingdom.”

If it pleases the king, let a decree be written that they be destroyed,

In having a royal edict, the matter would become official kingdom policy. Through this, any stink of the offense would be lifted off of himself, and it would be placed on the king and on his court. Regardless of who suggested the law, the king was demonstrating agreement with it, and full sanction for its execution. Haman would be completely off the hook when the matter was decreed.

(con’t) and I will pay ten thousand talents of silver into the hands of those who do the work, to bring it into the king’s treasuries.”

This is an immense amount of money being offered by Haman to accomplish the task. In essence, he has already said that keeping the Jews alive would be costly to the empire, but in destroying them, it would also be costly to the empire. And so to rectify the situation, he would pay for it himself. Some scholars question the accuracy of the amount because of its enormous size. But historical records show that other individuals had offered even greater amounts to kings for such purposes. One new word in Scripture here is genez or “treasuries.” It is from a root meaning “to store” and thus it is a chest or coffer. It will be seen twice in Esther, and once in Ezekiel.

10 So the king took his signet ring from his hand and gave it to Haman, the son of Hammedatha the Agagite, the enemy of the Jews.

This is the first of another set of two’s. Here the king takes off his signet ring and gives it to Haman so that he will possess the king’s authority, including the issuance and authentication of an edict in the king’s name. This will be done again for Mordecai in verse 8:2. This first time, it is given to a Gentile, Haman the Amalekite. The next time it will be given to a Jew, Mordecai. This time it will be for the destruction of the Jews; next it will be for their salvation. They contrast, but they confirm that God sets up rulers and he deposes rulers in order to accomplish His purposes.

The tabaath, or signet ring, comes from taba, meaning “down,” or “to sink.” Thus, it is a ring which is used to press down into wax or clay in order to impress a seal. It is that which speaks of authority. Haman is given the full authority to act on behalf of the king. The ring would act as a signet. When pressed into a wax seal, it would be equivalent to an issuance directly from the king. Thus, the king has agreed to the deed, and now the full authority of the Persian empire is to be directed against the Jews by the hereditary enemy of the Jews. The full name and lineage are given here to show the momentous nature of the event.

11 And the king said to Haman, “The money and the people are given to you, to do with them as seems good to you.”

There are two varied explanations for these words. The first is a refusal of the money offered by Haman. The decree is allowed, and no expectation of payment is needed. The second is that the money being given to him is that of the plunder received from the killing of the Jews. Confiscation of property was always the result of capital punishment, and thus that would be received by the royal coffers. Either way, the king would benefit, and it would either cost Haman nothing, or he would also benefit monetarily.

12 Then the king’s scribes were called on the thirteenth day of the first month,

This seems purposeful and calculated by Haman. This is the day prior to the Passover. Even if all the Jews of the empire would not hear of the edict at this time, those in Shushan would. Mordecai’s Passover remembrance of the Jew’s deliverance would be a mournful taste of future Jewish destruction.

It should be noted that an almost exact recurrence of this event happened just under 500 years later, when at this same time, the gospels record that the Jews themselves conspired together with the Gentiles and the powers of darkness to destroy the true Passover Lamb, Christ Jesus. But just as the Jews of this time were to be delivered by God who is working behind the scenes on their behalf, so Christ would be delivered from death by God who destroyed Satan’s power through the resurrection. In this, the Jews cut themselves off from His favor. Those who were friends became His enemies, and those who were far off, were brought near.

12 (con’t) and a decree was written according to all that Haman commanded—to the king’s satraps, to the governors who were over each province, to the officials of all people, to every province according to its script, and to every people in their language. In the name of King Ahasuerus it was written, and sealed with the king’s signet ring.

The decree went out to all officials throughout the empire 11 months prior to its execution. It would take some time for the messages to be received, but even it it was a couple weeks, there would still be many months of terror for the Jews. Those who could get up and flee very well might do so. For those who stayed, they only did so in anticipation of certain death. One new and rare word is used here, akharshdarpan, or satrap. It is a Persian loan word which will only be seen four times in Esther.

This now also introduces another set of two’s. It is the actual issuance of a royal edict for the destruction of the Jews. This will be overwritten in chapter 8. One is for the Jew’s destruction; one is for their salvation. They contrast, but they confirm God’s overarching protection of the Jews despite the wicked plots against them. Man enacts, but God rules over man as absolute Sovereign.

13 And the letters were sent by couriers into all the king’s provinces, to destroy, to kill, and to annihilate all the Jews, both young and old, little children and women, in one day, on the thirteenth day of the twelfth month, which is the month of Adar, and to plunder their possessions.

The courier system of the empire is described by Xenophon. It was highly efficient, modeling our Pony Express. The verse here, citing the content of the letter, uses as many surplus words as a Dicken’s novel – destroy, kill, annihilate; and young and old, little children, and women. The cruel passion of the overuse is to ensure that complete destruction of all Jews, without exception, is the ultimate goal. The timing of the mandate is for exactly 11 months from the date of issuance, or the 13th of the 12th month. Plundering of the possessions is mandated, and it would be assumed that the royal coffers would receive at least a portion of what was taken.

EW Bullinger defines the number thirteen as the number connected to rebellion, apostasy, defection, corruption, disintegration, revolution, or some kindred idea. Very fitting indeed.

14 A copy of the document was to be issued as law in every province, being published for all people, that they should be ready for that day.

It was not sufficient for a letter to be sent to the governors with the instructions of what they were to do. Instead, a pathshegen, or an exact copy of the edict was to be made in the language of the people. The word is also Persian, showing the careful nature of the author to ensure that the details are exacting concerning the transcript to be made. It was to be posted so that all could see it, and to understand what the king had ordered. Thus, all people would be aware of, and ready for, the events of the chosen day.

15 The couriers went out, hastened by the king’s command; and the decree was proclaimed in Shushan the citadel.

As it is a royal edict, the message would impel the couriers to ensure it was transmitted as quickly as possible. The post would travel by day and by night until it reached its intended destination. Further, an immediately available copy was posted in Shushan itself. The joyous day of Passover would be turned to mourning and lamentation for the Jews of Shushan.

*15 (fin)So the king and Haman sat down to drink, but the city of Shushan was perplexed.

Here is the first of another set of two’s. In this verse, the city of Shusan is said to be perplexed. In verse 8:15, it will rejoice and be glad. They contrast certainly, but they confirm the wise proverb of Solomon –

“When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice;
But when a wicked man rules, the people groan.” Proverbs 29:2

The contrasts are evident. The king and Haman sat down with purpose – to eat and drink, but the people of the city were buk, or perplexed. The word is used but three times in Scripture, and its meaning is “confusion,” but it gives the sense of wandering aimlessly. One could think of the guy who is fired, and who walks without purpose out of the building with the pink slip hanging in his limp hand and muttering, “What will I do? What will I do?”

So while they sat; the people wandered. While they ate and drank, the people’s stomachs were turning. While they laughed; the people moaned in horror. While they were being filled; the people had been drained. While the destruction of the Jews was Haman’s delight; sadness for them was the people’s plight. The chapter ends on this troubling note. The enemies of God’s people always rejoice when such things occur. Jesus Himself said this before His crucifixion –

“Most assuredly, I say to you that you will weep and lament, but the world will rejoice; and you will be sorrowful, but your sorrow will be turned into joy.” John 16:20

Mordecai here, representative of the Jewish people, is being used as a type of Christ to come. They were, for all intents and purposes, as good as dead. And yet, they would be restored to life, plus. And so it is with Christ. He truly was crucified and died, but He rose with all authority and power in heaven and earth granted to Him. The Bible says in Proverbs that the lot is cast into the lap, but it’s every decision is from the Lord (16:33). In His control of even the purim, or lots, used by Haman, the Lord orchestrated it so that there would be almost 11 months for the decision to be overturned, and for the events to take a new and wonderful path.

This is true with every moment of our life. We are stuck in time, and we can’t see a moment ahead, but God is already at the very end of it all. He is working out our good, even during times which seem horribly bad. The Jews of Mordecai’s day found this out, and we find it out each time the future unfolds in a positive way for us.

“I need a place to stay. I’m losing where I am.” Guess what, the Lord will provide. “I lost my job.” Don’t worry, something better will come up. He may not provide for every want, but the Lord provides for every need. We keep getting proofs of this, and we keep forgetting it as soon as a new day begins.

Don’t fret, don’t be anxious, don’t be disheartened. Destruction has been determined by man, but glorification has been decreed by God. For those in Christ Jesus, even death itself cannot destroy our hope. While Haman smugly thinks he’s had the final say, the Lord is laughing louder, saying “No way.”

But all of the words of comfort about a good and final end are only true for those who are in Christ. You can only be assured of the Lord’s blessings by being a child of the Lord. And there is only one way that can happen, and that is through receiving Jesus Christ and being one of His redeemed.

Closing Verse: “Remember the former things of old,
For I am God, and there is no other;
I am God, and there is none like Me,
10 Declaring the end from the beginning,
And from ancient times things that are not yet done,
Saying, ‘My counsel shall stand,
And I will do all My pleasure,’” Isaiah 46:9, 10

Next Week: Esther 4:1-17 In the omnipresence of the Lord we need to be schooled and colleged… (Unseen and Unacknowledged) (6th Esther Sermon)

The Lord has you exactly where He wants you. He has a good plan and purpose for you. At times, you might feel as if he has no great design for you in life, but he has brought you to this moment to reveal His glory in and through you. So follow Him and trust Him and He will do marvelous things for you and through you.

There Is a Certain People

After these things King Ahasuerus promoted Haman
The son of Hammedatha the Agagite
And advanced him and set his seat
Above all the princes who were with him, as he deemed right 

And all the king’s servants
Who were within the king’s gate
Bowed and paid homage to Haman
For so the king had commanded concerning him
———-so that they would get this straight

But Mordecai would not bow or pay homage
Then the king’s servants who were within the king’s gate
Said to Mordecai, “Why do you transgress the king’s command?”
Why can’t you get this thing straight?

Now it happened, when they spoke to him daily
And he would not listen to them as planned
That they told it to Haman
To see whether Mordecai’s words would stand

For Mordecai had told them that he was a Jew
This is why this thing he wouldn’t do

When Haman saw that Mordecai
Did not bow or pay him homage; this thing he wouldn’t do
Haman was filled with wrath
And he was determined to do in this Jew 

But he disdained to lay hands on Mordecai alone
For they had told him of the people of Mordecai
———-to him this thing was shown

Instead, Haman sought to destroy all the Jews
Who throughout the whole kingdom of Ahasuerus were
The people of Mordecai
He wanted them all done in for sure

In the first month, which is the month of Nisan
In the twelfth year of Ahasuerus the king
They cast Pur (that is, the lot)
Before Haman to determine the day and the month of this thing 

Until it fell on the twelfth month of the calendar
Which is the month of Adar

Then Haman said to King Ahasuerus
|“There is a certain people scattered and dispersed
Among the people in all the provinces of your kingdom
Their laws are different from all other people’s
———-I think they are accursed

And they do not keep the king’s laws; it’s crazy and insane
Therefore it is not fitting for the king to let them remain

If it pleases the king, let a decree be written that they be destroyed
And I will pay ten thousand talents of silver, so I shall do
Into the hands of those who do the work
To bring it into the king’s treasuries, if approved by you

So the king took his signet ring from his hand
And gave it to Haman, the son of Hammedatha the Agagite
The enemy of the Jews
Believing that what he was doing was good and right 

And the king said to Haman
“The money and the people are given to you
To do with them as seems good to you
So this thing you are instructed to do

Then the king’s scribes were called on the thirteenth day
Of the first month, when the year was new
And a decree was written
According to all that Haman commanded to do

To the king’s satraps
To the governors who were over each province
———-so they were equipped
To the officials of all people
To every province according to its script

And to every people in their language
In the name of King Ahasuerus it was written out
And sealed with the king’s signet ring
So that there would be no doubt

And the letters were sent by couriers
Into all the king’s provinces
———-to destroy, to kill, and to annihilate all the Jews
Both young and old, little children and women
In one day was to be accomplished this terrible news

On the thirteenth day of the twelfth month, if you did wonder
Which is the month of Adar, and to their possessions plunder 

A copy of the document was to be issued
As law in every province, as the law did say
Being published for all people
That they should be ready for that day 

The couriers went out, hastened by the king’s command
And the decree was proclaimed in Shushan the citadel
So the king and Haman sat down to drink
But the city of Shushan was perplexed at this bombshell

Lord God, thank You for Your presence that is with us
Even when we don’t realize that You are there
Because You sent Your own Son Jesus
We can know that You truly do care

And so Lord, be real to us in a wonderful new way
Open our minds and our hearts to seeing You always
Through every step we take, and throughout every day
Be real to us, O God, and to You will shall give all of our praise

Hallelujah and Amen…

Esther 2:12-23 (A Night With the King)

Esther 2:12-23
A Night With the King

Where does satisfaction come from? And can we, at any time, say that we are completely satisfied? Abraham Maslow’s pyramid was taught to us when I was in school. He developed it to show that basic needs had to be met before a person could attain a higher level of satisfaction. As I was taught it, each step up would bring us closer to a marvelous high point where we would be truly satisfied.

His levels started with Physiological needs – food, water, warmth, and rest. If you were deprived one of these things, you couldn’t get beyond that point. It kept you down, and you would stay down. After that were Safety needs – security and safety from harm. From there, you progressed to Love and Belonging needs – intimate relationships, friendships, and the like.

After meeting those needs, up the pointy hill you climbed to Esteem needs – you would meet your desire for prestige and feelings of accomplishment and self-worth. Whoo hoo. And finally, yes! After a long trek of meeting all of these other needs, you could finally self-actualize. There you could find your true full potential, including any creative activities that would allow you to express yourself in a complete way.

Unfortunately, you could drop from one point back to a lower point. If you went bankrupt, you might wind up going from self-actualization to physiological needs overnight.

Even as a kid, I questioned the stupidity of this way of looking at life. Almost every moment of our life, we are facing any and all of these needs. Just because you’re hungry and can’t buy lunch, it doesn’t mean that you also don’t want to have close and intimate friendships. Maslow’s pyramid was taught because teacher’s needed something to tell us during the long hours of each school day, and someone came up with a diagram. That was more than they had done, and so people ran with it.

There is no time when we can’t fully actualize, and that actualization is never, no not ever, found in self. The concept of self-actualization is so ridiculous that it has ruined an entire generation of people who were taught it was possible. To find the most neurotic, self-consumed, lives-out-of-control people on the planet, all you need to do is pick up a magazine and read about the latest problems with the Hollywood crowd.

The people who have every one of Maslow’s levels met and exceeded, right up to the pointy top of it, are also the ones who are drunks, adulterers, drug addicts, liars, hate-filled… shall I go on? And we want to emulate them?

Actualization comes from one place, and one place alone. It comes from a personal relationship with the Lord. It comes from standing approved in Him. When we cannot find approval from any other place, including self, we can – and do – find it in Him.

Text Verse: “As the deer pants for the water brooks,
So pants my soul for You, O God.
My soul thirsts for God, for the living God.
When shall I come and appear before God?” Psalm 42:1

King Ahasuerus is looking for a queen. Whoo hoo! Let’s hope he finds a good one. Well, we know he did. We read the sermon text for the day. Her name is Esther. But by the end of our verses today, we find that he didn’t delight in the queen completely. In fact, he failed in Maslow’s pyramid there and in other areas.

He is the king. He has all the money and power he could ever want. He could pursue whatever avenue of life he wanted to. Self actualization? He should be the epitome of it. But he failed to find joy in his queen, and he failed to find security in his life. Actualization apart from intimacy with the Lord is impossible. He alone is the Source of all things, and therefore He alone can meet our needs and desires fully and completely. And He can (and will!) do so to the point that we will never drop down a level on that crummy pyramid again. As long as we fix our eyes on Jesus, we have the full and complete actualization to carry us throughout the endless ages of eternity. This is a truth which can only be found in His superior word. And so let’s turn to that precious word once again and… May God speak to us through His word today and may His glorious name ever be praised.

I. Myrrh and Perfumes (verses 12-14)

12 Each young woman’s turn came to go in to King Ahasuerus

Eventually each of the virgin’s selection would finally result in the purpose of their selection, a night with the king and a chance at being made queen. The word tor, or turn, is introduced. It will be seen here and in verse 15, and then twice in the Song of Solomon. It comes from the word tur which signifies to spy something out. That in turn comes from a root meaning to meander about.

In the Song of Solomon, the word is used to describe rows of ornaments, such as jewels on a necklace. Together they are beautiful, and yet they are individual, radiant, jewels. In this then, we can see that it is as if the king here is winding his way through a process, spying out that which will bring him to his final result, the selection of a queen. Thus, each virgin’s turn is a guided process, while the king’s is a meandering one.

Like slavery in the Bible, our modern sensibilities do not always coincide with what occurs in these stories. We may think of what is happening as brutish, sexist, or whatever other label we wish to pin on the event, but this was the standard of the times, and these things were common, accepted, and normative for the age. It is certain that those of this period would look at our lives, such as wearing bikinis at the beach, and find us to be out of proper moral bounds.

12 (con’t) after she had completed twelve months’ preparation, according to the regulations for the women,

There were set laws for the virgin’s preparation. This was not a willy-nilly process of taking beautiful women from the provinces and then sending them arbitrarily to the king for his pleasure, but a refined process which was intended for the safety of the king, the honor of the office, and also for the king’s delight.

An entire year of beauty preparations was called for to ensure that nothing of her old life remained. First, such a period would ensure that she didn’t come pregnant, and thus defiled. That would quickly become noticeable. Further, if she was from a land of garlic, they would want that to be purged from her system so she only smelled delightful for the king.

If she had spent her days outdoors, her skin would be tanned, and not whatever natural color she would be in the royal residence. And moral or physical flaw would have a chance to be revealed before she could either harm, or disgrace, the royal office. For these, or any other reasons, the time of her preparation lasted a full year.

The number twelve in the Bible signifies governmental perfection, and so we could infer that this is stated as well to indicate that any candidate for being queen was properly evaluated to ensure she met the necessary qualifications for holding such a position within the government as well.

12 (con’t) for thus were the days of their preparation apportioned: six months with oil of myrrh,

The word “preparation,” or maruq, here is closely associated with the word tamruq, which has already been seen, and which is also used in this verse. It give the sense of beautifying through rubbing with perfumery for purification. For six months, each virgin would be rubbed down with oil of myrrh.

This first spice, mor, or myrrh, comes from marar, or “bitter.” The name gives the sense of “distilling in drops.” It has only been seen so far in Exodus 30 in the making of the special incense for burning in the tabernacle.

Myrrh comes from a shrub and can be obtained in one of two ways. The first is the purest form where it naturally exudes from the plant. This is the “myrrh of freedom,” or “free flowing myrrh.” Inferior myrrh comes from the bark when incisions are made in it. Myrrh is fragrant to smell, but bitter to the taste. Looking at the uses of myrrh in the Old Testament, the prominent idea which it symbolizes is love, but more especially, love in intimate union, but not necessarily sexual in nature.

Myrrh was presented to Christ at both His birth by the Magi, and at his death when mixed in wine to deaden His pain, something He refused.

12 (con’t) and six months with perfumes and preparations for beautifying women.

The second six-month period is dedicated to rubbing her down with bosem, or balsam. The word signifies fragrance, and can be any of various balsam spices, thus the word in Hebrew is plural. The modern words in English for both of these words have retained their Hebrew origin quite well – mor is myrrh, and bosem is balsam. After twelve months of such rubbing, the woman would be as sweet smelling as she could possibly be, ready for the night of her calling…

13 Thus prepared, each young woman went to the king,

The idea here was that there was only a presentation of the woman after this full treatment had been rendered. Once the time of purification and beautification had been met, she would await her turn for a chance to be elevated to the position of queen, or to become a permanent concubine of him, living out her life among the other concubines. In order to give her the best chances in her own mind of obtaining the former, she was given a special honor…

13 (con’t) and she was given whatever she desired to take with her from the women’s quarters to the king’s palace.

The idea here is that her presentation was whatever she thought would be most pleasing or enticing to the king. If she wanted a certain dress, a particular necklace, a given bit of make up or eye liner, and so on, then it would be provided. This was her one big night, and it was her final chance to change her destiny, possibly going from provincial girl to royal queen. Whatever was kept in the women’s quarters was allotted to her for her special night.

14 In the evening she went, and in the morning she returned to the second house of the women,

The translation here is correct concerning evening and morning. Some translations will incorrectly say, “on the morrow.” The account is written by a Hebrew. The Hebrew day began in the evening, not the morning. Thus it is the same day. To say, “on the morrow,” is a technical error as much as a poor paraphrase. The virgin would go into the king in the evening, and when her night was completed, she would be directed to a new residence called the second house of the women.

It is a house specifically maintained for the king’s concubines. They would never be permitted to lay with any other man, nor could they ever seek marriage. It is said that Darius, who was conquered by Alexander, had three hundred and sixty concubines. In 1 Kings, Solomon is said to have had a similar number –

“And he had seven hundred wives, princesses, and three hundred concubines; and his wives turned away his heart.” 1 Kings 11:3

These women who had gone into Ahasuerus were forever the king’s property. They would remain that way for the rest of their lives. Their time would be filled with the enjoyments of the royal house and food, but there would be no contact for them with the outside world. There, they would have a new custodian to watch over them…

14 (con’t) to the custody of Shaashgaz, the king’s eunuch who kept the concubines.

The king’s eunuch, specially chosen for this particular duty, is Shaashgaz. This is the only time he is mentioned in Scripture. Albert Barnes identifies the name with either sheshkhunj, meaning beardless, or sestgunj, meaning weak of loins. Either Persian word would be a fitting epithet for a eunuch. In essence then, he is named by his state. It would be like someone calling me Beardy, or Mr. Muscle. Either way, the epithet would be fitting of the state in which I exist.

14 (con’t) She would not go in to the king again unless the king delighted in her and called for her by name.

Under the care of Shaashgaz, the now-defiled concubine would never leave the care of the king’s eunuch again, unless the king was enamored with her, and if his memory called her to mind. If so, she would be called for by name, and would again be brought to him. It would not be hard for a woman who loathed her calling to simply make herself displeasing to the king on the first night. After this, she would forever be free from being forced to come to him again, but it would also mean that she would be barren and unloved for the rest of her life as well.

My night with the king; how will it be?
Will he find delight and joy as I to him submit?
Is there possibly royalty awaiting me?
Will he to me the royal crown commit?

How my heart trembles, and my body shakes
To step into his presence, and to him submit
My head it spins; my constitution quakes
Will he to me the royal crown commit?

One night with the king; can it be true?
Will there be many more as queen after I so submit?
I am ready to present myself through and through
Will the king to me the royal crown commit?

II. The Feast of Esther (verses 15-18)

15 Now when the turn came for Esther the daughter of Abihail the uncle of Mordecai,

Here we learn the name of Esther’s father, Abikhayil, or Father of Might. The term “father” is to be taken in the sense of possession, and so he would be the “Possessor of might.” Here he is also noted as the dod, or uncle, of Mordecai. The word dod means uncle, but it also means “beloved.” Here we have Mordecai in a beloved relationship with the Father of Might.

15 (con’t) who had taken her as his daughter, to go in to the king,

It is Mordecai who had taken Esther to be his daughter. Now this same Esther is about to have her chance to attain royal status, like all the other women before her were given. There can be only one, and so she will do as she is instructed, trusting in the word of another instead of her own futile attempt at attaining the kings’ approval…

15 (con’t) she requested nothing but what Hegai the king’s eunuch, the custodian of the women, advised.

Instead of trusting in her own ability to discern what would be most pleasing to the king, she wisely takes the advice of the king’s eunuch. As the king’s eunuch, he would know exactly what was pleasing to him, and he would impart that knowledge to whoever he felt was worthy of receiving that inside information. It shows that he favored her, just as was seen in verse 9.

In this, we could infer a picture of being chosen for the king by grace through faith. The grace is imparted by Hegai, the faith is seen in her acknowledging his instruction. As the appointed trustee of the king, he would bear word from him to the women under his charge. He now exits the narrative and the Bible. Goodbye Hegai.

15 (con’t) And Esther obtained favor in the sight of all who saw her.

The word for “favor” is khen. It means grace, favor, and the like. A literal translation here would be, “…and Esther received grace in the eyes of all seeing her.” She was obviously beautiful to behold, and when adorned with only those things recommended by the bearer of the king’s word to the virgins, she received grace from all eyes which alighted upon her.

16 So Esther was taken to King Ahasuerus, into his royal palace, in the tenth month, which is the month of Tebeth, in the seventh year of his reign.

As it is the seventh year of the reign of Ahasuerus, and as it is the tenth month, the time of this union is placed at either Dec/Jan 479/478 BC. The extended time between the events of chapter 1 and the events now is explained by the king’s absence while waging war against Greece, a time in which he was defeated and suffered disgrace for his losses. Now, in order to redirect his mind away from that sad event, he is working on choosing a queen for the realm. This is the only mention of the month of Tebeth in Scripture. The name corresponds to the tenth month of the Egyptian calendar known as Tubi.

17 The king loved Esther more than all the other women,

The list includes both his lesser wives, and his concubines. In other words, there is a type of hierarchy among the king’s women. There is the chosen queen. After her would be his chosen wives. They would pay respect to the queen, but they were also given certain privileges as wives, such as special quarters, a set revenue from taxes, and the like. And below them would be the concubines. Esther was loved more than all of these. Therefore…

17 (con’t) and she obtained grace and favor in his sight more than all the virgins;

va’tisa khen va’khesed lepanav – And obtained grace and lovingkindness before him. The addition of the words “more than all the virgins” repeats what we have already deduced. None of the secondary wives who were below Vashti were desired by him in making one of them a queen. Instead, virgins were sought out, among whom Esther prevailed, being the fairest virgin of them all.

These words now close out one of our sets of twos. In verse 9, Esther found khesed lepanav, or “lovingkindness before” Hegai. Here, she finds khen va’khesed lepanav – grace and lovingkindness before the king. There it was favor of the keeper of the women, here it concerns the love of the king. They contrast, and yet they confirm that she was pleasing in all ways as a refined and beautiful woman.

In Hegai is seen a parallel to the work of the Spirit who searches out and prepares those circumcised in heart to be pleasing to God. Through Him grace is found, and after that, grace and lovingkindness is displayed towards God’s people.

17 (con’t) so he set the royal crown upon her head and made her queen instead of Vashti.

The setting of the crown is the conferral of the position. In this act, she was raised from concubine to queen, and from unwed to wife. It was now her position to fill in the place of the vanquished Vashti, who is mentioned for the last time in Scripture. We can wave goodbye to her.

18 Then the king made a great feast, the Feast of Esther, for all his officials and servants;

This is, like the other feasts mentioned, a banqueting feast. This one is, however, termed a mishteh gadol, or a great banquet. Whether this was the customary type of feast for a newly appointed queen, or whether it is because of the exceptional beauty and grace found in Esther, either way it would have been a magnificent ordeal. It was one to which all of those in high positions would have been invited, and all would be careful to heap high praises upon his choice for queen.

18 (con’t) and he proclaimed a holiday in the provinces and gave gifts according to the generosity of a king.

Here is a word found only this once in the Bible, hanakhah, translated as “holiday.” The word comes from nuakh, meaning “rest.” And so “holiday” is not a bad guess. However, some translations will say, “a release.” Others say, “remission of taxes.” This would then give the sense of rest from taxes. It could even be that the queen’s gold is what is being referred to.

As I said earlier, a certain portion was collected from various cities which was given as a revenue to the wives of the king. Adam Clarke thinks that in this, Esther may have petitioned the king to give a rest from this particular tax, thus it would make her a very popular queen. The people would be freed from this obligation for a certain amount of time, or even during the entire time of her filling the position. Whatever the case, it is best to not get dogmatic and stick with any one translation, which could be entirely wrong. Along with this release, gifts were extended to those who found favor in the king’s eyes during this happy celebration.

I have found favor before the king
And in his eyes I am highly esteemed
The honor bestowed upon me makes my heart sing
What chance was there? None, so it seemed

But in the eyes of the king, I found grace and favor
And so before him now as his bride I stand
Rejoicing in this moment: one I will forever savor
When the king extended to me his loving hand

And upon my head, the royal crown has been set
As the queen, I shall be near to him, just at his side
But from where I came, I shall never forget
Never shall my heart be filled with pride

Instead, I will be grateful for the position given to me
A queen to the king! Oh, how can it be!

III. A Plot Against the King (verses 19-23)

19 When virgins were gathered together a second time,

This is now the second noted gathering of virgins. The first was in 2:8. The first gathering was to find a queen, the second gathering is after a queen has been selected. The first gathering was for the king to find sufficiency in a queen, the second is to fill a void in the king’s desired harem. One meant a good life for Esther, the second could mean death for her. They contrast, and yet they confirm that the king was always on the lookout for others to find pleasure in.

The translation of the NKJV is correct. Many versions say, “And when the virgins were gathered the second time.” There is no definite article in front of either “virgins” or “second.” Adding in a definite article in either place leads to a false idea of what is being said. These are not the same group of virgins, and there is no subsequent gathering of them. Instead, this is a new group of virgins, and it is a stand-alone occurrence. One must ask, “Why is this mentioned at all?” What difference does it make in placing this statement here, instead of just not mentioning it at all? These questions have plagued scholars for eons.

Some see this as going back to what happened before Esther’s marriage and reliving an event which took place then. That is disproved in the second clause of this verse. Some insert a plot by the royal officials to supplant Esther. Nothing indicates that. It is forced and incorrect. No commentary really gives a suitable reason for the inclusion of these words. But to understand them merely takes looking ahead to what Esther says in chapter 4 –

Then Esther spoke to Hathach, and gave him a command for Mordecai: 11 “All the king’s servants and the people of the king’s provinces know that any man or woman who goes into the inner court to the king, who has not been called, he has but one law: put all to death, except the one to whom the king holds out the golden scepter, that he may live. Yet I myself have not been called to go in to the king these thirty days.”

Chapter 3 shows that this was after the start of the twelfth year of the king’s reign; or five years later. It was apparent that despite Esther finding favor in the king’s eyes, even enough to be made queen, he still was enjoying the privilege of being king by bringing in another group of virgins. After five years of being queen, he was still more interested in what is new and exciting than he was in her. Because he was enjoying this avenue, she had not been called to be with the king. If she were out of his favor because he found a virgin he favored more, entering his presence without permission would mean her death. Though she was queen, it did not permit her to approach his throne without first being called. This is the reason for including this seemingly irrelevant note about a second gathering of virgins.

19 (con’t) Mordecai sat within the king’s gate.

These words show that the previous clause was not referring back to before she was made queen. At that time, he is said to have paced in front of the women’s quarters. Now he sits within the king’s gate. He was then, and is now, where she can be most easily contacted. Due to her occupying the queen’s residence, the nearest place that he could be to obtain news about her was at this spot. Each word and clause is carefully selected to show a logical progression of the story, while at the same time showing that God is in the background directing the events despite the choices and decisions of man.

20 Now Esther had not revealed her family and her people, just as Mordecai had charged her,

Verse 20 is parenthetical between verses 19 and 21. It is providing information necessary to develop the theme which is continuing on in the story. The primary placement of the word “family” here is notable in the Hebrew. As John Lange says of it, “This is here placed first, because the relation of Esther to Mordecai is under consideration.”

The fact that she was Jewish has nothing to do with her hiding the matter, as if she was ashamed of it, or as if it could have, or could still, harm her in the eyes of the king. That is entirely unfounded, and by the end of the story that will be seen wrong. It is Mordecai who has instructed her, and that is all that matters. He is concerned about her and other’s perception of her relation to him. Their nationality is of secondary concern.

This is now the ending of another set of twos. She was shown to have concealed her identity in verse 2:10, and the same is said of her now in this verse. The first was at the command of Mordecai, and the second is in obedience to his command. They contrast, and yet they confirm the obedience of Esther to her adopted father. In this, no faithlessness to the king or anyone else can be noted, but a great faithfulness to Mordecai is seen. This is substantiated by the next words…

20 (con’t) for Esther obeyed the command of Mordecai as when she was brought up by him.

The inclusion of these words shows the faithfulness of Esther to Mordecai. Her royal position, and whatever wealth and honor she possessed was seen as secondary to her faithful allegiance to the one who raised her and nurtured her. This may also show a humility in Mordecai. With her advancement to queen, he also could have risen in the royal court. But by keeping their family unit a secret, Mordecai would retain his particular position without any additional pomp and favor being bestowed to him. The intimate family connection between the two is what is highlighted. In this, the word omnah, or “being brought up,” is given. This is the only time it is found in the Bible, and it gives the sense of training, or tutelage. His raising of her resulted in a faithful, obedient step- daughter.

21 In those days, while Mordecai sat within the king’s gate, two of the king’s eunuchs, Bigthan and Teresh, doorkeepers, became furious and sought to lay hands on King Ahasuerus.

The story now proceeds from verse 19, after the parenthetical insert. It is possible that Bigthan is the same person as Bigtha in verse 1:10. This is not improbable because the name changes a third time in verse 6:2 to Bigthana. If this is the same person, he was high in the king’s court. Teresh may have been elevated to that same rank at some point in the intervening years. Together, they were considered doorkeepers.

The Hebrew word for “door” here is one which is translated also as a bowl, basin, or cup. Thus, this is a door where there is a curved-in threshold, and probably then, the very entrance way to the king’s bedroom. This would have been a position of the highest trust, because of it would also be the position easiest to rush upon and kill the king. Somehow, Mordecai learned that they had evil intent for the king. Any speculation about why they were angry, or how Mordecai found out is irrelevant, and so it goes unstated.

What is rather unusual is that eventually, history records that this same king, Xerxes, would eventually be murdered by Artabanus, the captain of the guard, and Aspamitras, a chamberlain and eunuch. One plot against him was foiled, but another would eventually see his end.

This verse introduces a set of two’s. Here the words of the deeds of Bigthan and Teresh, the doorkeepers of Ahasuerus, are reported by Mordecai. The same words – Mordecai, Bigthan,Teresh, doorkeepers, and Ahasuerus – are all repeated in verse 6:2. The two accounts differ as one is occurring, and one has occurred, but they confirm that what has occurred is crucial to the unfolding events in the lives of all concerned.

22 So the matter became known to Mordecai, who told Queen Esther, and Esther informed the king in Mordecai’s name.

As speculated in the previous sermon, Mordecai was possibly a eunuch or a doorkeeper of some level within the royal compound. This makes it not at all improbable that he could have heard of the plot against the king. However the word came to him, he passed it on to Esther, and from there it was passed on to the king in Mordecai’s name.

This would have two positive results. First, it would vouch for the truthfulness of the information, and secondly, it would hopefully benefit Mordecai in a time of future need. It is a note of wisdom on the part of Esther to thus pass on the information in this manner. It would also directly lead to the salvation of the Jews, as well as the exaltation of Mordecai.

23 And when an inquiry was made into the matter, it was confirmed, and both were hanged on a gallows;

The inquiry was certainly one which involved torture. Anyone who threatened the king would face death, and so a denial would be expected. Eventually, a confession would be gathered concerning the matter, and then the execution would be handed down. In this case, the word is talah, or hanging. However, it doesn’t necessarily mean hanging by a rope. In Deuteronomy 21, it says –

“If a man has committed a sin deserving of death, and he is put to death, and you hang him on a tree, 23 his body shall not remain overnight on the tree, but you shall surely bury him that day, so that you do not defile the land which the Lord your God is giving you as an inheritance; for he who is hanged is accursed of God.” Deuteronomy 21:22, 23

Paul then cites that verse in Galatians 3:13 to indicate crucifixion. This was known to be common in Persia at the time, and so they may have been hung to a tree by crucifixion. The word translated as “gallows” here simply means wood from a tree. However they departed, it would have been an ouchy way to go.

*23 (fin) and it was written in the book of the chronicles in the presence of the king.

We finish with words that would otherwise be unimportant except for the continuance of the narrative. It is these words here which will bring about another chain of events which will lead to Jewish salvation when it seemed they were to be destroyed.

Like other courts of the ancient Middle East, the Persians had scribes who sat before the king and recorded what he did. They would move with him, and keep a constant record of events. For the king, it would be like a careful diary that he could refer to anytime in order to bring back to memory things that he may have let slip during the busy hours of his daily life.

At times during the narrative of these verses, it seems hard to grasp why certain things are mentioned. As I said, a couple verses in particular have left scholars scratching their heads and reaching out for explanations which have failed to sufficiently answer the situation or circumstance.

But because this is the word of God, each word is carefully selected, and even carefully placed within the Hebrew, in order to show us a marvelously unfolding tapestry of God’s wisdom concerning how to resolve a matter which seems out of control, as well as His neverending watch over, and care for, His people.

Nothing is superfluous, nothing is left out, and each detail shows meticulous attention. As we continue on, it will appear that the Jews will be destroyed. This would include those back in the land after return from exile. There would be nothing left of them because of the hatred of one man, soon to be introduced. However, God promised in the Law of Moses that they would always be kept as a people. Esther will show how this promise continued to be kept. But it is the little details now that are getting us to that point.

Again, we can look to these things, and we can insert ourselves right into them as far as God’s faithfulness is concerned. Once He speaks, that word is stronger than iron. When it is recorded, it is to be considered an everlasting surety that we can cling to. Christ Jesus has established His church, and His church is made up of individuals. As carefully as He watched over Mordecai and Esther, He is watching over us. Both Mordecai and Esther are going to face stress and trouble, but both of them – along with their people – will also be delivered.

No matter what we face, the Lord has said that because of our faith in Christ Jesus, we are sealed with a guarantee – the greatest guarantee of all – the Holy Spirit. Our salvation is set. To question it after God has sealed us, is to question God’s integrity. Let us not waiver in our conviction, and let us stand fast on the truth of His word. In the end, we will stand approved not because of our reliability, but because of His.

Closing Verse: “I thank my God always concerning you for the grace of God which was given to you by Christ Jesus, that you were enriched in everything by Him in all utterance and all knowledge, 6even as the testimony of Christ was confirmed in you, so that you come short in no gift, eagerly waiting for the revelation of our Lord Jesus Christ, who will also confirm you to the end, that you may be blameless in the day of our Lord Jesus Christ. God is faithful, by whom you were called into the fellowship of His Son, Jesus Christ our Lord.” 1 Corinthians 1:4-9

Next Week: Esther 3:1-15 Whether Jew under a star, or the church under a steeple… (There is a Certain People) (5th Esther Sermon)

The Lord has you exactly where He wants you. He has a good plan and purpose for you. At times, you might feel as if he has no great design for you in life, but he has brought you to this moment to reveal His glory in and through you. So follow Him and trust Him and He will do marvelous things for you and through you.

A Night With the King

Each young woman’s turn came
To go in to King Ahasuerus, it was when
After she had completed twelve months’ preparation
According to the regulations for the women

For thus were the days of their preparation apportioned:
Six months with oil of myrrh, for a really good smell
And six months with perfumes and preparations
For beautifying women as well

Thus prepared, each young woman went to the king
And she was given whatever she desired
To take with her from the women’s quarters
To the king’s palace; as she was so inspired

In the evening she went, and in the morning she returned
To the second house of the women; her new confines
To the custody of Shaashgaz
The king’s eunuch who kept the concubines

She would not go in to the king again, for sure
Unless the king delighted in her, and by name called for her

Now when the turn came for Esther
The daughter of Abihail the uncle of Mordecai
Who had taken her as his daughter
To go in to the king, by and by

She requested nothing but what Hegai the king’s eunuch
The custodian of the women, advised
And Esther obtained favor in the sight of all who saw her
With her beauty everyone was hypnotized

So Esther was taken to King Ahasuerus
Into his royal palace, in the tenth month, we know
Which is the month of Tebeth
In the seventh year of his reign it was so

The king loved Esther more than all the other women
And she obtained grace and favor in his sight
More than all the virgins
Esther pleased the king on that night

So he set the royal crown upon her head
And made her queen; replacing Vashti instead 

Then the king made a great feast, the Feast of Esther
For all his officials and servants he did this thing
And he proclaimed a holiday in the provinces and gave gifts
ccording to the generosity of a king

When virgins were gathered together a second time, on that date
Mordecai sat within the king’s gate 

Now Esther had not revealed her family and her people
Just as Mordecai had charged her, so she did
For Esther obeyed the command of Mordecai
As when she was brought up by him, even as a kid

In those days, while Mordecai sat
Within the king’s gate, two of the king’s eunuchs
———- they were treasonous
Bigthan and Teresh, doorkeepers
Became furious and sought to lay hands on King Ahasuerus 

So the matter became known to Mordecai
Who told Queen Esther, just the same
And Esther informed the king
Yes, she informed the king in Mordecai’s name 

And when an inquiry was made into the matter, it was confirmed
And both were hanged on a gallows; so they were dangling
And it was written in the book of the chronicles
In the presence of the king

Lord God, thank You for Your presence that is with us
Even when we don’t realize that You are there
Because You sent Your own Son Jesus
We can know that You truly do care

And so Lord, be real to us in a wonderful new way
Open our minds and our hearts to seeing You always
Through every step we take, and throughout every day
Be real to us, O God, and to You will shall give all of our praise

Hallelujah and Amen…

 

Esther 2:1-11 (In Search of a Queen)


Esther 2:1-11
In Search of a Queen

Bad starts do not always mean bad finishes. We all know this. We’ve seen the game, we’ve heard of the person born in poverty who rose above his circumstances, and so on. The same is true in the Bible. There are bad starts, and there are great finishes. Humanity started out poorly in Adam, but Christ turned things around. What lies ahead is rather magnificent because of Him.

Of the sons of Israel, some started out well. Reuben was the firstborn of Jacob, but he didn’t finish too well. His father’s final words from his deathbed were rather terse, and they close out with the anticipation of things not excelling for Reuben in the future.

Benjamin did not start out well. He was the last of Jacob’s sons, and his mother died in giving him birth. In fact, she named him Ben-Oni, Son of My Suffering. Were it not for dad renaming him with a very positive name, it would have seemed like he would always be on the bad side of things. But like his naming and renaming, Benjamin’s history takes a parallel course.

He remained somewhat in obscurity, but eventually during the time of the judges, he was caught up in something so wicked and so perverse that it looked like he might not survive at all. He was reduced to a mere 600 men. He may have blinked off into extinction at this point, but he continued on. The bad-streak didn’t end there. Saul, the first king of Israel was from Benjamin, and it seemed like things had turned around for them. But Saul re-turned them around and lost the kingship. Benjamin’s infancy was one of suffering, and it seemed that it was destined to continue.

But along with these, and other bad things, which happened to him, he is now given a chance to make things better. That really isn’t apparent in the story yet, but the very fact that Benjamin is singled out shows us that this is possible. Will the son of suffering take on a new direction? Will he really become the son of the right hand? Well, all things are possible. The apostle Paul sure found that out…

Text Verse: “If anyone else thinks he may have confidence in the flesh, I more so: circumcised the eighth day, of the stock of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin, a Hebrew of the Hebrews; concerning the law, a Pharisee; concerning zeal, persecuting the church; concerning the righteousness which is in the law, blameless.” Philippians 3:4-6

What? Paul… a Benjamite! And proud of it! Where does he get such confidence? While penning his words to those at Philippi, he probably was thinking about the events from the book of Esther. And probably about verse 5 of chapter 2. He knew the story, he celebrated it year by year at the Feast of Purim, and it could have been a great source of boasting for him that he was from this tribe, highlighted here for the first time, in the book of Esther.

Great things had come from Benjamin, including the Apostle Paul. But Paul would have us less happy for him about his heritage and lineage than he would have us fix our eyes on Jesus, the true Son of the Right Hand. These names, these stories, these actual events in human history… all of these things only point to the One who provides the greatest finish of them all.

We have little victories in life that change our destiny and put us on a path to success, fame, wealth, or whatever, but unless the Lord is in the equation, in the end it just doesn’t matter. The billionaire will turn back to the same dust as the bum in the streets. The movie star will putrefy just the same as the ditch digger, and the stock broker is heading to the same end as the 7-11 clerk.

Benjamin started poorly, but Benjamin will get a chance to end well. But that good ending is only because of the Lord who directs the events and calls people to Himself. If the response is made, then good will come of things – not just for this life, but for all the ages to come. After finishing the list of things he could brag in… that he COULD brag in, Paul tells of what value those things are in relation to what is truly worthy of boasting – “But what things were gain to me, these I have counted loss for Christ.” In the end, the entire Bible is to lead us to that one Person who is worth boasting in – Jesus. This is a truth which is to be found in His superior word. And so let’s turn to that precious word once again and… May God speak to us through His word today and may His glorious name ever be praised.

I. Queen Instead of Vashti (verses 1-4)

After these things, when the wrath of King Ahasuerus subsided,

The words “After these things” take us back to all that occurred concerning Vashti, her refusal to heed the king, and everything resulting from that embarrassing ordeal. It is at some point after this that kesok khamat ha’melekh akhashverosh – “was subsided wrath the king Ahashuerus.” The word used for “subsided” is rather rare. It was seen in Genesis and Numbers. It will be seen here in Esther twice, and then only one more time in Jeremiah.

It comes from a root meaning “to weave a trap.” And so figuratively, through the idea of secreting away, it gives the sense of subsiding or pacifying. The second time it will be seen in Esther is in verse 7:10 where it is again used to speak of the subsiding of the king’s wrath. Thus, it is the basis for forming a new set of two’s. This first subsiding of the king’s anger is after his actions against Vashti, and it will set up the decision to find a queen to replace her, leading to Esther being selected to fill her vacancy. The second subsiding of his anger is after his actions against the wicked Haman, and it will set up the decision to replace Haman with Mordecai, filling his his vacancy.

In both, there is a replacing of a Gentile with a Jew. One is a female, one is a male. The two accounts contrast, and yet they confirm the hand of God in the appointment of two of His chosen people to fill the highest roles of the king’s life and government. Both are of the same tribe and family, Benjamin, or “Son of My Right Hand.” It is a fitting name when considering that in verse 8:8 both Esther and Mordecai are given royal authority, using the king’s signet ring, to then issue an edict which will save the Jews.

As the signet is a symbol of the king’s right hand, or authority, the fact that they are from Benjamin points directly to Christ as the true Savior of the Jews, and the true Son of the Right Hand. All of this can be gleaned from a simple statement using a particular word that the king’s wrath had shakakh, or subsided. It prefigures the replacement of Adam by Jesus pictured by Mordecai, and also those merely circumcised in the flesh with those circumcised in the heart, seen in Vashti/Esther. Paul speaks of both. First Mordecai –

“The first man was of the earth, made of dust; the second Man is the Lord from heaven. 48 As was the man of dust, so also are those who are made of dust; and as is the heavenly Man, so also are those who are heavenly. 49 And as we have borne the image of the man of dust, we shall also bear the image of the heavenly Man.” 1 Corinthians 15:47-49

Mordecai will replace Haman who acted wickedly, being a follower of the works of the devil, as we are shown in 1 John 3:8. Christ came and replaced Adam who acted wickedly when he believed the lies of the devil. For man, that sad state is overturned by the work of Christ. Second we see Esther –

“Therefore, if an uncircumcised man keeps the righteous requirements of the law, will not his uncircumcision be counted as circumcision? 27 And will not the physically uncircumcised, if he fulfills the law, judge you who, even with your written code and circumcision, are a transgressor of the law? 28 For he is not a Jew who is one outwardly, nor is circumcision that which is outward in the flesh; 29 but he is a Jew who is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the Spirit, not in the letter; whose praise is not from men but from God.” Romans 2:26-29

Esther replaces the wayward bride, Vashti. She was externally beautiful, but her internal attitude was not directed towards the king’s command (circumcision of the flesh only). Esther will be both internally and externally obedient towards what is right (circumcision of the heart).

Although we are jumping ahead in order to understand our sets of two’s, it’s ok because we will get to number 2 too, and when we do, we can then review everything that here we looked into. That is, if it’s ok with you.

It won’t be seen until verse 16 of this chapter exactly when Esther will be chosen as queen, but for now, we can review the historical timeline. The feast at Susa of Chapter 1 was in the year 483BC. In the spring of the year 481BC Ahasuerus, or Xerxes, set out for Greece. It is some time between these dates that these events began to come about. There is a long absence of time between the events of chapter 1 and later in chapter 2 which is perfectly explained by the Greek campaign which is recorded in extra-biblical history. In other words, the account is perfectly reliable, and it fits with historical records found elsewhere.

1 (con’t) he remembered Vashti, what she had done, and what had been decreed against her.

The words here give us the sense that the king actually wished he had not made the decision and enacted the decree. Whether he could actually override his edict, or whether it was impossible according to law, hardly matters. Even if he could, by overriding it, he would demonstrate that his decision wasn’t firm, fixed, and final. It would reflect a vacillating king who had been more influenced by wine than by sound judgment.

This could not be allowed. And so the sense of almost sadness at what had come about is seen in these words. The king was left without a queen that he probably otherwise adored, and his decree finalized the matter. This is all the more surely the case, because he already would have had a harem, and yet there is no sense of pleasure in any of them. Otherwise, the “another” of verse 1:19 would have been an easy replacement. But none of the harem interested him. We can almost see one of the royal court asking him, “Why haven’t you chosen a new queen to replace Vashti?” His answer, “None of the concubines interests me.” And so, to repair the situation, an exciting new avenue is recommended…

Then the king’s servants who attended him said: “Let beautiful young virgins be sought for the king;

The king’s servants mentioned here are not the royal court of seven. Instead, they are probably the attendants of the court, such as the eunuchs and the like who served the king, and who would be personally affected by his disposition, and aware of his demeanor. They would also know of his preferences concerning the harem, and were aware that none of them was agreeable to the king as a replacement queen. And so, as a point of self interest in having a happy king, they set forth their proposal.

Four words are used to describe the women in the proposal, nearot betulot tovot mareh – “young women, virgins, beautiful in appearance.” In this, they have covered all of the desired bases. They are to be young, and thus not set in mind and demeanor. They are to be virgins, an obvious qualification. To not be a virgin would be wholly unsuited to the distinction of being presented to the king. And they were to be beautiful in appearance, another obvious requirement.

and let the king appoint officers in all the provinces of his kingdom,

The kingdom consisted of 127 provinces from India to Ethiopia with princes appointed over them. It is a giant swath of land, with an enormous number of cultures and languages. In appointing officers in each province, they would be able to search out the most beautiful and cultured of all of the women. Even if only one was chosen from each province as the epitome of those she represented, it would increase the king’s harem by 127 women – of every color, culture, and ethnicity. The officers would be meticulously careful to find the very best, as it would then reflect favorably on them and on their status before the king.

(con’t) that they may gather all the beautiful young virgins to Shushan the citadel,

From their home, to which they would never return, and unless chosen as a queen, from their family whom they would never see again, these women would become property of the king, and would spend their lives at the citadel, awaiting his call.

(con’t) into the women’s quarters,

el beit hanashim – unto house the women. This would be a house where women were separately maintained. In one part of the house would be the virgins. In another part would be the wives or concubines. They would be kept under separate governors who would be over them, serving the king’s interests.

(con’t) under the custody of Hegai the king’s eunuch, custodian of the women.

Hege, as the Hebrew reads, is seen only here in Chapter 2. He will be also be called Hegai, but it is the same person. The context of the passage seems to show that he is the keeper of the entire house of the women, both virgins and the non-virgin concubines or wives. He is a eunuch, something rather necessary for someone being placed in such a position of authority under the king of the land.

(con’t) And let beauty preparations be given them.

v’naton tamruqehen – “and a giving cosmetic purification.” The verb is in the infinitive absolute form, which highlights and gives prominence to the act. As John Lange says, it “presupposes the subject as being self-evident.” If this was modern English, the thought might be, “And of course, naturally, she will be purified in the usual way.”

This customary way of purification introduces the word tamruq. In the Bible, it will only be seen three times, all in this chapter. It comes from the word maraq, meaning to polish or scour. Thus, it would be a purification of rubbing. There would be cosmetics combined into a soap or oil, and then the rubbing may have been with hands, towels, or a nice soft luffa. Whatever is intended, it would have been a pretty delightful way to be pampered.

Then let the young woman who pleases the king be queen instead of Vashti.”

Going under the assumption that only one young woman was selected from each province, that still leaves the odds extremely slim for any particular girl to be chosen. Therefore, in order to be the one who pleases the king, she would have to be not only beautiful, but cultured; wise; pleasantly emotional, but not overly so; bold in one way, but completely submissive in another; and so on. The idea of, “You only get one chance to make a first impression,” is wholly true here. To be chosen would mean a completely different type of life lay ahead than to be rejected and to forever remain a concubine.

(con’t) This thing pleased the king, and he did so.

With the coming war with Greece, the order would go out, and there would have been plenty of time for selecting the finest virgins, for the women to be gathered, and then to educate them in the Persian language, and to properly prepare them according to the standards of purification. Further, an extended period under eunuch control would ensure that no chance of an already-pregnant girl could be presented to him. There was no rush in the matter, and the longer the period, the better for both the king and for the potential queen. He is pleased with the suggestion, and it would be carried out in a thorough and meticulous way.

A chaste virgin, to be presented to the King
Prepared and presented for His delight
A woman who will make His heart sing
A woman to outshine the darkness of night

Who will it be that is presented to the King?
Who is the one chosen for the King’s delight?
The call has gone out; like a bell it does ring
For a chaste and perfect virgin; beautiful to the sight

So the King will rejoice in His precious bride
The beautiful virgin in whom He does delight
Forever she will remain at His side
And together they will outshine the darkness of the night

II. Hadassah, That is, Esther (verses 5-7)

In Shushan the citadel there was a certain Jew

The Hebrew is laid out in a completely different way than almost all the English translations. It begins with ish yehudi hayah – “man, Jew, there was.” It is an abrupt and sudden change from the previous narrative concerning the king, the royal court, and the various things which transpired there. It is obviously a grammatical form used to introduce a complete contrast to what has been stated, and a look forward to what lies ahead. Cambridge states, “The influence which he, a Jew, is to have upon the history is thus placed in significant contrast with the brilliancy of the court of Susa.”

This is correct. The Jews had been in exile – though the exile was ended by Cyrus in 529BC. Many are scattered among the nations, and they have been out of favor with God. Jerusalem was not yet a walled and vibrant city. That wouldn’t occur until the time of Nehemiah in 445BC. The Jews are in a lowly state which is completely contrasted to the royal scene which has thus far been presented.

This Jew is right in Shusan, the citadel. From later in the narrative, it would rightly be assumed that he is either a eunuch or a doorkeeper in the king’s employ. Although there could be some further explanation for his ability to access the women’s court. More about this Jew is next revealed…

(con’t) whose name was Mordecai

The name Mordecai is generally debated as to belonging either to a Persian word, mordkai, meaning “Little Man,” or it is tied to the name of the Babylonian god Marduk, and thus it would mean “Pertaining to Marduk.” If this is so, it is not without precedent. The name of Daniel was changed to reflect a Babylonian god, as were others. If Mordecai was a eunuch or a doorkeeper, he would serve among the royals, and would be renamed accordingly. As Paul means “Small,” I would go with Mordecai – Little Man – showing a connection between the two.

(con’t) the son of Jair, the son of Shimei, the son of Kish,

Here are listed four names which are widely debated. Some see them as his four immediate ancestors. But this is unlikely. Names of ancestors in Scripture are, at times, given to highlight a particular genealogy without specifically naming all in that genealogy. This is the case with Jesus’ record in Matthew 1. The term ben, means “son,” but it can be, and often is, a generational term. One can be a son of Abraham even today, for example.

In this case, he was either the direct son of Jair, or Jair may be listed for another reason which I will explain in verse 6. From there, Mordecai is the son by ancestry of Shimei who is recorded as having cursed King David in 2 Samuel 16:5. Eventually, this same person was executed by Solomon in 1 Kings 2:46. Kish then is named as his next important ancestor. Though Shimei’s father was Gera, it is Kish who is significant, being the father of King Saul, the first king of Israel.

Therefore, Kish is the tie between the two genealogies. It is from his house that both King Saul and Mordecai, through Shimei, come. They are both sons of Kish according to ancestry. This Kish is mentioned by Saul, or Paul, in Acts 13:21. The importance of this connection to Kish lies yet ahead in the story. The name of Kish is connected to the word qush, a verb meaning to ensnare. Thus it may mean “To Snare.”

(con’t) a Benjamite.

Finally, we learn here that the term yehudi, or Jew, only indicates that he fell under the broader term which is by now being used to designate any person from any tribe of Israel. He is thus both a Jew and a Benjamite. Again, Benjamin means “Son of my right hand.”

Kish had been carried away from Jerusalem with the captives who had been captured with Jeconiah king of Judah, whom Nebuchadnezzar the king of Babylon had carried away.

The name Kish is incorrectly inserted here. The Hebrew simply says, “Which has been carried away.” It is speaking in a general term, not of either Kish or of Mordecai. Rather, this means that this family line, leading to Mordecai, had been carried away. In fact, it very well may be Jair who then is listed for this very reason. He being the ancestor who saw exile. Though more a paraphrase, the New Living Translation gives the correct sense of this verse –

“His family had been among those who, with King Jehoiachin of Judah, had been exiled from Jerusalem to Babylon by King Nebuchadnezzar.” NLT

It is this family line which eventually was carried away along with Jeconiah, king of Judah, by Nebuchadnezzar. That was more than 100 years before (598/597BC). As a side note, this is the only time Jerusalem is mentioned in Esther. Further, it is spelled in an alternate way Yerushalayim.

As a completely amazing point. Of the acrostics found in this one verse, four are one and the same word, mehera, or “In a hurry.” Two are in the noun form, and two are in the verb form. They form from reading the verse both forward AND backwards. It is exceptional! The chances of this being random are zero.

And Mordecai had brought up Hadassah,

This is the only time that the name Hadassah is used in the Bible. It means “Myrtle.” The myrtle is one of the branches used by the Jews to build their sukkah in the Feast of Tabernacles according to Nehemiah 8:15. The hadas, or myrtle, is from the same root at hadom, or footstool. The root means, “to stamp upon.” One can think of stamping out sin. It is also one of the prophetic pictures of God’s promised blessings in Isaiah 55:13. Thus, it is quite appropriate to this story of saving and blessing the Jewish people.

(con’t) that is, Esther,

The name Esther comes from a Persian word meaning “star.” Specifically, it would be the “star” Venus, indicating beauty and good fortune. However, the name of Esther to a Hebrew would remind the audience of two different thoughts, both having a bearing on the story. The first is a compound word which would sound like, “She Searches out Evil.” That would be relevant to the heroine. The second is even more relevant to the story itself. The name sounds like a word signifying “hiding.” And so Esther would sound like “I Am Hidden.” It is exactly what we discussed in the hidden, and yet fully evident, presence of the Lord in the book, and of the hidden acrostics pointing to the Lord in the book as well.

7 (con’t) his uncle’s daughter, for she had neither father nor mother.

This makes her his own first cousin. He was obviously older and took care of her from the time of the parent’s passing. As the Lord directs the life of man, it is obvious that He directed the death of the parents in order to bring Esther into Mordecai’s life to save the Jews. One can make obvious deductions by simply stepping back and seeing how God has orchestrated each step of what occurs in order to meet His purposes, and to fulfill His promises.

(con’t) The young woman was lovely and beautiful.

The same words are used to describe both Rachel and Joseph as that of Esther – beautiful of form. In addition to this another adjective signifying “beautiful in sight” is added on. She was both shapely and pleasing to the eyes – each a gift of God, but the opposite in appearance cannot be considered a curse. God endows beauty according to His wisdom, and in order to complete the course of His will. One can anticipate details of the story at this point. She has met the requirements for beauty of the royal decision. Now we just have to watch the story unfold.

(con’t) When her father and mother died, Mordecai took her as his own daughter.

This was not by chance, but according to will. God’s will was for the saving of the Jews, and so according to that greater purpose, the parents were taken away. Mordecai’s will was for the safety of his cousin, and the preservation of her Jewishness, and so according to that greater purpose, he took her in as his own daughter. Possibly being a eunuch or a doorkeeper, he was already close to the royal court. This further met the plan which was to be realized by the Lord. This realization begins in verse 8…

In search of a queen to be by My side
A radiant beauty to live with through the ages
A chaste virgin prepared as a bride
Whose beauty exceeds the poems on thousands of pages

Adorned as a queen in royal splendor
Gloriously appareled, such a beautiful sight
A bride like no other, so soft and so tender
And glistening with jewels, shining and bright

A bride fit for a King, radiant and lovely is she
One to bring joy forever to the King’s heart
The perfect union, so shall it forever be!
Nothing will separate them, nor tear them apart

III. Under the Hand of Hegai (verses 8-11)

So it was, when the king’s command and decree were heard, and when many young women were gathered at Shushan the citadel, under the custody of Hegai, that Esther also was taken to the king’s palace,

The king’s command is his spoken approval. The decree, or written law is what would have been issued based on that. Josephus records that there were approximately 400 women gathered together at this time, Esther being one of them. It is possible that the name Esther is being used in a future manner, having been given to her some time after coming into the palace. However, it very well may be that Mordecai called her Esther, and told her to use this name in order to hide her identity before entering the palace. It would go along then with what is stated in verse 10.

This now introduces another set of two’s. This one corresponds to the second gathering of virgins recorded in verse 2:19. The first gathering is to find a queen, the second gathering is after a queen has been selected. The first gathering was for the king to find sufficiency in a queen; the second is to fill a void in the king’s desired harem. One meant a good life for Esther; the second could mean death for her. They contrast, and yet they confirm that the king was always on the lookout for others to find pleasure in.

(con’t) into the care of Hegai the custodian of the women.

el yad hegai shomer hanashim – literally, “into the hand of Hegai keeper of the women.” The spelling of the name of Hegai varies from Hege of verse 3, but it is referring to the same person. The only difference in the spelling of the names is the final letter which changes from an aleph to a yod, previously known as a yad, which means “hand.” In this verse, Esther has been placed into the hand of Hegai, and the spelling of his name reflects that change. It is into his hand that care of this vitally important woman has been placed.

Now the young woman pleased him, and she obtained his favor;

Esther’s beauty must have been extraordinary. Hegai would have had countless girls under his care – virgins, concubines, lesser wives, and female attendants for them all. And yet, he was truly smitten with Esther – probably both in her physical looks, and in her comportment and demeanor. He saw someone who truly was fitting as a queen, and in preparing her, he would be possibly finding even greater favor in the eyes of the king.

For him to place her in the order in which she arrived would be to keep her away from the king longer. This might be a source of the king’s wrath for him later. If the king chose someone else before coming to Esther, and then was given Esther as a concubine, Hegai might look like the world’s worst keeper of the women.

These words bring in another set of two’s. Here, Esther finds khesed lepanav, or “lovingkindness before him.” This will be repeated concerning Esther in the eyes of the king in verse 2:17. Here it is favor of the keeper of the women, there it concerns the love of the king. They contrast, and yet they confirm that she was pleasing in all ways as a refined and beautiful woman. Because he has found her exceptional, he moves to prepare her for the king with all alacrity…

(con’t) so he readily gave beauty preparations to her, besides her allowance.

The word translated as “so he readily” is v’bahel. The word bahal gives the sense of being dismayed. In this, the sense of hurriedly, or urgently is seen. In 2 Chronicles 26, King Uzziah illegally burnt incense before the Lord. When he did, his forehead broke out in leprosy. In response to this, the priest hurried him out of the sanctuary. This is the sense of the word. Hegai was almost in a panic to have this marvelous beauty prepared for the king.

In this is seen the second of the three times tamruq, or items for purification, is found. She was quickly started on this course of preparation and also given manah, or a special diet of food, as most good translations state it. Those selected for the king’s service, be it virgins or wise men, were given a special portion of food as their diet.

(con’t) Then seven choice maidservants were provided for her from the king’s palace,

The word “maidservants” is prefixed with the word “the.” In other words, it is stating that there were designated seven maidservants to assist her and prepare her as a candidate to being queen. This then is more than just a glamour-fest. It is an entire body of training and introduction into how to conduct oneself in the king’s palace. These seven would prepare both her physical looks, such as in bathing, hair care, and the like, but they would also train her in etiquette, manners, customs, and so on.

The word “choice” to describe these maidservants is a participle of the verb raah which is used for a particular purpose in both the Talmud and in rabbinical Hebrew, and which occurs only here in the Bible. It shows the special care of Esther as she is being readied for her encounter with the king. Hegai has gone to enormous lengths to ensure that Esther would be ready, that she would be ready quickly, and that she would be fully ready. And as a sign of true endearment to this fabulous beauty he does more…

(con’t) and he moved her and her maidservants to the best place in the house of the women.

It is as if Hegai anticipates the outcome of the selection. He not only does all that he can for her to prepare her for what was to come, but he gives her the quarters which reflect what she would receive. The rooms would have been palatial, airy, and a delight to the senses. It is obvious that even if the king had not yet made his selection, Hegai had already done so for him…

10 Esther had not revealed her people or family, for Mordecai had charged her not to reveal it.

This verse is supplementary to what has just been said about Esther’s exceptional treatment, but the reason for it is not stated. Here, she has been commanded by Mordecai to not reveal either her people, meaning being Jewish, or her line of birth, meaning being of the stock of Israel. Many scholars say that if her Jewish roots had been known, it would have been a setback to her chances to becoming the queen, as if being Jewish in itself was a liability. But that makes no sense. If the best beauties of all the provinces were gathered together, it would include the province of Judea. There is no reason to assume that to be correct.

However, being raised in Sushan, her spoken Persian would be flawless. It would be a plus if she were assumed to be a native Persian, even if it was not a minus to be a foreigner. If she, without lying, said “I am from Sushan,” it would be utterly delightful to both Hegai and the king that such a beauty was reared right in their backyard. Such seems to be the thinking on Mordecai’s mind.

This verse initiates yet another set of two’s. It is that Esther has concealed her identity. That is first found here, and then again in verse 2:20. The first is at the command of Mordecai, and the second is in obedience to his command. They contrast, and yet they confirm the obedience of Esther to her adopted father.

*11 (fin) And every day Mordecai paced in front of the court of the women’s quarters, to learn of Esther’s welfare and what was happening to her.

Unlike the parents of all of the other girls who would probably never again hear of the state of their daughters, Mordecai was able to find out about Esther’s affairs. In whatever capacity he served, he was able to access the front of the women’s quarters and inquire about her there. Even in this, one can see the Lord’s hand working behind the scenes. He has chosen someone with at least partial access to find out what is going on, and to maintain a relationship with the person who would eventually become queen.

Each step of the story continues to show that despite Israel’s inability to stay faithful to their God and the covenant cut between them, such is not the case with the Lord. He is there, tending to His promises, and ensuring that His chosen people would not be destroyed by a wicked plot against them. They had been exiled, some had returned and begun life in Israel again, but there were still many scattered throughout the nations. And soon, all of them would be threatened by the evil intent of one man.

But God has a greater plan that is being worked out in the background. Like a meticulous clock that strikes the seconds, and then the minutes, and then the hours, ever faithful to proclaim the march of time, the Lord is there, silently moving circumstances as He sees fit to faithfully proclaim the cycle of redemption from beginning to end.

He took Enoch away, for His purposes. He saved Noah through the flood, to continue them on. He called Abraham, He chose Isaac, and He faithfully led Jacob. His favor went toward Rahab, a harlot, and He called Ruth, a young Gentile widow to be His own. Here in Esther, this beautifully woven tapestry is continuing on – for Israel, in anticipation of Christ, and to secure a people from the Gentiles.

He is never distant or uninterested. Though we normally don’t see it until after the fact, He is working to bring all things to a good end for those who trust Him. This must be true. What would God merit in stepping out of the eternal realm, uniting with humanity, and dying on a cross, if it wasn’t for a very good end. If nothing else, the cross of Christ shows us that God is completely interested in every one of us. So be of good cheer, do the right thing, and call out to Jesus. As caring as the Lord is about what occurred in the palace at Shushan, He is just as caring about what occurs with you.

Closing Verse: “Oh, that you would bear with me in a little folly—and indeed you do bear with me. For I am jealous for you with godly jealousy. For I have betrothed you to one husband, that I may present you as a chaste virgin to Christ. But I fear, lest somehow, as the serpent deceived Eve by his craftiness, so your minds may be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ. For if he who comes preaches another Jesus whom we have not preached, or if you receive a different spirit which you have not received, or a different gospel which you have not accepted—you may well put up with it!” 2 Corinthians 11:1-4

Next Week: Esther 2:12-23 What will be the outcome of this thing? (A Night With the King) (4th Esther Sermon)

The Lord has you exactly where He wants you. He has a good plan and purpose for you. At times, you might feel as if he has no great design for you in life, but he has brought you to this moment to reveal His glory in and through you. So follow Him and trust Him and He will do marvelous things for you and through you.

In Search of a Queen

After these things, when the wrath of King Ahasuerus subsided
He remembered Vashti, what she had done
And what had been decreed against her
After the course of his wrath had run

Then the king’s servants who attended him said
———-with a notable ring
“Let beautiful young virgins be sought for the king

And let the king appoint officers
In all the provinces of his kingdom, so to you we tell
That they may gather all the beautiful young virgins
To Shushan the citadel

Into the women’s quarters
Under the custody of Hegai
The king’s eunuch, custodian of the women
Whom on the virgins he keeps his eye

And let beauty preparations be given them
Then let the young woman who pleases the king
Be queen instead of Vashti
This thing pleased the king, and he did so; yes he did this thing

In Shushan the citadel there was a certain Jew
Whose name was Mordecai the son of Jair
The son of Shimei, the son of Kish, a Benjamite
More of Modecai, you can bet we will hear

Kish had been carried away from Jerusalem
With the captives who had been captured in the fray
With Jeconiah, king of Judah
Whom Nebuchadnezzar the king of Babylon had carried away

And Mordecai had brought up Hadassah
That is, Esther, his uncle’s daughter; so they were related
For she had neither father nor mother
As the Bible to us has stated

The young woman was lovely and beautiful
When her father and mother died
Mordecai took her as his own daughter
Parenting skills to her he applied

So it was, when the king’s command and decree were heard
And when many young women were gathered
———-at Shushan the citadel
Under the custody of Hegai
As the story does tell

That Esther also was taken to the king’s palace, there and then
Into the care of Hegai the custodian of the women 

Now the young woman pleased him
And she obtained his favor, so we know
So he readily gave beauty preparations to her
Besides her allowance, to her he did bestow

Then seven choice maidservants
Were provided for her from the palace of the king
And he moved her and her maidservants
To the best place in the house of the women
———-so for her he did this thing

Esther had not revealed her people or family one little bit
For Mordecai had charged her not to reveal it

And every day Mordecai paced
In front of the court of the women’s quarters
To learn of Esther’s welfare
And what was happening to her from any passing reporters

Lord God, thank You for Your presence that is with us
Even when we don’t realize that You are there
Because You sent Your own Son Jesus
We can know that You truly do care

And so Lord, be real to us in a wonderful new way
Open our minds and our hearts to seeing You always
Through every step we take, and throughout every day
Be real to us, O God, and to You will shall give all of our praise

Hallelujah and Amen…

Esther 1:13-22 (Master of the House)

Esther 1:1322
Master of the House

There are probably as many reasons to have faith in the word of God as there are people who read the word of God. Each person who picks it up and finds strength in their faith through it does so because it speaks to them personally. In strengthening their faith, their assurance of the word itself is also strengthened.

Though it is as common as candy bars at 7-11 today for people to say they trust the Christian God in general, or the Lord Jesus in particular, and yet not trust the Bible, that is a logical contradiction. One cannot say he trusts the Lord properly in one breath, and then say he does not trust the source which tells of Him in another.

Not only is it illogical, but frankly, being illogical, it is then also stupid. It would be like saying, “The neighbor built a new concrete house next door to us, but I don’t believe it’s concrete.” “Did you see them build it?” “Yes.” “Did they use concrete?” “Yes.” So, why don’t you believe it’s concrete?” “I just don’t believe it is. They aren’t the kind of people to live in a concrete house.” “So you’re basing your idea about the makeup of the house on what you think, not on what it is made up of.” “Of course! Why would I ever believe that they would live in a concrete house.” Any normally thinking person would find that both illogical and stupid. And yet, the number of people who say they believe in Jesus, but then say that they don’t believe in the word which tells us about Jesus could fill the Pacific Ocean.

But enough about them. For those who actually read the word, accept it as the word, and who then are strengthened in their faith concerning the word, they do so for a ton of reasons. Some, because they find it uplifting, just as God Himself is uplifting. Some because they see the harmony in the message – stretching from Genesis to Revelation. And yet, it was authored by 40 or so men, over 1600 years, in several languages, and in various countries. Despite this, it is seamless and continuous in what it states, how it states it, and the way things are stated.

Some realize that Jesus is revealed pretty much everywhere, and so they come to strength of faith because of this. We could go on and on with things like this because this word is an inexhaustible source of information, wonder, and delight. If we treat it as such, it will always fill our lives with the faith it was intended to impart.

Text Verse: The secret things belong to the Lord our God, but those things which are revealed belong to us and to our children forever, that we may do all the words of this law.” Deuteronomy 29:29

For me, all of the things I just mentioned increase my faith in the word, and also in the Lord who gave us the word. But one of the things that just amazes me, and which I can always refer to in my mind when I have doubts, is the patterns found in the Bible. There are numerical patterns, there are pictorial patterns, and there are word patterns. There are also literary patterns such as poetic, chiastic, parallelistic, and acrostic. It goes on and on.

Many of the patterns overlap. Many of the patterns have only been discovered in the past few years. Some of them in the… past few days. And then some that were discovered in the past have been built upon by others using new technologies. Today, guess what we will see in some of our verses? If you said to yourself, “Patterns,” give yourself an A+. We’ll start with some today, and they will continue to develop in the chapters to come.

If you are like me, these will help you in your times of doubt. “Lord, are You there? I feel distanced from You.” Just think on the word, remember the patterns, and they will let you know that He is, in fact, there. If He spent so much time hiding stuff in this word that has never been seen before in order to bring the curious mind to a state of ecstasy, how much more do you think He wants you to trust the stuff that is right there in the open! Be of good cheer. He is there. He has not forsaken you nor abandoned you. This is some of the marvel to be found His superior word. And so let’s turn to that precious word once again and… May God speak to us through His word today and may His glorious name ever be praised.

I. A Question of Law (verses 13 & 14)

13 Then the king said to the wise men

The words here show that the king, though probably rather incensed at the embarrassing situation, still had enough restraint to not fly off the handle. It needs to be remembered that this has been a banqueting party, and he certainly would have been enjoying the banqueting. That alone is enough to lower one’s restraint. But further, he was embarrassed in front of everyone who attended the party, regardless of the propriety of his initial request – something noted in our last sermon. And yet, he kept his demeanor as a wise king before deciding anything, and refers to his wise men.

What type of “wise men” referred to here is debated. The word is a common one which simply indicates intelligent, skillful, and wise-hearted. Some scholars define the counselors of a Persian king as being in two categories. The first being astrologers and astronomers who looked to the heavens for direction. The second would be those schooled in laws and customs of the empire.

Others disagree and state that, unlike the Babylonians, diviners and astrologers were not a known part of the Persian kingdom. Regardless of this, in this case and for the type of decision, the words of the wise men seem to point to a body of men who were familiar with law and custom, rather than seekers of divination. This is seen in the following words…

13 (con’t) who understood the times

The king’s counselors had an understanding of the state of the empire, how Vashti’s actions might affect it, and what the consequences of not taking action appropriate to the situation might be. In saying they “understood the times,” it is almost a metonymy where the things done in the times are spoken of as the times themselves.

The same type of thought is seen in 1 Chronicles 12:32 when the men of Issachar were said to have an understanding of the times concerning David’s position as king. They knew of the importance of aligning with him to unite the kingdom of Israel into one body and then to further the army in that state.

13 (con’t) (for this was the king’s manner toward all who knew law and justice,

Although not a king of Israel, Ahasuerus here displays the wisdom of Solomon. Several times in the proverbs, he expresses a similar thought to that of Proverbs 15:22 –

Without counsel, plans go awry,
But in the multitude of counselors they are established.” Proverbs 15:22

Instead of arbitrarily rendering a decision, or making one without consulting others who were skilled in law and justice, the king sought out his counselors. This was not a trait particular to Ahasuerus though. It was considered the right thing to do among each of the rulers of the empire.

This is expressed in the words davar ha’melekh, or “word (of) the king.” In this sense, the “word” doesn’t signify his command, but the matter and manner of how the king approached such things. It is similar to how the office of US President works. He has cabinet secretaries, a chief of staff, etc., who are there to consult before rendering a decision. In the end, the Bible says that this is the wise path to follow. As such, it is something that we all should apply to our own decisions. Is there someone that you can turn to when you need to make an important decision? Along with prayer to the Lord, seeking out wise human advice is the right thing to do when matters could otherwise go awry.

14 those closest to him being Carshena, Shethar, Admatha, Tarshish, Meres, Marsena, and Memucan, the seven princes of Persia and Media,

This verse closes out a set of two’s. The first was in verse 1:10, listing the seven servants of the king. Now it lists the second set of seven servants of the king. As I said in the previous sermon, two’s in the Bible signify a contrast and yet a confirmation of something. These contrast as they were seven lowly eunuchs and then seven high nobles, but they confirm the orders of the king in regards to Queen Vashti.

For now, like the eunuchs in verse 10, some of the names here are very difficult to pin down as to their meaning. To attempt to find a secret code in them would be an act of finding what one is looking for, rather than finding what is actually intended. But what is interesting is that the number seven arises again. There were seven eunuchs, sent out on the seventh day of the feast, and there are now seven counselors to the king. It is apparent that, like Israel, the number seven was an important one to the Persians.

Some say this is because of the seven planets known at the time, or that it is because of the seven-day cycle which permeates cultures, and which directs the movement of man. Or finally, the seven counselors may have been selected in order to correspond to the seven Amshaspands, or “glorious ones” of the spiritual and mental worlds. These go back to the Babylonian empire, but were known to the empire of the Persians and Medes as well. For whatever reason, the number seven is known to play an important part in the kingdom of the Persians and Medes. This is true with the appointment of these seven counselors…

14 (con’t) who had access to the king’s presence, and who ranked highest in the kingdom):

The translation here is more literally stated as, “who seeing the face of the king; those sitting first in the kingdom.” To sit indicates authority in this case, and thus these seven possessed authority equal to one another, but below that of the king. These seven counselors are most likely similar to those referred to again in Ezra 7:14 at the time of king Atarxerxes. Thus, this is more than just a counsel which would be adjusted based on circumstance and choice of the king. Rather, it was a set number during the duration of the empire.

As they were “seeing the face of the king,” it indicates that they had free and unrestricted access to him. Such was not the case with any others. This will be revealed as we continue through the book. For now, Ahasuerus takes advantage of the wise counsel of these men by asking for their advice.

Is there law and justice in the land?
How shall we approach this thing which has been done?
Can we let what occurred be left to stand?
If not handled, what course will we see run?

There must be order, and there must be law
If not, then things will surely get out of hand
Those who have seen will tell what they saw
No, what occurred cannot be left to stand

Give advice! Tell us what is found in the law
Let us do what is right, so that nothing gets out of hand
Our final decision should be rendered without a flaw
So we will be able to maintain peace throughout the land

II. Memucan’s Advice (verses 15-22)

15 “What shall we do to Queen Vashti, according to law,

The verse actually begins with, ke’dath mah la’asot, or “according to law, what shall we do.” “According to law” prefixes the question, as a strong stress. Further, there is no article in front of “law.” In other words, and as a paraphrase, “Legally, what is required?” Queen Vashti is placed as a subject of the kingdom, and thus one not immune from the standards set within the kingdom.

Along with that, it appears that the king is acting in a completely dispassionate manner concerning what should be decided. In all, the entire matter is being held as a breach of that which is legal and against the throne, rather than a mere offense to the king personally. This is then more fully expressed in the next words…

15 (con’t) because she did not obey the command of King Ahasuerus brought to her by the eunuchs?”

The king doesn’t say, “because she did not obey my command.” Instead, he refers to himself in the third person with, “the command of King Ahasuerus.” Here it uses a word, maamar, or command, which is found only three times in the Bible, and all are right here in Esther. It is derived from the word amar, or “said,” and thus it indicates a command, because it is the stated word of the king.

Interestingly, the first time it is used is here from the mouth of the king. The second will be from Mordecai, the cousin of Esther, and the third will be a command from Esther herself. It is an implicit note of the importance of both Mordecai and of Esther.

One point that John Gill makes while citing ancient sources, and which is worth repeating, is that it very well may be that all of this has occurred while the king and his counselors were still under the wine’s influence. He says, “it was the manner of the Persians at festivals, and when inflamed with wine, to consult and determine about matters of the greatest moment; yea, reckoned their counsels and decrees firmer than when made when they were sober; so the ancient Germans.”

If this is so, one can imagine them actually saying this in an open and even slurred way. In other words, this all may have been conducted in front of the entire group gathered before him, and he is making light of the matter while still being precise in the handling of it. The entire episode may be one of conduct outside of a state of sobriety. If so, it might reveal the substance behind the words of verse 2:1. It is all speculation, but it might help us to explain quite a bit to look at it this way.

16 And Memucan answered before the king and the princes:

Of the seven named princes, Memucan was named last, and yet he is the first and only one recorded as voicing an opinion. It is thus suspected then that he was the youngest of the advisers, and so he was asked to speak first. This is something which carried on even in legal circles of England where the puisne judges, and the youngest peers would voice their thoughts first. His advice now shows that there was no known law to cover this situation. Instead of citing law, he cites what the condition is and what should be done to correct it…

16  (con’t) “Queen Vashti has not only wronged the king, but also all the princes,

Before giving advice on what should be done, he gives a major consideration for the king to contemplate. The first portion of that consideration is the scope of the offense. In this, he goes from the specific, the king, to the general, those below the king. He notes that it is true that the king had been wronged, but then he says that the wrong extends also to those below him as advisers.

In other words, this could affect their positions, which would only cause more harm to the king. The royal court itself had been wronged, bringing the entire scope of the throne into question if the matter was to not be handled in a suitable way, appropriate to the level of the offense. But, Memucan doesn’t stop with this. As an adviser to the king, rejection of his advice would be rather embarrassing.

In fact, in 2 Samuel 17, Ahithophel, adviser to Absalom, son of David, gave advice as the king’s adviser which was rejected. The rejection was so displeasing to him that it says that “he put his household in order, and hanged himself.” And so, in order to have the best possible chance that his advice will be looked on favorably, he continues to exemplify the scope of the crime…

16  (con’t) and all the people who are in all the provinces of King Ahasuerus.

Not only was the king wronged, and not only was the royal court wronged – both of which might be straightened out or handled in a suitable fashion – but no indeed! The entire kingdom was affected. Memucan continues from the more specific to the more general, even to the house of every soul within the empire. It is a kingdom which stretched from India to Ethiopia, and which encompassed 127 provinces. To allow this offense to go unpunished would affect the whole sh’bang. To show how this would come about, he turns next to the second portion of his consideration…

17 For the queen’s behavior will become known to all women,

What Vashti did was against her husband, but it was also against the highest authority in the land. Memucan argues that eventually this will get out, and that when it does, all women will hear of it, and it will be known that the king himself was unable to control his disobediant wife. Thus, she will become a model for all women to follow…

17 (con’t) so that they will despise their husbands in their eyes,

Different words are translated as “husband” in the Bible. Though not uncommon, the word used by Memucan here is one of authority, baal. It means “master” or “owner.” The choice is certainly purposeful in using this word. When the conduct of Vashti towards the king is made known to the women of the realm, he argues that the obvious result will be that every woman will despise their baal.

But the wording is stronger than the NKJV makes it. Rather than “they will despise their husbands in their eyes,” it more literally says, “to render their husbands contemptible in their eyes.” In other words, it’s not just that the husbands will be despised, but that they will appear despicable. “If the king is so weak, then how much more is the man I’m married to who is just one of his lowly subjects!” This is the intent of the Hebrew. Memucan is passing along to the ears, and for the consideration of the king, that it will be empire-wide chaos…

17 (con’t) when they report, ‘King Ahasuerus commanded Queen Vashti to be brought in before him, but she did not come.’

The words “when they report” are actually masculine in the Hebrew. The masculine suffix is substituted for the feminine. It is they who usurp the normal order when they appeal to the disobedience of Queen Vashti. She was commanded, and yet she did not come. The entire body of Memucan’s words are intended to ensure that the king would consider no other option than accepting the advice he is to be given based on the consideration which has been laid before him. The king’s authority is in question, the judgments of the advisers are in question, and the order of the entire realm is in question – all because of disobedient Vashti. In fact, the cancer is already about to spread…

18 This very day the noble ladies of Persia and Media will say to all the king’s officials that they have heard of the behavior of the queen.

If you read the older English, KJV, it says, “Likewise shall the ladies of Persia and Media say…” Reading that in today’s English, one would think it is speaking of all of the ladies in the realm. This is not the intent of the words. The Hebrew word is sarah, which is identical to the name of Abraham’s wife, Sarah. It signifies a noble lady, a princess, etc. In older English, and among the more refined English today, the term “ladies” still carries this connotation, but just note that this is speaking of the wives of the nobility. Memucan is moving from the more general toward the more specific once again to prove his point, and to highlight the urgency of the situation which is…

18 (con’t) Thus there will be excessive contempt and wrath.

In marvelous literary fashion, a man after my own heart, Memucan uses two thoughts when but one might be sufficient. He first says a word unique in Scripture bizayon, or contempt. He precedes it with a preposition u-ke’day bizayon, or “and thus sufficient contempt.” The idea of “sufficient” here, however, is one of excessiveness. He then adds in va’qaseph or “and indignation” for good measure.

One would presume that the excessive contempt would be on the part of the wives, and the wrath would be on the part of the husbands. There would snippy attitudes, there would be angry words, and there would be scratches, punches, and shouting matches. Oh my! Could the realm survive? The entire tenor of Memucan’s consideration is given for the maximum effect upon the mind of the king. He is arguing as an orator before longing ears. And so with his words of consideration complete, he next proceeds to a recommended course of action…

19 If it pleases the king,

im al ha’melekh tov. The identical words are repeated by Nehemiah in Nehemiah 2:15. It is a way of saying, “I have a recommendation for the king to consider, and to act upon, if it is good in his eyes.”

19 (con’t) let a royal decree go out from him,

A royal decree is a published decree. It would be sent out to all provinces, and made public to all people. Coming from the king, it was considered established law.

19 (con’t) and let it be recorded in the laws of the Persians and the Medes, so that it will not be altered,

The Hebrew literally reads, “that it may not pass away.” Once recorded as a law, it would be considered fixed, firm, and unchanging. In theory, it is believed that the king could override the law, but it would be at the expense of his own honor to do such a thing. It would be considered weak and vacillating. Further, if it is written into law as recommended, the king couldn’t later blame Memucan for recommending that he dethrone Vashti. He would thus be safe from any later retribution.

This is also the first of another of the author’s use of two’s in the book – the irrevocability of the law is noted here, and then it is noted again in verse 8:8. They contrast as one is concerning the authority of man over woman in the realm, and the second concerns the protection of the Jew throughout the Gentile realm. But they actually confirm what God has ordained in His word. Man is to have authority over the woman, and the Jew is to be preserved as a people forever. Such sets of two’s will continue to be used throughout the book.

19 (con’t) that Vashti shall come no more before King Ahasuerus;

The law is to read that the separation of them was to be, in fact, a permanent divorce. She would never again enter into the presence of the king.

Another backwards acrostic is seen in this verse. The first letters of the words tavow Vashti lipne ha’melekh Akhashverosh, or “shall come Vashti before the king Ahasuerus,” form the word ohalot, or “tents.”

Ohel, or tent, is the word used to describe the tent of meeting, for example, which was seen numerous times in Exodus. The tents of all men of the empire will be affected by the decree, and the tent of the king is now no longer accessible to the dethroned queen. Instead…

19 (con’t) and let the king give her royal position to another who is better than she.

The word Memucan uses for “another” is reuth. It is a rare one, so far only seen once in Exodus. It is a feminine noun which signifies a fellow woman. In other words, Memucan is anticipating one of the royal concubines would be elevated to queen in place of her. This would be the expected course of action, but there is a hidden Force behind the scenes, working toward a particular end in order to highlight, save, and exalt the people called by His name. The Name of that all-seeing Force is secretly hidden in the next words…

20 When the king’s decree which he will make is proclaimed throughout all his empire (for it is great), all wives will honor their husbands, both great and small.”

A new word, pithgam, or “decree” is used. It is of Persian origin and it will be seen just two times. Surprisingly, despite being Persian, the second and final time will be by Solomon in Ecclesiastes 8:11. As this is a royal decree, no wife would dare to challenge it and do less than honor her husband. If the queen was dethroned for her act, a common wife – after the edict was published – would possibly be libel to face execution. No other commentary is necessary on the surface. However, to get to the secrets of Esther, we have to stretch our minds a bit. To begin doing that, I’ll translate the sentence in the order that it is written in the Hebrew. It is a little clumsy, but it will still make sense – “And shall be heard decree the king which he shall make in all his kingdom (for great it) and all the wives shall give honor to their masters to from great and unto small.”

By the time we finish Esther, the words here will fit so many varied patterns that you will need a computer to sort them all out… literally. Some of the patterns came out only days before I typed the sermon as Sergio accessed the Superior Word computer over an entire night in order to run a program to find them.

Great scholars, such as Keil and Lange, note the structure of the verse. Lange says, “The predicate nishma (heard) is chosen, since it makes a presupposition for the yitenu (shall give) which is expressed.” In other words, the proclamation of the king will lead to the giving of honor by the wives to their husbands. Keil notes that the parenthetical clause, “for it is great,” is intended to flatter the king’s vanity, and induce an inclination to agree to the proposal.

These are both correct, but the structure is more purposeful than just that. We’ve already noted that the name of the Lord, Yehovah, is never mentioned in Esther. But this teeny book of 10 chapters with 167 verses, is said by one scholar to mention the king 192 times. The kingdom is mentioned 26 times. The name Ahasuerus is mentioned 29 times. That is a lot in so few verses. But it would actually be untruthful to say, Yehovah isn’t mentioned at all. The first time He is seen is in this oddly-structured verse. It is found in a backward running acrostic of the words hi v’kal hanashim yitenu, or “it and all the wives shall give.” YHVH, or Yehovah, is the first letter of each word, in reverse.

That could be mere coincidence, but it isn’t, as you will see.

Further, the verse itself forms an entire acrostic sentence. In proper sequence it reads, Yehovah harekhem mevi, or “Yehovah brings forth your (pl) mountain.”

Mountains in the Bible have a lot of memorable symbolism attached to them, but as an individual symbol, it represents the place where government is established. This is seen, for example, in Isaiah 2 –

Now it shall come to pass in the latter days
That the mountain of the Lord’s house
Shall be established on the top of the mountains,
And shall be exalted above the hills;
And all nations shall flow to it.
Many people shall come and say,
“Come, and let us go up to the mountain of the Lord,
To the house of the God of Jacob;
He will teach us His ways,
And we shall walk in His paths.”
For out of Zion shall go forth the law,
And the word of the Lord from Jerusalem. Isaiah 2:2, 3

This same type of symbolism is used when speaking of Babylon in Jeremiah 51:25. Here in Esther, we can see that the Lord is behind the scenes continuing to bring Israel to the point where their mountain will be brought forth; the place from which Messiah will send forth His law. All of this is being pictured here in Esther. Further, it is rather amazing because this acrostic is found in a verse about the Persian government; its mountain.

The introduction of the Divine Name here brings in several instances of two’s which we already started earlier. First, this instance is spoken by Memucan, a Gentile. There will be four times the divine name Yehovah is seen in an acrostic. This and the third will both be spoken by Gentiles. Also, the first and the third are a pair because they both have the name spelled backwards. However, the first and the second are a pair because they have the Name formed using the initial letters of the four words of which they are comprised.

Further, the first and the fourth are a pair because they are spoken about Queen Vashti and then about Haman. The third and the fourth, as we will later see, will be spoken by Queen Esther and by Haman. But this in turn makes the first and second a pair because they are both in relation to (about and by) a queen, whereas the third and the forth are both in relation to (about and by) Haman.

And more, the first and the third, which both have the Divine Name spelled backward, form a pair revealing the truth that Yehovah is seen overruling what the Gentiles have counseled in order to effect His own purposes. And then even more, the first and the second, which have already been identified as a pair because they are formed from initial letters, both speak of initial facts within the story, and these initial facts are in relation to events where Yehovah initiates His will to overrule the events.

All of this may be confusing, but the information is so beautifully laid out that it is not possibly by random chance. We will see this as we highlight the other sets of twos which will arise as we get to the next three instances of the hidden Divine Name, Yehovah.

21 And the reply pleased the king and the princes, and the king did according to the word of Memucan.

The words here must be taken in a general way simply because the next verse does not say that the matter was recorded in the law of the Persians and Medes. It very well may have been, and it probably was so, but the king may have simply fired Vashti and put out a proclamation concerning wives being obedient to their husbands.

This is the third, and last, reference to Memucan in the Bible. However, some scholars believe that Memucan is the same as the wicked Haman who will be introduced in verse 3:1. If this is so, then the edict of his own suggestion will eventually lead to his own downfall. That can only be speculation, however. Regardless though, the king and the princes were pleased with the reply of Memucan, and his suggestions were accepted as far as the final verse now notes…

22 Then he sent letters to all the king’s provinces,

The king’s decree went forth copied as individual letters for each of the 127 provinces of the kingdom. It is noted by Herodotus that this was the first standardized postal system of its kind, one which is said to have been an excellent operation. Word was transmitted quickly, efficiently, and throughout the entire kingdom.

22 (con’t) to each province in its own script,

It is not known how many different scripts were used throughout the empire, but it would be a large number. In order to have competent scribes, people would certainly have been brought to the royal palace from each province, and there given an intensive study in the Persian language. From there, they would be maintained as scribes for all royal edicts and other governmental notices.

22 (con’t) and to every people in their own language,

This is an important addition to the verse. There can be many languages which use the same script. To send a note in German could be read, but maybe not understood, by the English. The same is true with the various languages which use Cyrillic symbols, but which are entirely different when spoken. The system employed to ensure all scripts and languages were clearly transmitted must have been massive. But for something as important as the next words, it was a necessary thing to have. They are good and relieving words for the often downtrodden and commonly ignored husband…

22 (con’t) that each man should be master in his own house,

Such words of wisdom. They go back to the creation of man, and they have often been interrupted by bad influence concerning what is right. Solomon speaks quite a bit on the matter, in the positive, and in the negative. In just one proverb, he defines both –

An excellent wife is the crown of her husband,
But she who causes shame 
is like rottenness in his bones.” Proverbs 12:4

From this point on, at least in the kingdom of Ahasuerus, things would be a lot better for the once overwhelmed man of the house. He was now officially appointed as master. A good deal indeed.

*22 (fin) and speak in the language of his own people.

The verse and the chapter close out with some of the most complicated words of the book. The thought, at least translated as it is here, has nothing to do with what occurred with Vashti, and so it seems to have nothing to do with the edict at all. Before analyzing it then, we should see how various translators have handled them –

using his native tongue. NIV

should say whatever he pleases. NLT

speak according to the language of his people. ESV

it should be published according to the language of every people. KJV

should be in charge of their wives and children. CEV

should be the master of his home and speak with final authority.  GNT

be the ruler in his own house and speak with authority. GWT

should publish it according to the language of his people. ERV

The intent here is that the man is to rule his house. If he has a foreign wife, she and the children were to be subject to him. They were to speak his language, thus he would be in control of the house, not a side piece to be picked on in a foreign tongue. This exact occurrence is seen in the book of Nehemiah –

In those days I also saw Jews who had married women of Ashdod, Ammon, and Moab. 24 And half of their children spoke the language of Ashdod, and could not speak the language of Judah, but spoke according to the language of one or the other people.” Nehemiah 13:23, 24

This was not to be accepted within the realm. The husband was to be master of the house, and the structure of the family would be based on that, including the language which he spoke. In this, there would be much less discontent for the once neglected, over-worked, and under-appreciated man of the house.

We’re finished with the first chapter of Esther, and frankly as I typed this (26 February, a few weeks before you got to hear it), I was completely excited about what lay ahead. I hope you feel the same now. The story itself is just fun to read and analyze. With the added bonus of hidden acrostics and the like, it is like opening a treasure chest and seeing wondrous riches.

But let’s also not miss the overall subject while analyzing the details. There is an ultimate point to what we have started in Esther. It is the protection of the Jewish people in order for God to reveal Himself in and through them. He’s done it in the word, as we have seen today, but He has also done it for His people, even in exile – just as His word said He would.

In the protection of Israel, despite their state as exiles and being subjected to foreign rule for disobedience to Him, we see that God is faithful to His covenants through the patriarchs and through Moses, and He is also faithful to His promises which predate those covenants. He said He would send a Redeemer all the way back in Genesis, and He is continuing to work on that promise here in Esther. By preserving Israel, He is preserving the line through whom He would enter the stream of humanity. This is the message of Scripture. Messiah is coming; Messiah has come; Christ will come again. Be assured and reassured of this.

Closing Verse: “For My own sake, for My own sake, I will do it;
For how should 
My name be profaned?
And I will not give My glory to another.”
Isaiah 48:11

Next Week: Esther 2:1-11 Beautiful virgins brought to Shushan. What does it mean? (In Search of a Queen) (3rd Esther sermon)

The Lord has you exactly where He wants you. He has a good plan and design for you. At times, you might feel as if he has no great purpose for you in life, but he has brought you to this moment to reveal His glory in and through you. So follow Him and trust Him and He will do marvelous things for you and through you.

Master of the House

Then the king said to the wise men
Who understood the times
(For this was the king’s manner
Toward all who knew law and justice, and how to handle crimes 

Those closest to him being Carshena
Shethar, Admatha, Tarshish, Meres, Marsena, and Memucan also
The seven princes of Persia and Media
Who had access to the king’s presence; anytime they could go

And who ranked in the kingdom highest
To them his voice he then addressed

What shall we do to Queen Vashti according to law
Because she did not obey the command
Of King Ahasuerus brought to her by the eunuchs?”
She has flippantly disobeyed my demand!

And Memucan answered before the king and the princes:
Queen Vashti has not only wronged the king
But also all the princes
And all the people who are in all the provinces of King Ahasuerus
———-to them also she has done this thing! 

For the queen’s behavior will become known
———-to all women, so that they will despise
Their husbands in their eyes

When they report, ‘King Ahasuerus commanded
Queen Vashti to be brought in before him, but she did not come
———-she refused what he demanded! 

This very day the noble ladies of Persia and Media
Will say to all the king’s officials; just do the math!
That they have heard of the behavior of the queen
Thus there will be excessive contempt and wrath 

If it pleases the king, let a royal decree go out from him
And let it be recorded in the laws of the Persians and the Medes
So that it will not be altered
That Vashti shall come no more before King Ahasuerus
———-for her wicked deeds

And let the king give her royal position; surely you will agree
To another who is better than she 

When the king’s decree which he will make is proclaimed
Throughout all his empire (for it is great)
All wives will honor their husbands, both great and small
It will be a slam dunk, and also a checkmate

And the reply pleased the king and the princes
———-it was really spot on
And the king did according to the word of Memucan

Then he sent letters to all the king’s provinces
To each province in its own script
And to every people in their own language
And this is what the letters did depict

That each man should be master in his own house
Great advice indeed
And speak in the language of his own people
Yes, each man his own house he should lead

Lord God, thank You for Your presence that is with us
Even when we don’t realize that You are there
Because You sent Your own Son Jesus
We can know that You truly do care

And so Lord, be real to us in a wonderful new way
Open our minds and our hearts to seeing You always
Through every step we take, and throughout every day
Be real to us, O God, and to You will shall give all of our praise

Hallelujah and Amen…