Matthew 20:20

Monday, 8 June 2026

Then the mother of Zebedee’s sons came to Him with her sons, kneeling down and asking something from Him. Matthew 20:20

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at the “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen).

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“Then she approached Him, the mother – the ‘sons, Zebedee’, with the ‘sons, hers’, worshipping and asking something from Him.” (CG)

In the previous verse, Jesus told the twelve about His coming passion and the resurrection that will occur on the third day. Matthew next records, “Then she approached Him, the mother – the ‘sons, Zebedee’.”

This would be Salome, as can be determined from two separate sets of verses –

“And many women who followed Jesus from Galilee, ministering to Him, were there looking on from afar, 56 among whom were Mary Magdalene, Mary the mother of James and Joses, and the mother of Zebedee’s sons.” Matthew 27:55, 56

“There were also women looking on from afar, among whom were Mary Magdalene, Mary the mother of James the Less and of Joses, and Salome41 who also followed Him and ministered to Him when He was in Galilee, and many other women who came up with Him to Jerusalem.” Mark 15:40, 41

Some also place her as the sister of Mary, the mother of Jesus –

“Now there stood by the cross of Jesus His mother, and His mother’s sister, Mary the wife of Clopas, and Mary Magdalene.” John 19:10

This is possible, but Mark’s “many other women” means that it must remain speculation. Next, Matthew records that she came “with the ‘sons, hers’.” These are specified elsewhere, such as in Mark’s record of this event, as James and John –

“Then James and John, the sons of Zebedee, came to Him, saying, ‘Teacher, we want You to do for us whatever we ask.’” Mark 10:35

It is apparent that the request of James and John (as cited in Mark 10) is mingled with the actions of their mother. Whether they or she initially instigated the event, they were all aware of it and probably figured that Jesus would incline towards their appeal if it was made through their mother. Whatever the case, she came “worshipping.”

The word proskuneó, which has been seen ten times already, is used. It is a derivative of pro, to or toward, and either kuón, dog, or kyneo, to kiss. Either way, the sense is understood. It is like a dog that comes to the feet of a master or kissing the feet of a superior.

Thus, it implies a sense of worship. In conjunction with her humble prostration, it says, “and asking something from Him.”

Unitedly, they have a petition from Jesus. One can tell by the mother’s inclusion that is something beyond a regular request.

Life application: Of this event, Cambridge, who was obviously there at the time of Jesus, making a video of the event, says –

“St Mark begins ‘And James and John the sons of Zebedee came unto him, saying, &c.’ For once St Matthew is more graphic and true to detail than St Mark.”

I mean, how else could they state this unless they were on the same “See the Messiah” tour? The utterly ridiculous nature of their comment is indicative of some arrogant buffoon who has decided what must be true and what must be a fabrication in God’s word.

Without ever considering that the two accounts could easily be melded together into one scene, they have derided the word of God and claimed that one account is “superior” to the other. To say “more…true to detail” means that the other account is less true to detail.

Rather than such an arrogant and dismissive comment, John Gill handles the variance between the two with logic –

“These two disciples, having observed what Christ had said concerning the twelve disciples sitting on twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel, and what he had just related, concerning his rising again the third day, which they might understand of some display of his glory; and concluding from all this, that the setting up of his temporal monarchy was at hand, inform their mother of it, and move to her, to use her interest with Christ, in their favour: and which they did, partly to shun the envy and ill will of the rest of the disciples; and partly, to conceal their own pride and vanity; as also, they might think a request from her, on their behalf, would be more easily granted: accordingly, she agreeing to the motion, they all three came, as Matthew relates, and the mother is the mouth, and speaks for her sons; so that they may be said to make such a request by her, she representing them; or they joined in the petition with her; or as soon as she had made it, they seconded it, and made it their own.”

Be humble with God’s word. Don’t be arrogant or a know-it-all. Someday, you will have to stand before its Author and give an account concerning how you treated it.

Lord God, help us to remember to always handle Your word with respect and care. May we never diminish its sacred contents. You are God. Help us to accept Your word as trustworthy and reliable, seeking to understand the difficult parts with humility. To Your glory, we pray. Amen.

 

1 Samuel 22:1-13 (Doeg the Adomite, Part I)

Artwork by Douglas Kallerson

1 Samuel 22:1-13
Doeg the Adomite, Part I

(Typed 26 January 2026) Gerry Rafferty was a Scottish musician born in 1947. He played with the Humblebums and Stealers Wheel before going solo. The song “Stuck in the Middle with You” was one of the more popular songs from Stealers Wheel. However, his real fame came when he released his solo album City to City.

Anyone who listened to the radio in the late seventies would have heard his songs playing. The song “Baker Street” continues to be played, and the video has tens of millions of views on YouTube.

Unfortunately, like Saul, he didn’t handle his exalted position very well. Although the Bible doesn’t give many specific details on Saul’s condition, one can imagine the parallels between the two. Rafferty descended into alcoholism, depression, and erratic, self-destructive behavior.

It is said he struggled with the pressures of fame and carried around personal demons. He would disappear from public view and hide in various locations. He drank himself to death in 2011. Studying the details of the life of Saul, one can see he, too, was filled with a host of mental problems, resulting in erratic behavior.

Text Verse: “To the ‘orchestrating.” Enlightening, to David, in going, Doeg the Adomite, and he caused to declare to Saul, and he said to him, ‘He went, David, unto ‘house, Ahimelech’.’” Introduction to Psalm 52 (CG)

Saul was already on edge before Doeg reported to Saul. His slide into mental instability made his attitude and actions afterward seem inevitable. Samuel warned the people about their desire for a king. Israel chose to have fallen men lead them rather than the Lord. Even after being presented with what they could expect from a king, they still shouted, “No! For lo! King, he will be upon us!” (1 Samuel 8:19) (CG).

From that time forward, kings came and went, but the majority of them were not great kings. And Saul was not the measure of what a great king would be. Rather, time and again in Kings and Chronicles, David is used as the standard for whether a king was a good one or not when their rule is described.

The kings were evaluated based on how they honored or failed to honor the Lord. Each of us will be evaluated in the same way. When we stand before Him, that one premise will be the deciding factor for every reward or loss we experience.

As we haven’t seen or personally interacted with the Lord, everything we are judged on will be based on our faith in Him. One doesn’t need faith when he has sight. But we are to live by faith that He is there, and He is a Rewarder of all who come to Him. Specifically, this means the things we do in this life, by faith.

This is a fixed and firm truth that is to be found in His superior word. And so, let us turn to that precious word once again, and… May God speak to us through His word today, and may His glorious name ever be praised.

I. In the Stronghold (verses 1-5)

David therefore departed from there

vayelekh David misham – “And he walked, David, from there.” Chapter 21 ended with the words of Achish, king of Gath, saying, “Behold! You will see man raving himself! To why you will cause to bring him unto me? Lacking being raved, I, that you caused to bring this to rave himself upon me? The this you will bring unto my house?”

These opening words of Chapter 22, unless they are not chronological but categorical, are referring to Gath. David means Beloved. David walked from there…

1 (con’t) and escaped to the cave of Adullam.

vayimalet el mearat adulam – “And he was eluded unto ‘Cave, Adullam’.” Adullam is in the Judean foothills, about 16-20 miles southwest of Jerusalem, near the Valley of Elah, where David slew Goliath. It is eastward and a bit south of Gath.

The meaning of Adullam is debated. Jones sees it as coming from the Arabic ‘dl, just and am, people. As such, he says, Justice of the People. The NOBSE and BDB identify is coming from the root ‘mum, a word leading to the thought of turning aside, and thus, Hiding or Seeking Refuge. Young’s says Resting Place.

However, Charlie takes another path. Adullam is mentioned in Micah 1, where the prophet uses puns to identify the names of many locations, such as –

“Therefore you shall give presents [shillukhim] to Moresheth [moresheth] Gath;
The houses of Achzib [akhziv] shall be a lie [akhsav] to the kings of Israel.
15 I will yet bring an heir [yarash] to you, O inhabitant of Mareshah [mareshah];
The glory of Israel shall come to [עַד] Adullam [עֲדֻלָּם].” Micah 1:14, 15

In these words, he says ad adulam, “unto Adullam.” If the name is a contraction of ad and olam (vanishment), a phrase common in Scripture, it would mean Unto Vanishment or Forever. That would fit with the idea of God’s glory noted in Micah. Sergio agreed with this assessment 🥳.

As for the mearah, cave, it is from ur to make naked. Thus, it signifies what is exposed or bare. In Joshua 10, it was used to signify the Torah, the five books of Moses.

1 (con’t) So when his brothers and all his father’s house heard it, they went down there to him.

vayishmeu ekhav vekhal beith aviv vayeredu elav shamah – “And they heard, his brothers and all ‘house, his father’, and they descended unto him there-ward.” If David’s family heard he was there, it means they were informed he was there.

In other words, David probably sent messengers to tell them that Saul was after him and, thus, would probably be coming after them.  Along with them…

And everyone who was in distress, everyone who was in debt, and everyone who was discontented gathered to him.

vayithqabetsu elav kal ish matsoq vekhal ish asher lo noshe vekhal ish mar nephesh – “And they amassed themselves unto him, all ‘man, scrunch’, and all man who ‘to him, indebted’, and all ‘man, bitter soul’.” Along with his family, a hodge-podge collection of disaffected people joined up with David.

Maybe these people felt the brunt of Israel’s decision to call for a king. They realized that the little they had was being taken for Saul’s use, exactly as Samuel warned in Chapter 8 when the request was made.

A new word is used here, matsoq, a narrow place. It gives the sense of being pressed. A fun word to describe such a situation is the noun scrunch, the act or sound of scrunching. That is the result of being scrunched. Such people may have felt this way because of the laws set forth by the king.

Along with the scrunchies were the indebted, something that may have come about from tax systems set up by Saul, and those who were bitter in soul. Such people may have had family taken from them and put into servitude to the king, just as Samuel warned.

This is all speculation, but these people were not content with how things were going. They have put their lot in with David, a refugee from Saul. Therefore, it makes sense that Saul was the cause of their problems…

2 (con’t) So he became captain over them. And there were about four hundred men with him.

vayhi alehem lesar vayihyu imo kearba meoth ish – “And he was upon them to commander. And they were, with him, according to four hundreds man.” Despite being disaffected, David was able to bring them into a cohesive band of military men, signified by the word commander.

His bravery among Israel when he challenged the Philistine was remembered. His adeptness in leading his thousand men to battle would have been the subject of many talks. His natural ability to tactfully handle the aches and disaffected moans of others made him a reasonable man to be listened to and obeyed.

Four hundred is a derivative of four, the number of creation and the world (and city) number, and ten, which signifies “Completeness of order, marking the entire round of anything … It implies that nothing is wanting; that the number and order are perfect; that the whole cycle is complete” (Bullinger).

It is also a derivative of forty and ten. Forty is described by Bullinger –

“It is the product of 5 and 8, and points to the action of grace (5), leading to and ending in revival and renewal (8). This is certainly the case where forty relates to a period of evident probation. But where it relates to enlarged dominion, or to renewed or extended rule, then it does so in virtue of its factors 4 and 10, and in harmony with their signification.”

As for those who should not be conjoined with a band of armed men…

Then David went from there to Mizpah of Moab;

vayelekh David misham mitspeh moav – “And he walked, David, from there – ‘Mizpah, Moab’.” Mizpah Moab is found only here in Scripture. Its location is unknown. However, Mizpah means Watchtower. Therefore, it would have been a place in a prominent location.

This means that David is now dwelling in the land of Moab, at this particular location. Reading the whole verse at once, it makes it sound like he took his parents to the king who was residing at Mizpah Moab, but that is not the case. David is staying there instead of in Cave Adullam.

Moab means From Father.

3 (con’t) and he said to the king of Moab, “Please let my father and mother come here with you, till I know what God will do for me.”

vayomer el melekh moav yetse na avi veimi itekhem ad asher eda mah yaaseh li elohim – “And he said unto ‘king, Moab’, “You will bring out, pray, my father and my mother with you until which I will know what He will do to me – God.” This is a new sentence within the verse. David is in Mizpah Moab, which will be called “the stronghold” in the next verse. While there, he wants to disencumber himself of the added burden of tending to his parents.

Because of this, he contacted the king of Moab, asking him to take charge of his parents while he was in Mizpah Moab. The reason David could communicate so naturally with the king of Moab is two-fold.

First, he was descended from Ruth, the Moabitess. Jesse, his father, was her grandson. Second, it said in 1 Samuel 14:47 that Saul fought Moab as an enemy. The old adage “The enemy of my enemy is my friend” would have applied to David who was hated by Saul.

Therefore, David made this appeal for his parents, asking the king to keep them by his side when he went out in the land, meaning while David continued to learn what God had planned for him.

So he brought them before the king of Moab, and they dwelt with him

vayankhem eth pene melekh moav vayeshevu imo – “And he caused to guide them – faces ‘king, Moab’, and they sat with him.” The words tell us that the king of Moab agreed to David’s request. Therefore, he entrusted his parents to the care of the king of Moab while he remained in Mizpah Moab, as is seen in the next words…

4 (con’t) all the time that David was in the stronghold.

kal yeme heyoth David bametsudah – “all days was David in the stronghold.” As can be seen when the sentences and clauses are rightly divided, David’s location is in Mizpah Moab, a different place than where his parents are. This location is identified with a new word in Scripture, matsud, a stronghold.

It is cognate to matsod, a net, and thus by implication a bulwark or hold. Both are derived from the verb tsud, to lie alongside (as in waiting for prey). Therefore, it signifies to hunt.

Now the prophet Gad said to David,

vayomer gad ha’navi el David – “And he said, Gad the prophet, unto David.” Gad is introduced here. He is only seen once in 1 Samuel, but he will also be seen five times in 2 Samuel 24 as well as in the Chronicles. In 2 Samuel 24, he is noted as David’s khozeh, gazer.

Gad is derived from gadad, to cut, invade, or expose. It is generally believed to mean Fortune, Good Luck, or something similar, but Abarim rightly states it is “a fortune for which a troublesome, invasive effort is made.” Gad’s words to David are…

5 (con’t) “Do not stay in the stronghold; depart, and go to the land of Judah.”

lo theshev bametsudah lekh u-vatha lekha erets Yehudah – “Not you will sit in the stronghold. You must walk, and you went to you – land Judah.” This confirms that the stronghold is Mizpah Moab. David is dwelling outside of the land of Israel, as he did when he was in Gath of the Philistines. He wanted a national border to separate him from Saul.

However, he wanted to “know what He will do to me – God.” Gad, the prophet, provided him an answer, which is to set his feet in the direction of Judah.

Judah means Praise. Because of Gad’s instruction…

5 (con’t) So David departed and went into the forest of Hereth.

vayelekh David vayavo yaar khareth – “And he walked, David, and he went ‘Forest, Hareth’.” This location is found only here in the Bible. The name is derived from kharath, to engrave. That word was only seen once, as well –

“And the tablets, work God, they. And the writing, writing God, it. Engraved [khareth] upon the tablets.” Exodus 32:16 (CG)

As for the yaar, forest, Abarim notes the following –

“The verb יער (ya’ar) isn’t used in the Bible and it’s a complete mystery what it might have meant. Noun יער (ya’ar) is the common word for forest or thicket, and the identical noun יער (ya’ar) means honeycomb. It is, of course, perfectly possible that these two nouns are not two but one, describing something general like a thing that consists of many elements, which contain energetic nutrients (either fruits or honey) …” Abarim

Young, in agreement with Strong, identifies the name with the cognate word khoresh, forest or wooded. He says Thicket. Jones says A Cutting. Charlie says Engraved.

Eyes on the Lord, not on oneself
This is the way to keep things right
Let us take our self-worth and put it on a shelf
Let us keep Jesus in our sight

When we have troubles or trials
We should fix our eyes on Jesus
And when our life is filled with smiles
Let us remember what He has done for us

Being haughty and filled with pride in self
Our eyes are misdirected from what is right
Let us take this attitude and put it on a shelf
Jesus! Let us always keep Jesus in our sight

II. Behold Me, My Lord (verses 6-13)

When Saul heard that David and the men who were with him had been discovered—

vayishma shaul ki noda David vaanashim asher ito – “And he heard, Saul, for he was known, David, and mortals who ‘with him’.” One might wonder why the Lord told Gad that David should return to Judah if Saul was sure to find out his location.

The answer is that the Lord was directing David’s steps. In this, He will reveal details in typology of future events. At the same time, David’s life is being prepared for his reign as king through his interactions with Saul. God is directing both men to meet His purposes in the ongoing stream of redemptive history.

Saul means Asked, but the spelling is identical to Sheol. One can think of the pit asking for the souls of men.

6 (con’t) now Saul was staying in Gibeah under a tamarisk tree in Ramah,

veshaul yoshev bagivah takhath ha’eshel baramah – “And Saul, sitting in the Gibeah under the tamarisk in the height.” A large number of translations agree with the NKJV and say, “in Ramah.” However, Gibeah is about seven miles south of Ramah. Saul was a big guy, but he wasn’t that big.

Rather, the word ramah, height, is being used in a new way to indicate a high place. It will be used four more times this way in Ezekiel.

This is the second of three times eshel, tamarisk, will be seen. The first was in Genesis 21:33 when Abraham planted a tamarisk and called on the Lord, the Everlasting God. The last use of the word will be in chapter 31 when the bones of Saul and his sons will be buried under a tamarisk in Jabesh.

Because of Abraham’s actions in Genesis 21, we can infer that the significance of the tamarisk is permanence and reliability.

6 (con’t) with his spear in his hand, and all his servants standing about him—

vakhanito veyado vekhal avadav nitsavim alav – “And his spear, in his hand, and all his servants ‘being stationed upon him’.” The scene is that of the seat of power and authority, similar to Deborah sitting under the palm in the area between Bethel and Ramah. Saul has called a council because David has been located.

The spear is the symbol of Saul’s authority. However, the word khanith, spear, is identical to the feminine word meaning grace.

then Saul said to his servants who stood about him, “Hear now, you Benjamites!

Rather: vayomer shaul laavadav hanitsavim alav shimu na bene yemini – “And he said, Saul to his servants, the ‘being stationed upon him,’ ‘You must hear, pray, sons Right.” There is no justification for translating this as Benjamites. The plural marker is on “sons.” Also, as in verses 9:1 and 9:4, the word yemini, right, is a singular proper noun.

This may be a way of identifying all of Saul’s men, regardless of tribal affiliation, as being on the right, even when not Benjamites. Whatever his intent, saying Benjamites, as almost all translations do, damages the intent. To these “sons Right,” Saul asks…

7 (con’t) Will the son of Jesse give every one of you fields and vineyards,

gam lekhulekhem yiten ben Yishai sadoth ukheramim – “Also, to you all he will give, ‘son, Jesse’, fields and vineyards?” The word “also” is being used as the initiator of a question, as in “Will he,” rather than a statement of assurance, as in “He will also give…”

In other words, Saul has done exactly what Samuel warned about, taking the property of the people and passing it out to his chosen select attendees –

“And your fields, and your vineyards, and your olives – the good, he will take and he gave to his servants.” 1 Samuel 8:14

The Lord, through Samuel, told the people what to expect. They would get a leader who would be partial to some and unfavorable toward others. Saul has exactingly lived up to those words.

Jesse means Yehovah Exists.

The thought of Saul’s partiality continues…

7 (con’t) and make you all captains of thousands and captains of hundreds?

lekhulekhem yasim sare alaphim vesare meoth – “To you all he will put commanders thousands, and commanders hundreds?” Samuel likewise mentioned this in his address to the people –

“Your sons he will take, and … put to him commanders thousands and commanders fifties.” 1 Samuel 8:11, 12

This is great for those who are appointed to the position of commander, but the families from whom they are taken would have had no choice in the matter.

Saul was using his authority to sway those under his command to feel sorry for him. He wanted to dissuade them from any thought of forsaking him and taking a stand with David.

And more, he is actually concerned that they have formed a conspiracy against him. Thus, his delusions were not only focused on David, his main enemy, but anyone who was not actively rubbing Saul’s back and expending his energies for the sake of his king…

All of you have conspired against me,

ki qeshartem kulekhem alay – “For you tied, you all, upon me.” The word “tied” does not refer to them tying up (binding) Saul. Rather, it expresses uniting in a league, binding together in the form of a treasonous conspiracy.

Saul is certain that the people should have been able to weed David out and eliminate him since he is back in Judah. Therefore, because this wasn’t done, his own subjects must want it that way. This is evident to him because…

8 (con’t) and there is no one who reveals to me that my son has made a covenant with the son of Jesse;

vein goleh eth azeni bikhrath beni im ben Yishai – “And naught denuding my ear in cut, my son, with son Jesse.” There is no reason to assume that the covenant between Jonathan and David in Chapter 20 was known to anyone else, including Saul.

Rather, Saul assumes that because Jonathan stood up for David, they had cut a covenant. Because of this, he is certain those with him could not be so blind as to not know it as well. He is projecting his own cogitations on those under him.

8 (con’t) and there is not one of you who is sorry for me or reveals to me

veein kholeh mikem alay vegoleh eth azeni – “And naught ‘being rubbed’ from you upon me and denuding my ear.” The NKJV gives a suitable paraphrase of the intent. The word khalah, rubbed, signifies being worn out, sick, worried, etc. A more suitable paraphrase would be, “None of you are worried sick for me about this issue…”

Saul has gone from being a brave fighting man to a deluded, neurotic wimp who shudders over every little thing as if his life were the whole purpose for the existence of the universe.

He is certain that David and his son cut a covenant and that everyone else was aware of it but failed to tell him because…

8 (con’t) that my son has stirred up my servant against me, to lie in wait, as it is this day.”

ki heqim beni eth avdi alay leorev kayom hazeh – “For he caused to rise my son, my servant, upon me to lurk according to the day, the this.” This tells us that Saul is only speculating. Nothing like this was covenanted between Jonathan and David. And more, both Jonathan and David have been the epitome of faithful servants and soldiers to Saul.

He is delusional and expects those around him to coddle him with words of encouragement and fidelity. Instead, he will get words from a bootlicker that will lead to the catastrophic downfall of many men…

Then answered Doeg the Edomite, who was set over the servants of Saul,

vayaan doeg ha’adomi vehu nitsav al avde shaul – “And he answered, Doeg the Adomite, and he ‘being stationed’ upon ‘servants, Saul’.” The form of the verb natsav, to station, is used many times followed by the word al, upon. The meaning is quite often “with” or “next to,” although it can mean “on top of.”

There is no need to assume that he was over the servants of Saul. He was one of them, standing with them before Saul. He is just one of Saul’s lackeys, and he knows his words will end in disaster for others. David even confirms this in verse 22.

Doeg is from daag, to be or become anxious. Thus, his name means Anxious or Fearful. Adomi comes from adom, red or ruddy. Thus, he is the Red One.

9 (con’t) and said, “I saw the son of Jesse going to Nob, to Ahimelech the son of Ahitub.

vayomar raithi eth ben Yishai ba noveh el akhimelekh ben akhituv – “And he said, ‘I saw ‘son, Jesse’ going Nob-ward unto Ahimelech, ‘son, Ahitub’.’” It is a true statement. However, it is information that, when presented, will only stir Saul’s madness even more.

David understood this and wrote this about him in Psalm 52 –

“Why do you boast in evil, O mighty man?
The goodness of God endures continually.
Your tongue devises destruction,
Like a sharp razor, working deceitfully.
You love evil more than good,
Lying rather than speaking righteousness. Selah
You love all devouring words,
You deceitful tongue.” Psalm 52:1-4

Jesse means Yehovah Exists. But it also means My Husband. As such, the name Jesse contains the weighty notion that human marriage reflects divine revelation.

Strong’s says Nob means Fruit, coming from nob, to flourish. This can be real fruit or figurative, such as the fruit of the lips, meaning praise, etc. Abarim has the source as nabah, to be high or prominent. They define it as Height or High Place. Ahimelech means My Brother Is King, Brother of the King, or something similar. Ahitub means My Brother Is Goodness or Brother of Goodness.

Doeg, knowing that his words will lead to devouring others, continues…

10 And he inquired of the Lord for him,

vayishal lo Yehovah – “And he asked to him in Yehovah.” Nothing is recorded about this. When confronted with it, Ahimelech will not deny it. Rather, he will note that this was a common occurrence. Despite this, it is something that will immediately set Saul on a bad path.

If the high priest asked for guidance for David, Saul would assume he would also know that David was a renegade by whatever answer was given. This would be considered abetting a fugitive for not letting Saul know.

10 (con’t) gave him provisions,

vetsedah nathan lo – “And provision he gave to him.” Along with abetting David, Ahimelech also aided him in his flight by giving him food. One can see Saul clenching his fists, grinding his teeth, and making that angry mrrrrrrr sound that dogs do when they get miffed. And more…

10 (con’t and gave him the sword of Goliath the Philistine.”

veeth kherev galeyath ha’pelishti nathan lo – “and ‘sword, Goliath, the Philistine’, he gave to him.” This is true, and it would have set Saul off even more. Allowing David to have the sword that he used to cut off the Philistine’s head would make him seem invincible to those he encountered. It would be the highest status symbol for him as a warrior to possess.

The word sword, kherev, has the same spelling as Horeb, the mountain of God. It is used consistently to picture the law.

Goliath means Exposer with a secondary meaning of Exiler.

Philistine means Weakener. Goliath, being called “the Philistine,” means he is the main Weakener, typical of Satan who uses law to destroy humanity’s relationship with God.

11 So the king sent to call Ahimelech the priest, the son of Ahitub, and all his father’s house, the priests who were in Nob. And they all came to the king.

vayishlakh ha’melekh liqro eth akhimelekh ben akhituv ha’kohen veeth kal beith aviv ha’kohanim asher benov vayavou khulam el ha’melekh – “And he sent, the king, to call Ahimelech, ‘son, Ahitub’ the priest, and all ‘house, his father’, the priests who in Nob. And they came, they all, unto the king.” Instead of going to Nob, Saul called the priests to come to him. All of them.

That does not bode well. If he was concerned about fairness in his accusations, he would have called Ahimelech, the only person who was spoken of by Doeg.

It seems that Saul purposed to do what he would do from the moment he heard Doeg’s news. Calling the priests to him would leave them totally vulnerable to whatever Saul decided. They would be defenseless, surrounded by Saul’s men, with no place they could flee without being cut down.

Saul would have been stewing the entire time it took to send men to get the priests and bring them to him. By now, he would be completely unhinged. His attitude can easily be seen in the manner he addresses Ahimelech…

12 And Saul said, “Hear now, son of Ahitub!”

vayomer shaul shema na ben akhituv – “And he said, Saul, ‘You must hear, pray, son Ahitub.’” The imperative verb and the use of the name Ahitub, Ahimelech’s father, sets a sore and nasty tone when talking to the high priest. Saul is abrupt, discourteous, and demeaning right off the bat. On the contrary, Ahimelech’s response is just the opposite…

12 (con’t) He answered, “Here I am, my lord.”

vayomer hineni adoni – “And he said, ‘Behold me, my lord.’” Ahimelech doesn’t jump on Saul as he could have. Being the high priest, he had the same type of anointing as Saul did. He could have responded just as curtly, but he instead acknowledges Saul’s presence while calling him lord.

This doesn’t calm him down a bit. Saul begins raking Ahimelech over the coals instead of quietly and politely asking for his view of what took place…

13 Then Saul said to him, “Why have you conspired against me, you and the son of Jesse,

vayomer elo shaul lamah qeshartem alay atah u-ven Yishai – “And he said unto him [k.], Saul, ‘To why you tied upon me, you and ‘son, Jesse’.’” There is a difference in the written and oral Hebrew. The written says elo, while the oral says elav. The difference is the lack of a single letter, a yod. The meaning remains the same, however.

It could be a copyist’s error, or it may be that dropping the yod has significance. Whatever the intent, Saul uses the same charge towards his men that he now accuses Ahimelech of, conspiracy against his authority.

Calling David “the son of Jesse” accentuates this, just as in the previous verse when Saul called Ahimelech the son of Ahitub. With his rude accusation stated, he next provides the charges…

13 (con’t) in that you have given him bread and a sword, and have inquired of God for him,

betitekha lo lekhem vekherev veshaol lo belohim “in your giving to him bread, and sword, and asking to him in God.” The three things stated by Doeg are considered sufficient to accuse the priest of treason. Saul has accused Ahimelech without even obtaining a statement from him first.

The decision concerning the matter is already concluded in Saul’s mind. Ahimelech’s actions were treasonous, so…

*13 (fin) that he should rise against me, to lie in wait, as it is this day?”

laqum elay leorev kayom ha’zeh – “to rise unto me to lurk according to the day, the this?” The charge is not for helping David flee for his life, but for providing David with supplies and a weapon in order to enable him to come against Saul.

This dismisses the fact that Saul is surrounded by his men. In other words, he feels they are inept and unable to secure his life against a single enemy, and that Ahimelech has made this possible.

Like the radical left protestors in the US, fighting against the legally established government officials in the lawful execution of their duties by removing violent criminal aliens from the society, Saul has lost all sense of reason.

He has reduced himself to a state of animal instinct, biting at anything he sees as the slightest threat to himself. Such a state can happen to anyone when he exalts himself and his supposed importance above what is normal for humans. With such an attitude, a state of mental instability can creep in and bring real harm to us.

We will have to wait to find out what the result of Saul’s madness will mean for the priests. For now, we can consider that without the fear of the Lord and the restraint on our lives that comes from applying the Bible to our lives, we are all capable of going off the deep end.

Looking around at the ungodly cities and states of America, we can see an attitude similar to Saul. All restraint is cast off, there are unjust leaders and judges, and the people who are being obedient to the Lord are in their crosshairs.

Things didn’t start that way. But as the word of the Lord and biblical Christianity have been pushed out of our lives, such conduct is the inevitable result. Eventually, a catastrophe like 9/11 may happen, and the people will seek God as they always do.

But depending on when in the stream of time such an event occurs, it may be too late. There is a point where God’s tolerance of human wickedness will reach its end.

Until then, it is our job to hold fast to the word, keep telling others that there is a better way, and pray for direction and wisdom in ourselves and in those who so desperately need Jesus. May we be about His business while the day of God’s favor is here.

Closing Verse: “Here is the man who did not make God his strength,
But trusted in the abundance of his riches,
And strengthened himself in his wickedness.” Psalm 52:7

Next Week: 1 Samuel 22:14-23 The guy is a biblical blight, it’s true… (Doeg the Adomite, Part II) (48th 1 Samuel sermon)

The Lord has you exactly where He wants you. He has a good plan and purpose for you. He is the One who abases the haughty and exalts the humble. He regards the lowly, and the proud, He knows from afar. So yield yourself to Him, trust Him, and believe His word. In this, He will do great things for you and through you.

1 Samuel 22:1-13 (CG)

And he walked, David, from there. And he was eluded unto ‘Cave, Adullam’. And they heard, his brothers, and all ‘house, his father’, and they descended unto him there-ward. 2And they amassed themselves unto him, all ‘man, scrunch’*, and all man who ‘to him, indebted’, and all ‘man, bitter soul’. And he was upon them to commander. And they were, with him, according to four hundreds man.

3And he walked, David, from there – ‘Mizpah, Moab.’ And he said unto ‘king, Moab’, “You will bring out, pray, my father and my mother with you until which I will know what He will do to me – God?” 4And he caused to guide them – faces ‘king, Moab’, and they sat with him all days was David in the stronghold.

5And he said, Gad the prophet, unto David, “Not you will sit in the stronghold. You must walk, and you will go to you – land Judah.” And he walked, David, and he went – ‘Forest, Hareth’.

6And he heard, Saul, for he was known, David, and mortals who ‘with him’. And Saul, sitting in the Gibeah under the tamarisk in the height. And his spear, in his hand, and all his servants ‘being stationed upon him’. 7And he said, Saul to his servants, the ‘being stationed upon him’, “You must hear, pray, sons Right. Also, to you all he will give, ‘son, Jesse’, fields and vineyards? To you all he will put commanders thousands, and commanders hundreds? 8For you tied, you all, upon me. And naught denuding my ear in cut*, my son, with son Jesse. And naught ‘being rubbed’ from you upon me and denuding my ear. For he caused to rise my son, my servant, upon me to lurk according to the day, the this.”

9And he answered, Doeg the Adomite, and he ‘being stationed’ upon ‘servants, Saul’. And he said, “I saw ‘son, Jesse’ going Nob-ward unto Ahimelech, ‘son, Ahitub’. 10And he asked to him in Yehovah. And provision he gave to him, and ‘sword, Goliath, the Philistine’, he gave to him.”

11And he sent, the king, to call Ahimelech, ‘son, Ahitub’ the priest, and all ‘house, his father’, the priests who in Nob. And they came, they all, unto the king. 12And he said, Saul, “You must hear, pray, son Ahitub.”

And he said, “Behold me, my lord.”

13And he said unto him [k.], Saul, “To why you tied upon me, you and ‘son, Jesse’, in your giving to him bread, and sword, and asking to him in God, to rise unto me to lurk according to the day, the this?”

 

1 Samuel 22:1-13 (NKJV)

David therefore departed from there and escaped to the cave of Adullam. So when his brothers and all his father’s house heard it, they went down there to him. And everyone who was in distress, everyone who was in debt, and everyone who was discontented gathered to him. So he became captain over them. And there were about four hundred men with him.

Then David went from there to Mizpah of Moab; and he said to the king of Moab, “Please let my father and mother come here with you, till I know what God will do for me.” So he brought them before the king of Moab, and they dwelt with him all the time that David was in the stronghold.

Now the prophet Gad said to David, “Do not stay in the stronghold; depart, and go to the land of Judah.” So David departed and went into the forest of Hereth.

When Saul heard that David and the men who were with him had been discovered—now Saul was staying in Gibeah under a tamarisk tree in Ramah, with his spear in his hand, and all his servants standing about him— then Saul said to his servants who stood about him, “Hear now, you Benjamites! Will the son of Jesse give every one of you fields and vineyards, and make you all captains of thousands and captains of hundreds? All of you have conspired against me, and there is no one who reveals to me that my son has made a covenant with the son of Jesse; and there is not one of you who is sorry for me or reveals to me that my son has stirred up my servant against me, to lie in wait, as it is this day.”

Then answered Doeg the Edomite, who was set over the servants of Saul, and said, “I saw the son of Jesse going to Nob, to Ahimelech the son of Ahitub. 10 And he inquired of the Lord for him, gave him provisions, and gave him the sword of Goliath the Philistine.”

11 So the king sent to call Ahimelech the priest, the son of Ahitub, and all his father’s house, the priests who were in Nob. And they all came to the king. 12 And Saul said, “Hear now, son of Ahitub!”

He answered, “Here I am, my lord.”

13 Then Saul said to him, “To why have you conspired against me, you and the son of Jesse, in that you have given him bread and a sword, and have inquired of God for him, that he should rise against me, to lie in wait, as it is this day?”

Matthew 20:19

Sunday, 7 June 2026

and deliver Him to the Gentiles to mock and to scourge and to crucify. And the third day He will rise again.”  Matthew 20:19

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at the “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen).

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“and they will surrender Him to the Gentiles unto the ‘mock, and flog, and crucify’, and the third day, He will rise up.” (CG)

In the previous verse, Jesus reminded His twelve that in going up to Jerusalem, He would be betrayed to the chief priests and scribes who would condemn Him to death. He finishes this thought, saying, “and they will surrender Him to the Gentiles.”

Despite the chief priests and scribes condemning Jesus to death, they did not have the authority to crucify Him. As such, the gospels bear out that they went to the Gentiles to have the sentence against Jesus executed. Once in Gentile hands, however, there was more that would be expected. He was delivered “unto the ‘mock, and flog, and crucify’.”

For the first time, Jesus specifically notes the means by which He would be killed. It is a new word, stauroó, to impale. But that must be understood not as being pierced through the entire body, but through parts of the body, being affixed to something, such as a cross, pole, wall, etc.

In the case of Jesus’ coming crucifixion, there is a debate whether the cross He bore was only the lintel, which was then affixed to a standing tree or pole, or if He bore the entire cross.

One theory, clearly refuted by verses in the gospels, is that Jesus was affixed to a single stake. In such a case, His hands would be pierced above His head with His body hanging below them. However, Matthew 27:37 says that the accusation against Him was put above His head. Therefore, that is not how He was crucified. As for His death, which is certain when one is crucified by the Romans, Jesus says, “and the third day, He will rise up.”

This is stated in all three synoptic gospels. Jesus would rise on, not after, the third day. It is confirmed in Acts and the epistles as well. It is an important point that many miss, instead assuming that it was three days and then Jesus arose at the start of the fourth day.

Life application: Of Jesus’ words, it says in Luke –

“But they understood none of these things; this saying was hidden from them, and they did not know the things which were spoken.” Luke 18:33

Mark adds in another thought, saying, “But they did not understand this saying, and were afraid to ask Him” (Mark 9:32).

Jesus spoke the word concerning His passion directly to the men. He told them exactly what would happen. And yet they didn’t understand, and they were afraid to ask. If you have read the Bible a few times, you begin to realize there are things you just don’t understand.

This usually isn’t the case the first few reads through because most people cannot process all that is being thrown at them. Like hearing a song on the radio or learning a new language, it takes a bit of repetition to begin to understand the lyrics of the song or the variation of the words in a language.

The same is true with reading the Bible. After a few times through, distinctions in various accounts begin to show up. If this is the word of God, it is telling us something that is true, just like Jesus’ words to the apostles. And yet, we struggle with what is said.

Instead of feeling foolish and not asking, and instead of not wanting to bother God, as if He is too busy with other things, He is pleased with our wanting to know what His word is saying. And so, it should be natural to us to call out, “Lord, I don’t understand what is going on here. Show me what you are telling us in Your word.”

If you do this, you will often find that very soon after, you will read a commentary, hear someone talking about, or get led to another part of the Bible that exactingly explains what you were wanting to know. God is there, waiting for you to talk to Him. That is called “prayer.”

Prayer doesn’t need to be on your knees with your eyes closed and your hands clasped. It is communication between you and God in whatever manner establishes the link. From there, a sense of fellowship is established, and He gladly responds to your petition. That is, of course, if you are in Christ. If you are not, no reply should be expected.

But if you are in Christ, you are God’s child through adoption. Your heavenly Father is waiting for you to talk to Him. So open thy mouth, and speak. He will not be bothered at all.

Lord God, Your word is big and difficult for us to grasp when we first start into it. It continues to be that way as we dig deeper. But You gave it to us. And so, coming to You is the appropriate way to have it revealed to us. Help us to remember this and to seek Your face when we come to things we do not understand. Open our eyes, O God, to see wonderful things in Your word. Amen.

Matthew 20:18

Saturday, 6 June 2026

“Behold, we are going up to Jerusalem, and the Son of Man will be betrayed to the chief priests and to the scribes; and they will condemn Him to death, Matthew 20:18

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at the “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen)

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“You behold! We ascend to Jerusalem, and the ‘Son, the Man’, He will be surrendered to the chief priests and scribes, and they will sentence Him – death.” (CG)

In the previous verse, it said Jesus was going up to Jerusalem. Taking His twelve disciples aside, He readied to speak to them, saying, “You behold! We ascend to Jerusalem.”

It is a fact they were aware of. Thus, the meaning is, “Something should be expected when we ascend to Jerusalem.” With that in mind, He continues, saying, “and the ‘Son, the Man’, He will be surrendered.”

This is the third time Jesus has spoken of this event. It is why He specifically said, “We ascend to Jerusalem.” What He referred to in the past will now be realized –

“From that time Jesus began to show to His disciples that He must go to Jerusalem, and suffer many things from the elders and chief priests and scribes, and be killed, and be raised the third day.” Matthew 16:21

“Now while they were staying in Galilee, Jesus said to them, ‘The Son of Man is about to be betrayed into the hands of men, 23 and they will kill Him, and the third day He will be raised up.’ And they were exceedingly sorrowful.” Matthew 17:22, 23

The first time He spoke of this was just after Peter’s words, acknowledging that Jesus is the Messiah. The second time was shortly after the transfiguration. When they had come down the mountain, and the afflicted boy was healed, He told them of what was ahead. Now, in accord with His previous words, He confirms to them that the time has come. He will be surrendered “to the chief priests and scribes.”

These are the religious leaders of Israel. They would be the ones to make various decisions according to the Law of Moses concerning what should be done with transgressors of the law. Despite standing Jesus before their council and finding He had done nothing in violation of the law, Jesus notes, “and they will sentence Him – death.”

How could their Messiah and the Son of God, as confirmed before those two previous warnings, be sentenced to death? The disciples, despite hearing Jesus’ words, will be seen not to have understood Him at all.

Life application: How often do we hear someone say something and we don’t process it in the manner they intended? Later, when whatever they said comes to pass, we may say, “I thought you were joking” or “I just didn’t get what you were saying.”

This is common because we tend to hear what we want to hear. Unfortunately, we do this with God’s word as well. There are pastors, preachers, and teachers of the Bible who purposefully ignore the word, speak against it, or say it has an error.

When we hear this, we might say, “Those are really bad people. Look how they treat the word!” And yet, in our own doctrine or beliefs concerning the Bible, we may do exactly the same thing. Do we accept that the Earth is billions of years old? Then we are treating the Bible in the same manner.

Do we have a female Bible teacher or pastor? If so, we have rejected what God’s word says concerning such things. When we hear the story of Samson, do we say, “That is just an exaggeration” concerning something reported about him? What right do we have to make such a claim?

It is one thing to misunderstand what we are being told, but to block out the clearly spoken (and then recorded) word of God, we make ourselves the arbiter of what God’s word says. Of course, there must be a context to every passage in Scripture. If we are rightly handling the context, then the fault will lie with those who are not doing so. But when something is explicit and in context, we must accept what God has said.

It is important to have this attitude. Just because we don’t understand a particular issue, we should still work within the framework of what God has said, accepting it by faith as reliable.

Lord God, help us to have the right attitude concerning Your word, never second-guessing what is plainly stated for us. It may be that a translation is faulty or an analysis is wrong, so give us the wisdom to check those things out. But what is said that is plain and clear, may we accept it and apply it to our walk before You. Amen.

Matthew 20:17

Friday, 5 June 2026

Now Jesus, going up to Jerusalem, took the twelve disciples aside on the road and said to them, Matthew 20:17

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at the “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen)

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“And ascending, the ‘Jesus to Jerusalem’, He took twelve disciples apart alone, and in the road, He said to them,” (CG)

In the previous verse, the final thought concerning the parable of the workers in the vineyard was given. With that complete, a new direction takes place, beginning with, “And ascending, the ‘Jesus to Jerusalem’.”

Regardless of the elevation where one is, the Bible always describes the journey to Jerusalem as an ascent. In fact, there are many locations with a higher elevation in the land itself. The highest among them is Mount Hermon in the Golan Heights, which sits at 7,336 feet above sea level.

After that, many peaks are higher than Jerusalem, a few of them are Mount Ha’Ari, Mount Ramon, Mount ‘Arif, Mount ‘Ofa’im, Mount Hilla, Mount Zafrir, and Mount Hillel. These and other points exceed the elevation of the Temple Mount in Jerusalem, which sits at 2,430 feet. Despite this, the trek there is considered an ascent.

Of this trek, Charles Ellicott says, “The narrative is not continuous, and in the interval between Matthew 20:16-17 we may probably place our Lord’s ‘abode beyond Jordan’ (John 10:40), the raising of Lazarus, and the short sojourn in the city called Ephraim (John 11:54). This would seem to have been followed by a return to Persea, and then the journey to Jerusalem begins.”

If this is correct, it can be found in what is known as a harmonization of the gospels, which several reliable sources have taken the time to put together, showing the exact chronology of events throughout the four gospels. Of this ascent, the narrative continues, saying, “He took twelve disciples apart alone.”

At this time, there were probably many people with them on the trek, but Jesus wanted to specifically provide information to the twelve that the others were not yet to be privy to. Therefore, Matthew continues, “and in the road, He said to them.”

The verse excitedly ends as if a breath is needed before continuing to the precious words of Jesus to His twelve selected apostles.

Life application: It is important to confirm information in commentaries, not taking them at face value until verified and considered in relation to what the Bible says. In John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible, he records the following concerning this verse –

“Which was situated (f) in the highest part of the land of Israel: the land of Israel, is said to be higher than any other land whatever; and the temple at Jerusalem, higher than any part of the land of Israel; wherefore Christ’s going to Jerusalem, is expressed by going up to it.”

His footnote says his information was derived from “T. Bab. Sanhedrim, fol. 87. 1.” When John Gill recorded this, in the 1700s, he was using what information was available to him. Unfortunately, the Babylonian Talmud presented him with erroneous information, which has since been passed on to the minds of those who have read it.

At many times, the ascent to Jerusalem is not a physical ascent at all. However, it is always a theological ascent as one moves closer to the point where man meets with the God of Israel. That is why it can be said that a person on Mount Hermon, high above Jerusalem in elevation, will ascend as he makes the trek to Jerusalem.

Remember this as you read the Bible. John Gill certainly didn’t intentionally provide wrong information, but for some reason, the compilers of the Babylonian Talmud did. They probably knew what was said was incorrect, but they recorded it anyway.

Understanding that this biblical elevation of Jerusalem is stated as it is, it then becomes more pertinent when considering Paul’s words in Galatians –

“For these are the two covenants: the one from Mount Sinai which gives birth to bondage, which is Hagar— 25 for this Hagar is Mount Sinai in Arabia, and corresponds to Jerusalem which now is, and is in bondage with her children— 26 but the Jerusalem above is free, which is the mother of us all.” Galatians 4:24-26

At one point, the city of Jerusalem was considered the pinnacle of elevation because it was where God was dealing with men, interacting with them through temple rites and rituals. That ended with the completed work of Christ. The veil was torn, and access to God through Jesus Christ was made available.

The temple in Jerusalem, which ministers the law of Moses, is not, nor will it ever again be, the pinnacle of God’s interactions with man. It is a place of bondage leading to death. It is a place of enmity with God. Wherever Jesus Christ is, that is the place where the spiritual ascent is now realized. That is because He fulfilled the law, set it aside, and introduced the New Covenant in His blood.

To miss this point has led to incredibly bad theology in relation to end times events (eschatology) within the church. People openly applaud the coming construction of the temple in Jerusalem, which will reintroduce sacrifices based on the Law of Moses. It is the very thing Christ came to abolish, and yet Christians actively support this diabolical event. This should not be.

Let us fix our eyes on Jesus alone, mourning over Israel’s failure to see the One they have missed for so long. Pray for them. Many will die before their time of realization comes about. Pray to God that eyes will be opened before that tragic day which lies ahead comes upon them.

Lord God, we lift up the lost in the world, knowing that a day of judgment lies ahead for all unless the word gets to them before it arrives. May You work mightily through missionaries, social media, and the simple but effective words of believers around the world to just open their mouths and speak about Your goodness as seen in Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.