1 Samuel 23:16-29 (You Will Reign Upon Israel, Part II)

1 Samuel 23:16-29
You Will Reign Upon Israel, Part II

(Typed 16 & 17 February 2026) In 1993, the US had a bit of a spat with the Somalis. Throughout much of the year, there was military conflict, which culminated in the October 1993 battle of Mogadishu, a battle made famous in the movie Blackhawk Down.

During the year, Mohamed Farrah Aidid, often called General Aidid, remained elusive to the US government intelligence agencies. And yet, the press was there interviewing him time and again. How could the entire US intelligence apparatus not find someone that a bunch of left-wing newsies could? Something never made sense about that.

In the passage today, Saul relentlessly pursues David, and yet, he never gets him. Despite this, his son Jonathan has no problem finding David and spending time with him.

It’s hard to understand how these things occur, but the account is detailed, and Jonathan was able to do what Saul and his army failed to.

Text Verse: “To the Chief Musician. A Psalm of David the servant of the Lord, who spoke to the Lord the words of this song on the day that the Lord delivered him from the hand of all his enemies and from the hand of Saul.” Introduction to the 18th Psalm

David was betrayed by the people of Keilah, whom he saved from the hand of the Philistines. Later, while in the area of the Ziphites, a city belonging to his own tribe of Judah, he was betrayed by some of them.

With Saul constantly pressing hard after him, it seemed like he couldn’t catch a break. He had a true and trusted friend in Jonathan. His men were loyal to him as well. But above all that, because of his trust in the Lord, the Lord was with him.

This was evidenced throughout his life. Just when he needed delivery, the Lord was there to provide it. We, too, have such great assurances. Because of Jesus, the Lord will always deliver us in the way that He deems is appropriate. We can trust in that.

Such great truths as this are to be found in His superior word. And so, let us turn to that precious word once again, and… May God speak to us through His word today, and may His glorious name ever be praised.

I. To All Longing Your Soul (verses 16-20)

16 Then Jonathan, Saul’s son, arose

vayaqam yehonathan ben shaul – “And he arose, Jehonathan, ‘son, Saul’.” Jonathan is reintroduced into the narrative. He has not been seen since verse 20:42, when he and David agreed that there would be peace between them and between their households forever.

As seen in several accounts, his name is spelled differently here. Instead of Jonathan, the Hebrew has an additional letter, hey, elongating the name. It is the fifth letter of the aleph-bet and means look, reveal, and breath –

יוֹנָתָ֗ן
יְהוֹנָתָ֜ן

Jonathan will be mentioned only here in the chapter. The next time he will be mentioned is in Chapter 31, where it notes his death in battle. Jehonathan has the same meaning as Jonathan, Yah Has Given.

16 (con’t) and went to David in the woods

vayelekh el David khoreshah – “and he walked unto David Horesh-ward.” Somehow, Jonathan learned of David’s location and went to visit him. As with the previous verses, the name Horesh contains an additional hey at the end.

This hey ending is dismissed by Hebrew grammarians as a fossilized ending that has no bearing on the meaning of the name, but that seems like an excuse to dismiss what is not understood. I have retained the meaning of this ending and translated it with the standard locational meaning of such a suffix as Horesh-ward.

The word either is the name of a location, Horesh, or it is the word khoresh, which means forest. Either way, the result is the same for typology. David means Beloved.

16 (con’t) and strengthened his hand in God.

vayakhazeq eth yado belohim – “And he seized his hand in God.” This conveys the idea that David needed strength, he reached out for it in God, God was grasped, and David was thus strengthened in the power and reliability of God. The strengthening is an encouragement in David’s time of distress and difficulty as he hid from Saul, who relentlessly pursued him.

17 And he said to him, “Do not fear, for the hand of Saul my father shall not find you.

vayomer elav al tira ki lo thimtsaakha yad shaul avi – “And he said unto him, ‘Not you will fear, for not it will find you, ‘hand, Saul’, my father.’” The imagery is that Saul’s hand blindly searches for David, swinging about trying to strike him.

Jonathan knows that David is under the divine protection of God. Saul may doggedly pursue David, reaching with his hand to impinge in David, but David will remain unharmed. Saul means Asked. His name is identical in spelling to Sheol. Jonathan understands more than just God’s divine protection of David, though…

17 (con’t) You shall be king over Israel,

veatah timlokh al yisrael – “And you, you will reign upon Israel.” Jonathan understands that Saul will not reign as king forever. But he goes further, clearly understanding that it is David, not he, who will rule over the nation.

Israel means He Strives With God.

Without saying it explicitly, Jonathan indicates that he is giving up any right to ruling in place of his father…

17 (con’t) and I shall be next to you.

veanokhi ehyeh lekha lemishneh – “And I myself, I will be to you to double.” The meaning is most likely that Jonathan expects to be appointed as David’s right-hand man. He would be like Joseph was to Pharaoh, leading the people under the hand of David. Such an underling’s primary job was to ensure the rule and authority of the king was always upheld and never challenged.

17 (con’t) Even my father Saul knows that.”

vegam shaul avi yodea ken – “And also, Saul, my father, knowing thus.” This cannot be taken to mean that Saul knew for certain that Jonathan would rule with David or that Saul was sure David would rule. Rather, it means that Saul felt it was a logical outcome based on how things were working out.

The reason it cannot be a certainty is that Jonathan will not survive to be David’s second in command. Thus, there was no prophetic word given to Saul. Jonathan knew Saul had just figured that this was how things would work out.

18 So the two of them made a covenant before the Lord.

vayikrethu shenehem berith lipne Yehovah – “And they cut, they two, covenant to ‘faces, Yehovah’.” Jewish scholars say that they renewed the covenant that had been made before. Christian scholars agree with that. But it doesn’t say that at all. It says they cut a covenant.

It is not a renewal but a new covenant. Jonathan has yielded his authority and right to the kingdom to David. David has accepted Jonathan’s offer and agreed that he will be his right-hand man. Time and circumstance will preclude this from happening, but the covenant was made, should the opportunity arise.

18 (con’t) And David stayed in the woods, and Jonathan went to his own house.

vayeshev David bakhoreshah vihonathan halakh leveitho – “And he sat, David, in the Horesh-ward. And Jehonathan, he walked to his house.” Unless another encounter which Scripture does not record occurred, this was the last time they would see one another alive.

19 Then the Ziphites came up to Saul at Gibeah, saying, “Is David not hiding with us in strongholds

vayaalu ziphim el shaul ha’givathah lemor halo David mistater imanu vametsadoth – “And they ascended, Ziphites, unto Saul the Gibeah-ward, to say, ‘(Indeed) not David hiding himself with us in the strongholds.’” The area is the Wilderness of Ziph. Thus, those dwelling there are known as Ziphites. The somewhat lengthy explanation of the name was detailed in verse 14.

As there is no article before Ziphites, it indicates some of the people of Ziph in general, not the people as a whole. Their allegiance to Saul, or their fear of him, has led them to betray David’s location to the king.

It may also be that they thought David would claim the area as his own, leaving them without what they currently possessed.

Gibeah means Hill. It is etymologically connected to Gabbatha.

Regardless of their reason, Ziphites came and disclosed the information to Saul, saying David was…

19 (con’t) in the woods, in the hill of Hachilah, which is on the south of Jeshimon?

bakhoreshah begivath ha’khakhilah asher mimin hayshimon – “in the Horesh-ward in ‘Hill, the Hachilah’ which from ‘right, the wasteland’?’” They provided specific detail so that Saul would not waste time scouring an entire area.

According to Strong, Hachilah is from khaklili, a word “By reduplication from an unused root apparently meaning to be dark; darkly flashing (only of the eyes); in a good sense, brilliant (as stimulated by wine) — red.”

That word is found only once in Scripture –

“Crimson – eyes from wine,
And white – teeth from milk.” Genesis 49:12 (CG).

The word “from” means the words are being used as a comparative. As the second clause is compared to white, meaning whiter, I would assume this means darker red from the redness of wine. As such, I say Crimson. Others say Dark, Gloomy, or Dusky.

The wasteland, yeshimon, comes from yasham, to lie waste. Being prefixed by the definite article, it signifies the wasteland. Having given the necessary information to Saul…

20 Now therefore, O king, come down according to all the desire of your soul to come down;

The words are lively and show the full support of these men towards Saul: veatah lekhal avath napshekha ha’melekh laredeth red – “And now to all longing your soul, the king, to descend you must descend.” We could paraphrase this as “We know you really want this deep down inside, and as the king, you should descend and fulfill your desire.” When he does his part…

20 (con’t) and our part shall be to deliver him into the king’s hand.”

velanu hasgiro beyad ha’melekh – “And to us – cause to shut him in ‘hand, the king’.” If the king acts according to their offer, they will do their part and shut David in. Then the king can grab him, shutting him in his own hand. Because of their full support…

Do not fear, for the Lord is by Your side
Trouble may pursue, but it will not find You
The Lord is faithful – tested and tried
Yes, the Lord is there, faithful and true

You shall reign as King over Israel
So continue on despite the trials you face
Satan doesn’t stand a chance, he will be chucked into hell
When all is finished, that will be his place

Do not fear or be dismayed
The troubles will soon pass away
All the trials and sorrow will fade
Eternal glory is set for You on that glorious day!

II. Crag, the Divisions (verses 21-29)

21 And Saul said, “Blessed are you of the Lord, for you have compassion on me.

vayomer shaul berukhim atem leYehovah ki khamaltem alay – “And he said, Saul, ‘Blessed you to Yehovah, for you commiserated upon me.’” Saul conveys that David is the one who had it out for him. As the king, he should be safe from attempts on his life by his underlings. But David was a bully trying to harm him.

On the other hand, these Ziphites felt sorry for Saul and his plight and were willing to help him. Because of this, he blessed them in the name of Yehovah.

22 Please go and find out for sure,

The whole verse is put together willy nilly, as if Saul is trying to speak intelligibly, but he can’t quite do it: lekhu na hakhinu od – “You must walk, pray, you will cause to establish yet.” The meaning is, “Go back to your area, please, and be sure to once again carefully get a fix on where David is.” As the NKJV says, “find out for sure.”

He next somewhat repeats the same thought…

22 (con’t) and see the place where his hideout is, and who has seen him there.

udeu ureu eth meqomo asher tihyeh raglo mi raahu sham – “And you must know, and you must see his place where it will be his foot – who he saw him there.” The imperatives are like saying, “Be certain! Be sure to locate exactly where his foot is standing. Make sure it is an eyewitness account and get the exact details.

It is like his mind is racing, and he is in panic mode to know with complete certainty the exacting details. This is because…

22 (con’t) For I am told he is very crafty.

His words about David are emphatic: ki amar elay arom yarim hu – “For it said unto me conceiving, he will cause to conceive, he.” It is a new word in Scripture, arom, to be or make bare. But it is only used in its derivative sense, what being made bare leads to. It is seen just five times in Scripture.

In analyzing each use of the word, conceive, to form or devise a plan in the mind seems to be the best fit. One sees or considers what is going on, and his mind exposes or makes bare a solution by conceiving what to do.

Saul essentially says, “Be one hundred percent sure. Identify exactly where he is because he has probably already devised a plan to make it look like he is in one place when he is really in another. He, David, is such a crafty dude.”

23 See therefore, and take knowledge of all the lurking places where he hides;

ureu udeu mikol hamakhavoim asher yithkhabe sham – “And you must see, and you must know from all the hideouts where he will ‘secrete himself’ there.” Saul uses another new word, makhave, a hideaway. It is derived from khava, to secrete or hide. It is only seen here and in Isaiah 32:2.

Saul wants them to reconnoiter, monitoring David’s movements, locating each place he goes. That way, if he eludes Saul, he will know where David fled.

23 (con’t) and come back to me with certainty, and I will go with you.

veshavtem elay el nakhon vehalakhti itekhem – “And you will return unto me unto ‘being established,’ and I will walk with you.” Once his words have been acted on and it has been established with certainty what he has asked for, he will then go with the Ziphites to pursue David.

23 (con’t) And it shall be, if he is in the land, that I will search for him throughout all the clans of Judah.”

vehayah im yeshno vaarets vehipasti otho bekhol alphe Yehudah – “And it will be, if he exists in the land, and I will ‘search’ him in all ‘thousands, Judah’.” The meaning is clear. No matter where David might be hiding among all of the various clans, signified by a division of a thousand, Saul would be there to get him.

24 So they arose and went to Ziph before Saul.

vayaqumu vayelekhu zipha liphne shaul – “And they arose, and they walked Ziph-ward to ‘faces, Saul’.” The Ziphites received their instructions, turned around, and headed back towards Ziph. At the same time…

24 (con’t) But David and his men were in the Wilderness of Maon, in the plain on the south of Jeshimon.

vedavid vaanashav bemidbar maon baaravah el yemin hayshimon – “And David, and his mortals, in ‘Wilderness, Maon’, in the wasteplain, unto ‘right, the wasteland’.” Maon was first mentioned in Joshua 15. It was next mentioned in Judges 10:12. It means Abode or Habitation.

As seen in verse 14, the wilderness is a place of God’s grace and closeness to Him, but it is also a place of testing. For some, such as Israel, the testing results in disobedience. For others, such as Christ when He was tested, it is a place of fellowship through obedience.

The wilderness and the law are closely connected because testing is accomplished through law. This is seen in the word itself, midbar. It is derived from the verb davar, to speak, and the noun davar, meaning word. The Lord spoke the Ten Commandments (words/devarim) in the desert (midbar) of Sinai.

25 When Saul and his men went to seek him,

vayelekh shaul vaanashav levaqesh – “And he walked, Saul, and his mortals to seek.” Without saying it, the meaning is that the Ziphites got a report to Saul as requested. With that in hand, Saul and his men headed out after David. However…

25 (con’t) they told David. Therefore he went down to the rock, and stayed in the Wilderness of Maon.

vayagidu ledavid vayered ha’sela vayeshev bemidbar maon – “And they caused to declare to David, and he descended – the crag, and he sat in ‘Wilderness’ Maon’.” The meaning is unclear without knowing the landscape. Was David on the crag and descended from it, or was he somewhere else and he descended to the crag (he descended – the crag)? If the former, then it means he went to Maon. If the latter, it means the crag is in Maon.

As he was already in the wilderness of Maon, it means he went to a crag that would provide a natural barrier. Once down from the crag, he waited in the general area to see what Saul would do.

The Pulpit Commentary includes a quote from Claude Condor’s 1878 book, Tent Work in Palestine: A Record of Discovery and Adventure, which says –

“Between the ridge of El Kolah (the ancient hill of Hachilah) and the neighbourhood of Maon there is a great gorge called ‘the Valley of Rocks,’ a narrow but deep chasm, impassable except by a detour of many miles, so that Saul might have stood within sight of David, yet quite unable to overtake his enemy; and to this ‘cliff of division.’”

25 (con’t) And when Saul heard that, he pursued David in the Wilderness of Maon.

vayishma shaul vayirdoph akhare David midbar maon – “And he heard, Saul, and he pursued after David – ‘Wilderness, Maon’.” There are obviously spies watching on both sides. David heard about Saul coming, and Saul heard about David’s descent. The better or more recent the intel, the more likely one side will prevail over the other.

Eventually, the matter became as intense as the climax of a Mission Impossible movie…

26 Then Saul went on one side of the mountain, and David and his men on the other side of the mountain.

vayelekh shaul mitsad ha’har mizeh vedavid vaanashav mitsad ha’har mizeh – “And he walked, Saul, from ‘side, the mount’, from this, and David and his mortals from ‘side, the mount’, from this.” The topography of the mountain being referred to include the crag that divided them. David waited for Saul to move. Once he did, David did as well, just on the opposite side of the mountain…

26 (con’t) So David made haste to get away from Saul, for Saul and his men were encircling David and his men to take them.

vayhi David nekhpaz lalekheth mipene shaul veshaul vaanashav oterim el David veel anashav lethaphesam – “And he was, David, being hastened to walk from ‘faces, Saul’. And Saul, and his mortals, encircling unto David and unto his mortals, to manipulate them.”

A new word is seen, atar, to encircle. It is used when crowning someone. In Psalm 65, the sense is used in beautiful metaphor –

“You encircled year – your good,
And your circulars, they will (surely) drip – fat.” Psalm 65:11 (CG)

The sense is that the Lord blesses the entire year with His goodness, and as each year returns upon itself, the land is blessed with abundance.

Understanding this, we see that Saul has men going in both directions around the mount so that eventually, one division or another will meet up with David and his men. In this impossible-to-escape-without-a-battle scenario set, the impossible (with all of its little dashes) is brushed away by more pressing matters…

27 But a messenger came to Saul, saying, “Hurry and come, for the Philistines have invaded the land!”

u-malakh ba el shaul lemor maharah velekhah ki phashetu phelishtim al ha’arets – “And messenger, he came unto Saul, to say, ‘You must (surely) hurry, and you must (surely) walk. For they overspread, the Philistines, upon the land.’” Saul had his enemy in sight. He had his men encircling them so that they could “manipulate” them.

Everything was set for Saul to overcome David when, out of the blue, a runner with a message told him of a much greater need. Because Saul and the army were distracted, the Philistines could wreak havoc on the people of Israel. The frustration level in Saul’s mind must have been enough to give him a stroke at that point. However…

28 Therefore Saul returned from pursuing David, and went against the Philistines;

vayashav shaul mirdoph akhare David vayelekh liqrath pelishtim – “And he returned, Saul, from pursuing after David. And he walked to encounter – Philistines.” As the king, he had his battles to choose. If he continued to pursue David, it would have been his head to lose. He knew this, broke off the pursuit he so desperately desired to finish, and returned to tend to the invading Philistines. Therefore…

28 (con’t) so they called that place the Rock of Escape.

al ken qareu lamaqom ha’hu sela ha’makhleqoth – “Upon thus, they called to the place, the it, ‘Crag, the Divisions.’” The Pulpit Commentary continues to explain the layout and what transpired –

David “went to it as being an impassable barrier between him and his pursuers. But ‘he hasted anxiously to get away’ (ver. 26), because Saul would divide his army into two parts, and so David would only have the advantage of the few miles of detour which Saul must make. … The ordinary notion that David and his men were concealed from the sight of Saul by an intervening mountain is disproved, not only by no such mountain existing, but also by the clause, ‘Saul and his men were surrounding David and his men’ (ver. 28). They had them in sight, and were forming in two divisions, so as to pass the gorge at the two ends and close upon the flanks of David’s small band of followers.”

It is called sela ha’makhleqoth because it is a crag that divided David and Saul and by which they were permanently divided as far as this battle goes. Hence, the plural, Divisions.

The name is a double entendre. The crag was the physical divider, and it stands as a witness to their division by the fortunes of time and event as set forth by God. With that exciting event behind them…

*29 (fin) Then David went up from there and dwelt in strongholds at En Gedi.

vayaal David misham vayeshev bimtsadoth ein gedi – “And he ascended, David, from there. And he sat in ‘strongholds, En Gedi’.” The location is on the western shore of the Dead Sea. 2 Chronicles 20:2 tells us it is the same location known as Hazezon-Tamar, seen in Genesis 14:7, which is identified by the palms that grow there.

The name En Gedi, however, identifies it by the ayin, literally an eye, but figuratively a spring of water, and the animal, gedi, a young goat. The implication is that young goats frequented the area. Thus, its name means Fountain of a Kid.

The word gedi is from gadah, to cut off. Typologically, the goat is what finishes a matter.

The Crag of Divisions is a glorious place
When one side is saved by the Lord’s protective hand
They will look up and see His face
And those who see it will understand

The other side will have to face their own trials
Troubles await them that they must face
It won’t be joy, and there will be no smiles
For them, the Crag of Divisions is not a happy place

The Lord is the judge, and He does what is right
Protecting His own in the trials they face
For them, there is a future, shining and bright
On the day when they will see His face

III. Explaining the Typology

This passage deals with several truths seen during the church age. The first one is the state of the nation of Israel during this dispensation.

In verse 1, David, accepting the doctrines of Christ, was told that the Philistines, the Weakeners, were fighting against Keilah, Out-slung.

They represent those cast out by the Lord, picturing Israel in their exile. There are many verses to explain this, but Jeremiah 10:18 is perfect because it uses the root of Keilah to demonstrate what the Lord will do to Judah. There, it says –

“For thus He said, Yehovah:
‘You behold! I slinging [qala]
‘Inhabiting the land’ in the beat, the this,
And I caused to cramp to them
To end purpose, they will find.” Jeremiah 10:18 (CG)

The Weakeners were plundering the threshing floors of Keilah. That is the place of separation and judgment where the chaff is separated from the kernel. There are Jews, called a remnant by Paul, throughout the church age. They have the same problem with Weakeners as anyone else.

We can think of those who accept what Christ teaches (represented by David), going to save the Jews from the Weakeners, those trying to weaken the faith of others by inserting the law into their beliefs. It is something false Christians have been doing with the Jews forever, telling them that it is ok to observe the law. Think of John Hagee or the doctrine of the Roman Catholic Church.

Those who accept the doctrines of Christ must act in such instances.

In verse 2, David asked the Lord if he should go and attack the Philistines. The Lord said yes. However, in verse 3, his men feared. They said, “Behold! We here in Judah – frightened.” It is typical of those who have been saved but are unwilling to engage against the Weakeners on behalf of the Jews. They are in Judah, Praise, and yet they are afraid.

David went to the Lord in verse 4 and again asked if he should engage. The Lord told him to do so, “You must arise! You must descend – Keilah. For I – delivering Philistines in your hand.” The imperatives tell us that it is our job to evangelize the Jews. We should not coddle or shy away from those who teach them falsities about the law.

In verse 5, David attacked the Philistines, and he was victorious, taking their livestock. The word miqneh comes from qanah. It gives the sense of one’s possessions. Those who accept the doctrines of Christ will always defeat such weak opponents and take what they possess, meaning their false teachings.

The parentheses about Abiathar bolting from Saul to David came in verse 6. It is logically placed here as a statement of fact to explain how David had an ephod available.

Abiathar’s name comes from a word that signifies an excess, but not as unwanted or without a purpose. It is that which goes beyond the needs of the original thing. He represents the law, which, despite being dead, still serves a purpose, even to this day.

He was noted as the son of Ahimelech, My Brother Is King, signifying the law anticipating Christ. Christ came, the law was annulled and done (Ahimelech’s death). But it still serves a purpose in its issue (Abiathar). It is used as a tutor to lead people to Christ.

In verse 7, Saul, signifying Sheol calling out for the souls of men, heard that David had gone to Keilah. Those who accept the doctrines of Christ were among the exiles from Judah. Saul figured he would win this battle. Why would anyone go among the non-believing Jews except to share in their apostate lifestyle?

Saul noted that David had shut himself inside a city with doors and bars. Once again, he has misunderstood the call of the Lord on David’s life, and so he prepared to go to battle against Keilah to besiege David and his men.

David, however (verse 9), learned of Saul’s evil plans. Therefore, David called Abiathar to bring the ephod. David, accepting the doctrines of Christ, is going to use the law itself to determine if Saul will come against him.

David asked two questions, “They will cause to shut me, masters Keilah, in his hand?” and “He will descend, Saul, according to which he heard, Your servant?” The Lord answered the second that Saul would come against him. Therefore, David repeated his first question, adding a note of handing him and his men in Saul’s hand.

The Lord answered that they would do so. The law itself prophesies that the Jews as a nation will not accept Christ until the end of this dispensation. That can be understood without referring to the New Testament. Passages such as Ezekiel 4 and Daniel 9, among many others, assures us.

David was aware of his own state before the Lord, but he was unwilling to risk his men. Therefore, in verse 13, it said that David and about six hundred men arose. The number in both Judges 18 and Judges 20 was seen to represent the duration of the church age.

This means that during the church age, the Jews may not be on the side of the Philistines, but they are not on the side of those who accept the doctrines of Christ either. They are, as seen elsewhere, A People who are not God’s people at this time.

Saul doesn’t need to wage war against them because they will be joining him in Sheol without Christ to get them out. Saul halted his expedition because David wasn’t there.

In verse 14, it said “And he sat, David, in the wilderness, in the strongholds, and he sat in the mount in ‘wilderness, Ziph’. And he sought him, Saul, all the days, and not He gave him, God, in his hand.”

A wilderness is a place of testing and closeness with God. The stronghold signifies a place of hunting. A mountain typologically signifies a large but centralized group of people. Ziph signifies an outflowing, as in pitch melting.

The whole verse points to the effects of the church age, where the church is flowing out, hunting for souls to save, while living in this land of testing and yet closeness to God.

Verse 14 speaks of an indeterminate time at which this takes place, and at no time did God give David into Saul’s hand. It reflects eternal security.

Verse 15 said David was in the wilderness of Ziph “in the Horesh-ward.” The word is used four times in the chapter, always with the locative h ending. The root of the word is karash, to scratch. That has many significations. The main idea of it, however, is that of opening something up, as in plowing, etching, or even conceiving in one’s mind.

Because of the complicated nature of the word, I would guess that it refers to those who hold to the doctrines of Christ. They seek out the word, plowing it to unearth mysteries, searching out Christ. That would perfectly explain why David was “in the Horesh-ward.”

The seemingly contradictory thought is explained by those who accept the doctrines of Christ always being in the word, seeking to uncover more. And for thousands of years, new insights continue to come out of the word, practically daily.

Understanding this, it noted in verse 16 that Jehonathan, the saved believer granted salvation by grace through faith, came to David the Horesh-ward. It is what believers are to do. There it said, “he seized his hand in God.” Again, this is just what believers are to do: strengthen those who accept the doctrines of Christ.

In verse 17, Jonathan said that his father would not find David and that David would be king over Israel, He Strives With God. That is exactly what was set to happen. However, he also said he would be second to David, something that will not happen. Saved believers during this dispensation will be taken out at the rapture.

Verse 18 noted the covenant that David and Jonathan cut. After that, David stayed in the Horesh-ward while Jehonathan returned to his house. There had to be a literal parting of the two recorded at some point. This is when it took place.

In verse 19, Ziphites ascended unto Saul the Gibeah-ward. It doesn’t say “the Ziphites.” Thus, it means some Ziphites. Heading toward Gibeah signifies those who have not arrived at Gibeah. They reflect those in the church who have not accepted the doctrines of Christ.

The location they gave concerning David is “in the Horesh-ward in ‘hill, the Hachilah’, which from ‘right, the wasteland’.” This speaks of pursuing Christ. The givah, hill, is the same meaning as Gibeah, with the same connection to Gabbatha.

The Hill the Hachilah, or Hill the Crimson, speaks of the judgment rendered at Gabbatha, the cross of Christ. Being from ‘right, the wasteland’ signifies Christ’s power over the desolation of sin and its consequences.

These Ziphites tell Saul to come down, and they will shut David in their hand for him. Considering where David is, that is an impossibility. But they are a bit dull concerning the matter.

Verses 21-24 were Saul’s directives and their compliance with them. Then the narrative went directly to a note concerning David being in the Wilderness of Maon to the right of the wasteland. In other words, David is in the Habitation of Christ’s power over the desolation of sin and its consequences.

The final section of this chapter deals with the Lord’s continuous care for those who hold to the doctrines of Christ.

Verse 25 noted Saul seeking David. David heard about it and descended to the crag in Wilderness Maon. The sela, rock, is used again and again to picture the Lord as the Provider, Protector, and Defender of His people.

In verse 26, Saul was on one side of the mount while David was on the other. Remember, a mountain, har, is synonymous with a large but centralized group of people. Being on opposite sides of the mount, it means they are on opposite sides of the belief system of the group of people with whom they are identified.

Saul represents man destined for Sheol. However, there are those who will remain in Sheol and those who are destined to be removed from there. The dividing line is faith in Jesus Christ.

While David was retreating from Saul, it noted that Saul was encircling him. At that decisive moment in verse 27, a messenger came to tell Saul about the Weakeners overspreading the land. This caused Saul to give up pursuing David.

What will happen after the rapture? The Weakeners will truly overspread the land on a global scale. With those of the true church gone, this is exactly what can be expected.

Because of this, the crag was called Crag, the Divisions. A division existed between Saul and David as a physical divider. That pictures the spiritual divide between those who hold to the doctrines of Christ, contrasted to the power of Sheol.

The division serving as a witness points to Sheol having no ability to keep those it receives who hold to the doctrines of Christ.

The final verse said that David ascended and sat in the strongholds of En Gedi, the Fountain of a Kid. A fountain is a permanent source of fresh water. As noted, the gedi, is from gadah, to cut off. It is what finishes a matter. It speaks of living in the presence of God with the eternal flow of His Spirit. Thus, sin and death have been permanently dealt with.

These things are what can be expected during the church age, culminating in its end. The chapter has been given to reveal it. We don’t have to fear Sheol. Even if we die before the coming of Christ, there is a division set between God’s people and the power of Sheol. He is that Division, and we can confidently trust Him.

The passage is another in a list of typologically presented passages intended to help us understand what is doctrinally right and proper. In seeing what God has tucked away in these lessons, we can refine our own thinking about what God is telling us in other passages that may be disputed in the New Testament.

Pay heed to the details! God is giving us this information for our benefit if we will just search it out. Above all, He is meticulously telling us that Jesus is the key to it all. Let us be diligent to tell others about Him as well. The world needs Jesus. Without him, there will be hell to pay.

Closing Verse: “As for God, His way is perfect;
The word of the Lord is proven;
He is a shield to all who trust in Him.” Psalm 18:30

Next Week: 1 Samuel 24.1-13 I’ll say it, and I’ll say it a-gain, even till it’s done… (For Reigning, You Will Reign, Part I) (51st 1 Samuel sermon)

The Lord has you exactly where He wants you. He has a good plan and purpose for you. He is the One who abases the haughty and exalts the humble. He regards the lowly, and the proud, He knows from afar. So yield yourself to Him, trust Him, and believe His word. In this, He will do great things for you and through you.

1 Samuel 23:16-29 (CG)

19And they ascended, Ziphites, unto Saul the Gibeah-ward, to say, “(Indeed) not David hiding himself with us in the strongholds in the Horesh-ward in ‘Hill, the Hachilah’ which from ‘right, the wasteland’?” 20And now to all longing your soul, the king, to descend, you must descend. And to us – cause to shut him in hand the king.

21And he said, Saul, “Blessed you to Yehovah, for you commiserated upon me.” 22You must walk, pray, you will cause to establish yet. And you must know, and you must see his place where it will be his foot – who he saw him there. For it said unto me conceiving, he will cause to conceive, he. 23And you must see, and you must know from all the hideouts where he will ‘secrete himself’ there. And you will retun unto me unto ‘being established’, and I will walk with you. And it will be, if he exists in the land, and I will ‘search’ him in all ‘thousands, Judah’.”

24And they arose, and they walked Ziph-ward to ‘faces, Saul’. And David, and his mortals, in ‘Wilderness, Maon’, in the wasteplain, unto ‘right, the wasteland’. 25And he walked, Saul, and his mortals to seek. And they caused to declare to David, and he descended – the crag. And he sat in ‘Wilderness, Maon’. And he heard, Saul, and he pursued after David – ‘Wilderness, Maon’. 26And he walked, Saul, from side, the mount, from this, and David and his mortals from side, the mount, from this. And he was, David, being hastened to walk from ‘faces, Saul’. And Saul, and his mortals, encircling unto David and unto his mortals, to manipulate them.

27And messenger, he came unto Saul, to say, “You must (surely) hurry, and you must (surely) walk. For they overspread, the Philistines, upon the land.” 28And he returned, Saul, from pursuing after David. And he walked to encounter – Philistines. Upon thus, they called to the place, the it, ‘Crag, the Divisions’. 29And he ascended, David, from there. And he sat in ‘strongholds, En Gedi’.

Verse 23 – Qeri: “and his mortals.”

 

1 Samuel 23:16-29 (NKJV)

16 Then Jonathan, Saul’s son, arose and went to David in the woods and strengthened his hand in God. 17 And he said to him, “Do not fear, for the hand of Saul my father shall not find you. You shall be king over Israel, and I shall be next to you. Even my father Saul knows that.” 18 So the two of them made a covenant before the Lord. And David stayed in the woods, and Jonathan went to his own house. 19 Then the Ziphites came up to Saul at Gibeah, saying, “Is David not hiding with us in strongholds in the woods, in the hill of Hachilah, which is on the south of Jeshimon? 20 Now therefore, O king, come down according to all the desire of your soul to come down; and our part shall be to deliver him into the king’s hand.”

21 And Saul said, “Blessed are you of the Lord, for you have compassion on me. 22 Please go and find out for sure, and see the place where his hideout is, and who has seen him there. For I am told he is very crafty. 23 See therefore, and take knowledge of all the lurking places where he hides; and come back to me with certainty, and I will go with you. And it shall be, if he is in the land, that I will search for him throughout all the clans of Judah.”

24 So they arose and went to Ziph before Saul. But David and his men were in the Wilderness of Maon, in the plain on the south of Jeshimon. 25 When Saul and his men went to seek him, they told David. Therefore he went down to the rock, and stayed in the Wilderness of Maon. And when Saul heard that, he pursued David in the Wilderness of Maon. 26 Then Saul went on one side of the mountain, and David and his men on the other side of the mountain. So David made haste to get away from Saul, for Saul and his men were encircling David and his men to take them.

27 But a messenger came to Saul, saying, “Hurry and come, for the Philistines have invaded the land!” 28 Therefore Saul returned from pursuing David, and went against the Philistines; so they called that place the Rock of Escape. 29 Then David went up from there and dwelt in strongholds at En Gedi.

Matthew 21:5

Sunday, 28 June 2026

“Tell the daughter of Zion,
‘Behold, your King is coming to you,
Lowly, and sitting on a donkey,
A colt, the foal of a donkey.’” Matthew 21:5

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at the “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen)

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“You say to the ‘daughter, Zion’,
‘You behold! The ‘King, yours’, He comes to you,
Benignant and having been upon-stepped upon a donkey,
Even upon ‘colt, son under-yoked’.’” (CG)

In the previous verse, it was noted that all of the things concerning the donkey were done to fulfill prophecy. The specific prophecy is from Zechariah 9:9, with an introductory note more closely aligned with Isaiah 62:11. That introductory note is, “You say to the ‘daughter, Zion’.”

The whole verse from Isaiah says –

“Indeed the LORD has proclaimed
To the end of the world:
‘Say to the daughter of Zion,
“Surely your salvation is coming;
Behold, His reward is with Him,
And His work before Him.”’” Isaiah 62:11

In Zechariah, the opening note reads –

“You must whirl, vehemently, ‘daughter, Zion’,
You must cause to acclaim, ‘daughter, Jerusalem’.” (CG)

With the introductory words given, the specific prophecy from Zechariah is cited, beginning with, “You behold! The ‘King, yours’, He comes to you.” In the Hebrew, the verb was in the imperfect aspect, “Behold, your King, He will come to you.” With the advent of Christ, there was no need to continue with that. Thus, Matthew’s words are present tense. Matthew continues, saying, “Benignant.”

The word, already seen twice in Matthew, signifies mild, such as a humble or gentle person. The word in Hebrew signifies depressed in mind or circumstances. Thus, it can signify poor, afflicted, needy, humble, etc. The context will provide the meaning. Matthew continues with, “and having been upon-stepped upon a donkey.”

This is a new word, epibainó, coming from epi, upon, and basis, a step. Thus, it literally means to “upon-step.” A donkey is stepped over in order to mount. The word exactingly describes the action. As noted in a previous commentary, the general word onus, donkey, is more specific in the Hebrew. There it is a khamor, a male donkey. Matthew finishes the citation, saying, “Even upon ‘colt, son under-yoked’.”

Another new word is seen here, hupozugion. It is from hupo, under, and zugos, a yoke. Thus, under-yoked is an exact translation. Also noted previously was that the colt in Hebrew is the word ayir, an animal just being broken in. It is from ur, to awaken. One can sense the connection as the colt is “awakened” to its new role as a bearer of burdens.

Also in the Hebrew is the athon, a female donkey, known as a jenny. That word signifies permanence. Taking these animals with the Hebrew and Greek meanings, one can more fully understand the significance of the intent of Jesus’ actions.

The khamor, jack, gives the sense of redness. In Old Testament typology, it signifies humanity derived from Adam, the red man taken from the red soil (adam is from adom, to be red). However, this donkey had never been yoked, a picture of the burden of sin, despite being the son of a jenny that was under a yoke. The jenny is from athon, enduring or perennial. The enduring burden of sin remained unbroken in man until the coming of Christ.

Jesus riding on this previously unyoked donkey is telling us that He is the Messiah, unstained by Adam’s sin, despite having come from the line of humanity. How is that possible? Because His father is God, not a human male. As sin passes from father to child, and because Jesus’ Father is God, no sin passed to Him.

A new yoke is now available for humanity. The burden of law was coming to an end. This is something being pictured in Jesus’ fulfillment of this Old Testament prophecy. Placing the two verses side by side, a comparison can be made between the future prophecy and the fulfilled prophecy –

“You must whirl, vehemently, ‘daughter, Zion’,
You must cause to acclaim, ‘daughter, Jerusalem’,
Behold, your King, He will come to you,
Righteous and being saved, He,
Lowly, and riding upon jack, and colt ‘son, jenny’.”

“You say to the ‘daughter, Zion’,
‘You behold! The ‘King, yours’, He comes to you,
Benignant and having been upon-stepped upon a donkey,
Even upon ‘colt, son under-yoked’.’”

The words of Jesus from earlier in Matthew explain the typology –

“Come to Me, all you who labor and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest. 29 Take My yoke upon you and learn from Me, for I am gentle and lowly in heart, and you will find rest for your souls. 30 For My yoke is easy and My burden is light.” Matthew 11:28-30

Life application: Pay attention to the details. Great nuggets of treasure are to be found in God’s majestic word.

Lord God, thank You for the unlimited amount of treasure found in Your superior, magnificent word. You have given us one life to live before we stand before You. May we diligently strive to know You and what You have done more fully as we read and consider this beautiful word. Amen.

Matthew 21:4

Saturday, 27 June 2026

All this was done that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the prophet, saying: Matthew 21:4

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at the “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen)

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“This also, all, it having become that it should be fulfilled, the ‘having been spoken through the prophet,’ saying.” (CG)

In the previous verse, Jesus gave instructions to the disciples concerning what to say if anyone challenged them while untying the donkeys. Matthew next shows that what occurred took place in accordance with prophecy, saying, “This, also, it having become.”

As in Matthew 1:22 concerning the fulfillment of prophecy, Matthew uses a perfect participle to indicate that what had happened wasn’t just an event that took place, but that it has a resulting ongoing state.

Matthew indicates that the prophecy was intended to be fulfilled by the Messiah and that, in fact, it occurred. His fulfillment of the prophecy is the final and forever fulfillment of it. That is seen in his next words, “that it should be fulfilled.”

In other words, there was nothing random or unplanned about the event. Rather, the prophecy had been made, and Jesus’ directions to these men brought about the fulfillment of what had been recorded in Scripture. Of this, the Pulpit Commentary states, “Not only the will of the Father, but the words of Scripture, had delineated the life of Christ, and in obeying that will he purposed to show that he fulfilled the prophecies which spake of him.”

This is correct as long as one understands that Scripture is the will of the Father. There should be no separation of thought between the two, as they are harmoniously realized in the life and actions of Christ. And what has been fulfilled is “the ‘having been spoken through the prophet,’ saying…”

Prophecy is inspired by God. The writing prophet is the instrument through whom the prophecy is given, the scroll receives the words that flow from divine revelation expressed through the prophet’s mind to the quill and ink that writes out the words. In the case of the life of Christ, everything was anticipating His coming to fulfill the divine will that had become the written will of recorded prophecy.

Life application: Understanding the way in which prophecy is received is important. God did not write the words of Scripture on the scrolls maintained by Israel. Rather, God is Spirit, having no parts and not working within the stream of time. He created time and is outside of it.

What God does is to inspire a person through a process that uses the person’s own personal characteristics and circumstances. Thus, the prophet is not a tool, like a pen, that is wielded apart from any meaningful input. Rather, for example, the prophet’s personal writing style will come through.

Paul’s handwriting was clearly distinguishable, as he himself notes in Galatians 6:11. The prophet’s experiences, emotions, etc., are revealed in what he writes. And yet, what is written is clearly the word of God, as is seen in Matthew 21:4 (and elsewhere throughout Scripture).

God’s will, being expressed in the writings, will come to pass. Nothing can thwart it as the moment set by Him approaches. Thus, the writings in Scripture are a testimony to what God has determined. They stand as a witness that God’s will is, in fact, being worked out in the world.

This is why we can confidently claim what the Bible says as our own surety in doctrine and in hope. This is not a claim as if saying, “God’s word says someone can be rich and thus I claim wealth.” That is a misuse of the word.

Rather, our claim is based on the reality behind the substance of the words. “God’s word says that we are saved by grace through faith with nothing added. I stand on that. I believe it and have 100% confidence that it is true.”

This is why it is so important to know what the Bible actually says, and in its proper context. If God’s word says that Israel will be brought into the New Covenant as a nation and that they will be the head of the nations during the millennium, we should confidently avow that it will be so.

Understanding what Scripture says about the future and then standing on it is a demonstration of faith in the Lord’s sovereignty over all things. When we waffle in our convictions about a doctrinal matter, we demonstrate either a lack of faith in what is said or a lack of surety in our understanding of what is said. Either way, we should get that corrected. God’s word is written, it is authoritative, and it will come to pass. Trust this.

Lord God Almighty, help us to have surety and confidence in Your word. It is written, it makes claims and proclamations, and we should understand them and have trust in them. May our walk with You be established and grounded in Your precious word. Amen.

Matthew 21:3

Friday, 26 June 2026

And if anyone says anything to you, you shall say, ‘The Lord has need of them,’ and immediately he will send them.” Matthew 21:3

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at the “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen)

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“And if anyone, to you, he says anything, you will say that the Lord, these – need, He has. Immediately, also, he will send them.” (CG)

In the previous verse, Jesus instructed two of His disciples to go to the village opposite them, where they would find a donkey tied and with her colt. He instructed them to loosen them and bring them to Him. He continues this instruction, saying, “And if anyone, to you, he says anything.”

It is something one would expect. Imagine being told to go to the nearest village, and when you find a silver Toyota Corolla parked by a bank, you are to get in it and bring it back to your boss. You would expect someone to say something as you got into it. This is the same general sense.

Donkeys were personal property. They were used for transportation, and they were generally parked somewhere accessible for the owner to load them up with goods or himself and move along.

Therefore, one would expect to be challenged when two unknown people came up and started untying donkeys that didn’t belong to them. If such were the case, Jesus continues, “you will say that the Lord, these – need, He has.”

The meaning of “Lord” is not easily discernible. The word can mean the Lord, Yehovah. If this is the intent, it does not mean that the disciples thought Jesus was Yehovah. That will only be understood later. However, it could be a way of saying, “Yehovah has a need for this,” just as we might say, “I am doing this on behalf of God.”

It could also mean Lord in the sense of the Messiah. The word “Lord” is preceded by the definite article. It doesn’t say “our Lord,” but “the Lord.” Lazarus has been raised. People at this time, who lived in this area, would have come to believe Jesus was the promised Messiah. The events of the triumphal entry certainly indicate this. That is seen in John’s gospel –

“Then many of the Jews who had come to Mary, and had seen the things Jesus did, believed in Him. 46 But some of them went away to the Pharisees and told them the things Jesus did. 47 Then the chief priests and the Pharisees gathered a council and said, “What shall we do? For this Man works many signs. 48 If we let Him alone like this, everyone will believe in Him, and the Romans will come and take away both our place and nation.” John 11:45-48

The term Lord can also mean “master” when spoken by any given person. Thus, the disciples could have been saying, “Our master needs it, and it will be returned in due time.” The second option seems the most likely.

They are in the area where Lazarus was raised. Jesus had many disciples who thought He was the Messiah. The local people were already believing this as well. And so, saying the Lord needed the donkey would be sufficiently understood that the owners would agree. This is debated, and the true intent can only be speculated. No matter which is correct, Jesus confidently says, “Immediately, also, he will send them.”

This almost gives the sense that Jesus had talked with these people and told them that in a day (or a few days), He would send men to come borrow their donkeys. If so, then it would resolve any hint of questioning, apart from the initial encounter. “Oh, you are Jesus’ disciples. Yes, go ahead and take them.”

Life application: As you can see, any of the three options for what is occurring is possible. The word kurios, lord, is used to describe Yehovah in Matthew 1:20. In Matthew 20, the blind men called out to Jesus, calling Him Lord while asking for healing. They probably meant “Lord” as in Messiah.

In 1 Peter 3:6, the term is used of Abraham being called lord by Sarah. He is the master of the house. One can see that care needs to be taken when trying to determine who is being referred to when such a word is used.

If there is this much difficulty over a single word, it shows us that we should be attentive to what is going on in Scripture, considering all possibilities. Reading commentaries can help clarify such difficulties, or they can further muddy the waters, especially when two sound theologians come to differing conclusions.

As the proverb says –

“The first one to plead his cause seems right,
Until his neighbor comes and examines him.” Proverb 18:17

Don’t just jump on the first explanation of a matter without considering that there may be better options to explain it.

O God, Your word is big and often complicated, but it is not impossible to understand. It gives us many challenges to consider and many options we can explore before grasping what is being said. What a treat this is for us! Thank You for Your wonderful word. Amen.

Matthew 21:2

Thursday, 25 June 2026

saying to them, “Go into the village opposite you, and immediately you will find a donkey tied, and a colt with her. Loose them and bring them to Me. Matthew 21:2

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at the “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen)

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“Saying to them, ‘You go into the village, the ‘opposite you,’ and immediately you will find ‘donkey, having been bound’, and ‘colt, with her’. Having loosened, you bring to Me.’” (CG)

The previous verse noted that Jesus and those with Him drew near to Jerusalem, coming to Bethphage by the Mount of Olives. At this point, it needs to be understood that Matthew is giving details categorically, not necessarily chronologically.

John’s gospel includes the death and the raising of Lazarus, coming before the triumphal entry. Therefore, there is time and there are events between leaving Jericho and the events that will take place that occurred while Jesus was in this area. Understanding that, when there, He sent two disciples. Matthew next records, “Saying to them, ‘You go into the village, the ‘opposite you,’.’”

The village is not identified. Some argue it is Bethphage, the city just mentioned in verse 1. Others, because of the term “opposite you,” think it refers to Bethany. John Gill, with lively defense, suggests it is Nob, a city of the priests mentioned first in 1 Samuel 21.

Regardless, because the name is not given, it has purposefully been left out to keep the narrative typology untarnished. Once in this city, Jesus continues, saying, “and immediately you will find ‘donkey, having been bound’.”

The onus, donkey, is introduced here. It is a primary word. Donkeys are found in both testaments. The Topical Lexicon says it is “a symbol of humble service, patient endurance, and covenant blessing.” This word is found five times in the New Testament in Matthew, Luke, and John. Although onomastic scholars don’t generally tie this word onus to our modern word onus, signifying a burden, it is a likely candidate for its etymological root.

This is a female donkey, a jenny. That makes her comparable to the Hebrew word athon, coming from ethan, permanence or enduring. As such, the idea of “patient endurance” noted above is written right into the Hebrew naming of this animal. Jesus continues with, “and ‘colt, with her’.”

Another new word, pólos, a foal or filly, especially a young donkey, is seen. This word is found twelve times, only in all four gospels. In Zechariah 9:9, it says of the coming Messiah that He would be “riding upon jack (khamor, a male donkey), and upon colt (ayir), ‘son, jenny’.”

The words are telling a story. The khamor, jack, is derived from khamar, to boil (but with the sense of redness as in a reddened boiling pot). The word ayir, colt, is from ur, to awaken. Thus, it is a colt that is just being broken. The athon, jenny signifies permanence.

This will be further explored when we come to verses 4 and 5, where the prophecy is explicitly cited. Of these two donkeys, it next says, “Having loosened, you bring to Me.”

Jesus is specifically directing what will be the fulfillment of this ancient prophecy. Matthew is the only one who notes two donkeys. The other gospels focus only on the one Jesus will ride on. This makes sense because Matthew’s writing is directed most specifically to the Jewish people, presenting Jesus as the King of the Jews and the fulfillment of their Scriptures.

The colt would follow its mother as she led it along in this procession.

Life application: An ancient analysis of these verses from Jerome looks to the mother donkey as representing the Jewish people who had, for many hundreds of years, borne the yoke of the Law of Moses. He points to the colt as representing the Gentiles, being as yet unbroken until the time Christ sat on it.

Considering the roots of the words presented above, does that fit with what is being said and what fits into the dispensational model? Think about this as the verses continue to be evaluated. God is not just telling us surface stories of what actually took place. Rather, He is giving us deeper information in His word.

What is said and anticipated in the Old Testament through typology is confirmed in the New. The physical reality of the past is teaching us spiritual truths concerning God, the coming of Christ, the effects of His work, etc.

Many scholars call this “mystical,” as if it were a fanciful notion of made-up stuff. Some dismiss typology altogether, as if it has no use in biblical interpretation. What is wrong with such evaluations? The answer is found explicitly right in the New Testament, in passages such as 1 Corinthians 10:1-6 and Galatians 4:21-31.

In those passages, Paul says that the stories of the Old Testament were examples of Christ being presented through typology. He even says it indirectly in verses such as in 1 Corinthians 5 –

“Your glorying is not good. Do you not know that a little leaven leavens the whole lump? Therefore purge out the old leaven, that you may be a new lump, since you truly are unleavened. For indeed Christ, our Passover, was sacrificed for us. Therefore let us keep the feast, not with old leaven, nor with the leaven of malice and wickedness, but with the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth.” 1 Corinthians 5:6-8

Paul makes a one-to-one comparison between the Passover and the Feast of Unleavened Bread to Christ and our life in Christ. God is working through types and pictures in the Old Testament, conveying information about what lies ahead. Every word and every detail of these ancient passages is given to point us to spiritual truths.

Be sure to think about what you are reading in the Old Testament. It is all pointing to Jesus, what He has done, and how it applies to us. Typology is how God is doing this.

Lord God, thank You for how Your wisdom is on display in ancient passages of Your word that seem to make no sense… until we look for Jesus. Then they fall into place, making all the sense in the world. What a treat it is for us to search out our Lord in them! Amen.