Matthew 4:12-16 (A Great Light)

Artwork by Douglas Kallerson

Matthew 4:12-16
A Great Light

Now when Jesus heard that John had been put in prison, He departed to Galilee. 13 And leaving Nazareth, He came and dwelt in Capernaum, which is by the sea, in the regions of Zebulun and Naphtali, 14 that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by Isaiah the prophet, saying:
15 “The land of Zebulun and the land of Naphtali,
By the way of the sea, beyond the Jordan,
Galilee of the Gentiles:
16 The people who sat in darkness have seen a great light,
And upon those who sat in the region and shadow of death
Light has dawned.”

(Typed 2 December 2024) The sermon text seems to have little to do with the birth of Jesus. We’ll discover that it does later. But even the surface text is comprised of words that wonderfully express the contrast between what the Bible considers good and bad.

The clauses in verse 16 compare darkness to the shadow of death. Both clauses provide light as a contrast. Elsewhere in the Bible, darkness is seen to be a metaphor for a spiritually dead state because of sin. Light, however, is given as a state of perfection, holiness, moral purity, and life.

At times, when someone doesn’t have the truth, he is said to be without light. To have light shine is to reveal the truth. The Apostle Paul lacked the truth, but then suddenly, light shone around him from heaven in such dazzling brightness that it blinded him.

His sin-stained life was literally stunned by the overwhelming brightness of the perfection of God in Christ, the risen Jesus. The contrast between the two highlights how far away from the truth Paul was.

With his conversion, Paul saw the true Light for who He is. He became the apostle to the Gentiles to lead them from the same state of spiritual darkness that he suffered under. Simeon beheld the Child Jesus and he prophesied this would take place…

Text Verse: “Lord, now You are letting Your servant depart in peace,
According to Your word;
30 For my eyes have seen Your salvation
31 Which You have prepared before the face of all peoples,
32 A light to bring revelation to the Gentiles,
And the glory of Your people Israel.” Luke 2:29-32

Simeon’s words reflect the tenor of Isaiah 49:6 where Isaiah spoke of the restoration of Israel and the light of the Messiah being provided to the Gentiles. As for the law, it is not considered a light, except as it is included in the greater body of writings which comprise the Lord’s word.

If the law itself was a sufficient light, there would have been no need for a Messiah. That should clue people into the purpose of the law, but it escapes many. Thus, they become mired in the same darkness in which Paul found himself.

Rather, the word of God in both testaments refers to the Lord as Light or being the Source of light. For example, Psalm 36:9 says of the Lord, “in Your light we see light.” It is a way of saying that life, something associated with light, is found in the light of the Lord.

As we contemplate the significance of Christmas, we should consider more than a Baby lying in a manger, but what that Baby signifies. Light is just one aspect of His superlative greatness. It is the aspect that we will consider today concerning the Lord Jesus, the Child of Christmas. He is the great Light who has come to illuminate the world with the splendor of God.

This truth is carefully and exactingly highlighted in His superior word. And so, let us turn to that precious word once again, and… May God speak to us through His word today, and may His glorious name ever be praised.

~~~~~~~

The incarnation of Jesus Christ came about at this time of year, right around the time known in John 10:22 as the Feast of Dedication. This can be deduced from an exacting timeline given in the Bible, but it must be elicited from passages in both Testaments.

This timeline shows us that Jesus was born in the September/October timeframe, corresponding to the Feast of Acclamation recorded in Leviticus 23:23-25. Backing up from this time, the number of days for human gestation brings one to the end of December in our modern calendar.

Thus, Jesus’ incarnation was at this time of the year, corresponding to the Feast of Dedication, also known as the Festival of Lights. The Light of the World entered into the darkness, preparing to illuminate the way for man.

This pattern is seen time and again in Scripture. The Bible says in 1 John 1:5, “that God is light and in Him is no darkness at all.” In Genesis, on the first day of creation, it says –

“The earth was without form, and void; and darkness was on the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God was hovering over the face of the waters.
Then God said, ‘Let there be light’; and there was light.” Genesis 1:2, 3

There was darkness, and then there was light. But if God is light, then that means He purposefully created with darkness so that afterward, the light could be revealed. He was setting a pattern for us to understand what would come later, meaning things coming from outside to accomplish something inside, as well as light overcoming darkness.

Adam was created outside of Eden and was only afterward placed in the Garden. Adam is never equated to light, but through his misdeeds came the pall of spiritual darkness.

Abraham was called, and only then did he enter into the land of Canaan. Paul says –

“And the Scripture, foreseeing that God would justify the Gentiles by faith, preached the gospel to Abraham beforehand, saying, ‘In you all the nations shall be blessed.’ So then those who are of faith are blessed with believing Abraham.” Galatians 3:8, 9

In Canaan, Abraham received the gospel, meaning the doctrine of salvation by grace through faith. And what does Paul equate the gospel to? The answer is found in 2 Corinthians 4:4, where he refers to “the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ.” Light had come into Cannan.

Jacob was called into Canaan from Padan Aram, being renamed Israel as he entered the land. Israel was to be the bearer of light, meaning the hope of God in Christ.

From there, Israel, the nation, was birthed in Egypt (see Exodus 4:22), and only then were they brought into Canaan. The land of spiritual darkness was being prepared, through Israel’s time of darkness under the law, to receive that light, a light that would be emitted to the whole world –

“And you, child, will be called the prophet of the Highest;
For you will go before the face of the Lord to prepare His ways,
77 To give knowledge of salvation to His people
By the remission of their sins,
78 Through the tender mercy of our God,
With which the Dayspring from on high has visited us;
79 To give light to those who sit in darkness and the shadow of death,
To guide our feet into the way of peace.” Luke 1:76-79

The Light of God in Christ, Jesus, came from outside of this darkened earthly realm and entered into it. The patterns of the past were given to show what God would do. From that springboard, a new direction is given, but following the same pattern.

Believers are called outside of the New Jerusalem in anticipation of being brought in. But Paul says that we are as lights in the world in Philippians 2:15, meaning we were lights brought forth in the darkness. The light of God in Christ continues through His people as they bring the light of the gospel to this world darkened from sin.

Understanding these things, we can more fully appreciate the verses of our sermon text…

12 Now when Jesus heard that John had been put in prison, He departed to Galilee.

Akousas de ho Iēsous hoti Iōannēs paredothē anechōrēsen eis tēn Galilaian – “And Jesus, having heard that John – he was surrendered, He withdrew into the Galilee.” These words follow directly after Jesus was tempted by Satan in the wilderness. Unlike Adam, who had failed and succumbed to the devil’s testing, Jesus had prevailed over it. With these temptations behind Him, it next says, “And Jesus.”

Some manuscripts, and thus some translations, do not include the name Jesus here. For example, the Berean Literal Bible says, “And having heard that John had been arrested, He withdrew into Galilee.”

As always, there are those who claim one text or another is correct, but the context is completely understandable either way. Jesus is the Subject of the words. Of Him, it next says, “having heard that John – he was surrendered.”

The word is paradidómi. It gives the sense of giving or turning over. Thus, it can be putting someone in prison, entrusting someone with goods, betraying someone, etc. The word simply means to surrender.

John was arrested or surrendered to the prison. This event is not necessarily chronological. Matthew presents things in more of a categorical manner. Of this, Charles Ellicott notes the following –

“Between the 11th and 12th verses there is a great break, and it is well to remember what passed in the interval: (1) the return to the Baptist, and the call of the six disciples (John 1:29-51); (2) the marriage at Cana, and the visit to Capernaum (John 2:1-12); (3) the cleansing of the Temple; the interview with Nicodemus, and the last testimony of the Baptist (John 2:13 to John 3:36). At this stage comes in the imprisonment of John (mentioned here, but not narrated till 14:3-5) and the consequent journey through Samaria to Galilee (John 4:1-42). The verse now before us may be noted as implying a ministry in Judæa, which for some reason the writer does not narrate.” Charles Ellicott

Jesus continued His ministry. Eventually, He heard of John’s imprisonment, and so it says, “He withdrew.”

The word is anachóreó. Strong notes that the “underlying idea perhaps is of taking refuge from danger or of going into retirement.” In other words, Jesus is withdrawing to the Galilee. This would keep His ministry from overexposure in Judea until the right time for His ministry to come to its completion. It next says, “into the Galilee.”

Most translations do not include the article. Rather, they simply say Galilee. But even in the Hebrew, the location is normally preceded by the definite article. It is a region, the Galilee, first noted in Joshua 20:7. It signifies a circle or circuit. In 1 Kings 9:11, it included twenty cities that were given to Hiram, king of Tyre, by Solomon.

Because it designates an area, “the Circle,” inclusion of the article more appropriately defines the area when it is included in the Greek text.

Of this verse, the Expositor’s Greek Testament says, “In a few rapid strokes the evangelist describes the opening of the Messianic work of Jesus in Galilee. He has in view the great Sermon on the Mount, and the group of wonderful deeds he means thereafter to report, and he gives first a summary description of Christ’s varied activities by way of introduction.”

This statement is somewhat misleading. As noted above in Ellicott’s commentary, Jesus carried out His ministry for some amount of time in the area of Judea. However, Matthew’s focus is more categorical than chronological. It is good to remember this when evaluating the gospels in order to avoid theological misunderstandings.

At times, the actual chronology of when Jesus said things can be difficult to determine because of how the gospels present their narratives. Therefore, it is better to have a side-by-side comparison of the content of the gospels before jumping to erroneous conclusions.

With such a side-by-side comparison, the events of Jesus’ life make a much fuller and more understandable picture from a chronological perspective. Such comparisons can be found right online, so when you are trying to sort things out, do a search, and you can explore things in that manner. With that noted, Matthew continues with…

13 And leaving Nazareth, He came and dwelt in Capernaum, which is by the sea, in the regions of Zebulun and Naphtali,

kai katalipōn tēn Nazara elthōn katōkēsen eis Kapernaoum tēn parathalassian en horiois Zaboulōn kai Nephthalim – “And having disregarded Nazareth, having come, He dwelt in Capernaum, the seaside, in borders Zebulun and Naphtali.” After Jesus heard that John was arrested, He withdrew to the Galilee. The narrative continues with, “And having disregarded Nazareth.”

The Greek spelling of Nazareth here is Nazara. It is only spelled this way here and in Luke 4:16 when the people of the town heard Him speak, were offended by His words, and tried to cast Him off a cliff, rejecting Him and His ministry.

Matthew speaks of a visit to Nazareth in Matthew 13, which seems to parallel Luke’s account. This identical spelling between the two is a clue that the two accounts are, in fact, referring to the same event.

The meaning of the name Nazareth is highly debated. Most Lexicons and Concordances admit its origin is unknown. Scholars think it is likely the origin comes from the Hebrew word netser, a branch, or nazar, to consecrate oneself.

From there, Old Testament references to these words are used to force meaning into the text to explain Matthew’s words that say, “that [hoti] a Nazarene He will be called” (Matthew 2:23). However, this is unnecessary.

Matthew wasn’t quoting Scripture as translations imply by using quotation marks, rather, he was making a point about the writings of Old Testament prophets, such as Isaiah 9:2. Isaiah is saying the light is Christ, and being called a Nazarene is a fulfillment of this prophecy.

For example, if a prophecy noted someone would be a famous surfer in Sarasota, and he was actually living on Siesta Key, they may say, “He will be called a Siesta Surfer.” As Siesta Key is a part of Sarasota, the prophecy would make complete sense to those who understood it.

This explains why hoti, that, is included in Matthew’s words. If he was citing a prophecy, the word would not be needed. But it is an explanatory pronoun. If Joseph had moved to Tiberius instead of Nazareth, the words of Matthew would still speak of the fulfillment of the words of the prophets. For example –

“…that it should be fulfilled having been spoken through the prophets, that a Tiberian He will be called.”

With this understanding, and with no need to force meaning into the name Nazareth, Abarim derives it from a verbal form of zara, to scatter. This form is used several times in the Old Testament, such as in Numbers 5, where it says v’nizr’ah zara – “And scattered seed.” Thus, they translate Nazareth as Scattered or Sown.

As for Jesus’ movement as recorded in this verse, some people think there were two visits to Nazareth, allowing Him to now leave the city. Others think the visit recorded in Luke 4, Mark 6, and Matthew 13 each refer to the same visit.

As noted, Matthew is not necessarily presenting a chronological narrative, so it is likely all of the visits are the same. Despite this, pretty much every translation of Matthew 4:12 says “left,” “leaving,” “having left,” etc., as if He was there and then departed from Nazareth.

The word, however, is kataleipó. The word means “to leave down.” Thus, it signifies to abandon, forsake, neglect, leave, etc. Here in Matthew 4, it probably means “passed by.”

In other words, Jesus was in Nazareth, as recorded in Matthew 2:23. It is where He grew up. Matthew 3:13 notes that Jesus came from the Galilee to John. One would assume that means He left Nazareth, which is in the Galilee, and went to John to begin His ministry.

Now that He is returning to the Galilee (4:12), one would expect Him to return to Nazareth. Instead, He passes by, or disregards, Nazareth, forsaking it as His base and dwells in Capernaum instead. The word is used this way in Acts 21:3 –

“And having sighted Cyprus, and having disregarded it on the left, we sailed to Syria and landed at Tyre. For there the ship was to be unloading the cargo” (CG).

Properly translating the word in this manner resolves the difficulty presented by all translations. Understanding this, it next says, “having come, He dwelt in Capernaum.”

The name is derived from the Hebrew word kaphar, a village, and Nakhum, the Hebrew name of the prophet Nahum. His name comes from nakham, to sigh, meaning to breathe strongly. As such, it is a word signifying to console, comfort, reconsider, etc. Each case is determined by the context.

Thus, his name means something like Compassion, Comfort, or Consolation. Hence, the name of the location is Village of Compassion or something similar. As the base for Jesus’ ministry, it is a beautiful parallel to Him and His work. Of the location, it next says, “the seaside.”

The word is found only here in Scripture, parathalassios. It is derived from para, beside or by the side of, and thalassa, sea. Thus, “seaside” is a literal translation. Of this location, Wikipedia says –

“…a fishing village established during the time of the Hasmoneans, located on the northern shore of the Sea of Galilee. It had a population of about 1,500 in the 1st century AD. Archaeological excavations have revealed two ancient synagogues built one over the other. A house turned into a church by the Byzantines is held by Christian tradition to have been the home of Saint Peter.

The village was inhabited continuously from the 2nd century BC to the 11th century AD, when it was abandoned sometime before the First Crusade. This includes the re-establishment of the village northeast of the earlier location in c. 700, during the Early Islamic period.”

It was rediscovered in 1838 but not identified as the same location until later. Of this location, it next says, “in borders Zebulun and Naphtali.”

Zebulun means Glorious Dwelling Place. Naphtali means My Twistings or My Wrestlings. As will be seen, this move to Capernaum in this particular area of inheritance within the tribes of Israel is made by Jesus to fulfill prophecy.

Before going on, it should be noted that because of the way translations are made, it becomes almost a herd mentality to continue to translate things the same as everyone else. Otherwise, a variation by one translation may seem completely out of place and might even be a source of derision.

But if Jesus only made one trip to Nazareth, there must be an explanation as to why He didn’t actually go to Nazareth and then depart from there in Matthew 4. The word used to explain this, when properly translated, provides that explanation.

It is best not to get stuck in the herd mentality but to go where the narrative actually leads. In Matthew 19:5, the same word as used here in Matthew 4:13 is used when citing Genesis 2:24. A man will depart, kataleipó, from his father and mother and be united to his wife.

This does not mean that he has to physically depart from them. In fact, throughout history, such has not been the case. Rather, a man is to depart from them in the sense of them being his top priority. His primary allegiance to them is disregarded for the sake of his wife. His duties to her become the main priority.

As a life lesson, never stop considering what the word is telling you. Don’t reject anything off hand when it may be correct, but also don’t be duped by those who claim to have new or secret knowledge that nobody else has.

Rather, take everything with a grain of salt until you have personally checked things out. This is wise. It is the prudent way of avoiding many pitfalls in your theology and in your walk with the Lord.

14 that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by Isaiah the prophet, saying:

hina plērōthē to rhēthen dia Ēsaiou tou prophētou legontos – “That it might be fulfilled, the ‘having been spoken’ through Isaiah the prophet, saying…” Matthew next begins with, “That it might be fulfilled.”

In other words, the movement of Jesus to Capernaum in the regions of these two tribes of Israel was actually a fulfillment of prophecy in Scripture. Concerning where the prophecy is, Matthew tells us with the words, “the ‘having been spoken’ through Isaiah the prophet, saying.”

Some say Nazareth is a town located within Naphtali. However, some place it in the tribe of Zebulun. The ancient borders are not completely known. Either way, it is rather certain that Capernaum was located in the territorial allotment of Naphtali. Between the two places He lived, the fulfillment of Isaiah’s words, as will next be described, is certainly realized in Jesus’ life and ministry.

There are many literary styles in Scripture, including prophecy. Matthew claimed that Isaiah prophesied these things. One proof that God’s hand is behind the word is prophecy.

Things are stated by Him, and then they come to pass. Many prophecies have been fulfilled. Others are in an ongoing process of being fulfilled (such as God’s promises to keep Israel as a people). And others are yet future to us today.

Because of the innumerable prophecies that have already been fulfilled, we can be sure of several things:

The word is reliable. God has spoken, and what He says faithfully comes to pass. Thus, it proves that He is fully in charge of the future as it unfolds.

Jesus is the Messiah. God promised a Messiah. He has given prophecies in His word that tell when He would come, what would be the situation with Israel at His coming (and afterward), what family He would descend from, what His birth would be like, the things the Messiah would do, etc. Only Jesus qualifies concerning the fulfillment of these prophecies. Also, no person can ever fulfill them in the future based on the way God has arranged things.

Past performance assures us of future results. Because the word is trustworthy in the fulfillment of prophecy, we can be certain that those things which have not yet been fulfilled will be as well. And this isn’t just true with exacting prophecies but also with general and specific promises.

In the word, we are told that there will be a rapture. We can rest in that promise, being assured that it will come to pass. We are told that those in Christ who have died before us will be raised to eternal life. We should not worry one iota that it might not happen. God has promised us eternal life in a state we cannot yet understand. One without pain, fear, or death.

God’s past performance is a reliable testimony that His promises about the future for His people will be realized.

Do not fret, fear, or be uneasy about where life is taking you. Rest in the truth that God’s word will stand. Jesus has prevailed, and we will, too. Hold fast to this as the world around us continues to spin out of control. It really isn’t out of control at all.

God is allowing man to take the course he chooses until the time when He will set things straight. With those things to reassure us, we continue with Matthew’s words which cite the prophecy of Isaiah…

15 “The land of Zebulun and the land of Naphtali,
By the way of the sea, beyond the Jordan,
Galilee of the Gentiles:

Gē Zaboulōn kai gē Nephthalim hodon thalassēs peran tou Iordanou Galilaia tōn ethnōn

“Land Zebulun and land Naphtali,
Way of the sea, beyond the Jordan –
Galilee of the Gentiles.”

These words are the specific words of prophecy by Isaiah, which begin with, “Land Zebulun and land Naphtali.”

The words come from Isaiah 9, the first seven verses of which are filled with descriptions of the coming Messiah. Matthew’s citation is not directly from the Hebrew or the Greek. Rather, it appears that he was writing from memory and giving the substance of the idea.

Isaiah’s words are directed to the area of two tribes that sat north in the land of Israel. Naphtali extended to the northern border of Canaan. Its eastern border rested along the Jordan and the Sea of Galilee. Zebulun’s border ran next to Naphtali in approximately its southwest area. Isaiah’s words are addressed to this particular area, next noting, “Way of the sea.”

The sea is speaking of the Sea of Galilee. There is a route that leads to these areas by going around the sea, but so close to the sea that it is considered a sea highway. The next words of Isaiah, “beyond the Jordan,” are usually ignored or completely misunderstood.

The word is peran. It means over, on the other side, beyond, etc. It answers to the Hebrew noun ever, the region across or beyond. Both give the sense of a location that is opposite to the point of reference. However, Naphtali and Zebulun are within the borders of Canaan. Therefore, it seems like the thought is erroneous.

Why would a prophecy about these two tribal inheritances be given as if from across the Jordan when Isaiah was in Jerusalem on the west side of the Jordan?

Because of this, the words are ignored at times. Some say that they are speaking of the two areas as a base for Jesus’ evangelism on the other side of the Jordan (something not indicated by the words of Isaiah). Others will note it means something like what Albert Barnes says –

“This does not mean to the east of Jordan, as the phrase sometimes denotes, but rather in the vicinity of the Jordan, or perhaps in the vicinity of the sources of the Jordan.” Albert Barnes

Such a notion is incorrect. The word means the other side, beyond, etc., and it is used here as if from the area east of the Jordan. It does not mean “in the vicinity of.” The answer comes from looking at the fuller words of Isaiah in the surrounding context. Isaiah 8:1-10 refers to the invasion of Assyria. For example –

“Then I went to the prophetess, and she conceived and bore a son. Then the Lord said to me, ‘Call his name Maher-Shalal-Hash-Baz; for before the child shall have knowledge to cry “My father” and “My mother,” the riches of Damascus and the spoil of Samaria will be taken away before the king of Assyria.’” Isaiah 8:3, 4

The rest of Isaiah 8 will first describe this invasion, and then it will describe the state of the people within the land, ending with the words, “Then they will look to the earth, and see trouble and darkness, gloom of anguish; and they will be driven into darkness.” It is from this springboard that the majestic words of hope come forth in Isaiah 9.

Therefore, the words “beyond the Jordan” refer to the area of the land of Israel’s northern kingdom, which included Zebulun and Naphtali, but they are spoken from the perspective of Assyria, which is east of the Jordan. It is in this area that hundreds of years later, the Messiah would bring hope to a land that had been through so much anguish and darkness at the time of Isaiah.

It is a land that still languished spiritually at the time of the coming of Christ Jesus. Understanding the reference to Isaiah’s words clears up the otherwise seemingly incomprehensible words. From this springboard, Matthew continues with, “Galilee of the Gentiles.”

This area contained land given to the Gentile king of Tyre, Hiram, as recorded in 1 Kings 9. It was later invaded by Assyria, and the people of the northern kingdom were taken into exile. From there, the Assyrians took Gentile people and moved them into this area, as noted in 2 Kings 17:24, 25.

Because of problems within the land, one of the priests of Israel was sent back to instruct these new inhabitants on how to live there properly (1 Kings 17:27, 28). The account next says –

“However every nation continued to make gods of its own, and put them in the shrines on the high places which the Samaritans had made, every nation in the cities where they dwelt. 30 The men of Babylon made Succoth Benoth, the men of Cuth made Nergal, the men of Hamath made Ashima, 31 and the Avites made Nibhaz and Tartak; and the Sepharvites burned their children in fire to Adrammelech and Anammelech, the gods of Sepharvaim. 32 So they feared the Lord, and from every class they appointed for themselves priests of the high places, who sacrificed for them in the shrines of the high places. 33 They feared the Lord, yet served their own gods—according to the rituals of the nations from among whom they were carried away.” 1 Kings 17:29-33

The pagan practices never departed from the area, and it always remained a place without the light of the Lord. This is why the Jews of Jesus’ time who lived in the north, and who would travel to Jerusalem, would avoid Samaria.

It was a place that developed its own worship of the Lord with its own modified version of the writings of Moses, known as the Samaritan Pentateuch. It is to this land of spiritual gloom that Isaiah’s prophecy is directed…

*16 (fin) The people who sat in darkness have seen a great light,
And upon those who sat in the region and shadow of death
Light has dawned.”

ho laos ho kathēmenos en skōtei eide phōs mega kai tois kathēmenois en khōra kai skia thanatou phōs aneteilan autois

“The people sitting in darkness, it saw Light – great,
And sitting in a country and death-shadow,
Light – it arose upon them.”

The words begin with “The people sitting in darkness,” and they explain the situation described in the previous verse.

The Assyrians came in and conquered the land, removing the northern ten tribes for their faithless conduct before the Lord. In place of them, pagans from around the Assyrian empire were brought in. They worshiped all the gods of their homelands, bringing great spiritual darkness when they did.

Many of these false religions were intermingled with the customs and religion of the Jews, as it said –

“They feared the Lord, yet served their own gods—according to the rituals of the nations from among whom they were carried away.” 2 Kings 17:33

This lack of properly worshiping the Lord continued throughout the years. This verse uses a present participle, sitting. Translations that render it as “sat” do a disservice to the intent. They were sitting and continued to sit.

The light of the worship of the Lord under the law did not permeate the darkness in which they sat. Something greater was needed to pull them out of the state of darkness in which they were stuck. But when Christ came, this area of darkness, “it saw Light – great.”

It is referring to Jesus and His ministry. This area was His main focus for an extended period. And it wasn’t just to the Jews, even though that was the primary calling. An example of Jesus bringing light to others is found in John 4, where He was presented as the Messiah to the Samaritans in Sychar.

Throughout the region, there was only darkness, and this included the religion of the Jews in the synagogues. They had been taken over by the religious leaders who misdirected the people with their false, self-centered teachings. These received the greatest rebukes from Jesus. As He said to them –

“Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you travel land and sea to win one proselyte, and when he is won, you make him twice as much a son of hell as yourselves.” Matthew 23:15

Thus, the words of Isaiah continue, referring to the masses of this region, “and sitting in a country.” The people were sitting in darkness, and the darkness is here equated to the country. The area is within the original borders of the land of Israel, and yet there was only darkness.

Something greater than the law was needed to move them into a right relationship with the Lord, as the words of the prophecy next note, “and death-shadow.”

The Greek is two separate nouns: skia, a shadow, and thanatos, death. Taken together, they translate the single word found in the Hebrew of Isaiah, tsalmaveth – “death-shadow.” The death referred to carries a double connotation. It is the spiritual death that results in the physical death of humanity.

In other words, without the spiritual life of Christ, man is destined to die. This is what Jesus came to change. He came to give light and life to His people, bringing them out of the spiritual death in which they lived and from the physical death that all suffer because of it.

The words of the prophecy say of His coming, “Light – it arose upon them.” The words are beautifully explained by John as he opened his gospel narrative –

“In Him was life, and the life was the light of men. And the light shines in the darkness, and the darkness did not comprehend it.
There was a man sent from God, whose name was John. This man came for a witness, to bear witness of the Light, that all through him might believe. He was not that Light, but was sent to bear witness of that Light. That was the true Light which gives light to every man coming into the world.” John 1:4-9

In Jesus’ appearing, the words of Isaiah are fulfilled. He is the Great Light that came into the world and who appeared in the spiritually dark lands noted by Isaiah. In John 7, it says –

“Then the Pharisees answered them, ‘Are you also deceived? 48 Have any of the rulers or the Pharisees believed in Him? 49 But this crowd that does not know the law is accursed.’
50 Nicodemus (he who came to Jesus by night, being one of them) said to them, 51 ‘Does our law judge a man before it hears him and knows what he is doing?’
52 They answered and said to him, ‘Are you also from Galilee? Search and look, for no prophet has arisen out of Galilee.’” John 7:47-52

These religious leaders had the words of Isaiah right before them, and yet they refused to accept what he had written because it did not fit their presuppositions about the Messiah.

This is still the case today. Why are there some who follow the doctrines of Calvinism and some who completely reject Calvin’s main points? Why are there people who accept that you can lose your salvation, while others teach salvation is eternal?

Many believe in a rapture, while others reject the notion as silly. And even among those who accept the premise of a rapture, there are disagreements on the timing of the event.

This is a teeny portion of various disagreements within Christianity over doctrine. In fact, it is an infinitesimally small portion of them. Why is this?

There are several reasons. One is that people are arguing from different viewpoints about the source of what they believe. Some hold to Scripture alone, but they may hold to a single source text of the Hebrew or Greek or to a single English translation.

Some think that the church has been given ongoing authority to set doctrine, while others accept that the Bible is the sole source of doctrine for believers. But this still leads back to “which source text or translation.”

Even if a standard is agreed on, if one fails to take the Bible in its proper context, there can be no agreement on how doctrine is presented. If Jesus speaking to Israel under the law is used to make a doctrinal point in the church, and if that conflicts with what Paul says in his epistles, then there will be a disagreement on a particular doctrine.

And, of course, there are those who simply pull doctrines out of thin air and teach them as if they are biblically correct. These may be based on emotions, sensational events, or desires for power or money. In using those as the basis for instructing others who are uneducated in proper theology, people are captivated and brought into often disastrous situations.

We must each decide what standard we will accept as authoritative. As God has said His word is authoritative, that is the safest place to find the truth. From there, each step of the way, we should consider our next step carefully while fixing our eyes on Jesus, whom the Bible says is “the author and finisher of our faith” (Hebrews 12:2).

If we do this, our priorities should be right as we continue our walk before God. Let us do this above all else as we seek His face in the Great Light of the face of Jesus Christ our Lord, as Paul notes in 2 Corinthians 4:6.

This light had to start somewhere. Reading these words of Matthew, who cites earlier words of Isaiah, tells us a story that is deeper than the surface text. By taking the names and details of verses 12-16, we are given a picture of this.

And Jesus (Salvation), having heard that John (Yehovah Has Been Gracious – the final witness to Israel) – he was surrendered, He withdrew into the Galilee (the Liberty – signifying freedom from the law). 13 And having disregarded Nazareth (Sown – the nation of Israel), having come, He dwelt in Capernaum (Village of Compassion), the seaside, in borders Zebulun (Glorious Dwelling Place – the heavenly promise) and Naphtali (My Wrestlings – the completed work of Christ). 14 That it might be fulfilled, the ‘having been spoken’ through Isaiah the prophet, saying,

15 “Land Zebulun and land Naphtali,
Way of the sea, beyond the Jordan (the Descender – Christ’s
incarnation) –
Galilee (Liberty) of the Gentiles.
16 The people sitting in darkness, it saw Light – great,
And sitting in a country and death-shadow,
Light – it arose upon them.”

The Lord, the Descender, came from heaven, united with human flesh, fulfilling all that was necessary to bring us back to a state of perfection that is acceptable to God. But to descend means from somewhere, meaning from God.

Just as in the Genesis 1 account, the Light that existed in God entered into the darkness of His creation. He did this in the form of a human being. But the Light came at the Feast of Dedication, the Festival of Lights, the time that we celebrate Christmas.

The Light that shone in Israel and that dawned upon the Gentiles is the Lord God. When we celebrate Christmas on the 25th, we are not really celebrating the birth of a baby born in Bethlehem. Rather, we are acknowledging the most incredible moment in all of human history: the uniting of the eternal Creator with His creation in the womb of a woman.

What Israel missed, for the most part, is what the Gentiles have come to understand intimately. Someday, Israel will understand too, but that day is yet ahead. For now, we can and should rejoice in the wonderful workings of God where He saw fit to join with us in this struggle against darkness and to prevail for us so that we can join Him in perfect fellowship for all eternity.

Thank God for the Child of Christmas and for the Light of the world, our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ.

Closing Verse: “The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Highest will overshadow you; therefore, also, that Holy One who is to be born will be called the Son of God.” Luke 1:35

Next Week: *Malachi 3:5, 6 It is a truth that cannot be refuted… (For I, Yehovah! Not Transmuted) (7th Malachi Sermon)

The Lord has you exactly where He wants you. He has a good plan and purpose for you. He sent His own Son into the world to reconcile you to Himself. Remember the enormity of what that means each day of your life. And then, follow Him and trust Him as He continues to do marvelous things for you and through you.

The Zeal of the Lord of Hosts

Unto us a Child is born
A time to rejoice and not to mourn

Unto us a Son is given
The One to lead us from death to a’livin’

And the government will be upon His shoulder
Every eye will see Him; every soul will be His beholder

Upon the throne of David and over His kingdom’s realm
To order it and establish it with judgment and justice
From that time forward, even forever – He at the helm
The zeal of the Lord of hosts will perform this

And His name will be called Wonderful
The Counselor and Mighty God is He
Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace, pure and white as wool
Of the increase of His government and peace, no end shall we see

Do not be afraid, for behold
I bring you good tidings of great joy
Which will be to all people, forever told
The wondrous story, the birth of a Boy

For there is born to you this day
In the city of David, a Savior, it is He
Christ the Lord whom heaven’s hosts obey
The Messiah has come; and now you may go and see

And this will be the sign to you:
You will find a Babe wrapped in swaddling clothes
Lying in a manger, a glorious view
The Christmas Child whom our Heavenly Father bestows

A Child like no other has come to dwell among us
He shall lead us in paths of righteousness for His name’s sake
And His name is called out, His name is JESUS
Come, and of the Heavenly Child partake

He is God’s gift and heaven’s treasure
He is Immanuel – God with us
And He bestows upon us grace without measure
The Christmas Child, our glorious Lord – JESUS!

Hallelujah and Amen…

 

 

 

Judges 21:20-25 (No King in Israel, Part XI)

Artwork by Douglas Kallerson.

Judges 21:20-25
No King in Israel, Part XI

(Typed 5 August 2024) While typing the Judges sermons, Sergio was also going through Judges and Ruth. One morning, he messaged me with the Mr. Exploding Head emoji and some great insights he pulled out of his personal study –

Judges ends with:
– Mourning for Benjamin, no wives/descendants
– Plan for survival: marry daughters of Shilo
– Last verse: “There was no king in Israel”

Book of Ruth:
– Naomi mourns loss of husbands/descendants
– Plan for survival with Boaz; Ruth births Obed
– Last verse: “and to Obed was born Jesse, and to Jesse, David.” — KING DAVID!

It is a marvelous pattern that exists between the two, and it was a nice catch that I have not seen elsewhere presented. It provides another of several reasons why Ruth, despite occurring during the time of the Judges, is maintained as its own book, separate from and placed after Judges.

God is slowly and methodically presenting us with the developing theme of redemption in Israel as it applies beyond their borders, even encompassing the entire world. In the book of Judges, it says that there was no king in Israel but everyone did what was right in his own eyes.

It would not make sense to put Ruth within the pages of Judges for that reason. In Israel, during the time of the judges, there was no king. In Israel after Christ departed, there has been no king. But a king was anticipated in Judges, and a King is anticipated in Israel’s future.

Everything is going forward, but we can look back in order to see what lies ahead. It is amazing what God has done for us in the pages of Scripture.

Text Verse: “O Israel, you have sinned from the days of Gibeah;
There they stood.
The battle in Gibeah against the children of iniquity
Did not overtake them.” Hosea 10:9

Hurricane Debby arrived while I was typing this sermon on August 5. Despite not being a big hurricane, Sarasota received an inordinate amount of rain. Our backyard was flooded from the high tides and our garage was flooded from the precipitation.

And more, it rained and stormed so much from midnight on that I got almost no sleep at all. In the morning, sermon typing began. When I finished typing, the rains had stopped and the garage was still full of water. Some things are just more important than others.

Today, we will close out the book of Judges. I personally would not have imagined the amount of intricate detail contained in the book when we started. The dispensational model of history is on full display, the rapture is alluded to a few times, and the consummation of all things is clearly seen in several of the stories. God has taken real events and real people’s lives from thousands of years ago and revealed to us truths using human history.

Some of those pictures are future to us now, including those found in the final chapter of Judges. The subject matter is Israel, but the idea of Israel makes no sense without her Messiah, their King. Yes, there is currently no king in Israel, even if Israel has a King. That is destined to change some wonderful day.

What an astonishing and marvelous thing God has presented to us through these types and pictures! Such great things are to be found in His superior word. And so, let us turn to that precious word once again, and… May God speak to us through His word today, and may His glorious name ever be praised.

I. From the Whirlings (verses 20-25)

20 Therefore they instructed the children of Benjamin,

The written Hebrew does not correspond to the oral reading: vaysav eth b’ne vinyamin – “And commands [sg.], sons Benjamin.” The written has the word “command” as spoken by one, “he commands.” The oral has it as spoken by all, “they command.” There is usually no reason to deviate from the written unless there is confusion on the part of the Jewish scribes.

The surrounding verses are all in the plural, so they make this plural as well. However, verse 20:28 noted that Phinehas was at Bethel. He, as the high priest, could very well be the final word on the matter. It said in verse 21:2 that the people came up to Bethel. The next verses indicated the people petitioned the Lord.

As such, there was the implicit understanding that this was all being done with the guidance of the Lord. Thus, it was likely that either the Lord directly, or Phinehas on behalf of the Lord, gave this command.

20 (con’t) saying, “Go, lie in wait in the vineyards,

l’mor l’khu v’aravtem bak’ramiym – “to say, ‘Walk and lurk in the vineyards.’” The command was for these two hundred Benjamites to go to the area of Shiloh where the annual feast was and hide themselves in the vineyards. Whether this was a feast of Israel or a local feast only, these times of celebrations were when the vineyards were in full leaf. Thus, it would make it easy to hide without being noticed.

In Scripture, vineyards represent the cultural side of humanity. There are various vineyards that represent various cultures.

21 and watch; and just when the daughters of Shiloh come out to perform their dances,

There is a gender discord in the words. Also, as in verse 19, the name of the location is spelled without an “h” ending: urithem v’hineh im yetsu b’noth shilo lakhul bamkholoth – “And seen, and behold, if come [masc. pl.] daughters Shilo to whirl in the dances.” The word translated as “come” is masculine even though it refers to the dancing daughters.

The men hiding in the vineyards were to watch for women who whirled while dancing. The women were called the daughters of Shilo. This could mean they were only young women from that location, or if this was a pilgrim feast for the nation, it could extend to women from all over Israel who were staying there during the feast.

21 (con’t) then come out from the vineyards, and every man catch a wife for himself from the daughters of Shiloh; then go to the land of Benjamin.

Each of the verbs in this clause are in the perfect aspect: vitsathem min hakramim vakhataphtem lakhem ish ishto mibnoth shilo vahalakhtem erets Binyamin – “and came from the vineyards, and seized to them man, his wife, from daughters Shilo. And walked land Benjamin.” The women were out dancing without male supervision, totally unsuspecting that there were so many men lying in wait.

Because of this, it could not be thought that the men of Israel gave their daughters to the men of Benjamin. Thus, they would be released from any penalty of the oath. The general scholarly opinion is that this is deceitful and inappropriate.

However, if it was the Lord or Phineas who authorized this plan in the previous verse, that argument does not hold up. It is probably the reason why the singular was written in the first place. The verbs being in the perfect aspect make this a done deal.

Also, there is a new word to Scripture here, only found elsewhere in Psalm 10:9, khataph. It signifies to clutch, thus, to seize as a prisoner. The men were instructed to grab a girl and not let go. From there, they were to escape with her to the land of Benjamin…

22 Then it shall be, when their fathers or their brothers come to us to complain,

Again, there are gender discords in the words: vahayah ki yavou avotham o akhehem larov elenu – “And is when come their [masc. pl.] fathers, or their [masc. pl.] brothers, to contend unto us.” Nothing is noted about the complaints of the mothers. It would be natural that the men or brothers would complain as well as the mothers. The women had been taken away by the men of Benjamin. But that appears to be the only reason why they might complain, as is seen in the next words…

22 (con’t) that we will say to them, ‘Be kind to them for our sakes, because we did not take a wife for any of them in the war; for it is not as though you have given the women to them at this time, making yourselves guilty of your oath.’”

The words are very obscure and highly debated. Various manuscripts have modified them in an attempt to make sense. Also, depending on the reference, there appears to be another gender discord: v’amarnu alehem khanunu otham ki lo laqakhnu ish ishto bamilkhamah ki lo atem nathatem lahem kaeth tesamu – “and we said unto them, ‘Favor us, them [masc. pl.], for not we took man his wife in the war, for not you gave to them, according to the time trespassed.’”

The normal reading would be that the word “them” refers to the women, but it is again in the masculine, “Do us a favor concerning them.”

It could be referring to the men of Benjamin, but even then, the words remain complicated. Regardless, the complaint referred to is not that the daughters have been stolen away, and they miss them in the usual sense. The complaint is because the women have been given to Benjamin contrary to the oath, making the community guilty.

But this plan is not a violation of the vow for anyone whose daughter was seized. As such, there is no culpability on the part of the fathers or brothers. And yet, there has been a resolution to the dilemma of the wifeless men.

The words “according to the time trespassed” seem to mean that, at this time, there is no trespass on the part of these men of Israel. Having said that, the structure of the words is extremely unusual. So much so that Clarke leaves it up to the reader to decide what he prefers –

“It is an obscure sentence; and the reader, if not pleased with what is laid down, may endeavor to satisfy himself with others which he may find in different versions and commentators.” Adam Clarke

His words bear a sentiment I cannot agree with. We must work to determine meaning, not pick and choose.

23 And the children of Benjamin did so; they took enough wives for their number from those who danced, whom they caught.

vayaasu khen b’ne vinyamin vayisu nashim l’misparam min hamkhol’loth asher gazalu – “And do thus, sons Benjamin. And lift women, to their number, from the whirlings whom they plucked.” The words are somewhat poetically forceful. The women were lifted. This gives the sense of them being in a group where each man of Benjamin sees the one he likes and lifts her out as his own.

There would have been two hundred snatched away according to the number of those in Benjamin still needing wives. They were taken “from the whirlings,” meaning those who came out to dance. And they were, gazal, plucked, a word often used to indicate being kidnapped, robbed, or seized away.

23 (con’t) Then they went and returned to their inheritance, and they rebuilt the cities and dwelt in them.

vayelkhu vayashuvu el nakhalatam vayivnu eth hearim vayeshvu bahem – “And walk, and return unto their inheritance. And build the cities, and dwell in them.” It is a later description of what occurred, showing that this was compiled and recorded later, probably by Samuel. Benjamin retained his inheritance. As they grew in number, they would have expanded and continued to rebuild in the land given to them by the Lord.

24 So the children of Israel departed from there at that time, every man to his tribe and family; they went out from there, every man to his inheritance.

vayith’halkhu misham b’ne Yisrael baeth ha’hi ish l’shivto ul’mishpakhto vayesu misham ish l’nakhalatho – “And walk, from there, sons Israel in the time, the it. Man to his tribe and to his family. And go from there, man to his inheritance.” The words end the formal narrative. Benjamin was spared and rescued. The matter of wives for them was settled, so the people of Israel departed and headed home.

The repetition provides its own emphasis concerning the situation:

*And walk (dispersing), from there (Shiloh), sons Israel (all men of all tribes) in the time, the it. Man to his tribe (Judah, for example) and to his family (within the tribe).
*And go from there, man to his inheritance (the land granted by the Lord and which was then divided accordingly).

Saying that each man went to his inheritance is a way of indicating that the tribal inheritances remained intact. Despite almost losing one tribe, the nation remained according to the set design of the Lord. And this occurred, despite the fact that…

25 In those days there was no king in Israel;

The words are letter-for-letter identical to Judges 17:6: bayamim ha’hem ein melekh b’Yisrael – “In the days, the those, naught king in Israel.” Until there was a king, there was no king. To write that this was in the days when there was no king acknowledges that there was a king when the narrative is being presented.

The words imply that a king would rectify the situation. And this is just what the author (compiler or whatever) next presents…

*25 (fin) everyone did what was right in his own eyes.

ish ha’yashar b’enav yaaseh – “Man the straight in his eyes does.” As there was no king in Israel, everyone saw his own path as the straight one, and then took it. Thus ends Chapter 21 and the book of Judges.

Be strong and of good courage; I am with you
Fear not and be not dismayed
Others may depart, but I am faithful and true
It is I who have all your debts paid

I will bring you into the inheritance
And there I will place you forever
Of Me failing, there is not a chance
Nothing can the bond between us sever

Be strong and of good courage, trust in Me
Fear not and be not dismayed; I am with you
The word I have spoken, so shall it be
I am the Lord your God, faithful and true

II. Pictures of Christ

Verse 1 noted that Israel (He Strives With God) had sworn an oath at Mizpah (Watchtower) that no one would give his daughter to Benjamin as a wife. In Chapter 20, Benjamin pictured those with a messianic hope, even if it was wrongly directed. Mizpah signifies the Lord is watching over the process of what transpires.

To not give a daughter signifies to cut off such a person because there is no one to continue his name. No wife means no continuance. But with the war over, the people have realized that there are those who are of Israel but who have no chance of continuation. Therefore the nation made a great ululation before the God, meaning the true God.

In Verse 3, one tribe in Israel was visited, meaning it was judged. It tells us that messianic law observers will receive their judgment in the tribulation period. Most will be cut off. Israel had come against their false doctrine in Chapter 20, leaving only six hundred.

Six is the number of man, especially fallen man. Ten implies that nothing is wanting and the whole cycle is complete. In order to restore this tribe in Israel, two separate plans are devised. The first plan begins in verse 5, where it is asked who among the tribes did not come up to the battle against Benjamin. Anyone who didn’t had essentially aligned himself with Benjamin. Such were to be cut off.

Israel grieved for Benjamin because they had no future (verse 6). They had their inheritance, but without wives, there could be no continuance. Verse 7 also noted that they were a mere remnant from Benjamin.

To correct this, it was noted that no one had come up to Mizpah to the Lord from Jabesh Gilead. The meaning is Dry Perpetual Fountain. It was seen in Judges 11 that Gilead, without the article, speaks of Israel, the fountain.

To grasp the meaning, one must think of Israel as the means of providing the Fountain, regardless of whether individuals are included in its transmission or not (Ephesians 2:12). The Spirit is the Mode by which one is included.

Right now, Gentiles are brought into the commonwealth of Israel along with Jews. However, not all Jews nor all Gentiles receive it. Israel is Perpetual Fountain, not The Perpetual Fountain (meaning the Holy Spirit). The use or lack of use of the article tells us this.

Understanding this, Dry Perpetual Fountain would reflect those who have no means of providing the Fountain. There is no possible connection to the Spirit, and that individual is foreign to Israel. These are those who have rejected the Lord in the tribulation and took the mark of the beast. They are to be eliminated.

As such, verse 10 says that twelve thousand valiant men were sent to wipe them out. It is the number of perfection of government or governmental perfection. Ten implies that nothing is wanting, and the whole cycle is complete. It tells us that the millennial government is set and ready to be put in place. The thought is reflected in Matthew 25 –

“When the Son of Man comes in His glory, and all the holy angels with Him, then He will sit on the throne of His glory. 32 All the nations will be gathered before Him, and He will separate them one from another, as a shepherd divides his sheep from the goats.” Matthew 25:31, 32

Those who are to be killed will be slain with the mouth of the kherev, sword. That has consistently pictured the law given at Horeb. In this case, it is emblematic of Jesus, who fulfilled the law and whom they had rejected –

“And the rest were killed with the sword which proceeded from the mouth of Him who sat on the horse. And all the birds were filled with their flesh.” Revelation 19:21

Four hundred virgins are spared (40×10). It is derived in two ways, both of which match the tribulation and the beginning of the millennium –

“It is the product of 5 and 8, and points to the action of grace (5), leading to and ending in revival and renewal (8). This is certainly the case where forty relates to a period of evident probation. But where it relates to enlarged dominion, or to renewed or extended rule, then it does so in virtue of its factors 4 and 10, and in harmony with their signification.”

These virgins (implying purity) were brought to Shiloh (Tranquility) in the land of Canaan (Humbled). It signifies they have entered God’s rest, having been humbled before Him through the work of Christ.

With them at Shiloh, in verse 13, terms of peace were announced to Benjamin at the Rock of Rimmon. The Son of the Right Hand is accepted because of Christ and their new understanding of Him as the true Messiah. This is seen in the name Sela Rimmon – Lofty of the Mature Mind.

Verse 14 said these men came back and were given the women from Jabesh Gilead. That is explained in the words of Ezekiel 47 –

“‘Thus you shall divide this land among yourselves according to the tribes of Israel. 22 It shall be that you will divide it by lot as an inheritance for yourselves, and for the strangers who dwell among you and who bear children among you. They shall be to you as native-born among the children of Israel; they shall have an inheritance with you among the tribes of Israel. 23 And it shall be that in whatever tribe the stranger dwells, there you shall give him his inheritance,’ says the Lord God.” Ezekiel 47:21-23

Those of the Dry Fountain are brought into a permanent and right relationship with Israel with full rights in the land. Despite this there is a lack of two hundred women, the number of Insufficiency. The number is never stated, but it is implied. As such, the insufficiency applies to these men of Israel.

Despite the insufficiency, a plan was formed, which was in the form of an adamant assertion that there would be no lack in Israel, even if daughters could not be given to these men. They could not do so based on the oath noted in verse 18 that any who gave their daughter to Benjamin would be cursed.

As such, verse 19 noted the coming feast in Shilo. In that verse and twice more in 21, the location is given without the hay (h) ending. Like Geba in Chapter 20, the change in spelling has meaning.

Hay is the fifth letter of the Aleph Beth, the number of grace. It also is used when referring to a connection to the Spirit. Its meaning is Look, Reveal, and Breath. Each is something connected with the Spirit. As such, it is a confirming note that there will be people born in the millennium who do not originally have the Spirit. In any age, one receives the Spirit through faith. There are several verses in the Old Testament that confirm this.

After noting Shilo, the narrator then took the unusual step of explaining its location. Everything about the name Shilo, like its name having no hay (h), demonstrates a lack of connection to God, “which from north-ward to Bethel from ascension-ward, the sun, to highway – the ascending – from Bethel Shechem-ward, and from south to Lebonah.”

Northward, tsaphonah signifies Concealed, thus “Concealed to the House of God.”

Ascension-ward [mizrakhah, from zarakh, to arise] the sun [shemesh] signifies the time prior to Jesus’ coming, thus the time of the law –

“But to you who fear My name
The Sun [shemesh] of Righteousness shall arise [zarakh]
With healing in His wings.” Malachi 4:2

Shechem means the neck between the shoulders. Thus, it literally means Shoulder or Back. But that comes from shakam, to start or rise early, and so it gives the sense of (Having a Sense of) Responsibility, as in Personal Interest. As seen elsewhere, it speaks of the personal interest and responsibility of those under the law.

The south, negev, signifies Parched. It speaks of the time before the giving of the Spirit.

Lebonah means White or Frankincense (which is white), but the word laven has consistently been used in Scripture to describe works, as in man’s works, because bricks turn white when they are fired, but bricks are the work of men’s hands.

The entire verse speaks of being separate from the grace that is finally revealed to Israel at the end of the tribulation period.

The words “Walk and lurk in the vineyards” speak of cultures. As has been seen many times before in Scripture, vineyards represent the cultural side of humanity. There are various vineyards that represent various cultures. As the Jewish culture of today is a group of many cultures gathered together, the words could not be more appropriate.

In verse 21, the gender discord was noted. Such a gender discord, however, was first seen in verse 12. Speaking of the four hundred virgins, it said –

“And bring them [masc. pl.] unto the camp, Shiloh, which in land Canaan.”

Next, in verse 21, it said –

“And seen, and behold, if come [masc. pl.] daughters Shilo to whirl in the dances.”

When the women are seen, verse 21 said that every man was to seize a wife for himself from the vineyards and go to the land of Benjamin. The verbs were in the perfect aspect. It is a done deal when that takes place.

In verse 22, the highly complicated words contained another gender discord. In the Hebrew, the words are obscure and so there are many texts that have diverted from them –

‘Favor us, them [masc. pl.], for not we took man his wife in the war, for not you gave to them, according to the time trespassed.’”

If looked at from the perspective of the end times, they become clear. The daughters were not taken by these men during the time when they were warring against the Lord through false belief. Nor were they given by those who did believe. “According to the time trespassed” describes the state of the men before Christ appeared and cleared up their faulty doctrine.

The gender discords are speaking of people groups. In the Bible, people groups are always referred to in the masculine, such as goyim, Gentiles, or anashim, peoples. It explains why those gender discords are listed. They are referring to those bodies or groups whom they represent.

In the first four hundred women of verse 12, the men were given the daughters of Jabesh Gilead, Dry Fountain, and thus Gentiles, as noted in Ezekiel 47 cited earlier. In the two hundred additional women, they are obtaining daughters from those born in the millennium from the regathered peoples of Israel.

One can see the true believers in Israel saying, “We vow to not intermarry with anyone who is not a believer in the Lord Jesus. Those who followed false messiahs would be excluded from this covenant. But here, we are presented with ways in which those who make it through the millennium will be able to continue even if such vows were made.

Verse 23 noted that the two hundred Benjamites went, returned to their inheritance, rebuilt the cities, and dwelt in them. It is an appropriate statement in general for after the tribulation. There will be an inheritance for those who survive the ordeal, and they will rebuild and dwell in their cities.

Verse 24 likewise said that all of the children of Israel returned to their inheritances. The two descriptors said –

And walk (dispersing), from there (Shiloh), sons Israel (all men of all tribes) in the time, the it. Man to his tribe (Judah, for example) and to his family (within the tribe).

And go from there, man to his inheritance (the land granted by the Lord, which was then divided accordingly).

This provides the reason for the reexplanation of the tribal inheritances detailed in Ezekiel 48, which refers to the millennial dispensation.

Finally, verse 25 ended with the same thought that ended Judges 17:6, “In the days, the those, naught king in Israel. Man the straight in his eyes does.”

These two verses are bookends that anticipate the time when Israel would reject Jesus as their King even until the end of the tribulation period. That is clearly depicted in their own proclamation to Pilate on the day Christ was crucified –

“When Pilate therefore heard that saying, he brought Jesus out and sat down in the judgment seat in a place that is called The Pavement, but in Hebrew, Gabbatha. 14 Now it was the Preparation Day of the Passover, and about the sixth hour. And he said to the Jews, ‘Behold your King!’
15 But they cried out, “Away with Him, away with Him! Crucify Him!’
Pilate said to them, ‘Shall I crucify your King?’
The chief priests answered, ‘We have no king but Caesar!’
16 Then he delivered Him to them to be crucified. Then they took Jesus and led Him away.” John 19:13-16

During all this time, Israel has done whatever it wanted. They rejected Moses from the beginning, paying mere lip service to the word of the Lord given through him. Then they rejected the One that Moses clearly wrote about, both explicitly and implicitly.

Further, the Law of Moses continues on in the writings that follow his time of service. In Judges alone, there have been an incredible number of pictures of Jesus, His work, the redemptive plan He laid out, etc.

It would be presumptuous to assume that all of the pictures I have presented in Judges have been interpreted correctly, but it is clear from the overall context of the Bible what is being presented, that the details – even if some were wrongly interpreted – are swallowed up in the surety of the overall pictures.

Among the pictures have been wonderful insights into core doctrines of Scripture, such as the deity of Christ, salvation by grace alone, seeking justification through works of the law only separate us further from God, dispensationalism, and so forth.

Along with those, many other useful doctrines have been presented to clear up the muddy waters of bad theology. There were several references to the rapture that solidified the surety of that teaching. Further, the timing of the rapture, being pre-tribulation, is clarified.

The fact that Israel of the past is the same group of people we see in the world today is also confirmed, demonstrating to us that the church has not replaced it, but is an extension of it. Gentiles are grafted into the commonwealth of Israel, but they remain Gentiles just as Jews remain Jews.

These and so many other points of doctrine have been carefully detailed in these ancient, difficult, and picturesque stories that have excited the minds of believers for thousands of years. In the order of biblical books, Ruth comes next. That has already been analyzed, and so soon we will begin 1 Samuel.

First, though, we will take a short diversion and head to a new book (or two) for a few weeks to see what is detailed elsewhere. No matter where we are in the Bible, however, we are sure to come across interesting secrets, find hidden treasures, and above all, see the Person of Jesus Christ being presented to us in a vast array of ways.

Everything about this word is centered on Him and what He has done and continues to do for His people. Let us never fail to pick up the Bible daily and search out its marvelous contents, looking for Him as we do.

I look for you, my Precious Lord
But then again, I lose my sight.
And even though I might get lost
I know you never leave my side.

I look for you in my every-days,
In so many moments, so many times.
I know that You are always there,
Yet, I can’t see You with my eyes.

To hear You, Lord it’s not an easy task.
My ears might never hear your voice.
But I know, Lord, that You are here,
Right inside my very soul.

I look for You in Your Word.
I look for You in my heart,
And I know Jesus through the cross,
Through transformation of my life.

So help me, Lord, to comprehend;
that to see You, Lord
is to know your grace.
That to hear You, Lord
is to know Your Word,
and through the faith
Is to be Yours.

So help me Jesus
to hear your voice,
not with my ears
but with my soul.

Help me to see
not with my eyes
but with your Spirit
inside my heart.

Izabela Bednara

Closing Verse: “Then say to them, ‘Thus says the Lord God: Surely I will take the children of Israel from among the nations, wherever they have gone, and will gather them from every side and bring them into their own land; 22 and I will make them one nation in the land, on the mountains of Israel; and one king shall be king over them all; they shall no longer be two nations, nor shall they ever be divided into two kingdoms again.” Ezekiel 37:21, 22

Next Week: Malachi 1:1-3 What a picture the Lord did draw… (Jacob and Esau) (1st Malachi Sermon)

The Lord has you exactly where He wants you. He has a good plan and purpose for you. It is He who judges His people according to their deeds. So, follow Him, live for Him, and trust Him, and He will do marvelous things for you and through you.

No King in Israel, Part XI

Therefore they instructed the children of Benjamin, saying
“Go, lie in wait in the vineyards for your chances
And watch; and just when the daughters of Shiloh
Come out to perform their dances

Then come out from the vineyards
And every man catch a wife for himself (we know you’re all-in)
From the daughters of Shiloh
Then go to the land of Benjamin

Then it shall be, when their fathers or their brothers
Come to us to complain, that we will say to them, for shor
‘Be kind to them for our sakes
Because we did not take a wife for any of them in the war

For it is not as though you have given
The women to them at this time
Making yourselves guilty of your oath
Thus, things will be fine

And the children of Benjamin did so
They took enough wives for their number
From those who danced, whom they caught
They acted and did not slumber

Then they went and returned to their inheritance
And they rebuilt the cities and dwelt in them
———-living out their second chance

So the children of Israel departed from there at that time
Every man to his tribe and family
They went out from there
Every man to his inheritance and his own territory

In those days there was no king in Israel
Everyone did what was right in his own eyes
———-so the word does tell

Lord God, turn our hearts to be obedient to Your word
Give us wisdom to be ever faithful to You
May we carefully heed each thing we have heard
Yes, Lord God may our hearts be faithful and true

And Lord God, thank you for this wonderful book
Judges! What a marvel to have studied it
Into every detail possible we took a look
And to You our thanks and praise we now submit!

Hallelujah to Christ our Lord!
Hallelujah for Judges, a marvelous part of Your superior word!

Hallelujah and Amen!
Indeed, Hallelujah and Amen…

 

20 Therefore they instructed the children of Benjamin, saying, “Go, lie in wait in the vineyards, 21 and watch; and just when the daughters of Shiloh come out to perform their dances, then come out from the vineyards, and every man catch a wife for himself from the daughters of Shiloh; then go to the land of Benjamin. 22 Then it shall be, when their fathers or their brothers come to us to complain, that we will say to them, ‘Be kind to them for our sakes, because we did not take a wife for any of them in the war; for it is not as though you have given the women to them at this time, making yourselves guilty of your oath.’ ”

23 And the children of Benjamin did so; they took enough wives for their number from those who danced, whom they caught. Then they went and returned to their inheritance, and they rebuilt the cities and dwelt in them. 24 So the children of Israel departed from there at that time, every man to his tribe and family; they went out from there, every man to his inheritance.

25 In those days there was no king in Israel; everyone did what was right in his own eyes.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Judges 21:1-19 (No King In Israel, Part X)

Artwork by Douglas Kallerson

 

Judges 21:1-19
No King in Israel, Part X

(Typed 29 Jul 2024) The narrative in Judges 21 brings in a point of doctrine that seems to escape a surprisingly large portion of the church. It is such a critical point to understand, that in misunderstanding the precept, it has brought in some of the nuttiest thinking imaginable to various denominations, sects, and cults.

Benjamin has been reduced from a number of 26,700 fighting men, plus women, children, and the aged, to only 600 men. So, does the tribe of Benjamin still exist after the battle? It would be hard to find a single person who would say, “No, Benjamin no longer exists.”

Until those 600 died, Benjamin would still be a tribe. But what if the number was only 120? Would Benjamin still exist? Again, the answer is affirmative. But what if there were only 17, 8, or 2? The answer would remain the same. Even if only one man of Benjamin survived, the tribe would still be considered a tribe.

This is understood in the world today. A couple of times in my life, I have heard of someone thought to be the last remaining person of a particular tribe of people, like the Eskimos, for example. When that person dies, that particular tribe dies out. Until then, the tribe remains.

Text Verse: “…though I also might have confidence in the flesh. If anyone else thinks he may have confidence in the flesh, I more so: circumcised the eighth day, of the stock of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin, a Hebrew of the Hebrews; concerning the law, a Pharisee; concerning zeal, persecuting the church; concerning the righteousness which is in the law, blameless.” Philippians 3:4-6

The apostle Paul was of the tribe of Benjamin. So, applying the logic, did the tribe of Benjamin exist at the time of Paul? Obviously! Even if Paul was the only Benjamite left (which he wasn’t), the tribe would still exist until he died.

In Luke 2:36, a woman of Asher, Anna, the daughter of Phanuel, is named. Thus, Asher remained. In fact, after the exile of the ten northern tribes of Israel by Sennacherib, King of Assyria, members of almost every tribe in Israel are mentioned. In other words, even though the majority of the tribe was exiled and their land inheritance was lost, there were still people from those tribes residing in the southern area of Judah.

That fact continued on through the time of the apostles. In Acts 26:7, Paul said, “To this promise our twelve tribes, earnestly serving God night and day, hope to attain. For this hope’s sake, King Agrippa, I am accused by the Jews.” Likewise, the book of James is written to “the twelve tribes which are scattered abroad.”

Despite the exile, there were no “lost tribes.” And yet, denominations, sects, and cults within the supposed Christian church claim that they comprise the gathered lost tribes of Israel. This is true of British Israelism, the Worldwide Church of God, the Mormons, Jehovah’s Witnesses (in one respect), and others.

They all claim something that they are not, and they base it on a faulty understanding of Scripture. Benjamin did not die out at the time of Judges, despite what took place in Judges 20. And none of the tribes of Israel died out at the exile of the ten northern tribes.

They continued on through the time of Jesus and the apostles, and they are being regathered to the land of Israel today. A good life lesson for the church would be to stop co-opting things belonging to Israel to which it has no right.

If one wonders why there is so much disunity in the church today, it is because people fail to read the Bible, and even when they do, they take much of it out of its proper context. Do not do this! Great and reliable truths such as this are to be found in His superior word. And so, let us turn to that precious word once again, and… May God speak to us through His word today, and may His glorious name ever be praised.

I. What Shall We Do? (verses 1-7)

Chapter 20 ended with the total defeat of the army of Benjamin and the complete destruction of the tribe and all its people. The only exception was noted in the final verses, saying –

“But six hundred men turned and fled toward the wilderness to the rock of Rimmon, and they stayed at the rock of Rimmon for four months. 48 And the men of Israel turned back against the children of Benjamin, and struck them down with the edge of the sword—from every city, men and beasts, all who were found. They also set fire to all the cities they came to.” Judges 20:47, 48

With that remembered, we now enter into the contents of the final chapter of the book of Judges…

Now the men of Israel had sworn an oath at Mizpah, saying,

v’ish Yisrael nishba bamitspah l’mor – “And man, Israel, sworn in the Mizpah, to say.” In this chapter, it is apparent that there are two oaths that had previously been made by the congregation at Mizpah but which had not been recorded. These oaths form the underlying structure of what will be recorded throughout the chapter. The first of these two oaths is noted next…

1 (con’t) “None of us shall give his daughter to Benjamin as a wife.”

ish mimenu lo yiten bito l’binyamin l’ishah – “Man from us not gives his daughter to Benjamin to wife.” The oath was fortunately not one of kharem, the total devotion of the tribe to God. If that were the case, the six hundred at the Rock of Rimmon would have been hunted down and killed as well.

However, the people made an oath that Benjamin was cut off from marriage rights among the tribes of Israel, at least at this time. Of this practice, John Lange provides an explanation –

“They abrogated the connubium (the right of intermarriage) with the tribe. They determined to treat Benjamin as a heathen people, or as heathen nations, in the absence of special treaties (ἐπιγαμία [epigamia]), were accustomed to look upon each other. There were instances of heathen tribes who did not at all intermix. Such cases were found among Germanic tribes also, until Christianity had fully conquered them. It was the church that brought East-Goths and West-Goths, Anglo-Saxons and Britons, Franks and Romans, to look upon each other as tribes of one Israel. Very great, therefore, must have been the indignation of the collective Israel, when they thus, as it were, cast Benjamin out of their marriage covenant.”

The oath was made, and it could not be taken back. As such, it has left Israel with a problem because they had killed all of the women and children of Benjamin. This left these six hundred men without any ability to continue the existence of the tribe beyond themselves.

Israel means He Strives with God. The Mizpah means The Watchtower. Benjamin means Son of the Right Hand.

Then the people came to the house of God, and remained there before God till evening. They lifted up their voices and wept bitterly,

vayavo ha’am beith el vayeshvu sham ad ha’erev liphne ha’elohim vayisu qolam vayivku b’khi gadol – “And comes, the people, Bethel. And sit there until the evening to faces the God. And lift their voice and weep, ululation whopping.” Here, it says, “the people.” Thus, it is inclusive of soldiers, men, women, and children.

The people came out collectively to Bethel and spent the entire day there before the God, meaning the One True God, among those who are in a right relationship with Him. Of this, the meaning is that the ark was still there after the battle as it was in Judges 20:27. This time before the Lord was one of mourning and sadness.

First, the verb is bakah, to weep. That is enhanced by the next word, the noun b’khi, a weeping. Such a weeping, when it involves an entire congregation, has a lot of noise and emotion. Thus, the word ululation fits perfectly. It has a particular onomatopoetic quality that matches the Mideastern weeping expressed here: ululululululu. Along with this ululating, there are deep searchings of heart and questions to God…

and said, “O Lord God of Israel, why has this come to pass in Israel,

Rather: vayomru lamah Yehovah elohe Yisrael hay’thah zoth b’Yisrael – “And say, ‘Why, Yehovah God Israel, came this in Israel?’” Of these words, Adam Clarke incorrectly says –

“This was a very impertinent question. They knew well enough how it came to pass. It was right that the men of Gibeah should be punished, and it was right that they who vindicated them should share in that punishment; but they carried their revenge too far, they endeavored to exterminate both man and beast.” Adam Clarke

However, they did exactly as the law stipulated. They eradicated the evil from Israel. There was nothing unjust in their actions and there was nothing rude in the question. The Lord directed the battles, He oversaw the events, and He knew what the outcome would be. The question isn’t why the battle took place or came out as it did. Instead, the question involves national integrity…

3 (con’t) that today there should be one tribe missing in Israel?”

The words are a sloppy paraphrase: l’hipaqed hayom miYisrael sheveth ekhad – “To visit the day from Israel tribe one?” The word is paqad, to visit. It is one of the most widely applied words in the Bible and each instance has to be considered from the context to understand the word’s signification.

In this case, the visitation means in judgment leading to near eradication. It cannot mean “one tribe missing in Israel” because the one tribe still exists, even if in a completely degraded and seemingly hopeless, cut-off state. Benjamin was visited, and the concern is that he will check out of the tribal enumeration at some point in the future.

The triple repetition of the name Israel in this one verse stresses the matter in a unique and forceful way that reveals the utter astonishment and confusion in the minds of the people. They were a unified whole, being the twelve sons of Israel. But more than that, this unity was under the headship of the Lord.

The covenant cut with them, and the promises made to them were of a national nature, inclusive of all the tribes. If Benjamin were to be lost entirely, how would that affect the covenant promises and their national identity? This is what is on their minds.

The Lord had covenanted with the twelve tribes at Sinai in Exodus 24. Later in Leviticus 26, He affirmed that they would be kept as a people, noting that even in the distant future, He would be their God –

“But for their sake I will remember the covenant of their ancestors, whom I brought out of the land of Egypt in the sight of the nations, that I might be their God:
am the Lord.” Leviticus 26:45

The sorrow and confusion among the people would be great. How could the words of the covenant be true if Benjamin was set to perish? Therefore, the people come before the Lord in hope of a resolution…

So it was, on the next morning, that the people rose early and built an altar there, and offered burnt offerings and peace offerings.

vayhi mimakhorath vayashkimu ha’am vayivnu sham mizbeakh vayaalu oloth ushlamim – “And is, from morrow, and arose early the people, and build there altar, and ascend burnt offerings and peace offerings.” These words show, with all certainty, that the translation of some versions as house of God instead of Bethel is incorrect.

If Israel had appeared before the house of God in Shiloh, they would not need to build an altar. Rather, the ark had been brought to Bethel (meaning House of God) while the rest of the tabernacle remained at Shiloh. Therefore, the people built an altar according to the Law of the Altar found in Exodus 20:24-26.

Once it was built, then the offerings could be presented. The burnt offerings are those wholly burnt to Yehovah as a sign of complete submission or dedication to Him. The peace offerings had a sacred portion removed for the Lord according to the written law, and the rest was eaten by the people.

As such, the burnt offerings are for restoration from sin, and the peace offerings are a sign of renewed fellowship based on that restoration. After these were offered in the presence of the Lord, the second oath that had been made but was not previously recorded is detailed…

The children of Israel said, “Who is there among all the tribes of Israel who did not come up with the assembly to the Lord?”

vayomru b’ne Yisrael mi asher lo alah vaqahal mikal shivte Yisrael el Yehovah – “And say, sons Israel, ‘Who which not ascended in the assembly from all tribes Israel unto Yehovah.’” A head count was taken in order for Israel to fulfill an oath that was previously made. This timing of this assembly had to have been at the time of Judges 20:1-3. That is the only time that Mizpah is mentioned in the narrative until this chapter. But that is what is next referred to…

5 (con’t) For they had made a great oath concerning anyone who had not come up to the Lord at Mizpah, saying, “He shall surely be put to death.”

ki hashvuah ha’g’dolah hay’thah laasher lo alah el Yehovah hamitspah l’mor moth yumath – “For the oath, the whopping, made to which not ascended unto Yehovah the Mizpah to say, ‘Dying shall die.” When the assembly was called, it was a matter of national concern. Benjamin had to be dealt with. Any who did not come up would thus be considered as allying with Benjamin. Therefore, as was done to Benjamin was to be done to them.

That vow was put on hold while the matter of Benjamin was dealt with. One can see that verse 5 follows chronologically after verses 6 & 7, but it is placed here to reveal the genesis of the process that would lead to the restoration of the tribe of Benjamin. As such, verses 6 & 7 should be considered parenthetical. One can see this if verses 5 & 6 are reversed –

So it was, on the next morning, that the people rose early and built an altar there, and offered burnt offerings and peace offerings. And the children of Israel grieved for Benjamin their brother, and said, “One tribe is cut off from Israel today. What shall we do for wives for those who remain, seeing we have sworn by the Lord that we will not give them our daughters as wives?” The children of Israel said, “Who is there among all the tribes of Israel who did not come up with the assembly to the Lord?” For they had made a great oath concerning anyone who had not come up to the Lord at Mizpah, saying, “He shall surely be put to death.” And they said, “What one is there from the tribes of Israel who did not come up to Mizpah to the Lord?” And, in fact, no one had come to the camp from Jabesh Gilead to the assembly.

And the children of Israel grieved for Benjamin their brother,

vayinakhamu b’ne Yisrael el Binyamin akhiv – “And sigh, sons Israel, unto Benjamin his brother.” The word nakham is variously translated in this verse as repent, lament, grieve, felt sorry, etc. It comes from a primitive root signifying to sigh, as when one breathes heavily. One can see the people with their heads down, worn out from their ululating and simply sighing in anguish. It appears as if there is no hope for Benjamin, and thus, they continue with mournful words…

6 (con’t) and said, “One tribe is cut off from Israel today.

vayomru hayom shevet ekhad miYisrael – “And say, ‘Hewn, the day, tribe one from Israel.’” The words show that the earlier translation of the NKJV that the tribe was missing is incorrect. The tribe exists, but it is hewn away from Israel, cut off from any discernible future because of their weakened state and the oath concerning wives…

What shall we do for wives for those who remain, seeing we have sworn by the Lord that we will not give them our daughters as wives?”

mah naaseh lahem lanotarim l’nashim vaanakhnu nishbanu b’Yehovah l’bilti teth lahem mibnotenu l’nashim – “What do to them, to the remainings, to wives? And we sworn in Yehovah to exception give to them from our daughters to wives.” Benjamin exists, but only as “the remainings.” They are a shadowy remnant of the tribe. And with the oath sworn “in Yehovah,” those who gathered could not go back on their word. And more, this was “to exception.”

It was a united and universal proclamation that their daughters were not to be given to Benjamin as wives. However, as it is said, necessity is the mother of invention. There is a need, and a lightbulb of inspiration comes on in the minds of the people. It is where verse 5 logically follows chronologically –

“The children of Israel said, “Who is there among all the tribes of Israel who did not come up with the assembly to the Lord?” For they had made a great oath concerning anyone who had not come up to the Lord at Mizpah, saying, “He shall surely be put to death.”

Four hundred young virgins for six hundred men
It ain’t enough to give to all
So, you’ll need to plan again
Before you have that six hundred couple wedding ball

But it will come about for sure
Because there is no lack in the Lord’s plan
Trust in Him, He has the cure
To take care of every man

The Lord is faithful, and it will come to pass
And a good end will be the result
For every man, a lovely lass
Because His plan is without fault

II. Four Hundred Young Virgins (verses 8-14)

And they said, “What one is there from the tribes of Israel who did not come up to Mizpah to the Lord?” And, in fact, no one had come to the camp from Jabesh Gilead to the assembly.

vayomru mi ekhad mishivte Yisrael asher lo alah el Yehovah hamitspah v’hineh lo ba ish el hamakhaneh miyavesh gilad el haqahal – “And say, ‘Who one from tribes Israel, which no ascended unto Yehovah the Mizpah.’ And behold! No came man unto the camp from Jabesh Gilead unto the assembly.”

Two stones can be overturned at one time. The people have made an oath that anyone who didn’t come up to the assembly was to be put to death. However, this was not a kherem, or total devotion to the Lord. If it was, it would include the entire family along with all of their possessions. Rather, it was a call for the fighting men to assemble, as is evidenced in Judges 20.

And more, as these men didn’t come out, they did not participate in the oath concerning the giving of daughters. As such, they will relinquish their lives while implicitly giving their daughters.

The name Jabesh (Yavesh) comes from the verb yavesh, to be dry, dried up, or withered. It is used in the drying up of a river, land, bones, etc. It is also used of the withering of grass. Thus, Jabesh Gilead means something like Dry (Drying) Perpetual Fountain or Withered (Withering) Perpetual Fountain. Its location is east of the Jordan in the tribal allotment of Manasseh.

For when the people were counted, indeed, not one of the inhabitants of Jabesh Gilead was there.

vayithpaqed ha’am v’hineh ein sham ish miyovoshve yavesh gilad – “And visits the people. And Behold! Naught there man from inhabitings Jabesh Gilead.” To visit here means to review them for a full census as you would when counting an army. In this action, they found that, sure enough, Jabesh Gilead failed to come up and prepare for the battle against Benjamin.

As such, it is as if they had allied with Benjamin against Israel. This will become a part of the solution to the dilemma faced by the collective nation…

10 So the congregation sent out there twelve thousand of their most valiant men,

vayishl’khu sham ha’edah shnem asar eleph ish mibne hekhayil – “And send there, the congregation, two ten thousand man from sons the valor.” The Latin Vulgate says ten thousand. This was probably to avoid a difficulty based on the assumption that there were one thousand drawn off from each tribe.

If so, with Levi and Benjamin excluded, it would leave ten or eleven tribes depending on whether Joseph was reckoned as one or if Ephraim and Manasseh were counted separately. But nothing is said of a set number from each tribe. It appears that they simply mustered twelve thousand out of the whole for the battle ahead.

The number is derived from twelve, perfection of government or governmental perfection, and ten, completeness of order where the whole cycle is complete.

10 (con’t) and commanded them, saying, “Go and strike the inhabitants of Jabesh Gilead with the edge of the sword, including the women and children.

vaytsavu otham l’mor l’khu v’hikithem eth yoshve yavesh gilad l’pi kherev v’hanashim v’hataph – “And command them, to say, ‘Walk and struck inhabitings Jabesh Gilead to mouth sword, and the woman, and the children.’” There was to be a complete eradication of those in the city by the kherev, or sword. However, one exception is to be made, which is implicitly stated next…

11 And this is the thing that you shall do: You shall utterly destroy every male, and every woman who has known a man intimately.”

v’zeh hadavar asher taasu kal zakhar v’khal ishah yodaath mishkav zakhar takharimu – “And this the word which doing: All male and all woman knowing bed male – anathematize.” Because of what happened with Midian before entering Canaan, there was no need for the explicit command to retain the living females. This is the same generation that heard the words of Moses –

“And Moses said to them: ‘Have you kept all the women alive? 16 Look, these women caused the children of Israel, through the counsel of Balaam, to trespass against the Lord in the incident of Peor, and there was a plague among the congregation of the Lord. 17 Now therefore, kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman who has known a man intimately. 18 But keep alive for yourselves all the young girls who have not known a man intimately.’” Numbers 31:15-20

The kherem, or anathematized, of the inhabitants was similar to an offering to the Lord. The virgins are to be excepted so they can be presented as an offering to Benjamin, a tribe of the Lord’s people…

12 So they found among the inhabitants of Jabesh Gilead four hundred young virgins who had not known a man intimately;

vayimtsu miyovoshve yavesh gilad arba meoth naarah v’thulah asher lo yad’ah ish l’mishkav zakhar – “And find, from inhabitings Jabesh Gilead, four hundred damsel, virgin, who not known man to bed male.” The number of dead is unimportant to the narrative and so it is excluded. However, the number of virgins is significant and is thus given.

It is a derivative of four, the number of creation and the world (and city) number, and ten which was just explained. It is also a derivative of forty and ten. Forty is described by Bullinger –

“It is the product of 5 and 8, and points to the action of grace (5), leading to and ending in revival and renewal (8). This is certainly the case where forty relates to a period of evident probation. But where it relates to enlarged dominion, or to renewed or extended rule, then it does so in virtue of its factors 4 and 10, and in harmony with their signification.”

12 (con’t) and they brought them to the camp at Shiloh, which is in the land of Canaan.

If this is referring to the virgins, as seems natural, there is a gender discord because the pronoun is masculine: vayaviu otham el hamakhaneh Shiloh asher b’erets k’naan – “And bring them [masc. pl.] unto the camp, Shiloh, which in land Canaan.” That this is referring to the virgins is more definitively supported by the words of verse 22, which will be seen when we get there.

The main camp of Israel is in Shiloh. With the war ending, that is where Phineas and the ark would return. The girls would be brought there until they were given in marriage to one of the Benjamites.

Shiloh means Tranquility. Canaan signifies Humbled, Humiliated, or even Subdued.

13 Then the whole congregation sent word to the children of Benjamin who were at the rock of Rimmon, and announced peace to them.

vayishl’khu kal ha’edah vaydabru el b’ne vinyamin asher b’sela rimon vayiqr’u lahem shalom – “And send, all the congregation, and word unto sons Benjamin who in Sela Rimmon. And call to them, ‘Peace!’” This means that the representative elders of each tribe went as a delegation to meet Benjamin, or a messenger went, carrying the words of approval from all the elders.

The time of warfare is over and a guarantee of Shalom, Peace, is granted to the remnant of the tribe.

Rimmon means Pomegranate. But the pomegranate symbolizes harvest-ready fruit, so it can further mean Mature Mind or Harvest Ready. The type of rock is a sela, or craggy rock. That word comes from a root signifying to be lofty.

14 So Benjamin came back at that time, and they gave them the women whom they had saved alive of the women of Jabesh Gilead;

vayashav Binyamin baeth hahi vayitnu lahem hanashim asher khiyu minshei yavesh gilad – “And returns, Benjamin, in the time, the it. And give, to them, the women who lived from women Jabesh Gilead.” The offer of peace would not be considered a ruse. If Israel wanted four hundred from Benjamin dead, they would have simply sent the army and wiped them out.

Rather, it was understood as a binding offer of peace. As a bonus for the process of reconciliation, the damsels kept at Shiloh would be presented to the men. From this, it would be understood that a full state of harmony between the tribes was reestablished…

14 (con’t) and yet they had not found enough for them.

The words are intentionally sparse to highlight the lack: v’lo matsu lahem ken – “And not found to them thus.” Despite having obtained four hundred virgins, they realized they had not found enough wives for all six hundred of the men of Benjamin. As such, there is a lack that will leave two hundred unmarried, so there needs to be another way of obtaining wives for those still without. In the short term…

No tribe will be rubbed out of Israel
The Lord has covenanted with them forever
And of the faithfulness of the Lord, we can tell
Because He will never fail – no, not ever

The Lord’s promises are sure and true
They can be relied upon without any doubt
When they apply personally to me or you
Trust them, you are dealing with the Lord’s clout

When He says that you are saved
Why would you ever question it is so?
The road to glory He has paved
Through faith in Christ, that’s all you need to know

III. A Yearly Festival of the Lord (verses 15-19)

15 And the people grieved for Benjamin, because the Lord had made a void in the tribes of Israel.

Rather: v’haam nikham l’vinyamin ki asah Yehovah perets b’shivte Yisrael – “And the people sighed to Benjamin. For made, Yehovah, breach in tribes Israel.” One can see the people, once they realized that there were more men of Benjamin than available women they had gathered for them, looking in the eyes of the other two hundred, looking away, and sighing.

It is not so much a void in Israel, but a breach. It is as if a dam has cracked, and a certain amount of one of the tribes is being lost downstream. Even if the dam can be repaired, the lost water cannot be retrieved. This is the thought on the minds of the people.

16 Then the elders of the congregation said, “What shall we do for wives for those who remain, since the women of Benjamin have been destroyed?”

This is probably not a question at all, but an assertion: vayomru ziqne ha’edah mah naaseh lanotarim l’nashim ki nishm’dah mibinyamin ishah – “And say, elders the congregation, ‘What do to the remainings to wives, for destroyed from Benjamin women.’” There is a conundrum. It is apparent that they had promised wives to the men in their offer of peace. However, the supply did not meet the demand.

As such, they state where women can be obtained from and how it will be done. All the women of Benjamin were dead, and the virgins of Jabesh Gilead, the only group who did not show up as mandated, were insufficient. It appears impossible, but a solution is available…

17 And they said, “There must be an inheritance for the survivors of Benjamin, that a tribe may not be destroyed from Israel.

The words are difficult and widely debated: vayomru y’rushath p’leitah l’vinyamin v’lo yimakheh shevet miyisrael – “And say, ‘Possession deliverance to Benjamin. And not rubbed tribe from Israel.’” No matter how they are translated, they require insertions or an explanation to be understood.

The words could be as the NKJV indicates, an adamant assertion that there must be more women or the tribe will perish. But this would assume that they honestly believe the tribe could be lost over two hundred men lacking wives. That seems unlikely.

Ellicott and Keil tie the possession to the land itself, “i.e., the tribe-land of Benjamin shall remain an independent possession for the Benjaminites who have escaped the massacre, so that a tribe may not be destroyed out of Israel” (Keil). Thus, they needed to find wives for the men. But that has nothing to do with the context.

And more, the land was given by the Lord to Benjamin. The other tribes of Israel had no right to withhold it or grant it. Cambridge naturally says the text is corrupt, which is their default setting.

Rather than this being an adamant assertion that there must be more women or the tribe will perish, it seems more likely that this is an adamant assurance by the leaders that the tribe will not be rubbed out. “There will be women (a possession) for those of Benjamin who were delivered (a deliverance), and no tribe will be rubbed from Israel. Stop weeping!”

Lange agrees with this, and it makes the most sense based on simple logic, the progression of thought, and the minimally provided Hebrew. Understanding this, it next says…

18 However, we cannot give them wives from our daughters,

The conjunction is simply “and,” but “however” would rightly explain the thought based on the emphatic “we” that follows: v’anakhnu lo nukhal latheth lahem nashim mibnothnu – “And we, not able to give to them wives from our daughters.’”

The congregation has vowed that they will not give women to Benjamin. This was understood and cannot be violated. Anyone who gave a daughter to a Benjamite would face the consequences. This was said to confirm the oath and ensure the vow’s validity. The reason for it is again reiterated and expanded upon…

18 (con’t) for the children of Israel have sworn an oath, saying, ‘Cursed be the one who gives a wife to Benjamin.’”

ki nishbu v’ne Yisrael l’mor arur nothen ishah l’vinyamin – “For sworn, sons Israel, to say, ‘Cursed giving wife to Benjamin.” All in the congregation made an oath. The details were specific. Anyone giving a wife to Benjamin would be in violation of the oath, and a curse would be upon such a person. Despite this…

19 Then they said, “In fact, there is a yearly feast of the Lord in Shiloh,

The name of the location here and verse 21 is spelled without an “h” ending: vayomru hineh khag Yehovah b’shilo miyamim yamimah – “And say, “Behold! Feast Yehovah in Shilo from days, days-ward.” This confirms the thought that the previous words were an adamant assertion to alleviate the woes of those who were mourning. In other words, “Stop weeping! We have a plan, and here are the details. It is true that nobody can give away a daughter to Benjamin, but that is not necessary to repair this breach.”

The term “from days” is rightly paraphrased as “yearly.” There were three annual feasts. The next one was coming in the days ahead (days-ward), and a solution to the problem rested there. The ingenious cunning of the plan will be laid out with intricate detail…

*19 (fin) which is north of Bethel, on the east side of the highway that goes up from Bethel to Shechem, and south of Lebonah.”

asher mitsphonah l’beith el mizr’khah ha’shemesh limsilah ha’olah mibeith el sh’khmah u-minegev lilvonah – “which from north-ward to Bethel from ascension-ward, the sun, to highway – the ascending – from Bethel Shechem-ward, and from south to Lebonah.’” Of the words, Ellicott rightly says, “This elaborate description of the site of Shiloh, a place which is so often mentioned elsewhere without any addition, is extremely curious.”

Some scholars say the words are a gloss. Others say the elders were being very precise so that Benjamin would know exactly where Shiloh was, but that makes no sense at all. If this is where the annual pilgrim feasts were, everyone would know exactly where Shiloh was.

Instead, it appears that these words are an explanatory parenthesis by the author, not a description by the elders. The location of the Ark of the Covenant had changed by the time Samuel (if he is the chronicler) compiled the narrative. Therefore, he is describing, under inspiration, the layout of the land for the reader.

Tsaphonah means northward, coming from tsaphon, north. North is the hidden direction in the northern hemisphere, where the sun moves toward or away from it, depending on the time of year. Thus, the word signifies Concealed.

Mizrakhah signifies eastward, coming from zarakh, to rise or come forth.

Shechem means the neck between the shoulders. Thus, it literally means Shoulder or Back. But that comes from shakam, to start or rise early, so it gives the sense of (Having a Sense of) Responsibility, as in Personal Interest.

The south, negev, signifies Parched.

Lebonah is found only here in Scripture. It comes from the verb laven, to be white and to make bricks. Thus, it literally means White or Frankincense (which is white), but the word laven has consistently been used in Scripture to describe works, as in man’s works, because bricks turn white when they are fired, but bricks are the work of men’s hands.

That is the end of our review today. We covered a lot of verses and a great deal of information, but it is time to stop and finish both the chapter and the book of Judges next week. A key lesson that can be discovered in so many commentaries on verses like these is that the Bible is to be taken literally and in its proper context.

We are not to appropriate things from Scripture or apply them to ourselves if we do not know what the subject matter is dealing with.

Obviously, in typology, we may find useful applications in our lives. Despite this, in a clear reading of the Bible, we can easily see that the church has not replaced Israel, and those in the church are not “spiritual Israel” or the ten (supposedly) lost tribes of Israel.

And more, we need more than our subjective opinion that the text has been manipulated, added to, or is missing something. Unless there is objective evidence of this, we should never make such claims. Just because we don’t understand what is going on doesn’t mean the content is in question.

It may just mean we have no idea what is being conveyed for one of various reasons. Next week, we will go over the typology of the chapter. When we do, if the typology matches the narrative, then all of the commentaries that say the text is in question are wrong.

Rather, we should give the word the benefit of the doubt, trusting that it is reliable. Only with valid evidence that there is a question should we then search out that avenue. Let us hold fast to the word and cherish it as the most valuable treasure, because it is!

Closing Verse: “Bless God in the congregations,
The Lord, from the fountain of Israel.
27 There is little Benjamin, their leader,
The princes of Judah and their company,
The princes of Zebulun and the princes of Naphtali.” Psalm 68:26, 27

Next Week: Judges 21:20-25 What a great story it has been to tell, like a slice of heaven… (No King in Israel, Part XI) (58th and Final Judges Sermon)

The Lord has you exactly where He wants you. He has a good plan and purpose for you. It is He who judges His people according to their deeds. So, follow Him, live for Him, and trust Him, and He will do marvelous things for you and through you.

No King in Israel, Part X

Now the men of Israel
Had sworn an oath at Mizpah, saying during this time of strife
“None of us shall give his daughter
To Benjamin as a wife

Then the people came to the house of God
And remained before God till evening there
They lifted up their voices and wept bitterly
And said, “O LORD God of Israel” in their prayer

Why has this in Israel come to pass? Do tell
That today there should be one tribe missing in Israel?

So it was, on the next morning
That the people rose early to make their profferings
And built an altar there
And offered burnt offerings and peace offerings

The children of Israel said
“Who is there among all the tribes of Israel, speak the word
Who did not come up
With the assembly to the LORD?

For they had made a great oath concerning anyone
Who had not come up, speaking their shibboleth
To the LORD at Mizpah, saying
“He shall surely be put to death

And the children of Israel
Grieved for Benjamin their brother
And said, “One tribe is cut off from Israel today
As a son taken from his mother

What shall we do for wives
For those who remain, who kept their lives
Seeing we have sworn by the LORD
That we will not give them our daughters as wives?

And they said, “What one is there
From the tribes of Israel
Who did not come up to Mizpah to the LORD?
Speak up! Do tell!

And, in fact, no one had come (and they should be trembly!)
To the camp from Jabesh Gilead to the assembly

For when the people were counted during this affair
Indeed, not one of the inhabitants of Jabesh Gilead was there

So the congregation sent out there twelve thousand
Of their most valiant men, and commanded them, saying
“Go and strike the inhabitants of Jabesh Gilead
With the edge of the sword, including the women and children
———-so they were relaying

And this is the thing that you shall do:
You shall utterly destroy every male
And every woman who has known a man intimately
Yes, every such female

So they found among the inhabitants of Jabesh Gilead
Four hundred young virgins who had not known a man intimately
And they brought them to the camp at Shiloh
Which is in the land of Canaan, north of the Salt Sea

Then the whole congregation sent word
To the children of Benjamin
Who were at the rock of Rimmon
And announced peace to them

So Benjamin came back at that time
And they gave them the women whom they had saved alive
Of the women of Jabesh Gilead
And yet they had not found enough for them
———- (Still missing 40 x 5)

And the people grieved for Benjamin for a spell
Because the LORD had made a void in the tribes of Israel

Then the elders of the congregation said
“What shall we do for wives to be deployed
For those who remain
Since the women of Benjamin have been destroyed?

And they said
“There must be an inheritance, so we tell
For the survivors of Benjamin
That a tribe may not be destroyed from Israel

However, we cannot give them wives from our daughters
For the children of Israel (to their chagrin)
Have sworn an oath, saying
‘Cursed be the one who gives a wife to Benjamin

Then they said, “In fact, there is a yearly feast of the LORD
In Shiloh, which is north of Bethel, oorah!
On the east side of the highway that goes up
From Bethel to Shechem, and south of Lebonah

Lord God, turn our hearts to be obedient to Your word
Give us wisdom to be ever faithful to You
May we carefully heed each thing we have heard
Yes, Lord God may our hearts be faithful and true

And we shall be content and satisfied in You alone
We will follow You as we sing our songs of praise
Hallelujah to You; to us Your path You have shown
Hallelujah we shall sing to You for all of our days

Hallelujah and Amen…

 

 

 

 

Now the men of Israel had sworn an oath at Mizpah, saying, “None of us shall give his daughter to Benjamin as a wife.” Then the people came to the house of God, and remained there before God till evening. They lifted up their voices and wept bitterly, and said, “O Lord God of Israel, why has this come to pass in Israel, that today there should be one tribe missing in Israel?”

So it was, on the next morning, that the people rose early and built an altar there, and offered burnt offerings and peace offerings. The children of Israel said, “Who is there among all the tribes of Israel who did not come up with the assembly to the Lord?” For they had made a great oath concerning anyone who had not come up to the Lord at Mizpah, saying, “He shall surely be put to death.” And the children of Israel grieved for Benjamin their brother, and said, “One tribe is cut off from Israel today. What shall we do for wives for those who remain, seeing we have sworn by the Lord that we will not give them our daughters as wives?”

And they said, “What one is there from the tribes of Israel who did not come up to Mizpah to the Lord?” And, in fact, no one had come to the camp from Jabesh Gilead to the assembly. For when the people were counted, indeed, not one of the inhabitants of Jabesh Gilead was there. 10 So the congregation sent out there twelve thousand of their most valiant men, and commanded them, saying, “Go and strike the inhabitants of Jabesh Gilead with the edge of the sword, including the women and children. 11 And this is the thing that you shall do: You shall utterly destroy every male, and every woman who has known a man intimately.” 12 So they found among the inhabitants of Jabesh Gilead four hundred young virgins who had not known a man intimately; and they brought them to the camp at Shiloh, which is in the land of Canaan.

13 Then the whole congregation sent word to the children of Benjamin who were at the rock of Rimmon, and announced peace to them. 14 So Benjamin came back at that time, and they gave them the women whom they had saved alive of the women of Jabesh Gilead; and yet they had not found enough for them.

15 And the people grieved for Benjamin, because the Lord had made a void in the tribes of Israel.

16 Then the elders of the congregation said, “What shall we do for wives for those who remain, since the women of Benjamin have been destroyed?” 17 And they said, “There must be an inheritance for the survivors of Benjamin, that a tribe may not be destroyed from Israel. 18 However, we cannot give them wives from our daughters, for the children of Israel have sworn an oath, saying, ‘Cursed be the one who gives a wife to Benjamin.’ ” 19 Then they said, “In fact, there is a yearly feast of the Lord in Shiloh, which is north of Bethel, on the east side of the highway that goes up from Bethel to Shechem, and south of Lebonah.”

 

 

 

Judges 20:36-48 (No King in Israel, Part IX)

Artwork by Douglas Kallerson.

Judges 20:36-48
(No King in Israel, Part IX)

(Typed 22 Jul 2024) The 21st of July was a marvelous day, long and tiring, but all Sundays are. I start at 3:30 am, and there is something to do right through 6 pm. There is no such thing as a 20-minute break, except here at church before the sermon, and that usually involves me taking care of something or someone.

Needless to say, at 6:10 pm, I was quite happy to shut down the computer and say, “Time for a shower, dinner, and then I can sleep.” Unfortunately, at 6:12 pm, Hideko walked up and asked why there was a puddle under Grandpa’s car.

I had no idea what she was talking about, but when I walked out, I saw the whole driveway was flooded there. When I moved his car, the bricks were bulging up like Mr. Creosote. That meant digging up the driveway at 6:30 pm to try and stop an obviously huge water leak.

If I just left it alone, we’d have a one or two-thousand-dollar water bill and possibly no water for the entire night. I had work to do. No shower, no food, no sleep…

Text Verse: “O Israel, you have sinned from the days of Gibeah;
There they stood.
The battle in Gibeah against the children of iniquity
Did not overtake them.” Hosea 10:9

The battle of Gibeah will deal with works. That will be seen as we continue through the verses and explain the typology. There are some works we must do, such as fixing the water line. It could not be fixed Sunday night, so we had no water. I got a temporary fix on it Monday morning, interrupting sermon typing. But at least it got done.

The entire driveway, from the road to the house needed to be dug up to replace the copper line that was now over 50 years old and which needed to be replaced. Then the entire parking lot of paver bricks needed to be re-laid, but that would be contracted out.

It will be a lot of hard, hot, tiring work, and it will be expensive. But it is nothing compared to what Jesus did. He did all the work necessary for man to be saved. All of it. To say otherwise is to essentially slap God in the face.

We cannot earn our way to heaven, and we cannot outdo what Jesus has done. To attempt to do so will result in condemnation. People who think they are meriting God’s favor through the law are deluded. They have rejected Jesus and bear the spirit of antichrist.

Such truths as this are to be found in His superior word. And so, let us turn to that precious word once again, and… May God speak to us through His word today, and may His glorious name ever be praised.

I. The Rock of Rimmon (verses 36-48)

These verses reexplain the battle described in verses 30 to 35, providing more detail than previously.

36 So the children of Benjamin saw that they were defeated.

vayiru v’ne vinyamin ki nigaphu – “And see, sons Benjamin, that struck.” There are two possibilities as to who “they” is referring to. The first is Benjamin, seeing that they have been defeated before Israel based on verse 35, which said, “And strikes, Yehovah, Benjamin to faces Israel.”

The second, correct, view is that this is speaking of the men of Israel being struck before Benjamin as stated in verse 32, “And say, sons Benjamin, ‘Struck, they, to our faces according to in the first.’”

Israel feigned defeat as in the previous days of fighting. This has Benjamin confident. They are being lulled into a sense of their own overwhelming superiority to make a bad decision that will cost them the battle…

36 (con’) The men of Israel had given ground to the Benjamites, because they relied on the men in ambush whom they had set against Gibeah.

vayitnu ish Yisrael maqom l’vinyamin ki batkhu el ha’orev asher samu el hagivah – “And give man Israel place to Benjaman, for trusted unto the ambushing who set unto the Gibeah.” The men of Israel pretended that they were once again being beaten by Benjamin. As such, they retreated. This would draw Benjamin away from the city and expose it to those lying in ambush…

37 And the men in ambush quickly rushed upon Gibeah; the men in ambush spread out and struck the whole city with the edge of the sword.

v’ha’orev hekhishu vayiphsh’tu el hagivah vayimsokh ha’orev vayak eth kal ha’ir l’pi kharev – “And the ambushing hastened and deploy unto the Gibeah, and draws the ambushing and strikes all the city to mouth sword.” With Benjamin successfully drawn away from the city, the city is left in a state of nudity, as indicated in verse 33, which said, “and ambushing Israel gushes from his place from nudity Geba.” Those set in ambush rushed into the city.

Some think the word mashak, draw, means they drew a blast on the trumpet to alert all of those ambushing to take the city. The word was used like that in Joshua 6:5. This is incorrect. That would alert Benjamin of the attack.

Rather, the words “and draws the ambushing” mean that those set in the ambush extended themselves, being drawn out, in order to surround and attack the city. This is how the word was used in Judges 4:6, 7. Once the city was sufficiently surrounded, those with access would rush through the gates and begin the job of killing everyone inside with the mouth of the kherev (חרב), sword.

38 Now the appointed signal between the men of Israel and the men in ambush was that they would make a great cloud of smoke rise up from the city,

A paraphrase is needed. A direct translation is almost unintelligible. And more, the construction causes all kinds of speculation on what is being said: v’ha’moed hayah l’ish Yisrael im ha’orev herev [or kherev] l’haalotham masath he’ashan min ha’ir – “And the appointment was, to man Israel with the ambushing, increase [or sword] to their ascending, ascension the smoke from the city.”

The words, “And the appointment was, to man Israel with the ambushing” refer to what was preset by both parties, meaning the main force of Israel and those set in ambush. They agreed upon the sign. It is the next words, translated as “increase to their ascending,” that are so complicated – הֶ֕רֶב לְהַעֲלֹותָ֛ם.

The first word, herev, has several problems that are quite complicated. The word itself is spelled hay, resh, beith. It is believed to be from ravah, to be or become great. One opinion is that it is an apocopated (shortened by omitting one or more sounds at the end) form of an imperative, mixing the direct with the indirect.

Another opinion is that it is an apocopated infinitive. A third is that it is an incorrect repetition of the preceding word as they are similarly spelled –

הָאֹרֵ֑ב / הארב
הֶ֕רֶב / הרב

A third possibility is that it is simply a gloss (an annotation, a footnote, an explanation, a comment or commentary, etc.). A fourth possibility is that the spelling is actually kheth, resh, beith. The hay and the kheth are almost identical, ה or ח.

This would then change the meaning to “sword to their ascending.” This is supported by some Hebrew manuscripts and one Greek manuscript. Each explanation has its detractors and its own pros and cons.

39 whereupon the men of Israel would turn in battle.

vayahaphokh ish Yisrael bamilkhamah – “And turns, man Israel, in the war.” The forces of Israel, who had retreated as if they were beaten again by Benjamin, have seen the signal of the smoke ascending. With that, they turn in order to face those chasing them.

39 (con’t) Now Benjamin had begun to strike and kill about thirty of the men of Israel. For they said, “Surely they are defeated before us, as in the first battle.”

u-vinyamin hekhel l’hakoth khalalim b’ish Yisrael kishloshim ish ki amru akh nigoph nigaph hu l’phanenu kamilkhamah harishonah – “And Benjamin began to strike pierced in man Israel, according to thirty man. For said, ‘Surely, striking struck he to our faces according to the war the first.” This conveys new information, explaining how the defeat of Benjamin took place.

Benjamin was chasing Israel who was fleeing as if they were losing. While chasing them, thirty men of Israel fell. Benjamin thought things were going just as in the previous battles, which encouraged them to continue the chase, knowing they would be victorious.

Bullinger says, “THIRTY being 3 x 10, denotes in a higher degree the perfection of Divine order, as marking the right moment.”

40 But when the cloud began to rise from the city in a column of smoke, the Benjamites looked behind them, and there was the whole city going up in smoke to heaven.

v’hamaseth hekhelah laaloth min ha’ir amud ashan vayiphen Binyamin akaharav v’hineh alah kh’lil ha’ir ha’shamaymah – “And the ascension began to ascend from the city, column smoke. And turns, Benjamin, behind him. And behold! Ascended whole the city the heaven-ward.” The city was overrun. Once everyone inside was killed, Israel set it on fire. The smoke was the signal for the army of Israel, who is currently pretending to retreat from Benjamin.

With the city on fire, Benjamin saw it. The realization of their error would have completely horrified them. But more…

41 And when the men of Israel turned back, the men of Benjamin panicked, for they saw that disaster had come upon them.

v’ish Yisrael haphakh vayibahel ish Binyamin ki raah ki nag’ah alav ha’raah – “And man Israel turned. And shuddered man Benjamin, for saw that touched upon him the evil.” Benjamin is facing the entire army of Israel who has assumed the initiative. Gibeon is being consumed by fire, meaning Benjamin’s families and homes. They cannot retreat there, and Israel is coming full upon them. Thus, they shudder in fear of what they have to face…

42 Therefore they turned their backs before the men of Israel in the direction of the wilderness;

vayiphnu liphne ish Yisrael el derekh ha’midbar – “And turn to faces man Israel unto road the wilderness.” The men of Benjamin were facing Israel. Thus, they turned their faces away and fled on the road to the wilderness in an attempt to save themselves…

42 (con’t) but the battle overtook them, and whoever came out of the cities they destroyed in their midst.

Rather: v’ha’milkhamah hidbiqathu vaasher mehearim mashkhithim otho b’thokho – “And the war impinged him. And who from the cities, ruined (pl.) him in his midst.” Translations that make the singulars into plurals do so, trying to explain the difficulties, but they only make things worse.

The words “in his midst” are either referring to Benjamin or the wilderness (meaning “in its midst”). If it refers to the wilderness, then everything in between is a circumstantial clause. If it refers to Benjamin, then “who from the cities” would probably mean those of the cities of Benjamin who fled from the cities were destroyed along with the soldiers of Benjamin.

As there is more than one city of Benjamin, and because only Gibeah is said to be burned, the latter seems likely because it would then explain Chapter 21, where there are no women of Benjamin left.

The masculine “him” would be all-encompassing, speaking of the aged, the youth too young to fight, and the women. Anyone who fled the cities was killed along with the warriors of Benjamin.

43 They surrounded the Benjamites, chased them,

The words are obscure and complicated: kitru eth Binyamin hirdiphuhu m’nukhah – “Enclosed Benjamin. Pursued his rest.”

There is a new word, kathar. It signifies to enclose as if in surrounding or besieging. Benjamin is completely hemmed in. As for the word menukhah, it is a noun signifying rest or a resting place. It seems to mean that Benjamin has no place of rest. As soon as he thinks he can stop and rest, Israel is right there to destroy him.

Because of the complicated nature of the words, some translations just say “from Nukhah” which would be the name of a place meaning Rest.

43 (con’t) and easily trampled them down as far as the front of Gibeah toward the east.

hidrikhuhu ad nokhakh hagivah mimizrakh shamesh – “Tread him until front the Gibeah from ascension sun.” Israel chased Benjamin from the point where they had been pursued until they turned back, becoming the pursuers. This continued until they were just in front of the now burned-out city of Gibeah. This pursuit was from east to west. Of those in this pursuit…

44 And eighteen thousand men of Benjamin fell; all these were men of valor.

vayiplu mibinyamin shmoneh asar eleph ish eth kal eleh anshe khayil – “And falls, from Benjamin, eight ten thousand man. All these men valor.” The number 18 was explained in the previous sermon.

45 Then they turned and fled toward the wilderness to the rock of Rimmon;

vayiphnu vayanusu hamidbarah el selah ha’rimmon – “And turn, and flee the wilderness-ward, unto Rock the Rimmon.” This refers to the remaining men of Benjamin who have not yet been killed. Upon coming to the east side of Gibeah and realizing there was no haven left where they could retreat, they turned and fled in the direction of the wilderness as far as Rock the Rimmon.

The name Rimmon means Pomegranate. But the pomegranate symbolizes harvest-ready fruit, and so it can further mean Mature Mind or Harvest Ready. The type of rock is a sela, or craggy rock. That comes from a root signifying to be lofty.

45 (con’t) and they cut down five thousand of them on the highways. Then they pursued them relentlessly up to Gidom, and killed two thousand of them.

vayol’luhu bamsiloth khameshet alaphim ish vayadbiqu akharav ad gidom vayaku mimenu alpayim ish – “And he gleans in the highways five thousands man. And impinge after him until Gidom. And strike from him two thousand man.” The meaning of glean is that the army was already picked through like in a harvest. Anything left is then gleaned, or picked clean, one berry or stalk at a time.

Of those not killed on the way to Gibeah and who were in flight towards the wilderness, five thousand more were killed. Once in the area of Gidom, two thousand more were killed. The name Gidom is derived from the account. It signifies Cut Off or Exterminated, coming from gada, to hew down or cut off. Benjamin had been cut off at this location.

Five thousand is a multiple of five, grace, and ten, completeness of order where “nothing is wanting; that the number and order are perfect; that the whole cycle is complete” (Bullinger).

46 So all who fell of Benjamin that day were twenty-five thousand men who drew the sword; all these were men of valor.

vayhi khal ha’nophlim mibinyamin esrim vakhamishah eleph ish sholeph kherev bayom ha’hu eth kal eleh anshe khayil – “And is all the falling from Benjamin twenty and five thousand man drawing sword in the day, the it. All these men valor.” The number matches: 18+5+2 = 25. The number is a multiple of fives and ten. This is a record of only those killed on the third day of battle. The more precise number on this day was stated in verse 35, 25,100.

47 But six hundred men turned and fled toward the wilderness to the rock of Rimmon, and they stayed at the rock of Rimmon for four months.

vayiphnu vayanusu hamidbarah el sela ha’rimmon shesh meoth ish vayeshvu b’sela Rimmon arbaah khodashim – “And turn, and flee the wilderness-ward unto Rock the Rimmon six hundreds man. And sit in Rock Rimmon four months.” There are only six hundred male soldiers of Benjamin who survived. They fled as far as the rock, and that is where they remained.

The number is derived from six, the number of man, especially fallen man, and tens. Four is the number of material creation, the world number, and especially the city number.

The numbers now total 25,700 because of the number in verse 35. But Judges 20:15 said there were 26,700 total. Of course people complain about this, adjust the text, claim whoever recorded the narrative was a doof, etc. However, it is simple to explain. In the previous two battles, it would be unthinkable that tens of thousands of Israel died in each engagement, but none of Benjamin died.

As such, the additional 1000 are a rounded figure who certainly perished during those conflicts. There being less than one thousand on the two days, the numbers were not recorded to indicate the superlative nature of the rout of Israel by Benjamin.

48 And the men of Israel turned back against the children of Benjamin, and struck them down with the edge of the sword—from every city, men and beasts, all who were found.

Rather: v’ish Yisrael shavu el b’ne vinyamin vayakum l’pi kherev meir m’thom ad b’hemah ad kal hanimtsa – “And man Israel turned unto sons Benjamin, and struck them to mouth sword from city, completion until beast until all the found.” The words mean that the men of the army of Israel turned back to destroy any remaining survivors in Benjamin, killing them all. This was in every city, and it included every beast and every person that breathed. No memory of Benjamin beyond the six hundred at Rock the Rimmon remained.

*48 (fin) They also set fire to all the cities they came to.

gam kal hearim hanimtsaoth shilkhu ba’esh – “Also, all the cities, the found, sent in the fire.” With the people dead in each city, they then proceeded to burn them down. It speaks of utter destruction. With that, the narrative is complete.

Benjamin reaped the rewards of their wickedness, and Israel seemingly has a void in her tribes because of it. The final chapter of the book of Judges will detail how that void is dealt with. The entire narrative is a sad indictment of human sin and man’s failure to deal with it properly.

There is an inheritance that is coming to us
And it has already been granted: the deal is done
We have received the promise because of Jesus
It is based on His work alone – that of God’s own Son

There is no need to worry if we will enter glory
It is guaranteed because we believed what was told to us
We heard the word of faith, the gospel story
And we believed on the glorious name of Jesus

The inheritance is given to all who are sanctified
It has been granted because of what God has done
It has come through the blood of Jesus, He who died
And who rose again! In Him the victory is won

II. Explaining the Typology

The chapter is long and filled with an enormous amount of detail. To explain every verse in detail would take three full sermons. But we can get the picture through broad brushstrokes of what is being presented.

The first thing to remember is that the concubine of the Levite was divided and sent out to all Israel. She pictured the apostate church of the church age. She was violated by the Benjamites of Gibeah and died at the threshold of the house. It was a picture of her missing the rapture.

The Benjamites picture those with a false Jesus and a false gospel. They had super no bueno relations with the false church and eventually brought about her demise. The false church not raptured testifies to Israel.

Verse 1 noted that all of Israel, from Dan to Beersheba, came out to determine the matter. It speaks of the totality of Israel. If this is after the rapture, then it is inclusive of the tribulation period. If so, then Dan, Judge, represents the time of the rapture, something hinted at by James 5:9 where he says the Judge stands at the door.

Beersheba refers to the seven years of the tribulation initiated by the antichrist as was the case in the story of Genesis 26. This also includes those from the Gilead, The Perpetual Fountain, east of the Jordan. That represents the giving of the Spirit to Israel at the end of the tribulation.

The congregation has gathered at Mizpah, the Watchtower, to decide how to respond. The Lord is monitoring the events of Israel. The congregation includes the corners of the tribes, meaning the main supports, their leaders.

The number of those gathered is four hundred thousand. It is the world number and the number of completion where the whole cycle is complete. The totality of Israel in a final decision is thus the intent. Verse 3 noted that the sons of Benjamin heard about the gathering.

Benjamin represents the messianics of Israel. It is the ideology that a Messiah is coming. Those of Gibeah say that the Messiah is Jesus, but they believe in a false Jesus. Hence, they had relations with the false church. They are law observers who failed to trust in the grace of Christ. The cut-up concubine proves that the false church was not raptured, and these people, aligned with them, were not true believers as well.

In verse 8, the proposal is to destroy Gibeah, who has done these things. The agreement included casting the lot (verse 9) to decide who would go first. This shows that Israel does not have the Spirit to make decisions. Instead, they consult lots for guidance this way. Despite that, it does say the Lord responded. As it says in the Proverb, the Lord directs such things –

“The lot is cast into the lap,
But its every decision is from the Lord.” Proverbs 16:33

Verse 10 notes that Gibeah had done foolishness in Israel. They were morally corrupt. As noted, Gibeah is etymologically connected to the word Gabbatha. It has consistently pictured this. However, verse 10 and verse 33 record the name as Geba, not Gibeah.

Geba is missing the hay suffix. The letter is the fifth letter of the Aleph Beth, the number of grace. It also is used when referring to a connection to the Spirit. Its meaning is Look, Reveal, and Breath. Each is something connected with the Spirit. As such, it is a note that these people, though claiming the crucified Jesus, have claimed a false Jesus and have no connection to the Spirit.

Israel comes against this false doctrine, even if they don’t yet know what is right. In order to do so, they go to Benjamin telling them to give up the sons of worthlessness of Gibeah. Benjamin, the messianics, refuse.

To stop and explain, Israel is looking for a messiah. The problem is that whether they accept a false Jesus of works or another messiah, they are not looking for the true Messiah who has already come. This is the pickle that these people are in.

Thus, Benjamin, at this time, is reflective of the spirit of messiah, even if it is the false Messiah. The nation as a whole, whether messianic or not, is not looking for the Jesus of grace at this point. This story is given to show the resolution of that.

In their refusal, Benjamin musters 26000 soldiers. The meaning of the numbers indicates first a division, that of messianic thinking. Next, of rebellion, apostasy, defection, corruption, etc., that of doctrine. Also, completion of the whole cycle where the division and apostasy will end.

It also noted 700 choice men. These are mentioned separately in order to not mar the meaning of the number 26,000. Seven is spiritual perfection, ten is the completion of the cycle. It is a note that when the cycle is complete, spiritual perfection will be realized.

Out of this total number, there are noted 700 left-handed (actually shut up in the right hand) who could sling a stone at a hair and not miss. The description speaks of someone who is so law-observant that they never miss the mark in sinning. They weed out every sin. But it is still law-observance, and it fails to address inherited sin and the forgiveness of sin through Christ.

This is included to show that even the most meticulous messianic, who also observes every point of the law without fail, still stands opposed to grace and thus to the truth of God in Christ.

Verse 18 had the sons of Israel, meaning the soldiers, go to inquire of elohim, God in general, at Bethel (House of God). It is a general appeal to God that anyone, anywhere might do. Despite that, it says the Lord responded that Judah was to go first, meaning Praise is to go first. Unfortunately, one cannot praise God unless he praises Him through Jesus.

In going up, 22,000 of Israel died. There is division in their thinking, there is disorder, disorganization, and imperfection in their actions, and it carries through until the whole cycle is complete.

In their failure, they strengthen themselves. This is a note of self-trust. The Lord is not yet included in their every action. After this, they went up and wept before the Lord. Hooray, they are now acknowledging the Lord.

But it is the Lord in general, the same Lord they have consistently forsaken since Sinai, and the Lord they failed to recognize at His incarnation. The weeping is for their own loss, not for the Lord. They ask Him if they should go up against their brother again or not.

They acknowledge the brotherly affiliation, even if there is a point of strife between them. The answer from the Lord is to go up. No promises are made in the process. On this second day, 18,000 are killed. The number 18,000 is derived from two, nine, and ten, or three, six, and ten.

No matter which way eighteen is divided, there is the sense that man is not under the Lord but under transgression (2) and thus under judgment (9), and that it is for a divinely perfect period of time (3) where he remains fallen and destitute of God (6). That is seen in the words of Paul –

“But when the fullness of the time had come, God sent forth His Son, born of a woman, born under the law, to redeem those who were under the law, that we might receive the adoption as sons.” Galatians 4:4, 5

This state will be resolved when the whole cycle is complete (10). Verse 17 said, “all these drawing the sword.” The sword, kherev, has consistently pictured Mt. Horeb, the mount of the law. They were law observers who died under law. There is defeat from the messianics because of a failure to trust in Jesus.

Next, “all Israel” went up. The writing is on the wall. The messianics are wrong, but Israel under the law is just as wrong. And so they all go up to Bethel (House of God – think of the temple) and weep before the Lord, fasting till evening, and offering burnt offerings and peace offerings.

But this time, there is a new note. They inquire of the Lord, “And there, ark covenant the God in the days, the those.” This anticipates Israel acknowledging Jesus, the true Ark of the covenant of “the” God. The article always expresses those who are in a right relationship with Him or contrasts those who are not in a right relationship with Him. In this case, they now are.

It also noted the presence of Phinehas (Mouth of Judgement) the son of Eleazar (Whom God Helps), the son of Aaron (Very High). Each name anticipates Jesus, the true High Priest. He speaks the Judgment of God, He is the Help of God for His people –

“But I am poor and needy;
Make haste to me, O God!
You are my help [ezri] and my deliverer;
O Lord, do not delay.” Psalm 70:5

Jesus is the Son of the Most High (Luke 8:28). In finally consulting God through Him, the promise is made that God will deliver Benjamin into Israel’s hand. Verses 29-35 detailed the battle that would be conducted by setting an ambush.

Verse 31 had the unusual words “Gibeah-ward in the field.” The field is representative of the world (Matthew 13:38). The false doctrine of law observant messianics will be rooted out and wiped out.

Also, Israel arrayed in Baal Tamar, Lord of Righteousness, which pictures them standing on the merits of Christ and not their own righteousness. At that time, those ambushing are able to come against the nudity (the unprotected state) of Geba – the false belief in a Jesus inclusive of works, lacking grace and the Spirit.

From verse 36 through 46, the battle was reexplained in greater detail. Without going through every detail, verse 37 noted that all in the city were struck with the mouth of the sword. They died by the law observance they clung to.

Verse 38 had the unusual words, “And the appointment was, to man Israel with the ambushing, increase [or sword] to their ascending, ascension the smoke from the city.” As various texts read differently, it shows the confusion of the words. It would make no sense from the context to say a “sword” was ascending unless one understands that it is picturing the elimination of law observance.

Works of the law are completely burned up through acknowledging the grace of God in Christ. Only His works are sufficient to please God in the process of salvation. The ascension of the law in flames is what prompts Israel to turn and defeat the enemy.

Thirty of Israel were said to be struck down before this occurred. In other words, that moment was “the right moment,” marking “the perfection of Divine order.” The city that stood opposed to God was destroyed in fire.

Israel enclosed Benjamin and pursued his rest (verse 43). It is a nice touch. They were completely hemmed in and found no rest. Hebrews 4:3 says, “we who have believed do enter that rest.” Those who trust in self are not believers in the true Jesus. Rather, they follow a false Jesus.

Also, in verse 43, it noted they were trodden “until front the Gibeah from ascension sun [(mizrakh, from zarakh) sun (shemesh)].” It is a perfect description of Christ from His coming (zarakh) until His cross (represented by Gibeah) –

“But to you who fear My name
The Sun [shemesh] of Righteousness shall arise [zarakh]
With healing in His wings.” Malachi 4:2

Faith in the Messiah will destroy the doctrines of the false messianics. The number of those who fell in verse 44 is 18,000, a number which fits perfectly. In verse 45, those remaining soldiers of Benjamin fled toward Rock the Rimmon.

That signifies Lofty of the Mature Mind and will be fully explained in Chapter 21. On the way to Rock the Rimmon, it noted that 5,000 were gleaned. Five is the number of grace. One might think, “Where is grace in that?” But gleaning implies a thorough going over. In this case, some will be spared. So even if there is slaying, there is grace in the process.

From Rock the Rimmon, 2,000 were pursued to Gidom (Cut Off). It is the final number of the battle, and it signifies that this is the end of the destruction. The division and difference (2) are ended, and the whole cycle is complete (10).

In verse 46, the final tally for the third day is recorded, 25,000. Again, a number of grace mixed with completion. Despite the destruction, there is grace in the preservation at the end of the cycle. That is seen in the number noted in verse 47, six hundred.

These men will be used to re-establish the tribe of Benjamin in the next chapter. They are men who will enter into a new economy with a new direction. Despite that, verse 48 closes with a note that everyone and everything else of Benjamin and its cities was destroyed and burned in the fire.

It speaks of the complete removal of all the false messianic beliefs found in Israel. There is one Messiah, and He has come. And in His coming, He ended the law. Adherence to the law is no longer what God expects.

Rather, He wants His people to understand and accept the grace He has given in the coming of Jesus Christ. Nothing else will do and all else will be destroyed. This is what is being conveyed to us in Judges 20.

Yes, there is a real tribulation period coming on the world. It will involve real battles and a great loss of life on earth, but there is a spiritual battle that God is focusing on above all else. All worldly battles are simply an extension of failing to submit in the spiritual realm.

Out of curiosity, I counted the number of times that Israel is mentioned in this chapter. The total is 42. It is the number associated with the antichrist. Although this is speculation, it is reasonable to assume that God is giving us a hint.

Until Israel gets to the end of the tribulation period, they will still be under the law. Even those messianics who claim to know Jesus but still teach law observance are of the spirit of antichrist.

I have explained this before, but this is a good reminder: If you say you must do deeds of the law to be right with God, you are essentially denying the deity of Christ. If Christ is God, and if God fulfilled the law (in His humanity, meaning Jesus Christ), then to say that you must observe the law testifies that you do not believe Jesus is truly God.

It is the spirit of antichrist. How many ways God has shown us this is almost astonishing. And yet, more stories keep coming up with the exact same result in the typology. Judges is a book about judging. God judges us based on what we do. And the one thing He wants us to “do” is to believe in His Son. Nothing else will do.

Come to Jesus and be saved. Everything else leads to a bad end.

Closing Verse: “Then they said to Him, ‘What shall we do, that we may work the works of God?’
29 Jesus answered and said to them, ‘This is the work of God, that you believe in Him whom He sent.’” John 6:28, 29

Next Week: Judges 21:1-19 For Jay, this is uncharted territory, as he knows well – yes and amen… (No King in Israel, Part X) (57th Judges Sermon)

The Lord has you exactly where He wants you. He has a good plan and purpose for you. It is He who judges His people according to their deeds. So, follow Him, live for Him, and trust Him, and He will do marvelous things for you and through you.

(No King in Israel, Part IX)

So the children of Benjamin saw that they were defeated
The men of Israel had given ground to the Benjamites
Because they relied on the men in ambush
Whom they had set against Gibeah like noble knights

And the men in ambush quickly rushed upon Gibeah
The men in ambush spread out and struck
The whole city with the edge of the sword
Benjamin was out of luck

Now the appointed signal between the men of Israel
And the men in ambush was that they would make
A great cloud of smoke rise up from the city
Whereupon the men of Israel would turn in battle and
———-strong action they would take

Now Benjamin had begun to strike and kill
About thirty of the men of Israel
For they said, “Surely they are defeated before us
As in the first battle, so the signs seemed to tell

But when the cloud began to rise from the city
In a column of smoke, this was no joke
The Benjamites looked behind them
And there was the whole city going up to heaven in smoke

And when the men of Israel turned back
The men of Benjamin panicked, things were not swell
For they saw that disaster had come upon them
Therefore they turned their backs before the men of Israel

In the direction of the wilderness
But the battle overtook them, so it didst
And whoever came out of the cities
They destroyed in their midst

They surrounded the Benjamites, chased them, and easily
———-trampled them down
As far as the front of Gibeah toward the east
And eighteen thousand men of Benjamin fell
All these were men of valor from the greatest to the least

Then they turned and fled toward the wilderness
To the rock of RimmonAnd they cut down five thousand of them on the highways
Then they pursued them relentlessly up to Gidom

And killed two thousand of them
So all who fell of Benjamin that day
Were twenty-five thousand men who drew the sword
All these were men of valor, but with their lives they did pay

But six hundred men turned and fled
Toward the wilderness to the rock of Rimmon
And they stayed at the rock of Rimmon
For four months all alone

And the men of Israel turned back against the children of Benjamin
And struck them down with the edge of the sword
———-running them through
From every city, men and beasts, all who were found
They also set fire to all the cities they came to

Lord God, turn our hearts to be obedient to Your word
Give us wisdom to be ever faithful to You
May we carefully heed each thing we have heard
Yes, Lord God may our hearts be faithful and true

And we shall be content and satisfied in You alone
We will follow You as we sing our songs of praise
Hallelujah to You; to us Your path You have shown
Hallelujah we shall sing to You for all of our days

Hallelujah and Amen…

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

36 So the children of Benjamin saw that they were defeated. The men of Israel had given ground to the Benjamites, because they relied on the men in ambush whom they had set against Gibeah. 37 And the men in ambush quickly rushed upon Gibeah; the men in ambush spread out and struck the whole city with the edge of the sword. 38 Now the appointed signal between the men of Israel and the men in ambush was that they would make a great cloud of smoke rise up from the city, 39 whereupon the men of Israel would turn in battle. Now Benjamin had begun to strike and kill about thirty of the men of Israel. For they said, “Surely they are defeated before us, as in the first battle.” 40 But when the cloud began to rise from the city in a column of smoke, the Benjamites looked behind them, and there was the whole city going up in smoke to heaven. 41 And when the men of Israel turned back, the men of Benjamin panicked, for they saw that disaster had come upon them. 42 Therefore they turned their backs before the men of Israel in the direction of the wilderness; but the battle overtook them, and whoever came out of the cities they destroyed in their midst. 43 They surrounded the Benjamites, chased them, and easily trampled them down as far as the front of Gibeah toward the east. 44 And eighteen thousand men of Benjamin fell; all these were men of valor. 45 Then they turned and fled toward the wilderness to the rock of Rimmon; and they cut down five thousand of them on the highways. Then they pursued them relentlessly up to Gidom, and killed two thousand of them. 46 So all who fell of Benjamin that day were twenty-five thousand men who drew the sword; all these were men of valor.

47 But six hundred men turned and fled toward the wilderness to the rock of Rimmon, and they stayed at the rock of Rimmon for four months. 48 And the men of Israel turned back against the children of Benjamin, and struck them down with the edge of the sword—from every city, men and beasts, all who were found. They also set fire to all the cities they came to.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Psalm 42:5 (For I Shall Yet Praise Him)

Artwork by Douglas Kallerson.

Psalm 42:5
For I Shall Yet Praise Him

Now there was a day when his sons and daughters were eating and drinking wine in their oldest brother’s house; 14 and a messenger came to Job and said, “The oxen were plowing and the donkeys feeding beside them, 15 when the Sabeans raided them and took them away—indeed they have killed the servants with the edge of the sword; and I alone have escaped to tell you!”
16 While he was still speaking, another also came and said, “The fire of God fell from heaven and burned up the sheep and the servants, and consumed them; and I alone have escaped to tell you!”
17 While he was still speaking, another also came and said, “The Chaldeans formed three bands, raided the camels and took them away, yes, and killed the servants with the edge of the sword; and I alone have escaped to tell you!”
18 While he was still speaking, another also came and said, “Your sons and daughters were eating and drinking wine in their oldest brother’s house, 19 and suddenly a great wind came from across the wilderness and struck the four corners of the house, and it fell on the young people, and they are dead; and I alone have escaped to tell you!”
20 Then Job arose, tore his robe, and shaved his head; and he fell to the ground and worshiped. 21 And he said:
“Naked I came from my mother’s womb,
And naked shall I return there.
The Lord gave, and the Lord has taken away;
Blessed be the name of the Lord.”
22 In all this Job did not sin nor charge God with wrong. -Job 1:13-22

In 1776, and under a completely different context, Thomas Paine wrote a pamphlet called The American Crisis. It was a call to stir up the American army, which had faced defeats as they faced the British during the Revolutionary War. In his words, Paine wrote, “These are the times that try men’s souls.” It was such a poignant and stirring line that it has remained embedded in the American psyche ever since. It was also a key impetus for inspiring the army to cross the Delaware and attack the Hessian Army stationed at Trenton, New Jersey, becoming the American’s first significant victory of the war.

Job faced the times that tried his soul, and he prevailed over the battle that Satan brought against him by remaining steadfast in his faithful devotion to God, despite the inordinate amount of loss he faced.

But Satan was not through with him as Chapter 1 closed out. Rather, he continued to incite Job to sin against the Lord by attacking his physical body, covering him with painful boils from the sole of his foot to the crown of his head. All he was left with was potsherds to scrape his miserable, festering skin, pain from each swipe of a boil, and a nagging wife who implored him to “Curse God and die.” The latter being the greatest punishment of all. And yet, his words back to this treacherous woman vindicated his faith that God was just –

“But he said to her, ‘You speak as one of the foolish women speaks. Shall we indeed accept good from God, and shall we not accept adversity?’ In all this Job did not sin with his lips.” Job 2:10

In 1979, Steve Martin starred in the movie The Jerk. He was a white boy born as a poor black child, lacking any skills or abilities that could elevate him out of a life of mediocrity. And yet, through a series of events, he became extremely wealthy. But as such things go, it was all lost just as quickly as it appeared. When their downfall came about, he said to his wife, played by Bernadette Peters, that it was just money, and they could make more of that. Her response was, “I don’t care about losing all the money. It’s losing all the stuff.”

Is that what our life is to be remembered for? Stuff?

For me, it is Monday, 7 October. It is 4:30 am, and I have walked the dogs, read the Bible (over two cups of coffee), and quickly surveyed a property that has been our home since 1993 and the home of my father for another fifteen or so years beyond that.

In the previous ten days, we have gone through the most significant flooding of our lives. Dad moved onto the island in 1948. There have been storms, and there have been times of green grass and then high tides, but there was never a time where the high tides overflowed the island and completely swept away the green grass as it retreated… until late September of this year. And yet, within just a few days of that ending, we are set to face another hurricane, most likely as a direct or near-direct hit. Monday morning at 2 am, the forecast places the storm upon arrival as a category 3 with a significant storm surge.

The only question is whether it will veer a bit south, a bit north, or come directly at us. Each has positives and negatives concerning winds and tides, but none appear appealing at this point. And more, this storm will not just affect the coastal homes of the west coast of Florida as Helene did. Rather, every person in this church – even Ron and Shannon, who live many miles north and far inland will be on my mind because of the track once landfall is made.

Every person in this church is a burden upon my mind as I sit in the dark and type. Along with them are family and friends throughout the area. But what else does this day represent? A storm lies ahead, but 365 days ago, on this day, a storm of a different kind swept through parts of Israel when they were brutally attacked by a terrorist force bent on killing the people of Israel.

The Islamic forces of Hamas murdered, raped, and tortured the people they encountered. We have time to at least prepare for the next few days and decide what we will do as the storm approaches. Those people, like Job, simply faced the satanic onslaught as it came about, and they had to face the consequences of it once it had passed by. Many in Israel found out what was truly important at that time. And the nation as a whole had to decide what to do about what transpired. Their response, and the battles they continue to face, are a part of the unfolding drama of the prophetic scenario known to God all along.

As for those of us in the path of Hurricane Milton, time will tell what the result of its passing will be. As for Helene, we – meaning my father, Hideko, and I – have gone through that. It was a truly trying ordeal. As we watched the house fill with water, we heard appliances – one after another – fail. The washer-dryer unit, which wasn’t even running, came on and started to churn. Within a couple of minutes, it burned up. A freezer in the garage sparked and died.

The waters rose more and came into the house. Suddenly, there was a heavy smell of ozone, and the refrigerator gave off some scary rattling noises and died. What could we do? I got Dad to come from his house to ours, we all retreated upstairs, and we waited to see what the outcome would be.

Throughout the night, something kept happening that I will never forget. I called it “the sound of car death.” Different houses have been built on different levels of dirt brought in from the mainland in hopes of beating such an event, but for most, it wasn’t enough.

As the minutes turned to hours, again and again, there would be the steady beeping noise of a car alarm as the waters began to reach the electronics. The beeping would continue for a while and then become erratic, like a child who wasn’t getting his way over the toy he wanted Mommy to give him. And then, within a few minutes, the whining would stop… the car had died.

The next morning, and for the next days afterward, we saw Porches, Lamborghinis, Maserati’s, and other cars worth more than our house towed away to be made into other useful things, like razor blades and tin cans. One could almost hear the repetition of the words of Bernadette Peters… “It’s losing all the stuff.”

Along with the cars, tons and tons (and tons) of household goods were carried out to the roadside and heaped unceremoniously in piles that I eventually called “the walls of sorrow.” Scrappers came through each day, taking whatever their eyes alighted on. That reduced the level of junk a bit. But the walls of sorrow continued to grow for the next week as people came into town to survey the damages in these, their winter homes.

As a side note to highlight our own situation, and something you might find comical, as we watched the things stored up for a lifetime slowly being destroyed by the waters, I remember seeing a brand-new pack of Bounty paper towels bobbing around in the garage. Hideko had bought them just a couple of days before, and they were unopened when the storm hit. The ruin of those paper towels affected me more than almost anything else. We had used the washer/dryer for a year (it was Hideko’s retirement present).

We had used the refrigerator for eons. It was set to go anyway. The sofa had been slept on innumerable times, and every dog we had with us for thirty years probably threw up on it a dozen times in order to stake its rightful claim over it. But those Bounty towels were never opened. It was like taking $20.00 and just lighting it on fire. The waste seemed so… so… so pointless. Surely, these are the times that try men’s souls. The loss of the HMS Bounty didn’t seem as important to me as the loss of those paper towels call Bounty.

We have to consider each event as it comes, process it in whatever way it affects us, and then live with what happened. This is true for something as insignificant as a big pack of Bounty towels that wound up on the side of Midnight Pass Road without ever having served the purpose for which they were made.

As I sit here on Monday morning, I wonder if the coming storm will lift up those towels and the tons and tons of other things sitting out there, as yet uncollected, and deposit them, once again, all over our property.

And what about the people in the church? The storm is coming, and each one of them will probably face it to some extent. Will these, my family in Christ, be ok? All I can do is type, pray, and place my hope in the Lord’s hands for each of them.

The psalmist gave us words to consider in such times –

1 As the deer pants for the water brooks,
So pants my soul for You, O God.
My soul thirsts for God, for the living God.
When shall I come and appear before God?
My tears have been my food day and night,
While they continually say to me,
“Where is your God?”
When I remember these things,
I pour out my soul within me.
For I used to go with the multitude;
I went with them to the house of God,
With the voice of joy and praise,
With a multitude that kept a pilgrim feast.
Why are you cast down, O my soul?
And why are you disquieted within me?
Hope in God, for I shall yet praise Him
For the help of His countenance.
O my God, my soul is cast down within me;
Therefore I will remember You from the land of the Jordan,
And from the heights of Hermon,
From the Hill Mizar.
Deep calls unto deep at the noise of Your waterfalls;
All Your waves and billows have gone over me.
The Lord will command His lovingkindness in the daytime,
And in the night His song shall be with me—
A prayer to the God of my life.
I will say to God my Rock,
“Why have You forgotten me?
Why do I go mourning because of the oppression of the enemy?”
10 As with a breaking of my bones,
My enemies reproach me,
While they say to me all day long,
“Where is your God?”
11 Why are you cast down, O my soul?
And why are you disquieted within me?
Hope in God;
For I shall yet praise Him,
The help of my countenance and my God. Psalm 42

The rest of the week, like our very next moment of existence of each moment we live, is unknown to me. And so, shall I fret as we await the coming storm? Shall I call out and curse God if things don’t go well? Shall I throw a temper tantrum at the God who created all things and who temporarily gives them to us to enjoy?

Rather, I have determined now that in whatever comes, I shall yet praise Him. He alone is worthy of that. He alone determines the end from the beginning. When Sunday morning arrives, if it arrives for us as individuals and for us as a church gathering, I would hope that regardless of what transpires, each of you will say, “The Lord is my Rock. He is my Fortress, my Defense, my Hope, and my Hiding Place. Through the days of my life, I shall yet praise Him.”

What is stuff? For the most part, it is a distraction from our relationship with God. If we are wise, we can incorporate the things of our lives into that relationship. When a large and delicious meal is set before us, we can thank Him for it. Should we be in a foxhole with C-rations, we can thank Him for that. And if the week ahead finds any of us eating a meal provided by Samaritans Purse as we sit under a tent, having lost everything, we can thank Him for that as well.

Life, the spark of life that impels us forward, is not about stuff. Our lives will be judged based on our response to the things that occur around us and the situations in which we interact throughout our days, not on the amount of stuff we collected and idolized. If our responses and interactions acknowledge the goodness of the Lord while we are in the land of the living, He will justly and adequately reward us according to His goodness in relation to our faith. It is Monday morning for me as I type.

I am already trying to process the week ahead in ten thousand possible permutations of what could be. I am already mourning with those who are mourning. I am already burdened with those facing loss. I am already grateful for the storm that… that didn’t happen (oh! To pray and dream!).

To pass this week, as with each day of our lives as they occur, I am looking forward to it with the Lord as a part of it. Cursed God and die? It shall never be! You speak as one of the foolish women speaks!

In the Revolutionary War, many men gave everything to secure a land and a freedom for those who followed. On October 7th, 2023, many of Israel saw the futility of life without God as loved ones were taken from them.

When Hurricane Helene pushed north in late September, lives were uprooted, towns and villages were swept away, and many lives were lost. Some were faithful Christians, while others rejected that path. Eternal destinies were set as lives were extinguished through raging floodwaters.

In Butler, Pennsylvania, a president was spared while Corey Comperatore lost his life protecting his family. Corey was a saved believer in Christ, no one is really sure about President Trump. Which is in the better position right now? Life is about choices.

Now, another storm is just ahead. And if this sermon is given on Sunday, the 13th of October, it will be just behind. It has been my main goal and purpose in life these past years to prepare people for just such an event, actually, for the choices that should be made before such an event. Why do bad things happen to “good” people? First and foremost, the question is flawed. Jesus Himself told us this –

“Now behold, one came and said to Him, ‘Good Teacher, what good thing shall I do that I may have eternal life?’
17 So He said to him, ‘Why do you call Me good? No one is good but One, that is, God. But if you want to enter into life, keep the commandments.’” Matthew 19:16,17

The words of Jesus speak of an ultimate standard of goodness. The same word, translated as good, is used to speak of people elsewhere in a comparative sense. Jesus says in Matthew 12 that a good man, out of the good treasure of his heart, brings forth good things. Barnabas is called a good man in Acts 11:24.

These and numerous other examples are given as comparative uses of the word good. But in the eyes of God, apart from His Son, there are none truly good. The defect of sin remains in us, and we are prone to being anything but good.

However, if we go by the comparative sense of the word, we can and do ask why God allows the good to suffer. We question how God can be just when evil things happen to us. But consider the premise! Where do we live? Some of us chose to live in Florida. Now that… that is good.

We enjoy the benefits of the land we have chosen to live in. And. yet, there is not a person with a modicum of reason in his head who doesn’t know that Florida is prone to hurricanes. Should we move here and suddenly expect to be exempt from such an ordeal now that we have graced this land with our presence? What about those in Asheville, North Carolina? They moved in, and all was good. They lived their lives with God or apart from God as they so choose. Their choice of home was “good,” and they were “good” in whatever comparative sense filled their heads.

But is it reasonable to expect God to send the floodwaters upon Asheville and exempt the “goodest of the good” while sweeping away the less “good” because they weren’t quite as good as those gooder than them?

When a person goes water skiing, there is a chance that he will –

Have a heart attack.
Get bit by a shark and bleed out.
Get run over by the boat that is supposed to pull him along for a day of fun.
Hit a rock or a dock and come to a sudden end.
Etc.

Are these things God’s fault? Is God expected to bubble-wrap humanity so that they are free from such things? If God said, “No, I don’t want you water skiing. It’s just too dangerous,” you would shake your fist in His face and tell Him to mind His own business.

You probably did it with your own parents a time or two when they told you “No” over something not so intelligent that you were planning to do. But when your boyfriend slams into a dock and dies from sudden trauma, there is always God to blame… to question… to be angry at for allowing such a thing to happen. “I hate God. He took my wife from me.” I have personally heard this. Maybe you have, too. It is always God’s fault when tragedy arises, but it is almost never to His credit when the good things of life come about. “I achieved!” “I won!” “I earned!” “I built!”

How rare and wonderful it is to the ears of the Lord when someone gets his “I’s” corrected, and he finally sees things properly and as they should be. Why do bad things happen to good people? They don’t. Good things happen to us despite our lack of any true goodness.

Only in Christ, and only by the power of His goodness, can we even be looked at by God with the slightest hint of favor. If you don’t believe that, try reading Genesis 6. In fact, let’s see about all those comparatively “good” people and what God thought of them at that time –

“Then the Lord saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every intent of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually. And the Lord was sorry that He had made man on the earth, and He was grieved in His heart. So the Lord said, ‘I will destroy man whom I have created from the face of the earth, both man and beast, creeping thing and birds of the air, for I am sorry that I have made them.’ But Noah found grace in the eyes of the Lord.” Genesis 6:5-8

After only fifteen hundred years of man on earth, he had so corrupted his ways that there was no remedy left but to destroy him. And so, in the year 1656 Anno Mundi, the rains fell, the great storehouses of the deep, filled with the wrath of God, exploded forth, and the world went into a cataclysmic period of complete destruction.

All of the “good” people, comparatively speaking, on the planet didn’t measure up. Today, there are “good” people in Tel Aviv. Mom says, “He’s a good boy, and I am so proud of him and his husband.” In Los Angeles, there is a “good” District Attorney, respected by his colleagues and by every criminal he fails to prosecute. His walls are lined with awards and accolades, he wields power and authority, and he is a “good” man, comparatively speaking. In North Korea, there is a “good” leader, worshipped by his people as a living god and who wields complete authority over his “good” people.

Kamala Harris is a “good” person who will defeat evil Trump, who has come to destroy the “good” way of life introduced by those on the left. Donald Trump is a “good” person who wants to protect the “good” values of Americanism and democracy.

Each person before the flood was “good” on some unknown curve that was established within his own mind or within the minds of those around him. Each person on the planet today thinks he is “good” in some comparative way.

Why do bad things happen to “good” people? Ask those of the pre-flood world. Ask those who were in the seats of United Airlines Flight 175 that flew into the South Tower of the World Trade Center on September 11th, 2001, at 9:03 am. Or better yet, ask those who flew that plane into the tower.

Why did some of us suffer loss this past week? Why are my father and Doctor Bridges 91 years old while others have died at 87 or… 21, or… 3? Where does our standard of “good” come from? If it isn’t from God, then we have a faulty impression of goodness. And when we carry this impression around, of course, we will blame God when our favorite animal dies. “O God is so cruel.”

We have spent the entire life of that dog, from the moment it was a newborn puppy until the last moment of its life thinking about how great it is that we have this dog, never considering thanking the God (the God we don’t believe in) for allowing us to enjoy it while it is alive.

But the moment the dog dies, we blame God, tell Him that we hate Him (even though we don’t believe in Him!), and angrily and sadly bury it in the back yard. And then we go in and have a big steak for dinner, never considering that the cow on our plate was just as much a unique animal as the dog we just buried.

Last year my “good” wife (the best in fact ☺️) got cancer. Should we have blamed God for interrupting our “good” life? Last year, our house plumbing – all of it, water and sewer – exploded. Our “good” lives were upheaved. Should we have blamed God?

Twice in three weeks, we are facing possible complete annihilation of our home. Should we just give up, raise our fists to the heavens, and blame God? We are “good” people. Why doesn’t God give us a break? What about the “bad” guy down the road? Should God put up a wall to protect us and wash him away?

Why do bad things happen to “good” people? Because we make choices in a world of uncertainty. We choose to live in Florida. We choose to live in Sarasota. We choose to live on Siesta Key. We choose to continue to stay in a house that was built 76 years ago with substandard building materials. We choose the cars we drive, the workplace we go to each day, the route we take to get there, the store we shop at, and so much more. Life is a stream of choices in a world that is preset for certain events to occur at certain times to direct the course of history as it marches toward an inevitable conclusion that is already recorded in the pages of God’s word.

We have the overall blueprint, but we lack the details. And so, we make choices… “good” people (well, comparatively) in a fallen world. Many chose not to come to church today, or any Sunday in fact, and worship the Lord who created them.

Some choose to rob, murder, rape, and so forth. And yet, there is someone out there who will say, “He is a good person. He didn’t mean it.” They will rationalize away the crimes based on their past lives, the unfairness of the skin color they were born with, or for a thousand other reasons, and they will appeal to society that they are “good” people.

What happened to you this past week? Did you suffer loss? Praise the Lord for what you had. Thank Him it wasn’t worse. Did someone you know die? Thank the Lord that you were blessed to know that person. Did you come out unscathed completely? Praise Him for the blessing and pity those who were dealt a different hand.

It’s Monday morning. I’m sermon typing. I was just sent photos from a friend in Israel. Twice this week, he had to go into a bomb shelter while missiles flew in from the north. He sent pictures of bomb craters, a bombed-out car, pieces of shrapnel, windows pelleted with holes, etc.

In the next message, he said, “So I hear that the hurricane that’s coming tomorrow will push 18 feet of water from the shore line and 2-3 feet up beyond sea level. Are you guys evacuating?” He’s being bombed from the skies at random times and from random angles, and he is concerned about us in Florida. Does this “good” guy deserve the hatred leveled against him simply because he exists as a Jew (a Jesus-believing Jew, BTW) in the land of Israel? Is his concern for us in Florida rational while he actually faces greater uncertainty from moment to moment than we will in the days ahead? One thing is for sure: if we are alive and able, on our respective days of worship, that is where we will be – Yosi and me, on other sides of the ocean, praising the same Lord who has granted us the time and places of our lives in His presence.

We will be worshiping, praising, and serving the Lord who gave us this temporary, uncertain life. It is a life filled with loss – floating Bounty paper towels, if you will – that is completely uncontrollable. But it is a life worth living in the presence of God no matter how bad it gets, and no matter how good it can be.

We will praise Him in the storm, and we will thank Him for the abundance. He is the Creator and we are the created. The pot has no right to complain against the potter, “Why did you form me like this?” He formed us. We must live within the parameters of existence for which we are formed.

These may be the times that try men’s souls, but these are the days of our lives. We have to live them. And so, let us live them in a way that honors God. We have every right to mourn. Jesus wept. He surely wept over the madness of rejecting Him for the things of this world. He has come to show us the very heart of God the Father. Instead, we blame God the Father… for everything bad. And we ignore Him during the times when all is good.

Jesus wept. We, too, can mourn. Abraham mourned for the loss of Sarah. David mourned over the loss of Absalom. Why? Everyone else thought he was a loser, and indeed he was. He usurped his father’s throne, came after him to kill him, and wound up dead himself. And in his dying, David mourned –

“O my son Absalom—my son, my son Absalom—if only I had died in your place! O Absalom my son, my son!” 2 Samuel 18:33

What prompted David to so tenderly love such an unlovable person? What force, what thought, what eternal love impelled God to send His Son to die for such unlovable, unworthy, unholy creatures as us? What kind of love impelled the God who destroyed the entire world by the flood to send Jesus to die for billions and billions of Absaloms?

The love of God is greater far
Than tongue or pen can ever tell.
It goes beyond the highest star
And reaches to the lowest hell.
The guilty pair, bowed down with care,
God gave His Son to win;
His erring child He reconciled
And pardoned from his sin.

O love of God, how rich and pure!
How measureless and strong!
It shall forevermore endure—
The saints’ and angels’ song.

When hoary time shall pass away,
And earthly thrones and kingdoms fall;
When men who here refuse to pray,
On rocks and hills and mountains call;
God’s love, so sure, shall still endure,
All measureless and strong;
Redeeming grace to Adam’s race—
The saints’ and angels’ song.

Could we with ink the ocean fill,
And were the skies of parchment made;
Were every stalk on earth a quill,
And every man a scribe by trade;
To write the love of God above
Would drain the ocean dry;
Nor could the scroll contain the whole,
Though stretched from sky to sky.
-Frederick M. Lehman

For some, these indeed are the times that try men’s souls. But is our life about a bunch of stuff? Is it about petting puppies while having steak? Is our life about the house we live in, the refrigerator we possess, or the car we drive?

And why do bad things happen to good people? It’s because God has allowed it to be so. Though He slay me, yet I will trust Him. He is God, I am the work of His hands, and so I will trust Him. May this be your state as well? Today and every day, let us entrust our souls to God, who formed and fashioned us for His purposes.

And may He be glorified on our lips, in our actions, and throughout our days. May it be so. We have a meeting with Him in due time. May that day be one of joy and rejoicing because of the simple faith that pleases Him more than anything else.

Jesus! Jesus! Jesus! Thank God for Jesus, who truly makes us “good” in the sight of God. Because of Him, we can forever plumb the mysteries of why things are the way they are, knowing that all things meet a plan and a purpose that extends far beyond our current days of uncertainty, sadness, and loss.

Closing Verse: And we know that all things work together for good to those who love God, to those who are the called according to His purpose. 29 For whom He foreknew, He also predestined to be conformed to the image of His Son, that He might be the firstborn among many brethren. 30 Moreover whom He predestined, these He also called; whom He called, these He also justified; and whom He justified, these He also glorified.  -Romans 8:28-30

Next Week: Judges 20:36-48 An amazing story to tell, line by line… (No King in Israel, Part IX) (56th Judges Sermon)

The Lord has you exactly where He wants you. He has a good plan and purpose for you. It is He who judges His people according to their deeds. So, follow Him, live for Him, and trust Him, and He will do marvelous things for you and through you.

Hallelujah and Amen…