Judges 9:16-21 (Abimelech, King of Shechem, Part II)

Artwork by Douglas Kallerson.

Judges 9:16-21
Abimelech, King of Shechem, Part II

(Typed 15 January 2024) In the Hebrew text, Judges 9 begins with the word vayelek, “And went.” However, rather than translating it this way, some translate the prefix as now, then, one day, or just skip the conjunction altogether.

The Hebrew prefix vav can be variously interpreted and translated depending on the context, but simply saying “and” is always preferred by me. By saying “then” as the conjunction to open Chapter 9 (like the NKJV), a presupposition is inserted into the text that may not be correct.

In other words, by translating the vav as “then,” the reader is led to assume that what is presented follows after the events of Judges 8. But this is not necessarily so. After studying a particular passage, it is not uncommon to find that translating the vav as but, then, now, furthermore, however, etc. is incorrect.

This is too bad because the reader now has a faulty idea concerning what is going on in the narrative. In the case of Judges 9, the contents do not follow chronologically after Chapter 8. Rather, they are given to explain the events of Chapter 8.

Likewise, the typology of Chapter 8 dealt with the events of the tribulation period. However, some of what is presented in Chapter 9 goes all the way back to the time of the Babylonian exile of the people of Israel.

Text Verse: “Her prophets are insolent [phakhaz], treacherous people;
Her priests have polluted the sanctuary,
They have done violence to the law.” Zephaniah 3:4

From the time of the Babylonian exile, certain events were prophesied to occur that reach forward, even to the time after the tribulation period. Through the mistranslation of a single vav, the entire panorama of what is being typologically presented is obliterated.

In the Wycliff Bible of 1382, Chapter 9 of Judges opens with “Forʃoþe Abymelech… ȝede.” The Coverdale Bible of 1535 says, “Abimelech…wente.” They just skipped the conjunction altogether. Later, the Geneva Bible of 1587 reads, “Then Abimelech…went,” thus inserting a presupposition.

The KJV went with a more literal translation, “And Abimelech…went.” However, in 1982, the NKJV reverted to the Geneva Bible, saying, “Then Abimelech…went.” In the 2024 translation by Charlie Garrett, the most literal translation possible is rendered, “And went Abimelech.”

Can incorrectly translating a single letter, the vav hook, make any difference in how you look at a passage? Yes, it can. For maximum happy and greatest biblical oomph, don’t get tied down to a single translation that might lead you to a false conclusion.

Be willing to check things out, consider what is being said, and then evaluate your conclusions. You may find out that really, really interesting things are tucked away in this precious word.

As for the word Forʃoþe used in the Wycliffe Bible, I know you are dying to know what it means. It is an old English spelling of forsothe (more recently, forsooth). With the advent of the printing press around the 15th century,  the letters long S (ʃ) and thorn (þ) began to drop out of common use. The word essentially means “for truth,” but it also carries the idea of indeed, truly, in fact, etc. You now have a new squiggle for your brain.

Get ready! More squiggles are ahead as we contemplate God’s superior word. And so, let us turn to that precious word once again, and… May God speak to us through His word today, and may His glorious name ever be praised.

I. Because He Is Your Brother (verses 16-21)

In Judges 9:1-6, Abimelech’s conspiracy to reign as king was described. Having gone to Shechem, he pitted himself against the seventy sons of Jerubbaal, noting his familial connection to these men as a reason they should accept him as their ruler.

The agreement was made, the plot was carried out, and the seventy sons were executed. With that complete, the men of Shechem gathered together and made Abimelech king.

After that, Jotham went and stood on top of Mount Gerizim and spoke his parable against the men of Shechem. With that finalized, he will provide a literal interpretation of the words.

He will speak a protasis followed by an apodosis. The conditional part of this will be given in verses 16 through the first half of verse 19. The conclusion will follow at the end of verse 19. Another protasis and apodosis will then be stated in verse 20. After that, Jotham will leave the scene, not to be heard from again…

16 “Now therefore, if you have acted in truth and sincerity in making Abimelech king,

v’atah im b’emeth uvthamim asithem vatamliku eth avimelekh – “And now, if in truth and sincereness you have made and kinged Abimelech.” This begins the lengthy protasis, the conditional aspect of Jotham’s explanation. In his words, the actions of his audience are set in contrast to the actions of his father.

The words “if you have acted” encompass their actions as detailed in verses 1-6. If those deeds were done in truth and sincereness in relation to the life and conduct of Jerubbaal, there will be one conclusion he will grant.

The words “in truth and sincereness” are a modification of his words from the parable itself. In verse 15, Jotham said, “If in truth you anoint me to king over you.” This is the reason for the structure of his words now. They are based on the people’s intentions in making Abimelech king.

Abimelech means My Father is King, Father of a King, Father is King, Father Reigns, etc. It can even mean Desired Counsel.

16 (con’t) and if you have dealt well with Jerubbaal and his house, and have done to him as he deserves— 

v’im tovah asithem im yerubaal v’im betho v’im kigmul yadav asithem lo – “and if good you have made with Jerubbaal and with his house, and if according to recompense his hand you have made to him.” These words introduce the contrast. There are the men of Shechem, and there is the house of Jerubbaal.

It is important to consider that Jotham never mentions the name Gideon. Rather, the name Jerubbaal alone is mentioned nine times in this chapter. According to Bullinger, nine is the number of finality and judgment.

There is the making of Abimelech king and there is what was done to Jerubbaal’s house. Were the actions of Shechem acceptable? Were they noble and just? The thoughts are carefully placed before the people to consider, but they must look at the past to ascertain the truth…

17 for my father fought for you, risked his life, and delivered you out of the hand of Midian;

asher nakham avi alekhem vayashlekh eth naphsho mi’neged vayatsel ethkhem miyad midyan – “who fought, my father, unto you, and cast his soul from front you from hand Midian.” This is the actual contrast to the actions of the men of Shechem. Jotham reminds the people of the great deeds of Jerubbaal.

It is he who defeated Midian (Place of Judgment). In the process of warring, Jotham notes vayashlekh et naphsho – “and cast his soul.” Jerubbaal considered his life as nothing. Therefore, even if he prevailed over Midian, he, in essence, died in the process of defeating it. Despite this…

18 but you have risen up against my father’s house this day,

Rather: v’atem qamtem al beith avi ha’yom – “and you, you risen upon house my father, the day.” The words are emphatic, drawing a strong contrast to the noble deeds of Jerubbaal.

Also, rather than the more common ha’yom ha’zeh, “the day, the this,” which we translate as “this day,” the words are less definitive, saying “the day.” There was a day when the men of Shechem rose up against his father’s house…

18 (con’t) and killed his seventy sons on one stone,

vatahargu eth banav shivim ish al even ekhath – “and killed his sons, seventy man, upon stone one.” Jotham reminds the men of Shechem what they had done. They gave seventy pieces of silver to Abimelech. The implication was that there was one piece of silver per life. That was recorded earlier in this chapter –

“So they gave him seventy shekels of silver from the temple of Baal-Berith, with which Abimelech hired worthless and reckless men; and they followed him. Then he went to his father’s house at Ophrah and killed his brothers, the seventy sons of Jerubbaal, on one stone.” Judges 9:4, 5

With their bloody deed accomplished, it next says…

18 (con’t) and made Abimelech, the son of his female servant, king over the men of Shechem,

vatamliku eth avimelekh ben amatho al baale sh’khem – “and kinged Abimelech son his bondmaid over masters Shechem.” The word used to describe Abimelech’s mother is amah. It is variously translated as maid, handmaid, female slave, etc. It is the same word used in Genesis 21 –

“And Sarah saw the son of Hagar the Egyptian, whom she had borne to Abraham, scoffing. 10 Therefore she said to Abraham, ‘Cast out this bondwoman [amah] and her son; for the son of this bondwoman [amah] shall not be heir with my son, namely with Isaac.’” Genesis 21:9, 10

She may have been the concubine of Jerubbaal, but Jotham disdainfully points out that she was a mere slave in the house. The rebuke is a strong one which seems intentionally connected to the story of Abraham and Hagar.

Gideon had already told the people that it would not be he or his house that reigned over Israel but the Lord. However, if the people wanted a king, they could at least have appointed a son of one of Gideon’s wives, not one born of a mere slave. Instead, however, they chose this evil path…

18 (con’t) because he is your brother— 

He emphatically points out the reason for their treachery: ki akhikhem hu – “for your brother, he.” By stating it this way, Jotham is implying that those who made Abimelech king are all just like him, sons of a bondwoman, and thus slaves. The words are cutting and acerbic. With that stated, the conditional words of the protasis continue…

19 if then you have acted in truth and sincerity with Jerubbaal and with his house this day,

v’im b’emeth uvthamim asithem im yerubaal v’im beitho hayom hazeh – “and if in truth and in sincereness you have made with Jerubbaal and with his house, the day, the this.” Putting this side by side with the words of verse 16, the contrast is made clear –

“And now, if in truth and sincereness you have made and kinged Abimelech.” v.16
“and if in truth and in sincereness you have made with Jerubbaal and with his house.” v.19

Jotham is restating the matter after having presented the details. The fact that they kinged Abimelech means that they have not dealt rightly with Jerubbaal. They have rejected what he stood for because they rejected who he is. Because of this, the apodosis is next stated…

19 (con’t) then rejoice in Abimelech, and let him also rejoice in you.

The words bear emphasis: simkhu ba’avimelekh v’yishmakh gam hu bakhem – “rejoice in Abimelech, and rejoice also, he, in you.” You have made your decision, and you will now have to live with it. See how that turns out! What is more likely is next stated with another protasis followed by an immediate apodosis…

20 But if not, let fire come from Abimelech and devour the men of Shechem and Beth Millo;

v’im ayin tetse esh me’avimelekh v’thokhal eth baale sh’khem v’eth beith milo – “And if else, goes fire from Abimelech, and devours masters Shechem and Beth Millo.” If there is anything less than rejoicing in one another, then there should be a horrific consequence for what has transpired.

The seventy sons that were never intended to rule over the people were given for them to learn by. Instead of seeing them as a tool of instruction to remind them that the Lord was to rule over them, they rejected Jerubbaal and his words of authority and chose a fellow slave to rule over them instead. Therefore, the kingship of Abimelech should be to their ruin. But more…

20 (con’t) and let fire come from the men of Shechem and from Beth Millo and devour Abimelech!”

v’tetse esh mi’baale sh’khem u-mi’beith milo v’thokhal eth avimelekh – “And goes fire from masters Shechem, and from Beth Millo, and devours Abimelech.” As if detonating nuclear warheads results in mutually assured destruction, there is prophesied to be fire likewise coming from the masters of Shechem and Beth Millo to destroy Abimelech.

Now, with his words complete, it next says…

21 And Jotham ran away and fled;

vayanas yotham vayivrah – “And escaped, Jotham, and fled.” Jotham, Yehovah is Upright, has uttered his parable and prophecy. With that, and in order to be kept from retribution, he made his departure from Mount Gerizim…

*21 (fin) and he went to Beer and dwelt there, for fear of Abimelech his brother.

It says nothing of fear. Rather: v’yelekh beerah va’yeshev sham mipne avimelekh akhiv – “and went Beer-ward, and dwelt there, from face Abimelech his brother.” Jotham simply escaped and fled toward Beer. One can escape and flee for a number of reasons. In this case, the account says nothing of fear.

Inserting a presupposition like this can only misdirect the reader from considering other options. Jotham could just as easily have gone there to gather an army and return to destroy the people.

As for the name Beer, it means Well. The only other time a location is simply named Beer is in Numbers 21:16. If it is the same location, it is across the Jordan. If not, it doesn’t matter because only the name is important for the typology to be presented.

Seventy sons were killed on one stone
That’s rounded up from sixty-nine
The last has been left all alone
But this was all by God’s design

What can we learn from these seventy men
How does their death reveal God’s unfolding story
Surely, whatever will be seen will once again
Detail to us His power and glory

Seventy sons from Israel’s history
A lesson for them, if they will just pay heed
In the interpretation of this mystery
God’s final decision has been decreed

Show us, O God, what we are meant to see
Reveal to us the things that will be

II. The Amazing Details Explained

The first thing to note is that this account begins with the word “And” not “Then” or something else. It is not something coming chronologically after Chapter 8. Rather, it is given to explain the consequences for those who reject Christ in the future.

To recap, the book of Joshua detailed the work of the Lord in Salvation. Chapter 1 of Judges gave the account that demonstrated the world’s access to salvation in Christ. The seventy kings that gathered scraps under Adoni-Bezek’s table reflected the fallen nature of man. That was reversed in Acts 2 with the giving of the Spirit to fallen man, reuniting humanity as one in Christ.

The Jews first received the Spirit, but eventually, they – as a nation – rejected Christ. The account of Caleb (a Gentile) giving Achsah, his daughter, to Othniel along with land containing springs of water showed how the message of God in Christ transferred to the Gentiles during the dispensation of grace.

After that, the failure of Israel, tribe by tribe, to subdue the land was noted from the end of Judges 1 through the beginning of Chapter 3. That revealed Israel’s failure to come to Christ, They have remained in a state of disobedience, apart from God.

Then the narrative of the judges began when Othniel battled Cushan-Rishathaim. It was a picture of the Gentiles carrying the message of Christ until the House of Israel and the House of Judah would accept it.

That was a type of introduction to what lay ahead in the book. It gave a snapshot of what would occur in type and picture concerning the work of Christ as seen in Judges, even before the work was detailed.

Ehud followed. He took out Eglon. That pictured the complete atonement of transgressions of the law through the work of Christ. It was also noted that this work was fully sufficient to save both Jews and Gentiles.

Shamgar next gave a brief but complementary display of how to appropriate the work of Christ.

After that Deborah, the New Testament, referred to the Dispensation of Grace, represented by the Gentile-led church.

In Judges 5, Deborah rejoices over the events of Chapter 4. They were placed into a poetic narrative, gloriously revealing the obvious pleasure the Lord takes in the work of Christ and in His church. Someday the church will end at the rapture.

The first ten verses of Chapter 6 revealed the tribulation period after the church age. It is at that time that Israel will finally accept the gospel.

After that, Gideon was introduced to provide insight into the gospel prevailing in the tribulation period resulting in Israel as a nation being saved.

Each step of the Gideon narrative detailed the progressive nature of this event. Midian (Place of Judgment – the tribulation period) will be defeated, and Israel will come to Christ through the gospel.

The account of Judges 9 backtracks in time revealing an exact timeline for Israel from Daniel 9. The Abimelech narrative is given to confirm to Israel that the typology that has previously been seen in the Judges narrative, as detailed in these sermons, is correct. It is a warning for those in the tribulation period about a failure to come to Christ.

The key point to understanding this is found in the first sentence of the chapter – “And went Abimelech son Jerubbaal Shechem-ward.” The meaning is, “And went My Father is King, son of Let Baal Strive.” The name Jerubbaal, not Gideon, is used throughout the entire account.

Who is it that Let Baal Strive? Jesus. The law failed to strive against Him. Thus, He prevailed over it. But what did Israel do with Jesus? They rejected Him. The meaning is that they, as a nation, remain under the law.

Abimelech, who gave himself this name, went to his mother’s brothers and spoke to them and all of his mother’s father’s family (verse 1). Without saying it, the narrative implies that he gave himself this name because he was united with this family (as seen in Chapter 8).

Although getting ahead in the narrative, who is his mother? A bondmaid. He has aligned with this family, implying a family of slaves as noted in verse 18.

When at Shechem (verse 2), Abimelech asks if it is better for them that all seventy of the sons of Jerubbaal reign over them or just one. Shechem means (Having a Sense of) Responsibility. The narrative also consistently calls these men baale.

The connection to Baal is being highlighted. They picture those under the law striving with it in an attempt to merit God’s favor. The seventy sons of Jerubbaal picture the seventy sevens of Daniel 9 –

“Seventy weeks [shavuim: msc. pl.] are determined
For your people and for your holy city,
To finish the transgression,
To make an end of sins,
To make reconciliation for iniquity,
To bring in everlasting righteousness,
To seal up vision and prophecy,
And to anoint the Most Holy.” Daniel 9:24

Through Daniel, the Lord gave Israel a prophetic look into their future, telling them exactly when certain things would occur in relation to their Messiah. It speaks of the final casting off of the law and reconciliation with the Lord through Jesus.

The seventieth son, Jotham (Yehovah is Upright), called ha’qaton, or the youngest, pictures the seventieth week, the tribulation period. The word qaton comes from qut, to feel a loathing. It is that which grieves, is detested, despised, etc. It is the last chance given to those of Israel to come to Christ.

Verse 2 continues with Abimelech noting that he is their own flesh and blood. He is the son of a slave as they are. In hearing the offer, (verse 3), the men’s hearts were inclined to follow Abimelech. So who is Abimelech picturing? The answer is that he anticipates the rejection of Christ. Ultimately, he can be identified with the person noted by Jesus –

“I have come in My Father’s name, and you do not receive Me; if another comes in his own name, him you will receive.” John 5:43

He will be Israel’s supposed Messiah. Just as Abimelech came in his own name (having given it to himself), this false Messiah will come in his own name. He will be a Jew or at least half-Jewish (the nationality of Abimelech’s mother cannot be sufficiently determined). However, he will claim to follow the law, but he will be a false Messiah.

Verse 4 noted that these masters of Shechem gave him seventy pieces of silver from the temple of Baal-Berith (Lord of the Covenants). The covenants speak of the Mosaic covenant and the covenant with the Antichrist.

In Israel’s rejection of Christ, they are attempting to redeem themselves from the law through their own merits, silver being a picture of redemption.  Remember what Matthew Poole wrote concerning this act at the temple of Baal Berith –

“This place they chose, to signify that they still owned God, and their covenant with him; and did not worship Baal in opposition to God, but in conjunction with him, or in subordination to him.”

Israel is assuming they can rightly serve Yehovah while observing the law. But the law has been fulfilled and annulled in Christ. Unfortunately, without Christ, rightly serving the Lord is not possible.

Verse 4 continued by describing those who were hired by Abimelech using the words req, empty, and phakhaz, bubbling. The first word describes men who are not filled with the Spirit but are worthless.

The second word was in our text verse today. It is the second and last use of the word in Scripture and it describes those of Israel before the restoration of the people, meaning during the tribulation, who do violence to the law. As Christ is the fulfillment of the law, not coming to Christ perfectly describes them.

Verse 5 detailed the killing of the seventy sons of Jerubbaal on one stone by Abimelech. The act is a rejection of the detailed plan of God given to reveal the Messiah to Israel. The one stone speaks of Jesus. Peter, writing to the Jews of the end times, specifically reveals this –

“Therefore, to you who believe, He is precious; but to those who are disobedient,
‘The stone [Heb: even] which the builders rejected
Has become the chief cornerstone,’
and
‘A stone [Heb: even] of stumbling
And a rock of offense.’
They stumble, being disobedient to the word, to which they also were appointed.” 1 Peter 2:7, 8

Obviously, if Jotham survived, then the number excludes him, but for the sake of the narrative, he is included in the rejection. The sixty-nine sevens led to the coming of Christ. They were killed on the stone.

The final seven is, by their own actions, kept from them. There will be no restoration with God for those who follow this path. That is seen in the words of verse 5, “And remained Jotham son Jerubbaal, the youngest, for hidden.” The word khava is used by Isaiah concerning the hiding of Christ. He will only be revealed for salvation to those who believe –

“Listen, O coastlands, to Me,
And take heed, you peoples from afar!
The Lord has called Me from the womb;
From the matrix of My mother He has made mention of My name.
And He has made My mouth like a sharp sword;
In the shadow of His hand He has hidden [khava] Me,
And made Me a polished shaft;
In His quiver He has hidden Me.” Isaiah 49:1, 2

Verse 6 said, “And gathered all masters Shechem and all Beth Millo.” Shechem (Responsibility) looks to the people who will confirm the covenant with the Antichrist. They will see the law and renewed temple worship as their responsibility to save the people. Beth Millo (House of Filling) looks to the consecration (filling, aka consecration) of the people for temple worship.

Therefore, “And kinged Abimelech to king.” The Jews will see this person as the rightful heir to the throne of David and acknowledge him as such. Verse 6 ended with the difficult words, “with oak, standing, which in Shechem.” The oak is a symbol of strength.

As the words do not indicate a time, they could simply be a reference to what later occurs during the tribulation, referring to the Antichrist as he will be revealed –

“‘Therefore when you see the “abomination of desolation,” spoken of by Daniel the prophet, standing in the holy place’ (whoever reads, let him understand), 16 ‘then let those who are in Judea flee to the mountains.’” Matthew 24:15, 16

After this came the parable of the trees. This came from the top of Mount Gerizim. The har, or mount, is synonymous with a large but centralized group of people. Gerizim means Cutters Down. Despite being the mount from which the blessings of the law were proclaimed, Jotham prophesied a curse upon the people. This group of people will be cut down and separated from the Lord.

The words he calls out are to God, not the Lord. There is no covenant relationship to be considered. In the parable, it is clear that the appointment of a king is inappropriate. Instead of the final seven (Jotham) bringing them to God through Jesus, this appointment will be their demise.

He uses three trees as examples of rejection and one of acceptance. The first is the olive. It is a symbol of religious privilege. Romans 11:16-24 clearly indicates this –

“For if you were cut out of the olive tree which is wild by nature, and were grafted contrary to nature into a cultivated olive tree, how much more will these, who are natural branches, be grafted into their own olive tree?” Romans 11:24

There will be no religious privilege for these men. Next, is the fig tree which speaks of the spiritual connection between God and man. There will be no spiritual connection to God for these men. The third is the vine which refers to the basic expression of a thing. Their basic expression is that of the law, not grace. As the law brings condemnation, there will be no salvation for these men.

Instead of these kinds of trees, their leader is the atad, the buckthorn. The only other use of the word outside of a designated name for a place is in Psalm 58:9. The meaning there was the thorn is something taken away and burned before it is of any use at all. This will be the state of those who identify with the coming false Messiah.

In Luke 21, Jesus says this concerning the trees –

“Then He spoke to them a parable: ‘Look at the fig tree, and all the trees. 30 When they are already budding, you see and know for yourselves that summer is now near. 31 So you also, when you see these things happening, know that the kingdom of God is near. 32 Assuredly, I say to you, this generation will by no means pass away till all things take place. 33 Heaven and earth will pass away, but My words will by no means pass away.’” Luke 21:29-33

These words may be a reference to Jotham’s parable. When each tree shows its true colors in the end times, be it a spiritual connection to God (the fig) or its allegiance to the Antichrist, the state of how each is manifest will make it evident that the final hour has come, the tribulation will remove all who offend, and the kingdom of God will then be realized.

The last portion of Jotham’s parable (verse 15) tells what it will be like for those who cling to the law, “And if not, go out fire from the bramble and devour cedars the Lebanon.” As Lebanon is used as a picture of works under the law, those who remain strong in law worship will be devoured through their adherence to the law under their false Messiah.

The verses in our passage today were given in the form of a condition followed by a conclusion and are intended as a prophecy. They set a contrast between Abimelech and Jerubbaal.

The purpose is to provide a contrast between Christ’s striving with the law and theirs. Jesus came, lived out the law perfectly, and fulfilled the law for Israel. These people are rejecting God’s provision of the tribulation period which is intended to bring them to the point where they call on Jesus.

Instead, they will cling to the self-appointed supposed Messiah who comes in his own name. Jotham (Yehovah is Upright, picturing the decision of the Lord in appointing Jesus as the true Messiah) says in verse 16 that if that is acting in truth and sincerity, and if it is rightly dealing with Jerubbaal (Christ’s prevailing over the law) and his house (those who are His), there will be a particular result.

Before he says what the result is, he recounts (verse 17) the work of Jerubbaal (Jesus), saying, “He fought, my father, unto you.” What Jesus did was for His people, to save them. And more, “and cast his soul from front you from hand Midian.” He gave up His life to rescue His people from the Place of Judgment. Isaiah describes the act –

“Therefore I will divide Him a portion with the great,
And He shall divide the spoil with the strong,
Because He poured out His soul unto death,
And He was numbered with the transgressors,
And He bore the sin of many,
And made intercession for the transgressors.” Isaiah 53:12

Despite the work of Jesus, and being presented with this in the end times, most probably because of the rapture of the church leading to a right understanding of the words of Daniel 9, it says, “and killed his sons, seventy man, upon stone one.”

The work of Christ is made of no effect in Israel’s conduct. They will accept the false Messiah, attempting to obtain God’s favor through temple rites and rituals. Thus, they essentially kill the purpose of the seventy weeks granted to them. As it said in verse 18, “and you, you risen upon house my father, the day.”

The less definitive words “the day” point to the tribulation period, the day of the Lord. It is during this time that they will have once and for all cut themselves off from the grace of God in Christ. Instead, they “kinged Abimelech son his bondmaid over masters Shechem.”

The one who claims his father is king is the son of a bondmaid. Those who follow him, represented by “masters Shechem” are just like him. As Jotham said, “for your brother, he.” They are all sons of bondage. This is exactingly explained by Paul in Galatians 4 –

“Now we, brethren, as Isaac was, are children of promise. 29 But, as he who was born according to the flesh then persecuted him who was born according to the Spirit, even so it is now. 30 Nevertheless what does the Scripture say? “Cast out the bondwoman and her son, for the son of the bondwoman shall not be heir with the son of the freewoman.” 31 So then, brethren, we are not children of the bondwoman but of the free.” Galatians 4:28-31

Jotham’s words were probably intended to point out a direct connection to the story of Abraham and Hagar. Paul then provides the typological meaning in Galatians 4 for us to understand. With that understood, Jotham then gave the apodosis, “rejoice in Abimelech, and rejoice also, he, in you.”

If the false Messiah can restore them to God, they will be in the sweet spot. However, Jotham provides another statement of condition with an immediate conclusion, “And if else, goes fire from Abimelech, and devours masters Shechem and Beth Millo.”

Those who accept the false worship of a return to law observance under their false Messiah will be devoured through it. Likewise, “And goes fire from masters Shechem, and from Beth Millo, and devours Abimelech.” There will be destruction in both directions as the true nature of their wickedness in rejecting Christ is made manifest.

Understanding this, verse 21 finished with, “And escaped, Jotham, and fled, and went Beer-ward, and dwelt there, from face Abimelech his brother.”

The meaning is clear. Jotham (Yehovah is Upright, picturing the decision of the Lord in appointing Jesus as the true Messiah), who is representative of that state in the tribulation period, is removed from those who return to law worship.

Beer is a picture of where the Spirit issues from, which is not where the law is observed. Abimelech, the one who rejects Christ and returns to the law in the end times, has no access to God’s approval because he has no access to the Spirit of God. Those who follow him will be, with him, separated forever from God.

The passage we have looked at, which began in Judges 9:1, is a brilliant way of restating that which has already been clearly revealed. By going back to the seventy sevens of Daniel, it confirms other typology that reveals the ineffective nature of the law to bring about salvation.

Rather, it is a complete hindrance to a proper relationship with God. Daniel 9 is so precise that the timing of the coming Messiah is clearly presented. And yet, it then speaks of the Messiah being cut off (dying) and of false worship being instituted in the temple in Jerusalem.

If that is the case, then it means that there was something Israel missed about the coming of their Messiah. Now, after all of the amazingly clear typology of human history since Israel’s rejection of Jesus seen since the beginning of Judges, this recap of the time of the law after the Babylonian exile beautifully shows them what they have missed: Jesus.

It is Jesus’ work in defeating the power of the law that brought about the gospel, pictured by Gideon. Thus, there was no need to use that name here. In fact, it would have damaged the typology.

The seventy sevens of Daniel are not about the gospel, but about Israel’s relationship with God under the law, first leading to Jesus and then closing with a final seven that must be worked through in order for them to come to Jesus. Those who reject this reject a right relationship with God.

The point for those who have received Jesus should then be clear. Our relationship is not ever to be based on our works before God, except those done in faith. If we spend our time attempting to merit God’s favor through works, then we are not working in faith.

But if our works spring from our faith, no matter what they are, they will be rewarded by God. Paul clearly explains that to us in Romans 14:23 where he says, “whatever is not from faith is sin.” The best part of our failing in this regard is that because of Christ we are not imputed sin.

For those who fail to come to God through Christ, unfortunately, they remain under the curse of the law. Time and time again, the same thing is being revealed to us in new and exciting ways. But the point isn’t just to be excited. It is to ensure that we get it.

God has done the hard work. He has secured our salvation. And the reason why we needed it in the first place is because we put ourselves ahead of Him. We believed the devil that said we could be like God. We broke God’s law. And we were separated from Him.

Going through the Bible reveals a continuous reminder that law condemns, but God’s grace saves. Therefore, let us cling to the grace of God that is found in Jesus Christ our Lord. In this, we will always and forever remain in the sweet spot of His loving favor.

Closing Verse: “For as many as are of the works of the law are under the curse; for it is written, ‘Cursed is everyone who does not continue in all things which are written in the book of the law, to do them.’ 11 But that no one is justified by the law in the sight of God is evident, for ‘the just shall live by faith.’ 12 Yet the law is not of faith, but ‘the man who does them shall live by them.’” Galatians 3:10-12

Next Week: Judges 9:22-45 He’s a wreck. If you check’m, this you will see… (Abimelech, King of Shechem, Part III) (29th Judges sermon)

The Lord has you exactly where He wants you. He has a good plan and purpose for you. It is He who judges His people according to their deeds. So, follow Him, live for Him, and trust Him, and He will do marvelous things for you and through you.

Abimelech, King of Shechem, Part II

“Now therefore, if you have acted in truth and sincerity
In making Abimelech king
And if you have dealt well with Jerubbaal and his house
And have done to him as he deserves (if you have done this thing)

For my father fought for you, risked his life
And delivered you out of the hand of Midian (See,
———-here is a picture of it on my phone)
But you have risen up against my father’s house this day
And killed his seventy sons on one stone

And made Abimelech, the son of his female servant
———-him and not another
King over the men of Shechem, because he is your brother

If then you have acted in truth and sincerity
With Jerubbaal and with his house this day
Then rejoice in Abimelech
And let him also rejoice in you, if it will be that way

But if not, let fire come from Abimelech and devour
The men of Shechem and Beth Millo (sending them to heck)
And let fire come from the men of Shechem
And from Beth Millo and devour Abimelech!

And Jotham ran away and fled, he and none other
And he went to Beer and dwelt there, for fear of Abimelech
———-his brother

Lord God, turn our hearts to be obedient to Your word
Give us wisdom to be ever faithful to You
May we carefully heed each thing we have heard
Yes, Lord God may our hearts be faithful and true

And we shall be content and satisfied in You alone
We will follow You as we sing our songs of praise
Hallelujah to You; to us Your path You have shown
Hallelujah we shall sing to You for all of our days

Hallelujah and Amen…

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

16 “Now therefore, if you have acted in truth and sincerity in making Abimelech king, and if you have dealt well with Jerubbaal and his house, and have done to him as he deserves— 17 for my father fought for you, risked his life, and delivered you out of the hand of Midian; 18 but you have risen up against my father’s house this day, and killed his seventy sons on one stone, and made Abimelech, the son of his female servant, king over the men of Shechem, because he is your brother— 19 if then you have acted in truth and sincerity with Jerubbaal and with his house this day, then rejoice in Abimelech, and let him also rejoice in you. 20 But if not, let fire come from Abimelech and devour the men of Shechem and Beth Millo; and let fire come from the men of Shechem and from Beth Millo and devour Abimelech!” 21 And Jotham ran away and fled; and he went to Beer and dwelt there, for fear of Abimelech his brother.

 

 

Judges 9:1-15 (Abimelech, King of Shechem, Part I)

Wow! Artwork by Douglas Kallerson.

Judges 9:1-15
Abimelech King of Shechem, Part I

(Typed 8 January 2024) The words of the passage today include a parable by Jotham to the people of Shechem. He uses metaphor to convey his thoughts, comparing trees to people. Unlike today, growing up in the seventies brought interesting music to our ears.

Starting in the mid to late 60s, bands began to introduce complicated tapestries of music mixed with stories. Albums like “Tommy” and “Quadrophenia” by the Who made thematic presentations that covered entire albums.

One band, Rush, employed this style. One of their albums, “Hemispheres,” debuted in 1978 containing only four songs. Two of these songs divided into separate sections, often played separately, but one of the stand-alone songs was called “The Trees.”

The song is similar enough to what Jotham proclaims here in Judges that I immediately wondered if Rush got their inspiration for it from this passage. There is nothing to substantiate this, but it seems logical to me that Neil Peart, who wrote the lyrics, may have had some memory of Jotham’s words and formed the song from that.

I bring this up because years ago when I started to preach, I said to myself that if I ever did a sermon on Judges 9, their song would be a part of my analysis of Jotham’s parable. Well, here we are, and there you go.

Text Verse: “But I am like a green olive tree in the house of God;
I trust in the mercy of God forever and ever.
I will praise You forever,
Because You have done it;
And in the presence of Your saints
I will wait on Your name, for it is good.” Psalm 52:8, 9

John Lange says the following regarding Jotham’s parable –

“The parable belongs to the most remarkable productions of Israelitish life, not only on account of its political significance, but also for what may be called its literary character. Fable and so-called apologue are of oriental, non-Israelitish, as also non-Grecian, origin. They spring from a pantheism in which trees and animals furnished symbols for expressing the popular ideas. Although rooted in the religious vivification of nature, their employment was nevertheless brought to maturity by the pressure of social necessities. … They furnished the people with individual consolation against general misery. In their original appearance among the Greeks also, they fail not to exhibit this character. In the same way, Jotham speaks to the tyrants of Shechem in this popular language, which all understand. He does not speak like a prophet, for he is none, and Baal has stopped the ears of his auditors. He does not even speak of the power and mighty deeds of Jehovah, from whom his own name is derived. He speaks of “Elohim” and his retributions—of the Deity in the general sense in which the heathen also acknowledge him. He speaks altogether in their language, popularly, with popular wisdom.”

I disagree with his thoughts on such words being non-Israelitish and non-Grecian in origin. Rather, such parables are a part of the universal conscience instilled in us by God. Cultures all around the world use such thoughts, even if the form is different.

It is true that many of these cultures are pantheistic. But that is not the intent here. However, Lange is right that Jotham doesn’t refer to Yehovah at all. Rather, he uses the general term for God (or gods), elohim. And not only that, but he does it without any preceding article to indicate a right relationship with Him.

Rather, he uses a general term that could as easily be translated as gods as it can be God. In fact, some scholars and translations use the general “gods.” The entire passage is devoid of a close and personal connection to the Lord with the exception of the name Jotham.

Let’s get into it! Great things are to be found in His superior word. And so, let us turn to that precious word once again, and… May God speak to us through His word today, and may His glorious name ever be praised.

I. The Seventy Sons of Jerubbaal (verses 1-6)

The narrative of the life of Gideon ended in the previous chapter. Only one of his many sons was named. It is the Bible’s standard way of introducing a new figure into the narrative. The account closed out, saying –

“Then Jerubbaal the son of Joash went and dwelt in his own house. 30 Gideon had seventy sons who were his own offspring, for he had many wives. 31 And his concubine who was in Shechem also bore him a son, whose name he called Abimelech. 32 Now Gideon the son of Joash died at a good old age, and was buried in the tomb of Joash his father, in Ophrah of the Abiezrites.

33 So it was, as soon as Gideon was dead, that the children of Israel again played the harlot with the Baals, and made Baal-Berith their god. 34 Thus the children of Israel did not remember the Lord their God, who had delivered them from the hands of all their enemies on every side; 35 nor did they show kindness to the house of Jerubbaal (Gideon) in accordance with the good he had done for Israel.” Judges 8:29-35

Then Abimelech the son of Jerubbaal went to Shechem,

vayelekh avimelekh ben yerubaal shekhemah – “And went Abimelech son Jerubbaal Shechem-ward.” The narrative picks up immediately with the one named son of those closing words. The only other named son to this point was Jether who was recorded in Judges 8:20.

Abimelech means My Father is King, Father of a King, Father is King, Father Reigns, etc. It can even mean Desired Counsel. The exact one of these is to be determined from the surrounding context.

Jerubbaal means Let Baal Strive. The name is used nine times in this chapter while the name Gideon is never used. It reminds us of the act that established his judgeship in the first place –

“But Joash said to all who stood against him, ‘Would you plead for Baal? Would you save him? Let the one who would plead for him be put to death by morning! If he is a god, let him plead for himself, because his altar has been torn down!’ 32 Therefore on that day he called him Jerubbaal, saying, ‘Let Baal plead against him, because he has torn down his altar.’” Judges 6:31, 32

Shechem is in the tribal inheritance of Ephraim. Of the name Shechem, Cambridge says, “The town lies on the watershed (1870 ft.) between the Mediterranean and the Jordan basins, hence perhaps its name, shoulder.”

Shechem means Shoulder. However, that comes from shakam signifying to incline, as inclining the shoulder to a burden. Hence, it is normally translated as to rise or start early. Abarim defines Shechem as “[Having a Sense of] Responsibility.”

Of Abimelech, it next says he went…

1 (con’t) to his mother’s brothers,

el akhe imo – “unto brothers his mother.” This means that Abimelech went into the inheritance of Ephraim to his relatives of that tribe. He was related to them through his mother even though his father, Gideon, was of Manasseh. Next…

1 (con’t) and spoke with them and with all the family of the house of his mother’s father, saying,

vaydaber alehem v’el kal mishpath beith avi imo l’mor – “and spoke unto them and unto all family house father his mother, to say…” It is good to remember that his name, Abimelech, was not given by his father. Rather, the text read vayasem eth shemo avimelekh – “And he set his name: Abimelech.”

As there was no change in subject after stating that he was the concubine’s son, this indicates that it was not Gideon who gave this name. Rather, Abimelech set this name upon himself. Therefore, he claimed a title as much as giving himself a name.

As such, it indicates he is planning a conspiracy or conspiring to assume authority and is doing so with his family members of a different tribe (Ephraim) than that of all of his brothers of Manasseh. However, the record already said –

“Then the men of Israel said to Gideon, ‘Rule over us, both you and your son, and your grandson also; for you have delivered us from the hand of Midian.’
23 But Gideon said to them, ‘I will not rule over you, nor shall my son rule over you; the Lord shall rule over you.’” Judges 8:22, 23

There was no line of succession given. But Abimelech, disregarding this, is obviously claiming that he will, in fact, succeed Gideon. It would explain why he has set a new name upon himself As such, he says…

“Please speak in the hearing of all the men of Shechem:

Rather: daberu na b’azne khal baale sh’khem – “Speak, I pray, in ears all masters Shechem.” Using the word baal, master, lord, husband, etc., is intentional. It is a term that will be used sixteen times in this chapter. Abimelech is talking to his mother’s brothers and is asking for the leaders of each household to determine a matter…

2 (con’t) ‘Which is better for you, that all seventy of the sons of Jerubbaal reign over you, or that one reign over you?’

Following the blunder of the KJV, the NKJV continues to obscure the intent of the passage: mah tov lakhem hamshol bakhem shivim ish kol bene yerubaal im m’shol bakhem ish ekhad – “What good to you: ‘Ruling in you seventy man all sons Jerubbaal, if ruling in you man one?’”

The word used is mashal, to rule, not malakh, to reign. As noted previously, Solomon reigned (malakh – as in 1 Kings 1:35) over Israel, but he ruled (mashal) “over all kingdoms from the River to the land of the Philistines, as far as the border of Egypt” (1 Kings 4:21).

The word mashal, rule, is never used concerning Saul, the first king of Israel. Rather, each time it is said that he reigned (malakh). There is minimal overlap between the two words because they signify two different things.

The word mashal, rule, is used twice in this chapter, and both are in this verse. The word malakh is used seven times. These are the only uses of the word in all of Judges when referring to a person of Israel.

Abimelech sets before his brothers a false proposition. Gideon had already said that the Lord would rule over Israel. Nothing was said about any of his sons ruling, not seventy, not one. However, it can be inferred that the ephod that Gideon made and set up in Ophrah conferred upon the house a sense of authority it was never intended to grant.

Thus, it became the snare by which this plot would be brought to fruition. As it said –

“Then Gideon made it into an ephod and set it up in his city, Ophrah. And all Israel played the harlot with it there. It became a snare to Gideon and to his house.” Judges 8:27

Also note that Abimelech calls his father Jerubbaal, not Gideon. Gideon is the one who contended with Baal, the same as the name, Baal, used in this account. It provides a reason for calling the men of this town baale (masters) rather than anshe (men). Abimelech is setting the tone of the coming events through his careful selection of words: rule, masters/men, seventy/one, etc.

Of the number seventy, Bullinger says it “is another combination of two of the perfect numbers, seven and ten. … As compared with the sum of two numbers, the product exhibits the significance of each in an intensified form. Hence 7 x 10 signifies perfect spiritual order carried out with all spiritual power and significance. Both spirit and order are greatly emphasised.” Next, he says…

2 (con’t) Remember that I am your own flesh and bone.”

There is an emphasis in the words: uzkhartem ki atsmekhem uvsarkhem ani – “And remember for your bone and your flesh, I.” Abimelech sets a contrast between the seventy sons of Jerubbaal and himself. “They are of Manasseh while I am of Ephraim. They are not your kin while I am your bone and your flesh. Which is better to rule over you?” The words are deceptive and manipulative. However…

And his mother’s brothers spoke all these words concerning him in the hearing of all the men of Shechem;

vaydaberu akhe imo alav b’azne kal baale sh’khem – “And spoke, brothers his mother, upon him, in hearing all masters Shechem.” The clause carefully repeats the words of Abimelech. As he requested, so they performed.

There is no indication either way whether they knew that Gideon had said the Lord would rule over them. Despite this, the next words indicate that they were swayed to accept his false claim concerning the matter…

3 (con’t) and their heart was inclined to follow Abimelech, for they said, “He is our brother.”

They repeat the emphasis spoken to them: vayet libam akare avimelekh ki amru akhinu hu – “And stretched their heart after Abimelech, for said, ‘Our brother, he.” The word heart, being singular, shows that the masters of Shechem were united in intent and purpose. There was no dissension among them.

They saw an opportunity for a member of their own tribe to rule as king, and that would mean their city, from which he hailed, would be the king’s seat. As such…

So they gave him seventy shekels of silver from the temple of Baal-Berith,

vayitnu lo shivim keseph mibeith baal berith – “And gave to him seventy silver from temple Baal-Berith.” Judges 8:33 said –

“So it was, as soon as Gideon was dead, that the children of Israel again played the harlot with the Baals, and made Baal-Berith their god.”

Although it doesn’t say how long after Gideon’s death these events took place, it could not have been long. Abimelech is attempting to seize a power and authority that doesn’t even exist.

Unless the sons of Gideon openly made a pact of continued rule among themselves, of which the text says nothing, then Israel would have quickly known that there was currently no leader. And yet, Abimelech was able to secure money from the house of Baal-Berith that didn’t exist until, or only became operational again, after Gideon’s death.

Or it could be that the name Baal-Berith is derived from what occurs in this account along with what has already happened at this same location. In Genesis 18, the Lord made a vow to Abram in this location –

“Abram passed through the land to the place of Shechem, as far as the terebinth tree of Moreh. And the Canaanites were then in the land.
Then the Lord appeared to Abram and said, ‘To your descendants I will give this land.’ And there he built an altar to the Lord, who had appeared to him.” Genesis 18:6, 7

Likewise, Jacob also built an altar here –

“Then Jacob came safely to the city of Shechem, which is in the land of Canaan, when he came from Padan Aram; and he pitched his tent before the city. 19 And he bought the parcel of land, where he had pitched his tent, from the children of Hamor, Shechem’s father, for one hundred pieces of money. 20 Then he erected an altar there and called it El Elohe Israel.” Genesis 33:18-20

Also, in Joshua 24, it said –

“So Joshua made a covenant with the people that day, and made for them a statute and an ordinance in Shechem.
Then Joshua wrote these words in the Book of the Law of God. And he took a large stone, and set it up there under the oak that was by the sanctuary of the Lord. 27 And Joshua said to all the people, ‘Behold, this stone shall be a witness to us, for it has heard all the words of the Lord which He spoke to us. It shall therefore be a witness to you, lest you deny your God.’” Joshua 24:25-27

The name Baal-Berith means Master of the Covenant(s). The word Covenant is singular, but Jones’ Dictionary concludes that this construction is better-rendered plural. Thus, the name Baal-Berith, if rightly translated in the plural, might indicate the covenants that took place at this location, inclusive of the one coming in the next verses.

If so, and this seems likely, then Matthew Poole appears to be correct in saying –

“This place they chose, to signify that they still owned God, and their covenant with him; and did not worship Baal in opposition to God, but in conjunction with him, or in subordination to him.”

4 (con’t) with which Abimelech hired worthless and reckless men; and they followed him.

Literally: vayiskor bahem avimelekh anashim reqim uphkhozim vayelkhu akharav – “And hired in them, Abimelech, men empties and bubblings.” Abimelech hired men who were completely useless to society.

The first word used to describe them is req, an adjective meaning empty, and coming from ruq, to pour out, and thus empty. The second word is new and rare, phakhaz. It is a verb coming from a primitive root meaning to bubble up or froth as in boiling water. Thus, it signifies to bubble.

Both words, being plural signify empties and bubblings. Thus, men who are of no substance at all. John Gill calls them men of light heads and empty brains. That is certainly a good description of them.

Then he went to his father’s house at Ophrah and killed his brothers, the seventy sons of Jerubbaal, on one stone.

It is all singular: vayavo beith abiv aphratah vayaharog eth ekhav bene yerubaal shivim ish al even ekhath – “And goes in house his father Ophrah-ward and kill his brothers, sons Jerubbaal, seventy man upon stone one.” Despite having worthless men with him, the entire bloody account is accredited to Abimelech alone. And it may be that he personally accomplished the actual execution while the others only assisted.

Either way, the seventy were all killed on one stone. The idea being conveyed is that the payment of silver was one piece per son of Jerubbaal. Silver in the Bible refers to redemption. The word even, or stone, is derived from the root of banah, to build. The name Ophrah means Of the Dust.

5 (con’t) But Jotham the youngest son of Jerubbaal was left, because he hid himself.

vayivather yotham ben yerubaal ha’qatan ki nekhba – “And remained Jotham son Jerubbaal, the youngest, for hidden.” The same word used to describe him, ha’qaton, the youngest, was used to describe Othniel, the younger brother of Caleb.

It is likely he was the youngest son of Gideon, but even if not, it is a descriptor indicating that he was at least a younger son of his. His name comes from Yehovah and tam meaning complete, perfect, undefiled, upright, etc. Thus, his name means Yehovah is Upright, Yehovah is Perfect, or something similar. After this bloody attack…

And all the men of Shechem gathered together, all of Beth Millo,

vayeasphu khal baale sh’khem v’kal beith milo – “And gathered all masters Shechem and all Beth Millo.” The same people from Shechem who agreed to appoint Abimelech to rule over them are brought together to enact that agreement. It also now includes “all Beth Millo.”

The name comes from beith, house, and male, to fill. Thus, it means House of Filling or House of Fulness. However, the idea of filling can indicate an outcome. When a woman’s days of carrying are filled, they are completed (Genesis 25:24). When a man’s hand is filled, it means he is consecrated to a task (Exodus 28:41). When a person fills another’s words, he confirms them (1 Kings 1:14).

Therefore, the meaning may extend to House of Consecration, Affirmation, Completion, etc. As such, the name appears to be derived from the event, saying something like, “And gathered all masters Shechem and all House of Consecration.” It thus speaks of all the people who came to the ordination of their king…

6 (con’t) and they went and made Abimelech king

vayamlikhu eth avimelekh l’melekh– “And kinged Abimelech to king.” Right off the bat, whether legal or illegal, Abimelech is the first noted king in Israel.

It is a kingship ordained by man, not by the Lord, but the terms are specific. He reigns (malakh) rather than rules (mashal) as a king (melekh). Other than Jabin, the foreign king of Judges 4, the term will be used only concerning Abimelech in Judges.

6 (con’t) beside the terebinth tree at the pillar that was in Shechem.

The words are difficult and widely translated: im elon mutsav asher bishkhem – “with oak, standing, which in Shechem.” The word “with” means that this was the designated place for the matter to take place. At that location was the oak, a symbol of strength.

The next word, natsav, is a verb signifying to stand. The form is causative. Something was caused to stand. It therefore appears to be referring to the events of Joshua 24:27 seen earlier –

“And he took a large stone, and set it up there under the oak that was by the sanctuary of the Lord.”

As such, one can see the reason why the temple is called Baal-Berith, Master of the Covenants. It would also explain why Shechem here is called Beth Millo, House of Consecration. It is a remembrance of the events that took place in the past, including at the time of Joshua.

Listen to the trees, and they will tell you
Hear what they have to say
What is it a tree will or will not do?
And why has God created them in each way?

Some trees provide shade while others bear fruit
Some have wood for burning on a cold night
Each is made, a particular purpose to suit
Some give a painful rash, others wondrous delight

Hear what the trees have to say
Each created by the wisdom of God
They attend to our needs by night and by day
And so, His creative efforts we shall gladly laud

II. The Trees (verses 7-15)

Now when they told Jotham, he went and stood on top of Mount Gerizim, and lifted his voice and cried out. And he said to them:

vayagidu l’yotham va’yelekh vayaamod b’rosh har g’rizim vayisa qolo vayiqra vayomer lahem – “And told to Jotham, and went, and stood in head Mount Gerizim, and lifted his voice, and called, and said to them.” In hearing that they have made Abimelech king, Jotham takes action to rebuke the people.

Mount Gerazim is the mount of blessings called out according to the word of Moses from Deuteronomy 27. That was accomplished by Joshua in Joshua 8. As for calling out from the head of the mount, it is rather high, and he would not be heard by the people in Shechem from there.

However, there is no reason to assume he cared about that. If only a few people of Shechem harvesting on the mount or nearby heard, the point would be made. He is simply uttering a parable, intending it to be a prophecy and a curse over the masters of Shechem. Thus, it hardly mattered whether they all heard him or not.

Gerizim comes from the word garaz – to cut, cut up, or cut off. Being a plural word, the meaning is something like Cutters Down. It may refer to those who harvest, due to the fertility of the mountain. This is the last time it will be mentioned in Scripture.

A mountain, har, is a lot of something gathered. It is synonymous with a large but centralized group of people. As for his words, Jotham begins his discourse to the people of Shechem, saying…

7 (con’t) “Listen to me, you men of Shechem,
That God may listen to you!

shimu elay baale sh’khem v’yishma alekhem elohim – “Listen unto me masters Shechem, and listens unto you God.” It cannot go without notice that the word Elohim is used eight times in this chapter. Six of those refer to the true God and two to a false god. However, the Lord (YHVH) is never mentioned.

The meaning of his words could be that if they will hearken to what he says and turn from their treachery in allying with Abimelech, God will listen to their petitions for mercy. Or it could be that he wants them to hear his words of cursing upon them just as he wants God to hear their words of proclaiming a king in Shechem.

Whatever the intent is, the substance of his parable begins with…

“The trees once went forth to anoint a king over them.

halokh halkhu ha’etsem limshoakh alehem melekh – “Going, have gone the trees to anoint over them king.” The words introduce the thought that will be continued throughout the parable. Of the entirety of it, Adam Clarke says, “This is the oldest, and without exception the best fable or apologue in the world.”

Cambridge notes, “Part of a fable of this kind, taking the form of a dispute between the trees, has been discovered in the library of Ashurbanipal.” His reign was around 631 BC in Iraq.

The intent of Jotham’s words is to introduce a sense of morality that is obviously lacking in the minds of the masters of Shechem. He wants them to consider what they have done and to realize that the path they have chosen will only lead to disaster.

As for the words, “to anoint over them king,” this tells us that even though a king had not yet been appointed over Israel, the process of anointing such a leader was not unknown to the people. With the thought of the trees, meaning the people, looking to anoint a king over them, Jotham continues…

8 (con’t) And they said to the olive tree,
‘Reign over us!’

vayomru lazayith m’lokha alenu – “And said, to the olive, ‘Reign, you, over us!’” Some try to shove Gideon into the symbolism here, referring to his refusal to reign over the people. This may be, but because three different fruit trees are given the opportunity to reign, this seems unlikely.

Also, there is no need to make the parable into a list of specifics. If one tree is Gideon then who would the next two trees represent? Rather, Jotham is making a point about the event that took place. The only specific items to be compared are Abimelech and the thorn bush. As for the olive, it is the most noteworthy tree that surrounded Jotham.

Its fruit was, and remains, highly prized. Olives are used for eating, oil, soaps, and more. The oil is used for lighting lamps and cooking food, among other uses. The wood is prized for its beauty and can be burned for warmth. Jotham recognizes this as the finest of the trees…

But the olive tree said to them,
‘Should I cease giving my oil,
With which they honor God and men,
And go to sway over trees?’

vayomer lahem ha’zayith hekhodalti eth dishni asher bi y’khabdu elohim va’anashim v’halakhti lanua al ha’etsim – “And said to them the olive, ‘I cease my oil which in me they honor God and men, and go to wave over the trees?’”

The olive is incredulous. How could he step down from his exalted position to rule over the other trees? Through him and his oil, God is glorified, as in the burning of the priestly lamps, additions to sacrifices and offerings, etc. And through him, man is honored such as in the anointing of priests, kings, guests, and so forth.

As for the olive itself, it is a symbol of religious privilege. For example, it reflects the Spirit working through those who are included in this privilege. The olives receive their fatness from the roots. The branches receive this fatness and produce olives which are then used to put forth light before the Lord. Next…

10 “Then the trees said to the fig tree,
‘You come and reign over us!’

vayomru ha’etsim lat’enah lekhi at malkhi alenu – “And said the trees to the fig, ‘Come, you, reign over us!’” The fig is yummy, tasty, delectable, piquant, and delicious. It provides shade and it is useful for sewing coverings to hide oneself, although not very wellJ. Though maybe not as majestic as the olive, it is a remarkable specimen of God’s favor upon man.

As for the biblical significance of the fig, it does not refer to Israel the nation. That is a misinterpretation that has been passed on for eons. Rather, the fig speaks of the spiritual connection between God and man. When this was lost in the garden, they attempted, by their own works, to restore that connection through the use of fig leaves covering the disconnect, the shame of sin.

When Jesus cursed the fig, it was a parable concerning the place He was coming from and going to, the temple, which is the place where the spiritual connection with God was effected for the people. In His words, “Let no one eat fruit from you ever again” (Mark 11:14), He was indicating that the temple that served the law would never again be the source of connection to God. Instead, it would only come through Him.

11 But the fig tree said to them,
‘Should I cease my sweetness and my good fruit,
And go to sway over trees?’

vatomer lahem hatenah hekhodalti mathqi v’eth t’nuvathi ha’tovah v’halkhti lanua al ha’etsim – “And said to them, the fig, ‘I cease my sweetness and my produce, the good, and go to wave over the trees?’”

The fig is hugely, even whoppingly, succulent, sweet, and satisfying. It knows this and is as incredulous as the olive. “Why should I give up on what is so marvelous to do something of less importance? Let the other trees go elsewhere for a leader!” Therefore…

12 “Then the trees said to the vine,
‘You come and reign over us!’

vayomru ha’etsim lagephen lekhi at malokhi alenu – “And said the trees to the vine, ‘Come, you, and reign over us!” The vine bears grapes for eating and for drinking. From it comes wine that “makes glad the heart of man” (Psalm 104:15).

Without going into all of the amazing details of grapes, vineyards, and wine, suffice it to say that vineyards represent the cultural side of humanity. There are various vineyards that represent various cultures. Vineyards produce grapes, or cultural expressions, and these are mixed together through a mashing process to produce wine.

In the Bible, wine symbolizes the merging together of these expressions into a result. The thing that ought to happen can happen, symbolized by wine. It is as if an act of reasoning is occurring, and an intended result is realized.

Solomon uses wine in Proverbs 9 as a result of the workings of Wisdom. It is as if we are “seeing wisdom as wine drawn from the grapes of observations and deductions” (Abarim). Wine then represents our reasoning and that which will change our minds. A perfect example of this is found in Jesus’ words of Matthew 9 –

“Nor do they put new wine into old wineskins, or else the wineskins break, the wine is spilled, and the wineskins are ruined. But they put new wine into new wineskins, and both are preserved.” Matthew 9:17

Jesus was speaking of the law and grace. The new wine is the new dispensation of grace to come. The old wine was the dispensation of the law. If one were to introduce the new concept into the old, it would not work because the two are incompatible. Only if one put the new wine into the new wineskin and received the new wine would the mind be changed.

Likewise, in His first miracle, Jesus changed water into wine. He did it with water in jars used for purification. This was what was used to wash with. It wasn’t intended to be drunk. But in one stroke, He changed the water to wine, and thus the function of the jar and the applicability of its contents.

Understanding this, the vine itself is the basic expression of a thing. Jerusalem is equated to an outcast vine in Ezekiel 15. It was only good to be burned. The expression of Judah was supposed to reveal God, but it was worthless and revealed nothing of value.

Jesus, however, says He is the true vine in John 15. He is the true expression of God. His branches, His people, come forth from Him as an expression of Himself to bear fruit in that state in which they exist.

13 But the vine said to them,
‘Should I cease my new wine,
Which cheers both God and men,
And go to sway over trees?’

vatomer lahem ha’gephen hekhodalti eth tiroshi ha’sameakh elohim va’anashim v’halakhti lanua al ha’etsim – “And said to them, the vine, ‘I cease my sweet-wine, the rejoicer God and men, and go to wave over the trees?’” Another note of incredulity! The vine serves a marvelous purpose that can’t be set aside to do something so base and pointless as to lead the trees. Thus…

14 “Then all the trees said to the bramble,
‘You come and reign over us!’

vayomru khal ha’etsim el ha’atad lekh atah malakh alenu – “And said all the trees unto the buckthorn, ‘Come, you, reign over us.’” The atad, or buckthorn, is painful but otherwise mostly useless. Gesenius identifies it as the southern buckthorn or “Christ’s thorn.”

Outside of being used as the name of a place in Genesis 50, the only other use of this word is in Psalm 58 –

“Before your pots can feel the burning thorns [atad],
He shall take them away as with a whirlwind,
As in His living and burning wrath.” Psalm 58:9

This perfectly pointless and poignantly painful tree responds…

15 And the bramble said to the trees,
‘If in truth you anoint me as king over you,
Then come and take shelter in my shade;

vayomer ha’atad el ha’etsim im b’emeth atem moshkhim othi l’melekh alekhem bou khasu b’tsili – “And said, the buckthorn unto the trees, ‘If in truth you anoint me to king over you, come shelter in my shade.’” Of this, John Lange gives the sense –

“There lies in this the sharpest censure for the trees. The thorn-bush itself can scarcely believe that its election as king is honestly meant (בֶּאֱמֶת). Equally striking is it, that Jotham makes the thorn-bush speak of the trees as wishing to ‘anoint’ him. Anoint with what? With oil. But the ‘oil tree’ has already refused to be king over such subjects! The idea is: they anoint with oil, the symbol of peace, while they have murder and the opposite of peace in their hearts.—The thorn-bush declares his readiness to give them all he has. They are at liberty to shelter themselves in his shadow. But he gives no protection against the sun, and his branches are full of thorns.”

Their chosen king is worthless, he will be painful, and he is already suspicious of those who have appointed him over them. It is a recipe for disaster. He even says as much to them…

*15 (fin) But if not, let fire come out of the bramble
And devour the cedars of Lebanon!’

v’im ayin tetse esh min ha’atad v’tokhal eth arze ha’l’vanon – “And if not, go out fire from the bramble and devour cedars the Lebanon.” The cedar, or erez, ultimately comes from a word signifying firm or strong.

The cedars of Lebanon are referred to many times in Scripture. They denote strength and firmness. When equated to a person or a nation, it refers to one that is great and mighty. In Ezekiel 17, Zedekiah, king of Judah, is equated to a sprig taken from a cedar of Lebanon. Assyria is equated to a cedar in Lebanon in Ezekiel 31.

Jotham’s words mean that this vile buckthorn, Abimelech, would ignite a fire as rapidly burning thorns will do, and it would consume even the mightiest and most esteemed who chose him as king.

As for Lebanon, it is used as a picture of works under the law. It comes from the verb lavan, to be white. That is identical to the noun lavan, or brick, because bricks turn white when fired. That word carries the connotation of works because bricks imply the work of man as opposed to stone which is created by God.

With this verse complete, we must end for the day. The rest of the verses will come next week. Adam Clarke sums up the parable of Jotham, saying –

“The condensed moral of the whole fable is this: Weak, worthless, and wicked men, will ever be foremost to thrust themselves into power; and, in the end, to bring ruin upon themselves, and on the unhappy people over whom they preside.”

He is correct in this. It is seen in our nation today. The most perverted and worthless man imaginable is rushing our nation to the brink of disaster in every possible way he can conjure up. But this has been seen throughout history. A mere corporal, a vile and senseless man, brought the nation of Germany to the brink of total destruction.

It is important for us to choose leaders well, but we shouldn’t trust them to bring us anything other than temporary peace and prosperity. In the end, the only One we can truly put our hope in is Jesus. Anything or anyone else will lead us to a sad state of futility. Let us hold fast to our Lord who alone is worthy of our hope, love, and devotion.

Closing Verse: “It is better to trust in the Lord
Than to put confidence in man.” Psalm 118:8

Next Week: Judges 9:16-21 Detailing every speck, As we trek ‘em. Yes, so we do… (Abimelech, King of Shechem, Part II) (29th Judges sermon)

The Lord has you exactly where He wants you. He has a good plan and purpose for you. It is He who judges His people according to their deeds. So, follow Him, live for Him, and trust Him, and He will do marvelous things for you and through you.

Abimelech King of Shechem, Part I

Then Abimelech the son of Jerubbaal
Went to Shechem, to his mother’s brothers
And spoke with them and with all the family
Of the house of his mother’s father, sharing his druthers

Saying, “Please speak in the hearing of all the men of Shechem
‘Which is better for you, that all seventy (them or me alone)
Of the sons of Jerubbaal reign over you, or that one
———-reign over you?
Remember that I am your own flesh and bone

And his mother’s brothers spoke all these words
Concerning him in the hearing of all Shechem’s men
And their heart was inclined to follow Abimelech
For they said, “He is our brother, that’s settles it then

So they gave him seventy shekels of silver
From the temple of Baal-Berith
With which Abimelech hired worthless and reckless men
And they followed him down the street

Then he went to his father’s house at Ophrah
———and killed his brothers
The seventy sons of Jerubbaal, on one stone
But Jotham the youngest son of Jerubbaal was left
Because he hid himself, hiding all alone

And all the men of Shechem gathered together
All of Beth Millo, and they went (GPS could trek ‘em)
And made Abimelech king beside the terebinth tree
At the pillar that was in Shechem

Now when they told Jotham
He went and stood, but not just lingering about
On top of Mount Gerizim
And lifted his voice and cried out

And he said to them:
“Listen to me, you men of Shechem
That God may listen to you!
Check out my words, yes be sure to check ‘em

“Going, have gone the trees to anoint over them king.”
“And said, to the olive, ‘Reign, you, over us!’”
“And said to them the olive,
‘I cease my oil which in me they honor God and men, and go to wave over the trees?’”
“And said the trees to the fig,
‘Come, you, reign over us!’”
“And said to them, the fig,
‘I cease my sweetness and my produce, the good, and go to wave over the trees?’”
“And said the trees to the vine,
‘Come, you, and reign over us!
“And said to them, the vine,
‘I cease my sweet-wine, the rejoicer God and men, and go to wave over the trees?’”
“And said all the trees unto the buckthorn,
‘Come, you, reign over us.’”
“And said, the buckthorn unto the trees,
‘If in truth you anoint me to king over you, come shelter in my shade.’”
“And if not, go out fire from the bramble and devour cedars the Lebanon.”

Lord God, turn our hearts to be obedient to Your word
Give us wisdom to be ever faithful to You
May we carefully heed each thing we have heard
Yes, Lord God may our hearts be faithful and true

And we shall be content and satisfied in You alone
We will follow You as we sing our songs of praise
Hallelujah to You; to us Your path You have shown
Hallelujah we shall sing to You for all of our days

Hallelujah and Amen…

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Then Abimelech the son of Jerubbaal went to Shechem, to his mother’s brothers, and spoke with them and with all the family of the house of his mother’s father, saying, “Please speak in the hearing of all the men of Shechem: ‘Which is better for you, that all seventy of the sons of Jerubbaal reign over you, or that one reign over you?’ Remember that I am your own flesh and bone.”

And his mother’s brothers spoke all these words concerning him in the hearing of all the men of Shechem; and their heart was inclined to follow Abimelech, for they said, “He is our brother.” So they gave him seventy shekels of silver from the temple of Baal-Berith, with which Abimelech hired worthless and reckless men; and they followed him. Then he went to his father’s house at Ophrah and killed his brothers, the seventy sons of Jerubbaal, on one stone. But Jotham the youngest son of Jerubbaal was left, because he hid himself. And all the men of Shechem gathered together, all of Beth Millo, and they went and made Abimelech king beside the terebinth tree at the pillar that was in Shechem.

Now when they told Jotham, he went and stood on top of Mount Gerizim, and lifted his voice and cried out. And he said to them:

“Listen to me, you men of Shechem,
That God may listen to you!

“The trees once went forth to anoint a king over them.
And they said to the olive tree,
‘Reign over us!’
But the olive tree said to them,
‘Should I cease giving my oil,
With which they honor God and men,
And go to sway over trees?’

10 “Then the trees said to the fig tree,
‘You come and reign over us!’
11 But the fig tree said to them,
‘Should I cease my sweetness and my good fruit,
And go to sway over trees?’

12 “Then the trees said to the vine,
‘You come and reign over us!’
13 But the vine said to them,
‘Should I cease my new wine,
Which cheers both God and men,
And go to sway over trees?’

14 “Then all the trees said to the bramble,
‘You come and reign over us!’
15 And the bramble said to the trees,
‘If in truth you anoint me as king over you,
Then come and take shelter in my shade;
But if not, let fire come out of the bramble
And devour the cedars of Lebanon!’

 

 

 

 

 

Judges 8:22-35 (Gideon, Judge of Israel, Part X)

Artwork by Douglas Kallerson.

Judges 8:22-35

Gideon, Judge of Israel, Part X

(Typed 1 January 2024) The words of Gideon in these verses are also reflective of the great moral character of a person in American history. Gideon knew that ruling as a king was not appropriate and that the Lord alone should rule over Israel. That is a great mark of the man. He had the chance to grab and hold power, not only for himself but for his descendants after him. And yet, he turned it down.

George Washington was such a man. An excerpt from the Heritage Foundation article “The Man Who Would Not Be King” by Matthew Spalding, Ph.D. is quoted –

“As our first president, he set the precedents that define what it means to be a constitutional executive: strong and energetic, aware of the limits of authority but guarding the prerogatives of office. The vast powers of the presidency, as one Convention delegate wrote, would not have been made as great had not many of the members cast their eyes towards General Washington as president; and shaped their ideas of the powers to be given to a president by their opinions of his virtue.

“And the key ingredient in all of these things was moral character, something that Washington took very seriously and which gave to his decision-making a deeply prudential quality and to his authority an unmatched magnanimity. ‘His integrity was pure, his justice the most inflexible I have ever known, no motives of interest or consanguinity, of friendship or hatred, being able to bias his decision,’ Jefferson later observed. ‘He was, indeed, in every sense of the words, a wise, a good, and a great man.’

“It is no coincidence, then, that Washington’s most important legacy comes during moments of temptation, when the lure of power was before him. Twice during the Revolution, in 1776 and again in 1777 when Congress was forced to abandon Philadelphia in the face of advancing British troops, Gen. Washington was granted virtually unlimited powers to maintain the war effort and preserve civil society, powers not unlike those assumed in an earlier era by Roman dictators. He shouldered the responsibility but gave the authority back as soon as possible.

“After the war, there were calls for Washington to claim formal political power. Indeed, seven months after the victory at Yorktown, one of his officers suggested what many thought only reasonable in the context of the 18th century: that America should establish a monarchy and that Washington should become king. A shocked Washington immediately rejected the offer out of hand as both inappropriate and dishonorable, and demanded the topic never be raised again.”

How unlike so many today who can think of nothing but grabbing and holding onto power at any cost.

Text Verse: “Blessed are the meek,
For they shall inherit the earth.” Matthew 5:5

Throughout the Bible, the idea of meekness and humility in man is seen to be pleasing to the Lord. The arrogant, the proud, the haughty, the boasters, and other such people are seen as offensive to Him.

This truly reveals the greatness of God in His moral character. A god of our own making will inevitably be completely different than from how God is revealed in the Bible.

This is so foreign to our human understanding of greatness, that when Jesus came in absolute humility and submission to the will of His father, and even to those He created, the world at large rejected Him outright.

Gideon started out humble, acknowledging his insignificance, and even after doing great things, he remained humble. This is the message of the gospel as well.

It is the greatest message in the world because it is the saving message of Jesus. Nothing can be added to it without tainting it. It is simple, filled with humility in what it says about Jesus dying for our sins, and it expects a humble response that recognizes faith alone, apart from any personal merit.

Seeing the life of Gideon as a reflection of the gospel is a marvelous part of God’s superior word. And so, let us turn to that precious word once again, and… May God speak to us through His word today, and may His glorious name ever be praised.

I. Thus Midian Was Subdued (verses 22-28)

22 Then the men of Israel said to Gideon, “Rule over us, both you and your son, and your grandson also;

vayomru ish Yisrael el gidon m’shal banu gam atah gam binkha gam ben b’nekha – “And said man Israel unto Gideon, ‘Rule in us, also you, also your son, also son your son.” With the victory over Midian secured, the men of Israel have excitedly agreed among themselves that they desire Gideon to rule over them.

Most commentators claim that they are calling for a kingship that would begin with Gideon and extend to his progeny after him. But this is not necessarily the case. The word used is mashal, to rule, not malakh, to reign.

Solomon reigned (malakh – as in 1 Kings 1:35) over Israel, but he ruled (mashal) “over all kingdoms from the River to the land of the Philistines, as far as the border of Egypt” (1 Kings 4:21). The word mashal, rule, is never used concerning Saul, the first king of Israel. Rather, each time it is said that he reigned (malakh).

There is minimal overlap between the two words because they signify two different things. Having said that, the word malakh is used seven times in Judges 9 concerning Gideon’s son Abimelech. These are the only uses of the word in all of Judges when referring to a person of Israel.

As for Gideon, his name means Cutter. He has thus far pictured the gospel. Now, the men of Israel have asked him to rule, saying…

22 (con’t) for you have delivered us from the hand of Midian.”

ki hovoshatnu miyad midyan – “for you have saved us from hand Midian.” The people ascribed the salvation to Gideon when it was the Lord who selected Gideon, encouraged him in his state of weakness, and instructed him in what to do, when to do it, and how to accomplish the task.

Midian means Place of Judgment. It has thus far been typical of the tribulation period. Gideon, the gospel, was the instrument by which the Lord gained the victory for Israel in the tribulation. As for the men now in Judges, it next says…

23 But Gideon said to them, “I will not rule over you, nor shall my son rule over you; the Lord shall rule over you.”

vayomer alehem gidon lo emshol ani bakhem v’lo yimshol b’ni bakhem Yehovah yimshol bakhem – “And said unto them Gideon, ‘No ruling, I, in you; and no ruling my son, in you. Yehovah ruling in you.’” Of all of the achievements of his time as judge, this statement is the pinnacle of them all.

Gideon has deferred to the Lord, who provided the victory, to continue to be the ruler over Israel. He is turning down what almost any other person would have jumped at, knowing that such a rule by him was undeserved and would compromise the relationship that had existed between the Lord and His people.

Despite this honorable position, the very next words will lead to a blemish arising on the time of his leadership…

24 Then Gideon said to them, “I would like to make a request of you,

The words contain a cohortative: vayomer alehem gidon eshalah mikem sh’elah – “And said unto them, Gideon, ‘I will ask from you an asking.’” It is like a personal imperative. Gideon has something he greatly desires. His words then carry the weight of “I have something I would really like you to do for me.”

It appears that this verse begins a short insert that will end in verse 27. At that time, the narrative will resume. With that thought, the insert continues with…

24 (con’t) that each of you would give me the earrings from his plunder.”

It is incorrect: utnu li ish nezem shlalo – “Giving to me, man, earring his spoil.” He asks for each man to give an earring (sg.) from his plunder.

As for the word nezem, it simply signifies a ring. It may be an earring or a nose ring. The reason for the request is explained by the narrator…

24 (con’t) For they had golden earrings, because they were Ishmaelites.

ki nizme zahav lahem ki yishmelim hem – “For earrings gold to them, for Ishmaelites, they.” This explains why the translation is earring rather than nose ring. The earring was an identifying mark of the Ishmaelites. It is the fact that they are gold, however, that drives the request. As will be seen, he is using an earring from each man as a multiplier.

Ishmael means God Hears. Instead of calling them Midianites, who descend from Abraham by his wife Keturah, they are here called Ishmaelites who descend from Abraham by his concubine Hagar. The interchanging of the names is necessary for typology, but it has already been seen that the terms indicate a mixture of people –

“So Judah said to his brothers, ‘What profit is there if we kill our brother and conceal his blood? 27 Come and let us sell him to the Ishmaelites, and let not our hand be upon him, for he is our brother and our flesh.’ And his brothers listened. 28 Then Midianite traders passed by; so the brothers pulled Joseph up and lifted him out of the pit, and sold him to the Ishmaelites for twenty shekels of silver. And they took Joseph to Egypt.’” Genesis 37:26-28

As for the request, just as collecting insurance fees is a little leading to a lot, Gideon knows no one will turn down his simple request. Therefore, he will accumulate a great amount of wealth…

25 So they answered, “We will gladly give them.

The response is excited and very willing: vayomru naton niten – “And said, giving, will give.” The men were more than happy to oblige. Gideon had led them, there were innumerable enemies defeated, and each man’s spoil would have been great. Therefore, a single gold earring was an insignificant offering for their heroic leader.

25 (con’t) And they spread out a garment, and each man threw into it the earrings from his plunder.

Rather: vayipr’su eth ha’simlah vayashliku shamah ish nezem shlalo – “And spread the garment, and cast there, man, earring his plunder.” The definite article before garment would normally speak of a particular garment, but none is specified. Probably for this reason, the Greek translation says that Gideon spread out his garment.

From there, it again refers to the earring in the singular. The sense, then, is that each man cast only one earring into the plunder. Despite this, the amount really added up…

26 Now the weight of the gold earrings that he requested was one thousand seven hundred shekels of gold,

v’hi mishqal nizme ha’zahav asher shaal eleph ushba meoth zahav – “And was weight earrings the gold which asked thousand and seven hundreds gold.” This is a large amount of gold, signifying the great number of those slain. It is reckoned by scholars as around 50-75 pounds of gold.

The general thought is that each weighed about one-half a shekel and, thus there were about 3400 dead. This is incorrect. As noted, the Hebrew says, “earring his plunder.” Thus, if each man gave one earring and each collected many, then the extent of the slaughter is more strikingly realized.

As for the number, it is a multiple of 17 and 10s. Bullinger is careful to describe seventeen, saying –

Seventeen stands out very prominently as a significant number. It is not a multiple of any other number, and therefore it has no factors. Hence it is called one of the prime (or indivisible) numbers. What is more, it is the seventh in the list of the prime numbers.

The series runs 1, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, etc. Thirteen, it will be noted, is also a prime number, and is therefore important; but it is the sixth of the series: hence it partakes of the significance of the number 6, and is indeed an intensified expression of it.

In like manner seventeen being the seventh of the series, it partakes of and intensifies the significance of the number seven. Indeed, it is the combination or sum of two perfect numbers—seven and ten—seven being the number of spiritual perfection, and ten of ordinal perfection.

Contrasted together the significance of these two numbers is clear; and when united in the number seventeen we have a union of their respective meanings, viz., spiritual perfection, plus ordinal perfection, or the perfection of spiritual order.

Of the number ten, Bullinger also says, “Completeness of order, marking the entire round of anything, is, therefore, the ever-present signification of the number ten. It implies that nothing is wanting; that the number and order are perfect; that the whole cycle is complete.”

As for Gideon’s booty, it next says…

26 (con’t) besides the crescent ornaments, pendants, and purple robes which were on the kings of Midian, and besides the chains that were around their camels’ necks.

l’bad min ha’saharonim v’hantipoth u-bigde ha’argaman se’al malkhe midyan u-l’bad min ha’anaqoth asher b’tsavare g’malehem – “to exception from the round-ornaments, and the drop-ornaments, and garment the purple upon kings Midian, and to exception from the necklaces which in necks their camels.”

There are two new words. The first is netiphah, a word coming from nataph, to drop or drip but also to prophecy via inspiration. Thus, it would signify a drop-ornament, meaning an eardrop or a pendant. The second is anaq, a necklace.

The round-ornaments were first noted in Judges 8:21. They were either round or crescent-shaped ornaments that adorned the camels’ necks. The eardrops or pendants would have been worn by the men in addition to the gold earrings already noted.

The purple garments might be those of the kings and princes who were over the various tribes. Finally, the necklaces of the camels may have been to hold the round ornaments, or there may have been other chains beside them. All in all, the amount of spoil obtained by Gideon was exceptional. Next, it says…

27 Then Gideon made it into an ephod and set it up in his city, Ophrah.

vayaas oto gidon l’ephod vayatseg oto b’iro b’aphrah – “And made it, Gideon, to ephod. And placed it in his city, in Ophrah.” The “it” appears to be referring to the gold from the earrings apart from all of the items.

Depending on what commentary you read, the opinions on this act range from scathing indictment of apostasy to an acceptable dedication to the Lord, or even some sort of noble acknowledgment of the Lord’s provision.

The idea of this being intended as an object of idolatry is nuts. Gideon just said, “I will not rule over you, nor shall my son rule over you; the LORD shall rule over you.” That was immediately followed by his request for the earrings. And those, along with the other items, are said to be made into an ephod.

It is obvious from the immediate sequence of events that he intended that this was to be a symbolic reminder that the Lord is the Ruler over Israel. The ephod was the garment worn by the high priest as described in Exodus 28.

It is the part of the priestly garment that covers the chest in front and the upper back. It may be the part of the garments described in Revelation 1 in John’s vision of the Lord Jesus –

“Then I turned to see the voice that spoke with me. And having turned I saw seven golden lampstands, 13 and in the midst of the seven lampstands One like the Son of Man, clothed with a garment down to the feet and girded about the chest with a golden band.” Revelation 1:12, 13

This ephod is thus Gideon’s acknowledgment of the Lord’s dual role as ruler and priestly leader of the people. That is a concept not really grasped nor fully considered in Israel until a prophecy by Zechariah concerning the coming Messiah –

“Then speak to him, saying, ‘Thus says the Lord of hosts, saying:
‘Behold, the Man whose name is the BRANCH!
From His place He shall branch out,
And He shall build the temple of the Lord;
13 Yes, He shall build the temple of the Lord.
He shall bear the glory,
And shall sit and rule [mashal] on His throne;
So He shall be a priest [consider the ephod] on His throne,
And the counsel of peace shall be between them both.’” Zechariah 6:12, 13

Ophrah means Of the Dust.

27 (con’t) And all Israel played the harlot with it there.

v’yiznu kal Yisrael akharav sham – “And prostituted all Israel after it there.” Israel’s actions cannot be equated to Gideon’s intent though some try to link them. For example, the Lord directed Moses to make the serpent on the pole. It then saved the people who looked to it for healing.

However, despite the original intent, we later read this concerning the actions of King Hezekiah –

“He removed the high places and broke the sacred pillars, cut down the wooden image and broke in pieces the bronze serpent that Moses had made; for until those days the children of Israel burned incense to it, and called it Nehushtan.” 2 Kings 18:4

Because of the people’s actions, however…

27 (con’t) It became a snare to Gideon and to his house.

v’hi l’gidon u-l’beitho l’moqesh – “And was to Gideon, and to his house, to snare.” The moqesh, or snare, is translated as skandalon in the Greek text. That is later used in the New Testament to indicate an offense or a stumbling block, such as –

“And I, brethren, if I still preach circumcision, why do I still suffer persecution? Then the offense [skandalon: stumbling block] of the cross has ceased. 12 I could wish that those who trouble you would even cut themselves off!” Galatians 5:11, 12

The ephod, even if made with proper intentions, became a point of tripping up Gideon and his house.

28 Thus Midian was subdued before the children of Israel, so that they lifted their heads no more.

vayikana midyan liphne b’ne Yisrael v’lo yasphu la’seth rosham – “And subdued Midian to faces sons Israel, and no added to lift their heads.” These words appear to be a closing bookend to the words of verse 23 which preceded the short inserted passage –

v.23 But Gideon said to them, “I will not rule over you, nor shall my son rule over you; the Lord shall rule over you.”
v.28 Thus Midian was subdued before the children of Israel, so that they lifted their heads no more.

Never again in Scripture is Midian said to come against Israel. However, in Isaiah, it notes that in the future the Midianites will return to Israel in multitudes. It is a time prophesied by Isaiah to come, not unsurprisingly, after the tribulation period –

“The multitude of camels shall cover your land,
The dromedaries of Midian and Ephah;
All those from Sheba shall come;
They shall bring gold and incense,
And they shall proclaim the praises of the Lord” Isaiah 60:6

With that, it next says…

28 (con’t) And the country was quiet for forty years

vatishqot ha’arets arbaim shanah – “And rested the land forty years.” It is letter for letter the same as the corresponding words found in Judges 3:11 at the time of Othniel and Judges 5:31 at the time of Deborah.

Forty is defined by Bullinger as “a period of probation, trial, and chastisement—(not judgment, like the number 9, which stands in connection with the punishment of enemies, but the chastisement of sons, and of a covenant people).”

And more, because “it relates to enlarged dominion, or to renewed or extended rule, then it does so in virtue of its factors 4 and 10.”

Four, “is the number of things that have a beginning, of things that are made, of material things, and matter itself. It is the number of material completeness. Hence it is the world number, and especially the ‘city’ number.”

Ten has already been described. With that, the next words tell us that these forty years were…

28 (con’t) in the days of Gideon.

bime gidon – “in days Gideon.” The entire remaining duration of Gideon’s life was free from any conflict, from within or without.

The Lord is your Creator and your God
To Him alone are your thanks and praises due
Throughout your life and every step you trod
The Lord alone shall rule over you

To place your hope and faith in man
Is a sad place of trust. It will never do
And if having confidence in yourself is your plan
Your thinking is certainly askew

Look to the Lord alone and accept His saving grace
In that, you can be confident in eternal happiness
Only in Him can you behold God’s face
Anything else will leave you in an eternal mess

II.  Israel Again Played the Harlot (verses 29-35)

29 Then Jerubbaal the son of Joash went and dwelt in his own house.

Maybe a little more poetically: vayelekh yerubaal ben yoash vayeshev b’beitho – “And walked, Jerubbaal son Joash, and sat in his house.” To walk in Scripture signifies the conduct of one’s life. To sit means to dwell, but it implies in a peaceful and content manner. Sitting also implies one who judges.

For example, Deborah sat under the palm to judge in Judges 4. Likewise, the Angel of the Lord sat under the terebinth tree in Ophrah to render a judgment in Judges 6.

Gideon, who is Jerubbaal, conducted himself to his house where he dwelt henceforth, judging Israel. Jerubbaal means Let Baal Strive. Joash means Yehovah Has Bestowed. Of him, it next says…

30 Gideon had seventy sons who were his own offspring, for he had many wives.

u-l’gidon hayu shivim banim yotsei y’rekho ki nashim raboth hayu lo – “And to Gideon were seventy sons coming out his loin, for wives many were to him.” These words, and those of the next verse, are given to anticipate the coming chapter.

It should be noted that this doesn’t mean that all of his sons were born after he settled into his house. For example, his son Jether, the firstborn, was already noted. Thus, this is only a record of the seventy legitimate sons born to him. Bullinger says –

“Seventy is another combination of two of the perfect numbers, seven and ten. … Hence 7 x 10 signifies perfect spiritual order carried out with all spiritual power and significance. Both spirit and order are greatly emphasized.”

31 And his concubine who was in Shechem also bore him a son,

The words bear emphasis: u-pilagsho asher bishkhem yaldah lo gam hi ben – “And his concubine who in Shechem bore to him, also she, son.” The words of this verse are important in understanding what is coming. It just noted that Gideon had lots of legitimate sons from his legal wives.

However, here, it notes that his concubine in Shechem bore him a son. But it does so with an additional emphasis. This son is thus being introduced as a main figure in the coming narrative.

Shechem means Shoulder. However, that comes from shakam signifying to incline, as in inclining the shoulder to a burden. Hence, it is normally translated as to rise or start early. Abarim defines Shechem as “[Having a Sense of] Responsibility.” Of him, it next says…

31 (con’t) whose name he called Abimelech.

The translation is not correct, and it gives a completely wrong sense of what is going on: vayasem eth shemo avimelekh – “And he set his name: Abimelech.” There is no change in subject. Thus, it is not Gideon who gave this name.

Further, in the Bible, the way a person is given a name at birth is to say something like, “And he called [qara] his name Isaac.” To set a name means to give another name, like we do with a nickname.

My children and all their friends call me Skipper. But when I was born, my parents named me Emlen. On that same day, my maternal grandmother, thankfully and for a particular reason, called me Charlie. Thus, she set my name as Charlie. I set my name as Skipper for my children. Because of this, everyone but the government and the bank ignores the name my parents gave me.

As there is no change in subject, it is Abimelech who has set his name as such. Whatever his given name, it is irrelevant to the coming narrative. Abimelech means My Father is King, Father of a King, Father is King, Father Reigns, etc. It can even mean Desired Counsel. Exactly which of these is to be determined from the surrounding context.

32 Now Gideon the son of Joash died at a good old age,

Literally: vayamath gidon ben yoash b’sebah tovah – “And died, Gideon, son of Joash, in gray-hair good.” This exact expression, when referring to the death of an individual, is only used when referring to Abraham and David.

32 (con’t) and was buried in the tomb of Joash his father, in Ophrah of the Abiezrites.

vayiqaver b’qever yoash aviv b’apherah avi ha ezri – “And buried in grave Joash his father, in Ophrah father the Ezrite.” This is the last time that avi ha’ezri, or Father the Ezrite is seen in Scripture. It means Father the Helper.

33 So it was, as soon as Gideon was dead, that the children of Israel again played the harlot with the Baals,

v’hi ka’asher meth gidon vayashuvu b’ne Yisrael vayiznu akhare ha’b’alim – “And was according to which died Gideon, and turned sons Israel, and prostituted after the Baals.” The obvious meaning is that Israel did not do so during the life of Gideon. And yet, as soon as he died (according to which), the inner impulses of disobedience immediately took over again. As such…

33 (con’t) and made Baal-Berith their god.

It is the same word just used to set Abimelech’s name: vayasimu la’hem baal berith lelohim – “And set to them Baal Berith to their god.” In place of Yehovah, they have set Baal Berith as their god. The name means Master of the Covenant(s). The word Covenant is singular, but Jones’ Dictionary concludes that this construction is better rendered plural.

As a side note, the words can be translated as “They made a covenant with Baal to be their god.”

34 Thus the children of Israel did not remember the Lord their God,

v’lo zekru b’ne Yisrael eth Yehovah elohehem – “And no remembered sons Israel Yehovah their God.” These words are far too often repeated in Scripture: Israel disobeys the Lord. The Lord sends corrective measures to punish them and turn them back to Him. Israel cries out to the Lord for deliverance. The Lord delivers them. And finally, once again, Israel turns from the Lord, completely forgetting the great deliverance He brought about. As it next says…

34 (con’t) who had delivered them from the hands of all their enemies on every side;

Rather: ha’matsil otam miyad kal oyvehem misaviv – “the Deliverer them from hand all their enemies around.” The verb, being used as a noun, shows that it was the Lord who accomplished the feat. Even if it was done through Gideon, it was by His power, His Spirit, and His choosing and determination that it came about. Further…

35 nor did they show kindness to the house of Jerubbaal (Gideon)

v’lo asu khesed im beith yerubaal gidon – “And no made mercy with house Jerubbaal, Gideon.” The word khesed signifies mercy, favor, kindness, lovingkindness, etc. In this case, mercy probably captures the spirit of the word because of the next clause.

Jerubbaal’s house will be treated shamefully by the people. No mercy will be extended to his many sons. This will not at all be…

*35 (fin) in accordance with the good he had done for Israel.

k’kal ha’tovah asher asah im Yisrael – “According to all the goodness which he made with Israel.” Gideon had worked in goodness with Israel. Israel had worked without mercy with his house. The two thoughts set as a complete contrast –

And no made mercy with house Jerubbaal, Gideon.
According to all the goodness which he made with Israel.

Remember how the verses of this passage started out –

“Then the men of Israel said to Gideon, ‘Rule over us, both you and your son, and your grandson also.’” Gideon refused this and told them that the Lord would rule over them. In forgetting the Lord, they have turned away and also failed to remember the Lord’s instrument of deliverance.

Likewise, in neglecting the Lord, we neglect the word, the simple gospel, which was the instrument the Lord used to bring us back to Himself in the first place.

Gideon the son of Joash was finally laid to rest
But that is not the end of his story
Because of the Lord, he will be raised and blessed
Someday to walk with Him in eternal glory

This is the hope of the saints throughout time
That the Lord has come to restore us to God
The gospel message, ever so sublime
Is the good news to which we can applaud

Thank You, O God, for having sent Jesus
To bring us back to You through His shed blood
Such glorious things You have done for us
When we are submerged ‘neath the crimson flood

III. An Explanation of the Typology

The passage today has several different things going on in it, and thus it is complicated. The first thing presented is the conclusion to the narrative that ended with the slaying of Zebah and Zalmunna in the previous sermon. That includes these verses –

“Then the men of Israel said to Gideon, ‘Rule over us, both you and your son, and your grandson also; for you have delivered us from the hand of Midian.’
23 But Gideon said to them, ‘I will not rule over you, nor shall my son rule over you; the Lord shall rule over you.’” …
“Thus Midian was subdued before the children of Israel, so that they lifted their heads no more. And the country was quiet for forty years in the days of Gideon.” Judges 8:22, 23 & 28

This presents an acknowledgment that after the tribulation period, during the millennium, the Lord alone will be the ruler over Israel. For example, it says in Isaiah 40 –

“Behold, the Lord God shall come with a strong hand,
And His arm shall rule [mashal] for Him;
Behold, His reward is with Him,
And His work before Him.” Isaiah 40:10

The thought of the reward being with Jesus is repeated in the last chapter of the Bible –

“And behold, I am coming quickly, and My reward is with Me, to give to every one according to his work. 13 I am the Alpha and the Omega, the Beginning and the End, the First and the Last.” Revelation 22:12, 13

Until Israel goes through the tribulation period, the Lord is not their sole ruler, but once the gospel (Gideon) delivers Israel from the tribulation, the Lord will be in His rightful position of rule from that time on.

Between those verses, however, there was the difficult insert concerning the ephod. Simply stated, these verses demonstrate that any addition to the gospel (Gideon) taints the gospel.

Personally reaching back to the victory over the law as a source of inspiration, even if it is intended to glorify the Lord or represent His gospel, taints the gospel, which is something that is procured by faith alone.

Each of the verses points to man’s effort or boasting. Thus, the final words of that section say, “And was to Gideon, and to his house, to snare.” One cannot add to the gospel without tainting it. With any attempt to do so, it becomes a snare.

Gideon set up the ephod in Ophrah, Of the Dust. This means that those born during the tribulation period will still be fallen. They will need to believe and accept the untainted gospel that Christ alone atones for their sin, as has always been the case in previous dispensations. Anything else is a snare that is to be avoided.

The note of the victory over Midian and the forty years of rest during the days of Gideon is given to express the wholeness of the victory of Christ over His enemies. As long as the gospel is adhered to, there will be complete rest, and there will never again be a need for the Place of Judgment (Midian).

Verse 29 then said, “And Jerubbaal, son of Joash went and dwelt in his own house.” It is a final note confirming that the Lord will sit, as promised, in the house of the Lord during the millennium.

Jerubbaal, Let Baal Strive, speaks of Jesus. The law failed to strive against Jesus. Thus, He prevailed over it. The name Joash, Yehovah Has Bestowed, is included to clearly present that Christ is the One upon whom the Lord has bestowed all that is necessary to save man.

With that stated came the final verses concerning Gideon’s life after the battle. They are given as a foreshadowing of what lies ahead concerning Abimelech and the conduct of Israel during his time.

They are a necessary set of words to close out the literal history of Gideon and Israel. The next chapter, which is literal history, will then be used to reveal more typology.

As for Gideon, what a marvelous joy to see how God used him to reveal wonderful and amazing insights into the future of Israel’s history. At some point, hopefully soon, the rapture will occur. After that, Israel will enter into a seemingly hopeless seven years of true misery.

But during that time, they will go to the word, test it for what it proclaims concerning Jesus, and their nightmare will be ended. They will, as a nation, sit at the head of the nations for a thousand years.

However, that will only come about through humility and obedience to the gospel, accepting that Christ is their Lord and that He alone has paid their penalty for sin.

It will happen. The book is written, and it reveals to us what we need to know about what is coming. And more, it does it in such a way that we can have absolute confidence that it is reliable and true. If you are unsure about the word, test it with an open mind.

Every bit of time and effort you put into challenging it will be rewarded with greater confidence in what it says. In the end, you will find Jesus. And in finding Jesus, you will find peace, hope, and restoration.

Closing Verse: “And what more shall I say? For the time would fail me to tell of Gideon…” Hebrews 11:32

Next Week: Judges 9:1-15 What the heck. We’ll list the sermons, do ‘em and off we’ll check ‘em, until they are done… (Abimelech, King of Shechem, Part I) (28th Judges sermon)

The Lord has you exactly where He wants you. He has a good plan and purpose for you. It is He who judges His people according to their deeds. So, follow Him, live for Him, and trust Him, and He will do marvelous things for you and through you.

Gideon, Judge of Israel, Part X

Then the men of Israel said to Gideon
“Rule over us, both you and your son
And your grandson also
For you have delivered us from the hand of Midian

But Gideon said to them
“I will not rule over you
Nor shall my son rule over you
The LORD shall rule over you, so He shall do

Then Gideon said to them, “I would like to make a request of you
That each of you would give me the earrings from his plunder
For they had golden earrings
Because they were Ishmaelites: cool, like Quigley Down Under

So they answered, “We will gladly give them
And they spread out a garment (maybe from Boy Wonder)
And each man threw into it
The earrings from his plunder

Now the weight of the gold earrings that he requested
Was one thousand seven hundred shekels of gold-
———-that’s a lot of sheks
Besides the crescent ornaments, pendants, and purple robes which
———-were on the kings of Midian
And besides the chains that were around their camels’ necks

Then Gideon made it into an ephod
And set it up in his city, Ophrah – quite a distance from Laos
And all Israel played the harlot with it there
It became a snare to Gideon and to his house

Thus Midian was subdued before the children of Israel
So that they lifted their heads no more
And the country was quiet
For forty years in the days of Gideon; a time of no war

Then Jerubbaal the son of Joash went
And dwelt in his own house, so say the archives
Gideon had seventy sons who were his own offspring
For he had many wives

And his concubine who was in Shechem also bore him a son
Whose name he called Abimelech. Yes, that’s rights
Now Gideon the son of Joash died at a good old age
And was buried in the tomb of Joash his father, in Ophrah
———-of the Abiezrites

So it was, as soon as Gideon was dead
That the children of Israel, every Tom and Todd
Again played the harlot with the Baals
And made Baal-Berith their god

Thus the children of Israel
Did not remember the LORD their God, they did backslide
Who had delivered them from the hands
Of all their enemies on every side

Nor did they show kindness to the house of Jerubbaal (Gideon)
In accordance with the good he had for Israel done

Lord God, turn our hearts to be obedient to Your word
Give us wisdom to be ever faithful to You
May we carefully heed each thing we have heard
Yes, Lord God may our hearts be faithful and true

And we shall be content and satisfied in You alone
We will follow You as we sing our songs of praise
Hallelujah to You; to us Your path You have shown
Hallelujah we shall sing to You for all of our days

Hallelujah and Amen…

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

22 Then the men of Israel said to Gideon, “Rule over us, both you and your son, and your grandson also; for you have delivered us from the hand of Midian.”

23 But Gideon said to them, “I will not rule over you, nor shall my son rule over you; the Lord shall rule over you.” 24 Then Gideon said to them, “I would like to make a request of you, that each of you would give me the earrings from his plunder.” For they had golden earrings, because they were Ishmaelites.

25 So they answered, “We will gladly give them.” And they spread out a garment, and each man threw into it the earrings from his plunder. 26 Now the weight of the gold earrings that he requested was one thousand seven hundred shekels of gold, besides the crescent ornaments, pendants, and purple robes which were on the kings of Midian, and besides the chains that were around their camels’ necks. 27 Then Gideon made it into an ephod and set it up in his city, Ophrah. And all Israel played the harlot with it there. It became a snare to Gideon and to his house.

28 Thus Midian was subdued before the children of Israel, so that they lifted their heads no more. And the country was quiet for forty years in the days of Gideon.

29 Then Jerubbaal the son of Joash went and dwelt in his own house. 30 Gideon had seventy sons who were his own offspring, for he had many wives. 31 And his concubine who was in Shechem also bore him a son, whose name he called Abimelech. 32 Now Gideon the son of Joash died at a good old age, and was buried in the tomb of Joash his father, in Ophrah of the Abiezrites.

33 So it was, as soon as Gideon was dead, that the children of Israel again played the harlot with the Baals, and made Baal-Berith their god. 34 Thus the children of Israel did not remember the Lord their God, who had delivered them from the hands of all their enemies on every side; 35 nor did they show kindness to the house of Jerubbaal (Gideon) in accordance with the good he had done for Israel.

 

 

Judges 8:13-21 (Gideon, Judge of Israel, Part IX)

Artwork by Douglas Kallerson.

Judges 8:13-21
Gideon, Judge of Israel, Part IX

(Typed 25 December 2023) It has been pointed out in previous sermons that what will happen during the tribulation period in a literal sense, meaning the destruction and carnage on the planet, is only part of the story. At the same time, there is a spiritual battle that will be waged.

The timeline set by Paul in his epistles reveals the sequence of events that will take place. The rapture will occur, the antichrist will be revealed, and after that, a peace deal will be signed that will initiate the seven years of tribulation.

The timeline is clearly and unambiguously set in 2 Thessalonians 2. It was alluded to in Judges 6:1-10 in the opening narrative leading to Gideon as the judge of Israel. But the contents of Judges aren’t focused on the literal carnage of the world to come. Rather, they are focused on the spiritual battle that Israel will face.

Why would that be the case? The reason is that the church age is complete. The promises in the Old Testament concerning the millennium may include Gentiles who come to faith during the tribulation period, but it is Israel to whom the promises belong.

Everything else that occurs during the tribulation period is to bring Israel to this understanding. That will lead to their acceptance of the gospel and national salvation.

Text Verse: “I will plant them in their land,
And no longer shall they be pulled up
From the land I have given them,”
Says the Lord your God.” Amos 9:15

Israel is already back in the land. They have been planted, and they shall never again be pulled up. But their nation today is one of wickedness and unfaithfulness to the Lord. That, like the wickedness throughout the earth, must be dealt with before the time of harmony promised in the prophets comes.

What occurs outside of Israel, especially in what happens in the world in relation to Israel, is what is needed to bring them to the point of their anticipated conversion. Once that momentous event occurs, the Lord can personally intervene and bring about the end of the tribulation.

This is seen in Revelation 19, but it is also hinted at in Matthew 24. There, Jesus notes that there will be such great tribulation on the earth that if the days were not cut short, “no flesh would be saved.” However, He then says, “but for the elect’s sake, those days will be shortened.”

The spiritual battle that occurs during this time of tribulation is what Judges continues to deal with. It’s all to be found in His superior word. And so, let us turn to that precious word once again, and… May God speak to us through His word today, and may His glorious name ever be praised.

I. My Brothers, the Sons of My Mother (verses 13-21)

13 Then Gideon the son of Joash returned from battle, from the Ascent of Heres.

To start the verses today we come to a very complicated set of words that are widely rendered: vayashav gidon ben yoash min ha’milkhamah milmaaleh hekhreres – “And returned Gideon, son Joash, from the battle, from to ascent the sun (or, Ascent the Sun).”

Some translations say: before the sun was up; at the going up of the sun; from the cliff of the sun; by way of Heres pass; down from the battle of Ares; etc. This is referring to what was presented in the previous sermon from last week –

“Now Zebah and Zalmunna were at Karkor, and their armies with them, about fifteen thousand, all who were left of all the army of the people of the East; for one hundred and twenty thousand men who drew the sword had fallen. 11 Then Gideon went up by the road of those who dwell in tents on the east of Nobah and Jogbehah; and he attacked the army while the camp felt secure. 12 When Zebah and Zalmunna fled, he pursued them; and he took the two kings of Midian, Zebah and Zalmunna, and routed the whole army.”

Gideon went around the army and came at the camp in an unexpected manner. During the battle, the two kings fled. The natural way for them to flee would be east, the direction they had originally come from. Gideon pursued them and took them. Now, after capturing the kings, it says, “from to ascent the sun.” The meaning is that he turned back (from) the point (to) which he had been in pursuit of them.

He was heading in the direction of the sun’s ascent (east). Eventually, he captured the kings. Now, to return to his land, he turned back from this direction. This appears to be a purposeful way of saying “east” without using that descriptor.

It is also notable that the full name, Gideon son of Joash, is used. The last time it was seen was in Judges 7:14 at the time of the dream –

“Then his companion answered and said, ‘This is nothing else but the sword of Gideon the son of Joash, a man of Israel! Into his hand God has delivered Midian and the whole camp.’”

Since then, the name Gideon has been stated nine times. Now, his full name is again stated as a confirmation that the task of defeating the enemy has been completed. Joash means Yehovah Has Bestowed.

14 And he caught a young man of the men of Succoth and interrogated him;

vayilkad naar meanshe sukkoth vayishalehu – “And took youth from men Sukkoth and asked him.” The words seem unnecessarily detailed, but they are needed to set the framework for the next clause. That this is a naar, or youth, may seem surprising based on the next words…

14 (con’t) and he wrote down for him the leaders of Succoth and its elders, seventy-seven men.

vayiktov elav eth sare sukoth v’et zeqeneha shivim v’shivah ish – “and wrote unto him princes Sukkoth and her elders, seventy and seven man.” It is unknown if this youth being able to write was some unusual exception, or if it was a common trait. Either way, he was able to write, and he was intelligent enough to know the names of the princes of the city as well as its elders.

This was a means of ensuring that none of the leadership would escape justice for refusing to assist Gideon’s men with the simple provision of bread. Because of their pusillanimous refusal to help…

15 Then he came to the men of Succoth and said, “Here are Zebah and Zalmunna, about whom you ridiculed me,

va’yavo el anshe sukoth vayomer hineh zevakh v’tsalmuna asher kheraptem oti – “And came unto men Sukkoth, and said, ‘Behold! Zebah and Zalmunna, whom you reproached me.’” Presenting the kings would have been a rather shocking display. Gideon could have simply killed the two kings and left them to rot.

He could have taken their heads off and brought them back. But that would leave the question open as to how they died. However, with the two kings standing right there, this was an absolute confirmation that there was total victory over Midian. The kings had been spared for this very purpose. And more, he turns these leaders’ words back on their own heads…

15 (con’t) saying, ‘Are the hands of Zebah and Zalmunna now in your hand,

lemor ha’kaph zevakh v’tsalmuna atah b’yadkha – “to say, ‘The palm Zebah and Zalmunna now in your hand.’” In verse 6, using a singular verb indicating unanimity of speech, the leaders of Sukkoth said, “The palm Zebah and Zalmunna now in your hand?” Gideon reminds them of their words, repeating them back to the men. It is a letter for letter response. And he continues…

15 (con’t) that we should give bread to your weary men?’”

ki niten laanashekha hay’ephim lahem – “for giving to your men, the wearied, bread.” Gideon does a masterful changeup to their words –

“for giving to your army bread.”
“for giving to your men, the wearied, bread.”

Gideon had first said to them, “For wearied, they, and I, I pursuing after Zebah and Zalmunna, kings Midian.” The leaders had responded, essentially saying, “Why would we give your puny army bread when you are pursuing a massive force of Midianites?”

Here, he uses the same word for wearied, noting that they were, in fact, wearied. And yet, they prevailed over the massive force of Midian and the palm (the authority they possessed) of Zebah and Zalmunna was now in his hand (under his authority). As this was so, it is certain that a little city couldn’t stand against him…

16 And he took the elders of the city, and thorns of the wilderness and briers, and with them he taught the men of Succoth.

vayiqakh eth ziqne ha’ir v’eth qotse ha’midbar v’eth ha’barqanim vayoda bahem eth anshe sukoth – “And took elders the city, and thorns the wilderness and the flails. And knowing in them men Sukkoth.” This is just what he promised to do to them – “And thresh your flesh with thorns the wilderness and with the flails.”

The meaning is that using briars and flails, he threshed the flesh of the elders. By this, the men of Sukkoth as a whole were instructed in what the punishment for cowardice was. In this verse is the second and last use of barqanim, flails, in Scripture.

What this seems to mean is that they completely covered the elders with thorns of the wilderness and then repeatedly hit them with the flails, thus threshing their flesh in the process. It would have been an exceedingly painful lesson – stingy hot and ouchy.

As a side note, some commentators think there is an error in the text. Instead of the word yada, to know, they think it should read threshed. The two are very close in spelling if structured in a particular way –

וידע – and knowing
וידש – and threshed

Some manuscripts agree with this, but the change is unnecessary. The elders were punished and the rest of the men of the city learned the penalty for being cowards. Gideon next moves on to another spineless group…

17 Then he tore down the tower of Penuel and killed the men of the city.

v’eth Migdal penuel natats vayaharog eth anshe ha’ir – “And tower Penuel tore down. And killed men the city.” In verse 9, Gideon promised to come back and tear down the tower of Penuel. Nothing was said of killing the men of the city. And so it may have been that in tearing down the tower, the men were killed. They fled there for refuge and in its collapse, those inside were crushed with it.

The location of the city was strategically important enough that later, in the time of King Jeroboam, it was built again (1 Kings 12:25). Next, with his promise to the lily-livered inhabitants fulfilled, Gideon will turn his hand of justice upon those who had so severely afflicted Israel…

18 And he said to Zebah and Zalmunna, “What kind of men were they whom you killed at Tabor?”

The words are curious: vayomer el zevakh v’el tsalmuna ephoh ha’anashim asher haragtem b’thavor – “And said unto Zebah and unto Zalmunna, “Where-here the men whom you killed in Tabor?’” First, there is no antecedent to what is said. Neither Tabor nor the killing of these men has been mentioned during the account of Gideon. The last time Tabor was noted was in the battle of Judges 4 where it was called Mount Tabor.

Second, Gideon uses a rare word, ephoh. It comes from ay, where, and poh, here. Thus, it literally means where-here. It is always translated elsewhere as “where.” However, he may be using it as a general interrogative concerning a particular aspect of the men. If so, a similar combination in English might be “whaddabout.”

If it means only “where,” then it may be a taunt to the kings. “Where the men you killed in Tabor?” Something similar would then be the taunting of the Rabshakeh who stood at the walls of Jerusalem –

Beware lest Hezekiah persuade you, saying, ‘The Lord will deliver us.’ Has any one of the gods of the nations delivered its land from the hand of the king of Assyria? 19 Where are the gods of Hamath and Arpad? Where are the gods of Sepharvaim? Indeed, have they delivered Samaria from my hand? 20 Who among all the gods of these lands have delivered their countries from my hand, that the Lord should deliver Jerusalem from my hand?” Isaiah 36:18-20

Tabor comes from barar, to purify. It means Purity or Purified.

18 (con’t) So they answered, “As you are, so were they; each one resembled the son of a king.”

vayomru kamokha kh’mohem ekhad k’toar b’ne ha’melekh – “And said according to you, according to them: one according to form, sons the king.” Without hearing their intonation, it’s hard to be dogmatic concerning their intent.

If Gideon was taunting them in the previous clause, which seems likely, then they are either trying to pacify him through flattery, acknowledging his princely state, or they are returning a taunt as in, “They were all like the king’s sons, but now they’re all dead.”

Either way, it is of note that they use the term “the king” when there was no king in Israel. One would think they would say “a king.” Next, Gideon’s response seals their fate…

19 Then he said, “They were my brothers, the sons of my mother. As the Lord lives, if you had let them live, I would not kill you.”

The words are filled with life and force: vayomar akhai b’ne imi hem khai Yehovah lu hakhayitem otham lo haragti etkhem – “And said, ‘My brothers, sons my mother, them! Life Yehovah! Would you lived them, not I killed you.”

Not only were they sons of his father, but they were sons of the same mother. Thus, they had the closest bond of all between them. As Gideon is the nearest blood relative, from a legal sense it was his duty to execute these kings. However, he defers to his son to accomplish the deed. Thus, it would be a demeaning act added to their demise…

20 And he said to Jether his firstborn, “Rise, kill them!”

Gideon speaks with imperatives: vayomer l’yether b’koro qum harog otham – “And said to Jether, his firstborn, ‘Arise! Kill them!’” Deferring to his young son to accomplish the task would be considered a disgraceful death for these kings almost comparable to having a woman kill them.

It would also be instructional for the son as well as a mark of prestige that he could carry with him later in life, being the one who finished off these great kings.

As for the name Jether, it comes from yathar, to remain, make plenteous, preserve, etc. It can mean Preeminence, Excellence, Abundance, Remnant, Preserved, etc.

20 (con’t) But the youth would not draw his sword; for he was afraid, because he was still a youth.

v’lo shalaph ha’naar kharbo ki yare ki odenu naar – “And no drew the youth his sword. For afraid. For he still youth.” Despite being granted the honor of the kill, he was still young and fearful about such an act. Thus, he would have to learn through sight rather than action.

21 So Zebah and Zalmunna said, “Rise yourself, and kill us; for as a man is, so is his strength.”

The word “said” is singular and the kings use their own imperatives: vayomer zevakh v’tsalmuna qum atah uphga banu ki kaish g’vurato – “And said Zebah and Zalmunna, ‘Arise, you, and impinge in us. For according to the man, his strength.’”

These two know they are goners. If Gideon pressed the boy, insisting that he kill them, it wouldn’t simply be a disgrace. It is painfully evident that Jether had never done such a thing. Therefore, it would also be evidently painful for them that he had learned to kill through them. Therefore, they taunt Gideon into dispatching them to the pit. Therefore…

21 (con’t) So Gideon arose and killed Zebah and Zalmunna,

Hooray! vayaqum gidon vayaharog eth zevakh v’eth tsalmuna – “And rises, Gideon, and kills Zebah and Zalmunna.” With a little taunting to spur him on, Gideon determines not to press the child but to give the men what they asked for. Once the job was finished, it says…

*21 (fin) and took the crescent ornaments that were on their camels’ necks.

vayiqakh eth ha’saharonim b’tsaverei g’malehem – “And takes the round-ornaments which in necks their camels.” Here is a new and rare word, saharon. It is a round ornament, coming from the noun sahar, roundness. The word crescent has to be inferred, something that may or may not be the case.

Some tie it to the Arabic moon-god Sahar, but that still would signify roundness. Because many translations say crescent, and because it can be tied to the moon, an attempt to align this with the Islamic crescent is made. The decorations on camels’ necks both go all the way around the neck and, at times, hang like crescents.

The reason for taking the ornaments is to be found in verse 26 where it is noted that these are gold, ornaments fitting for the donkeys of kings.

Let us rejoice in God, we are no longer defiled
We have come to the One who purifies us
We were objects of His wrath, but upon us, He has now smiled
He is our Lord, He is our God, He is Jesus!

We missed Him on the first time around
Since then, we have remained defiled
Upon us, His wrath grew hot; it did abound
But finally, upon us, He has smiled

Our circumcision is not just in the flesh, but in the heart
We have accepted the gospel, entering new life
Today, we have made a glorious new start
We have reconciliation after many years of strife

II. Pictures of Christ

Judges 8 began with Ephraim angrily arguing with Gideon for not having been consulted concerning the battle against Midian. Ephraim (Twice Fruitful/Ashes), as has been seen, refers to the effect of the work of Christ among both Jews and Gentiles.

However, Gideon (the Gospel) had not called them for the initial battle against Midian (Place of Judgment, signifying the tribulation). This was upsetting to them.

To appease them (verse 2), he reminded them that their gleaning of grapes (the harvest of judgment) was better than the vintage of Abiezer (Father of Help). In validation of this, he referred to the fact that God gave into their hand Oreb and Zeeb (verse 3).

Remember in Chapter 7 there was a reference to those who tried to obtain the pledge of the Spirit without Christ and those who devour the flock. These were able to overcome through their faith in Christ, just as Revelation says will happen.

Gideon essentially said to them, “I, the Gospel, led the original charge of the battle against Midian (the first passing through of the vineyard), but you (YOU!) captured and beheaded the two princes of Midian, Oreb and Zeeb (the gleaning of the grapes). You then pursued the battle even as far as Midian itself. What did I do in comparison to you?”

It is a way of saying that just because the gospel goes forth, it doesn’t necessarily save everyone who hears it. Rather, only those who appropriate it by faith are saved.

The Father of Help, the giving of the Spirit accompanied by the gospel, is only effective for people when it is combined with their faith. It is a confirmation of the doctrine known as synergism. God does His part, but He does not force salvation on man. Rather, man must do his part by accepting Jesus and His work by faith.

With that, Ephraim was content and “relaxed their spirit.” This introductory account was given to clear up several points of theology that people still do not properly grasp.

Verse 4 noted that Gideon and the three hundred with him came to the Jordan, the Descender. As was seen, three hundred is a multiple of 3 and 10. Three signifies Divine Perfection. Ten signifies that nothing is wanting and the whole cycle is complete. But more, as noted, Bullinger says of 3 –

“The number three, therefore, must be taken as the number of Divine fulness. It signifies and represents the Holy Spirit as taking of the things of Christ and making them real and solid in our experience. It is only by the Spirit that we realise spiritual things. Without Him and His gracious operation, all is surface work: all is what a plane figure is to a solid.”

The numbers perfectly fit with what one would expect in the final spiritual battle being played out during the tribulation period. Further, as has been seen, the Greek letter Tau, a cross, represents the number 300. It is a clear note that Christ’s cross, which is the basis of the gospel, is what is being pictured here.

From it comes salvation and prevailing over the Place of Judgment. The gospel (Gideon) and the three hundred (the cross/Christ’s work) cross the Descender (Christ) and arrive at Succoth, Tabernacles. This would reflect the state of Israel (on the other side of the Jordan) not yet converted as a nation.

Succoth reflects their state as individuals. The tent refers to the human in his physical body. That is explicitly stated by both Paul and Peter. Peter says –

“For this reason I will not be negligent to remind you always of these things, though you know and are established in the present truth. 13 Yes, I think it is right, as long as I am in this tent, to stir you up by reminding you14 knowing that shortly I must put off my tent, just as our Lord Jesus Christ showed me. 15 Moreover I will be careful to ensure that you always have a reminder of these things after my decease.” 2 Peter 1:12-15

At Succoth (verse 5), Gideon asks for circles of bread. The elders and leaders deny his request. They are not willing to accept the gospel’s power to deliver them from Midian, the tribulation, by assisting in its propagation. This, in spite of Gideon’s claim that he is pursuing Zebah and Zalmunna – Sacrifice and Moving Image.

The names are referring to the law. Sacrifice is the Levitical sacrificial system set up for atonement. Moving Image is an exact description of the rites of the tabernacle/temple under the law. The Modern Hebrew New Testament confirms the use of the words below –

“For the law, having a shadow [tsel] of the good things to come, and not the very image [tselem] of the things, can never with these same sacrifices, which they offer continually year by year, make those who approach perfect.” Hebrews 10:1

“And every priest stands ministering daily and offering repeatedly the same sacrifices, which can never take away sins. 12 But this Man, after He had offered one sacrifice for sins forever, sat down at the right hand of God, 13 from that time waiting till His enemies are made His footstool.” Hebrews 10:11-13

These two, Zebah and Zalmunna are called “kings of Midian.” That is exactly what they will be in Israel. The reestablished law will be ruled during the tribulation by the sacrificial and temple system.

Remember that the word image, tselem, means that the tabernacle and temple were only shadows of the coming Christ, who is the very “image [tselem] of the invisible God” (Colossians 1:15 – confirmed by the Modern Hebrew New Testament). Israel rejected His coming, they removed themselves from fellowship with the Lord, were exiled, and will suffer through the tribulation.

The leaders of Succoth, picturing the leaders of those in Israel dwelling in their human tents, turn Gideon (the gospel) down – “The palm (possession of) Zebah and Zalmunna now in your hand (under your authority)?” They refused the message of Christ and failed to assist in the presentation of the gospel.

Because of their refusal, Gideon says (verse 7) that they will be punished, carefully describing what the punishment would be. He then (verse 8) ascended to Penuel (Turn to God!) and they answer similarly. There is a refusal to turn to God through the gospel, even while Midian (the tribulation) continues to exist.

With that (verse 9), Gideon promises that when he comes back in peace, he will tear down their tower. The tower, Migdal, comes from gadal, a verb that gives the sense of advancing, growing, boasting, magnifying, etc.

Israel will continue boasting in their state under the law, stubbornly refusing to acknowledge the gospel as long as their tower, the temple and its rites, are there for them to revel in.

Verse 10 noted that Zebah and Zalmunna were at Karkor, Destruction, with their army of fifteen thousand of the b’ne qedem, or sons East. They anticipate those who continue to cling to the law, annulled in the past through Christ’s work, simply because they cannot let go of it. A full description of such is carefully detailed in Hebrews.

The name Karkor (qarqor), where Midian is encamped, gives an ominous foreboding of their demise. The name is identical to the word used in Numbers 24:17 –

“I see Him, but not now;
I behold Him, but not near;
A Star shall come out of Jacob;
A Scepter shall rise out of Israel,
And batter the brow of Moab,
And destroy [qarqar] all the sons of tumult.”

The number of Midianites, fifteen thousand, is a multiple of fifteen and ten. Fifteen was explained by Bullinger as “acts wrought by the energy of Divine grace.”

Ten signifies, “Completeness of order, marking the entire round of anything … [it] implies that nothing is wanting; that the number and order are perfect; that the whole cycle is complete.” It would be hard to find a better description of Israel’s future meeting with God in Christ when the gospel finally prevails.

Still in verse 10, it noted that these fifteen thousand were all that was left out of the original one hundred and twenty thousand men who drew the sword. This is a multiple of one hundred and twenty and tens. Bullinger says one hundred and twenty –

“…is made up of three forties (3×40=120). Applied to time therefore it signifies a divinely appointed period of probation.”

In Daniel 9, Israel was given a divinely appointed period of probation under the law. The final seven years of that appointed time encompasses the tribulation period. When that entire round is complete, the time will be ended.

It is at this time that Gideon (the gospel) “went up by the road of those who dwell in tents on the east of Nobah and Jogbehah.” The east speaks of aforetime, the past. Nobah (barking) and Jogbehah (Lofty), speak of the state of the people.

Dogs bark. It is equating Israel to Gentiles. Those under law exalt themselves. Israel is being shown its true state before the Lord while under the law. However, the gospel will prevail in the battle. As it said of Gideon, “And struck the camp, and the camp was confidence.”

There is Israel, sitting in confidence smug and barking as they enter the tribulation, represented by these Midianites (Place of Judgment). But Jesus and Paul both show that the Antichrist is coming and the temple will be defiled by his presence. Israel’s confidence will be shattered and they will almost be brought to an end.

Verse 12 says at that time Zebah and Zalmunna fled. It is exactly described by Daniel –

“Then he shall confirm a covenant with many for one week;
But in the middle of the week
He shall bring an end to sacrifice [Zebah] and offering.
And on the wing [Zalmunna] of abominations shall be one who makes desolate,
Even until the consummation, which is determined,
Is poured out on the desolate.” Daniel 9:27

Jesus explains the “wing” metaphor –

“Therefore when you see the ‘abomination of desolation,’ spoken of by Daniel the prophet, standing in the holy place” (whoever reads, let him understand), 16 “then let those who are in Judea flee to the mountains.” Matthew 24:15, 16

The gospel will not prevail until Israel realizes they have put their eggs in the wrong basket. That won’t happen until after the Antichrist has done his evil work. Sacrifice and temple worship will flee (be brought to an end) and be captured.

With that understood, verse 13 says that Gideon (Cutter, the gospel) the son of Joash (Yehovah has Bestowed) returned from battle from ascent to the sun. As noted, the wording appears to be a purposeful way of avoiding saying the words “from the east.”

In other words, that would have marred the typology. Therefore, a different way of describing the same thing was employed. The gospel is from earlier times in Israel’s history, but it will only be understood by Israel in the future.

Using the full name, Gideon son of Joash, at this time signifies the victory of the gospel that was introduced at the beginning of the narrative. The wording, when considered, is rather incredible.

Verse 14 told of taking the young man of Succoth and inquiring of him. In turn, he wrote down the names of the seventy-seven leaders and elders of Succoth. Seventy-seven is a multiple of eleven (disorder, disorganization, imperfection, and disintegration) and seven (spiritual perfection).

They represent the chaotic state of Israel before coming to Christ mixed with the spiritually perfect completion of their state. In other words, it marks the spiritual fullness of Israel’s rebellion against the gospel. The time has come for the rule of the law to end. As seen earlier, being in Succoth, Tabernacles, signifies their state in humanity.

Gideon presented the ending of Sacrifice and Temple worship to them. They wouldn’t give the gospel a moment of consideration through all the times of wearied toil under the law. Therefore, he inflicts upon them their promised punishment, threshing them with thorns and flails.

It is not unlike what happened to Jesus. In Matthew 27:29, a crown of thorns was placed on his head. Only after that, in Matthew 27:30 did they strike him on the head with a reed. Thus, his flesh was threshed in a similar way, meaning with thorns and rods.

It next says (verse 17) that he tore down the tower of Penuel and killed the men of the city. The place of confident boasting, representing the law, is to be torn down and those who adamantly adhere to it will be killed. Jesus alludes to this in Luke –

“But his citizens hated him, and sent a delegation after him, saying, ‘We will not have this man to reign over us.’” … “But bring here those enemies of mine, who did not want me to reign over them, and slay them before me.” Luke 19:14 & 27

After this (verse 18), Gideon mockingly addresses Zebah and Zalmunna about the men who they killed at Tabor (Purified – from barar, to purify). It speaks of those who came to God through Christ during the tribulation period. Daniel 12, referring to this time, says –

“Many shall be purified [barar], made white, and refined, but the wicked shall do wickedly; and none of the wicked shall understand, but the wise shall understand.” Daniel 12:10

Their mocking, but surprising, response to him was, “one according to form, sons the king.” As there was no king in Israel at the time, the words are certainly given prophetically concerning those who will accept the gospel in the future. They are all likened to sons of the King. It refers to the sonship of those in Christ.

To confirm this, Gideon’s (the gospel’s) response was, “My brothers, sons my mother, them!” Each person saved by the gospel is a brother within the framework of the gospel. Their one mother is defined in Galatians 4:26, “but the Jerusalem above is free, which is the mother of us all.”

Those under law are in bondage and at enmity with God; those in Christ are free and sons of the King and brothers within the gospel. Because the law caused the death of these brothers, the law must be ended.

The introduction of Jether (verse 21) is brilliant. The firstborn of the gospel refers to the Jews who accepted the gospel first. The name has various meanings, such as Preeminence, Excellence, Abundance, Remnant, Preserved, etc. Each is a reflection of their state.

What does it say about the firstborn? He did not draw his sword, for he was afraid. It is the godly fear of one who possesses the grace of God mixed with a refusal to rely on the law (the kherev, sword), to slay the enemy. That task is left to Gideon, the gospel, to accomplish. Israel will learn that for each Jew who is saved, it is Christ’s work alone, reflected in the gospel, that prevails over the law.

Therefore, Gideon dispatched the law, the sacrifice and temple worship pictured by Zebah (Sacrifice) and Zalmunna (Moving Image). Finally, the passage ended with Gideon removing the round-ornaments off of their camel’s necks.

As seen in Chapter 7, camel comes from the verb gamal, to deal fully or adequately with. Thus, it can mean to wean, repay, require, reward, ripen, and so forth. The time of the law, clearly outlined in Daniel 9, is fully ripened and its end has come. It has been fully cameled.

Therefore, its ornamentation is stripped from its neck (tsavar), a word that comes from tsur, to confine, bind, besiege, etc. The binding of the law for Israel will be ended with the acceptance of the gospel.

Thus, with Israel’s acceptance, the battle is complete. The law is ended and its burden is removed. Remember, Gideon anticipates the gospel message –

“I declare to you the gospel which I preached to you … that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, and that He was buried, and that He rose again the third day according to the Scriptures.” From 1 Corinthians 15:1, 3, and 4

He, meaning His work which defines Him as the Messiah, is the gospel. The story of Gideon’s battle in Judges 8 is a marvelous tapestry detailing how it will, someday, change the status of Israel from being an enemy of the Lord to again being His people in the fullest sense of the word.

As noted at the beginning of the sermon, what is going to be played out in the world in literal events as described in Revelation are all a part of the underlying spiritual message of Israel’s reconciliation with God through Jesus.

The message is inclusive of Gentiles who will be saved, but the overarching goal of the tribulation is to bring about the promises of wholeness and fellowship with God that the Old Testament promises to Israel as a nation during the millennium.

It is an incredible witness to the faithfulness of God to uphold His word, even beyond any measure that we can hope to understand. It is so hard to grasp, that a large portion of those in the church simply reject the notion of God having any future purpose for Israel at all.

Likewise, a large portion of the church continues to believe that even if Jesus saved them, they still must perform works in order to keep their salvation. Most simply do not understand what the word grace means, and they cannot trust that God is eternally faithful to the commitments He makes.

Don’t be like these faithless souls. Your rewards are wholly tied up in one word – faith. Whatever you do in faith will be rewarded. Anything you do apart from faith is sin, and it will be a loss of rewards to you. The word is written. Have faith that everything it proclaims will come to pass, just as it is written.

Closing Verse: “Make their nobles like Oreb and like Zeeb,
Yes, all their princes like Zebah and Zalmunna,
12 Who said, ‘’Let us take for ourselves
The pastures of God for a possession.” Psalm 83:11, 12

Next Week: Judges 8:22-35 It’s great and so fun, what a story to tell, better than a royal bloodline… (Gideon, Judge of Israel, Part X) (27th Judges sermon)

The Lord has you exactly where He wants you. He has a good plan and purpose for you. It is He who judges His people according to their deeds. So, follow Him, live for Him, and trust Him, and He will do marvelous things for you and through you.

Gideon, Judge of Israel, Part IX

Then Gideon the son of Joash returned from battle
From the Ascent of Heres where the swords did rattle

And he caught a young man of the men of Succoth
And interrogated him right there and then
And he wrote down for him the leaders of Succoth and its elders
Seventy-seven men

Then he came to the men of Succoth and said
“Here are Zebah and Zalmunna, about whom you ridiculed me
———-back then
Saying, ‘Are the hands of Zebah and Zalmunna now in your hand
That we should give bread to your weary men?

And he took the elders of the city
And thorns of the wilderness and briers (this wasn’t
———-going to be pretty)
And with them he taught the men of Succoth
Then he tore down the tower of Penuel and killed
———-the men of the city

And he said to Zebah and Zalmunna
“What kind of men were they whom you killed at Tabor?
So they answered, “As you are, so were they
Each one resembled the son of a king, good for tales of lore

Then he said, “They were my brothers
The sons of my mother. Yes, it’s true
As the LORD lives, if you had let them live
I would not kill you

And he said to Jether his firstborn
“Rise, kill them! The order was not uncouth
But the youth would not draw his sword
For he was afraid, because he was still a youth

So Zebah and Zalmunna said, “Rise yourself, and kill us
For as a man is, so is his strength, got it, Tex?
So Gideon arose and killed Zebah and Zalmunna
And took the crescent ornaments that were on their camels’ necks

Lord God, turn our hearts to be obedient to Your word
Give us wisdom to be ever faithful to You
May we carefully heed each thing we have heard
Yes, Lord God may our hearts be faithful and true

And we shall be content and satisfied in You alone
We will follow You as we sing our songs of praise
Hallelujah to You; to us Your path You have shown
Hallelujah we shall sing to You for all of our days

Hallelujah and Amen…

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

13 Then Gideon the son of Joash returned from battle, from the Ascent of Heres. 14 And he caught a young man of the men of Succoth and interrogated him; and he wrote down for him the leaders of Succoth and its elders, seventy-seven men. 15 Then he came to the men of Succoth and said, “Here are Zebah and Zalmunna, about whom you ridiculed me, saying, ‘Are the hands of Zebah and Zalmunna now in your hand, that we should give bread to your weary men?’ ” 16 And he took the elders of the city, and thorns of the wilderness and briers, and with them he taught the men of Succoth. 17 Then he tore down the tower of Penuel and killed the men of the city.

18 And he said to Zebah and Zalmunna, “What kind of men were they whom you killed at Tabor?”

So they answered, “As you are, so were they; each one resembled the son of a king.”

19 Then he said, “They were my brothers, the sons of my mother. As the Lord lives, if you had let them live, I would not kill you.” 20 And he said to Jether his firstborn, “Rise, kill them!” But the youth would not draw his sword; for he was afraid, because he was still a youth.

21 So Zebah and Zalmunna said, “Rise yourself, and kill us; for as a man is, so is his strength.” So Gideon arose and killed Zebah and Zalmunna, and took the crescent ornaments that were on their camels’ necks.

 

 

Judges 8:1-12 (Gideon, Judge of Israel, Part VIII)

Artwork by Douglas Kallerson

Judges 8:1-12
Gideon, Judge of Israel, Part VIII

(Typed 18 December 2023) The reason for the battle that took place in Judges 6 was to take the burden off Israel after their time of oppression under Midian. Leading up to the battle, the children of Israel had done evil in the eyes of Yehovah. Therefore, the Lord delivered them into the hand of Midian for seven years (Judges 6:1).

The people of Israel were, therefore, hidden in caves and strongholds (Judges 6:2) because Midian would come against Israel and plunder them, leaving nothing in their wake (Judges 6:3-5).

The reason for all of their affliction was the evil they were doing in the eyes of the Lord. As was seen, this is a prophetic type of what is to come upon Israel during the tribulation period. It was only when their power was totally shattered that they finally cried out to the Lord (Judges 6:6).

The Lord sent a messenger to rebuke and remind them of their past, which they had completely forgotten. Instead, they ignored the voice of the Lord (Judges 6:7-10). Finally, Gideon was selected as the judge, and the process of delivering Israel began.

Text Verse: “For yet a very little while and the indignation will cease, as will My anger in their destruction.” 26 And the Lord of hosts will stir up a scourge for him like the slaughter of Midian at the rock of Oreb; as His rod was on the sea, so will He lift it up in the manner of Egypt.” Isaiah 10:25, 26

As today’s verses indicate, the arrogance of Ephraim is seen. The point of the Lord choosing Gideon was because it was the Lord who was to obtain the glory for the victory in battle, not Israel. That was explicitly stated by the Lord in Judges 7:2.

To select Ephraim to gain the victory over the foes, the greater of the two tribes would stand as the head of the battle. Even if it was only three hundred men led by someone from Ephraim, it would have been more notable for them than three hundred from Manasseh, much less the weakest clan of Manasseh (Judges 6:15).

Therefore, the Lord gaining the glory would be, at least in part, diminished. When we read the Bible, we must look at everything that is going on and continually ask ourselves, “Why have things been orchestrated as they are? What is the Lord doing, and why is He doing it in a particular way?”

In contemplating such things, we can more clearly understand how jealously He protects His glory. The Lord, having done what He did through Jesus, only makes sense if Jesus is Yehovah incarnate. The Lord Himself, through the work of Jesus Christ, is what is being highlighted in Scripture.

Our participation, whether as part of Israel or part of the church, is for us to see the work of the Lord, to rejoice in it, and to glorify Him for it. Let the glory of the Lord always be considered as you walk before Him in this life you have been given.

This marvelous truth is to be considered as we read His superior word. And so, let us turn to that precious word once again, and… May God speak to us through His word today, and may His glorious name ever be praised.

I. The Vintage of Abiezer (verses 1-3)

The words of Chapter 7 ended with –

“Then Gideon sent messengers throughout all the mountains of Ephraim, saying, “Come down against the Midianites, and seize from them the watering places as far as Beth Barah and the Jordan.” Then all the men of Ephraim gathered together and seized the watering places as far as Beth Barah and the Jordan. 25 And they captured two princes of the Midianites, Oreb and Zeeb. They killed Oreb at the rock of Oreb, and Zeeb they killed at the winepress of Zeeb. They pursued Midian and brought the heads of Oreb and Zeeb to Gideon on the other side of the Jordan.” Judges 7:24, 25

Remembering that, Chapter 8 begins with seemingly contradictory words…

Now the men of Ephraim said to him, “Why have you done this to us

vayomeru elav ish ephrayim mah ha’davar ha’zeh asitha lanu – “And said unto him man Ephraim, ‘What the word, the this, done to us?’” From the outset there is an obvious sense of anger in the words. Ephraim is bent out of shape at their treatment at the hand of Gideon. The specific reason is next stated by them…

1 (con’t) by not calling us when you went to fight with the Midianites?”

l’bilti q’roth lanu ki halakhta l’hilakhem b’midyan – “To except calling to us when went to fight in Midian.” It said at the end of Chapter 7 that Gideon sent messengers throughout Mount Ephraim to engage in the battle against Midian. However, this isn’t what they are arguing about.

Rather, they got the leftovers of the battle, as Midian was already fleeing away. They were called to be a mop-up crew to ensure total defeat of those in retreat. They weren’t called to participate in the larger battle where the glory of victory was gained. Therefore…

1 (con’t) And they reprimanded him sharply.

The words are highly emphatic: v’rivun ito b’khazeqah – “And quarreled (surely) with him in vehemence.” The attitude of Ephraim has its roots in the past. A good summary of where their arrogance is derived from is given by the Pulpit Commentary –

“It is possible that the transfer of the birthright from Manasseh to Ephraim (Genesis 48:13-19) may have produced some estrangement between the tribes. It is also possible that Ephraim, in view of their great tribal power, and the distinction conferred upon them by the judgeship of Joshua the son of Nun (Numbers 13:8), and the possession of his grave (Joshua 24:30), may have grown haughty and domineering, and perhaps more disposed to rest upon their former glories than to embark in fresh undertakings. Anyhow Gideon did not consult them, nor ask their aid, in the first instance. Now that the war had been so successful, the men of Ephraim were much displeased at not having been consulted.”

Remember that Gideon is from Manasseh. Therefore, the tribe with the greater blessing, Ephraim, is upbraiding the leader who has come from the less-favored tribe, Manasseh.

Ephraim’s position among the tribes, their size, their history of being preeminent in blessing and battle, etc., all came together, resulting in a haughty feeling that they deserved more share in the glory of the battle than they had received.

As for the names, Ephraim means Twice Fruitful and Ashes. Midian means Place of Judgment.

Concerning Ephraim’s chiding of Gideon, this same hauteur will cost them greatly in Chapter 12. For now, instead of fighting over the matter, Gideon yields to their protestations by acknowledging Ephraim’s greatness…

So he said to them, “What have I done now in comparison with you?

vayomer alehem meh asithi atah kakhem – “And said, ‘What done now like you?” In order to mollify the fit of pique that had welled up in Ephraim, Gideon subordinates himself, and thus his tribe, to his younger brother by asking a question in a comparative manner. The actual comparison comes in the next words…

2 (con’t) Is not the gleaning of the grapes of Ephraim better than the vintage of Abiezer?

halo tov ol’loth ephrayim mibsir aviezer – “Not grape-gleanings Ephraim from vintage Abiezer?” Here is a new word, oleloth. It is insufficiently translated by many as gleaning or gleanings. Rather, it is a particular type of gleaning, that of grapes. Being a noun in the plural construct, it should be rendered grape-gleanings. To get the sense of the word, Isaiah 17 provides clarity –

“Yet gleaning grapes [oleloth] will be left in it,
Like the shaking of an olive tree,
Two or three olives at the top of the uppermost bough,
Four or five in its most fruitful branches,”
Says the Lord God of Israel.” Isaiah 17:6

The word is derived from alal, to effect thoroughly. As such, it can indicate maltreatment of another, mocking, etc. In the case of such gleaning, a person goes through the grapes at harvest time. In order to get the most out of his harvest, he will cut all that he can as he goes over the grapes. The reason for this is stated in the law –

“When you gather the grapes of your vineyard, you shall not glean [alal] it afterward; it shall be for the stranger, the fatherless, and the widow. 22 And you shall remember that you were a slave in the land of Egypt; therefore I command you to do this thing.” Deuteronomy 24:21, 22

By law, there was not to be a second passing through (a gleaning) of the grapes. To do so would deprive those who were in need and who relied on these gleanings to merely survive.

Gideon is saying that the gleaning of Ephraim, this second passing through the meager remaining grapes, is greater than the vintage, or first cutting of the grapes, of Manasseh.

This may be a general statement of Gideon, like “You are so much greater than us that what we harvest each year is a pittance compared to what the poorest in your clan are left to eat.” If this is his intent, he will explain how in his coming words.

However, this is more likely a comparison to the battle itself, as in, “We may have initiated the battle, but what we did was incomparable to what you accomplished in the battle.”

The name Abiezer means Father of Help. As for what Gideon is conveying, his next words speak of the battle and the great achievement wrought by Ephraim…

God has delivered into your hands the princes of Midian, Oreb and Zeeb.

b’yedkhem nathan elohim eth sare midyan eth orev v’zaev – “In your hand gave God princes Midian, Oreb and Zeeb.” This explains the great accomplishment that outshone the deeds of Gideon, who cannot take credit for having dispersed the Midianite camp.

Rather, he simply did as instructed and the Lord brought about the victory. Gideon is humbly placing the deeds of Ephraim ahead of his effort, subordinating his clan below Ephraim who received the greater blessing from Jacob.

Oreb means Raven. Zeeb means Wolf. Continuing, he says…

3 (con’t) And what was I able to do in comparison with you?”

u-mah yakhol’ti asoth kakhem – “And what was I able to do like you?” In essence, his words say – “Gideon led the original charge of the battle against Midian (the first passing through of the vineyard), but you (YOU!) captured and beheaded the two princes of Midian, Oreb and Zeeb (the gleaning of the grapes). You then pursued the battle even as far as Midian itself. What did I do in comparison to you?” With that, the hoped-for response is realized…

3 (con’t) Then their anger toward him subsided when he said that.

Rather: az raphtah rukham mealav b’dabero ha’davar ha’zeh – “Then relaxed their spirit from upon him in his speaking the word, the this.” The word ruakh means wind, spirit, and breath. They all are united in thought.

There is the spirit which expresses the state of the emotion. There is the breath which is the spirit animated into substance. And there is the wind which is the motion of the breath as it passes through the nostrils of the men. One can think of someone fuming and the heavy breathing that results.

Any of the three words would suffice in the translation, but the spirit is the basis of the other two. Gideon, through his statement, was able to soothe the indignation of Ephraim. The substance of these first three verses is well reflected in the words of Proverbs 15:1 –

“A soft answer turns away wrath,
But a harsh word stirs up anger.
The tongue of the wise uses knowledge rightly,
But the mouth of fools pours forth foolishness.”

The whole thought is summed up well by John Lange –

“The vain tribe, which only smarted at the thought that an insignificant member of Manasseh should reap greater glory than Ephraim, is quieted when this person himself disclaims the glory. Vanity that prides itself on seeming merits, is always contracted. The Ephraimites do not understand the modesty of Gideon, which, in denying, as it were, his own real merits, necessarily pours the contempt of irony on their pretended deserts. But Gideon’s object is gained. They allow themselves to be pacified, and go home to bask themselves in the sunshine of their achievements. Gideon, for his part, teaches that victory alone does not suffice to save a people; but that he is the real hero who is truly humble, and for the sake of peace overcomes himself. To conquer, he must know how to bend.”

Who is fearful and unwilling to help?
When the Lord has already provided the victory
They will cry in anguish, from yelp to yelp
When Gideon punishes those who are contradictory

Pain and shame lie ahead for those of Succoth
When Gideon teaches them with thorns and flails
No more will they boastfully gloat
Instead, they will be remembered for their epic fails

And for the men of Penuel
For them, bad times lie ahead
A tough lesson is coming, and things won’t be swell
When the men wind up nothing but dead

II. Seeking Succor from Succoth (verses 4-9)

When Gideon came to the Jordan,

The whole verse is one of motion: vayavo gidon ha’yardenah – “And came, Gideon, the Jordan-ward.” The Jordan means The Descender. Gideon means Cutter. Gideon is coming toward and arriving at the Descender…

4 (con’t) he and the three hundred men who were with him crossed over, exhausted but still in pursuit.

The action and intensity continue: over hu u-shlosh meoth ha’ish asher ito ayephim v’rodphim – “crossing over, he and three hundred the man who with him, wearied and pursuing.” The Latin Vulgate completely botches the thought –

“he crossed him with the three hundred men who were with him, and who fled because of weariness and could not pursue him.”

It doesn’t at all say they couldn’t pursue. Rather, they were completely exhausted, and yet they continued the pursuit. They began their pursuit in the dead of night and just kept going.

The word used to describe them, ayeph, signifies languid. It thus is to be wearied or faint. It is the same word used to describe Esau when he sold his birthright –

“Now Jacob cooked a stew; and Esau came in from the field, and he was weary [ayeph]. 30 And Esau said to Jacob, “Please feed me with that same red stew, for I am weary [ayeph].” Therefore his name was called Edom.” Genesis 25:29, 30

It is because of their wearied state that the next words are detailed…

Then he said to the men of Succoth, “Please give loaves of bread to the people who follow me,

The translation is correct, but the Hebrew is more expressive: vayomer l’anshe sukoth tenu na kik’roth lekhem la’am asher b’raglay – Literally: “And said to men Succoth, ‘Give, pray, circles bread to the people who in my feet.’” Gideon is looking to revitalize his men with bread. This is all he has asked for, and it would be a common courtesy to oblige, especially for fellow Israelites in their state.

Succoth means Tabernacles. Gideon next explains his request…

5 (con’t) for they are exhausted, and I am pursuing Zebah and Zalmunna, kings of Midian.”

He emphatically states what is going on: ki ayephim hem v’anokhi rodeph akhare zevakh v’tsalmuna malkhe midyan – “For wearied, they, and I, I pursuing after Zebah and Zalmunna, kings Midian.” Gideon doesn’t go beyond the request for bread, such as enlisting fighting men, asking for intel on troop size or direction, or any other such thing. He simply notes the men are wearied as they pursue the enemies of Israel.

Zebah is the same as zebakh, a sacrifice. It means Sacrifice. The NAS Concordance says Zalmunna comes from the same as tselem, an image. The na at the end would then refer to nuah, to move, waver, tremble, quiver, etc. It gives the sense of motion.

Others say it is derived from tsel and mana – shade and to withhold. Therefore, the name may mean Moving Image or something like Denied Shade, Deprived of Shade, or Shade Has Been Denied. Without explanation, Ellicott says Shadow of an Exile.

As for the word tselem, image, it is the word used in Genesis 1 when God created man –

“Then God said, ‘Let Us make man in Our image [b’tselmenu], according to Our likeness; let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, over the birds of the air, and over the cattle, over all the earth and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth.” 27 So God created man in His own image [b’tsalmo]; in the image [b’tselem] of God He created him; male and female He created them.’” Genesis 1:26, 27

This word is also used as a prophetic type of Christ when Bezalel was selected to build the tabernacle in Exodus –

“Then the Lord spoke to Moses, saying: ‘See, I have called by name Bezalel [b’tselel] the son of Uri, the son of Hur, of the tribe of Judah. And I have filled him with the Spirit of God, in wisdom, in understanding, in knowledge, and in all manner of workmanship, to design artistic works, to work in gold, in silver, in bronze, in cutting jewels for setting, in carving wood, and to work in all manner of workmanship.’” Exodus 31:1-5

Bezalel was selected by the Lord to oversee the construction of the tabernacle that anticipated, in every detail, the “last Adam,” the very “image [tselem] of the invisible God” [Colossians 1:15 – as seen in the Modern Hebrew New Testament].

As for Gideon, with his simple request stated, a surprising response is provided…

And the leaders of Succoth said, “Are the hands of Zebah and Zalmunna now in your hand,

Rather: vayomer sare sukoth ha’kaph zebakh v’tsalmuna atah b’yadekha – “And said princes Succoth, ‘The palm Zebah and Zalmunna now in your hand?’” First, the verb “said” is singular. Therefore, either one person speaks for them or, more likely, they speak with a united voice.

Next, of the forty-plus translations I referred to, the only two that accurately translated the word as palm were a couple of Catholic Bibles. Though similar in meaning, the hand signifies power and/or authority. The palm (and sole) signifies possession and/or the state of something.

The men of Succoth are saying that the state of these two kings, because of the authority they possess, is not in Gideon’s hand (under his authority). As such, they question why it is…

6 (con’t) that we should give bread to your army?”

There may be a dual meaning here that forms a pun: ki niten litsvaakha lakhem – “for giving to your army bread.” Without the vowel points, the word lakhem, or bread, is identical in spelling to lakhem, war.

Therefore, they could be making a play on the thought. “Why should we give your army bread so that you can wage war.” If Gideon’s army is defeated, there will be retribution upon those who aided the warriors.

It is, however, an inexcusable excuse, peevish and cowardly. First, how on earth would a retreating army even know that their pursuers stopped and received bread? And more, these are fellow Israelites. If Gideon doesn’t succeed, Succoth will continue to be oppressed by Midian anyway.

It is Israel who cried out to the Lord for relief. He has provided the chance of obtaining it through Gideon, and yet they are unwilling to assist. Therefore…

So Gideon said, “For this cause, when the Lord has delivered Zebah and Zalmunna into my hand,

vayomer gidon lakhen b’theth Yehovah eth zebakh v’eth tsalmuna b’yadi – “And said, Gideon, ‘Therefore, in giving, Yehovah, Zebah and Zalmunna in my hand…” Gideon asserts, with all assurance, that the battle is won. Rather than wasting his time and energy with what he intends to do to these princes, he defers their punishment. But it is coming…

7 (con’t) then I will tear your flesh with the thorns of the wilderness and with briers!”

Though nobody translates it this way, this is the most probable meaning: v’dashti eth b’sarkhem eth qotse ha’midbar v’eth ha’barqanim – “And thresh your flesh with thorns the wilderness and with the flails.” Here is a word found only in this passage, now and in verse 16, barqanim.

It is so obscure that the Greek translation punts and simply says, “I tear your flesh with the thorns of the wilderness, and the Barkenim.”

The word comes from the noun baraq, lightning. That then comes from the verb baraq to flash, but in the sense of casting forth. It isn’t the light that is the flash, but the action. Most translations say briars. To justify this, Strong’s says, “perhaps as burning brightly.” In other words, when lit, thorns burn brightly.

That makes no sense. The only other suggestion is threshing sledges. To justify that, BDB says, “furnished with sharp (glittering) stones.” Neither of these satisfies.

However, the CG translation (fortunately for your understanding) does what the others fail to do. Rather than what is intended, the other options focus on the idea of the light aspect of lightning, not the action.

However, the CG translation insightfully uses the casting forth aspect of a flail. It is a rod connected to another rod by loops so that when the rod is cast forward by the arm, the smaller rod, the flail, picks up immense speed and thwacks down on the grain, threshing it. To confirm this most astute translation, we turn to Isaiah –

“For the black cummin is not threshed with a threshing sledge,
Nor is a cartwheel rolled over the cummin;
But the black cummin is beaten out with a stick,
And the cummin with a rod.” Isaiah 28:27

The rod, in this case, would include a flail. In using this implement, the person will increase his productivity without wearing himself out in the process. For best happy, and for more shrewd commentaries on obscure or mistranslated words, be sure to continue attending the Superior Word.

As for the promised pending punishment, it is delayed until the enemy is eliminated. It will make what comes upon these princes all the more poignantly painful. The narrative continues…

Then he went up from there to Penuel and spoke to them in the same way.

vayaal misham penuel vaydaber alehem kazoth – “And ascended from there, Penuel, and spoke unto them according to this.” Penuel is translated as Face of God, but this must be more exactingly explained. The word comes from panah (to turn) and el (God). The word paneh (or pl: panim) comes from this and signifies face(s).

The idea of Penuel is of action – He Turns to God, or emphatically, Turn to God! It speaks in the sense of a relationship.

8 (con’t) And the men of Penuel answered him as the men of Succoth had answered.

vayaanu oto anshe penuel kaasher anu anshe sukoth – “And answered him, men Penuel, according to which answered men Succoth.” In other words, they completely rejected his appeal for bread, ignoring any sense of familial relationship with him and opting to stay in the good graces of Midian. Therefore…

So he also spoke to the men of Penuel, saying, “When I come back in peace, I will tear down this tower!”

vayomer gam l’anshe penuel l’mor b’shuvi b’shalom etots eth ha’migdal hazeh – “And said, also to men Penuel, saying, ‘In returning in peace, breaking down the tower, the this.’” It may be that these men were in the tower when Gideon arrived, securing themselves there from the fleeing Midianites.

When Gideon arrived, he called out to them for bread, but they refused, thinking that they were secure in their tower and didn’t need Gideon’s assistance. Therefore, Gideon promised to return and destroy the object of their confidence. With that, the narrative turns to the objects of Gideon’s attention…

Another surprise awaits Midian
Another defeat awaits her kings
This is the Lord’s power working through Gideon
And for it, Israel’s heart sings

Who can doubt that the Lord led the battle
Victory despite such overwhelming odds
The shout of war and swords as they rattle
So much for Midian’s false trust in their gods

Through the Lord is victory and life
He is the One who guided every step of Gideon
Until was ended the time of strife
Until was defeated the vast army of Midian

III. He Took the Two Kings of Midian (verses 10-12)

10 Now Zebah and Zalmunna were at Karkor, and their armies with them, about fifteen thousand,

Rather: v’zebakh v’tsalmuna ba’qarqor u’makhanehem imam ka’khamesheth asar eleph – “And Zebah and Zalmunna in the Karkor, and their camps with them according to five ten thousand.” The name Karkor is variously defined as Foundation, Pounded Down, Even Ground, etc.

The word is identical in spelling to qarqar which is found in Numbers 24:17 where it signifies to shatter. As such, some define it as Destruction instead of Pounded Down.

There is another interpretation, though. As Karkor is not mentioned elsewhere, some suggest that it signifies rest. Not a place, but as what happens in the location. This is based on what it says in the next verse.

As for the number, it is a multiple of fifteen and ten (multiplied). Of fifteen, Bullinger says –

“…being a multiple of five, partakes of the significance of that number, also of the number three with which it is combined, 3 x 5. Five is, as we have seen, the number of grace, and three is the number of divine perfection. Fifteen, therefore, specially refers to acts wrought by the energy of Divine grace. Deity is seen in it, for the two Hebrew letters which express it are y, Yod (10), and h, Hey (5). These spell the ineffable Name of hy, Jah, who is the fountain of all grace. The number fifteen is thus made up, by addition, 10 + 5; but as the Jews would not, by the constant use of these two letters, profane the sacred name, two other letters were arbitrarily used for this number, and a different and artificial combination was thus formed—+ (Teth) = 9, and w (Vau) = 6. The number 9 + 6 would thus represent the number fifteen, but without any significance. Fifteen being 8 + 7 as well as 3 x 5, it may also include a reference to resurrection, as being a special mark of the energy of Divine grace issuing in glory.”

Ten: “Completeness of order, marking the entire round of anything, is, therefore, the ever-present signification of the number ten. It implies that nothing is wanting; that the number and order are perfect; that the whole cycle is complete.”

There, in this location, their camps totaled fifteen thousand. They were…

10 (con’t) all who were left of all the army of the people of the East;

kol ha’notarim mikol makhaneh b’ne qedem – “All the remainings from all camp sons East.” As seen several times, the b’ne qedem or “sons East” are the various people groups gathered together as one camp.

It seems like a sizable army, but when it says “the remainings,” it brings the matter to its true light…

10 (con’t) for one hundred and twenty thousand men who drew the sword had fallen.

v’ha’nophlim meah v’esrim eleph ish sholeph kharev – “And the fallers hundred and twenty thousand man drawing sword.” The meaning is that only one-ninth of the army had survived to this point.

As for the number, it is derived from one hundred and twenty multiplied by tens. Bullinger says one hundred and twenty –

“…is made up of three forties (3×40=120). Applied to time therefore it signifies a divinely appointed period of probation.”

The odds are still heavily against Gideon, but he has the initiative. Therefore, he continues onward against the oppressors of Israel…

11 Then Gideon went up by the road of those who dwell in tents on the east of Nobah and Jogbehah;

vayaal gidon derek ha’sh’khune ba’ohalim miqedem l’novakh v’yagbehah – “And ascended Gideon way the dwellers in tents from east to Nobah and Jogbehah.” The point is that they circled around to the east of these cities in an area where tent dwellers lived.

As such, it would be totally unexpected that war would come from a place where people were peacefully tending flocks. It was also the direction in which Midian was fleeing.

Nobah, or Novakh, is seen for the third and last time in Scripture. It means To Bark or Barking. It was located in the territory of Manasseh. Jogbehah is seen for the second and last time. It means Lofty or Exalted. It was in the territory of Gad.

Because of the surprising direction of Gideon’s attack, the camp of Midian was completely unprepared…

11 (cont) and he attacked the army while the camp felt secure.

vayak eth ha’makhaneh v’ha’makhaneh haya betakh – “And struck the camp, and the camp was confidence.” The word betakh is a noun signifying security or confidence. The men were confident, assuming that they had escaped far enough from near the Hill of Moreh, the original place of attack. Thus, they stopped and rested to lick their wounds.

They could rest and ponder how things could have gone so poorly, and yet, they would be comfortable enough to set their swords down and prepare for their return home. It is at such a time that Gideon and his men struck the camp.

12 When Zebah and Zalmunna fled, he pursued them;

vayanusu zebakh v’tsalmuna vayirdoph akharehem – “And fled Zebah and Zalmuna. And pursued after them.” Because of another engagement with the enemy in such an unexpected manner and place, the kings of Midian simply got up and fled. However…

*12 (fin) and he took the two kings of Midian, Zebah and Zalmunna, and routed the whole army.

It doesn’t say that they killed all of the camp. They may have been routed, but that isn’t what is conveyed: vayilkod eth shene malkhe midyan eth zebakh va’eth tsalmuna v’khal ha’makhaneh hekherid – “And seized two kings Midian, Zebah and Zalmunna, and all the camp terrified.”

What it seems to mean is that Gideon struck the camp, and the kings fled, so Gideon and his men simply left the battle to seize them. The rest of the Midianites were so terrified that they didn’t even bother to come after Gideon and his army, despite the huge numerical superiority.

They had been defeated, their leaders were goners, and they refrained from everything but shaking in their sandals and cowering in their tents.

With that, the verses for today are ended. Despite the odds, Gideon knew that with any number, when the Lord is involved, victory is guaranteed. And more, even without proper provision to sustain him and his men, he was willing to expend himself in pursuit of the enemy.

However, the Lord provided for them. They were able to continue and even prevail. This will be true for us if the Lord is behind what we are engaged in. This doesn’t mean that we should run off willy-nilly, assuming that what we intend to do will be a success.

Gideon had the word of the Lord to assure him of what he was to do. We have the word of the Lord as well. We don’t want to ever go beyond what is written, but we can have confidence in what we are doing if it is in accord with His word.

Let us trust in this and not falter in our determination to do what is right and what is expected of us. In the end, through life or death, we will be carried through to the promised end set before us in the word. So why worry in the meantime?

Until your time arrives, take heed to yourselves and to the doctrine you possess. Continue in them, and you will do well. Have the confidence of Gideon that you will prevail. The Lord is with you, so you will.

Closing Verse: “For You have broken the yoke of his burden
And the staff of his shoulder,
The rod of his oppressor,
As in the day of Midian.” Isaiah 9:4

Next Week: Judges 8:13-21 You wanna have fun, just listen for a spell, so get in line… (Gideon, Judge of Israel, Part IX) (26th Judges sermon)

The Lord has you exactly where He wants you. He has a good plan and purpose for you. It is He who judges His people according to their deeds. So, follow Him, live for Him, and trust Him, and He will do marvelous things for you and through you.

Gideon, Judge of Israel, Part VIII

Now the men of Ephraim said to him
Why have you done this to us by not calling us
When you went to fight with the Midianites?
And they reprimanded him sharply, putting up a fuss

So he said to them, “What have I done now
In comparison with you?
Is not the gleaning of the grapes of Ephraim
Better than the vintage of Abiezer? Isn’t it true?

God has delivered into your hands
The princes of Midian, Oreb and Zeeb, how about that?
And what was I able to do in comparison with you?
Then their anger toward him subsided when he said that

When Gideon came to the Jordan, he and the three hundred men
Who were with him crossed over, exhausted but still in pursuit
Then he said to the men of Succoth
“Please give loaves of bread to the people who follow me
———-our hunger is acute

For they are exhausted, and I am pursuing
Zebah and Zalmunna, kings of Midian, this is what I am doing

And the leaders of Succoth said
Speaking a bit too smarmy
“Are the hands of Zebah and Zalmunna now in your hand
That we should give bread to your army?

So Gideon said, “For this cause
When the LORD has delivered Zebah and Zalmunna into my hand
Then I will tear your flesh
With the thorns of the wilderness and with briers
———–so I have planned!

Then he went up from there to Penuel
And spoke to them in the same way
And the men of Penuel answered him
As the men of Succoth had answered that day

So he also spoke to the men of Penuel, saying
“When I come back in peace, I will tear down this tower!
———-So to you I am relaying

Now Zebah and Zalmunna were at Karkor
And their armies with them, about fifteen thousand men
All who were left of all the army of the people of the East
For one hundred and twenty thousand men who drew the sword
———-had fallen

Then Gideon went up by the road
Not taking a sightseeing tour
Of those who dwell in tents on the east of Nobah and Jogbehah
And he attacked the army while the camp felt secure

When Zebah and Zalmunna fled
He pursued them, intending them harmy
And he took the two kings of Midian, Zebah and Zalmunna
And routed the whole army

Lord God, turn our hearts to be obedient to Your word
Give us wisdom to be ever faithful to You
May we carefully heed each thing we have heard
Yes, Lord God may our hearts be faithful and true

And we shall be content and satisfied in You alone
We will follow You as we sing our songs of praise
Hallelujah to You; to us Your path You have shown
Hallelujah we shall sing to You for all of our days

Hallelujah and Amen…

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Now the men of Ephraim said to him, “Why have you done this to us by not calling us when you went to fight with the Midianites?” And they reprimanded him sharply.

So he said to them, “What have I done now in comparison with you? Is not the gleaning of the grapes of Ephraim better than the vintage of Abiezer? God has delivered into your hands the princes of Midian, Oreb and Zeeb. And what was I able to do in comparison with you?” Then their anger toward him subsided when he said that.

When Gideon came to the Jordan, he and the three hundred men who were with him crossed over, exhausted but still in pursuit. Then he said to the men of Succoth, “Please give loaves of bread to the people who follow me, for they are exhausted, and I am pursuing Zebah and Zalmunna, kings of Midian.”

And the leaders of Succoth said, “Are the hands of Zebah and Zalmunna now in your hand, that we should give bread to your army?”

So Gideon said, “For this cause, when the Lord has delivered Zebah and Zalmunna into my hand, then I will tear your flesh with the thorns of the wilderness and with briers!” Then he went up from there to Penuel and spoke to them in the same way. And the men of Penuel answered him as the men of Succoth had answered. So he also spoke to the men of Penuel, saying, “When I come back in peace, I will tear down this tower!”

10 Now Zebah and Zalmunna were at Karkor, and their armies with them, about fifteen thousand, all who were left of all the army of the people of the East; for one hundred and twenty thousand men who drew the sword had fallen. 11 Then Gideon went up by the road of those who dwell in tents on the east of Nobah and Jogbehah; and he attacked the army while the camp felt secure. 12 When Zebah and Zalmunna fled, he pursued them; and he took the two kings of Midian, Zebah and Zalmunna, and routed the whole army.