Joshua 17:14-18 (You Shall Create)

Artwork by Doug Kallerson.

Joshua 17:14-18
You Shall Create

On sermon typing day, my friend Sergio will often send me twenty messages in a row, just to be as annoying as possible. But that’s ok, I do the same to him while he is trying to do his video work. Other than him, I have contact with absolutely no one from the time I start till the time I finish. This has been true for years. An exception to this is truly an exception.

While studying the text for this sermon, there were some rather amazing inaccuracies in the translation of the verses. I noted to Sergio how fascinating the passage was and a few minutes later he came back with some comments on the first verse.

I responded with some analysis from verses 15 and 16. He came back with a dubious, “Yes that sounds right.” But after going through it a bit more, he said, “Yes. Wow. Incredible.” To make sure he wasn’t funning me, I asked if he really agreed with my conclusion and his response was, “Can’t believe you paid attention.”

In other words, while translators are spending their time trying to make a translation sound good and understandable, they will often miss the actual meaning of the words. Feeling good about this, I told Sergio that I actually just ran my thoughts through AI and that is what popped out. After that, I spent the morning playing solitaire.

Ok, that didn’t happen, but for fun, Sergio asked his AI resource for a sermon on our verses today. About one minute later, he sent me this –

“In Joshua 17:14-18, we see the story of the tribe of Joseph, specifically the half-tribe of Manasseh, who were given a large portion of land on the west side of the Jordan River. However, instead of being satisfied with the land they had been given, they complained and asked for more. This passage reminds us that it is easy to become discontent and never feel satisfied with what we have been given. It is important to remember to be grateful for the blessings that we have received, rather than constantly striving for more. Let us strive to cultivate an attitude of gratitude and trust in God’s provision for our lives.”

Being a little weak, he strengthened the parameters, asking it to “write a short sermon paragraph in an expository style about Joshua 17:14-18. Focus on the meaning of the Hebrew words and how this passage points to Jesus.”

Thirty seconds later, I got this –

“In Joshua 17:14-18, we see the tribe of Joseph, specifically the half-tribe of Manasseh, requesting more land from Joshua. The Hebrew word used for “more” in this passage is ‘od,’ which can also be translated as ‘still’ or ‘yet.’ This implies that the half-tribe of Manasseh already had a significant amount of land, but they were not satisfied and wanted more. This passage serves as a reminder of our own tendency to always want more, even when we have already been blessed with so much. However, this passage also points us to Jesus, who came to fulfill the desires of our hearts. In Philippians 4:19, Paul writes, ‘And my God will supply every need of yours according to his riches in glory in Christ Jesus.’ Just as God provided for the Israelites, He also provides for us, and we can trust that He will give us what we truly need. Let us seek to find contentment in Jesus and trust in His provision for our lives.”—AI

Well, so much for letting AI do the work. Hopefully what is presented today will be a bit better than that.

Text Verse: “And so all Israel will be saved, as it is written:
‘The Deliverer will come out of Zion,
And He will turn away ungodliness from Jacob;
27 For this is My covenant with them,
When I take away their sins.’” Romans 11:26, 27

It’s hard to understand how anyone can read the words of Paul and come to any other conclusion than that they are referring to national Israel of the future. But that is exactly what many think. It is stupefying to even imagine.

Our passage today will deal with this issue in detail. But having heard the verses from the NKJV, or almost any other version, you probably would never guess it. But look at some of the variations in translation you will see today –

*then go up to the forest country and clear a place for yourself there in the land of the Perizzites and the giants. NKJV
*Go up, to you the forest and create to you, there in land the Perizzite and the Rephaim. CG

*since the mountains of Ephraim are too confined for you. NKJV
*for hastened to you Mount Ephraim. CG

*The mountain country is not enough for us. NKJV
*Not found (meaning able to attain) to us the mount. CG

Reading the differences in these two translations is almost like reading an entirely different account. One thing is for sure, either one is right, and one is wrong, or they are both wrong, but both cannot be right.

What is the Lord telling us, and why is what is being said so hard to understand? The reason is what we are looking for. Translators will tend to reject things that don’t seem to make sense, even if that is the obvious translation of what is presented.

But in following this strategy for translation, a lot of meaning will be missed. I think you’ll agree by the time we finish. If not, and if you prefer something a little easier to listen to, let me know and I will have the AI put out 25- page sermon for you next week. That will take about 10 minutes and I’ll have the rest of the day to play solitaire.

Be sure to let me know what you decide. 10 minutes or 10 hours, I leave it up to you J. I hope you will go with the 10 hours. Such great treasure is to be found in His superior word. And so, let us turn to that precious word once again, and… May God speak to us through His word today, and may His glorious name ever be praised.

I. For Hastened to You Mount Ephraim (verses 14-18)

14 Then the children of Joseph spoke to Joshua, saying,

Here is a united voice of those of Ephraim and Manasseh. Together they form the voice of their father Joseph. The right of the firstborn was granted to him by Jacob, meaning a double portion. As such, this is making a play on the name Joseph.

Joseph or Yoseph, comes from the verb yasaph, to add. Thus, his name means He Shall Add. However, there is another meaning to his name based on his mother’s declaration at his birth –

“Then God remembered Rachel, and God listened to her and opened her womb. 23 And she conceived and bore a son, and said, ‘God has taken away [asaph] my reproach.’ 24 So she called his name Joseph, and said, ‘The Lord shall add [yasaph] to me another son.’” Genesis 30:22-24

She not only used the word yasaph, to add, but also the word asaph, to gather or remove. As such, his name means He Shall Take Away as much as it means He Shall Add. This duality of name meanings extends to both of Joseph’s sons as well. Ephraim and Manasseh each have dual meanings.

As for the double portion of the firstborn having been granted to him, that goes back to Jacob’s blessing upon his sons in Genesis –

“And now your two sons, Ephraim and Manasseh, who were born to you in the land of Egypt before I came to you in Egypt, are mine; as Reuben and Simeon, they shall be mine.” Genesis 48:5

During this blessing, Jacob placed the younger, Ephraim, above the older, Manasseh –

“So he blessed them that day, saying, ‘By you Israel will bless, saying, “May God make you as Ephraim and as Manasseh!”’ And thus he set Ephraim before Manasseh.” Genesis 48:20

Immediately after that, he then spoke of the surety of the double blessing to Joseph –

“Then Israel said to Joseph, ‘Behold, I am dying, but God will be with you and bring you back to the land of your fathers. 22 Moreover I have given to you one portion above your brothers, which I took from the hand of the Amorite with my sword and my bow.’” Genesis 48:21, 22

Because of this, the events of these verses in Joshua 17 take place. One can see the hidden pun of this opening clause by translating the names in it – vaydaberu bene Yoseph eth Yehoshua – “And spoke sons He Shall Add to the Lord is Salvation.”

The sons of He Shall Add are coming to get a little more added…

14 (con’t) “Why have you given us only one lot and one share to inherit,

Rather, the preposition is singular: madua nathatah li nakhalah goral ekhad v’khevel ekhad – “Why given to me inheritance – lot one and portion one?” The goral, or lot, is the casting of the grant itself. The khevel, or cord, is the measurement of that lot into a granted portion of land.

The two tribes of Joseph speak with one united voice. Because of their words, one might wonder if they had been out drinking all night or something.

A little background will help explain. First, the numbers of the tribes at the first census were 40,500 for Ephraim and 32,200 for Manasseh (Numbers 1:32-25). It is true that together they outnumbered every tribe except Judah, but individually, they were not exceptionally large in number.

At the second census, the numbers of Manasseh were more than Ephraim. Ephraim was 32,500 and Manasseh was 52,700. Together, they could be considered a large tribe, being 8700 larger than the largest tribe of Judah.

However, one-half of Manasseh wanted land east of the Jordan. This was granted. Taking them out of the total, the number left to occupy the grant west of the Jordan would be comparable to one of the middle or even smaller sized tribes.

And more, it may be that the land grant of Judah was significantly larger than that of Joseph’s land west of the Jordan, but Simeon will be incorporated within Judah’s land grant. And even more to the point, Judah’s land contains vast areas that are barren wilderness.

On the other hand, the land given to the sons of Joseph is rather large in proportion to their numbers and it contains some of the most fertile and productive land to be found within the borders of Canaan. Add in the giant swath of land east of the Jordan that was immensely good land for pasturing flocks, and they had more than any other tribe, by far.

What would cause them to claim they had insufficient land, or only one inheritance is hard to guess. Maybe they had been drinking too much the night before. Or it could be, based on what they will say in the coming verses, that they are claiming the only inheritance they have is what has been given to the half-tribe east of the Jordan. Whatever it is, a review of their recorded inheritance is needed.

The lot for both was introduced in Joshua 16:1-4. From there, the land of Ephraim was detailed in verses 16:5-10. After that, verses 17:1-13 detailed that of Manasseh. The land for both was decided and then it was divided between the two.

It is possible that they felt jipped by getting one lot which was then divided, or only Manasseh is speaking out the complaint because it had grown so much during the wilderness wanderings while Ephraim had diminished. As such, they felt they were due more land. But neither of these will seem to fit with the protestations they lay before Joshua.

The entire discourse is unreasonable based on what was just reviewed. And yet, they are presenting it as if there is an obvious deficiency in their allotment. It could be that because Joshua is of the tribe of Ephraim, they thought he would bear with their complaint and give them a note of favoritism. He will, however, remain steadfast in showing impartiality. Their complaint is…

14 (con’t) since we are a great people, inasmuch as the Lord has blessed us until now?”

Again, it is singular: va’ani am rav ad asher ad koh ber’khani Yehovah – “And I, people great until which, until now, has blessed me, Yehovah.” This is the only time that Yehovah is mentioned in this passage, and it appears that they are claiming that what they have been apportioned is not a blessing from Him at all.

They have been blessed up until now, but that doesn’t seem to include what they have been handed at this time. Their words are laughable in comparison to their numbers and in relation to what they have been allotted.

What they claim is obviously not correct, but something has motivated them to speak as they have, and Joshua immediately perceives what it is. He addresses it directly and he does it by using their own words…

15 So Joshua answered them, “If you are a great people

There is a strong emphasis as he repeats their claim right back to their ears: va’yomer alehem Yehoshua, im am rav attah – “And said to them, Joshua, ‘If people great, you…’”

They made the claim. If it is so, and if the land they have is supposedly insufficient for them, then there must be a problem within the land that they are unwilling to address. Instead, they want more (or other) land so that they can avoid that issue altogether. Joshua knows this and subtly uses their boasting to highlight their cowardice…

15 (con’t) then go up to the forest country and clear a place for yourself there in the land of the Perizzites and the giants,

aleh lekha ha’yarah u-beretha lekha sham ba’erets ha’perizi v’ha’rephaim – “Go up, to you the forest and create to you, there in land the Perizzite and the Rephaim.”

The problem isn’t the amount of land at all. The problem is the inhabitants in the land. The tribes have boasted of their size, supposedly necessitating more land and so Joshua hurls their words back at them – “If you are so great, you don’t need more land, you need a backbone.”

In his statement, he uses the word bara’, or create. It is the first use of this word in Scripture not connected to God and it appears intentional. There is another word he could have used, khatav, meaning to cut wood. But he goes beyond that and says, “Go create something out of the forest. Make it usable you great people. God, through the lot, created a portion for you. Now go create something out of it.”

The need for a backbone is twofold. First, they need to get to work with their creating. And second, Joshua seems to poke at them that they need to do it “there, in the land of those settled-in people, including the dreaded giants.”

There is an obvious failure of these people to rely on the Lord. He had promised to go before them, and He had done so, never failing them in the process. With the land allotted by Him, all they needed to do was trust and act.

As for the people groups,

Perizzite comes from perazi, a hamlet dweller. Thus, it means something like Villager or Dweller in an Open Country. Rephaim comes from a word meaning to sink down or relax or from a word meaning to heal. If the latter, then it indicates that their size came from being invigorated in some way, probably through special inbreeding.

Joshua has identified their failing and he has told them what to do about it. Their complaint about land really comes down to accessibility…

15 (con’t) since the mountains of Ephraim are too confined for you.”

Rather than “too confined,” as if that is all that is being referred to, it is Joshua speaking about the speed in which they will be able to subdue the mountainous area: ki ats lekha har ephrayim – “for hastened to you Mount Ephraim.” Mount Ephraim is being used as a synecdoche referring to all of the mountainous area apportioned to them.

In this, Joshua uses the word uts, to hasten to labor. It appears to be another poke at them. “Look at how easy Mount Ephraim is. You will have it all cleared out in no time. You just need to get to work and put a little effort into your inheritance.” With that, the moaning of Joseph continues…

16 But the children of Joseph said, “The mountain country is not enough for us;

Not living up to their name, He Shall Add, Joseph moans against Joshua’s words. Further, their answer is not that the mountain country isn’t enough. Rather, they are refuting Joshua’s claim that they can attain it speedily: lo yimatse la’nu ha’har – “Not found to us the mount.”

The meaning is not that the mountainous area is not enough for them, as if they needed more. Rather, the word is matsa, to find or attain. They are saying that they cannot overtake it. The people living there are too strong, they have settled into the area and are fortified, and there will be no way to drive them out.

Joshua said that the sons of Joseph will hasten to attain it and they claim that it is unattainable. They are wallowing in their own incompetence and ineptitude while failing to trust in the unseen hand of the Lord. With that, the moaning goes further…

16 (con’t) and all the Canaanites who dwell in the land of the valley have chariots of iron,

It is all singular: v’rekhev barzel b’kal ha’k’naani ha’yoshev b’erts ha’emeq – “and chariot iron in each the Canaanite, the dweller in land the valley.” It is a total exaggeration. Though they possessed chariots, these men claim that each and every Canaanite in the area had one, making it sound like they were as common as front doors on houses.

As such, they grumble that not only can they not attain the mountainous country, they also could never defeat those in the valley. The Canaanite was too strong, and they could never drive him out. Unlike the mountainous area where the people were dug in and fortified, these people were in the open areas.

This is where chariots are suitable and effective. Any obstruction at all would render them useless, but in open areas they are quite lethal. However, despite being a fearful weapon of war, it is not something beyond their ability to defeat.

In the battle of Joshua 11 by the waters of Merom, Joshua handily defeated the vast army and burned their chariots with fire. They knew this and yet they peevishly whine about the sizeable and beautiful grant of land they had been provided.

The entire passage demonstrates a complete lack of faith in the Lord and the promises He has made. Of the armies with chariots, they continue their grousing with the words…

16 (con’t) both those who are of Beth Shean and its towns and those who are of the Valley of Jezreel.”

la’asher b’beith sh’an u-b’noteha v’la’asher b’emeq yiz’r’el – “to who in Beth Shean and her daughters and to who in Valley Jezreel.” The term “daughters” means towns. Thus, it speaks of the smaller towns that fall under the protection of the mother city.

The entire clause speaks of utter defeat. Not only are they afraid of the main city, but they are irritable about even attacking the little towns around it. And those in the valley, open and exposed in the wide expansive area, are thought to be too tough for them to handle because of their chariots.

As for the names, Beth Shean means House of Ease or House of Security. Jezreel means God Sows. Being prefixed with emeq, or valley, it would be the Depth of God Sows, the emeq being a deep, broad valley.

Despite their whimpering, Joshua remains unaffected…

17 And Joshua spoke to the house of Joseph—to Ephraim and Manasseh—saying,

Rather than “spoke,” it uses the word “said.” Further, the chronicler says his words are directed “to the house of Joseph.” They have come to him with a complaint about their inheritance and so he addresses them as one.

His words confirm what I said earlier. Their initial complaint, which continues here, is that their only inheritance is that already given to the half-tribe east of the Jordan. What they have been granted west of the Jordan is unattainable and so they are left with that single land grant – whiners…

But, remaining undeterred, Joshua pokes them with great and emphatic words, even greater than they claimed themselves…

17 (con’t) “You are a great people and have great power;

am rav atah v’koakh gadol – “People great, you! And power whopping!” They came to Joshua with a claim that they were a great people, meaning numerous. Joshua has used the same word, rav, in the sense of powerful.

They obviously didn’t get it the first time, and so he adds in superlatives to almost mock them at their wincing attitude. The thing is, they cannot refute him. He has never failed in a battle, is of their same stock (meaning of the house of Joseph), and has had the Lord with him.

They are the entire house of Joseph, they are numerous, and they have accompanied Joshua into battle, having learned the skills he possesses. And more, it would be blasphemous for them to claim the Lord is not with them as well. They know this, and they know Joshua knows they know it. Hence…

17 (con’t) you shall not have only one lot,

lo yihyeh l’kha goral ekhad – “No shall be to you lot one.” Their griping has left Joshua entirely unaffected. What is east of Jordan is for the half-tribe of Manasseh. What is west is for Ephraim and half of Manasseh. And that land west of the Jordan is sufficient for both of them.

The matter is decided, the challenge is set before them, and it is their task to secure what has been decided by the lot. The land has been marked out, and now it is time for them to act. And so, Joshua continues…

18 but the mountain country shall be yours.

ki har yihyeh lakh – “For mountain shall be to you.” As in verse 15, the word har, or “mountain,” is referring to the entire mountainous area of the land grant. It is given to the house of Jacob. And it is attainable…

18 (con’t) Although it is wooded, you shall cut it down, and its farthest extent shall be yours;

ki yaar hu u-bereto v’hayah lekha tots’otav – “For forest it, and you shall create, and shall become to you its outgoings.” Joshua implies that the forest will sufficiently provide for them. With the wood, they can fashion weapons, they can build houses, and so on.

In other words, it should not be considered an obstacle, but a benefit. In cutting down the forest, they will also have the benefit of workable fields. The land is good, it is available, and they will be able to subdue it.

There is a formative process that must take place, but when it is accomplished, their goal of possessing a second lot will have been obtained. Joshua’s words are direct, but they are also encouraging. All of this would belong to them.

Many scholars say the “outgoings” refer to fields and plains that border the wooded area, but what seems more likely is that it is referring to the sea which borders the inheritance on the west. The Canaanites dwelt throughout the land, even to the seacoast. That will belong to them as well because, as he says…

18 (con’t) for you shall drive out the Canaanites,

It is again singular: ki torish eth ha’k’naani – “For shall disinherit the Canaanite.” They have been granted their inheritance from the Lord by lot. They are to disinherit those in the land in order to receive it. Joshua has remained fixed and resolute in his words. They are capable despite the force they will face…

18 (con’t) though they have iron chariots

Rather than “though,” Joshua makes a statement of fact: ki rekev barzel lo – “For chariot iron to him.” It seems almost like he is trying to intimidate them, and without his previous words, one would wonder what he was talking about. But Joshua has already told them that they are able, that they will prevail even against iron chariots, and even more…

*18 (fin) and are strong.”

The passage ends with Joshua making a strong and emphatic statement that seems contradictory to the intent of the matter: ki khazaq hu – “For strong, he.” Not only does the Canaanite possess chariots, but he is a strong foe. Despite this, the house of Joseph will prevail.

The final verse of the passage contains five statements, each beginning with ki, or for –

*For mountain shall be to you.
*For forest it, and you shall create, and shall become to you its outgoings.
*For shall disinherit the Canaanite.
*For chariot iron to him.
*For strong, he.

Each is based on what was previously stated. This because of this:

“No shall be to you lot one. Because mountain shall be to you. Because forest it, and you shall create, and shall become to you its outgoings. Because shall disinherit the Canaanite. Because chariot iron to him. Because strong, he.”

Behold, I create something new
Something glorious lies ahead that you will see
Believe that what I say, I will do
You can put your full confidence in Me

I shall create it and it shall be done
There will be a new order of things on that day
As sure as is the rising of the sun
So there is surety in what I now say

What you cannot imagine is what I will do
Though you disbelieve now, it shall come about
My word is faithful, and it is true
Be confident in this and have no doubt

II. Pictures of Christ

The inheritance of the half-tribe of Manasseh is east of the Jordan. In Joshua 12:1-6 it was noted that this was an inheritance obtained prior to national Israel’s salvation. In this case, a review of the events leading to the inheritance after Israel’s salvation is being detailed.

The passage deals with the house of Joseph, or He Shall Add, with a secondary meaning of Take Away. Joseph was to receive a double inheritance. If the land for the half-tribe of Manasseh is one inheritance, then there needs to be another.

The thing about this section is that it does not have to be chronological to what has already been said. Beginning it with “Then” as some translations do gives a time order sense, but it actually begins with “And.”

Because of this, the lot for their land could have been thrown at the time of their coming forward. The inheritances noted in Chapter 16 and the first half of this chapter could simply be categorical, just as has repeatedly occurred in Joshua. The inheritances are defined, and then background information is filled in.

That seems likely, but it is speculation. The reason it seems likely is that their claim to only one inheritance having been given them seems to presuppose it. Regardless of that, the matter is now addressed.

Joshua anticipates Christ, the Lord is Salvation. But each named tribe does too. The inheritance east of the Jordan is prior to Israel’s national salvation. Whether it pictures the church or just individual Jews within the church isn’t the issue because the Jews are a part of the church. It (with them) is an inheritance.

Putting aside the whining of the house of Joseph, which is certainly historical and accurate, the point of the words is that there is a second inheritance for Joseph due to the birthright. Likewise, there is a second inheritance for Christ due to His right to Israel, something testified to thoroughly in the books of Moses, the prophets, and so on.

The negative attitude of those who come to Joshua implies the difficulty of the task. Despite Jesus not being negative about the events, the difficult nature of providing an inheritance to national Israel is being seen.

In fact, to much of the church, it appears to be an impossibility. So the tenor of the words explains the reality of Israel’s current situation. It seems impossible that it could ever be the case.

In verse 15, the naming of the Perizzites and the Rephaim highlights this. Rephaim, as seen in Joshua 12, anticipated those who follow false prophets. That is about as accurate a description of Israel today as anyone could imagine – any word from the Lord is ok as long as it isn’t from Jesus.

Joseph, He Shall Add (and Take Away), picturing Jesus, is to add national Israel to His promised inheritance. He is to “create” land (fertile soil which is useable) out of these people groups. A seemingly impossible task.

Joshua (Jesus) lets it be known that the job is a snap – it is hastened labor to obtain “Mount Ephraim.” As has been seen in previous sermons, a mountain (har) is a lot of something gathered. It is synonymous with a large but centralized group of people.

The meaning is that Ephraim (Twice Fruitful) representing this second inheritance will hasten to come about.

Verse 16 noted that the sons of Joseph said they could not attain to this. That is the historical record. It may be doubted that the Lord Jesus will bring about the restoration of national Israel, but it will come about. Despite the staggering amount of apostasy and false prophets, through Christ, it will happen.

From there, another obstacle, the Canaanites, are mentioned along with their iron chariots. Canaanite signifies Humbled, Humiliated, or even Subdued. Iron represents strength, be it in binding together, in government, in hard service, in bondage, etc.

Chariots, like horses, are a source of pride –

“Some trust in chariots, and some in horses;
But we will remember the name of the Lord our God.
They have bowed down and fallen;
But we have risen and stand upright.” Psalm 20:7, 8

Israel is a land of humiliated people, trusting in self and in doctrines which are strongly bound together, such as in the culture and religious aspects of life. Saying these are in the emeq, or deep broad valley, signifies that they are deeply engrained and completely pervasive in them.

The two locations, Beth Shean and the Valley of Jezreel, signify Israel’s confidence and state of ease in their false ways and God sowing into their lives the just due they deserve –

“It shall come to pass in that day
That I will break the bow of Israel in the Valley of Jezreel.” Hosea 1:5

Like most prophecies, Hosea’s has an immediate fulfillment and a future one. Also, the writings of Hosea prophesy both the casting off of Israel, “You are not my people,” (Hosea 1:8) and the calling again of Israel, “You are my people,” (Hosea 2:23).

Verse 17 mentioned Joseph, Ephraim, and Manasseh all as one. It is the three two-fold workings of Christ seen previously in Joshua. Joseph anticipates Christ Who takes away man’s reproach and Who then adds him to God’s people. Manasseh pictures Christ who came to pay Adam’s debt and who, in the process, allows that debt to be forgotten before God.

Ephraim looks to Jesus. He is twice fruitful in the land of His affliction, prevailing over the law and thus becoming the Savior of Jew and Gentile as well as the church and national Israel. But His work also meant that sin was judged in Him, thus the ashes, signifying His afflictions.

To them Joshua acknowledges that they are great and whoppingly powerful. Of course, Christ can prevail over the failings of Israel. Therefore, “you shall not only have one lot.” The double inheritance belongs to the Lord.

With that, the fivefold repetition of “For” was proclaimed.

For mountain shall be to you. The centralized people group of Israel shall be His.

“Again the word of the Lord came to me, saying, 16 “As for you, son of man, take a stick for yourself and write on it: ‘For Judah and for the children of Israel, his companions.’ Then take another stick and write on it, ‘For Joseph, the stick of Ephraim, and for all the house of Israel, his companions.’ 17 Then join them one to another for yourself into one stick, and they will become one in your hand.” Ezekiel 37:15-17

For forest it. It is a forest, a cluttered and unusable land that needs to be created –

“For behold, I create [bara] new heavens and a new earth;
And the former shall not be remembered or come to mind.
18 But be glad and rejoice forever in what I create;
For behold, I create [bara] Jerusalem as a rejoicing,
And her people a joy.
19 I will rejoice in Jerusalem,
And joy in My people;
The voice of weeping shall no longer be heard in her,
Nor the voice of crying.” Isaiah 65:17-19

In creating this, it “shall become to you its outgoings.” In other words, the entire extent of Israel, to the very last person, will be holy.

For shall disinherit the Canaanite.

“In that day ‘HOLINESS TO THE LORD’ shall be engraved on the bells of the horses. The pots in the Lord’s house shall be like the bowls before the altar. 21 Yes, every pot in Jerusalem and Judah shall be holiness to the Lord of hosts. Everyone who sacrifices shall come and take them and cook in them. In that day there shall no longer be a Canaanite in the house of the Lord of hosts.” Zechariah 14:20, 21

The reason for disinheriting those who oppose Him is For chariot iron to him. Those who trust in self and in their firm unyielding false doctrines will either have those doctrines removed from them, or they, meaning those who trust in self, will be removed. Either way, nothing that is false will ever afflict Israel. This must be removed, For strong, he.

The meaning is obvious. Falsities are strong, dangerous, invasive, and pernicious. Those who teach them will be removed. Those who hold to them will be corrected or destroyed. This is what the double inheritance of the house of Joseph anticipates.

The inheritance is not merely the church that is saved during the church age. National Israel is the inheritance of Jesus as well. He was promised this, and it is His by inheritance.

The verses today are an explanatory statement of this fact. The thing about the passage that most strikes me is that without a correct translation of the Hebrew words, a completely different meaning is derived, which has nothing to do with what is actually being conveyed.

Hence, to really understand what is being said, one needs to go beyond reading several versions of the word (which is a good start), and go line by line through the text contemplating each word. It is a long, laborious, and tedious task, but what treasure is to be found in the word!

In such a study, we can be assured and reassured of the integrity of Scripture, the soundness of doctrines and the unsound nature of others, and so on. There are innumerable teachers and denominations that reject any future plan for, or significance of, national Israel. But they will be corrected in their thinking someday.

They have failed to understand what God is doing and why, but through a close evaluation of names, places, and obscure words, it all comes more clearly into focus. Above all, let us hold fast to the most fundamental truth of any. All of Scripture is about Jesus.

Without Him nothing in life makes sense and nothing in His word or this world has clarity. But with Him, our lives have purpose and meaning. And the word, it comes alive when we look for Him in its pages. Thank God for this tender and precious word and thank God for Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen and amen.

Closing Verse: “But you are a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, His own special people, that you may proclaim the praises of Him who called you out of darkness into His marvelous light; 10 who once were not a people but are now the people of God, who had not obtained mercy but now have obtained mercy.” 1 Peter 2:9, 10

Next Week: Joshua 18:1-10 It was a whopping gathering. You can bet it was so… (Israel Assembled Together at Shiloh) (36th Joshua Sermon)

The Lord has you exactly where He wants you. He has a good plan and purpose for you. It is He who has defeated the enemy and who now offers His people rest. So, follow Him and trust Him and He will do marvelous things for you and through you.

You Shall Create

Then the children of Joseph spoke to Joshua, saying
“Why have you given us only one lot and one share to inherit
Since we are a great people
Inasmuch as the LORD has blessed us until now?
———- surely more land we merit

So Joshua answered them, “If you are a great people
Then go up to the forest country and clear a place for yourself
———-this you shall do
There in the land of the Perizzites and the giants
Since the mountains of Ephraim are too confined for you”

But the children of Joseph said, “The mountain country
———-is not enough for us
And all the Canaanites who dwell in the land of the valley
———-have chariots of iron, as you know well
Both those who are of Beth Shean and its towns
And those who are of the Valley of Jezreel”

And Joshua spoke to the house of Joseph
To Ephraim and Manasseh, saying
“You are a great people and have great power
You shall not have only one lot. Hear what I am conveying

But the mountain country shall be yours
Although it is wooded, you shall cut it down, it’s where you belong
And its farthest extent shall be yours
For you shall drive out the Canaanites, though they have
———-iron chariots and are strong”

Lord God, turn our hearts to be obedient to Your word
Give us wisdom to be ever faithful to You
May we carefully heed each thing we have heard
Yes, Lord God may our hearts be faithful and true

And we shall be content and satisfied in You alone
We will follow You as we sing our songs of praise
Hallelujah to You; to us Your path You have shown
Hallelujah we shall sing to You for all of our days

Hallelujah and Amen…

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

14 Then the children of Joseph spoke to Joshua, saying, “Why have you given us only one lot and one share to inherit, since we are a great people, inasmuch as the Lord has blessed us until now?”

15 So Joshua answered them, “If you are a great people, then go up to the forest country and clear a place for yourself there in the land of the Perizzites and the giants, since the mountains of Ephraim are too confined for you.”

16 But the children of Joseph said, “The mountain country is not enough for us; and all the Canaanites who dwell in the land of the valley have chariots of iron, both those who are of Beth Shean and its towns and those who are of the Valley of Jezreel.”

17 And Joshua spoke to the house of Joseph—to Ephraim and Manasseh—saying, “You are a great people and have great power; you shall not have only one lot, 18 but the mountain country shall be yours. Although it is wooded, you shall cut it down, and its farthest extent shall be yours; for you shall drive out the Canaanites, though they have iron chariots and are strong.”

 

 

 

Joshua 17:1-13 (The Inheritance of Joseph – Manasseh (West))

Artwork by Doug Kallerson.

Joshua 17:1-13
The Inheritance of Joseph – Manasseh (West)

A portion of our verses today deal with the five daughters of Zelophehad. They were introduced in an offhand manner in Numbers 26, and then they were brought to the forefront of the narrative in Numbers 27.

The particular issue concerning them was that of inheritance of land. It was a complicated matter that had to be settled by the Lord. The Lord’s decree was given, and it completely resolved the matter for them at the time.

However, the decree concerning the inheritance brought another issue to the surface that needed a resolution. If not resolved, the daughters’ inheritances could easily cause problems for their entire tribe, and – by extension – the tribal rights of the entire nation.

One thing would lead to another. Without a suitable resolution, there would eventually be breakdown in the structure of the nation. Small things can lead to major problems if not thought through.

It isn’t that the Lord wasn’t aware of these details in advance. Rather, He knew exactly what the consequences of such a matter would be. But to ensure that these things were written directly into the law, He allowed the people to think through the issues and come forward for His judgment.

Text Verse: “I will deliver you from the Jewish people, as well as from the Gentiles, to whom I now send you, 18 to open their eyes, in order to turn them from darkness to light, and from the power of Satan to God, that they may receive forgiveness of sins and an inheritance among those who are sanctified by faith in Me.” Acts 26:17, 18

When Paul spoke about his conversion and the purpose of it, the Lord gave him several reasons for the ministry he had been chosen for such as opening the Gentile’s eyes, turning them from darkness to light, and so on. But the main purposes for the individual were forgiveness of sins and the granting of an inheritance.

The idea of an inheritance is having something bestowed at a particular time for an heir. The daughters of Zelophehad were told they would be granted an inheritance in the name of their father. Later, it was resolved that certain conditions had to be met in order for that inheritance to be granted.

Now, because they had met those conditions, the inheritance awaits them. This is such an important issue that these girls’ situation has been given more time in Scripture than many other figures of seemingly greater importance.

The details are methodically recorded in order to show us a part of what God has done in Christ in typology. Because of Him, we have the opportunity to obtain the inheritance set aside for those who meet the conditions set forth.

The ladies came forward to claim their inheritance. They didn’t go forward and say, “We hope we still have this available to us.” They cited the law and that was that. Nothing was said of their individual lives after meeting the stated conditions because those details are irrelevant. They did what was expected of them, and the matter was resolved.

How many people have met the stated conditions for receiving the inheritance, received the guarantee provided, and yet walk about in absolute insecurity in their minds concerning what is granted? They hold the guarantee! It was made by God who does not lie. All they need to do is claim it when the time comes.

If you are somehow troubled as to whether or not your salvation is secure, that is because you misunderstand what God did. It is not because Christ’s work is somehow lacking. Don’t let anyone disqualify you from the joy of knowing, one hundred percent, that you are saved if you have called on Jesus. Trust the word! You are.

Hints of this state in which you stand because of Jesus are found today in His superior word. And so, let us turn to that precious word once again, and… May God speak to us through His word today, and may His glorious name ever be praised.

I. A Lot for the Tribe of Manasseh (verses 1-6)

There was also a lot for the tribe of Manasseh,

v’hi ha’goral l’mateh m’nasheh – “And was the lot to tribe Manasseh.” Manasseh means He Shall Forget, but also From a Debt. He was the first son of Joseph and was born in Egypt. He and his brother Ephraim were adopted as sons of Jacob for inheritance rights.

Half the tribe of Manasseh has already received an inheritance east of the Jordan as was meticulously recorded several times. Of him, it says…

1 (con’t) for he was the firstborn of Joseph:

There is an emphasis in the words: ki hu bekor yoseph – “For HE firstborn to Joseph.” Despite having already received an inheritance east of the Jordan because of the valor of Machir, as recorded in Numbers and as restated by Moses in Deuteronomy 3:15, he was also granted land along with the other tribes west of the Jordan.

The reason for the emphasis is that despite Ephraim receiving the blessing of Jacob over Manasseh as recorded in Genesis 48, he was to receive the double portion based on the rights of the firstborn. That double portion is restated next for clarity…

1 (con’t) namely for Machir the firstborn of Manasseh, the father of Gilead,

Machir means Salesman. Gilead means Perpetual Fountain. As a historical point, though this is speaking of Machir, it means the family of Machir. They are being referred to as Machir for the purpose of inheritance. Machir died long ago. Further, one might think this is referring to Machir’s son, Gilead, recorded in Numbers 26 –

“The sons of Manasseh: of Machir, the family of the Machirites; and Machir begot Gilead; of Gilead, the family of the Gileadites.” Numbers 26:29

However, the name in this verse in Joshua is prefixed by an article: l’makhir bekor m’nasheh avi ha’gil’ad – “to Machir firstborn Manasseh father the Gilead.” Therefore, this is not speaking of his son Gilead, but of the land of Gilead – the Gilead.

What appears to have happened is that Machir named his son Gilead before the land of Gilead was taken in battle. 1 Chronicles 7:14 says that Manasseh bore Machir by a concubine from Aram. This would explain why he then named his own son Gilead, which was in the land of Aram.

Gilead is the border area between Syria and Canaan. Machir may have called Gilead this to honor the union between the two people groups from which he came. It also explains why this is said in Numbers 32 –

“And the children of Machir the son of Manasseh went to Gilead and took it, and dispossessed the Amorites who were in it. 40 So Moses gave Gilead to Machir the son of Manasseh, and he dwelt in it.” Numbers 32:39, 40

The same place from which Machir’s son was named – because of the union between his father and mother, Manasseh and Manasseh’s Aramitiss concubine – became their possession. It appears he was determined to obtain this land because of its connection to his genealogy. Thus, it next says…

1 (con’t) because he was a man of war; therefore he was given Gilead and Bashan.

Gilead means Perpetual Fountain. Bashan means Place of Fertile Soil. There is again an emphasis in the words: ki hu hayah ish milkhamah vayhi lo ha’gil’ad v’ha’bashan – “for HE was man war and was to him the Gilead and the Bashan.” Thus, the term “father of the Gilead” refers to his status as the possessor of this land.

Likewise, the words “father of Gilead,” without the article, means that he is the father of the person named Gilead. He was a man of war, intending to obtain this land. He fought and subdued it, and so Moses gave it to him. But he also named his son after the land. That covers what belonged to this tribe east of Jordan. Next, the second portion will be detailed…

And there was a lot for the rest of the children of Manasseh according to their families:

Here, a verb is used in place of a noun: vayhi livne m’nasheh ha’notarim l’mishp’hotam – “And was to sons Manasseh, the remainings, to their families.” As Machir obtained an inheritance east of the Jordan, and as these families intended to enter Canaan proper, giving them an inheritance west of Jordan fulfills the double portion requirement given to the firstborn son.

2 (con’t) for the children of Abiezer, the children of Helek, the children of Asriel, the children of Shechem, the children of Hepher, and the children of Shemida;

Abiezer means My Father is Help. Khelek means Portion or Smooth. Depending on the root word used, Asriel means God Has Filled with Joy or Vow of God. Shechem means Shoulder. Khepher means either Well (from dig) or Shame. Shemida means Knowing the Name or Fame of Knowledge.

2 (con’t) these were the male children of Manasseh the son of Joseph according to their families.

The original is more precise: “these sons Manasseh, son Joseph, the males, to their families.” The word “sons” here means “descendants” because it is accepted that Manasseh had only one son, Machir. Therefore, these are probably grandchildren of Manasseh and sons of Gilead.

Despite that, the reason for this specificity is realized in the next verses. It is a problem that arose during the wilderness wanderings and the resolution of it required Moses to go directly to the Lord for a decision to be made…

But Zelophehad the son of Hepher, the son of Gilead, the son of Machir, the son of Manasseh, had no sons, but only daughters.

Because inheritances are given through the male, this would cause a problem when the women married. If they married outside of the tribe of Manasseh, then the land would transfer to the son of the father and thus away from the tribe of Manasseh.

As Hepher was one of the six main families, the tribe could ostensibly lose one-sixth of their land to other tribes. This could be the case at any point in Israel’s future if a father had only daughters. The inheritances would become so convoluted that tribal lands would no longer truly exist. Tselophekhad means Shadow of Fear.

3 (con’t) And these are the names of his daughters: Mahlah, Noah, Hoglah, Milcah, and Tirzah.

Makhlah means Infirmity. Noah signifies Shaky Girl or Wandering. Khaglah means Turning in Joy. It is akin to the word khag which is a festival. Milkhah means Queen. Tirtsah means Well-pleasing or Delight.

Now that the inheritance is ready, the matter previously brought before Moses and settled at the word of the Lord is brought forth again to ensure that what was decided will come to pass…

And they came near before Eleazar the priest, before Joshua the son of Nun, and before the rulers, saying,

These five women are coming to ensure the promise of the Lord would be accomplished. They were obedient to marry within their tribe. In so doing, their children would receive a portion in the name of their father within the tribe also…

4 (con’t) “The Lord commanded Moses to give us an inheritance among our brothers.”

This was recorded in Numbers 27 –

“And the Lord spoke to Moses, saying: ‘The daughters of Zelophehad speak what is right; you shall surely give them a possession of inheritance among their father’s brothers, and cause the inheritance of their father to pass to them. And you shall speak to the children of Israel, saying: ‘If a man dies and has no son, then you shall cause his inheritance to pass to his daughter. If he has no daughter, then you shall give his inheritance to his brothers. 10 If he has no brothers, then you shall give his inheritance to his father’s brothers. 11 And if his father has no brothers, then you shall give his inheritance to the relative closest to him in his family, and he shall possess it.’ And it shall be to the children of Israel a statute of judgment, just as the Lord commanded Moses.” Numbers 27:6-11

The only caveat is that these ladies had to marry men within their tribe. That judgment comprises the contents of Numbers 36. After it was rendered, it then said –

“Just as the Lord commanded Moses, so did the daughters of Zelophehad; 11 for Mahlah, Tirzah, Hoglah, Milcah, and Noah, the daughters of Zelophehad, were married to the sons of their father’s brothers. 12 They were married into the families of the children of Manasseh the son of Joseph, and their inheritance remained in the tribe of their father’s family.” Numbers 36:10-12

With their obedience noted, it next says…

4 (con’t) Therefore, according to the commandment of the Lord, he gave them an inheritance among their father’s brothers.

This was a huge amount of land and so any deviation would have caused an immense upheaval in the tribal land grant to Manasseh. But with the decisions of the Lord rendered, the grant would remain forever unchanged. Therefore…

Ten shares fell to Manasseh,

va’yiplu khavle m’nasheh asarah– “and fell cords Manasseh ten.” Here the word khevel or “cord” is used. Cords were used for measuring long distances. Hence, it is metaphorically used to speak of a tract of land. Ten individual tracts were measured out according to the families of Manasseh.

At first, the number of parcels seems to make no sense. How could there be six sons named, but ten divisions of the land? It is because Hepher, having no sons, is divided among his five daughters. Thus, there are the parcels of his five brothers and five parcels for his daughters. This was…

5 (con’t) besides the land of Gilead and Bashan, which were on the other side of the Jordan,

These ten shares, along with those adjoining them on the other side of the Jordan pretty much span the total breadth of the land inhabited by Israel. They almost appear like wings in the midst of the other tribal grants because of the vast amount of land they encompass. The number of parcels being ten is then explicitly explained, which is…

because the daughters of Manasseh received an inheritance among his sons;

ki benoth m’nasheh nakhalu nakhala betok banav – “for daughters Manasseh inherited an inheritance in midst his sons.” The record of the entire process of this event is extremely precise since the matter first arose in Numbers 27.

The meticulous nature of chronicling this land division for the daughters is most remarkable, but it sets the precedent for all time concerning this issue and it shows the importance of both maintaining the name of the dead as well as maintaining the integrity of the tribal inheritances according to their original layout. With this settled, the division of Manasseh on both sides of the Jordan is mentioned one last time…

6 (con’t) and the rest of Manasseh’s sons had the land of Gilead.

v’erets ha’gil’ad hayethah livne m’nasheh ha’notarim – “And land the Gilead had sons Manasseh, the remainings.” The same verb used in verse 2 when referring to those west of the Jordan is now used of those east of the Jordan. The implication is that the tribe is not a whole without considering both allowances. Together, they form the double portion of the oldest son of Joseph who was then adopted by Jacob as his own.

An inheritance awaits us that is sure and true
It is given to all who come forward and receive
It was secured by Christ Jesus, Faithful and True
It is ours for the taking if we just believe

Calling on Jesus is what is good in God’s sight
The inheritance is ours, though we did nothing it to receive
Eternal life, dazzling and bright
Is ours for the taking if we just believe

Don’t fail to come forward; hear the plea
It is waiting if you will but receive
You and all the saints, around the glassy sea
It is yours for the taking if you just believe

II. The Borders of Manasseh (verses 7-13)

And the territory of Manasseh was from Asher to Michmethath, that lies east of Shechem;

The actual borders of Manasseh’s inheritance in Canaan are the subject of the next verses. Verses 7-10 detail the southern borders, beginning in the east. Verses 10 and 11 define the northern and eastern borders.

The first border begins at Asher or Happy. This is not the tribe of Asher, but a location known as such. It then goes to Michmethath, meaning Concealment or maybe Hiding Place. As it is prefixed by an article, it would be The Hiding Place. This location rests, as the Hebrew reads, “upon the face of Shechem.” Hence, its location stands before Shechem.

7 (con’t) and the border went along south to the inhabitants of En Tappuah.

More literally, it reads, “and went the border unto the right, unto dwellers En Tappuah.” Tappuakh comes from naphakh, signifying to breathe or blow. It means Love Apple and also breath. Being preceded by En, or Spring, it means Spring of the Love Apple or Eye of the Apple or Spring (Eye) of Breath. The word for eye and spring are identical in Hebrew.

Saying “to the inhabitants of En Tappuah” is a bit odd, but it means that the city itself did not belong to Manasseh. Rather, the border went as far as those residing in the country around Tappuah where there was a spring. That is seen in the next words…

Manasseh had the land of Tappuah, but Tappuah on the border of Manasseh belonged to the children of Ephraim.

The wording is a bit more precise: lim’nasheh hayethah erets tapuakh v’tapuakh el gebul m’nasheh livne ephrayim – “To Manasseh had land Tappuah, and Tappuah unto border Manasseh to sons Ephraim.” There is land in the area of Tappauh that belonged to Manasseh, but the city and maybe any land outside of it, right up to the border of Manasseh, belonged to Ephraim.

And the border descended to the Brook Kanah, southward to the brook.

The name Kanah comes from qaneh, reeds. Hence, it is the brook of reeds. But the reed is used as a measuring stick coming from the verb qanah, to acquire or possess. Hence, I would translate the two words together as Inheritance of the Possessor. Of this border, it next says…

9 (con’t) These cities of Ephraim are among the cities of Manasseh.

It is debated if this means the cities already mentioned (Asher, Michmethath, En Tappuah, and Tappuah), or if it is referring to cities on the border that descended to the river from the previous clause. Either way, the point is that there are cities that were filled with those from the tribe of Ephraim within the borders of Manasseh. This was already seen in Joshua 16:9.

9 (con’t) The border of Manasseh was on the north side of the brook;

The meaning is that even though the cities of Ephraim are north of the brook, the border of Manasseh goes to the north side of the brook. Thus, the Ephramite cities lie within the border of Manasseh, which is north of the brook. It may be confusing, but it is being stated explicitly so that the details are recorded, and the ownership of the cities is defined.

9 (con’t) and it ended at the sea.

v’hi tos’otav ha’yamah – “And his outgoings the sea-ward.” It means that the border continues until it reaches the sea.

10 Southward it was Ephraim’s, northward it was Manasseh’s,

Again, to ensure the border is perfectly understood, it restates the matter in another way, using the brook as a reference: negbah l’ephrayim v’tsaphonah lim’nasheh – “Southward to Ephraim and northward to Manasseh.” This despite the location of cities that are occupied by people of Ephraim.

10 (con’t) and the sea was its border.

It is speaking in the masculine of Manasseh as a person: “And was the sea his border.” The land represents the person, Manasseh, as much as the tribe fills the land. Next…

10 (con’t) Manasseh’s territory was adjoining Asher on the north and Issachar on the east.

There is an emphasis in the words: u-b’asher yip’geun mi’tsaphon u’b’yisakhar mi’mizrakh – “And in Asher impinged (certainly) from north, and in Issachar from east.”

The border of Manasseh followed the sea from Ephraim as far as Asher where they impinged upon one another. It then went eastward until it reached Issachar. From there, it went around Issachar and would have come to the Jordan where it went southward to Ephraim.

11 And in Issachar and in Asher, Manasseh had Beth Shean and its towns, Ibleam and its towns, the inhabitants of Dor and its towns, the inhabitants of En Dor and its towns, the inhabitants of Taanach and its towns, and the inhabitants of Megiddo and its towns

Issachar means He is Wages. Beth Shean means House of Ease or House of Security. Ibleam means Devouring the People or The People Flow Forth. Dor means To Dwell, but it is identical to the word translated as generation, as in the time period of one’s dwelling. En Dor would be the Spring of Dor.

The meaning of Taanakh is uncertain. Some think it is derived from an Egyptian word; others from an Arabic word. There is no corresponding root word found in Scripture. Megiddo comes from gadad, to penetrate or cut. Hence it signifies Invading or Intruding.

11 (con’t) —three hilly regions.

The words are complicated: sh’loshet ha’naphet – “three the naphet.” naphet is variously translated as counties, regions, coastal districts, heights, villages, etc. Some translations punt and make it a name “The third is Napheth.” It comes from noph, meaning height. So it is probably the three heights or hilly regions.

The point of the verse is to show that just as Ephraim had cities within Manasseh, so Manasseh had cities within Asher and Issachar. The repeated words “the inhabitants” means that contrary to the word of the Lord, those who dwelt in the cities and their villages were not exterminated as stated in the law…

12 Yet the children of Manasseh could not drive out the inhabitants of those cities,

v’lo yakh’lu bene m’nasheh l’horish eth he’arim ha’eleh – “And no able sons Manasseh to dispossess the cities, the these.” This is the same thing said of Judah in Joshua 15:63. Saying they were not able almost makes it seem excusable. That continues to be the perception in the next words…

12 (con’) but the Canaanites were determined to dwell in that land.

va’yovel ha’k’naani la’sheveth ba’arets ha’zoth – “And determined the Canaanite to dwell in land the this.” They were determined, so Manasseh had no choice but to live with them. This shows both a lack of trust in the power of the Lord, and an unwillingness to ask the other tribes to simply assist them in destroying the natives. This is perfectly evident from the next words…

*13 (fin) And it happened, when the children of Israel grew strong, that they put the Canaanites to forced labor, but did not utterly drive them out.

The word Canaanite is singular and there is an emphasis in the Hebrew: “And was when strong, sons Israel, and gave the Canaanite to forced labor, and dispossessing no dispossessed him.” If they were able to make these people submit to forced labor, then they were able to exterminate them. They just didn’t.

Like the tribe of Ephraim, this became a marriage of convenience for Manasseh and of inconvenience, but acceptable tolerance, to the Canaanite.

Giving thanks to God who has qualified us
To be partakers of the inheritance
It is a done deal through our Lord Jesus
Of losing it, there is just no chance

He has delivered us from the power of darkness
And He has conveyed us into the kingdom of the Son of His love
Without Christ, there would be no hope; what a mess
But because of Him, assurance of glory rains down from above

In Him we have redemption through His blood
And in Him there is the forgiveness of all of our sins
Come to Christ and be immersed in the cleansing flood
Come to Christ who for you the victory wins

III. An Assured Inheritance

The first verse of the chapter reintroduced Machir and his inheritance east of the Jordan. That was stated again to ensure that there is no doubt that the inheritance west of the Jordan is distinct from that east of it.

Verse 2 begins to detail this inheritance of Manasseh, which means To Forget but it also means From a Debt. Mentioning him anticipates Christ who came to pay Adam’s debt and who, in the process, allows that debt to be forgotten before God.

The verse also mentions that Manasseh is the son of Joseph, or He Shall Add. Christ is the One who adds those to be saved. Joseph also means Take Away. Christ is the One who takes away the reproach of those He saves.

The inheritance west, in Canaan, is given to six sons of Manasseh.  The number six signifies man, especially fallen man. These six sons anticipate Christ who came in the form of sinful man. But the focus is on the fifth son, Khepher, or Shame.

Five is the number of grace. Khepher anticipates Christ who bore our shame in order to redeem us. From there, Zelophehad, or Shadow of Fear, is named. He had no sons, only daughters, and they are named in the text.

He anticipates people who have no inheritance. Thus they live in the shadow of fear. And yet, the Lord guaranteed them an inheritance by His word and according to law.

That same Lord who secured the inheritance through His work also fully rendered the payment for the inheritance. He grants it to those who, seemingly deprived of it, are exalted to the obtaining of it.

The law provided the path for Zelophehad’s name to be continued and to ensure that the inheritance would not fail. This is seen in the names of those in his family. Zelophehad represents those born in sin, in the “shadow of fear.” As Hebrews says –

“Inasmuch then as the children have partaken of flesh and blood, He Himself likewise shared in the same, that through death He might destroy him who had the power of death, that is, the devil, 15 and release those who through fear of death were all their lifetime subject to bondage.” Hebrews 2:14, 15

This state of fear of death, brings forth Mahlah, or the sickly, infirm person, bound in sin. There is a state of pain because of the fallen condition in which man exists. Such a person, like Cain, is left in a land of wandering, represented by Noah. This lasts until the person finds Christ.

At that time, Hoglah, or Turning of Joy, enters into the picture. And in that turning of joy in obtaining the inheritance, Royalty is bestowed upon that soul, represented by Milcah, or Queen. In Revelation 1, this is recorded –

“To Him who loved us and washed us from our sins in His own blood, and has made us kings and priests to His God and Father, to Him be glory and dominion forever and ever. Amen.” Revelation 1:5, 6

In this state, and as inheritors of the divine promises of God found in Christ, His people are found well pleasing to God, represented by Tirzah.

These five came before Eleazar, or Whom God Helps, and Joshua, or The Lord is Salvation, who is the son of Nun, meaning Propagate or Increase. The names tell the story. They reflect the Lord in the various roles He serves in order to increase the family of God, securing the inheritance for them.

The daughters remind these men that the Lord commanded Moses to give them an inheritance among their brothers. This implicitly expresses the doctrine of eternal salvation. They were given the promise, the conditions were met, the law was satisfied according to the word of the Lord, and they have come to collect the inheritance.

It is well reflected in Ephesians 1:14 where the giving of the Holy Spirit upon belief in the completed substitutionary work of Christ brings about the guarantee, the pledge of salvation. It is a pledge granted to the one saved and payable by the One who gave it.

This explains why verse 3 began with a listing of the genealogy of Zelophehad, naming Hepher, Gilead, Machir, and Manasseh. Those of Manasseh on both sides of the Jordan descend from Manasseh’s son Machir. The root of Machir is makhar, to sell.

It is used in Isaiah 52, just before the words about the coming Suffering Servant, saying –

“For thus says the Lord:
‘You have sold yourselves for nothing,
And you shall be redeemed without money.’” Isaiah 52:3

It is man who sold himself and Jesus who redeemed us. That then explains why the chapter began with the inheritance east of the Jordan. Machir inherited the Bashan, the Place of Fertile soil, and the Gilead, the Perpetual Fountain. Being the only son of Manasseh, he actually inherits both land grants which went to Manasseh as the firstborn of Joseph.

The fertile soil is the word of God. The perpetual fountain anticipates the Spirit ceaselessly coming forth. This is how the inheritance comes about: hearing the word and receiving the Spirit. The inheritance west of the Jordan was then noted as being ten shares. Ten “implies that nothing is wanting; that the number and order are perfect; that the whole cycle is complete” (Bullinger).

The inheritance is not wanting in any way. It is complete. This is why it specifically recorded that it was “because the daughters of Manasseh received an inheritance among his sons.” Without this, the inheritance would be incomplete. But it is perfect. It is a resounding note of the wholeness of the work of Christ.

With this understood, the verses after that defined the borders of Manasseh, each anticipating the work of the Lord in one way or another, as has been the case with the previous tribal allotments.

They also noted the overlapping cities with the tribes they border. Each of these certainly has typological fulfilments. The meaning of which will surely include the work of Christ and its effects on His people, focusing on the guaranteed inheritance of the saints. This is certain because many of the same names were used as in Chapter 16. Historically, the record is necessary to properly define the land, the borders, and the possessions for the tribal inheritances.

As for the final verses that detail Israel’s failures concerning the inhabitants they did not drive out, those are necessary to explain why things in Israel later continued to fail as they did. Each of these recorded failures is actually a violation of the law. As such, it shows the collective guilt of the people.

Because of their guilt, the Lord would send corrective measures which temporarily returned them to the right path, but time and again, they fell back into their waywardness. As such, each cycle only further emphasized Israel’s need for a Messiah.

The nation could not save itself, nor could any individual within the nation save himself. The law highlighted the fallen nature of man and the guilt he bears for failing to measure up to God’s perfection.

But remember, these people had received their inheritance. Despite that, the failures continued. That is a lesson all by itself for each of us. We have received our inheritance in Christ, and yet we – like Israel – still fail the Lord. We need His salvation until the inheritance is finally realized in its fullness.

It is faith in Jesus that grants the inheritance, and it is Jesus’ sustaining salvation that guarantees it will come. This is the lesson of Israel. God covenanted with them, and He has continued to sustain them all these years because of His faithfulness.

In Christ, God has covenanted with us, and He is faithful to uphold that, even when we fail. Thank God for Jesus who makes this possible. We have a sure and marvelous hope set before us because of what He has done and what He continues to do. Yes, thank God for Jesus Christ our Lord.

Closing Verse: “Cast your burden on the Lord,
And He shall sustain you;
He shall never permit the righteous to be moved.” Psalm 55:22

Next Week: Joshua 17:14-18 Out of nothing, just a clean slate… (You Shall Create) (35th Joshua Sermon)

The Lord has you exactly where He wants you. He has a good plan and purpose for you. It is He who has defeated the enemy and who now offers His people rest. So, follow Him and trust Him and He will do marvelous things for you and through you.

The Inheritance of Joseph – Manasseh (West)

There was also a lot for the tribe of Manasseh
For he was the firstborn of Joseph, a deal not too bad
Namely for Machir the firstborn of Manasseh
The father of Gilead

Because he was a man of war, he got his war game on
Therefore he was given Gilead and Bashan

And there was a lot for the rest of the children of Manasseh
According to their families, as the record does convey

For the children of Abiezer, the children of Helek, the children
———-of Asriel
The children of Shechem, the children of Hepher, and the children
———-of Shemida also
These were the male children of Manasseh the son of Joseph
According to their families as the records show

But Zelophehad the son of Hepher, the son of Gilead
The son of Machir, the son of Manasseh, had no sons, but only
———-daughters, boo hoo
And these are the names of his daughters:
Mahlah, Noah, Hoglah, Milcah, and Tirzah too

And they came near before Eleazar the priest
Before Joshua the son of Nun, and before the rulers, saying
“The LORD commanded Moses to give us an inheritance
———-among our brothers”
So they were conveying

Therefore, according to the commandment of the LORD
———-such was His druthers
He gave them an inheritance among their father’s brothers

Ten shares fell to Manasseh, besides the land of Gilead and Bashan
Which were on the other side of the Jordan, a place not so bad
Because the daughters of Manasseh received an inheritance
———-among his sons
And the rest of Manasseh’s sons had the land of Gilead

And the territory of Manasseh
Was from Asher to Michmethath, ooh rah
That lies east of Shechem
And the border went along south to the inhabitants of En Tappuah

Manasseh had the land of Tappuah
But Tappuah on the border of Manasseh belonged to the children
———-of Ephraim, according to the book
And the border descended to the Brook Kanah
Southward to the brook

These cities of Ephraim are among the cities of Manasseh
That’s how it turned out to be
The border of Manasseh was on the north side of the brook
And it ended at the sea

Southward it was Ephraim’s, northward it was Manasseh’s
And the sea was its border
Manasseh’s territory was adjoining Asher on the north
And Issachar on the east according to the tribal order

And in Issachar and in Asher, Manasseh had Beth Shean
———-and its towns
Ibleam and its towns, the inhabitants of Dor and its towns as well
The inhabitants of En Dor and its towns, the inhabitants of Taanach
———-and its towns
And the inhabitants of Megiddo and its towns—three hilly regions
———locations pretty swell

Yet the children of Manasseh could not drive out the inhabitants
———-of those cities
But the Canaanites were determined to dwell in that land
———-so Manasseh, no doubt
And it happened, when the children of Israel grew strong
That they put the Canaanites to forced labor, but did not
———-utterly drive them out

Lord God, turn our hearts to be obedient to Your word
Give us wisdom to be ever faithful to You
May we carefully heed each thing we have heard
Yes, Lord God may our hearts be faithful and true

And we shall be content and satisfied in You alone
We will follow You as we sing our songs of praise
Hallelujah to You; to us Your path You have shown
Hallelujah we shall sing to You for all of our days

Hallelujah and Amen…

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

There was also a lot for the tribe of Manasseh, for he was the firstborn of Joseph: namely for Machir the firstborn of Manasseh, the father of Gilead, because he was a man of war; therefore he was given Gilead and Bashan. And there was a lot for the rest of the children of Manasseh according to their families: for the children of Abiezer, the children of Helek, the children of Asriel, the children of Shechem, the children of Hepher, and the children of Shemida; these were the male children of Manasseh the son of Joseph according to their families.

But Zelophehad the son of Hepher, the son of Gilead, the son of Machir, the son of Manasseh, had no sons, but only daughters. And these are the names of his daughters: Mahlah, Noah, Hoglah, Milcah, and Tirzah. And they came near before Eleazar the priest, before Joshua the son of Nun, and before the rulers, saying, “The Lord commanded Moses to give us an inheritance among our brothers.” Therefore, according to the commandment of the Lord, he gave them an inheritance among their father’s brothers. Ten shares fell to Manasseh, besides the land of Gilead and Bashan, which were on the other side of the Jordan, because the daughters of Manasseh received an inheritance among his sons; and the rest of Manasseh’s sons had the land of Gilead.

And the territory of Manasseh was from Asher to Michmethath, that lies east of Shechem; and the border went along south to the inhabitants of En Tappuah. Manasseh had the land of Tappuah, but Tappuah on the border of Manasseh belonged to the children of Ephraim. And the border descended to the Brook Kanah, southward to the brook. These cities of Ephraim are among the cities of Manasseh. The border of Manasseh was on the north side of the brook; and it ended at the sea.

10 Southward it was Ephraim’s, northward it was Manasseh’s, and the sea was its border. Manasseh’s territory was adjoining Asher on the north and Issachar on the east. 11 And in Issachar and in Asher, Manasseh had Beth Shean and its towns, Ibleam and its towns, the inhabitants of Dor and its towns, the inhabitants of En Dor and its towns, the inhabitants of Taanach and its towns, and the inhabitants of Megiddo and its towns—three hilly regions. 12 Yet the children of Manasseh could not drive out the inhabitants of those cities, but the Canaanites were determined to dwell in that land. 13 And it happened, when the children of Israel grew strong, that they put the Canaanites to forced labor, but did not utterly drive them out.

 

 

Joshua 16:1-10 (The Inheritance of Joseph – Ephraim)

Artwork by Douglas Kallerson.

Joshua 16:1-10
The Inheritance of Joseph – Ephraim

In the weeks before typing this sermon, a new technology was introduced. It is so important information-wise that it is believed to be as big of a leap forward as it was from flipping through the Yellow Pages to doing an online search.

What’s more, it isn’t limited to simply searching out information, but developing new ways to produce information. In other words, we may have an idea that we would like to express and this program is capable of producing it. For instance, I’d like it to search out acrostics in the Bible.

In the past, that was limited to doing a personal word-by-word check of each letter in an entire text. That is a long, tedious, and laborious task, even for a very short passage. That was shortened immeasurably some years ago by a code that was written to have a computer do the exact same thing in a few hours.

With this new technology, it may be possible to first write a code that could not only do this almost instantaneously, but it may be able to go beyond that to a code that compiles those acrostics into meaningful sentences with little or no human involvement.

Sergio and I thought of this same thing at basically the same time. Maybe it is something that can be put together. If so, it would speed up the process of uncovering the Bible’s mysteries in a way that was once unfathomable.

Text Verse: “Therefore I also, after I heard of your faith in the Lord Jesus and your love for all the saints, 16 do not cease to give thanks for you, making mention of you in my prayers: 17 that the God of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Father of glory, may give to you the spirit of wisdom and revelation in the knowledge of Him, 18 the eyes of your understanding being enlightened; that you may know what is the hope of His calling, what are the riches of the glory of His inheritance in the saints, 19 and what is the exceeding greatness of His power toward us who believe, according to the working of His mighty power 20 which He worked in Christ when He raised Him from the dead and seated Him at His right hand in the heavenly places, 21 far above all principality and power and might and dominion, and every name that is named, not only in this age but also in that which is to come.” Ephesians 1:15-21

The text verse today is like a short explanation of what is being seen in the ten verses set before us. If you come back and read these words again after the sermon, I think you will agree. The thing about it is that I was able to do all of this research in a bit under eleven hours.

I never had to get up from the desk to find a book to help me with the Hebrew. I didn’t need to flip through a book by Abarim explaining the meaning of names in the Bible. No map of Israel needed to be unfolded and poured over. All of these resources were at the tip of my fingers.

But these things were necessary just a few years ago. The same work would have not been possible for me to do in this manner in order to present the same sermon on it. Instead of eleven hours, I doubt it could have been done in eleven days of eleven hours each.

I had a hot pad on my back, a heater by my feet (it was a cold day), and some gummy bears to eat instead of being hunched over a pile of books with a wood fire to tend to. We live in an amazing time, at least from an information perspective. And information is what I have for you today.

There is an analysis of the verses, an explanation of the meaning of the words, and then a presentation of what they are telling us about the coming of the Messiah.

Great things such as these are to be found in His superior word. And so, let us turn to that precious word once again, and… May God speak to us through His word today, and may His glorious name ever be praised.

I. The Borders of the Tribe of Joseph (verses 1-4)

Chapter 15 dealt with the borders of the land of Judah, the inheritance of Caleb within those borders but separate from them as a personal inheritance, and then the cities contained within those borders.

With that complete, the account now turns to the inheritance of the great house of Joseph, the favored son of Israel. His name means He Shall Add, with a secondary meaning of Take Away.

It is he who received the right of the firstborn, the double portion. This is specifically noted in 1 Chronicles 5:2, where it says, “yet Judah prevailed over his brothers, and from him came a ruler, although the birthright was Joseph’s.”

Joseph’s two eldest sons, Ephraim and Manasseh, were adopted by Jacob/Israel as described in Genesis 48. Their inheritance in Canaan includes both Ephraim and the half-tribe of Manasseh. The first task is to decide the borders of Joseph’s inheritance inclusive of both sons. That begins with…

The lot fell to the children of Joseph

va’yetse ha’goral livne yoseph– “And went out the lot sons Joseph.” The word yatsa signifies to go or come out. As such, it is likely that the lots are either in a pot and dropped out, or they are cast out of the hand. From there, the lots were read as to how they wound up.

Another possible meaning is that the words “went out” are speaking of the actual borders to be described. They “went out” to the children of Joseph from one point to another. This, however, is unlikely based on the other uses of the word. Either way, the lot went out to indicate the border.

1 (con’t) from the Jordan, by Jericho, to the waters of Jericho on the east,

mi’yarden yerikho l’me yerikho mizrakhah – “from Jordan, Jericho to waters Jericho eastward.” Jordan means Descender. Jericho means Place of Fragrance. As for this southern border itself, it is not the northern border of Judah as one might expect. Rather, it will be the northern border of Benjamin that will be between Judah and Ephraim.

Hence, even though Benjamin’s lot will come out later, it will be in the highly favored position which includes the area of Jerusalem on Judah’s northern border.

As for the words “to waters of Jericho,” that means to the stream which is in the area of Jericho which comes up at the fountain now known as Ain es Sultan. It is the waters that are healed in the account of Elisha in 2 Kings 2. From there, it flows into the Jordan. Next, the description says…

1 (con’t) to the wilderness that goes up from Jericho through the mountains to Bethel,

The translation is wrong. The word “to” is not in the Hebrew ha’midbar oleh mirikho ba’har beit el – “the wilderness, ascending from Jericho in the mountain Bethel.” With the clauses taken together, the error in translation becomes evident –

“…from Jordan, Jericho to waters Jericho eastward, the wilderness, ascending from Jericho in the mountain Bethel.” Thus, the words “the wilderness” are given to describe the condition of this portion of the lot, not to define the border. This is evident from the words of Joshua 18:12 when referring to Benjamin’s northern border –

“And the border is to them at the north side from the Jordan, and the border hath gone up unto the side of Jericho on the north, and gone up through the hill-country westward, and its outgoings have been at the wilderness of Beth-Aven.” Joshua 18:12 (YLT)

Bethel means House of God. With this initial border defined, it…

then went out from Bethel to Luz,

The seemingly simple words are actually very complicated: va’yatsa mi’beith el luzah – “And went out from Bethel unto Luz-ward.” The problem is that elsewhere, Luz and Bethel are noted as the same place, such as –

“And he called the name of that place Bethel; but the name of that city had been Luz previously.” Genesis 28:19

&

“So Jacob came to Luz (that is, Bethel), which is in the land of Canaan, he and all the people who were with him.” Genesis 35:6

Without being dogmatic, Adam Clarke may be right, saying –

“It is very likely that the place where Jacob had the vision was not in Luz, but in some place within a small distance of that city or village, … and that sometimes the whole place was called Beth-el, at other times Luz, and sometimes, as in the case above, the two places were distinguished. As we find the term London comprises, not only London, but also the city of Westminster and the borough of Southwark; though at other times all three are distinctly mentioned.” Adam Clarke

Luz means Almond, but it comes from the verb, luz, meaning to turn aside, often in a negative way. Here are examples of both –

“My son, let them not depart [luz] from your eyes—
Keep sound wisdom and discretion;
22 So they will be life to your soul
And grace to your neck.” Proverbs 3:21, 22

“Because you despise this word,
And trust in oppression and perversity [luz],
And rely on them,
13 Therefore this iniquity shall be to you
Like a breach ready to fall,
A bulge in a high wall,
Whose breaking comes suddenly, in an instant.” Isaiah 30:12, 13

Hence, it can mean Departure, but it also means Twisted or Perverse. From there the border…

2 (con’t) passed along to the border of the Archites at Ataroth,

v’avar el gebul ha’arki Ataroth – “and passed over unto border the Archite, Ataroth.” Ataroth means Crowns. Archite comes from arak, to be long or to prolong. Thus, it means Long or Prolonging. This would be the home of Hushai the Archite noted as David’s friend and a wise counselor in 2 Samuel 15. Next…

and went down westward to the boundary of the Japhletites,

v’yarad yamah el gevul ha’yaphleti – “And went down westward unto border the Japhletite.” From a northerly and then a southwesterly movement, the border now heads westward. The name Japhleth comes from palat, to escape or deliver. Hence, it means He (God) Will Deliver. Next…

3 (con’t) as far as the boundary of Lower Beth Horon to Gezer; and it ended at the sea.

ad gevul beith horon takhton v’ad gazer v’hayu tos’oto yamah – “unto border Beth Horon, Lower, and unto Gezer, and its outgoings seaward.” Beth Horon means House of the Hollow and also House of Freedom. Gezer means Part or Portion.

So the children of Joseph, Manasseh and Ephraim, took their inheritance.

v’yinkhalu bene yoseph menasheh v’ephrayim – “And inherit, sons Joseph, Manasseh and Ephraim.” It is a concluding statement concerning the land granted to Joseph which includes both sons, remembering that Manasseh has land on both sides of the Jordan. But this is specifically the land allotted within the borders of Canaan.

Ephraim means both Twice Fruitful and Ashes. Manasseh means both He Shall Forget and From a Debt.

Of this parcel, Cambridge says, “The territory assigned to ‘the house of Joseph’ may be roughly estimated at 55 miles from east to west, by 70 from north to south.”

He shall add to the inheritance granted to Him today
By being productive and working with His hand
The crops will sprout, and the people will say
“Look at the bounty! Isn’t it grand?”

He shall do this when He takes away
The reproach we bore, that clung to us
In Him there is a brand-new day
For those who call out to Jesus

The borders have been drawn out
And they have a story to tell us
In reading that story, we will raise a shout
To the marvelous workings of our Lord Jesus

II. The Borders of Ephraim (verses 5-10)

The border of the children of Ephraim, according to their families, was thus:

Now that the borders of the land allotted to Joseph have been determined, it must be divided among his two sons adopted by Jacob/Israel, Ephraim and Manasseh. Of them, the first portion to be delineated will be the younger son, Ephraim. That begins with…

5 (con’t) The border of their inheritance on the east side was Ataroth Addar as far as Upper Beth Horon.

There is very little information on the borders of the areas given to Joseph. The words are short, abrupt, and seem incomplete. They are also difficult to pin down. As for these words, they read: vayhi gevul nakhalatam misrakhah Atroth adar ad beith khoron elyon – “And was border their inheritance eastward Ataroth Addar unto Beth Horon, Upper.”

Ataroth Addar means Crowns of Greatness or Majestic Crowns. Here, a distinction is made between Upper Beth Horon and Lower Beth Horon in verse 3. It is believed to be a bit eastward of Lower Beth Horon. Next, it says…

And the border went out toward the sea on the north side of Michmethath;

v’yatsa ha’gevul ha’yamah ha’mikh’m’thath mi’tsaphon – “And went out the border the seaward the Michmethath from north.”  As difficult as the words were to translate in verse 5, Keil says of these words, “the first clause of Joshua 16:6 is perfectly inexplicable, and must be corrupt.”

Almost every translation varies, trying to somehow clear up what is being conveyed. If nothing else, at least the name Michmethath can be defined. Strong’s says it is apparently derived from an unused root meaning to hide. Thus, it means Concealment or maybe Hiding Place. As it is prefixed by an article, it would be The Hiding Place. Next…

6 (con’t) then the border went around eastward to Taanath Shiloh, and passed by it on the east of Janohah.

v’nasav ha’gebul mizrakhah taanath Shiloh v’avar oto mi’mizrakh yanokhah – “And went around, the border, eastward Taanath Shiloh, and passed over it from east Janohah.” The word Taanath comes from ta’anah. It signifies an occasion such as was used in Judges 14 –

“But his father and mother did not know that it was of the Lord—that He was seeking an occasion to move against the Philistines. For at that time the Philistines had dominion over Israel.” Judges 14:4

The name Shiloh, as used here, is not speaking of the coming Messiah. It is derived from shalah, to be quiet or at ease, and thus something like Tranquility. The two words together can be defined as Discovered Haven.

The name Janohah is derived from yanakh, to put or place. That, in turn, comes from nuakh, to rest. Hence, it means Rest or He Will Give Rest.

Then it went down from Janohah to Ataroth and Naarah, reached to Jericho, and came out at the Jordan.

v’yarad mi’yanokhah Ataroth v’na’aratah, u-paga birikho v’yatsa ha’yarden – “And descended from Janohah, Ataroth and Naarah-ward, and impinged in Jericho and went out the Jordan.” The Ataroth here is believed to be different than the one mentioned in verse 16:2. Again it means Crowns. The name Naarah is identical to naarah, a girl or young woman who is of marriageable age. Hence, it means Girl.

The border went out from Tappuah westward to the Brook Kanah,

mi’tapuakh yelek ha’gevul yamah nakhal qanah – “From Tappuah goes the border westward brook Kanah.” Tapuakh comes from naphakh, signifying to breathe or blow. Thus, it may be Breath. It also means Love Apple, being identical to tapuakh found in Proverbs 25:11 and several times in the Song of Solomon.

The word translated as “brook,” nakhal, is a torrent, but it is the same as nakhal meaning an inheritance which is used in the next sentence of this verse.

The name Kanah comes from qaneh, reeds. Hence, it is the brook of reeds. But the reed is used as a measuring stick coming from the verb qanah, to acquire or possess. Hence, I would translate the two words together as Inheritance of the Possessor. Of this border, it next says…

8 (con’t) and it ended at the sea.

v’hayu tots’otav ha’yamah – “And its outgoings the seaward.” The border ends at the Mediterranean Sea. Of the borders described, and as complicated as they actually are to understand and properly delineate, Charles Ellicott gives a brief and concise summary of what has been presented –

“We thus obtain for the territory of Ephraim four boundary-lines—viz.: (a) the plain of Jordan on the east; (b) the line of hills bordering the Shephelah on the west; (c) the brook Kanah, and the line passing through Taanath-shiloh and Janohah to Jordan on the north; and (d) the north border of Benjamin (Joshua 16:1-3, and Joshua 18:12-14) on the south.” Ellicott

8 (con’t) This was the inheritance of the tribe of the children of Ephraim according to their families.

zoth nakhalath mateh bene ephrayim l’misp’hotam – “This inheritance tribe sons Ephraim to their families.”  The borders, as difficult to trace as they may be, are defined by the locations set forth in these past few verses.

With that, a special note concerning cities not within these borders is given to ensure there is no confusion as time passed. Properly rendered, verse 8 should probably end with a semi-colon and verse 9 then provides explanation…

The separate cities for the children of Ephraim were among the inheritance of the children of Manasseh, all the cities with their villages.

v’hearim ha’mibdaloth livne ephrayim be’tok nakhalath bene menasheh kal he’arim v’hatsrehen – “And the cities, the separated, sons Ephraim in midst inheritance sons Manasseh all the cities and their villages.”

Here is a word found nowhere else in Scripture, mibdalah. It comes from badal, to divide or separate. Thus, it is “the separated” cities. Taken together with the previous verse, the whole thought should essentially read –

“This is the inheritance of the tribe sons of Ephraim to their families, and the cities, the separated, belonging to the sons of Ephraim in midst of the inheritance of the sons of Manasseh – all the cities and their villages.”

The meaning is that there were certain cities within the borders of Manasseh that will belong to the inheritance of Ephraim. A specific note concerning them is found in the next chapter –

“And the territory of Manasseh was from Asher to Michmethath, that lies east of Shechem; and the border went along south to the inhabitants of En Tappuah. Manasseh had the land of Tappuah, but Tappuah on the border of Manasseh belonged to the children of Ephraim. And the border descended to the Brook Kanah, southward to the brook. These cities of Ephraim are among the cities of Manasseh. The border of Manasseh was on the north side of the brook; and it ended at the sea.” Joshua 17:7-9

The same is true with Manasseh having cities that were within the borders of Issachar and Asher.

It is speculated by some that because Ephraim was the larger tribe, they needed these cities. Others suppose it is a way of maintaining the brotherly bond between the two by having this arrangement. Charles Ellicott provides a reasonable explanation while using an understandable example –

“This fact would manifestly tend to produce a solidarity among the several tribes, and to prevent disunion by creating common interests. The interest of the stronger tribes would be served by completing the conquest of the territory assigned to the weaker. And the general formation thus produced would resemble that which was known by the name of the testudo, or tortoise, in Roman warfare. When a body of soldiers approached the wall of a town which it was intended to assault, they sometimes held their shields over them, overlapping like scales, each man’s shield partly sheltering his own, and partly his neighbour’s body, so that no missile could penetrate. Thus it may be said not only of Jerusalem, but of all the tribes in the land of their possession, that they were built as a city that is compact together, and at unity in itself: united by joints and bands, so that if one member of the body politic should suffer, all the members must suffer with it.” Ellicott

With the borders now fully expressed for Ephraim, the chapter ends on a failing note, one not unique to the tribes of Israel. The same thought was seen concerning Judah in verse 15:63 and it will be seen again as we progress…

10 And they did not drive out the Canaanites who dwelt in Gezer;

v’lo horishu eth ha’k’naani ha’yoshev b’gazer – “And no dispossessed the Canaanite, the dwelling in Gezer.” In these words, there is a difference between what was said in verse 15:63 and what is now presented. Of the Jebusites, it said that Judah could not drive them out. However, here, it simply says they did not drive them out.

Though seemingly the same on the surface, it does not appear that they actually should be considered comparable. This is because of the next words…

10 (con’t) but the Canaanites dwell among the Ephraimites to this day

va’yeshev ha’k’naani b’qerev ephrayim ad ha’yom ha’zeh – “and dwell the Canaanite in midst Ephraim until the day, the this.” Not only could Judah not drive out the Jebusites, but compare the two statements –

Judah – “and dwell the Jebusite with sons Judah in Jerusalem until the day this.”

Ephraim – “and dwell the Canaanite in midst Ephraim until the day, the this.”

It may just be an excuse to make the sermon longer, or it may be that the wording is purposeful. Judah couldn’t drive them out; they were in a fortified location as will be noted in 2 Samuel 5 and that location is on the border of Judah and Benjamin.

On the other hand, nothing is said about any difficulty here. Further, they are in the midst of Ephraim, meaning they could be isolated and eventually starved out. And more, it says…

*10 (fin) and have become forced laborers.

vayhi l’mas obed – “And become to a burden work.” It appears that this is a marriage of convenience for Ephraim and one of inconvenience, but acceptable tolerance, to the Canaanite. It is exactly what the Lord warned against and commanded not to occur. It is an early foreboding of bad times ahead.

Words that seem obscure or even wrong
Are set before us and we wonder why
But like the beauty of a heavenly song
They contain treasure that money cannot buy

In them there is a story waiting to be drawn out
Wonderful words that reveal amazing things to us
They are waiting to be seen as if ready to shout
About the glorious work of our Lord Jesus

Thank You, O God, for this precious word
Thank You for the delightful treasures waiting for us
When they are read out and we have heard
We will again thank You for our precious Lord Jesus

III. Pictures of Christ

The first three verses of the chapter dealt with the overall lot that fell to Joseph (He Shall Add/Take Away). In verse 1, it was described as from Jordan (Descender) Jericho (Place of Fragrance) to waters Jericho (Place of Fragrance) eastward (to arise or appear). That is then explained as the wilderness (a place of testing, but also of closeness to God) ascending from Jericho (Place of Fragrance) to Bethel (House of God).

Verse 2 says the border then went out from Bethel (House of God) toward Luz (Departure) from there it passed over unto the Archite (Long/Prolonging) at Ataroth (Crowns).

From there verse 3 says the border descended westward unto the Japhletite (He – God – Will Deliver) and continued unto the border of Lower Beth Horon (Lower House of Freedom) and to Gezer (Part/Portion) and ended at the sea.

With that, verse 4 noted that the children of Joseph (He Shall Add), Manasseh (He Shall Forget/From a Debt) and Ephraim (Twice Fruitful/Ashes) took their inheritance.

The verses anticipate the details of Christ’s coming, and the scope of His work as seen in the three named: Joseph, Ephraim, and Manasseh.

Joseph anticipates Christ who takes away man’s reproach and who then adds him to God’s people. Manasseh pictures Christ who came to pay Adam’s debt and who, in the process, allows that debt to be forgotten before God.

Ephraim looks to Jesus. He is twice fruitful in the land of His affliction, prevailing over the law and thus becoming the Savior of Jew and Gentile, but His work also meant that sin was judged in Him, thus the ashes, signifying His afflictions.

It is Jesus who descended from heaven bringing the water of life, signified by the waters of Jericho, in His appearing. He went through the wilderness, the testing, and yet He remained in closeness to God through it.

Bethel here anticipates Christ Jesus, the man in whom God dwells as is noted in John 2:19, where He said, “Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up.” His body is the House of God. From there, He went to the cross, symbolized by Luz (Departure).

But the cross could not hold him, symbolized by the Archite (the Prolonging) –

“Yet it pleased the Lord to bruise Him;
He has put Him to grief.
When You make His soul an offering for sin,
He shall see His seed, He shall prolong [arakHis days,
And the pleasure of the Lord shall prosper in His hand.” Isaiah 53:10

In this, the crowns were bestowed, the crown of the cross and the crown of eternal life, among many others (Revelation 19:12).

The trek then went to “He (God) Will Deliver” (the Japhletite), perfectly explained by the 22nd Psalm –

“He trusted in the Lord, let Him rescue Him;
Let Him deliver [palat] Him, since He delights in Him!” Psalm 22:8

God did deliver Him, and He came out of the tomb, the Lower House of Freedom. From which He was granted His part among the living. From there the border ended at the sea, westward, the place where God resides, ever westward.

It was actually at this time that the note about the children of Joseph, Manasseh and Ephraim, took their inheritance. That was described already, but it was because of this work of Christ as outlined in the borders that the symbolism of the names is fully understood.

Logically, their explanation fits right here in the order in which were presented, but I explained them prior to provide a basis to understand the subsequent verses in advance.

With that, it then turned to the borders of Ephraim (Twice Fruitful/Ashes).

The border was eastward (arise/appear) Ataroth Addar (Majestic Crowns) unto Upper Beth Horon (Upper House of Freedom). From there it went out westward (toward the sea) on the north (hidden) side of Michmethath (Hiding Place).

From there it went eastward (arise/appear) to Taanah Shiloh, (Discovered Haven) and passed by on the east of Janohah (He Will Give Rest). Then it descended from there to Ataroth (Crowns) and Naarah (Girl) and reached to Jericho (Place of Fragrance) and came out at the Jordan (Descender).

Then it went out from Tappuah (Breath) westward to Brook Kanah (Inheritance of the Possessor) and its outgoings were seaward.

It pictures the effects of Christ’s work for His people. Those who arise to the call of the gospel are given their majestic crowns of life (Revelation 2:10) and righteousness (2 Timothy 4:8) which are imperishable (1 Corinthians 9:25).

The border going west is the effect of the gospel, drawing us to God (who is ever west) while we are hidden in the Hiding Place, meaning Christ (Colossians 3:3). Going eastward to Taanah Shiloh is the arising of the Discovered Haven, the place for those who come to Christ. This is offered by Christ, symbolized by Yanokhah (He Will Give Rest).

The border then went down to Atroth (Crowns, signifying the rewards of coming to Christ) and Naarah (Girl, the church – a female entity of marriageable age) reaching to Jericho (heaven), coming out at the Jordan, the descending of Christ for His church (1 Thessalonians 4:16).

From there Tappuah signifies the breath of eternal life that comes at that time as we move toward God (westward) to the Inheritance of the Possessor – eternal life in Christ is realized, accompanied by eternally moving toward God, symbolized by the outgoings of the border being seaward.

The final verses mentioned the cities, though not named, including cities in Manasseh. It also noted that all of the Canaanites were not dispossessed. This is a historical note about the situation in which Ephraim found itself, and it will be a part of the continued lesson of life under the law.

Symbolically, it may (total speculation) signify that there are unconverted in the church who will always be there until the end. They may serve the church, but they are not of the people of God. Regardless of that, the borders of the two tribes form a grand picture of Christ and His work.

The borders of Ephraim form another marvelous picture of the effects of His work in the people of the church. The patterns form up in exactly the manner that would be expected of an evaluation of these things.

And some of the words, and how they are used later in the Bible to refer to the coming Messiah completely surprised me. I would think “I wonder if this word is what is being referred to in the Psalms.” Upon checking, it is exactly what I thought might be the case. This happened again and again, as it does in sermons like these.

Each piece fits and then builds upon something else so that when we enter the New Testament, the foundation has been laid and we can then compare it to what is presented there. It never gets old because it is so beautifully woven together.

Because of this, be assured and reassured that you are following the right path. God has set it all down for us to see, and also to build up our confidence concerning Christ Jesus. How blessed we are to see such things.

And if you are just hearing about the Lord being hidden in the Old Testament, check it out. You will find out it is so. Jesus said it was all about Him. Put your trust in this wonderful Lord who has revealed such marvelous things to us.

Call on Jesus and be a part of what God is doing in the world. And time is short. So do it today!

Closing Verse: “You search the Scriptures, for in them you think you have eternal life; and these are they which testify of Me.” John 5:39

Next Week: Joshua 17:1-13 Pretty great stuff, I must say. In fact, it is the best... (The Inheritance of Joseph – Manasseh (West)) (34th Joshua Sermon)

The Lord has you exactly where He wants you. He has a good plan and purpose for you. It is He who has defeated the enemy and who now offers His people rest. So, follow Him and trust Him and He will do marvelous things for you and through you.

The Inheritance of Joseph – Ephraim

The lot fell to the children of Joseph from the Jordan by Jericho
To the waters of Jericho on the east as well
To the wilderness that goes up
From Jericho through the mountains to Bethel

Then went out from Bethel to Luz
Passed along to the border of the Archites at Ataroth, as we know
And went down westward to the boundary of the Japhletites
As far as the boundary of Lower Beth Horon to Gezer it did go

And it ended at the sea, and that not by chance
So the children of Joseph, Manasseh and Ephraim
———-took their inheritance

The border of the children of Ephraim
According to their families was thus as we continue on
The border of their inheritance on the east side
Was Ataroth Addar as far as Upper Beth Horon

And the border went out toward the sea
On the north side of Michmethath
Then the border went around eastward to Taanath Shiloh
And passed by it on the east of Janohah

Then it went down from Janohah
To Ataroth and Naarah it then went
Reached to Jericho
And came out at the Jordan, this was its extent

The border went out from Tappuah
Extending quite nicely
Westward to the Brook Kanah
And it ended at the sea

This was the inheritance
Of the tribe of the children of Ephraim
According to their families
A nice patch of land it would seem

The separate cities for the children of Ephraim
Were among the inheritance
Of the children of Manasseh
All the cities with their villages where they could sing and dance

And they did not drive out the Canaanites who dwelt in Gezer
But the Canaanites dwell, something rather dumb
Among the Ephraimites to this day
And forced laborers they have become

Lord God, turn our hearts to be obedient to Your word
Give us wisdom to be ever faithful to You
May we carefully heed each thing we have heard
Yes, Lord God may our hearts be faithful and true

And we shall be content and satisfied in You alone
We will follow You as we sing our songs of praise
Hallelujah to You; to us Your path You have shown
Hallelujah we shall sing to You for all of our days

Hallelujah and Amen…

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The lot fell to the children of Joseph from the Jordan, by Jericho, to the waters of Jericho on the east, to the wilderness that goes up from Jericho through the mountains to Bethel, then went out from Bethel to Luz, passed along to the border of the Archites at Ataroth, and went down westward to the boundary of the Japhletites, as far as the boundary of Lower Beth Horon to Gezer; and it ended at the sea.

So the children of Joseph, Manasseh and Ephraim, took their inheritance.

The border of the children of Ephraim, according to their families, was thus: The border of their inheritance on the east side was Ataroth Addar as far as Upper Beth Horon.

And the border went out toward the sea on the north side of Michmethath; then the border went around eastward to Taanath Shiloh, and passed by it on the east of Janohah. Then it went down from Janohah to Ataroth and Naarah, reached to Jericho, and came out at the Jordan.

The border went out from Tappuah westward to the Brook Kanah, and it ended at the sea. This was the inheritance of the tribe of the children of Ephraim according to their families. The separate cities for the children of Ephraim were among the inheritance of the children of Manasseh, all the cities with their villages.

10 And they did not drive out the Canaanites who dwelt in Gezer; but the Canaanites dwell among the Ephraimites to this day and have become forced laborers.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Joshua 15:13-63 (A Share Among the Children of Judah)

Artwork by Douglas Kallerson

Joshua 15:13-63
A Share Among the Children of Judah

The account today has verses that will be very closely repeated in Judges 1. When this happens in the Bible, it is telling us that really important information is being conveyed. This doesn’t negate the other information in the Bible but highlights the material worthy of repetition.

There are some differences between the accounts here and in Judges 1, and there is lengthy debate concerning which account is the original, or which is in the right chronological location, and so on. It is the kind of thing you might read, and just continue on saying, “I wonder why it mentions this twice?” But you never dig any further.

I admit that has been me for the past many years. I never took my own advice and paid extra heed to what is being presented. Notice what Charles Ellicott remarks –

“Which is its original place? In Judges it is connected with the continuation of the conquest of Canaan by the tribe of Judah after Joshua’s death, and there we read they slew (literally, smote) Sheshai, and Ahiman, and Talmai. If this is the death, and not merely the defeat of the Anakim (the Hebrew word is not absolutely decisive), we have two stages in the conquest of Hebron described … It would seem, then, that the entire conquest of the Anakim was not effected at once, but begun by Caleb and Joshua in Joshua’s lifetime, and completed by the tribe of Judah, under the leadership of Caleb, after Joshua’s death.” Charles Ellicott

He tries to reconcile the two as both being different accounts. However, he later appears to give up on that notion and says –

“Upon the whole, it seems most reasonable to conclude that the proceedings by which Caleb secured his inheritance, and fulfilled the promise of Joshua 14:12, have been recorded here for the sake of completeness, though not necessarily belonging to this time.” Ellicott

Text Verse: “May God enlarge Japheth,
And may he dwell in the tents of Shem;
And may Canaan be his servant.” Genesis 9:27

What Ellicott appears to be saying is that though he isn’t sure about the two accounts being separate, he tends towards the notion that they are one account and the insertion of them here is not that it is separate but “for the sake of completeness.”

Looking at the surrounding text here in Joshua, that seems evident, and it will be explained as we go. Context matters, and the context of this passage is that of inheritance. If we think on that, then what is said about Caleb is obviously also dealing with an inheritance.

It has something to do with Noah’s blessing upon Japheth and Shem. I will not give a detailed explanation of that when we get there in the passage today, so you’ll have to go back and watch the early Genesis sermons or the recorded Bible studies to get an answer to that, but the two are connected.

Everything is interconnected in this word. We just need to figure out how. And in all honesty, we can read and study for the rest of our lives and still not see it all. We have fifty-one verses to go through today, and you will see that I do not even attempt to explain all but a few of them. We may never leave Joshua if I did.

Instead, I am giving you what is most relevant to understanding the overall picture of what is going on. Other details will be drawn out as we continue through the word and refer back to make a necessary connection someday.

For now, let us turn to that precious word once again, and… May God speak to us through His word today, and may His glorious name ever be praised.

I. A Blessing for Achsah (verses 13-19)

13 Now to Caleb the son of Jephunneh he gave a share among the children of Judah,

As a reminder, Caleb means Dog, Yephunneh means He will be Beheld, and Judah means Praise.

Because the division of the land is what is being described, it naturally follows that this section would be recorded here in Joshua, regardless of when the events actually took place. In Joshua 13:1 it said that Joshua is old. His time is drawing near.

The land which remained to be conquered is detailed (13:1-7). Then the division of the land east of Jordan is repeated, indicating the matter is accomplished (13:8-14). That included the subdivisions of land by tribe (13:15-33).

Next, the division of the land west of the Jordan is introduced (14:1-4), but before it actually occurs, the inheritance of Caleb is settled (14:6-15). With that carved out, the borders of Judah are given (15:1-12).  Then comes the naming of the cities within those borders (15:20-63).

But Caleb will, at some point in the future, carve out a particular division of this inheritance as indicated in these intervening verses. Though this is future, the details are logically placed here, before the naming of the cities of Judah, to ensure that the matter is settled and recorded.

One might ask, “Why would this account be placed here now if the actual events occur when it is recorded in Judges?” Rather, the exact opposite question would arise if it wasn’t: “Why wasn’t this record placed in the land division of Judah to clarify the exception?”

This is because it is the land division that is being dealt with. If we have an amendment to a land grant today, it would naturally be affixed to the original land grant documents regardless as to when it occurred. As such, these words now are that affixed amendment. Caleb was given his inheritance –

“Now therefore, give me this mountain of which the Lord spoke in that day; for you heard in that day how the Anakim were there, and that the cities were great and fortified. It may be that the Lord will be with me, and I shall be able to drive them out as the Lord said.” Joshua 14:12

Those anticipated events occur later in Judges 1, but they are logically placed in Joshua 15. As such, the words here in Joshua 15:13 are further detailing Caleb’s inheritance as spoken forth in Joshua 14.

To show that Caleb’s land grant, including this division, is included in Judah’s inheritance and not cut out of it as a separate and independent parcel, we read –

“And Joshua blessed him, and gave Hebron to Caleb the son of Jephunneh as an inheritance. 14 Hebron therefore became the inheritance of Caleb the son of Jephunneh the Kenizzite to this day, because he wholly followed the Lord God of Israel. 15 And the name of Hebron formerly was Kirjath Arba (Arba was the greatest man among the Anakim).” Joshua 14:13-15

Only after that were the borders of Judah described (15:1-12). Within those borders, a further division of Caleb’s inheritance is stated, demonstrating that it is a part of Judah, not a piece of land cut out of Judah. Joshua gave Caleb the son of Jephunneh a share among the children of Judah…

13 (con’t) according to the commandment of the Lord to Joshua,

This is in accord with Joshua 14:6, “You know the word which the Lord said to Moses the man of God concerning you and me in Kadesh Barnea.” His request, based on that, was to be granted…

13 (con’t) namely, Kirjath Arba, which is Hebron (Arba was the father of Anak).

As a reminder, Kirjath Arba means City of Four and Hebron means Alliance. We are reminded now that Arba, or Four, is the father of the Anaq. Rather than referring to a single person, Anak, it speaks of the clan: eth qiryath arba avi ha’anaq hi khevron – “Kirjath Arba, father the Anaq, it Hebron.”

As for the grant itself, this is in accord with Joshua 14:12 where Caleb said, “Now therefore, give me this mountain of which the Lord spoke in that day.” From there, the words of Joshua 14:13-15 (cited above) confirmed the grant. At the time of that request, Caleb said –

“…for you heard in that day how the Anakim were there, and that the cities were great and fortified. It may be that the Lord will be with me, and I shall be able to drive them out as the Lord said.” Joshua 14:12

That hopeful anticipation is now detailed, even though the events occur in Judges 1. The record states…

14 Caleb drove out the three sons of Anak from there: Sheshai, Ahiman, and Talmai, the children of Anak.

Rather than “drove out,” it reads: v’yoresh mi’sham Kalev eth sh’lovoshah bene ha’Anaq – “And disinherited from there Caleb three sons the Anaq.” The meaning is that he killed them (disinherited), and he assumed their land (inherited).

Sheshai means Whitish. Akhiman means My Brother is a Gift. Talmai means Plowman. Anak means Long Neck or Necklace. As they are called “the Anak,” they are a clan of people known for their unusually long or thick necks, or the adornments worn on their necks.

These three were already named in Numbers 13, many years before. Hence, the Pulpit Commentary may be correct when they say, “This also must not be pressed literally. Possibly these men were three chiefs of the Anakim.”

In other words, saying “the three sons of the Anaq” could be a way of speaking of those who descended from them, each being a clan. Or they may be sons bearing the same names as their fathers. As the order of the names is different now, it may explain that.

15 Then he went up from there to the inhabitants of Debir (formerly the name of Debir was Kirjath Sepher).

After dispossessing the Anakim, Caleb turned his sites on Debir, or Place of the Word, a place noted as having been called Kirjath Sepher. The word sepher is singular and means book. However, to get the right idea, you would call it “Book City,” and thus “City of Books,” a name obviously connected to Place of the Word. It was the place where the scrolls of writings were maintained, like a library today.

It was evidently important because of this, and Caleb defers to the former name when planning its attack. This is total supposition, but perhaps they wanted to capture the scrolls in order to get a better understanding of the layout of the land, the structure of cities, etc., by obtaining any such documents maintained there. So important was this mission that a great honor is offered…

16 And Caleb said, “He who attacks Kirjath Sepher and takes it, to him I will give Achsah my daughter as wife.”

va’yomer kalev asher yakeh eth qiryath sepher ul’khadah v’natati lo eth akhsah biti l’ishah – “And said Caleb, ‘Who strikes Book City and takes her – and I will give to him Achsah my daughter to wife.” Achsah comes from ekes, meaning a fetter (Proverbs 7:22) or an anklet (Isaiah 3:18). That comes from akas, to shake bangles as seen in Isaiah 3 –

“Moreover the Lord says:
‘Because the daughters of Zion are haughty,
And walk with outstretched necks
And wanton eyes,
Walking and mincing as they go,
Making a jingling with their feet,
17 Therefore the Lord will strike with a scab
The crown of the head of the daughters of Zion,
And the Lord will uncover their secret parts.’” Isaiah 3:16, 17

The offering of a daughter in this manner is not unusual. Throughout Kings and Chronicles, intermarriages are noted where one king gives a daughter to another, such as in 1 Kings 3:1. It is also something Saul promised to the victor over Goliath –

“So the men of Israel said, ‘Have you seen this man who has come up? Surely he has come up to defy Israel; and it shall be that the man who kills him the king will enrich with great riches, will give him his daughter, and give his father’s house exemption from taxes in Israel.’” 1 Samuel 17:25

As for the prize named Achsah, she goes to…

17 So Othniel the son of Kenaz, the brother of Caleb, took it; and he gave him Achsah his daughter as wife.

The wording here seems to place Caleb’s father as Kenaz and not Jephunneh. This is not right. The Hebrew could mean either Othniel or Kenaz is Caleb’s brother. Othniel is Caleb’s brother, both are sons of Jephunneh. The words ben qenaz, or “son of Kenaz,” mean “descendant of Kenaz,” and thus, he is – like Caleb – a Kenizzite as noted in Numbers 32:12.

His name means either Force of God or Lion of God. The NAS uses a different root which would signify Burning of God. Because he is the one to prevail over the city, Achsah goes to him, her uncle, as wife.

The meaning behind Kenaz, or Hunter, was explained in Chapter 14. It signifies a person who seeks after wisdom.

The purpose of the words is to show that both Caleb and Othniel are reckoned as descendants of this Gentile, Kenaz, and Achsah is thus accounted under both in this regard and yet she is being given a set inheritance within Judah as will be described.

18 Now it was so, when she came to him, that she persuaded him to ask her father for a field.

v’hi b’boah va’tsithehu lishol me’eth abiha sadeh – “And it was in her coming and she poked him to ask from her father field.” The word suth comes from shayith, a thorn. Hence, it figuratively signifies to poke or entice.

The meaning is that in her coming to Othniel as wife, she used that as opportunity to get him to either ask Caleb directly or to have him allow her to ask personally for a field. In Judges 1, the term ha’sadeh, or the field, is used. Thus, it is a particular field she has in mind. With that…

18 (con’t) So she dismounted from her donkey, and Caleb said to her, “What do you wish?”

va’titsnakh me’al ha’khamor va’yomer lah kalev mah lakh – “And jumped down from upon the donkey, and said to her, Caleb, ‘What to you?’” The difficulty here has ended in a wide variety of translations. The word tsanakh is found in only two accounts, this one and that of Jael in Judges 4 –

“Then Jael, Heber’s wife, took a tent peg and took a hammer in her hand, and went softly to him and drove the peg into his temple, and it went down into the ground; for he was fast asleep and weary. So he died.” Judges 4:21

What seems the best explanation of this comes from Adam Clarke, where he says “she hastily, suddenly alighted, as if she had forgotten something, or was about to return to her father’s house.”

One can imagine the scene. She is being conducted to the house of her new husband. She leans over and says, “We really need that field with the water. Let me ask him for it.” With that, she jumps down as if she refuses to go further unless she gets what she wants. Caleb is caught completely off guard and asks, “What’s the matter with you?” And then…

19 She answered, “Give me a blessing;

va’tomer t’nah li berakhah – “And answered, ‘Give to me blessing.’” The words mean, “Give to me a gift.” She wants something tangible from him. With that, she explains what…

19 (con’t) since you have given me land in the South, give me also springs of water.”

ki erets ha’negev n’thatani v’nathatah li guloth mayim – “For land the south given me, and give to me springs water.” The word negev means south, but it comes from a word meaning parched. Therefore, the land is almost pointless to possess unless water is available.

The word translated as springs, gullah, is new. It comes from galal meaning to roll. Thus, the water comes up as round and bubbling. Stanley described it in the 1860s, saying –

“Underneath the hill on which Debir stood is a deep valley, rich with verdure from a copious rivulet, which, rising at the crest of the glen, falls, with a continuity unusual in the Judæan hills, down to its lowest depth. On the possession of these upper and lower ‘bubblings,’ so contiguous to her lover’s prize, Achsah had set her heart.” Stanley’s Lectures, i. 264.

19 (con’t) So he gave her the upper springs and the lower springs.

va’yiten lah eth guloth iliyoth v’eth guloth takhtiyoth – “And gave to her springs upper and springs lower.” The word translated as upper, ili, is only found in this account. It comes from alah, to ascend. Thus, they are upper springs. The word signifying lower, takhti, comes from takhat, under. Thus it is the lower or lowest springs.

The account of Caleb, Othniel, and Achsah with the lands they possess is specifically stated here, just before the naming of the cities of Judah, to show what was rightfully theirs is to be reckoned within the overall inheritance of Judah.

Rolling waters, bubbling forth to us
Providing life in a parched land
They tell us of the glories of Jesus
Who alone sits at God’s right hand

The water of the word is what washes us
With it, we are cleansed and sanctified
It is these waters that tell us of Jesus
Of His perfect life, and that for us He died

We possess it because it was granted to us
And so, we carry to others this precious word
These rolling, bubbling waters reveal Jesus
It is through them that the salvation message is heard

II. Cities Within Judah’s Land Grant (verses 20-63)

20 This was the inheritance of the tribe of the children of Judah according to their families:

zot nakhalath mateh bene yehudah l’mishp’hotam – “This inheritance tribe sons Judah to their families.” Some translations make this a closing summary of verses 1-19 based on the borders provided minus the land given to Caleb. That then flows into the naming of the cities. As such, verses 13-19 are essentially a parenthetical insert for clarity.

Others take it as an opening statement concerning the cities that belong to Judah. As Hebron and Debir are listed as cities within Judah in the coming verses without any noted exceptions for Caleb, it seems likely that the first option is correct. As for the land, Cambridge notes –

“The territory of Judah, in average length about 45 miles and in average breadth about 50, was from a very early period divided into four main regions—(i) the South; (ii) the Lowland; (iii) the Mountain; (iv) the Wilderness.” Cambridge

From here through verse 63, these four main areas will be noted with some descriptions of their terminating lines. There will be 112 cities in the counting, plus Ekron, Ashdod, Gaza, and Jerusalem, thus totaling 116 cities. However, the naming of the cities will not match the numbers given. Of these lists, I will provide only a few comments along the way.

There may be a million typological patterns or hidden meanings, but those, if they exist, will be left for someone else to figure out. The main point of listing the cities is to specifically define what belongs to Judah. It is a necessary historical record. Therefore, we will review the verses without giving the meaning of the names.

21 The cities at the limits of the tribe of the children of Judah, toward the border of Edom in the South, were

More literally, it reads, “And were the cities extremity to tribe sons Judah until border Edom in the southward.” The meaning is that this list includes everything to the border of Edom and that is in the southern area of the inheritance.

Cambridge notes, “The South was the undulating pasture country which intervened between the hills, the proper possession of the tribe, and the desert country which marks the lower part of Palestine.” Their cities are –

21 (con’t) Kabzeel, Eder, Jagur, 22 Kinah, Dimonah, Adadah, 23 Kedesh, Hazor, Ithnan, 24 Ziph, Telem, Bealoth, 25 Hazor, Hadattah, Kerioth, Hezron (which is Hazor), 26 Amam, Shema, Moladah, 27 Hazar Gaddah, Heshmon, Beth Pelet, 28 Hazar Shual, Beersheba, Bizjothjah, 29 Baalah, Ijim, Ezem, 30 Eltolad, Chesil, Hormah, 31 Ziklag, Madmannah, Sansannah, 32 Lebaoth, Shilhim, Ain, and Rimmon: all the cities are twenty-nine, with their villages.

A few things of note: One is that Simeon will receive its inheritance within the borders of Judah. This will fulfill prophecy, but it also explains why some of the cities will be listed here and again in Simeon’s grant later.

Also, one city, Ziklag, is listed for both, but it was never subdued by Israel. It belonged to the Philistines. However, it was granted to David as a gift by Achish, king of Gath, in 1 Samuel 27:6.

Also, though it says 29 cities, depending on how they are listed, (such as “Hazor, Hadattah” or “Hazor-Hadattah,”) there are always more than 29. Various reasons have been suggested, such as 1) clerical error; 2) cities that were given but which were not possessed at that time; 3) joint cities that belonged to Judah and to Simeon; 4) some cities were known by more than one name; 5) some named locations were smaller hamlets or villages; or 6) other cities were later added while the original figure was maintained.

Some of the reasons given are ridiculous. Others may sufficiently explain the disparity.

33 In the lowland:

Of this, Cambridge says –

“The Lowland, or, to give it its proper name, the Shephelah, was a broad strip of land lying between the central mountains and the Mediterranean Sea. From the edge of the sandy tract which fringes the immediate shore it stretched up to the bases of the hills of Judah—the garden and granary of the tribe—and formed the lower part of the maritime plain which extended along the whole seaboard of Palestine from ‘the river of Egypt’ to Sidon.”

The cities of this area are…

33 (con’t) Eshtaol, Zorah, Ashnah, 34 Zanoah, En Gannim, Tappuah, Enam, 35 Jarmuth, Adullam, Socoh, Azekah, 36 Sharaim, Adithaim, Gederah, and Gederothaim: fourteen cities with their villages;

There are fifteen names even though the list says fourteen. However, in this listing, there is an article before Enam, v’ha’enam, or “and the Enam.” Enam means “Two Springs.” As such, Tappuah and Enam may be describing the same location – “Tappuah and the Two Springs.” If so, then the number fourteen is solved. If not, there is some other logical reason as stated before.

37 Zenan, Hadashah, Migdal Gad, 38 Dilean, Mizpah, Joktheel, 39 Lachish, Bozkath, Eglon, 40 Cabbon, Lahmas, Kithlish, 41 Gederoth, Beth Dagon, Naamah, and Makkedah: sixteen cities with their villages;

In verse 40, the name is either Lahmas or Lahmam. The letters for s and m are very similar in Hebrew and some manuscripts have one or another. Either way, the original exists and so there is no error in Scripture based on this.

Also, one of our dogs, a white chihuahua with ruby eyes is named Naamah (Pleasant). She is, mostly. But at times…

42 Libnah, Ether, Ashan, 43 Jiphtah, Ashnah, Nezib, 44 Keilah, Achzib, and Mareshah: nine cities with their villages; 

The cities are named and their number matches. Let’s go on…

45 Ekron, with its towns and villages; 46 from Ekron to the sea, all that lay near Ashdod, with their villages; 47 Ashdod with its towns and villages, Gaza with its towns and villages—as far as the Brook of Egypt and the Great Sea with its coastline.

The word translated as towns is bath, daughter. Hence, it is a daughter to the main city. Also, the cities being mentioned are in the feminine and it is more consistent to do as King Jimmy did, saying something like, “and her daughters and her villages.” In doing this, other passages in Scripture are more fully appreciated when they are given a feminine aspect.

48 And in the mountain country:

u-ba’har – “And in the mountain.” Cambridge says –

“The Mountain, or ‘the Hill Country,’ though not the richest, was at once the largest and the most important of the four. ‘Beginning a few miles below Hebron, where it attains its highest level, it stretches eastward to the Dead Sea and westward to the Shephelah, and forms an elevated district or plateau, which, though thrown into considerable undulations, yet preserves a general level in both directions.’”

48 (con’t) Shamir, Jattir, Sochoh, 49 Dannah, Kirjath Sannah (which is Debir), 50 Anab, Eshtemoh, Anim, 51 Goshen, Holon, and Giloh:  eleven cities with their villages;

The cities are named and their number matches…

52 Arab, Dumah, Eshean, 53 Janum, Beth Tappuah, Aphekah, 54 Humtah, Kirjath Arba (which is Hebron), and Zior: nine cities with their villages;

The Masoretic Text has an R instead of a D here, saying Rumah instead of Dumah. The letters are very similar in Hebrew. Other than that, the cities are named and the number matches…

55 Maon, Carmel, Ziph, Juttah, 56 Jezreel, Jokdeam, Zanoah, 57 Kain, Gibeah, and Timnah: ten cities with their villages;

Again, the numbers match what is named…

58 Halhul, Beth Zur, Gedor, 59 Maarath, Beth Anoth, and Eltekon: six cities with their villages;

The cities are named and numbered without controversy…

60 Kirjath Baal (which is Kirjath Jearim) and Rabbah: two cities with their villages.

Again, all is good with the description…

61 In the wilderness:

ba’midbar – “in the wilderness.” Cambridge says, “…which here, and here only, is synonymous with Arâbah, represents the sunken district adjoining the Dead Sea.”

61 (con’t) Beth Arabah, Middin, Secacah, 62 Nibshan, the City of Salt, and En Gedi: six cities with their villages.

Six cities numbered accordingly. And finally…

*63 (fin) As for the Jebusites, the inhabitants of Jerusalem, the children of Judah could not drive them out; but the Jebusites dwell with the children of Judah at Jerusalem to this day.

It is singular – “As for the Jebusite.” It is referring to the people group as a whole. A similar statement is made in Judges 1 –

“But the children of Benjamin did not drive out the Jebusites who inhabited Jerusalem; so the Jebusites dwell with the children of Benjamin in Jerusalem to this day.” Judges 1:21

Jerusalem was a border city, partly belonging to both Judah and Benjamin. It is, however, an interesting foreshadowing of the importance of the city to be so markedly noted at the end of these verses. It is also a sure note that this was not a later addition after the time of the kings when this could not have been a true statement. It was accomplished at the time of David.

Also, Bethlehem is noticeably missing from these, but eventually, it will become a city of the greatest importance.

The inheritance is within part of the commonwealth
And so, any can receive what it contains
But you cannot obtain it by trickery or stealth
Rather, those can never remove your chains

To have the freedom found in the waters that bubble
You must pay heed to that word
It is the remover of every care and trouble
When you accept the message you have heard

And it is not one spring, or seven, or three
No, the streams are numbered at only two
It is in them together that you can be free
Just these two springs will work; nothing else will do

III. Explaining the Achsah Typology

Translating the names of verse 13 sets the tone – Now to Dog the son of He Will Be Beheld he gave a share among the sons of Praise. We have seen that Caleb anticipates Gentiles. The words signify that believing Gentiles who come to Jesus are given an inheritance among the commonwealth of Israel (sons of Praise).

This is “according to the commandment of the Lord to Joshua [Jesus].” Verse 13 continued with the naming of the city. That inheritance was already explained in Chapter 14 and the meaning of the typology can be reviewed there. However, verse 14 adds in the note, “Caleb drove out the three sons of Anak from there: Sheshai, Ahiman, and Talmai, the children of Anak.”

Those names are given to explain the position of those who are a part of this joining together (Hebron/Alliance). Sheshai, or Whitish, looks to the purification of the believer because of Christ. Ahiman, “My Brother is a Gift,” is the relationship of the believer to Christ. Christ is the Gift. Talmai, or Plowman, looks to the one who puts his hand to the plow and doesn’t look back. In other words, a believer in Christ.

Verse 15 then noted going up to Debir (formerly Kirjath Sepher). Jesus is the Oracle, the Place of the Word. But He is to be found in the scrolls (as seen in the City of the Books) that speak of Him. Caleb is going there to dispossess the inhabitants and gain possession of it.

Verse 16 notes that whoever attacks the City of the Books and takes it will get Achsah, Caleb’s daughter, as wife. Her name means Anklet, an adornment of the foot. The foot signifies possession. She is the reward for the one who obtains the City of the Books. And the victor in verse 17 is Othniel, the son of Kenaz, brother of Caleb.

Othniel, or Force of God, is also the son of Kenaz, or Hunter. That was explained in Chapter 14 by Abarim as a name based on a profession, similar to many of our own names. Hence it is someone who seeks a form of wisdom like any such profession would.

In his case, it would be as a hunter of men in the sense that he is seeking the wisdom not only for himself, but for others as well. Thus, Othniel is typifying those who expend themselves in the pursuit of the knowledge of God and in conveying that to others.

It is to him that Achsah (Anklet) is given. As an adornment of the foot, she would indicate open and showy possession. But in receiving her after his victory over the City of the Books, he also inherits more. At her prodding, not only will there be a possession of parched land, but there is also request for, and granting of, bubbling waters.

The whole picture can be seen: Caleb signifying the Gentiles being brought into the commonwealth of Israel (Joshua 9), is also guaranteed the inheritance (Joshua 14). But there is more. Caleb possesses the inheritance. The City of Books is subdued.

It is the Bible that tells of Jesus that eventually comes under the responsibility and care of the Gentiles. This is something anticipated back in Genesis 9. Achsah is the prize, the “showy possession,” for the victory. But it is not just a lifeless inheritance that is obtained.

Rather, the waters given to Achsah (and thus to Othniel) are reflective of the living oracles of God, the two testaments, signified by the upper and lower springs – the New and Old Testaments. It is these that bubble up and provide life in the otherwise parched land of existence. They become the possession of the Gentiles.

And yet, that is still within the commonwealth, the borders of Judah. And so, it cannot be said that these are denied to the Jews. The commonwealth of Israel has never ceased to exist. It is the Gentiles who have been grafted into it.

The word has never been unavailable to the Jews, but these oracles have become the passion and possession of the Gentiles. The mantle of the spiritual blessing has gone to them while Israel as a nation has fallen away. Again, this is prefigured in the blessing upon Japheth by Noah in Genesis chapter 9.

This is what is being conveyed. Gentiles are not in any way subservient within Israel, and in many ways, they have taken the lead role for an extended amount of time.

While the Jews have frittered away the last 2000 years, the Gentiles have been hunting for souls and bringing them to Christ, teaching the word, searching out the riches of the word, and – above all – glorying in the Lord Jesus who is revealed in the word.

The account of Caleb, Othniel, and Achsah, with the lands they possess, was specifically placed just before the naming of the cities of Judah to show what was rightfully theirs is to be reckoned within the overall inheritance of the sons of Praise, the commonwealth of Israel.

God is telling a story to us through this word, and He is providing insights into the future, revealing the ongoing narrative in typology, and allowing us to see and understand these things, confirming that we are on the right path as we continue.

For example, Achsah was not given three springs. But Mormonism would necessitate that with “The Book of Mormon – Another Testament of Jesus Christ.” I’m sorry for them, but God has already shown, in advance, that this is not what is going on in the redemptive narrative.

He has methodically been covering every base for us to see what is and what is not acceptable. Nothing is left out, nothing is overlooked, and everything finds its place later that is hinted at in advance.

Do we have a sure word? We sure do.

Closing Verse: “Therefore let it be known to you that the salvation of God has been sent to the Gentiles, and they will hear it!” Acts 28:28

Next Week: Joshua 16:1-10 One lot wasn’t enough, so it would seem… (The Inheritance of Joseph – Ephraim) (33rd Joshua Sermon)

The Lord has you exactly where He wants you. He has a good plan and purpose for you. It is He who has defeated the enemy and who now offers His people rest. So, follow Him and trust Him and He will do marvelous things for you and through you.

A Share Among the Children of Judah

Now to Caleb the son of Jephunneh
He gave a share among the children of Judah
———-(but this was no setback)
According to the commandment of the LORD to Joshua
Namely, Kirjath Arba, which is Hebron
———- (Arba was the father of Anak)

Caleb drove out the three sons of Anak from there
Sheshai, Ahiman, and Talmai, the children of Anak
———-them he didn’t spare
Then he went up from there to the inhabitants of Debir
(formerly the name of Debir was Kirjath Sepher)

And Caleb said, “He who attacks Kirjath Sepher and takes it
———-thus risking his life
To him I will give Achsah my daughter as wife

So Othniel the son of Kenaz, the brother of Caleb, took it
———-while keeping his life
And he gave him Achsah his daughter as wife

Now it was so, when she came to him
That she persuaded him to ask her father for a field
———-who could resist that cute little dish?
So she dismounted from her donkey
And Caleb said to her, “What do you wish?”

She answered, “Give me a blessing
Since you have given me land in the South
———-(a land fit for kings)
Give me also springs of water”
So he gave her the upper springs and the lower springs

This was the inheritance of the tribe
Of the children of Judah according to their families as we know:
The cities at the limits of the tribe of the children of Judah
Toward the border of Edom in the South, toward the south
———-it does go

Were Kabzeel, Eder, Jagur, Kinah, Dimonah, Adadah
Kedesh, Hazor, Ithnan, Ziph, Telem, Bealoth (we’re not done yet)
Hazor, Hadattah, Kerioth, Hezron (which is Hazor)
Amam, Shema, Moladah, Hazar Gaddah, Heshmon, Beth Pelet

Hazar Shual, Beersheba, Bizjothjah, Baalah, Ijim, Ezem
Eltolad, Chesil, Hormah, Ziklag, Madmannah, Sansannah
———-(we’ll be done in a bit)
Lebaoth, Shilhim, Ain, and Rimmon
All the cities are twenty-nine, with their villages – that’s all of it

In the lowland: Eshtaol, Zorah, Ashnah, Zanoah, En Gannim
Tappuah, Enam, Jarmuth, Adullam, Socoh, Azekah, Sharaim
Adithaim, Gederah, and Gederothaim
Fourteen cities with their villages – a lot it would seem

Zenan, Hadashah, Migdal Gad, Dilean, Mizpah, Joktheel
Lachish, Bozkath, Eglon, Cabbon, Lahmas, Kithlish
Gederoth, Beth Dagon, Naamah, and Makkedah
Sixteen cities with their villages – more than one could wish

Libnah, Ether, Ashan, Jiphtah, Ashnah, Nezib
Keilah, Achzib, and Mareshah – a lot of reading to do
Nine cities with their villages
Ekron, with its towns and villages too

From Ekron to the sea, all that lay near Ashdod, with their villages
Ashdod with its towns and villages – where the swimming is fine
Gaza with its towns and villages—
As far as the Brook of Egypt and the Great Sea with its coastline

And in the mountain country: Shamir, Jattir, Sochoh
Dannah, Kirjath Sannah (which is Debir)
Anab, Eshtemoh, Anim, Goshen, Holon, and Giloh
Eleven cities with their villages – hold on! The list’s end is near

Arab, Dumah, Eshean, Janum, Beth Tappuah, Aphekah
Humtah, Kirjath Arba (which is Hebron), and Zior
Nine cities with their villages
Hold on… just a bit more

Maon, Carmel, Ziph, Juttah, Jezreel, Jokdeam, Zanoah
Kain, Gibeah, and Timnah too
Ten cities with their villages
Don’t you fret! We’re almost through

Halhul, Beth Zur, Gedor, Maarath, Beth Anoth, and Eltekon:
Six cities with their villages also
Kirjath Baal (which is Kirjath Jearim) and Rabbah:
Two cities with their villages, though you may not believe me
———-there’s just a bit more to go

In the wilderness: Beth Arabah, Middin, Secacah
Nibshan, the City of Salt, and En Gedi – the last to be named
Six cities with their villages
If your head is swimming, I’m not to be blamed

As for the Jebusites, the inhabitants of Jerusalem
The children of Judah could not drive them out, sad to say
But the Jebusites dwell with the children of Judah
At Jerusalem to this day

Lord God, turn our hearts to be obedient to Your word
Give us wisdom to be ever faithful to You
May we carefully heed each thing we have heard
Yes, Lord God may our hearts be faithful and true

And we shall be content and satisfied in You alone
We will follow You as we sing our songs of praise
Hallelujah to You; to us Your path You have shown
Hallelujah we shall sing to You for all of our days

Hallelujah and Amen…

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

13 Now to Caleb the son of Jephunneh he gave a share among the children of Judah, according to the commandment of the Lord to Joshua, namely, Kirjath Arba, which is Hebron (Arba was the father of Anak). 14 Caleb drove out the three sons of Anak from there: Sheshai, Ahiman, and Talmai, the children of Anak. 15 Then he went up from there to the inhabitants of Debir (formerly the name of Debir was Kirjath Sepher).

16 And Caleb said, “He who attacks Kirjath Sepher and takes it, to him I will give Achsah my daughter as wife.” 17 So Othniel the son of Kenaz, the brother of Caleb, took it; and he gave him Achsah his daughter as wife. 18 Now it was so, when she came to him, that she persuaded him to ask her father for a field. So she dismounted from her donkey, and Caleb said to her, “What do you wish?” 19 She answered, “Give me a blessing; since you have given me land in the South, give me also springs of water.” So he gave her the upper springs and the lower springs.

20 This was the inheritance of the tribe of the children of Judah according to their families:

21 The cities at the limits of the tribe of the children of Judah, toward the border of Edom in the South, were Kabzeel, Eder, Jagur, 22 Kinah, Dimonah, Adadah, 23 Kedesh, Hazor, Ithnan, 24 Ziph, Telem, Bealoth, 25 Hazor, Hadattah, Kerioth, Hezron (which is Hazor), 26 Amam, Shema, Moladah, 27 Hazar Gaddah, Heshmon, Beth Pelet, 28 Hazar Shual, Beersheba, Bizjothjah, 29 Baalah, Ijim, Ezem, 30 Eltolad, Chesil, Hormah, 31 Ziklag, Madmannah, Sansannah, 32 Lebaoth, Shilhim, Ain, and Rimmon: all the cities are twenty-nine, with their villages.

33 In the lowland: Eshtaol, Zorah, Ashnah, 34 Zanoah, En Gannim, Tappuah, Enam, 35 Jarmuth, Adullam, Socoh, Azekah, 36 Sharaim, Adithaim, Gederah, and Gederothaim: fourteen cities with their villages; 37 Zenan, Hadashah, Migdal Gad, 38 Dilean, Mizpah, Joktheel, 39 Lachish, Bozkath, Eglon, 40 Cabbon, Lahmas, Kithlish, 41 Gederoth, Beth Dagon, Naamah, and Makkedah: sixteen cities with their villages; 42 Libnah, Ether, Ashan, 43 Jiphtah, Ashnah, Nezib, 44 Keilah, Achzib, and Mareshah: nine cities with their villages; 45 Ekron, with its towns and villages; 46 from Ekron to the sea, all that lay near Ashdod, with their villages; 47 Ashdod with its towns and villages, Gaza with its towns and villages—as far as the Brook of Egypt and the Great Sea with its coastline.

48 And in the mountain country: Shamir, Jattir, Sochoh, 49 Dannah, Kirjath Sannah (which is Debir), 50 Anab, Eshtemoh, Anim, 51 Goshen, Holon, and Giloh: eleven cities with their villages; 52 Arab, Dumah, Eshean, 53 Janum, Beth Tappuah, Aphekah, 54 Humtah, Kirjath Arba (which is Hebron), and Zior: nine cities with their villages; 55 Maon, Carmel, Ziph, Juttah, 56 Jezreel, Jokdeam, Zanoah, 57 Kain, Gibeah, and Timnah: ten cities with their villages; 58 Halhul, Beth Zur, Gedor, 59 Maarath, Beth Anoth, and Eltekon: six cities with their villages; 60 Kirjath Baal (which is Kirjath Jearim) and Rabbah: two cities with their villages.

61 In the wilderness: Beth Arabah, Middin, Secacah, 62 Nibshan, the City of Salt, and En Gedi: six cities with their villages.

63 As for the Jebusites, the inhabitants of Jerusalem, the children of Judah could not drive them out; but the Jebusites dwell with the children of Judah at Jerusalem to this day.

 

 

 

Joshua 15:1-12 (The Borders of the Land of Judah)

Artwork by Douglas Kallerson.

Joshua 15:1-12
The Borders of the Land of Judah

I went out to Boulder, Colorado, in September of 2021 to be with a friend as he buried his wife who was also my friend. I was only there a couple days and didn’t see much, but one thing that I remember clearly was a rocky outcropping on the top of a mountain called Devil’s Thumb.

I was told it was there but couldn’t really see it until we got to the right angle, and then it became pretty obvious. It stuck right out just like a big fat thumb. There will be a similar thumb in today’s passage.

You’ve heard the sermon passage mentioning the Stone of Bohan. We could just say, “Well, yeah, it’s there to mark out the border and nothing more.” And that could be true. But when the things referred to in these borders keep matching things found elsewhere in the Bible, it becomes harder and harder to simply dismiss them as coincidences.

I will admit to a bit of speculation for a couple of the names in this passage, but that is more likely my inability to properly analyze what is being presented than any lack in the biblical text.

The thing is, like all other typology, it has to match the other instances where the same things are mentioned, or we’re just making things up as we go. That’s not a good way to handle an evaluation of Scripture. But when it does match up, that makes it pretty certain that we are being shown more than just literal history, but typology as well.

Text Verse: “Every word of God is pure;
He is a shield to those who put their trust in Him.” Proverbs 30:5

If every word of God is pure, then it logically follows that every word of God also has purpose. In stating that something in the word is pure, and the Bible says a lot of things, then we can be confident that God has carefully placed each word in Scripture for a reason, or several reasons.

Solomon then goes on to say that God is a shield to those who put their trust in Him. Well, how does that come about? Someone could say some other supposed holy book was the word of God. So, do we just say, “Ok, then I will put my trust in the god seen in that book because someone said it?” That would be foolish.

So how do we determine if the word we have is really the word of God? By reading it, studying it, and then accepting or rejecting the premise stated in it. Paul says that faith comes by hearing and hearing by the word of God (Romans 10:17).

You can’t reasonably say, “This is the word of God” without actually checking it out. But once you checked it out, faith came. The word was heard, and only then was there the necessary response. To get this, think of someone printing off a stack of books with the words “The Holy Bible” on the outside but just blank pages on the inside.

See, it doesn’t work. This wonderful book that we go through each week is filled with evidence that it is what it claims to be. In today’s sermon, I am going on faith that the borders of Judah are telling us a story. Why? Because I have done the study. If you stick around, you’ll hear this presented. Then you can decide if it fits with what you know.

Great things truly are to be found in His superior word. And so, let us turn to that precious word once again, and… May God speak to us through His word today, and may His glorious name ever be praised.

I. This Is the Boundary (verses 1-12)

The methodical presentation of how the land is divided continues in Chapter 15. The narrative went from what was conquered under Joshua to what remained to be conquered (13:1-7). It next detailed the land inheritance of those east of the Jordan (13:8-14).

That was then further defined by detailing the land of each of the tribes east of the Jordan: Reuben, Gad, and the half-tribe of Manasseh (13:15-33). In Chapter 13, it twice noted that Levi had no inheritance, meaning land inheritance.

Chapter 14 first noted how the land west of the Jordan would be divided to the nine and one-half tribes, again noting that Levi received no land inheritance (14:1-5). Immediately after that, it detailed the inheritance to be given to Caleb (14:6-15).

With that logically presented and detailed, the division of the land to individual tribes west of the Jordan takes place. There is careful order in how each step is laid out. The first tribe’s land grant is here detailed, that of Judah…

So this was the lot of the tribe of the children of Judah according to their families:

v’hi ha’goral l’mateh bene Yehudah l’mishp’hotam – “And came the lot to tribe sons Judah to their families.” Of this initial division, Charles Ellicott provides a logical reason for Judah’s placement, which is otherwise unstated in the narrative –

“The question arises at this point how the position of the tribes of Judah, Ephraim, and Manasseh was determined. As to the remaining seven, see Note on Joshua 18:5-10. It is noticeable that Hebron appears to have been promised to Caleb (Joshua 14:12), and Shechem assigned to Joseph by Jacob (Genesis 48:21-22; Joshua 24:32). Did not this necessarily bring the tribe of Judah into the south, the neighbourhood of Hebron, and Ephraim (with his brother Manasseh) into the centre of the country?” Ellicott

His thoughts make sense. The lot is directed by the Lord. In order to keep the tribes together in a logical fashion, He determined each placement in accord with these earlier promises and also in accord with prophecies previously uttered.

In other words, and for example, Jacob prophesied that Simeon and Levi would be divided in Jacob and scattered in Israel (Genesis 49:7). The scattering of Levi has come about through their selection as ministers to the people and because they have no tribal land grant. Simeon’s scattering will come about when their land grant is placed within the borders of the already selected land grant of Judah.

Another example would be when Jacob prophesied that the Messiah would come from Judah (Genesis 49:10). To ensure this, Judah’s land grant will be in the protected southern area of the land.

While the northern tribes are exiled, Judah would remain a bastion of safety for those from any tribe who moved into that inheritance, thus preserving all tribes and allowing the Messiah to come forth as prophesied.

From this, it can be seen that everything in the Old Testament, and even into the New Testament gospels and Acts, finds its place based upon the land grants being made as determined by the Lord. As the proverb says –

“The lot is cast into the lap,
But its every decision is from the Lord.” Proverbs 16:33

As for the listing of Judah first, nothing is said regarding the order of the lots cast. It is the results of the cast lots that is the focus. The land division for these first three tribes is stated according to the positioning of the tribes, generally going from south to north. As for Judah’s land…

1 (con’t) The border of Edom at the Wilderness of Zin southward was the extreme southern boundary.

el gevul edom midbar tsin negbah miqtseh teman – “unto border Edom, Wilderness Tsin, southward extremity south.” This is the southern border of the land of Canaan as defined in Numbers 34. Hence, this means that Judah is the southernmost tribe. Edom means Red. Tsin means Thorn or Barb.

And their southern border began at the shore of the Salt Sea,

Not only is the land described from south to north, but it is described from east to west. These words read: v’hi lahem gevul negev miqtseh yam ha’melakh – “And came to them border south extremity Sea, the Salt.” This is the southeasternmost point of the land now granted to Judah. Hence, the eastern border lies along the Dead Sea, which is further described as…

2 (con’t) from the bay that faces southward.

min ha’lashon ha’poneh negbah – “from the tongue, the facer southward.” It is debated what this tongue is, be it a rock promontory, a salt marsh, or simply the southern end of the Dead Sea. Looking at maps of the land gives varied possibilities. As the same term is used again in verse 5 and referring to the north end of the sea, I deduce it is speaking of the southern end of the sea here.

Then it went out to the southern side of the Ascent of Akrabbim, passed along to Zin, ascended on the south side of Kadesh Barnea, passed along to Hezron, went up to Adar, and went around to Karkaa.

The names are: Maaleh Aqrabim or Ascent of Scorpions. There are scorpions in this barren area, but in Scripture, the scorpion is also used figuratively for a scourge. Tsin means Thorn. Qadesh Barnea means Holy Purifying Wanderings. Khetsron means Enclosure or Surrounded by a Wall. Adar means Wide Open Place, Honorable, or Majestic. Karkaa means Floor, Ground, or Pavement.

Kadesh Barnea is the area furthest south. It was first noted in Genesis 14 as En Mishpat. It is the area where Miriam died and where Moses and Aaron rebelled against the word of the Lord. At that time, it was called Meribah Kadesh.

From there it passed toward Azmon and went out to the Brook of Egypt; and the border ended at the sea.

Atsmon comes from atsom meaning mighty. That comes from etsem meaning a bone. The idea is that the skeletal structure is what provides strength. Thus, the place is called Mighty or Mighty One. The Brook of Egypt is Nakhal Mitsraim.

The noun nakhal comes from the verb nakhal meaning to take or get as a possession. Mitsraim, though debated, may mean Double Trouble.

4 (con’t) This shall be your southern border.

The words of this single clause go from the third-person past tense to the second-person future tense, following the same style as Moses in Numbers 34. The reason for this isn’t certain, but it is probably because this is not only the southern border of Judah’s inheritance, but it is also the southern border of Israel’s inheritance.

The east border was the Salt Sea as far as the mouth of the Jordan.

u’gevul qedemah yam ha’melakh ad qetseh ha’yarden – “And border eastward, Sea the Salt, unto extremity the Jordan.” The meaning is that the western shore of the Dead Sea would be Judah’s eastern border all the way to where the Jordan enters into the sea. At that point…

5 (con’t) And the border on the northern quarter began at the bay of the sea at the mouth of the Jordan.

u-gevul liphat tsaphonah mil’shon ha’yam miqtseh ha’yarden – “And border side northward from tongue the sea extremity the Jordan.” The meaning is that this northern border goes to the spot where the Jordan River flows into the Dead Sea. From there…

The border went up to Beth Hoglah and passed north of Beth Arabah;

v’alah ha’gevul beith haglah va’avar mitsphon l’beith ha’aravah – “And went up the border, Beth Hoglah, and passed over north to Beth Arabah.” Beith Khoglah means House of the Partridge, but it also means House of Turning in Joy. The word comes from khagal, to wobble or hop. It is the same name as one of the daughters of Zelophehad.

This is a point between the tribes of Judah and Benjamin but belonging to Benjamin. It is between Jericho and the Dead Sea.

Beith ha’Aravah means House of the Plain, but it is derived from arav, to give in pledge. Hence, it can also mean House of the Pledge. It is ascribed to Judah in Joshua 15:61 and then to Benjamin in Joshua 18:22. Hence, it was a joint border city. Next…

6 (con’t) and the border went up to the stone of Bohan the son of Reuben.

v’alah ha’gevul even bohan ben reuben – “and went up the border, Stone Bohan, son Reuben.” Bohan is identical to bohen, the thumb or big toe. It was probably a thick, prominent stone that was used as a landmark and named after a son of Reuben. Maybe he was buried there or did some heroic thing there. Strong’s defines the meaning as Closing, but I have no idea why.

Then the border went up toward Debir from the Valley of Achor, and it turned northward toward Gilgal, which is before the Ascent of Adummim, which is on the south side of the valley.

Debir means Place of the Word. This is not the same Debir as seen in Joshua 10 or the other Debir in Joshua 13. It is a third location with this name situated not too far from Jericho.

Achor means Trouble. This is most likely where Wadi Qelt is today. It received its name from the events recorded in Joshua 7 when Achan was taken out and then stoned and burned.

Gilgal (ha’Gilgal) means The Rolling Away, signifying the Liberty. Adummim is a plural word coming from adom, red, and adam, Adam or man. Thus, it is the Ascent of the Red Ones or Ascent of the Adams (men). That is said to be mi’negev la’nakhal, or from south to the wadi. The noun nakhal coming from the verb nakhal means to inherit.

7 (con’t) The border continued toward the waters of En Shemesh and ended at En Rogel.

En Shemesh means Fountain (Eye) of the Sun. It is identified today as the Apostle’s Spring which is about a mile below Bethany; it is the only spring on the road to Jericho

En Rogel could have a couple meanings. Rogel comes from regel meaning foot or ragal, to go about on foot. As such, it could mean Fountain (Eye) of the Fuller, because the foot is used for washing garments, or Fountain of the Traveler.

And the border went up by the Valley of the Son of Hinnom to the southern slope of the Jebusite city (which is Jerusalem).

v’alah ha’gevul ge ben hinom el ketheph haybusi mi’negev hi yerushalim – “And ascended the border valley Son Hinnom unto shoulder the Jebusite – it Jerusalem.” The word translated as valley is different than the previous verses. It is ge, coming from gavah, pride or confidence. That comes from gaah, to rise up, increase, etc.

The original meaning of Hinnom is pretty much lost. The few who attempt to translate it associate it with wailing. Hence, this could be paraphrased as “the exaltation of the Son of Groaning.” In the New Testament this, becomes the well-known Gehenna. It is a valley that runs along the border of Jerusalem.

Jebusite means Treading Down or Trodden Underfoot. Jerusalem can have various meanings, but Foundation of Peace is sufficient.

8 (con’t) The border went up to the top of the mountain that lies before the Valley of Hinnom westward, which is at the end of the Valley of Rephaim northward.

It is supposed by some that this is referring to Mt. Moriah seen in Genesis 22:2 and 2 Chronicles 3:1, the spot where Isaac was offered up and later where the temple was built. This is said to be at the end of emeq rephaim tsaphonah – “depth Rephaim, northward.” The emeq is a deep broad valley.

Rephaim comes from either raphah, to sink or relax, or from rapha, to heal. Strong’s goes with the latter. Thus, it would be the Depth of Healed Ones.

Then the border went around from the top of the hill to the fountain of the water of Nephtoah,

v’ta’ar ha’gevul me’rosh ha’har el mayan me nephtoakh – “And marked out the border from top the mountain unto fountain waters Nephtoah.” There is a new word here, ta’ar. It comes from a primitive root meaning to delineate. Hence, it means to extend, be drawn, or mark out.

There is a marking out of the area from the top of the mountain that extends to the fountain of these waters, identified as Ain Lifta which is northwest of Jerusalem. Nephtoakh means Opening.

9 (con’t) and extended to the cities of Mount Ephron.

The name Ephron comes from either opher, a deer, or aphar, dust. The same name was seen in Genesis 23 and signifies Of the Dust.

9 (con’t) And the border went around to Baalah (which is Kirjath Jearim).

v’ta’ar ha’gevul baalah hi qiryat yearim – “And marked out the border Baalah, it Kirjath Jearim.” Baalah means Lady or Mistress. Kirjath Jearim means City of Forests or City of Honeycombs. This city is noted in Scripture as the residence for the Ark of the Covenant for twenty years after it was sent back to Israel by the Philistines.

10 Then the border turned westward from Baalah to Mount Seir,

v’nasav ha’gevul mi’baalah yammah el har seir – “And went around, the border, from Baalah westward unto Mount Seir.” This is obviously not the same Mount Seir in Edom. But the name is the same, Mount Hairy, probably given because of its hairy appearance, being covered in low brush or bushes. From there…

10  (con’t) passed along to the side of Mount Jearim on the north (which is Chesalon), went down to Beth Shemesh, and passed on to Timnah.

Mount Jearim has the same meaning as Kirjath Jearim – Mount of Honeycombs or Mount of Trees. The name Chesalon comes from kasal, used only in Jeremiah 10:8 –

“Inasmuch as there is none like You, O Lord
(You are great, and Your name is great in might),
Who would not fear You, O King of the nations?
For this is Your rightful due.
For among all the wise men of the nations,
And in all their kingdoms,
There is none like You.
But they are altogether dull-hearted and foolish;
A wooden idol is a worthless doctrine.” Jeremiah 10:6-8

Some use the word in a manner that attempts to turn it into a good concept and thus translate Chesalon as Trust or Firm Confidence, but it appears to simply mean Mount Stupidity. Beth Shemesh means House of the Sun. Timnah means Allotted Portion. Timnah is said to be in Judah in verse 15:57, but it is said to be in Dan in verse 19:43. Hence, it too was a joint border city.

11 And the border went out to the side of Ekron northward.

As seen in Chapter 13, Ekron comes from aqar, to pluck up or uproot. But that is from the same as eqer, an offshoot or descendant. Hence, the name could mean either Offshoot or Uprooted. Zephaniah will make a play on the name later in Scripture, saying, “Ekron shall be Uprooted.”

In Joshua 10:43, Ekron is said to be in the original land grant of Dan. It is a city that remained pretty much under the control of the Philistines. Wikipedia notes –

“Since the discovery in 1996 of the Ekron inscription, Ekron has been positively identified with the mound of Tel Miqne (Hebrew) or Khirbet el-Muqanna (Arabic). The tell lies 35 kilometres (22 mi) west of Jerusalem, and 18 kilometres (11 mi) north of Tell es-Safi, the almost certain site of the Philistine city of Gath, on the grounds of Kibbutz Revadim on the eastern edge of the Israeli coastal plain.”

11 (con’t) Then the border went around to Shicron, passed along to Mount Baalah, and extended to Jabneel;

Shicron supposedly comes from shakar, to become drunk. However, the root skr can mean either shakar or sakir, hired, sakar, to hire, wage, and so on. As such, it does not have to indicate being drunk, but wages. Jabneel comes from banah, to build, and el, God. Hence it is something like Built of God.

11 (con’t) and the border ended at the sea.

v’hayu tots’oth ha’gevul yamah – “and have been outgoings the border westward.” The meaning is seaward and thus the Mediterranean Sea. The entire northern border is thus complete. From there, the final border is described…

12 The west border was the coastline of the Great Sea.

u-gevul yam ha’yamah ha’gadol – “And border west the Sea the Great.” The same word, yam, means both sea and west. This is because directions are often defined by the layout of the land as one is standing in Canaan looking east. With that, the verses today finish with…

*12 (fin) This is the boundary of the children of Judah all around according to their families.

zeh gevul bene Yehuda saviv l’misp’hotam – “This boundary sons Judah around to their families.” One can see how this clause of verse 12 complements the opening verse of the chapter. They are like bookends to the section which has been presented –

v.1 – And came the lot to tribe sons Judah to their families.
v.12 – This boundary sons Judah around to their families.

The tribe of Judah, from which will descend the Messiah Himself, is thus described according to all of the names presented. However, it is certain is that this is more than just a list of marking points to define the land where Judah will dwell.

That will be seen as we continue. God is telling us a story about the coming Messiah, if we will just pay heed…

These are the borders of My land known as Praise
And together they have a story to tell us
It is a story that will continue on for eternal days
It is the story of our Lord, Jesus

Every detail gives us hints of what He has done
Or of how it is realized in each of us
The marvelous details concerning God’s own Son
Glorious pictures of our Lord, Jesus

God has set forth these things, allowing us to see
The beautiful things that Christ has done for us
The truths are found in the gospel that He offers for free
It is the precious gift of God, the gospel of our Lord, Jesus

II. Pictures of Christ

The borders of Judah were marked out, but Scripture doesn’t say how this came about. Whether it is the same process that is detailed for the northern tribes in Joshua 18 or not, we can’t know. All we are told in verse 1 is that this lot came out for Judah.

As the lot is directed by the Lord, that is sufficient for deciding the rest of the land divisions. Whether marked out by man and then decided by lot for the tribe, or whether the Lord decided the borders and then the tribe, or the tribe and then the borders, it doesn’t matter. There are borders, and they form a land grant. That grant is now given to Judah.

I will give the details of each place mentioned, but I don’t want to make stuff up. When my comments are speculative, I will let you know. As for these borders of Judah, or Praise, I suggest they are given as a snapshot of the work of Christ and how it applies to His people, including the state of His people.

The southern border, the right-hand border as Canaan is laid out, gives numerous references to Christ and His work. Edom’s border is the first thing mentioned and it defines Judah’s southern border. Edom means Red, but its letters are identical to adam, Adam/man. The picture of Adam and Edom in Genesis 25 was very clear, as other pictures have been since.

Christ is noted as the second Man and the last Adam, in 1 Corinthians 15 –

“And so it is written, ‘The first man Adam became a living being.’ The last Adam became a life-giving spirit.” 1 Corinthians 15:45

“The first man was of the earth, made of dust; the second Man is the Lord from heaven.” 1 Corinthians 15:47

This border was also said to be at the Wilderness of Zin or Thorn. In the Bible, the wilderness signifies an uncultivated area, not necessarily a barren desert. It is a place of God’s grace and of closeness to God, but it is also a place of testing.

For some, such as Israel, the testing resulted in disobedience. For others, such as when Christ was tested, it is a place of fellowship through obedience. The wilderness and the law are closely connected because it is by law that testing is accomplished.

As for the Wilderness of Zin, that was seen several times as typical of Christ’s cross. This is the extreme right or southern border.” The implication is that because the right is the position of power, the cross is the ultimate expression of the power of God in Christ –

“For the message of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God.” 1 Corinthians 1:18

If the message of the cross is the power of God, then it is the cross itself that demonstrates that power. The southern border was next said to begin at the southern border of the Salt Sea. Salt is a sign of the covenant, and it also signifies incorruptibility, an obvious picture of Christ’s incorruptibility, proven through His death and resurrection (Acts 2:31).

Akrabbim, or Scorpions, anticipates Christ’s scourging. The word scorpion is used elsewhere metaphorically in this manner. Kadesh Barnea, Holy Purifying Wanderings, is the extreme southern part of the wilderness of Zin. It anticipates the perfect work of Christ. Hezron, or Enclosure, anticipates His tomb.

Adar would signify the majestic nature of the Lord’s work (Luke 9:43, 2 Peter 1:16, etc.). Karkaa (Pavement) would anticipate the Pavement (Gabbatha) where Christ was judged in John 19:13. Atsom, Mighty, speaks of the mighty nature of Christ’s work.

These are not in order in the narrative, but! that only makes sense because they are north of Kadesh Barnea in the Wilderness of Zin which anticipates His cross. Hence they are anticipating the cross as the south is approached. The brook of Egypt, nakhal mitsraim, is the anticipation of the inheritance of those who were in Double Trouble – fallen and without God in the world.

This is the southern border. It anticipates Christ’s work, the power of God unto salvation brought about through His life, fulfilling of the law, death in fulfillment of the law, and the application of those things to the people of the world.

The statement which was in a different tense than the others, “This shall be your southern border,” anticipates that the typology extends beyond Judah to all of Israel. This would then be inclusive of Gentiles who are brought into the commonwealth of Israel (Ephesians 2:12). As such, it is an all-inclusive statement concerning the scope of the completed work of Christ.

With that, the eastern border was defined in verse 5 as the western border of the Salt Sea. The word qedemah, or eastward, was used. Qedem signifies east, but it also signifies before, earlier, and even everlasting in the Bible.

Again, it speaks of the nature of the covenant, which would be the New Covenant because the Jordan (the Descender, Christ Jesus) falls into the Salt Sea. His perfect work anticipates His incorruptible nature, the perfection of the New Covenant, and the eternal nature of that covenant.

The northern border has a lot of names in it. North is the dark or hidden direction in Scripture. We can think of it anticipating those who are hidden in Christ. In other words, the effects of the work of Christ as they apply to His people.

As just relayed, that begins at the Jordan as it falls into the Salt Sea. One must come through the Jordan (through Christ) to enter the inheritance. That is through His death, burial, and resurrection – typified by the Jordan at the mouth of the Salt (Dead) Sea.

Beth Hoglah, the House of Turning in Joy, anticipates the state of believers in their salvation. Beth Aravah, House of the Pledge, signifies the state of being sealed with the Spirit –

“Now He who establishes us with you in Christ and has anointed us is God, 22 who also has sealed us and given us the Spirit in our hearts as a guarantee [Greek: arrabón/pledge].” 2 Corinthians 1:21, 22 (see also 2 Corinthians 5:5 and Ephesians 1:13, 14)

The stone of Bohan, or Thumb, is next. Stone signifies establishment, as in setting up a pillar. It signifies permanence; that which is established is set to stand firm. It signifies resiliency and strength, as in that which is fixed and unyielding.

The thumb represents the hand and thus action. It is that which has the ability to grasp firmly. It anticipates the eternal security of the believer, something that follows naturally after the pledge of the Spirit. Adding in the name Reuben, meaning, See a Son, would anticipate the sonship of those who are in Christ. As Paul says, “For you are all sons of God through faith in Christ Jesus” (Galatians 3:26).

Verse 7 anticipates the trek believers take in Christ. It says the border went to Debir, Place of the Word, from the Valley (Depth) of Trouble. Man in Christ was in the depth of trouble. He hears the word and believes. From there, it goes to ha’Gilgal, the Liberty, just as man enters into the Liberty found in Christ. The reproach is rolled away.

That is said to be before the Ascent of Adummim, or Ascent of the Red Ones (men). It is the heavenly promise noted many times in Scripture, such as Ephesians 2:6 where believers are said to be raised up and seated in the heavenly places in Christ Jesus.

This location was on the south side of the valley. The word negev, or parched, is used. The valley is nakhal, an inheritance. The meaning seems obvious. Even though we have the heavenly inheritance in Christ, until things are finished, we are still on the dry side of glory, awaiting the life that is truly life where the waters of life flow copiously and constantly.

The border then continues to En Shemesh, Fountain of the Sun, and ends at En Rogel, Fountain of the Fuller. It speaks of the eternal light of Christ (Malachi 4:2) and thus the eternal flowing of light where there will be no night (Revelation 22:5), and of the eternally purified garments such as those mentioned in Revelation 3:5.

Verse 8 continues with the effects of the work of Christ on His people. It mentions the Valley of the Son of Hinnom – the exaltation of the Son of Groaning. Christ went through His passion and because of it, He now brings each of us out of our own state of groaning –

“For we know that the whole creation groans and labors with birth pangs together until now. 23 Not only that, but we also who have the firstfruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, eagerly waiting for the adoption, the redemption of our body.” Romans 8:22, 23

It then mentioned the Jebusite, the Treading Down. The word is derived from bus, to tread down or trample. The thought is expressed in Psalm 60 –

“Give us help from trouble,
For the help of man is useless.
12 Through God we will do valiantly,
For it is He who shall tread down [bus] our enemies.” Psalm 60:11, 12

Immediately after that, it said, “It Jerusalem.” The Foundation of Peace is realized because of our position in Christ.

Next, it said, “The border went up to the top of the mountain before the Valley [ge] of Hinnom westward, which is at the end of the Valley [emeq] of Rephaim northward.” A paraphrase of the two would be “the exaltation of groaning and the depth of the healed ones.” Each again anticipates the state of believers.

The fountain of Nephtoah anticipates eternal access into glory, symbolized by the gates that are never shut in the New Jerusalem (Revelation 21:25). Mount Ephron is given to anticipate the gathering of those “Of the Dust,” meaning the redeemed of humanity.

As for the next two names, I mentioned I don’t want to be dogmatic. I can only speculate and tell you what I think. Baalah is a feminine word. The word baal means “Master.”

Hence, Baalah, means Lady, but not as we think of as a general female. Rather, we can think of Lords and Ladies. My supposition would be it refers to the church as whole, a feminine noun. This was also called Kirjath Jearim. The standard meaning is City of Honeycombs or City of Forests. However, Abarim says –

“The verb יער (ya’ar) isn’t used in the Bible and it’s a complete mystery what it might have meant. Noun יער (ya’ar) is the common word for forest or thicket, and the identical noun יער (ya’ar) means honeycomb. It is, of course, perfectly possibly that these two nouns are not two but one, describing something general like a thing that consists of many elements, which contain energetic nutrients (either fruits or honey)…” Abarim

Therefore, this could be an explanation of the church, a group derived from many people, each filled with individual fruit of the Spirit. That’s the best I can do on this location. But it is actually supportable by the comparison of Israel to a forest in Malachi 7:14 –

“Tend Thy people with Thy staff, the flock of Thy heritage, That dwell solitarily, as a forest in the midst of the fruitful field; Let them feed in Bashan and Gilead, as in the days of old” (JPS Tanakh)

From there, it again mentions Baalah turning to Mt. Seir, meaning Hairy. Hair in the Bible signifies awareness, especially the awareness of sin. This would fit perfectly with those in the church who are both aware of sin and have handed that sin over to Christ.

As this seems likely, the next words would then follow logically. Mount Jearim would represent the gathering of the church that is restated as “it Chesalon.” Chesalon is the Mount of the Foolish, and it is well reflected by Paul’s words of 1 Corinthians 1:27 (and elsewhere) where he says that God has chosen the foolish things of the world to put to shame the wise.

The idea of being foolish is used in an ironic way when referring to believers, but it fits the typology here. The next two references are the House of the Sun, an obvious picture of the eternal nature of the light in the New Jerusalem.

In Revelation, it does say that there will be no sun. However, seeing as how Jesus is the Sun of Righteousness and He will be there, and because He is the lamp of the light of God, the typology fits. Timnah, Allotted Portion, is exactly what believers anticipate, meaning their allotted portion in glory.

Naming Ekron, or Offshoot, again speaks of the state of believers in Christ. Shicron or Wages, seems out of place as wages are usually negatively associated with earning one’s way. But when the wages are applied to Christ, such as in Zechariah 11:12, and then placed alongside the last two named places, Mount Baalah and Jabneel, the meaning seems clear.

The wages (Shicron) paid by Christ form the gathering of the church (Mount Baalah) which is Built of God (Jabneel). With that, the northern border is ended. All that is left is the west which is the Great Sea. That anticipates the state of eternally seeking after God.

Revelation 4:6 says there is a sea like glass before the throne of God. It later says there is no sea in the New Jerusalem because the sea in Scripture pictures the chaos/churning of the nations. The sea before the throne is placid like glass. There is harmony and tranquility before God. The west is the direction of the Holy of Holies and is emblematic of the throne of God. Hence, the Great Sea anticipates that.

With that, our passage for today is complete. As I mentioned, there are a few points that I feel confident enough to speculate on, but not confident enough to say with certainty.

Remember that when you listen to preachers evaluate the word. And the only way you can truly do that is to read and know the word as well. Take time to do that each day; at least two or ten times each day. And maybe get an audio Bible for your time in the car.

The more you take in the word, the better prepared you will be to walk away from people that misuse it. Above all, be sound in your doctrine about Jesus. If nothing else, be sure about that. If you get Him wrong, the rest of the Bible will be totally out of whack. Jesus! Jesus! Jesus! He is the key to salvation. Without Him, there can be no salvation.

Hold fast to Jesus, the One who all of this precious word anticipates, reveals, and explains. Yes, hold fast to Jesus.

Closing Verse: “For this reason we also thank God without ceasing, because when you received the word of God which you heard from us, you welcomed it not as the word of men, but as it is in truth, the word of God, which also effectively works in you who believe.” 1 Thessalonians 2:13

Next Week: Joshua 15:13-63 More precious than the biggest heists of lootah!… (A Share Among the Children of Judah)

The Lord has you exactly where He wants you. He has a good plan and purpose for you. It is He who has defeated the enemy and who now offers His people rest. So, follow Him and trust Him and He will do marvelous things for you and through you.

The Borders of the Land of Judah

So this was the lot of the tribe
Of the children of Judah according to each family:
The border of Edom at the Wilderness of Zin
Southward was the extreme southern boundary

And their southern border began at the shore of the Salt Sea
From the bay that faces southward
Then it went out to the southern side of the Ascent of Akrabbim
Passed along to Zin, yes Zin-ward

Ascended on the south side of Kadesh Barnea
Passed along to Hezron, how about that, ha?
Went up to Adar
And then around to Karkaa

From there it passed toward Azmon
And went out to the Brook of Egypt
And the border ended at the sea
This shall be your southern border, so don’t feel jipped

The east border was the Salt Sea
As far as the mouth of the Jordan (which rhymes with Gordon)
And the border on the northern quarter
Began at the bay of the sea at the mouth of the Jordan

The border went up to Beth Hoglah
And passed north of Beth Arabah, there and then
And the border went up to the stone
Of Bohan the son of Reuben

Then the border went up toward Debir from the Valley of Achor
And it turned northward toward Gilgal, where the troops rally
Which is before the Ascent of Adummim
On the south side of the valley

The border continued toward the waters of En Shemesh
And ended at En Rogel (let’s not hear any haw or hem)
And the border went up by the Valley of the Son of Hinnom
To the southern slope of the Jebusite city (which is Jerusalem)

The border went up to the top of the mountain
That lies westward before the Valley of Hinnom
Which is at the end of the Valley
Of Rephaim northward, where Rephaim roam

Then the border went around from the top
Of the hill to Nephtoah’s fountain of water (flowing to the brim)
And extended to the cities of Mount Ephron
And the border went around to Baalah (which is Kirjath Jearim)

Then the border turned westward from Baalah to Mount Seir
Passed along to the side of Mount Jearim – oohrah!
On the north (which is Chesalon)
Went down to Beth Shemesh, and passed on to Timnah

And the border went out to the side of Ekron northward
Then the border went around to Shicron, as you can see
Passed along to Mount Baalah, and extended to Jabneel
And the border ended at the sea

The west border was the coastline of the Great Sea
This is the children of Judah’s boundary

According to their families all around
This was Judah’s piece of ground

Lord God, turn our hearts to be obedient to Your word
Give us wisdom to be ever faithful to You
May we carefully heed each thing we have heard
Yes, Lord God may our hearts be faithful and true

And we shall be content and satisfied in You alone
We will follow You as we sing our songs of praise
Hallelujah to You; to us Your path You have shown
Hallelujah we shall sing to You for all of our days

Hallelujah and Amen…

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

So this was the lot of the tribe of the children of Judah according to their families:

The border of Edom at the Wilderness of Zin southward was the extreme southern boundary. And their southern border began at the shore of the Salt Sea, from the bay that faces southward. Then it went out to the southern side of the Ascent of Akrabbim, passed along to Zin, ascended on the south side of Kadesh Barnea, passed along to Hezron, went up to Adar, and went around to Karkaa. From there it passed toward Azmon and went out to the Brook of Egypt; and the border ended at the sea. This shall be your southern border.

The east border was the Salt Sea as far as the mouth of the Jordan.

And the border on the northern quarter began at the bay of the sea at the mouth of the Jordan. The border went up to Beth Hoglah and passed north of Beth Arabah; and the border went up to the stone of Bohan the son of Reuben. Then the border went up toward Debir from the Valley of Achor, and it turned northward toward Gilgal, which is before the Ascent of Adummim, which is on the south side of the valley. The border continued toward the waters of En Shemesh and ended at En Rogel. And the border went up by the Valley of the Son of Hinnom to the southern slope of the Jebusite city (which is Jerusalem). The border went up to the top of the mountain that lies before the Valley of Hinnom westward, which is at the end of the Valley of Rephaim northward. Then the border went around from the top of the hill to the fountain of the water of Nephtoah, and extended to the cities of Mount Ephron. And the border went around to Baalah (which is Kirjath Jearim). 10 Then the border turned westward from Baalah to Mount Seir, passed along to the side of Mount Jearim on the north (which is Chesalon), went down to Beth Shemesh, and passed on to Timnah. 11 And the border went out to the side of Ekron northward. Then the border went around to Shicron, passed along to Mount Baalah, and extended to Jabneel; and the border ended at the sea.

12 The west border was the coastline of the Great Sea. This is the boundary of the children of Judah all around according to their families.