Matthew 12:26

Wednesday, 13 August 2025

If Satan casts out Satan, he is divided against himself. How then will his kingdom stand? Matthew 12:26

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at the “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen)

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“And if the Satan, he ejects the Satan, he divided upon himself. How then, it will stand, his kingdom?” (CG).

In the previous verse, Jesus noted what would happen if a kingdom were divided against itself. Using the same idea to ensure the point is understood, He next says, “And if the Satan, he ejects the Satan, he divided upon himself.”

This is the second time that Satan is mentioned in the New Testament. The first time was in Matthew 4:10 during Christ’s temptation in the wilderness. At times, it is stated as a name or an appellative, as in Matthew 4:10. In Matthew 4:10, it said, “Withdraw, you Satan!” The meaning is probably closest to, “Withdraw, you Accuser!”

In this verse, both times it is preceded by a definite article, “the Satan” and thus “the Accuser.” Thus, it signifies, “And if the Accuser, he ejects the Accuser, he divided upon himself.” As such, it is not that one of his subordinates is ejecting another. It is as if he is ejecting himself.

It would be comparable to Joe Biden picking himself up and tossing himself out of the White House. That may be something the general public wished had taken place, but if it did, it would mean that he would no longer be in the White House. Instead, the American public was relieved of him in another way.

The point of Jesus’ words is that what the Pharisees accuse Jesus of, meaning casting out demons by the ruler of demons, signifies that when a demon enters a person, Satan has essentially entered that person as well. When Satan ejects a demon, he ejects himself. The thought is contradictory to furthering his goals, but more, it is contradictory to logic.

The words are not present tense, saying, “he is divided against himself.” Rather, the verb being aorist says, “he divided himself.” The division is stated regardless of a particular time. It is simply a fact that at some point, when Satan takes such an action, he has at that time divided himself.

As for Jesus’ continued words in such an instance, He remarks concerning the Accuser, “How then, it will stand, his kingdom?” The question demands a negative response: “It cannot.” If the verb were present tense, “he is divided against himself,” it could mean he could repair the division.

However, with the aorist verb, “he divided himself,” the repair is impossible. Therefore, just as a kingdom divided against itself cannot stand, Satan ejecting himself from his subjects has caused his kingdom to fall.

Logically, then, if Satan had given Jesus the authority to cast out demons, he would have given Him the authority to cast himself out. The proposition is ludicrous to even the poorest thinker. As such, Jesus is thoroughly shaming the thought processes of the Pharisees who spoke before thinking.

Life application: Jesus speaks of Satan as a real entity. He acknowledges angels and demons as well. Paul also speaks of the spiritual battle that believers face in Ephesians 6. Unfortunately, Christians cling to this as if we could lose the battle. They dwell on the negative aspect as if it is something that could thoroughly overwhelm us.

Hollywood is great with this, leading people to assume that Satan can steal away people’s souls while making no distinction between believers and unbelievers. In the case of believers, this is incorrect. Jesus has prevailed over Satan and his demons.

During this life, we can be afflicted by these spiritual forces, but if we are in Christ, we will never again be subject to their permanent rule. Paul even tells us of this in 1 Corinthians 5. Speaking of a wayward believer, he says, “…deliver such a one to Satan for the destruction of the flesh, that his spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord Jesus.”

Paul’s words of Ephesians 6 give us instruction for conducting our lives as Christians during this life, not “for” the next life. If you want to be free from spiritual affliction, follow the guidelines given there. But your eternal destiny, that of full restoration with God through Christ Jesus, was settled when you believed the gospel.

Don’t have the defeated attitude that so many Christians carry around with them. Christ has prevailed! In Him, we too have prevailed. The more we rely on Him and what He has done, the surer we will be that this is true. Stand firm in your salvation, apply the words of Scripture to your life, and don’t let the accuser and his minions rob you of your joy in Christ.

Lord God, thank You that because Christ has prevailed, we too have prevailed. May we stand fast in our salvation, knowing that we are free from law and therefore free from the imputation of sin. As this is so, we are free from the consequences that result from breaking the law. Satan can no longer hold such against us. Thank You, O God, that Jesus has prevailed! Amen.

 

Matthew 12:25

Tuesday, 12 August 2025

But Jesus knew their thoughts, and said to them: “Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation, and every city or house divided against itself will not stand. Matthew 12:25

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at the “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen).

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“And Jesus, having known their thoughts, He said to them, ‘Every kingdom, having divided against itself, it desolates, and every city or house having divided against itself, not it will stand’” (CG).

In the previous verse, Jesus was accused by the Pharisees of casting out demons by Beelzebul. This was obviously done quietly among themselves or towards the crowds without Jesus directly hearing it because Matthew next records, “And Jesus, having known their thoughts.”

Jesus perceived their thoughts even though He was not openly privy to their conversation. It is a trait that belongs to God –

“I, the Lord, search the heart,
I test the mind,
Even to give every man according to his ways,
According to the fruit of his doings.” Jeremiah 17:10

In knowing what they were thinking, He responds to their accusations, as recorded by Matthew, “He said to them, ‘Every kingdom, having divided against itself, it desolates.’”

There are two new words. The first is merizó, to apportion. As such, in this context, it signifies to divide one part from another. The second is erémoó, to desolate or make waste. If a kingdom is united, it will be alive and thriving, but when it is divided, it will become like a ruined wilderness where nothing productive takes place.

The sly accusation of the Pharisees does not hold water because it stands against simple logic. Jesus next provides a second example to solidify this truth, saying, “and every city or house having divided against itself, not it will stand.”

This is an example that would have been obvious to even someone as observantly dull about the world around them as the Pharisees. They may have been so stuck in their legalism that they never lifted their eyes to see how the normal world works, but Scripture and history would tell them that a city that did not possess the same goals and spirit of unity could not stand –

“And the house of Joseph also went up against Bethel, and the Lord was with them. 23 So the house of Joseph sent men to spy out Bethel. (The name of the city was formerly Luz.) 24 And when the spies saw a man coming out of the city, they said to him, ‘Please show us the entrance to the city, and we will show you mercy.’ 25 So he showed them the entrance to the city, and they struck the city with the edge of the sword; but they let the man and all his family go. 26 And the man went to the land of the Hittites, built a city, and called its name Luz, which is its name to this day.” Judges 1:22-26

A single man not in step with the rest of the city brought the city to destruction. Evidence of such division makes the accusation of the Pharisees completely untenable.

Life application: Paul spends most of his time in the book of 1 Corinthians writing against divisions within the church. He does this because of the very precept Jesus highlights in this verse. The church at Corinth had many divisions of various types. If this problem were not corrected, the church could not stand.

His letter is a warning and admonition to churches throughout the age. Unless there is unity within the church, little divisions will lead to a total division of the congregation or even a total collapse of the church.

People have many pet peeves that drive their choice of church attendance. Generally, doctrine is not first and foremost on people’s minds. Some people want comfortable chairs. Some want a church where food is served. Some look for a certain type of entertainment.

When these types of things are one’s priority for church attendance, it is a rather shallow foundation on which continued attendance can be expected. With a simple change in the direction of the music, some will protest. If their protest isn’t catered to, there will be disharmony. Depending on the size of the church, it can cause a split, or it may just cause those who are disenchanted to find another church.

As silly as this seems, it is as common as chicken meals at KFC. Churches, first and foremost, are intended to analyze and instruct in the word, which explains God and His redemptive plans for man through Jesus Christ. Once this main reason for gathering loses priority, there is no longer a sound footing for the church to continue without division.

Hold fast to the word, honor God through Jesus, and be ready to restore harmony within the church when it is called for. Jesus spoke about division and its consequences. Paul then set the example for us in his letters. We should do our best to emulate his instruction.

“Now I plead with you, brethren, by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that you all speak the same thing, and that there be no divisions among you, but that you be perfectly joined together in the same mind and in the same judgment. 11 For it has been declared to me concerning you, my brethren, by those of Chloe’s household, that there are contentions among you. 12 Now I say this, that each of you says, ‘I am of Paul,’ or ‘I am of Apollos,’ or ‘I am of Cephas,’ or ‘I am of Christ.’ 13 Is Christ divided? Was Paul crucified for you? Or were you baptized in the name of Paul?” 1 Corinthians 1:10-13

Lord God, may we stand united in our devotion to You and to growing in You through a proper evaluation and right understanding of Your word. Help us in this, O God, so that we may be mature in our thinking, always placing You first in our hearts and lives. Amen.

 

Matthew 12:24

Monday, 11 August 2025

Now when the Pharisees heard it they said, “This fellow does not cast out demons except by Beelzebub, the ruler of the demons.” Matthew 12:24

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at the “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen).

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“And the Pharisees, having heard, they said, ‘This, not He ejects the demons if not in Beelzebul, prince of the demons’” (CG).

In the previous verse, the people, although not committed to the proposition, somewhat suspected that Jesus may be the Son of David. Having stated this, the usual suspects now chime in. Matthew records, “And the Pharisees, having heard.”

Having seen their track record thus far, it can already be surmised that these men were indignant at the very thought of Jesus being the anticipated Messiah. Therefore, “they said, ‘This, not He ejects the demons if not in Beelzebul, prince of the demons.’”

There is no article before “prince” or “ruler” (NKJV). Thus, the statement speaks of a title more than a position. One can see the emphatic retort to the people’s questioning –

23 ‘Not any, this, He is the Son of David?’
24 ‘This, not He ejects the demons if not in Beelzebul, prince of the demons.’

In order to draw the people’s speculation away from Jesus possibly being the Son of David, they go to the most extreme resolution possible. Not only is He not the Son of David, but He also isn’t even just a charlatan. Rather, He has power, but that power is surely derived from he who is prince of the demons!

They couldn’t deny that the miracles were real. The evidence was there before them. But they would never come to acknowledge that what Jesus did was of God. Therefore, the certain explanation that they clung to was that Jesus’ power was demonic.

Because of their words, Jesus will carefully explain why their reasoning is faulty and why they are in serious trouble before God because of their accusation.

Life application: On 24 June 2025, Adam Sheafe was arrested for crucifying an Arizona pastor several months earlier. Sheafe intended to kill fourteen more pastors, all because they believe in Jesus. The news service said –

“The suspect described his plan as ‘Operation First Commandment’ and claimed that the Bible’s New Testament teachings about Jesus Christ go against the biblical commandment that says, ‘You shall have no other gods before me.’ Sheafe stated, ‘His commandments have been annulled by this character called Jesus, a human being who I believe is the son of Satan’” (American Military News).

Sheafe is obviously theologically confused. But what would lead someone to take such a stand? The answer is because he was told something about Scripture that was incorrect and, instead of doing the research, he trusted what he was told.

The people of Israel were presented with the obvious truth that Jesus was capable of healing the deaf and blind, and yet they questioned whether He was the Messiah or not. To rob them of any faith that may have sprouted in their hearts, the Pharisees quickly intervened and assured them that Jesus was healing by the power of Beelzebul.

It is one thing to listen to authority figures, and it is another to do so without checking what they say. Israel was presented with their Messiah. They rejected Him as a nation, and it caused them to, once again, fall under the curses of the Law of Moses. They had agreed to the law, they were to live by it, and they were to accept what it taught.

As Jesus noted in John 5, Moses wrote about Him. In Luke 24:27, it says, “beginning at Moses and all the Prophets, He expounded to them in all the Scriptures the things concerning Himself.” Israel rejected this. They continue to do so today.

Unfortunately, because of the teachings of modern-day Judaizers and Hebrew Roots adherents, this attitude has spread around the world. Like the Roman Catholic Church, their doctrine denies the all-sufficiency of Christ’s work, mandating individual works as a part of the salvation process.

Law has been the problem since the first days of man on earth. It remains a problem to this day. It is what puts a wall between God and man. What is needed is God’s grace. We cannot find life without it, and we cannot find healing and restoration apart from it.

May we remember this lesson. Jesus came to demonstrate to Israel that He was their Messiah. As a part of this demonstration, He gave His life up in fulfillment of the Law of Moses. Why would we ever want to go back to that? May we go forward in God’s grace, living for Him and honoring Him by honoring the full, finished, final, and forever work of Jesus Christ our Lord.

Lord God, thank You for the all-sufficient nature of Christ’s work. Through what He has done, we are fully reconciled to You. Thank You for Jesus, our Lord and Savior. Amen.

 

1 Samuel 4:1-11 (He Came, God, Unto the Encampment)

Artwork by Douglas Kallerson.

1 Samuel 4:1-11
He Came, God, Unto the Encampment

(Typed 19 May 2025) Humans have a propensity to treat God, or some aspect of Him, like a talisman. This is the basis of idolatry.

For example, Buddhists’ gods are not just external beings that are there to tend to the people, receive worship, and so forth. There are statues of Buddha that they pray to, and they carry things around which they think will protect them, etc.

Hinduism is similar, but it takes things to another level. Hindus form things and then call those things gods. In other words, the thing that is formed by man becomes a god. This is not unique to Hinduism. In fact, Isaiah 44:9-17 records the Israelites doing exactly that.

This is just one of the innumerable ways that Israel strayed from proper worship of the Lord. One of the ways they treated the Lord shamefully is found in the passage today. They suffered defeat at the hands of the Philistines, so they brought the Ark of the Lord out to battle in hopes of making things better.

The ark became a talisman to them. It wasn’t the Lord or their relationship with Him that they were concerned about. Instead, it was the ark that they thought would bring them the victory. Many hundreds of years later, the people had still learned nothing…

Text Verse: “Do not trust in these lying words, saying, ‘The temple of the Lord, the temple of the Lord, the temple of the Lord are these.” Jeremiah 7:4

In Jeremiah’s time, the people were trusting in the temple of the Lord for their safety and security. Their relationship with Him didn’t matter at all, as testified to by Jeremiah and the other prophets of his time.

The people went on doing whatever corrupt thing they wanted, assuming they had a pass because they had the temple of the Lord among them. But the temple of the Lord is only an edifice constructed for the presence of the Lord in a limited sense.

Solomon acknowledged this when he said, “But will God indeed dwell on the earth? Behold, heaven and the heaven of heavens cannot contain You. How much less this temple which I have built!” (1 Kings 8:27).

The special presence of the Lord in the temple was conditioned upon the obedience of the people. Jeremiah told the people this and was almost executed for it. Had it not been for the words of Micah, who proclaimed essentially the same thing, a prophet whose writings were already canonized, Jeremiah would have met his end.

What are you trusting in to be right with God? Do you think your association with a church will make you pleasing to God? Will a close friendship with a supposed “holy” person, the amount you give to a church, or some other things do it?

Will observing the laws God has set forth in His word make you right with Him? Many people observed the law during Jesus’ time, and His words were often harsh and direct toward them. He never told them to ignore God’s laws, but their observance of the law was lacking something.

Think. Consider what God will accept. The Bible is the source for us to know, with all certainty, what God is looking for in order to have a right relationship with Him. Whether it was during the time of the law or after its annulment and the introduction of the New Covenant, what God is looking for is faith.

This is a certain truth that is to be found in His superior word. And so, let us turn to that precious word once again, and… May God speak to us through His word today, and may His glorious name ever be praised.

I. May It Come in Our Midst (verses 1-4)

And the word of Samuel came to all Israel.

vayhi devar shemuel lekhal Yisrael – “And it is, word Samuel, to all Israel.” There is a great deal of dissension on where these words belong. Various manuscripts, such as the Vulgate, Septuagint, Syriac, and Arabic, place them at the end of Chapter 3 in order to disassociate them from the coming narrative.

In other words, if Samuel was receiving the word, and if the battle was a failure, how can that be reconciled? Catholic Bibles, following the Vulgate, have this clause at the end of Chapter 3. Even some non-Catholic Bibles follow this pattern.

After this clause, Samuel will not be mentioned again until verse 7:3. Samuel means Asked from God. What I suggest is that the account after this clause is an explanatory insert, like a lengthy parenthetical statement that ends in Chapter 7 when the narrative is again picked up –

“And it is, word Samuel, to all Israel. … And He spoke, Samuel, unto all house Israel, to say, ‘If in all your heart you returning unto Yehovah, you must cause to turn aside gods the foreign in your midst, and the Ashtaroth, and you must cause to erect your heart unto Yehovah you must serve Him to His separation. And may He deliver you from hand Philistines.” 4:1 … 7:3 (CG)

The need to divert from the Hebrew is eliminated and the abruptness of this first clause of the chapter is softened by following this approach. The rest of the intervening verses provide an explanation of how things came to the point where Samuel is the one instructing Israel when the narrative arrives there.

1 (con’t) Now Israel went out to battle against the Philistines,

vayetse Yisrael liqrath pelishtim lamilkhamah – “And he went out, Israel, to encounter Philistines to the battle.” These words provide a connection back to Judges 13:1 –

“Again the children of Israel did evil in the sight of the Lord, and the Lord delivered them into the hand of the Philistines for forty years.”

Assumptions have to be made concerning this forty-year period, but it began before the birth of Samson as noted in Judges 13:5. Allowing time for Samson to grow and assume his role, it says in Judges 15:20 that he judged Israel 20 years in the days of the Philistines.

This would bring the forty-year period into the early time of 1 Samuel. It is probable that the judgeship of Eli was contemporary with Samson, something that was seen elsewhere in Judges. This seems like a strong possibility because it says in 1 Samuel 7 –

“Then Samuel spoke to all the house of Israel, saying, ‘If you return to the Lord with all your hearts, then put away the foreign gods and the Ashtoreths from among you, and prepare your hearts for the Lord, and serve Him only; and He will deliver you from the hand of the Philistines.’” 1 Samuel 7:3

Following that, in 1 Samuel 7:13, it says –

“So the Philistines were subdued, and they did not come anymore into the territory of Israel. And the hand of the Lord was against the Philistines all the days of Samuel.”

If 1 Samuel 7:13 is the end of the forty-year period mentioned in Judges 13:1, it would mean that the time of Eli fits into that period, ending with this statement during Samuel’s day. Without exact dating, it is hard to be dogmatic as to the exact chronology of events. Despite this, Israel is set to engage the Philistines, still during the time of the judges.

The Philistines have not been mentioned since Judges 16:30 –

“Then Samson said, ‘Let me die with the Philistines!’ And he pushed with all his might, and the temple fell on the lords and all the people who were in it. So the dead that he killed at his death were more than he had killed in his life.” Judges 16:30

Their name signifies Weakeners…

1 (con’t) and encamped beside Ebenezer;

vayakhanu al ha’even ha’ezer – “And they inclined upon the Stone, the Helper.” The words are anticipatory of the name given later, and they may further complicate the chronology. The reason is that this name is not given until Chapter 7 –

“And the men of Israel went out of Mizpah and pursued the Philistines, and drove them back as far as below Beth Car. 12 Then Samuel took a stone and set it up between Mizpah and Shen, and called its name Ebenezer [even ha’azer: Stone, the Helper], saying, ‘Thus far the Lord has helped us.’” 1 Samuel 7:11, 12

Here in Chapter 4, it twice uses the definite article, “the Stone, the Helper,” identifying it as something already named. Thus, the name anticipates the events of Chapter 7. Ezer is derived from the noun ezer, help or helper. Thus, it is The Stone The Helper.

Because the name is explained in Chapter 7, it leans to the notion that the account here is an explanatory insert, and the first clause fits naturally with the words of 7:3 as indicated earlier.

1 (con’t) and the Philistines encamped in Aphek.

u-phelishtim khanu vaapheq – “And Philistines, they inclined in Aphek.” There are various locations named Aphek. This being near Eben-ezer may be the city recorded in Judah in Joshua 12:18. The name is derived from the verb aphaq, to contain. Reflexively, it would mean to restrain or force oneself.

Because of this, some identify it as Strength, Enclosure, or Fortress. Others identify it as the action itself, and thus, Control, Restraint, or Discipline.

Then the Philistines put themselves in battle array against Israel. And when they joined battle,

vayaarkhu phelishtim liqrath Yisrael vatitosh ha’milkhamah – “And they arranged, Philistines, to encounter Israel. And it spread, the battle.” The verb natash comes from a root signifying to pound. When you pound something, it spreads out. As such, think of the battle spreading out as the men engaged in battle. During this spreading engagement…

2 (con’t) Israel was defeated by the Philistines,

vayinageph Yisrael liphne phelishtim – “And he was smitten, Israel, to faces Philistines.” It is an indication that the events occurred when Israel was delivered to the Philistines for forty years. The Lord is using this time of affliction to humble Israel as a means of bringing them back to Himself. But the cost is high…

2 (con’t) who killed about four thousand men of the army in the field.

vayaku vamaarakhah basadeh kearbaath alaphim ish – “And they caused to kill in the arrangement in the field according to four thousand man.” Nothing was said about how many engaged the battle or from what tribes. Also, nothing is recorded concerning the Philistine numbers. The focus is on the dead, the number of which is a multiple of four and ten.

Four is “the number four always has reference to all that is created. It is emphatically the number of Creation; of man in his relation to the world as created; while six is the number of man in his opposition to and independence of God. It is the number of things that have a beginning, of things that are made, of material things, and matter itself. It is the number of material completeness. Hence it is the world number, and especially the ‘city’ number.” E.W. Bullinger

Ten signifies “Completeness of order, marking the entire round of anything, is, therefore, the ever-present signification of the number ten. It implies that nothing is wanting; that the number and order are perfect; that the whole cycle is complete.” E.W. Bullinger

Saying that they were killed in the field could be seen as a superfluous addition. As it says nothing of Israel being put to flight, where else would they be killed? As such, the words are intentionally stated to further accentuate the number for the sake of typology.

And when the people had come into the camp,

The words are in the singular: vayavo ha’am el ha’makhaneh – “And he came, the people, unto the encampment.” The massing of men refers to the host of Israel joined as one (he). It is in response to the first words concerning the battle in the previous verse –

4:2 – And he went out, Israel, to encounter Philistines to the battle.
4:3 – And he came, the people, unto the encampment.

3 (con’t) the elders of Israel said, “Why has the Lord defeated us today before the Philistines?

vayomeru ziqne Yisrael lamah nagaphnu Yehovah ha’yom liphne phelishtim – “And they said, aged Israel, ‘Why He smitten us, Yehovah, the day, to faces Philistines?’” Not much has changed in the past two thousand years. It is as if they have no clue why God would allow them to be defeated by their enemy.

“We are the people of the Lord! Why does all this bad stuff keep happening to us?” They are the people of the Lord under the Law of Moses, an exceptional situation that requires exceptional adherence to the law.

To not adhere is to bring a curse upon oneself. The law itself explicitly states this. Paul reexplains it for those who fail to understand –

“For as many as are of the works of the law are under the curse; for it is written, ‘Cursed is everyone who does not continue in all things which are written in the book of the law, to do them.’ 11 But that no one is justified by the law in the sight of God is evident, for ‘the just shall live by faith.’ 12 Yet the law is not of faith, but ‘the man who does them shall live by them.’” Galatians 3:10-12

So, what did Israel do that brought the curse? The answer is in Psalm 78 –

“Yet they tested and provoked the Most High God,
And did not keep His testimonies,
57 But turned back and acted unfaithfully like their fathers;
They were turned aside like a deceitful bow.
58 For they provoked Him to anger with their high places,
And moved Him to jealousy with their carved images.” Psalm 78:56-58

Immediately following these verses in the psalm are the details of the account before us today, which will be cited as our closing verse. Failing to understand the reason for their state of condemnation, the narrative continues…

3 (con’t) Let us bring the ark of the covenant of the Lord from Shiloh to us,

niqekhah elenu mishiloh eth aron berith Yehovah – “We must take unto us from Shiloh Ark Covenant Yehovah.” As noted earlier, Israel is treating the ark like a talisman. Gideon won victory over the Midianites without the presence of the ark, knowing that the Lord was with him.

God is not limited to a particular place, even if His presence can be more pronounced in a particular place, such as when He dwelt between the cherubim of the ark, or when sealing the indwelt believer.

Israel failed to determine the root cause of their defeat. Instead, they trusted that an implement made by man for worshiping the Lord had a particular power that extended beyond His abilities.

Shiloh means Tranquility.

3 (con’t) that when it comes among us it may save us from the hand of our enemies.”

veyavo beqirbenu veyoshienu mikaph oyevenu – “And may it come in our midst. And He will cause to save us from palm ‘our hatings.’” There are various ways these words could be translated, depending on how one perceives their intent.

Calling it the Ark Covenant Yehovah signifies that in their minds the ark is intricately connected to the covenant –

“And may it come in our midst. And may it cause to save us from palm ‘our hatings.” The ark must be brought and it will save the people. The presence of the ark is capable of saving the people because it represents the covenant and they are the covenant people. Therefore, the Lord will respond simply because the ark is there.

“And may it come in our midst. And may He cause to save us from palm ‘our hatings.” The ark must be brought for the Lord to save His people. This limits the power of the Lord to the presence of the ark, or at least that its presence signifies a binding appeal to the covenant.

“And may He come in our midst. And may He cause to save us from palm ‘our hatings.” The presence of the Lord is united with the ark. In bringing the ark, the Lord comes to the camp. With the Lord in the camp, He will then save Israel based on the covenant cut between them.

Such differences are not insignificant. Each tells its own story about how Israel understood its relationship with the Lord.

The words “palm ‘our hatings’” need explanation. Though the hand and palm are similar in meaning, the yad, hand, signifies power and/or authority. The kaph, palm (and sole), signifies possession and/or the state of something. Thus, Israel is not merely under the authority of the Philistines. Rather, it has become a possession of theirs.

So the people sent to Shiloh,

Again, the people are referred to in the singular: vayishlakh ha’am Shiloh – “And he sent, the people, Shiloh.” The entire gathering singularly sends for the ark to be brought from Shiloh…

4 (con’t) that they might bring from there the ark of the covenant of the Lord of hosts, who dwells between the cherubim.

vayisu misham eth aron berith Yehovah tsevaoth yoshev ha’keruvim – “And they lifted, from there, Ark Covenant Yehovah Sabaoth, sitting the cherubim.” The name is changed from the previous verse. It is now the Ark of the Covenant of Yehovah Sabaoth. He is the Lord of the hosts of Israel. As such, He is expected to wield His power among the hosts, thus defeating their enemy…

4 (con’t) And the two sons of Eli, Hophni and Phinehas, were there with the ark of the covenant of God.

vesham shene vene eli im aron berith ha’elohim khapheni u-phinekhas – “And there, two sons Eli with Ark Covenant the God, Hophni and Phinehas.” The narrative mentions the two sons to set up the continued narrative and to show how the words of the Lord to Eli would come to their fulfillment.

Being with the ark implies they would go with the ark. Also, its name changes again. This time it is Ark Covenant the God. It is the same term first introduced in Judges 20:27.

The use of the article is expressive. It refers to the one true God in relation to man. It is used to reveal those who are in a right relationship with Him, or to contrast those who are not in a right relationship with Him. It is already understood from the previous sermon that they are not in a right standing with God.

Eli means Foster Son. Hophni means My Hollow. Phinehas means Mouth of Brass, and thus, Mouth of Judgment.

Woe to us! We are doomed
The Lord is not with us today
Seeking out our faults, His eye has zoomed
Our sin is revealed, we have nothing to say

Let us tend to this situation
We can easily fix it, let’s do it right away
We are Israel, the great nation
We can do it here and now, yes, let’s do it today!

Get the ark! Bring it out! All will be swell
God can’t turn us down when we have it on display
With it among us, things will go well
This will turn out to be a glorious day

II. Hophni and Phinehas (verses 5-11)

And when the ark of the covenant of the Lord came into the camp, all Israel shouted so loudly that the earth shook.

vayhi kevo aron berith Yehovah el ha’makhaneh vayariu khal Yisrael teruah gedolah vatehom ha’arets – “And it is, according to entering Ark Covenant Yehovah unto the encampment, and they shouted, all Israel, acclamation whopping. And it was agitated – the earth.” The ark itself brought about the thundering excitement of the people.

If they had faith in the Lord apart from the ark, one would expect that they would be like David, who exalted the Lord as he entered into battle. The ark is never referred to in that passage. Rather, when he faced Goliath, it said –

“You come to me with a sword, with a spear, and with a javelin. But I come to you in the name of the Lord of hosts, the God of the armies of Israel, whom you have defied.” 1 Samuel 17:45

Likewise, in Judges 20, it said the people went up to Bethel, where the ark was kept, to offer burnt offerings and peace offerings before the Lord. At that time, they humbled themselves before Him, not using the ark as a talisman for victory by bringing it back to the battle with them.

This has not been the attitude of the people in this account. Only by the presence of the ark are they aroused to a fevered pitch. In the first battle, they assumed the Lord was there with them. When that was proven false, they decided to bring out their talisman to wield the power of the Lord for their victory.

Now when the Philistines heard the noise of the shout, they said, “What does the sound of this great shout in the camp of the Hebrews mean?

vayishmeu phelishtim eth qol ha’teruah vayome’ru meh qol ha’teruah ha’gedolah ha’zoth bemakhaneh ha’ivrim vayedeu – “And they heard, Philistines, voice the acclamation. And they said, ‘What voice the acclamation, the whopping, the this, in encampment the Hebrews?’”

This is the first time since Deuteronomy 15 that the term Hebrew has been used. It is derived from Eber, an ancestor who was the great, great-grandson of Noah. His name is derived from the noun ever, signifying the region beyond or on the other side. That is from the verb avar, to cross over. Thus, it signifies Crosser Over.

The uproar was so great, it was clearly heard in the Philistines’ camp. It was such a resounding cry that they must have been shocked. Israel had just been defeated, losing four thousand men. And yet, their bravado has suddenly reached a fevered pitch. You can almost hear the Philistines saying, “What on earth is going on over there?”

6 (con’t) Then they understood that the ark of the Lord had come into the camp.

Rather: ki aron Yehovah ba el ha’makhaneh – “For Ark Yehovah, it came unto the encampment.” It is simply a statement of fact, not an understanding of the Philistines. Whenever the understanding came about, their reaction was…

So the Philistines were afraid, for they said, “God has come into the camp!”

vayireu ha’pelishtim ki ameru ba elohim el ha’makhaneh – “And they feared, the Philistines, for they said, ‘He came, god, unto the encampment.’” Saying god in the singular (the verb is singular) does not negate that they are polytheists. They are simply making a statement that a god has come into the camp.

They have their own god, Dagon, who will be introduced later, and the narrative later confirms that they are thinking of one god among many. Regardless of that, however, is the fact that they are doing what the Israelites have done by uniting the ark with the presence of Israel’s God, as if one equals the other.

As such, they are in great fear at the news…

7 (con’t) And they said, “Woe to us! For such a thing has never happened before.

vayomeru o lanu ki lo hayethah kazoth ethmol shilshom – “And they said, ‘Woe to us! For not it was according to this – time before, trebly.” The words ethmol shilshom, time before, trebly, form an idiom. It is equivalent to saying, “The time before, even three times as much.” Thus, it refers to searching their extended memory concerning times past and coming up with nothing.

No such event as this had happened to them before, and they did not know how to process it.

Woe to us! Who will deliver us from the hand of these mighty gods?

o lanu mi yatsilenu miyad ha’elohim ha’adirim ha’eleh – “Woe to us! Who he will cause to deliver us from hand the gods, the majesties, the these.” The adjectives and pronouns are plural. Thus, the word elohim is to be translated in the plural as “gods.” To the Philistines, there are many gods united in one hand.

It is inconceivable that they thought this was the One true God. If that were so, they would not have their own god, Dagon. As such, their concept of the word elohim is not what the Bible presents when referring to the true God. They continue with the plural to substantiate this…

8 (con’t) These are the gods who struck the Egyptians with all the plagues in the wilderness.

eleh hem ha’elohim ha’makim eth mitsrayim bekhal makah ba’midbar – “These, they, the gods, the ‘causing to strike Egypt’ in all wound in the wilderness.” The pronouns and verb are plural this time. Therefore, it demands the plural rendering “gods.”

The word makah, wound, is given as an all-encompassing thought concerning the things that came upon Egypt, culminating in their destruction in the sea. This was remembered by the Philistines. It was an event that was prophesied in the Song of Moses –

“The people will hear and be afraid;
Sorrow will take hold of the inhabitants of Philistia.” Exodus 15:14

It is, however, the greatness of the Lord, not the greatness of Israel, that is exalted in the song. The faithfulness of the Lord to the covenant means that, despite Israel’s faithlessness, and indeed in connection with it, the Lord will reveal His greatness through them. In this case, it means through their defeat and what transpires because of it.

The Philistines don’t know this, so they must whip themselves into a greater fevered pitch than Israel. As such, there is no assurance that Israel will prevail just because of the Lord’s presence.

Egypt means Double Trouble.

Rather than seeming victory, Israel’s defeat is assured…

Be strong and conduct yourselves like men, you Philistines,

hithkhazequ vihyu laanashim pelishtim – “You must seize yourselves and you must be to men, Philistines!” Israel’s bringing the ark of the Lord to the camp is what stimulates the Philistines to action. They have their proverbial backs against the wall. Therefore, they set themselves wholeheartedly to what is coming. As additional motivation, the call continues…

9 (con’t) that you do not become servants of the Hebrews, as they have been to you.

pen taavdu la’ivrim kaasher avedu lakhem – “Lest you will serve to Hebrews according to which they served to you.” Israel served the Philistines because of their unfaithfulness to the Lord. The Philistines didn’t know this, but they did know they did not want to be servants to the Hebrews. Therefore, the words warn them of the consequences of failure. Therefore…

9 (con’t) Conduct yourselves like men, and fight!”

Rather: vihyithem laanashim venilkhamtem – “And you became to men, and you were fought!” The Philistines have gone from fear to motivation to surety of battle. They will not run from battle but allow themselves to be engaged by the enemy. This is their only choice to avoid being enslaved.

10 So the Philistines fought, and Israel was defeated, and every man fled to his tent.

Rather: vayilakhamu phelishtim vayinageph, Yisrael vayanusu ish leohalav – “And they were fought, Philistines, and he was smitten, Israel. And they fled, man to his tents.” Israel engaged the battle against the Philistines, and yet it is Israel, each man, who fled.

The seemingly jumbled-up wording, “they fled, man to his tents,” is an idiomatic expression used to indicate that all of the people fled, each man to his individual tents. In a house, there are rooms, but in a man’s camp, there are various tents. For example, Abraham had a tent, Sarah would have had her tent, etc. Thus, it is an all-encompassing statement of the man’s possessions.

10 (con’t) There was a very great slaughter, and there fell of Israel thirty thousand foot soldiers.

vatehi ha’makah gedolah meod vayipol miyisrael sheloshim eleph ragli – “And it was, the wound – whopping very. And he fell, from Israel, thirty thousand footman.” Instead of the wound falling upon the Philistines as it did upon Egypt in the wilderness, it fell upon Israel in a superlative way because of the loss of thirty thousand men.

Bullinger says the number thirty, “being 3 x 10, denotes in a higher degree the perfection of Divine order, as marking the right moment.”

11 Also the ark of God was captured;

vaaron elohim nilqakh – “And Ark God, it was taken.” Here, the article is left off. Instead of Ark the God, it says Ark God. It is removed from Israel by the Philistines. What happens to it is the subject of Chapter 5 and a part of Chapter 6. As for the ark’s attendants…

*11 (fin) and the two sons of Eli, Hophni and Phinehas, died.

u-shene vene eli methu khapeni u-phinekhas – “And two sons Eli, they died – Hophni and Phinehas.” Eli, Foster Son, is left without a son due to his failings in regard to their wickedness. It is the fulfillment of the word of the Lord spoken through Samuel.

When the battle is lost, it seems the end
Victory has been stolen away
We have lost brother and we have lost friend
The battle is lost on this tragic day

What will become of Israel
The presence of the Lord has been carried away
What will happen to us? Only time will tell
The battle is lost on this tragic day

But God can bring good out of what is evil
He has a plan to guide the way
He will overcome sin and the power of the devil
What lies ahead is a glorious day

III. A Better Priesthood

In verse 1, it noted that the word of Samuel was to all Israel. The words anticipate the events of Chapter 7. But to get there, the narrative concerning Eli, his sons, and the ark needs to be dealt with. Therefore, Israel, He Stives With God, went out to encounter the Philistines, the Weakeners, in battle.

In typology, they are those who strive to weaken the faith of others. Saying that Israel inclined upon ha’even ha’ezer, The Stone the Helper, is anticipatory of the naming of the place in Chapter 7. As such, it indicates that this is an insert, and the events, though tragic, are not the end of the story.

In Scripture, the Lord is called our Help numerous times, such as –

“Our soul waits for the Lord;
He is our help [ezer] and our shield.” Psalm 33:20

He is the Stone of Help regardless of the events that take place in this story. In fact, though seemingly contradictory, He is the Stone of Help for Israel at this time.

The Philistines inclined in Aphek, Constrain or, reflexively, Restrain. They are there to constrain Israel. In the battle, Israel was defeated, losing four thousand. The numbers signify that which is created (the world number), and the number of completeness of a cycle, where nothing is wanting.

A dispensation of the world has come to its termination. The elders of Israel cannot comprehend the loss to those who would weaken their faith. During the time of the law, faith is obscured by works. The Weakeners use the law to afflict the people.

A remedy for their loss is to bring the Ark Covenant Yehovah from Shiloh, Tranquility. The typology shows that it is the time to bring Jesus (of which the Ark is emblematic) from heaven to accomplish His mission, saving Israel from “‘palm’ our enemies.”

Israel is under the possession of the Weakeners. This is what the law does. It possesses those under it. The Gentiles were not under the Law of Moses. It had no possession over them. They are under other law, but that is not what is being dealt with. It is just an example for understanding.

Verse 4 noted the lifting of the ark from Shiloh. This is a way of describing Christ’s cross –

“Lo, My servant doth act wisely, He is high, and hath been lifted up [asah: to lift], And hath been very high.” Isaiah 53:13 (YLT)

At that time, it is called “Ark Covenant Yehovah Sabaoth.” As noted, “He is expected to wield His power among the hosts, thus defeating their enemy.” Saying “sitting the cherubim” indicates atonement. On the ark, the cherubim were on the Mercy Seat, looking downward at the place of atonement, anticipating Christ’s sacrifice.

In the same verse, it noted the two sons of Eli, Foster Son, named Hophni, My Hollow, and Phinehas, Mouth of Judgment.

As seen previously, Eli anticipates those of Israel under the law through the mediation of Aaron, the foster son without full rights of adoption. His sons are representative of the two aspects of the Aaronic Priesthood.

The Lord’s hollow, His place for filling, was used for the law. It is how the efforts between the people and the Lord came about. Likewise, the Mouth of Judgment spoke forth the judgment of God upon the people based on the law.

At that time, Eli’s sons are noted with Ark Covenant the God. In other words, it refers to those who are in a right relationship with Him or to contrast those who are not. None under the law are in a right relationship with Him because of the law. They must be brought out from under the law through faith, something even David spoke of while living under the law –

“Blessed is he whose transgression is forgiven,
Whose sin is covered.
Blessed is the man to whom the Lord does not impute iniquity,
And in whose spirit there is no deceit.” Psalm 32:1, 2

Paul explains David’s words in Romans 4.

Verse 5 again noted “Ark Covenant Yehovah.” It anticipates Jesus, the Fulfiller of the Covenant. The shout of Israel is ascribed to the Hebrews, Crossers Over. It is the victory cry of those who have crossed over into the New Covenant through Christ’s shed blood.

The Philistines, Weakeners, not understanding the events, were terrified. They remembered the freeing of Israel from Egypt, Double Trouble. That is indicative of life under sin and without God. Man is born in sin, and he cannot redeem himself. Thus, he is in double trouble.

Verse 7 noted, “He came, God, unto the camp.” That is what is on the minds of the Philistines, and it is the reality seen in Scripture. Jesus is God. The text is stating a fact in one way, even if it was intended another way by the Philistines.

The same God who defeated Egypt had now come into the camp. The Philistines, Weakeners, understand that a spiritual battle is taking place and they must prevail. And so, the call is to be men, and they will be fought.

At this point, the victory appears to be won by the Philistines. Israel fled, and thirty thousand fell. However, the number indicates that what happened is completely within the plan and providence of God. It is the higher degree of perfection of Divine order marking the right moment (thirty) where all is complete and nothing is wanting (ten).

This is true despite the capture of the Ark God and the death of Hophni and Phinehas. The capturing of the ark, signifying the death of Christ, and its removal to the land of the Philistines has a purpose. The death of Hophni and Phinehas marked the end of the Aaronic priesthood, the means of mediation and judgment under the Old Covenant.

“For on the one hand there is an annulling of the former commandment because of its weakness and unprofitableness, 19 for the law made nothing perfect; on the other hand, there is the bringing in of a better hope, through which we draw near to God.” Hebrews 7:18, 19

This completes the verses for today. Next week, more in relation to the ending of the law will be seen. All of these things happened at the same time, however, in Christ’s atoning death. Despite that, the narrative has to take them individually to reveal what God in Christ is doing.

For example, in Christ’s death, the law is annulled. There is, at the same time, the introduction of the New Covenant. There is also atonement for sin, justification before God, being sanctified and set apart to God, etc. These and so many other things were accomplished and finalized on the cross of Calvary.

But to understand each facet, these Old Testament stories are provided. Hanging the king of Ai revealed something concerning Christ’s work. Killing a thousand men with the jawbone of a donkey revealed something else.

Jephthah sacrificed his daughter and gave us other pictures. Each of these, and a host of other stories, has been compiled by God from the history of Israel to show us what He has done and is doing in redemptive history. And every detail of it is only understandable when viewed through the lens of Christ.

Let us have this attitude as we read God’s word. We should search it out and contemplate what He is telling us. It is a treasure of infinite value because it is that which tells us of His love for us as realized in the giving of Christ. Hold fast to this word, and fix your eyes on Jesus. May it be so, to the glory of God.

Closing Verse: “When God heard this, He was furious,
And greatly abhorred Israel,
60 So that He forsook the tabernacle of Shiloh,
The tent He had placed among men,
61 And delivered His strength into captivity,
And His glory into the enemy’s hand.” Psalm 78:59-61

Next Week: 1 Samuel 4:12-22 It happened because they were not victorious… (Inglorious) (9th 1 Samuel Sermon)

The Lord has you exactly where He wants you. He has a good plan and purpose for you. He alone is the perfect example of love – untarnished, unblemished, and completely pure and holy. He offers this love to you. So, follow Him, live for Him, and trust Him, and He will do marvelous things for you and through you.

1 Samuel 4:1-11 (CG)

4 And it is, word Samuel, to all Israel.

———————

And he went out, Israel, to encounter Philistines to the battle. And they inclined upon the stone, the Helper. And Philistines, they inclined in Aphek. 2 And they arranged, Philistines, to encounter Israel. And it spread, the battle. And he was smitten, Israel, to faces Philistines. And they caused to kill in the arrangement in the field according to four thousand man. 3 And he came, the people, unto the encampment. And they said, aged Israel, “Why He smitten us, Yehovah, the day to faces Philistines? We must take unto us from Shiloh Ark Covenant Yehovah. And may it come in our midst. And He will cause to save us from palm ‘our hatings.’” 4 And he sent, the people, Shiloh. And they lifted, from there, Ark Covenant Yehovah Sabaoth, sitting the cherubim. And there, two sons Eli with Ark Covenant the God, Hophni and Phinehas.

5 And it is, according to entering Ark Covenant Yehovah unto the encampment, and they shouted, all Israel, acclamation whopping. And it was agitated – the earth. 6 And they heard, Philistines, voice the acclamation. And they said, “What voice the acclamation, the whopping, the this, in encampment the Hebrews?” For Ark Yehovah, it came unto the encampment. 7 And they feared, the Philistines, for they said, “He came, god, unto the encampment.” And they said, “Woe to us! For not it was according to this – time before, trebly. 8 Woe to us! Who he will cause to deliver us from hand the gods, the majesties, the these. These, they, the gods, the ‘causing to strike Egypt’ in all wound in the wilderness. 9 You must seize yourselves and you must be to men, Philistines! Lest you will serve to Hebrews according to which they served to you. And you became to men, and you were fought!”

10 And they were fought, Philistines, Israel. And they fled, man to his tents. And it was, the wound – whopping very. And he fell, from Israel, thirty thousand footman. 11 And Ark God, it was taken. And two sons Eli, they died – Hophni and Phinehas.

 

1 Samuel 4:1-11 (NKJV)

And the word of Samuel came to all Israel.

Now Israel went out to battle against the Philistines, and encamped beside Ebenezer; and the Philistines encamped in Aphek. Then the Philistines put themselves in battle array against Israel. And when they joined battle, Israel was defeated by the Philistines, who killed about four thousand men of the army in the field. And when the people had come into the camp, the elders of Israel said, “Why has the Lord defeated us today before the Philistines? Let us bring the ark of the covenant of the Lord from Shiloh to us, that when it comes among us it may save us from the hand of our enemies.” So the people sent to Shiloh, that they might bring from there the ark of the covenant of the Lord of hosts, who dwells between the cherubim. And the two sons of Eli, Hophni and Phinehas, were there with the ark of the covenant of God.

And when the ark of the covenant of the Lord came into the camp, all Israel shouted so loudly that the earth shook. Now when the Philistines heard the noise of the shout, they said, “What does the sound of this great shout in the camp of the Hebrews mean?” Then they understood that the ark of the Lord had come into the camp. So the Philistines were afraid, for they said, “God has come into the camp!” And they said, “Woe to us! For such a thing has never happened before. Woe to us! Who will deliver us from the hand of these mighty gods? These are the gods who struck the Egyptians with all the plagues in the wilderness. Be strong and conduct yourselves like men, you Philistines, that you do not become servants of the Hebrews, as they have been to you. Conduct yourselves like men, and fight!”

10 So the Philistines fought, and Israel was defeated, and every man fled to his tent. There was a very great slaughter, and there fell of Israel thirty thousand foot soldiers. 11 Also the ark of God was captured; and the two sons of Eli, Hophni and Phinehas, died.

 

 

Matthew 12:23

Sunday, 10 August 2025

And all the multitudes were amazed and said, “Could this be the Son of David?” Matthew 12:23

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at the “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen).

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“And they were astounded, all the crowds. And they said, ‘Not any, this, He is the Son of David?’” (CG).

In the previous verse, Jesus healed a mute and blind man so that he could speak and see. Now, the reaction to that by the crowds is provided by Matthew, saying, “And they were astounded, all the crowds.”

A new word, existémi, to be amazed or astounded, is used. It is from ek, out, and histémi, to stand. The idea is that of being knocked off one’s feet or beside oneself. The people saw this and were truly amazed at what they beheld.

So incredible was the miracle that, despite not understanding how Jesus could be the Messiah, they still couldn’t dismiss it. This is seen in their seemingly oddly constructed words, “And they said, ‘Not any, this, He is the Son of David?’”

The word méti, only seen so far in Matthew 7:16, is used. It comes from me, not, and tis, any (something, certain, some, etc.). A single word that might reflect their thinking would be the word whether. Combining that with “this” to identify Him specifically adds emphasis.

They are essentially saying something like, “It can’t be that He is the Son of David, but maybe He is!” They are conflicted and trying to reason between what they presuppose about a Messiah and what their eyes actually see.

This is the second time that anyone has specifically addressed Jesus as the Son of David. The first time was an adamant assertion –

“When Jesus departed from there, two blind men followed Him, crying out and saying, ‘Son of David, have mercy on us!’” Matthew 9:27

These two blind men were able to discern that Jesus is, in fact, the Son of David, meaning the promised Messiah. However, the crowds who could see could not fully come to such a resolution in their minds. Such is the power of presupposition.

Life application: We as humans quite often form presuppositions about a matter or a person based on a limited, imperfect, or tainted understanding of the person or thing. Once that thought is settled in our minds, it is very hard to get it out.

For example, a person may sit in a church when he is young, listening to a biblically inept pastor who doesn’t know eschatology very well. The pastor may deny that there is something called the rapture, and without any biblical support, he dismisses it as nonsense.

For that young person, he is sitting under an authority figure whom he likes and respects. He trusts that what he has heard is correct. As he grows, he learns that there are not only those who believe in a rapture, but that there is a wide range of views as to its timing.

However, his mind is already made up that there is no such thing. And so, when he discusses the matter with others, he already has a wall up to defend against the doctrine, even though it is clearly presented in the word. When presented with the clear and obvious instruction, his mind finds it hard to resolve what he already believed and what Paul precisely states.

In this state, he is conflicted, just like the people who saw Jesus’ healing of the deaf and blind man. Two blind people, who couldn’t see what Jesus looked like, knew from their other senses that He must be the Son of David. But these people, allowing for their preconceived notions about Him, were unable to fully perceive what was plain and obvious.

What do you believe about King James Only-ism? How do you perceive the state of the nation of Israel today? What do you believe happens to believers when they die? Is the coming temple and its sacrifices a good thing or a bad thing in God’s eyes? Is Jesus both God and Man? Is Jesus the only way to heaven? If you are saved, can you lose your salvation?

If you have been around the faith long enough, you have already been presented with views on these matters, whether they were responsibly taught from Scripture or not. What you were originally taught, or what your mind conceived was correct, is what you will believe going forward, unless you are to stop and say, “I will go where the word leads, even if it conflicts with what I currently believe.”

This is not an easy path to follow. We usually put a lot of our time and mental thought into what we think we believe. To say, “I was wrong,” is like throwing away a part of who we have become. It can also be embarrassing. And yet, are we going to put God, His word, and proper doctrine first?

The people saw Jesus and they beheld His miracles, and yet, they struggled to say, “Surely, this is the Messiah.” Their Scriptures already told them what He would do, but they held stubbornly to presuppositions, conflicted and tossed about in their thinking.

“Then the eyes of the blind shall be opened,
And the ears of the deaf shall be unstopped.
Then the lame shall leap like a deer,
And the tongue of the dumb sing.” Isaiah 35:5, 6

Lord God, help us in our thinking. We come to the table with piles of theological baggage heaped up in our minds. Sometimes it is from honest but misguided teachers. Sometimes, it is from people who don’t want us to see the truth. And sometimes, we just made things up in our heads. Help us to clear this out, to see what is correct, and to be pleasing to You in our doctrine. Amen.