Matthew (Written)

Friday, 14 August 2026

But they made light of it and went their ways, one to his own farm, another to his business. Matthew 22:5

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at the “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen).

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“The ‘also having been uncaring’, they departed, the, indeed, to the ‘his field’, the also to the ‘emporium, his’.” (CG)

In the previous verse, the king sent out other servants to tell those who had been called that the brunch was prepared, the oxen and fatlings were killed, and all things were ready. He then emphatically implored them to come to the nuptials. However, Jesus continues, saying, “The ‘also having been uncaring’.”

A new word, ameleó, is used. It is from the negative particle a and meló, to be of interest or concern. Thus, it signifies to be uncaring. The use of the word in the parable is exactingly described in Hebrews 2 –

“For if the word spoken through angels proved steadfast, and every transgression and disobedience received a just reward, ³ how shall we escape if we neglect [ameleó] so great a salvation, which at the first began to be spoken by the Lord, and was confirmed to us by those who heard Him, ⁴ God also bearing witness both with signs and wonders, with various miracles, and gifts of the Holy Spirit, according to His own will?” Hebrews 2:2-4

These people received the invitation and “neglected” or were uncaring about such a great salvation, as Jesus continues to indicate, saying, “they departed.”

Instead of heading to the nuptials, they took off in another direction. For those who have witnessed to others, the attitude has probably been seen. Jesus continues with, “the, indeed, to the ‘his field’, the also to the ‘emporium, his’.”

Both are looking for worldly gain. One sees his field as being more necessary to attend to than receiving the invitation to true riches. Labor itself can be its own replacement of God. Working hard, whether honestly or dishonestly, has the attraction of being a sign that the person is capable of earning his way in this world. The mental connection then says, “If I am productive here, surely I will be productive in the next world.”

The other sees buying and selling as the better path. This is borne out in an almost unlimited number of ways, be it buying and selling cars, stocks, real estate, etc. It is assumed that if one is successful through exceptional business acumen, he will be successful in a like manner in the next life, never thinking that the next life will be expressed in a completely disparate paradigm.

Life application: People in general look at the way they conduct their lives and assume that by doing what they are doing, they will somehow “get ahead,” as if their affairs in this life are a logical steppingstone to the next life.

It is true that what we do here will determine what happens to us in the next life, but not in the sense that most people think. God sets the parameters for entering His kingdom, not us. When we confuse this with our own plans, we make an eternity-changing error.

The gospel of Jesus is laid out in a simple formula: accept that what God has done is sufficient, receive what He has done through belief, and then rest in that faith throughout your earthly existence.

This is pleasing to God. But we might confuse this plan by saying we believe in Jesus while rejecting the premise that we don’t need to do anything else. Law observance becomes an addiction. With each new precept that we add to our arsenal of “works”, we further distance ourselves from any hope of reconciliation with God.

Simply being uncaring about the gospel means we are more caring about whatever else we are engaged in. Life becomes a me-centered existence where we are sure that God will accept us for the path we have chosen. This is the “all paths lead to God” mentality.

Others know that the path they have chosen is wrong, but they suppress the knowledge of God to the point where He is never even considered, as they wallow in all sorts of depravity. It doesn’t matter which expression of life we choose. If it is not a gospel-centered choice, it will lead to the same state of condemnation.

Really “decent” people who intend well in all manner of life are no closer to God than Adolph Hitler. Sin is the problem. The gospel is the only answer to the issue of sin. Until that is dealt with, there is no reconciliation with God and no hope for the pitiful lost soul.

God has done it all. Trust this and be saved.

Lord God, give us wisdom to set ourselves and our thoughts of self-sufficiency aside. Grant us the right mindset to hear the gospel, accept its truth, and to then live out our lives ever trusting that our faith in it was sufficient to continue to bring us to You. May it be so to Your glory. Amen.

Thursday, 13 August 2026

Again, he sent out other servants, saying, ‘Tell those who are invited, “See, I have prepared my dinner; my oxen and fatted cattle are killed, and all things are ready. Come to the wedding.”’ Matthew 22:4

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at the “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen).

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“Again, he sent other servants, saying, ‘You say to those ‘having been called’, “You behold, the ‘brunch, mine’ I prepared, the ‘oxen, mine’ and the fatted have been sacrificed, and all – readied. You come to the nuptials!”’” (CG)

In the previous verse, Jesus continued the parable of the wedding feast, saying that the servants were sent out to those who had been called, but that none were willing to come. He continues now, saying, “Again, he sent other servants, saying.”

The word allos is used. It signifies others of the same kind. They were different servants, but they possessed the same characteristics as the first. Their instructions begin with, “You say to those ‘having been called’.”

As in the previous verse, the perfect participle is used, indicating those of Israel. They had been called previously, and that calling continued until that day. When they go to these people, they are to say, “You behold, the ‘brunch, mine’ I prepared.”

This is a new word, ariston. It will be seen a total of three times, once here and twice in Luke. Its meaning is debated. Strong says, “the best meal (or breakfast; perhaps from eri (‘early’)), i.e. Luncheon — dinner.” HELPS Word Studies says, “…(literally, ‘without boundary, designation’) – properly, ‘undetermined,’ referring to the meal eaten anytime before the main meal (i.e. ‘supper,’).”

A word that will adequately convey any of the meanings is brunch. Along with that, they are to proclaim, “the ‘oxen, mine’ and the fatted have been sacrificed.”

Three more new words are seen. The first is tauros, a bull or ox. This is probably etymologically connected to the Aramaic word tor, a bull. That, in turn, is connected to the Hebrew shor, a bullock. One can see the Greek root of Ford’s Taraus model car, most of which have been turned into paper clips and razor blades at this point.

The second word is sitistos, a fatling. It is derived from sitos, grain. Thus, it is a grain-fed animal purposely raised for such feasts. This is its only use in the New Testament. The third new word is thuó, to kill as a sacrifice. HELPS Word Studies says, “…to kill as a sacrifice and offer on an altar. 2380 /thýō (‘sacrifice’) means more than ‘kill’ as it also suggests offering something as a spiritual sacrifice.” Along with these things, a note of urgency is given, “and all – readied.”

A final new word is seen, hetoimos, adjusted, ready, prepared, etc. It signifies that the necessary preparations are complete to meet an intended purpose. With that noted, imperative words of petition are laid forth, “You come to the nuptials!”

One can hear the plea, almost of desperation. “I have done everything for you to join me to share in this marvelous celebration. You gotta come, you just gotta!”

Life application: The words of Isaiah 65:2 come directly into focus –

“I have stretched out My hands all day long to a rebellious people,
Who walk in a way that is not good.”

It is as if the Lord is standing there, pleading with the people with His arms and hands extended. This continued for generation after generation. When Jesus came, the appeal continued to be made. At some point, anyone would say, “This simply isn’t working.”

This is a truth that has to be considered in the world at large. The Lord, through the gospel, has been pleading with the people of the world to come to Him. But there is one point to consider that cannot be overlooked. In the parable, God sent out servants.

This was once active. Jesus commissioned disciples and apostles to go out and spread the word. Now, though active in the sense that we are instructed in the word to send out the message (as in Romans 10), it is also something that is only hoped for in the sense that God doesn’t come into our house and say, “Ok, John, you need to go to Papua New Guinea and share the gospel.”

Rather, He relies on us to accept that His word is directive in this manner and that we will comply with what it says. It doesn’t take any effort to hand out a gospel tract, open your mouth at work to tell associates about your faith, or to live responsibly as a Christian, filled with the joy of the Lord, so that others will see and want to know about what you possess.

If you are a saved believer in Jesus, God desires to make His appeal to the people of the world through you. Are you willing to comply with His will? If not, you will stand before Him and give a reckoning of your life. There will be loss in such matters. Don’t suffer loss. Be one who is rewarded richly for complying with the will of God by sharing your faith with others.

Lord God, help us in the duty we are called to perform in conveying the good news of Jesus to others. May we be diligent in our efforts, carefully and meticulously finding others who need to hear this good news. Help us in this, O God. Amen.

Wednesday, 12 August 2026

and sent out his servants to call those who were invited to the wedding; and they were not willing to come. Matthew 22:3

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at the “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen).

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“And he sent, the ‘servants, his’ to call those having been called to the nuptials. And not they inclined to come.” (CG)

In the previous verse, it was noted that the kingdom of heaven is like a certain king who arranged a marriage for his son. Jesus next says, “And he sent, the ‘servants, his’.”

Various suggestions are given for who these servants represent:

“…the servants, are John the Baptist and Jesus Himself.” Expositor’s Greek Testament
“…the servants represent the aggregate work of the prophets up to the time of the Baptist.” Ellicott
“The servants here are John the Baptist, the twelve apostles, the seventy, who first preached the gospel to the Jewish people.” Pulpit Commentary
“…representing all preachers of the Gospel.” Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Bible Commentary

Verse 8 will use the word tote, then, after the burning of the city. Therefore, the wedding finally takes place after the destruction of Jerusalem. As this is the time for the wedding invitation, it could include John the Baptist, even if he was not to be a part of it. However, this even seems unlikely. The parable looks to the post-resurrection time of Israel’s interaction with God’s offer of Jesus.

The main substance being referred to, therefore, concerns those who were believers in Jesus, meaning the disciples and apostles. This is seen in the next words, “to call those having been called to the nuptials.”

There is a play on words, twice repeating the same word, kaleó. The use of the perfect participle in the second instance refers to a group that had been called in the past, with the call still in effect in the present. As such, it refers to Israel, the nation –

“You must hear unto Me, Jacob, and Israel, My ‘being called’, I – He, I – First, indeed I, Afterwards.” Isaiah 48:12 (CG)

Israel was called to be the Lord’s people through the time of the law. They were the “being called.” When the time came for the law to end and the new dispensation of grace to be ushered in, they were the “having been called.” However, at that time, Jesus says of them, “And not they inclined to come.”

The nation, as a whole and particularly as represented by its leaders, was uninterested in what Jesus offered. They wanted the old ways of law, seeing that it allowed them a privilege that no one else was entitled to.

Life application: Once, while reading a devotional from a reformed theology source that accepted the doctrine of preterism, it essentially said that at some point, the author believed that a new approach to various aspects of Scripture would come along and be so incredible to those who read it, they would not be able to accept the teaching, even though it would be correct.

He felt confident that biblical interpretation, as it was at the time, left various points incomplete. Think that one through. A person who believes Bible prophecy is fulfilled in its entirety, except for the second coming of Christ, understands that there was a gap in his understanding of Scripture.

A person who believes the church has replaced Israel knew there was something incomplete in regard to his view of biblical interpretation. The sad part of his analysis was that he was right. His view of biblical interpretation and his understanding of Scripture were deficient. He was also correct that a view would be proposed that would answer his deficiencies, and it would be rejected by many who heard it.

He was wrong, however, that it would come at some point in the future. It had already arrived in the form of dispensationalism. That developed until it was complete. It now answers the innumerable inaccuracies of views by scholars stuck in the reform ideas of preterism, “spiritual Israel,” etc.

Sometimes, we can be so sure something is wrong that we reject it outright, even when we know that what we currently believe may have serious deficiencies. To understand the Bible, dispensationalism is a must. But it was not really introduced by “early proponents” like John Darby. Rather, it stems from the writings of Paul, as inspired by the Holy Spirit.

Check things out. Compare them to the word. And be sure to make sure that what you believe conforms to the word. If it doesn’t, be sure to keep searching. Don’t just sit fat, dumb, and happy in a church that does not adequately resolve the difficulties that are found in Scripture if they have already been resolved elsewhere.

Lord God, lead us to proper instruction in Your word. If there is a deficiency in the teaching we receive, help us to be alerted to this and to seek out an answer that will adequately satisfy the need. May we be properly schooled in Your word as we seek to honor You. Amen.

Tuesday, 11 August 2026

“The kingdom of heaven is like a certain king who arranged a marriage for his son, Matthew 22:2

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at the “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen).

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“It resembled, the ‘kingdom the heavens,’ man, king who he made nuptials – the ‘son, his’.” (CG)

In the previous verse, Chapter 22 opened with a note saying that Jesus again spoke to them in a parable. That begins next, saying, “It resembled, the ‘kingdom the heavens,’.”

As has been seen in other parables, a comparison to the kingdom of the heavens is to be provided in a real-life setting. The wording, being directed to the religious leaders, would have been completely understandable to them.

This is certain because their coming reaction to Jesus’ words indicates they grasped what He had conveyed. As for the parable, He continues, saying, “man, king.”

Looking at the substance of the parable and comparing it with other parables so far, it is evident that this king is given as typical of God. With this in mind, it next says, “who he made nuptials.”

A new word, gamos, is seen here. It is a primary word signifying a wedding. It extends to what is associated with it, particularly the wedding feast, garments, etc. At times, it is rendered in the plural, probably indicating the extended nature of the feast and the various things associated with it. We might do the same thing when we say, “This is the week of the wedding celebrations.” The king is preparing the nuptials for “the ‘son, his’.”

Again, the comparison should be easily understood. God sent His Son into the world. The idea of the wedding is anticipated in the Old Testament, particularly in Isaiah. A union between Christ and those He came to save is the anticipated meaning of what is to come.

Life application: Though some of the contents of the parable extend into the future for those who listened to them, it brought about no meaningful change in them. This doesn’t mean that God forced them into the decisions they made. Rather, it means that God already knew what decisions they would make.

The fact that they continued ahead, full steam, in fulfilling the very words Jesus spoke to them shows the incredibly callous nature of the human heart. The Old Testament is filled with such instances. A prophet says to a king or a group of people what is going to happen, the people refuse to budge in their warning, and exactly what the prophet proclaimed comes about.

To this day, the words of Scripture continue to convey to Israel the truth of who Jesus is and what will happen to them because of their ongoing rejection of Him. And yet, Israel is heading directly into the things the Bible warns are coming.

People would rather wallow in their own self-satisfaction, believing lies, rather than taking God at His word. This does not reflect a lack of free will. Rather, it highlights it. What it does reflect is man’s inability to read, consider, and accept God’s word.

If you want to be unlike those types of people, determine to accept at face value what God says in His word. It has proven reliable for thousands of years. Do you really think there is a point where it will suddenly become unreliable? Not gonna happen!

Hear the word and accept what it says. This is the sweet spot to avoid all of the troubles that lie ahead for humanity. The word will direct you to a right relationship with God, and it will give you the ability to wisely counsel others on the danger they are in. Now is the time to get the word out. Be bold in telling others about Jesus!

Glorious Lord God, how stubborn we are to reject Your word and to continue down life’s path without the carefully provided instruction it contains. Help us to be confident in Your word and to tell others about how reliable it is, convincing them that it is the guide to proper living in Your presence. Amen.

Monday, 10 August 2026

And Jesus answered and spoke to them again by parables and said: Matthew 22:1

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at the “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen).

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“And answering, the ‘Jesus’, again, He said in parables to them, saying,” (CG)

The previous verse finished Chapter 21, noting that when the chief priests and Pharisees wanted to lay hands on Jesus, they feared the multitudes because they took Him for a prophet. Chapter 22 begins with the words, “And answering, the ‘Jesus’, again.”

It appears that what is being introduced is either chronological or at least occurring at the same general time and location. The word “answer,” as has been seen already, does not necessarily mean a question was asked, and this is in response to it. Rather, Jesus has made an observation based on the final words of Chapter 21 –

“And having heard, the chief priests and the Pharisees, His parables, they knew that concerning them, He speaks. ⁴⁶And seeking Him to seize, they feared the crowds, since as ‘prophet’, Him, they held.”

The coming parable is given in response to Jesus’ observation of this situation. In this case, “He said in parables to them, saying…”

The use of the plural, parables, indicates an ongoing set of parables, not that He will speak more than one at this particular time. As for the parable itself, it has some similar points to the parable in Luke 14:15-24. However, they are quite different.

Because of this, scholars ridiculously debate which is the original “correct” one and which is a later amendment. Rather, as has already been seen in Matthew, Jesus uses overlapping information in His teachings, just as pastors do in their sermons. This shows consistency, not irregularity.

Likewise, it appears in Mark 12 that Jesus’ conversation with the leaders ends after the parable of the wicked vinedressers. That does not exclude there being another parable first. It is simply a fact that is stated to conclude Mark’s particular focus on the events.

Life application: Once we have something in our heads about a matter, we will spend our time focusing on ensuring what we believe will prove to be true.

If we are looking for fault in the person we are with, we may find it easily enough by making comparisons or suppositions that may be entirely unfounded. Instead of looking at the positive qualities of that person and the beauty of his or her being, we will look for reasons why he or she is somehow defective in our sight.

People who are told that a certain version of the Bible is the only true version will spend their time trying to justify that fact, even to the point of being unreasonable in their conclusions. Likewise, they will do everything possible to find errors in all other translations they are presented with when they do not align with the version they are sure must be correct.

Those who are looking for an answer to supposed faults in the Bible will look for an answer that accommodates faults. Those who look for an answer to differences in the Bible, while assuming it reflects God, who is perfect, will attempt to find a resolution to those differences that will not accommodate faults in the text.

However, because of this, it could be argued that those who do the latter are doing the same thing that the others are doing, just from a different perspective. Both are trying to meet an agenda that they have already established in their minds. And that may be true. But the premise of the second approach takes the nature of God into consideration. The first does not.

If there is a God, He will be perfect in Himself and in what He does. Therefore, it is more reasonable to look for the perfections in God’s word than any perceived imperfections. Man, of course, has been entrusted with God’s word, and so error may naturally be found in whatever man has done.

But the overall thought is that God is in control of His word in a manner that will allow us to weed out any such incorruption. Therefore, we should be reasonably assured that with diligent study, we can come closer and closer to the perfections of His word, thus eliminating the supposed imperfections that others have presented.

For a multitude of reasons, it is unrealistic to assume a single version of the Bible is the one and only “true” version. However, because God is perfect, it is reasonable to assume we can and should strive to understand His word as a book of perfection when rightly considered and researched. This is what we should strive for.

Lord God, grant us the wisdom to carefully and prayerfully consider Your word as we read it. May we look for the perfection in it that we know exists in You. As Your word is a reflection of You, we can be certain such perfection is there. Help us to have this attitude. Amen.