Song of Songs (Written)

Artwork by Douglas Kallerson.

Song of Songs 4:12-16
Come My Beloved

(Typed 20 January 2025 – Inauguration day for President Donald J. Trump) President Trump took an oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution, and he was duly sworn in as the 47^th President of the United States.

This fact is now sealed in the records of the United States permanently. In the verses of this sermon, Solomon says that his beloved is a “fountain sealed.” A seal is something applied externally, but it carries internal truths.

Daniel was sealed in the lion’s den. This was an external sealing that conveyed the truth that what was inside was not to be released without the appropriate authority.

Jeremiah had a purchase deed for land he obtained from his uncle. He had it sealed according to the law and custom. Inside, it contained the details of the property and sale. The seal was to remain until the time that proof was needed concerning his ownership of the land.

Likewise, God provides a seal to people when they appropriately respond to the gospel. For example, Paul says the following in our text verse…

Text Verse: “Now He who establishes us with you in Christ and has anointed us is God, ²² who also has sealed us and given us the Spirit in our hearts as a guarantee.” 2 Corinthians 1:21, 22

The seal provided by God is a way of saying, “This one is mine. Nothing can change that.” Fortunately, God is incapable of making a mistake. As He knows the future, it logically follows that God’s sealing is eternal, meaning salvation is eternal.

If this were not so, then it would mean that He made a mistake because He sealed someone with a guarantee but then changed His mind. If He knew the future, then changing His mind would mean His sealing was in error.

People who don’t understand this either have not thought the process through, or they don’t understand the nature of God. If someone acknowledges that God knows the future but then says a person can lose his salvation, it demonstrates contradictory thoughts.

In the case of the woman in the Song of Songs, Solomon says that she is a “fountain sealed.” Consider this as we go through the verses and think on what the Lord is telling us.

Eternal truths are to be found in His superior word. And so, let us turn to that precious word once again, and… May God speak to us through His word today, and may His glorious name ever be praised.

I. Frankincense, Myrrh, and Aloes (verses 12-14)

¹² A garden enclosed

Rather: gan naul – “Garden locked.”  Scholars generally agree upon the meaning of the words, but translators are not always scholars. Saying “enclosed” doesn’t get the full sense of what is being said.

The word is naul, to lock, bolt, fasten up etc. It can even mean to sandal because the foot is locked up when a sandal is fastened around it. As such, it is more than enclosed which doesn’t always convey the sense of locked or secure.

A garden can be enclosed but not locked up. People may be able to walk in through an opening where a path is. In this case, it is a garden that may have access points, but those access points are not readily accessible to all.

The thought of a garden takes the reader back to Eden’s idyllic perfection. When someone plants a garden, the intent is often to have it as a place of produce and abundance of some sort.

However, quite often, a garden extends beyond food for eating. There are butterfly gardens, rock gardens, flower gardens, hanging gardens, spice gardens, moss gardens, etc.

Each, depending on the type, is normally designed as much for aesthetic beauty, even if some are particularly designed with the intent of obtaining delicious tasting vegetables and fruits. For example, some are specifically planned for their aromatic smells.

Whatever the garden’s purpose, it is a place where one can go, find rest, solitude, a mentally calming environment, a place for personal productivity, and so forth. Gardens are intended to reflect their personal nature.

The garden is made by a person with a particular design that satisfies his ideas concerning structure, layout, order, harmony, etc. In this case, Solomon is speaking of a particular type of locked garden. His words are used in a metaphorical sense…

^{12 (con’t)} Is my sister, my spouse,

akhothi khalah – “My sister – completer.” Solomon is saying that his beloved is her own garden with her own unique attributes which are locked up, meaning unshared with others. As such, he is saying she is a virgin. Nobody has violated her garden, nor do they have access to it.

As before, he provides two designations of her. She is his sister, demonstrating a similarity in intrinsic nature. It is not that she is literally a sister, but a sister in humanity, in culture, etc. Calling her khalah, completer, elevates that thought.

Despite being a sister in nature, she is also the one who perfects him and brings him to a state of fullness that didn’t exist without her. He said she is a locked garden, meaning she is chaste and undefiled. Next, to emphasize that point, he continues with…

^{12 (con’t)} A spring shut up,

The words are needlessly debated: gal naul – “A bubbling locked.” Using the same word, naul, locked, as in the first clause, the NKJV changes the translation from enclosed to shut up. This type of switcheroo unnecessarily confuses the precise wording that Solomon is presenting.

However, the debate is not about that. Rather, it is about the word gal, translated by me as bubbling. Some think the word gal is in error. It is a word used thirty-four times, but never in this sense.

It comes from galal, to roll. As such, it is something heaped up. In Genesis 31, it is used six times when referring to a heap of piled stones that stood as a witness between Laban and Jacob. Quite a few times, it refers to the billows or waves on the sea. They are heaped up as they roll along –

“For You cast me into the deep,
Into the heart of the seas,
And the floods surrounded me;
All Your billows and Your waves [gal] passed over me.” Jonah 2:3

Because it is not used elsewhere in the manner it is here in “Song the songs,” some scholars claim it should again read gan, garden. The two Hebrew words somewhat resemble each other –

גַּן

גַּל

However, it is unlikely a scribe would make such an error, especially going from the simpler nun to the more complex rendering with a lamed. But more, it overlooks the obvious parallelism between the final two clauses.

Rather, Solomon is using this word to form an alliteration between the first and third clauses while forming parallelism between the third and fourth clauses.

As for the word itself, because it signifies to roll as in heaped up, the idea is that of a spring that bubbles. Saying spring is more literal, but it doesn’t fully explain the word, which gives the sense of not just coming forth, but doing so in a bubbling manner.

This use of the word is like what was seen in Judges 1, where a similar word, gulah, was used to describe the same thing –

“So she said to him, ‘Give me a blessing; since you have given me land in the South, give me also springs [gulah] of water.’
And Caleb gave her the upper springs [gulah] and the lower springs [gulah].” Judges 1:15

Solomon has taken the shortened form, gal, which is derived from the same word galal as is gulah, and he has formed a play on words between garden, gan, and a bubbling spring, gal. Understanding this, he next forms parallelism with the words…

^{12 (con’t)} A fountain sealed.

mayan khathum – “Fountain sealed.” He essentially says the same thing as the previous clause but uses different words for effect. The word khathum, however, means more than just to lock. It carries the sense of being sealed, at times as with a signet or some other official marker –

“‘Men will buy fields for money, sign deeds and seal [khathum] them, and take witnesses, in the land of Benjamin, in the places around Jerusalem, in the cities of Judah, in the cities of the mountains, in the cities of the lowland, and in the cities of the South; for I will cause their captives to return,’ says the Lord.” Jeremiah 32:44

Looking at all the clauses together, one can see how Solomon carefully formed his words –

Garden [gan] locked,
My sister – completer.
*Bubbling [gal] locked,
*Fountain sealed.

The symbolism is that of his beloved being chaste and secreted away just for him. The thought is similarly expressed by Solomon in Proverbs while speaking of a woman by using the same type of metaphor –

“Drink water from your own cistern,
And running water from your own well.
¹⁶ Should your fountains be dispersed abroad,
Streams of water in the streets?
¹⁷ Let them be only your own,
And not for strangers with you.
¹⁸ Let your fountain be blessed,
And rejoice with the wife of your youth.
¹⁹ As a loving deer and a graceful doe,
Let her breasts satisfy you at all times;
And always be enraptured with her love.
²⁰ For why should you, my son, be enraptured by an immoral woman,
And be embraced in the arms of a seductress?” Proverbs 5:15-20

Keil gives a suitable explanation for Solomon’s words –

“To a locked garden and spring no one has access but the rightful owner, and a sealed fountain is shut against all impurity. Thus she is closed against the world, and inaccessible to all that would disturb her pure heart, or desecrate her pure person.” Keil

Continuing with the garden symbolism, Solomon says…

¹³ Your plants are an orchard

The structure of almost all translations follows the same pattern as the NKVJ. But they do not provide the breaks necessary to see what is being said: shelakhayikh pardes – “Your shoots – paradise.” Solomon continues with the parallelism. His beloved was equated to a garden previously, now a paradise.

The word shelakh is translated elsewhere as a sword, missile, etc. It is derived from the verb shalakh, to send away, stretch out, and so forth. That which metaphorically shoots out of her is likened to a paradise.

This is a word, pardes, seen for the last of only three times in Scripture. It signifies a park. Thus, by extension, an orchard or forest. It is derived from the Persian word pairidaeza, paradise, which is how the Greek translates it. Solomon uses the word in Ecclesiastes –

“I made my works great, I built myself houses, and planted myself vineyards. ⁵ I made myself gardens and orchards [pardes], and I planted all kinds of fruit trees in them. ⁶ I made myself water pools from which to water the growing trees of the grove.” Ecclesiastes 2:4-6

This paradise is next described by him, saying…

^{13 (con’t)} of pomegranates
With pleasant fruits,

The translation is terrible. First, including the word “of” would mean that the shoots spoken of previously are what describe the paradise, as in “a paradise of pomegranates.” But the structure that follows is ruined by such a translation.

Rather, everything that follows “paradise” is what describes it. Also, the word fruit is a collective singular word, and rather than an adjective, it is a plural noun:  rimonim im peri m’gadiym – “Pomegranates with fruit – preciousnesses.”

Seeing the way I translate the two clauses will enlighten you –

“Your shoots – paradise:
Pomegranates with fruit – preciousnesses.
Hennas with nards.”

There are two categories that follow the word paradise. This clause concerning pomegranates is the first. The rimon, pomegranate, is derived from ramam, to be high or exalted. It symbolizes harvest-ready fruit and means Mature Mind or Harvest Ready.

The shoots are then defined by “with fruit – preciousnesses.” It is why the second noun is plural. The pomegranate has one type of fruit, even if it has many of them. Each of the fruit is precious. As there are many of them, they are preciousnesses.

Any other translation makes no sense. Solomon continues with…

^{13 (con’t)} Fragrant henna with spikenard,

Both words are plural: k’pharim im n’radim – “Hennas with nards.” What is happening here is not as translations make it seem. The word “nards” is not a second plant. It describes the aromatic properties of the first plants, collectively called hennas. These will then be explained in the next verse. Here is how it all reads –

Hennas with nards:
¹⁴ Nard and saffron,
Cane and cinnamon.

But why is he saying this? It is because in Israel, they had the fragrances, but they didn’t have the plants themselves. John Lange rightly says –

“…the cyprus flower or alhenna was the only one of these plants, which was also cultivated in Palestine. The nard grass, grown only in India, is therefore simply added here for the sake of the delightfully fragrant unguent obtained from it, as in the following verse incense, calamus, cinnamon, and probably also saffron are exotic plants known to the Hebrews only from their aromatic products. The description accordingly loses itself here again in rapturous exaggerations and improbabilities in natural history, which however at the same time bear witness to an extensive knowledge of nature.” Lange

This “extensive knowledge of nature” is a great description seen in the Bible concerning Solomon –

“He spoke three thousand proverbs, and his songs were one thousand and five. ³³ Also he spoke of trees, from the cedar tree of Lebanon even to the hyssop that springs out of the wall; he spoke also of animals, of birds, of creeping things, and of fish. ³⁴ And men of all nations, from all the kings of the earth who had heard of his wisdom, came to hear the wisdom of Solomon.” 1 Kings 4:32-34

As seen in Chapter 1, the kopher, translated as henna, means a cover. In this case, it refers to henna, which is used to form a covering over the skin.

The word nards refers to the spikenard, already seen in Chapter 1, where typologically it is described and points to Christ. It was poured all over Him before His crucifixion. Being plural, it is being used as a single descriptor of each of the following scents…

¹⁴ Spikenard and saffron,

nered v’kharkom – “Nard and saffron.” We know that the word nards is referring to all of the subsequent fragrances because the word nard is now repeated in the singular. Solomon has essentially done something like this –

“Creosotes with jasmines: Jasmine and saffron, calamus and cinnamon…”

He has taken one plant that is not particularly aromatic and assigned to it many wonderful smells without any specificity. Next, he defines those smells beginning with the first wonderful smell. He then expands on that with more fragrances. As Lange rightly said, they are “rapturous exaggerations.”

The nard was just explained. Saffron, karkom, is found only here. It is derived from the Arabic kurkum, the crocus sativus. Keil says it is, “the genuine Indian safran, the dried flower-eyes of which yield the safran used as a colour, as an aromatic, and also as medicine.”

Strong’s lexicon says, “Its cultivation and trade were significant in regions such as Persia and India, and it was a symbol of beauty and love in various cultures.” Next, it says…

^{14 (con’t)} Calamus and cinnamon,

qaneh v’qinamon – “Cane and cinnamon.” The first of these is qaneh, cane, implying sweet cane. It is elsewhere translated as a reed. It is derived from qanah, to erect. However, that by extension signifies to acquire, procure, purchase, etc. It was first used as an aromatic in Exodus 30:23 when it was included as a part of the holy anointing oil.

The next, qinamon, was also first seen in Exodus 30:23. It is from an unused root meaning “to erect.” Thus, it is applied to cinnamon bark, which is found in upright rolls. Solomon next says…

^{14 (con’t)} With all trees

Like before, the NKJV and others seem to make the break in the rong place by saying “trees of frankincense.” Rather, Solomon is still describing the plural nards. From there, he will describe the trees: im kal atsei – “With all trees.” After this, he will continue with his list –

“With all trees –
Frankincense, myrrh, and aloes.”

^{14 (con’t)} of frankincense,
Myrrh and aloes,

Instead: l’vonah mor vaahaloth – “Frankincense, myrrh, and aloes.” As has been seen several times, frankincense comes from lavan, white. That is derived from lavan, to be or make white or to purify. It also signifies to make bricks because bricks whiten when they are dried.

Myrrh, mor, is from marar, bitter as has been seen.

The ahalim, aloes, refers to the lignum or wood aloes. It is a tree eight to ten feet tall that has a sweet smell and provides shade. It is also the source for aromatic resins and incense. It is used when speaking of a fragrance of the Lord in the 45^th Psalm –

“All Your garments are scented with myrrh and aloes and cassia,
Out of the ivory palaces, by which they have made You glad.” Psalm 45:8

Next, Solomon says…

^{14 (con’t)} With all the chief spices—

Rather, the two final nouns are plural: im kal rashe b’samim – “With all chiefs – fragrances.” The reason for this structure is that it forms a type of parallelism, repeating what was just said –

With all trees (im kal atse) –
Frankincense, myrrh, and aloes,
With all chiefs (im kal rashe) – fragrances.

These are the chief trees, and the word fragrances sums up the naming of the trees. What I have proposed for verses 13 and 14 is like the likely explanation of what is being said. In addition to that, the translations are certainly correct, in contrast to all other available translations.

However, the structure of the translation may have been misidentified by me. It does not match any others that I have seen. Despite this, I feel it is proper and I present it to you with calm but courageous confidence.

Next, the words turn again to the waters. Most scholars attribute them to Solomon speaking of his beloved. There are no gender markers to indicate it either way. It makes little sense for it to be Solomon speaking of his beloved when properly considered.

Rather, the words are assuredly the woman speaking about Solomon…

Into My death, you also can die with Me
Into new life, you can be born
When you trust the gospel story
In garments of righteousness, you I will adorn

The fragrance of your faith is pleasing to Me
Because it reflects what I have done
By faith, you have trusted Me completely
From that moment, new life has begun

How I rejoice over you!
My precious bride, My beautiful wife
My words are faithful and true
To you I have granted eternal life

II. Gushings From Lebanon (verses 15 & 16)

¹⁵ A fountain of gardens,

mayan ganim – “Fountain gardens.” The words go back to verse 12 and reveal a contrast –

¹² “A bubbling locked,
Fountain sealed.”

¹⁵ “Fountain gardens,
Well waters – living,
And gushings from Lebanon.”

Verse 12 spoke of the moral state of Solomon’s beloved. She is chaste, pure, and morally contained. The words of verse 15 refer to the spiritual state of Solomon. He is the provider who outwardly flows forth, providing abundance and life to Israel as its king.

Being a “fountain gardens,” means that his waters flow to refresh more than a single garden. Rather, he flows to all of the gardens of the Lord’s people. Next…

^{15 (con’t)} A well of living waters,

b’er mayim khayiym – “Well waters – living.” The idea of living waters is that of continuously flowing waters. They remain constant, fresh, and unimpeded. Thus, they continually provide life for those seeking it. Next, she says…

^{15 (con’t)} And streams from Lebanon.

v’nozlim min l’vanon – “And gushings from Lebanon.” The word nazal comes from a primitive root signifying to drip or shed by trickling. In this case, it is plural and gives the sense of gushing waters or many streams.

Coming from Lebanon means the waters are from the snow melt. Thus, they are cool, refreshing, abundant, and descending from a higher point.

As with frankincense, Lebanon comes from lavan, white. As already noted, that is derived from lavan, to be or make white or to purify. It also signifies to make bricks because bricks whiten when they are dried.

With that stated, she now calls out with vibrant, exclamatory words…

¹⁶ Awake, O north wind,

The verb is imperative: uri tsaphon – “Awake, north!” It is speaking of a stirring from the north. Though the word wind is not included, it is implied. The land heats and the winds arise as a result. From there, they move across the land. Next…

^{16 (con’t)} And come, O south!

Again, the verb is imperative: uvoi teman – “And go, south!” The word bo can mean either to come or to go. In this case, it doesn’t seem likely that she is asking for both the north and south wind to come at the same time. This is especially true when the south wind can be very hot in Israel.

Thus, I have translated it as go. The meaning of the word go can be used as in “Go away,” or “Go, do your thing.” Therefore, nothing is lost in the translation. As a side note, the construct, uvoi, is used only four times. The other three uses indicate to go. Therefore, it is a perfectly plausible pronouncement.

^{16 (con’t)} Blow upon my garden,

The imperative verbs continue: haphikhi gani – “Puff my garden.” The winds rising in the north and going to the south makes sense considering the word puakh, to puff. It is as if the wind is breathing across the land.

But her words ask for them to puff across her garden, meaning herself. The bride of Solomon is calling on the winds to blow over her, and she asks for this…

^{16 (con’t)} That its spices may flow out.

yiz’lu b’samav – “Gushes its fragrances.” It is the same word just used to describe the gushing of the waters from Lebanon. She asks the wind to pick up the spices noted above that describe her and carry them to her beloved. From there, she says…

^{16 (con’t)} Let my beloved come to his garden

yavo dodi l’gano – “Come, my beloved, to his garden.” She acknowledges that her garden is his garden. She has completely yielded to him, inviting him to come to her…

*^{16 (fin)} And eat its pleasant fruits.

The word fruit is again singular, as in verse 13: v’yokhal peri m’gadav – “And eat fruit – his preciousnesses.” The word garden is masculine, so she could be speaking of the fruit as being of the garden in general, “its preciousnesses.”

But with a singular noun, fruit, it seems she is talking about him, saying, “his preciousnesses.” Gardens normally have more than one fruit. But he focused on only one when describing her, the pomegranate. She is repeating that back to him, “Come to your garden and eat your fruit, your preciousnesses.”

With Chapter 4 complete, there is still typology to consider. The words continue the typology of Christ from the previous sermon, where he called her “completer” four times.

The beloved provides a sense of completion to him as any bride does. The verses described what she was like in order to become this completer.

Next, he begins to describe what she is like, starting with “Garden locked. My sister – completer.” As noted, she is her own garden with her own unique attributes, but they are locked up, meaning unshared with others.

This means she is a chaste virgin. Nobody has violated her garden, nor do they have access to it. It is reflective of Paul’s words in 2 Corinthians –

“Oh, that you would bear with me in a little folly—and indeed you do bear with me. ² For I am jealous for you with godly jealousy. For I have betrothed you to one husband, that I may present you as a chaste virgin to Christ.” 2 Corinthians 11:1, 2

The imagery of her being “Bubbling locked, Fountain sealed,” means that she is His alone, she is reserved solely for Him, and only He has access to her. That is perfectly seen in Paul’s writings, such as in our text verse. Also –

“In Him you also trusted, after you heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation; in whom also, having believed, you were sealed with the Holy Spirit of promise, ¹⁴ who is the guarantee of our inheritance until the redemption of the purchased possession, to the praise of His glory.” Ephesians 1:13, 14

Speaking of her shoots, meaning the redeemed within the garden, as “shoots – paradise” explains the state of the redeemed. They form a paradise, being people who are mature-minded, symbolized by the pomegranate, concerning Christ. For example, Paul says –

“However, we speak wisdom among those who are mature, yet not the wisdom of this age, nor of the rulers of this age, who are coming to nothing. ⁷ But we speak the wisdom of God in a mystery, the hidden wisdom which God ordained before the ages for our glory.” 1 Corinthians 2:6, 7

Next, the description “hennas with nards” looks to their state in Christ. Henna is from kophar, a covering. As noted in Chapter 1, the word is used to signify a ransom. The plural speaks of each individual as one who is ransomed by the Lord.

Likewise, the nard was poured all over Christ in preparation for His burial. As such, those who are redeemed are symbolically covered in the nard of Christ’s death. Christ’s death was a type of baptism. Believers are then baptized into His death and bear the fragrance of it –

“What shall we say then? Shall we continue in sin that grace may abound? ² Certainly not! How shall we who died to sin live any longer in it? ³ Or do you not know that as many of us as were baptized into Christ Jesus were baptized into His death? ⁴ Therefore we were buried with Him through baptism into death, that just as Christ was raised from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life.” Romans 6:1-4

The subsequent naming of each spice carries symbolism. First, the nard. Next, the saffron was noted as being a symbol of beauty and love. The qaneh, cane, is the source of the word canon, which we use to indicate the authority of Scripture, as in the canon of Scripture.

Thus, this spice is used to indicate the word of God. It is reflective of Christ, the word of God, who both embodies and reveals it. His word is that which is used as the standard measure for the acquisition and purchase of God’s people.

The qinnamon, cinnamon, is found four times in the Bible. Two point to Christ, two point to harlotry.

The word comes from an unused root meaning to erect. Thus, there is a house being erected by the Lord for His people, and there is a false one which is being erected by the false religious system of the world for those who pursue her harlotry. One will stand forever; the other will be forever destroyed.

Each of these spices points to a truth concerning the redeemed in relation to Christ. After those, it said –

“With all trees –
Frankincense, myrrh, and aloes.”

These spices have each been described already. Frankincense symbolizes purification, but it also speaks of works. The prominent idea of myrrh speaks of bitterness and symbolizes love. More especially, however, love in intimate union, but not necessarily sexual in nature.

Finally, the aloes were noted as one of the fragrances of the Lord in Psalm 45. These each then refer to the Lord’s work, the bitterness of it, and His fragrance before God. Saying they are “all chiefs – fragrances” is a way of saying that what Christ has done is the epitome of what identifies His people.

After the words about the woman were complete, she then described Him. He is the “Fountain, gardens,” whether those of faith in the past (apart from the law), the redeemed under the law, or the redeemed after His completion of it.

He is the “Well waters – living.” As Jesus Himself said –

“Whoever drinks of this water will thirst again, ¹⁴ but whoever drinks of the water that I shall give him will never thirst. But the water that I shall give him will become in him a fountain of water springing up into everlasting life.” John 4:13, 14

These descriptions exactly define Jesus as He has revealed Himself. But she also says he is “gushings from Lebanon.” Because of the etymological similarity, the meaning of Lebanon is the same as frankincense, which speaks of Christ’s work.

The water from His works provides for His people, just as John 7 said. It is He who fulfilled God’s will, suffered for His people, and provides purification and life for them.

The last verse called on the wind. The north, tsaphon, signifies concealed. The south, teman, signifies the right hand. It is a call from the redeemed to have their own fragrances go forth openly (from the concealed) and in strength (symbolized by the right hand) for the Lord to come among them, “And eat fruit – His preciousnesses.”

It is a call for the Lord to be pleased with the fruit of those who are mature-minded, meaning having the mind of Christ by the act of receiving Him through faith.

We again see in these verses the reasons why this “Song the songs” is read each year at the Passover. As it anticipated the cross of Christ, the Passover Lamb, it is a call to share in the greatest love story ever written.

The book speaks of the union of Christ with His bride, the completer. As noted in the previous sermon, there is something about the Lord presenting the church as a bride to Himself that brings about its own state of completeness.

Otherwise, there would be no reason for Him to die on the cross and then to prepare the church as a bride for Himself. Whatever it is that He sees in His redeemed, His word has given a great number of typological anticipations of His union with it.

For example, Genesis 24 was all about this process when Abraham sent his servant to acquire a bride for Isaac. This book now is showing us that there is a fullness that can only be experienced when a man has a wife.

Transferring that thought to God in Christ, it shows us the true value He sees in His redeemed. He was willing to go through the years of redemptive history leading to Jesus, and then have Jesus go through immeasurable trials and suffering for this process to be completed.

Whatever value He sees in uniting with His redeemed, the fact is that He sees it. We are the beneficiaries of everything that lies ahead, and that state is procured by a simple act of faith in what He has done. Let us not insert ourselves into that part of the equation.

Let us trust in what He has done. In doing so, we will receive the full benefit of what He has promised to His people.

Closing Verse: “On the last day, that great day of the feast, Jesus stood and cried out, saying, ‘If anyone thirsts, let him come to Me and drink. ³⁸ He who believes in Me, as the Scripture has said, out of his heart will flow rivers of living water.’ ³⁹ But this He spoke concerning the Spirit, whom those believing in Him would receive; for the Holy Spirit was not yet given, because Jesus was not yet glorified.” John 7:37-39

Next Week: Our Annual Resurrection Day Message

The Lord has you exactly where He wants you. He has a good plan and purpose for you. He alone is the perfect example of love – untarnished, unblemished, and completely pure and holy. He offers this love to you. So, follow Him, live for Him, and trust Him, and He will do marvelous things for you and through you.

Song of Songs 4:12-16 (CG)

¹² Garden locked,
My sister – completer.
A bubbling locked,
Fountain sealed.
¹³ Your shoots – paradise:
Pomegranates with fruit – preciousnesses.
Hennas with nards:
¹⁴ Nard and saffron,
Cane and cinnamon,
With all trees –
Frankincense, myrrh, and aloes,
With all chiefs – fragrances.

¹⁵ Fountain gardens,
Well waters – living,
And gushings from Lebanon.
¹⁶ Awake, north!
And go, south!
Puff my garden,
Gushes its fragrances.
Come, my beloved, to his garden,
And eat fruit – his preciousnesses.

 

Song of Songs 4:12-16 (NKJV)

¹² A garden enclosed
Is my sister, my spouse,
A spring shut up,
A fountain sealed.
¹³ Your plants are an orchard of pomegranates
With pleasant fruits,
Fragrant henna with spikenard,
¹⁴ Spikenard and saffron,
Calamus and cinnamon,
With all trees of frankincense,
Myrrh and aloes,
With all the chief spices—
¹⁵ A fountain of gardens,
A well of living waters,
And streams from Lebanon.

¹⁶ Awake, O north wind,
And come, O south!
Blow upon my garden,
That its spices may flow out.
Let my beloved come to his garden
And eat its pleasant fruits.

 

Artwork by Douglas Kallerson

Song of Songs 4:7-11
Unhearted Me!

(Typed 13 January 2025) Thus far, the words of “Song the songs” have portrayed a wonderful love story between Solomon and his beloved. As we have seen, this has provided many insights into God’s love for His people and their relationship with Him.

In the passage today, we again see Solomon rejoice over her, saying things that show how utterly enraptured he is with her. Believe it or not, that describes how the Lord feels about His people.

You may or may not think He feels this way about you, but if you are a believer in God’s promises found in the sending of Jesus the Messiah, you are definitely looked at that way by Him. But what is it that makes it so?

God is not looking at externals. He doesn’t care what you look like, how many teeth you have, or if you are always dirty because you live in poor conditions and have no water for washing. These things are earthly, and they will all pass away in time. So what is it that makes the redeemed of the Lord an object of His great affection, even to the point that He is enraptured with them?

Text Verse: “For by grace you have been saved through faith, and that not of yourselves; it is the gift of God, ⁹ not of works, lest anyone should boast. ¹⁰ For we are His workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand that we should walk in them.” Ephesians 2:8-10

We are not saved by our works, but rather by faith. Later I will cite Romans 4, which says we are saved apart from works. This does not mean that we are saved apart from works in the ultimate sense, however. Rather, we are not saved by our works.

Somebody had to do something to restore us to God. That is the point of the law. The man who does the things of the law will live by them. The lesson of the law is that nobody can do those things and live. The infection of sin is too deep.

Thus, God sent Jesus to do the works for us. Being saved apart from works only speaks of what we do. Our faith is to be in the completed works of Jesus. Beyond that, there is nothing in heaven or on earth that can merit salvation for us. This is what grace means. We are getting what we do not deserve, and it comes by faith in what He has done.

How is this pictured in today’s verses? Get ready, you’ll see as we go. Great things are to be found in His superior word. And so, let us turn to that precious word once again, and… May God speak to us through His word today, and may His glorious name ever be praised.

I. My Sister – Completer (verses 7-9)

In the previous verses of this chapter, Solomon went into great detail concerning the beauty of his beloved. Verse 6 was a transitional verse without any gender markers. Thus, it could have been either Solomon or the beloved speaking.

I would guess that it was the beloved. She continued in her direction until the day ended. Assuming it was the woman, I logically connected that with the focus of the saints, meaning Christ, until their time ends and He takes His people to Himself. With that transitional verse complete, the words next return to Solomon…

⁷ You are all fair, my love,

kulakh yaphah rayathi – “You all beautiful my querida.” Those scholars who assume verse 6 was the woman speaking tend to say that these words include not just her physical beauty but the beauty of her soul as well.

The reason is that the woman has not only displayed physical beauty, but a loving demeanor by what she said in response to his compliments. Assuming it was her speaking, she said –

“Until that puffs the day,
And flit the shadows.
I walk, to me, unto mount the myrrh,
And unto hill the frankincense.”

She would continue her walk until the day ended, demonstrating restraint and focus. She is not just physically lovely but wholesome in character as well. Having noted her all-beautiful state, he repeats the thought in parallelism…

^{7 (con’t)} And there is no spot in you.

 

u-mum ein bakh – “And blemish not in you.” The word mum signifies a stain or blemish. It can refer to both physical and/or moral blemishes. The thought was expressed concerning Absalom, David’s son –

“Now in all Israel there was no one who was praised as much as Absalom for his good looks. From the sole of his foot to the crown of his head there was no blemish [mum] in him.” 2 Samuel 14:25

Unfortunately, the word concerning Absalom spoke only of his physical perfection as he was a morally corrupt individual. A suitable thought is expressed in the New Testament when referring to the redeemed as having no moral blemish –

“Husbands, love your wives, just as Christ also loved the church and gave Himself for her, ²⁶ that He might sanctify and cleanse her with the washing of water by the word, ²⁷ that He might present her to Himself a glorious church, not having spot or wrinkle or any such thing, but that she should be holy and without blemish.” Ephesians 5:25-27

In these words of Ephesians, the moral perfection of God’s people, imputed to them because of the substitutionary work of Christ, is referred to. Solomon, looking upon the perfection of her beauty, most likely inclusive of both physical and moral points, continues…

⁸ Come with me from Lebanon, my spouse,

The word “come” is only implied in this clause. In typical fashion in Hebrew, the full thought only comes in a later clause: iti mil’vanon kalah – “With me from Lebanon, completer.” What appears to be the case is that after complimenting his beloved for her perfection, which is highlighted by the words of verse 6, he still wants her to stay and participate in the union of love.

Putting verse 6 beside verse 8 allows this to be grasped. She says she will walk unto mount the myrrh and unto hill the frankincense. He then calls those locations Lebanon. The reason he can poetically do this is because the spelling of the two is almost identical –

לְבוֹנָה – l’vonah, frankincense
לְבָנוֹן – l’vanon, Lebanon

Whether she is actually saying that she is going north to Lebanon or not, the fact that she is going to the mount of frankincense is poetically turned into the area of Lebanon –

6.
Until that puffs the day,
And flit the shadows.
I walk, to me, unto mount the myrrh,
And unto hill the frankincense.

8.
With me from Lebanon, completer,
With me from Lebanon – come!
Turn from top Amana, from top Senir and Hermon,
From habitations lions,
From mountains leopards.

Therefore, instead of yielding to her plans of walking to the mountains until the end of the day, he is poetically asking her to come from the mountains to him.

As we have seen, the name Lebanon comes from the same word, lavan, white. That is derived from lavan, to be or make white or to purify. It also signifies to make bricks because bricks whiten when they are dried.

This is the first time he has called her kalah, completer. No other translation uses the word completer, instead they say bride or spouse. However, that is only a description, not really a translation.

The word kalah is derived from kalal, to complete or make perfect. Therefore, it is also often translated as daughter-in-law, such as Judah’s daughter-in-law, Tamar, or Ruth, the daughter-in-law of Naomi.

The thought is probably that the son, and thus the family, is made complete with the acquisition of his bride. Thus, the designation is bestowed upon her as the one who completes or perfects the son: completer. Solomon is saying that she is the one who completes him. Therefore, he repeats the thought…

^{8 (con’t)} With me from Lebanon.

iti mil’vanon tavoi – “With me from Lebanon – come!” Placing the word come at the end of the two clauses rather than at the beginning causes the mind to remain in a state of anticipation. It also provides its own emphasis. He is in an excited state of desire for them to be together. Because of that, he continues with…

^{8 (con’t)} Look from the top of Amana,

Rather: tashuri merosh amana – “Turn from top Amana.” There are two identical verbs that could be used here, both spelled shur. The first is shur (שׁוּר) to spy out, survey, look, etc. The second is shur (שׁוּר) to turn, and thus to travel about.

He has just asked her to come from Lebanon. Thus, he isn’t asking her to join him in looking from the top of a mountain. Rather, he is repeating the thought of the first two clauses by using a different word – “With me, come! Turn from the top of Amana!”

Further, this doesn’t mean that she is in a different location in this clause or in the next clauses. Rather, he is describing Lebanon by her various peaks.

If someone was in Florida and had a girlfriend in New York City, he could poetically say, “Come from New York City! Turn from the Empire State Building, from Trump Tower, and from Rockefeller Plaza!” That is the substance of what is being conveyed here.

As for the name Amana, it is found only here in Scripture. It is derived from the root aman, to confirm, support, or be faithful. As such, it is variously translated as Permanent, Confirmation, Constant, Faithful, etc. The Greek translation uses the word pistis, Faith. Next, Solomon says…

^{8 (con’t)} From the top of Senir and Hermon,

merosh seniyr v’khermon – “From top Senir and Hermon.” The poetic use of mountaintops in Lebanon continues. Senir was first mentioned in Deuteronomy 3:9. It is the Amorite name given to Mount Hermon. The name is also used in 1 Chronicles 5:23 and Ezekiel 27:5. It is believed to mean Glittering Breastplate of Ice. Hermon means Sacred. Solomon next continues with…

^{8 (con’t)} From the lions’ dens,

mim’onoth arayoth – “From habitations lions.” The ari, lion, comes from arah, to pluck. It speaks of the violence of the creature. Thus, he is essentially saying, “Come to me from the place of danger.”

The last lion in Israel was killed in the 16^th century, but they have been extinct from Lebanon for almost a thousand years. At the time of Solomon, they were common. He implores her to be safe from them. That thought is then repeated with the next words…

^{8 (con’t)} From the mountains of the leopards.

mehar’re n’meriym – “From mountains leopards.” The namer, leopard is introduced here. The word is derived from an unused root signifying to filtrate, a process that makes something clear or transparent through filtration. The idea is that of spotting as if by dripping. Hence, you come in thought to the spotted coat of the leopard.

Leopards were found in Lebanon until early in the 20^th century but are now extinct. There are leopards in Israel, but most are in captivity. It has been about 15 years since any were seen in the wild.

In saying, “from mountains,” it doesn’t necessarily mean he is speaking of many mountains. It may be if he is speaking of Amana, Senir, and Hermon separately.

However, if he is only referring to Senir and Hermon noted in the last clause, it could be a poetic way of calling the one mountain with two names as if they are separate mountains. That would be like saying, “Come with me from Petrograd and Leningrad, from the city of palaces, from the city of white nights, from the places of Peter the Great.”

Everything in the sentence refers to the same place. Therefore, the last designation in the plural, “places of Peter the Great,” is only referring to one place. That seems to be what Solomon is doing here by repeating different names and designations about the same mountain.

However, by making it plural, it can thus provide different typology. In the Bible, a har, mountain, is synonymous with a large but centralized group of people. Making it plural would then refer to various large people groups. Having called to her to come from these places, he next says…

⁹ You have ravished my heart,
My sister, my spouse;

The words are more of a paraphrase. The Hebrew is simpler: libavtini akhoti khalah – “Unhearted me! My sister – completer.” The word is lavav, a verb coming from levav, the heart. It is in the perfect aspect, so the action is a done deal.

Various translations say ravished, captured, captivated, made my heart beat faster, encouraged me, wounded, bewitched, stolen, etc. All of these depart from the exacting sense of the word. Rather, the simplicity of the word is found in the idea that Solomon has been heartened, but with the meaning of unheartened. It is as if there is nothing left in him for any other.

If she were a genius and he was overwhelmed by her daunting intelligence, he might say, “You have braindeaded me.” If she were a power wrestler with more strength than him, he might say, “You have disarmed me.” The words of Solomon are conveying simplicity of thought.

Also, calling his bride “my sister,” is not without precedent. In Genesis 12 and 20, Abraham truthfully said that his wife was his, akhoth, sister. What started as siblings increased to a married couple.

In Genesis 24, the collective household called Rebekah “our sister.” The word can signify a close female relative or a woman of the same people or nation. In Genesis 26, Isaac said that Rebekah was his sister. Though not true in his case, such exclamations would have been retained in the collective memory of the people.

The scholar Karl Budde noted that in ancient Egyptian love songs, the words “my sister” and “my brother” were used among lovers. This “Song the songs” has already relied on foreign motifs. As such, Solomon is being poetic towards her by saying this. To then explain the relationship further, he again says, khalah, completer.

He elevates the term of endearment, sister, a beloved part of his family, to the thought of her being the completer of the family, his bride. With that, he calls out again…

^{9 (con’t)} You have ravished my heart

libavtini – “Unhearted me!” It is the second and last time the word is used in this form. Being in the perfect aspect, and repeating it in this manner, he is indicating that he is utterly demolished by her. She has ravished and stolen away his heart, as he says…

^{9 (con’t)} With one look of your eyes,

Again, he leaves the words simple, omitting some for effect: b’akhad meenayikh – “In one from your eyes.” All it takes is a glance from her eyes or a flit of them to the left or right, and he becomes completely unhearted. He is so utterly smitten by her that his knees probably buckle and his temples pound. The poor guy. And he continues…

^{9 (con’t)}  With one link of your necklace.

The Hebrew is puzzling because of the use of the plural noun. Rather: b’akhad anaq mitsav’ronayikh – “In one necklace from your napes.” The use of the plural seemingly makes no sense. It is the word tsavar, the nape of the neck.

Because of the unusual plural form, some take this as meaning something suspended from the neck. That is how the Greek translation renders it, “…with one chain from your neck.” From there, translations follow that rendering in some form or another. But that could easily be expressed another way.

Those translations that say neck never render them properly in the plural. But the words are so specific that they call for us to consider them and resolve what is being conveyed.

It appears that he is referring to is the softly flowing cervical muscles on her neck as she moves her head. The plural, napes, then accentuates the beauty of each as they form the whole. He has already described her eyes and her neck earlier. These words now complement what he said earlier –

1 Your eyes – doves,

4 According to Tower David your nape,
Built to parapets.
Thousand the shield hang upon it,
All targets the mighties.

9 In one from your eyes,
In one necklace from your napes.

One movement like a dove, and one necklace hanging upon her parapeted tower, drives him absolutely bonkers. And so he continues…

With what will you come before the Lord?
What will you present for the sin of your soul?
What will bring you the great reward?
On what thing will you, your sins roll?

Shall you accomplish a great and noble deed?
Claiming it is worthy of His praise?
Shall giving up a wicked life or one of greed…
Bring you honor, blessing, and eternal days?

Rather, come to your God by faith in His grace
Come to Him with hands empty of any pride
By grace through faith alone will you see His smiling face
And through that alone will you in heaven reside

II. Your Loves (verses 10 & 11)

¹⁰ How fair is your love,
My sister, my spouse!

Rather: mah yaphu dodayikh akhoti khalah – “How beautified your loves, my sister – completer.” In Chapter 1, she twice spoke of her beloved’s loves, meaning his doting affections. In this verse, he twice returns that thought to her.

However, he uses the perfect aspect, beautified. And further, rather than her doting affections, he appears to be equating her loves to her physical attributes that he just spoke about. Hence, the word beautified.

Her attributes are complete in the perfection of their beauty. There is nothing he would change to make her more beautiful. Instead, they stand as a testament to the intrinsic perfection they bear.

Following the Greek, some translations says, “breasts” rather than “loves.” The words are similar, dod and dad. Therefore, the Latin, Aramaic, and several English translations go with this. This is certainly not right. First, he has already described her breasts in verse 4:5 using the word shad, a completely different word.

If he was describing them again, one would assume he would again use that word. Second, it was already seen in Chapter 1 that she was using parallelism in the use of this word in the plural. It would make sense that he is doing the same as well.

1:2 Kiss me from kisses his mouth –
For good your loves from wine.

4:9,10 – In one from your eyes,
In one necklace from your napes.
¹⁰ How beautified your loves, my sister – completer.

That thought then continues with a thought that carefully mirrors her words to him from Chapter 1…

^{10 (con’t)} How much better than wine is your love,

mah tovu dodayikh miyayin – “How bettered your loves from wine.” The meaning is that her attributes are better than wine. The word “from” in this clause is being used in a comparative sense: “Wine is good, but your loves are better.”

As with the previous clause, the verb is in the perfect aspect. Her attributes exceeded the bar set forth by wine. He would rather drink in the beautiful qualities of her physical attributes with his eyes than drink in the stimulating attributes of wine with his lips. What she offers is way better.

His next words continue to mirror in content what she said after she noted his loves –

1:2 Kiss me from kisses his mouth –
For good your loves from wine.
³ To aroma – your oils good,
Oil pouring – your name.

She notes his aroma based on the cologne he uses. He next notes hers here based on the perfume she uses…

^{10 (con’t)} And the scent of your perfumes
Than all spices!

v’reakh s’manayikh mikal b’samim – “And aroma your oils from all fragrances.” She has anointed herself with oils that exceed (from all, meaning greater than) all other fragrances. Her smell, then, is otherwise incomparable. It is simply the best. Having noted that, Solomon continues to speak affectionate words to his beloved completer…

¹¹ Your lips, O my spouse,
Drip as the honeycomb;

Rather: nopheth titoph’nah siphthothayikh kalah – “A dripping drops your lips, completer.” The word nopheth comes from nuph, to quiver. That leads to the sense of shaking to pieces and thus to drip. It is usually associated with honey, and so, most translations add that in, assuming that is what it is talking about. But it simply means a dripping.

The next verb, nataph, signifies to ooze, and thus to distill into drops. To get the somewhat alliterative sounds provided by the Hebrew, saying, “A dripping drops” fits well. The meaning here is not a literal dripping as if she is drooling on herself.

Rather, Solomon is speaking of her words, how what she says is perfectly pleasant and sweetly soothing to him. The exact same words, nopheth titoph’nah, are used of the speech concerning the wayward woman in Proverbs 5 –

“A dripping drops lips wayward,
And smooth from oil her mouth.” Proverbs 5:3

The meaning is that the words of an adulterous woman flow across her lips like a soft oozing while the words of her mouth are smoother than oil. In the case of his completer, her words likewise ooze forth smoothly. He next explains what that means, saying…

^{11 (con’t)} Honey and milk are under your tongue;

devash v’khalav takhath l’shonekh – “Honey and milk under your tongue.” This is what produces the dripping. It is as if her lips are moistened with honey and milk as she speaks. The words are to be taken metaphorically.

Honey is sweet. Therefore her words are filled with sweetness as she speaks. It is reflective of the words of the psalm –

“How sweet are Your words to my taste,
Sweeter than honey to my mouth!”  Psalm 119:103

Milk is used to express that which sustains, nourishes, and refreshes with its richness, such as –

“Whereas you have been forsaken and hated,
So that no one went through you,
I will make you an eternal excellence,
A joy of many generations.
¹⁶ You shall drink the milk of the Gentiles,
And milk the breast of kings;
You shall know that I, the Lord, am your Savior
And your Redeemer, the Mighty One of Jacob.” Isaiah 60:15, 16

As such, he is saying that her words do just this for him. The richness of what she says sustains, nourishes, and refreshes him as she speaks. It is as if sweetness, life, and vibrancy are found in her speech. Understanding this, his words next say…

*^{11 (fin)} And the fragrance of your garments
Is like the fragrance of Lebanon.

v’reakh salmothayikh k’reakh l’vanon –

“And fragrance your garments,
According to fragrance Lebanon.”

The Coverdale Bible of 1535, along with the Catholic versions that follow from the Latin Vulgate, convert Lebanon to frankincense. But this is unnecessary.

Lebanon is famous for its cedars, an especially aromatic tree. Like the juniper, they are both in the plant order of pinales. Walking through a copse or forest of them is marvelous.

But probably more to the point is that Solomon built and paneled a house in Jerusalem from Lebanese cedars –

“He also built the House of the Forest of Lebanon; its length was one hundred cubits, its width fifty cubits, and its height thirty cubits, with four rows of cedar pillars, and cedar beams on the pillars. ³ And it was paneled with cedar above the beams that were on forty-five pillars, fifteen to a row. ⁴ There were windows with beveled frames in three rows, and window was opposite window in three tiers. ⁵ And all the doorways and doorposts had rectangular frames; and window was opposite window in three tiers.” 1 Kings 7:2-5

Smelling the aromatic cedar every day would be a constant reminder of Lebanon. It would be something that became soothing and comforting each time he entered.

Likewise, smelling her would similarly remind him of how good she smelled each time she was near. Equating her to Lebanon makes complete sense when understanding Solomon’s surroundings.

As this is surely the fragrance he is referring to, even if it is not mentioned specifically, understanding the symbolism is worth the effort to consider –

The cedar, erez, ultimately comes from a word signifying firm or strong. The cedars of Lebanon are referred to many times in Scripture. They denote strength and firmness.

When equated to a person or a nation, the cedar refers to one who is great and mighty. In Ezekiel 17, Zedekiah, king of Judah, is equated to a sprig taken from a cedar of Lebanon. Assyria is equated to a cedar in Lebanon in Ezekiel 31.

With that, the verses of the passage are complete for today. However, we can find hints of God’s love for the redeemed in this passage as well.

Verse 7 noted his beloved’s completely beautiful nature (all beautiful) and that she was without spot. As before, the same general terminology is used when referring to the church. Ephesians 5 said –

“Husbands, love your wives, just as Christ also loved the church and gave Himself for her, ²⁶ that He might sanctify and cleanse her with the washing of water by the word, ²⁷ that He might present her to Himself a glorious church, not having spot or wrinkle or any such thing, but that she should be holy and without blemish.” Ephesians 5:25-27

The physical beauty of Solomon’s beloved is perfectly reflected in Paul’s description of the church. But more than how she is portrayed is how that came about, Christ “gave Himself for her.” That refers to His death on the cross.

Thus, we once again are given an insight into why this book, the “Song the songs,” is read by the Jews every year at the Passover. They have not made the connection that God is exactingly showing between the redeemed and Solomon’s lover.

However, these patterns can never be derived from Scripture unless they are studied as a whole, something Israel is not yet willing to do.

Verse 8 brought in Lebanon. Either it or frankincense has been brought into the narrative multiple times in the book. Both are derived from the same root and both point to the process of purification through works, emblematic of Jesus’ work on the cross. It is He who suffered for His people. It is His works that provide purification for them.

Verse 8 also introduced the word kalah, which I translate as completer. It refers to that which brings the family to a state of completion, or perfection. We need to be careful when we put on our typology thinking caps.

God is fully sufficient, and He needs nothing. Jesus is God. But Jesus is also human. Having a wife for a man is something that brings a state of completion to him and, thus, to the family.

There is something about the Lord presenting the church as a bride to Himself that brings about its own state of completeness. If it were not so, there would be no reason for Him to die on the cross and then to prepare the church as a bride for Himself.

Hence, we can find something useful and appropriate in the wording Solomon uses here. Saying, “With me from Lebanon, completer,” is telling us that the Lord is acquiring His redeemed from His work, and they (represented by her) provide a completion to His works. Repeating the thought accentuates the fact that it is by His work alone that it is accomplished, “With me from Lebanon – come!”

Immediately after that, the words say, “Turn from top Amana.” The imperative is to come to him by Faith (Amana). There is no other way to do so. Can’t you just see the words of the text verse clearly in this?

Next Senir, Glittering Breastplate of Ice, and Hermon, Sacred, point to purification and being set apart. The name Senir is given because of the white-capped nature of Hermon, thus purification. Hermon, being sacred, speaks of heaven, meaning that which is granted to the redeemed because of their faith. To Ephesians 2 again –

“But God, who is rich in mercy, because of His great love with which He loved us, ⁵ even when we were dead in trespasses, made us alive together with Christ (by grace you have been saved), ⁶ and raised us up together, and made us sit together in the heavenly places in Christ Jesus.” Ephesians 2:4-6

The words concerning the habitations of lions and the mountains of leopards give the sense of being saved from dwellings of those who will harm believers and from among the many nations of the earth.

Calling the beloved a sister along with a completer speaks of intrinsic nature. Jesus isn’t an angel as the JW’s maintain. He is fully human. Therefore, the church in nature is a “sister” type relationship, just as when the whole family, mother included, identified Rebekah as a sister.

The next verses referred to the enthralling beauty of the bride. Without trying to find a type or analogy in each one, it is sufficient to say that because Christ has prepared a bride for Himself, He is absolutely enthralled with who she is. Paul speaks of the various parts of the body, each having its own set purpose.

Likewise, the make up of the redeemed does as well. There is no part He will not rejoice over because they are His from Himself. Solomon could proclaim, “How bettered your loves from wine.” So, too, the Lord proclaims this over His redeemed.

Psalm 104:15 says wine “makes glad the heart of man.” But to the Lord, the attributes of His bride far exceed that. Noting the “dripping the drops” of the beloved’s lips and that honey and milk were under her tongue, signifies that the proclamation of the Lord’s people is sweet, sustaining, nourishing, and refreshing in their richness –

“For with the heart one believes unto righteousness, and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation. ¹¹ For the Scripture says, ‘Whoever believes on Him will not be put to shame.’ ¹² For there is no distinction between Jew and Greek, for the same Lord over all is rich to all who call upon Him. ¹³ For ‘whoever calls on the name of the Lord shall be saved.’” Romans 10:10-13

As for the final words of the verses, which refer to the fragrance of her garments being according to the fragrance Lebanon, it means that those who are saved by the Lord bear the fragrance of His works. That is seen in both testaments, but Revelation 3 is sufficient to see this –

“He who overcomes shall be clothed in white garments, and I will not blot out his name from the Book of Life; but I will confess his name before My Father and before His angels.” Revelation 3:5

To overcome is explained by John as accepting the message of God in Christ –

“For whatever is born of God overcomes the world. And this is the victory that has overcome the world—our faith. ⁵ Who is he who overcomes the world, but he who believes that Jesus is the Son of God?” 1 John 5:4, 5

The Father/Son relationship, speaking of accepting the deity of Jesus Christ through faith, is what allows one to overcome.

This is the typology and meaning of what is presented in the passage today. A love story between God and the redeemed of the world is being presented. It is all possible because of, and it is all centered on, the work of Jesus Christ.

The redeemed of all ages are brought near to God in the same way, through faith. Some were looking forward to His coming, others look back on it, but all are saved through what God has done through Him. Salvation is of the Lord. Thank God for Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.

Closing Verse: “But to him who does not work but believes on Him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is accounted for righteousness, ⁶ just as David also describes the blessedness of the man to whom God imputes righteousness apart from works:
⁷ ‘Blessed are those whose lawless deeds are forgiven,
And whose sins are covered;
⁸ Blessed is the man to whom the Lord shall not impute sin.’” Romans 4:5-8

Next Week: Song of Songs 4:12-16 There is no need for her to be shov-ed, he just asks… (Come My Beloved) (11^th Song of Songs sermon)

The Lord has you exactly where He wants you. He has a good plan and purpose for you. He alone is the perfect example of love – untarnished, unblemished, and completely pure and holy. He offers this love to you. So, follow Him, live for Him, and trust Him, and He will do marvelous things for you and through you.

 

Song of Songs 4:7-11 (CG)

⁷ You all beautiful my querida,
And blemish not in you.
⁸ With me from Lebanon, completer,
With me from Lebanon – come!
Turn from top Amana,
From top Senir and Hermon,
From habitations lions,
From mountains leopards.

⁹ Unhearted me! My sister – completer,
Unhearted me!
In one from your eyes,
In one necklace from your napes.
¹⁰ How beautified your loves, my sister – completer,
How bettered your loves from wine,
And aroma your oils from all fragrances.
¹¹ A dripping drops your lips, completer.
Honey and milk under your tongue.
And fragrance your garments,
According to fragrance Lebanon.

 

Song of Songs 4:7-11 (NKJV)

⁷ You are all fair, my love,
And there is no spot in you.
⁸ Come with me from Lebanon, my spouse,
With me from Lebanon.
Look from the top of Amana,
From the top of Senir and Hermon,
From the lions’ dens,
From the mountains of the leopards.

⁹ You have ravished my heart,
My sister, my spouse;
You have ravished my heart
With one look of your eyes,
With one link of your necklace.
¹⁰ How fair is your love,
My sister, my spouse!
How much better than wine is your love,
And the scent of your perfumes
Than all spices!
¹¹ Your lips, O my spouse,
Drip as the honeycomb;
Honey and milk are under your tongue;
And the fragrance of your garments
Is like the fragrance of Lebanon.

 

Artwork by Douglas Kallerson.

Song of Songs 4:1-6
Myrrh and Frankincense

(Typed 6 January 2025) Some of the wording in this passage may seem odd based on our modern understanding of the world. But we have to remember that things have not always been as they are now. One of the verses speaks of the woman’s teeth in a metaphor that is easily understood.

There may need to be a bit of explanation, but it is apparent that Solomon is elated about the condition of her teeth. Even today we get excited about nice teeth. But in America, unless the teeth are just exceptional, we would instead be inclined to note the defects rather than the good points of someone’s teeth.

However, until recent history, it would have been just the opposite. To understand why, a bit of tooth care history is cited here from a response provided by Google –

Tooth brushing became common in the United States after World War II, when the military required soldiers to brush their teeth daily. Soldiers brought the practice home with them and spread it to their families.

Here are some other milestones in the history of tooth brushing:
1780: William Addis developed the first mass-produced toothbrush in England.
1938: The first nylon toothbrush was made.
1939: The first electric toothbrush was made.
1960: The first electric toothbrush widely used in the U.S. was invented.

Before this national movement to enhance dental hygiene, it was not a common practice to spend much time on one’s teeth. Stained and missing teeth were common, bad breath ruled the day, and people just lived with it.

Text Verse: “I will greatly praise the Lord with my mouth;
Yes, I will praise Him among the multitude.” Psalm 109:30

Google gave a bit more information on oral hygiene for us to consider –

Before World War II, only 7% of American households brushed their teeth or had toothpaste. During World War I, the military considered dental disease a national crisis. The U.S. government issued hygiene kits to soldiers that included toothbrushes, toothpaste, or tooth powder.

Before the toothbrush, people used cloths or sponges dipped in mixtures of honey, salt, and herbal concoctions to clean their teeth. Tooth powders and toothpastes were used as long ago as 5000 B.C. in Egypt.

What was once a practice that was rather laborious and quite often neglected, as can be evidenced in parts of the world to this day, we now have the time, accessibility to quality brushes and pastes, and the modern desire to have healthy teeth.

That knowledge alone is enough to tell us that God isn’t worried about halitosis as we praise Him. He is also not concerned if we are missing teeth. If these things were a consideration, the praise from His people for millennia, along with the praise of many in the world today, would be offensive to Him.

God’s focus isn’t on such things. He desires our praises to be true and heartfelt. The references to healthy teeth in the woman are not to be taken to some unintended extreme as so often happens by people who take something from Scripture out of its intended context.

How Solomon saw the woman in a physical sense is how God looks at us in a spiritual sense. When we keep such boxes straight in our minds, we will avoid a lot of unsound thinking.

Such truths as this are to be found in His superior word. And so, let us turn to that precious word once again, and… May God speak to us through His word today, and may His glorious name ever be praised.

I. All Twinned (verses 1 & 2)

Behold, you are fair, my love!
Behold, you are fair!

The words are identical to verse 1:15. The pronouns are feminine, meaning that a male is speaking to a female: hinakh yaphah rayathi hinakh yaphah –

“Behold you! Beautiful, my querida.
Behold you! Beautiful!”

The beloved is overtaken by her exquisite beauty. The use of the interjection, behold, draws attention to what he is about to say. Making the proclamation twice is the Bible’s way of emphatically declaring a thing.

It is as if he has lost his breath over what his eyes are feasting on. In this stunned state, he next says…

^{1 (con’t)} You have dove’s eyes

These words are also the same as found in verse 1:15. They are more emphatic than the NKJV renders them: einayikh yonim – “Your eyes – doves.”

The comparison is not to dove’s eyes, but that she has eyes like doves – glistening, beautiful, shapely, and so forth.

The word yonah, dove, is from the same root as yayin, wine. This root signifies to effervesce. Thus, the dove is lively and animated. It carries with it a sense of warmth and love.

As she blinks, he thinks of its wing flitting. As she looks left or right, he thinks of the dove darting through the air. When he looks at the whites, he sees purity, and in the pupil, he sees gentleness and innocence. He is enraptured with her, especially captivated by her dovelike eyes. He continues with…

^{1 (con’t)} behind your veil.

These words are new, not found in verse 1:15: mibaad l’tsamathekh – “From behind to your veil.” The NKJV is not incorrect, but it lacks the fullness of the Hebrew. He is speaking of her eyes from a reference point, which is the veil. “From behind” is the position of her eyes, while “to your veil” is the point of reference.

It is as if there are two doves sitting in a protected alcove as one looks into it to see them. The word tsamah, veil, is introduced here. It will be seen twice more in this book, and once in Isaiah 47:2. Some translations say “locks,” as if it is referring to her hair. This doesn’t seem likely based on how the word is used in Isaiah

“Come down and sit in the dust,
O virgin daughter of Babylon;
Sit on the ground without a throne,
O daughter of the Chaldeans!
For you shall no more be called
Tender and delicate.
² Take the millstones and grind meal.
Remove your veil [tsamah],
Take off the skirt,
Uncover the thigh,
Pass through the rivers.
³ Your nakedness shall be uncovered,
Yes, your shame will be seen;
I will take vengeance,
And I will not arbitrate with a man.” Isaiah 47:1-3

Further, Strong’s notes it is derived from an unused root meaning to fasten on. Thus, a veil seems likely. This is probably not the revolting burka-styled veil forced on women in the Mideast. Rather it is more likely a sheer, small veil like one might see on a harem girl (think of I Dream of Jeannie). It is a veil of modesty which accentuates the eyes.

Next, he continues describing her beauty…

^{1 (con’t)} Your hair is like a flock of goats,

sarekh k’eder ha’izim – “Your hair according to flock the goats.” The sense here is that as he looks at her hair, it is the color of goats. But more, it is how goats appear to flow as they walk in clusters, some here, some there, rolling along.

Hair, sear, is used in Scripture to signify the existence of an awareness, particularly an awareness of sin. The ez, goat is used as an offering for sin, such as –

“And to the children of Israel you shall speak, saying, ‘Take a kid of the goats [s’iyir izim] as a sin offering, and a calf and a lamb, both of the first year, without blemish, as a burnt offering.’” Leviticus 9:3

“And he shall take from the congregation of the children of Israel two kids of the goats [s’iyire izim] as a sin offering, and one ram as a burnt offering.” Leviticus 16:5

The words, sear, hair, and sa’iyr, kid, are etymologically connected. For example, sear is used in Genesis 25:25 when describing Esau as being born hairy, while sa’iyr is used in Genesis 27:11 to describe his hairy state.

Intricate connections to other parts of Scripture are being conveyed to us as the man describes his beloved. Of her hair being like goats, he next says…

^{1 (con’t)} Going down from Mount Gilead.

shegal’shu mehar gilad – “Which cascaded from Mount Gilead.” It is another new and rare word, galash. It will only be seen again in verse 6:5. The word gives the sense of rolling, heaping up, or piling up.

Of these words, the BDB Lexicon says, “of flocks of goats, in the simile of a woman’s hair; construction & sense rather awkward.” It appears they are worried about the verb, which is in the perfect aspect. However, when one understands how goats descend, it isn’t awkward at all.

Solomon is thinking of a shepherd leading his flocks down the side of a mountain, in this case Mount Gilead. They would be clumped together in various areas, appearing to be rolling down the hills. Solomon isn’t speaking of them as they are cascading, but as they have cascaded – a moment in time.

In his mind, he sees goats on the side of the mountain and compares them to her hair at that moment. It could even be that they stopped on the side of the mountain and reclined, thus “heaped up” as curled locks would appear. Either way, the picture is beautiful to consider.

As has been seen many times in Joshua and Judges, a har (mount) is a lot of something gathered. It is synonymous with a large but centralized group of people. Gilead means Perpetual Fountain. Next, the man turns to another of her striking features…

² Your teeth are like a flock of shorn sheep

shinayikh k’eder haq’tsuvoth – “Your teeth according to flock the shorn.” The shen, tooth, is derived from shanan, a verb signifying to sharpen or whet. But it is also used when referring to the inculcation of instruction, as in teaching diligently.

The teeth of humans and animals are noted in Scripture, but teeth are also used metaphorically in various ways, such as devouring, ferocity, destruction, strength, power, etc. The word is also translated as ivory in this book and elsewhere.

In this case, he is speaking of her literal teeth being fabulously straight and white because the sheep are shorn. The word translated as shorn is another rare word, qatsav. It is derived from a primitive root signifying to clip or chop. It is found only here and in 2 Kings 6:6, where Elisha cut off a stick and threw it into water to make an axe head float.

After sheep are shorn, they aren’t bulging with hair. Thus, they look straight and even. Also, the brambles, dirt, and so forth that make them look dull or splotchy have been removed. Instead, they are nice and white. It is as if she has been regularly brushing with Crest Advanced Whitening. Ooh Ahh.

One can see from these words that if the word tsamah used above is a veil, it is a sheer fabric. Otherwise, he wouldn’t be able to describe her teeth until she removed the veil. With a wispy, sheer fabric, however, he would see her teeth and describe them just as he does here. Of these teeth, metaphorically described by sheep, he says…

^{2 (con’t)} Which have come up from the washing,

shealu min ha’rakhtsah – “Which ascended from the washing.” Not only were the sheep shorn, but they were then washed to accentuate their whiteness. The word is rakhtsah, a feminine noun signifying a bathing place. Thus, it is “the washing.” The word is found only here and in verse 6:6. Of her pearly whites, there is more good news ahead…

^{2 (con’t)} Every one of which bears twins,

shekulam math’imoth – “Which they all twinned.” The verb taam means to make double or twin. The meaning is that each tooth in her mouth bears its corresponding tooth. Just like sheep coming up two by two from the washing pool, those teeth on the top row are not without their mate on the bottom row. Hooray, she has all her teeth!

The type of verb used here means “to cause twins,” in other words, “making twins.” But how can a tooth make a twin? Scholars trouble over this, but it is not at all difficult to discern. When the mouth is open, the verb doesn’t apply, but when she closes her mouth while still showing her teeth, the joining of the top and bottom rows “makes twins.”

As for this description, it would actually be rarer than one might think. We take brushing as a part of daily life, but as noted in the opening comments, it wasn’t something practiced by the masses until much later in history.

In fact, it can be inferred from the words of Job and Amos that having teeth that weren’t clean was considered a good thing –

“My breath is offensive to my wife,
And I am repulsive to the children of my own body.
¹⁸ Even young children despise me;
I arise, and they speak against me.
¹⁹ All my close friends abhor me,
And those whom I love have turned against me.
²⁰ My bone clings to my skin and to my flesh,
And I have escaped by the skin of my teeth.” Job 19:17-20

“‘Also I gave you cleanness of teeth in all your cities,
And lack of bread in all your places;
Yet you have not returned to Me,’
Says the Lord.” Amos 4:6

Job describes skin on his teeth, meaning that he had a film left from what he ate, but it was just enough to keep him from dying. Cleanness of teeth in Amos means a complete deprivation of food, resulting in teeth that have no skin at all on them.

This doesn’t mean that cleaning one’s teeth, as this young beauty has done, was looked down on. But the whiteness of teeth, though extremely appealing, wasn’t considered overly necessary in society. Rather, older societies had more of a British than American attitude toward dental hygiene.

Stained and even missing teeth were just a part of life that wasn’t looked down on, even if a mouth with all of its teeth that were radiant was something to be noted with approval. Next, Solomon speaks in a parallel thought concerning her gnifty gnashers…

^{2 (con’t)} And none is barren among them.

v’shakulah ein bahem – “And bereaved, none, in them.” He is particularly fond of this attribute of hers, so he has spoken the thought a second time as a way of highlighting its truly remarkable nature. This is especially rare because even if people took the time to clean their teeth, they could still get knocked out or cracked or fall out.

If it weren’t for modern dental techniques, most of us would be showing empty spots when we smile. For sure, I would . She, on the other hand, had none to mar her glistening smile.

The two clauses contain a play on words not noticeable in translations –

shekulam math’imoth / v’shakulah ein bahem

Which they all [shekulam] twinned,
And bereaved [v’shakulah], none, in them

The use of parallelism, along with the play on words, especially highlights this notable aspect of hers.

There is also a gender discord in the words “Which they all (masc.) twinned (fem.). Keil, the only person I read who even commented on it, says it is an “incorrect exchange” and thinks this “refers to the mothers, none of which has lost a twin of the pair she had borne.”

But that confuses the analogy. What seems likely is that the discord is following the earlier words of the verse –

Your teeth (fem. noun) according to flock (masc. noun).
Which they all (the flock) twinned (teeth).

As for the smitten Solomon, his next words continue with high praises for his beloved…

What is true beauty to the Lord?
Is it fancy clothes and well-cut hair?
Is this how you perceive the word?
Is this the focus of all your care?

The Lord looks at the heart, searching for faithfulness
The externals don’t matter to Him at all
He doesn’t care about a three-piece suit or a fancy dress
In judging others this way, you’re headed for a fall

The least in fashion may have faith galore
And the one who is poor may please God the most
Don’t get judgmental toward the guy at the door
And in your appearance, do not boast

Be strong in your faith in Christ
That is how your soul will be greatly priced

II. Pasturing in the Lilies (verses 3-6)

³ Your lips are like a strand of scarlet,

k’khut hashani siphthothayikh – “According to thread, the crimson – your lips.” He is noting the beauty of her lips, being like the crimson that is obtained from the crimson grub worm. It is the same set of words used in Joshua 2 –

“So the men said to her: ‘We will be blameless of this oath of yours which you have made us swear, ¹⁸ unless, when we come into the land, you bind this line of scarlet [khut ha’shani] cord in the window through which you let us down, and unless you bring your father, your mother, your brothers, and all your father’s household to your own home.’” Joshua 2:17, 18

Solomon is equating her lips to such a thread of bright crimson. Next, he says a phrase unique to this verse…

^{3 (con’t)} And your mouth is lovely.

u-midbareikh naveh – “And your wilderness – beautiful.” The word midbar means wilderness or desert. Translating this as mouth would be the only time, out of 271 uses of the word, that it was translated this way. However, it is probably what Solomon is referring to, as if when she opens her crimson lips, her mouth looks like a beautiful wilderness.

Thus, the words are somewhat parallel but more complementary. But why would he use the term midbar this way? What seems likely is that he is making dual use of both words, lips and wilderness, forming a great play on two words translated as lips (saphah) and the word wilderness (davar).

The word lip, sapah, refers to a language. The word davar, word, refers to speech. These are both seen in their first use in Genesis, “Now the whole earth had one language [saphah] and one speech [davar]” (Genesis 11:1). Isaiah 36:5 also uses both words –

“I have said: Only, a word of the lips [davar shephtayim]! counsel and might are for battle: now, on whom hast thou trusted, that thou hast rebelled against me?” (YLT).

Likewise, the word midbar, wilderness, comes from davar, to speak, just noted in Genesis and Isaiah. That is identical to the noun davar, word. Without the later added vowel points, the word is the exact same spelling as a form of the noun “and from your word” found in Psalm 119 –

“Princes persecuted me gratis,
And from Your words [ומדבריך] startled my heart!” Psalm 119:161 (CG)

Therefore, he may be complimenting her lips and mouth while making a pun by complimenting her dialect and speech. It would certainly account for the very unusual use of the word wilderness –

According to thread, the crimson, your lips (saphah).
And your mouth (midbar) – beautiful.

According to thread, the crimson, your speech (saphah).
And from your words (midbar)– beautiful.

Therefore, Solomon could be making a pun that her lips, meaning her language, are like a beautiful crimson thread, and her manner of speaking is beautiful. Every word is carefully chosen, being pleasing to the ear and soothing to the mind.

This would make a marvelous play on words that seems to have eluded scholars all along. There is no doubt he is describing her physical beauty, but his words convey more than just that. He continues with more difficult words…

^{3 (con’t)} Your temples behind your veil
Are like a piece of pomegranate.

The translation is defective and misleading. The subject noun, translated elsewhere in the Bible as temple, is singular: k’phelakh ha’rimon raqathekh mibaad l’tsamathekh –

“According to slice the pomegranate,
Your countenance from behind to your veil.”

The word is raqah, meaning thinness. That is why it is translated as temple when Jael banged a tent peg through Sisera’s temple in the book of Judges. However, it doesn’t have to speak only of that.

Most translations incorrectly use the plural, temples. Some say cheek or cheeks. But that is another word lekhi, the cheek or jawbone. One translation says forehead. If he is seeing behind her sheer veil, he is seeing her forehead, temples, cheeks, etc.

Slicing a pomegranate in half leaves a circle with a Y shape where there is red in the Y and on both sides of it. Thus, I say the singular word countenance because the forehead, temple, and cheeks are the thin areas, corresponding to the outside of the Y.

This would cover the areas of thinness on her face collectively being red, maybe from an application of rouge. This is what one would expect of a woman in a wedding procession. Solomon continues next with…

⁴ Your neck is like the tower of David,

The words are dependent on the next clauses to fully understand: k’migdal David tsavarekh – “According to Tower David your nape.” The word is tsvvar, the same word used in verse 1:10 to describe her neck. However, in this case, it is more specifically the back of the neck. The word comes from tsur, to bind, besiege, cramp, etc.

It speaks of the binding of the back of the neck which is just what the next clauses will reveal. Thus, in this case, it is referring to the nape. The back of the neck is where there is strength. He is comparing it to the Tower of David, a high fortified tower. Next…

^{4 (con’t)} Built for an armory,

Rather, the noun is plural: banui l’thalpiyoth – “Built to parapets.” The word talpiyoth is found only here. Strong’s Lexicon says it comes from tel, a hill or mound, and piyoth, mouths or openings. However, his concordance says it is from an unused root meaning to tower.

The first is probably right. Either way, the plural complicates things, so translators have to be inventive. Some say built with rows of stones, jeweled with shields, built for weapons, etc. The Greek punts and makes it a proper name. But such translations make the thalpiyoth something other than a part of the neck.

However, it is surely a thought complement to the preceding clause and describes the neck, not what hangs on it. The Douay-Rheims, bulwarks, and the Catholic Public Domain, ramparts, are probably closer in thought. I went with parapets because it is the upward extension of a wall at the edge of a roof.

Thus, the word corresponds to the idea of height, like the tower of David. A parapet would have “mouths,” being crenelated so that soldiers could launch arrows or other projectiles and then go back behind the high edges of it for safety. The bones in her nape would give the sense of parapets…

^{4 (con’t)} On which hang a thousand bucklers,

eleph ha’magen talui alav – “Thousand the shield hang upon it.” The word magen refers to a shield. In this case, Solomon describes the necklace(s) that hang from her nape. It refers to a traditional coin-style necklace with a multitude of circle pendants, like round shields, that are so common in the Middle East, Northern Africa, India, etc.

One can see a tower with parapets ready for battle, the shields hanging there. When an enemy approaches, the shields are taken off display and held by the warriors. They are…

^{4 (con’t)} All shields of mighty men.

kol shilte ha’giborim – “All targets the mighties.” The word is shelet. It is translated elsewhere as shield. Because it is a different word, using a different word to translate it keeps from confusing the reader. A target is another word for a small round shield or buckler and is thus a fitting translation. The word is used in a fashion similar to what is being described in Ezekiel 27 –

“Men of Arvad with your army were on your walls all around,
And the men of Gammad were in your towers;
They hung their shields [shelet] on your walls all around;
They made your beauty perfect.” Ezekiel 27:11

Like the first two clauses, this one is given to complement the previous clause. With the explanation of what has been provided, that can now be seen –

*According to Tower David +your nape,
*Built +to parapets.

^Thousand the shield hang upon +it,
^All targets the mighties.

Solomon is having all kinds of fun using things he is familiar with to describe this beautiful woman. Understanding that, he next gets a bit risqué for some people’s sensibilities…

⁵ Your two breasts are like two fawns,

sh’ne shadayikh kishnei ophariym – “Two, your breasts, according to two fawns.” He is enamored with her breasts and finds a fitting descriptor to use as a metaphor. The opher is a fawn, coming from aphar, dust. Thus, it speaks of the dusty color of them. Of them, he next says…

^{5 (con’t)} Twins of a gazelle,

t’omei ts’viah– “Twins, gazelle.” This is the first use of ts’viyah, a female gazelle. It will only be seen again in verse 7:3. As seen previously, the tsviy, gazelle, comes from tsavah, to amass or swell, and thus “prominent.” That leads to the idea of beauty or splendor, which is a prominent trait. As such, the word is used to describe the gazelle because of its graceful beauty.

In this case, he equates this swelling splendor to her two breasts. This is what he is thinking of when gazing at her and he is not ashamed to let her know it. The symbolism is correct because he next says…

^{5 (con’t)} Which feed among the lilies.

Rather, a verb is used to describe the delightful sight: ha’roim bashoshanim – “the ‘feeding in the lilies.’” The gazelles are said to be feeding. If one watches a gazelle as it eats, its rump is elevated and rounded. They will also bounce around as they move from spot to spot. At times, they even do so when standing in one place munching down.

As such, he is complimenting her on their shape and youthful elasticity. Obviously, there is nothing wrong with such a thought because it is how God created women, and it is pretty much universal that such things capture the eyes and thoughts of men everywhere.

Equating the color of the lilies to her breast’s whiteness and fawns to her nipples, as some scholars do, seems to overstretch the symbolism. This is because she says essentially the same thing about him in verses 2:16 and 6:3. Also, in 5:13, she says his lips are lilies. Therefore, this doesn’t necessarily have to be white lilies.

Having provided her with marvelous descriptions of how he regards her beauty, the source of the next words is uncertain…

⁶ Until the day breaks
And the shadows flee away,

The words are identical to verse 2:17: ad sheyaphuakh ha’yom v’nasu ha’tselaliym –

“Until that puffs the day,
And flit the shadows.”

There are no gender markers to indicate whether it is Solomon or the woman. However, because they are the same words as 2:17, which is certainly the woman, modern scholars think it is the woman speaking here as well.

However, the words of 2:16 were also the woman. If the pattern were to follow, then the man continues to speak here –

My beloved to me, and I to him –
The “pasturing in the lilies.”

¹⁷ Until that puffs the day,
And flit the shadows.
Revolve!
Resemble to you, my beloved, to gazelle or to fawn, the stag,
Upon the mountains division.

///////

Two, your breasts, according to two fawns –
Twins, gazelle,
The “pasturing in the lilies.”

⁶ Until that puffs the day,
And flit the shadows.
I walk, to me, unto mount the myrrh,
And unto hill the frankincense.

In 2:16, it is singular, ha’roeh (the pasturing), and is thus speaking of him, the one tending the flocks in the lilies. In 4:5, it is plural, ha’roim (the pasturing), and refers to her breasts in comparison to the two gazelles.

Either way, the meaning of the words is that until the day is ending, which is at evening time when the wind begins to puff, and the shadows begin to flit away into darkness…

*^{6 (fin)} I will go my way to the mountain of myrrh
And to the hill of frankincense.

elekh li el har ha’mor v’el givath hal’vonah –

“I walk, to me, unto mount the myrrh,
And unto hill the frankincense.”

Without including all the details concerning these two fragrances as before, the prominent idea of myrrh speaks of bitterness and symbolizes love. More especially, however, love in intimate union, but not necessarily sexual in nature. Frankincense symbolizes purification but also speaks of works.

Because of the symbolism seen in previous chapters, I would suggest that this verse is the woman speaking.

The first five verses are like other such sets of verses which show how the Lord views His redeemed, speaking of them in the most beautiful metaphors. The final verse carries the same symbolism as the parallel verse in Chapter 2.

It is a commitment by the redeemed to continue until the time of night, when the day has puffed, arrives. It is the time when our work will cease, and the Lord will return for His beloved.

The myrrh, the bitterness associated with love, and the frankincense, the process of purification through works, are both derived from Jesus’ work on the cross. It is He who suffered for His people because of God’s love for them and it is His works that provide purification for them.

Saying, “I walk, to me, unto mount the myrrh and unto hill the frankincense” is a way of saying that God’s redeemed commit to walk among the redeemed (symbolized by the har, mount) who follow the bitter love of God in Christ, and in the shadow of the cross (symbolized by the givah, hill) which purifies His people through His work.

The words of the verses of this passage do not need to be overly spiritualized. They reflect the adoration of the Lord for His people, people of faith who have put their trust in Him. Closing out the verses, the word tells us that it is those of faith who are His people. It is not by our works but by trust in His – completed on the cross – that God accepts us.

Again as has been repeatedly stated, the reason for this “Song the songs” being read each year at the Passover is because it points to the cross of Christ. That is why the words keep repeating the same thoughts. The book is a wake-up call to pay attention to the rest of Scripture and find Jesus as the fulfillment of it all.

If we will view it from that perspective, there is no need to over-allegorize every detail. It is a book giving us details concerning the greatest love that ever could be. It is a book that details the love of God in Christ for the people of the world, exemplified by His love for Jesus, who would be the One to reconcile all the rest to Himself through the cross.

Closing Verse: “In this is love, not that we loved God, but that He loved us and sent His Son to be the propitiation for our sins.” 1 John 4:10

Next Week: Song of Songs 4:7-11 I am completely smitten by you, can’t you see?… (Unhearted Me!) (10^th Song of Songs sermon)

The Lord has you exactly where He wants you. He has a good plan and purpose for you. He alone is the perfect example of love – untarnished, unblemished, and completely pure and holy. He offers this love to you. So, follow Him, live for Him, and trust Him, and He will do marvelous things for you and through you.

Song of Songs 4:1-6 (CG)

Behold you! Beautiful, my querida,
Behold you! Beautiful!
Your eyes – doves,
From behind to your veil.
Your hair according to flock the goats,
Which cascaded from Mount Gilead.
² Your teeth according to flock the shorn,
Which ascended from the washing.
Which they all twinned,
And bereaved, none, in them.
³ According to thread, the crimson – your lips,
And your wilderness – beautiful,
According to slice the pomegranate,
Your countenance from behind to your veil.
⁴ According to Tower David your nape,
Built to parapets.
Thousand the shield hang upon it,
All targets the mighties.
⁵ Two, your breasts, according to two fawns –
Twins, gazelle,
The “pasturing in the lilies.”

⁶ Until that puffs the day,
And flit the shadows.
I walk, to me, unto mount the myrrh,
And unto hill the frankincense.

 

Song of Songs 4:1-6 (NKJV)

Behold, you are fair, my love!
Behold, you are fair!
You have dove’s eyes behind your veil.
Your hair is like a flock of goats,
Going down from Mount Gilead.
² Your teeth according to flock the shorn,

Which ascended from the washing.

Which they all twinned,

And bereaved, none, in them.

³ Your lips are like a strand of scarlet,
And your mouth is lovely.
Your temples behind your veil
Are like a piece of pomegranate.
⁴ Your neck is like the tower of David,
Built for an armory,
On which hang a thousand bucklers,
All shields of mighty men.
⁵ Your two breasts are like two fawns,
Twins of a gazelle,
Which feed among the lilies.

⁶ Until the day breaks
And the shadows flee away,
I will go my way to the mountain of myrrh
And to the hill of frankincense.

 

 

Artwork by Douglas Kallerson.

Song of Songs 3:6-11
Ascending From the Wilderness

(Typed 30 December 2024) The words of the passage today are exciting to read, even if they are difficult to understand. There is so much imagery in them that the mind is stimulated to form pictures as one progresses.

Reading one version of them will give you an idea of what the translator thinks is going on. Reading another version, and a completely different picture of what is presented will arise. Having said that, the more they are considered, the more confusing they can become.

Who is coming out of the wilderness in verse 6? What is the fear of the night in verse 8? Questions like these seem obvious until you read commentaries and discover there are vastly different scholarly views concerning them. You might ask, “How can that be? This is what it says.”

The NKJV, for example, doesn’t just translate the words, but they also add in extra-biblical identifiers intended to help the reader know what is going on. For example, all six verses in the passage are classified by the identifier, “The Shulamite.”

I have avoided using that term so far because her identification as a Shulamite doesn’t actually come until Chapter 6.

Another problem with saying “The Shulamite” is that the translators could be wrong. How do we know it’s not Solomon speaking? How do we know it isn’t a narrator talking about Solomon? How do we know it isn’t a narrator talking about the woman?

Text Verse: “Gird Your sword upon Your thigh, O Mighty One,
With Your glory and Your majesty.” Psalm 45:3

A passage like the one today is complicated. I was still working on the first verse two hours after I began. Several times during the day, I had to go back and retype things because I realized what I had typed initially was wrong.

Each word has been meticulously chosen to slowly and methodically reveal what is going on. To miss a single point can lead to a completely different conclusion. And even when a line of thought is considered correct, there are times where I will still say something like “Either way,” indicating that I am not entirely certain.

One might be inclined to think, “C’mon, this thing was written 2500 years ago! Enough people have looked at it to know exactly what is being said.” If you think that way, your thinking is amiss.

Typology has been evident throughout the books of Moses and the historical writings we have looked as so far. Most commentators don’t discuss that in their analyses. But in “Song the songs,” they almost exclusively focus on typology and allegory.

Unfortunately, their ideas about what is being hinted at from an allegorical or pictorial perspective are so outlandish that I don’t even bother considering them.

That tells us how difficult the words really are. Books that are specifically intended to give us typology, such as Joshua, are ignored in that regard. So far, this book only gives general hints of such things. And yet, it is almost exclusively evaluated as if this was its only purpose.

In the end, I hope you will enjoy what is presented. The typology of Christ is a bit more pronounced than some of the other passages we have seen so far. It is still a love song with vivid descriptions of the character for us to revel in.

Such wonderful things are to be found in His superior word. And so, let us turn to that precious word once again, and… May God speak to us through His word today, and may His glorious name ever be praised.

I. Dread in the Nights (verses 6-8)

⁶ Who is this coming out of the wilderness

mi zoth olah min ha’midbar – “Who this ascending from the wilderness?” The words “this” and “ascending” are feminine. As such, it is generally accepted that this is referring to the woman being brought forth in a bridal procession.

A minority opinion is that the next verse will explain what the “this” is while the “who” is speaking not of an individual, but as a feminine whole, such as “who is this procession.” The same words, mi zoth, are used again in verses 6:10 and 8:5 where they are certainly speaking of the woman.

Either way, being poetic, the words introduce what will only later be identified. They are intended to bring a sense of wondering and anticipation to the minds of those hearing the lines.

As for the wilderness, it is any place that is uncultivated, usually with sparse vegetation. Therefore, the contrast to the one coming out of the wilderness is highlighted. She is coming…

^{6 (con’t)} Like pillars of smoke,

k’thimaroth ashan – “According to columns smoke?” The one coming from the wilderness is coming “according to” not “with.” As such, this may not be speaking of people actually surrounding a bridal procession with incense. Rather, it is referring to how she appears as she ascends.

When Israel came out of the wilderness, they were preceded by a pillar of cloud by day and a pillar of fire by night (Numbers 14:14). Someone in the distance may see the sight and say, “That looks like a column of smoke.”

In fact, that is how many interpret this. They say it is speaking of Israel as they were brought out of the wilderness after forty years of wanderings. That seems forced because there was one column, it was of cloud, and the word here is not the same.

This word is timarah, a word believed to be derived from tamar or tomer, both of which refer to a palm. It is a column reaching upwards like a palm. This word is found only here and in Joel 2 –

“And I will show wonders in the heavens and in the earth:
Blood and fire and pillars [timarah] of smoke.” Joel 2:30

What seems most likely is that the man is saying this woman is ascending from the wilderness like columns of smoke. It is her physical appearance as she approaches that is poetically being described. One can think of her in Mideastern robes, ascending to him. As she does, the garments move like palm fronds swaying in the wind.

With this vivid picture in mind, he continues…

^{6 (con’t)} Perfumed with myrrh and frankincense,

The verb is passive: m’qutereth mor u-l’vonah – “Smoked – myrrh and frankincense.” It is as if the columns, her flowing garments, are being continuously smoked with myrrh and frankincense as she ascends, allowing the fragrances to waft upon the winds.

As was seen in Chapter 1, myrrh, mor, is an aromatic resin used in perfuming. It is derived from marar, bitter. The name gives the sense of “distilling in drops.” It was seen in Exodus 30 in the making of the special incense for burning in the tabernacle.

Myrrh comes from a shrub and can be obtained in one of two ways. The first is the purest form where it naturally exudes from the plant. This is the “myrrh of freedom,” or “free-flowing myrrh.” Inferior myrrh comes from the bark when incisions are made in it.

Myrrh is fragrant to smell, but bitter to the taste. The prominent idea that it symbolizes is love. More especially, love in an intimate union, but not necessarily sexual in nature.

Frankincense, levonah, comes from lavan, white. That is derived from lavan, to be or make white or to purify. It also signifies to make bricks because bricks whiten when they are dried. The name is perhaps given because of its white resin and resulting white smoke when it is burned.

Myrrh was used in making the holy anointing oil recorded in Exodus 30. Frankincense was used in making the incense, also recorded in Exodus 30. Both were presented to Jesus by the magi in Matthew 2:11. Along with these two, it next says…

^{6 (con’t)} With all the merchant’s fragrant powders?

Rather: mikol avqath rokhel – “From all powder peddling.” It is not that the pillars were being smoked with all of the fragrances, including these two, but these two specifically were being used by her out of all of the fragrances that the peddler sold.

The word rakal, to peddle, is a verb. It signifies to travel for trading. In this case, it speaks of the dealings of a spice merchant.

⁷ Behold, it is Solomon’s couch,

hineh mitatho shelishlomoh – “Behold! His bed, that to Solomon.” As noted in the previous verse, a lesser opinion concerning the passage is that the words explain what the “Who this” were speaking of –

“Who this ascending from the wilderness?”
“Behold! His bed, that to Solomon.”

The word bed, mittah, ultimately comes from a root signifying to stretch out or bend away, including moral deflection. It is feminine, so this opinion is that the whole scene that surrounds his bed is being referred to with the singular words “who this.” If this is the case, then the bed is being used in parallel with the word palanquin, which will be noted in verse 9.

This is how the NKJV translates the entire passage, meaning that all six verses are referring to the coming of Solomon. In 2 Samuel 3:31, the word mittah is used to describe a funeral bier, a bed for the dead which was being carried. Thus, this interpretation is not impossible. The palanquin would be a traveling couch for reclining rather than merely a seat.

If the previous verse was speaking of the woman, then this verse supposedly switches from focusing on her to focusing on him.

However, I argue for a third possibility. The entire passage is referring to the woman who is being brought out of the wilderness. Solomon has sent his palanquin to carry her to Jerusalem.

Whichever is correct, the meaning of the name Solomon is most likely Recompense. Of this bed of Solomon, it next says…

^{7 (con’t)} With sixty valiant men around it,

shishim giborim saviv lah – “Sixty mighties around to it.” Whether the bed is the palanquin or not, and whether it is Solomon or the woman on it, the words here are simple enough. The bed itself is surrounded by sixty warriors. However, the word is an adjective, geber, signifying strong or mighty. Being plural, it is sixty mighties. They are…

^{7 (con’t)} Of the valiant of Israel.

migiborey Yisrael – “From mighties Israel.” These would be specially selected men who were chosen out of the army to act as a security guard, like the honor guard who serve before the president.

⁸ They all hold swords,

Rather: kulam akhuze kherev – “They all seized sword.” It is not that they are holding swords, something a coming clause will refute. The word akhaz signifies to seize, often with the added idea of holding in possession. The meaning is that they all seized swords, taking the life of a warrior as their profession. Their state is…

^{8 (con’t)} Being expert in war.

m’lum’de milkhamah – “Taught war.” Having seized the sword, meaning taking on the life of a warrior, they were then taught war. The use of participles is telling a story about them, explaining why they were selected to serve Solomon.

Because of their decision to be warriors, followed by their training and conditioning in becoming mighties, they were qualified to serve as attendants to the king. As such, they surrounded his bed…

^{8 (con’t)} Every man has his sword on his thigh

ish kharvo al y’rekho – “Man – his sword upon his thigh.” This tells us why the translations that say they are holding their swords are wrong. They are men who have seized the sword, trained in war, and who now stand as guards around the king as his protectors. Their swords are on their thighs, ready to be grasped if necessary. They are “just in case” men…

^{8 (con’t)} Because of fear in the night.

mipakhad baleloth – “From dread in the nights.” The word fear is not speaking of Solomon’s fear, as if he was terrified of going to sleep, so he surrounded himself with warriors. Instead, it is the object that could harm, here called fear. This is how it is used, for example, in Psalm 91 –

“You shall not be afraid of the terror by night,
Nor of the arrow that flies by day.” Psalm 91:5

Because of the way things are being portrayed here, the scene seems to make the most sense as being the woman, not Solomon, who is the main subject. She was pictured as ascending from the wilderness.

From there, Solomon’s traveling bed was presented to her to carry her to him. The words of this verse are given as a description of the details of her protection as she traveled.

Any terror that may come against the caravan on its way to meet the king would be dealt with by the warriors assigned to protect her. The trip from Shunem, which is believed to be the modern city of Sulam, which is in the tribal allotment of Issachar, would take 25 to 50 hours depending on how fast a person walks.

Therefore, “dread in the nights” is a term that covers the night stops along the way. Anything that may arise as a threat was of no concern as she rested while surrounded by sixty mighties. As for the number sixty, it is the product of six and ten.

Six is a number stamped with the thought of human labor. It is the number of man, especially fallen man. Of the number ten, Bullinger says –

“Completeness of order, marking the entire round of anything, is, therefore, the ever-present signification of the number ten. It implies that nothing is wanting; that the number and order are perfect; that the whole cycle is complete.” EW Bullinger

Consider what you see and take it to heart
Contemplate what your eyes behold
Don’t be in a rush to make a jump start
Go slow and remember what you have been told

If you want joy and gladness of heart
You will take my advice
Don’t be in a hurry to make a jump start
Consider my words once and then consider them twice

When you see true happiness, note it as such
And be patient for it to come to you
Rushing ahead is not a sound crutch
Rather, being patient is the thing you should do

II. Go Out and See (verses 9-11)

⁹ Of the wood of Lebanon
Solomon the King
Made himself a palanquin:

The NKJV jumbles up the clauses: apir’yon asah lo ha’melekh sh’lomoh meatse hal’vanon –

“Palanquin made, to him, the king – Solomon,
From woods the Lebanon.”

The word translated as palanquin is found only here in Scripture, apir’yon. The BDB Lexicon says there is “no plausible Shemitic etymology” for it. It’s not just that there is no Hebrew root for it, but there is no root found in any of the languages which descend from Noah’s son Shem.

Therefore, they refer to the Yule Glossary of Anglo-Indian Words where the Sanskrit paryanka, a litter-bed, is identified as the possible source. Indians descend from Japheth, not Shem. Having an Indian word still makes sense based on other words in the Song which have an eastern flavor, such as the nard of verse 1:12.

The Greek translation uses the word phoreion, coming from phero, to bear. Greeks also descend from Japheth. Due to the Japheth connection, paryanka of the Indian Sanskrit seems likely.

Due to this, it is, therefore, a palanquin large enough to lay down in. These were common in India and were often highly decorated. Someone traveling to obtain nard and other Indian items may have been questioned about the things he saw while there, and such a palanquin might have been mentioned.

That would explain the words, “Palanquin made, to him, Solomon.” He heard the idea, liked it, and so, he directed one to be made. It is speculation, but there is a similar thought presented in 2 Kings 16 –

“Now King Ahaz went to Damascus to meet Tiglath-Pileser king of Assyria, and saw an altar that was at Damascus; and King Ahaz sent to Urijah the priest the design of the altar and its pattern, according to all its workmanship. ¹¹ Then Urijah the priest built an altar according to all that King Ahaz had sent from Damascus. So Urijah the priest made it before King Ahaz came back from Damascus.” 2 Kings 16:10, 11

Of this Indian style palanquin, it is described as having been built, “From woods the Lebanon.” In other words, it wasn’t of one type of wood, but several, each having been imported from Lebanon. Notable woods from Lebanon include the cedar, cypress, and algum.

The name Lebanon comes from the same word, lavan, that frankincense is derived from. The land is identified with the white mountain, covered in snow. That then identifies the whole mountain range that crosses the area.

The narrator next turns to a more meticulous description. Not only was it made from woods of Lebanon but also…

¹⁰ He made its pillars of silver,

amudav asah kheseph – “His pillars, made silver.” Because the previous verse said Solomon made the palanquin “to him,” meaning for himself, it is as if he is fashioning his personal articles. Thus, rather than “its,” they are “his” pillars, supports, etc.

The amud, pillar, comes from amad, to stand. It is the same word used to describe the pillar that went before Israel in the wilderness, the pillars of the temple in Jerusalem, etc.

These would be pillars from the base to hold up a roof or canopy covering the bed. In the Bible, silver, keseph, consistently pictures redemption. Next…

^{10 (con’t)} Its support of gold,

r’phidato zahav – “His spreading, gold.” It is another word found only here in Scripture, rephidah. It is derived from raphad, to spread or relax, which was used in verse 2:5, “spread me in the apples.” It is widely translated as base, canopy, covering, bottom, support, seat, reclining place, floor, rail, back, pavement, top, etc.

Those options cover pretty much the entire structure. Due to the lack of agreement, a literal translation, spreading, may be the best option. This avoids misleading the reader and it allows the mind to make its own mental images as to what it might be.

However, if I was to guess, I would go with canopy or covering for several reasons:

• There was certainly a covering, based on the fact that there are supports. But more than that, to not have a covering would be undignified, like carrying a dead person on a bier.
• It is logical to identify what the supports hold up after identifying the supports.
• No covering is otherwise described which would be a seemingly impossible omission.
• As it is what covers the palanquin, it would:

1. Be an appropriate symbol for the king, meaning a covering of gold.
2. Radiate the heat of the sun, keeping things cool.
3. Provide a beautiful sight to behold.

• The interior is described next. One would assume the description of the outside would be finished before starting on the inside.

Next, it notes…

^{10 (con’t)} Its seat of purple,

mer’kavo argaman – “His seat, purple.” The word merkav comes from rakhav, to ride or mount. As such, this is its rider, meaning the place where the king would sit or lie. The word is used elsewhere to describe a saddle and also chariots.

The color, argaman, signifies purple formed from a mixture of blue and red. Its meaning is thus a combination of what those two colors mean, which is the law for blue, and war, blood, and/or judgment for red.

^{10 (con’t)} Its interior paved with love

tokho ratsuph ahavah – “His midst, tessellated – love.” Again, a word is found only here, ratsaph. Strong’s defines it as a denominative from retseph, a noun signified by a burning coal. If one were to “coal” an interior, it would thus be tessellated.

There would be repeated shapes, like a mosaic pattern, adorning the inside. This would be done with inlays, overlays, stampings, or some other way that was unique and beautiful.

Affixing the word love provides scholars with all kinds of guesswork as to what the exact intent is. Some place the word paved as being an advanced accusative, as in “paved with love.” Some say it should be taken as an adjective, “paved in a lovely manner,” or as a noun, “paved of love.”

Rather, being a noun, it is an independent thought given to describe the state of the tessellation. It is paved love. The tessellation was carefully and meticulously done with the care only a woman could provide, becoming a state of love that exists. Only with that understood as its inherent state, does it next say…

^{10 (con’t)} By the daughters of Jerusalem.

mib’noth y’rushalim – “From daughters Jerusalem.” The women of Jerusalem may love their king, something evident in various ways. But their tessellation is a provision of love expressed to him.

To understand, we can all know that God loves us because of His care for us. He sent Jesus who is as love from Him. The crucifixion of Jesus was accomplished with love from Him. However, if in our minds we look at the cross with the beaten, bloody, and dead body of the Lord on it, knowing what it signifies, we can rightly say that Jesus is crucified – love.

If somebody asked us what we were looking at, we could respond, “That is love. It is from God.” Likewise, every time Solomon got into his palanquin, he could express the same thought, “This is love. It comes from the daughters of Jerusalem.”

That thought becomes a perfect segue to the next words…

¹¹ Go forth, O daughters of Zion,

ts’enah ur’enah b’noth Tsiyon – “Go out and see! Daughters Zion.” Scholars seem in agreement that these are not the same women as the daughters of Jerusalem just mentioned. But that seems like a giant stretch. Rather, the words are being presented synonymously.

They were just noted as having tessellated love. Now, rather than repeating the same designation, they are redesignated for emphasis. The women of Jerusalem are the daughters of Zion.

The name Zion, even if not originally Hebrew, is believed to come from the same root as tsiyun, a signpost, meaning a monumental or guiding pillar, or tsiyah, dryness or drought.

Therefore, it is translated as either Very Dry or Signpost. The connection between the two words is not as disparate as it may seem. In an arid location, something standing would be conspicuous.

^{11 (con’t)} And see King Solomon with the crown

ba’melekh sh’lomoh – “In the king Solomon.” These words are connected to the words “and see” of the previous clause, “Go forth and see…in the king Solomon.” The word raah means to see. However, this is as often as not a way of expressing something more abstract, such as considering, deeming, understanding, etc.

God saw that each step of the creation was good. Eve saw that the tree of life was good for food. Yehovah came down to see Babel as to what was going on there.

If these women were just called to see Solomon, it would have said so, “Go see Solomon.” However, it says, “in the king Solomon.” They are being asked to consider what they see, evaluating him…

^{11 (con’t)} With which his mother crowned him

baatarah sheit’rah lo imo – “In the crown that crowned, to him, his mother.” This is not referring to the crown of his coronation, but a wedding crown, as will be noted in the next clause. Repeating the word “in” means that what they are to consider continues this first thought –

Go forth and consider –
in the king Solomon
in crown

A particular point in Solomon’s life is being highlighted. The crown refers to the one that his mother crowned him with…

^{11 (con’t)} On the day of his wedding,

b’yom khathunato – “In day his wedding.” It is a word found only here as well, khathunnah. It is derived from khathan to give away in marriage, and thus to contract affinity by marriage.

Solomon may have been crowned with many crowns. He may have gotten a crown for being the best wrestler at Zion High School. He may have gotten a crown for best archery skills at Ir David College. He may have gotten crowns from other kings for various reasons.

However, the daughters of Jerusalem are being pointed toward considering Solomon for a particular crown that highlights a particular event –

Go forth and consider –
in the king Solomon
in crown
in day his wedding

But even that isn’t the end of the “ins.” Solomon eventually had lots of weddings. 1 Kings 11 says that he had three hundred wives. Many of them were certainly arranged marriages. However, there is one wedding that stands out. We know this because it is recorded in “Song the songs.” It was…

*^{11 (fin)} The day of the gladness of his heart.

u-v’yom simkhath libo – “And in day cheerfulness his heart.” Solomon truly loved this woman. His heart was cheerful at the thought of marrying her. He may have married other women in order to make an alliance, but if the daughter presented to him was a dud, he probably wouldn’t be very cheerful about the union.

However, this is the woman that stole his heart. They are being asked to consider this –

Go forth and consider –
in the king Solomon
in crown
in day his wedding, and
in day cheerfulness his heart

This meticulously worded sentence is intended to take us back to verse 3:5 –

Adjured you, daughters Jerusalem,
In gazelles or in does the field –
If wakens and if awakens the love,
Until she inclines.

A man might marry many women, but a woman was set to marry just one man. The adjuration was made to the women. These words are a concrete example of why a woman should be patient and not stir up love.

Solomon had plenty of chances to get married, but he had one marriage that was set apart from all others. The daughters of Zion, who are the daughters of Jerusalem and who had tessellated love for Solomon, are being instructed on what love is.

What thing can we do to purify ourselves?
Is there something that will make God favor us?
Or should we put our deeds up on the shelves
And simply trust in the work of Jesus?

We are already stained with sin
So it appears there isn’t much we can do
In fact, it seems we are already done in
Isn’t there some way we can start anew?

It is certain that Jesus is the only way
That’s what the word says, claiming it’s true
If you want reconciliation on that Day
Call on Jesus! He will carry you through

III. Christ in the Contents

The ongoing narrative has placed the woman, the beloved, as a type or picture of the redeemed of the Lord. She is ascending from the wilderness, a place of God’s grace and of closeness to Him, but also a place of testing.

Out of all of the fragrances of the peddler, she is smoked with myrrh and frankincense. Myrrh speaks of bitterness. Frankincense refers to the process of purification but also of works. Both are derived from Jesus’ work on the cross. It is He who suffered for His people. It is His works that provide purification for them.

It next noted Solomon’s bed. As was seen, the root word indicates stretching out and is inclusive of the idea of moral deflection. Christ’s grave would signify such a place. It is the place where man’s sin was ultimately disposed of.

The sixty mighties form a unified picture of Christ’s work. They are from the mighties of Israel, an apt description of the mighty spiritual men of Israel, but these sixty, anticipating the Lord, together seized the sword. Christ is the ultimate warrior who seized the law and held onto it.

Remembering the typology from many previous sermons, the kherev, sword, is identical in spelling to Horeb, the mountain of the law and, thus, emblematic of the law – חרב. The only things that makes the two distinguishable are the later added vowel points.

It doesn’t say they all seized swords. Rather, they all seized sword. Christ was taught the war of law. He seized it and prevailed over it. With that, it then said, “Man – his sword upon his thigh.” The words are excitingly reflected in Psalm 45:1, our text verse.

The bed, the palanquin as it is later described, was guarded “From dread in the nights.” It is a note of the protection of the Lord because He is the Fulfiller of the law. The one who is watched by Him is secure. That is reflected in the first words of Psalm 91 –

“He who dwells in the secret place of the Most High
Shall abide under the shadow of the Almighty.
² I will say of the Lord, ‘He is my refuge and my fortress;
My God, in Him I will trust.’” Psalm 91:1, 2

This psalm was cited earlier to show that the “dread” was not a personal feeling but the object of dread. The number of warriors is also an anticipation of Christ.

Sixty is a product of six and ten. It speaks of His human labor under the law in the appearance of fallen man (6) who completed everything necessary for His redeemed, demonstrating that nothing is wanting and the whole cycle is complete (10).

The focus next changed, describing the palanquin. It is a carrier for a king, but which is used for conducting His betrothed. It was first described as being made from “woods the Lebanon,” meaning its trees.

Trees are given as an identification of something. The olive tree has its own symbolism. The cedar, cypress, and oak, each have particular symbolism. The trees of the Lebanon, not being further defined, are thus identified by Lebanon.

As seen, it has the same root as frankincense. Thus, these trees signify what Lebanon signifies, works leading to purification. As this is the king’s carrier, anticipating Christ, it would anticipate the works of Christ as the carrier of the one inside.

It is Christ’s works, not those of the redeemed, that allow them to be carried to Him. The pillars, standings, of silver anticipate the firm redemption of the Lord. They remain (stand) and endure because of His redemption.

That is then highlighted by the rephidah, the spreading. I argued it was a canopy. However, regardless of what it actually is, the gold speaks of Christ’s kingship and deity. That is the support which ensures that His works and redemption are capable of restoring us to God – because He is God.

The rider, the merkav, is that which carries or transports. Its only description was that it is argaman, a mixture of blue and red. It speaks of Christ’s embodiment of the law (blue) and His death in fulfillment of it (red) where judgment was rendered. It is that which carries the redeemed.

The last description was “His midst tessellated – love.” It is a description of the sum total of the mosaic of Christ’s existence, His inner being, which is love. This was said to be “from daughters Jerusalem.”

The form of the word, mib’noth, from daughters, is found sixteen times. In all the other fifteen times, it is not referring to “from” as in “this came from her” but “out of” as in “she is from (out of) the daughters of Israel.” Taken in this manner, it would say, “from the daughters of Foundation of Peace.”

Reading it in that manner exactingly describes Christ as the product of the line leading to His incarnation. God set forth the Foundation of Peace in the women in Christ’s genealogy, many of whom are noted in Scripture, such as both daughters of Lot, Tamar of Genesis 38, Rahab the Harlot, etc., leading finally to Mary.

The final verse was its own implied adjuration. The daughters of Zion, Signpost, were essentially being instructed to behold Solomon in the day of his wedding and to consider what they saw through the carefully constructed words.

Solomon, Recompense, is being given as a type of Christ, the Recompense of the Lord for the sins of man. He is the fair payment required for restoration to be realized.

The hints of Christ and the redeemed are being seen throughout the book. It explains why the book is read each Passover.

The roots of each selected word keep pointing to the Person and work of Christ, culminating in the cross. The Passover was given in anticipation of that event. And so, when the Jews read this book each Passover, it is a call for them to see the true “Song the songs.”

Jesus, His life and work, culminating in the cross, is the highest expression of God’s love. They should recognize this each Passover and consider what God has done. As a nation, that has not yet happened. But someday, it will take on a new life that will excite them all their days.

For those who know Jesus, we can read this book and understand that the greatest love song ever written is an event in history that centers on the coming of Jesus to restore us to God. What a marvelous song it is. Thank God for Jesus Christ who makes intimate and eternal union with God possible.

Closing Verse: “And when they had come into the house, they saw the young Child with Mary His mother, and fell down and worshiped Him. And when they had opened their treasures, they presented gifts to Him: gold, frankincense, and myrrh.” Matthew 2:11

Next Week: Song of Songs 4:1-6 It is amazing, four sure, and it is intense… (Myrrh and Frankincense)

The Lord has you exactly where He wants you. He has a good plan and purpose for you. He alone is the perfect example of love – untarnished, unblemished, and completely pure and holy. He offers this love to you. So, follow Him, live for Him, and trust Him, and He will do marvelous things for you and through you.

Song of Songs 3:6-11 (CG)

⁶ Who this ascending from the wilderness,
According to columns smoke?
Smoked – myrrh and frankincense,
From all powder peddling.

⁷ Behold! His bed, that to Solomon –
Sixty mighties around to it,
From mighties Israel.
⁸ They all seized sword –
Taught war.
Man – his sword upon his thigh.
From dread in the nights.

⁹ Palanquin made, to him, the king – Solomon,
From woods the Lebanon.
¹⁰ His pillars, made silver,
His spreading, gold,
His seat, purple,
His midst, tessellated – love
From daughters Jerusalem.

¹¹ Go out and see! Daughters Zion,
In the king Solomon,
In the crown that crowned, to him, his mother,
In day his wedding,
And in day cheerfulness his heart.

 

Song of Songs 3:6-11 (NKJV)

⁶ Who is this coming out of the wilderness
Like pillars of smoke,
Perfumed with myrrh and frankincense,
With all the merchant’s fragrant powders?
⁷ Behold, it is Solomon’s couch,
With sixty valiant men around it,
Of the valiant of Israel.
⁸ They all hold swords,
Being expert in war.
Every man has his sword on his thigh
Because of fear in the night.

⁹ Of the wood of Lebanon
Solomon the King
Made himself a palanquin:
¹⁰ He made its pillars of silver,
Its support of gold,
Its seat of purple,
Its interior paved with love
By the daughters of Jerusalem.
¹¹ Go forth, O daughters of Zion,
And see King Solomon with the crown
With which his mother crowned him
On the day of his wedding,
The day of the gladness of his heart.

 

Artwork by Douglas Kallerson.

Song of Songs 3:1-5
I Shall Seek Whom Loved, My Soul

(Typed 23 December 2024) Many years ago, I heard the story of a guy who went to China as a missionary. While there, he led a man to the Lord. This Chinese man found that Jesus is the Lord God and that He alone can save mankind.

An understanding of who Jesus is and what He has done logically leads to the conclusion that He is the only way to be reconciled to God. If there is a disconnect between us and God, and if God Himself united with humanity in Christ to make the reconciliation possible, then any other religious expression must, by default, be false.

Why would God in Christ put in all the effort to join with humanity, live out a tiring and trial-filled earthly existence, allow Himself to be nailed to the cross, just to say, “Don’t worry, all paths lead to heaven.” The thinking is convoluted and extremely short-sighted.

This should be obvious, but only when the process is thought through. Many people are saved and never think deeply about such details. They believe the gospel, they are saved, and the mechanics of theology beyond that are never considered by them.

From a salvation standpoint, there is nothing wrong with this. In fact, it is exactly why God made the gospel simple. Anything more complicated would keep many from being saved. God knows that is just how limited humans are in thinking.

And yet, in its simplicity, it can also keep people from being saved. The thought that something as simple as belief is capable of saving actually hinders many from accepting it. However, their reason for it hindering them is because they want to be a part of the equation.

They think it is either incredible or foolish to suppose that God doesn’t need their help. They cannot believe that salvation excludes any participation on their behalf, with the exception of faith, meaning believing the simple gospel. This is a problem that Paul refers to in our text verse –

Text Verse: “..but we preach Christ crucified, to the Jews a stumbling block and to the Greeks foolishness.” 1 Corinthians 1:24

Paul explains this stumbling block when referring to Israel in Romans 9-11. In those chapters, he discusses the difficulty Israel faced in accepting that the law they had been under for eons was actually not capable of making them righteous before God.

When Jesus came and demonstrated that this was the case, they could not accept it. In Romans 9, Paul says –

“What shall we say then? That Gentiles, who did not pursue righteousness, have attained to righteousness, even the righteousness of faith; ³¹ but Israel, pursuing the law of righteousness, has not attained to the law of righteousness. ³² Why? Because they did not seek it by faith, but as it were, by the works of the law. For they stumbled at that stumbling stone. ³³ As it is written:
‘Behold, I lay in Zion a stumbling stone and rock of offense,
And whoever believes on Him will not be put to shame.’” Romans 9:30-33

The stumbling stone is the message of God in Christ, meaning faith in the simple gospel. The Chinese man that was saved asked the missionary who led him to the Lord, “Why did you wait so long to come and share this message? My father always knew there was a problem and that he needed God’s help to get it resolved. He died without ever hearing this.”

Being Chinese, all his life he would have been exposed to all kinds of religious teachings, especially from the Buddhist tradition. However, he was able to deduce that what they believed couldn’t be true.

Buddha was as a man and became the Buddha. He supposedly went from the imperfect to the perfect, attaining Nirvana. If thought through, anyone can figure out that this is not possible. Christianity teaches that God came in perfection and became as if imperfect when our sin was imputed to Him on the cross.

This is not only possible, but it also fully explains how we can be made perfect. Great truths such as this are to be found in His superior word. And so, let us turn to that precious word once again, and… May God speak to us through His word today, and may His glorious name ever be praised.

I. I Shall Compass In the City (verses 1-5)

By night on my bed I sought the one I love;

Rather, it is plural: al mishkavi balaeiloth biqashti eth sheahavah naphshiy –

“Upon my bed in the nights
Sought whom loved, my soul.”

The plural, nights, is variously explained by scholars. Some see it as a repeating event, from night to night. Others see it as something like “in the night hours,” or some other poetic use of the word.

It seems likely she is using the word to indicate “night after night.” This is how the same expression is used elsewhere –

“Behold, bless the Lord,
All you servants of the Lord,
Who by night [balaeiloth, lit: in the nights] stand in the house of the Lord!
² Lift up your hands in the sanctuary,
And bless the Lord.
³ The Lord who made heaven and earth
Bless you from Zion!” Psalm 134

She is lying on her bed, seeking out the one she loves. Literally, “whom loved, my soul.” As such, it is accepted by many that this is referring to a repeated dream that fills her sleeping hours, and which she is now telling others about.

This may be the case, or it may be a waking dream as we all have, something that fills the hours and keeps us from sleeping. It is still a dream world, but it is one that is based on a reality that exists, not one that the mind merely formulates.

There she is lying on the bed and yearning for her beloved. In this state…

^{1 (con’t)} I sought him, but I did not find him.

biqashtiv v’lo m’tsativ – “Sought him, and no found him.” She is in her dreamish world, searching for him. No matter where she turns, he is not there. With that stated, the meaning of her next words depends on how the words of verse 1 fit into the timeline…

² “I will rise now,” I said,
“And go about the city;

The verbs are cohortative. It is almost as if she is commanding herself to act: aqumah na vaasov’vah bair – “I shall arise, pray, and I shall compass in the city.” The question concerning these words is whether they follow verse 1 in time, or if they explain the thought of verse 1.

If the former, she had a dream about looking for her love and couldn’t find him. When she woke up from it, she went out to find him for real. If the latter, she stated her unsuccessful search for him and now more fully describes the contents of what she just said.

One can see this second option in the inserted words “I said” of the NKJV. “I was lying on my bed having a dream. I couldn’t find my love. So, I said to myself, “I will get up and find him.” This seems probable. She began to tell of her thoughts on the bed, and then she explained what was lacking in her first words.

It would be something like this –

I went out on the sea to find my fortune.
It was a rough and difficult life.

I decided when I was young that I would be a sailor.
When I was old enough, I walked to the docks and offered my services.
Off I went to lands of diversity and beauty,
But each stop was also fraught with trials and troubles.
I never attained the wealth I dreamt of.

The first two lines are given as an opening thought that is more fully fleshed out by what is then presented. It is similar to the structure of many passages in the Bible. For example, Genesis 1 provides the essential details to set up the rest of the narrative.

Genesis 2 then backs up to the sixth day of creation and fills in the detail. Understanding this, she implored herself to get up and find her beloved. She couldn’t stand not being with him and so she rose to act, even though this has occurred on her bed, meaning in a dream. In rising, she went…

^{2 (con’t)} In the streets

bash’vaqim – “In the streets.” This is the fourth and last use of shuq, a street, in the Bible. All four uses are in the writings of Solomon. It is derived from the verb shuq, to overflow. One can think of a vat overflowing and running along like a stream. Hence, such a street is a place where there is the running to and fro of activity.

One can see this in Ecclesiastes 12 –

“When the doors are shut in the streets [shuq],
And the sound of grinding is low;
When one rises up at the sound of a bird,
And all the daughters of music are brought low.
⁵ Also they are afraid of height,
And of terrors in the way;
When the almond tree blossoms,
The grasshopper is a burden,
And desire fails.
For man goes to his eternal home,
And the mourners go about the streets [shuq].” Ecclesiastes 12:4, 5

The streets are filled with the sounds of busy life (verse 4), and yet the aged cannot hear the boisterous sounds because of hearing loss. Eventually the person died and was mourned by the paid wailers hired for such occasions in biblical times. They would go up and down the streets wailing for the dead, calling attention to all concerning his passing.

The woman is willing to go out into the busy streets to find him…

^{2 (con’t)} and in the squares

u-barkhovoth – “and in the plazas.” The rechov is a broad open area within a city like our modern plaza. Quite often, they were in front of each city gate, but depending on the size of the city, there might be other places set aside for performances, proclamations, and so forth.

Wherever people are gathered, she will make a diligent search for him. She knows he is there and she is determined to find him.

The words in these clauses are set in parallel to the final words of the previous clause –

I shall compass in the city,
In the streets and in the plazas.

She has determined to go all around the city in order to find the one she loves. Whether he is idling in a café on a busy side street or listening to a musical in an open plaza, she has set her mind on finding him…

^{2 (con’t)} I will seek the one I love.”

Again, the verb is cohortative: avaqashah eth sheahavah napshiy – “I shall seek whom loved, my soul.” It is as if she is commanding herself to arise and go out to find him. His love is driving her to the point of impatience to see him. And so, up she goes at the internal command, heading out. However…

^{2 (con’t)} I sought him, but I did not find him.

biqashtiv v’lo m’tsativ – “Sought him, and no found him.” In her dream world, she has failed in her endeavor. She looked, but he elusively remained out of her reach, something quite common in such dream or dreamlike states.

The words here tend to confirm the thought that verse 2 is an explanatory description of verse 1 –

Upon my bed in the nights sought whom loved, my soul,
Sought him, and no found him.

I shall seek whom loved, my soul.
Sought him, and no found him.

She started with the basic thought, backed up, and then presented the fuller thought. Understanding that, she is not finished with the expanded explanation of events…

³ The watchmen who go about the city found me;

She uses verbs to explain those she encountered: m’tsauni ha’shom’rim hasv’vim bair – “Found me, the guardings, the ‘compassings in the city.’” As she is going throughout the city, those who guard it, regularly compassing it while looking for miscreants, found her. She has searched and come up with nothing. However, maybe they came across him…

^{3 (con’t)} I said,
“Have you seen the one I love?”

The NKJV continues with its explanatory inserts. The words are briefer and give the sense that the events are happening as she speaks them: eth sheahavah naphshiy r’item – “Whom loved, my soul, seen?”

In her dream, she is wandering about the city, not finding her love. So desperate is she to find him, that her mind remembers that guards walk around the city as well. And so she whips them up in her thoughts. Upon meeting them, she eagerly asks if they have come across him.

Some scholars have noted that this must be in the past, in her hometown, because she doesn’t explain who her beloved is. Therefore, they must know her and know who he is. As such, they deduce that it is a small city where everyone knows everyone else.

Such an analysis fails to consider the type of literature. It is poetic and only briefly explanatory. The few words could involve them stopping, having an extended conversation where she describes him to them, their answer in the negative, her thanking them, followed by all of them saying goodbye.

And more, if this is a dream, the brevity is perfectly in line with dreams. Everything in such an encounter is implied in a meeting, but the dream itself presses on toward the goal without giving all the minute details. There is no need to assume the account is in her hometown and not in Jerusalem.

The narrative isn’t focusing on the where of it. Therefore, such details are left unstated. Everything that happens is short, to the point, and dramatic as she explains the unfolding dream.

Whether they stopped and talked and told her they had not seen him or they ignored her question and continued on, the point is that her beloved remained unfound by her. However, good news lies ahead…

⁴ Scarcely had I passed by them,

kim’at sheavarti mehem – “According to little, which passed from them.” Though the NKJV is a paraphrase, it expresses the intent well. She saw the guards walking around on their watch and she asked if they had seen her beloved. Whatever the response from them involved, it didn’t help her out. But then, just moments after passing them by it was…

^{4 (con’t)} When I found the one I love.

ad shematsathi eth sheahavah naphshiy – “Until which found whom loved, my soul.” The tension in her dream, which has built up since the first words of verse 1, is now relieved. Moments after the disappointment of not being told where her beloved was, he is there. She has found him! And…

^{4 (con’t)} I held him and would not let him go,

The aspect of the first verb is perfect while the second is imperfect:

akhaztiv v’lo arpenu – “Seized him, and no release him.” The word akhaz, seize, is generally used in a strong and even forceful manner. Along with the act is normally the idea of holding what is seized in possession.

Adding to that, she uses the word raphah, to slacken. Thus, the words give the sense of, “I seized him, holding fast, and there is no way I am letting my tight grip go.”

She searched, finally found him, and now there she was ensuring that he would not get out of her hands…

^{4 (con’t)} Until I had brought him to the house of my mother,

ad shehavitiv el beith imi – “Until which brought him unto house my mother.” At this point, the intent could be anything. “Mom, I finally found the man of my dreams.” Or she may be using the thought of her mother’s house to speak of the whole family, “Hey everyone, I have found the man of my dreams.”

We are left to speculate what is on her mind. However, the unspecified nature of the act is immediately brought to clarity…

^{4 (con’t)} And into the chamber of her who conceived me.

v’el kheder horathi – “And unto chamber my conceiving.” The meaning is obvious, “This is where I was conceived. Let us repeat the event that took place on that day so new birth will take place.”

She is dreaming of the moment that will take place. In the previous chapter, he had come to her and asked her to come out so he could hear her voice.

She would not come out, but she did sing him a song of the vineyard. However, at evening time, she had told him to scamper home –

My dove in rifts the rock,
In cover the step,
Cause me to see your appearances,
Cause me to hear your voice.
For your voice – pleasant,
And your appearance – beautiful.

¹⁵ Grasp to us foxes,
Foxes little, binding vines,
And our vines cluster.

¹⁶ My beloved to me, and I to him –
The ‘pasturing in the lilies.’

¹⁷ Until that puffs the day,
And flit the shadows.
Revolve!
Resemble to you, my beloved, to gazelle or to fawn, the stag,
Upon the mountains division.

When he was gone, she went to bed and dreamt the same dream she always had. Someday she would go out to find him, and bring him into the very place she was conceived. With that, she again charges the daughters of Jerusalem with the same words as verse 2:7…

⁵ I charge you, O daughters of Jerusalem,
By the gazelles or by the does of the field,
Do not stir up nor awaken love
Until it pleases.

hishbati etkhem b’noth y’rushalim bitsvaoth o b’ayloth hasadeh im tairu v’im t’or’ru eth haahavah ad shetekh’pats –

“Adjured you, daughters Jerusalem,
In gazelles or in does the field –
If wakens and if awakens the love,
Until she inclines.”

Because the words are letter-for-letter identical to verse 2:7, refer back to that sermon if you need to refresh your mind concerning what is being said. The main point of them, though, is that she adjures the daughters of Jerusalem to be like the gazelles or does of the field. They are to be timid and wary as they go about in search of love.

With these words complete, the second major break in the song is realized. Two more are yet ahead at 5:1 and 8:4.

I will seek the Lord until I find Him
I know He is there, but I’m not sure what to do
Everything I have checked out is forbidding and grim
But the truth is there. And God, through it, I will find You!

You have instilled in us the knowledge of good and evil
I certainly know that this is true
And so, I can run from every lie of the devil
Until the day I find the truth, and come running to You

If I never find it and my life passes away
There is one thing I still will never do
I will not accept what is false. I will never go that way
Because I know there is truth that would have led me to You

II. Seeking the Lord

The main point of these five verses is diligence in seeking. They also focus on not awakening love until the appropriate time. As they are words in “Song the songs,” meaning the greatest of all songs ever penned, there must be an underlying lesson in what is stated.

The woman is going back in time to the repeated thoughts on her bed about the one whom her soul loves. She is explaining the thoughts to those who would hear and, hopefully, emulate. That is seen in the charge that she has given them.

She didn’t just say, “I want a man, and I’m going out to find one.” Rather, she has one man in mind that she will search for until she finds him. When she finds him, she will grasp him and not let him go. That was seen in the aspect of the verbs in verse 4. The first was perfect while the second was imperfect.

She knew he was out there, she searched thoroughly, and when her goal was attained, she held him continuously. He was not getting out of her hands until her goal was realized. Then she spoke the exact same adjuration she had made before, to the letter, in fact –

Adjured you, daughters Jerusalem,
In gazelles or in does the field –
If wakens and if awakens the love,
Until she inclines.

As explained in the previous sermon, the idea of these words is to have one’s priorities right. We are not to fall in love with any god. The people of the world are to be on alert, wary of anything that could awaken inappropriate love in us.

Rather, we are to allow the love (agapē, noun, fem.) of God, embodied in the Person of Jesus Christ, to awaken ‘the love’ that is truly love, as John says, “for God is love [agapē, noun, fem.]” (1 John 4:8).

As we saw, it is the same words as found in the Greek translation of this verse, “if you should arise and awaken the love [ten agapen: the love].” God is love. God in Christ is the embodiment of God’s love. The adjuration of the woman is to not be led astray by other loves but allow the love of God in Christ to awaken God’s love.

But she has said this in these verses after noting her search –

Upon my bed in the nights sought whom loved, my soul,
Sought him, and no found him.

² “I shall arise, I pray, and I shall compass in the city,
In the streets and in the plazas,
I shall seek whom loved, my soul.
Sought him, and no found him.

If the symbolism as presented is correct, there is a point being made here that escapes many in the church based on a faulty evaluation of what the Bible is saying.

We have seen in the previous sermons that this woman is being used as a type of the redeemed of the Lord. She is conveying to her audience how she came to find the love that she possesses. Her desire is the beloved she now has and whom she has been interacting with throughout the book.

The book began with the attraction the two felt for one another, explaining why it was so. The first chapter ended with the two in the garden together. After that, the first verses of Chapter 2 presented how that union in the garden came about, finishing with the adjuration to not waken love until she inclines. That was the end of the first main section.

The next section, which formed the content of last week’s sermon, went back to explain why she so adjured them. It gave hints of the time of the coming of Christ and of the establishment of the church age. What God in Christ is doing during this age is the love that all should seek after.

Think of the Chinese man who heard the gospel and received it. Like his father, he knew what was false, but until he heard the truth, he didn’t have any idea how things between God and him could be reconciled.

These five verses take the woman back further to her (meaning the redeemed of the Lord) attitude even before she met Him. She sought Him night after night but didn’t find Him.

At this point, we can think of the father of the Chinese man. He knew there was a problem between himself and God, but he didn’t know how it could be resolved. He just knew that the religious ideas he had been exposed to were not correct.

He sought diligently but could not find what he was looking for. However, in this process, he didn’t try to awaken love, meaning go after false gods. Instead, he waited for what never came. This is what the woman in “Song the songs” has done.

She has looked for her beloved night after night, knowing He is there, and yet not finding Him. Eventually, however, she found Him and seized Him, refusing to slacken her grip until she had brought Him to her place of conception.

Though the story refers to a human union, the details anticipate the union between the Lord and believers in the new birth. They were conceived in the flesh. There is now a desire to be birthed in the Spirit. Peter explains this in his first epistle –

“Since you have purified your souls in obeying the truth through the Spirit in sincere love of the brethren, love one another fervently with a pure heart, ²³ having been born again, not of corruptible seed but incorruptible, through the word of God which lives and abides forever.” 1 Peter 1:22, 23

This is the reason why the second adjuration is placed here concerning awakening love until it inclines. The woman, seen as a type of the redeemed, finds her true love, holds fast to Him, and refuses to let Him go. The meaning is that the redeemed maintain their doctrine to the end.

To let go of proper doctrine is to not hold onto the true love. This doesn’t mean a loss of salvation for the saved, but a lack of salvation for those who could otherwise be redeemed.

As noted already, the main point of these verses is that of diligence in seeking. One cannot seek unless he is able to do so. The “Song the songs” has been structured so far in a manner that goes backwards to explain how this greatest song is realized.

One cannot be intimate with the Lord prior to meeting Him. One cannot meet Him unless there is a mutual attempt at it coming about. But that couldn’t occur unless He came and made the union possible.

But even if He came, without people wanting to participate in His coming, there wouldn’t be any reason for Him to come. This is the point of today’s verses –

“The woman said to Him, ‘I know that Messiah is coming’ (who is called Christ). ‘When He comes, He will tell us all things.’” John 4:35

This woman at the well would not have said that if she didn’t believe He was coming. And more, she expected to learn from Him when He came. She may not have been actively seeking Him at the time, but she was aware that His time would come.

As I just said, one cannot seek unless he is able to do so. The passage today tells us that people can, in fact, seek the Lord. Pretty much everyone on the planet is seeking “God” in some form or fashion. Most are just doing it wrong.

To say that Muslims are not seeking God would be a laughable statement. To say that people who convert to Islam are not seeking God would be even more laughable. They are, in fact, seeking Him. But they have not properly thought through the details or they have ignorantly rejected what has been presented (as Paul says Israel has done in Romans 9-11).

By taking verses out of context, including Paul’s words of Romans 3, various doctrines have arisen, like Calvinism, that claim that man has no capacity or will to seek after God. That is proven false in humanity every day of the year. They are seeking. Most are just wrong in their approach –

“By faith Enoch was taken away so that he did not see death, ‘and was not found, because God had taken him’; for before he was taken he had this testimony, that he pleased God. ⁶ But without faith it is impossible to please Him, for he who comes to God must believe that He is, and that He is a rewarder of those who diligently seek Him.” Hebrews 11:5,6

In fact, when Paul spoke to those in Athens, it was one of his main points of doctrine –

“And He has made from one blood every nation of men to dwell on all the face of the earth, and has determined their preappointed times and the boundaries of their dwellings, ²⁷ so that they should seek the Lord, in the hope that they might grope for Him and find Him, though He is not far from each one of us.” Acts 17:26, 27

The word Paul uses there is zéteó. It signifies “to seek by inquiring; to investigate to reach a binding (terminal) resolution; to search, ‘getting to the bottom of a matter’” (HELPS Word Studies).

It is the same word that the Greek translation of the Old Testament uses three times in the first two verses of our sermon today. She sought out, looking for her beloved. In type, she is humanity who not only searches out God, but does so to get to the bottom of the matter and, thus, becoming the redeemed of the Lord.

This is why this book is labeled “Song the songs” or the greatest song ever written. It is a song about the mutual, not forced, love of God for His people and His people for the true God as He has revealed Himself in the Person of Jesus Christ.

Although the book is very difficult and even confusing, it is laid out in a way that shows us how the message can be easily understood. The love between God and His people will bring us back to a place that resembles the original garden of Eden in its beauty and perfection.

To understand how that will come about, the successive verses have so far been structured to keep taking us back in order to understand how to go forward. In other words, “Here is how we got to this stage, but to get to that stage, we had to go through this one. And to understand how we got there, we need to go back again and see what happened.”

At this point, the book is not presenting the same type of exacting typology of the earlier historical writings. Understanding the allegorical nature of the book requires understanding the overall presentation of redemption as found throughout the Bible.

In doing so, we can then understand the process of God’s redemption as portrayed in the loving relationship of these two people. Their desires, hopes, and aspirations for being with one another reveal the same characteristics in the mutual relationship that arises between the Lord and His redeemed.

Without understanding the cross of Jesus Christ, and how what it signifies is properly procured by His people, the book remains a mystery. But in grasping the back-and-forth nature of the relationship between these two, we can then grasp the same in our relationship with God and He with us.

Therefore, be sure to seek the Lord, search for Him diligently, and then hold fast to Him, even as He is holding fast to you. Be sound in your doctrine and be firm in what it presents, not waffling or being blown about by others who would seek to ruin your precious relationship with the glorious Lord who came to bring us back to Himself.

Closing Verse: “Let all those who seek [Greek LXX: zéteó] You rejoice and be glad in You;
Let such as love Your salvation say continually,
‘The Lord be magnified!’” Psalm 40:16

Next Week: Song of Songs 3:6-11 Who is this that my soul will bless… (Ascending From the Wilderness) (8^th Song of Songs sermon)

The Lord has you exactly where He wants you. He has a good plan and purpose for you. He alone is the perfect example of love – untarnished, unblemished, and completely pure and holy. He offers this love to you. So, follow Him, live for Him, and trust Him, and He will do marvelous things for you and through you.

Song of Songs 3:1-5 (CG)

Upon my bed in the nights
Sought whom loved, my soul,
Sought him, and no found him.

² “I shall arise, I pray, and I shall compass in the city,
In the streets and in the plazas,
I shall seek whom loved, my soul.
Sought him, and no found him.

³ Found me, the guardings, the ‘compassings in the city’ –
Whom loved, my soul, seen?

⁴ According to little, which passed from them,
Until which found whom loved, my soul.
Seized him, and no release him,
Until which brought him unto house my mother,
And unto chamber my conceiving.

⁵ Adjured you, daughters Jerusalem,
In gazelles or in does the field –
If wakens and if awakens the love,
Until she inclines.

Song of Songs 3:1-5 (NKJV)

By night on my bed I sought the one I love;
I sought him, but I did not find him.
² “I will rise now,” I said,
“And go about the city;
In the streets and in the squares
I will seek the one I love.”
I sought him, but I did not find him.
³ The watchmen who go about the city found me;
I said,
“Have you seen the one I love?”

⁴ Scarcely had I passed by them,
When I found the one I love.
I held him and would not let him go,
Until I had brought him to the house of my mother,
And into the chamber of her who conceived me.

⁵ I charge you, O daughters of Jerusalem,
By the gazelles or by the does of the field,
Do not stir up nor awaken love
Until it pleases.