Matthew 8:21

Monday, 17 March 2025

Then another of His disciples said to Him, “Lord, let me first go and bury my father.” Matthew 8:21

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen)

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“And another – of His disciples – said to Him, ‘Lord, You permit me first to go and inter my father’” (CG).

In the previous verse, Jesus told the scribe that the Son of Man has nowhere to recline His head. Next, He is again approached. Matthew records that, beginning with, “And another – of His disciples.”

The word translated as another, héteros, signifies another, but distinct in kind. This is in contrast to the Greek word állos which signifies another of the same kind. In other words, this appears to confirm that the scribe of the previous verse was not a disciple.

Rather, he was just an opportunist looking to ingratiate himself to Jesus in order to somehow profit off of His ministry. Of this person now, it says that he “said to Him, ‘Lord, You permit me first.’”

The word epitrepó, to permit, is introduced here. It literally means “to upon turn.” In other words, it is an expression to be used in a figurative sense to mean permit, yield, allow, etc.

If one thinks of a wheel turning, one might say, “As the wheel turns, I want to do this.” It would indicate an interval of time being permitted for him to do the requested thing. In this case, this upon turning is “to go and inter my father.”

Another new word is used, thaptó, to inter. Saying “bury” is something that we generally do, and so it is what we think of. However, it says in translations of 1 Corinthians 15:4, using this same word, that Jesus was buried. That is technically not correct. He was entombed or interred.

This was a common form of disposing of a body in Israel. It would be placed in a tomb, allowed to decay, and then the bones would be collected and placed in an ossuary. This can be seen in the passage about Lazarus –

“Then Jesus, again groaning in Himself, came to the tomb. It was a cave, and a stone lay against it. 39 Jesus said, ‘Take away the stone.’
Martha, the sister of him who was dead, said to Him, ‘Lord, by this time there is a stench, for he has been dead four days.’
40 Jesus said to her, ‘Did I not say to you that if you would believe you would see the glory of God?’ 41 Then they took away the stone from the place where the dead man was lying. And Jesus lifted up His eyes and said, ‘Father, I thank You that You have heard Me. 42 And I know that You always hear Me, but because of the people who are standing by I said this, that they may believe that You sent Me.’ 43 Now when He had said these things, He cried with a loud voice, ‘Lazarus, come forth!’ 44 And he who had died came out bound hand and foot with graveclothes, and his face was wrapped with a cloth. Jesus said to them, ‘Loose him, and let him go.’” John 11:38-44

This is also why it was pointed out that no one had been laid in the tomb where Jesus was interred before –

“This man went to Pilate and asked for the body of Jesus. 53 Then he took it down, wrapped it in linen, and laid it in a tomb that was hewn out of the rock, where no one had ever lain before.” Luke 23:52, 53

The tombs were reused after the bones had been removed and placed in an ossuary. The disciple is saying to Jesus that he would follow Him, but he first had to tend to his father’s internment. The probable meaning is that his father was old and would need to be buried upon his death. He was asking for a chance to see him off before following him.

What precipitated this was that Jesus was going to go to the other side of the sea with His disciples. Not knowing how long this would be, based on what He said to the scribe, he didn’t want to abandon his father at the time of his passing.

The reason this is the likely scenario is that when a person died, the culture insisted on an immediate internment. A delay of twenty-four or fewer hours would not call for such a response. Rather, the unknown date of an elderly person’s passing could ostensibly go on for years.

Life application: In 1965, a lawyer named André-François Raffray signed a contract to buy the house of Jeanne Calment. At the time Jeanne was 90. André-François figured it wouldn’t be long until she punched her ticket, and so he agreed to pay 2500 francs a month until she died. This is about $500 in today’s dollars.

Raffray didn’t expect her to live to be 123 years old. In fact, he died in 1995 at 77 while Jeanne Calment, the seemingly Everlasting Bunny, was still a spry 120. She lived three more years while Raffray’s family continued to pay her the monthly agreed upon amount.

In all, the over-eager Raffray (and his family after him) paid Jeanne Calment a total of 918,000 francs. This was nearly double the amount that the apartment was worth.

Remembering this lesson, we need to not get ourselves into things without any set end to them lest we lose our shirts in the process. Eternity is forever. Be set in where you will go when you go. Invest in Jesus, the only true guarantee of eternal life in the presence of God. Do it today!

O God, we invest in a lot of things in this life. Many of them turn out to be bad decisions filled with loss. But even when they are successes, they will eventually fade away. Nothing is sure except that we are set to die and then face the judgment. May our judgment for salvation wisely be settled now by calling on Jesus! Amen.

 

Song of Songs 3:1-5 (I Shall Seek Whom Loved, My Soul)

Artwork by Douglas Kallerson.

Song of Songs 3:1-5
I Shall Seek Whom Loved, My Soul

(Typed 23 December 2024) Many years ago, I heard the story of a guy who went to China as a missionary. While there, he led a man to the Lord. This Chinese man found that Jesus is the Lord God and that He alone can save mankind.

An understanding of who Jesus is and what He has done logically leads to the conclusion that He is the only way to be reconciled to God. If there is a disconnect between us and God, and if God Himself united with humanity in Christ to make the reconciliation possible, then any other religious expression must, by default, be false.

Why would God in Christ put in all the effort to join with humanity, live out a tiring and trial-filled earthly existence, allow Himself to be nailed to the cross, just to say, “Don’t worry, all paths lead to heaven.” The thinking is convoluted and extremely short-sighted.

This should be obvious, but only when the process is thought through. Many people are saved and never think deeply about such details. They believe the gospel, they are saved, and the mechanics of theology beyond that are never considered by them.

From a salvation standpoint, there is nothing wrong with this. In fact, it is exactly why God made the gospel simple. Anything more complicated would keep many from being saved. God knows that is just how limited humans are in thinking.

And yet, in its simplicity, it can also keep people from being saved. The thought that something as simple as belief is capable of saving actually hinders many from accepting it. However, their reason for it hindering them is because they want to be a part of the equation.

They think it is either incredible or foolish to suppose that God doesn’t need their help. They cannot believe that salvation excludes any participation on their behalf, with the exception of faith, meaning believing the simple gospel. This is a problem that Paul refers to in our text verse –

Text Verse: “..but we preach Christ crucified, to the Jews a stumbling block and to the Greeks foolishness.” 1 Corinthians 1:24

Paul explains this stumbling block when referring to Israel in Romans 9-11. In those chapters, he discusses the difficulty Israel faced in accepting that the law they had been under for eons was actually not capable of making them righteous before God.

When Jesus came and demonstrated that this was the case, they could not accept it. In Romans 9, Paul says –

“What shall we say then? That Gentiles, who did not pursue righteousness, have attained to righteousness, even the righteousness of faith; 31 but Israel, pursuing the law of righteousness, has not attained to the law of righteousness. 32 Why? Because they did not seek it by faith, but as it were, by the works of the law. For they stumbled at that stumbling stone. 33 As it is written:
‘Behold, I lay in Zion a stumbling stone and rock of offense,
And whoever believes on Him will not be put to shame.’” Romans 9:30-33

The stumbling stone is the message of God in Christ, meaning faith in the simple gospel. The Chinese man that was saved asked the missionary who led him to the Lord, “Why did you wait so long to come and share this message? My father always knew there was a problem and that he needed God’s help to get it resolved. He died without ever hearing this.”

Being Chinese, all his life he would have been exposed to all kinds of religious teachings, especially from the Buddhist tradition. However, he was able to deduce that what they believed couldn’t be true.

Buddha was as a man and became the Buddha. He supposedly went from the imperfect to the perfect, attaining Nirvana. If thought through, anyone can figure out that this is not possible. Christianity teaches that God came in perfection and became as if imperfect when our sin was imputed to Him on the cross.

This is not only possible, but it also fully explains how we can be made perfect. Great truths such as this are to be found in His superior word. And so, let us turn to that precious word once again, and… May God speak to us through His word today, and may His glorious name ever be praised.

I. I Shall Compass In the City (verses 1-5)

By night on my bed I sought the one I love;

Rather, it is plural: al mishkavi balaeiloth biqashti eth sheahavah naphshiy

“Upon my bed in the nights
Sought whom loved, my soul.”

The plural, nights, is variously explained by scholars. Some see it as a repeating event, from night to night. Others see it as something like “in the night hours,” or some other poetic use of the word.

It seems likely she is using the word to indicate “night after night.” This is how the same expression is used elsewhere –

“Behold, bless the Lord,
All you servants of the Lord,
Who by night [balaeiloth, lit: in the nights] stand in the house of the Lord!
Lift up your hands in the sanctuary,
And bless the Lord.
The Lord who made heaven and earth
Bless you from Zion!” Psalm 134

She is lying on her bed, seeking out the one she loves. Literally, “whom loved, my soul.” As such, it is accepted by many that this is referring to a repeated dream that fills her sleeping hours, and which she is now telling others about.

This may be the case, or it may be a waking dream as we all have, something that fills the hours and keeps us from sleeping. It is still a dream world, but it is one that is based on a reality that exists, not one that the mind merely formulates.

There she is lying on the bed and yearning for her beloved. In this state…

1 (con’t) I sought him, but I did not find him.

biqashtiv v’lo m’tsativ – “Sought him, and no found him.” She is in her dreamish world, searching for him. No matter where she turns, he is not there. With that stated, the meaning of her next words depends on how the words of verse 1 fit into the timeline…

“I will rise now,” I said,
“And go about the city;

The verbs are cohortative. It is almost as if she is commanding herself to act: aqumah na vaasov’vah bair – “I shall arise, pray, and I shall compass in the city.” The question concerning these words is whether they follow verse 1 in time, or if they explain the thought of verse 1.

If the former, she had a dream about looking for her love and couldn’t find him. When she woke up from it, she went out to find him for real. If the latter, she stated her unsuccessful search for him and now more fully describes the contents of what she just said.

One can see this second option in the inserted words “I said” of the NKJV. “I was lying on my bed having a dream. I couldn’t find my love. So, I said to myself, “I will get up and find him.” This seems probable. She began to tell of her thoughts on the bed, and then she explained what was lacking in her first words.

It would be something like this –

I went out on the sea to find my fortune.
It was a rough and difficult life.

I decided when I was young that I would be a sailor.
When I was old enough, I walked to the docks and offered my services.
Off I went to lands of diversity and beauty,
But each stop was also fraught with trials and troubles.
I never attained the wealth I dreamt of.

The first two lines are given as an opening thought that is more fully fleshed out by what is then presented. It is similar to the structure of many passages in the Bible. For example, Genesis 1 provides the essential details to set up the rest of the narrative.

Genesis 2 then backs up to the sixth day of creation and fills in the detail. Understanding this, she implored herself to get up and find her beloved. She couldn’t stand not being with him and so she rose to act, even though this has occurred on her bed, meaning in a dream. In rising, she went…

2 (con’t) In the streets

bash’vaqim – “In the streets.” This is the fourth and last use of shuq, a street, in the Bible. All four uses are in the writings of Solomon. It is derived from the verb shuq, to overflow. One can think of a vat overflowing and running along like a stream. Hence, such a street is a place where there is the running to and fro of activity.

One can see this in Ecclesiastes 12 –

“When the doors are shut in the streets [shuq],
And the sound of grinding is low;
When one rises up at the sound of a bird,
And all the daughters of music are brought low.
Also they are afraid of height,
And of terrors in the way;
When the almond tree blossoms,
The grasshopper is a burden,
And desire fails.
For man goes to his eternal home,
And the mourners go about the streets [shuq].” Ecclesiastes 12:4, 5

The streets are filled with the sounds of busy life (verse 4), and yet the aged cannot hear the boisterous sounds because of hearing loss. Eventually the person died and was mourned by the paid wailers hired for such occasions in biblical times. They would go up and down the streets wailing for the dead, calling attention to all concerning his passing.

The woman is willing to go out into the busy streets to find him…

2 (con’t) and in the squares

u-barkhovoth – “and in the plazas.” The rechov is a broad open area within a city like our modern plaza. Quite often, they were in front of each city gate, but depending on the size of the city, there might be other places set aside for performances, proclamations, and so forth.

Wherever people are gathered, she will make a diligent search for him. She knows he is there and she is determined to find him.

The words in these clauses are set in parallel to the final words of the previous clause –

I shall compass in the city,
In the streets and in the plazas.

She has determined to go all around the city in order to find the one she loves. Whether he is idling in a café on a busy side street or listening to a musical in an open plaza, she has set her mind on finding him…

2 (con’t) I will seek the one I love.”

Again, the verb is cohortative: avaqashah eth sheahavah napshiy – “I shall seek whom loved, my soul.” It is as if she is commanding herself to arise and go out to find him. His love is driving her to the point of impatience to see him. And so, up she goes at the internal command, heading out. However…

2 (con’t) I sought him, but I did not find him.

biqashtiv v’lo m’tsativ – “Sought him, and no found him.” In her dream world, she has failed in her endeavor. She looked, but he elusively remained out of her reach, something quite common in such dream or dreamlike states.

The words here tend to confirm the thought that verse 2 is an explanatory description of verse 1 –

Upon my bed in the nights sought whom loved, my soul,
Sought him, and no found him.

I shall seek whom loved, my soul.
Sought him, and no found him.

She started with the basic thought, backed up, and then presented the fuller thought. Understanding that, she is not finished with the expanded explanation of events…

The watchmen who go about the city found me;

She uses verbs to explain those she encountered: m’tsauni ha’shom’rim hasv’vim bair – “Found me, the guardings, the ‘compassings in the city.’” As she is going throughout the city, those who guard it, regularly compassing it while looking for miscreants, found her. She has searched and come up with nothing. However, maybe they came across him…

3 (con’t) I said,
“Have you seen the one I love?”

The NKJV continues with its explanatory inserts. The words are briefer and give the sense that the events are happening as she speaks them: eth sheahavah naphshiy r’item – “Whom loved, my soul, seen?”

In her dream, she is wandering about the city, not finding her love. So desperate is she to find him, that her mind remembers that guards walk around the city as well. And so she whips them up in her thoughts. Upon meeting them, she eagerly asks if they have come across him.

Some scholars have noted that this must be in the past, in her hometown, because she doesn’t explain who her beloved is. Therefore, they must know her and know who he is. As such, they deduce that it is a small city where everyone knows everyone else.

Such an analysis fails to consider the type of literature. It is poetic and only briefly explanatory. The few words could involve them stopping, having an extended conversation where she describes him to them, their answer in the negative, her thanking them, followed by all of them saying goodbye.

And more, if this is a dream, the brevity is perfectly in line with dreams. Everything in such an encounter is implied in a meeting, but the dream itself presses on toward the goal without giving all the minute details. There is no need to assume the account is in her hometown and not in Jerusalem.

The narrative isn’t focusing on the where of it. Therefore, such details are left unstated. Everything that happens is short, to the point, and dramatic as she explains the unfolding dream.

Whether they stopped and talked and told her they had not seen him or they ignored her question and continued on, the point is that her beloved remained unfound by her. However, good news lies ahead…

Scarcely had I passed by them,

kim’at sheavarti mehem – “According to little, which passed from them.” Though the NKJV is a paraphrase, it expresses the intent well. She saw the guards walking around on their watch and she asked if they had seen her beloved. Whatever the response from them involved, it didn’t help her out. But then, just moments after passing them by it was…

4 (con’t) When I found the one I love.

ad shematsathi eth sheahavah naphshiy – “Until which found whom loved, my soul.” The tension in her dream, which has built up since the first words of verse 1, is now relieved. Moments after the disappointment of not being told where her beloved was, he is there. She has found him! And…

4 (con’t) I held him and would not let him go,

The aspect of the first verb is perfect while the second is imperfect:

akhaztiv v’lo arpenu – “Seized him, and no release him.” The word akhaz, seize, is generally used in a strong and even forceful manner. Along with the act is normally the idea of holding what is seized in possession.

Adding to that, she uses the word raphah, to slacken. Thus, the words give the sense of, “I seized him, holding fast, and there is no way I am letting my tight grip go.”

She searched, finally found him, and now there she was ensuring that he would not get out of her hands…

4 (con’t) Until I had brought him to the house of my mother,

ad shehavitiv el beith imi – “Until which brought him unto house my mother.” At this point, the intent could be anything. “Mom, I finally found the man of my dreams.” Or she may be using the thought of her mother’s house to speak of the whole family, “Hey everyone, I have found the man of my dreams.”

We are left to speculate what is on her mind. However, the unspecified nature of the act is immediately brought to clarity…

4 (con’t) And into the chamber of her who conceived me.

v’el kheder horathi – “And unto chamber my conceiving.” The meaning is obvious, “This is where I was conceived. Let us repeat the event that took place on that day so new birth will take place.”

She is dreaming of the moment that will take place. In the previous chapter, he had come to her and asked her to come out so he could hear her voice.

She would not come out, but she did sing him a song of the vineyard. However, at evening time, she had told him to scamper home –

My dove in rifts the rock,
In cover the step,
Cause me to see your appearances,
Cause me to hear your voice.
For your voice – pleasant,
And your appearance – beautiful.

15 Grasp to us foxes,
Foxes little, binding vines,
And our vines cluster.

16 My beloved to me, and I to him –
The ‘pasturing in the lilies.’

17 Until that puffs the day,
And flit the shadows.
Revolve!
Resemble to you, my beloved, to gazelle or to fawn, the stag,
Upon the mountains division.

When he was gone, she went to bed and dreamt the same dream she always had. Someday she would go out to find him, and bring him into the very place she was conceived. With that, she again charges the daughters of Jerusalem with the same words as verse 2:7…

I charge you, O daughters of Jerusalem,
By the gazelles or by the does of the field,
Do not stir up nor awaken love
Until it pleases.

hishbati etkhem b’noth y’rushalim bitsvaoth o b’ayloth hasadeh im tairu v’im t’or’ru eth haahavah ad shetekh’pats

“Adjured you, daughters Jerusalem,
In gazelles or in does the field –
If wakens and if awakens the love,
Until she inclines.”

Because the words are letter-for-letter identical to verse 2:7, refer back to that sermon if you need to refresh your mind concerning what is being said. The main point of them, though, is that she adjures the daughters of Jerusalem to be like the gazelles or does of the field. They are to be timid and wary as they go about in search of love.

With these words complete, the second major break in the song is realized. Two more are yet ahead at 5:1 and 8:4.

I will seek the Lord until I find Him
I know He is there, but I’m not sure what to do
Everything I have checked out is forbidding and grim
But the truth is there. And God, through it, I will find You!

You have instilled in us the knowledge of good and evil
I certainly know that this is true
And so, I can run from every lie of the devil
Until the day I find the truth, and come running to You

If I never find it and my life passes away
There is one thing I still will never do
I will not accept what is false. I will never go that way
Because I know there is truth that would have led me to You

II. Seeking the Lord

The main point of these five verses is diligence in seeking. They also focus on not awakening love until the appropriate time. As they are words in “Song the songs,” meaning the greatest of all songs ever penned, there must be an underlying lesson in what is stated.

The woman is going back in time to the repeated thoughts on her bed about the one whom her soul loves. She is explaining the thoughts to those who would hear and, hopefully, emulate. That is seen in the charge that she has given them.

She didn’t just say, “I want a man, and I’m going out to find one.” Rather, she has one man in mind that she will search for until she finds him. When she finds him, she will grasp him and not let him go. That was seen in the aspect of the verbs in verse 4. The first was perfect while the second was imperfect.

She knew he was out there, she searched thoroughly, and when her goal was attained, she held him continuously. He was not getting out of her hands until her goal was realized. Then she spoke the exact same adjuration she had made before, to the letter, in fact –

Adjured you, daughters Jerusalem,
In gazelles or in does the field –
If wakens and if awakens the love,
Until she inclines.

As explained in the previous sermon, the idea of these words is to have one’s priorities right. We are not to fall in love with any god. The people of the world are to be on alert, wary of anything that could awaken inappropriate love in us.

Rather, we are to allow the love (agapē, noun, fem.) of God, embodied in the Person of Jesus Christ, to awaken ‘the love’ that is truly love, as John says, “for God is love [agapē, noun, fem.]” (1 John 4:8).

As we saw, it is the same words as found in the Greek translation of this verse, “if you should arise and awaken the love [ten agapen: the love].” God is love. God in Christ is the embodiment of God’s love. The adjuration of the woman is to not be led astray by other loves but allow the love of God in Christ to awaken God’s love.

But she has said this in these verses after noting her search –

Upon my bed in the nights sought whom loved, my soul,
Sought him, and no found him.

2 “I shall arise, I pray, and I shall compass in the city,
In the streets and in the plazas,
I shall seek whom loved, my soul.
Sought him, and no found him.

If the symbolism as presented is correct, there is a point being made here that escapes many in the church based on a faulty evaluation of what the Bible is saying.

We have seen in the previous sermons that this woman is being used as a type of the redeemed of the Lord. She is conveying to her audience how she came to find the love that she possesses. Her desire is the beloved she now has and whom she has been interacting with throughout the book.

The book began with the attraction the two felt for one another, explaining why it was so. The first chapter ended with the two in the garden together. After that, the first verses of Chapter 2 presented how that union in the garden came about, finishing with the adjuration to not waken love until she inclines. That was the end of the first main section.

The next section, which formed the content of last week’s sermon, went back to explain why she so adjured them. It gave hints of the time of the coming of Christ and of the establishment of the church age. What God in Christ is doing during this age is the love that all should seek after.

Think of the Chinese man who heard the gospel and received it. Like his father, he knew what was false, but until he heard the truth, he didn’t have any idea how things between God and him could be reconciled.

These five verses take the woman back further to her (meaning the redeemed of the Lord) attitude even before she met Him. She sought Him night after night but didn’t find Him.

At this point, we can think of the father of the Chinese man. He knew there was a problem between himself and God, but he didn’t know how it could be resolved. He just knew that the religious ideas he had been exposed to were not correct.

He sought diligently but could not find what he was looking for. However, in this process, he didn’t try to awaken love, meaning go after false gods. Instead, he waited for what never came. This is what the woman in “Song the songs” has done.

She has looked for her beloved night after night, knowing He is there, and yet not finding Him. Eventually, however, she found Him and seized Him, refusing to slacken her grip until she had brought Him to her place of conception.

Though the story refers to a human union, the details anticipate the union between the Lord and believers in the new birth. They were conceived in the flesh. There is now a desire to be birthed in the Spirit. Peter explains this in his first epistle –

“Since you have purified your souls in obeying the truth through the Spirit in sincere love of the brethren, love one another fervently with a pure heart, 23 having been born again, not of corruptible seed but incorruptible, through the word of God which lives and abides forever.” 1 Peter 1:22, 23

This is the reason why the second adjuration is placed here concerning awakening love until it inclines. The woman, seen as a type of the redeemed, finds her true love, holds fast to Him, and refuses to let Him go. The meaning is that the redeemed maintain their doctrine to the end.

To let go of proper doctrine is to not hold onto the true love. This doesn’t mean a loss of salvation for the saved, but a lack of salvation for those who could otherwise be redeemed.

As noted already, the main point of these verses is that of diligence in seeking. One cannot seek unless he is able to do so. The “Song the songs” has been structured so far in a manner that goes backwards to explain how this greatest song is realized.

One cannot be intimate with the Lord prior to meeting Him. One cannot meet Him unless there is a mutual attempt at it coming about. But that couldn’t occur unless He came and made the union possible.

But even if He came, without people wanting to participate in His coming, there wouldn’t be any reason for Him to come. This is the point of today’s verses –

“The woman said to Him, ‘I know that Messiah is coming’ (who is called Christ). ‘When He comes, He will tell us all things.’” John 4:35

This woman at the well would not have said that if she didn’t believe He was coming. And more, she expected to learn from Him when He came. She may not have been actively seeking Him at the time, but she was aware that His time would come.

As I just said, one cannot seek unless he is able to do so. The passage today tells us that people can, in fact, seek the Lord. Pretty much everyone on the planet is seeking “God” in some form or fashion. Most are just doing it wrong.

To say that Muslims are not seeking God would be a laughable statement. To say that people who convert to Islam are not seeking God would be even more laughable. They are, in fact, seeking Him. But they have not properly thought through the details or they have ignorantly rejected what has been presented (as Paul says Israel has done in Romans 9-11).

By taking verses out of context, including Paul’s words of Romans 3, various doctrines have arisen, like Calvinism, that claim that man has no capacity or will to seek after God. That is proven false in humanity every day of the year. They are seeking. Most are just wrong in their approach –

“By faith Enoch was taken away so that he did not see death, ‘and was not found, because God had taken him’; for before he was taken he had this testimony, that he pleased God. But without faith it is impossible to please Him, for he who comes to God must believe that He is, and that He is a rewarder of those who diligently seek Him.” Hebrews 11:5,6

In fact, when Paul spoke to those in Athens, it was one of his main points of doctrine –

“And He has made from one blood every nation of men to dwell on all the face of the earth, and has determined their preappointed times and the boundaries of their dwellings, 27 so that they should seek the Lord, in the hope that they might grope for Him and find Him, though He is not far from each one of us.” Acts 17:26, 27

The word Paul uses there is zéteó. It signifies “to seek by inquiring; to investigate to reach a binding (terminal) resolution; to search, ‘getting to the bottom of a matter’” (HELPS Word Studies).

It is the same word that the Greek translation of the Old Testament uses three times in the first two verses of our sermon today. She sought out, looking for her beloved. In type, she is humanity who not only searches out God, but does so to get to the bottom of the matter and, thus, becoming the redeemed of the Lord.

This is why this book is labeled “Song the songs” or the greatest song ever written. It is a song about the mutual, not forced, love of God for His people and His people for the true God as He has revealed Himself in the Person of Jesus Christ.

Although the book is very difficult and even confusing, it is laid out in a way that shows us how the message can be easily understood. The love between God and His people will bring us back to a place that resembles the original garden of Eden in its beauty and perfection.

To understand how that will come about, the successive verses have so far been structured to keep taking us back in order to understand how to go forward. In other words, “Here is how we got to this stage, but to get to that stage, we had to go through this one. And to understand how we got there, we need to go back again and see what happened.”

At this point, the book is not presenting the same type of exacting typology of the earlier historical writings. Understanding the allegorical nature of the book requires understanding the overall presentation of redemption as found throughout the Bible.

In doing so, we can then understand the process of God’s redemption as portrayed in the loving relationship of these two people. Their desires, hopes, and aspirations for being with one another reveal the same characteristics in the mutual relationship that arises between the Lord and His redeemed.

Without understanding the cross of Jesus Christ, and how what it signifies is properly procured by His people, the book remains a mystery. But in grasping the back-and-forth nature of the relationship between these two, we can then grasp the same in our relationship with God and He with us.

Therefore, be sure to seek the Lord, search for Him diligently, and then hold fast to Him, even as He is holding fast to you. Be sound in your doctrine and be firm in what it presents, not waffling or being blown about by others who would seek to ruin your precious relationship with the glorious Lord who came to bring us back to Himself.

Closing Verse: “Let all those who seek [Greek LXX: zéteó] You rejoice and be glad in You;
Let such as love Your salvation say continually,
‘The Lord be magnified!’” Psalm 40:16

Next Week: Song of Songs 3:6-11 Who is this that my soul will bless… (Ascending From the Wilderness) (8th Song of Songs sermon)

The Lord has you exactly where He wants you. He has a good plan and purpose for you. He alone is the perfect example of love – untarnished, unblemished, and completely pure and holy. He offers this love to you. So, follow Him, live for Him, and trust Him, and He will do marvelous things for you and through you.

Song of Songs 3:1-5 (CG)

Upon my bed in the nights
Sought whom loved, my soul,
Sought him, and no found him.

2 “I shall arise, I pray, and I shall compass in the city,
In the streets and in the plazas,
I shall seek whom loved, my soul.
Sought him, and no found him.

3 Found me, the guardings, the ‘compassings in the city’ –
Whom loved, my soul, seen?

4 According to little, which passed from them,
Until which found whom loved, my soul.
Seized him, and no release him,
Until which brought him unto house my mother,
And unto chamber my conceiving.

5 Adjured you, daughters Jerusalem,
In gazelles or in does the field –
If wakens and if awakens the love,
Until she inclines.


Song of Songs 3:1-5 (NKJV)

By night on my bed I sought the one I love;
I sought him, but I did not find him.
“I will rise now,” I said,
“And go about the city;
In the streets and in the squares
I will seek the one I love.”
I sought him, but I did not find him.
The watchmen who go about the city found me;
I said,
“Have you seen the one I love?”

Scarcely had I passed by them,
When I found the one I love.
I held him and would not let him go,
Until I had brought him to the house of my mother,
And into the chamber of her who conceived me.

I charge you, O daughters of Jerusalem,
By the gazelles or by the does of the field,
Do not stir up nor awaken love
Until it pleases.

 

Matthew 8:20

Sunday, 16 March 2025

And Jesus said to him, “Foxes have holes and birds of the air have nests, but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay His head.” Matthew 8:20

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen)

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“And, Jesus, He says to him, ‘The foxes, they have burrows, and the birds of the sky encampings, and the Son of Man, He has not where the head He might recline’” (CG).

In the previous verse, Jesus was approached by a scribe who told Him he would follow Him wherever He went. In response to that, it next says, “And, Jesus, He says to him, ‘The foxes, they have burrows.”

In these words, the alópéx is introduced. It is a burrowing animal and is figuratively used when speaking of a cunning person. The main typological idea of a fox in the Old Testament is one who trips others up. In the New Testament, the fox will only be seen again in a comparable passage in Luke 9:58 and one more time when speaking of Herod in Luke 13:32.

The reason for Jesus’ words is not yet apparent, but His words concerning the fox tell us that they have phóleos, burrows, where they can go. It is another new word found only here and in Luke 9:58 under the same context. It signifies a lair for animals in the form of a hole, thus a burrow. In such a place, foxes can secret themselves away. Jesus next continues with, “and the birds of the sky encampings.”

This is a third new word, kataskénósis, it is derived from kata, down against, and skénoó, a tent or tabernacle. As such, it literally means an encamping. It is also found only here and in Luke 9:58. Birds, like foxes, have a place to go where they can dwell with their own. However, the verse continues with, “and the Son of Man, He has not where the head He might recline.”

This is a fourth new word, klinó. It is a primary verb meaning to slant or slope. As such, and because He is referring to a place to settle in, the word recline exactly fits the thought. When the day of labor is ended, a person reclines to eat and then further reclines to sleep.

The meaning is that, unlike the very basic necessities for the animals and birds, meaning a place to be with their own and to settle themselves for the needs of life, Jesus was without them. Instead, He was an itinerant traveler, not knowing where He would find rest from day to day.

This is also the first of thirty times in Matthew that the term Son of Man will be used when referring to Jesus. In total, it will be used about one hundred times in the New Testament. It refers to His human nature, having been born of a woman. Elsewhere, which began in Matthew 4:3, He is called the Son of God. This refers to His deity, having been conceived of God the Holy Spirit.

The point of Jesus’ words to this man is that He knew the scribe had not understood the purpose and goal of the ministry. Rather, he saw the crowds, figured he could gain from being with Jesus, and said he, too, would follow. Jesus knew what the scribe thought he would gain and spoke His words in a manner that would reveal His understanding of the man’s intent. There was no room for opportunists in a ministry that had no rooms booked for the night.

Life application: In Genesis 1, it says that God created everything to reproduce after its own kind. Apples produce more apples. Cows produce more cows. People produce more people. It is a fact that was set at the beginning, and it continues to be a fact today. To understand what God in Christ has done, a simple rule of interpretation based on Genesis 1 reveals the truth of the matter –

Jesus was born of a human female. Human females reproduce more humans. Jesus is a human. Thus, He is a Son of man, fully human.

Jesus was conceived of God’s Holy Spirit indicating that God is the Father of Jesus. As the Child bears the nature of the Father, Jesus is the Son of God.

The point of Genesis 1 telling us about the reproduction of all kinds continuing as the same kind is something we all understand, but the reason for telling this truth is to alert us to the fact in a purposeful way. It is also true that ice floats and that hydrogen explodes, but there is no need to tell us these things. They have no bearing on what is being detailed in Scripture.

But when we are given the truth about the nature of all living things, we should ask, “Why did God tell us this? We know it is true, so why bother?” The answer is that in proper theology, one plus one will always equal two. The doctrine of aberrant cults will quite often claim Jesus was not really a human or Jesus was not really God. But the pattern was set and it is without exception.

This is what God in Christ has done. To teach anything else about the nature of Jesus Christ than being fully God and fully human is heretical. It will lead to a false gospel, and it will lead to condemnation for those who fail to accept what God has done. Be careful to learn how to add. One plus one equals two.

O God, You have done it! You united with Your creation, coming in the Person of Jesus to restore us to You. Salvation is of the Lord. We give You all praise, honor, and glory for what You have done. Thank You, O God, for Jesus Christ our Lord! Amen.

 

Matthew 8:19

Saturday, 15 March 2025

Then a certain scribe came and said to Him, “Teacher, I will follow You wherever You go.” Matthew 8:19

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen)

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“And having come, one scribe, he said to Him, ‘I will follow You wherever, if You may go’” (CG).

In the previous verse, Jesus saw many crowds around Him and commanded that He and the disciples depart to the other side. Having said that, Matthew next records, “And having come, one scribe.”

Nothing is said of who this is. It simply notes that he is one of the scribes. It is surmised, and likely so, that this person saw Jesus’ miracles and was impressed enough to follow Him. But the reasoning behind the decision appears to be for personal gain. It was just noted that there were “many crowds.”

Crowds consist of people. Many crowds mean lots of people. Where lots of people gather, money is usually abundant, even among the poor. Like with selling insurance, a little from each quickly adds to a big bank account. It is the rule of multiplication.

Jesus, on the other hand, wasn’t there for “many crowds.” Instead, He was there to accomplish the will of the Father, regardless of the gain He could receive. The scribes were already in a position to have wealth. He says nothing of giving up his current status. Instead, it next says that “he said to Him, ‘I will follow You wherever, if You may go.’”

Jesus is set to go to the other side. The scribe may have assumed He was going to increase the number of people he could encounter over there, thus increasing his possible income as well. This is all speculation, but Jesus’ answer to him in the coming verse appears to suggest it is a correct line of reasoning.

Life application: In the church today, like in the church throughout history, there is often the idea of gathering wealth through multiplication. It is normal for a pastor or preacher to want to increase the size and scope of his ministry. This should be expected because he is putting forth a message that he, hopefully, believes is true and is worth getting out to the masses.

However, a ministry can get quickly derailed from that original purpose by receiving exactly what it was looking for. By increasing in size, there is also a need for more space to meet. In making more space, which costs more money, there is then the need to make more in order to pay for the things it has taken on in the form of liabilities.

And so, more people are needed to help pay those incurred liabilities. As such, a ministry expands, gets a certain number of people to give, sees the money coming in, and then wants to expand again. One way this has been handled, which then takes the pressure off the local church, is to form denominations.

The RCC, for example, keeps the original structure of instruction but now places all the liabilities (and ultimate profits) under one main umbrella. That main body can now control the direction of all other churches under it. As more money is needed, it begins to assimilate aberrant teachings into it because it needs to keep the revenue stream going.

This is known as syncretism, the uniting of different beliefs, cultures, schools of thought, etc., as if each belief is acceptable within the larger umbrella. This is the RCC in a nutshell. It has innumerable false teachings at various levels and in various cultures that may not flow up or over, but they keep the local churches happy.

Sometimes, these aberrant teachings get an audience, and the entire church begins to accept them into their religious thinking. Having happy and content worshippers, regardless of the truth, is profitable. Therefore, a general state of apostasy begins to take over.

It has been seen in innumerable denominations over the past centuries. Today’s major denominations have doctrines that are completely at odds with the original teachings that established them. And the reason for this is almost always the same, money. Compromising for the sake of money, along with fame and power, is a hallmark of churches that expand too much or too quickly.

Be on guard concerning where you go and who you listen to. Subtle changes concerning doctrine within churches or denominations may not seem to be a big deal, but within a span of time, the people in the pews have been stewed into a state of complacency that they didn’t even realize had come about.

Only the wise will look around and say, “Things have changed, we need to move out of here before we are stewed along with everyone else.” How do you think abortion has become acceptable within so many denominations? What about homosexuality?

These denominations would never have tolerated such things when they started. But now, they permeate almost all churches within their scope of authority. In some cases, every single church has bowed the knee to such terrible changes in doctrine.

Glorious God Almighty, help us to be set in our doctrine early on. And we know that will not take place unless we are aware of what is proper. And we cannot do that unless we know Your word. Therefore, O God, give us the hunger, desire, and time necessary to know Your precious word. Amen.

 

Matthew 8:18

Friday, 14 March 2025

And when Jesus saw great multitudes about Him, He gave a command to depart to the other side. Matthew 8:18

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen)

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“And Jesus, having seen many crowds around Him, He ordered to depart to the other side” (CG).

In the previous verse, Jesus and His actions were shown by Matthew to be the fulfillment of the prophecy of Isaiah concerning the healing of the people. With that thought complete, he next records, “And Jesus, having seen many crowds around Him.”

Some later manuscripts have the words in the singular, “And Jesus, having seen a great crowd around Him” (BLB). Either way, the thought is understood. He and His disciples were hemmed in by the thronging masses. They had worked tirelessly, but as noted by the words, the crowds continued to come. Therefore, it next says, “He ordered to depart to the other side.”

Here the word, keleuó, to urge on, is introduced. Strong’s defines its meaning as “to incite by word.” Thus, it gives the sense of commanding, ordering, bidding, instructing, encouraging, etc. Anything that will impel others to get up and accomplish a task is what is suggested.

They are currently located in Capernaum. It is in the very northwest area of the Sea of Galilee. From there, Jesus is instructing them to go to the eastern shore of the sea. One gets the sense that they need a break, as hinted by the statement about the many crowds.

Jesus and His disciples need to redirect things, and so taking a boat will hopefully provide them with the needed separation from those who are currently surrounding them. To walk would allow the crowds to follow them without providing any separation and relief.

Life application: Although it doesn’t explicitly say that Jesus needed rest, it can be deduced from the words concerning the crowds. During the trip, many things will come about, however, that are necessary inclusions in His life to fill up the narrative concerning His messiahship.

Once the trip across the sea is complete, Luke 8:40 says, “So it was, when Jesus returned, that the multitude welcomed Him, for they were all waiting for Him.” The crowds were there when they departed, and they anticipated His return.

It is not unlike our current state. Jesus fulfilled His messianic ministry, died in fulfillment of the law, and rose again, and then He finished His time here and ascended to heaven. We have been assured He will return for us. Are we eagerly awaiting that day?

The crowds anticipated His coming, knowing He would return. If we can fix our minds on the fact that Jesus is also returning, many of the things that disturb us from day to day will not matter, or they will find their proper place.

There were surely people left sick and troubled with various afflictions in the many crowds, but they knew Jesus would return and they would have their chance to find relief. In the church, there are all kinds of afflictions, griefs, troubles, and personal disasters. But Jesus is coming!

Don’t lose sight of the great and enduring promise we possess. This life is temporary, and it is woe-filled. For some, there are greater woes than others. But for each of us, there should be the eager anticipation that our day of uniting with the Lord will come. So be of good cheer as we wait for it.

“For the Lord Himself will descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of an archangel, and with the trumpet of God. And the dead in Christ will rise first. 17 Then we who are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air. And thus we shall always be with the Lord. 18 Therefore comfort one another with these words.” 1 Thessalonians 4:16-18

Glorious God, we have lots of troubles in this life. They are sufficient to fill our days with greater hope that the promises of Jesus’ return will end them and that we will be in Your presence forever. We know the time is set, but if we can speed it along with our pleas, then we will gladly do so! Even so, come Lord Jesus. Amen.