Matthew 12:20

Thursday, 7 August 2025

A bruised reed He will not break,
And smoking flax He will not quench,
Till He sends forth justice to victory;
Matthew 12:20

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at the “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen).

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

A reed, being battered, not He will break, and flax being smoldered, not He will extinguish, until if He ejects judgment into victory” (CG).

In the previous verse, Matthew continued his citation of Isaiah 42, revealing that the passage prophetically pointed to Jesus and His ministry. That citation continues with his next words, which are comparable to Isaiah 42:3 –

“Reed bruised, not He will break, and flax darkish, not He will extinguish it. To truth, He will cause to bring verdict” (CG).

Matthew’s words of citation begin with, “A reed, being battered, not He will break.”

Two new words are seen here. The first is suntribó, to crush completely, such as breaking into pieces. The next is katagnumi, to rend in pieces, such as cracking apart.

The words of Isaiah, and now cited by Matthew, point to extreme care and attentiveness to being gentle. A bruised reed will collapse with the slightest bit of force because its fibers have been damaged. The analogy is to a person who has been bruised by a life of sin or affliction.

For example, in Luke 7:36-50, we read about the sinful woman who came to Jesus, washing His feet with her hair. The Pharisee would have taken her and cast her out, destroying any faith-fiber left in her. But Jesus allowed her to wash and kiss His feet, knowing she was crushed from her life of sin. Because of her faithful display of love for the Lord, His words to her were, “Your sins are forgiven,” and “Your faith has saved you. Go in peace.”

In a similar metaphor, Matthew next says, “and flax being smoldered, not He will extinguish.”

Three new words are seen in this one clause. The first is linon, flax. It is the material (the flax plant) used to make linen. One can see the etymological connection between the two, linon and linen.

The second new word is tuphó, a word found only here in the New Testament. It signifies to make a smoke, as in something slowly being consumed by fire, but without a flame. It is hot enough to burn, but there isn’t enough oxygen for it to turn into a blaze, and so it sits and smolders.

Also, the word sbennumi is used. It signifies to quench or extinguish.

The idea is that a smoldering flax, such as a piece of linen, will go out with the slightest touch. The teeny amount of oxygen that was available to cause the smoldering is removed, and even the smoldering is quenched. The meaning of the words is that of someone with the smallest bit of faith will not have it quenched by the Lord. He will never deprive such, quenching their faith by treating them contemptuously or as if they were unimportant.

And this state of care for His people is, “until if He ejects judgment into victory.”

There are various opinions on the meaning of the words. Each of them, however, finds its fulfillment in the work of Christ. The care of the Lord for those who are bruised or smoldering will not cease until the end. Their judgment will be realized in victory. The direct translation from Isaiah said, “To truth he will cause to bring verdict.”

The judgment of the Lord will be vindicated as a state of truth. The idea seems, therefore, to ultimately point to the Lord’s care of His people until the final victory is realized, such as the state of those who are glorified at the rapture of the church –

“For this corruptible must put on incorruption, and this mortal must put on immortality. 54 So when this corruptible has put on incorruption, and this mortal has put on immortality, then shall be brought to pass the saying that is written: ‘Death is swallowed up in victory.’
55 ‘O Death, where is your sting?
O Hades, where is your victory?’” 1 Corinthians 15:53-55

None shall be rejected who comes to the Lord by faith, even if their faith is comparable to a bruised reed or a smoldering piece of linen.

Life application: Understanding the care of the Lord for His people, we should be careful how we evaluate others. The sinful woman at Jesus’ feet would have been cast out by anyone in the religious circles of Israel. But Jesus understood her faith and was unwilling to quench it merely out of social propriety.

The same will be true with anyone who comes to Him in true faith. Each of us will fail the Lord from time to time. This is inevitable, but it demonstrates the immense grace of God that is found in Jesus. Despite our failings, He forgave us. Despite our continued failings, His grace continues.

The Lord would have us not sin at all, but He is aware of our limitations. Because of this, even when we do sin, He is not counting those transgressions against us any longer –

“Now all things are of God, who has reconciled us to Himself through Jesus Christ, and has given us the ministry of reconciliation, 19 that is, that God was in Christ reconciling the world to Himself, not imputing their trespasses to them, and has committed to us the word of reconciliation.” 2 Corinthians 5:18, 19

Heavenly Father, You are aware of our every failing, and yet You still have forgiven us through our faith in Jesus. Help us to be strong in our ability to stand against sin and its many temptations so that we will be pleasing to You. Above all, help us to keep our faith in Christ strong as we live in Your glorious presence, holding fast to Him until that wonderful Day of redemption. Amen.

 

Matthew 12:19

Wednesday, 6 August 2025

He will not quarrel nor cry out,
Nor will anyone hear His voice in the streets. Matthew 12:19

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at the “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen).

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“Not He will wrangle, nor He will clamor, nor anyone – he will hear in the streets His voice” (CG).

In the previous verse, Jesus was referred to in Matthew’s citation of Isaiah 42. Isaiah’s words that parallel this verse are found in Isaiah 42:2 –

“Not he will shriek, and not he will lift, and not He will cause to declare in the street His voice” (CG).

In the Hebrew, the word “lift” must mentally be supplied with the additional words “His voice.” Understanding this, Matthew continues his citation, stating, “Not He will wrangle.” Matthew uses the word erizó, which signifies to wrangle, as in disputing or quarreling. This is its only use in the New Testament.

While among Israel, Jesus did not possess a contentious spirit. Rather, He stated His case and rebuffed falsities, but the gospels show that He did not get into lengthy arguments with those who came against Him. Next, it says, “nor He will clamor.”

It is a second new word, kraugazó, clamor, as in people shouting vehemently. There are times Jesus is recorded as having lifted up His voice, but it was usually in a petition for reason or a calling of those around Him to come to their senses. There was no sense of violent argumentation in those accounts. The only other time this word is used when referring to Jesus is found in John 11 –

“Now when He had said these things, He cried with a loud voice, ‘Lazarus, come forth!’ 44 And he who had died came out bound hand and foot with graveclothes, and his face was wrapped with a cloth. Jesus said to them, ‘Loose him, and let him go.’” John 11:43, 44

In that instance, Jesus’ crying out was not violently agitating the people, which is the point Isaiah and Matthew are making. Understanding this, Matthew continues with, “nor anyone – he will hear in the streets His voice.”

The idea here is a person who looks to draw attention to himself as a way of gaining popularity. If one went into the streets and started singing or acting, it would mean he was trying to draw attention to himself. Likewise, if he started a public agitation about some leader or against Rome, he would be trying to gain an audience.

Jesus didn’t approach His ministry that way. Instead, He led by His actions, not having a need to distract from them with lofty or manipulative words.

Life application: There are innumerable ways of getting the word out to the people. It would be a sad loss for people to take the words of this verse and say, “Jesus didn’t do XX, and therefore I will not do that as well.”

He has already told His disciples, “Whatever I tell you in the dark, speak in the light; and what you hear in the ear, preach on the housetops” (Matthew 10:27). There is no record of Jesus having gone to the rooftops to do this. Jesus set His own example based on His ministry. We are to set our example based on our abilities, culture, situation, etc.

It would be inappropriate for a person to stand up in the middle of his office and start preaching like a street evangelist. It would probably lead to his dismissal. Sometimes, handing out a tract is the right thing to do. At others, getting a permit and going to a town square to preach may draw people to you.

However, standing on a street corner with a megaphone and yelling at the passing people that they are all sinners and are going to hell is a ridiculous approach that many have taken over the years. That will only cause people to close their ears, laugh at the crazy Christian, and alienate those in the crowd from ever wanting to have anything to do with Jesus.

The point of evangelizing is to bring people to Jesus. Understanding the time, situation, location, state of the people, etc., is all necessary to effectively transmit the good news so that it will be heard and accepted.

Remember that the exaltation of Jesus as the One God sent to restore us to Him is the primary thing we are to share with others. This is the point of the gospel. We are in a bad spot. God took the initiative to correct that. He sent Jesus, who did everything necessary to restore us to God. All God wants from us is to believe the good news.

How you communicate this message is important. Consider it and then act accordingly.

Heavenly Father, help us to be aware of the best way to get the message of Jesus out to others. Help us to consider the time and circumstances around us and to then be willing to use them to lead others to a saving knowledge of You. Yes, Lord, give us wisdom in this awesome responsibility. Amen.

 

Matthew 12:18

Tuesday, 5 August 2025

“Behold! My Servant whom I have chosen,
My Beloved in whom My soul is well pleased!
I will put My Spirit upon Him,
And He will declare justice to the Gentiles. Matthew 12:18

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at the “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen)

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“You behold! My Servant whom I chose, My beloved in whom it approved, My soul, I will place My Spirit upon Him, and judgment to the Gentiles, He will proclaim” (CG).

In the previous verse, Matthew noted that Jesus’ actions were prophesied by Isaiah. To support this, he quotes Isaiah, saying, “You behold! My Servant whom I chose.”

The word hairetizó, to make a choice, is found only here. It signifies to select as one’s own. The words are a loose rendering of Isaiah 42:1 –

“Behold! My Servant whom I uphold.”

The Greek translation of Isaiah rewrites the Hebrew to indicate that Isaiah was speaking of Jacob, saying, “Jacob is my servant, I will help him.” Israel is called the Lord’s servant in Isaiah 41:8 –

“But you, Israel, are My servant,
Jacob whom I have chosen.”

This is probably why the Greek changes Isaiah 42:1 to read Jacob.  However, there is a developed thought being made between Jacob (Israel) and the coming Messiah in the words of Isaiah, where the Messiah is given as representative of Israel. As for Matthew’s citation, he continues with, “My beloved in whom it approved, My soul.”

The Hebrew is close, reading, “In Him, My Chosen, it accepted, My soul” (CG). The Lord God is saying that He is fully pleased with the One He has chosen to represent His people. Therefore, Matthew continues with, “I will place My Spirit upon Him.”

The Hebrew of Isaiah 42:1 says, “I gave My Spirit upon Him” (CG). The Lord, looking forward in time, speaks in the perfect aspect, as if it is already done, knowing that the Messiah would perfectly fulfill His will. This event occurred earlier in Matthew –

“When He had been baptized, Jesus came up immediately from the water; and behold, the heavens were opened to Him, and He saw the Spirit of God descending like a dove and alighting upon Him. 17 And suddenly a voice came from heaven, saying, ‘This is My beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased.’” Matthew 3:16, 17

God ordained that Jesus would come and that He would fully and adequately deal with what was necessary to redeem man, restoring him to a right relationship with his Creator once again. Everything given in type and shadow under the Mosaic Covenant would be perfectly realized in Jesus Christ. As such, Matthew continues with, “and judgment to the Gentiles, He will proclaim.”

The Hebrew reads, “Verdict to the Gentiles, He must cause to bring out” (CG). The word verdict, mishpat in Hebrew, signifies the system of law and truth, “especially a sentence or formal decree (human or (participant’s) divine law, individual or collective), including the act, the place, the suit, the crime, and the penalty” (HELPS Word Studies).

A comparable word is given in the Greek cited by Matthew, krisis, a decision. That extends to a tribunal and, thus, justice rendered by such a tribunal.

Isaiah’s words refer to what the Messiah would come to do, including bringing out a verdict to the Gentiles, meaning the non-Jewish people. Matthew says that Jesus is the One who fulfilled these words through His ministry. The Pulpit Commentary rightly states –

“The thought here, therefore, is not of Christ’s power to punish and avenge (though he refused to use it as yet), but of his bringing a revelation which should eventually spread, not only to the Jews who now rejected him, but to the Gentiles whom they despised.”

Life application: Because of prophecies, such as those from Ezekiel and especially Daniel, a timeline is set in the Old Testament concerning the timing of the coming of the Messiah. There is a very precise and limited time in which He could have come.

Further, other prophecies give the necessary genealogy of the coming Messiah, such as being from Judah. Israel is still waiting for their supposed Messiah to show up. This negates the timeline provided by Daniel, but it also negates the prophecies of lineage.

This is because it is impossible to prove such a lineage today. There are no existing records to prove from which tribe a person descends. There is a claim that some genetic markers help isolate the priestly class of Israel, but that is not what is necessary to prove a Messiah, because priests descend from Levi, not Judah.

As the timing of the coming of the Messiah is known to have occurred already, and as the genealogical records of those who could be the Messiah were destroyed after a certain point in time, either the prophecies are wrong and the Hebrew Scriptures are not the word of God, or the Messiah has come at the set time and with the proper credentials.

Looking back on history, there is only One who is documented to have met those requirements. And more, there is a written record of His coming found in the four gospels. Comparing what those writers say to what was prophesied before His coming, we can be perfectly confident that Jesus is, in fact, the fulfillment of God’s plans in this regard.

If we believe in Jesus, we have put our eggs in the right basket. Be sure to believe the gospel, the good news, concerning Jesus Christ!

Lord God, with a bit of study, we can be wholly confident that what was prophesied in the Hebrew Scriptures finds its fulfillment in Jesus Christ. As You sent Him to not only be the Messiah of the Jews, but to be the One who would render right judgment to the Gentiles, we praise You because of Him and through Him. Thank You for Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.

 

Matthew 12:17

Monday, 4 August 2025

that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by Isaiah the prophet, saying: Matthew 12:17

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at the “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen)

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“That it should be fulfilled, the ‘having been spoken’ through Isaiah the prophet, saying,” (CG).

In the previous verse, Jesus was noted as admonishing the crowds not to make Him apparent. Next, Mathew says, “That it should be fulfilled.”

As has been seen several times already, Jesus is the Subject of prophecy. Things were declared concerning Him, His coming, His work, and the effects of His work toward those He was sent to deliver.

Matthew returns to Scripture to provide more insights into the proclamation of the prophets, saying, “the ‘having been spoken’ through Isaiah the prophet, saying.”

As seen above, the last verse from Matthew noted Jesus not wanting to be made openly manifest at the time. Thus, we can conclude that something Matthew will draw from Isaiah will point to that.

Life application: Radio personality Joe Rogan made the news concerning his new idea concerning God. The article said, “he feared God ‘is actually created by human beings creating this infinitely intelligent thing that can essentially harness all of the available energy and power of the universe and create anything it wants.’”

The article also cited him, saying, “This whole idea of Jesus coming back, well maybe it’s real. Maybe we just completely misinterpreted these ancient scrolls and texts and what it really means is that we are going to give birth to this.”

Citing another author, the article said, “Yampolskiy, an author and researcher in AI safety, added to Rogan’s theory, suggesting that reality is just an ongoing cycle of Big Bangs – the explosion that kickstarted the universe – starting and restarting life over and over again.”

It’s a problem when people don’t take the time to think logically. These men are discussing infinites as being created by finites. Further, where is the Creator if something created does the creating? These are problems of logic that should be contemplated from time to time.

What is known as the First Principles will help a person to think logically about God. In understanding these First Principles, we can weed out errors in our thinking. In doing so, we can more fully appreciate the prophecies recorded in the Old Testament as they point to Jesus.

Was there a Creator? Could He tell the future? If so, what does this say about the coming of the Messiah and what He would do? Think about such questions as you study the word. As for the First Principles, a quick review of them is in order –

‎1. Being Is (B is) = The Principle of Existence
To say “There is no being” is self-refuting. One must exist in order to make the claim.

  1. Being Is Being (B is B) = The Principle of Identity
    To say “Being isn’t being” is self-refuting. One must be a being in order to make a claim about not being a being.
  2. Being Is Not Nonbeing (B is Not Non-B) = The Principle of Noncontradiction
    If being exists (see Principle #1), then it cannot be non-being. The principle is self-evident and undeniable.
  3. Either Being or Nonbeing (Either B or Non-B) = The Principle of the Excluded Middle
    If I exist (asking the question means I do), then I am being. If I am being, then I am not non-being. The principle is self-evident and undeniable; there is no wiggle room.
  4. Nonbeing Cannot Cause Being (Non-B>B) = The Principle of Causality
    Something cannot come from nothing (and we cannot have an infinite regress in matter (or being) – see Einstein and Relativity). The principle is undeniable.
  5. Contingent Being Cannot Cause Contingent Being (Bc>Bc) = The Principle of Contingency (or Dependency)
    This would lead to an infinite regress of causes, which is disproved by Relativity – Time, Space, and Matter came into existence simultaneously and are dependent upon each other. The principle is undeniable.
  6. Only Necessary Being Can Cause a Contingent Being (Bn —>Bc) = The Positive Principle of Modality
    A being that cannot Not exist must, therefore, exists if contingent beings exist. The principle is reducible to the undeniable.
  7. Necessary Being Cannot Cause A Necessary Being (Bn>Bn) = The Negative Principle of Modality
    The principle is undeniable. Only one Necessary Being can exist. Any being which exists apart from a Necessary Being is contingent and could Not exist. It is self-evident.
  8. Every Contingent Being Is Caused by a Necessary Being (Bn—>Bc) = The Principle of Existential Causality
    The fact that there are contingent beings (I think, therefore I am, but I am not necessary) necessitates a Necessary Being. We exist. Therefore, a Being that cannot Not exist must exist. The principle is undeniable in and of itself.
  9. Necessary Being Exists (Bn Exists) = Principle of Existential Necessity
    Contingent beings exist (see next principle); therefore, a Necessary Being must exist. The principle is reducible to the undeniable.
  10. Contingent Being Exists (Bc Exists) = Principle of Existential Contingency
    The principle is undeniable. To say “I (a contingent being) don’t exist” is self-refuting. I do exist (Principle 1), which is self-evident.
  11. Necessary Being Is Similar to Contingent Being(s) It Causes (Bn —similar —>Bc) = Principle of Analogy
    Nothing can exist that doesn’t reflect the nature of the Necessary Being. To state something doesn’t is self-refuting. The principle is undeniable.

Understanding the nature of God, reality, logic, etc., is indispensable in understanding why one religion is false and another may be true. Weeding out what is false through logic leaves us with one possibility concerning God. It is the God presented in Scripture who matches what is logically necessary.

It is our duty to read Scripture and see if what is presented there is an acceptable revelation of God. As fulfilled prophecy shows that the Bible is reliable, we can trust that the message of the Bible is from God, who knows the beginning from the end.

Lord God, help us to think clearly and logically as we approach theology. May our understanding of who You are and what You have done from the Bible give us reassurance for all of our days that what You have promised will, in fact, come to pass. Thank You for Your word, this wonderful word that reveals You. Amen.

 

1 Samuel 3:1-21 (Before It Was Denuded Unto Him)

Artwork by Douglas Kallerson

1 Samuel 3:1-21
Before It Was Denuded Unto Him

(Typed 12 May 2025) In the verses today, it said Samuel did not know the Lord because he was unaware of the word of the Lord. When the Lord called to him, he needed to have it explained that it was the Lord speaking to him. Then he was able to respond and receive the word intended for him to hear.

As we will see, this doesn’t mean he doesn’t know who the Lord is. Rather, he doesn’t have an intimate relationship with Him because His word was unknown.

If that concept doesn’t bring up memories of previous times I have spoken to you, it means that either you haven’t heard me speak before or you haven’t paid attention to what I have said to you.

If the former, welcome! I hope you will learn the lesson of the word of the Lord and apply it to yourself. If the latter, you must not pay attention while I’m speaking, because I repeat the same sentiment … a lot.

Pretty much everyone knows who the Lord is. But most of the world, including churches full of people, don’t know the Lord because they don’t know the word of the Lord.

Text Verse: “None of them shall teach his neighbor, and none his brother, saying, ‘Know the Lord,’ for all shall know Me, from the least of them to the greatest of them.” Hebrews 8:11

In this verse, the author of Hebrews was speaking of the people of Israel. They had been brought out of Egypt, and He had made a covenant with their fathers, but they didn’t continue in His covenant.

Samuel was at the place of the Lord, near the tabernacle in Shiloh, and yet he didn’t know the Lord until he knew the word of the Lord. The implication is that none of Israel knew the Lord because none of them knew the word of the Lord. It was lacking in Israel at the time.

My repeated statement to the people in this church is that you cannot know God unless you know Jesus, and you cannot know Jesus unless you know the word that tells of Jesus, meaning the Bible.

Jesus explicitly told Israel that in order to know the Father, they had to know Him. For us, the only source we have to know Jesus is the Bible. As such, if you do not know the Bible, you, like Samuel in this story, do not know the Lord.

Jesus is the Word of God, and therefore, despite “knowing God,” people do not “know God.” This is the sense of what is said about Samuel. This truth continues to this day. Only when the word of the Lord was revealed to him as such did he then come to know the Lord.

The word denude means to strip something of its covering. In verse 8, it says that the word of the Lord was not “revealed” to Samuel. The word is literally “denude.” The word of God is how the Lord strips Himself of what is unknown, making Himself known to us.

Without the Bible, the Lord and His word remain unknown to us. It cannot be stressed enough, and so I say it almost every time we are together. Please! Read your Bible. It is where the Lord is revealed to us. This is a great truth that is to be found in His superior word. And so, let us turn to that precious word once again, and… May God speak to us through His word today, and may His glorious name ever be praised.

I. For You Called to Me (verses 1-9)

Now the boy Samuel ministered to the Lord before Eli.

vehanaar shemuel meshareth eth Yehovah liphne eli – “And the lad, Samuel, attending Yehovah to faces Eli.” In Chapter 1, Samuel was born to Hannah. Once he was weaned, he was presented to Eli, having been “asked” to the Lord for all his days. After that, statements about Samuel were interspersed between other events in Chapter 2, leading to this –

“And Samuel, ministering faces Yehovah. Lad being girded ephod – linen.” 1 Samuel 2:18
“And he grew, the lad Samuel, with Yehovah.” 1 Samuel 2:21
“And the lad, Samuel, walking and growing, and good with Yehovah and also with men.” 1 Samuel 2:26
“And the lad, Samuel, attending Yehovah to faces Eli.” 1 Samuel 3:1

The meaning of this verse is that Samuel is ministering, not to Eli but to the Lord. He is doing it in the presence of Eli, as if Eli is superintending over his ministrations. Samuel means Asked from God. Eli means Foster Son.

1 (con’t) And the word of the Lord was rare in those days;

u-devar Yehovah hayah yaqar bayamim hahem – “And word Yehovah it is valuable in the days, the those.” The adjective, yaqar, valuable, is introduced here. It is derived from the verb yaqar, to be valuable or precious, which is derived from a root presumably meaning to be heavy.

Translating this as “rare” is probably a good paraphrase. When something is uncommon, it has more value. The more available something is, the less value is assigned to it. It’s why a handful of dirt is free. However, for a heavy load of dirt, there is added expense. This is next explained…

1 (con’t) there was no widespread revelation.

ein khazon niphrats – “Naught vision being breached.” Another new word, the noun khazon, vision, is introduced. It is derived from khazah, to gaze at or mentally perceive. This is the only time it is mentioned in 1 Samuel, and it only becomes common later in the Old Testament.

Of this type of visual or mental perception, the word parats is used. It signifies to break out. In Genesis 30:43, it says of Jacob –

“Thus the man became exceedingly prosperous [parats], and had large flocks, female and male servants, and camels and donkeys.”

The idea is that the wealth of Jacob broke out and spread before him. The direction of the Lord through vision was valuable because it was uncommon.

And it came to pass at that time, while Eli was lying down in his place,

vayhi bayom hahu veeli shokev bimeqomo – “And it was, in the day, the it, and Eli lying in his place.” As nothing has been said to define the day at this time, the words “the day, the it” are anticipatory of what lies ahead in verse 3:4. Eli is lying down…

2 (con’t) and when his eyes had begun to grow so dim that he could not see,

Though not a single translation is as mine, it reads: veeno hekhelu khehoth lo yukhal liroth – “And his eye – they caused to bore dim. Not he will be able to see.” The written Hebrew is not the same as the spoken –

veeno – And his eye (written)
veenav – And his eyes (spoken)

The change is probably deemed necessary because the verse goes from the singular, eye, to the plural, they. But there is no need to divert from the written word. In this case, the singular stands for the plural. This is seen elsewhere, such as –

“And thou sayest unto thy servants, Bring him down unto me, and I set mine eye upon him.” Genesis 44:21 (YLT)

The singular eye refers to the perception of both eyes. As such, this is probably referring not only to Eli’s failing eyesight in both eyes, but also his lack of receiving vision in his mental perception. It is an explanation for the coming account. There was no vision left to Eli…

and before the lamp of God went out

vener elohim terem yikhbeh – “And lamp God, before it will extinguish.” This is at the end of the night hours before the dawn comes, as can be deduced from Exodus 27:20, 21 –

“And you shall command the children of Israel that they bring you pure oil of pressed olives for the light, to cause the lamp to burn continually. 21 In the tabernacle of meeting, outside the veil which is before the Testimony, Aaron and his sons shall tend it from evening until morning before the Lord. It shall be a statute forever to their generations on behalf of the children of Israel.”

The wee hours of the morning would be the time of day when the lamp would be close to running out of oil.

3 (con’t) in the tabernacle of the Lord where the ark of God was, and while Samuel was lying down,

In the NKJV, the clauses are jumbled, and thus the sense is lost. Also, saying “tabernacle” is wrong: u-shemuel shokev beheikhal Yehovah asher sham aron elohim – “and Samuel lying in portico Yehovah, where there Ark God.” Samuel is not lying where the ark is. Rather, he is lying in the area where the ark is.

The ark was in the most holy place of the tabernacle. The lamp was in the holy place outside the veil of the most holy place. The words show the nearness of Samuel to the tabernacle. He is residing in the area where he can minister to the Lord before Eli. It is at this time…

that the Lord called Samuel.

vayiqra Yehovah el shemuel – “And He called, Yehovah, unto Samuel.” Yehovah calls with an audible voice to him. It is possible, but seemingly unlikely based on verse 10, that this was from the Most Holy Place where the ark was located. Rather, it seems more likely that His word is coming to Samuel’s ears directly in an audible form of revelation without regard to location.

4 (con’t) And he answered, “Here I am!”

vayomer hineni – “And he answered, ‘Behold me!’” Samuel hears a call. As a young man in the portico, placed there to tend to the needs of the tabernacle and those who ministered there, he naturally responds and gets up…

So he ran to Eli and said, “Here I am, for you called me.”

vayarats el eli vayomer hineni ki qaratha li – “And he ran unto Eli, and he said, ‘Behold me! For you called to me.’” Knowing that Eli’s eyes were bad, he would have assumed the old man needed help with something and rushed over to see how he could assist…

5 (con’t) And he said, “I did not call; lie down again.”

The verbs in Eli’s response are imperative: vayomer lo qarathi shuv shekhav – “And he said, ‘Not I called! You must return and you must lie down!’” The use of the imperative may indicate Eli was annoyed at the disturbance. Therefore, it says…

5 (con’t) And he went and lay down.

vayelekh vayishkav – “And he walked, and he laid down.” Samuel was probably thinking it had been a dream, but it had seemed real to him.

Then the Lord called yet again, “Samuel!”

vayoseph Yehovah qero od shemuel – “And He added, Yehovah – call again Samuel.” Although He probably called him by name, as in verse 10, that is probably not the intent. Rather, at this time, like before, it is a narrative explaining that the Lord called him.

6 (con’t) So Samuel arose and went to Eli, and said, “Here I am, for you called me.” He answered, “I did not call, my son; lie down again.”

vayaqam shemuel vayelekh el eli vayomer hineni ki qaratha li vayomer lo qarathi veni shuv shekhav – “And he arose, Samuel, and he walked unto Eli, and he said, ‘Behold me! For you called to me.’ And he said, ‘Not I called, my son! You must return and you must lie down!’” This time, it doesn’t say he ran to Eli. Rather, he got up and went to him, probably without feeling rushed like the first time. Maybe he thought Eli was calling out in a dream.

It could be that the sharp response of Eli last time has made Samuel leery about annoying him. And that seems to be what happened because Eli again uses the same imperative verbs, repeating himself. Both of them are probably confused at this point. Thus, the narrator provides an explanatory insert…

(Now Samuel did not yet know the Lord, nor was the word of the Lord yet revealed to him.)

u-shemuel terem yada eth Yehovah veterem yigaleh elav devar Yehovah – “And Samuel – before he knew Yehovah, and before it was denuded unto him word Yehovah.” The words introduce the subject, “And Samuel.” They next explain his state.

Not knowing Yehovah does not mean he didn’t know about Him. It means he didn’t have a personal connection to Him through divine revelation (word Yehovah). Having the word denuded indicates the intimate connection between the word and the Lord Himself. When the word is uncovered, the Lord is made known.

And the Lord called Samuel again the third time. So he arose and went to Eli, and said, “Here I am, for you did call me.”
Then Eli perceived that the Lord had called the boy.

vayoseph Yehovah qero shemuel bashelishith vayaqam vayelekh el eli vayomer hineni ki qaratha li vayaven eli ki Yehovah qore lanaar – “And He added, Yehovah – call Samuel in the third. And he arose, and he walked unto Eli, and he said, ‘Behold me! For you called to me!’ And he discerned, Eli, for Yehovah calling to the lad.” Being a bit slow on the uptake, Eli finally realizes what is going on. He probably didn’t expect the word to come to Samuel like this, but now he has to admit it has taken place.

Ellicott rightly says, “…this ignorance of Samuel served God’s design, as it gave Eli the fuller assurance of the truth of God’s call and message to Samuel.”

Therefore Eli said to Samuel, “Go, lie down; and it shall be, if He calls you, that you must say, ‘Speak, Lord, for Your servant hears.’” So Samuel went and lay down in his place.

vayomer eli lishemuel lekh shekhav vehayah im yiqra elekha veamarta daber Yehovah ki shomea avdekha vayelekh shemuel vayishkav bimeqomo – “And he said, Eli to Samuel, ‘You must walk! You must lie down! And it became if He will call unto you, and you said, “You must speak, Yehovah, for hearing – your servant.”’ And he walked, Samuel, and he laid down in his place.”

Again using imperatives, but this time understanding the situation, Eli urges him to go lie down again in anticipation of another calling. As for the words, “You must speak, Yehovah,” this is one of many verses that disproves the common Jewish teaching that people never spoke the divine name. The text would not say he was to do so if they never did. Despite Eli’s instructions, Samuel doesn’t address Him by name…

10 Now the Lord came and stood and called as at other times, “Samuel! Samuel!”
And Samuel answered, “Speak, for Your servant hears.”

vayavo Yehovah vayithyatsav vayiqra khepaam bepaam shemuel shemuel vayomer shemuel daber ki shomea avdekha – “And He came, Yehovah, and He will station Himself. And He called, according to beat in beat, ‘Samuel, Samuel.’ And he said, Samuel, ‘You must speak, for hearing, Your servant.’” The reflexive verb, translated as “He will station Himself,” does not have to mean that the Lord is physically present there, although that is also not out of the question.

It may mean that the Lord’s presence, regardless of any physical manifestation, has manifested Himself. The word coming in verse 15 describes a sort of manifestation, like looking in a mirror.

The words “according to beat, in beat” are a Hebraism meaning “done as it was done before.” The Lord called for Samuel, and he responded accordingly…

The word of God, holy and pure
Given to us from His wise and loving hand
Through it, our faith can be strong and sure
Through it, the Lord’s will we understand

What is right for salvation unto life?
How can we know when something is wrong?
Through the word, we can weed out theological strife
And have doctrine sure, sound, and strong

Praise be to God for this precious word
Praise to Him who has shown us what is true and right
The pages of the Bible are a precious cutting sword
Weeding out falsity and revealing His glorious light

II. Until Vanishment (verses 11-21)

11 Then the Lord said to Samuel: “Behold, I will do something in Israel at which both ears of everyone who hears it will tingle.

vayomer Yehovah el shemuel hineh anoki oseh davar beyisrael asher kal shomeo tetsilenah shete azenav – “And He said, Yehovah, unto Samuel, ‘Behold! I doing word in Israel which all hearing it, they will tinkle, two his ears.’” The Lord introduces a word, tsalal, signifying to tinkle as through vibration. It is used here to describe a coming disaster.

It will be used in a similar fashion concerning the destruction of Jerusalem in 2 Kings 21:2 and Jeremiah 19:3. The last use will be in Habakkuk 3:16 when referring to the quivering of lips while in distress. Thus, this is an expression of horrified shock, as if the ears are ringing from the vibration of bad news.

12 In that day I will perform against Eli all that I have spoken concerning his house, from beginning to end.

bayom ha’hu aqim el eli eth kal asher dibarti el beitho hakhel vekhaleh – “In the day, the it, I must cause to rise unto Eli all which I spoke unto his house, beginning and completing.” The words “all which I spoke” refer to the words of the Lord through the man of God in verses 2:27-36. Saying “beginning and completing” means that nothing that He spoke would be omitted.

The Lord is repeating this to Samuel so that he is aware of what will take place…

13 For I have told him that I will judge his house forever for the iniquity which he knows,

vehigadti lo ki shophet ani eth beitho ad olam ba’avon asher yada – “For I caused to disclose to him, for judging, I, his house – until vanishment – in perversity which he knew.” The meaning of “caused to disclose” is that God sent His messenger to Eli to tell him what was coming in the judgment He would mete out.

The “perversity which he knew” is…

13 (con’t) because his sons made themselves vile, and he did not restrain them.

ki meqalelim lahem banav velo khihah bam – “For trivializing to them, his sons, and not he rebuked in them.” The word qalal means to be or make light. Just as honoring someone gives the sense of heaviness, trivializing someone is to make them light.

One can get the sense from Genesis 12:3, “And let me bless ‘blessing you,’ and trivializing you – I will execrate.” The meaning is that the Lord promised to bless those blessing Abraham, but He would execrate those who trivialized (made light of) him.

The sons of Eli had trivialized themselves despite their office, which demanded that they honor the Lord through their actions. It was Eli’s responsibility to rebuke them, but he failed to do so. Therefore, judgment was coming upon Eli’s house.

14 And therefore I have sworn to the house of Eli that the iniquity of Eli’s house shall not be atoned for by sacrifice or offering forever.”

velakhen nishbati leveith eli im yithekaper avon beith eli bezevakh u-beminkhah ad olam – “And thus I was sevened to house Eli if it will atone itself, perversity house Eli, in sacrifice and in present until vanishment.” The word shava signifies to swear. However, it is derived from sheva, seven, the number of spiritual perfection.

The idea is that of completion, as if having repeated a declaration seven times. Saying “I was sevened” means that the Lord has determined and affirmed the matter. In this case, sacrifices and presents required by the law will never atone for their conduct again.

The repetition of ad olam, until vanishment, from the previous verse fully explains the matter. The judgment is determined, and it will be permanent. With that understood, it next says…

15 So Samuel lay down until morning, and opened the doors of the house of the Lord.

vayishkav shemuel ad ha’boqer vayiphtakh eth dalthoth beith Yehovah – “And he will lie, Samuel, until the morning. And he will open doors, house Yehovah.” This is the first reference to something other than the tabernacle that the Lord directed to be constructed while in the wilderness. That was a movable tent with a surrounding courtyard that was also movable.

However, now being at Shiloh, some sort of edifice was built around it, or instead of it, or part of it. Samuel’s duties apparently included the opening of these doors. The matter-of-fact nature of the words signifies that this was a regular occurrence.

15 (con’t) And Samuel was afraid to tell Eli the vision.

u-shemuel yare mehagid eth hamareah el eli – “And Samuel, he feared from causing to declare the manifestation unto Eli.” The word here, mareah signifies a type of vision. In Exodus 38:8, it is used of the bronze mirrors of the women who served at the tabernacle. Therefore, it is some type of manifestation, whether physical or merely visual. Despite his fear of speaking…

16 Then Eli called Samuel and said, “Samuel, my son!”
He answered, “Here I am.”

vayiqra eli eth shemuel vayomer shemuel beni vayomer hineni – “And he will call, Eli, Samuel. And he will say, ‘Samuel, my son.’ And he will say, ‘Behold me!’” A friendly relationship is noted in the words “my son.” But it is also a note of authority from a greater to a lesser. It is how Joshua addressed Achan after his sin was exposed through the casting of the lot.

Samuel acknowledges this state of authority in his response, awaiting Eli’s continued words…

17 And he said, “What is the word that the Lord spoke to you?

Rather, leaving the source somewhat indefinite: vayomer mah ha’davar asher diber elekha – “And he will say, ‘What the word which He spoke unto you?’” Eli doesn’t have to say, “the Lord.” It is understood who the word came from. He next intensifies his words…

17 (con’t) Please do not hide it from me.

al na tekhakhed mimeni – “Not, I pray, you will secrete from me.” He asked for the word of the Lord. Now he asks for the entire word without anything kept back. In other words, “Don’t paraphrase his words, don’t generalize them, and don’t attempt to withhold them either.” He is asking for an exacting account of what was said. He then intensifies his words further…

17 (con’t) God do so to you, and more also, if you hide anything from me of all the things that He said to you.”

koh yaaseh lekha elohim vekhoh yosiph im tekhakhed mimeni davar mikal ha’davar asher diber elekha – “Thus He will do to you, God, and thus He will cause to add, if you will secrete from me word from all the word which he spoke unto you.’” This is a particular adjuration that began in Ruth and continues until 2 Kings.

It is used to form an absolute assertion or a firm adjuration. Associated with it comes an implied threat upon the speaker or the one being spoken to, sometimes for noncompliance and sometimes as a matter of fact.

In this case, Eli is adjuring Samuel to speak as requested. If he fails to do so, he will ask God to take corrective action on Samuel even more severe than he knows is coming upon him, which he knows is coming because the Lord has circumvented him and gone to Samuel. Therefore…

18 Then Samuel told him everything, and hid nothing from him. And he said, “It is the Lord. Let Him do what seems good to Him.”

vayaged lo shemuel eth kal ha’devarim velo khikhed mimenu vayomer Yehovah hu ha’tov beenav yaaseh – “And he caused to declare to him, Samuel, all the words. And not he secreted from him. And he will say, ‘“Yehovah, He. The good in his eyes He will do.’” The NKJV gives the sense, even if a bit of a paraphrase.

Eli is resigned to the word, knowing it will come about. At the same time, he indicates his understanding that the Lord is just and fair. Despite his weakness and unprofitableness as a judge and priest, he was still faithful to accept the will of the Lord.

19 So Samuel grew, and the Lord was with him and let none of his words fall to the ground.

vayigdal shemuel veYehovah hayah imo velo hipil mikal devarav artsah – “And he will grow, Samuel. And Yehovah, He was with him. And not He caused to fall from all his words, ground-ward.” It seems unlikely that this refers to Samuel’s words, but the words of the Lord through Samuel. The verb is causative. As such, the Lord is upholding the prophecies Samuel spoke. This is similar to other instances –

“Blessed be the Lord, who has given rest to His people Israel, according to all that He promised. There has not failed one word of all His good promise, which He promised through His servant Moses.” 1 Kings 8:56

20 And all Israel from Dan to Beersheba knew that Samuel had been established as a prophet of the Lord.

vayeda kal Yisrael midan vead beer shava ki neeman shemuel lenavi laYehovah – “And it will know, all Israel, from Dan and until Beer-Sheba, for being faithful, Samuel, to prophet to Yehovah.” This is the second of seven times this phrase is used in the Old Testament. It will be used twice in reverse in the Chronicles, saying, “from Beersheba to Dan.” It signifies the entirety of the land and people of Israel within the borders of Canaan.

Dan is the northernmost point of reference, while Beersheba is the southernmost.

Dan means Judge. Beersheba means both Well of Seven and Well of Oath. As for the statement about Samuel, the same word was used when referring to Moses –

“Not so with My servant Moses;
He is faithful in all My house.” Numbers 12:7

Moses was faithful in the Lord’s house, and Samuel is a faithful prophet to the Lord.

21 Then the Lord appeared again in Shiloh.

vayoseph Yehovah leheraoh veshiloh – “And He will cause to add, Yehovah, to be seen in Shiloh.” The chapter began with no vision coming through. Now, at the end of the chapter, that is turned around. Because of Samuel, there is vision once again. Shiloh means Tranquility.

The appearing of the Lord is explained in the next words…

*21 (fin) For the Lord revealed Himself to Samuel in Shiloh by the word of the Lord.

ki niglah Y’hovah el shemuel beshilo bidvar Yehovah – “For He was denuded, Yehovah, unto Samuel in Shilo in word Yehovah.” Notice that the final h drops off Shiloh of the previous clause.  The appearance of the Lord is through the word of the Lord. It is how the Lord reveals Himself.

From this point, Samuel will be mentioned one more time in verse 4:1 and then not again until verse 7:2.

The Word of God – holy, pure, and perfect too
It is given to satisfy man’s weary soul
Let us take an eternal view
And come to know this precious scroll

In the Book of Life, our names will be
We pursued His word and found Jesus
The Lord’s redeemed by the glassy sea
Great things God has done for us

Open it! The precious Book of Life
Accept what it says, it is holy and true
Through the word comes ending of the strife
And the beginning of something new

III. Know the Lord

In the verses today, it noted Samuel ministering to the Lord before Eli. It is reflective of Christ’s work to the Lord being accomplished before the precepts of the law, represented by Eli, Foster Son, meaning the state of being under the law.

That the word of the Lord was valuable, meaning rare, in those days is an excellent representation of the state of Israel. There was no prophetic utterance during the intertestamental period from the time of Malachi until the coming of John the Baptist, a period of about 430 years.

Eli is described as lying down and not being able to see. It is an excellent description of the law at that time. It was old, ineffective, and unable to perceive its unprofitableness. The singular use of eye instead of eyes shows the myopic nature of the law. Thus, they, meaning vision and prophecy, were lost to it.

The note about the lamp of God going out is an indication that the light of the law, which only anticipated the coming of Christ, would go out at the dawning of the day. This is exactingly reflected in Jesus’ words about John –

“If I bear witness of Myself, My witness is not true. 32 There is another who bears witness of Me, and I know that the witness which He witnesses of Me is true. 33 You have sent to John, and he has borne witness to the truth. 34 Yet I do not receive testimony from man, but I say these things that you may be saved. 35 He was the burning and shining lamp, and you were willing for a time to rejoice in his light. 36 But I have a greater witness than John’s; for the works which the Father has given Me to finish—the very works that I do—bear witness of Me, that the Father has sent Me.” John 5:31-36

John was the last prophet before Jesus. He was the end of the burning, shining lamp of the law, which was given to anticipate the coming of Christ. With his arrival, the lamp was all but through.

The threefold calling by the Lord to Samuel, Asked from God, who represents the seed of the state of grace (Hannah), signifies the divine completeness of the time of the law. The seed of the state of grace is being called while under the law (Eli, Foster Son), alerting it that the time had come.

The back-and-forth between Samuel and Eli is given to reveal this. Finally, the Lord’s calling is responded to by Samuel, and the assurance was that the Lord’s prophecy against Eli, Foster Son, would be fulfilled in its entirety (begging and completing). It would be a judgment on his house until vanishment, meaning forever. Every word would be accomplished, without anything being left undone.

The deeds of Eli’s sons are particularly highlighted, along with his not restraining them. Though their names are not used in this passage, remembering them is appropriate: My Hollow and Mouth of Brass (meaning Mouth of Judgment).

Eli is the state of those under law. Hophni is not the law itself but the medium by which the Lord conducted his affairs. The law is the filling of that medium. It is that which fills the Hollow. Phinehas is the judgment of the law. Those who had administered the law had trivialized these things, and nothing was said about it in correction.

For this reason, the Lord told Samuel, adamantly affirming, that sacrifices and presents (the basis for atonement under the law) would never atone for such transgressions again, forever.

The meaning of these verses is clear: the state of the law (Eli) and its house (meaning the roles of Hophni and Phinehas) would be ended forever. The sacrifices and offerings of the law would no longer be effective.

The reason this was spoken by the Lord to Samuel, who had not yet known the word of the Lord, was rightly noted by Ellicott, “this ignorance of Samuel served God’s design, as it gave Eli the fuller assurance of the truth of God’s call and message to Samuel.”

Those under law would never imagine that the law would end were it not for the Lord’s word to be spoken through the seed of grace. This fact is proven true to this day as those under the law still disregard the premise entirely, and even those who were called by grace continually get seduced back into law observance.

The final three verses are not given as a chronological marker that necessarily occurs before the events of Chapters 4 to 6. They simply form points of fact –

1) Samuel grew and the Lord was with him, and He caused none of his words to fall groundward, 2) All Israel, from Dan to Beersheba, knew that Samuel had been established a prophet of the Lord, and 3) Yehovah appeared again in Shiloh and he was denuded (made fully known) unto Samuel “in Shilo in word Yehovah.”

Being points of fact, they are to be offset from the rest of the narrative. From there, the opening clause of Chapter 4 will then be followed by a long parenthetical thought that ends in Chapter 7. After the events of those chapters are explained, I will explain why this is so.

The explanation for the contents of the chapter is complete, except for those points. The time of the law had a promised end. It was to be replaced by the time of grace. Jesus is the Seed of grace that allows us to likewise become the seed of grace, represented by Samuel and the “seven” that Hannah’s song proclaimed were born to her.

Samuel has thus far dealt almost exclusively with the idea of law versus grace. God is telling the world, beginning with Israel, both in the word and in historical lessons, that the law is incapable of restoring us to Him. Only through Jesus’ fulfillment of it is that restoration possible.

But this brings us back to the main point of the opening comments today. How can you know if you are obligated to observe the law, some select parts of it, or if it is entirely set aside unless you know the Bible?

I can tell you until I am blue in the face, but if I die this afternoon (then I will really be blue in the face!), someone else will take my place in your life. That person may say just the opposite of what I tell you. “Charlie didn’t know what he was talking about! If you eat pork, you can’t be saved.”

And so, for the rest of your life, you give up on ham, pork, chitlins, bacon (oh, bacon!), and all of the other delicious byproducts that come from our porky friends. What a waste! And it is all because you failed to check the manual.

Your walk with the Lord is ultimately up to you. My advice is that you make it a good one by knowing what He has done for you. In doing so, you will know of the freedom that He offers to the people of the world. Be sure to know the Lord by knowing His word.

Closing Verse: “And Pharaoh said, ‘Who is the Lord, that I should obey His voice to let Israel go? I do not know the Lord, nor will I let Israel go.” Exodus 5:2

Next Week: 1 Samuel 4:1-11 To make a rhyme, I made up a word, envampment… (He Came, God, Unto the Encampment) (8th 1 Samuel Sermon)

The Lord has you exactly where He wants you. He has a good plan and purpose for you. He alone is the perfect example of love – untarnished, unblemished, and completely pure and holy. He offers this love to you. So, follow Him, live for Him, and trust Him, and He will do marvelous things for you and through you.

 

1 Samuel 3:1-21 (CG)

And the lad, Samuel, attending Yehovah to faces Eli. And word Yehovah it is valuable in the days, the those. Naught vision being breached. 2 And it was, in the day, the it, and Eli lying in his place. And his eye – they caused to bore dim. Not he will be able to see. 3 And lamp God, before it will extinguish, and Samuel lying in portico Yehovah, where there Ark God. 4 And He called, Yehovah, unto Samuel. And he answered, “Behold me!” 5 And he ran unto Eli, and he said, “Behold me! For you called to me.”

And he said, “Not I called! You must return and you must lie down!” And he walked, and he laid down.”

6 And He added, Yehovah – call again Samuel.

And he arose, Samuel, and he walked unto Eli, and he said, “Behold me! For you called to me.” And he said, “Not I called, my son! You must return and you must lie down!” 7 (And Samuel – before he knew Yehovah, and before it was denuded unto him word Yehovah.)

8 And He added, Yehovah – call Samuel in the third. And he arose, and he walked unto Eli, and he said, “Behold me! For you called to me!”

And he discerned, Eli, for Yehovah calling to the lad. 9 And he said, Eli to Samuel, “You must walk! You must lie down! And it will be if He will call unto you, and you will say, ‘You must speak, Yehovah, for hearing – your servant.” And he walked, Samuel, and he laid down in his place.

10 And He came, Yehovah, and He will station Himself. And He called, according to beat in beat, “Samuel, Samuel.”

And he said, Samuel, “You must speak, for hearing, Your servant.”

11 And He said, Yehovah, unto Samuel, “Behold! I doing word in Israel which all hearing it, they will tinkle, two his ears. 12 In the day, the it, I must cause to rise unto Eli all which I spoke unto his house, beginning and completing. 13 For I have caused to disclose to him, for judging, I, his house – until vanishment – in perversity which he knew. For trivializing to them, his sons, and not he rebuked in them. 14 And thus I was sevened to house Eli if it will atone itself, perversity house Eli, in sacrifice and in present until vanishment.”

15 And he will lie, Samuel, until the morning. And he will open doors, house Yehovah. And Samuel, he feared from causing to declare the manifestation unto Eli. 16 And he will call, Eli, Samuel. And he will say, “Samuel, my son.”

And he will say, “Behold me!”

17 And he will say, “What the word which He spoke unto you? Not, I pray, you will secrete from me. Thus He will do to you, God, and thus He will cause to add, if you will secrete from me word from all the word which he spoke unto you. 18 And he caused to declare to him, Samuel, all the words. And not he secreted from him. And he will say, “Yehovah, He. The good in his eyes He will do.”

19 And he will grow, Samuel. And Yehovah, He was with him. And not he caused to fall from all His words, ground-ward. 20 And it will know, all Israel, from Dan and until Beer-Sheba, for being faithful, Samuel, to prophet to Yehovah. 21 And He will cause to add, Yehovah, to be seen in Shiloh. For He was denuded, Yehovah, unto Samuel in Shilo in word Yehovah.

 

1 Samuel 3:1-21 (NKJV)

Now the boy Samuel ministered to the Lord before Eli. And the word of the Lord was rare in those days; there was no widespread revelation. And it came to pass at that time, while Eli was lying down in his place, and when his eyes had begun to grow so dim that he could not see, and before the lamp of God went out in the tabernacle of the Lord where the ark of God was, and while Samuel was lying down, that the Lord called Samuel. And he answered, “Here I am!” So he ran to Eli and said, “Here I am, for you called me.”

And he said, “I did not call; lie down again.” And he went and lay down.

Then the Lord called yet again, “Samuel!”

So Samuel arose and went to Eli, and said, “Here I am, for you called me.” He answered, “I did not call, my son; lie down again.” (Now Samuel did not yet know the Lord, nor was the word of the Lord yet revealed to him.)

And the Lord called Samuel again the third time. So he arose and went to Eli, and said, “Here I am, for you did call me.”

Then Eli perceived that the Lord had called the boy. Therefore Eli said to Samuel, “Go, lie down; and it shall be, if He calls you, that you must say, ‘Speak, Lord, for Your servant hears.’” So Samuel went and lay down in his place.

10 Now the Lord came and stood and called as at other times, “Samuel! Samuel!”

And Samuel answered, “Speak, for Your servant hears.”

11 Then the Lord said to Samuel: “Behold, I will do something in Israel at which both ears of everyone who hears it will tingle. 12 In that day I will perform against Eli all that I have spoken concerning his house, from beginning to end. 13 For I have told him that I will judge his house forever for the iniquity which he knows, because his sons made themselves vile, and he did not restrain them. 14 And therefore I have sworn to the house of Eli that the iniquity of Eli’s house shall not be atoned for by sacrifice or offering forever.”

15 So Samuel lay down until morning, and opened the doors of the house of the Lord. And Samuel was afraid to tell Eli the vision. 16 Then Eli called Samuel and said, “Samuel, my son!”

He answered, “Here I am.”

17 And he said, “What is the word that the Lord spoke to you? Please do not hide it from me. God do so to you, and more also, if you hide anything from me of all the things that He said to you.” 18 Then Samuel told him everything, and hid nothing from him. And he said, “It is the Lord. Let Him do what seems good to Him.”

19 So Samuel grew, and the Lord was with him and let none of his words fall to the ground. 20 And all Israel from Dan to Beersheba knew that Samuel had been established as a prophet of the Lord. 21 Then the Lord appeared again in Shiloh. For the Lord revealed Himself to Samuel in Shiloh by the word of the Lord.