Matthew 22:24

Wednesday, 2 September 2026

saying: “Teacher, Moses said that if a man dies, having no children, his brother shall marry his wife and raise up offspring for his brother. Matthew 22:24

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at the “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen)

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“…saying, ‘Teacher, Moses, he said if anyone, he should die not having children, he will affinitize the ‘brother, his, the wife, his’, and he will raise seed – the ‘brother, his’.’” (CG)

In the previous verse, the Sadducees, who say there is no resurrection, came to Jesus to query Him, “saying, ‘Teacher, Moses, he said if anyone, he should die not having children, he will affinitize the ‘brother, his, the wife, his’.’”

A new word is seen here, epigambreuó, to affinity with. It is from epi, upon, and gamos, a marriage or wedding. This is its only use in the New Testament. Of this word, Vincent’s Word Studies says –

“From γαμβρός [gambros], a word used in classical Greek to denote any one connected by marriage’ a brother-in-law, father-in-law, even a bridegroom. The word is appropriate here because it refers to marriage between marriage-relatives.”

The matter brought by the Sadducees refers especially to a levirate type of marriage. That is described in Deuteronomy 25 –

“If brothers dwell together, and one of them dies and has no son, the widow of the dead man shall not be married to a stranger outside the family; her husband’s brother shall go in to her, take her as his wife, and perform the duty of a husband’s brother to her. And it shall be that the firstborn son which she bears will succeed to the name of his dead brother, that his name may not be blotted out of Israel. But if the man does not want to take his brother’s wife, then let his brother’s wife go up to the gate to the elders, and say, ‘My husband’s brother refuses to raise up a name to his brother in Israel; he will not perform the duty of my husband’s brother.’ Then the elders of his city shall call him and speak to him. But if he stands firm and says, ‘I do not want to take her,’ then his brother’s wife shall come to him in the presence of the elders, remove his sandal from his foot, spit in his face, and answer and say, ‘So shall it be done to the man who will not build up his brother’s house.’ 10 And his name shall be called in Israel, ‘The house of him who had his sandal removed.’” Deuteronomy 25:5-10

An example of such a marriage is found in the account of Tamar and the sons of Judah in Genesis 38. Of the Sadducees’ question, they continue their words to Jesus, saying, “and he will raise seed – the ‘brother, his’.” This is just what was described by Moses in Deuteronomy 25.

Based on this mandate, the Sadducees will propose a question to Jesus.

Life application: The Unwilling Brother. Why was this ancient rite included in the Law of Moses? As noted, the precept predates the law. A brother was to step in and perform the duty of the brother-in-law. The account in Deuteronomy provides a short review of the inability of the law to bring forth children.

Man, once connected to God, is the dead husband, typified by Adam. The woman represents humanity. A son, in this scenario, would indicate a spiritual reconnection to God. Adam, the man who was once spiritually alive, died and left her no such children.

The purpose of Genesis 38 was to set that idea as a precedent. The story there is one that anticipates the restoration of this spiritual connection to God. To understand that passage, refer to the Genesis 38 sermons from the Superior Word. A full typological explanation is provided there.

Life under the Law of Moses is typologically given as the brother. It is, ostensibly, available to give children to the woman as a brother-in-law. As it says in Leviticus 18 –

“And you will guard My enactments and My verdicts, which he will do them, the man, and he will live in them. I, Yehovah.” Leviticus 18:5 (CG)

However, “being under law” does not delight in the woman, and is – in fact – in a state that is at enmity with her. Paul states that explicitly in Ephesians 2 –

“For He Himself is our peace, who has made both one, and has broken down the middle wall of separation, 15 having abolished in His flesh the enmity, that is, the law of commandments contained in ordinances, so as to create in Himself one new man from the two, thus making peace.” Ephesians 2:14, 15

In typology, life under the law will not perform the duty to give the woman a son. Hence, she performs the rite of disgracing him and stripping him of any authority to ever have any right to her again. However, Christ is of the woman, meaning humanity. And of Him, it says in the law itself –

“Then I said, ‘Behold, I come;
In the scroll of the book it is written of me.
I delight [khapets] to do Your will, O my God,
And Your law is within my heart.’” Psalm 40:7, 8

Because life under the law would not perform the duty, as is evidenced in the 1400+ years of it bringing no one to restoration with God, Christ came to do it. He delighted to do the will of God, and He performs what life under the law was unwilling to perform.

In this, He – as a member of humanity – took away the authority of the law and brought it to its end. Thus, life under the law is “The house of him who had his sandal removed.”

This is indicated in Paul’s words to those at Corinth, saying, “And so it is written, ‘The first man Adam became a living being.’ The last Adam became a life-giving spirit” (1 Corinthians 15:45). God in Christ is the nearer brother who could, and who did, give a Son, His Firstborn, to the barren woman. From there, life is restored to any who come to Him.

The lesson: There are no born-again children in humanity through life under the law, not before, nor will there ever be. Only in Christ is there a delight in bringing children to God through humanity. In this Son comes a new family, among whom Christ Jesus is the Firstborn.

Deuteronomy 25 is a beautiful passage, found in the law, that conveys to us the truth that life under law is insufficient to save anyone. Only in Christ’s fulfillment of the law is there any hope for fallen man. That thought is perfectly expressed by Paul in Romans 3 –

“But now the righteousness of God apart from the law is revealed, being witnessed by the Law and the Prophets22 even the righteousness of God, through faith in Jesus Christ, to all and on all who believe.” Romans 3:21, 22

The law itself witnesses to what God was going to do in Christ. Righteousness is imputed to those who simply reach out to God through Him, by faith, and accept what He has done.

If you have friends or family stuck in some law-observant church, keep pecking away at them. Their time is short, and they have an infinitely high hill to climb going that route. They won’t make it. Trust in Christ, rest in Christ, and put away your futile attempts at pleasing God through any other avenue than Jesus Christ.

He is the answer to the problem that separates us from God. And surprisingly, the law itself testifies to that fact. Thank God for Jesus Christ.

We are so grateful to You, O God, for sending Jesus to be our Kinsman Redeemer, bringing us back to Yourself through Him. We thank You for the eternal life that is granted to us through what Jesus has done. Thank You for ever and ever. Amen.

Matthew 22:23

Tuesday, 1 September 2026

The same day the Sadducees, who say there is no resurrection, came to Him and asked Him, Matthew 22:23

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at the “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen)

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“In that, the ‘day’, they approached Him, Sadducees (saying not is ‘resurrection’), and they queried Him.” (CG)

In the previous verse, the Pharisees and Herodians marveled at Jesus’ words and departed. Maybe having seen or heard about this, another group comes forward, ready to test Him. Matthew records, “In that, the ‘day’, they approached Him, Sadducees.”

This sect was first seen, along with the Pharisees, in Matthew 3:7. This was at the time John the Baptist was baptizing in the Jordan. They were noted again, several times in Matthew 16.

Their specific interaction at that time was with Jesus as they, along with the Pharisees, asked for a sign from heaven. Of this group of religious leaders, Matthew specifically notes a point of doctrine that they held to, which is “(saying not is ‘resurrection’).”

Surprisingly, this is a new word in Scripture, anastasis, a standing up again. It is from the word an anistémi, to stand up. That is prefixed with the word ana, up, but used in various other ways in a distributive manner. In the New Testament, other than Luke 2:34, anastasis is always used in reference to a resurrection. In Luke 2:34, it says –

“Then Simeon blessed them, and said to Mary His mother, ‘Behold, this Child is destined for the fall and rising [anastasis] of many in Israel, and for a sign which will be spoken against…”

As for the reason they have come to Jesus, Matthew records, “and they queried Him.” The word used to describe their query is one of deliberate asking. Thus, their query is specifically designed to glean an answer or response from Jesus about a matter.

Life application: In 1 Corinthians 15, Paul writes the following –

“Now if Christ is preached that He has been raised from the dead, how do some among you say that there is no resurrection of the dead? 13 But if there is no resurrection of the dead, then Christ is not risen. 14 And if Christ is not risen, then our preaching is empty and your faith is also empty. 15 Yes, and we are found false witnesses of God, because we have testified of God that He raised up Christ, whom He did not raise up—if in fact the dead do not rise. 16 For if the dead do not rise, then Christ is not risen. 17 And if Christ is not risen, your faith is futile; you are still in your sins! 18 Then also those who have fallen asleep in Christ have perished. 19 If in this life only we have hope in Christ, we are of all men the most pitiable.” 1 Corinthians 15:12-19

The key point of Christian faith is that Jesus Christ rose from the dead. The cross of Christ is the key focus of our faith, and the point on which every Christian’s boast should be directed (see Galatians 6:14), but a crucifixion without a subsequent resurrection is a pointless place to direct one’s hope.

Many people have been crucified in human history. They died, and they remain dead. But Jesus was resurrected from the tomb. This event then solidifies the meaning of the cross. Someone can say, “I will give up my life to save another.” And, in fact, many have done that throughout human history.

But that type of saving is only to prolong the temporary life we live. A soldier could jump on a grenade to save his fellow soldier, but the saved soldier could be shot dead thirty seconds later. Both are dead and both will remain dead.

However, no human can die for another’s sin when they have already inherited Adam’s fallen nature. The sin is there in us from the moment we are conceived. Various pagan religions sacrificed babies, young virgins, etc., all hoping for some type of atonement, but such a sacrifice is ineffectual because of original sin.

Jesus, however, was born without Adam’s fallen nature. His father is God. Thus, with a human mother, He is the God/Man. He was born without sin, He lived under the law without sinning, and He died in fulfilment of the law, taking away sin committed under law for those who trust in Him.

The resurrection proves that our sin is atoned for. It also proves that we are eternally saved (because we are no longer under law, and it is by law that sin is imputed). The resurrection also proves that Jesus is God. As all humans who descend from Adam have sin through their father, and because Jesus resurrected, it proves that Jesus’ Father is God.

As all beings reproduce after their own kind, the resurrection provides irrefutable proof that Jesus Christ is the God/Man. Hope? Hope? We have the greatest hope of all when we put our trust in Jesus Christ. Nothing can ever separate us from God again when we come to Him through Jesus Christ.

Let us remember this as we pass through this world of toil, trouble, trial, and times of temptation or turmoil. These things are bound to come, but Christ has overcome the world. For those who are in Him, they too have overcome the world.

Praise God for Jesus Christ our Lord!

We praise and exalt You for what You have done for us, O God. The majesty of what You have done is more wonderful than all else. Thank You for the giving of Jesus Christ our Lord, in whom, we now have the hope of the resurrection to eternal life. Amen.

Matthew 22:22

Monday, 31 August 2026

When they had heard these words, they marveled, and left Him and went their way. Matthew 22:22

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at the “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen)

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“And having heard, they wondered, and having left Him, they departed.” (CG).

In the previous verse, Jesus told those He was talking to that, based on the image and inscription of their own coin, they needed to render unto Caesar what was to Caesar, and to God what was to God. With that stated, it next says, “And having heard, they wondered.”

Once the thought-process of such a statement is known, people can easily slip into the thinking that Jesus’ words would have been easily presented and that anyone could come to the same conclusion. “Surely I would have figured that out!” But this is not true.

The dismissal of what Jesus said in this manner will usually come from those who already have a bias against the Christian message. In other words, a rabbi may be shown this account, and his answer might be, “Sure, sure. We already know this. We’ve been living it out for two thousand years. There is nothing new in this.”

But such words dismiss the clear and confident intent of the plan brought forth by the Pharisees and the Herodians. They were positive Jesus would trip up over their question. It takes a very well contemplated response, something not usually forthcoming when asked on the spot about such a matter, to be able to think this through quickly and clearly.

Of course, hindsight is 20/20, and we as humans are quick to think that we would have been just as quick at giving such a response. As for those who proposed the question to Jesus, they knew the truth of the matter.

The Pharisees could not hint at Jesus’ words being inappropriate within a religious context. The Herodians were completely shut down in their attempt to accuse Jesus of sedition. Therefore, Matthew records, “and having left Him, they departed.”

What else could they do? They were embarrassed into silence. If any of their own disciples were present, they had embarrassed themselves in front of them. With tails between legs, they turned and scampered.

Life application: Throughout the years, there have been great thinkers who can easily think through difficult issues on the spot. If a technical challenge is needed to overcome a situation, someone may be right on the spot to suggest something that will save the day.

In a military setting, there may be a seemingly impossible situation. And yet, the skill of a single man in understanding the layout of the land may change the course of the battle. Sgt Alvin York was able to do this in WWI.

When facing the onslaught of moral depravity within a society, there may be a handful of voices from people who can quickly and reasonably speak against the tide of perverse thinking of people who come forward with arguments as to why what they are doing is acceptable.

In America today, there are a few such voices, mostly Christians or Jews, who will engage the masses in open discussions about moral issues. In such cases, their logic is irrefutable, and it quickly destroys the arguments of those with opposing views.

Unfortunately, such moral thinkers are often targeted by those who disagree with them. Their websites are attacked, their video platforms are demonetized or scrubbed entirely, their lives are threatened, and the forums where they debate are often shouted down or shut down entirely, even before they get a chance to speak.

In the case of clear biblical thinking, there are those who know what the Bible says, in its proper context, and without irrational thinking being included in their presentations. When this is the case, those who base their theology and doctrine on emotions, presuppositions, or biases (such as what is the state of Israel, whether a single version of the Bible is the only true word, or the timing of when the rapture will occur), will openly attack those holding to the proper view, calling them false teachers or heretics.

Jesus was eventually crucified for His proper stance on what was occurring in His society and in regard to the Law of Moses. Over the years, this has been the case with many of His true followers. Hence, the term martyr is well known to those who remember Christian history.

As believers in Jesus Christ, we should hold fast to the word of God, be firm in our moral convictions, and be ready to defend what we believe. We may not be as quick or clear-thinking as some people, but that is why they are in the public spotlight, and we are not. If their words are in accord with what is biblically sound, we should applaud them.

Matters such as creation versus evolution, support for Israel or standing against it, homosexuality within the church, and so forth, are all things we should have a firm stand on, even if we are not quick enough to publicly enter into a debate about them.

Lord God, thank You for those who rightly interpret and divide Your word, including those who can do so in open forums where others are watching. Help us to consider such arguments and mold our thinking to what is pure, right, moral, and just. To Your glory, we pray. Amen.

1 Samuel 28:1-17 (‘Mistress, ov’ – The Witch of En Dor, Part I)

Artwork by Douglas Kallerson

1 Samuel 28:1-17
‘Mistress, ov
The Witch of En Dor, Part I

(Typed 27 April 2026) When we were young, my brothers and I watched a TV show called Bewitched. We would gather around the TV, which had twelve channels, but only three of which would actually come in at any given time. Each week we anxiously waited to see if we would get reception.

If so, we awaited what cool thing would happen. With a twinkle of her nose, Samantha (Elizabeth Montgomery) could make the impossible happen. We were amazed. From time to time, her terrible mother Endora (Agnes Moorehead) would show up and take over the show.

I did not like that lady. To this day, when I read 1 Samuel 28, Endora comes to mind. Her name is based on the location where the witch in this chapter is from, En-dor. As we grew up, my brothers and I realized that witches can’t do what TV shows say they can.

Even witches know this is true. The witch of En Dor could not call up the dead, as is evident from the details of the story. But it is fun to preach on this chapter after growing up with a TV show that has a connection to it.

Text Verse: “And the person who turns to mediums and familiar spirits, to prostitute himself with them, I will set My face against that person and cut him off from his people.” Leviticus 20:6

Saul doesn’t actually die in this chapter, but his approaching death is certain because the Lord revealed that it would be so. Over the years, many people have asked me about verses found here, specifically those relating to Samuel’s spirit being raised.

Jehovah’s Witnesses deny it was Samuel. But guess what, so do many scholars. Some say it was the devil lying through the witch. Some say it is the witch using ventriloquism. Others find various reasons why the text doesn’t say what it says.

We will evaluate that as we go. But my advice in all such matters is to accept what the Bible says, taking it at face value. What it proclaims is historically true, prophetically without fault, and reliable in every detail.

When it says that God made man on the sixth day of creation, we should accept that, taking the words as written. God is telling us His story. It is a story that includes us. How He deals with us is based on how we relate to His word.

Let us be sure to accept it as absolutely sure and reliable. Great and sure truths are to be found in His superior word. And so, let us turn to that precious word once again, and… May God speak to us through His word today, and may His glorious name ever be praised.

I. And They Were Assembled, Philistines (verses 1-6)

Now it happened in those days that the Philistines gathered their armies together for war, to fight with Israel.

vayhi bayamim ha’hem vayiqbetsu phelishtim eth makhanehem latsava lehilakhem beyisrael – “And it was, in the days, the those, and they amassed, Philistines, their camps to the host to be battled in Israel.” The words, “the days, the those” refer to the events of Chapter 27. David had fled to the land of the Philistines.

While there, he had gained Achish’s favor by telling him that he had been raiding Israel and its allies when he had instead been raiding tribes unfriendly to Israel. During those days, the Philistines had gathered for war.

This force is more than mere raiding parties performing minor incursions into the land. It includes all of the Philistine leaders, and thus all of the soldiers of the five Philistine enclaves. Of this coming battle, Adam Clarke records –

“The Philistines gathered their armies together – Sir Isaac Newton conjectures that the Philistines had got a great increase to their armies by vast numbers of men which Amasis had driven out of Egypt. This, with Samuel’s death, and David’s disgrace, were no inconsiderable motives to a new war, front which the Philistines had now every thing to hope.”

Everything being presented is given to typologically reveal spiritual events coming in later redemptive history.

Philistine means Weakener. They are those who work to weaken the faith of others, particularly through law observance. The recorded war anticipates battle in the spiritual realm. Israel means He Strives with God. The name is a double entendre. It can be positive (on God’s side) or negative (against God).

Because David had gained the confidence of Achish, king of Gath, as seen in Chapter 27…

1 (con’t) And Achish said to David, “You assuredly know that you will go out with me to battle, you and your men.”

Rather: vayomer akhish el David yadoa teda ki iti tetse vamakhaneh atah vaanashekha – “And he said, Achish, unto David, ‘Knowing, you know, for with me you will go out in the camps, you and your mortals.’” It says “camps”, not “battle.”

This indicates that more than one Philistine enclave was going out on an independent excursion. Being in the camps implies being in the battle. When there is a battle, there are camps where the warriors of each enclave stay, just as in Chapter 17 in the account of David and Goliath.

David was a well-known warrior. He had fled from Saul and taken up residence in the land of the Philistines. While there, he convinced Achish that he was fighting against Judah and the allies of Israel, so Achish believed he could never return to Israel again. And more, he believed that in a larger engagement, David could be trusted to fight valiantly with the Philistines against Israel.

The meaning of Achish’s name is too dubious to pin down with certainty. David means Beloved. He pictures “accepting the doctrines of Christ.” Because of Achish’s confidence…

So David said to Achish, “Surely you know what your servant can do.”

David’s words are emphatic: vayomer David el akhish lakhen atah teda eth asher yaaseh avdekha – “And he said, David, unto Achish, ‘To thus, you, you will know what he will do, your servant.’” Achish used the verb yada, to know – yadoa teda: “knowing, you will know.” David repeats it back to him – lakhen atah teda: “to thus, you, you will know.”

This essentially means, “Oh yeah, you will surely know what I can do.” The thought is ambiguous. Achish takes it as a mark of valor towards him, especially because David calls himself “your servant.” However, servants have been known to turn against those they serve.

We can speculate on the tone of the response and David’s true intentions, but because he has not attacked Israel over the past many months, there is no reason to assume he would actually do so at this point. Achish takes him to mean that he will fight alongside him. Therefore…

2 (con’t) And Achish said to David, “Therefore I will make you one of my chief guardians forever.”

The NKJV misses the intent of the word rosh, head: vayomer akhish el David lakhen shomer leroshi asimekha kal ha’yamim – “And he said, Achish, unto David, ‘To thus, ‘guarder to my head’ I will put you all the days.’” Achish repeats David’s affirmation –

“To thus, you, you will know what he will do, your servant.”
“To thus, guarder to my head I will put you all the days.”

The NKJV uses the word rosh, head, in the wrong way, as if David will be a “chief” guarder (one of many). Rather, Achish is saying that David will be the guarder to his “head” meaning his right-hand man and personal protector.

Now Samuel had died, and all Israel had lamented for him and buried him in Ramah, in his own city.

The words of verse 3 are parenthetical: u-shemuel meth vayispedu lo kal Yisrael vayiqberuhu varamah u-veiro – “(And Samuel, he died, and they lamented to him, all Israel. And they interred him in the Ramah, and in his city.” The reason for including this lies ahead in the narrative, but the words serve as a backdrop to that. What is said was already noted in 1 Samuel 25

25:1 – “And he died, Samuel, and they were assembled, all Israel, and they lamented to him, and they interred him in his house in the Ramah.”

28:3 – “And Samuel, he died, and they lamented to him, all Israel. And they interred him in the Ramah, and in his city.”

Saying “and in his city” is probably because there are at least two places called Ramah. This specifically identifies which Ramah he was buried in. Samuel means Asked from God. The Ramah means The Lofty Place. Still in the parenthesis, it says…

3 (con’t) And Saul had put the mediums and the spiritists out of the land.

veshaul hesir ha’ovoth veeth hayideonim meha’arets – “(And Saul, he caused to veer the necromancers and the conjurors from the land.)” Samuel is dead. Saul had removed all of the necromancers and the conjurors. He had also killed Ahimelech and the priests at Nob.

He had few options to communicate with God or gods. There were other priests and the school of the prophets, but the main priest and the main prophet were both gone. By this point, he may have installed another high priest. This appears likely. We will see that as we continue.

This appears to be the reason for mentioning Samuel’s death again, along with the note about the necromancers and conjurers. It sets up the narrative going forward.

As for the ov, necromancer, it is a word signifying “to mumble.” It also signifies a water skin because when you blow into a skin, like into a soda bottle, you get the hollow oooooohhhh sound. Also noted is the yiddeoni, conjuror. That is derived from yada, to know. As such, it refers to one who has knowledge like a wizard.

With this introductory parenthetical thought complete, the narrative diverts from David with Achish until the end of the chapter, inserting a story about what happens with Saul…

Then the Philistines gathered together, and came and encamped at Shunem.

vayiqavetsu phelishtim vayavou vayakhanu veshunem – “And they were amassed, Philistines, and they came, and they inclined in Shunem.” As noted earlier, this is an assembling of the axles, meaning the five lords of the Philistines. As such, it would be a great amassing of people.

And more, Shunem is located in the tribe of Issachar, in northern Israel in the Jezreel Valley. The Philistines, therefore, have marched up through the land to this wide valley, taking up their position on the north and west of where Saul will be.

Scholars do not agree where the name Shunem is derived from. Strong says it is from the name Shuni, to rest or be quiet. Others, based on various root words, say Uneven, Two Resting Places, Silences, or Teeth. As for Israel…

4 (con’t) So Saul gathered all Israel together, and they encamped at Gilboa.

vayiqbots shaul eth kal Yisrael vayakhanu bagilboa – “And he assembled, Saul, all Israel. And they inclined in the Gilboa.” Due to the size of the Philistine force, Saul made a general call for all capable military men of Israel to amass for war. The location he chose is across the Jezreel Valley to the south and east of the Philistines.

Gilboa is from gal, something rolled and thus a heap, and baah, to gush over and thus to swell. As such, it is The Rolling Fountain, The Fountain of Bubbling, The Bubbling Fountain, The Boiling Fountains, etc.

When Saul saw the army of the Philistines, he was afraid, and his heart trembled greatly.

vayar shaul eth makhaneh phelishtim vayira vayekherad libo meod – “And he saw, Saul, ‘camp, Philistines’, and he feared. And it shuddered, his heart, vehemently.” The size and layout of the Philistine camp made Saul extremely fearful. This would not be a small battle with one side quickly overcoming another. It would be a bloody, brutal match of armies where many would be slaughtered.

And more, he knew God had turned from him and that the kingdom would eventually be taken from him. He may have thought this was the time when he would lose it. He had lost David, and he might have known David was with the Philistines. If so, adding him and his men to the Philistine forces would add to the slaughter. Added to that is more bad news…

And when Saul inquired of the Lord, the Lord did not answer him, either by dreams or by Urim or by the prophets.

vayishal shaul beYehovah velo anahu Yehovah gam baholomoth gam baurim gam baneviim – “And he asked, Saul, in Yehovah. And not he answered him, Yehovah, also in the dreams, also in the Urim, also in the prophets.” A pun is made here. Saul’s name means Asked. Thus, it says, “And he asked, Asked, in Yehovah.”

Saul asked for a divine response, but it did not come in any of the usual ways. The threefold repetition of gam, also, is intended to highlight the situation. No response to Saul’s asking, in any form, was given. Therefore, he is left without any guidance that he could rely on.

There are a few things about this verse that cause difficulties. The first is that in 1 Chronicles 10, it says –

“So Saul died for his unfaithfulness which he had committed against the Lord, because he did not keep the word of the Lord, and also because he consulted a medium for guidance. 14 But he did not inquire of the Lord; therefore He killed him, and turned the kingdom over to David the son of Jesse.” 1 Chronicles 10:13, 14

This is seen by some scholars as a contradiction. Saul asked “in the Lord” in 1 Samuel, but translations of 1 Chronicles say he didn’t. This thought disappears when the Hebrew is checked. In 1 Chronicles, it says of him –

“…to ask (shaal) in the necromancer to inquire (darash), and not he inquired (darash) in Yehovah.”

All Saul did was “ask” in Yehovah. The implication is that he went so far and then gave up. On the other hand, he “asked” in the necromancer to go further for him and inquire. He put trust in the necromancer above trusting and seeking in the Lord.

The difference is not so much “who” is being consulted but “how” they are being consulted. The “who” issue is bad enough, but adding in the “how” makes his actions a combined slap in the face of the Lord.

This verse is where it appears Saul appointed his own high priest, Zadok. Thus, saying he inquired by the Urim was probably something done by Zadok on Saul’s behalf. In 2 Samuel 8, two high priests are noted –

“And Zadok, ‘son, Ahitub’, and Ahimelech, ‘son, Abiathar’ – priests. And Seraiah – tallier.” 2 Samuel 8:17 (CG).

As Saul found no success in asking in Yehovah, exactly as 1 Chronicles says, Saul did…

Can a witch summon the dead?
Is it possible for the turn of a card to direct me?
Can I tell the future when my palm is read?
Into the other realm, I want to see 

Can knocking on wood really bring me luck?
Or will stepping on a crack really break my back?
Maybe it could if I tripped… unlucky duck
Down I would go, and my head would quack

Wait! I can see the future if I want to
The Bible tells us what’s coming in the latter days
No need to turn a card or two
Turning the Bible’s pages will reveal God’s ways

II. Whom Will I Cause to Ascend to You? (verses 7-17)

Then Saul said to his servants, “Find me a woman who is a medium, that I may go to her and inquire of her.”

vayomer shaul laavadav baqeshu li esheth baalath ov veelekhah eleha veedreshah bah – “And he said, Saul, to his servants, ‘You must seek to me – woman, ‘mistress, ov’. And let me walk unto her, and let me inquire in her.’” A new word, baalah, a mistress, is used here. It is the feminine form of baal, master.

Saul asks for a woman who is a mistress of an ov (a familiar spirit). This is the word elsewhere rendered “necromancer,” but here Saul uses it relationally—one who possesses such a spirit, a kind of “mumbler,” as if channeling a spirit.

Saul’s wording reflects a belief that the spirit is in a working relationship with the woman. The ov is not merely consulted, but one must ask the woman to inquire of the ov. Understanding these nuances, notice the difference in what is said –

1 Samuel 28: 6 – “And he asked (shaal), Saul, in Yehovah.”
1 Chronicles 10:13, 14 – “…to ask (shaal) in the necromancer to inquire (darash), and not he inquired (darash) in Yehovah.”
1 Samuel 28:7 – And let me walk unto her, and let me inquire (darash) in her.’”

Saul’s relationship with the Lord lacks faith, but he was willing to place his trust in a ‘mistress, ov’. In other words, he did not truly seek Yehovah, but he was willing to rely on the medium for a response. That goes with the earlier citation of 1 Chronicles 10:13 exactingly, “because he did not keep the word of the Lord.”

Keeping the word of the Lord is considered an act of faith (belief) as noted in Hebrews 3:18. This resolves the supposed contradiction between this account and 1 Chronicles 10. It further explains Saul’s failed relationship with Yehovah.

7 (con’t) And his servants said to him, “In fact, there is a woman who is a medium at En Dor.”

vayomeru avadav elav hineh esheth baalath ov beein dor – “And they said, his servants, unto him, ‘Behold! Woman, ‘mistress, ov’ in En Dor.’” It isn’t stated how his servants knew she was there, which raises all kinds of questions, but they were aware of her presence.

En Dor is a bit north and about seven or eight miles over difficult ground from where they were in the Gilboa. And more, they would have to go around the camp of the Philistines to get to her. Saul is going to a great deal of trouble to continue his disobedience to the Lord.

En Dor is from ein, spring (literally, eye) and either dor, a revolution of time, as in an age or generation, or one of several other roots. Therefore, it is translated as Spring of a Generation, Spring of Habitation, Spring of Dwelling, Where the Eye Lingers, etc.

So Saul disguised himself and put on other clothes, and he went, and two men with him; and they came to the woman by night.

vayitkhapes shaul vayilbash begadim akherim vayelekh hu u-shene anashim imo vayavou el ha’ishah layelah – “And he searched himself, Saul. And he clothed ‘garments, others’. And he walked, he and two mortals with him, and he came unto the woman – night.” The meaning of “searched himself” is that he looked himself over to determine what about himself needed to be hidden.

From there, he changed from his royal garments into garments that would conceal his identity. Everything about this is reflection of his state. He takes a dangerous path, emblematic of his hardened heart. He goes at night, a reflection of his darkened soul. He conceals who he is, reflecting his unkingly actions. And he goes to a necromancer, reflecting his rejection of Yehoah.

8 (con’t) And he said, “Please conduct a séance for me, and bring up for me the one I shall name to you.”

vayomer qasomi li baov vehaali li eth asher omar elayikh – “And he said, ‘You must distribute [k.] to me in the ov, and you must cause to ascend to me whom I will say unto you.’” The scribes change the text from Saul’s blunt and direct words to a softer tone –

Written: “You must distribute to me.”
Oral: “You must distribute to me, I pray.”

The change makes it sound more polite and idiomatically standard for a request of this nature. That seems like a ridiculous reason to change the text. Despite that, most translations go with the oral. The word is qasam, to distribute. It signifies to determine by lot or magical scroll. Thus, it gives the sense of divining.

Therefore, when Saul says, “distribute to me in the ov,” he is asking for the ability of the ov to be portioned out to him. The portioning he specifically wants is for someone to be brought up from the dead. She has hesitations though…

Then the woman said to him, “Look, you know what Saul has done, how he has cut off the mediums and the spiritists from the land.

vatomer ha’ishah elav hineh atah yadata eth asher asah shaul asher hikhrith eth ha’ovoth veeth hayideoni min ha’arets – “And she said, the woman unto him, ‘Behold! You, you knew what he did, Saul, which he caused to cut the necromancers and the conjurors from the land.’” At an earlier time in Saul’s kingship, he took action to uphold the law. In Leviticus 20, it says –

“A man or a woman who is a medium, or who has familiar spirits, shall surely be put to death; they shall stone them with stones. Their blood shall be upon them.” Leviticus 20:27

The irony of Saul now coming to such a person is evident, but she doesn’t yet know it is Saul. However, she suspects these men are working on his behalf…

9 (con’t) Why then do you lay a snare for my life, to cause me to die?”

velamah atah mitnaqesh benaphshi lahamitheni – “And to why you ‘entrapping oneself’ in my soul to cause to kill me?” Her words are evidence that the written text of the previous verse is the most likely translation. Someone looking for divination would make a request politely, reassuring the diviner that he wasn’t a foe. But with Saul’s curt demand, she immediately suspected that this was a setup to trap her into revealing her skills.

Saul must next remove the proverbial wall he put up between them before they can proceed…

10 And Saul swore to her by the Lord, saying, “As the Lord lives, no punishment shall come upon you for this thing.”

vayishava lah shaul beYehovah lemor khai Yehovah im yiqerekh avon badavar hazeh – “And he was sevened to her, Saul, in Yehovah, to say, ‘Alive Yehovah, if it will encounter you, perversity, in the word, the this.’” The incredible hardening of Saul’s heart is seen in his words. He swears an oath in the name of Yehovah, who wouldn’t answer his lackluster questions through dreams, the Urim, or prophets.

It is mind-numbing to see him do this, and yet, it is just like people anywhere who will gladly swear an oath by God, even when they deny Him, ignore Him, or have no meaningful relationship with Him. As for the oath, instead of telling her that word will never get back to Saul, he swears that nothing will be done to her.

11 Then the woman said, “Whom shall I bring up for you?”

vatomer ha’ishah eth mi aaleh lakh – “And she said, the woman, ‘Whom I will cause to ascend to you?’” Her question is simple and direct. It is the kind of response you will get from any tarot card reader, palm reader, or person who conducts seances, etc.

They claim they have complete authority over their area of the spiritual realm. They do it in a casual manner, as if it is no more difficult than bagging groceries. Saul accepts her confidence…

11 (con’t) And he said, “Bring up Samuel for me.”

vayomer eth shemuel haali li – “And he said, ‘Samuel, you must cause to ascend to me.’” It is another irony. Samuel means Asked from God. Saul asks a necromancer, a person at enmity with God, to bring up Asked from God. In turn, instead of asking from God, her request will be made to an ov. Everything about the account is completely twisted around and ungodly.

Despite that, her petition comes back with a positive response…

12 When the woman saw Samuel, she cried out with a loud voice.

vatere ha’ishah eth shemuel vatizaq beqol gadol – “And she saw, the woman, Samuel. And she shrieked in ‘voice, great’.” It is certain from her reaction that she never expected someone to come up from the dead, despite spending her life deluding others and herself that she had such powers.

Samuel did certainly, in fact, rise. This was not a result of her sorcery. Rather, it is an explicit rebuke from the Lord who allowed it. The reason we know Samuel arose is because the Bible says, “And she saw, the woman, Samuel.”

That is all we need to know to understand the matter. This isn’t an explanation from the woman. Rather, it is an explanation from God in His word. What is a little puzzling are her next words…

12 (con’t) And the woman spoke to Saul, saying, “Why have you deceived me? For you are Saul!”

vatomer ha’ishah el shaul lemor lamah rimitani veatah shaul – “And she said, the woman, unto Saul, to say, ‘To why you hurled me? And you – Saul!’” No reason for how she realized this is given. And yet, some of the goofiest commentaries found among scholars are provided to explain the matter. Pages and pages of speculation are given over her response.

Because the Bible doesn’t explain it, all we can do is guess. For all we know, Samuel came forth annoyed and said, “What do you want now, Saul?” Or maybe, she finally noticed his height and realized who he was.

It may also be that because this is the first time she has ever actually seen a real spirit, she realized it had to be Saul calling for Samuel who anointed him. Here I am speculating like everyone else 😲.

Regardless, her knowledge is for the sake of Saul, not her. Because she has deduced it is Saul without having known before, it is a confirmation to him that what will transpire is true…

13 And the king said to her, “Do not be afraid. What did you see?”

vayomer lah ha’melekh al tirei ki mah raith – “And he said to her, the king, ‘Not you will fear. For what you saw?’” His reassurance was necessary. He had vowed, and with his words to confirm he was no harm, she continues…

13 (con’t) And the woman said to Saul, “I saw a spirit ascending out of the earth.”

vatomer ha’ishah el shaul elohim raiti olim min ha’arets – “And she said, the woman, unto Saul, ‘Gods, I saw, ascending from the earth.’” The word she uses, elohim, means God, god, or gods. It can refer to the true God, false gods, people in certain positions of power, etc. To understand, regardless of who is being referred to, one should think of “over there.”

If it is the true God, he is “over there” in relation to humans. If it is a false god, it is what humans think they are in relation to them, such as, “Oh, these are my gods that I pray to. They help me from their realm over there.” If it is a human, as in Psalm 82:6, it means men who are “over there” in relation to other humans, be it as a judge, a leader, etc.

She sees apparitions and calls them elohim. They are “over there,” and yet, they are also now here in some manner, just as when God intervenes in our lives. He is “over there,” and yet He is also here. The reason for translating it in the plural, “gods,” is because the verb ascending is plural.

John Lange notes that to match the noun form, the plural verb is given. But that doesn’t make sense. She could have used the verb in the singular. However, Saul now switches to the singular, which she continues with…

14 So he said to her, “What is his form?”
And she said, “An old man is coming up, and he is covered with a mantle.”

vayomer lah mah taoro vatomer ish zaqen oleh vehu oteh meil – “And he said to her, ‘What its form?’ And she said, “‘Man, aged’, ascending, and he clothed – robe.’” Saul wouldn’t know this was a man. Thus “its form” is more likely what he said than “his form.” That is confirmed by her stating that the form was a man.

He didn’t know it was a man until she told him. Thus, the pronoun has gone from the indefinite, its, to the definite, he. Saying he is clothed in a robe signifies dignity, even in death, while in Sheol.

As for the appearance, the Bible leaves no doubt that she sees Samuel. It is telling us what happened. If she were making this up, the Bible would say so.

It is inexcusable, like not accepting a literal six-day creation, to dismiss the clearly stated words. Her description is enough to convince Saul that it is Samuel…

14 (con’t) And Saul perceived that it was Samuel, and he stooped with his face to the ground and bowed down.

vayeda shaul ki shemuel hu vayiqod apayim artsah vayishtakhu – “And he knew, Saul, for Samuel, he. And he hunched, nostrils earthward, and he prostrated himself.” Once he saw that Samuel had arisen, you can almost hear the next event – kerplunk. Saul’s face went downward, first hunching over towards the earth and then he went to his knees…

15 Now Samuel said to Saul, “Why have you disturbed me by bringing me up?”

vayomer shemuel el shaul lamah hirgaztani lehaaloth othi – “And he said, Samuel, unto Saul, ‘To why you caused to quiver me to cause to ascend me?’” Again, the Bible is what attests to the fact that it is Samuel speaking.

Further, it does not say Samuel spoke through the woman. Even if he did, it is still conveyed in the Bible that Samuel spoke to Saul. There is no need to assume anything else.

His words “caused to quiver me” show that he was at ease, as in a state of rest. The Bible does not tell us if it was the prodding of the witch or the prodding of God by which he was quivered. Ultimately, however, the latter is true either way. As for Samuel’s words, they are directed to Saul.

Either God allowed the woman to do that which she had never done before, or He bypassed her and directly answered Saul’s request for Samuel to be brought forth.

15 (con’t) And Saul answered, “I am deeply distressed; for the Philistines make war against me, and God has departed from me and does not answer me anymore, neither by prophets nor by dreams.

vayomer shaul tsar li meod u-phelistim nilkhamim bi velohim sar mealay velo anani od gam beyad haneviim gam bakhalomoth – “And he said, Saul, ‘It cramped to me, vehemently. And Philistines being battled in me. And God, He veered from upon me. And not He answered me again, also in hand the prophets, also in the dreams.”

Saul goes through his laundry list of reasons for why he felt disobeying the law was ok, as if he can make his actions acceptable. But even while moaning about it, he acknowledges that God left him. Saul’s thinking is confused and erratic.

In his excuse, he never mentioned the Urim. Some speculate that might be because he massacred the priests of Nob. That could be the case, or it could be that, as noted above, he had appointed a new high priest. That would only add to the pickle he was in if he mentioned that to Samuel. Regardless…

15 (con’t) Therefore I have called you, that you may reveal to me what I should do.”

vaeqraeh lekha lehodieni mah eeseh – “And I (surely) called to you to cause me to know what I will do.’” Samuel has been in Sheol. He is either transmitting from there or, when the conversation is over, he will return there. Either way, for Samuel to give Saul advice, he would have to petition God for it.

Why would Saul expect an answer from God through Samuel if God didn’t answer him any other way? If he thinks Samuel can give him advice apart from God, that demonstrates even less clarity of mind.

Everything about Saul’s actions and reasoning is completely out of touch with reality. Samuel confirms this…

16 Then Samuel said: “So why do you ask me, seeing the Lord has departed from you and has become your enemy?

vayomer shemuel velamah tishaleni veYehovah sar mealekha vayhi arekha – “And he said, Samuel, ‘And to why you will ask me? And Yehovah, He veered from upon you, and He became your foe!’” A new and rare word, ar, foe, is seen here. It is from ur, awake. Thus, it is a foe, as one watches out for mischief, something you would do when you are awake.

Samuel’s words mean, “When I spoke, it was always what the Lord determined for me to speak. That hasn’t changed. The Lord has left you and has actively become your enemy. So why would you come to me for advice?”

Whatever Saul was thinking when he headed to En Dor, his hopes for help from Samuel would not be forthcoming. And more…

17 And the Lord has done for Himself as He spoke by me.

The words confuse scholar and translator alike: vayaas Yehovah lo kaasher diber beyadi – “And He did, Yehovah, to Him according to which He spoke in my hand.” About half the translations I checked say this is Samuel speaking about Saul in the third person.

That is incorrect. The NKJV has rendered it correctly. Yehovah did for Himself (to Him) just what He spoke through Samuel. This goes back to 1 Samuel 15 when Saul disobeyed the Lord’s word concerning anathematizing Amalek. Saul failed to do as he was instructed, and the Lord promised him, through Samuel, that this day would come…

*17 (fin) For the Lord has torn the kingdom out of your hand and given it to your neighbor, David.

vayiqra Yehovah eth ha’mamlakhah miyadekha vayitenah lereakha ledavid – “And He rent, Yehovah, the kingdom from your hand, and He gave it to your associate, to David.’” This is just what the Lord said through Samuel. The only addition, which is the final confirmation of Saul’s continuous suspicions, is that David would succeed him as king –

“And he turned, Samuel, to walk, and he caused to seize in ‘extremity, his robe’, and it was rent. 28And he said unto him, Samuel, ‘He rent, Yehovah, ‘kingdom, Israel’ from upon you the day. And he gave her to your associate – the good from you. 29And also ‘Refulgency*, Israel’, not He will cheat, and not He will be sighed. For not human, He, to be sighed.’” 1 Samuel 15:27-29

Saul’s kingdom is set to end. Samuel doesn’t need to consult the Lord about it. He gave the prophecy, and it would be fulfilled. But this is not where Samuel’s words end. He will give Saul a full accounting, in advance, of what the Lord showed him concerning Saul’s situation.

And guess what? The Lord has given mankind the same thing. He has given us a full accounting of what He is doing in human history, from beginning to end.

The little details aren’t included. Samuel won’t tell Saul if he will have breakfast in the morning or how long it will take him to march to the battle. But he will give Saul a full understanding of what is important in the overall picture.

This is what God has done for us. We don’t need a full itinerary of what we should do for a vacation, whom we should marry, or whether we should start a new business.

Those things are not what we need to know from God. We are to pray about them and act according to our desire. But the greater matters of our place in redemptive history have been revealed in the word.

We know what God has done, we know what He is doing, and we know what He will do right through to the consummation of all things. All of it is recorded in the word. And like Saul, we can be certain that those things will come about.

The Lord has spoken through His word. He tells us that He really created the universe in 6 days. He caused a donkey to open its mouth and speak. He brought Samuel back from Sheol to speak to Saul. He sent Jesus to die for our sins.

These things have occurred. It is our job to take the word at face value, even if it seems incredible at times. God does the incredible. So trust Him by trusting His word. In this, you will be pleasing to Him for trusting what He says is true.

Closing Verse: “For if the word spoken through angels proved steadfast, and every transgression and disobedience received a just reward, how shall we escape if we neglect so great a salvation, which at the first began to be spoken by the Lord, and was confirmed to us by those who heard Him.” Hebrews 2:2, 3

Next Week: 1 Samuel 28:18-25 Better than picking fresh oranges in a grove, that’s for shore, and yes – it’s true… (‘Mistress, ov’, the Witch of En Dor, Part II) (60th 1 Samuel Sermon)

The Lord has you exactly where He wants you. He has a good plan and purpose for you. He is the One who abases the haughty and exalts the humble. He regards the lowly, and the proud, He knows from afar. So yield yourself to Him, trust Him, and believe His word. In this, He will do great things for you and through you.

What were the ashes of the red heifer used for? For the water purification.

1 Samuel 28:1-17 (CG)

1 And it was, in the days, the those, and they amassed, Philistines, their camps to the host to be battled in Israel. And he said, Achish, unto David, “Knowing, you must know, that with me, you will go out in the camp, you and your mortals.”

2And he said, David, unto Achish, “To thus, you, you will know what he will do, your servant.”

And he said, Achish, unto David, “To thus, ‘guarder to my head’ I will put you all the days.”

(3And Samuel, he died, and they lamented to him, all Israel. And they interred him in the Ramah, and in his city. And Saul, he caused to veer the necromancers and the conjurors from the land.)

4And they were amassed, Philistines, and they came, and they inclined in Shunem. And he assembled, Saul, all Israel. And they inclined in the Gilboa. 5And he saw, Saul, ‘camp, Philistines’, and he feared. And it shuddered, his heart, vehemently. 6And he asked, Saul, in Yehovah. And not He answered him, Yehovah, also in the dreams, also in the Urim, also in the prophets.

7And he said, Saul, to his servants, “You must seek to me – woman, ‘mistress*, ov*’. And let me walk unto her, and let me inquire in her.”

And they said, his servants, unto him, “Behold! Woman, ‘mistress, ov’ in En Dor.”

8And he searched himself, Saul. And he donned ‘garments, others’. And he walked, he and two mortals with him, and they came unto the woman – night. And he said, “You must distribute [k.] to me in the ov, and you must cause to ascend to me whom I will say unto you.”

9And she said, the woman, unto him, “Behold! You, you knew what he did, Saul, which he caused to cut the necromancers and the conjurors from the land. And to why you ‘entrapping oneself’ in my soul to cause to kill me?”

10And he was sevened to her, Saul, in Yehovah, to say, “Alive Yehovah, if it will encounter you, perversity, in the word, the this.”

11And she said, the woman, “Whom I will cause to ascend to you?”

And he said, “Samuel, you must cause to ascend to me.”

12And she saw, the woman, Samuel. And she shrieked in ‘voice, great’. And she said, the woman, unto Saul, to say, “To why you hurled me? And you – Saul!”

13And he said to her, the king, “Not you will fear. For what, you saw?”

And she said, the woman, unto Saul, “Gods*, I saw, ascending from the earth.”

14And he said to her, “What its form?”

And she said, “’Man, aged’, ascending, and he wrapped – robe.” And he knew, Saul, for Samuel, he. And he stooped, nostrils earthward, and he prostrated himself.

15And he said, Samuel, unto Saul, “To why you caused to quiver me to cause to ascend me?”

And he said, Saul, “It cramped to me, vehemently. And Philistines being battled in me. And God, He veered from upon me. And not He answered me again, also, in hand the prophets, also, in the dreams. And I (surely) called to you to cause me to know what I will do.”

16And he said, Samuel, “And to why you will ask me? And Yehovah, He veered from upon you, and He became your foe! 17And He did, Yehovah, to Him according to which He spoke in my hand. And He rent, Yehovah, the kingdom from your hand, and He gave it to your associate, to David.”

 

1 Samuel 28:1-17 (NKJV)

1 Now it happened in those days that the Philistines gathered their armies together for war, to fight with Israel. And Achish said to David, “You assuredly know that you will go out with me to battle, you and your men.”

So David said to Achish, “Surely you know what your servant can do.”

And Achish said to David, “Therefore I will make you one of my chief guardians forever.”

Now Samuel had died, and all Israel had lamented for him and buried him in Ramah, in his own city. And Saul had put the mediums and the spiritists out of the land.

Then the Philistines gathered together, and came and encamped at Shunem. So Saul gathered all Israel together, and they encamped at Gilboa. When Saul saw the army of the Philistines, he was afraid, and his heart trembled greatly. And when Saul inquired of the Lord, the Lord did not answer him, either by dreams or by Urim or by the prophets.

Then Saul said to his servants, “Find me a woman who is a medium, that I may go to her and inquire of her.”

And his servants said to him, “In fact, there is a woman who is a medium at En Dor.”

So Saul disguised himself and put on other clothes, and he went, and two men with him; and they came to the woman by night. And he said, “Please conduct a séance for me, and bring up for me the one I shall name to you.”

Then the woman said to him, “Look, you know what Saul has done, how he has cut off the mediums and the spiritists from the land. Why then do you lay a snare for my life, to cause me to die?”

10 And Saul swore to her by the Lord, saying, “As the Lord lives, no punishment shall come upon you for this thing.”

11 Then the woman said, “Whom shall I bring up for you?”

And he said, “Bring up Samuel for me.”

12 When the woman saw Samuel, she cried out with a loud voice. And the woman spoke to Saul, saying, “Why have you deceived me? For you are Saul!”

13 And the king said to her, “Do not be afraid. What did you see?”

And the woman said to Saul, “I saw a spirit ascending out of the earth.”

14 So he said to her, “What is his form?”

And she said, “An old man is coming up, and he is covered with a mantle.” And Saul perceived that it was Samuel, and he stooped with his face to the ground and bowed down.

15 Now Samuel said to Saul, “Why have you disturbed me by bringing me up?”

And Saul answered, “I am deeply distressed; for the Philistines make war against me, and God has departed from me and does not answer me anymore, neither by prophets nor by dreams. Therefore I have called you, that you may reveal to me what I should do.”

16 Then Samuel said: “So why do you ask me, seeing the Lord has departed from you and has become your enemy? 17 And the Lord has done for Himself as He spoke by me. For the Lord has torn the kingdom out of your hand and given it to your neighbor, David.

 

Matthew 22:21

Sunday, 30 August 2026

They said to Him, “Caesar’s.”
And He said to them, “Render therefore to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s, and to God the things that are God’s.”
Matthew 22:21

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at the “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen)

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“They say to Him, ‘Caesar’s.’ Then He says to them, ‘You render, therefore, those Caesar’s to Caesar, and those the ‘God’s’ to God.’” (CG).

In the previous verse, Jesus asked the Pharisees and Herodians whose image and inscription were on the coin. In response to that, “They say to Him, ‘Caesar’s.’”

Rather than holding up the coin and saying, “Look, this is Caesar’s image and inscription,” Jesus had them respond to His question. By doing so, they have, with their own mouths, affirmed that the coin they used belonged not to the Jewish nation, but to their overlords, the Romans.

Therefore, their thought of trapping Jesus in His words will fail. Their question to Him in Verse 17 was not an either/or response after all. Instead, the correct response, when thought through, is seen in the continued exchange, “Then He says to them, ‘You render, therefore, those Caesar’s to Caesar.’”

The nation was subject to Rome. They used its currency, they lived by whatever laws were imposed on them, and they could be elevated in the Roman society or cast into Roman prisons. The coin in Jesus’ hand confirmed this. To say otherwise would be an act of rebellion against those who ruled over them. Along with that thought, Jesus says, “and those the ‘God’s’ to God.”

To the Jews, whether they believed in God or not, they knew that the culture of the nation was established on the premise that there is a God and that He had given His law through Moses to the nation. Nobody would deny that. Anyone who spoke against it could be punished up to death, even if the death penalty had been reserved for Rome to mete out.

As this is so, their laws mandated many things that the people were expected to do. This included the sacrificial system, the tithes and offerings, observing particular days like the Sabbath and the Day of Atonement, etc. Even the garments they wore had aspects mandated in the Law of Moses.

The crops they could grow in a field and the types of food they could eat were also governed by the law. Obedience to the law was considered rendering to God because their law came from Him. These points were undeniable, and these leaders’ attempts to trap Jesus in His words had failed, epically.

Life application: If these men had taken .00156 seconds to think through what their own Scriptures said, they would have seen the error in their thinking concerning an either/or answer to the question they asked of Jesus. In Jeremiah 29, it says –

“Thus says the Lord of hosts, the God of Israel, to all who were carried away captive, whom I have caused to be carried away from Jerusalem to Babylon:
Build houses and dwell in them; plant gardens and eat their fruit. Take wives and beget sons and daughters; and take wives for your sons and give your daughters to husbands, so that they may bear sons and daughters—that you may be increased there, and not diminished. And seek the peace of the city where I have caused you to be carried away captive, and pray to the Lord for it; for in its peace you will have peace. For thus says the Lord of hosts, the God of Israel: Do not let your prophets and your diviners who are in your midst deceive you, nor listen to your dreams which you cause to be dreamed. For they prophesy falsely to you in My name; I have not sent them, says the Lord.” Jeremiah 29:4-9

The fate of the people, be it living in freedom, in captivity, or under the rule of their enemies in their own land, was solely at the will of the Lord. This is recorded throughout Judges and onward. The word of the Lord through Jeremiah explicitly notes this.

It is the Lord who sent them into exile. He did it by the hand of Nebuchadnezzar, and their exile was to Babylon. This wasn’t an aberration. Rather, it was prophesied in advance, and even the number of years the exile would continue was told to them by Jeremiah in his words to them.

During the time of that exile, at the Lord’s direction, they were expected to render unto Babylon the things that belonged to Babylon. Babylon was God’s chosen instrument to chastise Israel for its aberrant ways. If they rebelled against the authority placed over them, there would be consequences.

The Lord instructed them to live in peace in their new land. To disobey that would be to incur the Lord’s wrath. Likewise, they would incur the wrath of those who held them captive. That truth has not changed to this day. Whether they accept their state in the world or not, and whether they believe in the Lord or not, they are to render unto whatever nation they live in what belongs to that nation, and they are to render unto God what belongs to Him.

The same is true for believers. Paul says in Romans 13 –

“Let every soul be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and the authorities that exist are appointed by God. Therefore whoever resists the authority resists the ordinance of God, and those who resist will bring judgment on themselves.” Romans 13:1, 2

Stand on the word when such things arise. God has ordained your time, place, and station in life. Live within the framework of those things in a manner that will honor Him.

Lord God, in so many ways, You have taken the pressure off us. When Your word tells us to do something, all we need to do is be obedient to what You have said. Help us to remember this, complying with such things according to Your will for each of us. Amen.