Matthew 1:16

Heroes of the Spanish American War Memorial.

Tuesday, 23 July 2024

And Jacob begot Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus who is called Christ. Matthew 1:16

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen)

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen) (Click here for part II), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen) (Click here for part II).

“And Jacob begot Joseph, the husband of Mary, from whom birthed Jesus, being called the Christ” (CG).

The previous verse ended with, “and Matthan begot Jacob.” The genealogy of Jesus now continues with, “And Jacob begot Joseph.”

The name Joseph has a dual meaning. It is derived from yasaph, to add. However, it is also connected to asaph, to take away or remove. Both were on the mind of Rachel when she bore Joseph –

“Then God remembered Rachel, and God listened to her and opened her womb. 23 And she conceived and bore a son, and said, ‘God has taken away [asaph] my reproach.’ 24 So she called his name Joseph, and said, ‘The Lord shall add [yasaph] to me another son.’” Genesis 30:22-24

Thus, the name means Increaser, or He Shall Add. But it has a secondary intended meaning of Remover, or He Shall Take Away. This Joseph recorded in Matthew is begotten of Jacob, his natural father. Joseph is the husband of Mary. It is through Joseph, the father, that the right to the kingly line of David is established.

Both Matthew and Luke acknowledge that Jesus is the Christ. However, the genealogy of Luke does not read the same as Matthew. Rather, it says, “Now Jesus Himself began His ministry at about thirty years of age, being (as was supposed) the son of Joseph, the son of Heli…” (Luke 3:23).

This seems to throw a monkey wrench into Jesus’ lineage. However, Luke 1 & 2, establish that Joseph is not the natural father of Jesus. Rather, Jesus was begotten of God as indicated in Luke 1 –

“And the angel answered and said to her, ‘The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Highest will overshadow you; therefore, also, that Holy One who is to be born will be called the Son of God.’” Luke 1:35

Both Matthew’s and Luke’s genealogies were compiled before the destruction of the temple. Therefore, what was recorded was verifiable at that time. With this in mind, Bengel provides a list of assertions to be considered. The details of the explanations for these assertions are quite extensive but are necessary to obtain a right understanding of what is going on in the two genealogies.

Only the key points will be included. Any removal of content is without providing ellipses, and so for a more thorough understanding of Bengel’s comments, such as verse references and citations, refer to his commentary –

———————————————

I. Messias or Christ is the Son of David.

This is admitted by all.

II. Even in their genealogies both Matthew and Luke teach that Jesus is the Christ.

This is clear from Matthew 1:16, and Luke 3:22.

III. At the time when Matthew and Luke wrote the descent of Jesus from David had been placed beyond doubt. 

Both Matthew and Luke wrote before the destruction of the Temple of Jerusalem, when the full genealogy of the house of David, preserved in the public records, was easily accessible to all: and our Lord’s adversaries did not ever make any objection, when Jesus was so frequently hailed as the Son of David.

IV. The genealogy in St Matthew from Abraham, and that in St Luke from the creation of man, to Joseph the husband of Mary, is deduced, not through mothers but fathers, and those natural fathers.

This is evident in the case of all those ancestors, whose names St Matthew and St Luke repeat from the Old Testament. Wherefore it is not said, whether Ruth had been the wife of Mahlon or Chilion; but Obed is simply said to be the son of his real father Boaz by Ruth [though his legal father was Mahlon.] From Abraham to David the same ancestors are evidently mentioned by both Matthew and Luke; so that there can be no doubt but that both Evangelists intend not mothers but fathers, and those, fathers by nature, from David to Joseph. Thus, in the books of Kings and Chronicles, as often soever as the mother of a king is mentioned alone, it is a sign that he whom her son is said to have immediately succeeded was his natural father.

V. The genealogy in Matthew from Solomon, and that in Luke from Nathan, is brought down to Joseph, not with the same, but with a different view[respectu, relation, regard.]

This is clear from the preceding section.

VI. Jesus Christ was the Son of Mary, but not of her husband Joseph.

This is evident from Matthew 1:16.

VII. It was necessary that the genealogy of Mary should be drawn out.

Without the genealogy of Mary, the descent of Jesus from David could not be proved, as follows from what has just been said.

VIII. Joseph was for some time reputed to be the father of the Lord Jesus.

The mystery of the Redeemer’s birth from a virgin was not made known at once, but by degrees; and, in the meanwhile, the honourable title of marriage was required as a veil for that mystery. Jesus, therefore, was believed to be the Son of Joseph, for instance, after His baptism, by Philip (John 1:45); in the time of His public preaching, by the inhabitants of Nazareth (Luke 4:22Matthew 13:55), and only a year before His Passion by the Jews (John 6:42). Many still clung to this opinion even after our Lord’s Ascension, and up to the time, therefore, when, a few years subsequently to that event, St Matthew wrote his gospel.

IX. It was therefore necessary that the genealogy of Joseph also should in the meanwhile exist.

It was necessary that all those who believed Jesus to be the Son of Joseph, should be convinced that Joseph was descended from David. Otherwise they could not have acknowledged Jesus to be the Son of David, and consequently could not acknowledge Him to be the Christ. When therefore the angel first appeared to Joseph, and commanded him to take unto him his wife, he called him (Matthew 1:20) the Song of Solomon of David: because, forsooth, the Son of Mary would for a time have to bear that name as if derived from Joseph. In like manner, not only was Jesus in truth the first-born (Luke 2:7Luke 2:23) of His mother, but it behoved also that He should be reputed to be the first-born of Joseph: those, therefore, who are called the brethren of Jesus, were His first cousins, not His half-brothers. It is needless to attempt, as some have done, to prove the consanguinity of Joseph and Mary from their marriage: for even if David be their nearest common ancestor, St Matthew’s object is attained. St Matthew then has traced the genealogy of Joseph, but still so as to do no violence to truth: for he does not say that Jesus is the Son of Joseph, but he does say that He was the Son of Mary; and in this very sixteenth verse he intimates, that this genealogy of Joseph, which had its use for a time, would afterwards become obsolete. Mary’s descent from David was equally well known at that time, as appears from St Luke.

X. Either Matthew gives the genealogy of Mary, and Luke that of Joseph; or Matthew that of Joseph, and Luke that of Mary.

This clearly follows from the preceding sections.

XI. The genealogy in Matthew is that of Joseph; in Luke, that of Mary.

St Matthew traces the line of descent from Abraham to Jacob: he expressly states that Jacob begat Joseph, and expressly calls Joseph the husband of Mary. Joseph therefore is regarded throughout this genealogy as the descendant of those who are enumerated, not on Mary’s account, but on his own. Matthew, indeed, expressly contradistinguishes Joseph from Mary as the son of Jacob; but in St Luke, by a less strict mode of expression, Heli (Luke 3:23) is simply placed after Joseph. Since, then, Joseph is described in Matthew as actually the son of Jacob, St Luke cannot mean to represent him as actually the son of Heli. The only alternative which remains, therefore, is to conclude that he is the son of Heli, not in his own person, but by virtue of another, and that other his wife. Mary, then, is the daughter of Heli. The Jewish writers mention a certain מרים בת עלי, Mary, the daughter of Heli, whom they describe as suffering extreme torments in the infernal regions. St Luke does not, however, name Mary in his genealogy; for it would have sounded ill, especially to Jewish ears, had he written “Jesus was the Son of Mary, the daughter of Heli, the son of Matthat,” etc.—on which account he names the husband of Mary, but that in such a manner that all may be able to understand (from the whole of his first and second chapters), that the name of Mary’s husband stands for that of Mary herself.

XII. That in St Luke is the primary, that in St Matthew the secondary genealogy.

When a genealogy is traced through female as well as male ancestors, any descent may be deduced in many ways from one root; whereas a pedigree, traced simply from father to son, must of necessity consist only of a single line. In the genealogy, however, of Jesus Christ, Mary, His mother, is reckoned with His male ancestors, by a claim of incomparable precedence. In an ordinary pedigree ancestors are far more important than ancestresses. Mary, however, enters this genealogy with a peculiar and unrivalled claim, above that of every ancestor whatever of the whole human race; for whatever Jesus derived from the stock of man—of Abraham, or of David—that He derived entirely from His mother. This is the One Seed of Woman without Man. Other children owe their birth partly to their father, partly to their mother. The genealogy of Mary, therefore, which is given in St Luke, is the primary one. Nor can that of Joseph, in St Matthew, be considered otherwise than secondary, and merely employed for the time, until all should become fully convinced, that Jesus was the Son of Mary, but not of Joseph. St Matthew mentions Jechoniah, although he is passed by in the primary genealogy.

XIII. Whatever difficulty yet remains regarding this whole matter, so far from weakening, should even confirm our faith.

The stock of David had, in the time of Jesus of Nazareth, dwindled down to so small a number (see Revelation 22:16), that on this ground also the appellation “Song of Solomon of David” was used by Antonomasia[21] for “The Messiah.” And that family consisted so exclusively of Jesus and His relatives, that any one who knew Him to belong to it could not fail, even without the light of faith, to acknowledge Him as the Messiah, since the period foretold by the prophets for His manifestation had already arrived, and none of our Lord’s relations could be compared with Himself. Our Lord’s descent, therefore, from the race of David, as well as His birth at Bethlehem, were less publicly known; nay, rather He was in some degree veiled, as it were, by the name of Nazarene, that faith might not lose its price. And thus men, having been first induced on other grounds to believe that Jesus was the Messiah, concluded, on the same grounds, that He must be the Son of David. The necessary public documents, however, were in existence, whence it came to pass, that the chief priests, though employing every means against our Lord, never questioned His descent from David. Nay, even the Romans received much information concerning the Davidical descent of Jesus. Of old the facility with which His descent could be traced, showed Jesus to be the Son of David: now the very difficulty of so doing (caused as it is by the destruction of Jerusalem, and all the public records which it contained), affords a proof, against the Jews at least, that the Messiah must long since have come. Should they acknowledge any other as the Messiah, they must ascertain his descent from David in precisely the same manner that we do that of Jesus of Nazareth. As light, however, advanced, the aspect of the question has not a little changed. Jesus was called, on various occasions, “The Son of David,” by the multitude, by the blind men, by the woman of Canaan: but He never declared to His disciples that He was the Son of David, and they, in their professions of faith, called Him, not “The Son of David,” but “The Son of God;” He invited, also, those who called Him the Son of David, to advance further. In the first instance our Lord’s descent from David was rather a ground of faith, afterwards it became rather an obstacle to faith. No difficulty can now be a hinderance to them that believe.—See 2 Corinthians 5:16. Jesus is the root and the offspring of David, and the bright and morning star.

XIV. Matthew and Luke combine ulterior objects and advantages with the genealogy.

If the Evangelists had merely wished to show that Mary and also Joseph were descended from David, it would have been sufficient for their purpose, had they, taking the genealogies as they exist in the Old Testament for granted, commenced at the point where these conclude, namely, with Zorobabel, or at any rate with David himself, and traced the line through Nathan or Solomon down to Jesus Christ. St Matthew, however, begins further off, viz. with Abraham, and descends through David and Solomon. St Luke, on the other hand, ascends to Nathan and David, and thence beyond Abraham to the first origin of the human race. Each of them, therefore, must have had at the same time a further object in view.

St Luke, as is evident at first sight, makes a full recapitulation and summary of the lineage of the whole human race, and exhibits with that lineage the Saviour’s consanguinity to all Gentiles, as well as Jews: St Matthew, writing to the Hebrews, begins with Abraham, thus reminding them of the promise which had been made to that Patriarch. Again, St Luke simply enumerates the whole series, through more than seventy steps, without addition or comment: whereas St Matthew, besides several remarkable observations which he introduces in particular cases concerning the wives and brothers of those whom he mentions, and the Babylonian Captivity, divides the whole series into three periods; and, as we shall presently consider, enumerates in each of these periods fourteen generations. And hence, also, we perceive the convenience of the descent in Matthew, and the ascent in Luke: for in this manner the former was enabled more conveniently to introduce those observations and divisions; the latter, to avoid the stricter word ἐγέννησεbegat, and take advantage of the formula ὡς ἐνομίζετοas was supposed, and in an exquisite manner to conclude the whole series with God.—ὁ λεγόμενος Χριστόςwho is called Christ) St Matthew is dealing with the Jewish reader, who is to be convinced that Jesus is the Christ, by such means as His genealogy. And accordingly he here and there [throughout his Gospel] expresses and establishes what the other Evangelists take for granted. The force of the name Christ recalls especially the promise given to David concerning the Kingdom of the Messiah: and the force of the name Jesus recalls especially the promise given to Abraham concerning the Blessing.

———————————————

As for Joseph, he is next called “the husband of Mary.”

This is fully established in the gospel records. The name Mary, from the Hebrew Miriam, may mean Obstinacy (Stubbornness), Beloved, Myrrh, or something else, depending on the root word. Matthew next says, “from whom birthed Jesus.”

The name Jesus is from the Hebrew name Yeshua. It means Salvation. Mary is the human mother of Jesus and, as Bengel rightly notes, Jesus’ humanity comes wholly from her. He is the Seed of the Woman. His father is God and as His mother is human, and as all things reproduce after their own kind as indicated in Genesis 1, then Jesus is the God/Man.

As sin travels to offspring from the human father, then Jesus is the fulfillment of the sign of circumcision. He is the One to “cut” the transfer of sin from father to child because He is the sinless Son of God. Thus, Matthew next says, “being called the Christ.”

The verb is a present participle. He is and always will be the Christ, meaning “the Anointed One.” The word has the same meaning as the Hebrew word Messiah. God Anointed Jesus to be the Savior of the world, a role He fulfilled in His earthly ministry.

Life application: All hail the name of Jesus.

Lord God, You have done great things for us. Thank You for coming in the Person of Jesus Christ to restore us to Yourself. All praise, glory, and honor belong to You. Amen.

 

Matthew 1:15

Nifty cool bench, Wyoming Capitol.

Monday, 22 July 2024

Eliud begot Eleazar, Eleazar begot Matthan, and Matthan begot Jacob. Matthew 1:15

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen).

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“And Eliud begot Eleazar, and Eleazar begot Matthan, and Matthan begot Jacob” (CG).

The previous verse ended with, “and Achim begot Eliud.” The genealogy of Jesus continues next with, “And Eliud begot Eleazar.”

Eleazar means God Has Helped or Whom God Helps, coming from el, God, and azar, to help. Next it says, “and Eleazar begot Matthan.”

Matthan means Gift, coming from the verb nathan, to give. You may know someone named Nathan. Now you can explain his name to him and get him interested in reading the Bible. The genealogy now comes to the final name before the coming of Christ Jesus, saying, “and Matthan begot Jacob.”

The name Jacob comes from the Hebrew name Yaaqov. That is derived from aqev, the heel or hind part, which is derived from the verb aqav, to follow at the heel. Thus, the name means Heel Catcher. This, in turn, signifies Supplanter because when one grabs another’s heel, he will trip him up and take his place. The name also means Who Closely Follows After, He Who Sets Down His Heel, and so forth. It is a rich name with a variety of meanings.

Life application: There is a lot of coded information in this genealogy of Christ. A study by Dr. Ivan Panin recorded in the book Numerics in Scripture by Mark Vedder concerning this genealogy gives incredible mathematical patterns that seem impossible to be random. In fact, a definite wisdom and intelligence was used to make them.

Are these patterns the work of Matthew, or did Matthew simply copy these things down under the inspiration of the Spirit? The chances weigh heavily towards the latter. If Matthew had intentionally made this list with these patterns in mind, it would certainly have been recorded somewhere. However, it wasn’t until the 1800s that Dr. Panin discovered these patterns.

Take time to search the internet on his work.  You can also obtain a copy of the book by Mark Vedder online. It is a fascinating and incredible study that will leave you satisfied that you are on the right track when you are following Jesus. It is just one more of countless subtle proofs that God’s hand is clearly resting upon His sacred word.

Lord God, even with all of the proofs and evidences imaginable concerning the reliability of Your word, we still have to accept, by faith, that Jesus actually died for our sins, was buried, and rose again the third day. We did not witness it, and so we must have faith that it is so. And we do. Nothing else makes sense in this tiring world without Jesus. But with Him, all is fresh, alive, and new. Thank You for Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.

 

Judges 15:16-20 (Samson, Judge of Israel, Part VI)

Artwork by Douglas Kallerson.

Judges 15:16-20
Samson, Judge of Israel, Part VI

(Typed 29 April 2024) Throughout most of their history, the Jewish people have been faithfully unfaithful to the word that established them. God spoke through Moses, and then He continued to speak through His prophets for hundreds of years.

Moses penned the Torah (the Pentateuch) under inspiration of the Lord. It is the first five books of the Bible. However, it is not the entirety of the word of God to Israel. The Law of Moses thus continues with the utterances of the prophets who served under the law and whose words were then included in the sacred writings.

One of the things that Moses told them, which is substantially repeated several times in Scripture, says, “Whatever I command you, be careful to observe it; you shall not add to it nor take away from it.”

Moses’ words in Deuteronomy 12:32 presuppose at least these two things: 1) Do not add to or subtract from what the Lord inspires, and 2) observe the things that are written in the proper context.

These are the things that Israel failed at. They had their own oral traditions and false writings that they held to. They also failed to uphold the Scriptures given by God in their proper context. One of the obvious reasons we hold to the word as written is because, as we see week after week, it tells us about Jesus.

Those things are missing from false writings and false oral traditions. After Christ came, the Jews went even further afield and compiled the Talmud. It is a document that includes the Mishnah, a written compilation of the oral Torah, and the Gemara, a clarification of the Mishnah and other writings. At times, the Gemara expounds broadly on the Hebrew Bible.

The problem with these is that there is no light of Christ to be found in them. Hence, Israel is in a bad pickle. They are without Christ, and they have no proper connection to Christ because of their failure to come to the word alone to find Him.

How can that be corrected? A review of the typology in Judges 15 will reveal this.

Text Verse: “Calling a bird of prey [ayit] from the east,
The man who executes My counsel, from a far country.
Indeed I have spoken it;
I will also bring it to pass.
I have purposed it;
I will also do it.” Isaiah 46:11

The words of the text verse will be used later to point to what Judges 15 is telling us. When God gives us stories and instructions in His word, we should be able to make connections to other things that are based on reality.

An example is in today’s passage. Samson notes that he is exceptionally thirsty. This isn’t a problem if water is readily available. However, anyone who has been to Israel knows that there are many places that are extremely parched.

Add in the heat of the season, and it is evident why Samson is so distraught. The narrative is set at the time of the wheat harvest, which is around May to June. It is normally getting very hot in Israel at that time.

At the time of typing this sermon at the end of April, the temperature in Israel ranged from 91 to 105 degrees, depending on the location. Add in the dryness of the land without rain, and Samson’s words come alive in our minds. We can feel his thirst ourselves.

God uses such things as the time of year, the dryness of the land, the lack of shade, and so forth to tell us things that will reveal Jesus. This is why Scripture alone must be the reference for our doctrine. It is the only way that God has specially revealed Jesus to the world in writing.

Be sure not to get sidetracked by those who manipulate the word of God, either by taking it out of context or by adding to or taking away from it. And how can you do that unless you are aware of and versed in the written word? Read and know the Bible!

Great things about Jesus are to be found in His superior word. And so, let us turn to that precious word once again, and… May God speak to us through His word today, and may His glorious name ever be praised.

I. En Hakkore (verses 16-20)

16 Then Samson said:
“With the jawbone of a donkey,
Heaps upon heaps,
With the jawbone of a donkey
I have slain a thousand men!”

Translations of this verse are all over the place, but ultimately it is a powerful paronomasia (a play on words) that to tolerably and tidily translate is perfectly perplexing: vayomer Shimshon bilkhi ha’khamor khamor khamorathayim bilkhi ha’khamor hikethi eleph ish – “And says, Samson, in jawbone the donkey, donkey two donkeys. In jawbone, the donkey, struck thousand man.” / Or: “And says, Samson, in jawbone the donkey, heap two heaps. In jawbone, the donkey, struck thousand man.” / Or: “And says, Samson, in jawbone the donkey, clay clays. In jawbone, the donkey, struck thousand man.”

The word translated as donkey is khamor. The word translated as heap (or clay) is khomer. Coming from khamar, to boil up. Thus, it would be something that grows. In this case, a heap. However, both words ultimately come from khamar, an unused root meaning to be red. The reason for clay is the same as why Job said this –

“Truly I am as your spokesman before God;
I also have been formed out of clay.” Job 33:6

As such, it’s hard to tell what Samson was thinking. Was he saying he killed a bunch of men who were like donkeys? Was it a bunch of men who made heaps of dead? Or was he saying that he returned the enemy to being lumps of clay? Whichever he is referring to, it still forms a poignantly, profound, and profuse pun. The ultimate point of the words is that the slaughter was immense.

17 And so it was, when he had finished speaking, that he threw the jawbone from his hand, and called that place Ramath Lehi.

vayhi k’khalotho l’daber vayashlekh hal’khi miyado vayiqra lamaqom ha’hu Ramath lekhi – “And is, when he finished to speak, and casts the jawbone from his hand. And calls to place, the it, Ramath Lehi.’” One can see Samson standing there, hand raised, holding the jawbone, and saying his poem. Once he finished, he tossed it out of his hand.

After this, he named the place Ramath Lekhi. It means Height of the Jawbone, High Place of the Jawbone, or Exalted Jawbone, or based on the Hebrew l’khi – Exalted to Life. The name Ramath comes from rum, to be high or exalted.

Some people argue Casting Away of the Jawbone. But the word translated as cast is shalakh. It does not necessarily mean to cast away by flinging it far away. Moses was told to cast his staff on the ground, and it became a snake. He would have just tossed it down. This is probably what Samson did.

18 Then he became very thirsty; so he cried out to the Lord and said, “You have given this great deliverance by the hand of Your servant; and now shall I die of thirst and fall into the hand of the uncircumcised?”

vayitsma meod vayiqra el Yehovah vayomar atah nathata b’yad avdekha eth hathshuah ha’g’dolah hazoth v’atah amuth batsama v’naphal’ti b’yad ha’arelim – “And thirsts, very. And calls unto Yehovah. And says, ‘You gave, in hand your servant, the salvation, the whopping, the this. And now, dies in the thirst, and fall in hand the foreskinned.’”

The thirst he felt was a natural consequence of the situation. It is the harvest season when it is hot and dry in Israel. He had been bound. He broke those bonds and engaged in a battle against an entire army of men, taking out a thousand of them. Thirst would be at the forefront of his physical thoughts, just as it was for Jesus on the cross.

And more, Samson acknowledges that the Lord gave the victory through his hand, but it is notable that not a single person of Judah was there to help. If any had been, he could have asked that person for water. The battle was the Lord’s, fought for His people. Despite this, they had all denied and forsaken him, leaving Samson to die at the hands of the foreskinned Philistines.

But God was with him and responded to his need…

19 So God split the hollow place that is in Lehi, and water came out,

Rather, as in verse 9, there is an article before lekhi: vayivqa elohim eth hamakh’tesh asher ba’lekhi vayetsu mimenu mayim – “And cleaves, God, the mortar which in the Jawbone. And comes, from it, water.” It is notable that it says elohim rather than Yehovah. The powers of God are credited with the action.

As for what He did and where He did it, the word baqa, to cleave, is used. It can signify to rend, rip, divide, split, break open, break through, etc. What He cleaved is a new and rare word, maktesh. It signifies something hollowed out, a mortar. The word is from kathash, to pound as if in a mortar.

The only other place where maktesh is seen, other than as a name, is in Proverbs 27 where the mortar and pestle is described –

“Though you grind a fool in a mortar [maktesh] with a pestle along with crushed grain,
Yet his foolishness will not depart from him.” Proverbs 27:22

The mortar and pestle was the earliest means known for grinding grain. Grain was placed in a shallow depression in a stone, the mortar, and was then pounded with another stone known as the pestle.

This cleaving of the mortar is not in the jawbone of the donkey but a hollowed-out area in the place called the Jawbone. This is what God split open. When He did, water came out…

19 (con’t) and he drank; and his spirit returned, and he revived.

vayesht vatashav rukho vayekhi – “And drinks, and returns his spirit. And lives.” Samson was completely parched. He called for water and God provided it. In drinking it, it was as if he came to life again. The Lord accomplished the victory through Samson, and then He restored Samson to life through the cleaving of the hollow.

There is a rhyming pun in the Hebrew if you know the hidden meaning of Lehi –

God split the hollow place that is in Lehi (l’khi: to life)
And drinks, and returns his spirit, and lives (vayekhi)

19 (con’t) Therefore he called its name En Hakkore, which is in Lehi to this day.

al ken qara sh’mah ein ha’qore asher ba’lekhi ad hayom hazeh – “Upon thus, calls her name, ‘Fountain, the Caller,’ which in the Jawbone until the day, the this.” Following Samson’s calling out to the Lord, God cleaved the hollow and sent forth water. Thus, the well that sprang up is called Spring, the Caller.

The name En Hakkore comes from two words, ayin, a spring or an eye, and the active participle of qara, to call or proclaim. Thus, it means Fountain (Eye) of the Caller or Fountain (Eye) of the Calling.

It is this fountain that continued to flow, even at the time of the author of Judges. Extra-biblical writings also speak of the fountain being there many hundreds of years later. In fact, Barnes notes –

“A spring, on the way from Socho to Eleutheropolis, was commonly called Samson’s spring in the time of Jerome and writers in the 7th, 12th, and 14th centuries.” Albert Barnes

*20 (fin) And he judged Israel twenty years in the days of the Philistines.

vayishpot eth Yisrael bime plistim esrim shanah – “And judges, Israel, in days Philistines, twenty year.” The statement is unusual in that the record of Samson has another chapter to go. However, at the end of his life, the words will be repeated. Here, the verb is in the imperfect aspect: Samson judges Israel. At the end of Chapter 16, the aspect will be perfect, he judged Israel.

Of the number twenty, Bullinger notes –

It “…is the double of ten, and may in some cases signify its concentrated meaning. But its significance seems rather to be connected with the fact that it is one short of twenty-one, 21 – 1 = 20; that is to say, if 21 is the three-fold 7, and signifies Divine (3) completion as regards spiritual perfection (7), then twenty, being one short of 21, it would signify what Dr. Milo Mahan calls expectancy.”

With the verses complete, we will next look at what God is telling us about things yet to come…

With a fresh jawbone of a donkey
The enemy is struck and defeated
How is it so? How can it be?
With a mere jawbone, the victory is completed

And with a call out to the Lord
The hollow place is split
At the mere calling of a word
Out flow the waters, flowing forth from it

How glorious is the Fountain of the Caller
That it flows forth to this day
A treat for every Bible scholar
God gives forth His Spirit, and He does so without delay

II. Pictures of Christ

In Judges 14, we saw that Samson’s betrothed wife pictured Israel in her apostate state. Jesus came to Israel despite their apostasy, using that state to bring them back to Himself.

The account of the lion roaring at Samson revealed the means by which Christ will deliver His people. It was typologically given as an anticipation of the work of Christ through adherence to the word of the Lord to overcome the Philistines, the Weakeners, condemning those who rely on the law or personal merit as a means of works-based salvation.

Samson then walked and ate the honey. This reflected Jesus’ possession of the Word to sustain Him. Samson gave his riddle to the Philistines and some of them were able to glean the meaning of the riddle through his wife, meaning Israel’s apostate state.

It represented those who realized the time of Jesus’ coming. They solved the riddle. For this, they were granted their garments, just as believers are covered in Christ’s righteousness. However, the chapter ended with the note that the wife was given to his companion, who had been his best man.

John the Baptist noted that he was “the friend of the bridegroom” in John 3:29. He was the last prophet of the law and thus stands as representative of the law that Jesus came to fulfill. John died before Jesus fulfilled the law, and therefore he did not receive the grace of God in Christ in the new dispensation.

The bride being given to the best man by the father anticipates Israel remaining under the law. Chapter 14 ended there and Chapter 15 resumes the narrative with the words, “in days harvest wheat.”

The wheat harvest follows the barley. Barley (seorah), for reference, comes from sear, hair. It is the crop of hairy ears. Hair signifies awareness, particularly an awareness of sin. It is the time of the law. The wheat harvest follows that and, thus it is the time of grace.

Christ first fulfills the law and then comes grace. As noted, Jesus metaphorically used wheat to refer to Himself in John 12:24. Still in verse 1, Samson went with a young goat to visit his wife, representing Israel in her apostate state. The gedi izim, or kid goats, was his offering to go into her.

That anticipates that her sin was to be cut off and atoned for. Samson, speaking with an imperative, said, “I will go in unto my wife, the her chamber.” Likewise, Christ came to atone for Israel’s sin and be wedded to her. However (verse 2), Samson’s father would not allow it. His words were, “Saying, I said, ‘For hating, you hated her.’”

It was assumed that Jesus would have nothing more to do with Israel because of her apostate state. However, it is that state, prophesied through Jeremiah that the Lord will use in order to correct her. That was seen in Chapter 14 –

“Thine apostasy [apostasia] shall correct thee, and thy wickedness shall reprove thee: know then, and see, that thy forsaking me bitter to thee, saith the Lord thy God; and I have taken no pleasure in thee, saith the Lord thy God.” Jeremiah 2:19 (LXX)

That did not happen at the time of Jesus’ first coming. As such, the father said that he had given the wife to his companion. It pictures Israel’s returning to the law as noted concerning John the Baptist a moment ago.

Instead of the bride, the father offered Samson his other daughter, noting that she was even better than the first. Without directly saying anything about her, it is obvious she was rejected. Israel, even in her apostate state, was to be the bride of the Lord.

Instead, Samson, Place of the Sun (the Word of God in Christ), was determined to punish the Philistines (the Weakeners, meaning the false teachings opposed to the Word of God in Christ).

In order to do so, Samson noted that he would be blameless when he brought evil upon them (verse 3). To start the process, he caught three hundred foxes.

Three hundred, being a multiple of 3 and 10 signifies Divine fulness and completeness of order where nothing is wanting and the whole cycle is complete. This is done through “taking the things of Christ and making them real and solid in our experience” (Bullinger).

The number of foxes, three hundred, represents the timing of Christ’s earthly ministry. Using foxes (hole diggers) signifies that these things will occur by tripping up the foe.

The use of torches has a double signification, it illuminates the work of Christ and burns up the works of the Weakeners. Tying the foxes at the zanav, tail, means that he was using the foxes to destroy their falsehood, symbolized by the tail.

Teaching falsehood is exactly what the Weakeners, symbolized by the Philistines, picture. One can think of Pharisees, Sadducees, etc. coming against Jesus in His ministry, but He destroys their every argument.

In verse 5, Samson lit the torches and set the foxes free in the standing grain [qamah] of the Philistines. This burned up the shocks [gadiysh], the standing grain, and the “vineyard olive.” The first two of these were first noted in Exodus 22 –

“If fire breaks out and catches in thorns, so that stacked grain [gadiysh], standing grain [ha’qamah], or the field is consumed, he who kindled the fire shall surely make restitution.” Exodus 22:6

These things represent the labors of the people, both the present labors (the standing) and that which they have already tended to (the shocks). It speaks of the totality of the unsound doctrine of those who opposed Christ through self-works.

To get a sense of this, the word gadiysh is used only four times in Scripture. The first three refer to shocks of grain, but the last use refers to a tomb, because a tomb is something heaped up like shocks of grain –

For the wicked are reserved for the day of doom;
They shall be brought out on the day of wrath.
31 Who condemns his way to his face?
And who repays him for what he has done?
32 Yet he shall be brought to the grave,
And a vigil kept over the tomb [gadiysh]. Job 21:30-32

The labors of the Weakeners are burned up through the work of Christ. Like the tomb of a person being a witness to his life, the works of the Weakeners stood as a witness to their works.

The last thing noted, the “vineyard olive,” was the unusual term which seemed incorrect. An olive grove and a vineyard are not the same thing. However, typology is being conveyed.

The vineyard represents the cultural side of the people, the traditions of the elders, etc., that Jesus spoke against. The olive refers to their religious privilege, which – without Christ – is no privilege at all. It is all burned up through the ministry of Christ.

Verse 6 then brought in the questioning of the Philistines concerning who was responsible for burning up their works. The answer was that “Samson, affinity the Timnite, for took his wife and gives her to his companion.”

Think of Jesus: Samson (Place of the Sun, referring to the Word of God in Christ), the one tied to apostate Israel through affinity to the Allotted Portion-ite (the promise of Messiah), burnt up the Philistines’ deeds because the father-in-law gave his wife to his companion.

In other words, because of the deeds of the false teachers of Israel, the nation remained bound to the Law of Moses. This is the reason Christ came against their theology. He came to give grace, but Israel kept rejecting Him and His instruction.

Still in verse 6, the Philistines came up and burned Samson’s wife and her father with fire because of what Samson did. The Weakeners of Israel stood against Jesus and robbed Israel of any chance of being saved at that time.

It is clear, based on the words of Scripture, that there is a future for Israel the nation, but there has to be a way of showing that Israel, at Jesus’ time, was led astray and kept from Christ. This is symbolized by the act of burning the wife.

However, verse 7 then emphatically said, “And says to them, Samson, if (surely) doing according to this, when if I revenge in you, and after, I cease.” The difficult words were explained thus –

“And says to them, Samson:
Based on: if (surely) doing according to this
Therefore: when if I revenge in you,
Result: and after, I cease.”

Jesus came to accomplish His mission by uniting with Israel. The false teachers and false doctrine prevented that through their teachings, and therefore, He would carry out His planned program to act against them anyway, thus completing His mission.

One can sense this in Luke 9:51, “Now it came to pass, when the time had come for Him to be received up, that He steadfastly set His face to go to Jerusalem.” It is what is anticipated in the words of verse 8, “And strikes them leg upon thigh, slaughter whopping.”

Jesus, in His ministry, did a mighty work against the false teachings and false teachers of Israel, even if they prevented the nation from entering its rest. He continued until His mission was fully complete.

Still in verse 8 it said that Samson went down and dwelt in the cleft of Crag Etam. The name means the cleft of the Lofty Place of Ravenous Birds. That has to be understood from the words of our Text Verse today. The name is derived from ayit, a bird of prey. That verse from Isaiah was a prophecy of Cyrus who would release the captives of Israel, returning them to their land.

However, even into antiquity, the words were known to anticipate the work of the Messiah. The larger context says –

“Remember the former things of old,
For I am God, and there is no other;
I am God, and there is none like Me,
10 Declaring the end from the beginning,
And from ancient times things that are not yet done,
Saying, ‘My counsel shall stand,
And I will do all My pleasure,’
11 Calling a bird of prey from the east,
The man who executes My counsel, from a far country.
Indeed I have spoken it;
I will also bring it to pass.
I have purposed it;
I will also do it.
12 ‘Listen to Me, you stubborn-hearted,
Who are far from righteousness:
13 I bring My righteousness near, it shall not be far off;
My salvation shall not linger.
And I will place salvation in Zion,
For Israel My glory.’” Isaiah 46:9-13

As such, the cleft of the Crag of Etam anticipates the lofty counsels of God where Samson, the Word of God in Christ, dwells.

Next, in verse 9, it noted that the Philistines ascended, encamped in Judah, and dispersed in Lehi. Lehi means Jawbone. However, as Abarim noted, it cannot go unnoticed that someone who knows Hebrew and who looks at the name will see the words To Life (To as in Toward).

The Weakeners, the false teachers and their teachings, came against Judah, dispersing in To Life. When Judah asked why the Philistines had come against them, they said it was to bind Samson.

Think of the false teachers, the Judaizers, in Galatia! They wanted to bind the Word of God in Christ and teach law observance. It is the entire point of calling the council at Jerusalem in Acts 15.

Both during the time of Jesus’ ministry and afterward, even to this day, the same Weakeners infect and attempt to destroy the world of proper Christ-centered doctrine.

From there, in verse 11, three thousand men of Judah went to the cleft of the rock of Etam, the “lofty counsels of God,” to get Samson. When they came to him, they noted that the Philistines ruled over them. The Weakeners, those who teach law observance, are still pointing Israel to this false doctrine today.

His response was, “According to which done to me, thus done to them.” The false teachers work against the Word of God in Christ, stealing away the bride and burning her family. Therefore, the Word of God in Christ responds with a great slaughter against them. One can see the spiritual war raging in the world in these verses.

Next (verse 12), the men of Judah came down to arrest Samson and deliver him into the hand of the Philistines. Judah, for two thousand years, has been in this position. They have handed the Word concerning Christ over to the false teachers, but they have not killed Him off completely. That is seen in the exchange –

“Then Samson said to them, ‘Swear to me that you will not kill me yourselves.’
13 So they spoke to him, saying, ‘No, but we will tie you securely and deliver you into their hand; but we will surely not kill you.’”

In the continuation of verse 13, it said, “And binds him in two ropes, new. And ascends him from the crag.” The word ropes, as explained, signifies something intwined like a string, a wreath, a chain, etc. That comes from avath, to wind or weave. It is used just once, in a figurative sense –

“That they may successfully do evil with both hands—
The prince asks for gifts,
The judge seeks a bribe,
And the great man utters his evil desire;
So they scheme [avath] together.” Micah 7:3

The two cords represent the false teachings Judah accepted concerning the coming Messiah, meaning the verbal and written commandments that had arisen among the Jews in contradistinction to the word of God.

Such things were prophesied in Isaiah 29:13 and then referred to by Jesus in Matthew 15:8, 9. The word concerning Christ was bound. However, as twice before in the Samson narrative, it next said, “And surges, upon him, Spirit Yehovah.”

The Spirit of God is in the Word of God in Christ. When it is properly presented, it will prevail. Thus, it next said, “And becomes, the ropes, which upon his arms, according to the flax which burned in the fire. And melts, his bonds, from upon his hands.”

The effective reach of Christ to accomplish salvation (the arms), and the power and authority of Christ to effect that salvation (the hands), are completely loosed in rightly applying the Word of God.

When they are properly presented, they are wholly capable of defeating the enemy. As such, “And finds, jawbone donkey, fresh. And sends his hand. And takes her. And strikes, in her, thousand man.” Or stated typologically, “And finds, To Life Red One, Fresh.”

In the properly handled word concerning Christ, the Man (Red One) who gives Life (Jawbone) is revealed. This word is fully capable of destroying the false teachings of the false teachers. His victory over them as recorded in verse 16, says –

“And says, Place of Sun (the Word of God in Christ):
‘In To Life the Red One
Red One two Red Ones.
In To Life, the Red One,
Struck thousand man.’”

Through the Word of God in Christ (the incarnate Man) the doctrines of the false teachers are completely obliterated. Hooray for Jesus!

After that, it then said (verse 17), “And is, when he finished to speak, and casts the jawbone from his hand. And calls to place, it, Ramath Lehi.’” In prevailing over the enemy, the To Life has served its purpose and never again needs to be wielded. But in memory of the event, the place is called Exalted To Life! It is an eternal memorial to the resurrection of Jesus Christ. Again, hooray for Jesus!

With this accomplished, it noted Samson’s great thirst and his appeal to the Lord. He had gained the victory, but now would he fall into the hands of the foreskinned? Was Christ’s victory just a one-time salvation that had no lasting effects? No! The response is, “And cleaves, God, the hollow which in the Jawbone. And comes, from it, water.”

Not only did Christ prevail in His atonement for sin, but that caused God to send the Spirit for believers as well. This is why the narrative started with “in the time of the wheat harvest.” The thus narrative anticipates that time which begins around Pentecost, the time when the Spirit was first given in Acts 2.

God cleaved the mortar, a spot where grain could be ground to make bread. In cleaving it, water issued forth. It again speaks of the Word of God of Christ. Christ’s atonement was sufficient, He was raised to life, His spirit revived, and because of Him, the Spirit henceforth issues to those who believe, apart from works of the law.

One can see the symbolism of Christ, the Bread of Life, who was metaphorically crushed in the mortar. He then revived as the Spirit issued forth. That is seen in the words, “Upon thus, calls her name, ‘Fountain, the Caller,’ which in the To Life until the day, the this.”

The Fountain remains, issuing forth from the Fountain of the Caller, the Word of God in Christ –

“He who believes in Me, as the Scripture has said, out of his heart will flow rivers of living water.” John 7:38

Verse 20 ended with, “And judges, Israel, in days Philistines, twenty year.” Twenty is the number of Expectancy. It said in Judges 13 that Samson would begin to save Israel from the hand of the Philistines. That will continue even until the time of David.

Samson is being used to show the process of Israel’s salvation from the Weakeners, though not the entire panorama of it. There is the expectancy of that in each part of the Samson narrative. This will be seen again at the end of Chapter 16.

The main lesson, once again, is that of law versus grace. The Philistines are the Weakeners, those who work against the message of salvation through the deeds of Christ alone. Instead, they teach personal merit through deeds. This is wholly contradictory to what God in Christ has done.

A choice is set before us, and it cannot be ignored. We must give up on self and trust solely in the merits of Jesus Christ, believing the gospel and accepting that it is sufficient for our salvation and its continued effects, right up until the day God calls us home.

Let us have this mind and glorify God for what He has done through Jesus. And it is the Word of God in Christ, represented by Samson, the Place of the Sun, that will lead us to understand these things. Pick up the Bible, and there you will find the Word. And in Him, you will find contentment and rest.

Closing Verse: “And because you are sons, God has sent forth the Spirit of His Son into your hearts, crying out, ‘Abba, Father!’ Therefore you are no longer a slave but a son, and if a son, then an heir of God through Christ.” Galatians 4:6, 7

Next Week: Judges 16:1-9 This guy is number one. What a story to tell – like a slice of heaven.. (Samson, Judge of Israel, Part VII) (45th Judges Sermon)

The Lord has you exactly where He wants you. He has a good plan and purpose for you. It is He who judges His people according to their deeds. So, follow Him, live for Him, and trust Him, and He will do marvelous things for you and through you.

Samson, Judge of Israel, Part VI

Then Samson said: “With the jawbone of a donkey
Heaps upon heaps of them
With the jawbone of a donkey
I have slain a thousand men!”

And so it was, when he had finished speaking, by and by
That he threw the jawbone from his hand, and called that place
———-Ramath Lehi

Then he became very thirsty
So he cried out to the LORD and said
“You have given this great deliverance by the hand of Your servant
And now shall I die of thirst and fall into the hand of the
———-uncircumcised and wind up dead?

So God split the hollow place that is in Lehi
And water came out, and he drank away
And his spirit returned, and he revived
Therefore he called its name En Hakkore, which is in Lehi
———-to this day

And he judged Israel years twenty
In the days of the Philistines, with enemies aplenty

Lord God, turn our hearts to be obedient to Your word
Give us wisdom to be ever faithful to You
May we carefully heed each thing we have heard
Yes, Lord God may our hearts be faithful and true

And we shall be content and satisfied in You alone
We will follow You as we sing our songs of praise
Hallelujah to You; to us Your path You have shown
Hallelujah we shall sing to You for all of our days

Hallelujah and Amen…

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

16 Then Samson said:

“With the jawbone of a donkey,
Heaps upon heaps,
With the jawbone of a donkey
I have slain a thousand men!”

17 And so it was, when he had finished speaking, that he threw the jawbone from his hand, and called that place Ramath Lehi.

18 Then he became very thirsty; so he cried out to the Lord and said, “You have given this great deliverance by the hand of Your servant; and now shall I die of thirst and fall into the hand of the uncircumcised?” 19 So God split the hollow place that is in Lehi, and water came out, and he drank; and his spirit returned, and he revived. Therefore he called its name En Hakkore, which is in Lehi to this day. 20 And he judged Israel twenty years in the days of the Philistines.

 

 

 

 

Matthew 1:14

Wyoming Capitol.

Sunday, 21 July 2024

Azor begot Zadok, Zadok begot Achim, and Achim begot Eliud. Matthew 1:14

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen).

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“And Azor begot Zadok, and Zadok begot Achim, and Achim begot Eliud” (CG).

The previous verse ended with, “and Eliakim begot Azor.” The genealogy of Jesus continues next with, “And Azor begot Zadok.”

Zadok means Righteous or Just, coming from the word tsadeq, to be just. After him, it says, “and Zadok begot Achim.”

Achim means Raised Up or Established, either coming from the Hebrew qum, to arise or stand, or kun, to establish. After him, the list continues with, “and Achim begot Eliud.”

Eliud means My God is Majestic or My God is Praise, coming from el, God, and either hod, majesty, or yada, to praise. The “i” is possessive and thus “My God.” These three men were honored to be in the line of David leading to Jesus, other than that, nothing is known of them from a historical perspective.

Life application: Sometimes, it is hard to discern exactly what root a name is derived from. This is true in the Hebrew Bible, and so how much more difficult is it when a name is transliterated from Hebrew into Greek. Assumptions must be made as to which root the name is derived from.

There are times when an analysis is surely correct, but unless it is absolutely certain, it is good to consider a variety of possibilities. Such studies can lead one into a marvelous tapestry of gleaning information about the Hebrew language, so don’t hesitate to try one.

The study of the Bible involves the study of many other things, such as the original languages of Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek, also numbers, names, types of gemstones, metallurgy, and on and on. There are almost an endless number of avenues in which to study the Bible, so don’t get bogged down or in a rut in your daily reading!

Instead, look for new and exciting things to consider. What about trees? One can do an extensive study on the trees in the Bible, gleaning incredible insights into why God selected certain trees. Their wood, their sap, their leaves, and their fruit all can give us insights into what God is conveying to us.

Be ready to dive in! Pick a topic and go for it. You will be blessed each time you do.

Lord God, Your word is so deep, rich, and magnificent that we can study it all our lives and still find more that we can learn. There seems to be no end to the marvelous tapestry contained within the words, lines, and pages of Your precious word. Help us to study it and revel in it all the days of our lives. Amen.

 

Matthew 1:13

Road outside Wyoming Capitol.

Saturday, 20 July 2024

Zerubbabel begot Abiud, Abiud begot Eliakim, and Eliakim begot Azor. Matthew 1:13

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen)

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“And Zerubbabel begot Abiud, and Abiud begot Eliakim, and Eliakim begot Azor” (CG).

The previous verse ended with, “and Shealtiel begot Zerubbabel.” Matthew’s genealogy leading to Israel’s Messiah now continues with, “And Zerubbabel begot Abiud.”

This listing does not match that of 1 Chronicles 3, which says –

“The sons of Pedaiah were Zerubbabel and Shimei. The sons of Zerubbabel were Meshullam, Hananiah, Shelomith their sister, 20 and Hashubah, Ohel, Berechiah, Hasadiah, and Jushab-Hesed—five in all.” 1 Chronicles 3:19, 20

From this list, it is believed by some that Abiud is the same as Hananiah in that genealogy. John Gill thinks he is the same as Mushullam. Either way, the reason for the variance in names is that someone “…might have two names; nor is this unlikely, since it was usual, especially about the time of the Babylonish captivity, for men to have more names than one, as may be observed in Daniel and others, Daniel 1:7 where they went by one, and in Judea by another” Gill.

The list continues with “and Abiud begot Eliakim, and Eliakim begot Azor.”

Neither name is listed in 1 Chronicles. None of the names from this point on are recorded in Old Testament Scripture because of the dating of 2 Chronicles which ends prior to the intertestamental period.

Of this record, Bengel says –

“Hiller explains in his Syntagmata, pp. 361, sqq., where he shows, that the Jews acknowledged the genealogy in the said passage of Chronicles to be that of the Messiah: nor, indeed, was it necessary that any other genealogy should have been carried further down there than that of the Messiah. There can, therefore, be no doubt but that the passage in question was particularly well known to the Jews; and there was, consequently, the less need that St Matthew should repeat it in extenso. In this generation, then, concludes the scripture of the Old Testament. The remainder of the genealogy was supplied by St Matthew from trustworthy documents of a later date, and, no doubt, of a public character.”

Life application: The genealogical records in the Old Testament were meticulously maintained, but they didn’t account for differences in names at the time when two names were used. They simply listed a name and continued on. As such, a lot of research is often needed to know who is being referred to. At times, speculation must be made.

An example of one person with two names is found in the sons of Saul –

Ner begot Kish, Kish begot Saul, and Saul begot Jonathan, Malchishua, Abinadab, and Esh-Baal.” 1 Chronicles 9:39

The son named Esh-Baal is the same as Ishbosheth recorded in 2 Samuel 2:8. Likewise, the son of Jonathan, Mephibosheth of 2 Samuel 4:4, is called Merib-baal in 1 Chronicles 8:34. These things can be deduced from the surrounding text within the narratives at times, but the point is that people being given two names is not unusual, nor is it something that is always noted.

As noted above, Daniel and the three men noted with him in Daniel 1:7 were given new names when they were exiled to Babylon. If their names were recorded, normally only one would be maintained in a particular genealogy. This makes things both difficult and, at times, completely unsure. However, in the Bible, there is enough information for us to be certain that Jesus is the Messiah. Even with a difficult genealogy to consider, innumerable other clues point both to the timing of His coming and the role He would fulfill.

Let us be confident that we have a sound and reliable record of what God intends for us, even if we do not have all the answers to various genealogical difficulties at this time.

Heavenly Father, thank You for Your word which gives us great insights into what You have done and continue to do in the stream of history to bring us back to Yourself. Above all, thank You for Jesus who is so prominently on display in the pages of the Bible. We have every assurance that we are following You properly when we choose to follow Jesus. Amen.