Daily Writing

Saturday, 4 July 2026

So the multitudes said, “This is Jesus, the prophet from Nazareth of Galilee.”  Matthew 21:11

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at the “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen).

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“The ‘also crowds’, they said, ‘This, He is the prophet, Jesus, the ‘from Nazareth, the Galilee’.’” (CG)

In the previous verse, when Jesus had come into Jerusalem, the people asked who He was. In response, “The ‘also crowds’, they said, ‘This, He is the Prophet, Jesus.’”

This response can be taken in a couple of ways. The first is that they are claiming Jesus is the fulfillment of Moses’ words –

“And the Lord said to me: ‘What they have spoken is good. ¹⁸ I will raise up for them a Prophet like you from among their brethren, and will put My words in His mouth, and He shall speak to them all that I command Him. ¹⁹ And it shall be that whoever will not hear My words, which He speaks in My name, I will require it of him.’” Deuteronomy 18:17-19

This was understood to be a particular prophet who would come in the future, not merely one of a line of prophets. In fact, in John’s gospel, that this is a particular individual is made perfectly clear –

“Now this is the testimony of John, when the Jews sent priests and Levites from Jerusalem to ask him, ‘Who are you?’
²⁰ He confessed, and did not deny, but confessed, ‘I am not the Christ.’
²¹ And they asked him, ‘What then? Are you Elijah?’
He said, ‘I am not.’
‘Are you the Prophet?’
And he answered, ‘No.’” John 1:19-21

The other option is that the words “the Prophet” refer to one of the many prophets who had arisen since the time of Moses, such as Samuel, Gad, Daniel, Jeremiah, etc. Thus, the people would be speaking in general terms. Based on His being hailed as the Messiah with the quoting of Psalm 118, the former option seems likely, but it is debatable. Along with being noted as the Prophet, it next says, “the ‘from Nazareth, the Galilee’.”

Jesus (Yeshua) was a common name at the time. To ensure He was identified more fully, the area where He was raised and performed so many miracles is affixed to His identity. The stories of great miracles being performed in the area of the Galilee would have permeated the collective conscience of the people.

Life application: To this day, it is debated who Jesus is. Islam has Him in a list of prophets leading to Muhammad. They deny His deity, and they deny that He was killed or crucified. Instead, they teach that He was raised bodily to heaven, protecting Him from death.

Mormons teach that Jesus was a man who became a god. Liberal churches teach that Jesus was a good teacher, but shy away from anything about Him that is confrontational or causes them to admit that their sinful lives will be judged by Him. They have so watered down the message of Jesus that every perversion imaginable is supposedly considered acceptable to Jesus, calling their vile teaching “loving” and “non-judgmental.”

An overwhelming number of messianic churches, along with groups like the Hebrew Roots Movement, teach that Jesus came to restore and “renew” the Mosaic covenant, thus requiring His people to continue observing the Law of Moses. Jehovah’s Witnesses teach that Jesus was the archangel, Michael. He was crucified for sin and then was raised as a “mighty spirit being.” They deny a literal physical resurrection of the Man who is God incarnate.

These are but a few of the skewed and heretical ideas put forth concerning who Jesus is. But getting the “who” of Jesus right is the most important thing any human can do. So important is this issue that CS Lewis, in his book Mere Christianity, used a “poached egg” analogy, illustrating the absurdity of people’s thoughts concerning Jesus.

He notes that a man claiming to be God while being merely human would be a lunatic or the Devil of hell, not a teacher. He compared the delusion of claiming divinity to the insanity of a man who believes he is a poached egg.

Either Jesus is the Lord God, or He is not. To deny His deity, if He is God, cannot be overcome in the process of salvation. The Lord alone is without sin, and the Lord alone deserves the glory for what He has accomplished. If He is the Lord God, it is our duty and responsibility to honor Him as such.

Be careful to consider who Jesus is. Get this point right, believe that God has done what He has done through Jesus, and be saved. This is important.

Lord God, may we be strong in our convictions concerning Jesus and what He has done for us. And may we stand firmly on the good news when talking to others. There is no other Savior, no other access to heaven’s glory, and no other King of the Universe than the Lord God who has come in the Person of Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.

Friday, 3 July 2026

And when He had come into Jerusalem, all the city was moved, saying, “Who is this?” Matthew 21:10

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at the “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen)

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“And having entered, He, into Jerusalem, it was shaken, all the city, saying, ‘Who is this?’” (CG)

In the previous verse, the multitudes were said to have cried out joyous words, hailing Jesus as the fulfillment of the messianic promises, highlighted with words from Psalm 118. With the procession continuing forward, it next says, “And having entered, He, into Jerusalem.”

The words are carefully stated, emphatically showing that Jesus is the focus of attention. It is He who has entered the holy city. The fact that it is Jerusalem brings a sense of foreboding, however. Jesus has already noted before His disciples that “it cannot be that a prophet should perish outside of Jerusalem” (Luke 13:30). He also said this specifically about Himself just a short time before –

“Now Jesus, going up to Jerusalem, took the twelve disciples aside on the road and said to them, ¹⁸ ‘Behold, we are going up to Jerusalem, and the Son of Man will be betrayed to the chief priests and to the scribes; and they will condemn Him to death, ¹⁹ and deliver Him to the Gentiles to mock and to scourge and to crucify. And the third day He will rise again.’” Matthew 20:17-19

As for the reception in the city, it next says, “it was shaken, all the city.”

It is a new word, seió, to rock to and fro or sideways, and thus to agitate, move, quake, or shake. It is the same word used in Matthew 27 as a literal shaking –

“Then, behold, the veil of the temple was torn in two from top to bottom; and the earth quaked [seió], and the rocks were split, ⁵² and the graves were opened; and many bodies of the saints who had fallen asleep were raised; ⁵³ and coming out of the graves after His resurrection, they went into the holy city and appeared to many.” Matthew 27: 51-53

This is also the same thought that occurred when Naomi and Ruth came to Bethlehem in Ruth 1:19. The word used was hum, to make an uproar or agitate greatly. As for Jesus’ entry, it is to be remembered that this is the time of the Passover. There would be upwards of two or three million people crowding the city. Such a sight would cause an immense agitation as people vied to get a glimpse of what was going on. In seeing Jesus entering as He did, they were “saying, ‘Who is this?’”

As there were people from all over Israel, as well as pilgrims from other countries returning for the feast, those who had never seen or heard of Jesus would have been wondering why such a large group of people was actively shouting out the words expected of honoring the Messiah Himself. Thus, the confusion and turmoil would have been immense.

Life application: The nation of Israel had the entire week to evaluate the matter set before them. Is this Person being conducted into the city really the Messiah or not? Unfortunately, those who made the decisions for the nation were not to be swayed by the masses.

Instead, they actively voiced their opposition to Jesus and His ministry. And this was done despite all the evidence imaginable having been presented over the previous years that He ministered in their presence.

The people of the land saw what He had accomplished and were convinced that He was the One. And yet, in a few days, He would be crucified and rejected by most of the nation. The ability of those in power to sway the masses is exceptionally strong.

As such, we have to be careful to not allow ourselves to be deluded by supposed specialists in any field, be it politics, religion, medicine, etc. But we also need to not be persuaded by those who speak against specialists, either.

In other words, there are “specialists” at refuting every specialist one can imagine. This is why there are believers in a flat Earth. There are people who convincingly sway the minds of people using faulty logic or manipulation of the data to convince us of one conspiracy or another.

In all such things, we should not assume that what we are presented is correct until we have thought the matter through. Is the Earth billions of years old? When Jesus said, “It is finished,” what was He talking about? Question what you hear before agreeing to someone’s possibly nutty idea about the matter. Did Joseph Smith really hear from God that there is another testament of Jesus Christ?

Be wise and discerning, checking things out. Truth is what corresponds to reality. There is a whole world of untruthful information being tossed before us. Jesus really was heralded as the Messiah by the people. If the masses who were stirred had checked things out, they may have ignored their leaders and saved a great deal of woe.

Someday, they will go to their Scriptures, check out what they say, compare them with the events of the world around them, and conclude that they were wrong about Jesus. It is a lesson we should pay heed to in all things.

Lord God, there is a world full of information and disinformation swirling around us. People have agendas that are often contrary to what is good, normal, logical, and right. Give us wisdom to discern the truth, or at least not to accept what is presented without sufficient evidence concerning whatever matters come our way. Help us in this, O God. Amen.

Thursday, 2 July 2026

Then the multitudes who went before and those who followed cried out, saying:
“Hosanna to the Son of David!
‘Blessed is He who comes in the name of the LORD!’
Hosanna in the highest!” Matthew 21:9

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at the “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen)

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“The ‘also crowds’, those preceding, and those following, they croaked, saying:

‘Hosanna! The ‘Son, David’!
Having been blessed, the ‘coming in Name, Lord!’
Hosanna in the uppermosts!’” (CG)

In the previous verse, it was noted that a great multitude spread their clothes on the road while others cut down branches from the trees, spreading them on the road as well. It next says, “The ‘also crowds’.”

These would be those just described who thronged around Jesus. The scene would have been rather incredible with Jesus in their midst, being highlighted among them. The description of the crowds is seen in the words, “those preceding, and those following.”

Some wanted to lead the way, as if they were a king’s guards, going before him to herald his name and clear out anyone who stood in the way to hinder the progress. Others would follow behind, as if they were a king’s loyal subjects, willing to follow him into battle or in a victory procession. Such a scene is recorded in 1 Samuel –

“Now it had happened as they were coming home, when David was returning from the slaughter of the Philistine, that the women had come out of all the cities of Israel, singing and dancing, to meet King Saul, with tambourines, with joy, and with musical instruments. ⁷ So the women sang as they danced, and said:
‘Saul has slain his thousands,
And David his ten thousands.’” 1 Samuel 18: 6, 7

Of those who went before and followed after Jesus, it notes that “they croaked.”

The word has been seen before, krazó, to croak as a raven. Thus, it would be a distinct and loud shout from the masses. They were “saying: ‘Hosanna! The ‘Son, David’!”

It is a new word in the New Testament, coming from the Hebrew words yasha, to save, and na, pray, as in “pray tell.” The form of the verb in the Hebrew would be causative imperative with an emphatic paragoge, thus hoshia (you must surely cause to save) na, pray. The importance of this is because it is what is recorded in the 118^th Psalm –

“Oh, pray, Yehovah!
You must (surely) cause to save (hoshia), pray (na)!” Psalm 118a (CG)

The people were aware that the psalm anticipated the coming Messiah. Their calling out “Hosanna” was an acknowledgement that they believed that He is the fulfillment of that expectation. Their words of this acknowledgment continue with, “Having been blessed, the ‘coming in ‘Name, Lord’!”

This is also found in the 118^th Psalm –

“Blessed the ‘coming’ in ‘name, Yehovah’.” Psalm 118:26a (CG)

Matthew’s words in the Greek use a perfect participle, “having been blessed.” That is followed by a present participle “coming.” Thus, it indicates that the people are proclaiming that Jesus was the fulfillment of the anticipated Messiah and that He continues to fulfill that role. His coming is in the name of Yehovah.

There is no doubt about the intent of their proclamation. The people believe Jesus has been appointed by Yehovah to work His salvation in the name of Yehovah. Because of this, they continue, saying, “Hosanna in the uppermosts!”

Another new word is seen, hupsistos, the plural of hupsos, elevation. Thus, it is a superlative normally translated as “highest.” To preserve the plural, the word “uppermosts” gives the most literal sense. This would be comparable to the Hebrew and Aramaic adjectives elyon, uppermost. When referring to God, it is normally translated as Most High.

It should be noted that the words of the people do not mean that they believed Jesus is God. Rather, they believed He was sent by God to fulfill the messianic role and promises contained in Scripture. It is only in the resurrection and the theology surrounding that event (mixed with an understanding of the virgin birth) that the deity of Christ Jesus can be deduced and explained.

Life application: There is no doubt that the masses of Israel thought that Jesus was the anticipated Messiah. However, the rulers, meaning those who spoke for the nation, rejected this. In their rejection of Him, they had Him crucified.

In His crucifixion, the people then believed the lies of the leaders. Many were saved through faith in Jesus after the resurrection, as testified to in Acts. However, the nation as a whole was led astray by the leaders. In their rejection of Him, they were punished according to the curses set forth in the Law of Moses.

A point should be gleaned from this. We should not allow our spiritual understanding of what God is doing to rest in the hands of others. It is true that we have leaders appointed over us for gaining knowledge about the word, and about what God has done and is doing.

But we should not blindly trust anyone. Look at the disaster that has been caused in cults like the Seventh Day Adventists, the Mormons, the Jehovah’s Witnesses, etc. Look at how people follow Roman Catholicism without regard to Scripture.

Our doctrine and theology must be derived from somewhere. Where is it that you should obtain it? The answer is from God. As God has given us the Bible for this purpose, we should be in the Bible, studying it, and checking out what we are told. Israel, the entire nation of them, has been led astray by false leaders for two thousand years.

Many in the church have followed suit, following leaders who have misdirected people away from the truth of God in Christ. Don’t let anyone do this to you. KNOW YOUR BIBLE and check what you are told.

Lord God, help us to be responsible and check out everything we are told. Your word alone is the instruction we need to know You and what You expect. As we are taught from it, give us the wisdom to then verify what we have been instructed. Amen.

Wednesday, 1 July 2026

And a very great multitude spread their clothes on the road; others cut down branches from the trees and spread them on the road. Matthew 21:8

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at the “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen)

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“The ‘also most crowd’, they spread their ‘the cloaks’ in the road, others, also, they chopped branches from the trees, and they strewed in the road.” (CG)

In the previous verse, the disciples brought the donkey and the colt, and they laid their clothes on them, and Jesus sat on them. Next, Matthew records, “The ‘also most crowd’.”

The word pleistos has already been seen once. It signifies the largest number or the greatest in quantity. Thus, it means that the majority of the people in the crowd participated in what Matthew will next say, which is that “they spread their ‘the cloaks’ in the road.”

It is certain that there were those, like the Pharisees and Sadducees, who would not participate in this. Hence, the use of the word pleistos means that most of the people joined in, even if they didn’t all do so. Another word, strónnuó, is seen. It signifies “to strew” as in spreading out.

In this case, the people saw Jesus and the commotion around Him and wanted to participate in the jubilation, as a sign of respect and honoring Him in a kingly fashion, they removed their outer garments and spread them before Him. This is seen elsewhere in Scripture –

“Then Jehu came out to the servants of his master, and one said to him, ‘Is all well? Why did this madman come to you?’
And he said to them, ‘You know the man and his babble.’
¹² And they said, ‘A lie! Tell us now.’
So he said, ‘Thus and thus he spoke to me, saying, “Thus says the Lord: ‘I have anointed you king over Israel.’”’
¹³ Then each man hastened to take his garment and put it under him on the top of the steps; and they blew trumpets, saying, ‘Jehu is king!’” 2 Kings 9:11-13

Along with this sign of recognizing Jesus’ kingly authority, it says, “others, also, they chopped branches from the trees, and they strewed in the road.” John’s gospel says that as Jesus was coming to Jerusalem, they “took branches of palm trees and went out to meet Him.”

That is probably different than what Matthew is describing. Jesus has been placed on a donkey, and immediately, in honor of Him, the people took their clothes and spread them out. Others, as a similar sign of respect, cast down the branches, as if their efforts were being cast before Him.

Those hearing that Jesus was coming would have taken palms and shaken them as a sign of greeting and acknowledgment of His presence, like giant waving hands. As He passed, they may also have cast them down, or they may have kept waving them as they followed. The waving and casting of palms would have been accompanied by their shouts, which will be seen in the next verse. The scene would have been filled with lively joy.

Life application: Think on the fickleness of the situation seen here. The people are cumulatively coming out in honor of the one they believe is the Messiah, giving Him a kingly welcome. And yet, for the next two thousand years, His name has been used as a curse word.

This is seen in any nation where a leader is heralded as a great man while things are going well, but as soon as things take the slightest downturn, people start to turn from him and moan about what an incompetent person they have leading them.

In such a case, the people will normally either overthrow him,  or the leader, if he has solidified enough power, will begin to persecute the people, quashing any sense of rebellion. Either way, the joy of the initial prospects for a leader can quickly return to regret and even fear.

In the case of Jesus, the people misunderstood His reason for coming. He came to deal with the greatest foe of all, and it wasn’t the Romans who occupied their land. Because of this, they felt that He had failed them. How could the Messiah not exalt them, God’s chosen people, to the position and benefits promised them in their Scriptures?

But God’s timing and plans must take precedence over temporary exaltation. Souls need to be saved, and God’s house must be built out of those who will, by faith, come to Him. Law is contrary to faith. Israel felt they merited God’s favor. To this day, they still do.

Until they realize that they are actually just like any other people in regard to sin and unrighteousness, they cannot be granted the fulfillment of the promises made in their Scriptures.

All of us must come to God through faith. Only then can we be considered sons of God. But by faith in the gospel of Jesus Christ, that takes place. We enter into a new life paradigm. It is one that brings us near to God in a new way.

Someday, that will be realized in its fullness. Hold fast to what lies ahead as we live out our lives under the temporary rule of whatever authority is appointed over us. We have a true King who has us securely in His grasp.

Lord God, how great it is to know that whatever leader we have over us now, whether good or bad, we will not have to endure in this situation forever. The good leader will die, and another who may not be so good will take his place. All the while, our true King, our Lord and Savior Jesus, has us safely in His hand until the day He brings us to Himself. May that day be soon. Amen.

Tuesday, 30 June 2026

They brought the donkey and the colt, laid their clothes on them, and set Him on them. Matthew 21:7

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at the “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen)

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“They brought the donkey and the colt, and they upon-set atop them the ‘cloaks, theirs’, and He upon-sat atop them.” (CG)

In the previous verse, Matthew noted that the disciples went and did as Jesus commanded them concerning the donkeys. With that noted, it next says, “They brought the donkey and the colt.”

As noted in a previous commentary, only Matthew focuses on both the donkey and her colt. The other three gospels focus on the colt alone because it is the animal that Jesus rode. Matthew continues with, “and they upon-set atop them the ‘cloaks, theirs’.”

Depending on the source text, the words can be confusing. There are several differences between texts. This study uses the Stephanus Textus Receptus of 1550. As for what it says, the word “they” is again referring to the disciples –

They brought … and they upon-set.

The word “them” refers to both animals –

“the donkey and the colt … and they upon-set atop them.”

From there, it notes the cloaks are what was upon-set atop the animals. After that, it next says, “and He upon-sat atop them.”

A new word, found only here in Scripture, is seen, epikathizó, to sit upon. It is from epi, upon, and kathizó, to sit down. Jesus is the subject, going back to the previous verse –

Having gone, also, the disciples, and having done just as He commanded them, the ‘Jesus’ … and He upon-sat atop them. But the word “them” then further confuses scholars, as if it is referring to the donkeys, meaning Jesus sat on two donkeys. That makes no sense because the nearest antecedent is the cloaks –

“and they upon-set atop them the ‘cloaks, theirs’, and He upon-sat atop them.”

Others argue that because the cloaks were placed on both donkeys, it does refer to the cloaks, but it would still mean he had to sit atop both donkeys. Again, that has to be read into the words.

For all we know, he sat upon the cloaks on one of the donkeys, and someone else sat on the cloaks on another donkey to help keep the younger, previously unridden donkey, content to walk by its mother. It would take much more to assume Jesus sat on two donkeys than it would to figure someone else sat on the mother to keep the newly broken colt steady.

Life application: Without getting too bogged down in an overly complicated commentary, a note from Myer’s New Testament Commentary finishes the thought, saying, “it would appear that it was the dam on which Jesus rode, with the foal walking by her side.”

Why they would come to this conclusion, regardless of which source text is used, is unthinkable. Mark, Luke, and John never mention a second donkey. All of them agree that Jesus rode on the colt.

To change that because of a botched text or someone’s botched analysis, would cause a real contradiction between the gospels.

Be sure that when you read commentaries to check out several others if something seems wrong about the one you are reading. At the same time, remember that there are different texts that people use for their translations.

Little differences can cause confusion in the text. Don’t assume something is wrong in God’s word just because of something you have read or heard. Be diligent to check and then think things through, or do further study. In the end, you will inevitably find that what seemed incorrect has a reasonable explanation.

Lord God, Your word is a true treasure of delight and wonder. Help us to carefully consider it and to cherish its contents all the days of our lives. To Your glory we pray. Amen.