1 Samuel 16:14-23 (Arise! Anoint Him! Part II)

Artwork by Douglas Kallerson

1 Samuel 16:14-23
Arise! Anoint Him! Part II

(Typed 10 November 2025) In this passage, Saul discovers the price of being disobedient to the Lord. He probably never figured things would change so completely. However, this is what the Lord determined was right.

This is not to say that every unhappy thing that occurs to us came directly from the Lord. We live in a fallen world and suffer the consequences of sin. We have to adapt to the changes we face as we get older, suffer from accidents or external attacks, and encounter health-related issues that can come in an almost infinite variety of ways.

For Saul, the reason for his declining mental state is explicitly stated. The Spirit of the Lord departed from him, and something else replaced that influence. In order to adjust to this difficulty, it is suggested that music help control and calm his mental state.

It has been known for as long as man has walked on the earth that music nearly instantly calms a restless mind and lifts a heavy heart. Slow, soothing songs lower stress hormones and ease a racing pulse. This gives your brain the same relief as a deep breath.

Upbeat tunes spark dopamine, the feel-good chemical our bodies naturally produce. Singing or drumming delivers a quick sense of victory that pushes back sadness.

Text Verse: To the Chief Musician. A Song. A Psalm. Intro to Psalm 66

Many psalms begin with the words, “To the Chief Musician.” The meaning is that the psalms were set… anyone? To music. Although some of them may have been slow and contemplative, one would be hard-pressed to say that they all were.

One read through the 150th Psalm tells you that if the Levites had modern guitars and amplifiers, the people would be praising the Lord with them. Seeing David whirl and spin before the Lord when the ark was brought to Jerusalem tells us that rejoicing before the Lord includes dancing that would make those in Victorian England run to prayer closets, hoping to escape the supposed sure coming of the wrath of God.

Along with music, lyrics, such as those found in the psalms, allow us to borrow someone else’s words to ease pain we can’t even properly describe. They can guide us back toward hope that we thought was wholly elusive.

In today’s passage, David is called to play for Saul. David was God’s choice to replace Saul as king. His music was certainly a part of the reason for this.

Playing an instrument sharpens memory and focus, and it trains the mind to stay active. It directs the individual to unite in thought, emotion, and intent with the subject of the music. In David’s psalm, he was uniting with the Lord in this way.

Many of the psalms were meant for corporate worship. It is known that a shared chorus or concert melts loneliness and weaves voices together into an instant state of belonging.

Because of the benefits of music, we don’t need a therapist to begin changing our mental state. If we listen to music, tap a rhythm, or hum along with others, we can change our attitude and focus. It’s free, safe, and always ready to be our first step back to peace.

We see this in the account of Samuel, and we can infer it from other passages in Scripture as well. Wonderful things such as this are to be found in His superior word. And so, let us turn to that precious word once again, and… May God speak to us through His word today, and may His glorious name ever be praised.

I. Knowing Thrumming (verses 14-17)

These verses need to be considered parenthetical and actually belong after verse 18:1a. This has already occurred several times in 1 Samuel.

There are several reasons for this, but the description of David here and in verse 17 gives a strong hint. It would also explain why Saul’s condition came upon him as it did.

14 But the Spirit of the Lord departed from Saul,

veruakh Yehovah sarah meim shaul – “And Spirit Yehovah, it veered from with Saul.” This is the Spirit that first came upon him in verse 10:10 –

“And they came there, the hill-ward, and behold, company prophets to meet him. And it surged upon him, Spirit God. And he prophesied himself in their midst.” 1 Samuel 10:10

It again surged upon Saul in verse 11:6, meaning that the Spirit was available to him all the time. It was a pressing force when action was needed. That Spirit, however, departed from Saul…

14 (con’t) and a distressing spirit from the Lord troubled him.

u-viatatu ruakh raah meeth Yehovah – “And it affrighted him, breath evil-ward from Yehovah.” The word ruakh has three separate and distinct translations: spirit, wind, and breath. The context of each use determines its meaning. There is overlap in how people perceive what is being presented. The corresponding Greek word, pneuma, carries the same three meanings.

Determining what word to translate pneuma as requires the same thought process as the Hebrew ruakh. In the Greek, the only exception to this is when the word is preceded by the definite article, thus indicating the Holy Spirit.

All translations say “spirit” in the second clause. The question is, are the clauses set in parallel or in contrast? The first clause is universally agreed to be the Spirit of Yehovah (also God) in these verses. The differences would be –

And Spirit Yehovah, it veered from with Saul.
And it affrighted him, spirit evil from Yehovah.

And Spirit Yehovah, it veered from with Saul.
And it affrighted him, wind evil from Yehovah.

And Spirit Yehovah, it veered from with Saul.
And it affrighted him, breath evil from Yehovah.

The word “from” shows this is probably an active agent. Benson, et al, says, “That is, by God’s permission, who delivered him up to be buffeted by Satan.” That inserts what is unstated, but it is not out of the question. An example of a secondary agent used in this manner is found in 1 Kings 22:19-23.

The word breath is a possibility. In Ezekiel 37, it says –

“Thus says the Lord God to these bones: ‘Surely I will cause breath [ruakh] to enter into you, and you shall live. I will put sinews on you and bring flesh upon you, cover you with skin and put breath [ruakh] in you; and you shall live. Then you shall know that I am the Lord.’” Ezekiel 37:5, 6

Likewise, in Isaiah, it says –

“The voice said, ‘Cry out!’
And he said, ‘What shall I cry?’
‘All flesh is grass,
And all its loveliness is like the flower of the field.
The grass withers, the flower fades,
Because the breath [ruakh] of the Lord blows upon it;
Surely the people are grass.” Isaiah 40:6, 7

These and other such instances make breath a possibility. As for translating it as “spirit,” in Hosea 11, it says –

“For He, between brothers, He will cause to fruit
It will come, east wind [ruakh] – Yehovah
From wilderness, ascending.
And it will pale, his well,
And it will parch, his fountain.
He will plunder, depository, every vessel delightfulness.” Hosea 11:15 (CG)

The east wind, a wind of turmoil, destruction, and trouble in the Bible, is said to come from Yehovah. Though the term “evil wind” is not used, the meaning is synonymous in relation to those who receive it.

Therefore, there is precedent for the use of a wind directed from Yehovah that causes trouble. Outside of what happens to Saul, there is no evil spirit sent directly from the Lord.

The word translated as “affrighted” in this clause, baath, is introduced. It signifies to fear. In this case, it is what causes the fear. The Topical Lexicon rightly says, “It is never a mild uneasiness; it is a jolt of fear that immobilizes, unnerves, or drives one to desperate action. The concept is closely linked with the felt reality of divine judgment or the crushing weight of impending calamity.”

This is something that suddenly comes upon Saul and causes him mental anguish.

15 And Saul’s servants said to him, “Surely, a distressing spirit from God is troubling you.

vayomeru avde shaul elav hineh na ruakh elohim raah mevaitakha – “And they said, servants Saul, unto him, ‘Behold, we pray, breath God, evil-ward, affrighting you.’” The evil breath from Yehovah is now called “breath God evil.” The servants perceive this as an evil breath of God. Verse 23 will confirm this is so.

The question now is whether this evil breath is something of God that is placed upon Saul or is it a breath that causes evil in Saul. It should be taken as an axiom that in God, there is no evil. However, be it God or the Lord, something that is sent will cause what we perceive as evil, even if it suits His good purposes –

“If it will be blown, shophar in city,
And people not they will shudder?
If there will be evil in city,
Yehovah, not He did?” Amos 3:6 (CG)

In Amos, the question is rhetorical, but did Yehovah actively cause the evil, or was it allowed through the attack of the enemy? The answer is that it was allowed. As such, there is precedent for this concerning God in this verse in Samuel as well. As for Saul, to alleviate this problem, a suggestion is made…

16 Let our master now command your servants, who are before you, to seek out a man who is a skillful player on the harp.

yomar na adonenu avadekha lephanekha yebaqshu ish yodea menagen ba’kinor – “You will say, we pray, our lord – your servants to your faces – you will seek man knowing thrumming in the harp.” As explained before, the words “to your faces” is the Hebrew idiom which means “before you.” The servants who stand before Saul recommend a thrummer upon the harp to ease Saul’s distress. The reason for this is…

16 (con’t) And it shall be that he will play it with his hand when the distressing spirit from God is upon you, and you shall be well.”

vehayah biyoth alekha ruakh elohim raah venigen beyado vetov lakh – “And it was, in being upon you breath God, evil-ward, and he thrummed in his hand, and good to you.” These words led me to decide upon breath rather than wind. One would think a wind would come to a person while a breath would come upon him, as if it resided in him but manifested itself at times.

The words breath, wind, and spirit are almost interchangeable. The sense will not be lost when thought through, regardless of which word is used. However, as God is the source and there is no noted intermediary, I am hesitant to use the word spirit.

It is practically written into our makeup that sounds can affect our mood. Music is something that soothes us and mentally refreshes us, a condition known as Autonomous Sensory Meridian Response. On the contrary, a child’s incessant moaning or the grating of fingernails on a chalkboard will bring about a state of misophonia in many people.

The suggestion by the servants is hopeful, anticipating a positive response to Saul’s condition. The word translated as thrumming, is new, nagan. It signifies to beat a tune with the fingers, particularly when playing on a stringed instrument.  Saul accepts their suggestion…

17 So Saul said to his servants, “Provide me now a man who can play well, and bring him to me.”

vayomer shaul el avadav reu na li ish metiv lenagen vahaviothem elay – “And he said, Saul, unto his servants, ‘You must see, I pray, to me man ‘causing to make well to thrum,’ and you cause to bring unto me.’” Saul agrees, using an imperative. It is as if he says, “You really need to go get me a guy that can do this and bring him back to me directly.” Because of this, a recommendation will be made…

Thrumming a tune to ease the soul
Soundness returns to the mind
It’s a help when things spin out of control
Or when the world is unkind

A tune to take the cares away
Or remind you of times in the past
Music to encourage you throughout the day
And to make your evening a total blast

Music is a gift found in the word
It speaks of psalms, hymns, and also songs
Let music fill you with knowledge of the Lord
Through guitars, trumpets, and even gongs

Make a resounding sound to the Lord anytime
Or sing to Him a melody so sublime

II. He Thrummed in His Hand (verses 18-23)

18 Then one of the servants answered and said, “Look, I have seen a son of Jesse the Bethlehemite,

Rather: vayaan ekhad mehanearim vayomer hineh raiti ben leyishai beith ha’lakhmi – “And he answered, one from the lads, and he said, ‘Behold! I saw son to Jesse – House the ‘My Bread’.’” This is the second of four times the term beith ha’lakhmi or House the ‘My Bread” is seen.

As with the Lord’s words in verse 1, it is specifically worded this way. James Strong sees it as a patrial, as noted in verse 1. If so, it would be like saying, “House ‘the bread-ite,’” Thus, one would think it would be consistently used as such.

But it is used only four times, and only in the books of Samuel, while the standard Bethlehem is used ten times in the same books. This seems to negate that idea.

My suggestion to resolve this is that the youth speaking is one of David’s brothers, mentioned already, and who will be noted again in Chapter 17. This would explain why both David and this person use the term.

It was first used by the Lord in 1 Samuel 17:1 when referring to this family. It is then used by two of Jesse’s sons, acknowledging the Lord’s designation. Thus, Bethlehem is the House where their bread comes from. Hence, “House the ‘My Bread.’” This is speculation, but it would fit with the idea that these verses are parenthetical and belong after Chapter 17.

Jesse means My Husband. It also means Yehovah Exists. As such, the name Jesse contains the weighty notion that human marriage reflects divine revelation.

If this is one of David’s brothers, he would know David had been anointed as king, something he would not want revealed. It would also explain why he knows what he knows about David, saying…

18 (con’t) who is skillful in playing, a mighty man of valor, a man of war, prudent in speech, and a handsome person; and the Lord is with him.”

yodea nagen vegibor khayil veish milkhamah unevon davar veish toar veYehovah imo – “knowing thrum and powerful valor, and man battle, and being discerned – word, and man – form, and Yehovah with him.’” This individual was intimately aware of David’s abilities and qualities, including that Yehovah was with him. That could be a general statement, but a brother who saw him anointed would certainly know this.

Again, his identity as a brother is speculation. Regardless, his description of David is enough to cause Saul to act…

19 Therefore Saul sent messengers to Jesse, and said, “Send me your son David, who is with the sheep.”

vayishlakh shaul malakhim el Yishai vayomer shilkhah elay eth David binkha asher batson – “And he sent, Saul, messengers unto Jesse. And he said, ‘You must send-ward unto me David your son who in the flock.” The words are imperative and given as a command to Jesse.

David is with the tson, flock, but he is being summoned to attend to Saul. The word tson comes from a root meaning to migrate. This provides another clue that it could be David’s brother. He would know that David was the one to tend Jesse’s flock. David means Beloved. In response…

20 And Jesse took a donkey loaded with bread, a skin of wine, and a young goat, and sent them by his son David to Saul.

vayiqakh Yishai khamor lekhem venod yayin ugedi izim ekhad vayishlakh beyad David beno el shaul – “And he took, Jesse, jack – bread, and skin wine, and kid goats, one. And he sent in hand David, his son, unto Saul.” Jesse loaded David up with supplies as an offering to Saul.

Bread, lekhem, signifies dependence on God, sustenance, and life itself.

Wine, yayin, symbolizes the merging together of cultural expressions into a result. The thing that ought to happen can happen, symbolized by wine. It is as if an act of reasoning is occurring, and an intended result is realized.

The animal is described as a gedi, a kid. That comes from an unused root signifying to cut off. As an example –

“Then he turned to her by the way, and said, ‘Please let me come in to you’; for he did not know that she was his daughter-in-law.
So she said, ‘What will you give me, that you may come in to me?’
17 And he said, ‘I will send a young goat [gedi] from the flock.’
So she said, ‘Will you give me a pledge till you send it?
18 Then he said, ‘What pledge shall I give you?’
So she said, ‘Your signet and cord, and your staff that is in your hand.’ Then he gave them to her, and went in to her, and she conceived by him. 19 So she arose and went away, and laid aside her veil and put on the garments of her widowhood.
20 And Judah sent the young goat [gedi] by the hand of his friend the Adullamite, to receive his pledge from the woman’s hand, but he did not find her. 21 Then he asked the men of that place, saying, ‘Where is the harlot who was openly by the roadside?’
And they said, ‘There was no harlot in this place.
22 So he returned to Judah and said, ‘I cannot find her. Also, the men of the place said there was no harlot in this place.
23 Then Judah said, ‘Let her take them for herself, lest we be shamed; for I sent this young goat [gedi] and you have not found her.’” Genesis 38:16-23

It is understood that the goat is what finishes a matter.  The next word, izim, signifies goats. It is the term used for the sin offering, including that mandated on the Day of Atonement in Leviticus16:5. Once loaded up and sent…

21 So David came to Saul and stood before him. And he loved him greatly, and he became his armorbearer.

vayavo David el shaul vayaamod lephanav vayeehavehu meod vayhi lo nose khelim – “And he came, David, unto Saul. And he stood to his faces. And he cherished him, vehemently. And he was to him lifting vessels.” Here is another indication of the flow of the narrative. David came to Saul and Saul cherished him. In Chapter 18, it says –

“And it was according to his finish to speak unto Saul, and soul Jehonathan, it was tied in soul David. (Insert 1 Samuel 16:14-23) And they cherished him – Jehonathan, according to his soul. 2 And he took him, Saul, in the day, the it, and no he gave to return house his father.” 1 Samuel 18:1, 2

The written Hebrew in verse 18:1 reads “they.” The oral, not understanding the flow of the narrative, says, “he.” When things are placed as suggested, the narrative flows properly, and it removes all of the complications and seeming contradictions found in Chapter 17.

22 Then Saul sent to Jesse, saying, “Please let David stand before me, for he has found favor in my sight.”

vayishlakh shaul el Yishai lemor yaamad na david lephanay ki matsa khen beenay – “And he sent, Saul, unto Jesse, to say, ‘He will stand, I pray, David, to my faces. For he found graciousness in my eyes.’” This request is perfectly in line with what was just stated about the flow of the narrative. Saul is pleased with David and informs Jesse that he wishes his son to be in his presence henceforward. Therefore…

23 And so it was, whenever the spirit from God was upon Saul, that David would take a harp and play it with his hand.

vehayah bihiyoth ruakh elohim el shaul velaqakh David eth ha’kinor venigen beyado – “And it was, in coming breath God unto Saul, and he took, David, the harp, and he thrummed in his hand.” Notice that it says “breath God” without the adjective “evil” included. We can see how the three translations of the word ruakh coalesce here.

There is the initiator of the process, the spirit, the means by which the change is made. There is the medium in which the process moves, the wind. And there is what is being moved, the breath. These terms are used without precision in order to describe what is going on. The breath of God is sent unto Saul.

Seeing verse 18:10 will add more insight, “And it was from morrow, and it sent, breath God, evil unto Saul, and he prophesied himself in midst the house.” The breath of God that Saul carries with him would cause him evil in his being. It’s not that God sent evil, but that Saul’s state, based on God’s breath, is what causes the evil in him to appear.

Whenever this came about, David would thrum to pacify his state…

23 (con’t) Then Saul would become refreshed and well,

veravakh leshaul vetov lo – “And it revived to Saul, and good to him.” A new word is seen here, ravakh, to breathe freely. Saul was all tensed up, unable to breathe freely. When he heard the music, he unwound and was able to breathe properly again. David’s playing eased him, causing him to lighten up in his mind and loosen up in his being, restoring him to normalcy. Therefore…

*23 (fin) and the distressing spirit would depart from him.

vesarah mealav ruakh ha’raah – “And it veered from upon him breath, the evil-ward.” It is as if the breath of God that caused the evil condition to arise in him would turn off the path he was on, allowing him to continue without it.

One can think of a schizophrenic taking his meds and being restored to clear thinking. The tendency remains in him, but it is controlled because of the calming effects of the medicine. Such was the music of David’s thrumming to Saul.

This verse gives two more reasons why I prefer breath to spirit. The first is the new word in the previous clause, where Saul is granted freedom to breathe apart from the “evil breath.” Also, Adam Clarke, in his comments on verse 14, said –

“It has been said:
‘Music hath charms to sooth the savage breast.’

This has been literally proved: a musician was brought to play on his instrument while they were feeding a savage lion in the tower of London; the beast immediately left his food, came towards the grating of his den, and began to move in such a way as to show himself affected by the music. The musician ceased, and the lion returned to his food; he recommenced, and the lion left off his prey, and was so affected as to seem by his motions to dance with delight. This was repeatedly tried, and the effects were still the same.” Clark 16:14

If an animal is afflicted with the same angry demeanor but is calmed by music, would it be appropriate to attribute that to the Spirit of God? Rather, it is the breath in the lion, ultimately from God, which affects his demeanor.

A time of transition can be filled with grief
As one thing passes from one hand to another
But a patient soul can offer relief
And be kind in the process, like one’s brother

Saul’s time as king will have to end
And when it does, another will take his place
Is his successor an enemy or friend?
Will Saul ever accept David’s face?

God chose David to replace king Saul
A man who understood the Lord’s will well
He will faithfully adhere to the call
And honor Saul as king until rings his funeral bell

III. From Saul to David, Types of Christ

The contents of this chapter have been placed categorically to instruct us on what God is doing. The information concerning Saul’s condition logically follows the anointing of David, even though it is not chronologically how things happened.

Things are placed this way to show us the transition of the kingdom from Saul to David. This had to happen in order to fulfill God’s redemptive purposes.

It is good to note now that after verse 13, Samuel, Asked from God, takes on a new meaning. Instead of asking from God for sons of grace (Jesus and His people), his name now predominantly means asked from God for the Seed of Grace (Jesus).

Saul, Asked, will also take on a new meaning. Instead of picturing those who seek the truth, he is Asked, the man without the Spirit, Asked of Sheol (which is identical to his name), calling out for the souls of men, while men ask to be freed from the curse of Sheol. It is a double entendre.

In other words, his name reveals that the pit, at this time, is the true leader of the people. He represents the state of those destined for the pit.

The serpent deceived the first man, and all were destined to follow their leader to the same place. One might even view him as a type of inherited sin, leading the people looking for redemption in the wrong direction. The pit asks for, and receives, those destined to perish. Can this be corrected?

In verse 1, the Lord spoke to Samuel about mourning over Saul. The pit is rejected from “reigning upon Israel.” The pit is the state of man without Jesus. The Lord tells Samuel, “You must fill your horn – oil.”

The horn is a symbol of prominence and power. Having oil in it for anointing indicates the presence of the power of the Holy Spirit being specially highlighted in a particular place.

It anticipates Jesus, the Anointed of God, bearing all His prominence and power. Samuel is sent to Jesse – House the ‘My Bread.’ Jesse, Yehovah Exists, is a reference to the deity of Christ. To understand the full significance of the Hebrew meaning of House the ‘My Bread,’ go back and review the lengthy analysis in verse 1.

The kingdom will belong to the Son of Yehovah, Christ, in His incarnation. Samuel is told that in order to avoid suspicion, he is to take an eglat baqar, heifer of the herd. This indicates circular and to seek. It refers to the word being searched out to determine who this king will be.

Jesse is to be invited to the feast. At that time, the Lord will provide the instruction and whom to anoint. The sacrifice is a slaughter intended for a feast, something anticipated in the coming of Christ, not for atonement, but life in Christ.

In verse 4, it specifically mentions Bethlehem. It is a direct connection to the birthplace of Jesus, the Bread of Life.

In that verse was the parenthetical thought, “(And they shuddered, elders the city, to meeting him.)” That provides a marvelous connection to Matthew 2:3, “And Herod the king, having heard, he was agitated, and all Jerusalem with him.”

As Herod didn’t exist and Jerusalem wasn’t a part of the picture yet, the parenthetical words provide the connection that would be missed. In verse 5, Jesse, Yehovah Exists, (the subject based on the parenthesis), asks if Samuel had come in peace. It gives the sense of Luke 2:14 –

“Glory to God in the highest,
And on earth peace among people with whom He is pleased.” Luke 2:14 (NASB)

With the attendees gathered, Samuel went through the process of identifying the one to be anointed as prescribed by the Lord. Three are named, Eliab, My God Is Father, looks to the Pharisees in Israel who claimed that God is their father (John 8:42).

Abinadab looks to the Sadducees, who felt they were in a right state with the Lord, as noted in Matthew 26:63-65. Shammah looks to the scribes who were repeatedly spoken against by Jesus in the gospels because of their hypocritical stands against the truth of God.

These “greats” of the house were passed up in favor of another. In like manner, the other sons of Jesse were rejected, totaling seven, the number of spiritual perfection. After inquiry, Samuel discovers there is another son. Though not stated, he is the eighth, the number of resurrection and regeneration. It marks the beginning of a new era or order.

The spiritually perfect time has come, and a new era is to be introduced with this final son who is “keeping in the flock.” The word tson, flock, comes from a root signifying to migrate.

Jesus is the one who migrates through the word in typology as seen in the people, the flock, mentioned in various passages. Likewise, one can think of the migration of people in search of Christ, just as they are in search of food.

In verse 12, David was brought in and described as admoni, red. This points to Jesus who bears the redness of Adam. His eyes were noted as yapheh, a word meaning to be bright, and thus beautiful. It refers to Christ’s bright spiritual state, focus, and understanding. Also, his roi, visage is good. It speaks of Christ’s suitability as a Man.

After that, Samuel was told by the Lord to anoint him. Humanity has asked from God for a Man to fulfill the necessary role as His Anointed, and Jesus is the response to the eons of humanity leading to Him.

In verse 13, Samuel, Asked from God, anointed David, Beloved, in the midst of his brothers. It is the first time his name is mentioned in 1 Samuel. At that time, the Spirit of the Lord came upon him from that day forward. It is what God did to Jesus in the midst of the people of Israel –

“The Spirit of the Lord is upon Me,
Because He has anointed Me
To preach the gospel to the poor;
He has sent Me to heal the brokenhearted,
To proclaim liberty to the captives
And recovery of sight to the blind,
To set at liberty those who are oppressed;
19 To proclaim the acceptable year of the Lord.” Luke 4:18, 19

Finally, in verse 13, it said that Samuel went Ramah-ward. It reflects heading to the Lofty Place where those who hold to grace alone, even after salvation, will be exalted. They anticipate what they possess but which they have not yet actually attained.

In verse 14, the new passage concerning Saul began. This is where the typology of the names of Samuel and Saul changes.

Though these verses chronologically belong after Chapter 17, they are rightly placed here to show the contrast of Saul with David and to begin the next series of stories predominantly using David to further the redemptive narrative.

The Spirit Yehovah departed from Saul, and the evil breath from Him affrighted him. Because of this, it was suggested that someone familiar with thrumming the kinor, the harp, be sought out. The kinor is the first instrument mentioned in Scripture.

It is seen 42 times throughout most of the Old Testament, demonstrating “the instrument’s continuity from the dawn of human culture through the post-exilic community.” It is a “melodic conduit for human response to divine revelation” (Topical Lexicon). It is symbolic of both judgment and restoration.

The number 42 is the number connected with the Antichrist. However, it is also a number related to the Lord’s opposition to this force. Bullinger says, “Its factors are six and seven (6×7=42), and this shows a connection between man and the Spirit of God, and between Christ and Antichrist.”

One can see the battle between Sheol and man raging as he looks for relief from his determined end. The focus on the “breath” in this passage takes the reader back to Genesis 2 –

“And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living being.” Genesis 2:7

Man was given the breath of life, but because of sin’s death sentence, it is an evil breath that man now possesses. Therefore, the war between the spirit of Antichrist and the Spirit of God in Christ Jesus, the Man who came in the appearance of fallen Adam, is highlighted.

In verse 18, it was noted that the son of Jesse, Yehovah Exists, was of House the ‘My Bread.’ It speaks of the Incarnation of Jesus, God’s Bread of Life. David was noted as “knowing thrum and powerful valor, and man battle, and being discerned – word, and man – form, and Yehovah with him.”

A more accurate set of words about Jesus would be hard to find. He is the One who knows judgment and restoration (thrum). He is the epitome of powerful valor. He is the Man of battle. He, the Word of God, is discerned in word. He is a Man of form. And Yehovah is with Him.

Saul then sent messengers to get David, “who in the flock.” Jesus was of the flock of Israel. He would be the appropriate One to tend to the need that has been presented.

Because of the request, Jesse took a khamor, a jack, a male donkey, signifying a red one,. In past sermons, it has pictured Jesus, the Red One.

He was loaded with bread, life’s sustenance. He also took wine, the cultural expression that leads to the Messiah. Along with that, he took a “kid goats.” The symbolism is the cutting off of sin by the goat of atonement, anticipating Jesus, who was the fulfillment of the Day of Atonement goat sacrifice. He is what finishes the matter of sin.

This is presented by Jesse to Saul. It is Jesus, the Lord’s offering to man, who needs relief from the call of Sheol. From there, the final verses noted the acceptance of Saul concerning David and how David began his service to Saul to alleviate him of his “breath God” that afflicted him.

Verses 14 through 23 were categorically placed here to show how Jesus was anticipated in the Sheol-destined people of Israel. If this event had been placed where it chronologically belonged, it would have made no sense from a redemptive standpoint.

Thus, like other times this occurred, God is giving us information in a step-by-step manner so that we can understand what He is doing in redemptive history.

And all of it centers on Jesus Christ. The details are enough to thoroughly convince us that God has a plan, that it is being slowly and methodically worked out, and that it will come to a satisfactory conclusion in due time.

The intricacy of how things are laid out is complicated, so much so that I don’t know of anyone else who has come up with the layout as presented. Albert Barnes and a Dr. Warburton (as cited by Adam Clarke) were close, but misplaced where the verses resume in Chapter 16.

However, discovering that both of these scholars realized that these events came after Chapter 17 gives me confidence that what I have presented is correct. There are good reasons why both Barnes and Warburton were a bit off. When we arrive at Chapter 18, the structure will be made clear.

For now, get ready for the wonderful details of how David will take his anointing that was detailed in this chapter and use it in an exceptional way to glorify God as we enter into Chapter 17 next week. Until then, be sure to read your Bible, love what it conveys, and cherish the One it proclaims with all your heart and soul.

Closing Verse: “Inasmuch then as the children have partaken of flesh and blood, He Himself likewise shared in the same, that through death He might destroy him who had the power of death, that is, the devil, 15 and release those who through fear of death were all their lifetime subject to bondage.” Hebrews 2:14, 15

Next Week: 1 Samuel 17:1-11 Into these verses we will carefully spieth until they are done… (David and Goliath, Part I) (35th 1 Samuel Sermon)

The Lord has you exactly where He wants you. He has a good plan and purpose for you. He is the One who abases the haughty and exalts the humble. He regards the lowly, and the proud, He knows from afar. So yield yourself to Him, trust Him, and believe His word. In this, He will do great things for you and through you.

1 Samuel 16:14-23 (CG)

The following verses are a parenthetical insert that chronologically belong after 1 Samuel 18:1a

———————

14And Spirit Yehovah, it veered from with Saul. And it affrighted him, breath evil-ward from Yehovah. 15And they said, servants Saul, unto him, “Behold, we pray, breath God, evil-ward, affrighting you.” 16You will say, we pray, our lord – your servants to your faces – you will seek man knowing thrumming in the harp. And it was, in being upon you breath God, evil-ward, and he thrummed in his hand, and good to you.

17And he said, Saul, unto his servants, “You must see, I pray, to me man ‘causing to make well to thrum,’ and you cause to bring unto me.”

18And he answered, one from the lads, and he said, “Behold! I saw son to Jesse – House the ‘My Bread,’ knowing thrum and powerful valor, and man battle, and being discerned – word, and man – form, and Yehovah with him.”

19And he sent, Saul, messengers unto Jesse. And he said, “You must send-ward unto me David your son who in the flock.” 20And he took, Jesse, jack – bread, and skin wine, and kid goats, one. And he sent in hand David, his son, unto Saul. 21And he came, David, unto Saul. And he stood to his faces. And he cherished him, vehemently. And he was to him lifting vessels. 22And he sent, Saul unto Jesse, to say, “He will stand, I pray, David, to my faces. For he found graciousness in my eyes.” 23And it was, in coming breath God unto Saul, and he took, David, the harp, and he thrummed in his hand. And it revived to Saul, and good to him. And it veered from upon him breath, the evil-ward.

———————

Matthew 17:1

Sunday, 15 February 2026

Now after six days Jesus took Peter, James, and John his brother, led them up on a high mountain by themselves; Matthew 17:1

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at the “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen)

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“And after six days, Jesus, He takes with – Peter, and James and John his brother, and them, He uphefts into a high mountain off alone” (CG).

In the previous verse, Jesus finished up Chapter 16, noting that there were some standing there with Him who would not taste death till they saw the Son of Man coming in His kingdom. Chapter 17 now begins, saying, “And after six days.” Mark says the same. Luke says, “about eight days.” Of this somewhat indeterminate time, “Jesus, He takes with – Peter, and James and John his brother.”

These selected men are, at times, referred to as the inner circle. This is because this is not the only time they are selected to come separately with Jesus. Rather, there are several such instances in the gospels. Of this group accompanying Jesus, it next says, “and them, He uphefts into a high mountain off alone.”

A new word is seen here, anapheró. It is derived from ana, up, and pheró, to bring, bear, or carry. The ten uses of the word combine to give a sense not found in any single English word. It refers to leading others up a mountain, being carried up into heaven, offering up sacrifices, carrying the sins of others, etc.

In each case, there is upward motion and the sense of bearing or leading a mass that has weight. A single word, that now exists as of the typing of this commentary, and which can describe all of these various thoughts understandably, is “upheft.” With a right click of the mouse, the red line under the word has disappeared, and it is now entered into the computer’s dictionary.

As for the mountain Jesus uphefted the men to, there are various views. A later tradition identifies it as Mount Tabor. However, it is known that a fortress was on top of Tabor at the time. Further, its location is not conducive to the surrounding narrative as well.

A good candidate is Mount Hermon. It is the snowcapped mountain bordering Israel, Lebanon, and Syria. In typology, it is used in the Old Testament to symbolize heaven from which the Jordan (the Descender) then flows, picturing Jesus descending from heaven.

This seems like the likely mountain to accommodate what will next take place, but because it is not named, this remains speculation. This account, however, is a good contrast to what was said in Matthew 4 –

“Again, the traducer, he takes Him to a mountain – exceedingly high – and shows Him all the kingdoms of the world and the glory of them.” Matthew 4:8

“And after six days, Jesus, He takes with – Peter, and James and John his brother, and them – He takes up into a high mountain off alone.” Matthew 17:1

Life application: It was noted above that Matthew and Mark say, “after six days,” while Luke says, “about eight days.” There is no contradiction in that. The word after means “after.” The word about means “about.” Seven is after six, and a general ending of seven is about eight. The indeterminate wording allows people to speak and write in their natural way without there being a contradiction.

Depending on the time reference of a person’s statement, such things happen all the time. If one reckons the time after the day of an event, the timing would be –

Monday – Tuesday/Wednesday/Thursday/Friday/Saturday/Sunday.

If one reckons from the day of an event, it would be –

Monday/Tuesday/Wednesday/Thursday/Friday/Saturday/Sunday – Monday.

Thus, the first is six days after the first day, while the second is about eight days. We do the same type of reckoning all the time. If you arrive in Florida on a plane at 11:30 pm on 11 April, during a later conversation, you might still say you were in Florida on that day. If you left Wednesday morning at 5 am, you might say you were there that day also. Thus, you have been at the location three days, despite your total time there being about thirty-six hours.

When you are reading the Bible, be sure to consider such things. Luke uses a different perspective to say exactly the same thing as Matthew and Mark did. This is to be expected from a chronicler who is from outside of Israel as he sits and counts days. The timing provided by those inside Israel would be from their personal experience and how that aligns with culturally accepted norms.

When considering these things in their proper light, it is evident that no contradiction exists. Instead, the accounts are reliable and actually support the veracity of what is stated.

Lord God Almighty, You have given us a word which is challenging to our minds, and yet understandable when it is properly and carefully evaluated. Thank You that we will get out of Your word just what effort we put into it. Thank You for such a wonderful gift to guide and instruct us. Amen.

 

Matthew 16:28

Saturday, 14 February 2026

Assuredly, I say to you, there are some standing here who shall not taste death till they see the Son of Man coming in His kingdom.” Matthew 16:28

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at the “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen)

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube, (Click Here to listen), or Rumble  (Click Here to listen). 

To read the CG translation of Matthew 16, scrolling with music, on YouTube (Click Here to listen), or on Rumble (Click Here to listen).

An extra bonus from Daniel Higgins at “Bible in Ten” podcast. His input on links between Nehemiah and Matthew 16. (Click here to listen).

“Amen! I say to you that they are some of those having stood here who not they should taste death until if they should see the Son of Man coming in His kingdom.” (CG).

In the previous verse, Jesus told His disciples that the Son of Man is about to come in His kingdom, and then He will give each according to his practice. He next says, “Amen! I say to you that they are some of those having stood here.”

The Greek verb is a perfect participle. As can be seen, the NKJV fails to properly elucidate this, saying, “some standing here.” In fact, one would be hard-pressed to find a translation that accurately translates the verb. Instead, they rely on a present tense or present participle rendering.

But Jesus’ words indicate a completed action, the results of which are still present or relevant, “having stood here.” The same perfect participle is found in the same context in Mark 9:1. Combined with the words, “some…here,” this limits the scope of what is said to those present. Of those referred to, Jesus next says they are those “who not they should taste death.”

A new word is seen, geuomai, to taste. It is used figuratively here to indicate experiencing. It is aorist subjunctive, viewing the whole as a single completed event. In other words, these will not experience death, “until if they should see the Son of Man coming in His kingdom.”

The meaning of this is widely debated. Is this referring to the transfiguration? Does this speak of the resurrection? Is it the beginning of the church at Pentecost? Is it the destruction of the temple in AD70? Is it referring to the millennial kingdom? And so on. Each of these has its supporters. For example, some believe that Jesus’ words in John 21:22 mean that John is still alive and he will be one of the two witnesses.

One of several problems with that is that the two witnesses will be killed before the Son of Man returns. Further, Jesus’ words in Matthew 16:28 are plural, indicating more than one person. One of many problems with the destruction of the temple view is that Jesus didn’t return in AD70. If He did, other words of Jesus would be a complete failure, such as Matthew 24:27.

There is no record of such an event, something that would not be lacking. That is an unbiblical attempt by preterists to dismiss any future prophecy, including the restoration of national Israel as a literal, historical event.

The problem with the Pentecost view is that it was the Holy Spirit, not Jesus, who came upon the people in Acts 2. To conflate the meaning of one with the other is stretching the text like a rubber band, which will eventually snap. As for the resurrection view, as Jesus was not in a glorified state at the resurrection, that also seems to be a stretch of the intent.

The account that is noted next at the beginning of Matthew 17 follows in the same manner in all three synoptic gospels, which is a strong hint that tells us that the transfiguration is what Jesus is referring to. It is a kingdom foretaste for the benefit of the disciples. As it is recorded in the word, it is thus provided as a benefit for all.

This glorified state was then viewed by John when he received the book of Revelation, including Jesus’ return in Revelation 19. For a fuller and more complete explanation of the details of Matthew 16, please continue reading the life application section of this commentary.

Life application: Chapter 16 of Matthew is a passage that petitions the Jews of the end times to consider who Jesus is based on their own history, comparing it to how He is portrayed in Scripture.

In verse 1, Jesus was approached by the Pharisees and Sadducees, who asked for a sign from heaven. As in Chapter 15, these types of men represent the same thinking and paradigm as the rabbis of Israel today. Jesus told them that they could read the signs in the sky, but they could not discern the signs of the times.

With the coming of the end times, the Jews of Israel would naturally be expected to understand the situation they are in, but they will be clueless about the matter. In verse 4, Jesus said that the generation was wicked and adulterous, something akin to what Peter calls the Jews who rejected Jesus in Acts 2:40. Jesus continued that no sign would be given to it, except the sign of the prophet Jonah.

As explained, the sign of the prophet Jonah is the destruction of the temple, it being a year for a day based on Jonah’s proclamation, “Yet forty days, and Nineveh shall be overthrown.”

In the end times, the Jews will have to look to their Scriptures, understand that their temple was destroyed and they were exiled for rejecting Jesus, internalize this truth, and then have faith in Him based on that.

As an explanation of the doctrine of faith in the Messiah, in verse 5, the disciples went across the Sea of Galilee. As such, they crossed the Jordan because the Jordan runs through the sea. Being on the other (east) side signifies those who have not come through Christ to be saved. Jesus told them in verse 6 to take heed and beware of the leaven of the Pharisees. They thought He was talking about bread. But He corrected them by recapping the miracles of feeding the five thousand and the four thousand.

These miracles, anticipating the salvation of Jews and Gentiles, testify to His being the Messiah. What He was warning them about was the doctrine of those false teachers, not about bread. Their doctrine is to be equated with the false doctrine of the rabbis and other law teachers of the end times who have returned to law observance, temple worship, etc. It is a warning that the end times Jews are not to follow those Satan-led examples.

Faith in Jesus, as represented by the feeding of the masses, is what brings restoration with God.

In verse 13, it is noted that Jesus came into the region of Caesarea Philippi. Caesarea is derived from Caesar. The idea of being a Caesar is the deification of the individual. He is attributed a god-like status. Philippi is from Philip, a lover of horses. But in Scripture, a horse is metaphorically used as a source of military pride –

“Some trust in chariots, and some in horses;
But we will remember the name of the Lord our God.” Psalm 20:7

Abarim rightly defines Philippi with the lengthy paraphrase, They Who Lean On Their Military Complex. It is exactly the source of pride that Israel of today is heading towards. Their military superiority is their source of pride and is exalted to god-like status. This will only increase after the battle of Gog/Magog.

It is in this prefigured end-times state that Jesus asks them who He is. The various answers are answers you could expect from Jews. Jesus was a prophet (or false prophet) or whatever. However, Simon Peter proclaims Him the Christ. What was Jesus’ response? “Blessed are you, Simon Bar-Jonah.”

The same name that was acknowledged as the sign in verse 4 is now noted by Jesus. He is Simon (Hearer) Son of Jonah. In other words, he represents the Jews who have understood (heard) the sign of Jonah. To be a son signifies identity. The end times Jews who acknowledge Jesus as the Christ are “sons of Jonah,” because they have made the connection by understanding the sign. In essence, “We missed Him when He came, but we know now who He is.”

It is on this proclamation that Jesus will build His out-calling of those in the end times. They will receive the keys to the kingdom of the heavens, entering into the millennial reign of Christ. In verse 21, Jesus spoke of His destiny to suffer and die. Peter’s words of admonishment stirred Jesus to turn His back on him, call him Satan, and tell him he was not mindful of the things of God, but the things of men.

It is a warning to the end times Jews that they are to accept a crucified Savior as the role of the Messiah. Israel looked, and still looks, for a conquering Messiah, but His role as the crucified Messiah is what God highlights in Him more than all else.

From there, Jesus told the disciples the words about denying themselves and losing their souls (meaning their lives) in order to save their souls. It is exactly what is seen in Revelation –

“Then a third angel followed them, saying with a loud voice, “If anyone worships the beast and his image, and receives his mark on his forehead or on his hand, 10 he himself shall also drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured out full strength into the cup of His indignation. He shall be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels and in the presence of the Lamb.” Revelation 14:9, 10

&

“And I saw something like a sea of glass mingled with fire, and those who have the victory over the beast, over his image and over his mark and over the number of his name, standing on the sea of glass, having harps of God.” Revelation 15:2

In verse 27, it said, “For the Son of Man is about to come in His Father’s glory with His messengers.” This is exactingly described in Revelation 19:11 –

“And I saw the heaven having been opened. And you behold! Horse, white! And the ‘sitting upon it’ being called ‘Faithful and True,’ and in righteousness He judges, and He battles” (CG).

Jesus is coming in His Father’s glory. In Matthew 24, it notes that in the end times, He will send out His angels (Greek: messengers) to gather His elect.

The final verse of the chapter then said, “Amen! I say to you, that they are some of those having stood here who not they will taste death until if they should see the Son of Man coming in His kingdom.” Again, this is exactly what occurs in Revelation. Some of the end times Jews will make it through the entire tribulation, not seeing death until they behold Jesus coming in His kingdom.

These things are gleaned from Matthew 16, forming a picture of what is coming in the future for Israel.

Lord God, how precious it is to know that You will not reject Israel, even when the whole world is imploding, You will be with them and carry them as a people through the tribulation and into the time promised to them so long ago. Thank You for Your covenant faithfulness, even to those of us who fail You constantly. Amen.

 

Matthew 16 (CG)

1And having approached, the Pharisees and Sadducees, testing, they queried Him to show them a sign from heaven. 2And answering, He said to them, “Evening having come, you say, ‘Good weather!’, for the heaven, it is red, 3and early, ‘This day… inclemency!’, for glowering, the heaven, it reddens. Hypocrites! Indeed, you know to discern the face of the heaven, and the seasons’ signs, not you can. 4Generation – evil and adulteress – it seeks a sign, and a sign – not it will be given it – if not the sign of Jonah the prophet.” And having left them, He departed.

5And His disciples, having come to the beyond, they overlooked to take bread. 6And Jesus, He said to them, “You behold, and you caution from the leaven of the Pharisees and Sadducees.”

7And they deliberated in themselves, saying, “Because not we took bread!” 8And Jesus, having known, said to them, “Why – you deliberate in yourselves, little-faithed? Because you took no bread? 9You grasp, not yet, nor you recollect the five loaves – the five thousand, and how many handbaskets you took? 10Nor the seven loaves – the four thousand, and how many hampers you took? 11How not you recollect that I spoke not concerning bread to you! Caution from the leaven of the Pharisees and Sadducees.” 12Then they comprehended that not He said to caution from the leaven – the bread, but from the teaching – the Pharisees and Sadducees.

13And Jesus, having come to the allotments – Caesarea, the Phillipi, He entreated His disciples, saying, “Whom they say, the men, Me to be, the Son of Man?”

14And they said, “These, indeed, John the Immerser, and others Elijah, and others, Jeremiah or one of the prophets.”

15He says to them, “And you, whom you say Me to be?”

16And answering, Simon Peter, he said, “You, You are the Christ, the Son of God, the living.”

17And Jesus, answering, He said to him, “Blessed you are, Simon, Bar-Jonah, for flesh and blood not it revealed to you, but My Father, the ‘in the heavens’.” 18And I also, I say to you that you, you are Peter, and upon this – the Rock – I will build My out-calling, and Hades’ gates, not they will overpower her. 19And I will give you the keys of the kingdom of the heavens. And whatever, if you may bind upon the earth, it will be ‘having been bound’ in the heavens. And whatever, if you may loosen upon the earth, it will be ‘having been loosed’ in the heavens.” 20Then He enjoined His disciples that they should say to none that He, He is Jesus the Christ.

21From then He began, Jesus, to show His disciples that it necessitates Him to depart to Jerusalem and to suffer many from the elders, and chief priests, and scribes, and be killed, and the third day be roused.

22And Peter, having clutched Him, he began to admonish Him, saying, “Propitious, to You, Lord! No, not it will be, this to You!”

23And, having turned, He said to Peter, “You withdraw behind Me, Satan! Snare, you are, to Me. For you think not these of God but these of men.”

24The Jesus, He said to His disciples, “If any, he desires to come after Me, let him disown himself, and he took his cross, and he follows Me. 25For whoever, if he may desire to save his soul, he will lose it. And whoever, if he may lose his soul because of Me, he will find it. 26For what it benefits a man if he may gain the whole world and he may lose his soul? Or what will he give, man, equivalent his soul? 27For the Son of Man is about to come in His Father’s glory with His messengers. And then He will give each according to his practice. 28Amen! I say to you, that they are some of those having stood here who not they will taste death until if they should see the Son of Man coming in His kingdom.”

 

Matthew 16:27

Friday, 13 February 2026

For the Son of Man will come in the glory of His Father with His angels, and then He will reward each according to his works. Matthew 16:27

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at the “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen)

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“For the Son of Man is about to come in His Father’s glory with His messengers. And then He will give each according to his practice” (CG).

In the previous verse, Jesus asked what profit it would be for a man to gain the world but lose his soul. He also questioned what a man could give for his soul. Jesus next says, “For the Son of Man is about to come in His Father’s glory.”

What is Jesus talking about here? Ellicott says, “The fact that the Son of Man is about to come to execute judgment, clothes its abstract statement with an awful certainty.” The Pulpit Commentary says, “the final judgment would put things in their true light.” Gill says, “either a second time to judgment at the last day … or in his power, to take vengeance on the Jewish nation.”

These thoughts of judgment essentially sum up the overall thought of what scholars say the verse is referring to. It is true that Jesus is coming in judgment. However, His words place “about” in the emphatic position. Word for word, it reads “About for the Son the Man to come.”

With the emphasis on “about…to come,” it is a stretch to tie this into the final judgment. The chapter began with the Pharisees and Sadducees testing Him, asking for a sign from heaven. The contents of the chapter focus on faith in God’s plans as the overarching theme.

Jesus is speaking to and about Israel under the law. As this is so, the “about…to come” is likely referring to Israel’s judgment for rejecting Jesus. Understanding that this was the sign of Jonah Israel was to expect, as detailed in Matthew 16:4, it seems to be the logical explanation.

However, all three synoptic gospels mention this general idea of Jesus’ coming (Matthew 16:27, Mark 9:1, and Luke 9:27). After each, the transfiguration is mentioned. The transfiguration is something only seen by Peter and John. They were told to tell no one what they saw until the Son of Man was raised (Matthew 17:9, Mark 9:9). They complied with this as noted in Luke 9:36.

Jesus is ultimately referring to the judgment of Israel in AD 70, but His words at this time are immediately referring to the transfiguration. This continues to be seen in His next words, “with His messengers.”

When Jesus is transfigured, who is He with? Though getting ahead in the narrative, He is with Moses and Elijah. Jesus is not referring to angels. He is referring to those who received His word and passed it to the people of Israel.

Moses and Aaron are called messengers of the covenant in Acts 7:53 and Hebrews 2:2 (yes, those verses are referring to Moses and Aaron – see the corresponding Superior Word commentaries). John the Baptist is called a messenger in Malachi 3. Jesus equates him to Elijah in Matthew 11:14, and he is prophesied to come as the Lord’s representative in Malachi 4:5.

These are the messengers Jesus is referring to now. Moses represents the law, while Elijah represents the prophets of the law. They will appear with Jesus at the transfiguration. Only then are the next words stated by Jesus. “And then He will give each according to his practice.”

A new word is seen here, praxis, a practice (Sure sounds like the Klingon planet’s moon). HELPS Word Studies says, “a function, implying sustained activity and/or responsibility.”

Almost all translations make this thought a continuation of what has already been said in this verse. However, it is likely a separate sentence beginning with “And then.” There will be the transfiguration, something Peter will refer to in 2 Peter 1:18 as a witness to the truth of God in Christ.

With the testimony of these apostles, the nation of Israel can accept or reject their word. In their rejection of it, judgment will come. And it did come, just as Jesus said concerning the sign of Jonah. The temple was destroyed forty years later.

The judgment of Israel came upon each “according to his practice.” Was their practice faith in Jesus or continued trust in the law which He fulfilled? This is what Jesus is speaking about.

Life application: God’s messengers are both earthly and heavenly. The context of the passage determines which is being referred to. The law was not received by angels from heaven. It was received by men who then passed it to the people of Israel.

Angels did not come to earth and sleep with human women in Genesis 6. Rather, the ungodly line of Cain intermingled with the godly line of Seth. Over-sensationalizing the word leads to confusion of thought and a misunderstanding of what God is doing in the redemptive narrative as it has unfolded throughout the ages.

If someone is constantly referring to such sensational things, it would be best to avoid their instruction on them. If that is all they speak about, they should be rejected entirely. The Bible’s focus is on man’s restoration and relationship with God through Jesus Christ. Keep this in focus, and you will do well.

O God, give us wisdom to rightly discern what Your word is telling us. There are many things that are hard to understand, and there are a lot of teachings that contradict each other. We can easily get lost in a sea of disagreement. So, Lord, lead us to the proper evaluation of what is being said so that we will be rightly trained. Amen.

 

Matthew 16:26

Thursday, 12 February 2026

For what profit is it to a man if he gains the whole world, and loses his own soul? Or what will a man give in exchange for his soul? Matthew 16:26

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at the “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen)

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“For what it benefits a man if he may gain the whole world and he may lose his soul? Or what will he give, man, equivalent his soul?” (CG).

In the previous verse, Jesus spoke of the importance of following Him, saying, “For whoever, if he may desire to save his soul, he will lose it. And whoever, if he may lose his soul because of Me, he will find it.” In explanation of that, He continues, saying, “For what it benefits a man.”

He is asking what advantage is gained in the proposition He will set forth. If one were to deal with his soul in a supposed trade-up or barter for better, what advantage would result “if he may gain the whole world?”

Here is a new word, kerdainó, to gain. HELPS Word Studies says, “an ancient mercantile term for exchanging (trading) one good for another; (figuratively) to exchange (trade out) what is mediocre (‘good’) for the better, i.e. ‘trading up.’”

So, the thought is that this person has a soul, and he trades it for what seems a better deal. It is the old “sell your soul to the devil” idea, where one gets to be a rock star with lots of money, girls, cars, and ten big houses. In the case of this person, he trades his soul, supposedly up, for the whole world. And yet, Jesus says, “and he may lose his soul?”

It is a second new word, zémioó, to injure. In this case, it is to suffer loss. So the person gets the whole world, something once offered to Jesus by the devil in Matthew 4:8 & 9. Despite gaining the world, he isn’t eternal. His soul will be required of him at some point.

When that time comes, he is judged and unceremoniously chucked into the Lake of Fire. Was possessing the world worth it? Only a fool, and the world is filled with them, thinks so. Jesus continues, saying, “Or what will he give, man, equivalent his soul?”

A third new word is seen, antallagma, an equivalent or ransom. The word is only found in this context here and in Mark 8:37. What can a man give for the ransom of His soul, securing safety from eternal damnation? The question is answered in Psalm 49 –

“Why should I fear in the days of evil,
When the iniquity at my heels surrounds me?
Those who trust in their wealth
And boast in the multitude of their riches,
None of them can by any means redeem his brother,
Nor give to God a ransom for him—
For the redemption of their souls is costly,
And it shall cease forever—
That he should continue to live eternally,
And not see the Pit.” Psalm 49:5-9

The answer is that no payment can be obtained, apart from Jesus Christ (as noted in the previous two verses), to reconcile finite fallen man with the infinitely pure and holy Creator. The separation exists, and apart from God’s intervention in Christ, man stands condemned. It is what Jesus expressly says in John 3:18 –

“He who believes in Him is not condemned; but he who does not believe is condemned already, because he has not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.”

Life application: Paul alludes to exactly what Jesus is saying here in Matthew 16 –

“But what things were gain to me, these I have counted loss for Christ. Yet indeed I also count all things loss for the excellence of the knowledge of Christ Jesus my Lord, for whom I have suffered the loss of all things, and count them as rubbish, that I may gain Christ and be found in Him, not having my own righteousness, which is from the law, but that which is through faith in Christ, the righteousness which is from God by faith; 10 that I may know Him and the power of His resurrection, and the fellowship of His sufferings, being conformed to His death, 11 if, by any means, I may attain to the resurrection from the dead.” Philippians 3:7-11

Paul was given a choice. He chose wisely. Each of us is given a choice. Will we follow Jesus, accepting His ransom payment for our souls, or will we cling to this life, attempt to possess everything, and in doing so, lose it all? To attempt to gain in a world of loss is not a smart decision. But to supposedly “lose” now for a life of eternal gain is infinitely beneficial. Choose wisely.

Lord God, we often put way too much hope in things that are unprofitable. It is hard to shake off the desire for the things of this world. Help us to press toward the goal for the prize of the upward call of God in Christ Jesus. To Your glory, we pray. Amen.