1 Samuel 17:41-58 (David and Goliath, Part IV)

Artwork by Douglas Kallerson

1 Samuel 17:41-58
(David and Goliath, Part IV)

(Typed 19 November 2025) Life is filled with anticipation. This is true regardless of age, and it isn’t limited to humans either. I have eight dogs, and I can assure you of it. Every day at 3 am, a few of my dogs anticipate a walk in the yard. At 5:50 am, they all get antsy as they anticipate Hideko getting up.

This is because after she gets up, they all go out and then they… they… they… (are you anticipating?) they get a treat. Sometimes they get too antsy and start barking before she wakes up. If that happens, and they wake her up early, no treat will be forthcoming.

They usually don’t have to be told more than once, “Shut up or no treat for you.” They know and comply. In today’s passage, Israel and the Philistines have been anticipating a battle. Before that, however, Goliath had spent forty days anticipating an opponent coming out to face him.

As we have gone through the verses, we have been anticipating more insights into what is being said. When the verses are complete, we will be anticipating what they are pointing to and why God chose this story with the particular details to include in His word.

Text Verse: Text Verse: “But God has chosen the foolish things of the world to put to shame the wise, and God has chosen the weak things of the world to put to shame the things which are mighty; 28 and the base things of the world and the things which are despised God has chosen, and the things which are not, to bring to nothing the things that are, 29 that no flesh should glory in His presence.” 1 Corinthians 1:27-29

Paul’s words can be applied to David. He was the youngest of his family. He was looked down on by his oldest brother. Saul told him he was not capable of defeating the enemy because he was young and untrained. He was just a shepherd boy tending his father’s flock.

But the Lord knew David’s abilities, his heart and determination, and that David was the right person to move from shepherding his father’s flocks to shepherding the House of Israel.

The battle against Goliath will solidify this in the minds of the people, even if it will be a long time before David begins to rule over them. Whatever our abilities are, even if seemingly weak, base, or even foolish to others, God can use them for His glory.

We can have confidence in ourselves because of confidence in the Lord, and also do great things. And more, the things we do which are “great” may not seem great to anyone else, but if they are done in faith, they are great in the Lord’s eyes.

A carpet cleaner who serves the Lord with his life certainly pleases Him more than a prime minister, president, or king who has no heart for Him. Let us remember this and be people of faith, living lives for His glory, not our own.

This is commendable before God. It is a truth found in His superior word. And so, let us turn to that precious word once again, and… May God speak to us through His word today, and may His glorious name ever be praised.

I. I Come Unto You in Name – Yehovah Sabaoth (verses 41-47)

41 So the Philistine came, and began drawing near to David,

The Hebrew is alive with motion: vayelekh ha’pelishti holekh veqarev el David – “And he walked, the Philistine, walking, and neared unto David.” The energy of the words shows determined purpose. Goliath waited weeks for a challenger. Each step now is one of delight and anticipation. “Finally, a worthy foe has left the ranks of Israel to meet my challenge.” This is further supplemented by the words…

41 (con’t) and the man who bore the shield went before him.

veha’ish nose ha’tsinah lephanav – “And the man lifting the shield to his faces.” The words are close to verse 7 but they leave out the verb “walking.”

“And lifter the shield walking to his faces.” (v.7)
“And the man lifting the shield to his faces.” (v.41)

The movement, and thus the purpose and intent of the action, is ascribed to Goliath. And so, it is as if the shield-bearer is a single unit with him, being propelled on by Goliath’s movement.

The giant, adorned in all of his military gear, with a shield-bearer as well, is actually not alone. Someone guards him. But no one goes before David. The contrast is made all the more poignant by the use of the words in this verse. In his state, and in the confidence he surely felt, we next enter the very thoughts of Goliath.

As he gets close enough to see David, he is incredulous. So much so that he leans his head forward another few inches as if he needs better focus, and then a sense of disbelieving amazement fills his face. His nose scrunches, his eyes squinch, his forehead crimps down, and he says, “Huh?” As the narrative says…

42 And when the Philistine looked about and saw David,

vayabet ha’pelishti vayireh eth David – “And he caused to scan, the Philistine, and he saw David.” The word navat signifies to look intently and thus to scan. Goliath was scanning the field, watching as David approached. Once he was close enough, his eyes zoomed in on his opponent. Surely with a stupid but astonished look on his face, Goliath carefully observed David, and…

42 (con’t) he disdained him;

vayivzehu – “And he disesteemed him.” The word was first seen in the account of Esau when he sold his birthright. For a mere bowl of red soup, he sold off what was of such high value, showing disdain for it. Here, Goliath looks at David and disesteems him. He sees nothing of value in regard to a battle…

42 (con’t) for he was only a youth,

ki hayah naar – “For he was lad.” The Israelites had sent a boy to fight a man. They had sent an inexperienced person to challenge a champion. It was the first reason to disesteem David…

42 (con’t) ruddy

veadmoni – and red.” Here, admoni, red, is used for the third and last time. It was first used of Esau when he was born –

“And the first came out red [admoni]. He was like a hairy garment all over; so they called his name Esau.” Genesis 25:25

It was next used in Chapter 16 when describing David –

“And he sent, and he brought him. And he red [admoni] with beautiful eyes and good visage. And He said, Yehovah, “Arise! Anoint him! For this he!” 1 Samuel 16:12

Admoni comes from the same root as the verb adom, to be red. It can speak of the hair or the complexion. Either way, the connection to Esau should not be missed. To understand why, take a break and go watch the sermons on Esau and Jacob from Genesis 25 and 27.

It is all the more interesting that the words “despise” and “red” are used in both accounts. A connection between the two has been established. Being red – in hair or complexion – was another reason to disesteem David. To Goliath, David had no gray hairs of an adult. He also had the weak complexion of a ruddy young boy. As such, Goliath saw him as an unfit challenger…

42 (con’t) and good-looking.

im yepheh mareh – “with beautiful appearance.” This would be a complete surprise. All who were trained in battle would have the look of a warrior. Some may paint their faces to make them look more aggressive. They may also have scars, missing teeth, and so on. And more, for sure, they would snarl and show contempt for their opponent.

David displayed none of these features. He looked like any regular person that you might meet on the street. Thus, it was a third reason to disesteem him…

43 So the Philistine said to David, “Am I a dog, that you come to me with sticks?”

vayomer ha’pelishti el David ha’khelev anokhi ki atah va elay bamaqloth – “And he said, the Philistine, unto David, ‘The dog, I? For you come unto me in the sticks.’” Verse 40 said in the singular that David “took his stick in his hand.” Here, Goliath says, “sticks.” This is certainly an expression of derision, like saying to someone, “Grow up and stop playing with tinker toys.” But more, he adds in ha’kelev anoki – “the dog, I?”

In other words, “Fighting the dog with sticks may be effective. Is that what you think I am?” The Philistine stands there arrayed in battle armor, with weapons far fiercer than just angry flashing teeth. Sticks will be entirely ineffective against such a foe. Because of this…

43 (con’t) And the Philistine cursed David by his gods.

vayqalel ha’pelishti eth David belohav – “And he lightened, the Philistine, David in his God.” Out of twenty-seven translations I checked for this sermon, only two state this in the singular, “his God.” Goliath is cursing David b’elohav, or “in his God,” meaning the God of Israel. It is a direct insult to Yehovah.

No Philistine god is named in the account. Goliath has purposefully come out morning and evening to challenge Israel – assuredly at the time of the daily sacrifices. Thus, he is not relying on his false god or gods, but is verbally attacking Israel’s God.

44 And the Philistine said to David, “Come to me,

vayomer ha’pelishti el David lekhah elay – “And he said, the Philistine unto David, ‘You must walk-ward unto me.” Goliath was no longer in the mood for advancing. He must have thought the challenge was a joke or some type of ruse by Saul.

Either way, it is obvious that he takes David as no true challenge. Because of this, instead of continuing to press forward, he called for David to come to him, certainly not expecting him to do so. But if he did, only then would he act…

44 (con’t) and I will give your flesh to the birds of the air and the beasts of the field!”

veetenah eth besarekha leoph ha’shamayim u-levehemath ha’sadeh – “and let me give your flesh to bird the heavens and to beast the field.” Goliath was so confident of the outcome that he was prepared to dispatch his opponent with little effort and leave his carcass out for whatever came to collect it. He had not moved away from his side of the ravine, and no Israelite would dare come and carry him away. In his mind, David is already dead and no threat at all.

45 Then David said to the Philistine, “You come to me with a sword, with a spear, and with a javelin.

vayomer David el ha’pelishti atah ba elay bekherev u-vakhanith u-vekidon – “And he said, David, unto the Philistine, ‘You come unto me in sword and in the spear, and in javelin.’” In the earlier verses describing Goliath, nothing was said of a sword. Here, it becomes apparent that he carried one.

David, noting the weaponry of Goliath contrasts that with his own armament, something much more potent in battle…

45 (con’t) But I come to you in the name of the Lord of hosts,

veanokhi va elekha beshem Yehovah tsevaoth – “And I come unto you in Name – Yehovah Sabaoth.” David sets an absolute contrast between himself and Goliath. Goliath is using what is created but then manipulated within the creation (fashioning implements for battle out of elements) to conduct his warfare. However, David comes forward in the name of Yehovah – the self-existent God.

As He is self-existent, He is separate from the creation, meaning He is transcendent over it. As this is so, trusting in His name means trusting in the sum of who He is. He has presented Himself already to Israel in numerous ways: Yehovah Yireh – the Lord will Provide, Yehovah Rapha – the Lord is my Healer, Yehovah Nisi – the Lord is my Banner, Yehovah Meqadishkhem – the Lord who Sanctifies you, and Yehovah Shalom – the Lord is Peace.

These are but a few ways the Lord has revealed Himself to His covenant people. David presents Him to Goliath as Yehovah Tsevaoth, the Lord of Hosts. It is a term introduced in 1 Samuel 3. This is its fifth use in Scripture. The name comes from tsava, signifying a massing, such as of persons. Being a plural, it indicates He is the Lord of Hosts. Later, David will use this term in the 24th Psalm –

“Who is this King of glory?
The Lord of hosts,
He is the King of glory. Selah” Psalm 24:10

David next expands on this name, saying that He is…

45 (con’t) the God of the armies of Israel,

elohe maarkhoth Yisrael – “God arrangements Israel.” The many-faceted Lord who is a Provider, Healer, source of Peace, and so forth, is also the Captain and Ruler of the ranks of His army – the army that Goliath has openly defied. David will trust in this One to take away the reproach of the uncircumcised Philistine. His confidence in the Lord was unwavering throughout his life –

“Some trust in chariots, and some in horses;
But we will remember the name of the Lord our God.
They have bowed down and fallen;
But we have risen and stand upright.” Psalm 20:1

David is trusting solely in the Lord as his Helper. Goliath thinks he sees victory. David, however, looks beyond the moment to the ultimate defeat of the enemy. This is seen in how he has treated the name of Yehovah…

45 (con’t) whom you have defied.

asher kheraphta – “whom you exposed.” This is the fifth and last time the verb kharaph, to expose, is seen in this chapter. It comes from the noun khoreph, harvest time, or autumn, as in the time of a gathered crop.

David notes that Goliath has not only stripped the ranks of Israel as a reaper would strip the fields at harvest, laying them bare and exposing them, but he has also done this to Yehovah’s name. The taunt cannot be allowed to stand. Therefore…

46 This day the Lord will deliver you into my hand,

ha’yom ha’zeh yesagerkha Yehovah beyadi – “The day, the this, He will shut you, Yehovah, in my hand.” The word sagar signifies to close or to shut up. As such, David is saying that Goliath will be ensnared in his hand, unable to escape. In such an incapacitated state, David says…

46 (con’t) and I will strike you and take your head from you.

vehikitikha vahasirothi eth roshekha mealekha – “And I will cause to strike you. And I will cause to veer your head from upon you.” The confidence of David is so great that not only will Goliath be shut up in his hand, but David will have complete control over him, prophesying that he will remove Goliath’s head from his body. Plus…

46 (con’t) And this day I will give the carcasses of the camp of the Philistines to the birds of the air and the wild beasts of the earth,

venathati peger makhaneh phelishtim ha’yom ha’zeh leoph ha’shamayim u-lekhayath ha’arets – “And I gave carcass camp Philistines the day, the this, to bird the heavens and to living the earth.” The word is singular, “carcass.” David looks at the entire camp of the Philistines as one body that will be slain and presented as an offering to the birds and the beasts. In defeating Goliath, the deed will be accomplished.

46 (con’t) that all the earth may know that there is a God in Israel.

veyedeu kal ha’arets ki yesh elohim leyisrael – “And they will know, all the earth, for exists God to Israel.” Israel means He Strives With God. It can be for God or against God. The idea is that God is not “for” Israel, but that God possesses Israel. They are His people, and He displays that fact through them.

47 Then all this assembly shall know that the Lord does not save with sword and spear;

veyedeu kal ha’qahal ha’zeh ki lo bekherev u-vankhanith yehoshia Yehovah – “And they will know, all the assembly, the this, for not in sword and in the spear, He will cause to save, Yehovah.” The implements of battle used by Goliath are unnecessary for the Lord to gain the victory.

Even if used, it is not they that win the battle, but the Lord Himself who does. It is right to understand the etymology of these implements. The kherev, sword, comes from the verb kharav, to be dry or dried up. It is identical to the name of the mountain, Horeb, where the Law of Moses was received, and which comes from the same root word, kharav.

The khanit, spear, comes from the verb khanah, to incline (and thus to camp) or decline (as the sun in the afternoon). The connection is that a spear is for thrusting, like pitching a tent. That is from the same root as khanan, to stoop or bend in kindness to an inferior, as in God dealing graciously with someone.

There is more to the word, though. It is the same word as the feminine form of khen, grace, the word from which Hannah, Grace, is ultimately derived. Of note is that in verse 13:19, it said, “sword or spear.” Here it says, “in sword and in the spear.”

Understanding these things will help us to understand the typology being presented and why the Lord included such things in this marvelous account of David facing the giant Philistine. David says that it is not in a sword or spear that the victory in battle is attained. Rather…

47 (con’t) for the battle is the Lord’s, and He will give you into our hands.”

ki leYehovah ha’milkhamah venathan etkhem beyadenu – “For to Yehovah the battle! And He gave you [all] in our hand.” The battle belongs to Yehovah alone. Only in Yehovah can the enemy be defeated. It is a victory he then hands to His people.

David’s confidence in Yehovah is such that Goliath and all of the hosts of the Philistines will be handed to Israel. His confident attitude is reflected many years later in a psalm penned by the sons of Korah –

“For I will not trust in my bow,
Nor shall my sword save me.
But You have saved us from our enemies,
And have put to shame those who hated us.
In God we boast all day long,
And praise Your name forever. Selah” Psalm 44:6-8

I come to you in the name of the Lord of hosts
The God of the armies of Israel, whom you have defied
You may have the power to pull up fence posts
But when this battle is over, it is you who will have died

The Lord of Hosts! The God of Israel
In Him is our trust and our hope this day
What happens here, to our children we will tell
When you are dead, and your corpse is cast away

Blessed be the Lord! And blessed be His name
My trust is in Him to do away with you today
Great will be the victory, and the honor of His fame
When you are gone, Israel will shout ‘Hooray!’

I. In the Sling and in the Stone (verses 48-58)

48 So it was, when the Philistine arose and came and drew near to meet David, that David hurried and ran toward the army to meet the Philistine.

vehayah ki qam ha’pelishti vayelekh vayiqrav liqrath David vaymaher David vayarats ha’maarakhah liqrath ha’pelishti – “And it was, for he arose, the Philistine, and he walked, and he approached to encounter David. And he hurried, David, and he ran – the arrangement, to encounter the Philistine.” With the parley ended, Goliath could no longer remain still.

The challenge had been made. It was apparent that his opponent was serious, so he rose to his full height and went into motion. The double verbs enhance the excitement of the narrative – Goliath arose, “and he walked, and he approached.” Likewise, “And he hurried, David, and he ran…” No Hollywood movie could improve on the tension of the moment…

49 Then David put his hand in his bag and took out a stone; and he slung it and struck the Philistine in his forehead,

vayishlakh David eth yado el ha’keli vayiqakh misham even vayqala vayakh eth ha’pelishti el mitskho – “And he sent, David, his hand unto the vessel. And he took from there stone. And he slung, and he caused to strike the Philistine unto his forehead!” The account gives a simple description of how the marvelous blow came about. He put his hand to the bag, pulled out a single stone, and slung it with the precision of a sniper, hitting Goliath directly in his forehead.

For David tending to the sheep, there would be little else to do in the wilderness than practice with his sling. His skill would be so refined that the account is not only likely, but it would be hard to imagine how he could miss, even while at a full run. He was proficient with the sling. And more, the Lord’s honor was at stake, and the Lord’s presence was with him. The victory was a given…

49 (con’t) so that the stone sank into his forehead,

vatitba ha’even bemitskho – “And it sank, the stone, in his forehead!” The forehead in the Bible signifies the place of conscience and identification. David identified with Yehovah, but Goliath identified himself against Him. He had made his stand, and he was judged for it. So great was the blow that the stone not only crushed his forehead, but it also sank into it, becoming one with it…

49 (con’t) and he fell on his face to the earth.

vayipol al panav aretsah – “And he fell upon his face earthward!” This shows that not only was Goliath injured, but he was completely incapable of any further action. Being facedown, he was left completely exposed to whatever fate awaited him.

50 So David prevailed over the Philistine with a sling and a stone,

vayekhezaq David min ha’pelishti baqela u-vaeven – “And he seized, David, from the Philistine, in the sling and in the stone.” In twenty-seven translations checked for the sermon, only the NET Bible includes the definite articles before “sling” and “stone.” The strength of David is placed in the sling and in the stone. It is through this means that Lord won the victory.

50 (con’t) and struck the Philistine and killed him.

vayakh eth ha’pelishti vaymithehu – “And he caused to strike the Philistine. And he caused to kill him.” It says that David struck the Philistine and killed him. The means by which the kill is credited is the sling and the stone. David hit his mark, and the victory was won. It then says of this…

50 (con’t) But there was no sword in the hand of David.

vekherev ein beyad David – “And sword, naught, in hand David.” It is specific and unambiguous. David did not have his own sword. This is stated specifically for a purpose. David prevailed not with his own sword…

51 Therefore David ran and stood over the Philistine, took his sword and drew it out of its sheath and killed him, and cut off his head with it.

vayarats David vayaamod el ha’pelishti vayiqakh eth kharbo vayishlephah mitarah vaymothethehu vayikhrath bah eth rosho – “And he ran, David, and he stood unto the Philistine, and he took his sword, and he drew her from her sheath, and he killed him…” David had no sword, and yet he prevailed over the Philistine.

However, to complete the victory, while ensuring that the wound didn’t only appear terminal, David drew out the sword of the Philistine and killed him with it, “…and he cut, in her, his head.”

Whether they were two actions or one, the giant’s life was ended with his own sword, and his head was removed with it as well. The events are minutely recorded to provide specific details of other events coming in redemptive history.

This is the last time the sword is mentioned in this passage, but this same sword will be brought back into the narrative later in 1 Samuel –

“And he said, the priest, ‘Sword Goliath the Philistine whom you struck in Valley the Elah. Behold! It wrapped in the mantle behind the ephod. If it you will take to you, take. For naught other beside it in this.’” 1 Samuel 21:9 (CG)

It is a marvelous passage which plays on the name of Goliath – the Exposer – and his sword, which was covered in a cloth. Goliath thought he would expose with his sword, but his sword lay covered behind the ephod.

51 (con’t) And when the Philistines saw that their champion was dead, they fled.

vayiru ha’pelishtim ki meth giboram vayanusu – “And they saw, the Philistines, for he dead, their powerful, and they fled.” Here, the word translated as “champion” by the NKJV is completely different than the previous two uses.

The word is gibor. It signifies strong or mighty. Though Goliath had made an agreement that the Philistines would become the slaves of Israel if he was defeated, the people were so shocked to see him dead that they turned on their heels and fled.

With this, the entire mood of the battle lines changed, and Israel went on the offensive…

52 Now the men of Israel and Judah arose and shouted, and pursued the Philistines as far as the entrance of the valley

vayaqumu anshe Yisrael vihudah vayariu vayirdephu eth ha’pelishtim ad boakha gay – “And they arose, mortals Israel and Judah, and they caused to shout, and they pursued the Philistines until your coming – ravine.” It says, “ravine,” not “the ravine.”

Because of this, scholars have raised many questions and much speculation. One possibility is that the word gai, valley, is a misspelling of Gath. The Greek translation says “Gath,” and so this is possible, but not a preferred choice. It could be some indiscriminate valley.

Regardless, the men of Israel and Judah took the initiative, raised the war cry, and went hot on the heels of the Philistines…

52 (con’t) and to the gates of Ekron.

vead shaare eqron – “and until gates Ekron.” The name Ekron comes from aqar – to uproot or pluck up. Thus, it signifies Uprooting or Extermination. Zephaniah makes a play on the name in his book –

“For Gaza shall be forsaken,
And Ashkelon desolate;
They shall drive out Ashdod at noonday,
And Ekron shall be uprooted.” Zephaniah 2:4

Ekron is noted in 2 Kings 1:2 as the location of the god Baal-Zebub, a false deity that Jesus will equate with the ruler of demons in Matthew 12:24.

52 (con’t) And the wounded of the Philistines fell along the road to Shaaraim, even as far as Gath and Ekron.

vayipelu khalele phelishtim bederekh shaarayim vead gath vead eqron – “And they fell pierced, Philistines, in road – Shaaraim, and until Gath, and until Ekron.” Shaaraim is the plural of shaar, gate. Thus, it signifies “Two Gates.” It is the scene of a bloody battle where the bodies lie strewn for, literally, miles. Israel took the initiative and overcame its enemies because David first vanquished their champion.

53 Then the children of Israel returned from chasing the Philistines,

vayashuvu bene Yisrael mideloq akhare phelishtim – “And they returned, sons Israel, from flaming after Philistines.” The word dalaq, pursue, comes from a root signifying a flame. Thus, this is a heated, burning pursuit, cutting down the enemy like stubble, which is then burned. When that was accomplished, they returned…

53 (con’t) and they plundered their tents.

Rather: vayashosu eth makhanehem – “And they plundered their camps.” This means that the army of the Philistines was divided into various camps, probably based on the villages from which they came. They destroyed the inhabitants of those cities, and then they returned and plundered their various camps.

54 And David took the head of the Philistine and brought it to Jerusalem,

vayiqakh David eth rosh ha’pelishti vayviehu yerushalim – “And he took, David, head the Philistine, and he caused to bring it – Jerusalem.” The meaning of the name “Jerusalem” is debated, but the meaning of the second half it is not. It comes from the verb shalem, “to be complete,” or “to be sound.” That gives the sense of the word shalom, peace.

It isn’t merely a quiet peace, but a state of wholeness or completion. The first part could come from one of several sources, which lead to various significations, but Foundation of Peace is sufficient to get the point.

David takes Goliath’s head there, but no explanation as to why is given. Nor is the head mentioned again in Scripture. At the time, the fortress of Zion was not yet captured, but Jerusalem was possessed by Israel. It is possible that he took the head there to terrify the Jebusites, letting them know that they, too, would be defeated in due time.

Others think that this was written later when David conquered Zion and brought the head to this fortress at that time. This would mean that he kept it as a trophy all along, and Jerusalem was where it finally ended up when David ruled over Israel. That seems a stretch, and, in turn, it would make the next clause seem out of place.

54 (con’t) but he put his armor in his tent.

veeth kelav sam beaholo – “And his vessels, he put in his tent.” David was obviously given the right to all of Goliath’s goods, which would have included his armor, weapons, and personal effects. But is that what this is referring to? The Hebrew leaves open an obvious set of possibilities.

Is this speaking of David putting Goliath’s goods in his tent, or David putting his goods in Goliath’s tent? It says, “and his goods he put in his tent.” Translational and scholarly comment is unanimous that it is the former. The second option isn’t even considered.

However, the pattern of the previous clause makes David the subject and Goliath the object. If that pattern continues in this clause, it would read –

* And David took the head of the Philistine and brought it to Jerusalem
* And his (David’s) goods he put in his (Goliath’s) tent

If the Israelites plundered the camp of the Philistines, it means they also procured the tents along with everything else. David came to the camp to deliver supplies to his brothers, and then he would have returned to his father’s beith, house. Therefore, not being a warrior, it is likely he didn’t even have a tent.

Therefore, David took over the tent of Goliath, placing his goods there. That means everything belonging to Goliath became the possession of David.

Another question that arises is, “Why would it speak of Goliath’s head being taken to Jerusalem a long time in the future and then revert to this note just after the battle?”

It seems more likely that the head of Goliath was taken to Jerusalem as a note of the victory. The city of Jerusalem was granted to Benjamin, but it bordered Judah, and was occupied by people from the tribe of Judah. As Judah means “Praise,” and Jerusalem means “Foundation of Peace,” it seems to be a symbolic gesture playing on the two names.

Two important points to consider are that it says, “his head,” not his “skull,” and the name Goliath is not a derivative of the same root as the word “skull.” Thus, this cannot have any typological connection to “Golgotha,” although that would have been an interesting twist. Something else, rather, is being pictured…

55 When Saul saw David going out against the Philistine, he said to Abner, the commander of the army, “Abner, whose son is this youth?”

vekhiroth shaul eth David yotse liqrath ha’pelishti amar el avner sar ha’tsava ben mi zeh ha’naar avner – “And according to seeing, Saul, David going to encounter the Philistine, he said unto Abner, commander the hosts, ‘Son who this, the lad, Abner?’” The final verses of the chapter have long perplexed readers and scholars alike.

Indeed, many scholars fall back on the supposition that they are not a part of the original text since they are lacking from the Greek translation of it.

Others simply dismiss them with little or no commentary, hoping to avoid the dilemma altogether. The reason for this is that in Chapter 16, David was introduced to Saul and had tended to him during his time of mental affliction.

There are several possibilities concerning this. The first is that Saul focuses on who David’s father is. Unless one is sharp and has a great memory, he may have simply forgotten where David came from and who his father was.

These verses never ask who David is, just who his father is. Since David prevailed in the battle, Saul would need to know whose family was to be given his daughter and be exempted from taxes in Israel.

A second option is that the accounts are not necessarily chronological. This is actually likely, and it was what was concluded in our analysis of Chapter 16.

The events are being tied together categorially in order to present David logically in relation to how events fall into a greater picture of his life and of redemptive history.

David is anointed king by Samuel. At some point, his brothers are in the camp awaiting battle with the Philistines, and David comes to the camp. Eventually, he becomes the hero of the battle. During that time, Saul asks whose son he is.

At some point, Saul went or goes into fits of mental depression. It is found that the same person who was the hero against Goliath has other skills as well and is called into permanent service under Saul.

Following the narrative I laid out in Chapter 16 resolves all of these difficulties. Jonathan is never mentioned in relation to David before Chapter 18. It is true that the order is difficult, but it is no more difficult than understanding that the time frames of events, such as in Chapter 16, could have been over a period of years.

Such categorical rather than chronological accounts permeate Scripture. They may cause confusion when not understood, but they are actually logical progressions of thought when viewed from the greater plan of the redemptive narrative. For now, Abner responds…

55 (con’t) And Abner said, “As your soul lives, O king, I do not know.”

vayomer avner khe naphshekha ha’melekh im yadaeti – “And he said, Abner, ‘Alive, your soul, the king, if I knew!” Abner comes from two words, av, father, and ner, a lamp.  Thus, it means something like Father Is a Lamp, or it could even extend to Father Is Light. As Abner’s father is named Ner, Lamp, it may simply be, “My Father Is Light.”

Abner doesn’t have any idea about David’s father, so the narrative continues…

56 So the king said, “Inquire whose son this young man is.

vayomer ha’melekh sheal atah ben mi zeh ha’alem – “And he said, the king, Saul, ‘You must ask, you, son who this, the stripling?” The word elem, stripling, is used. It is only seen here and in 1 Samuel 20:22. The fact that Saul uses this word, indicating a young man, seems to indicate that the age of David here is not the same as the account in 1 Samuel 16.

With a few years between events, David’s appearance could have been completely different. At one time, he was a youth. Later, he will be a man with a beard. Understanding this, once the battle was over, David was presented to Saul…

57 Then, as David returned from the slaughter of the Philistine, Abner took him and brought him before Saul with the head of the Philistine in his hand.

u-kheshuv David mehakoth eth ha’pelishti vayiqakh oto avner vayviehu liphne shaul verosh ha’pelishti beyado – “And according to returning, David, from causing to strike the Philistine, and he took him, Abner, and he caused to bring him to faces Saul. And head the Philistine in his hand.” David is presented to Saul while he is still carrying Goliath’s head.

Note that when David was first brought before Saul in this chapter, he never asked his father’s name. It may be an indication that he never expected David to prevail.

Now that he has, Saul needs to know what family David belonged to in order to honor the father of the hero of the battle. This is likely the intent, so the inquiry is made…

58 And Saul said to him, “Whose son are you, young man?”

vayomer elav shaul ben mi atah ha’naar – “And he said unto him, Saul, ‘Son who, you, the lad?’” Again, the inquiry is made about who David’s father is. This, along with the unusual use of the word elem, young man, favors the notion that the accounts are categorically placed. Saul wants to know what family he belongs to, and…

*58 (fin) So David answered, “I am the son of your servant Jesse the Bethlehemite.”

vayomer David ben avdekha Yishai beith ha’lakhmi – “And he said, David, ‘Son, your servant, Jesse, House the ‘My Bread.’” It seems like an odd place for the narrative to end, but it’s not. Saul needed to know whose son David was, but we needed to know who David is.

It is this David who is the son of Jesse, and it is this Jesse who, according to Ruth 4, is the son of Obed. Also, it is this Obed who is the son of Boaz, the husband of Ruth, of whom the book of Ruth is written. The names are important because they keep taking us back to earlier stories.

The father of Boaz is Salmon, who was married to Rahab the harlot. Each time the Bible focuses on someone, we have to remember that we are reading something that was documented and already known to the people. The book of Joshua detailed who Rahab was, and the story eventually goes back to Perez and Zerah, who came from Judah.

The importance of these final verses of Chapter 17 means one thing to Saul, but they mean something completely different to those who want to know what God is doing in redemptive history. With the events of David’s life now being recorded, the next generation would have another clue concerning the promised Messiah.

Let us not forget this. When we come to a passage that seems out of place or irrelevant to the immediate narrative, it does not mean that it is.

We have discovered why it is important to know who David’s father is from these final verses of the chapter. We will next try to find out how the chapter itself is important to the overall redemptive narrative of the Bible.

It is great that an unprotected youth slew a giant all by himself in the Valley of Elah, but unless that story has some greater significance, it is just a curious story.

Many people have done great things, and their stories aren’t included in the Bible. But God has selected events to give us clues into what He is doing or will do, and how those things will come about.

Let us remember that Christ is the main focus of this marvelous gift we call the Holy Bible. Even if nothing else were to come out of the story, we know that David’s heroics are recorded, and he will eventually become the king of the nation. After that, covenant promises will be made to him concerning his house and his successors, including the greatest of them – our Lord.

David was a person of faith, even from his youth. He trusted with all of his being that he would prevail because he trusted in his God. For us, we are on the other side of the cross. If David could have such marvelous faith and confidence in the Lord from such an obscure perspective of God’s overall plan, shouldn’t we have so much more?

Let us trust in the Lord, have confidence in His promises, and stand fast in our faith. David pleased God. We too can please Him. That becomes possible by believing His word. And so, let us do so – to His glory.

Closing Verse: “I will sing a new song to You, O God;
On a harp of ten strings I will sing praises to You,
10 The One who gives salvation to kings,
Who delivers David His servant
From the deadly sword.” Psalm 144:9, 10

Next Week: 1 Samuel 17 You are curious about the typology. You ask, “It is whyeth?” You will find out –  no jive… (David and Goliath, Part V) (39th 1 Samuel Sermon)

The Lord has you exactly where He wants you. He has a good plan and purpose for you. He is the One who abases the haughty and exalts the humble. He regards the lowly, and the proud, He knows from afar. So yield yourself to Him, trust Him, and believe His word. In this, He will do great things for you and through you.

 

1 Samuel 17:41-58 (CG)

41And he walked, the Philistine, walking, and near unto David. And the man lifting the shield to his faces. 42And he caused to scan, the Philistine, and he saw David. And he disesteemed him. For he was lad, and red, with beautiful appearance. 43And he said, the Philistine, unto David, “The dog, I? For you come unto me in the sticks.” And he lightened, the Philistine, David in his God. 44And he said, the Philistine unto David, “You must walk-ward unto me, and let me give your flesh to bird the heavens and to beast the field.”

45And he said, David, unto the Philistine, “You come unto me in sword and in the spear, and in javelin. And I come unto you in Name – Yehovah Sabaoth – God arrangements Israel, whom you exposed. 46The day, the this, He will shut you, Yehovah, in my hand. And I caused to strike you. And I caused to veer your head from upon you. And I gave carcass camp Philistines the day, the this, to bird the heavens and to living the earth. And they will know, all the earth, for exists God to Israel. 47And they will know, all the assembly, the this, for not in sword, and in the spear, He will cause to save, Yehovah. For to Yehovah the battle! And He gave you [all] in our hand.”

48And it was, for he arose, the Philistine, and he walked, and he approached to encounter David. And he hurried, David, and he ran – the arrangement, to encounter the Philistine. 49And he sent, David, his hand unto the vessel. And he took from there stone. And he slung, and he caused to strike the Philistine unto his forehead! And it sank, the stone, in his forehead! And he fell upon his face earthward! 50And he seized, David, from the Philistine, in the sling and in the stone. And he caused to strike the Philistine. And he caused to kill him. And sword, naught, in hand David. 51And he ran, David, and he stood unto the Philistine, and he took his sword, and he drew her from her sheath, and he killed him, and he cut, in her, his head.

And they saw, the Philistines, for he dead, their powerful, and they fled. 52And they arose, mortals Israel and Judah, and they caused to shout, and they pursued the Philistines until your coming – ravine, and until gates Ekron. And they fell pierced, Philistines, in road – Shaaraim, and until Gath, and until Ekron. 53And they returned, sons Israel, from flaming after Philistines. And they plundered their camps. 54And he took, David, head the Philistine, and he caused to bring it – Jerusalem. And his vessels, he put in his tent.

55And according to seeing, Saul, David going to encounter the Philistine, he said unto Abner, commander the hosts, “Son who this, the lad, Abner?”

And he said, Abner, “Alive, your soul, the king, if I knew!”

56And he said, the king, Saul, “You must ask, you, son who this, the stripling?”

57And according to returning, David, from causing to strike the Philistine, and he took him, Abner, and he caused to bring him to faces Saul. And head the Philistine in his hand. 58And he said unto him, Saul, “Son who, you, the lad?”

And he said, David, “Son, your servant, Jesse, House the ‘My Bread.’”

 

1 Samuel 17:41-58 (NKJV)

41 So the Philistine came, and began drawing near to David, and the man who bore the shield went before him. 42 And when the Philistine looked about and saw David, he disdained him; for he was only a youth, ruddy and good-looking. 43 So the Philistine said to David, “Am I a dog, that you come to me with sticks?” And the Philistine cursed David by his gods. 44 And the Philistine said to David, “Come to me, and I will give your flesh to the birds of the air and the beasts of the field!”

45 Then David said to the Philistine, “You come to me with a sword, with a spear, and with a javelin. But I come to you in the name of the Lord of hosts, the God of the armies of Israel, whom you have defied. 46 This day the Lord will deliver you into my hand, and I will strike you and take your head from you. And this day I will give the carcasses of the camp of the Philistines to the birds of the air and the wild beasts of the earth, that all the earth may know that there is a God in Israel. 47 Then all this assembly shall know that the Lord does not save with sword and spear; for the battle is the Lord’s, and He will give you into our hands.”

48 So it was, when the Philistine arose and came and drew near to meet David, that David hurried and ran toward the army to meet the Philistine. 49 Then David put his hand in his bag and took out a stone; and he slung it and struck the Philistine in his forehead, so that the stone sank into his forehead, and he fell on his face to the earth. 50 So David prevailed over the Philistine with a sling and a stone, and struck the Philistine and killed him. But there was no sword in the hand of David. 51 Therefore David ran and stood over the Philistine, took his sword and drew it out of its sheath and killed him, and cut off his head with it.

And when the Philistines saw that their champion was dead, they fled. 52 Now the men of Israel and Judah arose and shouted, and pursued the Philistines as far as the entrance of the valley and to the gates of Ekron. And the wounded of the Philistines fell along the road to Shaaraim, even as far as Gath and Ekron. 53 Then the children of Israel returned from chasing the Philistines, and they plundered their tents. 54 And David took the head of the Philistine and brought it to Jerusalem, but he put his armor in his tent.

55 When Saul saw David going out against the Philistine, he said to Abner, the commander of the army, “Abner, whose son is this youth?”

And Abner said, “As your soul lives, O king, I do not know.”

56 So the king said, “Inquire whose son this young man is.

57 Then, as David returned from the slaughter of the Philistine, Abner took him and brought him before Saul with the head of the Philistine in his hand. 58 And Saul said to him, “Whose son are you, young man?”

So David answered, “I am the son of your servant Jesse the Bethlehemite.”

 

 

Matthew 18:1

Sunday, 15 March 2026

At that time the disciples came to Jesus, saying, “Who then is greatest in the kingdom of heaven?” Matthew 18:1

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at the “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen)

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“In that hour, they came, the disciples to Jesus, saying, ‘Who then, he is, greatest in the kingdom of the heavens’” (CG).

In the previous verse, Jesus’s word finished Chapter 17 as He told Peter to go to the sea, cast a hook, and take the first fish he caught, opening its mouth, and taking out a stater that would be in its mouth. With that, Peter was to pay the temple tax for Jesus and himself. Chapter 18 begins with, “In that hour.”

Mark and Luke do not mention the account concerning Peter and the payment of the temple tax. Instead, they go into Jesus’ words about Him being betrayed and killed (Matthew 17:22, 23) directly into the account now stated. Peter, being the one approached by the tax collectors, may have simply been drawn out of the flow of the narrative, or Matthew may have put that account in there categorically to ensure typology was maintained.

Either way, each account describes this scene a little bit differently, but all agree on the overall tenor of what occurs. Placing the three accounts together, a full picture of how the matter arose is easily seen. This matter is, according to Matthew, that “they came, the disciples to Jesus, saying, ‘Who then, he is, greatest in the kingdom of the heavens?’”

To introduce this account, Mark says, “Then He came to Capernaum. And when He was in the house He asked them, ‘What was it you disputed among yourselves on the road?’” Luke records, “Then a dispute arose among them as to which of them would be greatest.”

The substance of the matter is that of being great in their hoped-for Messianic kingdom. The disciples argued over who the greatest of them would be. Thus, there is a mark of selfishness and a desire to be recognized above the others. This is a part of the human condition, and few, if any, are exempt from it.

Life application: For the most part, those who appear exempt from feelings of grandeur and self-importance are simply aware of the fact that they don’t have a way of becoming great, or they lack what is needed in whatever they think “being great” means. It’s not that they don’t want it, it’s that they aren’t able to attain it.

This may not be universal, but it generally becomes evident when someone who had no shot at becoming “great” suddenly has greatness thrust upon him. It is a very rare soul who will handle his elevation responsibly and with humility.

But such an attitude is contrary to what is biblically expected of all, much less leaders. Paul says –

Let nothing be done through selfish ambition or conceit, but in lowliness of mind let each esteem others better than himself. Let each of you look out not only for his own interests, but also for the interests of others.” Philippians 2:3, 4

After saying that, he pens the example of Christ, the One to be emulated –

“Let this mind be in you which was also in Christ Jesus, who, being in the form of God, did not consider it robbery to be equal with God, but made Himself of no reputation, taking the form of a bondservant, and coming in the likeness of men. And being found in appearance as a man, He humbled Himself and became obedient to the point of death, even the death of the cross. Therefore God also has highly exalted Him and given Him the name which is above every name, 10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of those in heaven, and of those on earth, and of those under the earth, 11 and that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.” Philippians 2:5-11

Therefore, even if this is not in our nature, we are asked to work on it, until it becomes our nature. The King of the Universe was willing to unite with humanity and take on the lowliest form of man, serving others. This is what God esteems in us. It is akin to the example that Jesus will set forth to His disciples in the verses ahead in Matthew.

Let us have this mind in us, to the glory of God who called us unto Himself.

Lord God Almighty, may we be willing to set aside our pride, lustful desires, and the earthly temptations that we are constantly bombarded with to pursue a life of humility and honoring others. Above all, may our actions be done to glorify You. You alone are truly worthy of all praise, glory, and honor. Amen.

 

Matthew 17 Summary

Saturday, 14 March 2026

An explanation of the overall pictorial contents of Matthew 17.

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at the “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen)

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

Also, if you would like to listen to Daniel Higgins’ comparison between Esther (the 17th book) and Matthew 17 (Click Here to listen). The notes for his study can be found at this link (Click  Here), or just see below this S/W commentary.

Chapter 17 of Matthew completes a picture that has been ongoing for several chapters. In Chapter 14, there was a snapshot of Israel’s history in relation to the law. Chapter 15 then gave a picture of what is going on in the world from the time Jesus fulfilled the law until the rapture. Chapter 16 revealed a passage that petitions the Jews of the end times to consider who Jesus is based on their own history, comparing it to how He is portrayed in Scripture.

Chapter 17 began with the words “after six days.” It is a reference to the six days of creation, which mirror the six thousand years of man’s time before the millennium, the seventh day, the day of God’s rest on earth –

“And in that day there shall be a Root of Jesse,
Who shall stand as a banner to the people;
For the Gentiles shall seek Him,
And His resting place shall be glorious.” Isaiah 11:10

Jesus took Peter, James, and John up on a high mountain. Peter is the apostle to the circumcision (Galatians 2:7), James was the first apostle to die, and John was the last. This is an honor that James and John had sought, but in a different way –

“Then the mother of Zebedee’s sons came to Him with her sons, kneeling down and asking something from Him.
21 And He said to her, ‘What do you wish?’
She said to Him, ‘Grant that these two sons of mine may sit, one on Your right hand and the other on the left, in Your kingdom.’” Matthew 20:20, 21

In one respect, Jesus granted the request concerning the placement of apostolic honor. These three men form a triad of witnesses to the Jews. There on the high mountain, Jesus metamorphosed before them. Moses and Elijah, representing the law and the prophets as well as the living and the dead, appeared along with Jesus.

Peter, whose epistles are strategically placed after Paul’s, indicating they are addressed to the end times Jews after the church age, offered to build three tabernacles, dwelling places, for them. The voice of the Father came out of the cloud, noting that it is His Son, Jesus, in whom He is well pleased, and that they were to hear Him.

It is the final lesson of the end times. The law and prophets are not what the Jews are to focus on, but Jesus. It is His glory alone that will take them into the millennium, the law being finally removed from Israel (see Hebrews 8:13).

While descending the mountain, the disciples asked Him why the scribes said that Elijah was to come first. Jesus said, “Elijah indeed, he comes first, and he will reconstitute all” (17:11). Elijah is literally coming back to witness to Israel. However, Jesus also noted that Elijah had come already. The disciples understood this to mean John the Baptist.

The indication is that Israel will understand from these two appearances that they missed the ball, and the troubles they have faced were a self-inflicted wound. Verses 14-17 detail the healing of the man’s son. No names of people or locations were given, just a description of the boy being moonstruck and suffering badly because he frequently fell into the fire and frequently into the water.

It is a picture of Israel in their history before the Lord, completely untreatable, even by the disciples (their witness to Israel) –

“Your affliction is incurable,
Your wound is severe.
13 There is no one to plead your cause,
That you may be bound up;
You have no healing medicines.” Jeremiah 30:12, 13

See also Micah 1:8,9.

Jesus called them a faithless and perverse generation, something that exactingly describes Israel. It is a point stated to the Jews by Peter in Acts 2:40. Despite their failure, it says that Jesus rebuked the demon, and it left the child that very hour. Israel’s wound will be cured immediately at the return of Christ.

When the disciples asked why they couldn’t cast it out, Jesus said it was because of their unbelief and that that kind could only go out by fasting and prayer. Jesus doesn’t say who must fast and pray. Rather, He says it is a part of such healing.

Fasting is a sign of mourning and repentance toward God. Prayer is the means by which God is petitioned.  In the future, at the time of Christ’s return, Israel will, like ancient Nineveh, fast and pray to the Lord. When they do, they will be healed.

The final verses of the chapter referred first to them “overturning” in the Galilee (verse 22). The word was anastrephó. As explained, one can return without any intent or change in the way things are, or one can return while considering, making changes, redirecting to something new, etc. It is also used as a word indicating contrast.

It is the state of Israel after having been healed. There is a return with a considered change, redirecting them to something new. They will enter the New Covenant, returning to God in a new way. That wording is based on Jesus’ words about the Son of Man being betrayed into the hands of men, being killed, and being raised on the third day (verse 23).

That is the exact gospel Paul explains in 1 Corinthians 15:3, 4. Israel will be overturned in their thinking by finally accepting, as Paul says, “the gospel which I preached to you, which also you received and in which you stand, by which also you are saved” (1 Corinthians 15:1,2).

In verse 24, it says that they came to Capernaum. The name is derived from kaphar, to cover, as in atonement, and Nahum, the name of the prophet. However, Nahum is derived from nakham, to sigh. The sense of the word extends to regretting, feeling sorry, and being or getting comfort.

All three of these are tied up in the thought of salvation. While in this location, those who received the temple tax asked if the Teacher paid the tax. Peter’s answer in verse 25 was that He did. The tax, as explained, was based on the ransom money (silver) described in Exodus 30:11-16. It is the money representing salvation through Christ’s sacrifice, ransoming man from the power of the devil.

Still in verse 25, Jesus preanticipated Peter by asking about paying such taxes, does that come from the king’s sons or from unfamiliars (those outside the family). The word used was prophthanó, to get an earlier start on a matter.

Jesus didn’t just speak of the matter of Israel’s salvation before they asked for it. He spoke of the matter before they could ask. In other words, the Bible has clearly proclaimed that Israel will once again be God’s people. Their ransom money had been procured long before they knew there was a need for it. This was preanticipated by God in Christ.

Peter’s response to Jesus about the tax was from unfamilars. Jesus said, “Hence, the sons, they are exempt.” It is a point that will apply to Israel after the Lord returns. Being sons of God (as a nation), once again, they will be free from such payment.

Verse 27 described the manner in which Peter would find such a coin to pay the taxes. It was provided by Jesus in a miraculous way. Likewise, Israel will not pay anything for their ransom. Rather, it will be provided by Christ’s all-sufficient payment at the cross of Calvary.

The final words of the chapter recorded Jesus’ words to Peter, “That, having taken, you give to them for Me and you.” Jesus’ work leading to His resurrection is what validated both His and Israel’s sonship.

For Jesus, that is recorded in Romans 1:4, where it says, “and declared to be the Son of God with power according to the Spirit of holiness, by the resurrection from the dead.” See also Hebrews 1:5.

For Israel of the end times, pictured by Peter, the apostle to the circumcision, it is belief in the gospel that will bring about their state of sonship. The tax is paid through the miracle-working power of God in Christ.

Life application: Chapter 17 of Matthew clearly indicates that there is a future for Israel, the people. They are restored to the land of Israel as prophesied in God’s word. They will never be uprooted from it again, according to that same word –

“‘I will bring back the captives of My people Israel;
They shall build the waste cities and inhabit them;
They shall plant vineyards and drink wine from them;
They shall also make gardens and eat fruit from them.
15 I will plant them in their land,
And no longer shall they be pulled up
From the land I have given them,’
Says the Lord your God.” Amos 9:14, 15

This is good news for Israel. However, for Israel at this time, the news is not so good. They are not currently God’s people (Hosea 1:9, 10 & Romans 9:25, 26). Not being God’s people, they are also not sons of God. That right has been stripped from them at this time.

Rather, Jesus clearly notes that their father is the devil –

“You are of your father the devil, and the desires of your father you want to do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and does not stand in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaks a lie, he speaks from his own resources, for he is a liar and the father of it. 45 But because I tell the truth, you do not believe Me. 46 Which of you convicts Me of sin? And if I tell the truth, why do you not believe Me? 47 He who is of God hears God’s words; therefore you do not hear, because you are not of God.” John 8:44-47

To reject Jesus is to reject God because Jesus is God and the Son of the Father. Jesus calls Israel during this dispensation a “synagogue of Satan” in Revelation 2:9 and 3:9. Calling them God’s people at this time does a disservice to them. What they need is evangelism, not coddling, sycophancy, fawning, or flattering.

They are not right with God, and not to evangelize them, when you have the opportunity to do so, can only continue them down the path leading to the Lake of Fire. This is important. Israel needs Jesus. Without Him, they are like any other nation on the planet that lacks Jesus Christ. Be bold in your proclamation of Jesus Christ to all people, Jew and Gentile alike.

Lord God, help us to think rightly about our conversations with others. Help us to remember that without Jesus, they are on a one-way path to eternal condemnation. May we boldly proclaim the good news of Jesus Christ to all people. Amen.

 


 

Exploring the Connection Between Matthew 17 and the Book of Esther

For BibleInTen.com – By DH – 14th March 2026

 

Welcome back to Bible in Ten.

Today we come to Matthew 17, and in this series that leads us naturally to Book 17 of the Old Testament: Esther.

And with an explanation of the overall pictorial contents of Matthew 17 provided in the previous episode, Matthew chapter 17 becomes much clearer and in this supplementary episode, we will see how Esther strengthens it as a supporting witness.

Esther is not just a story about Jewish survival in Persia.  Esther is a book about the Lord hidden from open view, but still directing all things toward redemption. The book exists not mainly to magnify the Jews, but to show the unseen faithfulness of God in preserving them for the sake of His promises and ultimately for the sake of the Redeemer, the true subject of Scripture.

The Esther Bible Study available on the Superior Word develops the following pictures:

  • Ahasuerus pictures God, the ruler over the world.
  • Vashti pictures disobedience and loss of access to the throne.
  • Esther pictures the Gospel, especially in her mediating role before the king.
  • Haman pictures Law, even law bringing wrath and death.
  • Mordecai pictures Christ: hidden at first, then honored, then exalted, then clothed with authority, then writing with full power, then sending letters of peace and truth, and finally having his greatness recorded through all the realm.

That makes Esther a strong support for what Matthew 17 is picturing.

1) “After six days” — the approach to kingdom rest

Matthew 17 begins, “after six days.”  As was said this points toward the six-thousand-year course of man’s time before the seventh-day rest, the millennial kingdom.

Esther supports this by opening in a royal setting already marked by splendor, order, and throne-rule. Shushan is treated almost like a paradise-throne setting, and Ahasuerus is taken as picturing the divine throne-rule itself. So both chapters begin not with chaos, but with the king and the court already in view.

2) Christ revealed in glory before a select company

On the mountain, Jesus is transfigured before Peter, James, and John.

That is the hidden unveiling of the King before His glory is openly seen by all.

Esther supports this pattern through hiddenness before manifestation. The whole book works by concealed identity, concealed movements, and God working in the background long before the reversal appears.  The Lord is not named openly in Esther, yet He is there, hidden, moving everything toward the appointed outcome.

So Matthew 17’s select-company glory scene sits very comfortably beside Esther’s hidden-providence structure.

3) Moses and Elijah testify that all prior revelation converges on Christ

Moses and Elijah appear with Jesus, but not as equals. They are witnesses.

That fits Esther’s Christ structure too. The whole book drives toward one central exalted figure: not Vashti, not Haman, not even Esther by herself, but finally Mordecai in exaltation. And Mordecai is clearly picturing Christ Jesus, the one advanced to authority by the king.

So just as Matthew 17 narrows the law and prophets toward Christ, Esther narrows all of its movements toward the greatness of Mordecai, a picture of the greatness of Christ.

4) “Hear Him” and “Jesus only”

This is the heart of Matthew 17.

The Father says, “Hear Him,” and the disciples then see “Jesus only.”

That fits Esther, because Esther repeatedly moves the reader away from outward structures and toward the one through whom life and deliverance actually come. Esther is a picture of the beautiful Gospel message, but Mordecai is the Christ figure who ends up invested with the king’s authority and acting with the signet.  The signet granted to Mordecai pictures the authority of Christ.

So if Matthew 17 says, in effect, “Hear Him”, Esther says in its own symbolic way: the decisive authority now rests with the Christ-figure who bears the king’s signet.

5) Hidden glory must wait for resurrection-grounded disclosure

Jesus tells them not to publicise the vision until after resurrection.

Again, Esther supports this because Esther is a book of timed disclosure. Esther conceals her identity, Mordecai watches from outside, and the hidden plan only comes into the open at the appointed hour. The Lord is working behind the scenes and the book’s whole structure depends on that hiddenness.

So Matthew 17 and Esther both teach: that public revelation comes only when the right moment arrives.

6) Elijah / restoration and Israel’s future turning

Matthew 17 speaks of Elijah in two ways at once: John the Baptist has already fulfilled an Elijah-like role, but Jesus’ wording also leaves a still-future restoration role in view.

Esther also supports a future restoration by showing that the covenant people are threatened but not discarded. Esther is treated as a book of redemptive history in which the Jews are preserved because God’s promises to them stand, and because the Messiah must come and return in connection with them.

Esther strengthens the Matthew 17 reading that Israel is not finally cast off. God is not finished with Israel chiefly through Jesus’ future-tense words about Elijah restoring all things, and then reinforced through the picture of Israel’s healing and restored sonship later in the chapter.”

Though threatened and with God’s face hidden from open view, they are brought through to preservation, mourning, reversal, and future blessing

7) The afflicted boy and Israel’s incurable condition

The Matthew 17 explanation treats the afflicted boy as picturing Israel in its historical condition: wounded, unstable, and untreatable by human means.

Esther strongly confirms that pattern. The Jews stand under a decree of destruction that has to be properly and purposefully dealt with. Haman, picturing Law, has issued a death-word, and the people are trapped unless royal intervention occurs.

In Matthew 17 the boy is incurable by the disciples.

IN Esther the Jews are doomed under an irreversible decree.

In both: the people cannot heal or save themselves.

8) Christ alone intervenes to heal and deliver

In Matthew 17, Jesus heals what the disciples could not.

In Esther, the same pattern appears through the Mordecai-Christ picture and the Esther-Gospel mediation.

Matthew 17 pictures Israel’s future restoration, healing, and restored sonship through Christ. The book of Esther supports that pattern by showing that although the first decree of death cannot be revoked, a new decree can be issued through Mordecai’s royal authority that brings life to the threatened people.

The old word of death cannot simply be revoked, but another word can be issued which grants life. That second word comes through Esther and Mordecai, and the edict issued by Mordecai is explicitly treated as a picture of the New Covenant.

Mordecai, picturing Christ, receives the signet, acts with royal authority, and sends out the saving word.

Thus Esther is supportive of Matthew 17’s portrayal of Messiah Himself being the one who intervenes.

9) The cross remains central

IN Matthew 17 Jesus speaks of betrayal, death, and resurrection.

The notes by CG on this from Esther chapter 10 bear repeating:

Haman pictures Law, but Christ actually died. It was Christ who was nailed to the cross, and so in type and picture, Christ became our Haman, our Man under Law, if you will. It is no different at all than Christ equating Himself with the serpent on the pole in John 3:14, or Paul saying that God made Him who knew no sin to be sin for us.

In the death of His body, the law died with Him for all who believe. For all who don’t, Law, and thus the enmity, remains. This is where the marvelous symbolism of a very misunderstood passage in the book of John is explained. It says in John 20, “Then Simon Peter came, following him, and went into the tomb; and he saw the linen cloths lying there, and the handkerchief that had been around His head, not lying with the linen cloths, but folded together in a place by itself.” Many fanciful explanations have been made up about this, but the truth is revealed in what happened to Haman, when he was taken to be executed… they covered his face. The Law was to die. Christ died in fulfillment of the law. When He arose, the face covering was removed, and carefully folded. It was an intentional act of the Lord showing that the shame of death through Law had been removed for those who trust in Him. The people of Israel, the Jews, even to this day, celebrate Purim, and yet they are celebrating the exact opposite of what they think they are celebrating. They curse Haman, stamp their feet, and howl wildly as his name is read, and yet, he simply pictures Law that they are still under. Until they come to Christ, Haman will continue to come after them to destroy, to be killed, and to be annihilated because of the ministry of death, meaning Law (2 Corinthians 3:7). Why do the Jews celebrate Purim? It is because of what pur signifies. It is a lot, a broken piece, and thus Purim, the plural of pur, signifies broken pieces. Pur means “to break,” “frustrate,” “make ineffectual,” “annul,” “bring to naught.” This is what Christ has done concerning our covenant with death according to Paul – For the message of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God. 19 For it is written: “I will destroy the wisdom of the wise, And bring to nothing the understanding of the prudent.” 20Where is the wise? Where is the scribe? Where is the disputer of this age? Has not God made foolish the wisdom of this world? 21 For since, in the wisdom of God, the world through wisdom did not know God, it pleased God through the foolishness of the message preached to save those who believe. 22 For Jews request a sign, and Greeks seek after wisdom; 23 but we preach Christ crucified, to the Jews a stumbling block and to the Greeks foolishness, 24 but to those who are called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God. 25 Because the foolishness of God is wiser than men, and the weakness of God is stronger than men. 1 Corinthians 1:18-25 The Jews cling to the law, but it is Christ who has defeated that enemy. The law is annulled in Christ. This is the message of Purim.

Life Application 

There is also a striking present-day echo. In 2026, Purim began on the evening of March 2nd just 2 days after Israel was again in direct conflict with Iran.

Just as Haman was also not himself Persian (he was Amalekite who gained influence at the heart of the palace and used imperial power against God’s people).  In a similar way,  The Islamic Republic of Iran’s rulers are militant usurpers who seized control of the land of Persia in 1979 and have held the nation in bondage ever since.

Even the recent reports and speculation about Israeli intelligence using covert medical cover—dentists, hidden tracking, to coordinate a sudden destruction on the Supreme Leader —carry an Esther-like atmosphere.    Just for fun check out the link to a stop motion lego video about this by “Stop Motion Sam”!

The deeper parallel is the same: the enemy appears secure, the plot seems advanced, yet unseen movements are already in motion, and when the appointed moment comes, the reversal is sudden.

 

Matthew 17:27

Friday, 13 March 2026

Nevertheless, lest we offend them, go to the sea, cast in a hook, and take the fish that comes up first. And when you have opened its mouth, you will find a piece of money; take that and give it to them for Me and you.” Matthew 17:27

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at the “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen)

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

To read the translation of Matthew 17 in the same manner on YouTube (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“And that not we should entrap them, having gone to the sea, you cast a hook, and the ‘having ascended first’ fish, you lift, and having opened its mouth, you will find a stater. That, having taken, you give to them for Me and you.” (CG).

In the previous verse, Peter responded to Jesus that the kings of the earth take their customs and taxes from the unfamiliars. Jesus then responded that the sons are free. Despite this truth, He continues, saying, “And that not we should entrap them.”

The idea is that it would be inappropriate to cause those collecting the census to be tripped up by the claim that the sons are free from paying. It would lead to a difficult set of explanations and argumentations that would serve no purpose in the ongoing ministry as it marched to its completion.

Jesus’ time to be revealed as the Messiah had not yet reached its fulfillment (Matthew 16:20). Therefore, any claims of exemption from paying the temple tax would be misunderstood and could later be used as a charge against Him. Understanding this, Jesus continues His words to Peter, saying, “having gone to the sea, you cast a hook.”

It is a word found only here in Scripture, agkistron, a hook. It is akin to agkalé, an arm (as curved or bent). Both are derived from agkos, a bend. Jesus feels Peter needs a little time to himself for relaxation. Well, maybe not. Jesus has a specific intent for Peter to go fishing, and so He continues, “and the ‘having ascended first’ fish, you lift.”

Jesus doesn’t say, “…if you catch a fish.” Rather, He confirms Peter will. Regardless of its size or kind, he isn’t to toss it back. Rather, Jesus says, “and having opened its mouth, you will find a stater.”

It is another word found only this once in the Bible, statér, a stander (standard of value). HELPS Word studies says it is “a silver coin worth two didrachma and equivalent to four denarii (a tetradrachma, four drachmae) – the exact amount of the Temple-tax required for two people.”

In other words, what Jesus is doing is proving His authority over every possible contingency one could imagine. Peter is to go fishing, cast in a hook, he will catch a fish (a fifty/fifty proposition), when he pulls up the fish, regardless of its type, and out of all the fish he could possibly catch in the Sea of Galilee, and it occurring at that exact moment, there will be a coin in its mouth.

The probability of such an event extends to all the fish in human history that have been found with a coin in their mouths. When the coin is pulled out, it will be the exact coin needed to pay the tax for the two of them. That would open up the probability of every coin ever to have been in the area of the Sea of Galilee, along with the chances of it being the exact type of coin needed to pay for exactly two people.

Further, the fact that it is found in the fish’s mouth, not swallowed, means that either the fish picked it up at the exact moment it also caught the hook, proving Jesus’ omniscient knowledge, or Jesus created it in the fish’s mouth while Peter was catching it, proving Jesus’ omnipotence along with His omniscience.

The impossibility of Jesus’ words, unless He has the ability to affect every single aspect of this event, is obvious. Understanding this, Jesus instructs Peter on what to do with the coin he is going to find, saying, “That, having taken, you give to them for Me and you.”

Jesus sees it as less inconvenient to do what would be utterly impossible for any human being who has ever existed to do than to argue about the temple tax with people who would then be offended at His claim. It is an utterly astonishing proposition to consider.

Life application: The wickedness of the liberal scholar’s heart is exposed in the evaluation of recorded events like these in the Bible. So adamant are they that Jesus could not have done what is stated here, they have come up with several “explanations” of how this miracle was effected.

There is no point in giving them all. Each one fails to adhere to the simplicity and exacting nature of the description given in the account. One example will suffice: Jesus told Peter to go fishing. He gave him these instructions. Peter went out and caught a fish. Peter then sold the fish for a stater so that the temple tax could be paid.

Not only does that not match the account, but it also abuses it so heavily that there would be no point in including the story at all. Peter and the other disciples probably went fishing anytime they had a chance, maybe even when Jesus told them to, so that they could enjoy dinner.

There is no record of such a thing because it has no importance or connection to what is necessary to understand Jesus’ ministry. Such people will receive their rewards for leading people astray with faulty analyses, such as this.

Be careful to take what is recorded in the Bible at face value. It is important to understand that we are to accept God’s word by faith, even when it is not possible for us to do what is recorded there. It is a snap for God to do so if He wishes. Have faith in that.

Lord God Almighty, You can do all things, and we trust that just as You know every fish in the sea, so You are intimately aware of us. Such knowledge is beyond our minds’ ability to grasp, but we can accept it by faith, knowing that You are in complete control of all things. Thank You for this surety. Amen.

 

Matthew 17 (CG)

1And after six days, Jesus, He takes with – Peter, and James, and John his brother, and them, He uphefts into a high mountain off alone. 2And He metamorphosed before them, and it radiated, His face, like the sun, and His garments, it became whites, as the light. 3And you behold! They appeared to them Moses and Elijah, conversing with Him. 4And answering, Peter, he said to Jesus, “Lord, it is good – us to be here. If You desire, we will make here three tabernacles: You one, and Moses one, and Elijah one.”

5Yet he speaking, you behold! Cloud – lustrous, it overshadowed them. And you behold! Voice – from the cloud, saying, “This, He is, My Son, the Beloved in whom I approved! You hear – Him!” 6 And having heard, the disciples, they fell upon their face, and they feared exceedingly. 7And He came, Jesus. He touched them, and He said, “You rouse, and you fear not.” 8And having uplifted their eyes, they saw none, if not Jesus alone.

9And descending, they, from the mountain, Jesus, He enjoined them, saying, “You tell none the vision until that the Son of Man from dead, He arose.”

10And His disciples, they queried Him, saying, “Why therefore the scribes, they say that Elijah, it necessitates, to come first?”

11And Jesus answering, He said to them, “Elijah, indeed, he comes first, and he will reconstitute all. 12And I say to you that Elijah, he came already, and they knew him not, but they did in him as much as they desired. And thus the Son of Man, He is about to suffer under them.” 13Then the disciples, they comprehended that He spoke to them concerning John the Immerser.

14And they, having come unto the crowd, he approached Him – man, knee-falling to Him, and saying, 15“Lord, You compassionated my son, for he moon-strikes and he suffers badly, for frequently he falls into the fire and frequently into the water. 16And I presented him to Your disciples, and they could not cure him.”

17And Jesus, answering, He said, “O! Generation disbelieving and having been mangled! I will be with you until when? I will uphold you until when? You carry him here to Me.” 18And Jesus, He admonished it, and the demon, it proceeded from him, and the boy, he was cured from that hour.

19Then, the disciples having come to Jesus off alone, they said, “Through what we – not we could eject it?”

20And Jesus, He said to them, “Through your faithlessness. For amen! I say to you, if you should have faith as a mustard seed, you will say to this mountain, ‘You depart hence thither,’ and it will depart. And nothing, it will be impossible for you. 21And this kind it departs not if not in prayer and fasting.”

22And they, overturning in the Galilee, Jesus, He said to them, “The Son of Man, He is about to be surrendered into men’s hands. 23and they will kill Him and the third day, He will rouse.” And they distressed exceedingly.

24And they, having come to Capernaum, they came, those taking the drachmas, to Peter, and they said, “Your Teacher, He completes not the drachmas?”

25“Yes,” he says.

And when he entered into the house, Jesus, He preanticipated him, saying, “What, you, it seems, Simon? The kings of the earth, from whom do they take tributes or census? From their sons or from unfamilars?”

26He says to Him, Peter, “From the unfamilars.”

Jesus, He says to him, “Hence, the sons, they are exempt. 27And that not we should entrap them, having gone to the sea, you cast a hook, and the ‘having ascended first’ fish, you lift, and having opened its mouth, you will find a stater. That, having taken, you give to them for Me and you.”

 

Matthew 17:26

Thursday, 12 March 2026

Peter said to Him, “From strangers.”
Jesus said to him, “Then the sons are free. Matthew 17:26

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at the “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen)

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to
listen).

“He says to Him, Peter, ‘From the unfamilars.’ Jesus, He says to him, ‘Hence, the sons, they are exempt’” (CG).

In the previous verse, Jesus asked Peter what he thought. Do the kings of the earth take tribute and census from their sons or unfamilars? Next, we read, “He says to Him, Peter, ‘From the unfamilars.’”

It would be counterproductive and unkingly for a king to take any such collection from his sons. This is a precept that would be perfectly understood from their own Scriptures. At the time of their first king, Saul, it was seen that the son of the king would be exempt from such things, even if it was a son through marriage –

“So the men of Israel said, ‘Have you seen this man who has come up? Surely he has come up to defy Israel; and it shall be that the man who kills him the king will enrich with great riches, will give him his daughter, and give his father’s house exemption from taxes in Israel.’” 1 Samuel 17:25

The king was the one who levied taxes on the people. He was the one to take the people’s sons and daughters for his own household use, and for the army he established (see 1 Samuel 8:10-18). His own sons usually did serve in the military with him, but they were not obligated to the standard impositions placed on the people for the sake of his kingdom. Peter understood this. In response to this, we read, “Jesus, He says to him, ‘Hence, the sons, they are exempt.’”

A new word is seen here, eleutheros, unrestrained, meaning “to go at pleasure.” It is used in the sense of citizenship, where a person is not a slave. In this case, it means unrestrained from the burdens that support the king and his kingdom.

Jesus is making a point that Peter should clue into. If Jesus is the Messiah, He is God’s Son. Those who are His will belong to the household of God as sons. This is the point He makes in John 8 –

“Then Jesus said to those Jews who believed Him, ‘If you abide in My word, you are My disciples indeed.  32  And you shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.’

33  They answered Him, ‘We are Abraham’s descendants, and have never been in bondage to anyone. How can You say, ‘You will be made free’?’
34  Jesus answered them, ‘Most assuredly, I say to you, whoever commits sin is a slave of sin.  35  And a slave does not abide in the house forever, but a son abides forever.  36  Therefore if the Son makes you free, you shall be free indeed.’” John 8:31-36

If Jesus is God’s Son, and those who are brought into sonship with God through Him, then why would they pay for the tributes and census for the maintenance of the temple of His (and thus their) Father? Further, and a point that is not yet understood by the disciples, the temple is an edifice that pointed to Jesus. He is the fulfillment of everything the temple anticipated. Understanding these things puts the matter in proper perspective.

Life application: Jesus was born under the Law of Moses, a law He gave to the people of Israel. By subordinating Himself to the Law, He was required to be obedient to it. This included things that He was logically exempt from, but which required obedience to fulfill all righteousness. And this is what He said He would do at an early point in His ministry –

“Do not think that I came to destroy the Law or the Prophets. I did not come to destroy
but to fulfill.” Matthew 5:17

In His fulfillment of the law, including those things that He would normally be exempt from, such as the temple taxes, the law is annulled through Him for anyone who has
come to Him by faith. He becomes a son of God. And, as He said, “…if the Son makes you free, you shall be free indeed.”

However, being under law is not freedom. It is a mark of bondage to sin. As such, to reimpose the standards of the law upon oneself, it is a denial of sonship. It is as if the
person voluntarily excommunicates himself from a relationship with his Father in heaven. Paul explains this in meticulous detail in his epistles, especially Galatians. Those who come to Christ are not under law but under grace. Be sure to revel in the freedom by which Christ has made us free. Do not allow yourself to be brought back under the yoke of slavery, meaning law. It is an act of contempt for what God in Christ has done. Live out your freedom in gratitude for what He has done for us. This is what we are to
do!

Lord God, thank You that we are Your sons through faith in what Jesus has done. The pressure is off. We are free from the bondage of slavery to sin. Law no longer has authority over us! We can now revel in Your grace and goodness because of Jesus. Hallelujah and amen.