Matthew (Written)

Shrimp plant.

Sunday, 1 September 2024

Therefore bear fruits worthy of repentance, Matthew 3:8

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen).

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“Produce, you, therefore, fruits worthy of reconsideration” (CG).

The previous verse cited John the Baptist’s words to the Pharisees and Sadducees who were coming to him as he was immersing people. He called out to them, “Vipers’ offspring! Who disclosed to you to flee from the coming wrath?” With that stated, he now continues his chiding of them, saying, “Produce, you, therefore, fruits.”

The word is karpos, fruit. It is that which is plucked and used for food. It is to be taken figuratively in passages such as this to indicate that which comes from an individual or an entity based on effort, faith, etc.

Both testaments use the fruit symbolism. In the New Testament, Jesus used the metaphor, helping to explain the meaning for us when He said –

“Either make the tree good and its fruit good, or else make the tree bad and its fruit bad; for a tree is known by its fruit. ³⁴ Brood of vipers! How can you, being evil, speak good things? For out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaks. ³⁵ A good man out of the good treasure of his heart brings forth good things, and an evil man out of the evil treasure brings forth evil things.” Matthew 12:33-35

The state of a tree will determine the state of the fruit the tree bears. The state of a tree will be based on its location, soil, amount of sun, and so forth. As for John’s word, some texts say the singular karpon, fruit. Others say the plural karpous, fruits.

In English the word fruit can be singular or plural depending on the reference. A banana is a fruit, many bananas are still fruit. However, bananas, apples, and oranges are fruits. As such, when one is speaking in an uncountable form, he will say, “I eat fruit.” But when referring to a countable amount, the word fruits is used, such as, “The basket is filled with amazing fruits like pomegranates and durian.”

In this case, John is speaking to a group of people, “Produce you (plural), fruits.” This may make more sense than the singular because he certainly isn’t expecting each person he is addressing to produce the same type of fruit (“You all need to bear fruits, each according to the type of tree you are”) unless he is referring individually to all of them (“Each of you is to bear his own fruit in a worthy manner”). Then it may be that he is speaking in an uncountable manner.

This may be hair-splitting, but each possibility is worth considering. As for the fruits John refers to, he continues saying that they should be “worthy of reconsideration.”

The point of John’s baptism was for people to reconsider their state before God, “We have been acting in this manner and it is not worthy of our calling as the people of Israel, we need to reconsider our ways and then turn to the path of what is right.” This is the immersion that John heralded. He was preparing the people for the coming of the Messiah by turning their hearts back to the Lord.

The KJV blows this translation when it says, “Bring forth therefore fruits meet for repentance.” The archaic word “meet” signifies that which is suitable or fitting. In this, there is an ambiguity that can destroy the intent because it can mean, “When you come to be baptized by me, you are professing reconsideration,” as if the external act defines the reconsideration.

That is somewhat like the idea of infant baptism which essentially says, “This rite sanctifies this child for salvation.” Even later in life, Catholics will often say, “I am in a good place! I got baptized when I was young.” They treat the baptism as if it is something that produced good in them. This is not the intent of John’s words.

Rather, one reconsiders and then is baptized in John’s baptism. In Christ, one believes in His completed work and then as a symbol of that belief, he is then baptized. The believer’s reconsideration is about who God is and what He has done in Christ. Only after that comes a change in life based on the knowledge that is obtained as he grows in his faith.

Life application: In Galatians 5:22, Paul says, “But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, ²³ gentleness, self-control. Against such there is no law.” The word fruit there is singular. Though there are many types of fruit, they are all of the Spirit. As you can see, the use of the singular and plural takes consideration.

In the parallel passage to Matthew 3:8 which is found in Luke 3:8, the word is again plural, “Produce, therefore, fruits worthy of reconsideration…”

As you go through the Bible, don’t hesitate to hesitate! Stop, think about what is being said, and consider what you are reading. Of course, various source texts may be different, and even translations will divert from what the source text says. As such, it is good to read multiple translations.

If you have the patience, get a parallel Bible and read two or more translations side by side. It can open your eyes to variations in translation. From there, you can then seek out why there is a difference in them. You can also weed out incorrect or ambiguous translations, such as the KJV referenced above.

These things will help you to get a better understanding of Scripture. But don’t just read the word. Be sure to bear fruit in your mind as you take in what is being presented to you from the mind of God.

Glorious God, what a treasure it is to be in Your word daily, tasting its delights and rejoicing in its truths. Our days are better when we start there, and our lives are so much better off as we continue to search it out and apply its precepts to our lives. Yes, Lord God, thank You for Your word. And thank You above all for Jesus our Lord, the One who is so beautifully presented to us in it. Amen.

Super duper sweet-smelling type of jasmine.

Saturday, 31 August 2024

But when he saw many of the Pharisees and Sadducees coming to his baptism, he said to them, “Brood of vipers! Who warned you to flee from the wrath to come? Matthew 3:7

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen).

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“And having seen many of the Pharisees and Sadducees coming about his immersion, he said to them, ‘Vipers’ offspring! Who disclosed to you to flee from the coming wrath?’” (CG).

In the previous verse, it noted that those who went out to John the Baptist were baptized by him in the Jordan, confessing their sins. Now Matthew, while speaking of John, says, “And having seen many of the Pharisees and Sadducees.”

These are the main two groups addressed in the gospel narratives in relation to spiritual matters. However, there are other groups that are mentioned at times in leadership positions, such as the Herodians. As for these two groups, there are many extensive commentaries on them. One of the most detailed is that of Albert Barnes. For brevity, the commentary of Cambridge is provided –

Pharisees] The name signifies “Separatists;” the party dates from the revival of the National life, and observances of the Mosaic Law under the Maccabees. Their ruling principle was a literal obedience to the written law and to an unwritten tradition. Originally they were leaders of a genuine reform. But in the hands of less spiritual successors their system had become little else than a formal observance of carefully prescribed rules. “The real virtues of one age become the spurious ones of the next.” Prof. Mozley, Sermon on Pharisees. The “hypocrisy” of the Pharisees, which stifled conscience and made them “incapable of repentance,” is the special sin of the day rebuked more than any other by the Saviour.

Politically they were the popular party, supporters of an isolating policy, who would make no terms with Rome or any other foreign power. The Zealots may be regarded as the extreme section of the Pharisees.

The Sadducees were the aristocratic and priestly party, they acquiesced in foreign rule, and foreign civilization. They refused to give the same weight as the Pharisees to unwritten tradition, but adhered strictly to the written law of Moses. Their religious creed excluded belief in a future life, or in angels and spirits (Acts 23:8). The name is probably derived from Zadok the priest in David’s time. Others with less probability connect it with Zadok, a disciple of Antigonus of Socho, who lived in the second century b. c. The derivation from tsaddik (righteous) is untenable.

Of these two groups, Matthew notes that they were “coming about his immersion.”

They probably had questions about his authority, purpose, doctrine, intent, and so forth. If so many people were coming to him, was he a threat to their authority and teaching? And if this was the case, how could they trap him in his own words, etc.?

We can assume that the questions these groups will ask of Jesus, as recorded in the gospels, were similar to those they would have asked John about now. Therefore, knowing their lives and form of religion, “he said to them, ‘Vipers’ offspring!’”

The word is echidna, a poisonous snake. The identification of this snake should not be pressed too far because the same word is used when referring to a snake on the island of Malta in Acts 28.

The serpent was introduced at the fall of man in Genesis 3. This is probably a reference to that. Serpents continue to be noted in Scripture after that. One instance is especially highlighted in the account of the time during the wilderness wanderings in Numbers 21. There, the people were bit by serpents, and many died. In this, the people acknowledged their sins, and a remedy was given by the Lord to heal the people.

As such, the main thought of John is probably that of these men being the spawn of Satan who cause the people to sin, separating them from God. They were the evil offspring of their evil parent acting in crafty and malevolent ways. After so addressing them, John next says, “Who disclosed to you to flee from the coming wrath?’”

He uses the word hupodeiknumi. It is a compound word signifying “to exhibit under the eyes.” It is only used six times in the New Testament, and it is variously translated. Many translations say something like “warned,” or “forewarned.” Contextually, that may be the idea, but it is more of a paraphrase. For example, the word is used in Acts 20 when speaking about what one should do –

“I have shown [hupodeiknumi] you in every way, by laboring like this, that you must support the weak. And remember the words of the Lord Jesus, that He said, ‘It is more blessed to give than to receive.’” Acts 20:35

For a word that gives the underlying sense of the meaning, disclose is sufficient. John questioned these men, asking who had disclosed to them to flee from the coming wrath. It would be difficult to think that John meant this literally as if they truly were coming to hear his message and reconsider their ways.

Whether John knew their true intent or not, or whether he merely suspected it, Jesus knew exactly what these men were thinking. Their words were often duplicitous toward Him. Two examples of this are found in Matthew 22:15-33 where first the Pharisees and then the Sadducees tried to trip Him up.

Understanding this, John may have been speaking to them in a tongue-in-cheek manner with a sarcastic emphasis in his question to them. In other words, “Wrath is coming, it will come on all offenders, but you don’t think you even lie in that category, so what are you doing here inquiring about my immersion for repentance?”

As for the wrath that lay ahead, it had been prophesied in the Scriptures that Israel would be exiled twice. Exile implies war, famine, and death. It implies the destruction of their land. But there is also the final wrath of judgment when all men stand before God. These men probably felt secure that they would escape both.

Paul, however, addresses the issue of coming wrath several times (Ephesians 5:6, 1 Thessalonians 1:10, etc.). One main time, specifically speaking of these particular Jews, he writes –

“For you, brethren, became imitators of the churches of God which are in Judea in Christ Jesus. For you also suffered the same things from your own countrymen, just as they did from the Judeans, ¹⁵ who killed both the Lord Jesus and their own prophets, and have persecuted us; and they do not please God and are contrary to all men, ¹⁶ forbidding us to speak to the Gentiles that they may be saved, so as always to fill up the measure of their sins; but wrath has come upon them to the uttermost.” 1 Thessalonians 2:14-16

Life application: The wrath of God is something that cannot be dismissed when the Bible is read and accepted at face value. To sin is to miss the mark with God. In this, judgment must come. The very nature of God demands it. To not accept His provision for forgiveness and atonement of sin means that His wrath, by default, remains upon that person.

The religious leaders of Israel were under God’s judgment for sin. They were offered forgiveness through the atoning work of Jesus Christ, but most of them never accepted God’s offer. They remained under His wrath because of this. We must remember that no person is good enough or can do enough good to be pleasing to God. That belongs to the Lord alone who fully pleased His Father. Therefore, only by coming to God through Jesus can one be saved. Be wise and accept the offer that God has made in the giving of Jesus!

“And the grace of our Lord was exceedingly abundant, with faith and love which are in Christ Jesus. ¹⁵ This is a faithful saying and worthy of all acceptance, that Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners, of whom I am chief. ¹⁶ However, for this reason I obtained mercy, that in me first Jesus Christ might show all longsuffering, as a pattern to those who are going to believe on Him for everlasting life. ¹⁷ Now to the King eternal, immortal, invisible, to God who alone is wise, be honor and glory forever and ever. Amen.” 1 Timothy 1:14-17

Heavenly Father, You have sent Jesus! Thank You, O God, for having done for us what we could never do. You alone are to be praised for Your goodness to us in reconciling us through the precious blood of Jesus our Lord. Hallelujah to You. Amen.

 A night-blooming cereus in a cedar tree.

Friday, 30 August 2024

and were baptized by him in the Jordan, confessing their sins. Matthew 3:6

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen).

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“and they were immersed in the Jordan by him, acknowledging their sins” (CG).

The previous verse noted that Jerusalem, all Judea, and the region around the Jordan went out to John the Baptist. With that remembered, the thought now continues with “and they were immersed.”

The word baptizó, to baptize, is now used for the first time in the New Testament. It is a transliteration of the Greek word. Its English meaning is “to submerge.” It is unfortunate that the word was transliterated and not translated because a lot of very poor theology could have been avoided.

However, that is the reason the word was not translated. Nobody at the time wanted to get stuck in a theological argument about sprinkling vs. immersion, or whether child baptism is acceptable. Wars could have started over such a thing. As for the meaning, a few commentaries will be given –

HELPS Word Studies says, “properly, ‘submerge’ (Souter); hence, baptize, to immerse (literally, ‘dip under’). 907 (baptízō) implies submersion (‘immersion’), in contrast to 472 /antéxomai (‘sprinkle’).” So, no sprinkling. Got it.

Thayer’s Greek Lexicon says, “properly, to dip repeatedly, to immerge, submerge (of vessels sunk, Polybius 1, 51, 6; 8, 8, 4; of animals, Diodorus 1, 36).” So, when a ship sinks, it gets baptizo’d. Got it.

Strong’s says, “From a derivative of bapto; to immerse, submerge; to make whelmed (i.e. Fully wet); used only (in the New Testament) of ceremonial ablution, especially (technically) of the ordinance of Christian baptism — Baptist, baptize, wash.” Whelmed… I see. Fully wet. Got it.

This issue of John’s immersion was that of completely submerging those who came to him. A sign was thus being made that the people were wholly devoting themselves to return to the Lord, reconsidering their ways. If they came out and John sprinkled a little water on them, it would have signified something entirely different.

Further, John’s baptism, being a baptism of reconsideration of one’s ways, would not apply to little children because they had nothing to reconsider. Until they were old enough to know what was right and reject what was wrong, they were under the care and direction of their parents.

When Jesus initiated the New Covenant, the same truths would exist, but the immersion He directed now has a different purpose –

“And it happened, while Apollos was at Corinth, that Paul, having passed through the upper regions, came to Ephesus. And finding some disciples ² he said to them, ‘Did you receive the Holy Spirit when you believed?’
So they said to him, ‘We have not so much as heard whether there is a Holy Spirit.’
³ And he said to them, ‘Into what then were you baptized?’
So they said, ‘Into John’s baptism.’
⁴ Then Paul said, ‘John indeed baptized with a baptism of repentance, saying to the people that they should believe on Him who would come after him, that is, on Christ Jesus.’
⁵ When they heard this, they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus. ⁶ And when Paul had laid hands on them, the Holy Spirit came upon them, and they spoke with tongues and prophesied.” Acts 19:1-6

In Acts 2, like John’s immersion, the immersion directed by Peter was one of reconsideration (Acts 2:38), but it was for a different reason. They had just rejected Jesus and crucified Him. They had to reconsider their actions first, believing on the name of Jesus.

So, each account in Acts needs to be considered carefully to understand what is happening. The main point for now is that baptism signifies full immersion. Got it? Got it! John was immersing them “in the Jordan by him.”

The Jordan was first mentioned in the previous verse. It means The Descender. Everything about the Jordan forms a picture of Jesus. John was symbolically preparing them for the coming of their Messiah by submerging them in the waters of the Descender. This was because they were “acknowledging their sins.”

Sin comes about through law. Where there is no law, sin is not imputed (Romans 5:13). The law is not something that is given for righteous people. Rather, Paul explains the purpose of the law in 1 Timothy –

“But we know that the law is good if one uses it lawfully, ⁹ knowing this: that the law is not made for a righteous person, but for the lawless and insubordinate, for the ungodly and for sinners, for the unholy and profane, for murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers, for manslayers, ¹⁰ for fornicators, for sodomites, for kidnappers, for liars, for perjurers, and if there is any other thing that is contrary to sound doctrine, ¹¹ according to the glorious gospel of the blessed God which was committed to my trust.” 1 Timothy 1:8-11

These are the type of people that were coming forward, acknowledging their state and reconsidering it before the Lord.

It is hard to figure out why people today would want to return to the law that Jesus fulfilled. By doing so, they are admitting that they are not righteous. Instead, they are reflected in the words of Paul above.

Rather, those who have come to Christ today are now deemed as righteous before God, not because of what they have done, but because of what He has done.

Life application: It was noted above that the Jordan, the Descender, pictures Christ. A portion of that will be explained so that you can understand how God has taken even the natural layout of the land of Israel to tell us about the coming of Christ Jesus.

The Descender starts at Mount Hermon, which means “Sacred.” It is a three-peak mountain, each peak of which is essentially the same size and height. That is a reference to the Trinity. Hermon is capped in snow all year, signifying purity. It is emblematic of heaven, the Sacred place.

The water descends from Mount Hermon springing up in the very northern areas of Israel, just as Jesus sprang up from the land in His incarnation. The waters first pass to and through the area of Dan, or Judge. Christ descended from heaven to the world to be the Judge of sin and to have sin judged in Him.

The waters flow south into the Galilee, where they linger before passing south, again into the Jordan. Christ’s life and ministry were centered on this area where He lingered, spending most of His recorded time there. The Jordan then travels in a very long zigzagging path along the border of Canaan. Christ, the Descender, went through all Israel, traveling and preaching.

The Jordan terminates in the Salt Sea, the Sea of the Arabah (Sea of the Pledge). It is the Dead Sea. Christ, the Descender, went to His death. But there was no corruption found in Him, typified by the salt of the Salt Sea – the salt being a picture of incorruption. In His death, the pledge, typified by the “Sea of the Pledge,” is given. It refers to the Spirit, the pledge (arrabon – from the Hebrew eravon) of Ephesians 1:13, 14 –

“In Him you also trusted, after you heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation; in whom also, having believed, you were sealed with the Holy Spirit of promise, ¹⁴ who is the guarantee [arrabon] of our inheritance until the redemption of the purchased possession, to the praise of His glory.” Ephesians 1:13, 14

From this sea, the waters do not continue on. Rather, they evaporate – a picture of the resurrection and ascension. As for the fulfillment of the typology, Jesus Himself expressly tells us that He is the fulfillment of what the Jordan pictures –

“For I have come down from heaven, not to do My own will, but the will of Him who sent Me.” John 6:38

Though modern New Testament Hebrew is different from biblical Hebrew, there are overlapping words. In the Sar Shalom Hebrew translation of Jesus’ words, v’yaradti, “and I have come down,” is used. The name Jordan is from the same word, yarad. Jesus is the Descender.

These are but a few of the many pictures that can be drawn from a study on the Jordan. For example, Joshua 3 and 4 tell of the time when Israel passed through the Jordan on dry ground. Both passages give amazing insights into the future redemption of Israel when they come to God through acknowledgment of Jesus Christ. To understand these pictures, the sermons from the Superior Word are available in a variety of different formats for you to read, watch, or listen to.

Each time the Jordan is mentioned in Scripture, information about the Person of Jesus is seen. Be sure to consider what you are reading as you go through the Bible. It is all telling us of Jesus.

How precious is Your word, O God! It is telling us wonderful stories about what has been, what is currently going on, and what is coming in the history of the redemption of man, and it is all centered on the giving of Your Son for us. Thank You, O God, for Jesus Christ our Lord. Hallelujah and Amen.

Native Florida oranges. To make drinkable, add 2 quarts of sugar for each pint of juice.

Thursday, 29 August 2024

Then Jerusalem, all Judea, and all the region around the Jordan went out to him Matthew 3:5

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen).

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“Then went out to him Jerusalem, and all Judea, and all the surrounding of the Jordan” (CG).

The previous verse noted John the Baptist’s attire and his food. Despite what would seem a person who was completely out of touch with reality in today’s world, the people of Israel realized they were dealing with a great man of God. Therefore, it next says, “Then went out to him Jerusalem.”

In this case, it is referring to the inhabitants of Jerusalem. It is making a point that the people of the capitol city, despite having all of the religious leaders in that area, were spiritually hungry and wanted to know what God was doing through John. It was evident to them that his message carried the weight and authority of the Lord, just as with the Old Testament prophets. Next, the list mentions, “and all Judea.”

It is the general area where the Jews lived. Samaria is not included in this list because it was not a place where the Jewish people greatly inhabited, although there was a Jewish presence. In fact, in John 4, this division of the Jews and the Samaritans is particularly highlighted.

The words here include another comparative that is not to be taken literally. The word “all” does not literally mean “all.” It refers to the overall scope of the area. People from all over Judea came to hear John the Baptist. This will be evident from other verses in the gospels concerning the thoughts being presented by Matthew now. Along with Jerusalem and Judea, it next says, “and all the surrounding of the Jordan.”

The adjective perichóros is used. It is derived from peri which means about, around, or concerning (as in concerning a matter), and chóra, a country, district, region, and so forth. Thus, it signifies that which is around a region. Being an adjective, “surrounding” gives the proper sense.

This would be Jewish inhabitants living along the Jordan, such as in the area of Galilee and so forth. It would include people living on both sides of the Jordan as well. A good summary of these words is found later in Matthew 4:25 –

“Great multitudes followed Him—from Galilee, and from Decapolis, Jerusalem, Judea, and beyond the Jordan.”

Life application: As was stated in Matthew 1:19, there are words that must be considered carefully and in line with other uses of the word in the Bible, as well as the greater context of the Bible. Not every “every” means “every” and not all “all’s” mean all.

This does not mean, as some might then claim, that the Bible has errors. Rather, it means that the Bible uses the common terminology of the day to make a point. If someone were having a political rally in Washington, DC, depending on the size of the crowd that came, it would be common to hear it said, “It was amazing! All of DC came to hear him speak.”

The fact is that not all of DC came to hear him speak. Those opposed to his message would not come. Those at work would not come. Those in the hospital would not come. And so forth. An example of this is that in the next verse (Matthew 3:6), it will be noted that all of these people who came to John were baptized by him. However, in Luke 7, it says –

“And when all the people heard Him, even the tax collectors justified God, having been baptized with the baptism of John. ³⁰ But the Pharisees and lawyers rejected the will of God for themselves, not having been baptized by him.” Luke 7:29, 30

As is evident, not everyone was baptized by John the Baptist. Remember to have care when considering the words of Scripture. Think about what is being conveyed and understand that human terminology, including cultural expressions which may include exaggerations for effect, is employed at times to make a point or to note a superlative.

Remembering these things will help you to avoid confusion in what you are reading.

Lord God, thank You for Your word which gives us so much information relative to our own lives. We can see that the people recorded in the Bible are like us today. We are all living out our lives in Your presence, and we all need to learn the lessons of Scripture to determine how to live properly in Your eyes. May we use this wonderful blueprint to do just that. Thank You for Your precious word that leads us to Jesus, the perfect example of what is right and good. Amen.

Plant, potted, on post. 1 each.

Wednesday, 28 August 2024

Now John himself was clothed in camel’s hair, with a leather belt around his waist; and his food was locusts and wild honey. Matthew 3:4

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen)

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“And he, John, had his apparel from camel’s hair, and a leathery girdle around his waist, and his food was locusts and wild honey” (CG).

In the previous verse, Matthew cited words from Isaiah 40 and stated that John the Baptist was the fulfillment of that particular prophecy. Now, he continues the narrative by describing John, saying, “And he, John, had his apparel from camel’s hair.”

On the surface, the words seem superfluous. However, the words have several important significations. The first is that John is being contrasted to the leaders of Israel –

“When the messengers of John had departed, He began to speak to the multitudes concerning John: ‘What did you go out into the wilderness to see? A reed shaken by the wind? ²⁵ But what did you go out to see? A man clothed in soft garments? Indeed those who are gorgeously appareled and live in luxury are in kings’ courts. ²⁶ But what did you go out to see? A prophet? Yes, I say to you, and more than a prophet. ²⁷ This is he of whom it is written:
“Behold, I send My messenger before Your face,
Who will prepare Your way before You.”’” Luke 7:24-27

But there is more to the description than this. Matthew’s words note his clothes were from the hair of the camel. This wasn’t a garment cut from a camel’s hide made of its skin and hair, but is rather a coarse, hairy garment.

The words of Matthew rely heavily on an understanding of the Old Testament, both in actual narratives and in typology. For example, the word camel in Hebrew comes from the verb gamal, to deal fully or adequately with. Thus, it can mean to wean, repay, require, reward, ripen, and so forth. As such, it refers to the treatment, either well or ill, that a person will receive.

Hair signifies an awareness, especially of sin. Taken together, the two thoughts tell us that the very appearance of John the Baptist was given as a tangible, visible marker of making people aware of sin and that it would be dealt with fully and adequately. As he was a herald of the Messiah, his appearance pointed to this ultimately being accomplished in the ministry of the Messiah.

Next, Matthew records, “and a leathery girdle around his waist.” The word dermatinos, translated as “leathery” is an adjective, not a noun. One can see the word derma, or skin, in it. As such, it is a belt or girdle of skin. This word will only be seen here and in Mark 1:6 where Mark also describes John. It is a leathery girdle that John pulled his garments tight with.

The skin is what surrounds what is inside. A girdle is used for pulling in and holding. The symbolism here is restraint of the inner man, keeping sin from controlling a person.

Taken together, these two descriptions which focus on the hair of the garment and the leathery nature of the girdle, and which provide such detailed symbolism, are purposefully included to equate John to Elijah –

“Then he said to them, ‘What kind of man was it who came up to meet you and told you these words?’
⁸ So they answered him, ‘A hairy man wearing a leather belt around his waist.’
And he said, ‘It is Elijah the Tishbite.’” 2 Kings 1:7, 8

The reason this is important is because of what Jesus will later say to His disciples –

“Now as they came down from the mountain, Jesus commanded them, saying, ‘Tell the vision to no one until the Son of Man is risen from the dead.’
¹⁰ And His disciples asked Him, saying, ‘Why then do the scribes say that Elijah must come first?’
¹¹ Jesus answered and said to them, ‘Indeed, Elijah is coming first and will restore all things. ¹² But I say to you that Elijah has come already, and they did not know him but did to him whatever they wished. Likewise the Son of Man is also about to suffer at their hands.’ ¹³ Then the disciples understood that He spoke to them of John the Baptist.” Matthew 17:9-13

In Malachi 4:5, Elijah was prophesied to be sent in an attempt to bring restoration to the people of Israel. It would be out of place for such a person to come in a manner unlike Elijah. And so, John came in the form of Elijah, hairy and with a leathery girdle. The people, however, “did not know him” even though he came in such an obvious parallel to how Elijah was described in their own writings. Of John, Matthew’s words continue with,
“and his food was locusts and wild honey.”

The locust was something eaten by the poor. It can be prepared in various ways, but even if it was accompanied with spices, it is not the kind of thing people of any means at all would prepare for a regular meal. Likewise, the honey is described as “wild.” The word signifies “pertaining to the country” and, as in English, it can mean both wild as in nature or wild as in fierce or raging.

Thayer’s Greek lexicon says it is “used of animals in a state of nature which grows without culture.” It is not unlike the description of Elijah as he was tended to during the time of drought in the land –

“So he went and did according to the word of the Lord, for he went and stayed by the Brook Cherith, which flows into the Jordan. ⁶ The ravens brought him bread and meat in the morning, and bread and meat in the evening; and he drank from the brook. ⁷ And it happened after a while that the brook dried up, because there had been no rain in the land.” 1 Kings 17:5-7

Though different food is described, it is the reliance on what the Lord provides through nature that forms the parallel. Elijah was living in a time of drought, being sustained by the Lord. John was living in a time of spiritual drought, likewise, being sustained by the Lord.

The locust signifies judgment. This is seen from the plagues on Exodus (Exodus 10) through to the plagues of the end times (Revelation 9). Honey comes from bees which pollinate flowers and so it implies all sorts of fruit trees, herbs, and flowers – abundance.

In the Bible, honey is equated to the word of God. In the account of Samson, honey in a wild state was found in the carcass of a lion that he had earlier killed. The symbolism there was that of the sustaining power of the word of God.

Understanding these things, John’s appearance and his food are being equated with his ministry. He came in the form of Elijah as a forerunner of Jesus, preparing the way for the messianic ministry of the Lord. His words were words of coming judgment or a reliance on God’s word.

Life application: Everything about how John is described is given to show us hints of what has already been learned from a full study of the Old Testament. It is true that one can know about Jesus and His salvation without ever reading a word of the Old Testament, but Scripture in the New really comes alive by knowing the Old.

Be sure to read the whole word of God. Read it in the morning, read it at night, and read it throughout the day as time permits. Think about what is being said, contemplate each thing that is presented, and consider why God chose certain words – animals, locations, etc. – to describe each account. Information from the Creator is being transmitted to us to understand what He is doing in redemptive history.

In understanding these things, a much richer and fuller understanding of Jesus is then available to us. Let us learn about our Lord, contemplating every facet of His being, by reading and understanding the word that tells us of Him!

Lord God, thank You for the treasure which You have given us in the pages of Scripture. Praises to You for how it is laid out, telling us of JESUS! Yes, thank You for this marvelous superior word. Amen.