Matthew (Written)

Saturday, 1 March 2025

Now when Jesus had entered Capernaum, a centurion came to Him, pleading with Him, Matthew 8:5

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen)

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“And Jesus, having entered into Capernaum, a centurion, he came to Him, invoking Him” (CG).

In the previous verse, Jesus, having cleansed the leper, instructed him to go directly to the priest and offer the gift commanded by Moses. Now, the narrative changes direction, saying, “And Jesus, having entered into Capernaum.”

It should be noted that some manuscripts omit the name of Jesus. For example –

“When He entered Capernaum, a centurion came to Him, pleading with Him.” Holman

If the inclusion of the name is not original, someone may have inserted it to clarify that it was Jesus, not the leper who entered Capernaum. That seems a bit obvious, however. If the name is original and now missing in those manuscripts, it may be a copyist’s error that came about for one reason or another.

Either way, the surrounding context leaves no doubt about who the verse is referring to. Jesus had come down from the mount, met a leper on the way to where He was going, and then continued on to His destination, which was Capernaum. Once inside the city, it next says, “a centurion, he came to Him, invoking Him.”

The hekatontarchos, centurion, is introduced here. The word is derived from hekatón, a hundred, and archó, to rule or reign. Thus, he is a Roman soldier who rules over a cohort of one hundred men.

It is highly unusual that a man with such authority would actively seek out a Jew, much less plead with him over a matter. In such a position, it would be expected that he might send one of his underlings to Jesus and direct him to do whatever it is he has on his mind. But the man’s approach is an exception.

If it is the same account being referred to, which seems likely, the same narrative in Luke 7 gives a bit more background, saying –

“So when he heard about Jesus, he sent elders of the Jews to Him, pleading with Him to come and heal his servant. ⁴ And when they came to Jesus, they begged Him earnestly, saying that the one for whom He should do this was deserving, ⁵ ‘for he loves our nation, and has built us a synagogue.’” Luke 7:3-5

However, no discrepancy between the two should be considered. By sending elders of the Jews instead of one of his underlings, he is making a personal appeal through the elders rather than an authoritative demand through a soldier. The reason for sending the elders is more fully explained in Luke as well.

For now, this man has made a personal appeal to Jesus, invoking Him to come for a personal reason. As for translating the word parakaleó as invoke here, the reason is that one of its meanings is to call earnestly for. But there is associated with it the sense of a capability of the one being invoked that is beyond that of the one invoking.

For example, one might invoke a spirit, god, lawful edict, etc. This centurion is making a particular appeal to Jesus as an authoritative figure, able to do something that is beyond himself or those whom he is sending. As these are elders, it shows an immense trust in Jesus that extends beyond what one would normally expect of another, including leadership figures in Israel.

Life application: The words of Matthew in this account are already setting the stage for what is to become a normal theme from this point on. It is something that was seen, however, early in Matthew when Magi came to the land of Israel to worship the Child.

The Gentiles are taking on a position within the narrative that is contrasted to that of the Jews. This might seem out of place, but it is precisely what was prophesied by the Lord through Isaiah –

“And in that day there shall be a Root of Jesse,
Who shall stand as a banner to the people;
For the Gentiles shall seek Him,
And His resting place shall be glorious.” Isaiah 11:10

As the story of the interaction between Jesus and this centurion continues, ask yourself why the Lord included this account in His word. Then consider the world around you and how it continues to be relevant today. As you read through the book of Acts, consider what it is saying from this same perspective.

What is God looking for? The answer is faith. Pay attention to this key point. Both testaments of Scripture ultimately reveal this truth.

Lord God, may we be people of faith who live faithfully in Your presence. Give us the willpower and focus to not get distracted by our own supposed goodness or our own good deeds. Rather, may we understand that who we are, what we have, and what we can offer are all given by You and belong to You. May we align our lives to show that we believe this is true. Amen.

Friday, 28 February 2025

And Jesus said to him, “See that you tell no one; but go your way, show yourself to the priest, and offer the gift that Moses commanded, as a testimony to them.” Matthew 8:4

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen)

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“And Jesus, He says to him, ‘You see you tell none, but you go, you show yourself to the priest, and you present the gift that Moses, he commanded, for a testimony to them’” (CG).

In the previous verse, Jesus reached out His hand and willingly touched the leper. In this act, the leper was immediately cleansed. Next, it says, “And Jesus, He says to him, ‘You see you tell none.”

The reason for this injunction is debated. The Pulpit Commentary refers to several different views to consider –

(1) to save the man from temptation to self-importance; or

(2) to prevent any rumour of the miracle coming to the ears of the recognized authorities, and thus prejudicing them in their verdict upon his case; or, and more probably,

(3) for the Lord’s sake, for this seems to be the reason for the command in all the other occasions when it is given (Matthew 9:30; Matthew 12:16; Matthew 17:9; Mark 5:43; Mark 7:36; Mark 8:26; cf. Mark 1:34; Mark 3:12). The Lord did not desire to be thronged with multitudes who came only to see his miracles; he would work in quiet (cf. the quotation from Isaiah in Matthew 12:18-21).

Although the Pulpit Commentary’s third point receives their note of it being the likely explanation, it actually seems unlikely. The reason for this is what it just said as the chapter opened –

“When He had come down from the mountain, great multitudes followed Him. ² And behold, a leper came and worshiped Him, saying, ‘Lord, if You are willing, You can make me clean.’” Matthew 8:1, 2

The note that “great multitudes followed Him” is a part of the surrounding context and was stated purposefully. His miracle was, in fact, viewed by many people. This is attested to again in Matthew 8:10 where it notes that Jesus spoke to those who followed, implying the crowd was still there.

So why would Jesus instruct this man to tell no one then? The answer is found in the rest of the verse, beginning with, “but you go, you show yourself to the priest.”

This is the first mention of the hiereus, priest, in the New Testament. The word is derived from hierós, meaning sacred, holy, set apart, etc. This is a person set apart, belonging to the temple, thus, a priest. Jesus told the man to go to the priest because, as is recorded in Leviticus 14, it says –

“Then the Lord spoke to Moses, saying, ² ‘This shall be the law of the leper for the day of his cleansing: He shall be brought to the priest.’” Leviticus 14:1, 2

From there, the ritual required for the cleansed leper is recorded all the way through Leviticus 14:32. The reason why Jesus instructed the man to tell no one is that if he ran home and started telling his family and friends he was back, cleansed from his uncleanness, he would be in violation of the law.

First and foremost, his responsibility was to receive the rites of the law. As it says in Leviticus 14:20, “So the priest shall make atonement for him, and he shall be clean.” The validation of his cleansing was necessary for him to be deemed clean. If he was at home celebrating without this validation, then there would be a person not yet deemed clean among the people.

Jesus purposefully spoke to the man in this way in front of the thronging crowd to show that the man was instructed to be fully obedient to the Law of Moses. Thus, Jesus was not promoting disobedience but full obedience. That continues to be seen with the next words, “and you present the gift that Moses, he commanded, for a testimony to them.”

Here is another new word, marturion, a witness or testimony. It speaks of something evidential. It is where our modern word martyr is derived from. A martyr’s life is something evidential concerning the witness he bears.

As for the gift Moses commanded, that is what is recorded in Leviticus 14 as noted above. It was a requirement set forth in the law. To not offer this would be a violation of the law.

Life application: The proverb says –

“The first one to plead his cause seems right,
Until his neighbor comes and examines him.” Proverb 18:17

Several views concerning Jesus’ words about telling no one were presented above. Any of them might seem correct when someone presents his case concerning the meaning. You might say, “Yeah, that makes sense.” But then someone else will say, “No, the reason must be this…” From there you might say, “Yeah, that makes more sense.”

When someone adds in their thoughts with the word probably attached to them, then you might say, “Well, he is an authority, and he has checked out the possibilities. Therefore, he is probably right. That makes the most sense of all.” However, words like probably are subjective and need to still be considered carefully.

By checking the context, it is seen that their “probably” is completely incorrect. Many people saw and heard. They would have gone and told what they saw. Jesus was purposefully doing what He was doing in front of many so that they would bear witness that He was doing everything in accord with the law.

Be sure to not get caught up in the first opinion you read. Check many views, reread the passage along with the surrounding context, and then come to your conclusion. You may find what seemed right at first is actually incorrect.

Lord God, help us to carefully consider Your word as we read it. May we not be sent down wrong paths of understanding, but give us the wisdom to check what we are told and to verify if it is right. Help us to be responsible in our understanding of Your word through right doctrine. Amen.

Thursday, 27 February 2025

Then Jesus put out His hand and touched him, saying, “I am willing; be cleansed.” Immediately his leprosy was cleansed. Matthew 8:3

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen)

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“And having outstretched the hand, Jesus – He touched him, saying, ‘I desire. You be cleansed.’ And immediately his leprosy, it was cleansed” (CG).

In the previous verse, Jesus was approached by a leper who prostrated himself before Him and noted that the Lord could cleanse him if He desired. Now, in response to that, it next says, “And having outstretched the hand.”

There is a new word, ekteinó, to stretch out. It is found only in the gospels and Acts. It is derived from ek, out of or from, and teinó, to stretch. Thus, it signifies to outstretch, extend, or even cast out as in the casting out of anchors on a ship. In putting His hand forward, it is an indication that He was unafraid of catching the leprosy from the man. And so, it next says, “Jesus – He touched him.”

Here is another new word, haptomai. The meaning behind the word is to attach oneself, but the context gives the broader sense of what is being conveyed. HELPS Word Studies says, “(‘to modify or change by touching’) – properly, ‘touching that influences’ (modifies); touching someone (something) in a way that alters (changes, modifies) them, i.e. ‘impact-touching.’”

Jesus’ response through outstretching His hand and touching him is to effect a change in the leper in some manner. Along with His touching him, He was “saying, ‘I desire. You be cleansed.’”

Although the instructions for dealing with leprosy in Leviticus 13 do not explicitly say a person is made unclean by touching a leper, it can be inferred from elsewhere, such as –

“Or if a person touches any unclean thing, whether it is the carcass of an unclean beast, or the carcass of unclean livestock, or the carcass of unclean creeping things, and he is unaware of it, he also shall be unclean and guilty.” Leviticus 5:2

Leprosy caused a state of uncleanness. That is explicit in Leviticus 13:3 and elsewhere. Therefore, verses such as Leviticus 5:2, along with many others in Leviticus, reveal that in touching something or someone unclean, the uncleanness transfers to the individual. Depending on the situation, it required a minimum of washing oneself and being in a state of uncleanliness until evening.

Despite this, Jesus touched the man. With that done, and with a note that He was willing to cleanse him, it next says, “And immediately his leprosy, it was cleansed.”

The change was instantaneous, having gone from one state to the next. As the man is clean, how could Jesus be accused of being unclean? Did a state of uncleanliness transfer to Him, or did a state of cleanliness exist that overshadowed the man’s state of uncleanliness?

The debate among the crowd, especially among the scribes and Pharisees probably went on and on. But the fact is that the man was cleansed. As this was so, how could they prove a state of uncleanliness in Jesus? Indeed, they could not. The man was standing there without leprosy.

Life application: Human beings are born in a state of uncleanliness. This is due to being born with a state of inherited sin. No human is acceptable to God in this state. This is a truth fully and explicitly stated in Scripture. And yet, in coming to Christ, that state is changed.

The wages of sin is death. However, eternal life is promised to those who believe in Jesus and His completed work. If this is so, then there can no longer be sin associated with that person. This is also explicit in Scripture –

“Now all things are of God, who has reconciled us to Himself through Jesus Christ, and has given us the ministry of reconciliation, ¹⁹ that is, that God was in Christ reconciling the world to Himself, not imputing their trespasses to them, and has committed to us the word of reconciliation.” 2 Corinthians 5:18, 19

Not only are past sins forgiven, but the person – because he is in Christ and no longer under law – no longer has sin imputed to him. The problem is law. It is the problem that must be worked through in order to no longer be imputed sin.

Jesus fulfilled the law. His fulfillment of the law is credited to anyone who believes in Him. As this is so, law is annulled in that person. Without law, sin is no longer imputed. Jesus is demonstrating this to Israel, teaching them a truth that they completely missed.

If God never said, “A person with leprosy is unclean,” then there would be no imputation of uncleanliness in another person who touched him. But by giving the law, uncleanliness is transferred. The Bible uses tangible states of being to convey to us spiritual truths. There is nothing in the Christian faith today that says a person is unclean if he touches something forbidden by the law.

So why on earth do people keep going back and putting themselves under the law? We must consider what Christ has done, accept it as fully capable of bringing us near to God, and then rest in His completion of everything necessary to accomplish that. Trust in this! It is what God expects of you.

Glorious God, thank You for cleansing us from all of our impurity through the precious blood of Christ. We praise You for what You have done. Hallelujah and amen.

Wednesday, 26 February 2025

And behold, a leper came and worshiped Him, saying, “Lord, if You are willing, You can make me clean.” Matthew 8:2

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen)

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“And behold! A leper having come, he worshipped Him, saying, ‘Lord, if you desire, you can cleanse me.’” (CG).

In the previous verse, Jesus came down from the mountain with great multitudes following him. Now, it says, “And behold! A leper.”

It is a new word, lepros, a leper. It is derived from the same root as lepra, leprosy. That root is lepis, a scale, such as that seen in Acts 9:18. In turn, that comes from lepó, to peel. From this, one can see that the affliction is a scaly, peeling disease.

A person with such an affliction was unclean according to the law. The requirements for such diseases are meticulously recorded in Leviticus 13. Of anyone with such an affliction, the law said –

“Now the leper on whom the sore is, his clothes shall be torn and his head bare; and he shall cover his mustache, and cry, ‘Unclean! Unclean!’ ⁴⁶ He shall be unclean. All the days he has the sore he shall be unclean. He is unclean, and he shall dwell alone; his dwelling shall be outside the camp.” Leviticus 13:45, 46

Such a person, therefore, would be an outcast. There was to be no physical contact with him due to his state of uncleanness. However, this person, hearing about Jesus – probably from the crowds talking and considering Him the Messiah – believed he could be healed by Him. Therefore, it next says, “having come, he worshipped Him.”

The word proskuneó is the same as that used when the Magi came to worship the Child in Matthew 2 and when the Traducer asked for worship in Matthew 4. It is variously translated as worship, bowed down, prostrated, etc.

Such a gesture does not mean the man thought Jesus was God. It would be the same as coming before a high-ranking Roman authority, a king, etc. Each instance demands its own interpretation and the viewpoints on such things will vary based on the context, presuppositions, etc.

In some instances later, it is obvious that Jesus is being worshipped with the same reverence as God. In this one, however, that fact was yet unknown to the people. But if He was thought to be the Messiah, He would be God’s promised representative.

If one were to understand the implication of the prophetic words, they would be able to deduce that this coming One was the God/Man, but there is no indication the people understood this –

“‘Behold Me – Sending My messenger,
And turned way to My faces
And instantly comes unto His temple,
The Lord, whom you seek,
And Messenger the covenant,
Whom you – delighted.
Behold! Coming!’
Said Yehovah Sabaoth.” Malachi 3:1 (CG)

Regardless of the act, bowing for honor or worshiping as the Lord, the leper was “saying, ‘Lord, if you desire, you can cleanse me.’”

The word translated as “Lord,” likewise has a variety of meanings based on the context. It can mean a superior of any kind or even a person who is greatly respected. It can also be applied to the Lord God. Again, regardless of what this person thought about Jesus’ nature, he was convinced that He could perform this cleansing.

The word is katharizó, to cleanse or purify. The man was unclean according to the law. His concern was to be cleansed. The cleansing, however, implies healing. One cannot be clean under the law unless he is healed of this type of affliction. The main concern here, however, is cleansing.

Depending on one’s state, he could be healed and yet still unclean for some other reason. What this person wants is to be fully cleansed. Thus, he would be healed and also acceptable to return to enjoy living among the people in that state.

This is the first direct account of the healing of an individual by Jesus. In Matthew 4, it did say –

“And Jesus went about all Galilee, teaching in their synagogues, preaching the gospel of the kingdom, and healing all kinds of sickness and all kinds of disease among the people. ²⁴ Then His fame went throughout all Syria; and they brought to Him all sick people who were afflicted with various diseases and torments, and those who were demon-possessed, epileptics, and paralytics; and He healed them.” Matthew 4:23, 24

This person had probably heard of the healings previously conducted along with the words of the crowd as He passed through this city. In hearing these things, he had the faith to know he too could be cleansed by Jesus.

Life application: The healings recorded in the gospels and Acts are there for the reason of proving Jesus is the Messiah. They are recorded at times as an indication of individual faith by those who were healed. They were recorded at times to demonstrate a lack of faith by those who should have possessed it, such as in Matthew 17:14-21.

The purpose of these events has been met. Israel was given sufficient evidence that Jesus was the Messiah. Likewise, the authority of Jesus among the apostles and the early church stood as a witness to Israel that God’s favor had moved from Israel to the church.

Because those purposes have been met, there is no longer a need for miracle healing. Making claims on healing, as is so common in the church, demonstrates a misunderstanding of the purpose of Scripture and it demonstrates an arrogance in the one claiming such healing because the Bible does not align with the claims.

At times, for example, Paul was able to simply heal at a command. However, he prayed for the healing of others many times. Sometimes, Paul was unable to heal others, and the person’s affliction remained. This was true of Trophimus (2 Timothy 4:20) and Timothy (1 Timothy 5:23), among others.

The Bible does not provide the authority for the church today to claim healing. We are to pray for healing and allow the Lord to determine if it will happen or not. Anything beyond that is presumptuous and inappropriate.

Lord God, we are to live by faith. May our prayers for the healing of others be faithfully presented to You. May we never arrogantly demand from You, remembering that we may have afflictions that suit Your purposes. Lord, with the strength to praise You, even in times of affliction, may we be content. Amen.

Tuesday, 25 February 2025

When He had come down from the mountain, great multitudes followed Him. Matthew 8:1

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen).

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“And He having come down from the mountain, great crowds – they followed Him” (CG).

The previous verse ended Chapter 7. Chapter 8 closes out the event we call the Sermon on the Mount beginning with the words, “And He having come down from the mountain.”

The reason for going up the mountain to preach is not stated. All it said as Chapter 5 opened was, “And seeing the multitudes, He went up on a mountain, and when He was seated His disciples came to Him” (Matthew 5:1). It could be that because of the multitudes, He expected more room to preach and still be seen and heard. A level area might be more difficult to speak to so many.

In the spot believed to be where the sermon was conducted, today known as the Mount of Beatitudes, the acoustics are said to be well suited to such a discourse. It could also be that teaching in such an area was to give the sense of exaltation of His words. Moses received the law from an elevation on Mount Sinai.

When receiving the law, Moses was alone on the mount. On the other hand, while Jesus spoke, He was surrounded by people. In fact, at the giving of the Law of Moses, it said –

“You shall set bounds for the people all around, saying, ‘Take heed to yourselves that you do not go up to the mountain or touch its base. Whoever touches the mountain shall surely be put to death. ¹³ Not a hand shall touch him, but he shall surely be stoned or shot with an arrow; whether man or beast, he shall not live.’ When the trumpet sounds long, they shall come near the mountain.” Exodus 19:12, 13

The first account, at the giving of the law, shows the inaccessibility of man to God through the law. On the other hand, the latter account of the Sermon on the Mount demonstrates access to God through Christ’s fulfillment of the law just as He noted He would do in Matthew 5:17.

Nothing done by Jesus is without significance, including going up the mountain to speak His words to the disciples and the others who gathered.

Understanding this, it next says that “great crowds – they followed Him.” These would certainly include all those descending after the instruction He provided. But it probably would have included many more who heard that His words were astonishing and that He was probably the Messiah. Hence, there would be a great throng following Him.

This would then provide a chance for many to witness the events that will next be revealed by Matthew as His narrative continues.

Life application: As you read the unfolding events recorded in the gospels, think about why the surrounding words are included in the movements Jesus makes. Why did He go up on a mountain to speak? Why did He immediately come down from the mountain when He was finished? Why will He go to Capernaum instead of another nearby town?

Each thing is there for a reason as Jesus’ life and actions form walking parables of what God wants us to see and consider. Just as the land of Israel – its geography, layout, and location in relation to other countries and people groups – is used to teach us spiritual truths, so is the life of Jesus as He interacts with the people in the land.

God’s word is precise and filled with details that have importance. Remember this and consider the surrounding events in relation to the rest of Scripture. Hints of the very process of man’s redemption in relation to the dispensations of time are being provided. They will be revealed to those who consider them and align them with the rest of what is recorded in the word.

Lord God, what a precious and wonderful word You have given to us. Thank You for the intricate details that are being used to teach us truths about Jesus and His work in relation to the rest of Scripture. Thank You! Thank You, O God for revealing Your heart to us through the revealing of Jesus. Amen.