Daily Writing

Tuesday, 28 April 2026

His disciples said to Him, “If such is the case of the man with his wife, it is better not to marry. Matthew 19:10

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at the “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen).

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“They say to Him, His disciples, ‘If it is this, the case of the man with the wife, it conduces not to marry.’” (CG)

In the previous verse, Jesus pronounced His authoritative decree concerning divorce. So strong were His words taken in a society that openly tolerated it, we next read, “They say to Him, His disciples.”

In verse 3, it was the Pharisees who brought up the matter of divorce. Jesus made His statement, and it is not they, but Jesus’ disciples who respond. The Pharisees could agree or disagree with Jesus because they saw His words as an interpretation.

In Mark’s account, this response by the disciples is recorded as being later, in the house. Despite this, it is evident that they see Jesus’ words for what they are, a fixed and authoritative proclamation. As such, they say, “If it is this, the case of the man with the wife, it conduces not to marry.”

The disciples seem incredulous at the matter. What a burden it must have seemed! A man and a woman vowed before God to be faithful to one another in whatever wording a culture chose for such rites.

For example, it is generally stated in the US that the couple will stick it out through health and sickness, poverty or wealth, good times and bad times, etc. Other cultures may have their own choice of words to unite a couple, but it is generally accepted by normal functioning societies that the bond is expected to last… at least on paper.

The disciples’ response, however, shows that they understood this wasn’t always the case, maybe not even normally the case. Jesus’ response to their incredulity will be a stern warning to those who flippantly excuse divorce as an acceptable avenue in a “failed” marriage. To God, a marriage that follows His rules, despite the happiness of the union, is a successful marriage.

Life application: No wonder the Christian message is dying out around the world. When people realize God expects them to act morally in societies where morals are pretty much laughed at, it means the Bible, too, will be laughed at.

From there, society sees the mocking attitude of those who go from one marriage to another and, in turn, follow suit. What was once considered wholly unacceptable and a reason for being shunned in society suddenly becomes the standard.

And yet, the vows of marriage remain pretty much unchanged. “I promise these things before God…” When the marriage ends, there is no concern about the vows that were made. There is no dread of being held accountable for their actions.

This is true in churches as well as in society in general. Pastors have extramarital relationships, get divorced and remarried, and people continue to go to the churches they preach at. This means that what the Bible says has no value to them. If it did, they would not tolerate such things.

How willing are you to uphold the words of Scripture, even if you are miserable? Our happiness is not the main focus of Scripture. Rather, glorifying God with our lives is more important than what we want from moment to moment in our fleeting existence.

Let us attempt to honor God, being responsible for the words we utter in vows to those we have united with in marriage.

Lord God, may we be faithful concerning the words we speak and the vows we make. Help us to be people who are willing to put You above all else, knowing that these lives are temporary and will someday be behind us. We have an eternity in Your presence to look forward to. So, Lord, help us to have this eternal perspective even now. Amen.

Monday, 27 April 2026

And I say to you, whoever divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, and marries another, commits adultery; and whoever marries her who is divorced commits adultery.” Matthew 19:9

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at the “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen).

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“And I say to you that whoever, if he should dismiss his wife not upon harlotry, and he shall marry another, he commits adultery. And the ‘having been dismissed,’ having married, she commits adultery.” (CG)

In the previous verse, Jesus explained that Moses permitted divorce because of the hardness of the people’s hearts. However, from the beginning it was not so. Jesus continues, saying, “And I say to you.”

His words are not an explanation but a declaration. There is nothing subjectively interpretive in them. In other words, He doesn’t say, “Well, Moses says, but this point can be inferred from the Genesis account.” Instead, Jesus is speaking with His own authority to define a matter, which is “that whoever, if he should dismiss his wife not upon harlotry, and he shall marry another, he commits adultery.”

This is clear and unambiguous. If a person has a wife and she is faithful to him, he has no biblical right to divorce her. If she does engage with another man, she is obviously an adulteress and has broken the marriage covenant. In such a case, he has the right to divorce her.

However, if the man’s wife was faithful, and he divorces her and later marries another, he is now guilty of adultery. He has violated the marriage covenant. The precept set forth in Genesis 2 concerning the two being one flesh is, according to Jesus, a binding precept. Likewise, He continues, saying, “And the ‘having been dismissed,’ having married, she commits adultery.”

It has already been established that if a woman commits adultery during marriage, she has violated the marriage covenant. So, Jesus’ words here mean that if a man divorces his wife who has been faithful and she remarries, she is still considered an adulteress. She remained bound to her husband despite the piece of paper he issued to be rid of her.

In other words, to avoid being labeled an adulteress, she would have to remain single, even after divorce, or until he died, at which time, her vows to him were annulled.

Life application: The words of Jesus in this verse are intensely debated over. Some manuscripts have dropped the final clause, “And the ‘having been dismissed,’ having married, she commits adultery.” By doing this, it relieves the tension for some, but when thought through, it isn’t relieved at all.

The point of Jesus’ words relies on the original nature of the Genesis account. It does not rely on what the man or woman wants or does. In other words, once a marriage has taken place, the two have become one. Violations of that precept must be considered from that perspective.

If a woman is dismissed by her husband, she is still bound to the original precept of her marriage, meaning identifying with the husband she married, regardless of their active status as a couple.

With that having been said, there is a truth that must be considered. In Christ, all sin is forgiven. One law cannot be held above all the others as being apart from Christ’s atonement, as if He has forgiven everything but adultery.

Therefore, though this is a binding precept, it is not a matter of loss of salvation if violated. Rather, if a believer goes through a divorce and is identified as an adulterer according to Jesus’ words, that disobedience will be judged for rewards and losses according to 1 Corinthians 3 and 2 Corinthians 5.

Those in Christ are not under law, but grace. However, it should never be the case that grace be thought of as an excuse for license to sin. Such an idea is perverse and should not be considered. God looks at our marriage covenant in the same light He looks at His covenant with us. They are to be considered indissoluble by those who enter them. It is the reason Israel still exists as a nation today.

God will fulfill every promise He has made to the people He has covenanted with.

Lord God, help us to live honorably in Your presence, living our lives according to Your will and in accord with the precepts set forth by You. May we never consider it ok to tread upon the grace You have bestowed upon us. Help us in this, O God. Amen.

Sunday, 26 April 2026

He said to them, “Moses, because of the hardness of your hearts, permitted you to divorce your wives, but from the beginning it was not so. Matthew 19:8

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at the “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen).

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“He says to them, ‘Because Moses, toward the hardheartedness of you, he allowed you to dismiss your wives. But from the commencement, not it has been thus.’” (CG)

In the previous verse, Jesus was asked about Moses’ provision in the law concerning the issuing of a certificate of divorce. In response to that, Matthew records, “He says to them, ‘Because Moses, toward the hardheartedness of you.’”

A new word, not found outside biblical references, is seen here, sklérokardia. It is derived from two words, the first being skléros, dry, but indicating hard or tough, like a dry scab. Figuratively, it refers to stubborn people who won’t budge, bend, or submit. The second word is kardias, the heart. By analogy, it refers to the thoughts or feelings of a person. It is the seat of moral preference.

By placing the two words together, one can see the result: a heart that is hardened and morally obdurate. Of the words of Jesus, He ascribes this state as being the reason for Moses’ grant for divorce. This does not negate the doctrine of inspiration. What Moses said was under the inspiration and divine approval of God.

However, the book of Deuteronomy is written from Moses’ perspective. When the Lord is mentioned, it is generally in the third person, such as, “Yehovah our God, He made with us – covenant, in Horeb” (Deuteronomy 5:2).

As such, Jesus refers to the words as being those of Moses. But it is the Lord who truly looks upon the hardheartedness of the people. Moses, on the other hand, saw the result of it being worked out in the lives of the people. It is in this state of understanding the state of the people that Moses directed his words pros, toward, their hardheartedness.

The fact is that divorce was and remains a part of the human condition. Israel was taken out of the body of humanity. Their inclinations would be no different than those of anyone else. The law, however, would magnify the people’s guilt in such matters. In seeing this state in them, Jesus says, “he allowed you to dismiss your wives.”

Moses’ words were not a command to dismiss. Rather, they were an accommodation to do so because of the hard state of human hearts, among whom Israel is included. In other words, Moses had to decide the matter, considering what would have been the result if this allowance were not provided.

The answer is that things would have been worse in various ways, not better. Otherwise, the allowance would not have been given. Despite this allowance, however, Jesus next says, “But from the commencement, not it has been thus.”

The verse in Jesus’ words is a perfect participle. Depending on the translation, such as the NKJV, someone may deduce that it was not so in the beginning, but because of accommodation through Moses, that then changed. This is incorrect. The use of the perfect participle tells us that it was not that way in the beginning, it was not that way at the time of Moses’ allowance, and it continued not to be the case even up to the present.

This accommodation does not change the original intent of marriage at all. Rather, Jesus will continue to explain the matter in the verses ahead.

Life application: As an example of mixing doctrines, consider the words of the Pulpit Commentary –

“From the beginning. The original institution of marriage contained no idea of divorce; it was no mere civil contract, made by man and dissoluble by man, but a union of God’s own formation, with which no human power could interfere. However novel this view might seem, it was God’s own design from the first. The first instance of polygamy occurs in Genesis 4:19, and is connected with murder and revenge. Matthew 19:8.”

The substance of the Pulpit Commentary on the matter of divorce is fine. But one must stop and ask, “What does the last sentence of the commentary have to do with divorce?” The answer is, “Nothing.” Further, the conclusion they gave concerning polygamy is entirely amiss.

The fact that murder is mentioned by Lamech has nothing to do with his being married to two wives. Second, murder had already been seen, in the same chapter, when connected in a similar offhand manner to a non-polygamous marriage.

Cain killed Abel. They were sons of Adam and Eve. The fact that murder took place has nothing to do with that fact, just as the fact that Lamech had two wives, from a biblical standpoint, has nothing to do with Lamech’s killing of another person.

Be careful when reading commentaries not to get misdirected into irrelevant side issues. This is quite common in commentaries, but incorrect conclusions can become the highlight of a matter because of such things. When that happens, all kinds of false teachings can quickly arise.

If someone wants to deviate from a thought being presented, there needs to be a reason for it, such as a “life application” that is understood to be extra to the main content.

Likewise, be sure to stick to relevant facts yourself in your own discussions about theology and doctrine. In doing so, you will build a stronger case without fallacious conclusions that misdirect from the matter at hand.

Lord God, help us to be faithful husbands and wives, living out our lives in adherence with what You have set forth for marriages in Your word. May we be patient, caring, and forgiving as we interact with the spouse You have blessed us with all the days of our lives. Amen.

Saturday, 25 April 2026

They said to Him, “Why then did Moses command to give a certificate of divorce, and to put her away?” Matthew 19:7

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at the “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen).

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“They say to Him, ‘Therefore, why he did enjoin, Moses, to give a divorce scroll to dismiss her?’” (CG)

In the previous verse, Jesus, having cited Scripture to justify His conclusion, said that what God has joined, man should not separate. With that stated, an obvious question arose. Matthew records, “They say to Him, ‘Therefore, why he did enjoin, Moses, to give a divorce scroll to dismiss her?’”

The reason this is obvious is that it is found in the Pentateuch or Torah, the same five books in which Genesis is recorded. There is nothing wrong with the question, and such confusion should be expected. If a truth is evidently being taught in one part of the Torah and elsewhere something seems contradictory to that, then how can those thoughts be reconciled?

Such confusion will often cause one to take the laxer stand in the debate unless there is a compelling reason why they shouldn’t. In other words, “This appears to say something in Genesis, but it isn’t explicit. Our teacher has noted that Deuteronomy says something different, which is stated explicitly. Therefore, we must go with Deuteronomy.”

That is why there were different schools of thought, such as Shammai and Hillel. One may have deduced that the precept implied in Genesis had limitations. The other held firmly to Deuteronomy due to its explicitly stated nature. As Moses didn’t give any further qualifications, then the laxer approach must be acceptable.

However, there is one more consideration at this time in Israel’s history. In Malachi 2:16, the prophet declared to the people –

“And this is the second thing you do:
You cover the altar of the Lord with tears,
With weeping and crying;
So He does not regard the offering anymore,
Nor receive it with goodwill from your hands.
¹⁴ Yet you say, ‘For what reason?’
Because the Lord has been witness
Between you and the wife of your youth,
With whom you have dealt treacherously;
Yet she is your companion
And your wife by covenant.
¹⁵ But did He not make them one,
Having a remnant of the Spirit?
And why one?
He seeks godly offspring.
Therefore take heed to your spirit,
And let none deal treacherously with the wife of his youth.
¹⁶ For the Lord God of Israel says
That He hates divorce,
For it covers one’s garment with violence,
Says the Lord of hosts.
Therefore take heed to your spirit,
That you do not deal treacherously.” Malachi 2:13-16

Because of this, Israel should have carefully considered the words of Moses and taken a second look at their actions and attitudes concerning divorce.

Life application: Theology is not always black and white and clearly set on the pages of Scripture. Many things have to be carefully considered from a much wider angle than a single precept on a page.

It is true that Moses gave an allowance for divorce. But what was the reason for it? Jesus will give a clear and exacting response to the question. When thought through, it should make sense to those who hear it. But Jesus’ response will elicit more concerns in the minds of His disciples.

But this is how the Bible presents things. There are things to be inferred. Directives come along that may seem confusing. Other things are stated later that are hard to reconcile with what has already been said, etc.

Eventually, however, as the years pass, the greater plan of redemption becomes clearer and clearer. Little steps are taken to give lessons. From there, things will take their place. When that occurs, people may still not understand what is happening because they have failed to see the progression of what God is doing.

Those who continue to hold to the law are in such a category. They failed to see that the law was a steppingstone to lead Israel to Jesus. In failing to see that, they rejected the new direction. Along with their rejection, they teach others who were never under the law that they need to go back to the part of the plan where those teaching law observance still are.

All of this is because of a failure to see the greater picture of what God is doing.  That is why God has made the gospel so hugely simple. If people can’t understand the basic gospel, and the world is full of people who don’t, imagine if it were any more complicated!

God is looking to get people saved through Christ. Once that is done, it is important to grow in Christ, lest someone come along and pull you back into a part of what God has already set aside. Keep reading the Bible! Keep looking at what God has done from the bigger and more complete plan of redemption. This is how you will be firm and secure in what is a big and complicated book.

Glorious Lord God, thank You for the simple gospel. By it we are saved. Once that is out of the way, help us to continue to grow in our walk with You. May we be responsible stewards of the time You have given us. Help us in this, O God. Amen.

Friday, 24 April 2026

So then, they are no longer two but one flesh. Therefore what God has joined together, let not man separate.” Matthew 19:6

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at the “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen).

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“So too, they are no longer two, but one flesh. Therefore, what God, He conjoined, not let him separate, man.” (CG)

In the previous verse, Jesus cited the Genesis narrative where a man is said to leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, becoming one flesh. Based on that early Genesis record, Jesus now states that a precedent took place that pertains to all people at all times. He begins that thought, saying, “So too, they are no longer two.”

A new word is seen, ouketi. It is derived from ou, a negative particle, such as “not,” and eti, yet, still, longer, etc. Together, they form the thought “no longer.”

There is now a bond between the two which has united them as “one flesh” in God’s eyes. Though they are still two people, they have formed a single, indissoluble whole. They are not two independent units. Rather, they are two entities united into a single unit.

A comparable thought is a yoke of oxen, which form a single whole. They are two oxen, but they form one yoke fulfilling a single purpose. That is actually explicitly seen in Jesus’ conclusion, “Therefore, what God, He conjoined, not let him separate, man.”

Two new words are seen here. The first is suzeugnumi. It is derived from sun, with, and zeugos, a couple (as in yoked). Together, they signify “to yoke together” and thus, figuratively, to conjoin as in marriage. This word is found only here and in the comparable passage of Mark 10:9.

The next new word is chórizó, to place room between. It is derived from chóra, a room or a space of territory. Figuratively, chórizó thus means to put asunder, separate, etc. One could think of a couple deciding to have two separate rooms instead of one. Eventually, they decide they like it and permanently separate, divorcing and permanently breaking the bonds of marriage.

Jesus says that this should not be. God joined them as one. Therefore, what He has done is not to be undone by man.

Life application: In Ephesians, Paul confirms that Jesus’ words are not only directed to Israel during the time of the law, but at all times. He then explains that this bond of marriage anticipates something greater –

“Wives, submit to your own husbands, as to the Lord. ²³ For the husband is head of the wife, as also Christ is head of the church; and He is the Savior of the body. ²⁴ Therefore, just as the church is subject to Christ, so let the wives be to their own husbands in everything.
²⁵ Husbands, love your wives, just as Christ also loved the church and gave Himself for her, ²⁶ that He might sanctify and cleanse her with the washing of water by the word, ²⁷ that He might present her to Himself a glorious church, not having spot or wrinkle or any such thing, but that she should be holy and without blemish. ²⁸ So husbands ought to love their own wives as their own bodies; he who loves his wife loves himself. ²⁹ For no one ever hated his own flesh, but nourishes and cherishes it, just as the Lord does the church. ³⁰ For we are members of His body, of His flesh and of His bones. ³¹ ‘For this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh.’ ³² This is a great mystery, but I speak concerning Christ and the church. ³³ Nevertheless let each one of you in particular so love his own wife as himself, and let the wife see that she respects her husband.” Ephesians 5:22-33

If God has united man and woman in marriage and says it is a permanent bond in His eyes, how do you think He considers the bond of a person who has united with Christ? The doctrine of eternal salvation is clearly and unambiguously upheld.

We look to our own broken relationships and impute our own failings to God. “My father was a loser and a drunkard. Fathers cannot be trusted, and God, who is the ‘Father’ sure can’t be trusted!” “My husband left me for another woman. He ruined my life and his own children’s lives. Jesus will be just as unfaithful as he was. And even if He is a good Husband, I will fail Him, and He will cast me away.”

This is how we view things, from our own failed perspective. But this is why God gave us the Bible and the example of Israel. Despite their constant failure to be a suitable people for Him, He faithfully has endured their troublesome ways, covenanting with them and working to ensure that they will come into the New Covenant someday.

Let us remember that God does not fail. He will perfectly fulfill every promise He has made to His people.

Lord God, thank You that we have the absolute assurance that You will bring us to Yourself in Your heavenly kingdom. You will never leave us, never forsake us, and because of Jesus, You have and will continue to forgive us of our innumerable failings. Thank You for Your infinite faithfulness, O God. Amen.