Matthew 17 Summary

Saturday, 14 March 2026

An explanation of the overall pictorial contents of Matthew 17.

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at the “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen)

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

Also, if you would like to listen to Daniel Higgins’ comparison between Esther (the 17th book) and Matthew 17 (Click Here to listen). The notes for his study can be found at this link (Click  Here), or just see below this S/W commentary.

Chapter 17 of Matthew completes a picture that has been ongoing for several chapters. In Chapter 14, there was a snapshot of Israel’s history in relation to the law. Chapter 15 then gave a picture of what is going on in the world from the time Jesus fulfilled the law until the rapture. Chapter 16 revealed a passage that petitions the Jews of the end times to consider who Jesus is based on their own history, comparing it to how He is portrayed in Scripture.

Chapter 17 began with the words “after six days.” It is a reference to the six days of creation, which mirror the six thousand years of man’s time before the millennium, the seventh day, the day of God’s rest on earth –

“And in that day there shall be a Root of Jesse,
Who shall stand as a banner to the people;
For the Gentiles shall seek Him,
And His resting place shall be glorious.” Isaiah 11:10

Jesus took Peter, James, and John up on a high mountain. Peter is the apostle to the circumcision (Galatians 2:7), James was the first apostle to die, and John was the last. This is an honor that James and John had sought, but in a different way –

“Then the mother of Zebedee’s sons came to Him with her sons, kneeling down and asking something from Him.
21 And He said to her, ‘What do you wish?’
She said to Him, ‘Grant that these two sons of mine may sit, one on Your right hand and the other on the left, in Your kingdom.’” Matthew 20:20, 21

In one respect, Jesus granted the request concerning the placement of apostolic honor. These three men form a triad of witnesses to the Jews. There on the high mountain, Jesus metamorphosed before them. Moses and Elijah, representing the law and the prophets as well as the living and the dead, appeared along with Jesus.

Peter, whose epistles are strategically placed after Paul’s, indicating they are addressed to the end times Jews after the church age, offered to build three tabernacles, dwelling places, for them. The voice of the Father came out of the cloud, noting that it is His Son, Jesus, in whom He is well pleased, and that they were to hear Him.

It is the final lesson of the end times. The law and prophets are not what the Jews are to focus on, but Jesus. It is His glory alone that will take them into the millennium, the law being finally removed from Israel (see Hebrews 8:13).

While descending the mountain, the disciples asked Him why the scribes said that Elijah was to come first. Jesus said, “Elijah indeed, he comes first, and he will reconstitute all” (17:11). Elijah is literally coming back to witness to Israel. However, Jesus also noted that Elijah had come already. The disciples understood this to mean John the Baptist.

The indication is that Israel will understand from these two appearances that they missed the ball, and the troubles they have faced were a self-inflicted wound. Verses 14-17 detail the healing of the man’s son. No names of people or locations were given, just a description of the boy being moonstruck and suffering badly because he frequently fell into the fire and frequently into the water.

It is a picture of Israel in their history before the Lord, completely untreatable, even by the disciples (their witness to Israel) –

“Your affliction is incurable,
Your wound is severe.
13 There is no one to plead your cause,
That you may be bound up;
You have no healing medicines.” Jeremiah 30:12, 13

See also Micah 1:8,9.

Jesus called them a faithless and perverse generation, something that exactingly describes Israel. It is a point stated to the Jews by Peter in Acts 2:40. Despite their failure, it says that Jesus rebuked the demon, and it left the child that very hour. Israel’s wound will be cured immediately at the return of Christ.

When the disciples asked why they couldn’t cast it out, Jesus said it was because of their unbelief and that that kind could only go out by fasting and prayer. Jesus doesn’t say who must fast and pray. Rather, He says it is a part of such healing.

Fasting is a sign of mourning and repentance toward God. Prayer is the means by which God is petitioned.  In the future, at the time of Christ’s return, Israel will, like ancient Nineveh, fast and pray to the Lord. When they do, they will be healed.

The final verses of the chapter referred first to them “overturning” in the Galilee (verse 22). The word was anastrephó. As explained, one can return without any intent or change in the way things are, or one can return while considering, making changes, redirecting to something new, etc. It is also used as a word indicating contrast.

It is the state of Israel after having been healed. There is a return with a considered change, redirecting them to something new. They will enter the New Covenant, returning to God in a new way. That wording is based on Jesus’ words about the Son of Man being betrayed into the hands of men, being killed, and being raised on the third day (verse 23).

That is the exact gospel Paul explains in 1 Corinthians 15:3, 4. Israel will be overturned in their thinking by finally accepting, as Paul says, “the gospel which I preached to you, which also you received and in which you stand, by which also you are saved” (1 Corinthians 15:1,2).

In verse 24, it says that they came to Capernaum. The name is derived from kaphar, to cover, as in atonement, and Nahum, the name of the prophet. However, Nahum is derived from nakham, to sigh. The sense of the word extends to regretting, feeling sorry, and being or getting comfort.

All three of these are tied up in the thought of salvation. While in this location, those who received the temple tax asked if the Teacher paid the tax. Peter’s answer in verse 25 was that He did. The tax, as explained, was based on the ransom money (silver) described in Exodus 30:11-16. It is the money representing salvation through Christ’s sacrifice, ransoming man from the power of the devil.

Still in verse 25, Jesus preanticipated Peter by asking about paying such taxes, does that come from the king’s sons or from unfamiliars (those outside the family). The word used was prophthanó, to get an earlier start on a matter.

Jesus didn’t just speak of the matter of Israel’s salvation before they asked for it. He spoke of the matter before they could ask. In other words, the Bible has clearly proclaimed that Israel will once again be God’s people. Their ransom money had been procured long before they knew there was a need for it. This was preanticipated by God in Christ.

Peter’s response to Jesus about the tax was from unfamilars. Jesus said, “Hence, the sons, they are exempt.” It is a point that will apply to Israel after the Lord returns. Being sons of God (as a nation), once again, they will be free from such payment.

Verse 27 described the manner in which Peter would find such a coin to pay the taxes. It was provided by Jesus in a miraculous way. Likewise, Israel will not pay anything for their ransom. Rather, it will be provided by Christ’s all-sufficient payment at the cross of Calvary.

The final words of the chapter recorded Jesus’ words to Peter, “That, having taken, you give to them for Me and you.” Jesus’ work leading to His resurrection is what validated both His and Israel’s sonship.

For Jesus, that is recorded in Romans 1:4, where it says, “and declared to be the Son of God with power according to the Spirit of holiness, by the resurrection from the dead.” See also Hebrews 1:5.

For Israel of the end times, pictured by Peter, the apostle to the circumcision, it is belief in the gospel that will bring about their state of sonship. The tax is paid through the miracle-working power of God in Christ.

Life application: Chapter 17 of Matthew clearly indicates that there is a future for Israel, the people. They are restored to the land of Israel as prophesied in God’s word. They will never be uprooted from it again, according to that same word –

“‘I will bring back the captives of My people Israel;
They shall build the waste cities and inhabit them;
They shall plant vineyards and drink wine from them;
They shall also make gardens and eat fruit from them.
15 I will plant them in their land,
And no longer shall they be pulled up
From the land I have given them,’
Says the Lord your God.” Amos 9:14, 15

This is good news for Israel. However, for Israel at this time, the news is not so good. They are not currently God’s people (Hosea 1:9, 10 & Romans 9:25, 26). Not being God’s people, they are also not sons of God. That right has been stripped from them at this time.

Rather, Jesus clearly notes that their father is the devil –

“You are of your father the devil, and the desires of your father you want to do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and does not stand in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaks a lie, he speaks from his own resources, for he is a liar and the father of it. 45 But because I tell the truth, you do not believe Me. 46 Which of you convicts Me of sin? And if I tell the truth, why do you not believe Me? 47 He who is of God hears God’s words; therefore you do not hear, because you are not of God.” John 8:44-47

To reject Jesus is to reject God because Jesus is God and the Son of the Father. Jesus calls Israel during this dispensation a “synagogue of Satan” in Revelation 2:9 and 3:9. Calling them God’s people at this time does a disservice to them. What they need is evangelism, not coddling, sycophancy, fawning, or flattering.

They are not right with God, and not to evangelize them, when you have the opportunity to do so, can only continue them down the path leading to the Lake of Fire. This is important. Israel needs Jesus. Without Him, they are like any other nation on the planet that lacks Jesus Christ. Be bold in your proclamation of Jesus Christ to all people, Jew and Gentile alike.

Lord God, help us to think rightly about our conversations with others. Help us to remember that without Jesus, they are on a one-way path to eternal condemnation. May we boldly proclaim the good news of Jesus Christ to all people. Amen.

 


 

Exploring the Connection Between Matthew 17 and the Book of Esther

For BibleInTen.com – By DH – 14th March 2026

 

Welcome back to Bible in Ten.

Today we come to Matthew 17, and in this series that leads us naturally to Book 17 of the Old Testament: Esther.

And with an explanation of the overall pictorial contents of Matthew 17 provided in the previous episode, Matthew chapter 17 becomes much clearer and in this supplementary episode, we will see how Esther strengthens it as a supporting witness.

Esther is not just a story about Jewish survival in Persia.  Esther is a book about the Lord hidden from open view, but still directing all things toward redemption. The book exists not mainly to magnify the Jews, but to show the unseen faithfulness of God in preserving them for the sake of His promises and ultimately for the sake of the Redeemer, the true subject of Scripture.

The Esther Bible Study available on the Superior Word develops the following pictures:

  • Ahasuerus pictures God, the ruler over the world.
  • Vashti pictures disobedience and loss of access to the throne.
  • Esther pictures the Gospel, especially in her mediating role before the king.
  • Haman pictures Law, even law bringing wrath and death.
  • Mordecai pictures Christ: hidden at first, then honored, then exalted, then clothed with authority, then writing with full power, then sending letters of peace and truth, and finally having his greatness recorded through all the realm.

That makes Esther a strong support for what Matthew 17 is picturing.

1) “After six days” — the approach to kingdom rest

Matthew 17 begins, “after six days.”  As was said this points toward the six-thousand-year course of man’s time before the seventh-day rest, the millennial kingdom.

Esther supports this by opening in a royal setting already marked by splendor, order, and throne-rule. Shushan is treated almost like a paradise-throne setting, and Ahasuerus is taken as picturing the divine throne-rule itself. So both chapters begin not with chaos, but with the king and the court already in view.

2) Christ revealed in glory before a select company

On the mountain, Jesus is transfigured before Peter, James, and John.

That is the hidden unveiling of the King before His glory is openly seen by all.

Esther supports this pattern through hiddenness before manifestation. The whole book works by concealed identity, concealed movements, and God working in the background long before the reversal appears.  The Lord is not named openly in Esther, yet He is there, hidden, moving everything toward the appointed outcome.

So Matthew 17’s select-company glory scene sits very comfortably beside Esther’s hidden-providence structure.

3) Moses and Elijah testify that all prior revelation converges on Christ

Moses and Elijah appear with Jesus, but not as equals. They are witnesses.

That fits Esther’s Christ structure too. The whole book drives toward one central exalted figure: not Vashti, not Haman, not even Esther by herself, but finally Mordecai in exaltation. And Mordecai is clearly picturing Christ Jesus, the one advanced to authority by the king.

So just as Matthew 17 narrows the law and prophets toward Christ, Esther narrows all of its movements toward the greatness of Mordecai, a picture of the greatness of Christ.

4) “Hear Him” and “Jesus only”

This is the heart of Matthew 17.

The Father says, “Hear Him,” and the disciples then see “Jesus only.”

That fits Esther, because Esther repeatedly moves the reader away from outward structures and toward the one through whom life and deliverance actually come. Esther is a picture of the beautiful Gospel message, but Mordecai is the Christ figure who ends up invested with the king’s authority and acting with the signet.  The signet granted to Mordecai pictures the authority of Christ.

So if Matthew 17 says, in effect, “Hear Him”, Esther says in its own symbolic way: the decisive authority now rests with the Christ-figure who bears the king’s signet.

5) Hidden glory must wait for resurrection-grounded disclosure

Jesus tells them not to publicise the vision until after resurrection.

Again, Esther supports this because Esther is a book of timed disclosure. Esther conceals her identity, Mordecai watches from outside, and the hidden plan only comes into the open at the appointed hour. The Lord is working behind the scenes and the book’s whole structure depends on that hiddenness.

So Matthew 17 and Esther both teach: that public revelation comes only when the right moment arrives.

6) Elijah / restoration and Israel’s future turning

Matthew 17 speaks of Elijah in two ways at once: John the Baptist has already fulfilled an Elijah-like role, but Jesus’ wording also leaves a still-future restoration role in view.

Esther also supports a future restoration by showing that the covenant people are threatened but not discarded. Esther is treated as a book of redemptive history in which the Jews are preserved because God’s promises to them stand, and because the Messiah must come and return in connection with them.

Esther strengthens the Matthew 17 reading that Israel is not finally cast off. God is not finished with Israel chiefly through Jesus’ future-tense words about Elijah restoring all things, and then reinforced through the picture of Israel’s healing and restored sonship later in the chapter.”

Though threatened and with God’s face hidden from open view, they are brought through to preservation, mourning, reversal, and future blessing

7) The afflicted boy and Israel’s incurable condition

The Matthew 17 explanation treats the afflicted boy as picturing Israel in its historical condition: wounded, unstable, and untreatable by human means.

Esther strongly confirms that pattern. The Jews stand under a decree of destruction that has to be properly and purposefully dealt with. Haman, picturing Law, has issued a death-word, and the people are trapped unless royal intervention occurs.

In Matthew 17 the boy is incurable by the disciples.

IN Esther the Jews are doomed under an irreversible decree.

In both: the people cannot heal or save themselves.

8) Christ alone intervenes to heal and deliver

In Matthew 17, Jesus heals what the disciples could not.

In Esther, the same pattern appears through the Mordecai-Christ picture and the Esther-Gospel mediation.

Matthew 17 pictures Israel’s future restoration, healing, and restored sonship through Christ. The book of Esther supports that pattern by showing that although the first decree of death cannot be revoked, a new decree can be issued through Mordecai’s royal authority that brings life to the threatened people.

The old word of death cannot simply be revoked, but another word can be issued which grants life. That second word comes through Esther and Mordecai, and the edict issued by Mordecai is explicitly treated as a picture of the New Covenant.

Mordecai, picturing Christ, receives the signet, acts with royal authority, and sends out the saving word.

Thus Esther is supportive of Matthew 17’s portrayal of Messiah Himself being the one who intervenes.

9) The cross remains central

IN Matthew 17 Jesus speaks of betrayal, death, and resurrection.

The notes by CG on this from Esther chapter 10 bear repeating:

Haman pictures Law, but Christ actually died. It was Christ who was nailed to the cross, and so in type and picture, Christ became our Haman, our Man under Law, if you will. It is no different at all than Christ equating Himself with the serpent on the pole in John 3:14, or Paul saying that God made Him who knew no sin to be sin for us.

In the death of His body, the law died with Him for all who believe. For all who don’t, Law, and thus the enmity, remains. This is where the marvelous symbolism of a very misunderstood passage in the book of John is explained. It says in John 20, “Then Simon Peter came, following him, and went into the tomb; and he saw the linen cloths lying there, and the handkerchief that had been around His head, not lying with the linen cloths, but folded together in a place by itself.” Many fanciful explanations have been made up about this, but the truth is revealed in what happened to Haman, when he was taken to be executed… they covered his face. The Law was to die. Christ died in fulfillment of the law. When He arose, the face covering was removed, and carefully folded. It was an intentional act of the Lord showing that the shame of death through Law had been removed for those who trust in Him. The people of Israel, the Jews, even to this day, celebrate Purim, and yet they are celebrating the exact opposite of what they think they are celebrating. They curse Haman, stamp their feet, and howl wildly as his name is read, and yet, he simply pictures Law that they are still under. Until they come to Christ, Haman will continue to come after them to destroy, to be killed, and to be annihilated because of the ministry of death, meaning Law (2 Corinthians 3:7). Why do the Jews celebrate Purim? It is because of what pur signifies. It is a lot, a broken piece, and thus Purim, the plural of pur, signifies broken pieces. Pur means “to break,” “frustrate,” “make ineffectual,” “annul,” “bring to naught.” This is what Christ has done concerning our covenant with death according to Paul – For the message of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God. 19 For it is written: “I will destroy the wisdom of the wise, And bring to nothing the understanding of the prudent.” 20Where is the wise? Where is the scribe? Where is the disputer of this age? Has not God made foolish the wisdom of this world? 21 For since, in the wisdom of God, the world through wisdom did not know God, it pleased God through the foolishness of the message preached to save those who believe. 22 For Jews request a sign, and Greeks seek after wisdom; 23 but we preach Christ crucified, to the Jews a stumbling block and to the Greeks foolishness, 24 but to those who are called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God. 25 Because the foolishness of God is wiser than men, and the weakness of God is stronger than men. 1 Corinthians 1:18-25 The Jews cling to the law, but it is Christ who has defeated that enemy. The law is annulled in Christ. This is the message of Purim.

Life Application 

There is also a striking present-day echo. In 2026, Purim began on the evening of March 2nd just 2 days after Israel was again in direct conflict with Iran.

Just as Haman was also not himself Persian (he was Amalekite who gained influence at the heart of the palace and used imperial power against God’s people).  In a similar way,  The Islamic Republic of Iran’s rulers are militant usurpers who seized control of the land of Persia in 1979 and have held the nation in bondage ever since.

Even the recent reports and speculation about Israeli intelligence using covert medical cover—dentists, hidden tracking, to coordinate a sudden destruction on the Supreme Leader —carry an Esther-like atmosphere.    Just for fun check out the link to a stop motion lego video about this by “Stop Motion Sam”!

The deeper parallel is the same: the enemy appears secure, the plot seems advanced, yet unseen movements are already in motion, and when the appointed moment comes, the reversal is sudden.

 

Matthew 17:27

Friday, 13 March 2026

Nevertheless, lest we offend them, go to the sea, cast in a hook, and take the fish that comes up first. And when you have opened its mouth, you will find a piece of money; take that and give it to them for Me and you.” Matthew 17:27

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at the “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen)

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

To read the translation of Matthew 17 in the same manner on YouTube (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“And that not we should entrap them, having gone to the sea, you cast a hook, and the ‘having ascended first’ fish, you lift, and having opened its mouth, you will find a stater. That, having taken, you give to them for Me and you.” (CG).

In the previous verse, Peter responded to Jesus that the kings of the earth take their customs and taxes from the unfamiliars. Jesus then responded that the sons are free. Despite this truth, He continues, saying, “And that not we should entrap them.”

The idea is that it would be inappropriate to cause those collecting the census to be tripped up by the claim that the sons are free from paying. It would lead to a difficult set of explanations and argumentations that would serve no purpose in the ongoing ministry as it marched to its completion.

Jesus’ time to be revealed as the Messiah had not yet reached its fulfillment (Matthew 16:20). Therefore, any claims of exemption from paying the temple tax would be misunderstood and could later be used as a charge against Him. Understanding this, Jesus continues His words to Peter, saying, “having gone to the sea, you cast a hook.”

It is a word found only here in Scripture, agkistron, a hook. It is akin to agkalé, an arm (as curved or bent). Both are derived from agkos, a bend. Jesus feels Peter needs a little time to himself for relaxation. Well, maybe not. Jesus has a specific intent for Peter to go fishing, and so He continues, “and the ‘having ascended first’ fish, you lift.”

Jesus doesn’t say, “…if you catch a fish.” Rather, He confirms Peter will. Regardless of its size or kind, he isn’t to toss it back. Rather, Jesus says, “and having opened its mouth, you will find a stater.”

It is another word found only this once in the Bible, statér, a stander (standard of value). HELPS Word studies says it is “a silver coin worth two didrachma and equivalent to four denarii (a tetradrachma, four drachmae) – the exact amount of the Temple-tax required for two people.”

In other words, what Jesus is doing is proving His authority over every possible contingency one could imagine. Peter is to go fishing, cast in a hook, he will catch a fish (a fifty/fifty proposition), when he pulls up the fish, regardless of its type, and out of all the fish he could possibly catch in the Sea of Galilee, and it occurring at that exact moment, there will be a coin in its mouth.

The probability of such an event extends to all the fish in human history that have been found with a coin in their mouths. When the coin is pulled out, it will be the exact coin needed to pay the tax for the two of them. That would open up the probability of every coin ever to have been in the area of the Sea of Galilee, along with the chances of it being the exact type of coin needed to pay for exactly two people.

Further, the fact that it is found in the fish’s mouth, not swallowed, means that either the fish picked it up at the exact moment it also caught the hook, proving Jesus’ omniscient knowledge, or Jesus created it in the fish’s mouth while Peter was catching it, proving Jesus’ omnipotence along with His omniscience.

The impossibility of Jesus’ words, unless He has the ability to affect every single aspect of this event, is obvious. Understanding this, Jesus instructs Peter on what to do with the coin he is going to find, saying, “That, having taken, you give to them for Me and you.”

Jesus sees it as less inconvenient to do what would be utterly impossible for any human being who has ever existed to do than to argue about the temple tax with people who would then be offended at His claim. It is an utterly astonishing proposition to consider.

Life application: The wickedness of the liberal scholar’s heart is exposed in the evaluation of recorded events like these in the Bible. So adamant are they that Jesus could not have done what is stated here, they have come up with several “explanations” of how this miracle was effected.

There is no point in giving them all. Each one fails to adhere to the simplicity and exacting nature of the description given in the account. One example will suffice: Jesus told Peter to go fishing. He gave him these instructions. Peter went out and caught a fish. Peter then sold the fish for a stater so that the temple tax could be paid.

Not only does that not match the account, but it also abuses it so heavily that there would be no point in including the story at all. Peter and the other disciples probably went fishing anytime they had a chance, maybe even when Jesus told them to, so that they could enjoy dinner.

There is no record of such a thing because it has no importance or connection to what is necessary to understand Jesus’ ministry. Such people will receive their rewards for leading people astray with faulty analyses, such as this.

Be careful to take what is recorded in the Bible at face value. It is important to understand that we are to accept God’s word by faith, even when it is not possible for us to do what is recorded there. It is a snap for God to do so if He wishes. Have faith in that.

Lord God Almighty, You can do all things, and we trust that just as You know every fish in the sea, so You are intimately aware of us. Such knowledge is beyond our minds’ ability to grasp, but we can accept it by faith, knowing that You are in complete control of all things. Thank You for this surety. Amen.

 

Matthew 17 (CG)

1And after six days, Jesus, He takes with – Peter, and James, and John his brother, and them, He uphefts into a high mountain off alone. 2And He metamorphosed before them, and it radiated, His face, like the sun, and His garments, it became whites, as the light. 3And you behold! They appeared to them Moses and Elijah, conversing with Him. 4And answering, Peter, he said to Jesus, “Lord, it is good – us to be here. If You desire, we will make here three tabernacles: You one, and Moses one, and Elijah one.”

5Yet he speaking, you behold! Cloud – lustrous, it overshadowed them. And you behold! Voice – from the cloud, saying, “This, He is, My Son, the Beloved in whom I approved! You hear – Him!” 6 And having heard, the disciples, they fell upon their face, and they feared exceedingly. 7And He came, Jesus. He touched them, and He said, “You rouse, and you fear not.” 8And having uplifted their eyes, they saw none, if not Jesus alone.

9And descending, they, from the mountain, Jesus, He enjoined them, saying, “You tell none the vision until that the Son of Man from dead, He arose.”

10And His disciples, they queried Him, saying, “Why therefore the scribes, they say that Elijah, it necessitates, to come first?”

11And Jesus answering, He said to them, “Elijah, indeed, he comes first, and he will reconstitute all. 12And I say to you that Elijah, he came already, and they knew him not, but they did in him as much as they desired. And thus the Son of Man, He is about to suffer under them.” 13Then the disciples, they comprehended that He spoke to them concerning John the Immerser.

14And they, having come unto the crowd, he approached Him – man, knee-falling to Him, and saying, 15“Lord, You compassionated my son, for he moon-strikes and he suffers badly, for frequently he falls into the fire and frequently into the water. 16And I presented him to Your disciples, and they could not cure him.”

17And Jesus, answering, He said, “O! Generation disbelieving and having been mangled! I will be with you until when? I will uphold you until when? You carry him here to Me.” 18And Jesus, He admonished it, and the demon, it proceeded from him, and the boy, he was cured from that hour.

19Then, the disciples having come to Jesus off alone, they said, “Through what we – not we could eject it?”

20And Jesus, He said to them, “Through your faithlessness. For amen! I say to you, if you should have faith as a mustard seed, you will say to this mountain, ‘You depart hence thither,’ and it will depart. And nothing, it will be impossible for you. 21And this kind it departs not if not in prayer and fasting.”

22And they, overturning in the Galilee, Jesus, He said to them, “The Son of Man, He is about to be surrendered into men’s hands. 23and they will kill Him and the third day, He will rouse.” And they distressed exceedingly.

24And they, having come to Capernaum, they came, those taking the drachmas, to Peter, and they said, “Your Teacher, He completes not the drachmas?”

25“Yes,” he says.

And when he entered into the house, Jesus, He preanticipated him, saying, “What, you, it seems, Simon? The kings of the earth, from whom do they take tributes or census? From their sons or from unfamilars?”

26He says to Him, Peter, “From the unfamilars.”

Jesus, He says to him, “Hence, the sons, they are exempt. 27And that not we should entrap them, having gone to the sea, you cast a hook, and the ‘having ascended first’ fish, you lift, and having opened its mouth, you will find a stater. That, having taken, you give to them for Me and you.”

 

Matthew 17:26

Thursday, 12 March 2026

Peter said to Him, “From strangers.”
Jesus said to him, “Then the sons are free. Matthew 17:26

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at the “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen)

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to
listen).

“He says to Him, Peter, ‘From the unfamilars.’ Jesus, He says to him, ‘Hence, the sons, they are exempt’” (CG).

In the previous verse, Jesus asked Peter what he thought. Do the kings of the earth take tribute and census from their sons or unfamilars? Next, we read, “He says to Him, Peter, ‘From the unfamilars.’”

It would be counterproductive and unkingly for a king to take any such collection from his sons. This is a precept that would be perfectly understood from their own Scriptures. At the time of their first king, Saul, it was seen that the son of the king would be exempt from such things, even if it was a son through marriage –

“So the men of Israel said, ‘Have you seen this man who has come up? Surely he has come up to defy Israel; and it shall be that the man who kills him the king will enrich with great riches, will give him his daughter, and give his father’s house exemption from taxes in Israel.’” 1 Samuel 17:25

The king was the one who levied taxes on the people. He was the one to take the people’s sons and daughters for his own household use, and for the army he established (see 1 Samuel 8:10-18). His own sons usually did serve in the military with him, but they were not obligated to the standard impositions placed on the people for the sake of his kingdom. Peter understood this. In response to this, we read, “Jesus, He says to him, ‘Hence, the sons, they are exempt.’”

A new word is seen here, eleutheros, unrestrained, meaning “to go at pleasure.” It is used in the sense of citizenship, where a person is not a slave. In this case, it means unrestrained from the burdens that support the king and his kingdom.

Jesus is making a point that Peter should clue into. If Jesus is the Messiah, He is God’s Son. Those who are His will belong to the household of God as sons. This is the point He makes in John 8 –

“Then Jesus said to those Jews who believed Him, ‘If you abide in My word, you are My disciples indeed.  32  And you shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.’

33  They answered Him, ‘We are Abraham’s descendants, and have never been in bondage to anyone. How can You say, ‘You will be made free’?’
34  Jesus answered them, ‘Most assuredly, I say to you, whoever commits sin is a slave of sin.  35  And a slave does not abide in the house forever, but a son abides forever.  36  Therefore if the Son makes you free, you shall be free indeed.’” John 8:31-36

If Jesus is God’s Son, and those who are brought into sonship with God through Him, then why would they pay for the tributes and census for the maintenance of the temple of His (and thus their) Father? Further, and a point that is not yet understood by the disciples, the temple is an edifice that pointed to Jesus. He is the fulfillment of everything the temple anticipated. Understanding these things puts the matter in proper perspective.

Life application: Jesus was born under the Law of Moses, a law He gave to the people of Israel. By subordinating Himself to the Law, He was required to be obedient to it. This included things that He was logically exempt from, but which required obedience to fulfill all righteousness. And this is what He said He would do at an early point in His ministry –

“Do not think that I came to destroy the Law or the Prophets. I did not come to destroy
but to fulfill.” Matthew 5:17

In His fulfillment of the law, including those things that He would normally be exempt from, such as the temple taxes, the law is annulled through Him for anyone who has
come to Him by faith. He becomes a son of God. And, as He said, “…if the Son makes you free, you shall be free indeed.”

However, being under law is not freedom. It is a mark of bondage to sin. As such, to reimpose the standards of the law upon oneself, it is a denial of sonship. It is as if the
person voluntarily excommunicates himself from a relationship with his Father in heaven. Paul explains this in meticulous detail in his epistles, especially Galatians. Those who come to Christ are not under law but under grace. Be sure to revel in the freedom by which Christ has made us free. Do not allow yourself to be brought back under the yoke of slavery, meaning law. It is an act of contempt for what God in Christ has done. Live out your freedom in gratitude for what He has done for us. This is what we are to
do!

Lord God, thank You that we are Your sons through faith in what Jesus has done. The pressure is off. We are free from the bondage of slavery to sin. Law no longer has authority over us! We can now revel in Your grace and goodness because of Jesus. Hallelujah and amen.

Matthew 17:25

Wednesday, 11 March 2026

He said, “Yes.”
And when he had come into the house, Jesus anticipated him, saying, “What do you think, Simon? From whom do the kings of the earth take customs or taxes, from their sons or from strangers?” Matthew 17:25

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at the “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen)

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“‘Yes,’ he says. And when he entered into the house, Jesus, He preanticipated him, saying, ‘What, you, it seems, Simon? The kings of the earth, from whom do they take tributes or census? From their sons or from unfamilars?’” (CG).

In the previous verse, Peter was asked if his Teacher paid the didrachma or not. The response is, “‘Yes,’ he says.”

Peter acknowledged that this is something Jesus did. The implication is that Peter had seen Him pay in the past, or that he was aware that Jesus paid any such obligation imposed by either the law or societal mandates without dispute. Otherwise, he would have answered “I don’t know,” or something similar. The simple answer speaks of Peter’s awareness of the matter.

However, that affirmative answer brings in a logical disconnect that Jesus will next address. He will do it in the form of a question to elicit Peter’s contemplation, followed by a response based on that. As such, Matthew records, “And when he entered into the house, Jesus, He preanticipated him.”

Here is a word found only once in Scripture, prophthanó, to get an earlier start of a matter. It is derived from pro, in front of or prior, and phthanó, to anticipate or precede. The archaic word preanticipate gives the proper sense. It is a word that bears redundancy. Jesus didn’t just speak before Peter did. He spoke of the matter that had just occurred before Peter could.

The previous verse noted that people talked to Peter about Jesus. It then said, “And when he entered into the house.” As Peter is the nearest antecedent, and the verb is singular (he entered), it means Peter went into the house.

At that point, Jesus, who was in the house and not present during the conversation between Peter and the collectors of the didrachma, was aware of their conversation. The unstated wording implies that Jesus supernaturally knew the contents of the conversation. With Peter in the house, Matthew next records, “saying, ‘What, you, it seems, Simon?’”

Jesus wants Peter to think through a matter. It is what any good teacher will do at times by stopping during a class and asking a question to help solidify an important point in the minds of the students. Jesus’ question is, “The kings of the earth, from whom do they take tributes or census?”

The first word, telos, has already been seen in a different context in Matthew 10:22. It refers to the point aimed at as a limit. In this case, it would be a tribute. Customs (used by some translations) refers to goods crossing international borders. A toll (used by some translations) is a duty on goods. This is a tribute, something paid to maintain peace or express loyalty to a ruler.

The second word, kensos, is the etymological root of our word census. It refers to an enrollment. In this case, the enrollment is one where the payment stands for the act of enrollment. In essence, it is the census derived from a census. Understanding this, Jesus questions further, “From their sons or from unfamiliars?”

Another new word is used, the adjective allotrios, not one’s own. It is derived from allos, different or else, and speaks of “not one’s own family.” A suitable word would be unfamiliar, being derived from un-familial, not relating to the family.

Jesus’ question is one intended to get Peter to think on two levels at the same time. He will think on the standard worldly level, but it asks Peter to also consider why Jesus would ask such a question and what his answer to them means based on his own proclamation made in Matthew 16:16, as well as what has transpired throughout Chapter 17, especially concerning the proclamation called out on the mountain in verse 5.

Life application: Older translations of this verse use the word prevent instead of preanticipate –

“He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying…” KJV et. al.

The word once meant to go before or precede. It no longer carries that meaning. Because of this, when reading an older translation, one will naturally assume that Jesus stopped Peter from speaking, forbidding him to say anything in order for Him to speak first. That is not the intent.

He did stop Peter from speaking, but Peter wasn’t forbidden from doing so. Rather, he had no chance to do so. The subtlety of difference changes the intent. There are good lessons we can learn from older translations, and there is, at times, a clarity that is not found in modern translations, such as pronouns that speak of more than one and others that speak of one only. For example, today the word you can mean singular or plural.

This is why it is always good to read lots of translations. If you are told to only read the KJV, you might, at times, be prevented from learning things properly. However, if you read it along with other Bibles, you might preanticipate problems before they cause confusion. You will be able to keep from making incorrect conclusions about what is actually being conveyed.

O God, what a fun world of delight it can be, sitting and thinking about all You have done in Your creation, in progressing through Your plan of redemption, and in contemplating those things as they are laid out in Your word. May we always consider You and what You have done and are doing as we live our lives before You. Amen.

 

Matthew 17:24

Tuesday, 10 March 2026

When they had come to Capernaum, those who received the temple tax came to Peter and said, “Does your Teacher not pay the temple tax?” Matthew 17:24

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at the “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen)

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“And they, having come to Capernaum, they came, those taking the drachmas, to Peter, and they said, ‘Your Teacher, He completes not the drachmas?’” (CG).

In the previous verse, Jesus told the disciples of His upcoming passion, causing them to be exceedingly sorrowful. It next says, “And they, having come to Capernaum.”

They had gone north to the area of Caesarea Philippi. Somewhere around there, maybe even Mount Hermon, where Jesus was transfigured. Having come down the mountain, they met the man with the demon-possessed son.

After that, Matthew noted that they were in the area of the Galilee. Now, Capernaum, His “seat of operations,” is where they have returned to. Having come here, it next says, “they came, those taking the drachmas.”

The didrachmon, a double drachma, is found twice in this verse but nowhere else. It is tribute money collected according to the Law of Moses. The word is derived from dis, twice or doubly, and drachmé, a drachma. That is derived from drassomai to catch. The idea is that of a coin held in the hand.

The collection of this coin is noted in Exodus 30 –

“Then the Lord spoke to Moses, saying: 12 ‘When you take the census of the children of Israel for their number, then every man shall give a ransom for himself to the Lord, when you number them, that there may be no plague among them when you number them. 13 This is what everyone among those who are numbered shall give: half a shekel according to the shekel of the sanctuary (a shekel is twenty gerahs). The half-shekel shall be an offering to the Lord. 14 Everyone included among those who are numbered, from twenty years old and above, shall give an offering to the Lord. 15 The rich shall not give more and the poor shall not give less than half a shekel, when you give an offering to the Lord, to make atonement for yourselves. 16 And you shall take the atonement money of the children of Israel, and shall appoint it for the service of the tabernacle of meeting, that it may be a memorial for the children of Israel before the Lord, to make atonement for yourselves.’” Exodus 30:11-16

Various forms of the Greek word didrachma are used 26 times in the Greek translation of the Old Testament when referring to the silver shekel. It is this coin that is now being referred to. That is why the general term “those taking the drachmas” is used. It was something everyone in Israel would have been aware of. Of them, it says they came “to Peter, and they said, ‘Your Teacher, He completes not the drachmas?’”

It is unknown exactly why this was asked. Some think that being a rabbi, He may claim exemption. Others suppose they were testing Him to see if He would meet the obligations as set forth in the law, and which Israel continued to mandate. Others suspect that the payment had become voluntary, but still expected, somewhat like a tip in a restaurant. The fact that the question is asked means there was doubt concerning Jesus’ willingness or presumed need to pay it.

Life application: In Exodus, the ransom money of the census in Israel was intended to make atonement for those brought out of Egypt. Notice how it says that the rich were not to give more and the poor were not to give less.

The rich man couldn’t walk up to the collector and say, “I am giving more in order to secure my own, better ransom.” The poor man could not feel that his atonement was of less importance than that of the wealthy man. And there is no stated provision for a man to pay for the ransom of another man. It is a tenet later written explicitly into Scripture by the sons of Korah –

“None of them can by any means redeem his brother,
Nor give to God a ransom for him—
For the redemption of their souls is costly,
And it shall cease forever—” Psalm 49:7, 8

The offering was equally binding on all, and thus its effects were equally realized in all. It is what saves them from the vengeance of God, which was sure to come on those who failed to make it, whether through pride, arrogance, or sheer neglect.

As for this silver, which in the Bible pictures redemption, in the Exodus account, it is directly equated to the blood of the Passover. The redemption of the lamb, and the ransom of the silver are intricately woven into one concept.

This silver was used in the construction of the tabernacle, for the sockets that supported the tabernacle, along with several other key items. The memorials of the Passover blood and silver ransom money brought to remembrance past deliverance, and they continued to remind the people of that state.

The redemption silver was used in the tabernacle construction to show us that everything about our redemption stands on Christ and is supported by Christ alone. Understanding that, it is something that applies to everyone equally. No person is more “saved” than any other, and no merit is found in anyone’s salvation. Christ did the work, while we accept what He has done by faith.

How wonderful is God’s unmerited favor!

Lord God, thank You that none of us can count on being more saved than anyone else, as if some of us will stand at the back of the line when brought to You. We all came to You in the exact same way, trusting in what Jesus has done to bring us back to You. Thank You that we know, with all certainty, that we are eternally saved through the precious blood of Jesus. Amen.