Daily Writing

Wednesday, 10 June 2026

But Jesus answered and said, “You do not know what you ask. Are you able to drink the cup that I am about to drink, and be baptized with the baptism that I am baptized with?”
They said to Him, “We are able.” Matthew 20:22

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at the “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen)

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“Answering, also, Jesus, He said, ‘Not you have known what you ask! Are you able to drink the cup, the ‘I, I am about to drink,’ or the immersion, the ‘I, I am immersed’ to be immersed?’
They say to Him, ‘We are able.’” (CG).

In the previous verse, the mother of Zebedee’s sons asked Jesus to grant that her two sons could sit on His right and left sides in His kingdom. In response, Matthew records, “Answering, also, Jesus, He said, ‘Not you have known what you ask!’”

As noted in the previous verse, a question like this can cause real problems for the one being asked. His mind will have to consider every contingency that may arise in the future, something such a spur-of-the-moment question will not normally allow.

Because of this, a tension arises between granting and not granting the request. In the case of Jesus, no such tension would arise. He would know and understand all future possibilities, including the negatives such a question would entail.

In this case, one of the immediate negatives is that the asker, not the one being asked, really has no idea what they (the verb is plural) are truly asking for. In the case of this question, Ellicott correctly states, “That nearness to Him in His glory could be obtained only by an equal nearness in suffering.”

It isn’t that they counted such a cost. Rather, they have no idea about such a cost. They think Jesus will be hailed by the people as the Messiah and Israel’s King, but there is not an inkling in their mind what He will go through for that to come about.

As this is so, these two men have actually put themselves ahead of Jesus. They are asking for a position in Jesus’ kingdom before He has gone through what is necessary to obtain that kingdom. It is true that their request is conditional on His securing the kingdom, but because of their ignorance of what that involves, it’s like saying, “Whatever happens that causes You to be king, we want to be there on seats with You when it is over.”

This is a natural human way of looking at things, and it is just what Jonathan did with David when he was set to become the king –

“And he said to him, ‘Do not fear, for the hand of Saul my father shall not find you. You shall be king over Israel, and I shall be next to you. Even my father Saul knows that.’” 1 Samuel 23:17

Jonathan assumed that the future was set by his words, but God’s plans and purposes must come to pass according to His will. Jesus, knowing what lies ahead in His ministry, hints that it will not be what these two men think, asking, “Are you able to drink the cup, the ‘I, I am about to drink’?”

The cup signifies one’s lot, good and bad. When one drinks from a cup of sweetness, the sweetness becomes a part of that person, invigorating him. When he drinks hemlock, it becomes a part of him, destroying his life. Jesus had come to deal with sin in humanity. Such a cup would mean God’s wrath on sin would be poured out. Israel sinned, and they received God’s cup of wrath –

“Awake, awake!
Stand up, O Jerusalem,
You who have drunk at the hand of the Lord
The cup of His fury;
You have drunk the dregs of the cup of trembling,
And drained it out.” Isaiah 51:17

Jesus’ cup would be sufficient to deal with all of the sins of humanity. Thus, it would be a terrifying cup of wrath and judgment. He continues, asking, “or the immersion, the ‘I, I am immersed’ to be immersed?”

Immersion signifies a change in direction and even in nature. John’s immersion was one of repentance, turning from sin and returning to the way of the Lord. Jesus’ immersion is found in the cross. It is the instrument of His immersion, going from life with God in Christ to immersion in death and separation from God for man’s sin.

These together, the cup and the immersion, were what Jesus was destined for. And they were not for His sake but for the world. Despite this, and having no clue what this meant, the brothers chimed in with words of confidence. Matthew records, “They say to Him, ‘We are able.’”

It is a noble and confident affirmation lacking any comprehension of what lay ahead for Jesus.

Life application: Imagine what God in Christ was willing to do to restore us to Himself. He was under no obligation to suffer the indignation, torture, and humility of the cross in order to restore us to Him. And yet, He willingly did it.

What value does God see in us? It is hard to figure but it is there. His infinite goodness meant setting aside His glory and taking on a frail, human form. And His humanity went through all the struggles and trials humans face. And then it went through more when He was judged for our sins.

If you feel you are lacking value, look to the cross of Christ. You have infinite value in God’s eyes when you accept the gospel and follow Jesus in faith.

Lord God, it is beyond our comprehension when we try to consider what the cross of Jesus truly signifies. It is the highest point of our existence when we to look and accept what it means. Everything changes from that moment on. Thank You, O God, for Jesus Christ our Lord. Thank You. Amen.

Tuesday, 9 June 2026

And He said to her, “What do you wish?”
She said to Him, “Grant that these two sons of mine may sit, one on Your right hand and the other on the left, in Your kingdom.” Matthew 20:21

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at the “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen).

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“The ‘Also He said’ to her, ‘What do you desire?’ She says to Him, ‘You said that they might sit, these, the ‘two sons of mine,’ one from ‘rights, You’, and one from ‘lefts, You’, in the ‘kingdom, Yours’.” (CG)

In the previous verse, the mother of Zebedee’s sons came to Jesus with her sons, kneeling before Him and asking a petition from Him. Matthew continues with, “The ‘Also He said’ to her, ‘What do you desire?’”

When put in a position like this, all a person can do is wait for whatever is coming. It is reminiscent of what occurred between the Lord and Abraham –

“Then the men turned away from there and went toward Sodom, but Abraham still stood before the Lord. ²³ And Abraham came near and said, ‘Would You also destroy the righteous with the wicked?’” Genesis 18:22, 23

Human beings have emotions and desires, wants and needs, and hopes and aspirations. Laying them before the Lord is one of the most common things we do. Jesus sees that what is being requested is obviously of great importance to them. With his question asked, “She says to Him, ‘You spoke.’”

The words mean she is asking for an authoritative statement to be made, essentially a declaration. Her request is “that they might sit, these, the ‘two sons of mine,’…”

She is asking for a decree to be made concerning her two sons. To sit in this case is not yet defined, but it means to hold a position. Israel “sat” in Egypt, the king “sits” on his throne, etc. A position is being requested. If it is made, it is something that will stand. People do this to other people, and it quite often puts them in a difficult position.

The reason for this is that a lifetime of contingencies may lie ahead that cannot be known at the time. Thus, when such a request is made, it can really put a person on the spot. As for the specific request, it is that “one from ‘rights, You’, and one from ‘lefts, You’.”

The plural, rights and lefts, is a way of expressing the totality of one’s side. This is common in Hebrew as well. But it is not unknown in English. We may say, “I am boxed in by my surroundings.” Such plural use gives a fuller sense than would be carried with a singular.

In this case, she is asking for her sons to sit in the fullness of Jesus right hand and left hand. The right hand is the preeminent position of honor, power, and authority. To be one’s “right-hand man” means he has full authority to exercise the superior’s will, just as Joseph had full authority over Pharaoh’s house.

At that time, Pharaoh said, “…only in regard to the throne will I be greater than you.” The left side is one step down in prominence. If the one on the right cannot fulfill his duty, the one on the left would assume it.  As for this place of authority, she is asking for, it is “in the ‘kingdom, Yours’.”

Jesus had said they were going to Jerusalem. He had made a statement that they did not understand, but it appeared the promised earthly kingdom was at hand, something that the nation fully expected when they hailed Him on Palm Sunday –

“Then those who went before and those who followed cried out, saying:
‘Hosanna!
Blessed is He who comes in the name of the Lord!
¹⁰ Blessed is the kingdom of our father David
That comes in the name of the Lord!
Hosanna in the highest!’” Mark 11:9, 10

Because of the nearness of what was anticipated, she has come forward now, seizing the moment in anticipation of her sons being Jesus’ chief men when that day arrived.

Life application: The sons of Zebedee have already been called “Sons of Thunder” by Jesus, as recorded in Mark 3:17. They had been a part of Jesus’ inner circle, having been invited to events that only they and Peter were privy to, such as the transfiguration and the raising of Jairus’ daughter.

It is evident from John’s gospel that Jesus had a special spot in His heart for John, even allowing him to sit next to Him at the Last Supper. Peter was impulsive and was openly rebuked by Jesus in Matthew 16. Thus, these two seemed like a logical choice to be Jesus’ chief men.

Though it may seem presumptuous to us, they probably felt that they had a right to their request already and wanted it solidified with their mother’s appeal.

In the end, they will get two distinct places of honor from Jesus. James will be the first apostle to die, while John will be the last. As such, they were granted special honor by Jesus in one way, even if it was not what they expected as they stood with their mother before Jesus.

Lord God, thank You for hearing our pleas, misguided as they may be. You know when to grant our requests and when they are inappropriate. Our hearts are opened to You, and we often are overzealous in what we desire. Thank You that You know what is best for us and respond according to Your wisdom. Amen.

Monday, 8 June 2026

Then the mother of Zebedee’s sons came to Him with her sons, kneeling down and asking something from Him. Matthew 20:20

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at the “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen).

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“Then she approached Him, the mother – the ‘sons, Zebedee’, with the ‘sons, hers’, worshipping and asking something from Him.” (CG)

In the previous verse, Jesus told the twelve about His coming passion and the resurrection that will occur on the third day. Matthew next records, “Then she approached Him, the mother – the ‘sons, Zebedee’.”

This would be Salome, as can be determined from two separate sets of verses –

“And many women who followed Jesus from Galilee, ministering to Him, were there looking on from afar, ⁵⁶ among whom were Mary Magdalene, Mary the mother of James and Joses, and the mother of Zebedee’s sons.” Matthew 27:55, 56

“There were also women looking on from afar, among whom were Mary Magdalene, Mary the mother of James the Less and of Joses, and Salome, ⁴¹ who also followed Him and ministered to Him when He was in Galilee, and many other women who came up with Him to Jerusalem.” Mark 15:40, 41

Some also place her as the sister of Mary, the mother of Jesus –

“Now there stood by the cross of Jesus His mother, and His mother’s sister, Mary the wife of Clopas, and Mary Magdalene.” John 19:10

This is possible, but Mark’s “many other women” means that it must remain speculation. Next, Matthew records that she came “with the ‘sons, hers’.” These are specified elsewhere, such as in Mark’s record of this event, as James and John –

“Then James and John, the sons of Zebedee, came to Him, saying, ‘Teacher, we want You to do for us whatever we ask.’” Mark 10:35

It is apparent that the request of James and John (as cited in Mark 10) is mingled with the actions of their mother. Whether they or she initially instigated the event, they were all aware of it and probably figured that Jesus would incline towards their appeal if it was made through their mother. Whatever the case, she came “worshipping.”

The word proskuneó, which has been seen ten times already, is used. It is a derivative of pro, to or toward, and either kuón, dog, or kyneo, to kiss. Either way, the sense is understood. It is like a dog that comes to the feet of a master or kissing the feet of a superior.

Thus, it implies a sense of worship. In conjunction with her humble prostration, it says, “and asking something from Him.”

Unitedly, they have a petition from Jesus. One can tell by the mother’s inclusion that is something beyond a regular request.

Life application: Of this event, Cambridge, who was obviously there at the time of Jesus, making a video of the event, says –

“St Mark begins ‘And James and John the sons of Zebedee came unto him, saying, &c.’ For once St Matthew is more graphic and true to detail than St Mark.”

I mean, how else could they state this unless they were on the same “See the Messiah” tour? The utterly ridiculous nature of their comment is indicative of some arrogant buffoon who has decided what must be true and what must be a fabrication in God’s word.

Without ever considering that the two accounts could easily be melded together into one scene, they have derided the word of God and claimed that one account is “superior” to the other. To say “more…true to detail” means that the other account is less true to detail.

Rather than such an arrogant and dismissive comment, John Gill handles the variance between the two with logic –

“These two disciples, having observed what Christ had said concerning the twelve disciples sitting on twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel, and what he had just related, concerning his rising again the third day, which they might understand of some display of his glory; and concluding from all this, that the setting up of his temporal monarchy was at hand, inform their mother of it, and move to her, to use her interest with Christ, in their favour: and which they did, partly to shun the envy and ill will of the rest of the disciples; and partly, to conceal their own pride and vanity; as also, they might think a request from her, on their behalf, would be more easily granted: accordingly, she agreeing to the motion, they all three came, as Matthew relates, and the mother is the mouth, and speaks for her sons; so that they may be said to make such a request by her, she representing them; or they joined in the petition with her; or as soon as she had made it, they seconded it, and made it their own.”

Be humble with God’s word. Don’t be arrogant or a know-it-all. Someday, you will have to stand before its Author and give an account concerning how you treated it.

Lord God, help us to remember to always handle Your word with respect and care. May we never diminish its sacred contents. You are God. Help us to accept Your word as trustworthy and reliable, seeking to understand the difficult parts with humility. To Your glory, we pray. Amen.

Sunday, 7 June 2026

and deliver Him to the Gentiles to mock and to scourge and to crucify. And the third day He will rise again.”  Matthew 20:19

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at the “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen).

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“and they will surrender Him to the Gentiles unto the ‘mock, and flog, and crucify’, and the third day, He will rise up.” (CG)

In the previous verse, Jesus reminded His twelve that in going up to Jerusalem, He would be betrayed to the chief priests and scribes who would condemn Him to death. He finishes this thought, saying, “and they will surrender Him to the Gentiles.”

Despite the chief priests and scribes condemning Jesus to death, they did not have the authority to crucify Him. As such, the gospels bear out that they went to the Gentiles to have the sentence against Jesus executed. Once in Gentile hands, however, there was more that would be expected. He was delivered “unto the ‘mock, and flog, and crucify’.”

For the first time, Jesus specifically notes the means by which He would be killed. It is a new word, stauroó, to impale. But that must be understood not as being pierced through the entire body, but through parts of the body, being affixed to something, such as a cross, pole, wall, etc.

In the case of Jesus’ coming crucifixion, there is a debate whether the cross He bore was only the lintel, which was then affixed to a standing tree or pole, or if He bore the entire cross.

One theory, clearly refuted by verses in the gospels, is that Jesus was affixed to a single stake. In such a case, His hands would be pierced above His head with His body hanging below them. However, Matthew 27:37 says that the accusation against Him was put above His head. Therefore, that is not how He was crucified. As for His death, which is certain when one is crucified by the Romans, Jesus says, “and the third day, He will rise up.”

This is stated in all three synoptic gospels. Jesus would rise on, not after, the third day. It is confirmed in Acts and the epistles as well. It is an important point that many miss, instead assuming that it was three days and then Jesus arose at the start of the fourth day.

Life application: Of Jesus’ words, it says in Luke –

“But they understood none of these things; this saying was hidden from them, and they did not know the things which were spoken.” Luke 18:33

Mark adds in another thought, saying, “But they did not understand this saying, and were afraid to ask Him” (Mark 9:32).

Jesus spoke the word concerning His passion directly to the men. He told them exactly what would happen. And yet they didn’t understand, and they were afraid to ask. If you have read the Bible a few times, you begin to realize there are things you just don’t understand.

This usually isn’t the case the first few reads through because most people cannot process all that is being thrown at them. Like hearing a song on the radio or learning a new language, it takes a bit of repetition to begin to understand the lyrics of the song or the variation of the words in a language.

The same is true with reading the Bible. After a few times through, distinctions in various accounts begin to show up. If this is the word of God, it is telling us something that is true, just like Jesus’ words to the apostles. And yet, we struggle with what is said.

Instead of feeling foolish and not asking, and instead of not wanting to bother God, as if He is too busy with other things, He is pleased with our wanting to know what His word is saying. And so, it should be natural to us to call out, “Lord, I don’t understand what is going on here. Show me what you are telling us in Your word.”

If you do this, you will often find that very soon after, you will read a commentary, hear someone talking about, or get led to another part of the Bible that exactingly explains what you were wanting to know. God is there, waiting for you to talk to Him. That is called “prayer.”

Prayer doesn’t need to be on your knees with your eyes closed and your hands clasped. It is communication between you and God in whatever manner establishes the link. From there, a sense of fellowship is established, and He gladly responds to your petition. That is, of course, if you are in Christ. If you are not, no reply should be expected.

But if you are in Christ, you are God’s child through adoption. Your heavenly Father is waiting for you to talk to Him. So open thy mouth, and speak. He will not be bothered at all.

Lord God, Your word is big and difficult for us to grasp when we first start into it. It continues to be that way as we dig deeper. But You gave it to us. And so, coming to You is the appropriate way to have it revealed to us. Help us to remember this and to seek Your face when we come to things we do not understand. Open our eyes, O God, to see wonderful things in Your word. Amen.

Saturday, 6 June 2026

“Behold, we are going up to Jerusalem, and the Son of Man will be betrayed to the chief priests and to the scribes; and they will condemn Him to death, Matthew 20:18

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at the “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen)

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“You behold! We ascend to Jerusalem, and the ‘Son, the Man’, He will be surrendered to the chief priests and scribes, and they will sentence Him – death.” (CG)

In the previous verse, it said Jesus was going up to Jerusalem. Taking His twelve disciples aside, He readied to speak to them, saying, “You behold! We ascend to Jerusalem.”

It is a fact they were aware of. Thus, the meaning is, “Something should be expected when we ascend to Jerusalem.” With that in mind, He continues, saying, “and the ‘Son, the Man’, He will be surrendered.”

This is the third time Jesus has spoken of this event. It is why He specifically said, “We ascend to Jerusalem.” What He referred to in the past will now be realized –

“From that time Jesus began to show to His disciples that He must go to Jerusalem, and suffer many things from the elders and chief priests and scribes, and be killed, and be raised the third day.” Matthew 16:21

“Now while they were staying in Galilee, Jesus said to them, ‘The Son of Man is about to be betrayed into the hands of men, ²³ and they will kill Him, and the third day He will be raised up.’ And they were exceedingly sorrowful.” Matthew 17:22, 23

The first time He spoke of this was just after Peter’s words, acknowledging that Jesus is the Messiah. The second time was shortly after the transfiguration. When they had come down the mountain, and the afflicted boy was healed, He told them of what was ahead. Now, in accord with His previous words, He confirms to them that the time has come. He will be surrendered “to the chief priests and scribes.”

These are the religious leaders of Israel. They would be the ones to make various decisions according to the Law of Moses concerning what should be done with transgressors of the law. Despite standing Jesus before their council and finding He had done nothing in violation of the law, Jesus notes, “and they will sentence Him – death.”

How could their Messiah and the Son of God, as confirmed before those two previous warnings, be sentenced to death? The disciples, despite hearing Jesus’ words, will be seen not to have understood Him at all.

Life application: How often do we hear someone say something and we don’t process it in the manner they intended? Later, when whatever they said comes to pass, we may say, “I thought you were joking” or “I just didn’t get what you were saying.”

This is common because we tend to hear what we want to hear. Unfortunately, we do this with God’s word as well. There are pastors, preachers, and teachers of the Bible who purposefully ignore the word, speak against it, or say it has an error.

When we hear this, we might say, “Those are really bad people. Look how they treat the word!” And yet, in our own doctrine or beliefs concerning the Bible, we may do exactly the same thing. Do we accept that the Earth is billions of years old? Then we are treating the Bible in the same manner.

Do we have a female Bible teacher or pastor? If so, we have rejected what God’s word says concerning such things. When we hear the story of Samson, do we say, “That is just an exaggeration” concerning something reported about him? What right do we have to make such a claim?

It is one thing to misunderstand what we are being told, but to block out the clearly spoken (and then recorded) word of God, we make ourselves the arbiter of what God’s word says. Of course, there must be a context to every passage in Scripture. If we are rightly handling the context, then the fault will lie with those who are not doing so. But when something is explicit and in context, we must accept what God has said.

It is important to have this attitude. Just because we don’t understand a particular issue, we should still work within the framework of what God has said, accepting it by faith as reliable.

Lord God, help us to have the right attitude concerning Your word, never second-guessing what is plainly stated for us. It may be that a translation is faulty or an analysis is wrong, so give us the wisdom to check those things out. But what is said that is plain and clear, may we accept it and apply it to our walk before You. Amen.