1 Corinthians (Written)

Thursday, 6 November 2014

For this reason the woman ought to have a symbol of authority on her head, because of the angels. 1 Corinthians 11:10

“For this reason” is referring to the hierarchy mentioned in verse 9. The covering mentioned earlier is a symbol of authority over the woman. Based on this statement, we can then interpret the meaning of “head” from verse 11:5 as “authority” and not the physical head. An example of this is found later in Paul’s writings in 1 Timothy 2:12 –

“And I do not permit a woman to teach or to have authority over a man, but to be in silence.”

This “covering” shows the authority placed over her and therefore what Paul writes in 1 Timothy is both explicit and expected. The modern church which is inundated with women pastors, preachers, teachers, reverends, and the like is therefore in willful disobedience of the word of the Lord. There can be no rewards for disobedience, and so the work they are doing, even if it brings others to Christ, will only bring self-inflicted loss.

Paul then explains this by saying, “because of the angels.” What exactly does this mean? There is no verse elsewhere in Scripture that explicitly refers to this statement. A search of several sound and notable Bible commentaries indicates the following:

“Thus would the apostle have the women appear In Christian assemblies, even though they spoke there by inspiration, because of the angels, that is, say some, because of the evil angels. The woman was first in the transgression, being deceived by the devil (1 Tim. ii. 14)), which increased her subjection to man, Gen. iii. 16. Now, believe evil angels will be sure to mix in all Christian assemblies, therefore should women wear the token of their shamefacedness and subjection, which in that age and country, was a veil. Others say because of the good angels. Jews and Christians have had an opinion that these ministering spirits are many of them present in their assemblies. Their presence should restrain Christians from all indecencies in the worship of God. Note, We should learn from all to behave in the public assemblies of divine worship so as to express a reverence for God, and a content and satisfaction with that rank in which he has placed us.” Matthew Henry’s Commentary on the whole Bible

“What this means, I do not yet understand.” The Geneva Bible

(In a lengthy discourse on the subject) – “I do not know what it means; and I regard it as one of the very few passages in the Bible whose meaning as yet is wholly inexplicable.” Barnes Notes on the New Testament

“…who are present at our Christian assemblies (compare Ps 138:1, “gods,” that is, angels), and delight in the orderly subordination of the several ranks of God’s worshippers in their respective places, the outward demeanor and dress of the latter being indicative of that inward humility which angels know to be most pleasing to their common Lord (1 Co 4:9; Eph 3:10; Ec 5:6). HAMMOND quotes CHRYSOSTOM, “Thou standest with angels; thou singest with them; thou hymnest with them; and yet dost thou stand laughing?” BENGEL explains, “As the angels are in relation to God, so the woman is in relation to man. God’s face is uncovered; angels in His presence are veiled (Isa 6:2). Man’s face is uncovered; woman in His presence is to be veiled. For her not to be so, would, by its indecorousness, offend the angels (Mt 18:10, 31). She, by her weakness, especially needs their ministry; she ought, therefore, to be the more careful not to offend them.” Jamieson, Faussett, and Brown

“The insubordination of women in refusing to acknowledge the authority of their husbands would offend the angels who, under God, guard the created universe (cf. Col 1:16; Eph 1:21), and know no insubordination.” The Wycliffe Bible Commentary

The commentaries from the Geneva Bible and Barnes above are probably the most honest commentaries on this subject, although they don’t help very much. Due to the variance of opinion on the matter, and the lack of direct scriptural links which actually support the statement, there is truly no harm in stating “I don’t know what this means.” However, the comment by Matthew Henry and the “evil angels” makes at least partial sense.

In the end, Paul knew what he was writing and the Corinthians at that time understood it. Because of this, we can trust that the statement “because of the angels” is valid in an of itself, even if it isn’t fully understood. It is a tenet which we can know is both sound and reasonable.

Life application: Even if we don’t fully understand “why” tenets are given in the Bible, or further – even if we don’t understand the explanation given for the “why,” if we understand the directive then we need to be obedient to that directive. Not understanding why something is directed is not an excuse to disobey the command.

Lord, I’ve come to the conclusion that I don’t completely understand the reason for some of the things You have told us to do in Your word. But I have enough sense to know that not understanding “why” isn’t a reason to be disobedient to You. You are God and I am man.

Maybe someday I will understand the “why”
But until then I will still comply

When You direct me in something, it is my duty to do it without question or complaint. All glory to You! Amen.

Wednesday, 5 November 2014

Nor was man created for the woman, but woman for the man. 1 Corinthians 11:9

Stated in concise form, Paul reiterates the thought of Genesis 2:18 –

And the Lord God said, “It is not good that man should be alone; I will make him a helper comparable to him.”

Man was not created for the woman, but rather “woman for the man.” Thus man has been given headship over the woman. And yet there is a benefit from the subordinate position. Because her true happiness is dependent on him, she has an entitlement to his care and protection. If one thinks of Christ and the church (as Paul is making this connection) then they can rightly see this. Christ will be pleased with His church when His church is in its proper subordinate position. When they follow His instructions and meet His plans as they are laid out, He has the onus to care for them as His word states.

The concept here is not one of tyrannical rule over a wife, but one of love, care, and protection. Women who cast off this model only prove themselves unworthy of all three of these points, just as a disobedient church will have its lampstand removed when it stands contrary to the Lordship of Christ (see Revelation 2:5).

Another point to consider concerning this verse is that it fully supports the notion of creation, not evolution. It further implicitly teaches short-term creation. In addition to countless other verses which people want to ignore or claim as allegorical, Paul acknowledges that humans were created; we did not evolve. If man was created, it was in a day and it was in the manner which the Genesis account states. Otherwise, Paul would have nothing to back up his statement in this verse.

Due to the logical progression of creation and the introduction of what is termed “good” in the creation account, the sixth-day of creation was one literal day. As the pattern is a literal day for the sixth day, then it would be a complete abuse of the text to assume that the other five days were not literal. Allegory schmallagory. The Bible’s proclamation of the events of Genesis are backed up by the words of the apostles, and more importantly, by the words of Christ.

Life application: There is nothing demeaning in the Bible concerning the roles of men and women and the hierarchy which is noted there. Instead, it is how God has ordained these things so that we can also understand the other hierarchies which exist. We don’t rule over Christ; He rules over us. If we get our levels of subordination out of order, only chaos will result. This is perfectly evident as western society has progressively thrown off the patriarchal family.

Lord, I cannot sit still when contemplating the wonders found in Your word and then comparing them to life around me. You created woman for man and what is more wonderful than that! You gave us different crops which produce a harvest at different times of the year to keep us busy and filled throughout the year. The trees put out their seeds, nuts, and cones at regular intervals so that the squirrels always have fresh food. The sun comes up at the right time and it sets in the right place. I could go on forever pondering the greatness of Your works. It is just as Your word says it should be. Truly You are glorious beyond measure! Amen.

Tuesday, 4 November 2014

 For man is not from woman, but woman from man. 1 Corinthians 11:8

The details of the creation of man and the subsequent creation of woman from man are recorded in Genesis chapter 2. They confirm points which are pertinent to Paul’s argument. Man was created first by God, directly from the dust of the earth. After this, woman was created for the help and benefit of man. Her creation came about from man, not from the dust of the earth. And her creation was not for her own benefit, but for the benefit of the man.

Three citations from that Genesis account will show this –

“And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living being.” Genesis 2:7

“And the Lord God said, ‘It is not good that man should be alone; I will make him a helper comparable to him.'” Genesis 2:18

“And the Lord God caused a deep sleep to fall on Adam, and he slept; and He took one of his ribs, and closed up the flesh in its place. ²² Then the rib which the Lord God had taken from man He made into a woman, and He brought her to the man.” Genesis 2:21, 22

It can be seen then that just as Eve stood in relation to Adam, all women stand in a general relationship to all men. In other words, there is order even in this issue which prompts thought and implies a hierarchy.

Life application: The Bible progressively reveals truths which are to be applied in a logical sequence in order to properly grasp what God is doing in redemptive history. Taking things out of that logical order will inevitably lead to disorder. For example, societal breakdown can be directly tied to not following the patriarchal system of family rule. When the father is removed from family headship, all of society suffers. Paying attention to what God has ordained will keep individuals, families, societies, and even the state of man on earth in proper functioning order and in a right relationship with God.

Wondrous heavenly Father, thank you for the sweetness of honey, the wonderful flavor of salt, the hot spices of peppers, the nourishing milk of the cow, and the delightful juice of the grape. Thank You for the immense number of fruits, the many types of grain, and the different flavors of fish and meat. Everything has been arranged to fill us with enjoyment and variety in order to get us to think through what a great and generous God You are. And so today, I want to acknowledge how grateful I am for all the wondrous flavors which excite my taste buds. And Lord, thank You for pistachio nuts too. Amen.

Monday, 3 November 2014

For a man indeed ought not to cover his head, since he is the image and glory of God; but woman is the glory of man. 1 Corinthians 11:7

The words thus far on this subject have been referring to the relation between women, men, and Christ as pertaining to the church, and order within the church. Now and for a few verses, they will refer to the relation between women, men, and Christ as pertaining to creation and order within creation. It is a switch to the concept of the woman in relation to the man who is created in the “image and glory of God.” For this reason, man should not cover his head.

This then is the answer to the problem addressed in verse 4. Because man is created in God’s image he should reflect that image when he is performing one of the two awesome duties of praying or prophesying. However, “woman is the glory of man.” This indicates her glory (it does not say “image”) is once-removed from God. Does this in any way contradict Genesis 1:27?

In that verse it says –

“So God created man in His own image; in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them.”

The answer is, “No, this is not a contradiction.” Paul only says woman is the “glory” of man. If “image” were implied in this context, the fact would still remain that woman is in the image of man and man is in the image of God. This would indirectly mean woman is in the image of God. We can see that Paul is carefully using his words to show that the creation account itself supports his directives concerning covering one’s head while praying or prophesying.

The Pulpit commentary once again describes the relationship quite eloquently –

“As moonlight is to sunlight, or as the earthshine is to the moonshine. Man reflects God; woman, in her general nature in this earthly and temporal dispensation, reflects the glory of man.”

Life application: Nothing demeaning or spiteful is flowing from the pen of Paul as he gives his directives for men and women in the church. Rather, that which is most glorifying to God is his intent. Because this is so, to reject his words is to deny God the glory which is intended for God in his words. Let us not be found in such an untenable position.

The words of the Bible are meant to show God’s glory
The directives found there are for that intent and aim
And so as we peruse the wondrous redemption story
Let us consider our actions as bringing glory to His name

When we stray from the words intended for us to follow
We then deny Him His just and rightful due
That is certainly a horrid pill to taste or to swallow
And so, to His word, let us be faithful and true

He will reward us in due time for adherence to His word
And nothing we do in His name will He overlook
And so in everything we do, let us glorify our Lord
By following the directives that have been given in His book

Lord, even if the whole world comes against me and cries out “tolerance!” towards sin, if Your word says otherwise, then I will stand on Your word. You have shown what conduct is acceptable and what is to be deplored and spoken against. But everywhere, people are caving in to societal pressure and towards that which is unholy and profane. Give me strength to endure even if it costs me my freedom or my life. Your word, O God, is my light and Christ is my true life. Amen.

Sunday, 2 November 2014

For if a woman is not covered, let her also be shorn. But if it is shameful for a woman to be shorn or shaved, let her be covered. 1 Corinthians 11:6

As seen in the preceding verse, there were instances noted in the Old Testament when a woman’s hair was to be shaved. Those instances were for specific purposes and not as a usual custom. Paul builds on that now. He noted that praying with her head uncovered is the same as if she were shaved and now he says if she isn’t covered, “let her also be shorn.” In the first half of this verse, Paul is giving a direction. If she is going to disregard the first, she shames her head (meaning the man under whose authority she stands). If she does this, then she should be shaved as a shame to herself.

In the second half of the verse, he notes that “if it is shameful for a woman to be shorn or shaved, let her be covered.” The intent is that because it is shameful (and presumably no woman would want to be shamed in this way) then she should cover her head to avoid the first shame (to her head, the man), which would result in the second shame (that of being shorn).

To shave the head is to “unveil” the head. What was given by nature as a covering and what serves as a fashion statement in women, is removed in the process of shaving the head. These natural traits are lost and that which is considered unnatural is what results.

What Paul is saying in this verse is not specifically a command, but rather it is an attempt to get his audience to think through to a logical conclusion what it means for a woman to pray or prophesy with her head uncovered. If she insists on this, then she also by default should insist that she be shorn (either explicitly or implicitly by her actions). And if she does this, then it implies that the concept of equality between the sexes does not actually apply in all cases. As Ellicott astutely observes –

“…it is illogical to argue in favour of any general principle as if it were of universal obligation, when you yourselves admit that it is not applicable in some cases.”

God has shown us in His word what is right and appropriate and he has shown that there is a hierarchy which exists and is to be adhered to. When it is violated, it upsets what is natural and proper. Unfortunately, many accepted principles of the New Testament are simply dismissed in today’s churches. This is especially true in churches which have deviated from the principles concerning propriety of conduct in regards to women. If these principles are ignored, then the floodgates of Scriptural deviation are opened wide. In essence, it is a rejection of Christ’s Headship over His church.

Life application: One cannot simply ignore verses or precepts which they don’t like without opening up a rushing torrent of bad doctrine. Every word of God has been given to instruct the people of God and thus a refusal to accept every word can only lead down one sorrowful path of eventual apostasy. It may take time, but it is the inevitable outcome.

O God, thank You for my time of prayer. Thank You for the quiet moments with You before I rise. It’s just You and me in close fellowship. Thank You for the prayers I share with You in the morning as the day gets started, for the prayers while I’m walking with You throughout the day, for the prayers that come while I work, and for the sweet time of prayer that we share over meals. Thank You O God for the time of prayer as I get into Your word, reading that treasured book. Thank You for the prayers I share with my fellow believers as we study Your word or fellowship at church. And thank You for the prayers which end my day, in the quiet moments alone with You before I fall asleep once again. Lord God, thank You for the ceaseless prayers I share with You! Moment by moment my life is spent communing with You. Thank You for this treasured time of prayer. Amen.