Exodus 23:1-9 (Justice, Justice You Shall Do)

Exodus 23:1-9
Justice, Justice You Shall Do

In the Gentile-led New Testament church, the words of Paul are our marching orders. They are where we are to get our doctrine and they are what we need to know in order to live rightly in this dispensation of time; the dispensation of grace.

The utter confusion of people concerning simple precepts like salvation by grace through faith without adding in works, eternal salvation, and the law being set aside in Christ are almost foreign to the multitudes who sit in churches around the world.

By understanding that Paul is where our doctrine comes from, we can then rightly know how to conduct ourselves at the point we are at now in redemptive history. Having said that, this doesn’t mean that we can’t learn anything from the law. Rather, the law shows us many wonderful precepts that we probably should follow.

Being in Christ means that we won’t be judged for not doing these things. Yes, the law is set aside in Christ. But they are still things which hold value for society and for our interactions with others. Today’s verses are literally filled with common sense items which, if adhered to, would alleviate many of the problems of our society.

Unfortunately, these precepts are all but ignored, especially by the people who need them most. The land is full of folks who either practice those things that they shouldn’t, or who fail to practice those things that they should.

These are matters of social and societal justice that we should do simply because they are the right thing to do. It is as if we have a debt to pay when confronted with them. So let’s pay what we owe for the sake of love…

Text Verse: “Owe no one anything except to love one another, for he who loves another has fulfilled the law.” Romans 13:8

As we go through these nine verses today, just ask yourself, “Is doing this thing that the people are being asked to do, or not to do, loving?” If it is, then do it – not for the sake of meriting God’s favor through deeds of the law, but for the sake of simply being the loving person Christ has called you to be.

This is the kind of common sense approach to the Bible that we need to hold fast to. If we say, “The law says” and then insist that everyone either does this “or else,” we’re being legalistic about a matter which has already been settled in Christ.

But if we say to ourselves, “This really is the right thing to do” and then we don’t do it, who are we hurting? The answer is pretty much everyone who is involved in the matter, including ourselves and our relationship with the Lord.

Let us act responsibly in our dealing with others. From time to time repeat the words “Justice, Justice you shall do.” I’ve been doing it for years and I’ve found that when I come to a situation that is tempting to me to do wrong in, those words pop right into my head and it prevents me from going any further.

God is the God of justice; being just is His very nature. And so let’s always attempt to imitate our glorious Creator by acting like Him. To define what it means to be just, we need to read His word where His justice is on prominent display. Yes, it’s all to be found in His superior word. And so let’s turn to that precious word once again and… May God speak to us through His word today and may His glorious name ever be praised.

I. Refrain from Evil (verses 1-3)

As I showed last week, and as I’ll remind you now, a chiasm spans the verses from 22:28-23:13. In chapter 22, Charles Ellicott stated –

“The remainder of the chapter contains laws which it is impossible to bring under any general head or heads, and which can, therefore, only be regarded as miscellaneous. Moses may have recorded them in the order in which they were delivered to him; or have committed them to writing as they afterwards occurred to his memory.” Charles Ellicott

At the beginning of his notes for Chapter 23, he continues with this same type of thinking –

“From Exodus 23:1 to Exodus 23:9 no kind of sequence in the laws can be traced; from Exodus 23:10 to the first clause of Exodus 23:19 there is, on the contrary, a certain connection, since the laws enunciated are concerned with ceremonial observance.” Charles Ellicott

This isn’t meant as a personal slam on Ellicott, but it does show that as God’s word is studied and built upon by scholars throughout the ages, we continuously get a better and clearer picture of the perfection of God’s word. Rather than being miscellaneous and with no sequence which can be traced, the chiasm shows beauty and harmony within these verses. They also show definite intent.

Exodus 22:28-23:13 – Help your enemy if his donkey/ox is in trouble
“Love your neighbor as yourself” (01/30/13)

a 22:28 shall not revile God
b 22:30 oxen and your sheep shall be with its mother seven days
c 22:31 “you shall not eat meat torn by beasts in the field”
d 23:1 “You shall not circulate a false report.”
e 23:3 not to show partiality to a poor man in his dispute.
x 23:4 enemy’s ox or donkey going astray, help him
x 23:5 donkey of one who hates you lying under its burden, help him
e 23:6 not to pervert the judgment of your poor in his dispute.
d 23:7 “Keep yourself far from a false matter;”
c 23:11 “and what they leave, the beasts of the field may eat.”
b 23:12 rest on seventh day, so ox and donkey may rest
a 23:13 no mention of the name of other gods

And so understanding that these words are purposeful and even marvelously arranged, we begin Chapter 23 at verse 1 –

“You shall not circulate a false report.

In these words is found an expansion of the ninth commandment –

“You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor.” Exodus 20:16

The words here are lo tissa shema shav – no spread a report false. The word tissa means “to lift up.” And so this would literally be translated as “not take up.” In essence, we get the mental picture of picking up a false report and putting it in our mouth.

The Greek translation of this passage says “You shall not receive a false report.” Thus it indicates the incoming action rather than an outgoing one. In all, this one word seems to be a favorite of translators to take the opportunity for inventing a new way of explaining it. Of the translations I referred to, the following words were selected –

“spread,” “pass along,” “raise,” “bear,” “give,” “utter,” “admit,” “publish,” “take up,” “receive,” “accept,” and “lift up.”

This shows the difficulty of deciding if the intent is to receive a false report or to put one out. However, Adam Clarke notes that –

“…the inventor and receiver of false and slanderous reports are almost equally criminal. The word seems to refer to either, and our translators have very properly retained both senses, putting raise in the text, and receive in the margin.” Adam Clarke

In other words, translators understand this word to indicate both receiving and putting out and so, the NKJV ingeniously uses the word “circulate” to show that it can be something coming in as well as going out. If one thinks of a mail processing machine, it receives in and it sends out. This seems to be the full intent of what is prohibited concerning the false report.

The word for “false,” or shav, here is used for just the third time in the Bible. The first two were in the giving of the third commandment. There it said –

“You shall not take the name of the Lord your God in vain, for the Lord will not hold him guiltless who takes His name in vain.” Exodus 20:7

We are not to hold the name of the Lord our God in vain, and we are not to vainly or falsely receive and disseminate a false report. This word, shav, comes from another word which carries the sense of desolating. And this is exactly what results from allowing false reports to continue.

Doing so can result in the most miserable of circumstances for the one who is falsely reported. When King Ahab wanted Naboth’s vineyard, his wife Jezebel had two scoundrels falsely charge him with blasphemy. In doing so, he was taken out and stoned to death.

Adam Clarke gives a good summary of what it would be like if people didn’t carry on with such false reports –

“Were there no publishers of slander and calumny, there would be no receivers; and were there none to receive them, there would be none to raise them; and were there no raisers, receivers, nor propagators of calumny, lies, etc., society would be in peace.” Adam Clarke

But in the world we live in, this is one of the most common of offenses. This is especially so today in the world with internet. People find every reason to pass on lies, knowing they are lies, for the simple purpose of destroying others. Internet trolls spend all of their time destroying others for no good reason at all.

But the Bible forbids this. Not only are we not to make up falsities, but we are to refrain from allowing them to pass through us. This idea of truthfulness in this manner is expanded on in Leviticus –

“You shall not go about as a talebearer among your people; nor shall you take a stand against the life of your neighbor: I am the Lord.” Leviticus 19:16

Penalties for such behavior are found in Scripture. One of particular note is given to protect the rights and the name of a woman who has been so maligned –

“If any man takes a wife, and goes in to her, and detests her, 14 and charges her with shameful conduct, and brings a bad name on her, and says, ‘I took this woman, and when I came to her I found she was not a virgin,’ 15 then the father and mother of the young woman shall take and bring out the evidence of the young woman’s virginity to the elders of the city at the gate. 16 And the young woman’s father shall say to the elders, ‘I gave my daughter to this man as wife, and he detests her. 17 Now he has charged her with shameful conduct, saying, “I found your daughter was not a virgin,” and yet these are the evidences of my daughter’s virginity.’ And they shall spread the cloth before the elders of the city. 18 Then the elders of that city shall take that man and punish him; 19 and they shall fine him one hundred shekels of silver and give them to the father of the young woman, because he has brought a bad name on a virgin of Israel. And she shall be his wife; he cannot divorce her all his days.” Deuteronomy 22:13-19

In agreement with this first clause in verse 1 are the continued words found in its second clause –

1 (con’t) Do not put your hand with the wicked to be an unrighteous witness.

Both clauses complement each other in intent. To put one’s hand with means “to join hands with.” In other words, it’s like making a pact where a person puts out his hand and the others put theirs together with him in agreement, like in a football huddle.

Some translations say “cooperate” or “join forces with.” Israel was told to not make such alliances with the wicked who would be untruthful in their testimony. Obviously what occurred in poor Naboth’s case shows the severity of this. He lost his life simply because two people falsely accused him.

The proverbs deal with this issue as well. There it shows that by making such an alliance, punishment is what will be expected –

“Though they join forces, the wicked will not go unpunished;
But the posterity of the righteous will be delivered.” Proverbs 11:21

As the Lord is the ultimate judge of all such things, even if a false witness isn’t caught in this life, he will receive his just punishment in the next. For the Christian who acts in this way, there will certainly be a loss of rewards at the bema seat of Christ.

In both clauses of this first verse of the chapter, the ninth commandment goes from the key point of the law to practical applications of it. Thus the Lord is further defining the intent of those majestic words lo taaneh bere-akha ed shaqer – You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor.

2 You shall not follow a crowd to do evil;

This clause of verse 2 can be taken in one of two ways. Both are sound and both apply as much today in principle as they did when they were penned. To “follow a crowd to do evil” means to join in with a crowd who is bent on evil because their popular voice.

The Latin phrase vox populi vox Dei, or the voice of the people is the voice of God, is often held to as being a reasonable way of handling disputed matters. However, it is a wholly inappropriate way of evaluating moral issues.

This concept translates into the modern thinking of “where morals come from.” Apart from the truth, which is that morals are derived from God, some believe that they are based on government standards. This is where we are today with the progressive democrat movement. To them, government sets morality.

Some say they should stem from personal mores. This would reflect the views of humanists who have decided that personal feelings dictate morals. Some say that morals come from social convention, and thus each society develops its morals as they grow and develop.

Others hold steadfastly to morals being derived from herd instinct. This would be those in the Baltimore and Ferguson riots and in the Occupy movement. They believe that the herd is the proper moral initiator and the one to continue refining their morals.

This is the idea of this verse. According to this law, where the crowd goes, if it is bent on evil, it is not to be followed. There are examples of the faithful in Scripture who refused to follow the herd. Job said –

“Have I feared the crowd or the contempt of the masses, so that I kept quiet and stayed indoors?” Job 31:34 (NLT)

Jesus taught specifically on this precept when He said these words for us to consider –

“Enter by the narrow gate; for wide is the gate and broad is the way that leads to destruction, and there are many who go in by it. 14 Because narrow is the gate and difficult is the way which leads to life, and there are few who find it.” Matthew 7:13, 14

Joseph Benson most eloquently states his view on this –

“We must inquire what we ought to do, not what the most do; because we must be judged by our Master, not our fellow-servants; and it is too great a compliment to be willing to go to hell for company.” Joseph Benson

What we are looking at in this verse is perfectly seen in the modern church and the homosexual movement. The crowd has gone down this unholy and immoral path and the multitudes of sheeple have followed along it as well. They have failed to realize that what is legal is not necessarily moral. They have followed the crowd and are headed to destruction.

As I said though, there is another view of these words which is equally proper. Instead of saying, “You shall not follow a crowd to do evil,” some scholars translate the word rabbim as “great men” instead of “crowd.” It can mean either, and this is a most common thing for people to do.

We see political leaders, rich people, or famous folks who are bent on pursuing evil. Our current president is the epitome of this, and yet people put in their hand with him to do evil possibly beyond anything that even Hitler or Stalin could have even imagined.

We are asked to not follow Arnold Schwarzenegger into the global warming debate just because he is wealthy and popular. We are to refrain from acting in agreement with the devil and his followers simply because they are supposedly great because of their position, possessions, or prominence. Job understood this –

“Great men are not always wise,
Nor do the aged always understand justice.” Job 32:9

2 (con’t) nor shall you testify in a dispute so as to turn aside after many to pervert justice.

Again, the word rabbim is used in these words and so it can mean either turning aside after many, or it can mean turning aside after great men. Either way, the idea is that justice is to be given by each of us in a dispute. Justice, justice you shall do.

We are not to turn from the truth whether it is the popular thing to do, or whether it will benefit us because a great man has already falsely testified and we could curry his favor or be saved from the power of his wrath.

The Pulpit Commentary even aligns these words with a panel of judges by saying, “…if thou art one of the judges, though shalt not simply go with the majority if it is bent on injustice, but form thine own opinion and adhere to it.”

Unfortunately, the judgment of judges has increasingly been found lacking in this precept. The reason for it is, of course the declining morals of our leaders. The left has done everything possible to destroy the moral underpinnings of our society even unto the point where the words of Job 9 ring true –

When a land falls into the hands of the wicked,
he blindfolds its judges. Job 9:24 (NIV)

The lessons of justice found within the law are given for the good of society and for the benefit of all within it. This goes from the greatest to the poorest of the land, and all in between…

3 You shall not show partiality to a poor man in his dispute.

This verse might be a bit of a shock to us considering the deference the Bible shows to the poor and needy as well as to the widow and orphan. However, what is right is right and justice is to be blind to the status of the individual. A poor man is never to be given a favorable, but unrighteous decision simply because he is poor.

As a brain squiggle for you, the word “poor” here is the adjective dal. It is the first time it is seen in Scripture. It comes from the verb dalal which means to dangle. By implication then a poor person dangles – he is lean, needy, and weak. Hebrew is vibrant and active in how it portrays such things.

Secondly, the word for “partiality” is hadar. This is the first of only seven times it will be used in the Bible. It essentially means “honor.” It is mostly used in man’s relation with man, as it is in this verse. In a comparable passage, we read this using the same word –

“You shall do no injustice in judgment. You shall not be partial to the poor, nor honor the person of the mighty. In righteousness you shall judge your neighbor.” Leviticus 19:15

Unfortunately, our nation has diverted from this sound precept. We began to defer in this exact manner when laws started to be passed simply because of the color of one’s skin, their sex, or their economic status. Each of these carries the same idea as the simple precept of showing partiality to a poor man.

Justice is to be blind in its decisions and no judgment is to be considered for any other reason than the matter at hand. Some European countries provide greater benefits for illegal immigrants than they do for their own citizens. Such unjust laws can only further degrade the morals of a society. They can in no way make things better.

The Bible lays a framework for man to consider and to learn from. However, we as a species would rather cast the proper way off from our shoulder and carry around the heavy burden of disobedience through injustice and all the ills that result from it.

In each of these first three precepts, we have been asked to refrain from evil. God wants justice served and His people to be free from the harms that come from engaging in that which is unjust. Justice, justice you shall do.

Treat others as you would have them treat you
This is the rule to you that I speak
Give to them when they are needy, this you shall do
And strengthen them when you see that they are weak

If one is lacking bread, would you hold back from them food?
If they are cold, give them a coat; show them compassion
Don’t withhold being polite and to them act so rude
Don’t hand out your help as if it is by ration

If you do these things, you will be living right
I will see what you have done and reward you
Nothing you do is hidden from My sight
And so justice, justice, yes justice shall you do

II. The Law of the Donkey (verses 4 & 5)

4 “If you meet your enemy’s ox or his donkey going astray, you shall surely bring it back to him again.

This verse and its application meet with a wide range of interpretations. However, if taken at face value it is rather clear. The word oyev or “enemy” isn’t further specified. This word is used to simply mean any enemy. The Pulpit Commentary unnecessarily finds a distinction here in who the “enemy” being referred to is. They say –

“A private enemy is here spoken of, not a public one, as in Deuteronomy 23:6.” Pulpit Commentary

The passage in Deuteronomy 23 says this –

“An Ammonite or Moabite shall not enter the assembly of the Lord; even to the tenth generation none of his descendants shall enter the assembly of the Lord forever, 4 because they did not meet you with bread and water on the road when you came out of Egypt, and because they hired against you Balaam the son of Beor from Pethor of Mesopotamia, to curse you. 5 Nevertheless the Lord your God would not listen to Balaam, but the Lord your God turned the curse into a blessing for you, because the Lord your God loves you. 6 You shall not seek their peace nor their prosperity all your days forever.” Deuteronomy 23:3-6

It could be that the Pulpit commentators were making their decision concerning public and private enemies based on the comparable passage to this verse from Deuteronomy 22 –

“You shall not see your brother’s ox or his sheep going astray, and hide yourself from them; you shall certainly bring them back to your brother. 2 And if your brother is not near you, or if you do not know him, then you shall bring it to your own house, and it shall remain with you until your brother seeks it; then you shall restore it to him. 3 You shall do the same with his donkey, and so shall you do with his garment; with any lost thing of your brother’s, which he has lost and you have found, you shall do likewise; you must not hide yourself.” Deuteronomy 22:1-3

In these verses, it speaks of the “brother’s ox.” Thus even if the “brother,” meaning a fellow Israelite, is an enemy, you are to make sure that he gets his animal back. However, if it belongs to a Moabite or an Ammonite, they weren’t under any obligation to return it. Other scholars have come to this exact conclusion.

However, it should be noted that no distinction between a public and a private enemy is given here, and eventually both Ammonites and Moabites entered into the people of Israel. Jesus descends from both people groups.

All that is noted concerning the wayward beast is that if a person sees it going astray, and even if it is belongs to an enemy – ha’shev tishivenu – “returning, you shall surely return it” to that person. This verse then is a germ of wisdom for us to understand Jesus’ words of Matthew 5 –

““You have heard that it was said, ‘You shall love your neighbor and hate your enemy.’ 44 But I say to you, love your enemies, bless those who curse you, do good to those who hate you, and pray for those who spitefully use you and persecute you, 45 that you may be sons of your Father in heaven; for He makes His sun rise on the evil and on the good, and sends rain on the just and on the unjust. 46 For if you love those who love you, what reward have you? Do not even the tax collectors do the same? 47 And if you greet your brethren only, what do you do more than others? Do not even the tax collectors do so? 48 Therefore you shall be perfect, just as your Father in heaven is perfect.” Matthew 5:43-48

If you notice, Jesus’ words say, “You have heard that it was said, ‘You shall love your neighbor and hate your enemy.'” The law never says this. It only says, “You shall love your neighbor.” Nowhere in the law does it say to hate one’s enemy.

Rabbinic tradition concluded that if one was instructed to love their neighbors, then obviously they were then to hate their enemies. However, this conclusion is not “obvious.” Rather, it is contradictory to the words of the verse we’re looking at.

The person may, in fact, be your enemy, but you weren’t to hate him enough to deprive him of his ox or donkey. Instead, you were to return it to him. Active kindness to one’s enemy may have been repugnant to the interpreter’s of the law, but it is the only possible explanation for this verse as context demands.

The spirit and intent of the law was so far removed from urging personal revenge or harm to one’s enemies that it wouldn’t even allow neglecting a wayward beast which would then cause that person to suffer personal loss. The Geneva Bible succinctly states –

“If we are bound to do good to our enemies beast, how much more to our enemy himself.” Geneva

5 If you see the donkey of one who hates you lying under its burden, and you would refrain from helping it, you shall surely help him with it.

The sense of this verse is plain and clear, regardless of the difficult nature of the Hebrew words and how they are ultimately translated. The reason I say this is that the word translated as “help” here is azav and it is used three times in this verse. It means “leave” or “forsake.”

Because of this, it takes thought to understand what is being said. But fortunately, there is also a comparable passage in Deuteronomy which helps explain what is being ordered –

“You shall not see your brother’s donkey or his ox fall down along the road, and hide yourself from them; you shall surely help him lift them up again.” Deuteronomy 22:4

Again, like before, the verse in Deuteronomy is referring to “your brother’s donkey” instead of the donkey of an enemy, but the principle remains the same. However, because an enemy is being referred to Keil explains the odd usage of the Hebrew –

“The peculiar turn given to the expression, “thou shalt cease from leaving,” is chosen because the ordinary course, which the natural man adopts, is to leave an enemy to take care of his own affairs, without troubling about either him or his difficulties. Such conduct as this the Israelite was to give up, if he ever found his enemy in need of help.” Keil and Delitzsch

For this reason, the word azav is first translated as “leave” in the sense of not leaving it in a helpless condition. Immediately after that, it then says azov ta’azov – “leaving you shall leave it,” but in the sense of removing it from its burden.

It is a sort of pun on the word to get the reader to understand that even though the conduct may seem contrary to normal reason, the Lord sees nothing contrary in the principle. The reason why this is important is because it is not the animal that is being focused on, but the relationship. Paul says this in the New Testament –

“For it is written in the law of Moses, ‘You shall not muzzle an ox while it treads out the grain.’ Is it oxen God is concerned about? 10 Or does He say it altogether for our sakes? For our sakes, no doubt, this is written, that he who plows should plow in hope, and he who threshes in hope should be partaker of his hope. 11 If we have sown spiritual things for you, is it a great thing if we reap your material things? 12 If others are partakers of this right over you, are we not even more?” 1 Corinthians 9:9-12

Paul says that the law’s concrete example of muzzling an ox is given as a spiritual picture of physical care for the pastor who does the hard work, laboring in his spiritual duties. Therefore, the precept of helping with an enemy’s donkey which is under a burden must carry a similar New Testament connotation of helping the enemy himself. Jesus uses a simple parable to show this truth –

“A certain man went down from Jerusalem to Jericho, and fell among thieves, who stripped him of his clothing, wounded him, and departed, leaving him half dead. 31 Now by chance a certain priest came down that road. And when he saw him, he passed by on the other side. 32 Likewise a Levite, when he arrived at the place, came and looked, and passed by on the other side. 33 But a certain Samaritan, as he journeyed, came where he was. And when he saw him, he had compassion. 34 So he went to him and bandaged his wounds, pouring on oil and wine; and he set him on his own animal, brought him to an inn, and took care of him. 35 On the next day, when he departed, he took out two denarii, gave them to the innkeeper, and said to him, ‘Take care of him; and whatever more you spend, when I come again, I will repay you.'” Luke 10:30-35

The Law said to help an enemy whose animal lay under a burden. Jesus explained that not only should we directly help our enemies, but he included the words, “he set him on his own animal.” It is not just that we are to relieve the burdens of our enemy’s animal, but we are to accept the burden of our wounded enemy upon our own animal, and then go beyond that as well with whatever help is needed. Justice, justice you shall do.

Again, the Geneva Bible gives a short clear comment –

“If God commands us to help our enemy’s donkey under his burden, will he suffer us to cast down our brethren with heavy burdens?” Geneva

Be kind to someone that I don’t like?
Why would I do such a thing?
Last year that guy stole my bike
And gave my own girlfriend a wedding ring!

Should I be nice to the person who always berates me?
Should I be the one to always turn the other cheek?
Look at my bruises, count all you can see!
People beat me up for being gentle and meek

Oh but if I can win some to the Lord
Through a calm and gentle attitude
It is better than them dying by His sword
And being cast into the fiery infinitude

Help me in this Lord; it’s contrary to all I know
But I can do it with Your Spirit; surely this is so

III. I Will Not Justify the Wicked (verses 6-9)

6 “You shall not pervert the judgment of your poor in his dispute.

Again, this is a clear and concise statement. However, for a fuller understanding of what is being said, it is important to note that a different word is used here for “poor” than in verse 3. There it was the word dal; here it is the word evyon. This is the first time it is used in the Bible. It means “needy.”

Verse 3 focused on not showing favoritism to the poor. Being poor can be a relative thing. We have poor in America that have cars, cell phones, cable TV, and the like. We also have the needy in America. They are lacking those things, and they are lacking the basics too.

To pervert the judgment of the needy seems like a minor thing, but it is truly kicking one when they are down. It is both cruel and inhumane. The law forbade this. Unfortunately, Israel failed to conduct themselves in the manner prescribed here. One example is found in Jeremiah 5 –

“They have grown fat, they are sleek;
Yes, they surpass the deeds of the wicked;
They do not plead the cause,
The cause of the fatherless;
Yet they prosper,
And the right of the needy they do not defend.” Jeremiah 5:28

7 Keep yourself far from a false matter;

This verse appears similar to verse 1, but that was dealing with receiving and passing on false testimony as a witness. This verse is dealing with receiving false testimony for judgment. The judge is to never pervert justice by receiving a false matter. If he does, it could mean life or death…

7 (con’t) do not kill the innocent and righteous.

When false testimony is received and knowingly acted upon, it may result in the death of the innocent and righteous. If this were to happen, it would be a case of judicial murder. As the judge is the law of the land, then their judgment will be handled elsewhere…

7 (con’t) For I will not justify the wicked.

These words are interpreted in two ways. The first is that the Lord promises that He will not justify the judge himself who has been commanded to not act in this contrary manner, and yet has done so by rendering a false sentence against the innocent.

As terrible as this crime is to be considered, it is not one which has been ignored in history. Far too often judges are willing to overlook the value of human life for whatever gain they believe they will obtain. But the Lord has promised to not overlook their offenses.

The second way this is viewed is that it means, “To be cautious of inflicting capital punishment on one whose guilt was not clearly proved. A doubtful case was rather to be left to God Himself, who would ‘not justify the wicked….'” (Barnes)

Although this is a minority view, it is possible because the judge had the option of going to the priests to determine guilt. Such a case is found in 1 Samuel 14 in a dispute about who was guilty of violating an oath. King Saul was determined to have the offender killed and consulted the lots to determine who it was.

8 And you shall take no bribe,  for a bribe blinds the discerning and perverts the words of the righteous.

The shokhad, or “bribe” is mentioned for the first two times here in the Bible in this verse. It can mean a gift or a reward, but it implies a bribe or a means of obtaining a favor. The Old Testament is rife with examples of bribes being used to pervert justice, and it is one of the singular reasons for the destruction of Jerusalem and the captivity of the people –

“Now hear this,
You heads of the house of Jacob
And rulers of the house of Israel,
Who abhor justice
And pervert all equity,
10 Who build up Zion with bloodshed
And Jerusalem with iniquity:
11 Her heads judge for a bribe,
Her priests teach for pay,
And her prophets divine for money.
Yet they lean on the Lord, and say,
“Is not the Lord among us?
No harm can come upon us.”
12 Therefore because of you
Zion shall be plowed like a field,
Jerusalem shall become heaps of ruins,
And the mountain of the temple
Like the bare hills of the forest.” Micah 3:9-12

Sadly, if the Lord is to look upon our nation and judge us in equal measure, there will be little left when He is done. Our political leaders have gotten fat off of bribes, either directly or through campaign money, and have completely perverted the justice of the people.

Uncontrolled power, wonton avarice, and ever more ill-gotten money are the very foundation of our political system. With the introduction the false global-warming agenda, it has now moved into a united effort by the leaders of the world to corrupt justice for the masses. It will only continue to get worse as the world moves closer and closer to the tribulation period.

9 “Also you shall not oppress a stranger,

This verse is very similar to Exodus 22:21 –

“You shall neither mistreat a stranger nor oppress him, for you were strangers in the land of Egypt.” Exodus 22:21

The word for oppress is lakhats, which means to distress. It comes from a word which signifies pressure. Because this section is speaking of justice and judicial righteousness, it is referring less to physical abuse than to societal abuses on foreigners, especially in legal matters. This seems evident from our final words of the day…

*9 (fin) for you know the heart of a stranger, because you were strangers in the land of Egypt.

“For you know the heart of a stranger.” The people of Israel were physically mistreated, but that was only a part of their oppression. They were also stripped of their justice; something that would have struck them not on their backs, but in their hearts.

Their time in Egypt was to be used as a point of reference for their conduct towards the strangers among them. Denying the stranger, meaning the foreigner among them, was so much on the mind of the Lord that He had it included in the verbal pronouncements of the curses against the people in Deuteronomy 27.

To deny the stranger justice was, and therefore still is, something that is on the Lord’s mind. To take advantage of a foreigner because they are a foreigner is to incur the wrath of God. This does not mean that foreigners are to be exempt from the laws which have been set up in a land. Rather, this is speaking of their treatment and their rights within those laws.

And in a comparable spiritual manner, we can look at Paul’s words in the book of Ephesians to see that we have a dual duty in this regard. Yes, we are to treat the non-citizen strangers among us rightly, but how much more should we treat the spiritual strangers properly as well.

Paul says that before coming to Christ, we Gentiles were also strangers, but now we are citizens –

“Therefore remember that you, once Gentiles in the flesh—who are called Uncircumcision by what is called the Circumcision made in the flesh by hands— 12 that at that time you were without Christ, being aliens from the commonwealth of Israel and strangers from the covenants of promise, having no hope and without God in the world. 13 But now in Christ Jesus you who once were far off have been brought near by the blood of Christ.” Ephesians 2:11-13

It is now incumbent on us to render the same level of justice to those who are still strangers from the covenant of promise. The law, in its entirety, is given to show us deeper spiritual truths. As we walk among those who are not in Christ, let us remember to be ready to accept them into these great covenant promises that we now enjoy. Justice, justice you shall do.

Let us not deprive them of the justice that God has handed out to the nations through the giving of His Son. Let me give you some verses to think on and remember so that when you come across a foreigner to the faith, you will know how to tell them about their ticket to heavenly citizenship…

Closing Verse: “My brethren, do not hold the faith of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Lord of glory, with partiality. 2 For if there should come into your assembly a man with gold rings, in fine apparel, and there should also come in a poor man in filthy clothes, 3 and you pay attention to the one wearing the fine clothes and say to him, “You sit here in a good place,” and say to the poor man, “You stand there,” or, “Sit here at my footstool,” 4 have you not shown partiality among yourselves, and become judges with evil thoughts?” James 2:1-4

Next Week: Exodus 23:10-19 Wonderful pictures of Christ these verses tell (Set Times and Feasts for Israel) (63rd Exodus Sermon)

The Lord has you exactly where He wants you. He has a good plan and purpose for you. Even if a deep ocean lies ahead of You, He can part the waters and lead you through it on dry ground. So follow Him and trust Him and He will do marvelous things for you and through you.

Justice, Justice You Shall Do

You shall not circulate a false report
Do not put in with the wicked your hand
To be an unrighteous witness either in or out of court
This is what to you I do command

You shall not follow a crowd to do evil
Nor shall you testify in a dispute
So as to turn aside after many to pervert justice
No, to another justice you shall not dilute

You shall not show partiality to a poor man in his dispute
As if his name were considered of less repute

If you meet your enemy’s oxOr his donkey going astray
You shall surely bring it back to him again
I am showing you the good and honest way

If you see the donkey of one who you he does disdain
Lying under its burden, this to you I submit
And if you would from helping it refrain
You shall surely help him with it

You shall not pervert the judgment, such as in a lawsuit
|Of your poor in his dispute

Keep yourself far from a false matter
Do not kill the righteous and innocent
For I will not justify the wicked
Never in such a contrary incident

And you shall take no bribe
For a bribe blinds the discerning
And perverts the words of the righteous
For justice you shall always be yearning

Also you shall not oppress a stranger
For you know the heart of a stranger, this is so
Because you were strangers in the land of Egypt
Their oppression from you I will not accept, you now know

Justice, justice we shall do
For this is how God would have us so act
To be like Him, merciful and true
To never state what is false, but only speak what is fact

In this we will be pleasing in His sight
And follow the path of our Lord Jesus
Who never strayed from what is right
And who though His death has justified us

For this we praise You, our King of glory
For You have written our names in Your gospel story

Hallelujah and Amen…

Galatians 1:10

DSC02541

Sunday, 7 February 2016

For do I now persuade men, or God? Or do I seek to please men? For if I still pleased men, I would not be a bondservant of Christ. Galatians 1:10

Paul begins this verse with the Greek arti gar – “For now.” The use of the adverb arti, rather than the more common word for now, nun, is used to indicate “here-and-now; exactly now, in the immediate present” (HELPS Word Studies). James Strong says that it indicates to “draw close together.” For this reason, these words of Paul are probably not speaking of his former life in Judaism which is just now being contrasted with his conduct in Christ. He has been converted for almost a quarter of a century at this point.

Rather, he is making an immediate connection with the words he just expressed –

“As we have said before, so now I say again, if anyone preaches any other gospel to you than what you have received, let him be accursed.”

The “right now” attitude which he is expressing gives the thought of, “It is necessary to leave off with my usual way of greeting a church in my letter and to be stern and direct. If the matter weren’t so urgent, I would give a happy and friendly greeting. However, at this time, the matter is so urgent that it is just not possible.”

The urgency has prompted him to simply open the letter and move directly into a curse upon those would attempt to “persuade men.” The word “persuade” is not the intent here, though. It is better translated as “seek approval of.” Paul is concerned about the Galatians looking for the approval of the false apostles; something he was completely unwilling to do. In contrast, he would rather seek God’s approval than that of any man.

In addition to seeking approval, he next asks, “Or do I seek to please men?” The false apostles were doing just that. If they were seeking to please God, they would hold fast to the true gospel of Jesus Christ – salvation by grace through faith. Instead, they were seeking to please men through the observance of matters of the law; a law which was set aside by the work of Christ. This leads directly to his final proclamation of this verse –

“For if I still pleased men, I would not be a bondservant of Christ.”

Paul had come out of the Old Testament system; the Law of Moses. This was certainly displeasing to those who were still under it. But that law was fulfilled. It was annulled, it was set aside, and it was nailed to the cross. If he were a men-pleaser, he would still be pursuing works of the law, and he would still be teaching others to do those works – “Don’t eat!” “Don’t touch!” “Observe the Sabbath!” “Get circumcised!”

But because Christ had fulfilled those and established a New Covenant of grace, Paul determined that he would “be a bondservant of Christ” rather than under the bondage of the law. He had a new Master and his face was set on pleasing Him. There is only one choice that is set before man – either please men though some type of work and thus reject Christ, or follow Christ and willingly receive what He has done, putting aside the works of the flesh.

Life application: Galatians is given to show us the utter severity of not receiving and adhering to the finished work of Christ. It is only though a complete submission to Him that we can be saved. We must realize that there is NO WORK which we can do in order to please God except to receive the completed work of His Son. This is why Jesus said, “This is the work of God, that you believe in Him whom He sent.” John 6:29

Heavenly Father, help us to get our thinking straight. If Jesus died in fulfillment of the law, then the law is fulfilled. If we return to deeds of the law in an attempt to be acceptable to You, then we have rejected what You have already done and have set out to seek our own righteousness. Was the cross that meaningless to us? No! Help us to understand that we stand justified by faith in Christ alone. I put my hope in His work alone! Amen.

 

Galatians 1:9

DSC02540

Saturday, 6 February 2016

As we have said before, so now I say again, if anyone preaches any other gospel to you than what you have received, let him be accursed. Galatians 1:9

There is a great divide between scholars concerning the words, “As we have said before.” Because of Paul’s seemingly great surprise at what has transpired in Galatia (read verse 6 to see this), it seems to some scholars that it is unlikely he had any idea that this turning away from the truth so quickly would have been possible. Therefore, the “before” appears to be speaking about the preceding sentence (read verse 8 to see this). In other words, “before” indicates the substance of verse 8 and what he says in verse 9 is a repetition for stress.

However, other scholars look to the structure of this verse and adamantly suppose that he is speaking of a previous warning which is not recorded elsewhere. Vincent’s Word Studies, for example, state –

“Not to be referred to the preceding verse, since the compound verb would be too strong, and now in the following clause points to an earlier time, a previous visit.”

What seems the most likely is that the first case is correct. The incredulity of Paul in the opening verses of his letter appears to indicate that he was taken completely by surprise by what has transpired. The repetition for stress is a common means of expression found throughout the Bible.

In Exodus 25, the Lord describes the construction of the ark of the testimony. In verse 16, He then says, “And you shall put into the ark the Testimony which I will give you.” Then, just a few verses later, after describing the mercy seat, He repeats the thought with, “You shall put the mercy seat on top of the ark, and in the ark you shall put the Testimony that I will give you.” This is seen again and again in Scripture. It is a grammatical device called parallelism. It is a repetition for emphasis.

The Lord used this type of repetition as well –

“Assuredly, I say to you, whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven.
19 “Again I say to you that if two of you agree on earth concerning anything that they ask, it will be done for them by My Father in heaven. 20 For where two or three are gathered together in My name, I am there in the midst of them.” Matthew 18:18-20

The substance of the words changes a bit, as it does now from Paul’s pen, but the intent of the words, with their accompanying emphasis, remains the same. The changes in Paul’s words are of substance, but not of intent –

8 – But even if we, or an angel from heaven, (the absolute negation of anyone after the original)
9 – As we have said before (speaking of the original)

9 – so now I say again (emphasis)

8 – preach any other gospel to you (from the absolute negation of anyone else)
9 – if anyone preaches any other gospel (who would dare!)

8 – than what we have preached to you, (what Paul originally preached)
9 – to you than what you have received, (what they received from Paul)

8 – let him be accursed. (stated penalty)
9 – let him be accursed. (stated penalty)

Life application: If you come across difficult passages in Scripture, there is a whole host of sound resources that you can refer to for an explanation of them. If these scholars are at polar opposites concerning a conclusion, then you must refer to your own knowledge of Scripture in order to make the best possible conclusion concerning the issue. The more familiar you are with the rest of Scripture, the better chance you will have of coming to the correct conclusion. Also, making diagrams and comparisons of what is being analyzed may help in the decision making process.

How marvelous, O Lord, is Your name in all the earth! You have set our earthly home in the most wonderful spot. It turns around each day, lighting one side and then the other. The sun rises and it also sets. The moon waxes full and it wanes to a beautiful crescent of sliver. Tides rise, and the fish are abundant. Tides ebb, and crabs are there to do what crabs do. There is harmony and there is wisdom on display, and everything is as it should be. How marvelous, O Lord, is Your name in all the earth. Amen.

 

 

Galatians 1:8

DSC02539

Friday, 5 February 2016

But even if we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel to you than what we have preached to you, let him be accursed. Galatians 1:8

Paul now makes a most direct statement, asking his audience to think the words through carefully and with all of the weight of what they imply bearing over them. “But” is set against the words of the previous verses which said –

“I marvel that you are turning away so soon from Him who called you in the grace of Christ, to a different gospel, 7 which is not another; but there are some who trouble you and want to pervert the gospel of Christ.”

What Paul will write concerning delivering a “different gospel” is exactly what the Judaizers had done. However, their actions will now be placed in comparison to other categories which bear even more weight and authority than they supposedly possessed. This comparison will draw out the enormity of the sin which they bear for their false gospel.

“But even if we” is Paul’s way of saying, “If I or any other true apostle.” Those who were commissioned by Christ Jesus personally were the ones entrusted with the gospel message. They were the highest authorities in humanity concerning this precious trust which had been delivered to them. This is the first comparison and it is something that would seem unimaginable to occur. And yet, in verse 2:11, something will arise which could almost be considered in line with this impossible-to-imagine scenario. When it does, Paul will note his actions to correct the situation.

From this human level of authority, Paul next raises the bar by saying, “or an angel from heaven.” We might be able to conceive that a man would presume to preach “another gospel,” but surely not so awesome an authority as an angel from heaven! And yet, Paul’s words echo down through the ages, even to our modern times, as a warning against the tricks of the devil as he sends his demons, masquerading as heavenly angels, in order to pervert the gospel.

The religion of Islam was supposedly given to Muhammad by the angel Gabriel. It is a religion which is contrary to Christianity and is a “different gospel” for sure. Mormonism began by a supposed visit to Joseph Smith by the angel Moroni. Mormonism is likewise contrary to the truth of the gospel of Jesus Christ. Other false teachers such as Ellen G. White of the 7th Day Adventists have claimed heavenly visions and have, in turn, perverted the truth of the true gospel. The list is not a short one and it is to be warred against by those who hold to the truth of the gospel.

And what is it that Paul warns against concerning these false apostles and false heavenly visitors? It is that they will “preach any other gospel to you than what we have preached to you.” There is one gospel message. Jesus Christ has come in the flesh; He was born under the law; He lived out that law perfectly; and He died in fulfillment of that same law. In His death, the Law of Moses was annulled and in its place came a New Covenant. The proof of this gospel is that Christ rose from the dead, prevailing over death.

Paul clearly defines the gospel he preaches in 1 Corinthians 15 –

“Moreover, brethren, I declare to you the gospel which I preached to you, which also you received and in which you stand, 2 by which also you are saved, if you hold fast that word which I preached to you—unless you believed in vain.
3 For I delivered to you first of all that which I also received: that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, 4 and that He was buried, and that He rose again the third day according to the Scriptures, 5 and that He was seen by Cephas, then by the twelve. 6 After that He was seen by over five hundred brethren at once, of whom the greater part remain to the present, but some have fallen asleep. 7 After that He was seen by James, then by all the apostles. 8 Then last of all He was seen by me also, as by one born out of due time.” 1 Corinthians 15:1-8

Christ is the fulfillment of the law and a New Covenant has been established through His shed blood. It is a covenant of grace. No works of any kind are to be added into the gift which He offers. To pervert this gospel is to say that what He did was insufficient for salvation. In essence, it is to say, “I don’t trust Christ to fully save me.” It is a slap in God’s face and it is the greatest of heresy. For such a false message, Paul says to “let him be accursed.”

Whether it is an apostle or even an angel from heaven who proclaims any different gospel, the pronouncement is the same. The word “accursed” or anathema in Greek means to be “devoted to God.” In this case, it is to be taken in a negative way. Such a person is to be devoted to the curse of God as set apart for destruction.

Life application: Today, many people are following the “Hebrew Roots Movement.” Although this sounds great because Jesus was a Jew and it’s always good to know the background of any issue, they have taken it to dangerous extremes – reinserting the law and mandating that followers of Christ live as He lived – as a Jew under the Law of Moses. This is heresy and it is exactly what Paul agues against. Why would anyone want to go back under the bondage of the law instead of trusting in the grace of Christ? The reason is that they do not trust in the finished work of Christ. This, and any other perversion of the true gospel, is exactly what Paul condemns. Don’t get swallowed up in such heresies. The law is fulfilled; we are under grace.

Heavenly Father, thank You for the finished work of Jesus. What could we add to what He has done? Help us to trust that when He said, “It is finished,” it means that this is so. May we never reintroduce precepts from the law, which is now annulled through His work, and thus set aside the grace You offer though Him. Help us to trust the pure and undefiled gospel. Thank You for the finished work of Jesus. Amen.

 

 

Galatians 1:7

DSC02537

Friday, 4 February 2016

…which is not another; but there are some who trouble you and want to pervert the gospel of Christ. Galatians 1:7

The NKJV wisely departs from the older KJV in their translation of verses 6 and 7. Notice the difference between the two –

I marvel that you are turning away so soon from Him who called you in the grace of Christ, to a different gospel, 7 which is not another; but there are some who trouble you and want to pervert the gospel of Christ. NKJV

I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel: Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ. KJV

Two entirely different words are translated as “another” by the KJV. The first is héteros – another (of a different kind). This stands in contrast to állos (“another of the same kind”). The KJV confuses this. Should verse 6 be cited alone, which is not an uncommon thing for people to do, there could be a misunderstanding of what Paul is saying. Thankfully, there are other versions one can refer to in order to get a fuller meaning of the intent of what is being said.

His words show us that what was presented to the Galatians by the Judaizers was a “different” gospel which was no gospel at all. He is so adamant against these people who are bringing in their false message that he calls them hoi tarassontes – “the troublers.” They are especially troublesome and are to be utterly rejected. There is one message of the good news found in Jesus Christ, and that is His fulfilling the law and then annulling it through His sacrifice on Calvary.

Paul notes in Romans 7:2, “For the woman who has a husband is bound by the law to her husband as long as he lives. But if the husband dies, she is released from the law of her husband.” In this, he was using a real-life example to make a spiritual point about the law. In his continued explanation he then says in verse 7:6, “But now we have been delivered from the law, having died to what we were held by, so that we should serve in the newness of the Spirit and not in the oldness of the letter.”

In other words, the gospel is that of grace. Christ fulfilled the law on our behalf and then He died, thus annulling the law (Hebrews 7:18) for all who believe in the sufficiency of His work. This is the gospel message. The Judaizers had come to the Galatians and were proposing a “different gospel” which was based on works of the law. This will be seen as we continue. It is these wicked people who Paul speaks of with the words, “but there are some who trouble you and want to pervert the gospel of Christ.”

The word Paul uses for “pervert” is metastrephó. It indicates a complete turning from one thing to another. To understand its sense, read the words of Acts 2:20 which use the same word –

“The sun shall be turned into darkness,
And the moon into blood,
Before the coming of the great and awesome day of the Lord.”

The change in the sun is complete, from light to darkness. This is what happens when works of the law are reintroduced into the grace of Christ: something entirely different results; something which can only bring condemnation to those who pursue it.

Life application: Paul lays out, in advance of directly making his charges against the Judaizers, the enormity of the error which has come to Galatia. It is an error which continues on today when any precept of the Law of Moses is reintroduced into the Gospel of grace of Jesus Christ. Paul will use circumcision as the benchmark of what he means concerning reintroducing the law. But the precept stands true for any other precept of the law: “You cannot eat pork.” – heresy! “You must tithe” – heresy! “You must observe the Saturday Sabbath” – heresy! We cannot pick and choose what constitutes grace. We can only trust in the grace that is given through the work of Christ. Trust in Christ and in Him alone for your salvation. After that, if you want to not eat pork, that is fine. If you want to give 10, 20, or 90% of your money to the church, that is fine. If you want to lay around all day on Saturday and do nothing, that is fine too. But if you are doing these things expecting to earn God’s favor and bring you salvation, you have fallen from grace.

Heavenly Father, how marvelous is the grace of Jesus Christ. He did all the work, fulfilling the law on our behalf. Now, you simply ask us to believe. How can we continuously muddy these pure and precious waters with all kinds of crazy additions to what He has done. “Yes, He fulfilled the law, but…” Rather, “I trust that what He did is fully sufficient to save me and keep on saving me. No ifs, ands, or buts!” Thank You for this absolute surety I possess. Amen.