Matthew 8:8

Tuesday, 4 March 2025

The centurion answered and said, “Lord, I am not worthy that You should come under my roof. But only speak a word, and my servant will be healed. Matthew 8:8

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen).

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“And, the centurion, having answered, he said, ‘Lord, I am not adequate that You should enter under my roof. But only You say a word, and my servant, he will be cured’” (CG).

In the previous verse, Jesus told the centurion that having come, He would heal his servant. Next, in response to that, it says, “And, the centurion, having answered.” As was noted in a previous commentary, Luke does not have the centurion come to Jesus but only messengers.

One might then say there is a contradiction in the two. How could he have answered if he stayed home? The difference is not insurmountable. Rather, Luke’s narrative says –

“Then Jesus went with them. And when He was already not far from the house, the centurion sent friends to Him, saying to Him, ‘Lord, do not trouble Yourself, for I am not worthy that You should enter under my roof. Therefore I did not even think myself worthy to come to You. But say a word, and my servant will be healed.’” Luke 7:6, 7

If the elders, speaking on behalf of the centurion, implored Jesus to come, then upon His agreement to come, they would have sent a note back to the centurion telling him that Jesus was on His way. That is why it then says, “when He was already not far from the house.”

In other words, after agreeing, and after word had been sent, Jesus started toward the centurion’s house. However, when word came to him that Jesus was coming, he told the messenger to stop His arrival and simply give the command. Understanding that there is no contradiction, but that Matthew is focusing on different parts of the details, the narrative continues with, “he said, ‘Lord, I am not adequate that You should enter under my roof.’”

The word stegé, roof, is introduced. It will be seen again once in Mark and once in Luke. It is associated with the verb stegó, to bear up under, such as in endurance. One bears up under the strain of whatever he is enduring. Thus, it speaks of the roof or covering of a house.

This centurion did not see himself as fit to have Jesus even enter into his house, knowing he was unworthy of such an honor. He had heard of the great things Jesus had done and he perceived that He was a true man of God because only such a man could accomplish the things he had heard about. And so, to keep from bothering the Lord any further, he continues with, “But only You say a word, and my servant, he will be cured.”

Here is another new word, iaomai. It signifies to heal or cure. Because the word therapeuó was used in the previous verse and it was translated as “heal,” it is right to use a different word here, even if similar in meaning. That way, the reader will not miss the fact that different words are provided in the original Greek.

The centurion’s words are rather incredible. He had asked for healing for his servant. That alone speaks of a person who truly believes in another’s capabilities. Nobody would go to a doctor if he felt the doctor couldn’t help. It would be a pointless gesture. However, this man not only believed Jesus could heal the servant, but that He could cure him without even being in his presence. It demonstrates an amazing amount of faith.

Generally, a physician must look over the patient, run tests, and only then prescribe whatever cure he feels will be appropriate to the situation. This centurion knew that none of this was necessary. Jesus could see, diagnose, and heal all from a distance without ever actually being in the presence of the paralyzed servant.

Life application: The centurion felt his unworthiness before the Lord, understanding His greatness and capability to connect with the God of Israel in order to effect healing in his servant. His humility stands as a testimony to the man.

How different his attitude is to those in churches today who snap their fingers and claim healing over others, as if they have the full authority to direct Jesus to do what they wish. It is true that Hebrews 4:16 tells us that we can come boldly to the throne of grace, but this is not speaking of presumptuously. Rather, it is speaking of confidence that because of Jesus, we can “find grace to help in time of need.”

Grace is getting what one does not deserve. Claiming things implies that what is claimed is deserved. We may approach God boldly because of Jesus, but that doesn’t mean we don’t need to display humility before Him as we petition Him.

Consider carefully how people treat their relationship with the Lord. Think about the various approaches you see, and then emulate that which is good, holy, and humble. This is right in the eyes of the Lord.

O God, may we be people of humility as we come into Your presence. May we never display an attitude that is demeaning of Your glory. Rather, help us to remember that the universe does not revolve around us. We are the created while You are our Creator. Thank You that we may approach You because of Jesus, but may we do so with honor and respect as we do. Amen.

 

Matthew 8:7

Monday, 3 March 2025

And Jesus said to him, “I will come and heal him.” Matthew 8:7

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen).

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“And Jesus, He says to him, ‘I, having come, I will heal him’” (CG).

In the previous verse, the centurion explained why he had come to Jesus, noting that his servant was paralyzed and in great torment. After hearing this, Matthew next records, “And Jesus, He says to him, ‘I, having come, I will heal him.’”

A couple of translations turn this into a question, “Jesus said to him, ‘Shall I come and heal him?’” (NIV). This does not appear to be the intent at all. Despite this, the Expositor’s NT says their rendering is ingenious.

Jesus, using an aorist participle (having come) affirms that when He comes, He will heal him. As such, the Pulpit Commentary rightly says, “The emphasis is not on the coming, but on the person who comes.”

A call was made from a non-Jew who was a part of the occupying power. It would seem like an out-of-place request, but it was made, and Jesus did not hesitate in responding to the need.

He also didn’t hesitate to note that He would attend to the servant accordingly. The word used therapeuó, has already been seen in Chapter 4. The meaning here is to heal, but the word itself signifies to attend to, coming from the word therapōn, an attendant.

Jesus had only heard about the man and had not even seen his condition to see if it was worse than anticipated. And yet, He confidently noted that He would handle the situation. It shows a total self-awareness of His capabilities and authority over the man’s condition.

Life application: Today, we still have the ability to request healing from the Lord. He is no farther than a prayer away. However, it may be His will to withhold healing for His own purposes.

There are people in Acts who were healed who had certainly been in the area of Jesus. One of them is someone who had to have been there when Jesus was in Jerusalem –

“Now Peter and John went up together to the temple at the hour of prayer, the ninth hour. And a certain man lame from his mother’s womb was carried, whom they laid daily at the gate of the temple which is called Beautiful.” Acts 3:1,2

According to Acts 4, the man was over forty years old. He was carried to this spot daily. It is difficult to imagine that he and Jesus were not in the same area together. And yet, Jesus didn’t heal him. Others in the area were healed later by the apostles as well.

By not healing them, Jesus left them so that others could have their ministry validated through the power of healing in His name. We have to live with our afflictions, understanding they may have a purpose we don’t see or understand.

At the same time, we can request the Lord to restore us. If it is His will, we can know that it is possible, having faith that it is so. All power in heaven and on earth is possessed by Him. So, we should not hold back at least asking for His hand of healing.

Lord God, how good You are to us. We thank You that we can know with certainty that we are saved and will someday be delivered from these mortal, corruptible bodies. And yet, even while in them, we can petition You for healing when they break down in one way or another. If You choose to heal, we will be healed. Thank You that we know that whatever happens, it is Your will that will come about. Amen.

 

Song of Songs 2:1-7 (His Banner Upon Me – Love)

Artwork by Douglas Kallerson

Song of Songs 2:1-7
His Banner Upon Me – Love

(Typed 9 December 2024) In 2019, I got to go on quite an adventure with two friends, Sergio and Yosi. They were both living in Israel at the time and were planning to hike from Jericho to Jerusalem, filming the adventure as they went.

When I heard what they were planning, I asked if I could join them. Sergio didn’t believe I was serious, knowing I am not one to take time off, especially for traveling. When I convinced him I was serious, he figured out the timing of the walk, let me know, and got things in order.

I had to prepare as well. First, my passport needed to be updated. Then I had to complete and schedule work in advance so that it would be posted while I was gone, and I decided to do so without letting anyone know that I was going. I would be gone for three days. For those who asked, I said I was going to Boston. It was true, just not the whole truth as it was my port of departure from the US.

My son and his girlfriend (now wife) drove me to Miami to get a passport. They never asked why I needed a passport. When I arrived in Israel, we got things together and left early in the morning from Nazareth to get to our starting point for the walk.

Though we prepared for the walk, we were actually unprepared for it…

Text Verse: “The Lord is your keeper;
The Lord is your shade [tsel] at your right hand.
The sun shall not strike you by day,
Nor the moon by night.” Psalm 121:5, 6

That walk is one of the highlights of my life. There were so many things along the way that we could tie into our understanding of Scripture, both in the physical landscape as it is described in the Bible as well as in the metaphors that the Bible uses concerning various things we interacted with.

For example, because of an error in planning, we ran short of water. Dangerously short. Despite the difficulties we faced, this led to a much greater appreciation for what the Bible tells about water, such as Jesus’ words concerning “living water.”

Another metaphor that was applicable is derived from the word tsel, shadow or shade. As in the text verse, it is used to describe a protection, a defense, etc.

At one point in our walk, we were so utterly exhausted we needed to stop. Fortunately, one of us was smart enough to bring an Arab keffiyeh, the large cloth headdress that is worn by the various desert tribes with colors or patterns that reflect their tribal identity.

That fortunate soul was able to sit in the open sun and not be overheated while he rested. The other two, however, only had broad hats that covered their heads to some extent but not much else. The spot we had to stop was completely exposed to the sun, with the exception of one 6-8-inch outcropping in the side of a cliff.

And so, while I sat on a post in the open sun, almost unaffected by the heat, the other two stood under this tiny slice of shade, resting and being protected by its defense. But they were standing while I sat

We learned what the Bible meant about shade in a very real and personal way along that walk. But that moment is etched in my mind as the prime example of it ever since. The Lord is our Shade. And He is so much more to those who have placed themselves under His protective care.

Such great truths as this are to be found in His superior word. And so, let us turn to that precious word once again, and… May God speak to us through His word today, and may His glorious name ever be praised.

I. Sweet to My Palate (verses 1-3)

As Chapter 1 ended, the lovers were on a green field with trees above and around them. Whether that scene has ended or not isn’t stated. They may still be in that field, or this may be a new encounter between them. Either way, in verse 1:15, the beloved had said to her –

“Behold you! Beautiful, my querida,
Behold you! Beautiful!
Your eyes – doves.”

What appears to be a tacit denial of that, or at least a humble moderating of it, she next says…

am the rose of Sharon,

ani khavatseleth ha’sharon – “I wildflower the Sharon.” This location, the Sharon, is probably the area known as Sharon, which is along the Mediterranean coast between Joppa and Mount Carmel. There is another area known as the Sharon in 1 Chronicles 5:16 where the Gadites dwelt. Thus, it is an area across the Jordan.

Rather than Sharon, however, some translations say “the field” or “the plain.” This is because Sharon comes from yashar, to be straight, level, even, etc. As such it may simply be she is saying, “I am just an ordinary flower in the open plain,” or “I am like a wildflower in the open plain.”

As for the flower itself, it is a word seen only here and in Isaiah 35:1, khavatstseleth, a word of uncertain origin. Some translations say rose, crocus, etc.

Some translations simply punt and say flower. However, other words in the Bible translate as a flower, so that isn’t preferred. As the identity isn’t known, saying “wildflower” provides a sort of catchall. That would be suitable to Isaiah 35:1 as well –

(Certainly) rejoices, wilderness and desert,
And shall twirl Aravah and blossom according to the wildflower. (CG)

As such, she may be saying she is merely a wildflower among many wildflowers. She may have loveliness, but it doesn’t stand above any other. She continues with…

1 (con’t) And the lily of the valleys.

Rather: shoshanath ha’amaqim – “Lily the vales.” She uses no article before lily. She is simply a lily among the lilies that are found in the many vales of Israel. She may be beautiful, but not more than any of the others.

As for the flower, lilies are mentioned eight times in this book. They are also noted in 1 Kings and 2 Chronicles when describing the flowery decorations in the temple and the shape of the Bronze Sea there as well. They are also noted in the headings of some of the Psalms. Last, they are mentioned once in Hosea.

In Song of Songs 5:13, she will equate his lips with lilies, thus identifying them as red. Some, therefore, identify this as the anemone coronaria, a type of flower with various colors, including red. Though it’s not a true lily, this is a possible description of it. With her statement made, her lover accepts but elevates the description…

Like a lily among thorns,

k’shoshanah ben ha’khokhim – “According to lily between the thorns.” He is essentially saying, “Yes, you may be a lily, but you stand alone among thorns.” Her radiant beauty is thus highlighted and set in complete contrast to those around her. The metaphor is next explained…

2 (con’t) So is my love among the daughters.

ken rayati ben ha’banoth – “Thus, my querida between the daughters.” All of the other women among whom she dwells are nothing but lowly, irksome, and painful compared to her. She is beautiful and filled with grace in comparison to them.

Her attempts at humble modesty have been overridden by his expressive words of compliment and exaltation. Next, she speaks in what Delitzsch says is a “contest of mutually eulogistic love”…

Like an apple tree among the trees of the woods,

k’tapuakh baatse ha’yaar – “According to apple in trees the forest.” She makes a similar type of metaphor just used of her and applies it to him. In a forest are many trees, but the apple will stand out when it is in blossom. All the other trees will go out of focus when one encounters a blooming apple tree.

Likewise, when it has fruit, it stands out from all the others. They are merely shades of green among the green. But the apple will be highlighted with its colorful fruit.

As for the tappuakh, apple, what type is unknown. It could actually be a quince, an orange, or some other tree. And even if not native to Israel, they go all the way back to at least the time of Joshua. In Joshua 12:17, it notes the king of Tappuakh. The location was named for the apple, and so he may have been the first to grow it domestically, or it was a place known for cultivating them.

The word comes from naphakh, to puff, breathe, blow, etc. Therefore, the tree is named for its fragrance. It is not only because of its flower and fruit, but its wonderful fragrance is another way that it stands out from the other trees. Like his words to her, this high compliment is next given as a comparison…

3 (con’t) So is my beloved among the sons.

ken dodi ben ha’banim – “Thus, my beloved between the sons.” As she is like a lily among thorns, meaning daughters, he is like an apple tree among the other trees, meaning sons.

Without trying to insert too much into the symbolism, for example, Israel or the church, but rather keeping things simple concerning the “Song the songs,” an apt comparison would be the relationship between the Lord and His redeemed at any given time.

God looks at His redeemed with delight and as people noticeable above all others. Likewise, His people understand Him in a similar fashion. Moses’ words of Exodus 15 are a clear match to the thought presented here –

“Who is like You, O Lord, among the gods?
Who is like You, glorious in holiness,
Fearful in praises, doing wonders?” Exodus 15:11

Even if there are so-called “gods” among the nations, the Lord stands out above them all because He is the one true God, the one loved by His people. As for the words of the woman, she continues with…

3 (con’t) I sat down in his shade with great delight,

The words are simpler: b’tsilo khimadti v’yashavti – “In his shade delighted and dwelt.” The metaphor of him being an apple tree continues here. Of all the trees, she has chosen him to sit under.

The word yashav means to sit, but that is more often than not a metaphor for dwelling. As such, she is saying that she delightedly accepts his protection and places herself under it as her covering. As noted in the introduction, this is quite often how the tsel, or shade, is portrayed in Scripture, such as –

“He who dwells in the secret place of the Most High
Shall abide under the shadow [tsel] of the Almighty.” Psalm 91:1

&

“For wisdom is a defense [tselas money is a defense [tsel],
But the excellence of knowledge is that wisdom gives life to those who have it.” Ecclesiastes 7:12

These and other references give a sense of what she is saying. He is her beloved, and she is utterly delighted to reside with him as he provides protection and safety for her. She next says…

3 (con’t) And his fruit was sweet to my taste.

uphiryo matoq l’khiki – “And his fruit sweet to my palate.” The fruit from the apple tree delights her palate, and thus, she has come to dwell under it in his protection. As for fruit, besides the literal meaning of that which is produced by fruit-bearing plants, it has numerous metaphorical meanings.

It speaks of offspring, such as the fruit of the womb. It refers to a reward, such as the fruit of the righteous. It speaks of works, good or bad, such as the fruit of one’s labors. It also refers to the words of a person, as in the fruit of one’s mouth.

Each of these gives the sense of that which is produced by someone or something, but it identifies the nature of the source. The nature of a parent (for example, a human) can be deduced by looking at a human child. The nature of a workman can be determined by the quality of the work he puts forth.

One does not need to see the source to know what it is. One can look at an apple and say, “That came from an apple tree.” In this case, she knows both the tree and its fruit, but she intimately knows the nature of the tree because of its fruit.

To look upon the cross of Christ
And consider what God has done
What a cost for which my soul was priced
The life of my Savior, God’s own Son

To redeem me back from the devil’s power
To set me on high where angels trod
His final cry, that terrible hour
The life of my Savior, the Son of God

 What is the value you see in us?
How can it be that this You have done?
That You would send for us the Lord Jesus
To die on the cross, Your precious Son?

II. His Right Hand Embraces Me (verses 4-7)

He brought me to the banqueting house,

heviani el beith ha’yayin – “Brought me unto house the wine.” There are various suggestions as to what “house the wine” is referring to. Some think it is a place known for its wine. Others, as seen in this translation, say it is a banqueting house.

However, she has been speaking in metaphor, and so it seems that continues here. Wine in Scripture represents our reasoning and that which can change our minds. A perfect example of this is found in Jesus’ words of Matthew 9 –

“Nor do they put new wine into old wineskins, or else the wineskins break, the wine is spilled, and the wineskins are ruined. But they put new wine into new wineskins, and both are preserved.” Matthew 9:17

Jesus was speaking of the law and grace. The new wine is the new dispensation of grace to come. The old wine was the dispensation of the law. If one introduced the new concept into the old, it would not work because the two are incompatible.

Only if the new wine is put into the new wineskin (the new dispensation) is the mind able to be changed. Therefore, her metaphor likely means that he has brought her to a place where her reasoning will be matched with his. She will be overcome, as if intoxicated, with the intentions for him that he has for her.

The daughters of Lot used wine to effect their intentions upon their father. They essentially brought him into “house the wine.” In Deuteronomy, Moses refers to Israel with the wine metaphor –

“Their wine is the poison of serpents,
And the cruel venom of cobras.” Deuteronomy 32:33

The reasoning of the people was poisonous venom, leading to their destruction. Their “house the wine” was a storage of wickedness and corruption. In the case of her lover’s reasoning, symbolized by the storage of wine from which he draws, the result towards her is…

4 (con’t) And his banner over me was love.

v’diglo alay ahavah – “And his banner upon me – love.” The word degel is used fourteen times in Scripture. The first thirteen are in Numbers when referring to the standards of the tribes of Israel. It is derived from dagal, a verb signifying being conspicuous. That word is used four times, three of which are in this book.

She is saying that what is conspicuous upon her, his banner, is love. It is on full display for all to see. Thinking of the wineskin metaphor makes this more understandable. Those who reason from the law are bannered in old wineskins. Those who reason from grace are bannered in new wineskins. His banner upon her, based on his reasoning, is love.

Next, she speaks about this state…

Sustain me with cakes of raisins,

The verbs are plural. She is not speaking to her lover but to those who hear, calling out for them to come and help her: samkhuni baashiyshoth – “Prop me (pl. you all) in the pressed-cakes.” It is as if she is swooning and will go down for the count if she isn’t propped up. With her strength gone, she needs sustenance because she is completely overcome by his love.

As for the ashiyshah, or raisin cakes, the word is derived from ashiysh, a foundation. Thus, it is something pressed down. Raisin cakes is a good guess, but it could be dates or some other treat that is pressed. It is not a flagon, as older translations state, based on an unsupportable rabbinic interpretation.

Like a diabetic who needs to get the sugar level up, she is fading fast. And so she calls out in an almost antithetical parallel thought for another possible remedy…

5 (con’t) Refresh me with apples,

rapduni batapukhim – “Spread me (pl. you all) in the apples.” The word raphad means to spread. In this case, it is used figuratively. Just as a bed is spread for one who is tired to provide relief, “Spread me in the apples” is a petition to be relieved by giving her apples.

One can see the antithesis in a direct translation. Both clauses give the sense of providing refreshment or comfort, but one is a propping up, the other is a spreading out –

Prop me in the pressed-cakes
Spread me in the apples.

The interesting imagery is lost in a normal translation. With her stimulating words of petition stated, she next explains why she needs this…

5 (con’t) For I am lovesick.

Although the translation gets the sense across, her words are more descriptive, using a verbal participle: ki kholath ahavah ani – “For rubbing love – I.” The meaning is that she is being rubbed out or worn down through her love. Without the food, there will be nothing left, as if someone took an eraser and rubbed her away.

She next explains the reason for her state of near swoon…

His left hand is under my head,

s’molo takhath l’roshi – “His left under ‘to my head.’” One can almost sense the position. He is holding her, and she, in the process of swooning, has her head back as he supports it with his left hand. She’s probably gasping in the process. Along with this tender gesture from him, she says…

6 (con’t) And his right hand embraces me.

vimiyno t’khab’qeni – “And his right embraces me.” The picture becomes even more vivid. It is as if she is standing there, fainting from the overwhelming state of being with him, and she starts falling backward.

So, he rushes his left hand up behind her to support her head while pulling her in closer with his right arm embracing her from behind. It is a scene exactingly repeated numerous times on Hollywood’s memorable celluloid presentations.

She is without strength, completely supported by his, and desperately in need of pressed-cakes and apples. The poor dear!

Some scholars and translations turn these words into a desire rather than an actual event –

“I wish that his left hand were under my head, and that his right hand were embracing me!” (ISV)

This seems contrary to the entire tone of what is being presented. And more, there is only one verb in this verse, and it is imperfect –

His left under ‘to my head,’
And his right embraces me.

She is stating things as they are, presenting facts, not as a desire. They are words of experiential knowledge, and so with this knowledge of the wonderment of his love, she calls for other women to pay heed…

I charge you, O daughters of Jerusalem,

hishbati etkhem b’noth y’rushalim – “Adjured you, daughters Jerusalem.” This is the first of four times in the book that she will call out in this manner. There is no reason to assume, as some scholars do, that these words are spoken by anyone other than the woman.

She has experienced love and wants to express her feelings about it to the other young women of Jerusalem. So she presents her words as an adjuration. It is advice to pay heed. She wants them to avoid such a sad fate.

Understanding this, she adjures them…

7 (con’t) By the gazelles or by the does of the field,

bitsvaoth o b’ayloth ha’sadeh – “In gazelles or in does the field.” The tsviy, gazelle, comes from tsavah, to amass or swell, and thus prominent. That leads also to the idea of beauty or splendor which is a prominent trait. As such, the word is used to describe the gazelle because of its graceful beauty.

The ayyalah, doe, is the feminine form of ayal, a stag. That, in turn, ultimately comes from a root signifying strength.

These are what she adjures them by. However, the difficulty of these words is not to be underestimated. In Deuteronomy 6:13 and 10:20 it says that those of Israel were to swear, shava, by the name of the Lord, implying not swearing in any other way –

“You shall fear the Lord your God and serve Him, and shall take oaths in His name.” Deuteronomy 6:13

Keil, without any biblical support, says –

“It is permitted to the Israelites to swear, נשׁבּע, only by God (Genesis 21:23); but to adjure, השׁבּיע, by that which is not God, is also admissible, although this example before us is perhaps the only direct one in Scripture.”

The lack of biblical support is probably why the Greek translation of this verse says –

“I have charged you, ye daughters of Jerusalem, by the powers and by the virtues of the field, that ye do not rouse or wake my love, until he please.”

It appears the Greek translation takes the root meanings of the animal’s names from the Hebrew, prominence and strength, and uses them as if she is applying them to the Lord. This seems to be the case, even though they have the two reversed from the Hebrew.

This is probably not the intent here because the words “of the field” still call out for something earthly. But it seems they were trying to avoid getting stuck in a theological quagmire.

What seems likely is that rather than adjuring the ladies by the gazelles and the does, as if they are the subjects, she adjures them without using any article – “in gazelles and does the field.” They are not the subject of the adjuration but an explanation of it. In essence, “You daughters of Jerusalem, I adjure you to be like gazelles or does in the field.”

Therefore, the meaning would be, “Ladies, I adjure you to be timid and wary like gazelles or does in the field in this matter.” If it was an adjuration with the animals as the subject, one would think she would say, “in the gazelles and in the does of the field.” However, this cannot be.

1) The articles are omitted, and 2) rather than and, it says or. The two clauses are not for one adjuration but are a repetitive explanation to highlight the matter.

With that, she tells them what they should be timid about…

7 (con’t) Do not stir up nor awaken love

The words are repetitive, both verbs are imperative, and the first is causative: im tairu v’im t’or’ru eth ha’ahavah – “If wakens, and if awakens the love.” Saying “stir up” gets the causative point across, but the sense of the repetition found in the Hebrew is lost. She is imploring them to be shy and timid about rushing things.

Instead, they are to be wary that they might otherwise blow something that could be memorable or miss something that could be far better than they settled for. Instead, they are not to awaken love…

*7 (fin) Until it pleases.

The words bear personification: ad shetekhpats – “Until she inclines.” It is as if love is a person that can be manipulated in a way that could be disastrous. Instead of rousing her from her sleep, imploring her to get up and get active, they should let her sleep blissfully until she decides to arouse herself and get about the business she is truly meant to accomplish.

These verses complete the first major break in the song. Three more breaks are yet ahead at 3:5, 5:1, and 8:4. In today’s verses, there lies a unique connection between the Lord and His redeemed –

I wildflower the Sharon.
Lily the vales.

The redeemed, understanding their position in the presence of the Lord, naturally feel insignificant. “I am nothing special, just another person among the billions on the planet, and yet I am here with the King.” Despite this, the Lord calls out…

According to lily between the thorns,
Thus, my querida between the daughters.

Among all of the people on the planet, your beauty is surpassing. While they are as painful thorns, you are more beautiful than all of those around you. Hence, I have focused my attention on you.

One must remember that such a statement by the Lord is not based on physical beauty but on the beauty of a soul demonstrating faith in Him and in the word that tells of Him.

According to apple in trees the forest,
Thus, my beloved between the sons,
In his shade delighted and sat,
And his fruit sweet to my palate [l’khiki].

The One who breathed [naphakh, the basis of tappuakh, apple] life into man (Genesis 2:7) is the true God. He is my Beloved among all of the “gods” of the nations.

I will rest in His shadow and dwell there all my days. His fruit, meaning the work of the Lord as displayed in the Person of Jesus Christ, which has been detailed in His word, is what I delight in –

“How sweet are Your words to my taste [l’khiki – to my palate],
Sweeter than honey to my mouth!” Psalm 119:103

Brought me unto house the wine,
And his banner upon me – love.

The Lord has brought me into His house of wine, His place of reasoning –

“‘Come now, and let us reason together,’
Says the Lord,
‘Though your sins are like scarlet,
They shall be as white as snow;
Though they are red like crimson,
They shall be as wool.’” Isaiah 1:18

In this state of mutual agreement, the banner of the Lord, His love, as evidenced in the cross of Jesus Christ and all it signifies, is made manifest.

Prop me in the pressed-cakes,
Spread me in the apples,
For rubbing love – I.

The ashiyish, the foundation, is the root of the ashiyshah, the pressed-cakes. It is a poetic way of saying that we are sustained, propped up, by Christ, the Foundation of our faith (1 Corinthians 3:11).

Likewise, the breath [naphakh, the basis of tappuakh, apple], anticipating the Spirit of God, our Comforter, Helper, etc., is the confirmation that Jesus is God, that He has given us rebirth, the breath of God once again.

In the Greek translation, the word in Genesis 2:7 for when God breathed the breath of life into man is ἐνεφύσησεν/enephusesen, the same word in the same form used only once in the New Testament –

So Jesus said to them again, “Peace to you! As the Father has sent Me, I also send you.” 22 And when He had said this, He breathed [ἐνεφύσησεν: enephusesen] on them, and said to them, “Receive the Holy Spirit. 23 If you forgive the sins of any, they are forgiven them; if you retain the sins of any, they are retained.” John 20:21-23

This is what makes us love-sick, rubbed with love. It is the hope-filled, eager, and constant anticipation of being with Christ Jesus –

“For the grace of God that brings salvation has appeared to all men, 12 teaching us that, denying ungodliness and worldly lusts, we should live soberly, righteously, and godly in the present age, 13 looking for the blessed hope and glorious appearing of our great God and Savior Jesus Christ14 who gave Himself for us, that He might redeem us from every lawless deed and purify for Himself His own special people, zealous for good works.” Titus 2:11-14

His left under ‘to my head,’
And his right embraces me.

The symbolism is to be taken as the total welcoming care and protection of the Lord for His redeemed.

Adjured you, daughters Jerusalem,
In gazelles or in does the field –
If wakens and if awakens the love,
Until she inclines.

The idea here is to have one’s priorities right. We are not to fall in love with any god. The people of the world are to be on alert, wary of anything that could awaken inappropriate love in us.

Rather, we are to allow the love (agapē, noun, fem.) of God, embodied in the Person of Jesus Christ, to awaken ‘the love’ that is truly love, as John says, “for God is love [agapē, noun, fem.]” (1 John 4:8).

They are the same words as found in the Greek translation of this verse, “if you should arise and awaken the love [ten agapen: the love].” God is love. God in Christ is the embodiment of God’s love. We are being given insights into the very heart of God as He poured out His heart in the “Song the songs.”

It is all centered on what He has done through Jesus Christ. This is the reason this poem is read each year at the Passover. The time and event of the crucifixion of Christ is the pinnacle of what God has done in the stream of human existence.

The “Song the songs” tells us to look to the cross of Jesus to find our true source of love and fellowship with God once again. Nothing could be clearer than this truth as it is revealed in the pages of His Superior Word.

Closing Verse: “When I remember You on my bed,
I meditate on You in the night watches.
Because You have been my help,
Therefore in the shadow [tsel] of Your wings I will rejoice.
My soul follows close behind You;
Your right hand upholds me.” Psalm 63:6-8

Next Week: Song of Songs 2:8-17 In it, I will surely rejoice… (Cause Me to Hear Your Voice) (6th Song of Songs sermon)

The Lord has you exactly where He wants you. He has a good plan and purpose for you. He alone is the perfect example of love – untarnished, unblemished, and completely pure and holy. He offers this love to you. So, follow Him, live for Him, and trust Him, and He will do marvelous things for you and through you.

Song of Songs 2:1-7 (CG)

I wildflower the Sharon.
Lily the vales.

2 According to lily between the thorns,
Thus, my querida between the daughters.

3 According to apple in trees the forest,
Thus, my beloved between the sons,
In his shade delighted and sat,
And his fruit sweet to my palate.

4 Brought me unto house the wine,
And his banner upon me – love.
5 Prop me in the pressed cakes,
Spread me in the apples,
For rubbing love – I.
6 His left under ‘to my head,’
And his right embraces me.

7 Adjured you, daughters Jerusalem,
In gazelles or in does the field –
If wakens and if awakens the love,
Until she inclines.

 

Song of Songs 2:1-7 (NKJV)

am the rose of Sharon,
And the lily of the valleys.

Like a lily among thorns,
So is my love among the daughters.

Like an apple tree among the trees of the woods,
So is my beloved among the sons.
I sat down in his shade with great delight,
And his fruit was sweet to my taste.

He brought me to the banqueting house,
And his banner over me was love.
Sustain me with cakes of raisins,
Refresh me with apples,
For I am lovesick.

His left hand is under my head,
And his right hand embraces me.
I charge you, O daughters of Jerusalem,
By the gazelles or by the does of the field,
Do not stir up nor awaken love
Until it pleases.

Matthew 8:6

Sunday, 2 March 2025

saying, “Lord, my servant is lying at home paralyzed, dreadfully tormented.” Matthew 8:6

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen).

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“And saying, ‘Lord, my servant, he has been cast in the house, paralyzed, tormenting terribly” (CG).

In the previous verse, Jesus entered Capernaum, at that time, Matthew records that a centurion came to him, pleading. Now, his reason for coming to the Lord is given, beginning with the words, “And saying, ‘Lord, my servant, he has been cast in the house.”

The word balló, to throw or cast, is used. It is a way of saying that a sickness took hold of him and cast him so that he is unable to stand against it. Further, it is a perfect participle, it was something that occurred at some point previously and continues until the present. The idea here is reflected in the words of Revelation 2 when referring to the false prophetess called Jezebel –

“And I gave her time to repent of her sexual immorality, and she did not repent. 22 Indeed I will cast her into a sickbed, and those who commit adultery with her into great tribulation, unless they repent of their deeds.” Revelation 2:21, 22

Understanding this, that which had cast the servant is next stated, he is “paralyzed, tormenting terribly.”

The word translated as tormenting basanizó signifies to torment or torture. In this case, it is a physical affliction which is a tormenting trial targeting his human physique. That is then supplemented by the word deinós, terribly. It is found only here and in Luke 11:53.

It gives the sense of being grievously or vehemently strong. The NKJV “dreadfully tormented” gets the thought across quite well. The centurion is looking for relief for one of his servants who is in agony and unable to recover.

He has turned to Jesus as a hope-filled opportunity, knowing that such an affliction would be beyond the ability of doctors to correct.

Life application: This is a fallen world where, as often as not, things don’t operate well. Sickness is a part of the human condition, and some have greater afflictions than others. In not knowing God personally through His word, people will use this fallen state to deny the existence of God, speak ill of Him (as if they are owed perfection), or claim that He is incompetent.

In John 9, we read these words –

“Now as Jesus passed by, He saw a man who was blind from birth. And His disciples asked Him, saying, ‘Rabbi, who sinned, this man or his parents, that he was born blind?’
Jesus answered, ‘Neither this man nor his parents sinned, but that the works of God should be revealed in him. I must work the works of Him who sent Me while it is day; the night is coming when no one can work. As long as I am in the world, I am the light of the world.’” John 9:1-4

This person was born blind. That was simply his state. Whatever he thought about God and his condition, Jesus was able to cure him and reveal to the world what He is capable of doing.

It is not God who is incompetent or uncaring. The Bible tells us that God gave man idyllic perfection. However, he wanted something he was told he could not have. Even if God knew he would do this, it is not God’s fault that he did.

Humanity continues to suffer the consequences of that bad decision, but God did not leave it at that and say, “Well, this is how it will be henceforth.” Rather, He promised He would deal with the issue. The Bible shows us how He has been doing so and it even tells us what it will be like when everything we messed up is finally corrected.

Instead of blaming God for our trials, and instead of thinking God is uncaring about the difficulties and sadnesses in our lives, we have a responsibility to fix our eyes on Jesus, the One who has come to restore all things.

Do we want to live our lives in a miserable state, seeking our own happiness in order to use up our time as best we can? Or do we want to live in the joy of the Lord, thanking Him for what we have and what is to come?

The difference in one’s attitude will reflect where his priorities are. The more you can mentally overcome the trials you are faced with, the greater the testimony you will be to those around you who need the same confidence that you display.

Jesus healed the blind. Jesus promised to bring us into His light and goodness for all eternity. If we believe the first, we should also believe the latter. And if we do, why allow the trials of this life to hold us down?

We are so grateful to You, O God for the knowledge that this present world is not all You have in store for us. Rather, we have a heavenly hope of life that is truly life. Help us to focus on that and to be reassured always in the promises You have made. Amen.

 

Matthew 8:5

Saturday, 1 March 2025

Now when Jesus had entered Capernaum, a centurion came to Him, pleading with Him, Matthew 8:5

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen)

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“And Jesus, having entered into Capernaum, a centurion, he came to Him, invoking Him” (CG).

In the previous verse, Jesus, having cleansed the leper, instructed him to go directly to the priest and offer the gift commanded by Moses. Now, the narrative changes direction, saying, “And Jesus, having entered into Capernaum.”

It should be noted that some manuscripts omit the name of Jesus. For example –

“When He entered Capernaum, a centurion came to Him, pleading with Him.” Holman

If the inclusion of the name is not original, someone may have inserted it to clarify that it was Jesus, not the leper who entered Capernaum. That seems a bit obvious, however. If the name is original and now missing in those manuscripts, it may be a copyist’s error that came about for one reason or another.

Either way, the surrounding context leaves no doubt about who the verse is referring to. Jesus had come down from the mount, met a leper on the way to where He was going, and then continued on to His destination, which was Capernaum. Once inside the city, it next says, “a centurion, he came to Him, invoking Him.”

The hekatontarchos, centurion, is introduced here. The word is derived from hekatón, a hundred, and archó, to rule or reign. Thus, he is a Roman soldier who rules over a cohort of one hundred men.

It is highly unusual that a man with such authority would actively seek out a Jew, much less plead with him over a matter. In such a position, it would be expected that he might send one of his underlings to Jesus and direct him to do whatever it is he has on his mind. But the man’s approach is an exception.

If it is the same account being referred to, which seems likely, the same narrative in Luke 7 gives a bit more background, saying –

“So when he heard about Jesus, he sent elders of the Jews to Him, pleading with Him to come and heal his servant. And when they came to Jesus, they begged Him earnestly, saying that the one for whom He should do this was deserving, ‘for he loves our nation, and has built us a synagogue.’” Luke 7:3-5

However, no discrepancy between the two should be considered. By sending elders of the Jews instead of one of his underlings, he is making a personal appeal through the elders rather than an authoritative demand through a soldier. The reason for sending the elders is more fully explained in Luke as well.

For now, this man has made a personal appeal to Jesus, invoking Him to come for a personal reason. As for translating the word parakaleó as invoke here, the reason is that one of its meanings is to call earnestly for. But there is associated with it the sense of a capability of the one being invoked that is beyond that of the one invoking.

For example, one might invoke a spirit, god, lawful edict, etc. This centurion is making a particular appeal to Jesus as an authoritative figure, able to do something that is beyond himself or those whom he is sending. As these are elders, it shows an immense trust in Jesus that extends beyond what one would normally expect of another, including leadership figures in Israel.

Life application: The words of Matthew in this account are already setting the stage for what is to become a normal theme from this point on. It is something that was seen, however, early in Matthew when Magi came to the land of Israel to worship the Child.

The Gentiles are taking on a position within the narrative that is contrasted to that of the Jews. This might seem out of place, but it is precisely what was prophesied by the Lord through Isaiah –

“And in that day there shall be a Root of Jesse,
Who shall stand as a banner to the people;
For the Gentiles shall seek Him,
And His resting place shall be glorious.” Isaiah 11:10

As the story of the interaction between Jesus and this centurion continues, ask yourself why the Lord included this account in His word. Then consider the world around you and how it continues to be relevant today. As you read through the book of Acts, consider what it is saying from this same perspective.

What is God looking for? The answer is faith. Pay attention to this key point. Both testaments of Scripture ultimately reveal this truth.

Lord God, may we be people of faith who live faithfully in Your presence. Give us the willpower and focus to not get distracted by our own supposed goodness or our own good deeds. Rather, may we understand that who we are, what we have, and what we can offer are all given by You and belong to You. May we align our lives to show that we believe this is true. Amen.