Matthew 10:33

Monday, 9 June 2025

But whoever denies Me before men, him I will also deny before My Father who is in heaven. Matthew 10:33

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at the “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen)

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“And if, whoever, he should deny Me before men, I will deny – I also – him before My Father, the ‘in heavens’” (CG).

In the previous verse, Jesus noted that whoever will assent in Him before men, He will assent that person before His Father in heaven. Now, taking the opposite angle, He says, “And if, whoever, he should deny Me before men.”

Jesus introduces the word arneomai, to contradict. As such, it signifies to disavow, reject, refuse, etc. As an example, it says this in Acts 3 –

“The God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, the God of our fathers, glorified His Servant Jesus, whom you delivered up and denied [arneomai] in the presence of Pilate, when he was determined to let Him go. 14 But you denied [arneomai] the Holy One and the Just, and asked for a murderer to be granted to you, 15 and killed the Prince of life, whom God raised from the dead, of which we are witnesses.” Acts 13-15

Jesus is saying to the apostles that when they go forth spreading their message, those they encounter will have to decide. If they assent in Him, He will speak likewise before the Father. However, those who deny Him, “I will deny – I also – him before My Father, the ‘in heavens.’”

The words bear a strong emphasis, just as in the previous verse. Jesus adamantly avows that those who deny Him, He too will deny. As with the previous verse, the words here speak of free will. There is nothing forced, and God leaves the decision up to the contemplation of the individual.

Jesus is speaking to those of Israel whom the apostles will encounter. The apostles are not directed to go to anyone outside of the cities of Israel, and Jesus’ ministry is – by His own words – directed to the lost sheep of the House of Israel (Matthew 10:6 & Matthew 15:24).

Further, Jesus’ words precede the completion of His ministry and fulfillment of the law. He is speaking about matters in that context.

Life application: How many times have you heard someone cite the words of Matthew 10:33 to indicate that a person can lose his salvation? As noted, the context is not speaking of those in the church. It is speaking of those of Israel, even before the completion of Jesus’ ministry.

Further, notice the use of the same word, translated as denied, in Acts 3 cited above. Who was Peter speaking to in those verses? He was speaking to the people of Israel who had denied their Messiah. Peter was appealing to them to change their minds and believe. Therefore, there is a chance for someone who had denied Jesus to “undeny” Him and believe.

Paul uses the same word in 2 Timothy 2 –

This is a faithful saying:
For if we died with Him,
We shall also live with Him.
12 If we endure,
We shall also reign with Him.
If we deny [arneomai] Him,
He also will deny [arneomai] us.
13 If we are faithless,
He remains faithful;
He cannot deny Himself.” 2 Timothy 2:11-13

But though often interpreted as such, those verses do not speak of a loss of salvation. Refer to the Superior Word commentary to understand what Paul is saying.

Since the completion of Christ’s ministry, He has fulfilled the Mosaic Covenant and established the New Covenant. Gentiles are accepted into this New Covenant through faith, just as Jews are. Believing the gospel leads to salvation. Salvation is guaranteed by the sealing of the Holy Spirit –

“In Him you also trusted, after you heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation; in whom also, having believed, you were sealed with the Holy Spirit of promise, 14 who is the guarantee of our inheritance until the redemption of the purchased possession, to the praise of His glory.” Ephesians 1:13, 14

Jesus didn’t speak of these things because His work was not yet complete. The message of salvation by faith through grace as a guarantee through the sealing of the Holy Spirit only came about after His atoning death for the sins of the world.

When someone believes, he has no longer denied Jesus. He moves from death to life, eternal life. Be sure to read the commentary on 2 Timothy 2:12, 13 to understand what Paul is referring to. And the next time you hear someone cite Matthew 10:33 as proof that one can lose his salvation, be sure to correct his thinking.

Lord God, despite not knowing everything about what You have done for us, we know that You have saved us, fully and forever, through belief in Your gospel. We know that nothing can ever separate us from Your love because of Jesus. We are saved – forever and ever. Amen.

 

Song of Songs 8:1-7 (The Seal Upon Your Heart

Artwork by Douglas Kallerson

Song of Songs 8:1-7
The Seal Upon Your Heart

(Typed 10 March 2025) The woman says that many waters cannot quench love. The many waters refer to that which is superlative. The Lord’s voice is said to be like that of many waters.

Likewise, the forces that can overwhelm a person are considered many waters. It is a phrase used repeatedly in Scripture to get across the idea of that which is superlative in nature in whatever comparison is being made.

In the comparison of love seen in this passage, it means that even all the waters of this world cannot drown out or extinguish love. Considering that the love of God for His redeemed is mentioned throughout Scripture, one would think that people would understand the doctrine of eternal salvation.

However, such would not be the case. Various churches claim that if you leave their congregation, you will lose your salvation, as if it is the denomination or individual church that provides security. Other churches claim, without really explaining the mechanics of it, that salvation can be lost in various ways.

Not only do they teach this, but they also provide no biblical support for how an “unsaved” person can be resaved. In such theology, verses must be ripped out of their context or completely misapplied. Works, the supposed evidence of salvation, are the emphasis.

The problem is that no specific works are identified as being necessary for continued salvation. It’s a sad trap that people find themselves in, but it is a rather common one.

Text Verse: “The voice of the Lord is over the waters;
The God of glory thunders;
The Lord is over many waters.
The voice of the Lord is powerful;
The voice of the Lord is full of majesty.” Psalm 29:3, 4

The Lord did not come to live the perfect life under the Law of Moses, instruct Israel in what is right and proper concerning the things of God, and give His life up on the cross just so that believers would have eternal insecurity.

Rather, the Lord taught that whoever believes in Him would not perish but have everlasting life. That isn’t something that comes with a lot of added theological baggage attached to it. Instead, it is a petition to believe.

How difficult it is to understand the meaning of the five-letter word, GRACE. The powerful and majestic voice of the Lord has told us what it is that saves us, His grace as revealed in the Person of Jesus Christ. If we aren’t sure of the meaning of grace, it would be right to consult the nearest dictionary. That simple act would clear up a great deal of muddied waters flowing through the church.

May we be responsible and pay heed. Telling others that they can lose what they couldn’t earn in the first place is not responsible. God has bestowed grace in the giving of Jesus. That bestowal is realized through belief. Nothing more.

Have faith. Believe the good news. This simple and yet marvelous truth is to be found in His superior word. And so, let us turn to that precious word once again, and… May God speak to us through His word today, and may His glorious name ever be praised.

I. His Right Embraces Me (verses 1-4)

Oh, that you were like my brother,

mi yiten’kha k’akh – “Who gives you according to brother.” The most common explanation for this is that she is wishing he were her brother so that they could express their affection for one another the way a brother and sister can. That way, they could be in public and dote upon one another.

However, though this idea may be correct, there is a fuller explanation. She wishes that he could be like her brother so that in their union, they would not have the difficulties that lovers face. For example, a brother is there in times of adversity (Proverbs 17:17), and the bond of brothers with sisters generally endures throughout life.

On the other hand, lovers have spats, and the love between them diminishes through the stresses and trials of life. He has previously called her “sister – completer.” She wants him to be like a brother so that the sibling relationship is truly realized between the two of them. To more poignantly reveal this, she says…

1 (con’t) Who nursed at my mother’s breasts!

li yoneq shede imi – “To my ‘sucking breasts my mother.’” In other words, she isn’t simply asking him to be a brother but a brother of her own mother. For example, it was known that David had many wives and also concubines. From them came many sons. The listing is given in 1 Chronicles 3:1-9.

However, there was a great deal of rivalry between the sons of different mothers. At times, such rivalries ended in murder or an attempt to usurp Solomon’s position as king.

Through all of this conflict, the bond between Absolom and Tamar is one of the strongest noted. This is because it is implied that they were born to David from the same mother. This strongest bond of blood through both the father and the mother is what the beloved is referring to. If this were the case…

1 (con’t) If I should find you outside,
I would kiss you;

emtsaakha bakhuts eshaq’kha

“Find you in the outside –
Kiss you.”

These words reveal that the first reason for her wanting to be like a brother to him is that they could, in fact, express their doting affections upon one another in a public setting. For example, Cambridge states –

“Only the uterine brother and the father’s brother’s son have among the Bedawin the right to kiss a maiden. Cp. Wetzstein, ZDMG. XXII. pp. 93, 108.”

This was probably true in the culture of Israel at the time as well. A brother and a sister could display affection openly without anyone giving a hoot, something that even married people might not feel comfortable doing. Instead, she could run up to him and say, “Hello, my dear brother!” while giving him a kiss on his cheek. Because he is her brother…

1 (con’t) I would not be despised.

gam lo yavuzu li – “Also, not disrespect to me.” Today, we tend to see people doing whatever they want in public. But when I was young, I don’t ever remember seeing even married people showing intimate affection in public. Such displays were meant for the privacy of home.

However, I remember brothers and sisters acting as naturally as the best of friends or even giving a kiss on the cheek without anyone batting an eye. Not having my own sister, it was almost a point of jealousy that they could get away with such things.

This is the intent of her words. She is looking for the strongest bond, one that will not fade but which is also unashamed of the nearness that a full-blood relationship can allow. With such intimacy and yet boldness…

I would lead you and bring you

enhagakha aviakha – “Lead you and bring you.” One can follow the train of thought: she sees her brother, the son of her mother, outside. She runs up to him and kisses him without a qualm or concern. There is no timidity or shame, and no one bats an eye. Then she grabs his hand and says, “Come along, brother,” dragging him as she takes him…

2 (con’t) Into the house of my mother,

el beith imi – “Unto house, my mother.” If he were a brother, she would lead him right to the house they grew up in. Nobody would question the matter because it is what brothers and sisters do all the time. With them there, instruction would take place. However, who the instructor is depends on how the next words are translated…

2 (con’t) She who used to instruct me.

The words are incorrect, regardless of the “who.” The verb is not past tense. Rather: t’lam’deni – “Will teach me.” Some translations believe that this is a relative clause belonging to the previous words, making the verb feminine. In essence, “I will take you into the house of my mother, and she will teach me how to tend to you.”

If it is the mother, an unstated but implied relative pronoun needs to be inserted, indicated by the word “who” in the NKJV. Other translations take the word as masculine, indicating it is Solomon who is the subject.

The mother is the nearest antecedent, so I would favor her being the subject, but it could be the woman saying that when she has brought Solomon to her house, he would teach her. The only other time this verb is used in this form t’lam’deni is in Psalm 119, when referring to the Lord –

“Must cause to utter, my lips, praise –
For will teach me [t’lam’deni] your enactments.” Psalm 119:171 (CG)

It is hard to be dogmatic. Either way, she is saying that in taking him to her mother’s house as if he were a brother, she would then receive instruction, be it from her mother or from Solomon. She would then know what to do…

2 (con’t) I would cause you to drink of spiced wine,

The final word is neither a verb nor an adjective, as all translations make it. Rather, it is a noun: ashq’kha miyayin hareqakh – “Cause you to drink from wine, the  vintner.” The word reqakh is found only here. It is derived from the verb raqakh, to compound or mix perfumes or spices.

Because she is referring to wine, the word vintner gets the point across. A vintner does more than just make wine. He is involved in every step of the process, including mixing to obtain the most delightful flavor, bouquet, and notes. It is the one word that most succinctly explains her intent.

Wine symbolizes the merging of cultural expressions into a result. The thing that ought to happen can happen, symbolized by wine. As such, it represents our reasoning and that which can change our minds. The particular wine she refers to is next named…

2 (con’t) Of the juice of my pomegranate.

measis rimoni – “From juice my pomegranate.” Pomegranate wine has been around for thousands of years. You can buy it pretty much anywhere today, and if you want to make your own, you can buy a gallon of Vintner’s Best Pomegranate wine starter mix from Amazon for about $50.00. Ooh. Ahh.

The rimon, pomegranate, is derived from ramam, to be high or exalted. It symbolizes harvest-ready fruit and means Mature Mind or Harvest Ready. From the idea of imbibing in her wine, she next turns to a new line of thought that was already expressed in verse 2:6…

His left hand is under my head,
And his right hand embraces me.

s’molo takhath roshi vimino t’khab’qeni

“His left under my head,
And his right embraces me.”

The words are letter-for-letter identical to verse 2:6 with the exception of the letter lamed, translated as “to.”

2:6 – His left under ‘to my head,’
And his right embraces me.

8:3 – His left under my head,
And his right embraces me.

In Chapter 2, she was almost in a state of swooning when she said this. That is probably the same thought being conveyed here. Notice the similarities between the two –

Chapter 2

4 Brought me unto house the wine,
And his banner upon me – love.
5 Prop me in the pressed-cakes,
Spread me in the apples,
For rubbing love – I.
6 His left under ‘to my head,’
And his right embraces me.

Chapter 8

2 Lead you and bring you,
Unto house, my mother –
Will teach me.
Cause you to drink from wine, the vintner,
From juice my pomegranate.

3 His left under my head,
And his right embraces me.

In Chapter 2, Solomon brought her into the house of wine. In Chapter 8, she brings him into her mother’s house, where she is instructed, and then gives him the wine of the vintner. In both instances, there is a loving embrace, and in both, there is also an adjuration which follows the scene…

I charge you, O daughters of Jerusalem,
Do not stir up nor awaken love
Until it pleases.

hishbati etkhem b’noth y’rushalim mah tairu u-mah t’or’ru eth ha’ahavah ad shetekhpats

“Adjured you, daughters Jerusalem –
Why waken and why awaken the love,
Until she inclines?”

The words are very similar to verse 2:7. One difference is that in verse 2:7, the adjuration is made “in gazelles or in does the field.” That is dropped out.

Next, 2:7 again says in the form of an adjuration, “If wakens and if awakens.” Here, in the form of a question, it asks, “Why waken and why awaken?” The sense, then, is “Why would you try to arouse love before she is ready to act? She will stir when the moment is right.”

Also, another change is that in the word translated as “awaken,” a single letter, a vav, drops out of it from verse 2:7 –

תְּעֽוֹרְר֛וּ
תְּעֹֽרְר֛וּ

This is the same thing that happened in the word “twins” found in verses 4:5 and 7:3. The pronunciation is identical, so unless you are inquisitive like Charlie, without putting the verses side by side, the change is completely indiscernible.

Without modern technology, the task would be much more laborious. The change is probably first noted for those who come to the Superior Word for their instruction.

Understanding these changes, we can put the verses side by side for comparison –

2:7 – Adjured you, daughters Jerusalem,
In gazelles or in does the field –
If wakens and if awakens the love,
Until she inclines.

8:4 – Adjured you, daughters Jerusalem –
Why waken and why awaken the love,
Until she inclines?

We are at the final break of the book. Each break has been followed by a sudden new beginning. The fourth part ends, as noted by Jamieson-Faucett-Brown, “in full repose and refreshment.” The fifth part is next…

A cross is there on the hill of Calvary
It is a sign of God’s love to the people of the world
On that cross, Jesus died for you and for me
The greatest display of love was on that day unfurled

Oh! That Christ died for sinners like us!
How deep is the love of God for this to have come about?
Wondrous is the giving of His Son, Jesus
Take hold of the promise, stand fast, and do not doubt

Christ died, and into the grave He went – had death won?
A lifeless body, seemingly the end of the story
But No! Death could not hold the sinless Son
He burst forth from the grave in radiant glory!

II. Fffflame Yah! (verses 5-7)

Who is this coming up from the wilderness,

mi zoth olah min ha’midbar – “Who this ascending from the wilderness.” The words are letter-for-letter identical to the first clause of verse 3:6. The words introduce what will only later be identified. They are intended to bring a sense of wonder and anticipation to the minds of the hearers.

As for the wilderness, it is any place that is uncultivated, usually with sparse vegetation. Therefore, it is in contrast to the one coming out of the wilderness. She is coming…

5 (con’t) Leaning upon her beloved?

mithrapeqeth al dodah – “Reclining upon her beloved.” The word raphaq, to recline, is found only here. She is ascending together with her beloved, reclining on him. It appears that they are together in his palanquin. It is unstated, but it would make sense based on the comparable words in Chapter 3 –

“Who this ascending from the wilderness,
According to columns smoke?
Smoked – myrrh and frankincense,
From all powder peddling.

7 Behold! His bed, that to Solomon –
Sixty mighties around to it,
From mighties Israel.” Song of Songs 3:6, 7 (CG)

If she is reclining on him, it could be either that they are walking and she is reclining on him as they walk or that she is reclining on him as they are carried. I would go with the latter because of the parallel to the words of Chapter 3. Either way, the words next change direction…

5 (con’t) I awakened you under the apple tree.

takhat ha’tapuakh orar’tikha – “Under the apple, I awakened you.” The words are not complicated, but they at first appear to have no connection to what was asked. Further, in the Hebrew text, these clauses are masculine, making the woman the one speaking. However, the Syriac and the Latin have them as feminine, making Solomon the speaker.

Without being dogmatic, it is probable, therefore, that the words are those of Solomon, and this is how I would personally take them. For some reason, the Masoretes changed the vowel pointing to have it reflect the woman speaking instead of the man.

If so, they got a sniff of Jesus and did not want that to be considered. That is not unusual in their text. They have hidden or obscured obvious hints of Christ in key passages of Scripture.

Either way, Solomon and his beloved are coming out of the wilderness, she is reclining on him, and he asks rhetorically who she is, knowing full well the answer because one of them had aroused the other under the apple tree. Next…

5 (con’t) There your mother brought you forth;

No way, José: shamah khib’latkha imekha – “There-ward bound you, your mother.” The word khaval signifies to wind tightly and thus to bind. Specifically, then, it means to bind by a pledge. For example –

“If you ever take your neighbor’s garment as a pledge [khaval], you shall return it to him before the sun goes down.” Exodus 22:26

The sense then is that under the apple (there-ward) she (or he) was given in pledge by her (or his) mother. That is then repeated, stressing the idea and also forming parallelism…

5 (con’t) There she who bore you brought you forth.

shamah khib’lah y’ladakha – “There-ward bound, ‘borne you.’” The words “your mother” and “borne you” are set in apposition to highlight that the mother was a part of the process in bringing her to be with Solomon (or Solomon to be with her) as she reclines or leans on him.

With that, it is certain that she now speaks to him…

Set me as a seal upon your heart,

simeni khakhotham al libkha – “Set me according to the seal upon your heart.” Saying “according to” tells us that this is figurative. A seal is something that marks something as dear or precious. It even gives a sense of ownership.

In the Bible, the heart is used metaphorically when referring to the inner person, the mind, the intellect, the will, etc. She is asking him to have her always in his thoughts and desires. Next, speaking in parallel, she says…

6 (con’t) As a seal upon your arm;

kakhohtam al z’roekha – “According to the seal upon your arm.” The zeroa, or arm, comes from the word zara, meaning “to sow” or “scatter seed.” The arm thus speaks of power and exertion, but also of effectual reach to accomplish.

When a man desires to show his strength or to defeat an enemy, he will stretch his arms out. In this one stance, he will both defend some and work against others. Therefore, her appeal is for his protection and defense through his strength and reach…

6 (con’t) For love is as strong as death,

ki azah khamaveth ahavah – “For strong, according to the death – love.” This is not referring to its inevitability. Rather, the meaning is that the state of love is like death. It is something that cannot be escaped. She is completely captured by it. Likewise…

6 (con’t) Jealousy as cruel as the grave;

qashah khish’ol qinah – “Severe, according to Sheol – jealousy.” The word qinah signifies jealousy, envy, or even zeal. Love is set in apposition to jealousy, and Sheol is set in apposition to death. Just as the state of love is something that cannot be escaped, so is the state of jealousy.

These parallel clauses are based on her request to be set as a seal. She is in the state of love and jealousy for her beloved. She is entrapped by them and wants to be affixed to him both mentally and physically at all times. One can see that she is equating each with the other –

For strong^, according to the death* – love+
Severe^, according to Sheol* – jealousy+

Therefore, because love and jealousy are one thing, the singular is used to identify them as such…

6 (con’t) Its flames are flames of fire,

r’shapheha rishpe esh – “Her embers – embers fire.” The resheph refers to a live coal, meaning an ember. The state of love, which is a state of jealousy, is thus equated to such an ember. To accentuate and highlight that thought, she speaks in heightened parallelism…

6 (con’t) A most vehement flame.

The NKJV is a poor paraphrase. Way more excitedly: shalhevethyah – “Fffflame Yah!” The word is rare, shalheveth. It is from the same as lahav, a flame, but it has a sibilant prefix. In other words, it is an extended sound, like a hiss. In this case, however, it has an extended f. Thus, fffflame.

But more, the word is suffixed with a shortened form of the divine name, Yehovah. Just as we say Hallelujah, to signify Praise Yah, this says shalhevethyah, “Fffflame Yah!” This is the one reference to the divine name in the book.

Understanding the emphatic nature of what is stated, she next continues to describe love…

Many waters cannot quench love,

mayim rabim lo yukh’lu l’khaboth eth ha’ahavah – “Waters, many, no able to extinguish the love.” The term mayim rabim, translated by most as “many waters,” is a superlative term indicating a roaring, raging torrent. It is something that is overwhelming.

The idea is that of a magnesium torch, even though she doesn’t know what that is. The Fffflame of Yah, symbolizing the state of love, is such a powerful flame that it will burn even when completely doused in a great, roaring stream.

Next, continuing to speak in parallel thought, she says…

7 (con’) Nor can the floods drown it.

un’haroth lo yishtphuha – “And streams, no quench her.” It is the same idea as just expressed concerning the unquenchable, jealous nature of love. When the waters have dried up, the love will continue to exist.

This is such a powerful truth that she turns to an affirmative statement to highlight the value and preciousness of the state of love…

7 (con’) If a man would give for love
All the wealth of his house,

im yiten ish eth kal khon beito ba’ahavah – “If give, man, all wealth his house in the love.” The idea here is more expansive than what we would think of when referring to a house. My house got flooded last year. If it got swept away, someone might say, “All the wealth of his house is gone.”

But that is not the totality of a house in Hebrew thought. Rather, it speaks of the family that issues from a man as well. The House of David refers to everything that the name David encompasses, meaning his descendants and all of the promises or blessings they accrue because he represents them.

The meaning is that if a man were to attempt to purchase love with everything his existence encompasses…

*7 (fin) It would be utterly despised.

boz yavuzu lo – “Disrespecting disrespect to him.” The word buz, to disrespect or despise, is used eleven times. All eleven by Solomon, and the last three are in this chapter. In this verse, it is used twice in a row.

This is the traditional way of emphasizing a verbal action to indicate the greatest or most superlative nature of what is being said. The word is stated as an infinitive absolute, and then it is restated in the imperfect. In English, we would say “utterly despised.”

Everything that a man is comprised of would be an utterly disrespectful offer for the purchase of love. With that, the verses for today are complete.

The Word of God – holy, pure, and perfect too
Is given to satisfy man’s weary soul
Let us take an eternal view
Let the word convert us to God’s heavenly roll

There, in the Book of Life, our names will be
Because we pursued His word and found Jesus
Innumerable redeemed, there beside the glassy sea
Such a marvelous thing God has done for us

If we will just open the Bible, our own Book of Life
And accept what it says as holy and true
Then, between us and God, will end the strife
In believing the gospel, life begins anew

III. Jesus in the Details

The significance of these verses in relation to Christ is more difficult than in the previous few chapters. However, what is key is that it refers to the house of the woman’s mother and the binding of the woman by the mother.

The woman speaks of the closest family relationship she could describe, where there is no hint of difficulty that lovers might face and no hint of impurity assumed by those who witness them. That relationship is of a brother from the same mother.

They are a couple, but this is the state she desires. That is the state of the redeemed in Christ –

“And we know that all things work together for good to those who love God, to those who are the called according to His purpose. 29 For whom He foreknew, He also predestined to be conformed to the image of His Son, that He might be the firstborn among many brethren. 30 Moreover whom He predestined, these He also called; whom He called, these He also justified; and whom He justified, these He also glorified.” Romans 8:28-30

There must be a common mother figure to identify the people of God. That is seen in Galatians 4 –

“Tell me, you who desire to be under the law, do you not hear the law? 22 For it is written that Abraham had two sons: the one by a bondwoman, the other by a freewoman. 23 But he who was of the bondwoman was born according to the flesh, and he of the freewoman through promise, 24 which things are symbolic. For these are the two covenants: the one from Mount Sinai which gives birth to bondage, which is Hagar— 25 for this Hagar is Mount Sinai in Arabia, and corresponds to Jerusalem which now is, and is in bondage with her children— 26 but the Jerusalem above is free, which is the mother of us all. 27 For it is written:
‘Rejoice, O barren,
You who do not bear!
Break forth and shout,
You who are not in labor!
For the desolate has many more children
Than she who has a husband.’” Galatians 4:21-27

The Jerusalem above, identified by the New Covenant, is considered as our mother. This must apply to Christ, too, because He is the first of the brethren according to Paul in Romans 8.

Stating that he was like a brother sucking at her mother’s breasts signifies the same source of nourishment. That is reflected in Peter’s words –

“Therefore, laying aside all malice, all deceit, hypocrisy, envy, and all evil speaking, as newborn babes, desire the pure milk of the word, that you may grow thereby, if indeed you have tasted that the Lord is gracious.” 1 Peter 1:2, 3

She didn’t say that her beloved actually sucked at her mother’s breasts, but made the comparison, which in Christ is a valid one. The same source of the word applies to Him and to His people.

She also stated that she would kiss him openly. The final verse of the 2nd Psalm speaks of kissing the Son. In other words, it refers to paying homage to Him. The final words say, “Blessed are all those who put their trust in Him” (Psalm 2:12).

In such an act of love, there is no disrespect to that person. Verse 2 noted taking her beloved into her mother’s house, being taught, and drinking from the vintner’s wine, meaning juice of the pomegranate.

The pomegranate signifies that which is harvest-ready and of the mature mind. Previously, it has been used to refer to the redeemed of the Lord. Here, that follows as well. The cultural expression (the wine) of the mature-minded (the pomegranate) is what Christ drinks.

That would explain the intimate embrace of verse 3. The beloved gave her adjuration, asking why someone would waken and awaken love until she inclines.

In her question, the vav, the sixth letter which represents man, particularly fallen man, drops out of the word.

The change, though hidden and subtle, is purposeful. Just as it was in verse 7:3, it is a personal note telling us of our already assured heavenly state. Those who have not awakened love through that which is false, but rather allowed it to develop in Christ, are His, meaning fully redeemed. In other words, eternal salvation is realized in Christ. The nature of the person is changed in Him.

Verse 5 had the debated form of the words as to whether they were masculine or feminine. I argued because of the nature of the words and supporting source texts that they are masculine. As such, it is Solomon speaking throughout the verse.

The redeemed are those brought out of the wilderness and who recline on Christ. Next, he notes that He awakened them under the apple tree. As seen previously, the tappuakh, apple, is derived from naphakh, to breathe or blow.

It is what the Lord did when He breathed the breath of life into Adam, and it is what Christ does in His people when they believe in Him, awakening new life in us.

The binding of the mother (there-ward) refers to the inclusion of those who believe in the New Jerusalem. Next, the woman (the redeemed) spoke of being set as a seal upon His heart and His arm.

That is well-reflected in the sealing of the Spirit, where believers are sealed in the mind (the heart) of Christ and under the authority and power (the reach of the arm) of Christ.

That love is expressed in permanently binding (death/Sheol) and in the unquenchable nature of Christ’s redemption (cinders and Fffflame Yah). It is eternal in nature. It cannot be extinguished, and yet, it cannot be purchased, even with everything that a man is comprised of. It can only be received by faith.

The passage speaks of the redemption of the redeemed: their state, their nature, and their security. It is why this is “Song the songs.” It speaks not only of the work of Christ, but the nature of it in the people He came to bring unto Himself.

The unfailing nature of the love spoken of by the woman is reflected in the eternal nature of God’s love for those He has covenanted with through the blood of Christ.

Let us consider what God has done. Thinking about the love between the king and a woman is anticipatory of the greatest love of all, the love of God for His people, because of Jesus. Hallelujah for the shalhevethyah, the Fffflame of Yah!

Closing Verse: “In Him you also trusted, after you heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation; in whom also, having believed, you were sealed with the Holy Spirit of promise, 14 who is the guarantee of our inheritance until the redemption of the purchased possession, to the praise of His glory.” Ephesians 1:13, 14

Next Week: Song of Songs 8:8-14 Your voice is so precious, My dear… (Cause Me to Hear!) (19th and final Song of Songs sermon)

The Lord has you exactly where He wants you. He has a good plan and purpose for you. He alone is the perfect example of love – untarnished, unblemished, and completely pure and holy. He offers this love to you. So, follow Him, live for Him, and trust Him, and He will do marvelous things for you and through you.

Song of Songs 8 (CG)

8 Who gives you according to brother,
To my ‘sucking breasts my mother.’
Find you in the outside –
Kiss you.
Also, not disrespect to me.

2 Lead you and bring you,
Unto house, my mother –
Will teach me.
Cause you to drink from wine, the vintner,
From juice my pomegranate.

3 His left under my head,
And his right embraces me.

4 Adjured you, daughters Jerusalem –
Why waken and why awaken the love,
Until she inclines?

5 Who this ascending from the wilderness,
Reclining upon her beloved?
Under the apple, I awakened you.
There-ward pledged you, your mother.
There-ward pledged, ‘borne you.’

6 Set me according to the seal upon your heart,
According to the seal upon your arm.
For strong, according to the death – love,
Severe, according to Sheol – jealousy.
Her cinders, cinders fire,
Fffflame Yah!

7 Waters, many, no able to extinguish the love,
And streams, no quench her.
If give, man, all wealth his house in the love,
Disrespecting disrespect to him.

 

Song of Songs 8 (NKJV)

Oh, that you were like my brother,
Who nursed at my mother’s breasts!
If I should find you outside,
I would kiss you;
I would not be despised.
I would lead you and bring you
Into the house of my mother,
She who used to instruct me.
I would cause you to drink of spiced wine,
Of the juice of my pomegranate.

His left hand is under my head,
And his right hand embraces me.
I charge you, O daughters of Jerusalem,
Do not stir up nor awaken love
Until it pleases.

Who is this coming up from the wilderness,
Leaning upon her beloved?

I awakened you under the apple tree.
There your mother brought you forth;
There she who bore you brought you forth.

Set me as a seal upon your heart,
As a seal upon your arm;
For love is as strong as death,
Jealousy as cruel as the grave;
Its flames are flames of fire,

A most vehement flame.

Many waters cannot quench love,
Nor can the floods drown it.
If a man would give for love
All the wealth of his house,
It would be utterly despised.

 

Matthew 10:32

Sunday, 8 June 2025

“Therefore whoever confesses Me before men, him I will also confess before My Father who is in heaven. Matthew 10:32

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at the “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen).

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“All, therefore, whoever he will assent in Me before men, I will assent – I also – in him before My Father, the ‘in the heavens.’” (CG).

In the previous verse, Jesus reassured His apostles that they were of more value than many sparrows. He next turns to words which have to be considered in their intended context.

Jesus is still speaking to His apostles (disciples as recorded in Luke 10). He is doing so while they go out into the cities of Israel to proclaim the good news of the kingdom. He has not yet been crucified for the sins of the world. Thus, His words speak solely of the relationship between Israel and Jesus.

Understanding this, He begins the first of two verses which must be considered with those points in mind, saying, “All, therefore, whoever he will assent in Me before men.”

The first thing to understand is that not every “every” means “every” and not every “all” means “all.”

Mark 1:5 says, “Then all the land of Judea, and those from Jerusalem, went out to him and were all baptized by him in the Jordan River, confessing their sins.” However, Luke 7:30 says, “But the Pharisees and lawyers rejected the will of God for themselves, not having been baptized by him.”

This is not a contradiction. Rather, the word “all” as used by Mark, as is often the case, is given as a general statement concerning who went to be baptized.

Jesus is making a broad statement concerning those who are going forth and those who will hear and attend to their message. Those who hear the message and assent in Him, acknowledging the word, will be in one category. That category is defined by His next words, “I will assent – I also – in him before My Father, the ‘in the heavens.’”

Jesus emphatically declares that He will then confess such a person before His Father. The proposition depends on the free will assertion of the individual hearing the good news. In response to that free will assertion, Jesus Himself will likewise assent concerning that person.

The expression en emoi, in Me, demonstrates a uniting of the confession with the individual. Despite this, these words are spoken prior to the giving of the Spirit, which first occurs in Acts 2 and which is spoken of in the epistles as a guarantee of eternal salvation, such as in Ephesians 1:13, 14.

Therefore, that process of salvation cannot be what Jesus is referring to here. Rather, He is speaking of a general confession of Him and not necessarily the uniting of an individual with the Spirit. That will become clear through analyzing the next verse.

Life application: The words of this verse and the next are constantly quoted by Christians concerning other Christians who then make claims of salvation or condemnation based on what Jesus is saying here. As an example –

“It means to acknowledge the Lord Jesus Christ, and our dependence on him for salvation, and our attachment to him, in every proper manner. This profession may be made in uniting with a church, at the communion, in conversation, and in conduct. The Scriptures mean, by a profession of religion, an exhibition of it in every circumstance of the life and before all people. It is not merely in one act that we must do it, but in every act. We must be ashamed neither of the person, the character, the doctrines, nor the requirements of Christ. If we are; if we deny him in these things before people; if we are unwilling to express our attachment to him in every way possible, then it is right that he should ‘disown all connection with us,’ or deny us before God, and he will do it.” Albert Barnes

That is not the gospel. In fact, what Barnes says is in complete contrast to the gospel, which says one is saved by grace through faith and that when one believes, he is sealed with the Holy Spirit for the day of redemption.

If what Barnes (et al) says is true, then it means that salvation is not of Christ but of our own efforts. Mixing the words of Jesus in the dispensation of the law with the words of Paul in the dispensation of grace will inevitably lead to confusion of thought and a contradiction in one’s theology.

Lord God, help us to walk with You all our days, living in a manner that is pleasing to You and in the joy of the salvation which You have given to us. When we fail in this, we know that You will still be with us, but it is we who will suffer the lack of fellowship as we do things our own way. May it not be so! Help us to hold fast to You always. Amen.

 

Matthew 10:31

Saturday, 7 June 2025

Do not fear therefore; you are of more value than many sparrows. Matthew 10:31

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at the “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen).

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“Therefore, not you should fear, many sparrows you excel – you!” (CG).

In the previous verse, Jesus noted that the very hairs of one’s head are numbered. Next, He says to the apostles, “Therefore, not you should fear.” These words take the reader back to verse 28, where Jesus said, “And do not fear those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul.”

If God so minutely knows the number of hairs on one’s head, and if a person is proclaiming the words of Christ, then that person, who is known in such minute detail, is being carefully considered as he proclaims his message. There will be caring for and tending for that person. Jesus explains this next, saying, “many sparrows you excel – you!”

One can see the emphatic nature of His words. God is aware of the falling of a single sparrow. God is aware of the number of hairs on the head of man. Therefore, God is aware of the threats against those who proclaim His word. If one of them falls to the ground because of the proclamation of His words, it will not have been in vain. God will remember him and raise him according to His promises.

The emphatic nature of the word “you” is telling His apostles that because of their trust in Jesus and their continued proclamation of the gospel, the matter is so. This cannot mean that it is a universal statement applying to all men.

The very people who would oppose them have already been seen to have a fate worse than Sodom and Gomorrah (verse 10:15). Therefore, the words now are not inclusive of those who stand opposed to the gospel, but they would logically include those who received them and accepted their words.

In other words, the state of man is one that is at enmity with God. It is the acceptance of the gospel that changes that state. God would have all come to a saving knowledge of the gospel, changing their default position and bringing them back to Himself. But those who reject the gospel remain separated from Him.

Worse, however, is the fact that they voluntarily did so. When one rejects the higher revelation, their condemnation must therefore be greater.

Understanding this, we see that the words of this verse can only apply to those who belong to God because of the gospel, not humanity in general.

Life application: One of the great problems found in churches with a social gospel is that the focus is on the “love” side of God, without any consideration for His just and righteous character. Without leading someone to Christ, all the feeding ministries on the planet are worthless.

It is pointless to feed someone into hell. It is ridiculous to tend to a marginalized community, taking care of their needs and being close friends with them, if you are not going to share with them the only news that can restore them to God.

However, this is what social gospel ministries do. Those conducting them think they are gaining God’s favor for doing good stuff for others, even if they don’t have a heart for the Lord. Those they minister to will die apart from God without the gospel. In the end, everyone connected to such a “giving” ministry will wind up in hell unless Jesus is in the equation.

It is better to be a person on the side of the street handing out tracts with the saving message of Jesus than it is to be catering to sinners in a feeding ministry without telling them of the consequences of their sin and their need for Jesus to cleanse them.

Keep things in the proper perspective. Any deed done in faith will receive its reward, no matter how small. Any deed not done in faith will receive no reward, no matter how great and expansive it is.

Lord God, may our faith in You and love for You stir in us the desire to share the good news with others. Help us in this, O God. People need Jesus. Without Him, there is no hope. But with Him, there is eternal surety and security. Thank You for Jesus! Amen.

 

Matthew 10:30

Friday, 6 June 2025

But the very hairs of your head are all numbered. Matthew 10:30

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at the “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen)

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“And you! Even the hairs of the head, they are all having been enumerated” (CG).

In the previous verse, Jesus noted that despite the fact that sparrows are almost of no monetary value to man, not one of them falls to the ground apart from the will of the Father. Now, in emphatic contrast to that, He begins with, “And you!”

In other words, there are the lowly sparrows that the Father is completely aware of in their existence, and then there are the people of the earth who are God’s highest creation. Of them, Jesus next says, “Even the hairs of the head, they are all having been enumerated.”

A new word, arithmeó, to enumerate, number, count, etc., is introduced. One can see the clear etymological ancestor of our modern word arithmetic, that dreaded or beloved discipline of our school days, depending on how our brains are put together in regard to numbers.

Jesus, after His emphatic declaration, thus separating the sparrow from man, notes that the Father is aware of every hair on our head. However, the use of the perfect participle (having been enumerated) is striking. It is not just that He knows at this time, but He knew and continues to know. As such, it is like saying, “When you lose a hair on your head, God is aware of it.”

Something so seemingly trivial is not unknown to God. Jesus’ words tell us that God is minutely knowledgeable about what we might think is unnecessary or impossible to discern.

Life application: Of this, Charles Ellicott steps over the border of propriety and says, “The apparent hyperbole of the figure is but the natural expression of the thought that even the incidents of life that seem most trivial are in very deed working together for good to those that love God.”

It is incorrect that Jesus’ words are hyperbole as if God really isn’t aware of such things. There is nothing in the universe, even the number of atoms or quarks in a red giant star, that God is unaware of. It may seem trivial or hyperbolic to think God would actually count the number of hairs on one’s head, but that is not the point of Jesus’ words.

God doesn’t need to count them. He simply knows the number, yesterday, today, and tomorrow. He also knows the definition of a hair, so that when someone is balding, what once was a hair no longer is. Jesus’ words, therefore, speak of the intimacy in which God knows everything about us, but they also convey the surety that everything is completely known to God at all times.

As it says in Isaiah –

“Who has measured the waters in the hollow of His hand,
Measured heaven with a span
And calculated the dust of the earth in a measure?
Weighed the mountains in scales
And the hills in a balance?” Isaiah 40:12

Concerning the complete understanding and knowledge of man, David says –

Such knowledge is too wonderful for me;
It is high, I cannot attain it.” Psalm 139:6

The words of Scripture, therefore, give us a double-edge to consider. On one side, there is God’s absolute knowledge of us as we fellowship with Him. He knows the moment we first believed, and He sees and records every act of faith we have ever demonstrated. Nothing that is to be rewarded will be left out.

On the other hand, God is intimately aware of our every fault. The things we think, do, or fail to do are all known to Him. Therefore, we should strive to be pleasing to Him at all times. In Christ, we are forgiven – past, present, and future. However, forgiven is not the same thing as losing rewards.

For those not in Christ, the imperfection of their lives sets up the need for eternal judgment by the infinite God. When the world complains against God’s judgment, it is due to a lack of understanding concerning the nature of God. He is not vindictive. Instead, He is perfectly holy, just, and righteous.

Man must be judged. This is the wonder of what God in Christ has done. For those who come to Him, man’s judgment was taken out on Him. Understanding what God has done ensures us, absolutely and entirely, of the doctrine of eternal salvation.

If it were not so, the cross would have been a pointless gesture on the part of God. All would be lost in their continued imperfection. But because of Christ, His righteousness is now imparted to us. Thank God for Jesus Christ, who has made this reconciliation possible for man. Take time to read Psalm 139 and think about the marvel of our Creator!

Lord God, thank You for the glory of Jesus’ cross. We stand in awe of what You have done. Thank You! Thank You for all eternity, Amen, and amen.