Genesis 10,6-20 (Die Völkertafel Teil 2 – Die Söhne von Ham)

Genesis 10,6-20 (Die Völkertafel Teil 2 – Die Söhne von Ham)

Als ich mit dem Schreiben der Predigt begann, die wir letzte Woche gehalten haben, lag eine Freundin im Krankenhaus. Sie schickte mir eine E-Mail mit den Zeiten, zu denen sie in ihrem Zimmer sein würde, damit ich sie besuchen könnte, und ich schickte eine E-Mail zurück mit den Worten:

“Ich fange heute mit der Predigt über Genesis 10 an und weiß ehrlich gesagt nicht, ob ich zu Besuch kommen kann. Es gibt eine Menge Namen, aber nicht viele andere Informationen. Ich glaube, es wird ewig dauern, dieses Kapitel mit einer ganzen Predigt durchzugehen.”

Was ich für eine ereignislose Predigt über das gesamte Kapitel hielt, entpuppte sich als eine Predigt von letzter Woche über fünf Verse. Und ich habe so viel ausgelassen, dass ich nicht glauben kann, dass der Herr mit der Präsentation zufrieden wäre, wenn ich diese Verse nicht eines Tages noch einmal durchgehen würde.

Ich habe das Gefühl, dass ich ein Verbrechen begangen habe, weil ich sie so schnell durchgegangen bin. Und wenn ich mich an den Zeitplan halte, den ich mir vorgenommen habe, werden wir heute die Linie von Ham und nächste Woche die Linie von Sem durchgehen und dann weiterziehen. Wir verpassen so viel, wenn wir so schnell unterwegs sind!

Wenn wir das Kapitel 10 wirklich vertiefen würden, könnten wir wahrscheinlich wochenlang weitermachen. Aber wir werden weitergehen, und ich bete, dass ihr mir in der Herrlichkeit verzeihen werdet, wenn ihr seht, wie viel wir in diesen Predigten verpasst haben.

Einleitung:

Die Abstammung von Ham, dem jüngsten Sohn Noahs, ist Gegenstand einer immensen Menge an Missbrauch gewesen, und man hat versucht, die Sklaverei auf der Grundlage von Noahs Fluch über diese Abstammung zu rechtfertigen. Das afrikanische Volk stammt von Ham ab und frühere Gelehrte benutzten diese Logik, um zu erklären, warum es akzeptabel war, Sklaven von dort zu besitzen.

Aber der Fluch war ein Fluch der Knechtschaft, nicht der missbräuchlichen Sklaverei. Insgesamt ist Ham die große ignorierte Figur von Noahs Segen, und die Volksgruppen, die die Söhne Hams bilden, bleiben relativ außerhalb des Hauptaugenmerks der Weltöffentlichkeit, obwohl sie das Talent hinter vielen erstaunlichen Erfindungen und Leistungen sind.

Textvers:

Nach diesem sah ich, und siehe, eine große Schar, die niemand zählen konnte, aus allen Nationen und Stämmen und Völkern und Sprachen; die standen vor dem Thron und vor dem Lamm, bekleidet mit weißen Kleidern, und Palmzweige waren in ihren Händen. Und sie riefen mit lauter Stimme und sprachen: Das Heil ist bei unserem Gott, der auf dem Thron sitzt, und bei dem Lamm!
Offenbarung 7,9-10

Kostbare Seelen aus allen Nationen, Stämmen, Völkern und Sprachen werden vor dem Thron Gottes stehen und Ihn anbeten. Erinnern wir uns daran, wenn wir arrogant auf unsere Mitmenschen herabschauen und…

Möge Gott heute durch Sein Wort zu uns sprechen, und möge Sein glorreicher Name immer gepriesen werden.

I. Kanaans Fluch

„Verflucht sei Kanaan;
Ein Knecht der Knechte
soll er seinen Brüdern sein.”
Und er sagte:
“Gelobt sei der HERR!
der Gott Sems,
und Kanaan möge sein Knecht sein.
Gott möge Japheth vergrößern,
und er möge in den Zelten Sems wohnen;
Und Kanaan möge sein Knecht sein.”
Genesis 9,25-27

Ham hat, wie du dich erinnerst, eine verwerfliche und beleidigende Tat an Noah begangen. Aber Gott hatte Ham bereits gesegnet, und so drehte er sich um und, anstatt seinen jüngsten Sohn zu verfluchen, verfluchte den jüngsten Sohn seines jüngsten Sohnes. Dieser Fluch gilt symbolisch für die gesamte Linie Hams in der Bibel, aber er richtet sich besonders gegen die Linie Kanaans.

6 Und dies sind die Söhne Hams: Kusch, Mizraim, Put und Kanaan.

In Kapitel 10 wird Hams Linie ausführlicher beschrieben als die der anderen Brüder Sem und Japheth. Aus diesem Grund ist es wichtig zu wissen, was aus diesen Menschen wurde und wie sie sowohl Gottes Volk in der Bibel als auch zukünftige Prophezeiungen beeinflussen.

Ham bedeutet “leidenschaftlich” oder “heiß”, aber es kann auch “verbrannt” oder “dunkel” bedeuten. Diese beiden Beschreibungen passen perfekt zu den Menschen, die von ihm abstammen. Die meisten der dunkleren Völker der Welt, einschließlich der australoiden, negriden und mongoloiden Völker, stammen von ihm ab. Aber auch andere dunkle Menschengruppen finden sich in den beiden Linien von Sem und Japheth.

Der erste von Hams Söhnen, der aufgeführt wird, ist Kusch. Sein Name bedeutet “schwarz”, und Kusch ist heute als Äthiopien bekannt. Das Volk von Kusch war auch bis nach Arabien verbreitet. Moses Frau wurde als Kuschitin oder Äthiopierin bezeichnet, obwohl sie aus Midian stammte, und so waren die beiden Völker zu dieser Zeit bereits vermischt.

Der zweitgenannte Sohn ist Mizraim, was “doppelte Enge” bedeutet, und sie wurden das Volk von Ägypten, sowohl in Ober- als auch in Unterägypten. Nach ihm ist Put aufgeführt. Sein Name bedeutet “ein Bogen”, und wir haben gesehen, wie sie in den letzten Monaten durch den Krieg in Libyen wieder auf die Weltbühne getreten sind.

Die Libyer stammen aus Put, zusammen mit anderen nordafrikanischen Gruppen, wie denen aus Kyrene, Tunesien, den Berbern, Somaliern, Sudanesen usw. Die meisten von ihnen haben der Welt in vielerlei Hinsicht Schwierigkeiten bereitet, und der Name “Bogen” ist für ihre kriegerische Haltung sehr passend.

7 Und die Söhne Kuschs: Seba, Havilah, Sabtah, Raamah, Sabtechah. Und die Söhne Raamahs: Sheba und Dedan.

Hier sind fünf Söhne von Kusch aufgeführt. Im nächsten Vers werden wir einen weiteren sehen. Sie werden nach ihrer Bedeutung für die biblische Geschichte aufgeteilt und benannt. Von den fünf Söhnen, die in diesem Vers genannt werden, sind nur bei einem auch die Namen seiner Söhne aufgeführt – Raamah. Seine Söhne sind Sheba und Dedan.

Noch einmal: Sie sind aufgelistet, weil sie für die biblische Geschichte relevant sind und wie sie mit Gottes Volk interagieren werden. Es mögen noch viele andere Söhne Hams geboren worden sein, aber nur diese sind aus diesem Grund hier aufgeführt.

Diese Söhne und Enkel verbreiteten sich über die gesamten Grenzen Israels. Sie reichen von Nordafrika über Arabien bis in das Gebiet des heutigen Iran.

Ein schönes Beispiel für Gottes Treue zum Geschlecht von Kusch finden wir im Buch Jeremia über einen seiner Nachkommen, einen äthiopischen Eunuchen namens Ebed-Melech, der Jeremia das Leben rettete, indem er ihn aus einem Kerker voller Schlamm herausholte.

Es war so schlimm, dass Jeremia tatsächlich im Schlamm versunken war, weshalb dieser Eunuch zum König ging, um die Erlaubnis zu erhalten, ihn herauszuziehen. Um ihn herauszuziehen, mussten sie ihm abgetragene Kleider und Lumpen unter die Achselhöhle legen, und es waren dreißig Männer nötig, um an den Seilen zu ziehen.

Wegen seiner Taten erinnert sich Gott im nächsten Kapitel an Ebed-Melech während der schrecklichen Belagerung und des letztendlichen Umsturzes von Jerusalem.

“Geh zu Ebed-Melech, dem Nubier, und sag zu ihm: ‘So spricht Jahwe, der allmächtige Gott Israels: Du wirst sehen, wie meine Worte über diese Stadt in Erfüllung gehen und das Unheil über sie hereinbricht. Du wirst es selbst miterleben. Aber dich werde ich an jenem Tag retten, spricht Jahwe. Du wirst den Leuten, vor denen du Angst hast, nicht in die Hände fallen. Ich lasse dich entkommen, damit du nicht getötet wirst. Du sollst dein Leben als Beute davontragen, weil du mir vertraut hast’, spricht Jahwe.”
Jeremia 39,16-18

Und vielleicht erinnerst du dich, dass ich letzte Woche erwähnt habe, dass der erste Nachkomme Hams, der Jesus in der Apostelgeschichte empfängt, ebenfalls aus der Linie von Kusch stammt. Er war der äthiopische Eunuch in Apostelgeschichte Kapitel 8, der für Kandake, die Königin der Äthiopier, arbeitete.

8 Auch zeugte Kusch den Nimrod; der war der erste Gewalthaber auf Erden.
9 Er war ein gewaltiger Jäger vor dem Herrn; daher sagt man: »Ein gewaltiger Jäger vor dem Herrn wie Nimrod«.

Neben seinen anderen Söhnen zeugte Kusch auch Nimrod. Dies ist eine rätselhafte Figur, die nur ein paar Mal in der Bibel erwähnt wird. Sein Name bedeutet “wir werden rebellieren” und kommt von dem Wort „marad“, was so viel wie “rebellieren” bedeutet.

Das Wort „marad“ wird in dreierlei Hinsicht verwendet – entweder als Rebellion gegen Gott, als Rebellion gegen die Autorität eines Königs oder in einem Fall als Rebellion gegen das Licht. Es ist Hiob, der auf die letztgenannte Weise davon spricht, und es ist möglich, dass er dabei an Nimrod und seine Nachkommen und ihre geistliche Rebellion gegen Gott dachte.

„Jene sind Feinde des Lichts und wissen nichts von Gottes Wegen. Sie bleiben auch nicht auf seinem Pfad. Bevor es hell wird, steht der Mörder auf und bringt Arme und Schutzlose um. Und der Dieb geht um in der Nacht. Der Ehebrecher wartet auf die Dämmerung; er sagt: ‘Kein Auge soll mich sehen!’, und er verhüllt sein Gesicht. Im Dunkeln brechen sie ein in die Häuser. Am Tag, da verstecken sie sich, denn sie scheuen das Licht. Die Finsternis gilt ihnen als Morgen, mit ihrem Schrecken sind sie wohlvertraut.”
Hiob 24,13-17

In der Bibel heißt es, dass Nimrod “anfing, ein Mächtiger auf der Erde zu sein. Er war ein mächtiger Jäger vor dem Herrn.” Er ist die erste aktive Figur, die von allen Enkeln Noahs erwähnt wird. Bis zu diesem Punkt wurden nur Namen und Orte erwähnt, aber jetzt erfahren wir echte Details über eine Person.

Es gibt zwei allgemeine Vorstellungen darüber, was es bedeutet, ein “mächtiger Jäger” zu sein. Die erste ist, dass er Tiere gejagt hat, wie wir es heute tun, und dass er das Land von ihnen gerodet hat, um einen Ort zu schaffen, der zum Leben geeignet war… unwahrscheinlich.

Die zweite und wahrscheinlichere Idee ist, dass er ein Anführer wurde und Menschen unter seinem Kommando sammelte, um sich zum Herrscher über das Gebiet zu machen, das er besiedeln würde. Er war ein mächtiger Jäger vor oder buchstäblich im Angesicht des Herrn. Das bedeutet sicherlich, dass er sich gegen den Herrn und gegen geistliche Autorität auflehnte, und das ist das Bild, das die Bibel von ihm zeichnet. Genau wie Kain vor der Sintflut hat er eine von Gott getrennte Linie errichtet und sich gegen ihn aufgelehnt.

10 Und der Anfang seines Königreiches war Babel, sowie Erek, Akkad und Kalne im Land Sinear.
11 Von diesem Land zog er aus nach Assur und baute Ninive, Rechobot-Ir und Kelach,
12 dazu Resen, zwischen Ninive und Kelach; das ist die große Stadt.
13 Mizraim aber zeugte die Luditer, die Anamiter, die Lehabiter und Naphtuchiter;
14 auch die Patrusiter und die Kasluchiter (von denen die Philister ausgegangen sind) und die Kaphtoriter.

Nimrod war ein mächtiger Jäger, aber er war auch ein mächtiger Baumeister und ein mächtiger Führer. Wie Kain, der die erste aufgezeichnete Stadt und Kultur gründete, ist es Nimrod, der nach der Sintflut denselben Weg einschlägt. Obwohl die Linie Kains in der Sintflut ausgelöscht wurde, ist sie in diesem Nimrod symbolisch lebendig.

Es gibt mehrere alte Schriften, die von Nimrod sprechen. In einer von ihnen heißt es: “Er war mächtig im Jagen … und in der Sünde vor Gott, denn er war ein Jäger der Menschenkinder in ihren Sprachen; und er sagte zu ihnen: ‘Verlasst die Religion Sems und haltet euch an die Einrichtungen Nimrods.'”

In einer anderen Schrift heißt es: “Von Grundlegung der Welt an ist niemand gefunden worden wie Nimrod, mächtig im Jagen und im Aufstand gegen den Herrn.”

Diese Schriften sind nicht biblisch, aber sie zeigen uns, dass die Überzeugung aus vergangenen Zeiten die war, dass Nimrod gegen den wahren Glauben kämpfte, der in der Natur und von seinen Vätern vor ihm offenbart wurde.

Das Wort, das für “Jäger” verwendet wird, bedeutet “Beute”. Es wird verwendet, wenn es um die Jagd auf Menschen durch Verfolgung, Unterdrückung und Tyrannei geht. Und es ist wahrscheinlich, dass er Macht erlangte und sie in tyrannischer Unterdrückung einsetzte, um das erste Königreich nach der Sintflut zu errichten.

Was hat es also mit Nimrod auf sich, dass die Liste der Personen plötzlich aufhört und ihn hervorhebt? Es liegt nicht nur daran, wer er war, sondern vor allem daran, was er tat und welche Städte er gründete. Seine Rebellion gegen Gott begründete das Land der Bosheit, welches im Rest der Bibel noch eine Rolle spielen wird.

Von diesem Zeitpunkt an, bis hin zur Offenbarung, wird es zwei Städte von großer Bedeutung geben, die zwei Konzepte widerspiegeln. Die erste ist Jerusalem, die Stadt des Friedens und der Ganzheit. Es ist die Stadt, in der Gott wohnt und die Gerechtigkeit regiert.

Das andere ist Babylon, was “Verwirrung” bedeutet. Es liegt in Sinear und ist die Stadt, die in geistiger Opposition zu Gott steht. Sie ist der Ort, an dem das Böse und die Schlechtigkeit regieren. Babylon liegt östlich von Jerusalem. Als der Mensch aus dem Garten Eden und aus Gottes Gegenwart vertrieben wurde, lag sie im Osten.

Wenn die Israeliten in Gemeinschaft oder im Frieden mit Gott waren, besaßen sie das Land Israel und die Stadt Jerusalem, aber wenn sie ungehorsam waren, wurden sie aus dem Land und in den Osten, nach Babylon im Land Sinear, vertrieben.

Aber Babylon ist nicht nur ein Ort, sondern auch ein Begriff für die geistliche Rebellion gegen Gott. Das zweite Exil der Juden wurde von den Römern verursacht. In seinem ersten Brief schreibt Petrus aus Rom, aber er sagt dies –

„Es grüßt euch die Miterwählte in Babylon und Markus, mein Sohn. Grüßet einander mit dem Gruß der Liebe. Friede euch allen, die ihr in Christus seid!“
Petrus 5,13-14

Gott sagt uns in Seinem Wort, dass das Babylon der Zukunft, das in der Offenbarung als die große Hure bezeichnet wird, sein Zentrum in Rom haben wird, genau dort, wo heute der Vatikan steht. Irgendwann, wahrscheinlich nach der Entrückung, wird die Stadt Rom die Anführerin aller geistlichen Opposition gegen Gott werden und die Kräfte des Bösen gegen Jerusalem, die Stadt des Friedens, richten.

Dazu wird sicherlich auch ein Bündnis mit den Menschen gehören, die heute in der Ebene von Sinear leben, den Moslems. Dieser Zusammenschluss der abtrünnigen Weltreligionen wird sich gegen das Volk Gottes, Israel, wenden und versuchen, es von der Erde zu tilgen.

II. Ein Diener der Diener soll er sein

15 Kanaan aber zeugte Zidon, seinen Erstgeborenen, und Het,
16 auch den Jebusiter, den Amoriter und den Girgasiter,
17 und den Hewiter, den Arkiter und den Siniter
18 und den Arwaditer, den Zemariter und den Hamatiter;

Ich sagte bereits, dass in Kapitel 10 mehr Platz für die Beschreibung der Linie Hams verwendet wird als für die der anderen Brüder Sem und Japheth. Und von allen Söhnen Hams wird mehr Platz für die Beschreibung der Kanaaniter verwendet als für die Beschreibung der anderen Söhne Hams.

Das liegt daran, dass sie sich in den Ländern direkt in und um Israel herum niedergelassen haben und somit den größten Einfluss auf das Volk Gottes haben werden. Kanaan bedeutet “Händler” oder “Diener”.

Elf Gruppen von Menschen stammen von Kanaan ab. Denk daran, dass es Kanaan war, der von Noah den Fluch der Knechtschaft erhielt, und dies sind die verfluchten Nachkommen von ihm. Trotzdem sehen wir später in der Bibel, dass sogar einigen dieser Völker Gnade widerfährt.

Zu wissen, wer diese Menschen sind, hilft uns, die Wege zu verstehen, die die Bibel einschlägt, während wir sie durchlesen. Wenn wir dieses Kapitel und diese besonderen Namen vernachlässigen, missverstehen wir viel von dem, was Gott durch die Menschen in der Welt getan hat, und wir gehen zu schnell an ihnen vorbei, zu unserem eigenen Schaden.

Drei Beispiele aus dem Alten Testament von Menschen aus dem Geschlecht Kanaans, die die Gnade des Herrn fanden, sind in den Frauen aufgezeichnet, die im Stammbaum Jesu in Matthäus Kapitel 1 genannt werden.

Von den fünf Frauen, die in dieser Genealogie erwähnt werden, ist nur Maria eine Israelitin. Rut stammte aus Moab, also aus der Linie Sems, und die drei anderen aus der Linie Kanaans.

Die erste ist Tamar, die Schwiegertochter von Juda, die seine Söhne Perez und Serach zeugte. Trotz des Skandals sagte Juda, dass sie in dieser Affäre gerechter war als er.

Die zweite ist Rahab, die Hure von Jericho, die die Spione Israels versteckte und in das Volk Israel aufgenommen wurde, als sie Salmon heiratete. Die beiden bekamen einen Sohn namens Boas, der der Urgroßvater von König David werden sollte.

Und die dritte stammt aus dem Bericht über David und Bathseba. Bathseba war mit Urija dem Hethiter verheiratet, einem der Söhne Heths, dem zweiten Sohn Kanaans. Trotz allem, was geschah, wurde Bathseba Gottes Gnade zuteil, und sie wurde aus dieser Linie in die Linie Sems gebracht.

Im Neuen Testament findet sich ein Beispiel in Matthäus 15,21-28 –

Jesus brach von dort auf und zog sich in die Gegend von Tyrus und Sidon zurück. Da kam eine Frau auf ihn zu und rief: “Herr, du Sohn Davids, hab Erbarmen mit mir! Meine Tochter wird von einem bösen Geist furchtbar gequält.” Es war eine Kanaaniterin aus jener Gegend. Aber Jesus gab ihr keine Antwort. Schließlich drängten ihn seine Jünger: “Fertige sie doch ab, denn sie schreit dauernd hinter uns her!” Er entgegnete: “Ich bin nur zu den verlorenen Schafen des Hauses Israel gesandt.” Da kam die Frau näher und warf sich vor Jesus nieder. “Herr”, sagte sie, “hilf mir!” Er entgegnete: “Es ist nicht recht, den Kindern das Brot wegzunehmen und es den Haushunden vorzuwerfen.” “Das ist wahr, Herr”, erwiderte sie, “aber die Hündchen unter dem Tisch dürfen doch die Brotkrumen fressen, die ihre Herren fallen lassen.” Da sagte Jesus zu ihr: “Frau, dein Vertrauen ist groß! Was du willst, soll geschehen!” Von diesem Augenblick an war ihre Tochter gesund.
Matthäus 15,21-28

Die Gnade des Herrn Jesus wurde einer Frau aus dem Geschlecht Hams und aus den Kindern Kanaans zuteil, weil sie eine Frau mit großem Glauben war. Und letzte Woche erwähnte ich Simon von Cyrene. Er war derjenige, der das Kreuz Jesu trug. Hier ist der Bericht –

Unterwegs begegnete ihnen ein Mann, der gerade vom Feld kam. Es war Simon aus Cyrene, der Vater von Alexander und Rufus. Die Soldaten zwangen ihn, das Kreuz für Jesus zu tragen. So brachten sie ihn bis zu der Stelle, die Golgota heißt, das bedeutet “Schädelstätte”.
Markus 15,21-22

Und es ist sehr wahrscheinlich, dass dieser Sohn Kanaans nicht nur Jesus diente, sondern ein Diener Jesu wurde. Im Schlusswort des Paulus an die Römer schreibt er: “Grüßt Rufus, den Auserwählten im Herrn, und seine und meine Mutter.” Es wird angenommen, dass es sich bei dem hier erwähnten Rufus um denselben Rufus handelt, der der Sohn des Simon war, der das Kreuz trug.

Simon war also die ultimative Erfüllung der Fluchworte Noahs – “ein Knecht von Knechten sollst du sein”. Jesus, dem leidenden Knecht, wurde von diesem Sohn Kanaans gedient, der sein Kreuz für ihn trug, sogar bis Golgatha, wo alle Flüche ihr Ende finden.

Und immer, wenn ich diesen Bericht lese, denke ich daran, was zwischen Petrus und Jesus in der Nacht, in der er verraten wurde, geschah –

“Herr”, sagte Simon Petrus, “wo gehst du hin?” – “Wo ich hingehe”, erwiderte Jesus, “dahin kannst du jetzt nicht mitkommen. Aber später wirst du mir dorthin nachfolgen.” “Herr”, entgegnete Petrus, “warum kann ich dir jetzt nicht folgen? Ich bin auch bereit, für dich zu sterben.” “Dein Leben willst du für mich lassen?”, erwiderte Jesus. “Ja, ich versichere dir: Noch bevor der Hahn kräht, wirst du mich dreimal verleugnen.”
Johannes 13,36-38

Simon von Cyrene, der Sohn Kanaans, trat an die Stelle von Simon Petrus, dem Sohn Sems, der Jesus versprochen hatte, sogar mit ihm in den Tod zu gehen.

Ich sagte bereits, dass wir uns wochenlang mit den Namen und Personen beschäftigen könnten, die in den heutigen Versen genannt werden. Aber um irgendwann in diesem Jahrhundert das Ende der Bibel zu erreichen, werden wir viele von ihnen übergehen müssen. Achte beim Lesen der Bibel auf die Stämme der Menschen, und du wirst dort Reichtümer und Schätze über die drei Söhne Noahs finden.

Ich möchte dir eine Frage stellen, aber nicht nur über die Linie von Ham, sondern speziell über die Linie von Kanaan. Kann mir jemand von euch sagen, wo die Jebusiter siedelten, welche Stadt von biblischer Bedeutung sie besaßen oder wie ein bedeutender Jebusiter hieß, und welche 11 Gruppen von Menschen von ihm abstammen?

Jerusalem wurde von den Jebusitern besiedelt, und selbst nachdem sie bei der Eroberung Kanaans fast vollständig vertrieben worden waren, blieben die Jebusiter dort bis zur Zeit Davids präsent.

Der Name Jebus bedeutet “zertreten” oder “Dreschplatz” und überraschenderweise wird dieser Name eine Prophezeiung für den Zeitpunkt in der Geschichte, an dem David die Tenne von Arauna, dem Jebusiter, kauft.

Dies war der Ort, an dem der Tempel Salomos gebaut werden sollte, und es ist genau derselbe Ort, an den Abraham fast 1000 Jahre zuvor ging, um seinen Sohn Isaak zu opfern. Es ist auch der Ort, an dem der Tempelberg heute steht und der das am meisten umkämpfte Grundstück der Welt ist.

Wenn du verstehst, wer diese Menschen in Kapitel 10 sind, kannst du sehr viel mehr über unsere Vergangenheit verstehen, wohin wir gehen und wie wir dorthin gelangen werden.

18 (Fortsetzung) …und danach breiteten sich die Sippen der Kanaaniter aus.
19 Und das Gebiet der Kanaaniter erstreckte sich von Zidon an bis dahin, wo man von Gerar nach Gaza kommt; nach Sodom und Gomorra, Adama und Zeboim hin, bis nach Lascha.

Diese Orte werden angegeben, um zu zeigen, dass die Kanaaniter in dem Land siedelten, das schließlich Abraham, dann seinem Sohn Isaak und dann seinem Sohn Israel gegeben werden sollte. Sie zeigen im Allgemeinen, dass sie das Land von Norden nach Süden und von Osten nach Westen ausfüllten. Diese Städte werden im weiteren Verlauf der Bibel wieder erwähnt.

20 Das sind die Söhne Hams nach ihren Sippen und Sprachen, in ihren Ländern und Völkerschaften.

Wie du siehst, spielen die Hamiter und die Kanaaniter eine wichtige Rolle in der Bibel. Viele dieser Völker wurden in Eroberungen und Schlachten vernichtet, aber viele von ihnen überlebten teilweise unversehrt oder nachdem sie sich mit anderen Völkern gekreuzt hatten. Die Errungenschaften dieser Völker waren immens, und heute bevölkern die Kinder Hams die Erde.

III. Die Hamiten in deiner Nähe

Ich habe vor einer Weile durch den Fernseher gezappt, und bei uns zu Hause dauert das nicht lange. Wir haben etwa 15 Kanäle und die meisten davon sind ziemlich schrecklich. Aber in der Hoffnung, etwas Lohnenswertes zu finden, und in dem Wissen, dass es nicht auf dem christlichen Kanal laufen würde, klickte ich die Reihe runter.

Ich kam zu einem Bildungskanal und da war dieser Typ, der über Hieroglyphen der Maya sprach. Ich dachte: “Langweilig”, aber ich hielt trotzdem kurz inne. Ich dachte, es würde irgendein verrückter Unsinn darüber sein, dass die Mayas das Ende der Welt vorausgesagt haben oder so.

Stattdessen war es Dr. Mark Van Stone, ein Professor für Kunstgeschichte am „Southwestern College“. Er liest die Hieroglyphen nicht nur, sondern schreibt sie auch auf. Er schrieb eine allgemeine Begrüßung für den Produzenten der Show in Maya, und es kostete eine Menge Arbeit und Sorgfalt und sehr spezielle Stifte, um sie genau richtig hinzubekommen.

Für mich war das eine der faszinierendsten 10 Minuten, die ich seit Ewigkeiten außerhalb der Bibel verbracht habe. Als ich ihm beim Schreiben und Aussprechen der einzelnen Figuren zusah, dachte ich: “Dieser Mann hat sein Leben einer Sache gewidmet, an der die meisten Menschen einfach vorbeigehen würden, ohne darüber nachzudenken.”

Hier gibt es diese uralte Sprache und Schrift, und ein Mann aus der Linie der Söhne Japheths hält sie am Leben. Die Maya stammen aus der Linie von Ham und alle ihre großen Errungenschaften spiegeln indirekt einen Teil dieses dritten Sohnes von Noah wider. Neben den Mayas stammen auch die Azteken, die Inkas, die Babylonier usw. von Ham ab.

Was bedeutet es also, im Zusammenhang mit dem von Noah ausgesprochenen Fluch ein “Diener von Dienern” zu sein? Nun, wie ich schon sagte, galt der Fluch Kanaan, aber er spiegelt sich in der gesamten Linie von Ham wider. Die Linie Sems ist Gottes Diener im geistlichen Sinne und die Linie Japhets ist Gottes Diener im intellektuellen Sinne.

Die Linie Hams jedoch hat der Welt physische Dienste und Erfindungen geleistet, und daher hat das, was sie hervorgebracht hat, sowohl Sem als auch Japheth gedient. Mit anderen Worten: Ham war ein Diener von Dienern.

Zwei der großen alten Weltreiche, die Ägypter und die Sumerer, stammen von Ham ab. Die seefahrenden Phönizier stammten von Ham ab. Die afrikanischen Stämme und die Chinesen und Japaner stammen alle von Ham ab, ebenso wie die amerikanischen Indianerstämme, die aus Richtung Asien kamen.

Die Söhne Hams waren die ersten großen Entdecker, die alle Teile der Welt bereisten. Sie waren die ersten Menschen, die Grundnahrungsmittel wie Mais, Kartoffeln, Bohnen und so weiter anbauten. Die Japaner haben erstaunliche Entwicklungen in der Pflanzenveredelung und -bestäubung gemacht.

Die meisten Grundformen und -typen von Gebäudestrukturen, Baumaterialien und -werkzeugen stammen aus der Linie Hams. Sie entwickelten viele Arten von Stoffen sowie Näh- und Webtechniken und -geräte.

Medizinische und chirurgische Instrumente und Praktiken, die Äonen zurückreichen, stammen von Hams Linie, ebenso wie die meisten Konzepte der praktischen Mathematik, Vermessung und Navigation. Banken, Postwesen, Handel, Maschinen und Handelsgeld stammen ebenfalls von ihnen.

Und die Entwicklung von Papier, Tinte zum Schreiben, Blockdruck, beweglichen Lettern und vielen anderen Schreib- und Kommunikationsfähigkeiten geht auf sie zurück. Je weiter man zurückgeht, desto mehr stellt man fest, dass fast jedes grundlegende System oder Gerät, das wir zum Leben und zur Erleichterung des Lebens benutzen, von einem der Söhne Hams stammt.

In diesem Sinne waren sie die Diener der Menschheit in Erfüllung der alten Prophezeiung von Noah. Trotzdem sind fast alle ihre Erfindungsfähigkeiten an einem bestimmten Punkt zum Stillstand gekommen. Schließlich treten die Söhne Japheths oder Sems auf den Plan und verfeinern sie und machen sie nützlicher.

Und noch etwas… so wie wir letzte Woche eine interessante Flutgeschichte in der Linie von Japheth hatten, haben wir auch eine in der Linie von Ham. Die Chinesen haben eine Tradition, dass ihr erster König, Fohi, was auf Chinesisch Noah heißt, auf den Bergen von Chin erschien, die von einem Regenbogen umgeben waren, nachdem die Welt mit Wasser bedeckt war.

Er opferte Gott Tiere, genau wie in der Genesis-Geschichte. Und er hatte einen Urenkel namens Sin, was wiederum perfekt mit der Bibel übereinstimmt. Die Siniten, benannt nach Kanaans Sohn Sin, lebten genau zu der Zeit, als sich die chinesische Kultur entwickelte. Noch heute wird die chinesische Kultur die Sino-Kultur genannt – nach Sin.

Eine andere Fluttradition innerhalb der chinesischen Kultur stammt vom Stamm der Miao im Südwesten Chinas. Es heißt, dass sie, bevor sie jemals von Missionaren besucht wurden, glaubten, dass Gott einst die ganze Welt durch eine Flut wegen der Schlechtigkeit der Menschen zerstört hatte, aber er rettete einen rechtschaffenen Mann namens Nuah, seine Frau und ihre drei Söhne.

Nuahs Söhne hießen Lo Han (Ham), Lo Shen (Sem) und Jah-hu oder Japheth. Sie und ein paar Tiere wurden alle durch den Bau eines riesigen Schiffes gerettet.

Die Chinesen haben auch ein Geschichtsbuch, das Shu Jing, das von Konfuzius verfasst wurde. In diesem Buch ist von einem Kaiser Shun die Rede, der etwa 2200 v. Chr. regierte, als die erste Dynastie begann. Er verehrte Shang Di oder den himmlischen Herrscher und opferte ihm einen Stier.

Shang Di entspricht Shaddai, dem Allmächtigen der Bibel.
Offenbar wurden diese Opfer an Shang Di bis 1911, als der letzte chinesische Kaiser abgesetzt wurde, fortgesetzt.

Von all jenen, die von der Linie Hams abstammen, haben vor allem drei einen großen Einfluss auf mein eigenes Leben gehabt. Die hübschesten Hamiten hier sind meine Frau Hideko und meine Tochter Tangerine.

Beide sind, zusammen mit meinem Sohn Thorr, die Hamiten, die mir am nächsten stehen. Und wie so viele aus ihrer Linie im Laufe der Jahrhunderte hat Gott jedem von ihnen Gnade und Gunst erwiesen.

Die wunderbare Geschichte der Bibel ist, dass Gott uns alle gleich ansieht, egal wer wir sind oder woher wir kommen, wenn wir Jesus Christus als Herrn anrufen. Es spielt keine Rolle, welche Hautfarbe wir haben, wo wir geboren wurden, wie viel Geld wir haben oder was auch immer.

Wir alle sind oder waren Feinde Gottes, aber er streckt Seine Hand nach uns aus durch Sein Wort, das von Jesus erzählt. Jesus lebte das vollkommene Leben, das niemand je gelebt hat, und Er war bereit, dieses Leben für alle zu opfern, die Seinen Namen anrufen. Wir alle sind entweder Söhne von Sem, Söhne von Ham oder Söhne von Japheth. Und sie alle sind Söhne von Noah und Noah stammt von Adam ab.

Wir tragen Adams Schuld und Jesus will sie von uns nehmen. Lass mich dir sagen, wie Er das für dich tun wird…

Hams Linie

Noahs jüngster Sohn trug den Namen Ham
Er verärgerte seinen Vater mit einer schändlichen Tat sodann
Das brachte sein Leben gehörig ins Wanken
Und seinem jüngsten Sohn einen Fluch – der wird sich nicht bedanken

Die Söhne von Ham waren Kusch, Mizraim, Put und Kanaan.
Von diesen vier hat sich die Linie Hams über die ganze Welt verteilt dann
Kusch hatte sechs Söhne, die seinen Namen weitertrugen
Und seine Nachkommenschaft der Verbreitung befugten

Kusch zeugte Nimrod, einen Mächtigen auf Erden
Er würde ein mächtiger Jäger vor dem Herrn werden
Er tat große Dinge, aber seine Taten brachten eine Dürre gar
in das geistliche Leben vieler Söhne von Noahs Schar

Die Anfänge von Nimrods Reich waren Babel, Erech, Kalne und Akkad
Diese Städte baute er im furchtbaren Land Sinear, dort war es, wo er das tat
Und von diesem Land zog er nach Assyrien und baute Ninive
Und auch Rehoboth Ir, Calah und Resen baute er eh

Mizraim wurde zu dem Volk, das jetzt Ägypten ist
Und im Laufe der Jahre wuchsen sie, bis man sechs weitere Gruppen misst
Aus ihnen gingen die Philister hervor, die Israel drangsalierten
Und die Israeliten auch ständig gehörig schikanierten

Kanaan, derjenige, an den Noah seinen Fluch richtete
Wurde elf Gruppen von Völkern, die man im Land sichtete
Sie breiteten sich aus und fürchteten nie das Schlechte
Doch schließlich wurden sie von Israel verdrängt, Gottes Knechte
Obwohl er ein Diener von Dienern war, der ungeliebte Sohn dann
Das Geschlecht Hams, große Dinge haben sie getan

Und viele dieser Menschen hat unser kostbarer Jesus gerettet
Denn für alle Söhne Noahs gab Er Sein Leben, hat sie losgekettet
Menschen aus Hams Linie überall auf der Erde
Den Sieg Jesu am Kreuz von Golgatha feiert die ganze Herde
Und von Jesu Namen verkünden auch sie Seinen Wert
Jesus ist der Retter aller Menschen, Er allein sei verehrt!

Und bis zum heutigen Tag erinnern wir uns an Simon von Cyrene
der das Kreuz des Herrn auf den Hügel trug mit jeder Sehne
Ein Diener des Dieners, so wird Simon gesehen
Die ultimative Erfüllung der Prophezeiung durfte er erleben

Und für mich ist die Linie von Ham ein Segen
Meine Frau und meine Kinder sind mir aus dieser Linie gegeben
Aber wie so viele andere wurden sie von jeder Sünde rein
als sie im Glauben riefen: “Ja, Jesus ist mein.”

Danke, Herr, für die Gnade gegeben den Menschen auf dieser Welt
Mögen wir immer Dein Lob singen, Du einzig wahrer Held!

Halleluja und Amen…

Als nächstes beenden wir Kapitel 10 mit – Genesis 10,21-32, Die Völkertafel Teil 3, Die Söhne Sems.

Acts 6:8

Stephen Kane is fraidy as he approached the Horses at Las Colinas.

Wednesday, 30 March 2022

And Stephen, full of faith and power, did great wonders and signs among the people. Acts 6:8

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen)

You can also read this commentary, with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

The previous verse spoke of the multiplication of the number of disciples. It also referred to the fact that many of the priests were obedient to the faith. The words now bring in Stephen again who was introduced as one of the seven in verse 6:5, saying he was a man full of faith and the Holy Spirit. Of him, it reconfirms this saying, “And Stephen, full of faith and power.”

It is of note that some manuscripts say “grace” rather than “faith” here. The word “faith” is more suited to verse 6:5, confirming that thought. Either way, he is carefully described here, being singled out from the other six chosen with him. The narrative will continue focusing on him throughout Chapter 6 and Chapter 7. As noted, saying that he is full of faith and power is given to parallel verse 6:5 –

And they chose Stephen, a man full of faith and the Holy Spirit…
And Stephen, full of faith and power…

As such, the “power” is set in parallel to “the Holy Spirit.” That is then further defined by saying that he “did great wonders and signs.”

The verb is imperfect. More rightly, it should be rendered saying he “was performing great wonders and signs.” It wasn’t that he simply did these things once, or a year ago, or when he was a certain age. Rather, it is speaking of him doing them during the entire time of the record set before us, and he continued doing them as well. Luke’s words further define his doing these things as being “among the people.”

It is an important inclusion. Stephen didn’t just do these things in the courts of a king. Nor did he do them in a traveling show for money. He was among the people and his actions were personally witnessed by them. What he did is not defined, but it can be supposed that it included miraculous healings and the like.

Or it could be that the coming words concerning him define what he did – that he was a great and effective orator. No matter what, so full of faith and of the Holy Spirit was he that he was able to do great things right among the people.

Life application: From time to time it is good to remember that being filled with the Holy Spirit is a passive thing. One is prepared to receive the Spirit. If a cup has a lid on it, it must have the lid removed in order for it to be filled. But the cup simply sits there and is filled. It happens passively. The cup doesn’t reach up and start filling itself.

Likewise, we need to be prepared for the reception of the Spirit. The way to do this is to have our lives opened up for His coming. Stephen was a man of faith. If we lack faith, we will not receive the Spirit. One can sing praises to God in a church band, but if he doesn’t believe in God (he was simply hired to sing for $150.00 a gig), then there is nothing about him that would allow the Spirit to fill him.

If we prepare ourselves through true faith, and if we live our lives in accord with the word and in a state of being opened up to God, then we will be filled. The more opened we are (through faith, love of God, appreciation for His goodness, in praising Him, in telling others about Him, and so on), the more we will be filled.

Let us live our lives totally in tune with God as He is presented in Scripture. Let us think on Him at all times. Let us overflow with His goodness in praise, prayer, and thanks! Be filled with the Spirit by being open receptacles prepared to receive Him.

Lord God, how good it is to read Your word, to think on You and Your goodness, to hold fast to You even in times of trial and difficulty. How good it is to know You in the most intimate of ways. Fill us with all of who You are, O God. Amen.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acts 6:7

The horses at Las Colinas.

Tuesday, 29 March 2022

Then the word of God spread, and the number of the disciples multiplied greatly in Jerusalem, and a great many of the priests were obedient to the faith. Acts 6:7

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen)

You can also read this commentary, with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

The words now follow immediately after the choosing of seven men to handle the daily distribution. There appears to be no logical connection between the two, and so it seems as if Luke is simply moving on to a new matter now that the previous issue has been resolved.

However, Acts 6:5 and Acts 6:8 both mention Stephen. And it is he who is the focus of the narrative through all of Acts 7. As such, it appears that Luke is implicitly tying what he will now say into the ministry and testimony of Stephen. With that noted, the verse begins with, “Then the word of God spread.”

The word translated as “spread,” signifies growing or increasing. It is an imperfect verb signifying an ongoing process. For example, the same verb in the same form is used in Luke 1 to describe the growing up of John the Baptist from a child into a man strong in the spirit.

The effect of the apostles has been rather profound, but because of their being Galileans, they were looked down on by those who were more educated (see Acts 2:7). Stephen has been noted as “a man full of faith and the Holy Spirit.” In the next verse, he will be noted as “full of faith and power.” And in Acts 7, he will demonstrate intimate knowledge of Scripture and of the history of his people.

Thus, it may be that Luke is now connecting some of the present growth to the efforts and knowledge of Stephen. Next, Luke records, “and the number of the disciples multiplied greatly in Jerusalem.”

At this time, Jerusalem remains the central hub of the faith. It is a logical place for the apostles to remain because there were three annual pilgrim feasts to the city. All people were to come and rejoice in the presence of the Lord during these feasts. During the rest of the year, the city was still full and bustling with activity, and evangelism would be ongoing. With the addition of more people, especially people like Stephen, the number of believers would, in fact, greatly multiply. It is a natural consequence of such things. Concerning this growth come Luke’s next words, saying, “and a great many of the priests were obedient to the faith.”

This is a key point in the development of the faith, meaning the body of believers in Jesus. It is based on the faith, meaning acceptance of the gospel by the priests. The word translated “obedient” is exactly right. It signifies “to obey.” But the underlying meaning is “to believe” or “to have faith.” In other words, the priests “have faith” in “the faith.”

This is not double talk, but it is exactly what is being presented. For example, Hebrews explicitly demonstrates this –

“For who, having heard, rebelled? Indeed, was it not all who came out of Egypt, led by Moses? 17 Now with whom was He angry forty years? Was it not with those who sinned, whose corpses fell in the wilderness? 18 And to whom did He swear that they would not enter His rest, but to those who did not obey19 So we see that they could not enter in because of unbelief.” Hebrews 3:16-19

The account that is cited by the author is that of Numbers 14, where the spies returned from Canaan and gave the people a bad report. The people failed to believe God, and thus they did not obey. Despite many poor translations that use the word “command” in that Numbers passage, there was no direct command spoken forth.

Rather, the word of the Lord said the people would enter, and the people simply failed to believe. Instead, they feared because of the negative report and failed to trust the Lord who had already proven Himself to them, time and again. It was because of their unbelief that they failed to enter into the promised rest.

These priests have now “obeyed” by believing. And it appears based on the placement of the verse that Stephen is to be considered a large part of this coming about.

Life application: Far too often, people take words and concepts out of their intended context, thus forming a pretext. The word “obey” has a meaning, but the substance behind that must be properly understood. If one is commanded to do something, then obedience is expected. That is the context.

However, if someone is told that they should simply trust and accept that another will safely guide him through the waters of disaster, then “obey” takes on a more subtle meaning. There was no command. Instead, there is only a hope that faith will be demonstrated.

God does not “command” anybody into salvation. He also does not “regenerate” people in order for them to believe. He set forth His proposition, and He asks us to believe: “I have sent My Son into the world. He has fulfilled the law and died for the sins of the world. I ask you to simply trust that and be saved.” That is the proposition. Obedience to it is “to believe.”

To add to that by stating that we must first believe His commands – whatever ones we decide upon – is to damage the simple message of obedience to faith (the gospel), and it is thus a false message, not given by God. It is a false gospel.

Be sure to understand these nuances of what is stated, and then effectively communicate them to others when presenting the gospel. If you tell someone that he does not have free will, and that a person must first be regenerated in order to believe (Calvinism), that person will have no idea what you are talking about, because what you are saying both makes no sense and it is unbiblical.

If you tell someone that they must obey Jesus in order to believe, and then start telling them that he has to observe the Sabbath, get circumcised, stop eating pork, quit cussing, and etc., you are presenting a false gospel of works. The gospel is about Jesus –

“that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, and that He was buried, and that He rose again the third day according to the Scriptures.” 1 Corinthians 15:3, 4

Explain this message to them, and don’t turn “obey” into something that doesn’t exist or something that is unintended. Keep it simple and you will be doing what God has done and expects us to do. Despite all of the complicated theology in Scripture, the gospel is the simplest message of all. Don’t add to it or change it! If you do, then it is no longer the gospel.

Heavenly Father, thank You for the simplicity of the gospel. You have taken the thing that has complicated all other things, meaning sin, and You have made the resolution to it so simple that even a young child can understand it. And it is rightfully simple. We are prone to complicate things. And so, You have laid it out for us, and done so in the most wonderful way. You sent Jesus to do it all. All we need to do is believe. Hallelujah and Amen.

 

 

 

 

 

Acts 6:6

Horses at Las Colinas, Texas.

Monday, 28 March 2022

whom they set before the apostles; and when they had prayed, they laid hands on them. Acts 6:6

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen)

You can also read this commentary, with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

The previous verse saw the selection of the seven men who were to be responsible for the daily distribution, with the selection complete, it next says, “whom they set before the apostles.”

The choice had been made by the multitude, deciding that these seven met the requirements of being of good reputation and full of the Holy Spirit. To confirm the selection, the men were brought before the apostles and were set there awaiting their consecration. With that complete, it says, “and when they had prayed.”

It can be assumed that this is the apostles, but it may be praying by all – both those to be ordained and the apostles who would ordain. Assuming it is the apostles praying over them, it next says, “they laid hands on them.”

This is the first time this act is noted since the establishment of the church. It is something that occurred when Paul was commissioned in Acts 9 –

“And Ananias went his way and entered the house; and laying his hands on him he said, ‘Brother Saul, the Lord Jesus, who appeared to you on the road as you came, has sent me that you may receive your sight and be filled with the Holy Spirit.’” Acts 9:17

It is also something Paul refers to concerning the establishment of authority elsewhere as well, such as when Timothy was consecrated –

“Do not neglect the gift that is in you, which was given to you by prophecy with the laying on of the hands of the eldership.” 1 Timothy 4:14

Also, Paul says this to Timothy concerning the continuance of such a practice –

“Do not lay hands on anyone hastily, nor share in other people’s sins; keep yourself pure.” 1 Timothy 5:22

This act is a symbolic one of both petitioning God through prayer as well as the transferring of authority through the laying on of hands. Ultimately, it is the Lord who recognizes or rejects a person, but there is to be an open acknowledgment of the transfer of authority to others in this manner. This remains the case to this day because of the inclusion of the practice in Paul’s pastoral epistles. Hebrews 6 also notes this practice, calling it a doctrine of elementary principle –

“Therefore, leaving the discussion of the elementary principles of Christ, let us go on to perfection, not laying again the foundation of repentance from dead works and of faith toward God, of the doctrine of baptisms, of laying on of hands, of resurrection of the dead, and of eternal judgment.” Hebrews 6:1, 2

Life application: Though the book of Acts is descriptive, the noting of the practice of prayer and the laying on of hands by Paul tells us that it is something that is expected throughout the church age. As such, it is not something to be ignored. Further, those in the congregation have a right to know how and where the person who pastors them was so ordained.

This is especially important because anyone can buy an ordination certificate right on the internet for a few dollars. No qualifications are needed except to give someone else your money. This is not a suitable way of recognizing or establishing authority. Rather, a dignified process should be in place to monitor candidates, evaluate their abilities, and then proceed with the ordination process.

Having said this, there is not an “unbroken line of succession” from the apostles in any particular denomination. The Roman Catholics, Anglicans, and so on claim that the same line of those ordained by the apostles still exists in their ordination process. As such, they claim a special calling rests upon them. If that were so, these denominations wouldn’t be filled with perverts and miscreants.

Ordination does not mean “holy.” It is simply an act by which authority is conferred. That authority may be completely tainted. Despite this, it is still an act that should be performed by any church that faithfully follows Jesus, holds to the word of God, and wants to continue its line of authority in another generation of faithful servants.

Lord God, You alone decide who is a faithful and just servant of Yours. And yet, You have given us the right to choose men who will carry on in positions of authority in Your church. And so, may we be faithful to carefully evaluate those we consider, and then when they are ordained, pray for Your blessing and for their endurance in the arduous task that they have been called to. May it be so to Your glory. Amen.

 

 

 

 

Deuteronomy 32:23-33 (The Song of Moses, Part IV)

Deuteronomy 32:23-33
The Song of Moses, Part IV

In some of our verses today, Moses, speaking as the Lord, says that He would have utterly eradicated Israel if it were not for the sake of the enemies misunderstanding what had taken place, and why. As such, the Lord would have to put up with the boasting of the enemies as it would be an indication to them that He is not what the Bible portrays Him to be.

Obviously, the Lord has already proclaimed that regardless of their actions, Israel would be kept as a people. But the Song of Moses highlights the keeping of Israel for this particular reason as well.

When considering this, one cannot help but think of the words of Sennacherib, King of Assyria, as called out by the Rabshakeh to the people of Jerusalem…

Text Verse: “Where are the gods of Hamath and Arpad? Where are the gods of Sepharvaim and Hena and Ivah? Indeed, have they delivered Samaria from my hand? 35 Who among all the gods of the lands have delivered their countries from my hand, that the Lord should deliver Jerusalem from my hand?” 2 Kings 18:34, 35

In response to this degrading talk, Hezekiah went before the Lord with the words of Sennacherib and prayed to him. His concluding words were, “Now therefore, O Lord our God, I pray, save us from his hand, that all the kingdoms of the earth may know that You are the Lord God, You alone” (2 Kings 19:19).

Should Sennacherib have prevailed and utterly destroyed Israel, the words of the Lord as conveyed by Moses would have been exactly what would have come to pass. As this is so, is this thought any less true today? Absolutely not. Despite what replacement theologians say, the keeping of Israel is intimately connected with the honor of the Lord.

And that truth is no more poignantly highlighted than in the supposedly sacred, but actually Satanic, book known as the Hadith. From a website about Islam Q&A, we read –

“It is narrated in the hadith that the Prophet [meaning Mohamed] … said: ‘The Hour will not begin until you fight the Jews, until a Jew will hide behind a rock or a tree, and the rock or tree will say: “O Muslim, O slave of Allah, here is a Jew behind me; come and kill him.’”

There are three possibilities with this: 1) Either the Bible is true, and the Hadith is false, or 2) The Bible is false, and the Hadith is true, or 3) both are false. A fourth option is not possible, that of both being true.

As such, Israel will be kept as a people forever, and the Lord has demonstrated that He is God, or Israel will someday be eradicated and Moses is wrong, logically following that then would be that the Lord is not God.

There is a whole lot tied up in the preservation of Israel if one understands the words of the books of Moses. It truly is unfortunate that replacement theology has arisen in the world. Those who hold to it actually place the integrity of the Bible on the same par as Israel’s enemies, even if they don’t intentionally do so. The result is the same.

Let us be sound in our thinking and not get caught up in strange teachings that do not accurately reflect what God is doing in redemptive history

Great things are to be found in His superior word. And so, let us turn to that precious word once again and… May God speak to us through His word today and may His glorious name ever be praised.

I. Amassed Evils (verses 23-25)

Since verse 19, the poem has highlighted the results of Israel’s abandonment of the Lord. In response to that, Moses has highlighted the Lord’s rejection of them. Since verse 20, Moses has been writing in the first person as if his words are those of Yehovah.

That continues now, referring to His rejection of them, His turning from them, and His judgment upon them. However, verse 21 alluded to His plan to lure Israel back to Himself through His active turning to another group of people.

While that has been occurring, the devastations upon Israel continue today. They are words of terrifying disaster that accurately, but most mournfully, reflect the state of the people of Israel since their rejection of Him at the time of their visitation by Christ Jesus. With that understood, the words of Yehovah continue…

23 ‘I will heap disasters on them;

aspe alemo raoth – “I will amass upon them evils.” One can imagine sheets of paper, each with a different evil written upon it, being torn off the stack and tossed onto the land. With the coming of each sheet, another disaster arrives. Soon, the land and the people are completely destroyed, and nothing is left but the sheets of doom lying in heaps, testifying against the people.

They have done evil before the Lord in defiance of His word, and so He sends forth His word to testify against them. As it comes, so come the evils He had promised. They are piercing and they are deadly…

23 (con’t) I will spend My arrows on them.

hitsay akaleh bam – “My arrows I will expend in them.” Whereas the Lord amasses evils upon the people, as if they are coming down from above, it now says He expends all of His arrows in them – as if He is standing amongst them and shooting at one after another directly until all His arrows are gone.

The arrow, in this case, signifies a plague of some sort. The word is being used metaphorically, as can be seen from Ezekiel 5 –

“When I send against them the terrible arrows of famine which shall be for destruction, which I will send to destroy you, I will increase the famine upon you and cut off your supply of bread.” Ezekiel 5:16

Even Job, a man outside of the covenant people, understood this symbolism –

“For the arrows of the Almighty are within me;
My spirit drinks in their poison;
The terrors of God are arrayed against me.” Job 6:4

An interesting internal a/b/c-c/a/b structure is provided with this verse –

(a) I will amass (b) upon them (c) evils
(c) My arrows (a) I will expend (b) in them

These evils and arrows are defined by the words of the coming verses…

24 They shall be wasted with hunger,

The entire verse is direct, and it calls for the mental insertion of prepositions and verbs that Moses simply leaves out. That begins with this first clause: maze ra’av– “Emaciated, hunger.” The adjective mazeh is found only here. It comes from an unused root signifying “to suck out.”

Thus, one can think of people that are simply skin and bones, as if a straw was inserted into them and their body fat and muscle were sucked out. The only thing left of them is a state of agonizing hunger. It is a perfectly suited description of the condition of the people when the Nazi death camps were liberated.

So starved were the people that when soldiers showed them a kindness by offering them a candy bar or some other food from their kits, some of the people’s bodies went into shock, and they died. An act of tender kindness turned into an unintended sentence of death. Next, the horror of the arrows progresses…

24 (con’t) Devoured by pestilence and bitter destruction;

u-lehume resheph v’qetev meriri – “And consumed fever and depletion bitter.” Two new nouns are spoken forth. The first is resheph. It comes from saraph, meaning “to burn.” Thus, it is that which burns, like a hot coal. In this case, I would think it is referring to an intense fever resulting from the emaciation.

The second is qetev. This comes from an unused root meaning to cut off. Thus, it is a state of ruin. To maintain it as a noun, I have said “depletion.”

Again, one can think of the horrors of the concentration camps and other such times of immense deprivation that have come upon the people as history has recorded. The people claimed to be Jews, they claimed to be united to the Lord, and yet, they have all but ignored Him.

The wounds, though stated as active events coming from the Lord, are actually self-inflicted wounds. They are the inevitable consequences of their failure to respond favorably to Him. But again, the Lord next states that these are a direct punishment from His hand…

24 (con’t) I will also send against them the teeth of beasts,

Making the words more pronounced, the word is singular, “tooth.” It is a way of uniting all teeth of every formidable beast into one giant weapon: v’shen behemoth ashalakh bam – “And fang beasts I will send in them.”

The tooth (fang) becomes a symbol for the chaos it wreaks. One can think of tearing flesh, blood, bits of bone and hair, all being openly displayed among the people. It is a horrifying thought of appalling devastation. And that terrifying weapon has a companion in its destructive purposes…

24 (con’t) With the poison of serpents of the dust.

im khamath zokhale aphar – “With a burning, reptiles dust.” The word translated as “a burning” is given to signify the state that occurs when bitten. Thus, venom or infection is to be understood. The next word, zakhal, is new. It comes from a verb meaning to shrink back or crawl away as if being shy or afraid.

As other words are translated as snake and serpent, I chose reptile because other reptiles also have bites that cause a burning of the body through venom or infection. The translation of the NKJV is less literal, but it is more understandable.

I am guessing on the structure of this verse, but the use of the connecting conjunctions is notable –

(a) Emaciated, hunger.
(a) And consumed fever and depletion bitter.
(b) And fang beasts I will send in them.
(b) With a burning, reptiles dust.

The terrors come from all directions. They come from above and from within. They come in many forms, and they come with a variety of horrors. But more is yet ahead, and they will be indiscriminate in who they come against…

25 The sword shall destroy outside;

mikhuts tesakel kherev – “From out shall bereave sword.” In other words, the terror from outside is the sword that will leave a person childless – be it in war, enemy attack, looters, or whatever. There will be danger on the outside that will leave the parent childless. And more…

25 (con’t) There shall be terror within

It is a plural noun followed by another noun: u-mekhadarim emah – “And from inner chambers, dread.” This is set in contrast to the previous clause. Outside is one place where there is bereavement. However, any place inside, as indicated by the plural, is a place of dread. This is comparable to the curses of Deuteronomy 28 –

“And among those nations you shall find no rest, nor shall the sole of your foot have a resting place; but there the Lord will give you a trembling heart, failing eyes, and anguish of soul. 66 Your life shall hang in doubt before you; you shall fear day and night, and have no assurance of life. 67 In the morning you shall say, ‘Oh, that it were evening!’ And at evening you shall say, ‘Oh, that it were morning!’ because of the fear which terrifies your heart, and because of the sight which your eyes see.” Deuteronomy 28:65-67

And these terrors will be…

25 (con’t) For the young man and virgin,

gam bakhur gam betulah – “Also young man; also virgin.” It speaks of those who are young with their entire lives ahead of them. They may be innocent to the things of the world, but the world is there to devour them.

While they think that a long and full life lies ahead, the termination of their days is at hand. It is like considering the tragedy of a man ready to be married, but who is then called up for the draft. Before the happiness can be realized, only sadness and loss are experienced. Further…

25 (con’t) The nursing child with the man of gray hairs.

Because this is a verb and two nouns, it was hard to give the same structure in the English: yoneq im ish sevah – “Suckling with man advancement.” The word sevah signifies being gray and thus old. The word “advancement” is the only noun I thought accurately matches what is said here while still conveying the intent.

This is then set against the young man and the virgin. Those who are much less developed, and those who are much more developed – even from the very beginning of life to the very ending of it – are not exempt from what is promised to come upon the people.

(a) From out shall bereave sword. (location/result)
(a) And from inner chambers, dread. (location/result)
(b) Also young man; also virgin. (comparison)
(b) Suckling with man advancement. (comparison)

It is rather amazing to see the variety of poetic structures Moses uses in his words. They go from one to another, often completely unique from those around it. And yet, they flow together harmoniously. Because of the tragedy, the words convey, the majesty of how they are penned is easy to overlook.

With these terrors duly noted, especially with them noted along with the calling of the Gentiles while they are ongoing, the tenor of the words next takes on a new direction…

Bitter destruction and days of pain are our lot
As multiplying terrors are found on every side
Surely it is as if a terrible plot
Is waged against us until all have died

From without there is evil to slay any and all
From within there is terror at what lies ahead
Around all the people has descended a dark pall
The enemy attacks wanting everyone dead

From where will come comfort and an end to this plight?
When will the Lord relent and end this disaster
Only horror and terror come to our sight
Save us O Lord, our God, and our Sovereign Master!

II. Our Hand is Exalted (Verses 26 & 27)

26 I would have said, “I will dash them in pieces,

The word “would” is not correct. The first verb is perfect and the second is known as cohortative. In other words, the first verb is as if the action is accomplished while the second expresses an intention to perform: amarti aphehem – “I have said: ‘I will blow them away.’”

Here we find another word found only this once in Scripture, paah. It comes from a primitive root meaning “to puff.” As such it is then an onomatopoeia meaning “to blow away.”

One gets the sense of the Lord breathing in deeply and then rapidly exhaling – “Paaaaaah!” It was the intention of Him to do just that, and in His anger at this disobedient nation, He exclaims that this is exactly what He will do. In this frame of mind, the dialogue marches on…

26 (con’t) I will make the memory of them to cease from among men,”

Again, the first verb is cohortative. The Lord intends to do this thing: ashbitah me-enovosh zikram – “I will cause to cease from mankind memory them.” This complements what was just said. The Lord says purposefully that He will blow the people away.

It will be such a great and pronounced exhaling that they will simply be eradicated. There will be of them not even a memory of a memory left among humanity. The structure of this verse is a simple a/a parallel –

I have said:
(a) ‘I will blow them away.’
(a) I will cause to cease from mankind memory them.

Despite the adamant proclamation that the Lord would eliminate Israel, there is a caveat that will spare them…

27 Had I not feared the wrath of the enemy,

lule kaas oyev agur – “If not provocation enemy I would abide.” The words here are difficult and are widely rendered by scholars, even if most translations are similar. The word kaas is the same as in verse 32:19 last week. It signifies to provoke.

Also, the word gur is used. It signifies to sojourn, reside, live as an alien, and so on. But at times it is rendered as “fear.” Hence, most translations take this route. It is mentally easy to justify for the sake of the reader.

But that does not seem to be the intent, even if it is the result. If the Lord were to blow away the people, He would have to live in the provocation of Israel’s enemies for as long as man remained on earth. Thus, there would be, in the mind of the enemy, the thought that the Lord was incapable of controlling His own people.

Therefore, the idea would be that in His frustration at them, He decided to just entirely eliminate them. If this was the case, then what kind of a God would He be? This translation is then fully supported by the next words…

27 (con’t) Lest their adversaries should misunderstand,

The word “misunderstand” is just the opposite of what is stated, even if it may be implied: pen y’nakeru tsaremo – “Lest should discern their adversaries.” The meaning is clear. The adversaries see that Israel is destroyed. It is a fact that they have recognized.

But this brings in all of the complications that could possibly come forth from such an event. The Lord established them. He gave His word through and to them. He brought the Messiah through them, but He also promised to keep them as a people and never break His covenant with them. On and on the thoughts would go.

The entire fabric of the redemptive process, up to and including the coming of Jesus and His promised return to Israel, would be suddenly and inextricably unwoven.

Just think of nations like Hitler’s Germany or Iran. They have been or they are completely set on the destruction of Israel. It is their greatest desire and their deepest hope. With the destruction of Israel would come a defiling of the name of the Lord, and an exaltation of the name of their supposed god.

The Lord would have to live in their provocations. At this point in the Song of Moses, everything is centered on the fact that Israel must continue, even though they have been as faithless as Hosea’s wife.

As these words are recorded concerning a time that occurs at the same time as the calling of the Gentiles, it is an absolute testimony to the fact that Israel was, is, and shall remain. Otherwise, the enemies of God would have an unearned right…

27 (con’t) Lest they should say, “Our hand is high;

pen yomeru yadenu ramah – “Lest they will say: ‘Our hand is exalted!’” The terrors described above included the sword, implying enemies who wield the sword.

The Lord may use pestilence, famine, or other means, but to completely eliminate a group of people that is scattered around the world – in part or in whole – would require the sword to fully accomplish the task. If Hitler had prevailed, one can see him rejoicing and taking credit for what he was able to do.

Likewise, if this came about today, it is absolutely certain that adherents to Islam would take credit for the victory, and for the rest of time they would proclaim that their false god was actually the victorious and true god. The Lord could not, and indeed He cannot, allow that to occur.

In the world, there would be a complete misperception concerning what actually transpired…

27 (con’t) And it is not the Lord who has done all this.”’

v’lo Yehovah paal kal zot – “And no Yehovah who accomplished all this.” The obvious meaning is, “It is we who have destroyed Israel and Yehovah neither had anything to do with it, nor was He able to stop it. We have prevailed, we are exalted, and Yehovah is not God.”

The Lord would have to abide in this. Any other options would be completely contradictory to His nature. In other words, and by default, the very act of Him blowing Israel away so that they were eliminated from mankind is also completely contrary to His nature. Israel, despite what they deserve, must stand.

The words of this verse are set in an a/b pattern –

(a) If not provocation enemy I would abide. (provoking)
(b) Lest should discern their adversaries. (discernment, but in the sense of not discerning)
(a) Lest they will say: ‘Our hand is exalted! (provoking)
(b) And no Yehovah who accomplished all this. (not discerning)

Who is great like our God? Who is he?
Who does such great wonders and mighty things?
Is there another so great? Can there be?
No! To our God alone all of creation sings

He has redeemed His people for His own
And He has kept them despite their constant falling away
Through this people His fame has grown
Great is His name, and greater day by day

Who could restrain Himself as has the Lord?
From destroying those who so callously turn away
But because of His faithfulness to His word
He has kept this people as His own, to this very day

III. Their Rock Had Sold Them (Verses 28-33)

With the last section complete, a new idea is put forth by Moses. It is in verses 28-33 that the evident nature of Israel’s unworthiness to be spared is detailed. As such, it highlights that they are, in fact, spared.

28 “For they are a nation void of counsel,

I disagree. The nation is a nation filled with counsel, of the highest sort and from the most impeccable Source. It is not that they are void of counsel. Rather: ki go obad esot hemah – “For nation devoid prudence they.”

The word go, or nation, is usually used when referring to Gentiles. However, they are here likened to any other nation. In fact, they are actually much duller than any other nation. That is seen in the word Moses introduces here.

It is the word etsah, coming from a verb signifying advice. As such it speaks of counsel, prudence, purpose, and so on. It is not at all that Israel lacked counsel. They had the law, they had the prophets, they had the Redeemer Himself. And then came the apostles after Him.

They had miracles, signs, and wonders performed among them. And yet, they had as much sense as that of a tree root, and maybe less. If God Himself appeared among them… wait a minute, He did. And even then, they could not perceive it. They failed to recognize the time of their visitation. And to this day, they remain blinded…

28 (con’t) Nor is there any understanding in them.

v’en bahem tevunah – “And no in them understanding.” This is a parallel thought to the previous clause. Just as there is no prudence in their thinking, they are also devoid of understanding. Both words of this verse now are used in a single verse in Proverbs –

There is no wisdom or understanding [tevunah]
Or counsel [etsah] against the Lord. Proverbs 21:30

In this, “counsel” is fine because that speaks in relation to the Lord about a thought or action against Him. However, here in Deuteronomy it is speaking of the state of Israel having counsel but not applying it because they lack the prudence or discernment to do so. One can see this in the parallelism –

(a) For nation devoid prudence they.
(a) And no in them understanding.

But this is not the Lord’s fault. He has done everything to make it otherwise, even giving them the prophetic word to warn them…

29 Oh, that they were wise, that they understood this,

The first verb is perfect, the second is imperfect: lu hakemu yaskilu zot – “If they were wise, they would understand this!” In other words, they have their history, they have the prophecies, they have the promises, and they have the WORD OF GOD to guide them.

It is all recorded there, both the past and the future. What has happened isn’t because they didn’t have sufficient information, but because they have been unwilling to simply check out the facts.

A perfect example of their inability to discern is seen in regard to the coronavirus issue. All of the information one needs to know concerning what is going on is out there. But Israel was the first to jump into the proverbial pot, implementing mandates of all sorts, and they have continued to seethe in the boiling water as the spices have been added.

They do not have the reason to grasp what is so painfully obvious. How much more ridiculous are they in regard to the weightier matters set before them…

29 (con’t) That they would consider their latter end!

An important preposition, to, is overlooked: yavinu l’akharitam – “They would consider to their latter end!” The words are parallel to the previous clause and can be understood when combined with the opening thought – “[If they were wise], they would consider to their latter end.”

This is speaking of the nation. It is true that blessings are promised to them in the Messianic age, but that is clearly indicated as being preceded by a time of great wrath and destruction upon them. This is evident from the words of Moses, the prophets, and Jesus Himself.

If they considered the time “to their latter end,” they would know that things will only get worse before they finally get better. But like sappy churches that fill the world, the focus is always, always, always on the blessing, the good, the prosperity, and the favor.

And yet, this is only a portion of what God says belongs to Israel, and what belongs to the church. The sadness of not considering what the word says to the people to whom it is directed – and indeed to the whole world – will fully, finally, and tragically be realized someday.

If they were wise:
(a) They would understand this!
(a) They would consider to their latter end!

As for Israel, the question is asked…

30 How could one chase a thousand,

ekah yirdoph ekhad eleph – “How could chase one a thousand?” It is the opposite, and multiplied, of what was promised to Israel as a blessing in Leviticus 26 –

“Five of you shall chase a hundred, and a hundred of you shall put ten thousand to flight;
your enemies shall fall by the sword before you.” Leviticus 26:8

Here, Moses indicates that the opposite is in store for Israel in the future. Asking it as a question implies that there is a fixed answer that is as obvious as the nose on one’s face. But before he explains how it could be, he provides a parallel example…

30 (con’t)And two put ten thousand to flight,

u-sh’nayim yanisu revavah – “And two cause to flee a multitude?” It is another and greater multiplication. Where one will chase a thousand, a foe of only two will cause an entire multitude to flee. The word revavah simply means a vast multitude whether definite or indefinite. But how could this happen…

30 (con’t)Unless their Rock had sold them,

It is not conditional. It is a perfect verb preceded by a positive conjunction: ki tsuram mekaram – “For their Rock had sold them.” The Lord gave them sure and great promises that He would be with them in battle and that they would defeat their enemies.

But in a state of being sold, the impossible would come to pass. It speaks of an amazing defeat of the people because they turned from their Rock, and then, He sold them…

30 (con’t)And the Lord had surrendered them?

v’Yehovah hisgiram – “And Yehovah delivered them.” Yehovah is clearly stated in parallel to the Rock of the previous clause. The word here literally means to shut up or to close. But it figuratively means “to deliver.” When one is shut up, he can be delivered over. This is seen, for example, in Amos where the same word is used –

“The Lord God has sworn by Himself,
The Lord God of hosts says:
‘I abhor the pride of Jacob,
And hate his palaces;
Therefore I will deliver up the city
And all that is in it.’” Amos 6:8

The amazing words show how far the people have gone from the Lord that the Lord would sell off and surrender the people.

(a) How could chase one a thousand?
(a) And two cause to flee a multitude?
(b) For their Rock had sold them.
(b) And Yehovah delivered them.

31 For their rock is not like our Rock,

ki lo ketsurenu tsuram – “For no like our Rock their rock.” Moses, speaking of the Lord, makes a comparison between the gods of the enemies and Yehovah. They are not at all like Him. This is stated throughout Scripture, such as –

“Truly, Lord, the kings of Assyria have laid waste all the nations and their lands, 19 and have cast their gods into the fire; for they were not gods, but the work of men’s hands—wood and stone.” Isaiah 37:18, 19

The contrast is absolute. Yehovah is God and all other “gods” are simply the work of men’s hands or the imagination of their minds. With that stated, Moses next says…

31 (con’t) Even our enemies themselves being judges.

v’oyevenu pelilim – “And our enemies, judges.” Many translations insert words here hoping for clarity. Others paraphrase what is said in an attempt to explain what is being said. But none that I found really explain what the meaning of the words must be.

It is apparent that the clauses are parallel. In looking at it as such, the meaning may come forth. I have set forth two variations either of which can be grammatically correct –

For no:
(a) like our Rock (b) their rock
(b) And our enemies, (a) judges

(a) For no like our Rock (b) their rock
(b) And our enemies, (a) judges

What appears to be the case here, and it is tough to be dogmatic, is that it is one of two options based on how the word “judges” is set in parallel to the Lord – either in a positive or a contrasting parallel.

If contrasting, it is saying that the Lord is the Rock and their gods are no rock. Likewise, their enemies are not judges. It is the Lord who made the decision, and both sold and surrendered them. The enemies actually had nothing to do with what occurred. I would prefer this.

However, it could be a positive parallel. If so, then He is the true Judge, and they are judges only because the Lord has allowed it. Said differently, Israel was sold by Yehovah to the enemy who then judged them. This makes less sense to me. Either way, the verses are set in parallel, and one of these two meanings seems to be the case.

32 For their vine is of the vine of Sodom

ki mi’gephen sedom gaphnam – “For from vine Sodom their vine.” It is debated who this is referring to, Israel or the Gentiles just mentioned. The answer must be Israel. Israel is compared to a vine again and again throughout Scripture, such as –

“Yet I had planted you a noble vine, a seed of highest quality.
How then have you turned before Me
Into the degenerate plant of an alien vine?” Jeremiah 2:21

Also, it is only they who are morally compared with Sodom and Gomorrah in the rest Old Testament –

“Hear the word of the Lord,
You rulers of Sodom;
Give ear to the law of our God,
You people of Gomorrah:” Isaiah 1:10

This then is given to explain the reason why the Lord sold them and surrendered them. That then leads to…

32 (con’t)And of the fields of Gomorrah;

u-mishadmoth amorah – “And from fields Gomorrah.” It is another new word, shedemah, coming from sadeh, or “field.” It is a field that is cultivated and should produce. However, what is produced by the vine and the field is next noted…

32 (con’t)Their grapes are grapes of gall,

anavemo ineve rosh – “Their grapes, grapes of poison.” Their produce of the vineyard is of no value at all, and in reality, it is harmful. The grapes here speak of the people’s actions, the fruit of their conduct. Putting up with them is like drinking wormwood.

32 (con’t) Their clusters are bitter.

ashkelot merorot lamo – “Clusters bitter to them.” This is the conduct of the people. It is a society filled with repulsive wickedness and perversion, as if they are carrying around entire clusters of inedible grapes. It is all they produce because their vine and their fields can produce nothing else.

(a1) For from vine Sodom their vine.
(a2) And from fields Gomorrah.
(b1) Their grapes, grapes of poison.
(b2) Clusters bitter to them.

Moses is explaining to the people their very nature in the future and the reason why all the evils will come upon them. As such, they deserve the same punishment that Sodom and Gomorrah received. But more of their character is brought forth next…

33 Their wine is the poison of serpents,

khamath tannim yenam – “Burning of serpents their wine.” This means that their wine is that made of serpent’s poison, which causes burning. The type of serpent, tannin, can only be guessed at. The word is used when speaking of things in the sea in Genesis 1:21, and it is what Moses’ rod turned into in Exodus 7:9. It was obviously poisonous because Moses ran from it.

Regardless of that, as wine is representative of a cultural expression in Scripture, it means that their entire culture is one that is just like the poison of serpents. It permeates everything about them as a people, flowing through them. Moses then further describes what the culture of Israel is like…

*33 (fin)And the cruel venom of cobras.

v’rosh pethanim akzar – “And poison vipers cruel.” Here is a new word, pethen. It is a venomous snake either in the cobra or viper family.

Due to the variety of vipers found in Israel, using “vipers” is a good possible translation, but there are also black desert cobras there as well. Regardless of the type of snake, the meaning is obvious. The “wine,” or cultural expression, of Israel is that of a highly venomous snake. Taken together, the clauses are set in a simple a/a parallel.

(a) Burning of serpents their wine.
(a) And poison vipers cruel.

The words of Moses are the words of Moses, and the Lord inspired them. Hence, one cannot say that what is said here is not reflective of the people without denying that these are the true words of God.

As a general statement concerning Israel, they must be considered a true, accurate, and current description of them as viewed from the Lord’s perspective. They have rejected their Messiah, they do not adhere to the word of the Lord, and they are filled with wickedness and self-righteousness.

And yet, despite their state before Him, He has kept them, and He will continue to keep them. The day is coming when they will again be His holy people. In the meantime, they have been handed over to Satan for what they rightly deserve.

But as I remind you each week, they are simply a snapshot of us. We are His people, and yet we fail Him constantly and in many ways. Despite that, just as His covenant with Israel stands, so His covenant with any who come to Him stands.

God, because of Jesus Christ, could no more reject one of His saved believers than He could reject His own Son. The covenant has been cut, the blood has been shed, and the commitment has been made.

Israel’s failings will not, nor can they ever, negate the faithfulness of the Lord to His side of the covenant. Likewise, our failings will not, nor could they, negate His faithfulness to the seal with which He has sealed us.

Because of this, how much more should we be willing to live for Him instead of following after the same failings that upset the Lord. If you are secretly caught up in adultery, you must consider your ways. If you are thieving from others, it is time to change what you are doing. If you treat your spouse with less than the greatest of respect, it is time for you to redirect your actions.

These are things that the Lord looks disfavorably on. And why should we be recorded in the annals of history as being just like those of Israel who have so greatly displeased the Lord? Let us do our utmost to live for God because of His great love with which He first loved us. May it be so, starting even today.

Closing Verse: “’I overthrew some of you,
As God overthrew Sodom and Gomorrah,
And you were like a firebrand plucked from the burning;
Yet you have not returned to Me,’
Says the Lord.
12 ‘Therefore thus will I do to you, O Israel;
Because I will do this to you,
Prepare to meet your God, O Israel!’” Amos 4:11, 12

Next Week: Deuteronomy 32:34-43 Amazing words, and that ain’t no jive… (The Song of Moses, Part V) (97th Deuteronomy Sermon)

The Lord has you exactly where He wants you. He has a good plan and purpose for you. But He also has expectations of you as He prepares you for entrance into His Land of Promise. So, follow Him and trust Him and He will do marvelous things for you and through you.

The Song of Moses, Part IV

‘I will heap disasters on them without haw or hem
I will spend My arrows on them

They shall be wasted with hunger
Devoured by pestilence and bitter destruction
I will also send against them the teeth of beasts
With the poison of serpents of the dust; a horrid concoction

The sword shall destroy outside
There shall be terror within, terrifying cares
For the young man and virgin
The nursing child with the man of gray hairs

I would have said, “I will dash them in pieces, right there and then
I will make the memory of them to cease from among men

Had I not feared the wrath of the enemy
Lest their adversaries should misunderstand
———-their thinking being amiss
Lest they should say, “Our hand is high
And it is not the LORD who has done all this

“For they are a nation void of counsel as if from jackals
———- they stem
Nor is there any understanding in them

Oh, that they were wise, that they understood this, and wisdom
———-they would spend
That they would consider their latter end!

How could one chase a thousand
And two put ten thousand to flight
Unless their Rock had sold them
And the LORD had surrendered them in their plight?

For their rock is not like our Rock who needs no nudges
Even our enemies themselves being judges

For their vine is of the vine of Sodom
And of the fields of Gomorrah through and through
Their grapes are sour gall
Their clusters are bitter too

The poison of serpents is their wine
And on the cruel venom of cobras they dine

Lord God, turn our hearts to be obedient to Your word
Give us wisdom to be ever faithful to You
May we carefully heed each thing we have heard
Yes, Lord God may our hearts be faithful and true

And we shall be content and satisfied in You alone
We will follow You as we sing our songs of praise
Hallelujah to You; to us Your path You have shown
Hallelujah we shall sing to You for all of our days

Hallelujah and Amen…

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

23 ‘I will heap disasters on them;
I will spend My arrows on them.
24 They shall be wasted with hunger,
Devoured by pestilence and bitter destruction;
I will also send against them the teeth of beasts,
With the poison of serpents of the dust.
25 The sword shall destroy outside;
There shall be terror within
For the young man and virgin,
The nursing child with the man of gray hairs.
26 I would have said, “I will dash them in pieces,
I will make the memory of them to cease from among men,”
27 Had I not feared the wrath of the enemy,
Lest their adversaries should misunderstand,
Lest they should say, “Our hand is high;
And it is not the Lord who has done all this.” ’

28 “For they are a nation void of counsel,
Nor is there any understanding in them.
29 Oh, that they were wise, that they understood this,
That they would consider their latter end!
30 How could one chase a thousand,
And two put ten thousand to flight,
Unless their Rock had sold them,
And the Lord had surrendered them?
31 For their rock is not like our Rock,
Even our enemies themselves being judges.
32 For their vine is of the vine of Sodom
And of the fields of Gomorrah;
Their grapes are grapes of gall,
Their clusters are bitter.
33 Their wine is the poison of serpents,
And the cruel venom of cobras.