Acts 9:13

Dallas.

Thursday, 28 July 2022

Then Ananias answered, “Lord, I have heard from many about this man, how much harm he has done to Your saints in Jerusalem. Acts 9:13

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen).

You can also read this commentary, with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

Previously, it was seen that the Lord explained to Ananias that he was seen in a vision by Paul putting his hand on him so that he might receive his sight. The conversation now continues with, “Then Ananias answered.”

One might think Ananias would, without hesitation, agree to what he had been told. He is in a vision with the Lord. And more, he is being told by Him that he was to go do something that had already been revealed to someone else as an accomplished fact. It is straightforward and simple. It is clear and unambiguous. And it is the Lord Himself who is conveying the message to him.

But instead of simply saying, “Yes, Lord, I can do that!” He pulls a “Moses at the burning bush” and starts giving reasons why the direction of the Lord isn’t the right thing to do. This begins with, “Lord, I have heard from many about this man.”

The words, “I have heard,” indicate that Ananias had lived for an extended period in Damascus. He may have been visiting Jerusalem during the pilgrim feast right at the beginning of the pouring out of the Holy Spirit in Acts 2 and became a believer at that time. In his return to his home after the feast, he had slowly become aware of the persecution those in Jerusalem were facing.

Further, the words also hint at the notion that he seems to think Jesus is unaware of what he knows. When taken with all that he is going to say, this first clause essentially says, “I’m sure you want me to do this, but I know other information about this guy that you are obviously unaware of. So, before I say, ‘No,’ I want you to know why.”

It really appears as if he thinks the Lord is somehow unaware of what is going on and so He needs to be brought up to speed on the matter. As such, Ananias continues, saying, “how much harm he has done to Your saints.”

The Lord is asking him to put his hands on Paul and heal him while Paul has been manhandling those he is aligned with. Jesus somehow missed this, and Ananias is giving him the necessary briefing to open the Lord’s own eyes so that he doesn’t have to open Paul’s eyes. The thought, though incredible to us now, appears to be just what is in the mind of Ananias.

It is of note that this is the first time since the establishment of the church in Acts 2 that the term hagios, “holy” or “saints,” has been used concerning the people of the Lord. There are a couple of points that can be deduced from this. The first is that Ananias says (and the Bible affirms) that they are “Your saints,” meaning saints of the Lord Jesus. Those who follow Him are regarded as being His people. As they are saints set apart to God as holy, then it – by default – means that Jesus is God.

Secondly, so far, the word hagios, has been used when speaking of the Holy Spirit, when speaking of Jesus (such as in Acts 3:14), when referring to “the Holy One and the Just,” when referring to the Old Testament prophets (see Acts 3:21), and of the holy place in Jerusalem (see Acts 6:13).

It is a term used by Paul of those he persecuted in Acts 26:10, and it is a word he uses time and again in his epistles when referring to people in the exact same context as Ananias now, meaning people set apart by the Lord in this new dispensation, the church age. It is another clear and unambiguous clue that the church began in Acts 2 and not, as many ridiculously claim, as having begun with Paul’s ministry.

Rather, the “saints” of the New Testament are saints because of the finished work of Jesus, not because of the preaching of Paul. For now, Ananias’ words end with “in Jerusalem.”

The persecution of the saints was centered on, but not limited to, Jerusalem. But by saying “in Jerusalem,” it appears to be a continued questioning of the Lord’s awareness of what was going on. It is as if he is saying, “Lord, this is going on right in your Holy City. Aren’t you aware of how detrimental and cunning this guy is? He is doing this right behind your back… right in Jerusalem!”

As odd, and even comical, as this might seem to us now, Ananias is much like Moses at the burning bush. He stated things that we can almost shake our heads in amazement at, wondering what he was thinking. But this shows us our inability to perceive the greatness of God.

Life application: How often do we question God about events happening around us? “Lord, don’t you see what is going on in the world today? Don’t you care?” “O God, why did my son get into this horrible accident? Weren’t you paying attention? For the rest of his life, he will be a cripple.”

Our questioning of God’s ability, caring, knowledge, love, etc. goes on and on. It is as if we can trust Him for the proper functioning of the planet, the solar system, the galaxy, and – indeed – an entire universe, but we cannot trust Him with the affairs of our own lives. He has it all under control until something negatively affects us.

However, this is not true. The disconnect is not with God, but with us. When things get out of whack, it is from our perspective. We are not God, but by calling into question His ability to properly conduct His affairs, it places us – not Him – at the center of focus. We are just a small part of a plan that has been going on since the day God created man on this earth. It is not all about us. Rather, it is all about Him and what He is doing through Jesus Christ to bring us back to Himself. Let us trust this. Let God be God, and may we accept that what is happening around us is not out of His knowledge or control!

Heavenly Father, surely You are in complete control. Even in a world that may seem to be spinning into complete chaos around us, You remain unaffected by it and completely aware of it. While we see turmoil, You see things working toward a good and proper end. Help us to have faith and to trust You through these trials. Amen.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acts 9:12

Big blade. Whopping.

Wednesday, 27 July 2022

“And in a vision he has seen a man named Ananias coming in and putting his hand on him, so that he might receive his sight.” Acts 9:12

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen).

You can also read this commentary, with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

Ananias was told by the Lord to go to Straight Street, inquiring at the house of Judas for a Saul of Tarsus, noting that he would be praying. The Lord continues with His words now, saying, “And in a vision.”

The word translated as “vision” is the same word just used in verse 9:10 to describe the vision that Ananias is currently having. It is an interesting thought then that Ananias is having a vision explaining to him that another person has had a vision. If Ananias trusts his own senses, then he must trust what is conveyed in his vision, and therefore he must trust that the vision seen by Saul (Paul) was real as well. But Ananias has not yet laid his hands on him, despite the fact that Jesus says, “he has seen.”

It is an aorist verb. As such, it is an event that has occurred at a particular moment without regard to time, but Jesus is speaking of it as if it has occurred in a vision, meaning before the event actually takes place.

The vision which Saul had is now complete in Saul’s mind as stated by Jesus, and yet it has not yet actually occurred in the stream of time. That is evident from the continued words of the verse. It shows that Christ is transcendent over time, and He has the ability to call it back from the past or to project it from the future.

As this is the case now, it really doesn’t matter if the time is short, such as in a few hours, or if it spans millennia. It demonstrates that Christ is “above” time and thus can operate “outside of” time. As such, His appearance in Genesis 18 or Judges 13 is just as possible as it is within a short time between His appearance to Saul and then Ananias. And more, His knowledge of the future events referred to in Revelation are equally possible. Understanding this, His words continue, saying, “a man named Ananias.”

Jesus tells Ananias that Saul’s vision includes him and that after arriving at Saul’s location, the vision will have been a past event. In this vision, it will be of Ananias “coming in and putting his hand on him.”

The verbs are aorist participles. It rightly says, “having come and having put his hand on him.” It is not known when Saul received the vision. For all we know, it could have happened at the same moment that Ananias had his. Or it could have been before it or as Ananias is on the way to the house. But by the time he arrives, Saul will have seen the the vision.

Because of this, it would then allow him to know with absolute certainty that what transpired was of the Lord and not of human effort. The Lord will be the Source and Power behind what happens, whereas Ananias will simply be the means by which it is carried out. The laying on of his hands will be the mode by which it occurs. Ananias is to do this to Paul “so that he might receive his sight.”

The translation is correct. The verb is subjunctive. It is a hypothetical event. The laying on of the hands is what will bring about the reality of what is, at this time, merely a possibility. Ananias is being informed that he is the one to carry out what is needed for Saul to have his vision restored.

One can assume that if Ananias didn’t do this, the vision Saul had would be proven false. In other words, if someone named Harry showed up and laid his hands on him and his sight was restored, it would not be a miracle of the Lord, but a healing by Harry because the Lord’s vision for Saul was that Ananias would do it. Everything about its miraculous character would suddenly be called into question.

If Harry knew Saul’s medical condition, he could come in and show himself to be a great healer and that a naturalistic explanation is sufficient. Or he could claim to be a man of God by healing Saul and profit off of the situation personally. Everything must occur as is seen in the vision. As it will, then it demonstrates the Lord’s absolute knowledge of the matter and His sovereignty over time and the events that take place.

Life application: In Amos 9, it says when speaking of the people of Israel –

“’I will bring back the captives of My people Israel;
They shall build the waste cities and inhabit them;
They shall plant vineyards and drink wine from them;
They shall also make gardens and eat fruit from them.
15 I will plant them in their land,
And no longer shall they be pulled up
From the land I have given them,’
Says the Lord your God.” Amos 9:14,15

Either this is true, or it is not. As this has never taken place, because Israel has been uprooted in the past and is only now back in the land of Israel, then either it must continue to take place into the future, or the Bible is not the word of God.

Prophecy is a part of Scripture that either proves or disproves its veracity. If the prophecies of the Bible are not true, then the Bible is conveying a false message. As this is so, then we can look to the prophecies of the Bible that have been fulfilled, and we can then be confident that what is promised into the future will also be fulfilled. Essentially, God has placed His integrity on the line for us to check and see if what He says is true.

He has done this so that we can know. He has done this so that we should know. He has done this so that we are without excuse for not knowing.

Let us be confident in the word as it continues to unfold as prophesied within the stream of time. It has validated itself and it continues to do so to this day.

Lord God, thank You for the surety we possess because of the reliability of Your word. It proclaims the future, and then the events come to pass as You have spoken. As this is so, we can confidently continue to hold fast to the promises that lie yet ahead, knowing that they will occur. And those promises, because of Jesus our Lord, are great indeed! Hallelujah and Amen!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acts 9:11

That’s a pretty whopping fan blade.

Tuesday, 26 July 2022

So the Lord said to him, “Arise and go to the street called Straight, and inquire at the house of Judas for one called Saul of Tarsus, for behold, he is praying. Acts 9:11

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen).

You can also read this commentary, with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

Ananias’ calling by the Lord Jesus has been noted. His instruction concerning that calling now begins with the words, “So the Lord said to him.” These words are now given in response to Ananias’ answer, “Here I am, Lord.” As he has acknowledged the Lord’s call, the Lord will now give him direction by saying, “Arise.”

The verb is an aorist participle. It should read, “Having arisen.” It is telling us that Ananias may have been lying down in bed when he received the call, hence it may be a vision not unlike that spoken by Job –

“For God may speak in one way, or in another,
Yet man does not perceive it.
15 In a dream, in a vision of the night,
When deep sleep falls upon men,
While slumbering on their beds,
16 Then He opens the ears of men,
And seals their instruction.” Job 33:14-16

Daniel refers to visions while on a bed several times as well. It is also possible that Ananias fell to the floor once the Lord appeared to him. But nothing is documented concerning that, which would be normal for Luke to record. Either way, however, Jesus is speaking to him in sequence. First, “Having arisen,” and then (omitting “and” which is not in the Greek text) “go to the street called Straight.”

The street called Straight is still in Damascus today. Damascus was redesigned during the Greek period by a man named Hippodamus, giving it a grid structure. The street called Straight was 1,500 meters long, extending across the city. It is the longest of the streets on this grid. There is the Mariamite Cathedral of Damascus on Straight Street which was built in the 2nd century. Since then, it has been rebuilt multiple times, and it presently is known as the seat of the Antiochian Orthodox Church. It is to this street that Ananias is directed to go “and inquire at the house of Judas.”

Nothing more is known about this particular man named Judas, even knowing if he was a believer or not. With Saul’s (Paul’s) status still up in the air concerning the faith, that could be guessed either way. What is certain is that after the coming events transpire, if he was not a believer, he would get an earful about Jesus from Saul. Another Judas is mentioned in Acts 15, but it cannot be known if he is the same man. As for Ananias, once he arrived at this house, he was to inquire “for one called Saul of Tarsus.”

This is the first time that the location identified with Saul, meaning his place of birth/growing up, is recorded. Identifying him as Saul of Tarsus is to pinpoint him distinctly from others named Saul. And more, it is also to inform the reader that he is a Jew that was a part of the dispersion. Thus, he would be familiar with the way Gentiles lived. He would also more than likely speak several languages and dialects (see 1 Corinthians 14:18). If so, and at this point it is only conjecture, he is a logical choice for being called as the Apostle to the Gentiles.

Tarsus, or Tarseus as a literal transliteration of the Greek, is noted here and in Acts 21:39. It is also called Tarsos in Acts 9:30, 11:25, and 22:3. James Strong speculates that the name comes from tarsos, meaning a flat basket. If so, it may reflect the layout of the city.

About the city, Thayer’s Greek Lexicon states it is “… a maritime city, the capital of Cilicia during the Roman period (Josephus, Antiquities 1, 6, 1), situated on the river Cydnus, which divided it into two parts (hence, the plural Ταρσοι). It was not only large and populous, but also renowned for its Greek learning and its numerous schools of philosophers (Strabo 14, p. 613 (cf. Lightfoot on Colossians, p. 303f)). Moreover, it was a free city (Pliny, 5, 22), and exempt alike from the jurisdiction of a Roman governor, and the maintenance of a Roman garrison; although it was not a Roman ‘colony’. It had received its freedom from Antony (Appendix, b. 104:5, 7) on the condition that it might retain its own magistrates and laws, but should acknowledge the Roman sovereignty and furnish auxiliaries in time of war…”

As for Ananias, Jesus continues His words to him, saying, “for behold, he is praying.” Saul went without seeing for three days and he neither ate nor drank (Acts 9:9). But he didn’t waste his time lying around moaning. Instead, he spent it praying. He had seen the risen Lord, and his life would be forever changed. As of yet, he had no idea what that meant, but he is about to find out.

Life application: The Bible mentions the word “pray” almost 400 times, from Genesis to Revelation. At times, it is mandated, such as in Genesis 20:7 (the first time prayer is mentioned). At times, it is encouraged, such as in Psalm 122:6. Sometimes a prayer is heard immediately, such as in 2 Kings 20:1-4. Sometimes, a prayer is not responded to for a considerable amount of time (see Daniel 10:10-14).

There are prayers the Lord finds pleasing, and he responds favorably to them, such as in Hannah’s prayer in 1 Samuel 1:12-18. And there are prayers that the Lord cannot respond to, as Isaiah 59:1, 2 reveals.

There are people that wonder how prayer can be effective if God already knows everything that will ever occur. If this is so, then how can prayer make any difference? But this is the same fallacious thinking as those who say that if God already knows about everyone who will be saved, then man must not have free will.

If God knows that He will take an action after prayer, it does not change the fact that prayer is needed. This is seen in Job 42:7-10. The obvious thing that can be deduced from the Bible about prayer is that it does have an effect, even if God already knows the outcome. As such, a prayer that is not uttered is a prayer that will not be responded to. A prayer that is made at least has the possibility of being granted if it is in accord with the will of God.

Paul tells us to pray without ceasing (1 Thessalonians 5:17). We cannot overload God with prayer. In fact, we are pleasing Him by being obedient to the exhortation to pray. And we can know from Jesus’ words that the more we pray, the more likely we are to get an answer (Luke 18:1-8). As these things are seen to be true from Scripture, pray! An unspoken prayer is no prayer at all. Pray!

Lord God, help us to be people of prayer. May our words of praise, petition, and supplication reach Your ears, and may You respond to them according to Your great wisdom. Hear the prayers of Your people, O God, including this one. Amen.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acts 9:10

Getting closer to the big environmentally unfriendly wind turbine blade.

Monday, 25 July 2022

Now there was a certain disciple at Damascus named Ananias; and to him the Lord said in a vision, “Ananias.”
And he said, “Here I am, Lord.”
Acts 9:10

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen)

You can also read this commentary, with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

The previous verse noted that Paul was without sight for three days and that he neither ate nor drank. It is during this time that the next words occur, saying, “Now there was a certain disciple.”

It is the same word, mathétés, used three times in Acts 6 (verses 1, 2, and 7), and then again in Acts 9:1 when referring to the disciples of Jesus. It signifies a learner. In this case, it is a follower of Christ who learns the doctrines laid out in Scripture and what is required to conduct oneself rightly. He is said to be “at Damascus.”

Rather, it says “in Damascus.” It is where he is located, and he was one of the people who would have been targeted by Paul once he arrived and started rounding up the believers. Of him, it says he is “named Ananias.”

It is the Greek transliteration from Khananyah (Hananyah), or “Yah is Gracious.” It is not an uncommon name, and it is seen about 30 times in the Old Testament. In the New Testament it is the name of the husband of Sapphira in Acts 5 and also one of the high priests seen in Acts 23:2 and 24:1. In Acts 22, this man is called a “devout man” using a term that signifies God-fearing or, literally, “taking hold of what is good.” Of him, it next says, “and to him the Lord said in a vision, ‘Ananias.’”

In the coming verses, it is fully apparent that this is the Lord Jesus who is addressing him. He is called personally in order to direct him. This is certainly intended to be used as a validation of the one who the Lord will commission. In other words, Ananias has been selected for the specific purpose of being a reliable testimony to the Lord’s having chosen Saul (Paul) for his apostolic ministry.

  • Ananias is a resident of Damascus, the city targeted by Paul.
  • Ananias is a disciple of Jesus, the specific group targeted by Paul.
  • Ananias is a devout man, meaning his testimony is known to be reliable.
  • Ananias is not an apostle. As such, this fact will add unique credence to Paul’s ministry. Paul’s apostolic doctrine came not from one of the apostles (Galatians 1:17), but directly from the Lord. Further, his calling is from the Lord, but the message is transmitted by a regular disciple.

Because of these things, Ananias’ testimony will be all the more credible and readily accepted by those who hear from him of what will now transpire. In response to the Lord’s call, it next says, “And he said, ‘Here I am, Lord.’”

This is the standard answer of many people called by the Lord in the Old Testament. It is a way of saying, “I am present and at your disposal.” With that noted, the Lord’s directions to him will be forthcoming.

Life application: Everything about Paul’s selection and conversion is marked off as a unique occurrence. In this, he is a part of, but separated from, the other apostles. As such, his commission is a unique one that will carry the already established church through the next two millennia (so far) as the Gentiles take the lead role in spreading the gospel of Jesus Christ to the world. Because of this, a few points should be considered.

  • The church is already established based on the introduction of the New Covenant in Christ’s blood.
  • Gentile inclusion has already been established prior to Saul’s (Paul’s) recorded conversion (Acts 8).
  • Gentile inclusion will continue to occur prior to the focus of Acts being on Paul (Acts 10).
  • The gospel that Paul proclaims is the same gospel as the other apostles proclaim (1 Corinthians 15:11).
  • Paul’s ministry was not only to the Gentiles, but always to the Jew first (Acts 9:20, 13:14, 14:1, 17:1, 17:10, 18:4, 18:19, 19:8, 28:17, etc.). Therefore,
  • Paul’s ministry is not a new ministry to establish the church. Rather, it is a ministry established to continue the expansion of the church in sharing the gospel, after the (known to the Lord) rejection of it by Israel, with the Gentiles.

These points are especially highlighted by the fact that Gentiles are included in the chapter prior to and directly after Paul’s conversion in Acts 9. They are brought into the church by Jews at the direction of Jesus personally.

As this is so, it demonstrates that those who proclaim the doctrine of hyperdispensationalism are teaching a false and heretical doctrine that destroys the purpose and intent of the Lord’s personal workings in Acts to establish and continue His church. Hyperdispensationalism teaches a false gospel by proclaiming two separate gospels, one for the Jew and one for the Gentile. This is, according to Paul in Galatians 1, anathema.

Heavenly Father, may we carefully consider what Acts is telling us and properly evaluate what is going on there. Help us to consider it thoughtfully because many false teachers have come to proclaim heretical teachings based on a misapplication of what is taught out of the book. So, Lord, guide us carefully through this foundational part of Your precious word. Amen.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Joshua 2:12-24 (According to Your Words, So Be It)

Joshua 2:12-24
According to Your Words, So Be It

When we were in Deuteronomy, we saw that the Lord told the people they were to exterminate every person in Canaan, letting no one survive. That was recorded in Deuteronomy 20 –

“But of the cities of these peoples which the Lord your God gives you as an inheritance, you shall let nothing that breathes remain alive, 17 but you shall utterly destroy them: the Hittite and the Amorite and the Canaanite and the Perizzite and the Hivite and the Jebusite, just as the Lord your God has commanded you, 18 lest they teach you to do according to all their abominations which they have done for their gods, and you sin against the Lord your God.” Deuteronomy 20:16-18

But even before that, this was recorded in Deuteronomy 7 –

“…you shall conquer them and utterly destroy them. You shall make no covenant with them nor show mercy to them. Nor shall you make marriages with them. You shall not give your daughter to their son, nor take their daughter for your son.” Deuteronomy 7:2, 3

Without connecting the two, Adam Clarke says the following –

“She [Rahab] had learned, either from the spies or otherwise, that all the inhabitants of the land were doomed to destruction, and therefore she obliges them to enter into a covenant with her for the preservation of herself and her household.” Adam Clarke

He is right; that is exactly what will come about in the verses today. Even before Israel officially enters the land, this word of the Lord is going to be violated. Rahab, after all, is an inhabitant of the land, and an oath is made between the two men of Israel and her.

Despite this, Rahab’s life, faith, and actions are used to teach us truths in typology and pictures about the work of God in Christ. In the end, our disobedience and failings can be used by God to bring much glory to Himself.

This doesn’t mean we should actively be disobedient in order for good to come about. Paul warns about such a perverse notion, but it does show the greatness of God that such things can – and often do – occur. Just look at what He did with Joseph’s brothers selling him off to Egypt!

Text Verse: “I was alive once without the law, but when the commandment came, sin revived and I died. 10 And the commandment, which was to bring life, I found to bring death. 11 For sin, taking occasion by the commandment, deceived me, and by it killed me. 12 Therefore the law is holy, and the commandment holy and just and good.” Romans 7:9-12

The law is good; it is we who are not. The law highlights that for us. What we need, and what Rahab will find out about – even before Israel does – is grace. And that comes when we demonstrate faith. Rahab did and she is remembered for that almost 3500 years later.

Good stuff from God’s precious word. Something else came out of the text, a definite chiastic structure. It’s a little hard to see in the English translation, but it comes out clearly in the Hebrew. However, you will get the gist of it.

Joshua 2:15-21 – Conditions or penalties.
A lesson concerning faith (5/16/2022)

It’s pretty wonderful to find these for several reasons. One is that it helps you to figure out what a difficult passage is telling you. Another is that it lets you know there is more than just a narrative being told, but there is a purposeful narrative, with a set intent that is being conveyed.

Also, things like this help solidify your faith in the fact that this really is God’s word and that He really is relaying special and important information for us to consider.

Great things like salvation by grace through faith and chiasms are to be found in His superior word. And so, let us turn to that precious word once again and… May God speak to us through His word today and may His glorious name ever be praised.

I. The Expectation, the Scarlet (verses 12-24)

12 Now therefore, I beg you, swear to me by the Lord,

Rahab has shown kindness to the spies in hiding them from arrest. But more, she had actually endangered her own life in the process. As such, she will ask for a return favor in both regards, saying: v’atah hishaveu na li b’Yehovah – “And now swear, I pray, to me in Yehovah.”

Most translations say, “swear to me by the Lord.” The ISV is closer, saying, “in the name of the Lord.”  This is the intent of saying “in Yehovah.” His name stands for who He is. To swear in His name is to wholly identify with the name. For now, she says…

12 (con’t) since I have shown you kindness, that you also will show kindness to my father’s house,

This is the anticipated exchange. She had helped them and spared their lives while risking her own, and so she is asking now that they will respond in kind. In saying “my father’s house,” it implies everyone associated with it. All who stem from her father are to be included in the agreement. In hopes of this, she says…

12 (con’t) and give me a true token,

u-netatem li oth emet – “and give to me sign true.” The word translated as “token” is oth. It signifies a sign, coming from the verb uth, meaning to consent or agree. It is something that stands for something else.

If one swears a vow such as this, that stands for performance of the vow. Thus, the sign does not necessarily have to be something physical, as we would think of a token today. There is an agreement to be sworn in the name of Yehovah which will stand as a sign between them. The substance of that oath is…

13 and spare my father, my mother, my brothers, my sisters, and all that they have, and deliver our lives from death.”

As noted, all that stems directly from her father is included in the request. The request is not unreasonable. As she saved two men of Israel, she essentially saved two households of Israel. Everything associated with them as the heads of a household, even if only future to them now, is to be considered as having been delivered.

Therefore, for her to ask for the household of her father is a just and reasonable request. The fulfillment of this will be seen in Joshua 6 –

“But Joshua had said to the two men who had spied out the country, ‘Go into the harlot’s house, and from there bring out the woman and all that she has, as you swore to her.’ 23 And the young men who had been spies went in and brought out Rahab, her father, her mother, her brothers, and all that she had. So they brought out all her relatives and left them outside the camp of Israel.” Joshua 6:22, 23

Due to the reasonable nature of what has happened, they agree to the conditions. As noted in the analysis of Deuteronomy 20, and which I referred to in the sermon introduction, this is not at all in accord with the clear and explicit command to destroy every person.

Nothing is said about agreeing to help someone who first helped an Israelite. The command is given without exception and was to be performed. Understanding this, and despite the good that resulted from the events that take place, one can see that even before Israel has entered the land, a violation of the law has taken place.

This truly shows the nature of the law. It is a law of death. It was given to bring to an end those that were in Canaan. That is the Lord’s prerogative, and it is to be obeyed. However, a violation of it means that the life promised for obedience cannot be obtained. In other words, it takes us back to Leviticus 18:5 –

“You shall therefore keep My statutes and My judgments, which if a man does, he shall live by them: I am the Lord.”

The good intentions of these two men in making this agreement means that they have violated the precept. In violation of the precept, Paul’s words of our text verse become clear, “And the commandment, which was to bring life, I found to bring death” (Romans 7:10).

One can see how desperately Jesus is needed in our lives to remove from us the guilt of the law. Adam died in violation of the law, and all who followed after him died in Adam. The Law of Moses only heaped up more sin upon the people. But this was given to hopefully lead them as a tutor would, directly to the saving grace of Christ Jesus. As for the narrative now…

14 So the men answered her, “Our lives for yours,

naphshenu takhtekem la’mut – “our soul under yours (pl.) – to die.” The meaning of “under” is that which replaces. Something rises from under and replaces that which is above. They have agreed that if the soul of any of them is taken, that their own soul is forfeit. They will take the place of the one lost, as long as…

14 (con’t) if none of you tell this business of ours.

im lo tagidu eth devarenu zeh – “if no you (pl.) disclose our word this.” By saying this in the plural, the onus is on Rahab to ensure that none of the family says a word. If the matter is disclosed by any, it negates the agreement for all, including her.

The agreement is not for her to keep quiet that they are spying out the land. That is already known. The agreement is that this applies only to Rahab and her father’s house. To share with others the sign of her protection, which will be mentioned in verse 18, would negate the oath. The agreement does not extend to any others.

Further, the agreement will not apply to any of the family who are not brought into her house, as will be noted as well.

14 (con’t) And it shall be, when the Lord has given us the land,

The words confirm that they are completely certain of the outcome: v’hayah b’tet Yehovah lanu eth ha’arets – “And it shall be in giving Yehovah to us the land.” They are as certain it will happen as Rahab is. Rahab had heard and believed. The spies see and know. The only thing left was for time to catch up with the certain outcome. Once it does, the agreement is…

14 (con’t) that we will deal kindly and truly with you.”

The words are nouns, not adverbs and the addressee is singular. “that we have done with you (sg.) kindness and truth.” What is promised will be formalized with a state, not just actions, that will match the promises that have been made. The fulfillment of this is also recorded in Joshua 6 –

“And Joshua spared Rahab the harlot, her father’s household, and all that she had. So she dwells in Israel to this day, because she hid the messengers whom Joshua sent to spy out Jericho.” Joshua 6:25

15 Then she let them down by a rope through the window,

Well, she was no Rapunzel. Instead, it says: va’toridem ba’khevel b’ad ha’khalon – “And she caused them to descend in the cord through the window.” She could do this…

15 (con’t) for her house was on the city wall; she dwelt on the wall.

The Hebrew reads, “for her house in side the wall and in the wall she dwelt.” The meaning is probably that her house butted up to the wall with the back wall of the house being the city wall.

From there, the top of the house would have extended above the wall where there was a window, or that there was a window directly in the wall that could be blocked up during a siege. Either way, it would allow those inside to look out over the surrounding country. Being against the wall, it would make the climb down very easy for the men.

This is similar to what happened to Paul in Acts 9, and which he refers to in 2 Corinthians 11 –

“Now after many days were past, the Jews plotted to kill him. 24 But their plot became known to Saul. And they watched the gates day and night, to kill him. 25 Then the disciples took him by night and let him down through the wall in a large basket.” Acts 9:23-25

&

“In Damascus the governor, under Aretas the king, was guarding the city of the Damascenes with a garrison, desiring to arrest me; 33 but I was let down in a basket through a window in the wall, and escaped from his hands.” 2 Corinthians 11:32, 33

16 And she said to them, “Get to the mountain, lest the pursuers meet you.

These words are not unimportant, and they are specifically included in what James finds noteworthy concerning her actions –

“Likewise, was not Rahab the harlot also justified by works when she received the messengers and sent them out another way?” James 2:25

Up until this point, she could have done all of this to simply not get killed by the spies, but these words completely destroy any notion of this. If she had feared for her life and wanted them to get caught, she would have sent them in the same direction as those sent to find them.

It is true that she could still report them, saying they were hiding in the mountain. However, they would have the advantage of seeing pursuers coming from their elevated position, and so that is not an acceptable notion.

But more, anyone familiar with the area can tell you that there are innumerable caves in the mountains. A resourceful person could hide there for months while remaining undetected. Without going into all of the detail that he would have been aware of, James is careful to note both her receiving of them and of her sending them out in another way.

Her actions are based on her faith, and her words to the men are words of faith in the promises and integrity of the men as well as in the capabilities of the Lord.

16 (con’t) Hide there three days, until the pursuers have returned. Afterward you may go your way.”

Here is a new word, khavah, to hide or conceal. It is from khavav, meaning to love. The connection is that just as one hides his love in the heart, or secrets away his love, so a person will hide himself or another for protection.

As for hiding three days, this might mean traveling at night to the mountains, staying for two days or so, and then leaving on the third night to avoid anyone seeing them. Jericho is not a full-day walk to the Jordan, but going to it, searching the fords in the immediate area, and then returning from it would take a good two days or so. Therefore, this would explain her recommendation.

17 So the men said to her: “We will be blameless of this oath of yours which you have made us swear,

The Hebrew seems incomplete: neqiyim anakhnu mishevuatekh ha’zeh asher hishbatanu – “Blameless we from oath yours, the this, which you made us swear.” As it is written, it appears that they are claiming they are acquitted of any guilt that arises. As such, translators add the word “unless” into the next verse.

The Geneva Bible says, “We will be released from our oath if you perform this condition that follows for so shall you and yours be delivered.” But it doesn’t say that. It simply says, “We [are] blameless from this oath of yours, which you made us swear.”

My guess is that they are indicating that to them, as if it is a done deal. They will perform and be blameless. The conditions are up to Rahab and her family to meet, but as for them, they will fulfill what they agreed to…

18 unless, when we come into the land,

hineh anakhnu baim ba’arets – “Behold, we come in the land.” It is not a conditional “unless.” Rather it is a statement of fact. They are avowing that it will come to pass. As this is the case…

18 (con’t) you bind this line of scarlet cord in the window through which you let us down,

This is the first condition of safety. It is not the same cord by which they scaled down the wall: eth tiqvat khut ha’shani hazeh tiqsheri ba’khalon asher horadtenu bo – “expectation, thread the scarlet, the this, you bind in the window which you caused us to descend.”

There is a new noun here, tiqvah, translated by almost everyone as “line” or “cord.” It signifies expectancy, hope, or a thing longed for, coming from the verb qavah, to wait for. The Septuagint, and two Catholic Bibles translate the clause using the word “sign.” That is probably closer to the intent than “cord.”

The idea is that the expectancy is to see it – “the expectation.” If it isn’t in the window, there is nothing to identify them. Hence, there is no protection to be given to them. Also…

18 (con’t) and unless you bring your father, your mother, your brothers, and all your father’s household to your own home.

The second condition for safety. Again, the word “unless” is not in these words. The directions simply continue on – “and you … bring into your home.” Just as if there is no scarlet thread to identify the house, there is no way to identify anyone who should be in the house but who is not.

19 So it shall be that whoever goes outside the doors of your house into the street, his blood shall be on his own head, and we will be guiltless. And whoever is with you in the house, his blood shall be on our head if a hand is laid on him.

The instructions here are so similar to the Passover that it is hard not to call that to remembrance –

“Now the blood shall be a sign for you on the houses where you are. And when I see the blood, I will pass over you; and the plague shall not be on you to destroy you when I strike the land of Egypt.” Exodus 12:13

&

“And you shall take a bunch of hyssop, dip it in the blood that is in the basin, and strike the lintel and the two doorposts with the blood that is in the basin. And none of you shall go out of the door of his house until morning. 23 For the Lord will pass through to strike the Egyptians; and when He sees the blood on the lintel and on the two doorposts, the Lord will pass over the door and not allow the destroyer to come into your houses to strike you.” Exodus 12:22, 23

Those inside where the blood has been applied are under protection. Those who are not inside are not protected. Whether the blood of the Passover, or the crimson-colored thread now, either is that which identifies the “where” and “for whom it is so.”

20 And if you tell this business of ours,

It is the third condition for safety: v’im tagidi eth devarenu zeh – “And if you (sg.) disclose our word this.” Just as if there is no scarlet thread to identify the house, and just as if anyone is not safely in the house, so Rahab is not to tell the matter to anyone else.

Notice the difference between the words of verse 14 and the words of this verse –

im lo tagidu eth devarenu zeh – “if no you (pl.) disclose our word this.”
v’im tagidi eth devarenu zeh – “And if you (sg.) disclose our word this.”

Verse 14 was dealing with the lives of these two men in relation to the lives of those who don’t disclose the situation. Now, verse 20 is dealing with the oath which Rahab made. In both instances, it is up to Rahab to ensure that either her father’s family remains silent, or that she personally remains silent. If she doesn’t…

20 (con’t) then we will be free from your oath which you made us swear.”

v’hayinu neqiyim mishvuatekh asher hishbatanu – “And we become blameless from oath yours which you made us swear.” Three conditions set forth must be met. If they are not, then the two men will be blameless in regard to the oath she made them swear.

Again, see the difference between this verse and verse 17 –

neqiyim anakhnu mishevuatekh ha’zeh asher hishbatanu – “Blameless we from oath yours, the this, which you made us swear.”
v’hayinu neqiyim mishevuatek asher hishbatanu – “And we become blameless from oath yours which you made us swear.”

They say that they are blameless before the oath she made them swear. They will uphold their part of the bargain. But that is conditional upon her complying with her part of the bargain. If she performs, they will be blameless before the oath she made them swear.

In other words, “Be like us and perform what you are to do. We are blameless, and if you don’t do what you are to do, we will be blameless.” Jericho will be destroyed either way, and her betrayal of the spies would not stop that.

However, her betrayal of them might destroy them, but it would also remove any chance of protection for her. Doing what they have put forth is her only chance of salvation. As such, she chooses wisely…

21 Then she said, “According to your words, so be it.”

Her words bear emphasis: va’tomer k’divrekem ken hu – “And she said, “According to your words, so IT.” Exactly as they have said, so shall it be. Her life depends on what has been said, and she will follow through accordingly.

21 (con’t) And she sent them away, and they departed.

It is the final act of what has already been stated. She directed them to the mountain to stay for three days. As we saw, that is what James said was an act of justifying work. It, being an act of faith, can be reckoned as such. Next, in an act of hope it says…

21 (con’t) And she bound the scarlet cord in the window.

va’tiqsor eth tiqvat ha’shani ba’khalon – “And she bound the expectation, the scarlet in the window.” This could have happened at any time, from immediately even to right up until the last moment before Israel arrived to begin their short siege.

One would think that she did it right then as the two men were watching. They would see she complied, they would remember the location and how it was displayed, and it would be a reminder to her to stay the course because deliverance was on the way.

22 They departed and went to the mountain, and stayed there three days until the pursuers returned. The pursuers sought them all along the way, but did not find them.

They put faith in Rahab’s words and followed through with what she had said. While the pursuers were chasing the wind, these two were safely in the mountains, probably in a nice cool cave. They obviously had provision to accomplish their task and it would have been a quiet time.

And more, the term three days can signify any part of three days being considered as a three-day period. Regardless of the exact hours they spent there, they avoided the pursuers and then headed back to make their report.

23 So the two men returned, descended from the mountain, and crossed over;

Without giving any specifics, any time of day, or which day it is, a good guess is that this occurred in the early morning. It would be cooler, they could get by Jericho without notice, and they could then ford the river in some manner. By the time they did, it would be light enough to do so without any danger. From there, they headed directly to the boss…

23 (con’t) and they came to Joshua the son of Nun, and told him all that had befallen them.

The word is saphar. It means “to recount.” They went through all of the details of their expedition, recounting each thing that was of note. That is especially so with the main point…

24 And they said to Joshua, “Truly the Lord has delivered all the land into our hands,

This goes back to the words of Rahab from verse 9 –

“I know that the Lord has given you the land, that the terror of you has fallen on us, and that all the inhabitants of the land are fainthearted because of you.” Joshua 2:9

It was perfectly evident that if a prostitute that lived on the wall of a city knew this, it was common knowledge to all the people. The fact that pursuers were sent out after them only confirmed this. They would not bother with passing strangers unless there was a great reason to do so. With that understood…

*24 (fin) for indeed all the inhabitants of the country are fainthearted because of us.”

v’gam namogu kal yosheve ha’arets mipanenu – “And also, have melted all dwelling the land from our presence.” It is practically a repeat of the words of Rahab in verse 9. The God who had executed great judgments upon Egypt and who had parted the Red Sea was now just across the Jordan with His people.

And it is the same people who had crushed both Sihon and Og in the land which they were now located. It was perfectly understood that there was no hope if the Lord determined to disinherit them from the land. It was sure to come to pass.

If you are told there is something that you need to do
Do you take that as meaning, “This is a work”?
Or is it just a condition to find out about you?
Is what I am asking only a linguistic quirk?

Yes, there are things we must do to be saved
But that doesn’t mean our salvation is earned
Rather, the Lord sets the conditions for the path He has paved
The difference is something that must be learned

Faith is not a work. It is obedience to the call
We are to believe the gospel we have heard
It is the path to salvation for one and all
God sets the parameters, so believe on His word

II. Pictures of Christ

I would suggest that Joshua 2 anticipates the work of Christ. It is a typological and anticipatory look into how His work will accomplish salvation for Israel and how His word details that. The chapter begins with these words –

“Now Joshua the son of Nun sent out two men from Acacia Grove to spy secretly, saying, “Go, view the land, especially Jericho.”

As we already know, Joshua means “The Lord is Salvation.” He anticipates Jesus who is the Lord and who is salvation. Joshua’s father’s name being included anticipates Christ also. Nun is from the verb nun, to propagate, or increase. This is what Christ would do, increasing the family of God through His completed work.

The number two in Scripture signifies that there is a difference. As such, it signifies division or difference. I would suggest these two then represent the two testaments in Scripture. In them, there is a contrast, and yet they confirm the whole of the word of God.

Israel has not yet entered the promise, and they cannot without faith in Christ. They picture the people of Israel who have not yet received Him in our world today.

The place the men depart from is the Shittim, or the Acacia Grove. That is derived from shotet, a scourge. That word is used only once in the Bible. In Joshua 23:13, it says –

“…know for certain that the Lord your God will no longer drive out these nations from before you. But they shall be snares and traps to you, and scourges on your sides and thorns in your eyes, until you perish from this good land which the Lord your God has given you.” Joshua 23:13

As such, this place is a place of scourges. This was certainly seen in Numbers 25 where this place was first mentioned –

“Now Israel remained in Acacia Grove, and the people began to commit harlotry with the women of Moab. They invited the people to the sacrifices of their gods, and the people ate and bowed down to their gods. So Israel was joined to Baal of Peor, and the anger of the Lord was aroused against Israel.” Numbers 25:1, 2

It is also true that the law itself can be equated to scourges, simply because “by the law is the knowledge of sin” (Romans 3:20). In Joshua 23, the people of Canaan are equated to scourges who would afflict Israel. Thus, the scourges are that which draw the people away from faith in the Lord and to that which is false. However, that can be avoided or overcome.

The two men are to go into Canaan, typical of the spiritual state found in Christ. The goal is Jericho, the Place of Fragrance, typical of heaven, or a return to that which was lost at the fall.

Immediately, still in verse 1, Rahab is introduced. Her name means Spacious. She is given to demonstrate salvation in Christ. He is the narrow path that leads to the broad places of heaven. She has invited the two to lodge, but then she is told to bring them out.

She has the key to understanding the Lord in both Testaments of the word. When she is told to bring them out, thus giving them up, if you remember it curiously said in the singular, “And took the woman two the men and hid him.”

Being in the singular, it would indicate one word, even if two testaments. She has secreted the whole counsel of God away. While the enemy is out chasing after these two, and not finding anything, she is safely keeping them.

And not only that, it says that she caused them to ascend to the gag, or roof. That comes from gaah, exalted or majestic. She has placed the word, the two testaments, in the exalted place in her home among the stalks of flax that she had there.

Flax is the basis of linen, a covering that depicts righteousness. This speaks of her tending to the word of God, exalting it, in order to seek and find righteousness.

Meanwhile, the enemy pursues these two all the way to the Jordan, upon the fords. The Jordan, the Descender, pictures Christ Jesus. But without the word, they will find nothing. Mankind can only come to Christ through His word which tells of Him. There is no crossing over except through the One Christ and through His one gospel.

While they are out pursuing, the two men are on the roof. Rahab ascended to them and showed her faith in the Lord, saying that she knows that He is God in heaven above and on the earth beneath. With that, she asks for kindness to be shown to her father’s house by sparing it.

The two men agree. If she is faithful to the conditions according to their word, they offer their lives in exchange. The token, the sign, is their word that it will be so. The word of God is sure. It is a sign of the truth of God. It testifies to His faithfulness.

With that, she lets them down by a cord. The word signifies to bind tightly, coming from a word meaning to pledge. She has accepted their word as a pledge of truthfulness. After that, the two state that they are blameless of the oath which she made them swear.

The word of God cannot fail. It is blameless. What it proclaims is absolutely certain. Their word to her is “expectation, thread the scarlet, the this, you bind in the window which you caused us to descend.” It is the crimson thread that runs throughout Scripture and that which testifies to Christ.

It is a typological picture that salvation comes through His blood. Any who are willing to hide themselves with this protective mark will be saved, just as was the case with the Passover. Destruction is inevitable, but salvation can be obtained for those who accept the conditions.

This is exactly how it is for salvation in Christ. The proposition is set forth, certain conditions must be met, and when they are, salvation is obtained. As we saw in the previous sermon, the conditions are stated by Jesus –

“Then they said to Him, ‘What shall we do, that we may work the works of God?’
29 Jesus answered and said to them, ‘This is the work of God, that you believe in Him whom He sent.’” John 6:28, 29

The scarlet thread is given in typology of that faith in Christ. The two testaments testify to this, and nothing else will do. If you think about it, Israel has not yet crossed through the Jordan (Christ), and thus they are not yet saved. However, Rahab is, even if it has not yet come about.

She put the cord up and awaited in hope of the deliverance that was promised to her. She was a Gentile sinner, and yet she obtained the promise before the people who were given the promise in the first place. Her name reflects her state. She obtained the broad places of heaven through her acts of faith.

Her statement to them was, va’tomer k’divrekem ken hu – “And she said, “According to your words, so IT.” That is what God expects of us. His word is written. It is laid out in two testaments, and they together form a unified whole that testifies to the workings of God in Christ. When we accept the conditions and apply faith as instructed, salvation is realized.

In her life profession while in Jericho, she was not morally inferior to those around her. Rather, it is just the opposite. She was willing to humble her heart before the Lord, she exalted those who came to her, and she was obedient to their word.

This is not unlike those of Israel who were considered the dregs of society, but who Jesus said would enter the kingdom of God before those who were supposedly righteous. They accepted the message of John, they looked for the Messiah of whom he spoke, and they accepted Him for who He is.

Israel is given an example of this in their own history, even before they enter through the Jordan. In fact, it is the last main message given to them before Joshua musters them and gets them ready to enter Canaan. Israel of today must learn this. It is only by faith in Christ that the inheritance can be obtained.

Moses, the law, died outside of Canaan. A harlot who simply trusted in the word of the Lord will be exalted within the borders of Canaan – even to becoming an ancestor of the Savior whom the actions of her life anticipate. What an amazing thing to consider.

Closing Verse: “Jesus said to them, ‘Assuredly, I say to you that tax collectors and harlots enter the kingdom of God before you. 32 For John came to you in the way of righteousness, and you did not believe him; but tax collectors and harlots believed him; and when you saw it, you did not afterward relent and believe him.’” Matthew 21:31, 32

Next Week: Joshua 3:1-13 To do it, they won’t need a Land Rover, but it would be fun… (And the People Crossed Over, Part I) (5th Joshua Sermon)

The Lord has you exactly where He wants you. He has a good plan and purpose for you. It is He who has defeated the enemy and who now offers His people rest. So, follow Him and trust Him and He will do marvelous things for you and through you.

According to Your Words, So Be It

Now therefore, I beg you
Swear to me by the LORD, so your vow you cannot douse
Since I have shown you kindness
That you also will show kindness to my father’s house

And give me a true token
And spare my father, my mother, my brothers, my sisters too
And all that they have
And deliver our lives from death, this I beg of you

So the men answered her, “Our lives for yours
If none of you tell this business of ours, so you shall not do
And it shall be, when the LORD has given us the land
That we will deal kindly and truly with you

Then she let them down
By a rope through the window
For her house was on the city wall
She dwelt on the wall, so out the window they did go

And she said to them
“Get to the mountain, lest the pursuers meet you, so she did say
Hide there three days, until the pursuers have returned
Afterward you may go your way

So the men said to her: “We will be blameless of this oath of yours
Which you have made us swear
Unless, when we come into the land
You bind this line of scarlet cord in the window
———-and we find it there

The window through which you let us down
And unless you bring your father, your mother, your brothers too
And all your father’s household to your own home
This is what we require of you

So it shall be that whoever goes
Outside the doors of your house into the street
His blood shall be on his own head
And we will be guiltless, when his death he does meet

And whoever is with you in the house
His blood shall be on our head if a hand is laid on him there
And if you tell this business of ours
Then we will be free from your oath which you made us swear

Then she said, “According to your words, so be it
And she sent them away, and they departed
And she bound the scarlet cord in the window
She was no longer fearful or fainthearted

They departed and went to the mountain
And stayed there three days until their pursuers returned
They sought them all along the way
But did not find them and the matter was adjourned

So the two men returned
Descended from the mountain, and crossed over as well
And they came to Joshua the son of Nun
And told him all that had to them befell

And they said to Joshua
“Truly the LORD has delivered all the land into our hands
———-triple A and plus, plus, plus
For indeed all the inhabitants of the country
Are fainthearted because of us

Lord God, turn our hearts to be obedient to Your word
Give us wisdom to be ever faithful to You
May we carefully heed each thing we have heard
Yes, Lord God may our hearts be faithful and true

And we shall be content and satisfied in You alone
We will follow You as we sing our songs of praise
Hallelujah to You; to us Your path You have shown
Hallelujah we shall sing to You for all of our days

Hallelujah and Amen…

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12 Now therefore, I beg you, swear to me by the Lord, since I have shown you kindness, that you also will show kindness to my father’s house, and give me a true token, 13 and spare my father, my mother, my brothers, my sisters, and all that they have, and deliver our lives from death.”

14 So the men answered her, “Our lives for yours, if none of you tell this business of ours. And it shall be, when the Lord has given us the land, that we will deal kindly and truly with you.”

15 Then she let them down by a rope through the window, for her house was on the city wall; she dwelt on the wall. 16 And she said to them, “Get to the mountain, lest the pursuers meet you. Hide there three days, until the pursuers have returned. Afterward you may go your way.”

17 So the men said to her: “We will be blameless of this oath of yours which you have made us swear, 18 unless, when we come into the land, you bind this line of scarlet cord in the window through which you let us down, and unless you bring your father, your mother, your brothers, and all your father’s household to your own home. 19 So it shall be that whoever goes outside the doors of your house into the street, his blood shall be on his own head, and we will be guiltless. And whoever is with you in the house, his blood shall be on our head if a hand is laid on him. 20 And if you tell this business of ours, then we will be free from your oath which you made us swear.”

21 Then she said, “According to your words, so be it.” And she sent them away, and they departed. And she bound the scarlet cord in the window.

22 They departed and went to the mountain, and stayed there three days until the pursuers returned. The pursuers sought them all along the way, but did not find them. 23 So the two men returned, descended from the mountain, and crossed over; and they came to Joshua the son of Nun, and told him all that had befallen them. 24 And they said to Joshua, “Truly the Lord has delivered all the land into our hands, for indeed all the inhabitants of the country are fainthearted because of us.”