Judges 4:17-24 (Deborah, Judge of Israel, Part II)

Head blasting artwork by Douglas Kallerson.

Judges 4:17-24
Deborah, Judge of Israel, Part II

Numbers are important in Scripture. Whether they are being used to describe how many days or years something occurred or the number of times things are listed, there is always a reason for the way things are structured. Nothing is superfluous. The following numbers are explained by E.W. Bullinger and are abbreviated from his longer analyses.

In this chapter, Deborah is mentioned five times. Five is the number of Grace. Barak is mentioned ten times. Ten marks the entire round of anything. The Lord (Yehovah) is mentioned eight times. Eight is the superabundant number.

God is mentioned twice, once as the Lord God of Israel. Two affirms there is a difference. There is a contrast between the two, but there is also a confirmation of something.

Jabin is mentioned seven times, the number of spiritual perfection. Sisera is mentioned thirteen times. That is the number of rebellion, apostasy, defection, corruption, disintegration, revolution, or some kindred idea.

Jael is mentioned four times. It is the number of things that have a beginning, things that are made, material things, and matter itself. It is the number of material completeness. Hence, it is the world number, and especially the city number

Text Verse: “Beloved, while I was very diligent to write to you concerning our common salvation, I found it necessary to write to you exhorting you to contend earnestly for the faith which was once for all delivered to the saints.” Jude 1:3

I was surprised to see how closely the meaning of the number of instances given above fits with the typology of what is presented. I won’t go through that in any detail but set it forth for you as a challenge to do your own checking. It’s kind of like a fun assignment by your favorite teacher J.

As you go through the Bible, check such things as how many times something is mentioned. Think on what is presented and consider why the Lord has included details like these. The word is a never-ending source of amazing facts, figures, patterns, metaphors, and so forth.

If you find your time reading the Bible to be boring, it’s because you aren’t being inventive. There is no end to the excitement you will find in this precious word. Enjoy this number challenge when you have time.

Wonderful things are to be found in His superior word. And so, let us turn to that precious word once again, and… May God speak to us through His word today, and may His glorious name ever be praised.

I. There Lay Sisera, Dead (verses 17-24)

17 However, Sisera had fled away on foot to the tent of Jael, the wife of Heber the Kenite;

v’sisra nas b’raglav el ohel yael esheth khever ha’qeni – “And Sisera fled in his feet unto tent Jael, wife Heber the Kenite.” Women had their own tents, as was noted in Genesis 18:6 where Sarah had her own tent apart from Abraham.

Clarke notes that “according to the etiquette of the eastern countries, no person ever intrudes into the apartments of the women.” Thus, it would be far less suspect for him to go to a woman’s tent. Because of the distance between the battle and where her tent was, Ellicott says –

“Three days must have elapsed since the battle before it would be possible for Sisera to fly on foot from the Kishon to ‘the nomad’s terebinth.’ It may well be conceived that the unfortunate general arrived there in miserable plight—a starving and ruined fugitive.”

The name Jael comes from yael, a mountain goat or ibex. That, in turn, comes from ya’al, to avail, or to confer or gain profit or benefit. For example, it is used in 1 Samuel 12:21, saying, “And do not turn aside; for then you would go after empty things which cannot profit [yaal] or deliver, for they are nothing.”

Abarim notes that because the mountain goat is so sure of its footing, it is literally an animal that benefits from its practical skill. Yael literally means Mountain Goat, but the deeper meaning must be considered – One Who Gets Somewhere Because of a Practical Skill.

17 (con’t) for there was peace between Jabin king of Hazor and the house of Heber the Kenite.

Here, the term beith, or house, is used in its patronymic sense. The people were tent dwellers. The “house” of Heber means the family of Heber. Because there was peace between them, Heber’s house did not suffer oppression, as did the children of Israel (4:3).

As nomads, they made no claims upon the land. They tended to their flocks, moved as the seasons dictated, and lived without entering conflict or taking sides in conflicts. Therefore, they were left to roam, untouched by the normal tides of life. As such, this was a logical place to seek asylum…

18 And Jael went out to meet Sisera,

Here the nature of the woman’s privacy noted earlier is highlighted. Sisera did not enter the tent and demand protection. Rather, she came out to him and – seeing his plight – made the offer of refuge…

18 (con’t)and said to him, “Turn aside, my lord, turn aside to me; do not fear.”

vatomer elav surah adoni surah elay al tira – “And said unto him, turn aside, my lord, turn aside unto me; not fear.” She makes the offer of refuge, calling him adoni, or my lord. It is a formal way of acknowledging him as honorably higher than herself.

Also, the repetition of “turn aside” is a way of calmly encouraging him that his flight is ended. There is no imposition laid upon her and no reason for him to venture further at this time. As for the words al tira, fear not, it signifies that he has no reason to fear being exposed to the pursuing enemy by her.

18 (con’t)And when he had turned aside with her into the tent, she covered him with a blanket.

vayasar eleha ha’ohelah vatkasehu ba’s’mikhah – “And turned aside unto her, the tent of her, and covered him in the s’mikhah. The covering, s’mikhah, is a word found only here in Scripture. It is derived from the verb samakh, to lean, lay, rest, or support.

There are numerous suggestions as to what it is, but it would be something commonly known among the Bedouins. Thus, it is probably a large goat’s hair tent-rug used for resting on that is commonly seen in such tents.

19 Then he said to her, “Please give me a little water to drink, for I am thirsty.”

Of this, Lange says, “Sisera is not incautious. He proceeds to ask for drink, pleading thirst. She gives him of her milk. It is an ancient, oriental practice, common to all Bedouins, Arabs, and the inhabitants of deserts in general, that whoever has eaten or drunk anything in the tent, is received into the peace of the house. The Arab’s mortal enemy slumbers securely in the tent of his adversary, if he have drunk with him.”

Whether he knew of this custom is unknown. The fact that she invited him in and covered him was sufficient for him to then ask for water. It is the obvious need of a man who has fled a great distance. Rather than water, however, it says…

19 (con’t) So she opened a jug of milk, gave him a drink, and covered him.

The nod, or jug, would be a goatskin. It was also commonly used as a wineskin. In it was khalav, or milk, coming from the same root as khelev, or fat. Fat in Scripture signifies the richest or choicest part. She grants him not only something to drink to simply sustain him but something nourishing as well. She then covered him up…

20 And he said to her, “Stand at the door of the tent,

The verb is masculine imperative: vayomer eleha amod petakh ha’ohel – “And said unto her, ‘Stand (ms.imp.) door the tent.” Without understanding the typology, it is unclear why the masculine form was used. Some think it was simply the more general form, “and might therefore be used for the more definite feminine” (Keil).

The ohel, or tent, comes from ahal, to be clear or shine. The sense is that a tent in a field is clearly conspicuous from a distance. Sisera doesn’t want someone to see the tent without her first being aware of it.

20 (con’t) and if any man comes and inquires of you, and says, ‘Is there any man here?’ you shall say, ‘No.’”

v’hayah im ish yavo u-shelekh v’amar hayesh poh ish v’amart ayin – “and it is if man comes and asks and says, ‘Is here man?’ and you have said, ‘None.’” To this point, nothing has been said concerning him being chased, even if it is obvious. A commander doesn’t run alone in his battle dress unless things haven’t gone well for him. He is thirsty and tired.

Thus, he has been in a hurry to get away from past events. Being the commander of the army, it is logical that people will be following after him to find him. He confirms this by asking her to lie for him. However, he underestimates the bonds that have existed between Israel and Yael’s people for many years now. She will not need to lie to anyone…

21 Then Jael, Heber’s wife, took a tent peg and took a hammer in her hand,

vatiqakh yael eshet khever eth y’tad ha’ohel vatasem eth ha’maqeveth b’yadah – “And took Yael, wife Heber, peg the tent, and set the perforator in her hand.” The inclusion of the words “wife Heber” provides its own emphasis.

It was just noted that there was peace between Jabin and the house of Heber, and yet this tells us that the peace did not go as deeply as family allegiances. Jael was noted in verse 11 as being of the children of Hobab, the in-law of Moses. Despite having separated from the Kenites, the affections of the past relationships remained grounded between Israel and the Kenites.

As for this clause, it contains a new and rare word, maqeveth. It is a noun signifying a hole or an excavation, coming from naqav, to pierce. Translations say hammer. The tool is used to make a perforation into something. Thus, it is a perforator.

As it says, she set it in her hand, it could be a stone, a hammer, a shaped piece of metal, etc. It is something the tent dwellers would have handy for sinking pegs. With these commonly used objects, it next says…

21 (con’t) and went softly to him and drove the peg into his temple, and it went down into the ground;

Rather: vatavo elav balat vathitqa eth ha’yathed b’raqato vatitsnakh ba’arets – “And went to him in secrecy and blasted the peg in his temple, and descended in the earth.” The word lat, a secret or a mystery, is used. Like Eva Marie Saint, she stealthily took action. Once near enough, and with the precision of John Wick, she gave a fatal headshot to Sisera.

The word taqa, a thrust, clap, or blast is used. At times, it signifies blasting on a trumpet. In this case, it is the blasting sound of pounding on a tent peg. As for the word translated as temple, raqah, this is the first of five times it will be seen. It comes from the word raq, thinness. Thus, it is the thin part of the head that we call the temple.

Whether one blow or multiple whacks, she drilled it through one temple, out the other side, and right into the earth itself…

21 (con’t) for he was fast asleep and weary. So he died.

Of the next words, John Lange’s commentary says, “The passage is a curiosity in interpretation. Regardless, it is emphatic: v’hu nirdam vayaaph vayamoth – “And HE, dead asleep and flying. And dies.”

Here is another new word, radam. It comes from a primitive root signifying to stun. Thus, it means to stupefy with sleep or death. As he was in a deep sleep and went straight to death, translating it as dead asleep seems to be a nice touch.

The next word, uph, signifies to fly. It comes from oph, bird. Thus, it is idiomatically meant to be faint or weary, just as when a very weary person’s head will swirl as if flying. Some translations say swooned, but this is surely speaking of his state, not what happened to him.

22 And then, as Barak pursued Sisera, Jael came out to meet him,

v’hinneh baraq rodeph eth sisra vatetse yael likrato – “And behold, Barak pursues Sisera. And came out Jael to meet him.” As noted earlier, this would have been obvious to her. Sisera was alone, weary, and would have had his battle attire on. She knew he was routed, and it had to be Israel who did so. All she had to do was wait, and someone would be along to collect his corpse.

There is no reason to assume that Barak suddenly showed up just as she was finishing the job. It simply notes that Barak was pursuing Sisera. He pursued, and she came out to meet him…

22 (con’t) and said to him, “Come, I will show you the man whom you seek.”

There is no hint of Barak first questioning her. She knew exactly why he was there and who he was looking for. One can imagine her smiling and speaking with a tone of pure satisfaction, or even jubilation, in her voice; “Come on in and check this out…”

22 (con’t) And when he went into her tent, there lay Sisera, dead with the peg in his temple.

vayavo eleha v’hinneh sisra nophel met v’ha’yathed b’raqato – “And went unto her, and behold, Sisera fallen – dead – and the peg in his temple.” She had purposefully left the peg in his temple, certainly for the shock value that it would bring. Sisera wasn’t just dead, but he was left on display with his head fixed to the ground.

The number of commentaries that absolutely excoriate her for what she did reveals an attitude not seen in Scripture. Through several paragraphs, Keil distances himself from her, as if she is some type of pariah. At one point, he says, “her heroic deed cannot be acquitted of the sins of lying, treachery, and assassination, which were associated with it.”

Clarke, likewise, seems a bit unhappy with her conduct, saying, “Now do we not find, in all this, bad faith, deceit, deep hypocrisy, lying, breach of treaty, contempt of religious rites, breach of the laws of hospitality, deliberate and unprovoked murder?”

That is not how she is viewed in Scripture, nor do such words align with the very next words in the passage…

23 So on that day God subdued Jabin king of Canaan in the presence of the children of Israel.

There is a subtle pun in the words: v’yakhna elohim ba’yom ha’hu eth yavin melekh k’naan liphe bene Yisrael – “And humbles, God, in the day, the it, Jabin king of Canaan to faces sons Israel.” The word kana is the root of Canaan. It signifies to humble or subdue. Likewise, Canaan means Humbled, Humiliated, or Subdued.

The name Yehovah, translated as Lord, is used eight times in this chapter. Once, it is in connection with the word elohim, “Has not the Lord God of Israel commanded” (verse 6). Now, only elohim, or God, is used. This signifies Powers or Forces that exist within Him. What seems to be the reason for the change is what it said in verse 9, “…nevertheless there will be no glory for you in the journey you are taking, for the Lord will sell Sisera into the hand of a woman.”

Jael became the instrument by which the Powers humiliated Jabin. His armies were already defeated, but more than just a rout, a woman completed the task by destroying the leader of the army. This was by design of the Lord, and it is hard to imagine how anyone could impute wrongdoing to her for having sided with Israel.

24 And the hand of the children of Israel grew stronger and stronger against Jabin king of Canaan,

There is a sense of motion and increase in the words: vatelekh yad bene Yisrael halokh v’qashah al yavin melekh k’naan – “And goes hand sons Israel, going, and harsh upon Jabin, king Canaan.” For twenty years, Jabin “harshly oppressed the children of Israel” (verse 3). And rightfully so. He was the instrument of the Lord’s affliction against Israel.

They had done evil in the sight of the Lord, and they got what He said they would get for their deeds. Eventually, they had suffered enough, and He sent word through Deborah that their time of servitude was to end. With the defeat of Sisera, the hand of Israel grew…

*24 (fin) until they had destroyed Jabin king of Canaan.

Josephus says that it was at this time, as Barak went toward Hazor, that he met and killed Jabin. But that does not align with the words here: ad asher hikhrithu eth yavin melekh k’naan – “until which had destroyed Jabin king Canaan.”

The words show a process. It wasn’t as if Jabin was destroyed immediately after this defeat, but Israel progressed until the point in which he was finally eliminated. With that, the chapter ends. It is a note of victory for Israel, but it was according to the purpose and plan of God. Hence, we can anticipate that the events form typology concerning future events…

The word of God, holy and pure
Is given to us from His wise and loving hand
Through it, our faith is strong and sure
On the word of God, we can make our stand

With it, we know what is right for salvation unto life
And we know when to reject that which is wrong
Through sound doctrine, we can weed out theological strife
And our faith will be sure, sound, and strong

Praise be to God, who has given us this precious word
He who has shown us what is true and right
The pages of the Bible are a precious cutting sword
Weeding out all that is false and revealing God’s glorious light

II. Pictures of Christ

The passage began by noting Ehud’s death in verse 1. He anticipated Christ in the last passage. Noting his death is intended to show that Christ’s work is complete. As has been seen, the resurrection of Christ is implied in such typological statements.

Also, it was noted that the text implies that Israel did evil even before the death of Ehud and that it simply carried on after his death. This is not unlike Israel. Because of this, in verse 2, the Lord sold them into the hands of Jabin, meaning The Wise (Intelligent). What we see is a picture of those who come against sound doctrine, such as the intellectual elite. They stand against the wisdom of God –

For the message of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God. 19 For it is written:
‘I will destroy the wisdom of the wise,
And bring to nothing the understanding of the prudent.’
20 Where is the wise? Where is the scribe? Where is the disputer of this age? Has not God made foolish the wisdom of this world? 21 For since, in the wisdom of God, the world through wisdom did not know God, it pleased God through the foolishness of the message preached to save those who believe. 22 For Jews request a sign, and Greeks seek after wisdom; 23 but we preach Christ crucified, to the Jews a stumbling block and to the Greeks foolishness, 24 but to those who are called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God. 25 Because the foolishness of God is wiser than men, and the weakness of God is stronger than men.” 1 Corinthians 1:18-25

Jabin is noted as the king of Canaan or Humbled. In this case, it signifies those who are humbled by rejecting the work of Christ. The text also noted he reigned in Hazor.

The name has various meanings, but the root word is what is instructing us. It comes from a word signifying “to begin to cluster or gather.” This is exactly what Paul writes of as expressed to Timothy –

“For the time will come when people will not put up with sound doctrine. Instead, to suit their own desires, they will gather around them a great number of teachers to say what their itching ears want to hear.” 2 Timothy 4:3 (NIV)

Such people are what the epistles focus on. They are the Gnostics with their secret wisdom. They are the intelligencia who are too smart for the gospel. They are those who want to divide and destroy for their own gain.

Continuing in verse 2, it noted the commander of his army was Sisera. Abarim explains that as See the Horse. The horse carries various connotations in Scripture, but it is a source of misplaced trust and pride, such as in Psalm 20:7 –

“Some trust in chariots, and some in horses;
But we will remember the name of the Lord our God.” Psalm 20:7

He is noted as dwelling in Harosheth Hagoyim, or Manufactory of the Gentiles. Abarim noted that this name “obviously embodied the strength and validity of systems of learning that were not part of Israel.” A good place to see where these words point is found in Colossians 2 –

“Therefore, if you died with Christ from the basic principles of the world, why, as though living in the world, do you subject yourselves to regulations— 21 “Do not touch, do not taste, do not handle,” 22 which all concern things which perish with the using—according to the commandments and doctrines of men? 23 These things indeed have an appearance of wisdom in self-imposed religion, false humility, and neglect of the body, but are of no value against the indulgence of the flesh.” Colossians 2:20-23

Paul’s words of Colossians 2 deal especially with the false teachings of the Judaizers. It is obvious that those Jews who rejected Christ are not of Israel. They are thus accounted as Gentiles in this regard, as Paul explains in Romans 9, where he says that “they are not all Israel who are of Israel.” This is their state during the church age.

The state of the church since its inception, and during all of the dispensation of grace, is one where it is harassed by those who manufacture systems of learning that are “not of Israel.” The church is not Israel, but it is grafted into the commonwealth of Israel (Ephesians 2:12).

The number of chariots noted in verse 3 was nine hundred. Thus, it speaks of both finality or judgment and completeness of order where nothing is wanting, meaning the whole cycle is complete. There is a time when the foes of the church will be judged, and it will be at the time when God deems the cycle is complete. That is mentioned by Paul in Romans 11:25 –

“For I do not desire, brethren, that you should be ignorant of this mystery, lest you should be wise in your own opinion, that blindness in part has happened to Israel until the fullness of the Gentiles has come in.”

Understanding this, it then noted that this vehement oppression lasted for twenty years. As seen, twenty is the number of expectancy. That is just how the church age is defined based on the proper notion of a pre-tribulation rapture. The church age is a time set by God, but one that is left indeterminate in length for us.

Verse 4 introduced Deborah, Bee, but indicating Formalizer. She is the one who Formalizes the word of the Lord. She anticipates the New Testament. She is noted as 1) woman, 2) a prophetess, and 3) Wife (or Woman) of Torches (Lamps).

The word diathéké, a covenant or testament, is a feminine noun. The New Testament is a book of prophecy. The word is considered a lamp in Scripture. As the New Testament is 27 books, the plural Lamps is given. Consider this in light of Peter’s words –

“And we have the more certain prophetic word, to which you do well taking heed, as to a lamp shining in a dark place, until this day shall have dawned and the morning star shall have arisen in your hearts, 20knowing this first, that any prophecy of Scripture is not of its own interpretation. 21For no prophecy at any time was brought by the will of man, but men spoke from God, being carried by the Holy Spirit.” 2 Peter 1:19-21 (BLB)

In all of the ways Deborah is presented, she matches how we would describe the New Testament. Of her, it says that she “was judging Israel at that time.” It is another perfect description of the New Testament in relation to the church. She renders decisions on behalf of the Lord, settles controversies, etc.

Verse 5 says that she would sit under the palm tree of Deborah between Ramah and Bethel in Mount Ephraim. Again, it describes the New Testament. She is “sitting in the place of righteousness conveying to the people the formalized word (davar) of the Lord.”

She does this between Height (Lofty Place) and the House of God. The Height, as in previous sermons, is the position the Lord places believers because of their faith in the Lord. Bethel anticipates heaven. The word is between these two locations.

The mount refers to the gathering of the believers, meaning all in the church. Ephraim means Twice Fruitful and Ashes. The first signifies that Christ’s work has produced fruit in the conversion of both Jews and Gentiles. The second signifies the price He paid to make this possible, which was the afflictions He endured.

Verse 5 continued with, “And ascended unto her sons Israel to the judgment.” This is where we go during this dispensation for judgment. We do not go to books of discipline or any other such nonsense, but especially to the New Testament epistles.

Verse 6 introduced Barak (Lightning), the son of Abinoam (Father of Pleasantness) from Kedesh (Holy) in Naphtali (My Wrestlings). Barak comes from a word found only once in Scripture –

“Flash forth lightning [baraq] and scatter them;
Shoot out Your arrows and destroy them.
Stretch out Your hand from above;
Rescue me and deliver me out of great waters,
From the hand of foreigners,
Whose mouth speaks lying words,
And whose right hand is a right hand of falsehood.” Psalm 144:6-8

He represents the power of the Lord to scatter His enemies. Being the son of Father of Pleasantness means that His power is reserved, as will be seen in a moment. Kedesh, Holy, speaks of the state of those made holy by Christ, which is a result of His wrestlings, in order to secure our salvation.

Barak is directed to deploy with ten thousand of Naphtali and Zebulun at Mount Tabor, Purified. The number anticipates the fullness of the church where the whole cycle is complete. Zebulun, or Glorious Dwelling Place, signifies the position of believers in Christ, meaning the heavenly places, as noted in Ephesians 2:6.

Tabor speaks of the state of believers, such as is noted in Titus 2:14, saying, “who gave Himself for us, that He might redeem us from every lawless deed and purify for Himself His own special people, zealous for good works.”

Verse 7 described the deployment of the enemy at the, nakhal qishon, River Kishon. The verb nakhal signifies to take possession. Kishon means Place of Ensnarement. The meanings speak for themselves. Deborah, quoting the Lord, says that is where “I have given them in your hand.”

However, Barak balks and says he will not go fight unless Deborah goes. It reveals the necessity for a complete reliance on the word of God. The Lord will not go around His word to defeat the enemies. Instead, the presence of the word is necessary to do so. That was clearly seen in the two propositions set forth –

  • If you will go with me, and I have gone. There is trust in the word if the communicator of the word is reliable.
  • And if no will go with me, no I will go. There is no trust in the word because the communicator of the word is not reliable.

Next, in verse 9, Deborah agreed but noted there would be no glory for Barak in the journey he was taking. The glory of the victory rests in adherence to the word, not by trusting in demonstrations of the Lord’s power to scatter. It sets forth a striking rebuke concerning modern Charismatic and Pentecostal doctrines.

With that, a note that Sisera would be sold into the hands of a woman was provided. It then said that “Deborah arose and went with Barak to Kedesh.” The New Testament is given, and it accompanies the power of God to scatter.

Verse 10 noted that the men went as preplanned in verse 7 and that Deborah went with them.

Verse 11 brought in Heber (Associate) the Kenite (Acquire) of the children of Hobab (Loved), the in-law of Moses (He Who Draws Out). It speaks of those Gentiles (Associates) who have Acquired (Kenite) salvation through Christ’s fulfillment of the law (Moses). They are united to Him by affinity through His imputed righteousness.

Still, in verse 11, it said Heber pitched his tent near the terebinth at Zaanaim (or Elon-Zaanaim) which is beside Kedesh (Holy). The terebinth (Elon) carries the idea of being mighty. It signifies Christ’s state, which was then removed (Zaanaim / Removals or Migrations) in His migration to Earth. He exchanged His heavenly aspect for an earthly one but remained holy as He did.

After that, the battle was described. It was summed up in verse 15, saying that the Lord routed Sisera, his chariots, and his army with the edge of the sword. As always, the sword is a picture of the law. Sword and Horeb, where the law was given, are spelled identically in Hebrew.

The meaning is that if one is not under grace, he is – by default – under law. Those who have not come to God through Christ’s fulfillment of the law will be judged by it. Sisera (See the Horse), however, escaped and fled on foot while Barak pursued the army as far as Harosheth Hagoyim.

There it noted that not a man of the army was left, but all fell by the edge of the sword. The power of God, through the fulfillment of the law, destroyed the enemy. The verse speaks of absolute victory.

Verse 17 referred to Sisera fleeing to the tent of Jael, the wife of Heber the Kenite. Her name means Mountain Goat, but the deeper meaning is One Who Gets Somewhere because of a Practical Skill.

She anticipates the body of believers, the church, or ekklésia, a feminine noun. There are individual believers that make up the church, and there is the church. The two are a united entity. But more specifically, it is the church that gets somewhere because of a practical skill.

It is the doctrines of the church that cause the church to function properly and to destroy the falsities of those who come against her.  She went out to meet Sisera and invited him in, telling him not to fear. After that, she covers him with a s’mikhah, something that should be used for resting on, laying on, leaning on, etc.

Instead of supporting him, it is a covering over him. After that, he asks for water, but she gives him milk. 1 Corinthians 1 and Hebrews 5 show that milk signifies a state of spiritual immaturity. Peter equates the word to pure milk. The picture here is that of lulling the enemy with basic doctrine.

With that, she again covers him while he gives her a masculine imperative to stand at the door of the tent. As noted, the ohel, or tent, comes from ahal, to be clear or to shine. A tent in a field is clearly conspicuous from a distance. Sisera doesn’t want to appear unprepared in the tent of the church.

As for the masculine imperative command, this is certainly used because even though the church is a feminine entity, it is comprised of believers who are considered a masculine entity.

With that, verse 21 noted that Jael, Heber’s wife, took a tent peg and a hammer, a perforator, in her hand. The emphasis on her being his wife indicates that the church is joined to believers only. Those who are not believers may “come to church,” but they are not of “the church.”

The tent peg is a clear reference to Christ –

“From him comes the cornerstone,
From him the tent peg,
From him the battle bow,
From him every ruler together.” Zechariah 10:4

The yathed or peg in this verse has always been considered a metaphor for the Messiah, upon whom all of the messianic promises are fixed and fulfilled. It is with the peg, Christ, that Jael went secretly.

The word is lat, a secret or a mystery. Paul refers to several mysteries in the church, but the main one that he speaks of is the union of Christ and the church, specifically as Gentiles are brought into it, and thus, the Gentile bride, as was foreshadowed in several Old Testament stories.

Jael, the feminine body (the church), took and blasted the peg (Christ) right through the head of Sisera (See the Horse), meaning misplaced trust and pride. Once that was accomplished, Barak, the power of God to scatter, showed up and was invited into her tent.

It then said, “And went unto her, and behold, Sisera fallen – dead – and the peg in his temple.” Notice that it didn’t say “into her tent,” but “unto her.” The power of God to scatter enters the church.

The victory was complete, and the final portion of it was granted to the church. This does not indicate, as many claim, that the church, as an independent body, will destroy wickedness and usher in perfection on earth.

Rather, Christ is said to be the Head of the church in both Ephesians and Colossians. The power of God to scatter (Barak) beheld the dead body of Sisera (misplaced trust and pride), killed by the church of whom Christ is the Head, and which was done in accord with the formalized word of God, not apart from it.

Verse 23 then noted that God subdued Jabin, king of Canaan, in the presence of the children of Israel. Jabin, the supposedly wise or intelligent one, is already defeated, as indicated by being the king of Canaan (Subdued) but he is further subdued as the church continues in sound doctrine.

That will come to its completion someday at the rapture, another noted mystery of Christ when it will be too late for the wise of the world. Destruction will come on a global scale and a new dispensation will be ushered in after that time.

The point of the verses today is that God is working through the church to accomplish the redemptive plans set forth during this dispensation. He is revealing His nature, His goodness, His sole path to reconciliation, His wisdom, and so much more through the church.

However, He is not doing this through active working of power (miracles, signs, wonders, etc.) as when He first established the church. That ended with the completion of Scripture, meaning the New Testament. The typology here shows this, clearly and unambiguously.

God is not working apart from His word but in accord with it. And that is accomplished through those who adhere to it. The passage is one that reveals the need for sound biblical doctrine to overcome the enemies we face. And we cannot get that apart from the word He has given.

The lesson then is to read the word, study the word, know the word, and be a part of the church that works in accord with the word. If we do this, we will be in the sweet spot. And how sweet it is.

Closing Verse: “How sweet are Your words to my taste,
Sweeter than honey to my mouth!
104 Through Your precepts I get understanding;
Therefore I hate every false way.” Psalm 119:103, 104

Next Week: Judges 5:1-5 It’s not blah, blah, blah, but so amazing and fun… (The Song of Deborah, Part I) (13th Judges Sermon)

The Lord has you exactly where He wants you. He has a good plan and purpose for you. It is He who judges His people according to their deeds. So, follow Him, live for Him, and trust Him, and He will do marvelous things for you and through you.

Deborah, Judge of Israel, Part II

However, Sisera had fled away on foot to the tent of Jael
The wife of Heber the Kenite, yes that’s right
For there was peace between Jabin king of Hazor
And the house of Heber the Kenite

And Jael went out to meet Sisera, and said to him
“Turn aside, my lord, turn aside to me; do not fear
And when he had turned aside with her into the tent
She covered him with a blanket, such a sweet old dear

Then he said to her
“Please give me a little water to drink, for thirsty I am
So she opened a jug of milk
Gave him a drink, and covered him, according to her plan

And he said to her
“Stand at the door of the tent and if any man comes and
———-inquires of you
And says, ‘Is there any man here?’
You shall say, ‘No.’ Thus, you shall do

Then Jael, Heber’s wife, took a tent peg and took a hammer
———-in her hand
And went softly to him and drove into his temple the peg
And it went down into the ground
For he was fast asleep and weary. So he died, not having
———-a chance to beg

And then, as Barak pursued Sisera
Jael came out to meet him, and said to him, yes she said
“Come, I will show you the man whom you seek
And when he went into her tent, there lay Sisera
———-with the peg in his temple… dead

So on that day God subdued Jabin king of Canaan
In the presence of the children of Israel. Yes, they did sing
And the hand of the children of Israel grew stronger and stronger
Against Jabin king of Canaan, until they had destroyed Jabin
———-Canaan’s king

Lord God, turn our hearts to be obedient to Your word
Give us wisdom to be ever faithful to You
May we carefully heed each thing we have heard
Yes, Lord God may our hearts be faithful and true

And we shall be content and satisfied in You alone
We will follow You as we sing our songs of praise
Hallelujah to You; to us Your path You have shown
Hallelujah we shall sing to You for all of our days

Hallelujah and Amen…

 

 

17 However, Sisera had fled away on foot to the tent of Jael, the wife of Heber the Kenite; for there was peace between Jabin king of Hazor and the house of Heber the Kenite. 18 And Jael went out to meet Sisera, and said to him, “Turn aside, my lord, turn aside to me; do not fear.” And when he had turned aside with her into the tent, she covered him with a blanket.

19 Then he said to her, “Please give me a little water to drink, for I am thirsty.” So she opened a jug of milk, gave him a drink, and covered him. 20 And he said to her, “Stand at the door of the tent, and if any man comes and inquires of you, and says, ‘Is there any man here?’ you shall say, ‘No.’”

21 Then Jael, Heber’s wife, took a tent peg and took a hammer in her hand, and went softly to him and drove the peg into his temple, and it went down into the ground; for he was fast asleep and weary. So he died. 22 And then, as Barak pursued Sisera, Jael came out to meet him, and said to him, “Come, I will show you the man whom you seek.” And when he went into her tent, there lay Sisera, dead with the peg in his temple.

23 So on that day God subdued Jabin king of Canaan in the presence of the children of Israel. 24 And the hand of the children of Israel grew stronger and stronger against Jabin king of Canaan, until they had destroyed Jabin king of Canaan.

 

 

Acts 22:1

‘merican made basket.

Sunday, 19 November 2023

“Brethren and fathers, hear my defense before you now.” Acts 22:1

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen).

You can also read this commentary, with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

The Greek reads – “Men, brothers and fathers, hear now my defense to you” (CG).

In the previous verse, which ended Chapter 21, Paul had been given permission to speak to the mob. Therefore, he motioned with his hand and began speaking to them in their own dialect. His recorded words begin with, “Men, brothers and fathers.”

He begins his discourse with the same words as Stephen in Acts 7:2. Andres, adelphoi kai pateres – “Men, brothers and fathers.” It seems like a triple address, but it is intended as simply “Brothers and fathers.” Calling out “men” first is a way of acknowledging the whole, which is then subdivided into a respectful note to the elders and a brotherly note to the others.

It also may have been a standard formula when addressing an assembly that included the leaders of Israel, such as scribes and elders. Either way, he next says, “hear now my defense to you.”

The word translated as “defense” is the Greek word apologia. It is the same word used in 1 Peter 3:15 when speaking of making a logical defense concerning the faith that we possess. It signifies a reasoned argument put forth in a verbal defense of oneself, one’s beliefs, etc. It was a term used when making a legal defense in ancient courts.

Life application: Paul will set forth to his countrymen a defense of himself and the reason for his faith. He will explain how he came to the position he held. He will acknowledge those who were familiar with his life before coming to Christ, his faithfulness to the customs and cultures of his people, and so forth.

We should all likewise be prepared to explain our faith as well. In our explanation, we should be ready to tell what brought us to Christ, how it is logical and reasonable that we hold to our views, the changes that have come to our lives because of our conversion, etc.

Think about your conversion and consider how you can use it to tell others about your hope. Also, take time to continue to solidify why you believe the Christian faith is reasonable and worthy of consideration for those you talk to.

Heavenly Father, Your word is what reveals Jesus to us. The message is sound and reasonable, and it is a message of love for the people of the world. Help us to properly convey this precious message to all we know and to all we encounter. May we be bold in our proclamation that Jesus is the hope for mankind. To Your glory, we pray. Amen.

 

Acts 21:40

West Virginia basket shop.

Saturday, 18 November 2023

So when he had given him permission, Paul stood on the stairs and motioned with his hand to the people. And when there was a great silence, he spoke to them in the Hebrew language, saying, Acts 21:40

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen).

You can also read this commentary, with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

The Greek reads – “And he, having permitted; Paul, having stood on the stairs, shook with the hand to the people. And great silence having come to be, he spoke in the Hebrew dialect, saying,” (CG).

Paul had just spoken to the commander, requesting permission to speak to the people. With that, it next says, “And he, having permitted.”

The commander was probably curious as to what would come about, and so he allowed this unusual request. Paul was safely out of the grasp of the people, the soldiers were obviously in control of the stairways, and the people would be no threat at this point.

Thus, allowing this could possibly control the crowd more. If they remained riled up, nothing would be lost. Therefore, permission was granted, and “Paul, having stood on the stairs, shook with the hand to the people.”

With permission comes action. Paul, being on the stairs, would have been above everyone in the crowd. The perfect participle indicates that Paul first stood, certainly facing the crowd. This alone would have brought the crowd’s attention more firmly on him. With that, he then motioned with his hand.

The word kataseió was also used in Acts 12:17, 13:16, and 19:33. It gives the sense of waving downward with the hand. It is probably the same type of motion we make even today. When someone is being noisy, and another person is trying to sleep, we may make the shhhhh sound while motioning downward.

By making this common hand motion towards the people, the crowd would have suddenly become interested in hearing him. With that, it then says, “And great silence having come to be.”

Anyone who could get a Roman commander to stop in the middle of an arrest and allow the supposed offender to speak would certainly have something to say. The mental picture is worth ten thousand words.

He would have been in chains that clanged as he moved. He would have been surrounded by a large number of soldiers bearing swords and shields and fully dressed for battle. He would have been in a traditional Hebrew garment and without any great flash. And yet he is allowed to speak! Who wouldn’t stop and grow silent? The marvel of the moment would have been an attention-arresting sight. With that, it next says that “he spoke in the Hebrew dialect, saying.”

With the coming of the silence came forth speech in their own language. Some translations say “Hebrew,” others “Aramaic.” The lingua franca was Aramaic, and this is what he would have spoken to them in.

In other words, the Hebrew language used in Scripture would be taught in synagogues, but the language of the Jews had evolved beyond that in the common speech of the people. This is the same idea as understanding ancient English and reading from it out of the Geneva Bible, while normally speaking in the common English of the United States today.

Hints of this Aramaic tongue are found in the gospels, clearly indicating that the original Hebrew was no longer the common tongue of the people. As for what he is about to speak to the crowd, curiously, the chapter ends in the middle of a sentence.

Some use a colon, some a semi-colon, and some a comma. However, it is punctuated, it is one of the convincing proofs of divine attention to the chapter and verse divisions of Scripture. A new chapter will commence in the middle of a thought.

Life application: People often get bent out of shape when they are told Paul spoke in Aramaic to the people. It is as if a sacredness has been removed from their thinking, and they immediately go on the defense, insisting that the people spoke Hebrew.

Call it what you will. What was spoken at the time of Jesus was not the language used in the Old Testament Scriptures. Today, the people in Israel speak Hebrew, but it is also not the same as in the Scriptures. Just as we find it very difficult to read the English of John Wycliffe, so it is with ancient and modern Hebrew.

The language of Israel at the time of Jesus and the apostles was so infused with Aramaic that calling it Aramaic is probably a better description of the dialect that would have been commonly spoken. The important issue isn’t the exact dialect that was spoken but that what Paul spoke to them was what they also understood.

He was fully capable of speaking in their local dialect. This is the same as what it says in 2 Chronicles –

“Then they called out with a loud voice in Hebrew to the people of Jerusalem who were on the wall, to frighten them and trouble them, that they might take the city. 19 And they spoke against the God of Jerusalem, as against the gods of the people of the earth—the work of men’s hands.” 2 Chronicles 32:18, 19

Here, it does not say “Hebrew.” Rather, it says Yehudith, or “Judean.” The language of the Jews had evolved into its own particular dialect. That dialect was known by some of the attacking army, and it was spoken clearly and openly to the people.

The study of languages in the Bible and during biblical times is an exciting adventure. But remember, no matter what language you speak, the Lord understands, reading your heart and knowing what is on your mind. Be blessed in this thought. The intimacy that you share with the Creator because of Jesus is closer than any variations that our languages develop over the millennia.

Lord God, no matter what language we speak, You are intimately familiar with our thoughts as we open our hearts to You. You gave us languages and they have evolved throughout the world. And yet, people from every tongue will sing their praises to You. How great it is to share intimacy with You through Jesus, regardless of which language we speak! Amen.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acts 21:39

Wild and Wonderful.

Friday, 17 November 2023 

But Paul said, “I am a Jew from Tarsus, in Cilicia, a citizen of no mean city; and I implore you, permit me to speak to the people.” Acts 21:39

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen)

You can also read this commentary, with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

More precisely, the verse reads, “And Paul said, indeed, I am a man, a Jew of Tarsus of Cilicia – not an insignificant city. And I beg you, allow me to speak to the people” (CG).

In the previous verse, the Roman commander had asked Paul if he wasn’t the Egyptian who had stirred up a rebellion among the people and who led four thousand Sicarii into the wilderness. In response to that, it next says, “And Paul said, indeed, I am a man, a Jew.”

Where the man just referred to was clearly an Egyptian who led Jews, Paul is a Jew who was being persecuted by Jews. He is contrasting himself to the Egyptian. The intent is surely to reveal to the commander that there was more hanky-panky going on than first met the eye. With that, he continues identifying himself, saying, “of Tarsus of Cilicia.”

This is the second and last time that Tarsus is identified this way. The first was in Acts 9:11. Being from Tarsus meant that he was a part of the dispersion. Thus, he would be familiar with the way Gentiles lived. He would also more than likely speak several languages and dialects (see 1 Corinthians 14:18), including the Greek he is now conversing in.

The particular spelling of the name in Greek is Tarseus. It is also called Tarsus in Acts 9:30, 11:25, and 22:3. James Strong speculates that the name comes from tarsos, meaning a flat basket. If so, it may reflect the layout of the city. It is one of the longest continually inhabited cities in the world.

Paul came from the opposite direction of Egypt, and he claimed to be a citizen from Tarsus. If he was found lying, it would only make it worse on him. Hence, there was every reason to believe him. Paul next notes that Tarsus is “not an insignificant city.”

The Greek word used to describe it is asémos. It means “undistinguished.” Vincent’s Word Studies says –

“…without a mark or token (σῆμα [sema]). Hence used of uncoined gold or silver: of oracles which give no intelligible response: of inarticulate voices: of disease without distinctive symptoms. Generally, as here, undistinguished, mean. There is a conscious feeling of patriotism in Paul’s expression.”

Ellicott further notes, “In addition to all its fame for culture, the town of Tarsus bore on its coins the word METROPOLIS-AUTONOMOS (Independent).”

Having confirmed his identity, thus demonstrating that he was not a rabble-rouser, he then makes a formal request to speak to the people, saying, “And I beg you, allow me to speak to the people.”

It is a formal request to the man who could allow it to be realized. His boldness in asking demonstrates that he was hoping it would make a difference in the outcome of the situation. Being a Jew and also not an instigator, then he must want to make a defense against their treatment of him.

Life application: As Paul does elsewhere, he appeals to his cultural and national identity. He was willing to work within the framework of the society in which he lived, using his particular identity for the benefit of himself and the ministry.

This is completely the opposite of how many cults and sects treat the national identity they possess. They shun participating in various aspects of society that affect them while actively participating in others. They claim they are not of this world, completely abusing the intent of Jesus’ words, in order to not participate. At the same time, they have driver’s licenses, registered marriages, and (you betcha they do) pay taxes, claiming it is right and responsible to do so.

And yet, they refuse to vote, engage in politics, participate in other cultural events, etc. It is a failed “pick and choose” type of lifestyle that harms the very goals they set forth for themselves in the country in which they live. This is completely the opposite of the biblical model found in both testaments of Scripture.

Don’t hesitate to participate. Your failure to do so may result in the loss of rights you possess or in harm to others (such as the Jews during Nazi Germany). You have a voice as a citizen of your nation. Use it.

Lord God, we are citizens of heaven because of Jesus, but we are also living out earthly lives in the lands which You have ordained for us. May we be responsible citizens of both as we await our departure from here and the trip to our final, heavenly, home with You. Help us in this. Amen.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acts 21:38

Old Barn, 1 each. West Virginia

Thursday, 16 November 2023

“Are you not the Egyptian who some time ago stirred up a rebellion and led the four thousand assassins out into the wilderness?” Acts 21:38

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen)

You can also read this commentary, with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

A more literal rendering would be, “Are you not, then, the Egyptian who before these days having upheaved and having led out into the wilderness the four thousand men, the Sicarii?” (CG).

In the previous verse, Paul was about to be taken into the barracks by the Roman soldiers. At this time, he asked the commander for permission to speak. In response, the commander asked if Paul spoke Greek. It can be inferred that Paul either nodded or verbally responded affirmatively. With that, the confusion of the commander arose, asking, “Are you not, then, the Egyptian.”

The conjunction, translated as “then,” reflects an inference on the part of the commander. He must have heard one of the people in the crowd (see verse 21:34) and deduced that what he had heard must be the truth of the matter.

In other words, the claim was so outlandish that he assumed it must be true. “Hey, get him. He’s the Egyptian that you’ve been looking for!” Luke will continue describing this Egyptian in his coming words.

Some scholars, however, look at his words as confirming a suspicion that he had. They say that the commander means, “You art not, then, that Egyptian?” The claim is that because he spoke in Greek, the assumption that he was the Egyptian was wrong.

Two things would argue against this. The first is that he had to defend Paul, not fight against him. Secondly, Greek was well-known in Egypt at the time. The weight of the evidence is that he is now making the assumption that this is the Egyptian, and for some reason, he has fallen into disfavor with the Jews.

Thus, the probable explanation for the words is that someone shouted out this lie, and the commander accepted it in his mind. Luke explains who that Egyptian was, saying, “who before these days having upheaved and having led out into the wilderness the four thousand men.”

There was a rebellion of some sort that took place. The commander was fully aware of it and was probably even told that his unit should be on the lookout for them. The word translated as “upheaved” has only been previously seen in Acts 17:6. It signifies to turn upside down, upset, unsettle, etc.

HELPS Word Studies says, “properly, turn something over (up to down), i.e., to upset (up-set), raising one part up at the expense of another which results in dislocation (confusion).” Thus, using “upheaved” sufficiently translated the idea. As for this crowd of four thousand, the commander next identifies them as “the Sicarii.”

It is a word found only here in Scripture, sikarios. Thayer’s explains the word, saying, “an assassin, i. e. one who carries a dagger or short sword (Latinsica (cf. Josephus, as below)) under his clothing, that he may kill secretly and treacherously anyone he wishes to (a cut-throat).” It specifically defines a Jewish fanatical group outlawed by the Roman authorities.

Concerning such a band of men, Cambridge notes –

“Josephus (Ant. xx. 8. 6; Bell. J. ii. 13. 5) tells how he was one of many impostors of the time, and when Felix was governor came to Jerusalem, gave himself out as a prophet, gathered the people to the Mount of Olives in number about 30,000, telling them that at his word the walls of Jerusalem would fall down, and they could then march into the city. Felix with the Roman soldiers went out against him. The impostor and a part of his adherents fled, but a very large number were killed and others taken prisoners. The narrative of Josephus does not accord with the account of St Luke, but if the former be correct, we may well suppose that the numbers and the occasion spoken of by the chief captain relate to an event anterior to that great gathering on the Mount of Olives. The fame of the impostor may have grown; indeed, must have done so before he could collect the number of adherents of which Josephus speaks.”

Life application: The account between the Roman commander and Paul shows us the extreme nature of hatred the Jewish people had developed toward Paul and his doctrine. Paul was a respectable Jew, a Pharisee. He was well-educated and well-known during his day.

When he came to faith in Jesus, he began to share the message of salvation to the Gentiles. Because of this, he became hated. The Jews thought that salvation and exaltation in the eyes of the Lord belonged exclusively to them. They were incensed that he would speak to Gentiles about such matters.

And yet, an Egyptian thug was given the lead over four thousand Jews and would have been almost a folk hero among the people in his resistance to Roman authority. If the account of Josephus is correct, even more sided with him eventually.

To these Jews, it was okay to follow a murderous Egyptian if it meant casting off Roman oppression, but it was not okay to follow a Savior who told the Gentiles that they could cast off the bondage of sin and death through faith in Him. To this very day, such an idea of Gentile salvation without conversion to Judaism is repugnant.

Paul’s words in the epistles are words of the Lord. They tell of freedom in Christ, but there are many who want to bring people back into bondage. Be careful to avoid anyone, Jew or Gentile, who preaches a message of works, especially works of the law, to somehow merit God’s favor. Christ has done it all. Trust in Christ alone for your salvation.

How we praise You, Lord God Almighty! Thank You for the freedom we possess from the bondage that once held us. Addictions are gone, legalism is removed, and purity of worship in spirit and in truth is realized when we come to Jesus, accepting the good news of His completed work. Yes, Thank You for Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.