Acts 24:10

Another coal mining plaque. West Virginia Capitol.

Thursday, 1 February 2024

Then Paul, after the governor had nodded to him to speak, answered: “Inasmuch as I know that you have been for many years a judge of this nation, I do the more cheerfully answer for myself, Acts 24:10

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen).

You can also read this commentary, with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

A literal translation would be, “And Paul answered, the governor having beckoned him to speak, ‘Knowing from many years, you, being judge to this nation, cheerfully these concerning myself I make a defense’” (CG).

Tertullus presented the charges against Paul, and the Jews assented to what Tertullus said, maintaining that his words were true. With that complete, it next says, “And Paul answered, the governor having beckoned him to speak.”

There is a sense of order and decorum. The plaintiff was allowed to speak in an uninterrupted fashion. Upon completion, the governor acknowledged Paul’s right to defend himself, and so he nodded or made a sign of some sort that indicated Paul could begin his defense. Paul then answered, beginning with, “Knowing from many years.”

He avoids the unnecessary words of flattery used by his opponent. He also defends himself without using a lawyer. Instead, he appeals directly to the justice of his case, stating that he knew it would be upheld because of Felix’s lengthy service.

The “many years” that he refers to is actually six or seven at this point. However, it is noted by Tacitus that Felix had already been a joint procurator with his predecessor Cumanus. Also, scholars note that many in his position were recalled after a much shorter period, and so from that perspective, “many years” is a good description.

He would be well educated in how to conduct such affairs and also well-versed in the Jewish rites, customs, and laws. Understanding this, Paul’s words continue, saying, “you, being judge to this nation.”

Again, there is nothing superfluous or unnecessary stated. Paul simply acknowledges that the governor had a right to judge the matter set before him. It is an implicit acceptance of the position and, thus, the judgment that will be rendered. Also, knowing that he is now under Roman jurisdiction, he will get a trial that fairly acknowledges his state as a Roman. Therefore, he continues with, “cheerfully these concerning myself I make a defense.”

The word Paul uses, translated as answer, is apologeomai. It is a word that is related to the “apology” or defense one would make for the Christian faith. In this case, it is a rightful defense against charges brought against him.

In all, the words Paul uses show a person who is bold in his words because of his belief in his personal innocence concerning wrongdoing. There is nothing smug, flattering, or superfluous in his opening statement. And more, he has the fact that a plot to kill him was initiated by the leaders of Israel to bolster his defense.

Whether those leaders knew that their plot was discovered or not, the governor did. It is a stain on their actions, and it weakens any charges brought against Paul, making them suspect and biased.

Life application: It can be difficult at times to restrain oneself from blurting out a defense against false charges. This is true regardless of the size of the offense that is being accused. Little things can be just as annoying to listen to as big ones. However, it is best to allow people to speak in an uninterrupted manner.

To see this type of thing in action, watch reporters who are designated to conduct interviews or debates for political positions, like those running for Congress or even the presidency. It is not uncommon for a question to be asked by the reporter, and then a lucid, rational, and well-thought-out answer is given. Because the response does not fit with the reporter’s worldview, he or she immediately begins to interrupt the candidate.

This is unprofessional and it demonstrates a weakness in any supposed impartiality of the reporter. And yes, it is as common for those on the left to do this as it is for dogs to pant. Don’t be like a panting dog in your own time of defense. And don’t be like one if you are asked to impartially judge or oversee a matter such as an interview or debate. Let your words be few, directed, and spoken at the proper time without interrupting others in the process.

Glorious Lord God, may we be careful to speak clearly and thoughtfully when there are words that may affect our standing in the eyes of others or even our freedom in society. Help us know what to say at such a time, give us grace and patience in our responses, and may we honor You in our lives. Amen.

 

 

 

 

Acts 24:9

Mining Miner Who Mines. West Virginia Capitol.

Wednesday, 31 January 2024

And the Jews also assented, maintaining that these things were so. Acts 24:9

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen).

You can also read this commentary, with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

The previous verse completed Tertullus’ words to Felix. With that, it next says, “And the Jews also assented.”

They agreed either collectively or individually, but they stood behind the substance of his words, affirming that Paul was a plague that needed to be eradicated. One can see them seated behind Tertullus nodding in agreement and maybe vocally assenting to the presentation. It is likely that they were all in agreement before they even arrived and were thus satisfied with Tertullus’ presentation. As such, they were “maintaining that these things were so.”

A new word is introduced: phaskó. It will only be seen again in Acts 25:19 and Romans 1:22. It is a prolongation of a more common word that signifies to say. Thus, it means to affirm, allege, profess, or something similar. Its use in Romans gives a sense of one of its intended meanings –

“Professing to be wise, they became fools.” Romans 1:22

One can see scientists haughtily proclaiming that the universe exploded itself into existence, with man arising over billions of years out of goo and thus proclaiming, “We don’t need God. We are free from His rule over us! Look at how wise we are!” God says they are fools.

These Jews had come together, affirming that Paul was guilty and needed to be punished for his transgressions.

Life application: The Bible makes many proclamations about how the world was created by God, is governed by His power and sustaining hand, is guilty before Him for failing to acknowledge Him, and so forth.

Either what it says is reliable and true, or it is not. If the first chapters of Genesis are not literal history, then the rest of the Bible is suspect as well. Jesus cites those chapters and proclaims they are literally true, acknowledging that the events really happened.

We cannot allegorize the creation account without falling into great error. If we are saved, we will not lose our salvation. But if we fail to accept God at His word, we will be judged for our lack of faith in regard to what He has proclaimed.

There are abundant videos and teachings available that give reasonable explanations that fully support the Genesis creation account. If you are unsure if the word is reliable in these chapters, test them by watching or reading what is out there. In the end, the Lord asks you to use reasoned faith in your relationship with Him. You cannot do this without checking things out.

Be wise and discerning. What can you skip in your normal routine that will allow you sufficient time to investigate such things?

Lord God, Your word is written, and it makes certain proclamations about who You are and what You have done. Help us to be willing to research and investigate these things and come to reasonable conclusions about the claims that are made there. May our faith be grounded in reality as we seek the mysteries of the world around us. To Your glory, we pray. Amen.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acts 24:8

Miner memorial. West Virginia Capitol.

Tuesday, 30 January 2024

“commanding his accusers to come to you. By examining him yourself you may ascertain all these things of which we accuse him.” Acts 24:8

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen).

You can also read this commentary, with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

A literal translation, even if a bit clunky, is, “having commanded his accusers to come to you, from whom you will be able, having examined, to know yourself concerning all these things which we accuse him” (CG).

In the previous verse, it said, “And Lysias, the commander, having come with great force, led away out of our hands.” That now continues with the words “having commanded his accusers to come to you.”

This was seen in a portion of Claudius Lysias’ letter to Felix, as recorded in the previous chapter –

“And when it was told me that the Jews lay in wait for the man, I sent him immediately to you, and also commanded his accusers to state before you the charges against him.” Acts 23:20

Not only did the commander send Paul safely to Caesarea, but he told the leaders of Israel that if they wanted a meeting with Paul in attendance, they would have to do so in the presence of the Roman governor. In fact, they were not given the choice. Instead, he commanded that they should appear before Felix. From there, Tertullus next says, “from whom you will be able.”

A relative pronoun is used, “whom.” Some translations, like the NKJV, say “him.” To our ears, using “whom” it sounds like Tertullus is asking for the accusers to be allowed to be examined. However, the pronoun is singular. And so, it is most probably speaking of Paul. But it also could be speaking of the Roman commander.

If so, and because he is not there, it may be that Tertullus is hoping that Felix would take this statement at face value and say, “No, there is no need to call him over this.” Either way, Tertullus continues, saying, “having examined, to know yourself concerning all these things which we accuse him.”

Either way, it is unlikely that either the Roman commander or Paul would agree that the things Paul had been accused of were true. The Roman commander would have insufficient evidence to substantiate the charges, and he would disagree with portions of the claims made. If he is referring to Paul, his words in the coming verses will completely refute the charges against him.

Life application: In this verse, Tertullus does what people continue to do today. He brazenly sets up a false narrative and then claims that when those who are interviewed are brought forward, they will agree with his position. We might call this the Shifty Schiff approach.

By boldly and brazenly lying, such people are openly mocking the integrity of the accused so that when they speak, they appear to be liars. It is a position that people will take when their side of an issue or argument has no substantiation at all.

This is a fallacy known as Poisoning the Well. The first person to speak will do so in an attempt to undermine the integrity of the next speaker, impugning his character in one way or another. They may imply he is manipulative, a liar, and that his words will be highly persuasive and thus must not be trusted, and so forth.

Even if the water in the well was perfectly good and drinkable to begin with, by poisoning the well, it is no longer to be trusted as safe. This tactic has been constantly used throughout the ages as a means of destroying someone of integrity before he even gets a chance to begin his presentation. It is highly effective because most people trust those they align with, even if their words are completely false.

Be aware of this fallacy, especially around voting season. You will see it constantly employed by those whose political position is one that has nothing of value to present to the people. It is also seen among Christian leaders and speakers at times. Be aware of this and call it out as soon as you identify it.

Lord God, help us to consider arguments – clearly and responsibly – that we see arise between people. May we not be sidetracked by fallacious thinking but instead consider what is said based on its adherence to the truth. It is a world full of confusion, but with Your wisdom to guide us, we will not be led astray by those who speak falsity and introduce error into their words. Yes, Lord God, help us in this. Amen.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acts 24:7

Mining plaque. West Virginia Capitol.

Monday, 29 January 2024

“But the commander Lysias came by and with great violence took him out of our hands, Acts 24:7

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen).

You can also read this commentary, with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

A better rendering of the Greek is, “And Lysias, the commander, having come with great force, led away out of our hands” (CG).

It should be noted that some manuscripts do not include the second half of the previous verse, this verse, or the first clause of verse 8. Thus, depending on the Bible you use, you may not have those things included or they may only be footnoted.

In the previous verse, Tertullus told Felix that Paul tried to profane the temple. Therefore, he was seized, and they tried to judge him according to Jewish law. That now continues with, “And Lysias, the commander.”

Interjecting the name of Lysias is an attempt to say, “If this person didn’t interfere, this matter would have been settled already. Paul would have been judged according to our law, and there would have been no reason to bother you here today.” With that understood, Tertullus continues, saying, “having come with great force, led away out of our hands.”

His words completely overlook the riot of the people and the quick actions of the Romans, which saved the life of Paul, a Roman citizen. In essence, there is an attempt to throw a disparaging light on Claudius Lysias, as if he had meddled in a matter that belonged to the Jews alone.

Tertullus is presenting the Jews as the unfortunate losers. He is further implying that if things had gone differently and they had just been allowed to handle things, they would have spared Felix all of this trouble by taking care of the matter themselves.

Life application: The common adage “hindsight is 20/20” means that if the information that is now known was available before, the errors of the past would not have been made. It is comparing 20/20 vision to clarity concerning a matter.

Tertullus is using this idea against Lysias’ actions. In essence, he is saying, “If Lysias had only known the whole situation, things would have come out just fine.” Sometimes, this type of thinking is true, but in the case of the Jews, this is completely false.

Felix can only go by what he is told. The flattery of Tertullus should give him a hint that what he is being told is a pile of lies. This is all the more certain because Lysias sent Paul to Caesarea based on the discovery of a plot to kill Paul that arose sometime after the events they are now referring to in the hearing.

It is often necessary not to rush to a judgment on a matter until it is carefully thought through and all options are weighed. Felix’s main responsibility was to maintain order in his jurisdiction, but another prime responsibility was ensuring the safety and protection of Roman citizens.

Paul used his citizenship to benefit himself. As such, he is using his citizenship to further his goal of spreading the gospel. Don’t hesitate to use whatever means are available to you to secure your safety and advancement within your society. This includes appealing to your citizenship, including your right to vote.

If you refrain from using those things that are available to you, you will ultimately be hindering your ability to share the gospel. If the opposing political party takes away your rights because you failed to vote, you will have harmed not only yourself but those who will never benefit from hearing the good news in a free and open society.

Little choices can have big consequences. So do what is right and participate in your society.

Lord God, help us to think clearly about our responsibilities. May we be willing to do the right thing in all situations. And to do the right thing, we need to consider not just the immediate effects but also the long-term effects of our actions or inactions. Give us wisdom in this, O God. Amen.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Judges 6:33-40 (Gideon, Judge of Israel, Part IV)

Judges 6:33-40
Gideon, Judge of Israel, Part IV

(Typed 20 November 2023) Adam Clarke’s commentary often has interesting insights into what is going on in the surface text. At times, he provides his own thoughts on what a passage is typologically presenting. At other times, however, he will openly dismiss the idea of any passage, even hinting at typology.

What this shows is that he thinks there is an overall picture of something, but that is all it is. The details are irrelevant to the overall picture. If that is his approach, it is a rather sloppy way of looking at things.

What would be the point of giving such minute details of things that are otherwise completely unnecessary to a particular story unless the Lord is telling us precious details of typology?

Maybe Clarke just couldn’t figure out what was being conveyed and so he found fault in those who thought they could. Of this passage from Judges 6, he cites the work of the church father, Origen –

“On the miracle of the fleece, dew, and dry ground, Origen, in his eighth homily on the book of Judges, has many curious and interesting thoughts, I shall insert the substance of the whole: The fleece is the Jewish nation. The fleece covered with dew, while all around is dry, the Jewish nation favored with the law and the prophets. The fleece dry, the Jewish nation cast off for rejecting the Gospel. All around watered, the Gospel preached to the Gentiles. and they converted to God. The fleece on the threshing-floor, the Jewish people in the land of Judea, winnowed, purged, and fanned by the Gospel. The dew wrung out into the bowl, the doctrines of Christianity, extracted from the Jewish writings, shadowed forth by Christ’s pouring water into a basin, and washing the disciples’ feet.”

Origen’s thoughts are interesting and insightful, but there are problems with them that cannot be overcome. Finding proper typology reveals exactly why God chose some stories from history and completely ignores innumerable others.

Improperly analyzing typology will lead people down odd paths of thought that have no real bearing on what is being portrayed. In Origen’s case, he lived so long ago that much of what we now know concerning history could not have been deduced.

Thus, there is an excuse if he missed the mark on what was being conveyed. We are further along in history, and we can more clearly see what God is doing. Jesus is the key, but there are key points that are linked to the picture, such as Israel, the law, etc.

Text Verse: “Therefore they shall be like the morning cloud
And like the early dew that passes away,
Like chaff blown off from a threshing floor
And like smoke from a chimney.” Hosea 13:3

Of the dew on the fleece, John Lange sees it as the advent of Christ, saying, “…his miraculous sign became the type of the highest and most wonderful miracle known to the church, the birth of Jesus from the Virgin Mary. Origen already speaks of the advent of the Son of God as the fall of the divine dew.”

The thought is poetic, but it does not match the rest of the typology being presented here. Either everything fits or it doesn’t. In this case, it doesn’t. And yet, what the dew pictures is based on Christ’s work and what results from it. As for Clarke, he finished his commentary on Origen and Chapter 6 of Judges saying –

“All this to some will doubtless appear trifling; but it is not too much to say that scarcely any pious mind can consider the homily of this excellent man without drinking into a measure of the same spirit, so much sincerity, deep piety, and unction, appear throughout the whole: yet as I do not follow such practices, I cannot recommend them.”

His words concerning Origen are kind, even gracious. But his thoughts about Origen’s finding typology in a passage such as this are dismissive. Hence, he would not appreciate my approach to Scripture. Typology is what explains what is otherwise inexplicable, and it is exactly what God is dealing in.

As for my conclusions concerning today’s passage, they are how I read what is going on. Origen’s thoughts are not entirely out of the ballpark, but they do land a bit far out in left field. God is telling us a story through typology. And it is a great story indeed because it is about what He has done in and through Jesus Christ.

Yes, it’s all to be found in His superior word. And so, let us turn to that precious word once again, and… May God speak to us through His word today, and may His glorious name ever be praised.

I. A Fleece of Wool in the Threshing Floor (verses 33-40)

33 Then all the Midianites and Amalekites, the people of the East, gathered together;

The people groups are singular: v’kal midyan va’amaleq u-b’ne qedem neesphu yakhdav – “And all Midian and Amalek and sons East gathered together.” The words take us back to the beginning of the chapter –

“Then the children of Israel did evil in the sight of the Lord. So the Lord delivered them into the hand of Midian for seven years, and the hand of Midian prevailed against Israel. Because of the Midianites, the children of Israel made for themselves the dens, the caves, and the strongholds which are in the mountains. So it was, whenever Israel had sown, Midianites would come up; also Amalekites and the people of the East would come up against them. Then they would encamp against them and destroy the produce of the earth as far as Gaza, and leave no sustenance for Israel, neither sheep nor ox nor donkey.” Judges 6:1-4

The raiders would come annually to steal away whatever produce had arisen from the labors of the land. It is the reason why Gideon was said to thresh wheat in the winepress, hiding from those who might spot him and raid what he had gathered.

Midian is the main group afflicting Israel. The name comes from madon, strife or contention. That is derived from din, to judge. Thus, it means Strife or Place of Judgment.

Amalek was the first of Israel’s enemies soon after leaving Egypt. The Lord declared war upon them from generation to generation (Exodus 17). Amalek is derived from am, people, and malaq, to nip or wring off the head of a bird with or without severing it from the body. Thus, they are The People Who Wring Off. They are those who are disconnected from the body and strive to disconnect the body.

The b’ne qedem or “sons East” would be the various people groups, including Arab tribes, Ishmaelites, etc. It is a way of saying anyone and everyone in the surrounding area gathered together. As for the word qedem, east, it means not only east in direction, but before in time, or that which has already been.

This would be a great sized force that has gathered…

33 (con’t) and they crossed over and encamped in the Valley of Jezreel.

va’yaavru va’yakhanu b’emeq yizr’el – “And crossed over and encamped in valley Jezreel.” This is the area referred to in Hosea 1, where the Lord uses naming Hosea’s children as object lessons to Israel. In Romans 9, Paul picks up on the words of Hosea’s prophecy and applies them to Israel during her time of rejection while the church is the focus of God’s attention.

In his first epistle, Peter then uses the words of Hosea 2 to reveal that Israel of the future, after the Gentile-led church age, will again be the people of God.

Jezreel means God Sows. Being prefixed with emeq, or valley, it would be the Depth of God Sows, the emeq being a deep, broad valley. One can see the similarity between the two names, Israel and Jezreel, when put side by side –

יזרעאל
ישראל

Israel, He Strives with God, has received judgment for striving against God. Now, that time is over, and God will strive with Israel, meaning for Israel, in the valley where God Judges.

34 But the Spirit of the Lord came upon Gideon;

v’ruakh Yehovah lavshah eth Gidon – “And Spirit Yehovah clothed Gideon.” The word lavash, to clothe, comes from a primitive root meaning to wrap around. One can imagine the Spirit enfolding around Gideon like a garment. The thought is not unlike that of Galatians 3:27 –

“For as many of you as were baptized into Christ have put on [enduo: clothed] Christ.”

Gideon was selected as the judge of Israel. The Lord clothed him with His Spirit readying him for the challenges ahead…

34 (con’t) then he blew the trumpet,

vayitqa ba’shophar – “and blew in the shophar.” The act is a call to arms for warfare. It was seen, for example, in Judges 3 –

“But Ehud had escaped while they delayed, and passed beyond the stone images and escaped to Seirah. 27 And it happened, when he arrived, that he blew the trumpet in the mountains of Ephraim, and the children of Israel went down with him from the mountains; and he led them.” Judges 3:26, 27

Gideon performed according to the word of the Lord by destroying the altar of the baal, upon which was the image of Asherah. After that, the Spirit of the Lord clothed him. Now, he is readied for the main part of his calling –

“Then the Lord turned to him and said, ‘Go in this might of yours, and you shall save Israel from the hand of the Midianites. Have I not sent you?’” Judges 6:14

Upon hearing those words, Gideon responded –

“So he said to Him, ‘O my Lord, how can I save Israel? Indeed my clan is the weakest in Manasseh, and I am the least in my father’s house.’” Judges 6:15

If you remember, theology was being developed in the exchange as Gideon was made to realize that the One he was speaking to was the Lord (YHVH), not merely a man. With that, the Lord responded –

“And the Lord said to him, ‘Surely I will be with you, and you shall defeat the Midianites as one man.’” Judges 6:16

The Lord promised to be with him, and he is clothed with the Spirit of the Lord. Thus, he is suitably prepared for the battle against Midian.

As for the shophar, it is a ram’s horn. The name is derived from shaphar, to be beautiful or comely. That comes from a root signifying to shine. Strong’s notes the connection between the two thoughts is the clear sound. As something beautiful shines, so the beautiful sound shines forth from the shophar. Upon blowing in the shophar, it next says…

34 (con’t) and the Abiezrites gathered behind him.

vayizaeq aviezer akharav – “And cried Abiezer after him.” It is the same word, zaaq, used at the beginning of the chapter to signify the distress of Israel in their affliction –

“So Israel was greatly impoverished because of the Midianites, and the children of Israel cried [zaaq] out to the Lord.” Judges 6:6

The NKJV saying, “gathered behind” is more of a paraphrase. The idea is that Gideon has sounded the trumpet, and Abiezer has cried out, as in a war cry, after him. One can think of the famous rebel yell of the Confederate South.

As for Abiezer, the spelling is different than in verses 11 and 24. There it said avi ha’ezri, My Father, the Ezrite or Father of the Ezrite. Here, it reads aviezer, My Father is Help or Father of Help. The entire clan of Abiezer is collectively named in the singular, but it refers to all who descended from him, be it hundreds or thousands. Along with them…

35 And he sent messengers throughout all Manasseh, who also gathered behind him.

The words concerning Manasseh, Gideon’s tribe, are emphatic: u-malakhim shalakh b’kal m’nasheh vayizaeq gam hu akharav – “and messengers sent in all Manasseh, and cried also, HE, after him.” The word translated as messengers means exactly that. But it is the same word, malakh, ascribed to the Lord seven times in verses 6:11-22.

Manasseh means To Forget and also From a Debt.

In hearing of Gideon’s support from Abiezer, the rest of the tribe coalesced around Gideon as well, crying after him. And more…

35 (con’t) He also sent messengers to Asher, Zebulun, and Naphtali; and they came up to meet them.

u-malkhim shalakh b’asher u-bizvulun u-b’naphtali vayaalu liqratam – “And messengers sent in Asher, and in Zebulun, and in Naphtali. And ascended to meet them.” Asher failed to come forward for battle at the time of Barak’s engaging Sisera, as was noted in Judges 5. However, they are listed first here, indicating a willingness to join with Gideon and his men.

Zebulun and Naphtali, however, willingly joined both battles –

“Asher continued at the seashore,
And stayed by his inlets.
18 Zebulun is a people who jeopardized their lives to the point of death,
Naphtali also, on the heights of the battlefield.” Judges 5:17, 18

Asher means both Blessed and Happy. Zebulun means Glorious Dwelling Place. Naphtali means My Wrestlings.

36 So Gideon said to God, “If You will save Israel by my hand as You have said—

It is a pregnant verse, filled with things to contemplate: vayomer gidon el ha’elohim im yeshkha movoshia b’yadi eth Yisrael kaasher dibarta – “And said Gideon unto the God, ‘If you are Savior – in my hand – Israel, according to which have spoken.’”

Rather than “God,” it says, “the God.” As always, the article is expressive. It is used when referring to the one true God in relation to man. But more especially, it is in relation to those who are in a right relationship with Him, or it is used to contrast those who are not in a right relationship with Him.

In this case, it is directly in relation to Gideon. Inserting the words “in my hand” between Savior and Israel speaks of this intimate relationship.

Also, rather than “as you have said,” it says, “as you have spoken.” It is an authoritative word of the Lord that expects no response or participation. Despite that, Gideon fails to accept the spoken word of “the God.”

However, Adam Clarke says, “Gideon was very bold, and God was very condescending. But probably the request itself was suggested by the Divine Spirit.”

And why not? Gideon is clothed with the Spirit of Yehovah. It would thus appear that the Spirit of the Lord is using Gideon and his request as an object lesson for both the immediate context as well as for typological anticipations of the future…

37 look, I shall put a fleece of wool on the threshing floor;

hineh anokhi matsig eth gizath ha’tsemer ba’goren – “Behold, I placing fleece the wool in the threshing floor.” Rather than the common word sum, to set, Gideon uses the word yatsag. The BDB says, “a vivid and forcible synonym of שָׂם [sam].” The word comes from a primitive root signifying to place permanently.

Next, the gizah, or fleece, is found seven times in Scripture, all in Judges 6. It is a feminine word, coming from gazaz, to shear. That comes from a primitive root signifying to cut off.

That is followed by the goren, or threshing floor. This is the only time it is seen in Judges. It is a place of separation and, thus, judgment. The chaff of the grain is separated from the kernel. It was referred to in the text verse from Hosea. This is also referred to by John the Baptist –

“Now as the people were in expectation, and all reasoned in their hearts about John, whether he was the Christ or not, 16 John answered, saying to all, ‘I indeed baptize you with water; but One mightier than I is coming, whose sandal strap I am not worthy to loose. He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and fire. 17 His winnowing fan is in His hand, and He will thoroughly clean out His threshing floor, and gather the wheat into His barn; but the chaff He will burn with unquenchable fire.’” Luke 3:15-17

Next, Gideon continues…

37 (con’t) if there is dew on the fleece only, and it is dry on all the ground,

im tal yihyeh al ha’gizah l’baddah v’al kal ha’aretz khorev – “If dew become upon the fleece, to her separation, and upon all the earth dryness…” The word tal, or dew, comes from talal, to cover. The idea is that dew covers the vegetation each day. However, dew is something transitory and fleeting. That was seen in our text verse where it said, “And like the early dew that passes away.”

The words speak for themselves. Gideon is asking for a sign concerning the challenge of the battle that is set before him. As for the word khorev, or dryness, it is the same spelling as Horeb, the mount where the law was received. Both the word and the name come from the verb kharav, to be dry or dried up. For Gideon, if he receives his request…

37 (con’t) then I shall know that You will save Israel by my hand, as You have said.”

Again, it says spoken, not said: vayadati ki tovoshia b’yadi eth Yisrael ka’asher dibarta – “And I shall know for saving – in my hand – Israel.” Gideon again places himself between the idea of saving and Israel. The significance is that the Lord is the One saving, but he is using Gideon to be the instrument of that salvation. And again, he uses the word davar, to speak. The Lord has spoken, and He will accomplish.

38 And it was so. When he rose early the next morning and squeezed the fleece together,

vayhi ken vayashkem mimakhorath vayazar eth ha’gizah – “And is thus. And rising early from morrow, and pressing the fleece.” Just as Gideon requested, so it was. Here is a new and rare word, zur. It signifies to press down and out. To get the sense, the Lord says to Job –

“The wings of the ostrich wave proudly,
But are her wings and pinions like the kindly stork’s?
14 For she leaves her eggs on the ground,
And warms them in the dust;
15 She forgets that a foot may crush [zur] them,
Or that a wild beast may break them.” Job 39:13-15

Upon pressing the fleece…

38 (con’t) he wrung the dew out of the fleece, a bowlful of water.

vayimets tal min ha’gizah melo ha’sephel mayim – “and drained dew from the fleece: fullness the bowl water.” In pressing the fleece, the water drained out, and not just a bit. The word bowl is sephel. This is the second and last use of it in the Bible. The first was in Judges 5:25, where Jael gave Sisera a majestic bowl of curd. The word comes from an unused root meaning to depress. Thus, it is a deep bowl.

39 Then Gideon said to God, “Do not be angry with me,

Gideon’s words of the verse are filled with cohortatives, jussives, interjections, anthropomorphisms, etc. Here, he uses a jussive, an implied command: vayomer gidon el ha’ elohim al yikhar apekha bi – “And said Gideon unto the God, ‘Not do burn Your nostril in me.’”

Gideon can see that he might get the Lord upset enough to have fire and smoke pour out of his nose and catch him on fire. Hence, he uses this jussive, do burn. Next, he says…

39 (con’t) but let me speak just once more:

The verb is cohortative: vaadaberah akh ha’paam – “and let speak, surely the once.” The word paam signifies a beat, as if pounding out on an anvil. In this case, he has spoken, but he wants to speak again. It is a request for another beat upon the anvil.

39 (con’t) Let me test, I pray, just once more with the fleece;

Again, the verb is cohortative: anaseh na raq ha’paam ba’gizah – “Let, I pray, only the once, in the fleece.” It is as if he is begging for the event to take place. If Clarke was right in suggesting that it was by the Spirit that Gideon was asking for a sign in the fleece, it is surely now only Gideon who is asking.

The Spirit provided a confirmation of “the God’s” intention for what was to take place. However, Gideon suddenly realizes, “Maybe there was dew everywhere, and it evaporated off the ground first.” This should not be unexpected. Charles Ellicott, citing Lord Bacon (mmmm, bacon), notes –

“Sailors have used every night to hang fleeces of wool on the sides of their ships towards the water, and they have crushed fresh water out of them in the morning.”

The fleece, then, is like an absorbent sponge. Gideon would have known this and begs for another, clearer, sign…

39 (con’t) let it now be dry only on the fleece, but on all the ground let there be dew.”

The first verb is a jussive: yehi na khorev el ha’gizah l’badah v’al kal ha’arets yihyeh tal – “Let there be, I pray, dryness unto the fleece, to her separation, and upon all the earth, become dew.” Gideon knows this is impossible apart from the supernatural hand of the Lord. It is something that could not be otherwise…

40 And God did so that night.

Instead of “the God,” it now simply says, “God.” vayaas elohim ken balaylah ha’hu – “And did Elohim thus in the night, the it.” The God whom Gideon stood in a right relationship with is the Powers over creation, the one true God. He accomplished the sign Gideon requested and gave a memorial for future redemptive history…

*40 (fin) It was dry on the fleece only, but there was dew on all the ground.

vayhi khorev el ha’gizah l’badah v’al kal ha’arets hayah tal – “And is dryness unto the fleece, to her separation. And upon all the earth was dew.” The miracle occurred as proposed. The fleece is being used as a metaphor for the small army of Israel, while the surrounding area depicts the vast army of Midian. As Matthew Henry rightly states –

“These signs are truly miraculous, and very significant. Gideon and his men were going to fight the Midianites; could God distinguish between a small fleece of Israel, and the vast floor of Midian? Gideon is made to know that God could do so.”

This is the immediate signification of the details in the story. Gideon has been given assurances that God has made a firm and complete distinction between Israel and the Midianites. However, one must ask, “What is it that separates Israel from the other nations?” In determining that, one can then perceive the typology being pictured.

A fleece to show what God is doing
Phases in a process going since time began
In what happens to the fleece, we are viewing
Steps He is taking in a wondrous plan

He was working in one way in the past
Revealing the heart found in man
What was found there could not last
But He knew that since before time began

One step leading to another along the way
Revealing what we need most of all
Christ Jesus put that on full display
Are you yet ready to heed the call?

II. The Law or Grace

In the introduction today, Adam Clarke summed up Origen’s thoughts about this passage. He said, “The fleece is the Jewish nation.” Though that may be the surface intent, as Matthew Henry stated, and it may be insightful in regard to typology, there is a fatal problem with that analogy. The Lord regularly uses gender in typology, and He does so consistently.

In fact, He actually fills the Old Testament with gender discords to ensure proper typology is maintained. We saw one of those in the account of Jael and Sisera where the text used a masculine imperative when it should have been a feminine imperative –

vayomer eleha amod petakh ha’ohel – “And said unto her, ‘Stand (ms.imp.) door the tent.”

In the book of Ruth, there are nine instances of gender discord in Chapter 1 and seven of them are spoken by Naomi. Other gender peculiarities are found elsewhere in the book. Unless one understands that the Lord is working through typology in such instances, these discords make no sense.

The problem with Origen’s analysis is that the word nation, the name Israel, the word people, etc., are all masculine nouns. Therefore, his analysis cannot be correct, even if it is both insightful and mentally surprising. Giving credit where credit is due, he was not that far off from what is being pictured.

The question just proposed as we closed out the mechanical analysis of the verses needs to be evaluated, “What is it that separates Israel from the other nations?” It is true that the Jewish nation is separate from the other nations, but this was because of their calling. And that calling, as a nation, was based on the Torah, the Law, a feminine noun.

Verse 33 took us back to the fact that Midian, Amalek, and the sons of the East had come against the land, just as was noted at the beginning of Chapter 6. Midian, Place of Judgment, is the main force. It speaks of the tribulation period that Israel will someday endure.

Amalek, the People Who Wring Off, are those disconnected from the body (meaning the body among whom God is present) and who strive to disconnect the body. This has been consistent since their first appearance of coming against Israel in Exodus 17.

That chapter ended with the words, “Because the Lord has sworn: the Lord will have war with Amalek from generation to generation” (Exodus 17:16). They are a true enemy, but they anticipate anyone who would attempt to nip the people of God off from the main body of His redeemed.

As noted, the word qedem, or east, also means beforehand or past times. For example –

“You will give truth to Jacob
And mercy to Abraham,
Which You have sworn to our fathers
From days of old [qedem].” Micah 7:20

The b’ne qedem, or “sons East,” refers to those who continue to cling to the law, annulled in the past through Christ’s work, simply because they cannot let go of it. Such a thought is carefully detailed in the book of Hebrews, such as –

“Of how much worse punishment, do you suppose, will he be thought worthy who has trampled the Son of God underfoot, counted the blood of the covenant by which he was sanctified a common thing, and insulted the Spirit of grace?” Hebrews 10:29

It next noted that these enemies “crossed over and encamped in valley Jezreel.” The words mean the “depth of God Sows.” It signifies Israel’s false ways and God sowing just due into their lives –

“It shall come to pass in that day
That I will break the bow of Israel in the Valley of Jezreel.” Hosea 1:5

Like most prophecies, Hosea’s has an immediate fulfillment and a future one. First, Hosea prophesies of the casting off of Israel, “You are not my people,” (Hosea 1 / Romans 9). He then prophesies of the calling again of Israel, “You are my people,” (Hosea 2 / 1 Peter 2) –

“Now when she had weaned Lo-Ruhamah, she conceived and bore a son. Then God said:
‘Call his name Lo-Ammi,
For you are not My people,
And I will not be your God.’” Hosea 1:8, 9

“As He says also in Hosea:
‘I will call them My people, who were not My people,
And her beloved, who was not beloved.’” Romans 9:25

///

“Then I will sow her for Myself in the earth,
And I will have mercy on her who had not obtained mercy;
Then I will say to those who were not My people,
‘You are My people!’
And they shall say, ‘You are my God!’” Hosea 2:23

“But you are a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, His own special people, that you may proclaim the praises of Him who called you out of darkness into His marvelous light; 10 who once were not a people but are now the people of God, who had not obtained mercy but now have obtained mercy.” 1 Peter 2:9, 10

In verse 34, the Spirit of the Lord clothed Gideon (the gospel, as seen in previous sermons). The meaning was seen in citing Galatians 3 where acceptance of the gospel means being clothed in Christ. It is the gospel that makes that come about.

At that time, Gideon blew the trumpet. It is the calling of the gospel, resounding out. The seven-year treaty Israel made with the Antichrist will be annulled.

As noted, saving Israel from the Place of Judgment (Midian) is the main part of Gideon’s calling. This came after the first objective, tearing down the altar of Baal, was taken care of. The truth is that the Messenger of the Lord is, in fact, the Lord incarnate, Jesus. He is not merely a man who is the Messiah of Israel, but the God/Man. This is key and central in understanding the true gospel.

It next noted, “And cried Abiezer after him.” It is an anticipation of the approval and help of the Father (Father of Help) upon those who accept the gospel message –

“But the Helper, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in My name, He will teach you all things, and bring to your remembrance all things that I said to you.” John 14:26

At the same time, verse 35, said, “and messengers sent in all Manasseh, and cried also, HE, after him.” As always, the name Manasseh (To Forget/From a Debt) anticipates Christ, who forgets our sins, having paid our sin debt.

Likewise, it also noted, “And messengers sent in Asher, and in Zebulun, and in Naphtali. And ascended to meet them.” It is like a smorgasbord of theology. The state of the people upon reception of the gospel is Blessed, they are given an eternal inheritance (Glorious Dwelling Place), and these are a result of the work of Christ alone (My Wrestlings), apart from works or personal merit.

This will be the state of Israel in the future. However, in anticipation of that, and to be certain that this is what is being conveyed, Gideon goes through the account of the fleece. Thus, the account is personal, using the term “the God” that demonstrates a right standing with the Lord –

“And said Gideon unto the God, ‘If you are Savior – in my hand – Israel, according to which have spoken.’”

Think of the typology, “If you are the Savior, in my (the gospel’s) hand, Israel.” Gideon is clothed with the Spirit, and it was inferred that this was the Spirit confirming His word through Gideon. Is the gospel truly Israel’s salvation? The sign of the fleece will show it is so.

Verse 37 then opened with, “Behold, I placing fleece the wool in the threshing floor.” The test of the gospel is to place a fleece (from a word signifying “to cut off”) in the threshing floor, the place of judgment.

Then Gideon used a less common word, translated as “set,” concerning the fleece. The word comes from a primitive root signifying to place permanently. The fleece, the cutting off, is being forcefully and permanently set out.

Previously, sin was dealt with under the law through the day of atonement. That is signified by the wool –

“‘Come now, and let us reason together,’
Says the Lord,
‘Though your sins are like scarlet,
They shall be as white as snow;
Though they are red like crimson,
They shall be as wool.’” Isaiah 1:18

The idea is whiteness and purity. Sin was cut off through the law. The first test was, “If dew become upon the fleece to her separation, and upon all the earth dryness…” That was the time of the law for Israel. The Law alone covered (tal/dew) with life, symbolized by the water pressed out of the fleece. The rest of the world remained apart from God’s redemptive plans.

Gideon, the gospel, knew this. However, he, not the law, is now being asked to lead Israel against the enemy. Therefore, he, through a series of cohortatives, jussives, interjections, anthropomorphisms, and so on, implores to have a more perfect representation of who he is in relation to Israel.

There was the beat of the anvil marking the time of the Law of Moses, but Gideon asks for a second beat, that of the time of the gospel. Maybe the gospel was also effective for those under law and no change is needed? The second test will determine if it is so.

Notice the difference in prepositions for the two propositions:

“If dew become upon the fleece to her separation, and upon all the earth dryness (חרב – the law)…” (verse 37).

“Let there be, I pray, dryness (חרב – the law) unto the fleece to her separation. And upon all the earth, become dew” (verse 39).

Gideon’s words are purposeful. If this is how it is, then the situation will be perfectly evident from a proper response to his plea. The khorev, or dryness/law, upon all the earth is man under sin because of the law given to Adam. Israel was also under law, but it was a law that offered atonement for sin, something lacking outside of Israel.

With that requested, “And did Elohim thus in the night, the it.” It only said Elohim, not “the Elohim.” To be in a right standing with God, one must be in a right standing with what God is doing. First was the time of the law, and then there is the grace that follows. The first must cease for the second to be realized. Therefore –

“And is dryness (חרב – the law) unto the fleece, to her separation. And upon all the earth was dew” (verse 40).

What Gideon has asked for as a confirmation is exactly what God provided. The second beat of the anvil is what God has purposed –

“Previously saying, ‘Sacrifice and offering, burnt offerings, and offerings for sin You did not desire, nor had pleasure in them’ (which are offered according to the law), then He said, ‘Behold, I have come to do Your will, O God.’ He takes away the first that He may establish the second. 10 By that will we have been sanctified through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all.” Hebrews 10:8-10

Where Israel under the law has no life, the whole world under the gospel (meaning any who accept it) is covered.

What we have seen today is a spiritual reality that is actually working out in the world, even as we live and move in it. Time is moving forward and it will lead to a real tribulation period where real calamity will come upon the entire earth.

But that physical reality is something that is actually being worked out in the spiritual world. First, the rapture will take place before the tribulation begins. Scripture is clear on that. The world that has rejected Jesus will fall under judgment.

This will include Israel. However, God covenanted with them that He would bring them into the New Covenant as a nation. This means that the law, the basis for the Old Covenant, must end. For it to end, Israel must agree to what the New Covenant offers.

This is available to anyone who accepts it at any time. However, Israel as a nation must also nationally accept it. Gideon, the gospel, is the means of that occurring, both for individuals and for national Israel. The account of Gideon and the fleece has been given for us to see this.

Israel will learn the lesson of the fleece someday. However, sadly, many people who claim to be followers of Christ Jesus – both Jews and Gentiles – have never learned it. Instead, they cling to the law to find their justification before God.

Paul argues against such an attitude in the most vehement manner. When we read the words of Revelation 4:2 – 19:10, we read words of disaster on the earth, but they are self-inflicted wounds being worked out on a global scale. All of it will stem from a rejection of what God has offered in Christ.

There is one gospel and one Jesus. Salvation is found in Him and the message that properly speaks of Him. Be sure that the Jesus you are following is the one the Bible proclaims, for there is not another (2 Corinthians 11:4).

Hold fast to the grace of God in Christ. It is the message that God has provided for the redemption of man. God in Christ has done the work. We can now do the praising for what He has done.

Closing Verse: “Now therefore, why do you test God by putting a yoke on the neck of the disciples which neither our fathers nor we were able to bear? 11 But we believe that through the grace of the Lord Jesus Christ we shall be saved in the same manner as they.” Acts 15:10, 11

Next Week: Judges 7:1-8 We’re not yet done. There’s more to tell, sakes alive… (Gideon, Judge of Israel, Part V) (22nd Judges Sermon)

The Lord has you exactly where He wants you. He has a good plan and purpose for you. It is He who judges His people according to their deeds. So, follow Him, live for Him, and trust Him, and He will do marvelous things for you and through you.

Gideon, Judge of Israel, Part IV

Then all the Midianites and Amalekites
The people of the East, so many the word does tell
Gathered together; and they crossed over
And encamped in the Valley of Jezreel

But the Spirit of the LORD
Came upon Gideon
Then he blew the trumpet
And the Abiezrites gathered behind him as one

And he sent messengers throughout all Manasseh
Who also gathered behind him
He also sent messengers to Asher, Zebulun, and Naphtali
And they came up to meet them

So Gideon said to God, “If You will save Israel by my hand
———-as You have said—
Look, I shall put a fleece of wool on the threshing floor
If there is dew on the fleece only, and it is dry on all the ground
Then I shall know that You will save Israel by my hand
———-as You have said, for shore

And it was so
When he rose early the next morning; his sleep did cease
And squeezed the fleece together
He wrung a bowlful of water of dew out of the fleece

Then Gideon said to God, “Do not be angry with me
But let me speak just once more to You
Let me test, I pray, just once more with the fleece
Let it now be dry only on the fleece, but on all the ground
———-let there be dew

And God did so that night, the miracle did abound
It was dry on the fleece only, but there was dew on all the ground

Lord God, turn our hearts to be obedient to Your word
Give us wisdom to be ever faithful to You
May we carefully heed each thing we have heard
Yes, Lord God may our hearts be faithful and true

And we shall be content and satisfied in You alone
We will follow You as we sing our songs of praise
Hallelujah to You; to us Your path You have shown
Hallelujah we shall sing to You for all of our days

Hallelujah and Amen…

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

33 Then all the Midianites and Amalekites, the people of the East, gathered together; and they crossed over and encamped in the Valley of Jezreel. 34 But the Spirit of the Lord came upon Gideon; then he blew the trumpet, and the Abiezrites gathered behind him. 35 And he sent messengers throughout all Manasseh, who also gathered behind him. He also sent messengers to Asher, Zebulun, and Naphtali; and they came up to meet them.

36 So Gideon said to God, “If You will save Israel by my hand as You have said— 37 look, I shall put a fleece of wool on the threshing floor; if there is dew on the fleece only, and it is dry on all the ground, then I shall know that You will save Israel by my hand, as You have said.” 38 And it was so. When he rose early the next morning and squeezed the fleece together, he wrung the dew out of the fleece, a bowlful of water. 39 Then Gideon said to God, “Do not be angry with me, but let me speak just once more: Let me test, I pray, just once more with the fleece; let it now be dry only on the fleece, but on all the ground let there be dew.” 40 And God did so that night. It was dry on the fleece only, but there was dew on all the ground.