Song of Songs 4:7-11 (Unhearted Me!)

Artwork by Douglas Kallerson

Song of Songs 4:7-11
Unhearted Me!

(Typed 13 January 2025) Thus far, the words of “Song the songs” have portrayed a wonderful love story between Solomon and his beloved. As we have seen, this has provided many insights into God’s love for His people and their relationship with Him.

In the passage today, we again see Solomon rejoice over her, saying things that show how utterly enraptured he is with her. Believe it or not, that describes how the Lord feels about His people.

You may or may not think He feels this way about you, but if you are a believer in God’s promises found in the sending of Jesus the Messiah, you are definitely looked at that way by Him. But what is it that makes it so?

God is not looking at externals. He doesn’t care what you look like, how many teeth you have, or if you are always dirty because you live in poor conditions and have no water for washing. These things are earthly, and they will all pass away in time. So what is it that makes the redeemed of the Lord an object of His great affection, even to the point that He is enraptured with them?

Text Verse: “For by grace you have been saved through faith, and that not of yourselves; it is the gift of God, not of works, lest anyone should boast. 10 For we are His workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand that we should walk in them.” Ephesians 2:8-10

We are not saved by our works, but rather by faith. Later I will cite Romans 4, which says we are saved apart from works. This does not mean that we are saved apart from works in the ultimate sense, however. Rather, we are not saved by our works.

Somebody had to do something to restore us to God. That is the point of the law. The man who does the things of the law will live by them. The lesson of the law is that nobody can do those things and live. The infection of sin is too deep.

Thus, God sent Jesus to do the works for us. Being saved apart from works only speaks of what we do. Our faith is to be in the completed works of Jesus. Beyond that, there is nothing in heaven or on earth that can merit salvation for us. This is what grace means. We are getting what we do not deserve, and it comes by faith in what He has done.

How is this pictured in today’s verses? Get ready, you’ll see as we go. Great things are to be found in His superior word. And so, let us turn to that precious word once again, and… May God speak to us through His word today, and may His glorious name ever be praised.

I. My Sister – Completer (verses 7-9)

In the previous verses of this chapter, Solomon went into great detail concerning the beauty of his beloved. Verse 6 was a transitional verse without any gender markers. Thus, it could have been either Solomon or the beloved speaking.

I would guess that it was the beloved. She continued in her direction until the day ended. Assuming it was the woman, I logically connected that with the focus of the saints, meaning Christ, until their time ends and He takes His people to Himself. With that transitional verse complete, the words next return to Solomon…

You are all fair, my love,

kulakh yaphah rayathi – “You all beautiful my querida.” Those scholars who assume verse 6 was the woman speaking tend to say that these words include not just her physical beauty but the beauty of her soul as well.

The reason is that the woman has not only displayed physical beauty, but a loving demeanor by what she said in response to his compliments. Assuming it was her speaking, she said –

“Until that puffs the day,
And flit the shadows.
I walk, to me, unto mount the myrrh,
And unto hill the frankincense.”

She would continue her walk until the day ended, demonstrating restraint and focus. She is not just physically lovely but wholesome in character as well. Having noted her all-beautiful state, he repeats the thought in parallelism…

7 (con’t) And there is no spot in you.

 

u-mum ein bakh – “And blemish not in you.” The word mum signifies a stain or blemish. It can refer to both physical and/or moral blemishes. The thought was expressed concerning Absalom, David’s son –

“Now in all Israel there was no one who was praised as much as Absalom for his good looks. From the sole of his foot to the crown of his head there was no blemish [mum] in him.” 2 Samuel 14:25

Unfortunately, the word concerning Absalom spoke only of his physical perfection as he was a morally corrupt individual. A suitable thought is expressed in the New Testament when referring to the redeemed as having no moral blemish –

“Husbands, love your wives, just as Christ also loved the church and gave Himself for her, 26 that He might sanctify and cleanse her with the washing of water by the word, 27 that He might present her to Himself a glorious church, not having spot or wrinkle or any such thing, but that she should be holy and without blemish.” Ephesians 5:25-27

In these words of Ephesians, the moral perfection of God’s people, imputed to them because of the substitutionary work of Christ, is referred to. Solomon, looking upon the perfection of her beauty, most likely inclusive of both physical and moral points, continues…

Come with me from Lebanon, my spouse,

The word “come” is only implied in this clause. In typical fashion in Hebrew, the full thought only comes in a later clause: iti mil’vanon kalah – “With me from Lebanon, completer.” What appears to be the case is that after complimenting his beloved for her perfection, which is highlighted by the words of verse 6, he still wants her to stay and participate in the union of love.

Putting verse 6 beside verse 8 allows this to be grasped. She says she will walk unto mount the myrrh and unto hill the frankincense. He then calls those locations Lebanon. The reason he can poetically do this is because the spelling of the two is almost identical –

לְבוֹנָה – l’vonah, frankincense
לְבָנוֹן – l’vanon, Lebanon

Whether she is actually saying that she is going north to Lebanon or not, the fact that she is going to the mount of frankincense is poetically turned into the area of Lebanon –

6.
Until that puffs the day,
And flit the shadows.
I walk, to me, unto mount the myrrh,
And unto hill the frankincense.

8.
With me from Lebanon, completer,
With me from Lebanon – come!
Turn from top Amana, from top Senir and Hermon,
From habitations lions,
From mountains leopards.

Therefore, instead of yielding to her plans of walking to the mountains until the end of the day, he is poetically asking her to come from the mountains to him.

As we have seen, the name Lebanon comes from the same word, lavan, white. That is derived from lavan, to be or make white or to purify. It also signifies to make bricks because bricks whiten when they are dried.

This is the first time he has called her kalah, completer. No other translation uses the word completer, instead they say bride or spouse. However, that is only a description, not really a translation.

The word kalah is derived from kalal, to complete or make perfect. Therefore, it is also often translated as daughter-in-law, such as Judah’s daughter-in-law, Tamar, or Ruth, the daughter-in-law of Naomi.

The thought is probably that the son, and thus the family, is made complete with the acquisition of his bride. Thus, the designation is bestowed upon her as the one who completes or perfects the son: completer. Solomon is saying that she is the one who completes him. Therefore, he repeats the thought…

8 (con’t) With me from Lebanon.

iti mil’vanon tavoi – “With me from Lebanon – come!” Placing the word come at the end of the two clauses rather than at the beginning causes the mind to remain in a state of anticipation. It also provides its own emphasis. He is in an excited state of desire for them to be together. Because of that, he continues with…

8 (con’t) Look from the top of Amana,

Rather: tashuri merosh amana – “Turn from top Amana.” There are two identical verbs that could be used here, both spelled shur. The first is shur (שׁוּר) to spy out, survey, look, etc. The second is shur (שׁוּר) to turn, and thus to travel about.

He has just asked her to come from Lebanon. Thus, he isn’t asking her to join him in looking from the top of a mountain. Rather, he is repeating the thought of the first two clauses by using a different word – “With me, come! Turn from the top of Amana!”

Further, this doesn’t mean that she is in a different location in this clause or in the next clauses. Rather, he is describing Lebanon by her various peaks.

If someone was in Florida and had a girlfriend in New York City, he could poetically say, “Come from New York City! Turn from the Empire State Building, from Trump Tower, and from Rockefeller Plaza!” That is the substance of what is being conveyed here.

As for the name Amana, it is found only here in Scripture. It is derived from the root aman, to confirm, support, or be faithful. As such, it is variously translated as Permanent, Confirmation, Constant, Faithful, etc. The Greek translation uses the word pistis, Faith. Next, Solomon says…

8 (con’t) From the top of Senir and Hermon,

merosh seniyr v’khermon – “From top Senir and Hermon.” The poetic use of mountaintops in Lebanon continues. Senir was first mentioned in Deuteronomy 3:9. It is the Amorite name given to Mount Hermon. The name is also used in 1 Chronicles 5:23 and Ezekiel 27:5. It is believed to mean Glittering Breastplate of Ice. Hermon means Sacred. Solomon next continues with…

8 (con’t) From the lions’ dens,

mim’onoth arayoth – “From habitations lions.” The ari, lion, comes from arah, to pluck. It speaks of the violence of the creature. Thus, he is essentially saying, “Come to me from the place of danger.”

The last lion in Israel was killed in the 16th century, but they have been extinct from Lebanon for almost a thousand years. At the time of Solomon, they were common. He implores her to be safe from them. That thought is then repeated with the next words…

8 (con’t) From the mountains of the leopards.

mehar’re n’meriym – “From mountains leopards.” The namer, leopard is introduced here. The word is derived from an unused root signifying to filtrate, a process that makes something clear or transparent through filtration. The idea is that of spotting as if by dripping. Hence, you come in thought to the spotted coat of the leopard.

Leopards were found in Lebanon until early in the 20th century but are now extinct. There are leopards in Israel, but most are in captivity. It has been about 15 years since any were seen in the wild.

In saying, “from mountains,” it doesn’t necessarily mean he is speaking of many mountains. It may be if he is speaking of Amana, Senir, and Hermon separately.

However, if he is only referring to Senir and Hermon noted in the last clause, it could be a poetic way of calling the one mountain with two names as if they are separate mountains. That would be like saying, “Come with me from Petrograd and Leningrad, from the city of palaces, from the city of white nights, from the places of Peter the Great.”

Everything in the sentence refers to the same place. Therefore, the last designation in the plural, “places of Peter the Great,” is only referring to one place. That seems to be what Solomon is doing here by repeating different names and designations about the same mountain.

However, by making it plural, it can thus provide different typology. In the Bible, a har, mountain, is synonymous with a large but centralized group of people. Making it plural would then refer to various large people groups. Having called to her to come from these places, he next says…

You have ravished my heart,
My sister, my spouse;

The words are more of a paraphrase. The Hebrew is simpler: libavtini akhoti khalah – “Unhearted me! My sister – completer.” The word is lavav, a verb coming from levav, the heart. It is in the perfect aspect, so the action is a done deal.

Various translations say ravished, captured, captivated, made my heart beat faster, encouraged me, wounded, bewitched, stolen, etc. All of these depart from the exacting sense of the word. Rather, the simplicity of the word is found in the idea that Solomon has been heartened, but with the meaning of unheartened. It is as if there is nothing left in him for any other.

If she were a genius and he was overwhelmed by her daunting intelligence, he might say, “You have braindeaded me.” If she were a power wrestler with more strength than him, he might say, “You have disarmed me.” The words of Solomon are conveying simplicity of thought.

Also, calling his bride “my sister,” is not without precedent. In Genesis 12 and 20, Abraham truthfully said that his wife was his, akhoth, sister. What started as siblings increased to a married couple.

In Genesis 24, the collective household called Rebekah “our sister.” The word can signify a close female relative or a woman of the same people or nation. In Genesis 26, Isaac said that Rebekah was his sister. Though not true in his case, such exclamations would have been retained in the collective memory of the people.

The scholar Karl Budde noted that in ancient Egyptian love songs, the words “my sister” and “my brother” were used among lovers. This “Song the songs” has already relied on foreign motifs. As such, Solomon is being poetic towards her by saying this. To then explain the relationship further, he again says, khalah, completer.

He elevates the term of endearment, sister, a beloved part of his family, to the thought of her being the completer of the family, his bride. With that, he calls out again…

9 (con’t) You have ravished my heart

libavtini – “Unhearted me!” It is the second and last time the word is used in this form. Being in the perfect aspect, and repeating it in this manner, he is indicating that he is utterly demolished by her. She has ravished and stolen away his heart, as he says…

9 (con’t) With one look of your eyes,

Again, he leaves the words simple, omitting some for effect: b’akhad meenayikh – “In one from your eyes.” All it takes is a glance from her eyes or a flit of them to the left or right, and he becomes completely unhearted. He is so utterly smitten by her that his knees probably buckle and his temples pound. The poor guy. And he continues…

9 (con’t)  With one link of your necklace.

The Hebrew is puzzling because of the use of the plural noun. Rather: b’akhad anaq mitsav’ronayikh – “In one necklace from your napes.” The use of the plural seemingly makes no sense. It is the word tsavar, the nape of the neck.

Because of the unusual plural form, some take this as meaning something suspended from the neck. That is how the Greek translation renders it, “…with one chain from your neck.” From there, translations follow that rendering in some form or another. But that could easily be expressed another way.

Those translations that say neck never render them properly in the plural. But the words are so specific that they call for us to consider them and resolve what is being conveyed.

It appears that he is referring to is the softly flowing cervical muscles on her neck as she moves her head. The plural, napes, then accentuates the beauty of each as they form the whole. He has already described her eyes and her neck earlier. These words now complement what he said earlier –

1 Your eyes – doves,

4 According to Tower David your nape,
Built to parapets.
Thousand the shield hang upon it,
All targets the mighties.

9 In one from your eyes,
In one necklace from your napes.

One movement like a dove, and one necklace hanging upon her parapeted tower, drives him absolutely bonkers. And so he continues…

With what will you come before the Lord?
What will you present for the sin of your soul?
What will bring you the great reward?
On what thing will you, your sins roll?

Shall you accomplish a great and noble deed?
Claiming it is worthy of His praise?
Shall giving up a wicked life or one of greed…
Bring you honor, blessing, and eternal days?

Rather, come to your God by faith in His grace
Come to Him with hands empty of any pride
By grace through faith alone will you see His smiling face
And through that alone will you in heaven reside

II. Your Loves (verses 10 & 11)

10 How fair is your love,
My sister, my spouse!

Rather: mah yaphu dodayikh akhoti khalah – “How beautified your loves, my sister – completer.” In Chapter 1, she twice spoke of her beloved’s loves, meaning his doting affections. In this verse, he twice returns that thought to her.

However, he uses the perfect aspect, beautified. And further, rather than her doting affections, he appears to be equating her loves to her physical attributes that he just spoke about. Hence, the word beautified.

Her attributes are complete in the perfection of their beauty. There is nothing he would change to make her more beautiful. Instead, they stand as a testament to the intrinsic perfection they bear.

Following the Greek, some translations says, “breasts” rather than “loves.” The words are similar, dod and dad. Therefore, the Latin, Aramaic, and several English translations go with this. This is certainly not right. First, he has already described her breasts in verse 4:5 using the word shad, a completely different word.

If he was describing them again, one would assume he would again use that word. Second, it was already seen in Chapter 1 that she was using parallelism in the use of this word in the plural. It would make sense that he is doing the same as well.

1:2 Kiss me from kisses his mouth
For good your loves from wine.

4:9,10 – In one from your eyes,
In one necklace from your napes.
10 How beautified your loves, my sister – completer.

That thought then continues with a thought that carefully mirrors her words to him from Chapter 1…

10 (con’t) How much better than wine is your love,

mah tovu dodayikh miyayin – “How bettered your loves from wine.” The meaning is that her attributes are better than wine. The word “from” in this clause is being used in a comparative sense: “Wine is good, but your loves are better.”

As with the previous clause, the verb is in the perfect aspect. Her attributes exceeded the bar set forth by wine. He would rather drink in the beautiful qualities of her physical attributes with his eyes than drink in the stimulating attributes of wine with his lips. What she offers is way better.

His next words continue to mirror in content what she said after she noted his loves –

1:2 Kiss me from kisses his mouth –
For good your loves from wine.
3 To aroma – your oils good,
Oil pouring – your name.

She notes his aroma based on the cologne he uses. He next notes hers here based on the perfume she uses…

10 (con’t) And the scent of your perfumes
Than all spices!

v’reakh s’manayikh mikal b’samim – “And aroma your oils from all fragrances.” She has anointed herself with oils that exceed (from all, meaning greater than) all other fragrances. Her smell, then, is otherwise incomparable. It is simply the best. Having noted that, Solomon continues to speak affectionate words to his beloved completer…

11 Your lips, O my spouse,
Drip as the honeycomb;

Rather: nopheth titoph’nah siphthothayikh kalah – “A dripping drops your lips, completer.” The word nopheth comes from nuph, to quiver. That leads to the sense of shaking to pieces and thus to drip. It is usually associated with honey, and so, most translations add that in, assuming that is what it is talking about. But it simply means a dripping.

The next verb, nataph, signifies to ooze, and thus to distill into drops. To get the somewhat alliterative sounds provided by the Hebrew, saying, “A dripping drops” fits well. The meaning here is not a literal dripping as if she is drooling on herself.

Rather, Solomon is speaking of her words, how what she says is perfectly pleasant and sweetly soothing to him. The exact same words, nopheth titoph’nah, are used of the speech concerning the wayward woman in Proverbs 5 –

“A dripping drops lips wayward,
And smooth from oil her mouth.” Proverbs 5:3

The meaning is that the words of an adulterous woman flow across her lips like a soft oozing while the words of her mouth are smoother than oil. In the case of his completer, her words likewise ooze forth smoothly. He next explains what that means, saying…

11 (con’t) Honey and milk are under your tongue;

devash v’khalav takhath l’shonekh – “Honey and milk under your tongue.” This is what produces the dripping. It is as if her lips are moistened with honey and milk as she speaks. The words are to be taken metaphorically.

Honey is sweet. Therefore her words are filled with sweetness as she speaks. It is reflective of the words of the psalm –

“How sweet are Your words to my taste,
Sweeter than honey to my mouth!”  Psalm 119:103

Milk is used to express that which sustains, nourishes, and refreshes with its richness, such as –

“Whereas you have been forsaken and hated,
So that no one went through you,
I will make you an eternal excellence,
A joy of many generations.
16 You shall drink the milk of the Gentiles,
And milk the breast of kings;
You shall know that I, the Lord, am your Savior
And your Redeemer, the Mighty One of Jacob.” Isaiah 60:15, 16

As such, he is saying that her words do just this for him. The richness of what she says sustains, nourishes, and refreshes him as she speaks. It is as if sweetness, life, and vibrancy are found in her speech. Understanding this, his words next say…

*11 (fin) And the fragrance of your garments
Is like the fragrance of Lebanon.

v’reakh salmothayikh k’reakh l’vanon

“And fragrance your garments,
According to fragrance Lebanon.”

The Coverdale Bible of 1535, along with the Catholic versions that follow from the Latin Vulgate, convert Lebanon to frankincense. But this is unnecessary.

Lebanon is famous for its cedars, an especially aromatic tree. Like the juniper, they are both in the plant order of pinales. Walking through a copse or forest of them is marvelous.

But probably more to the point is that Solomon built and paneled a house in Jerusalem from Lebanese cedars –

“He also built the House of the Forest of Lebanon; its length was one hundred cubits, its width fifty cubits, and its height thirty cubits, with four rows of cedar pillars, and cedar beams on the pillars. And it was paneled with cedar above the beams that were on forty-five pillars, fifteen to a row. There were windows with beveled frames in three rows, and window was opposite window in three tiers. And all the doorways and doorposts had rectangular frames; and window was opposite window in three tiers.” 1 Kings 7:2-5

Smelling the aromatic cedar every day would be a constant reminder of Lebanon. It would be something that became soothing and comforting each time he entered.

Likewise, smelling her would similarly remind him of how good she smelled each time she was near. Equating her to Lebanon makes complete sense when understanding Solomon’s surroundings.

As this is surely the fragrance he is referring to, even if it is not mentioned specifically, understanding the symbolism is worth the effort to consider –

The cedar, erez, ultimately comes from a word signifying firm or strong. The cedars of Lebanon are referred to many times in Scripture. They denote strength and firmness.

When equated to a person or a nation, the cedar refers to one who is great and mighty. In Ezekiel 17, Zedekiah, king of Judah, is equated to a sprig taken from a cedar of Lebanon. Assyria is equated to a cedar in Lebanon in Ezekiel 31.

With that, the verses of the passage are complete for today. However, we can find hints of God’s love for the redeemed in this passage as well.

Verse 7 noted his beloved’s completely beautiful nature (all beautiful) and that she was without spot. As before, the same general terminology is used when referring to the church. Ephesians 5 said –

“Husbands, love your wives, just as Christ also loved the church and gave Himself for her, 26 that He might sanctify and cleanse her with the washing of water by the word, 27 that He might present her to Himself a glorious church, not having spot or wrinkle or any such thing, but that she should be holy and without blemish.” Ephesians 5:25-27

The physical beauty of Solomon’s beloved is perfectly reflected in Paul’s description of the church. But more than how she is portrayed is how that came about, Christ “gave Himself for her.” That refers to His death on the cross.

Thus, we once again are given an insight into why this book, the “Song the songs,” is read by the Jews every year at the Passover. They have not made the connection that God is exactingly showing between the redeemed and Solomon’s lover.

However, these patterns can never be derived from Scripture unless they are studied as a whole, something Israel is not yet willing to do.

Verse 8 brought in Lebanon. Either it or frankincense has been brought into the narrative multiple times in the book. Both are derived from the same root and both point to the process of purification through works, emblematic of Jesus’ work on the cross. It is He who suffered for His people. It is His works that provide purification for them.

Verse 8 also introduced the word kalah, which I translate as completer. It refers to that which brings the family to a state of completion, or perfection. We need to be careful when we put on our typology thinking caps.

God is fully sufficient, and He needs nothing. Jesus is God. But Jesus is also human. Having a wife for a man is something that brings a state of completion to him and, thus, to the family.

There is something about the Lord presenting the church as a bride to Himself that brings about its own state of completeness. If it were not so, there would be no reason for Him to die on the cross and then to prepare the church as a bride for Himself.

Hence, we can find something useful and appropriate in the wording Solomon uses here. Saying, “With me from Lebanon, completer,” is telling us that the Lord is acquiring His redeemed from His work, and they (represented by her) provide a completion to His works. Repeating the thought accentuates the fact that it is by His work alone that it is accomplished, “With me from Lebanon – come!”

Immediately after that, the words say, “Turn from top Amana.” The imperative is to come to him by Faith (Amana). There is no other way to do so. Can’t you just see the words of the text verse clearly in this?

Next Senir, Glittering Breastplate of Ice, and Hermon, Sacred, point to purification and being set apart. The name Senir is given because of the white-capped nature of Hermon, thus purification. Hermon, being sacred, speaks of heaven, meaning that which is granted to the redeemed because of their faith. To Ephesians 2 again –

“But God, who is rich in mercy, because of His great love with which He loved us, even when we were dead in trespasses, made us alive together with Christ (by grace you have been saved), and raised us up together, and made us sit together in the heavenly places in Christ Jesus.” Ephesians 2:4-6

The words concerning the habitations of lions and the mountains of leopards give the sense of being saved from dwellings of those who will harm believers and from among the many nations of the earth.

Calling the beloved a sister along with a completer speaks of intrinsic nature. Jesus isn’t an angel as the JW’s maintain. He is fully human. Therefore, the church in nature is a “sister” type relationship, just as when the whole family, mother included, identified Rebekah as a sister.

The next verses referred to the enthralling beauty of the bride. Without trying to find a type or analogy in each one, it is sufficient to say that because Christ has prepared a bride for Himself, He is absolutely enthralled with who she is. Paul speaks of the various parts of the body, each having its own set purpose.

Likewise, the make up of the redeemed does as well. There is no part He will not rejoice over because they are His from Himself. Solomon could proclaim, “How bettered your loves from wine.” So, too, the Lord proclaims this over His redeemed.

Psalm 104:15 says wine “makes glad the heart of man.” But to the Lord, the attributes of His bride far exceed that. Noting the “dripping the drops” of the beloved’s lips and that honey and milk were under her tongue, signifies that the proclamation of the Lord’s people is sweet, sustaining, nourishing, and refreshing in their richness –

“For with the heart one believes unto righteousness, and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation. 11 For the Scripture says, ‘Whoever believes on Him will not be put to shame.’ 12 For there is no distinction between Jew and Greek, for the same Lord over all is rich to all who call upon Him. 13 For ‘whoever calls on the name of the Lord shall be saved.’” Romans 10:10-13

As for the final words of the verses, which refer to the fragrance of her garments being according to the fragrance Lebanon, it means that those who are saved by the Lord bear the fragrance of His works. That is seen in both testaments, but Revelation 3 is sufficient to see this –

“He who overcomes shall be clothed in white garments, and I will not blot out his name from the Book of Life; but I will confess his name before My Father and before His angels.” Revelation 3:5

To overcome is explained by John as accepting the message of God in Christ –

“For whatever is born of God overcomes the world. And this is the victory that has overcome the world—our faith. Who is he who overcomes the world, but he who believes that Jesus is the Son of God?” 1 John 5:4, 5

The Father/Son relationship, speaking of accepting the deity of Jesus Christ through faith, is what allows one to overcome.

This is the typology and meaning of what is presented in the passage today. A love story between God and the redeemed of the world is being presented. It is all possible because of, and it is all centered on, the work of Jesus Christ.

The redeemed of all ages are brought near to God in the same way, through faith. Some were looking forward to His coming, others look back on it, but all are saved through what God has done through Him. Salvation is of the Lord. Thank God for Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.

Closing Verse: “But to him who does not work but believes on Him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is accounted for righteousness, just as David also describes the blessedness of the man to whom God imputes righteousness apart from works:
‘Blessed are those whose lawless deeds are forgiven,
And whose sins are covered;
Blessed is the man to whom the Lord shall not impute sin.’” Romans 4:5-8

Next Week: Song of Songs 4:12-16 There is no need for her to be shov-ed, he just asks… (Come My Beloved) (11th Song of Songs sermon)

The Lord has you exactly where He wants you. He has a good plan and purpose for you. He alone is the perfect example of love – untarnished, unblemished, and completely pure and holy. He offers this love to you. So, follow Him, live for Him, and trust Him, and He will do marvelous things for you and through you.

 

Song of Songs 4:7-11 (CG)

7 You all beautiful my querida,
And blemish not in you.
8 With me from Lebanon, completer,
With me from Lebanon – come!
Turn from top Amana,
From top Senir and Hermon,
From habitations lions,
From mountains leopards.

9 Unhearted me! My sister – completer,
Unhearted me!
In one from your eyes,
In one necklace from your napes.
10 How beautified your loves, my sister – completer,
How bettered your loves from wine,
And aroma your oils from all fragrances.
11 A dripping drops your lips, completer.
Honey and milk under your tongue.
And fragrance your garments,
According to fragrance Lebanon.

 

Song of Songs 4:7-11 (NKJV)

You are all fair, my love,
And there is no spot in you.
Come with me from Lebanon, my spouse,
With me from Lebanon.
Look from the top of Amana,
From the top of Senir and Hermon,
From the lions’ dens,
From the mountains of the leopards.

You have ravished my heart,
My sister, my spouse;
You have ravished my heart
With one look of your eyes,
With one link of your necklace.
10 How fair is your love,
My sister, my spouse!
How much better than wine is your love,
And the scent of your perfumes
Than all spices!
11 Your lips, O my spouse,
Drip as the honeycomb;
Honey and milk are under your tongue;
And the fragrance of your garments
Is like the fragrance of Lebanon.

 

Matthew 9:7

Sunday, 6 April 2025

And he arose and departed to his house. Matthew 9:7

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen)

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“And, having arisen, he departed to his house” (CG).

In the previous verse, Jesus instructed the paralytic to arise, take up his bed, and go to his house. In response to that, it now says, “And, having arisen, he departed to his house.”

With the healing accomplished, the man was fully compliant with the directive given. Matthew focuses on the healing and obedience to the exclusion of all else. Mark provides a note that the man did this immediately, something quite common in his epistle. Luke provides the most detail, saying, “Immediately he rose up before them, took up what he had been lying on, and departed to his own house, glorifying God.”

The three accounts complement each other, providing a sound witness that the event took place just as recorded. The man, returning to his house, would have completely surprised those who knew him. He left being carried on a bed, and he returned carrying that same bed.

The victory over his paralysis was immediate and it was complete. He needed no extended rehab in order to adjust back to normal life.

Life application: This physical healing mirrors the greater spiritual healing that Jesus provides. When a person whose life is marked with sin comes to Christ through faith in Him and His finished work, he is spiritually healed from that moment. Paul gives details of this process –

“In Him you also trusted, after you heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation; in whom also, having believed, you were sealed with the Holy Spirit of promise, 14 who is the guarantee of our inheritance until the redemption of the purchased possession, to the praise of His glory.” Ephesians 1:13, 14

The moment we believe, we are saved and sealed with a promise, and which is a guarantee. The guarantee belongs to the believer. Saying that it is until the redemption of the purchased possession signifies that the salvation is eternal. It will not be taken away from the one who believes. To say otherwise is to say that God’s word is untrue.

“For whom He foreknew, He also predestined to be conformed to the image of His Son, that He might be the firstborn among many brethren. 30 Moreover whom He predestined, these He also called; whom He called, these He also justified; and whom He justified, these He also glorified.” Romans 8:29, 30

In God’s view, the moment we respond to the calling, we are saved. Upon salvation we stand justified before God. And more, in God’s view, we are glorified at that moment. God’s decrees are eternal in scope. Therefore, in entering the New Covenant through faith in Christ’s work, the deal is done. This is possible because…

“Now all things are of God, who has reconciled us to Himself through Jesus Christ, and has given us the ministry of reconciliation, 19 that is, that God was in Christ reconciling the world to Himself, not imputing their trespasses to them, and has committed to us the word of reconciliation.” 2 Corinthians 5:18, 19

In coming to Christ, we are reconciled to God. The separation that existed since Adam fell is ended. But more, in this process of redemption through Christ, no law is given. It is a redemption of grace. Therefore, because the wages of sin is death (meaning spiritual death and separation from God that leads to physical death), and because it is by law that sin is imputed (Romans 5:13), then we can no longer lose our salvation. The salvation is eternal.

One plus one will always equal two in proper theology.

Let us thank God for the full, final, finished, and forever salvation that has been procured for us through the giving of His Son, our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.

Lord God, we thank You for what You have done for us in the giving of Jesus. May we never fail to praise You for Your wonderful kindness in the grace that has been bestowed. Thank You, O God. We praise You now and forever. Amen.

 

Matthew 9:6

Saturday, 5 April 2025

But that you may know that the Son of Man has power on earth to forgive sins”—then He said to the paralytic, “Arise, take up your bed, and go to your house.” Matthew 9:6

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen).

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“And so, you might have known that the Son of Man, He has authority upon the earth to forgive sins… Then He says to the paralytic, ‘Having arisen, you lift your mat, and you go to your house’” (CG).

In the previous verse, Jesus asked the scribes whether it was easier to say, “Your sins are forgiven,” or to say, “Arise and walk.” Without waiting for a reply, Jesus continues with, “And so, you might have known that the Son of Man.”

This is the second time the term Son of Man is used by Jesus in Matthew. Instead of saying “I have authority,” He highlights the title. This would then be a claim that He is the One referred to in Daniel 7:13, whether they made the connection at this time or not. As for His using this title, the first time was in Matthew 8, also when addressing a scribe –

“And when Jesus saw great multitudes about Him, He gave a command to depart to the other side. 19 Then a certain scribe came and said to Him, ‘Teacher, I will follow You wherever You go.’
20 And Jesus said to him, ‘Foxes have holes and birds of the air have nests, but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay His head.’” Matthew 8:18-20

The term is one that speaks of Jesus’ human nature. Thus, it is appropriate to use at this time because He is obviously a man of Israel, and yet He has stated that He can forgive sins, a prerogative that belongs to God alone. Instead of calling Himself the Son of God, He is leaving that to be understood from His actions. Understanding this, it next says, “He has authority upon the earth to forgive sins…”

In other words, He being a man is claiming that God has granted Him an authority no one else possesses. This is the most important authority that could be granted. The reason for this is because the entire sacrificial system that had been set up for the priests of Israel was to deal with sin. God had instituted the Levitical system, chosen priests from that tribe, and given minute instruction in what to do when the people sinned against Him.

The rights and responsibilities of this system fell to the Levitical priests alone, and yet, they did not possess the authority to forgive sin. Rather, they performed the rituals through which the Lord would then provide the forgiveness and restoration. The words “shall be forgiven” are repeated again and again in the book of Leviticus when detailing these rituals. For example –

“The priest shall make atonement for him with the ram of the trespass offering before the Lord for his sin which he has committed. And the sin which he has committed shall be forgiven him.” Leviticus 19:22

It is the Lord alone who can forgive sin, and this is provided only directly or through the mediatorial work of priests. For Jesus to claim this right means that the Levitical system must be lesser than the forgiveness He could offer because no sacrificial work by the priests was necessary. Thus, it would be comparable to the words of Nathan to David –

“So David said to Nathan, ‘I have sinned against the Lord.’
And Nathan said to David, ‘The Lord also has put away your sin; you shall not die. 14 However, because by this deed you have given great occasion to the enemies of the Lord to blaspheme, the child also who is born to you shall surely die.’” 2 Samuel 12:13, 14

After making His astonishing claim, He will now proceed with the more difficult of the two options presented to the scribes in the previous verse, as Matthew notes, “Then He says to the paralytic, ‘Having arisen, you lift your mat, and you go to your house.’”

The words are strikingly similar to the words Jesus spoke to the infirm man in Jerusalem in John 5:8. In fact, in the parallel account in Mark 2:11, they are word for word identical to John 5:8. Those words say, “Jesus said to him, ‘Rise, take up your bed and walk.’”

There, Jesus was accused of violating the Sabbath because He told the man to do this on a Sabbath. Jesus is revealing to these scribes that He not only has the power to heal and to forgive, but that His authority also transcends the Sabbath because He is, as He says elsewhere, the Lord of the Sabbath.

With the mere spoken word, the man here in Matthew is told that he will be able to arise. In so doing, he is to lift up his mat and return to his home. Not only does Jesus speak the words, but they are such simple words that it makes the authority in them all the more striking. He doesn’t appeal to the Lord (Yehovah) or to God in general. Rather, His words bear the authority because they are uttered by Him.

Life application: Everything about the encounter between this paralyzed man and Jesus has brought forth the understanding that Jesus is God who is also a Man. The Bible doesn’t give us any other option in what is being conveyed. And yet, Israel denied this. At the time of the Lord’s appearing, they rejected Him, crucified Him, and called for His blood to be upon them and their children.

They got what they asked for and have suffered two thousand years of punishment (so far) for their unbelief. Do you think God is going to treat anyone else any differently? The Jehovah’s witnesses deny Jesus’ deity. The Mormons have twisted the nature of Jesus to deny it as well while still claiming they believe it.

The other religions of the world reject Jesus as their Savior. Those who have no religion have rejected Jesus as well. When Jesus said that He is the one way to be saved, it means that anyone who has not come through Him is… well, he is not saved. God’s wrath has been upon Israel. God’s wrath will remain on all others who do not come to Him.

Be sure to accept the Bible as it is written, accept who Jesus is shown to be, and call on Him as Lord, to the glory of God the Father, and unto your salvation. Don’t put it off!

“He who believes in Him is not condemned; but he who does not believe is condemned already, because he has not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.” John 3:18

Lord God, there is a world full of people who need to hear about Jesus. Some will reject the message. Others will accept it, if they are given the opportunity to do so. Help us to have pity on the world without Jesus and to get the word out. May we be a part of the solution to the tragic situation in which they currently stand. To Your glory, we pray. Amen.

 

Matthew 9:5

Friday, 4 April 2025

For which is easier, to say, ‘Your sins are forgiven you,’ or to say, ‘Arise and walk’? Matthew 9:5

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen).

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“For which it is easier: To say, ‘Your sins, they are forgiven,’ or ‘You arise, and you walk?’” (CG).

In the previous verse, Jesus knew the thoughts of the scribes and asked them why they thought evil in their hearts. Next, to reveal the evil He is referring to, He begins with, “For which it is easier: To say.”

This is a new word, eukopóteros, translated as easier. It is an adjective which, in this instance, will be used to provide a comparison between two choices. It is derived from eu, good or well, and kopos, a noun signifying a cut, but by analogy it speaks of toil or, figuratively, pain or labor.

Together, they give the sense of “better for toil.” In other words, it speaks of that which is easier. As for what Jesus will ask is easier, He next questions them with the two choices, which are, “‘Your sins, they are forgiven,’ or ‘You arise, and you walk?’”

In His question, Jesus is not speaking of which is easier to utter. Both can be uttered without any difficulty. Rather, He is referring to the effect produced by what is said. In other words, the assumption is that His words will have the intended effect through what is uttered. He has set the two propositions before the scribes, asking them their thoughts.

They have the ability to forgive others who offend them. If one of them does something wrong towards the other, the offended one can easily forgive if harmony has been restored concerning the offense. However, if one of them was a paralytic, could the other say to his friend, “Get up and walk” while having the intended effect? The answer between the two is quite obvious.

Understanding this, Jesus is dealing with two separate but connected issues. The first issue is a spiritual healing, something that – in this case – is between God and man. The latter is physical healing. But physical problems are the result of a fallen world. They ultimately result from sin which has been inherited from our first father, Adam.

Therefore, if Jesus has the ability to heal the paralytic after proclaiming that his sins have been forgiven, then the physical healing would be proof of the spiritual forgiveness. This is not the same as going to a doctor to be cured of a disease or malady. The doctor only has the ability to heal the physical defect, not the spiritual.

As such, if Jesus has the ability to forgive sins, which are an offense against God, and if He confirms that healing through the man’s physical healing, then He validates that He has the authority to forgive the sins as He spoke. Therefore, He is exercising the authority of God. It is another implicit note that He is, in fact, God.

Life application: Understanding that only God has the authority to forgive sin that has been committed against Him, what does that tell us about the Roman Catholic practice of supposedly forgiving sins against God?

They believe that through their confessional, they have the authority as the church to 1) provide forgiveness of sin, 2) reconciliation with God, the church, and others, 3) spiritual healing, and 4) a clearing of the conscience.

The system that has been put in place supposedly allows for mediation between God and man. But the Bible explicitly says in 1 Timothy 2:5 that there is one Mediator between God and man, the Man Christ Jesus. Reconciliation, therefore, can only be found in the shed blood and mediation of Jesus Christ.

Realizing this, one should run, not walk, from the Roman Catholic Church. The pope is not God’s representative on the earth. The Roman Catholic Church is not the official body where reconciliation between God and man takes place. And more, the Roman Catholic confession cannot provide forgiveness, reconciliation, spiritual healing, or a clearing of the conscience. As for the latter, it can only provide a searing of the conscience.

This is why those in the mafia feel they can do anything they want, including murder, and still be exonerated for their conduct. The conscience becomes so seared through this unholy practice that people are lulled into complacency in their spiritual lives to the point where they feel they only need to worry about the things of this world. At the same time, they allow the church to supposedly take care of the things necessary for their next life.

It is a sad and tragic state to exist in, all because people have failed to check the manual, meaning the Bible.

Lord God, help us to never trust anyone concerning spiritual matters without first checking with Your word. If we hear something about our relationship with You, give us the wisdom to check it out, so that our lives in Your presence will be sound and based on the reality presented in the Bible. Yes, Lord God. Help us in this. Amen.

 

Matthew 9:4

Thursday, 3 April 2025

But Jesus, knowing their thoughts, said, “Why do you think evil in your hearts? Matthew 9:4

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen).

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“And Jesus, having seen their thoughts, He said, ‘So why do you think evil in your hearts?’” (CG).

In the previous verse, Jesus was accused of blaspheming because He told the paralytic his sins were forgiven. Matthew continues with, “And Jesus, having seen their thoughts.”

There is a slight difference in manuscripts in these words. Some say having known while others say having seen. Either way, the intent is the same, He is aware of their thoughts, either seeing them, which is then transferred to knowing, or He knows them, which equates to mental perception.

The greater question that could be asked would be, “Is this referring to each person’s stream of thoughts, or is it the single thought of all the people He is addressing?” The first option would be a clear indication of deity. In the second option, one could argue that He picked up on the one thought they all had, that of His supposed blasphemy.

Whichever way is intended, there is nothing in the conversation to indicate anyone said anything to Him, and yet He was able to see/know what they were thinking. As such, the writer of the narrative intends for us to see that Jesus is reading their thoughts, even if someone wanted to argue otherwise.

Of the three accounts of this event, Mark gives the clearest sense of Christ’s understanding by saying, “But immediately, when Jesus perceived in His spirit that they reasoned thus within themselves, He said to them, ‘Why do you reason about these things in your hearts?’” Mark 2:8.

As for the word that is used, which is translated as “thought,” it is the Greek word enthumésis, a thought, reflection, deliberation, etc. It is introduced here. It is derived from the verb enthumeomai, which is also used in the second clause of this verse.

Understanding that the gospel writers really intend for us to see Jesus’ ability to read the thoughts of others, even if some might argue against this, it next says, “He said, ‘So why do you think evil in your hearts?’”

Jesus’ response clearly asks us to see that He has read their hearts. Of course, one could argue that this is a result of a proclamation made out loud that is then transferred to the location where the proclamation originated from.

In other words, if John and Mark were to say in front of Tom, “Tom is only doing this to impress Janet,” Tom might respond by saying, “What kind of evil are you thinking?” That is a possible understanding of such a response by Jesus here.

However, taking all three gospels together, and especially considering Mark’s works, as noted above, concerning Jesus perceiving in His spirit what they reasoned within themselves, it is evident the writers intend for us to see them in the light of Jesus’ ability to read the hearts and minds.

Life application: There is, at times, set intent in the Bible that is revealed in various ways. However, there is always someone who will argue against what the Bible is actually revealing. A good example of this is about who the term “sons of God” is referring to in Genesis 6. The surrounding narrative, and the way Genesis is structured in presented ideas, clearly indicates that the term is referring to the godly line of Adam through Seth. They are set in contrast to the ungodly line of Cain.

This is the set intent that the Bible is conveying to the reader. However, it is an unpopular view because it seems to lack any sensational value. Sensation is… well, it is sensational. And people like that. It is a process we call ear-tickling. However, if thought through, the fact that God is leading us in His word to Jesus through the godly line makes the matter highly sensational if one is looking for Jesus.

The purpose of the Bible isn’t just to tell us about giants that stomped around on the earth before the flood. That would be a distraction to the narrative. And yet, people devote an inordinate amount of time to this one thought. If you don’t believe that, go to YouTube and type in a question about the Nephilim or the sons of God as detailed in Genesis 6.

The number of videos is incredible and it is being added to daily. What a distraction from God’s intent! The Bible, instead, is revealing the generations of those who lead to the coming Messiah. This is why there are generations of Ishmael that are later set in contrast to the line of Isaac, and there are the generations of Esau later set in contrast to the line of Jacob.

In the case of Matthew 9:4, the set intent is to reveal a trait about Jesus that transcends the ability of other people. This is true with His healing, both in the presence of others and when they are not around. It is true in His ability to calm the seas and raise the dead. Jesus is a Man, but He is also God.

The writers of the gospel are setting forth their intent. We are to look at that intent, process it, and see the marvel of God in Christ working out His plan of redemption in the Person of Jesus. Keep your eyes on Jesus as you read from Genesis to Revelation. If you do this, your ears will be tickled in the most perfect way, the way that God intends.

Lord God, how exciting it is to see Jesus on each page of Your word as we continue through it. Focusing on the devil, demons, Mary, the church apart from Christ, etc., are not healthy ways of evaluating Scripture. Jesus is the focus. Help us to follow the directive You have set forth – “Fixing our eyes on Jesus!” Yes, help us to keep this proper focus. Amen.