Matthew 12:17

Monday, 4 August 2025

that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by Isaiah the prophet, saying: Matthew 12:17

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at the “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen)

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“That it should be fulfilled, the ‘having been spoken’ through Isaiah the prophet, saying,” (CG).

In the previous verse, Jesus was noted as admonishing the crowds not to make Him apparent. Next, Mathew says, “That it should be fulfilled.”

As has been seen several times already, Jesus is the Subject of prophecy. Things were declared concerning Him, His coming, His work, and the effects of His work toward those He was sent to deliver.

Matthew returns to Scripture to provide more insights into the proclamation of the prophets, saying, “the ‘having been spoken’ through Isaiah the prophet, saying.”

As seen above, the last verse from Matthew noted Jesus not wanting to be made openly manifest at the time. Thus, we can conclude that something Matthew will draw from Isaiah will point to that.

Life application: Radio personality Joe Rogan made the news concerning his new idea concerning God. The article said, “he feared God ‘is actually created by human beings creating this infinitely intelligent thing that can essentially harness all of the available energy and power of the universe and create anything it wants.’”

The article also cited him, saying, “This whole idea of Jesus coming back, well maybe it’s real. Maybe we just completely misinterpreted these ancient scrolls and texts and what it really means is that we are going to give birth to this.”

Citing another author, the article said, “Yampolskiy, an author and researcher in AI safety, added to Rogan’s theory, suggesting that reality is just an ongoing cycle of Big Bangs – the explosion that kickstarted the universe – starting and restarting life over and over again.”

It’s a problem when people don’t take the time to think logically. These men are discussing infinites as being created by finites. Further, where is the Creator if something created does the creating? These are problems of logic that should be contemplated from time to time.

What is known as the First Principles will help a person to think logically about God. In understanding these First Principles, we can weed out errors in our thinking. In doing so, we can more fully appreciate the prophecies recorded in the Old Testament as they point to Jesus.

Was there a Creator? Could He tell the future? If so, what does this say about the coming of the Messiah and what He would do? Think about such questions as you study the word. As for the First Principles, a quick review of them is in order –

‎1. Being Is (B is) = The Principle of Existence
To say “There is no being” is self-refuting. One must exist in order to make the claim.

  1. Being Is Being (B is B) = The Principle of Identity
    To say “Being isn’t being” is self-refuting. One must be a being in order to make a claim about not being a being.
  2. Being Is Not Nonbeing (B is Not Non-B) = The Principle of Noncontradiction
    If being exists (see Principle #1), then it cannot be non-being. The principle is self-evident and undeniable.
  3. Either Being or Nonbeing (Either B or Non-B) = The Principle of the Excluded Middle
    If I exist (asking the question means I do), then I am being. If I am being, then I am not non-being. The principle is self-evident and undeniable; there is no wiggle room.
  4. Nonbeing Cannot Cause Being (Non-B>B) = The Principle of Causality
    Something cannot come from nothing (and we cannot have an infinite regress in matter (or being) – see Einstein and Relativity). The principle is undeniable.
  5. Contingent Being Cannot Cause Contingent Being (Bc>Bc) = The Principle of Contingency (or Dependency)
    This would lead to an infinite regress of causes, which is disproved by Relativity – Time, Space, and Matter came into existence simultaneously and are dependent upon each other. The principle is undeniable.
  6. Only Necessary Being Can Cause a Contingent Being (Bn —>Bc) = The Positive Principle of Modality
    A being that cannot Not exist must, therefore, exists if contingent beings exist. The principle is reducible to the undeniable.
  7. Necessary Being Cannot Cause A Necessary Being (Bn>Bn) = The Negative Principle of Modality
    The principle is undeniable. Only one Necessary Being can exist. Any being which exists apart from a Necessary Being is contingent and could Not exist. It is self-evident.
  8. Every Contingent Being Is Caused by a Necessary Being (Bn—>Bc) = The Principle of Existential Causality
    The fact that there are contingent beings (I think, therefore I am, but I am not necessary) necessitates a Necessary Being. We exist. Therefore, a Being that cannot Not exist must exist. The principle is undeniable in and of itself.
  9. Necessary Being Exists (Bn Exists) = Principle of Existential Necessity
    Contingent beings exist (see next principle); therefore, a Necessary Being must exist. The principle is reducible to the undeniable.
  10. Contingent Being Exists (Bc Exists) = Principle of Existential Contingency
    The principle is undeniable. To say “I (a contingent being) don’t exist” is self-refuting. I do exist (Principle 1), which is self-evident.
  11. Necessary Being Is Similar to Contingent Being(s) It Causes (Bn —similar —>Bc) = Principle of Analogy
    Nothing can exist that doesn’t reflect the nature of the Necessary Being. To state something doesn’t is self-refuting. The principle is undeniable.

Understanding the nature of God, reality, logic, etc., is indispensable in understanding why one religion is false and another may be true. Weeding out what is false through logic leaves us with one possibility concerning God. It is the God presented in Scripture who matches what is logically necessary.

It is our duty to read Scripture and see if what is presented there is an acceptable revelation of God. As fulfilled prophecy shows that the Bible is reliable, we can trust that the message of the Bible is from God, who knows the beginning from the end.

Lord God, help us to think clearly and logically as we approach theology. May our understanding of who You are and what You have done from the Bible give us reassurance for all of our days that what You have promised will, in fact, come to pass. Thank You for Your word, this wonderful word that reveals You. Amen.

 

1 Samuel 3:1-21 (Before It Was Denuded Unto Him)

Artwork by Douglas Kallerson

1 Samuel 3:1-21
Before It Was Denuded Unto Him

(Typed 12 May 2025) In the verses today, it said Samuel did not know the Lord because he was unaware of the word of the Lord. When the Lord called to him, he needed to have it explained that it was the Lord speaking to him. Then he was able to respond and receive the word intended for him to hear.

As we will see, this doesn’t mean he doesn’t know who the Lord is. Rather, he doesn’t have an intimate relationship with Him because His word was unknown.

If that concept doesn’t bring up memories of previous times I have spoken to you, it means that either you haven’t heard me speak before or you haven’t paid attention to what I have said to you.

If the former, welcome! I hope you will learn the lesson of the word of the Lord and apply it to yourself. If the latter, you must not pay attention while I’m speaking, because I repeat the same sentiment … a lot.

Pretty much everyone knows who the Lord is. But most of the world, including churches full of people, don’t know the Lord because they don’t know the word of the Lord.

Text Verse: “None of them shall teach his neighbor, and none his brother, saying, ‘Know the Lord,’ for all shall know Me, from the least of them to the greatest of them.” Hebrews 8:11

In this verse, the author of Hebrews was speaking of the people of Israel. They had been brought out of Egypt, and He had made a covenant with their fathers, but they didn’t continue in His covenant.

Samuel was at the place of the Lord, near the tabernacle in Shiloh, and yet he didn’t know the Lord until he knew the word of the Lord. The implication is that none of Israel knew the Lord because none of them knew the word of the Lord. It was lacking in Israel at the time.

My repeated statement to the people in this church is that you cannot know God unless you know Jesus, and you cannot know Jesus unless you know the word that tells of Jesus, meaning the Bible.

Jesus explicitly told Israel that in order to know the Father, they had to know Him. For us, the only source we have to know Jesus is the Bible. As such, if you do not know the Bible, you, like Samuel in this story, do not know the Lord.

Jesus is the Word of God, and therefore, despite “knowing God,” people do not “know God.” This is the sense of what is said about Samuel. This truth continues to this day. Only when the word of the Lord was revealed to him as such did he then come to know the Lord.

The word denude means to strip something of its covering. In verse 8, it says that the word of the Lord was not “revealed” to Samuel. The word is literally “denude.” The word of God is how the Lord strips Himself of what is unknown, making Himself known to us.

Without the Bible, the Lord and His word remain unknown to us. It cannot be stressed enough, and so I say it almost every time we are together. Please! Read your Bible. It is where the Lord is revealed to us. This is a great truth that is to be found in His superior word. And so, let us turn to that precious word once again, and… May God speak to us through His word today, and may His glorious name ever be praised.

I. For You Called to Me (verses 1-9)

Now the boy Samuel ministered to the Lord before Eli.

vehanaar shemuel meshareth eth Yehovah liphne eli – “And the lad, Samuel, attending Yehovah to faces Eli.” In Chapter 1, Samuel was born to Hannah. Once he was weaned, he was presented to Eli, having been “asked” to the Lord for all his days. After that, statements about Samuel were interspersed between other events in Chapter 2, leading to this –

“And Samuel, ministering faces Yehovah. Lad being girded ephod – linen.” 1 Samuel 2:18
“And he grew, the lad Samuel, with Yehovah.” 1 Samuel 2:21
“And the lad, Samuel, walking and growing, and good with Yehovah and also with men.” 1 Samuel 2:26
“And the lad, Samuel, attending Yehovah to faces Eli.” 1 Samuel 3:1

The meaning of this verse is that Samuel is ministering, not to Eli but to the Lord. He is doing it in the presence of Eli, as if Eli is superintending over his ministrations. Samuel means Asked from God. Eli means Foster Son.

1 (con’t) And the word of the Lord was rare in those days;

u-devar Yehovah hayah yaqar bayamim hahem – “And word Yehovah it is valuable in the days, the those.” The adjective, yaqar, valuable, is introduced here. It is derived from the verb yaqar, to be valuable or precious, which is derived from a root presumably meaning to be heavy.

Translating this as “rare” is probably a good paraphrase. When something is uncommon, it has more value. The more available something is, the less value is assigned to it. It’s why a handful of dirt is free. However, for a heavy load of dirt, there is added expense. This is next explained…

1 (con’t) there was no widespread revelation.

ein khazon niphrats – “Naught vision being breached.” Another new word, the noun khazon, vision, is introduced. It is derived from khazah, to gaze at or mentally perceive. This is the only time it is mentioned in 1 Samuel, and it only becomes common later in the Old Testament.

Of this type of visual or mental perception, the word parats is used. It signifies to break out. In Genesis 30:43, it says of Jacob –

“Thus the man became exceedingly prosperous [parats], and had large flocks, female and male servants, and camels and donkeys.”

The idea is that the wealth of Jacob broke out and spread before him. The direction of the Lord through vision was valuable because it was uncommon.

And it came to pass at that time, while Eli was lying down in his place,

vayhi bayom hahu veeli shokev bimeqomo – “And it was, in the day, the it, and Eli lying in his place.” As nothing has been said to define the day at this time, the words “the day, the it” are anticipatory of what lies ahead in verse 3:4. Eli is lying down…

2 (con’t) and when his eyes had begun to grow so dim that he could not see,

Though not a single translation is as mine, it reads: veeno hekhelu khehoth lo yukhal liroth – “And his eye – they caused to bore dim. Not he will be able to see.” The written Hebrew is not the same as the spoken –

veeno – And his eye (written)
veenav – And his eyes (spoken)

The change is probably deemed necessary because the verse goes from the singular, eye, to the plural, they. But there is no need to divert from the written word. In this case, the singular stands for the plural. This is seen elsewhere, such as –

“And thou sayest unto thy servants, Bring him down unto me, and I set mine eye upon him.” Genesis 44:21 (YLT)

The singular eye refers to the perception of both eyes. As such, this is probably referring not only to Eli’s failing eyesight in both eyes, but also his lack of receiving vision in his mental perception. It is an explanation for the coming account. There was no vision left to Eli…

and before the lamp of God went out

vener elohim terem yikhbeh – “And lamp God, before it will extinguish.” This is at the end of the night hours before the dawn comes, as can be deduced from Exodus 27:20, 21 –

“And you shall command the children of Israel that they bring you pure oil of pressed olives for the light, to cause the lamp to burn continually. 21 In the tabernacle of meeting, outside the veil which is before the Testimony, Aaron and his sons shall tend it from evening until morning before the Lord. It shall be a statute forever to their generations on behalf of the children of Israel.”

The wee hours of the morning would be the time of day when the lamp would be close to running out of oil.

3 (con’t) in the tabernacle of the Lord where the ark of God was, and while Samuel was lying down,

In the NKJV, the clauses are jumbled, and thus the sense is lost. Also, saying “tabernacle” is wrong: u-shemuel shokev beheikhal Yehovah asher sham aron elohim – “and Samuel lying in portico Yehovah, where there Ark God.” Samuel is not lying where the ark is. Rather, he is lying in the area where the ark is.

The ark was in the most holy place of the tabernacle. The lamp was in the holy place outside the veil of the most holy place. The words show the nearness of Samuel to the tabernacle. He is residing in the area where he can minister to the Lord before Eli. It is at this time…

that the Lord called Samuel.

vayiqra Yehovah el shemuel – “And He called, Yehovah, unto Samuel.” Yehovah calls with an audible voice to him. It is possible, but seemingly unlikely based on verse 10, that this was from the Most Holy Place where the ark was located. Rather, it seems more likely that His word is coming to Samuel’s ears directly in an audible form of revelation without regard to location.

4 (con’t) And he answered, “Here I am!”

vayomer hineni – “And he answered, ‘Behold me!’” Samuel hears a call. As a young man in the portico, placed there to tend to the needs of the tabernacle and those who ministered there, he naturally responds and gets up…

So he ran to Eli and said, “Here I am, for you called me.”

vayarats el eli vayomer hineni ki qaratha li – “And he ran unto Eli, and he said, ‘Behold me! For you called to me.’” Knowing that Eli’s eyes were bad, he would have assumed the old man needed help with something and rushed over to see how he could assist…

5 (con’t) And he said, “I did not call; lie down again.”

The verbs in Eli’s response are imperative: vayomer lo qarathi shuv shekhav – “And he said, ‘Not I called! You must return and you must lie down!’” The use of the imperative may indicate Eli was annoyed at the disturbance. Therefore, it says…

5 (con’t) And he went and lay down.

vayelekh vayishkav – “And he walked, and he laid down.” Samuel was probably thinking it had been a dream, but it had seemed real to him.

Then the Lord called yet again, “Samuel!”

vayoseph Yehovah qero od shemuel – “And He added, Yehovah – call again Samuel.” Although He probably called him by name, as in verse 10, that is probably not the intent. Rather, at this time, like before, it is a narrative explaining that the Lord called him.

6 (con’t) So Samuel arose and went to Eli, and said, “Here I am, for you called me.” He answered, “I did not call, my son; lie down again.”

vayaqam shemuel vayelekh el eli vayomer hineni ki qaratha li vayomer lo qarathi veni shuv shekhav – “And he arose, Samuel, and he walked unto Eli, and he said, ‘Behold me! For you called to me.’ And he said, ‘Not I called, my son! You must return and you must lie down!’” This time, it doesn’t say he ran to Eli. Rather, he got up and went to him, probably without feeling rushed like the first time. Maybe he thought Eli was calling out in a dream.

It could be that the sharp response of Eli last time has made Samuel leery about annoying him. And that seems to be what happened because Eli again uses the same imperative verbs, repeating himself. Both of them are probably confused at this point. Thus, the narrator provides an explanatory insert…

(Now Samuel did not yet know the Lord, nor was the word of the Lord yet revealed to him.)

u-shemuel terem yada eth Yehovah veterem yigaleh elav devar Yehovah – “And Samuel – before he knew Yehovah, and before it was denuded unto him word Yehovah.” The words introduce the subject, “And Samuel.” They next explain his state.

Not knowing Yehovah does not mean he didn’t know about Him. It means he didn’t have a personal connection to Him through divine revelation (word Yehovah). Having the word denuded indicates the intimate connection between the word and the Lord Himself. When the word is uncovered, the Lord is made known.

And the Lord called Samuel again the third time. So he arose and went to Eli, and said, “Here I am, for you did call me.”
Then Eli perceived that the Lord had called the boy.

vayoseph Yehovah qero shemuel bashelishith vayaqam vayelekh el eli vayomer hineni ki qaratha li vayaven eli ki Yehovah qore lanaar – “And He added, Yehovah – call Samuel in the third. And he arose, and he walked unto Eli, and he said, ‘Behold me! For you called to me!’ And he discerned, Eli, for Yehovah calling to the lad.” Being a bit slow on the uptake, Eli finally realizes what is going on. He probably didn’t expect the word to come to Samuel like this, but now he has to admit it has taken place.

Ellicott rightly says, “…this ignorance of Samuel served God’s design, as it gave Eli the fuller assurance of the truth of God’s call and message to Samuel.”

Therefore Eli said to Samuel, “Go, lie down; and it shall be, if He calls you, that you must say, ‘Speak, Lord, for Your servant hears.’” So Samuel went and lay down in his place.

vayomer eli lishemuel lekh shekhav vehayah im yiqra elekha veamarta daber Yehovah ki shomea avdekha vayelekh shemuel vayishkav bimeqomo – “And he said, Eli to Samuel, ‘You must walk! You must lie down! And it became if He will call unto you, and you said, “You must speak, Yehovah, for hearing – your servant.”’ And he walked, Samuel, and he laid down in his place.”

Again using imperatives, but this time understanding the situation, Eli urges him to go lie down again in anticipation of another calling. As for the words, “You must speak, Yehovah,” this is one of many verses that disproves the common Jewish teaching that people never spoke the divine name. The text would not say he was to do so if they never did. Despite Eli’s instructions, Samuel doesn’t address Him by name…

10 Now the Lord came and stood and called as at other times, “Samuel! Samuel!”
And Samuel answered, “Speak, for Your servant hears.”

vayavo Yehovah vayithyatsav vayiqra khepaam bepaam shemuel shemuel vayomer shemuel daber ki shomea avdekha – “And He came, Yehovah, and He will station Himself. And He called, according to beat in beat, ‘Samuel, Samuel.’ And he said, Samuel, ‘You must speak, for hearing, Your servant.’” The reflexive verb, translated as “He will station Himself,” does not have to mean that the Lord is physically present there, although that is also not out of the question.

It may mean that the Lord’s presence, regardless of any physical manifestation, has manifested Himself. The word coming in verse 15 describes a sort of manifestation, like looking in a mirror.

The words “according to beat, in beat” are a Hebraism meaning “done as it was done before.” The Lord called for Samuel, and he responded accordingly…

The word of God, holy and pure
Given to us from His wise and loving hand
Through it, our faith can be strong and sure
Through it, the Lord’s will we understand

What is right for salvation unto life?
How can we know when something is wrong?
Through the word, we can weed out theological strife
And have doctrine sure, sound, and strong

Praise be to God for this precious word
Praise to Him who has shown us what is true and right
The pages of the Bible are a precious cutting sword
Weeding out falsity and revealing His glorious light

II. Until Vanishment (verses 11-21)

11 Then the Lord said to Samuel: “Behold, I will do something in Israel at which both ears of everyone who hears it will tingle.

vayomer Yehovah el shemuel hineh anoki oseh davar beyisrael asher kal shomeo tetsilenah shete azenav – “And He said, Yehovah, unto Samuel, ‘Behold! I doing word in Israel which all hearing it, they will tinkle, two his ears.’” The Lord introduces a word, tsalal, signifying to tinkle as through vibration. It is used here to describe a coming disaster.

It will be used in a similar fashion concerning the destruction of Jerusalem in 2 Kings 21:2 and Jeremiah 19:3. The last use will be in Habakkuk 3:16 when referring to the quivering of lips while in distress. Thus, this is an expression of horrified shock, as if the ears are ringing from the vibration of bad news.

12 In that day I will perform against Eli all that I have spoken concerning his house, from beginning to end.

bayom ha’hu aqim el eli eth kal asher dibarti el beitho hakhel vekhaleh – “In the day, the it, I must cause to rise unto Eli all which I spoke unto his house, beginning and completing.” The words “all which I spoke” refer to the words of the Lord through the man of God in verses 2:27-36. Saying “beginning and completing” means that nothing that He spoke would be omitted.

The Lord is repeating this to Samuel so that he is aware of what will take place…

13 For I have told him that I will judge his house forever for the iniquity which he knows,

vehigadti lo ki shophet ani eth beitho ad olam ba’avon asher yada – “For I caused to disclose to him, for judging, I, his house – until vanishment – in perversity which he knew.” The meaning of “caused to disclose” is that God sent His messenger to Eli to tell him what was coming in the judgment He would mete out.

The “perversity which he knew” is…

13 (con’t) because his sons made themselves vile, and he did not restrain them.

ki meqalelim lahem banav velo khihah bam – “For trivializing to them, his sons, and not he rebuked in them.” The word qalal means to be or make light. Just as honoring someone gives the sense of heaviness, trivializing someone is to make them light.

One can get the sense from Genesis 12:3, “And let me bless ‘blessing you,’ and trivializing you – I will execrate.” The meaning is that the Lord promised to bless those blessing Abraham, but He would execrate those who trivialized (made light of) him.

The sons of Eli had trivialized themselves despite their office, which demanded that they honor the Lord through their actions. It was Eli’s responsibility to rebuke them, but he failed to do so. Therefore, judgment was coming upon Eli’s house.

14 And therefore I have sworn to the house of Eli that the iniquity of Eli’s house shall not be atoned for by sacrifice or offering forever.”

velakhen nishbati leveith eli im yithekaper avon beith eli bezevakh u-beminkhah ad olam – “And thus I was sevened to house Eli if it will atone itself, perversity house Eli, in sacrifice and in present until vanishment.” The word shava signifies to swear. However, it is derived from sheva, seven, the number of spiritual perfection.

The idea is that of completion, as if having repeated a declaration seven times. Saying “I was sevened” means that the Lord has determined and affirmed the matter. In this case, sacrifices and presents required by the law will never atone for their conduct again.

The repetition of ad olam, until vanishment, from the previous verse fully explains the matter. The judgment is determined, and it will be permanent. With that understood, it next says…

15 So Samuel lay down until morning, and opened the doors of the house of the Lord.

vayishkav shemuel ad ha’boqer vayiphtakh eth dalthoth beith Yehovah – “And he will lie, Samuel, until the morning. And he will open doors, house Yehovah.” This is the first reference to something other than the tabernacle that the Lord directed to be constructed while in the wilderness. That was a movable tent with a surrounding courtyard that was also movable.

However, now being at Shiloh, some sort of edifice was built around it, or instead of it, or part of it. Samuel’s duties apparently included the opening of these doors. The matter-of-fact nature of the words signifies that this was a regular occurrence.

15 (con’t) And Samuel was afraid to tell Eli the vision.

u-shemuel yare mehagid eth hamareah el eli – “And Samuel, he feared from causing to declare the manifestation unto Eli.” The word here, mareah signifies a type of vision. In Exodus 38:8, it is used of the bronze mirrors of the women who served at the tabernacle. Therefore, it is some type of manifestation, whether physical or merely visual. Despite his fear of speaking…

16 Then Eli called Samuel and said, “Samuel, my son!”
He answered, “Here I am.”

vayiqra eli eth shemuel vayomer shemuel beni vayomer hineni – “And he will call, Eli, Samuel. And he will say, ‘Samuel, my son.’ And he will say, ‘Behold me!’” A friendly relationship is noted in the words “my son.” But it is also a note of authority from a greater to a lesser. It is how Joshua addressed Achan after his sin was exposed through the casting of the lot.

Samuel acknowledges this state of authority in his response, awaiting Eli’s continued words…

17 And he said, “What is the word that the Lord spoke to you?

Rather, leaving the source somewhat indefinite: vayomer mah ha’davar asher diber elekha – “And he will say, ‘What the word which He spoke unto you?’” Eli doesn’t have to say, “the Lord.” It is understood who the word came from. He next intensifies his words…

17 (con’t) Please do not hide it from me.

al na tekhakhed mimeni – “Not, I pray, you will secrete from me.” He asked for the word of the Lord. Now he asks for the entire word without anything kept back. In other words, “Don’t paraphrase his words, don’t generalize them, and don’t attempt to withhold them either.” He is asking for an exacting account of what was said. He then intensifies his words further…

17 (con’t) God do so to you, and more also, if you hide anything from me of all the things that He said to you.”

koh yaaseh lekha elohim vekhoh yosiph im tekhakhed mimeni davar mikal ha’davar asher diber elekha – “Thus He will do to you, God, and thus He will cause to add, if you will secrete from me word from all the word which he spoke unto you.’” This is a particular adjuration that began in Ruth and continues until 2 Kings.

It is used to form an absolute assertion or a firm adjuration. Associated with it comes an implied threat upon the speaker or the one being spoken to, sometimes for noncompliance and sometimes as a matter of fact.

In this case, Eli is adjuring Samuel to speak as requested. If he fails to do so, he will ask God to take corrective action on Samuel even more severe than he knows is coming upon him, which he knows is coming because the Lord has circumvented him and gone to Samuel. Therefore…

18 Then Samuel told him everything, and hid nothing from him. And he said, “It is the Lord. Let Him do what seems good to Him.”

vayaged lo shemuel eth kal ha’devarim velo khikhed mimenu vayomer Yehovah hu ha’tov beenav yaaseh – “And he caused to declare to him, Samuel, all the words. And not he secreted from him. And he will say, ‘“Yehovah, He. The good in his eyes He will do.’” The NKJV gives the sense, even if a bit of a paraphrase.

Eli is resigned to the word, knowing it will come about. At the same time, he indicates his understanding that the Lord is just and fair. Despite his weakness and unprofitableness as a judge and priest, he was still faithful to accept the will of the Lord.

19 So Samuel grew, and the Lord was with him and let none of his words fall to the ground.

vayigdal shemuel veYehovah hayah imo velo hipil mikal devarav artsah – “And he will grow, Samuel. And Yehovah, He was with him. And not He caused to fall from all his words, ground-ward.” It seems unlikely that this refers to Samuel’s words, but the words of the Lord through Samuel. The verb is causative. As such, the Lord is upholding the prophecies Samuel spoke. This is similar to other instances –

“Blessed be the Lord, who has given rest to His people Israel, according to all that He promised. There has not failed one word of all His good promise, which He promised through His servant Moses.” 1 Kings 8:56

20 And all Israel from Dan to Beersheba knew that Samuel had been established as a prophet of the Lord.

vayeda kal Yisrael midan vead beer shava ki neeman shemuel lenavi laYehovah – “And it will know, all Israel, from Dan and until Beer-Sheba, for being faithful, Samuel, to prophet to Yehovah.” This is the second of seven times this phrase is used in the Old Testament. It will be used twice in reverse in the Chronicles, saying, “from Beersheba to Dan.” It signifies the entirety of the land and people of Israel within the borders of Canaan.

Dan is the northernmost point of reference, while Beersheba is the southernmost.

Dan means Judge. Beersheba means both Well of Seven and Well of Oath. As for the statement about Samuel, the same word was used when referring to Moses –

“Not so with My servant Moses;
He is faithful in all My house.” Numbers 12:7

Moses was faithful in the Lord’s house, and Samuel is a faithful prophet to the Lord.

21 Then the Lord appeared again in Shiloh.

vayoseph Yehovah leheraoh veshiloh – “And He will cause to add, Yehovah, to be seen in Shiloh.” The chapter began with no vision coming through. Now, at the end of the chapter, that is turned around. Because of Samuel, there is vision once again. Shiloh means Tranquility.

The appearing of the Lord is explained in the next words…

*21 (fin) For the Lord revealed Himself to Samuel in Shiloh by the word of the Lord.

ki niglah Y’hovah el shemuel beshilo bidvar Yehovah – “For He was denuded, Yehovah, unto Samuel in Shilo in word Yehovah.” Notice that the final h drops off Shiloh of the previous clause.  The appearance of the Lord is through the word of the Lord. It is how the Lord reveals Himself.

From this point, Samuel will be mentioned one more time in verse 4:1 and then not again until verse 7:2.

The Word of God – holy, pure, and perfect too
It is given to satisfy man’s weary soul
Let us take an eternal view
And come to know this precious scroll

In the Book of Life, our names will be
We pursued His word and found Jesus
The Lord’s redeemed by the glassy sea
Great things God has done for us

Open it! The precious Book of Life
Accept what it says, it is holy and true
Through the word comes ending of the strife
And the beginning of something new

III. Know the Lord

In the verses today, it noted Samuel ministering to the Lord before Eli. It is reflective of Christ’s work to the Lord being accomplished before the precepts of the law, represented by Eli, Foster Son, meaning the state of being under the law.

That the word of the Lord was valuable, meaning rare, in those days is an excellent representation of the state of Israel. There was no prophetic utterance during the intertestamental period from the time of Malachi until the coming of John the Baptist, a period of about 430 years.

Eli is described as lying down and not being able to see. It is an excellent description of the law at that time. It was old, ineffective, and unable to perceive its unprofitableness. The singular use of eye instead of eyes shows the myopic nature of the law. Thus, they, meaning vision and prophecy, were lost to it.

The note about the lamp of God going out is an indication that the light of the law, which only anticipated the coming of Christ, would go out at the dawning of the day. This is exactingly reflected in Jesus’ words about John –

“If I bear witness of Myself, My witness is not true. 32 There is another who bears witness of Me, and I know that the witness which He witnesses of Me is true. 33 You have sent to John, and he has borne witness to the truth. 34 Yet I do not receive testimony from man, but I say these things that you may be saved. 35 He was the burning and shining lamp, and you were willing for a time to rejoice in his light. 36 But I have a greater witness than John’s; for the works which the Father has given Me to finish—the very works that I do—bear witness of Me, that the Father has sent Me.” John 5:31-36

John was the last prophet before Jesus. He was the end of the burning, shining lamp of the law, which was given to anticipate the coming of Christ. With his arrival, the lamp was all but through.

The threefold calling by the Lord to Samuel, Asked from God, who represents the seed of the state of grace (Hannah), signifies the divine completeness of the time of the law. The seed of the state of grace is being called while under the law (Eli, Foster Son), alerting it that the time had come.

The back-and-forth between Samuel and Eli is given to reveal this. Finally, the Lord’s calling is responded to by Samuel, and the assurance was that the Lord’s prophecy against Eli, Foster Son, would be fulfilled in its entirety (begging and completing). It would be a judgment on his house until vanishment, meaning forever. Every word would be accomplished, without anything being left undone.

The deeds of Eli’s sons are particularly highlighted, along with his not restraining them. Though their names are not used in this passage, remembering them is appropriate: My Hollow and Mouth of Brass (meaning Mouth of Judgment).

Eli is the state of those under law. Hophni is not the law itself but the medium by which the Lord conducted his affairs. The law is the filling of that medium. It is that which fills the Hollow. Phinehas is the judgment of the law. Those who had administered the law had trivialized these things, and nothing was said about it in correction.

For this reason, the Lord told Samuel, adamantly affirming, that sacrifices and presents (the basis for atonement under the law) would never atone for such transgressions again, forever.

The meaning of these verses is clear: the state of the law (Eli) and its house (meaning the roles of Hophni and Phinehas) would be ended forever. The sacrifices and offerings of the law would no longer be effective.

The reason this was spoken by the Lord to Samuel, who had not yet known the word of the Lord, was rightly noted by Ellicott, “this ignorance of Samuel served God’s design, as it gave Eli the fuller assurance of the truth of God’s call and message to Samuel.”

Those under law would never imagine that the law would end were it not for the Lord’s word to be spoken through the seed of grace. This fact is proven true to this day as those under the law still disregard the premise entirely, and even those who were called by grace continually get seduced back into law observance.

The final three verses are not given as a chronological marker that necessarily occurs before the events of Chapters 4 to 6. They simply form points of fact –

1) Samuel grew and the Lord was with him, and He caused none of his words to fall groundward, 2) All Israel, from Dan to Beersheba, knew that Samuel had been established a prophet of the Lord, and 3) Yehovah appeared again in Shiloh and he was denuded (made fully known) unto Samuel “in Shilo in word Yehovah.”

Being points of fact, they are to be offset from the rest of the narrative. From there, the opening clause of Chapter 4 will then be followed by a long parenthetical thought that ends in Chapter 7. After the events of those chapters are explained, I will explain why this is so.

The explanation for the contents of the chapter is complete, except for those points. The time of the law had a promised end. It was to be replaced by the time of grace. Jesus is the Seed of grace that allows us to likewise become the seed of grace, represented by Samuel and the “seven” that Hannah’s song proclaimed were born to her.

Samuel has thus far dealt almost exclusively with the idea of law versus grace. God is telling the world, beginning with Israel, both in the word and in historical lessons, that the law is incapable of restoring us to Him. Only through Jesus’ fulfillment of it is that restoration possible.

But this brings us back to the main point of the opening comments today. How can you know if you are obligated to observe the law, some select parts of it, or if it is entirely set aside unless you know the Bible?

I can tell you until I am blue in the face, but if I die this afternoon (then I will really be blue in the face!), someone else will take my place in your life. That person may say just the opposite of what I tell you. “Charlie didn’t know what he was talking about! If you eat pork, you can’t be saved.”

And so, for the rest of your life, you give up on ham, pork, chitlins, bacon (oh, bacon!), and all of the other delicious byproducts that come from our porky friends. What a waste! And it is all because you failed to check the manual.

Your walk with the Lord is ultimately up to you. My advice is that you make it a good one by knowing what He has done for you. In doing so, you will know of the freedom that He offers to the people of the world. Be sure to know the Lord by knowing His word.

Closing Verse: “And Pharaoh said, ‘Who is the Lord, that I should obey His voice to let Israel go? I do not know the Lord, nor will I let Israel go.” Exodus 5:2

Next Week: 1 Samuel 4:1-11 To make a rhyme, I made up a word, envampment… (He Came, God, Unto the Encampment) (8th 1 Samuel Sermon)

The Lord has you exactly where He wants you. He has a good plan and purpose for you. He alone is the perfect example of love – untarnished, unblemished, and completely pure and holy. He offers this love to you. So, follow Him, live for Him, and trust Him, and He will do marvelous things for you and through you.

 

1 Samuel 3:1-21 (CG)

And the lad, Samuel, attending Yehovah to faces Eli. And word Yehovah it is valuable in the days, the those. Naught vision being breached. 2 And it was, in the day, the it, and Eli lying in his place. And his eye – they caused to bore dim. Not he will be able to see. 3 And lamp God, before it will extinguish, and Samuel lying in portico Yehovah, where there Ark God. 4 And He called, Yehovah, unto Samuel. And he answered, “Behold me!” 5 And he ran unto Eli, and he said, “Behold me! For you called to me.”

And he said, “Not I called! You must return and you must lie down!” And he walked, and he laid down.”

6 And He added, Yehovah – call again Samuel.

And he arose, Samuel, and he walked unto Eli, and he said, “Behold me! For you called to me.” And he said, “Not I called, my son! You must return and you must lie down!” 7 (And Samuel – before he knew Yehovah, and before it was denuded unto him word Yehovah.)

8 And He added, Yehovah – call Samuel in the third. And he arose, and he walked unto Eli, and he said, “Behold me! For you called to me!”

And he discerned, Eli, for Yehovah calling to the lad. 9 And he said, Eli to Samuel, “You must walk! You must lie down! And it will be if He will call unto you, and you will say, ‘You must speak, Yehovah, for hearing – your servant.” And he walked, Samuel, and he laid down in his place.

10 And He came, Yehovah, and He will station Himself. And He called, according to beat in beat, “Samuel, Samuel.”

And he said, Samuel, “You must speak, for hearing, Your servant.”

11 And He said, Yehovah, unto Samuel, “Behold! I doing word in Israel which all hearing it, they will tinkle, two his ears. 12 In the day, the it, I must cause to rise unto Eli all which I spoke unto his house, beginning and completing. 13 For I have caused to disclose to him, for judging, I, his house – until vanishment – in perversity which he knew. For trivializing to them, his sons, and not he rebuked in them. 14 And thus I was sevened to house Eli if it will atone itself, perversity house Eli, in sacrifice and in present until vanishment.”

15 And he will lie, Samuel, until the morning. And he will open doors, house Yehovah. And Samuel, he feared from causing to declare the manifestation unto Eli. 16 And he will call, Eli, Samuel. And he will say, “Samuel, my son.”

And he will say, “Behold me!”

17 And he will say, “What the word which He spoke unto you? Not, I pray, you will secrete from me. Thus He will do to you, God, and thus He will cause to add, if you will secrete from me word from all the word which he spoke unto you. 18 And he caused to declare to him, Samuel, all the words. And not he secreted from him. And he will say, “Yehovah, He. The good in his eyes He will do.”

19 And he will grow, Samuel. And Yehovah, He was with him. And not he caused to fall from all His words, ground-ward. 20 And it will know, all Israel, from Dan and until Beer-Sheba, for being faithful, Samuel, to prophet to Yehovah. 21 And He will cause to add, Yehovah, to be seen in Shiloh. For He was denuded, Yehovah, unto Samuel in Shilo in word Yehovah.

 

1 Samuel 3:1-21 (NKJV)

Now the boy Samuel ministered to the Lord before Eli. And the word of the Lord was rare in those days; there was no widespread revelation. And it came to pass at that time, while Eli was lying down in his place, and when his eyes had begun to grow so dim that he could not see, and before the lamp of God went out in the tabernacle of the Lord where the ark of God was, and while Samuel was lying down, that the Lord called Samuel. And he answered, “Here I am!” So he ran to Eli and said, “Here I am, for you called me.”

And he said, “I did not call; lie down again.” And he went and lay down.

Then the Lord called yet again, “Samuel!”

So Samuel arose and went to Eli, and said, “Here I am, for you called me.” He answered, “I did not call, my son; lie down again.” (Now Samuel did not yet know the Lord, nor was the word of the Lord yet revealed to him.)

And the Lord called Samuel again the third time. So he arose and went to Eli, and said, “Here I am, for you did call me.”

Then Eli perceived that the Lord had called the boy. Therefore Eli said to Samuel, “Go, lie down; and it shall be, if He calls you, that you must say, ‘Speak, Lord, for Your servant hears.’” So Samuel went and lay down in his place.

10 Now the Lord came and stood and called as at other times, “Samuel! Samuel!”

And Samuel answered, “Speak, for Your servant hears.”

11 Then the Lord said to Samuel: “Behold, I will do something in Israel at which both ears of everyone who hears it will tingle. 12 In that day I will perform against Eli all that I have spoken concerning his house, from beginning to end. 13 For I have told him that I will judge his house forever for the iniquity which he knows, because his sons made themselves vile, and he did not restrain them. 14 And therefore I have sworn to the house of Eli that the iniquity of Eli’s house shall not be atoned for by sacrifice or offering forever.”

15 So Samuel lay down until morning, and opened the doors of the house of the Lord. And Samuel was afraid to tell Eli the vision. 16 Then Eli called Samuel and said, “Samuel, my son!”

He answered, “Here I am.”

17 And he said, “What is the word that the Lord spoke to you? Please do not hide it from me. God do so to you, and more also, if you hide anything from me of all the things that He said to you.” 18 Then Samuel told him everything, and hid nothing from him. And he said, “It is the Lord. Let Him do what seems good to Him.”

19 So Samuel grew, and the Lord was with him and let none of his words fall to the ground. 20 And all Israel from Dan to Beersheba knew that Samuel had been established as a prophet of the Lord. 21 Then the Lord appeared again in Shiloh. For the Lord revealed Himself to Samuel in Shiloh by the word of the Lord.

 

 

Matthew 12:16

Sunday, 3 August 2025

Yet He warned them not to make Him known, Matthew 12:16

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at the “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen)

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“And He admonished them that not they should make Him apparent” (CG).

In the previous verse, Jesus was said to have withdrawn from the area where the Pharisees had plotted against Him. As He went, it was noted that multitudes followed Him and He healed them all. Matthew continues with, “And He admonished them that not they should make Him apparent.”

There is a new adjective, phaneros, apparent. It is derived from the verb phainó, to shine, which is normally translated as appeared. The meaning is that despite healing all the people, He would tell them not to disclose Him and His deeds openly.

There are probably several reasons for this. The first is based on the conduct just seen concerning the Pharisees. The time for the completion of His ministry had not yet arrived. Multitudes making Him and His works apparent would likely hasten things. Therefore, a balance was maintained as He tended to the people.

Also, being made apparent would hinder the ministry. Crowds would become so large that He would not be able to move freely.

A third closely associated reason is that, in being made apparent, a reaction from the people noted in John 6 was likely to occur anywhere and at any time –

“Therefore when Jesus perceived that they were about to come and take Him by force to make Him king, He departed again to the mountain by Himself alone.” John 6:15

As such, Jesus determined that those He tended to should not trumpet out His works. Instead, they were to accept His healing hand with quiet gratitude.

Life application: It is not easy to do good deeds without wanting some hint of recognition for having done them. It is human nature to want to be noticed for the things we do. When we are noticed, we can then feel that the people around us have a positive view of us.

Because this is so, we need to evaluate why we do the things we do. If it is to have others see us in a positive light, then was it about the good deed to begin with? The answer may be that it was, but it is nice to have added benefits attached to what we do.

Jesus’ words in Matthew 6 concerning deeds are good to remember at any time and in any situation –

“But when you do a charitable deed, do not let your left hand know what your right hand is doing, that your charitable deed may be in secret; and your Father who sees in secret will Himself reward you openly.” Matthew 6:3, 4

If we really want lasting added benefit to the good things we do, we just need to do them with a heart for the Lord and in the understanding that He is aware of what we do. He knows our weaknesses, He reads our hearts, He sees our good deeds, etc.

There is no need to try to hide our failings from Him, and there is nobody else whose praise we need when we do a good deed for another. Knowing that God is aware of everything about us, we can be thankful for His mercies and grateful for the rewards He is storing up for us.

Lord God, wherever we are and whatever we do, You are with us. May we remember this and live our lives accordingly. May we do our best to refrain from wrongdoing, press on in right living, and live in faith that You are tending to us as children because of Jesus our Lord. Thank You for the minute care You have for us. Amen.

 

Matthew 12:15

Saturday, 2 August 2025

But when Jesus knew it, He withdrew from there. And great multitudes followed Him, and He healed them all. Matthew 12:15

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at the “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen)

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“And Jesus, having known, He withdrew thence. And they followed Him, great crowds. And He cured them all” (CG).

In the previous verse, the Pharisees, not happy with Jesus having healed on the Sabbath, went out and plotted against Him, how they might destroy Him. Matthew next records, “And Jesus, having known, He withdrew thence.”

Of His withdrawal, Mark adds in the words –

“But Jesus withdrew with His disciples to the sea.” Mark 3:7

Staying where these Pharisees were would only be like rubbing salt on an open wound. There was no reason to stay and have them further challenge Him at this point. He knew His time had not yet arrived, and so He put distance between Himself and them, going to a location where He could still openly speak to the people.

This is perfectly in accord with His words to the disciples from Matthew 10:23, which say, “When they persecute you in this city, flee to another.” Understanding this, it next says, “And they followed Him, great crowds.”

Mark explains the crowds, saying, “And a great multitude from Galilee followed Him, and from Judea and Jerusalem and Idumea and beyond the Jordan; and those from Tyre and Sidon, a great multitude, when they heard how many things He was doing, came to Him.” Mark 3:7, 8

Therefore, His withdrawal was not in hiding. Rather, it was just to get away from the annoying Pharisees who plotted against Him. With crowds following Him, they would not dare do something to harm Him lest the crowds turn on them. Matthew’s next words say, “And He cured them all.”

Matthew returns immediately to the thought of Jesus’ healing of others. This is what got the Pharisees in a huff. Their analysis of the law did not allow them to see the logic of Jesus’ healing on the Sabbath.

Jesus, however, knew that the Sabbath was made for man and not man for the Sabbath. Therefore, His works were not opposed to Sabbath observance. Rather, they were in accord with it, just as when the priests profaned the Sabbath and yet were guiltless.

Life application: One of the beautiful aspects of being in Christ is what it says in Paul’s epistles. First, he writes –

“For sin shall not have dominion over you, for you are not under law but under grace.” Romans 6:14

Because of this state of grace, Paul further says –

“Now all things are of God, who has reconciled us to Himself through Jesus Christ, and has given us the ministry of reconciliation, 19 that is, that God was in Christ reconciling the world to Himself, not imputing their trespasses to them, and has committed to us the word of reconciliation.” 2 Corinthians 5:18, 19

When we, as saved believers, do wrong, God does not impute our sin to us. If He did, we would lose our salvation. As we all do wrong quite often in one way or another, no person would remain saved. But God has placed us under a state of grace where we are free from condemnation.

This is the doctrine of grace. When a person is saved, he is saved forever. His state will never revert to being unsaved. A vast swath of Christianity, however, cannot stomach this truth. They fail to understand what the word grace means. Therefore, they incorrectly teach that one can, in fact, lose his salvation.

That is not grace. That is a continuing state of works. However, these same people, not accepting that they are wrong in their theology, will then accuse those who rightly understand that salvation is eternal, of teaching that it is ok to sin. To them, this must be the case because anyone who would teach eternal salvation must, by default, think it is ok to sin.

This isn’t even close to reality. Paul, who teaches the doctrine of eternal salvation, continues in his very next words after Romans 6:14, saying –

“What then? Shall we sin because we are not under law but under grace? Certainly not!” Romans 6:15

No reasonable thinking Christian would ever assume that being saved means we can willingly sin. If he understands a thing about the judgment seat of Christ, he knows that his eternal rewards are based on NOT SINNING as well as living out lives of faith, because people of faith will do their best to not sin but instead be pleasing to God.

This in no way diminishes the doctrine of eternal salvation. Rather, it exalts God, whose word instructs this doctrine. He has done everything necessary for the believer to be saved and to remain saved forever, despite himself. Such people understand what grace means and are eternally grateful for it.

Lord God, Your grace is seen in how You have saved Your people and then how You have continued to save them, despite themselves. Each of us is living in a body of sin, knowing we were and remain unworthy before You, but You give more grace. Thank You for Your tender, loving care of Your people. Amen.

 

Matthew 12:14

Friday, 1 August 2025

Then the Pharisees went out and plotted against Him, how they might destroy Him. Matthew 12:14

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at the “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen)

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“And the Pharisees, they took counsel against Him, having gone out, how they might kill Him” (CG).

In the previous verse, Jesus instructed the man with the withered hand to stretch it out. When he did, it was completely restored. With that complete, it next says, “And the Pharisees, they took counsel against Him.”

There is a new word, sumboulion. It is derived from sumboulos, a counselor or advisor. Thus, it signifies advisement, especially that derived from a deliberative body. They were miffed at Jesus for having healed on the Sabbath, and they were certainly still stinging from not being able to accuse Him for the conduct of His disciples as they walked in the grainfields. They had no valid excuse to condemn Him.

His handling of the word was appropriate, and His logic concerning the circumstances in relation to it was impeccable. Despite this, they had presuppositions and biases running through their minds. They couldn’t let go of their thoughts about Jesus and His actions on the Sabbath. Therefore, they took counsel against Him, “having gone out, how they might kill Him.”

This cannot be based on a precept from the law. If it were, they would have presented charges against Him and let the determining counsel decide His fate. But it was apparent that His response to their accusations adequately defended Him. As such, and because they didn’t like how things were going, their counsel was more of a plot to kill than a legal means of pursuing execution.

If they can trap Him in His words or manipulate the circumstances to have Him done away with, this is what they will do.

Life application: The Pharisees were so blinded by their own presuppositions about things that they could not see logic or reason, and they could not accept a different interpretation of the word, even if it was in accord with God’s intent.

In a review of the New Testament epistles, it becomes perfectly apparent that Sabbath observance is no longer required for those in the church. It is stated directly in several ways, and it is implied in many more.

Despite this, when a clear presentation of what these epistles say is shown to a Sabbatarian, he may deny that the words say what they say. This condition, known as cognitive dissonance, can be almost impossible to overcome.

In fact, when a challenge is presented to someone’s beliefs about a matter, even when it is correct, a state of enmity arises in the mind of the person who is being challenged. He may stomp away in a huff, say vile things to the person who has challenged his belief system, or he may even become violent, even to the point of death, over the matter.

This is where the Pharisees mentioned in Matthew were in their minds. Jesus gave examples directly from Scripture concerning the matter in the grainfield. He gave impeccable logic to those in the synagogue concerning the healing of the man’s withered hand.

But more, Jesus simply spoke the words, “Stretch out your hand,” and the hand was healed. There is nothing to be found in Scripture about speaking on the Sabbath Day. The Pharisees could not bring accusations against Him for that! Because of this, they determined that having Jesus killed was preferable to a proper interpretation of Scripture.

When we think we know it all, we will normally find out that we are wrong. This is especially true with proper biblical interpretation. No matter how well we know a particular doctrine, there are almost always things we have not considered in relation to it.

It is always good to put aside presuppositions and acknowledge that our understanding of a matter is probably imperfect. Having humility in our exchanges with others is, therefore, something we should display. Let us be reasonable as we discuss theology with others. Even if we are correct in our interpretation, we can present our side with respect and courtesy.

Lord God, give us patience with others as we consider Your word and debate what the intent in it is concerning its various doctrines. Help us to be open to understanding why others believe as they do. Even if we are right in our thoughts, may we be willing to patiently and kindly instruct others. Help us in this, O God. Amen.