Judges 16:10-22 (Samson, Judge of Israel, Part VIII)

Artwork by Douglas Kallerson.

Judges 16:10-22
Samson, Judge of Israel, Part VIII

(Typed 13 May 2024) The Hebrew in the passage that we will look at today has some interesting nuances. In one verse, it will take more time to explain what is being said in just a few words of the text than might seem necessary, but little variations in how something is considered or concerning its translation can make a world of difference in what is ultimately being pictured.

Because of that, care towards the intent of what is being presented needs to be given. Despite this, however, there are some great life lessons that can be drawn out from a casual reading. For example, Matthew Henry says –

“Samson had been more than once brought into mischief and danger by the love of women, yet he would not take warning, but is again taken in the same snare, and this third time is fatal. Licentiousness is one of the things that take away the heart. This is a deep pit into which many have fallen; but from which few have escaped, and those by a miracle of mercy, with the loss of reputation and usefulness, of almost all, except their souls. The anguish of the suffering is ten thousand times greater than all the pleasures of the sin.” Matthew Henry

As I read his thoughts, Donald Trump and Stormy Daniels immediately came to mind. Regardless of what actually happened between the two, they have both spent an inordinate amount of time and money trying to get past it.

In fact, they are still trying to put it behind them, and it will probably hound one or both of them for years to come. The same is true with innumerable politicians, pastors, and plumbers throughout the years. They are in jobs intended to help others with their problems, and yet many end up flushing their families, finances, and careers right down the drain.

Text Verse: “And it shall be that the elders of the city nearest to the slain man will take a heifer which has not been worked and which has not pulled with a yoke.” Deuteronomy 21:3

It may seem like an odd text verse for evaluating the life of Samson, or for a moral lesson about making bad choices, but it’s not really. Someone had to kill the person who lay slain in the field. And the person in the field may have done something to deserve getting whacked.

Consequences will arise from such things. At the same time, a heifer that has never been worked is specified for the atonement process being explained in Deuteronomy 21.

Likewise, Samson said that if he is bound in ropes that were never used for work, he would be like any other man. Even though he wasn’t telling the truth, there is a reason he said this. In Scripture, concepts build upon other concepts. Similarly, one story will, at times, be used to explain things going on in other stories.

We should pay heed to the subtleties. They can give us marvelous insights into what is going on in any given passage. For now, let us get into evaluating the verses. Great things are to be found in His superior word. And so, let us turn to that precious word once again, and… May God speak to us through His word today, and may His glorious name ever be praised.

I. How Can You Say, ‘I Love You?’ (verses 10-14)

In the previous sermon, the Philistines came to Delilah and asked her to allure Samson in an attempt to find out where his great strength lies. He gave her a false answer. When she tried it, her attempt failed. With that remembered, the account now provides her response to his deception…

10 Then Delilah said to Samson, “Look, you have mocked me and told me lies.

vatomer d’lilah el Shimshon hineh hethalta bi vatdaber elay k’zavim – “And says, Delilah, unto Samson, ‘Behold, deceived in me and speaking unto me lies.’” It is apparent that the Philistines lords’ presence was not made known to him.

Rather, Delilah bound him and made it look like she was pretending. When he broke the cords, she playfully came back with her pitiful response. “Oh poor me. You’re just making fun of me with your lies.” He would have thought playing a trick on the object of his affection was a fun thing to do.

Despite this, she tries again…

10 (con’t) Now, please tell me what you may be bound with.”

atah hagidah na li bameh teaser – “Now declaring, I pray, to me, in what binding?” This is probably after a period of time, be it the next day or a few days later. He broke the bonds, and she probably said something like, “Oh, you… such a bad boy.”

Later, she acted offended. Then after revealing how her poor heart was broken over the deception, she asked again what made him so strong. And so, once again, he has a bit of fun with her…

11 So he said to her, “If they bind me securely with new ropes that have never been used, then I shall become weak, and be like any other man.”

vayomer eleha im asor yaasruni baavothim khadashim asher lo naasah bahem m’lakha v’khalithi v’haythi k’akhad ha’adam – “And says, unto her, ‘If binding they bind me in ropes new, which not worked in them, and weakened, and became according to one the man.’” Samson responds with an obvious lie because in Judges 15, we read this, using the same word for rope, avoth, as here –

“So they spoke to him, saying, ‘No, but we will tie you securely and deliver you into their hand; but we will surely not kill you.’ And they bound him with two new ropes [avoth] and brought him up from the rock.
14 When he came to Lehi, the Philistines came shouting against him. Then the Spirit of the Lord came mightily upon him; and the ropes [avoth] that were on his arms became like flax that is burned with fire, and his bonds broke loose from his hands.” Judges 15:13, 14

It didn’t work with the men of Judah. Thus, we can be confident of the outcome here as well…

12 Therefore Delilah took new ropes and bound him with them, and said to him, “The Philistines are upon you, Samson!”

vatiqah d’lilah avotim khadashim vataasrehu bahem vatomer elav plishtim alekha Shimshon – “And takes, Delilah, ropes new, and binds him in them. And says unto him, ‘Philistines upon you, Samson.’” Following his instructions exactingly, she binds him with the new ropes, hoping she will chance to cash in on the big money. With him securely bound, she lets out her cry of hoped-for riches…

12 (con’t) And men were lying in wait, staying in the room.

v’ha’orev yoshev bekhader – “And the lying-in-wait sitting in the chamber.” The same word, the verb arav, that was used in verse 9, is used again. It comes from a primitive root signifying to lurk. The Philistines were lurking, waiting for a chance to overcome Samson…

12 (con’t) But he broke them off his arms like a thread.

vaynatqem meal zerootav kakhut – “And tears them from upon his arms according to the thread.” The unworked cords became like mere thread. The word is khut, the same word used when Rahab was told to tie a scarlet thread in her window. It is a thread also used to indicate a measuring line, such as in 1 Kings 7:5.

Samson once again kept Delilah from knowing the source of his strength, but the account has been giving us clues concerning it in the process. As for the viperous vixen…

13 Delilah said to Samson, “Until now you have mocked me and told me lies. Tell me what you may be bound with.”

vatomer d’lilah el Shimshon ad henah hethalta bi vatdaber elay k’zavim hagidah li bameh teaser – “And says, Delilah, unto Samson, ‘Until here deceived in me and speaks unto me lies. Declaring, her, to me in what binding.’” The deceitful dragon again plays the offended party.

This is probably on a later date. At the time he broke the bonds, she may have laughed or snorted at him as if it was a joke. But later she pretends like she has thought about it and is offended that he wouldn’t trust her with his secret. And again, Samson sees it as funny enough to spin another yarn…

13 (con’t) And he said to her, “If you weave the seven locks of my head into the web of the loom”—

His words form an ellipsis: vayomer eleha im taargi eth sheva makhl’photh roshi im ha’masakheth – “And says unto her, ‘If weaves seven locks my head with the warp.’” Samson’s words get closer to the source of his strength but still without revealing it.

The word arag signifies to weave. It can be literal but still used in a metaphorical way, such as in Isaiah 59 –

“No one calls for justice,
Nor does any plead for truth.
They trust in empty words and speak lies;
They conceive evil and bring forth iniquity.
They hatch vipers’ eggs and weave [arag] the spider’s web;
He who eats of their eggs dies,
And from that which is crushed a viper breaks out.” Isaiah 59:4, 5

Also, there are two new words used here. The first is makhalaphah, a ringlet of hair and thus a lock. It is derived from khalaph, to pass away or pass through. The idea is that locks glide over one another, forming a full head of hair.

The next new word is masseketh, the warp of a loom. It is derived from nasak, to weave. This root is found only in Isaiah 25 –

“And He will destroy on this mountain
The surface of the covering cast over all people,
And the veil that is spread [nasak] over all nations.
He will swallow up death forever,
And the Lord God will wipe away tears from all faces;
The rebuke of His people
He will take away from all the earth;
For the Lord has spoken.” Isaiah 25:7, 8

Leaving the sentence elliptical, Samson tells her that if she weaves his hair in the loom, she will receive the desired result. The reason for the ellipsis is simple enough. He is in her home and she obviously had a loom. He would have simply nodded in the direction of it as he spoke. The rest would be perfectly understood by her.

As for the number, seven is the number of spiritual perfection. What seems likely is that Samson had purposefully plaited his hair into seven locks, somewhat like Viking braids. It is these seven locks that he is referring to.

Also, as a side note, the Greek translation completes the thought, thus removing the ellipsis. Hence, some translations include the words of that text – “If thou shouldest weave the seven locks of my head with the web, and shouldest fasten them with the pin into the wall, then shall I be weak as another man.”

This is unnecessary, but the Greek adds it because of what is in the next verse…

14 So she wove it tightly with the batten of the loom,

The Hebrew is way less descriptive: vatitqa bayated – “And blasts in the peg.” The words essentially say the same thing as when Jael killed Sisera. There, it said vatitqa eth ha’yathed, “and blasts the peg.” There, Jael took a tent peg and blasted through the temple of Sisera, pinning his head to the ground.

Here, however, Delilah, the traitorous temptress, blasted the peg while weaving. The debate on what this means is long, and there is no firm resolution. I lean towards the words of the Pulpit Commentary that this refers to the weaver’s shuttle. Others completely disagree.

But this is what Delilah was told to do, which is to use his hair as the woof and weave it into the warp that was preset in her loom. Thus, she affixes his locks to the shuttle, here called a peg, and blasts it through the warp to form a mesh. Once her task was complete…

14 (con’t)  and said to him, “The Philistines are upon you, Samson!” But he awoke from his sleep, and pulled out the batten and the web from the loom.

vatomer elav p’listim alekha Shimshon vayiqats mishnatho vayisa eth haythad ha’ereg v’eth hamasakhet – “And says unto him, ‘Philistines upon you, Samson.’ And awakens from his sleep, and pulls up the peg, the loom, and the warp.”

Here is another rare word, ereg. It comes from arag, the word used which indicates to weave. It is used only one more time, in Job 7:6. Most translations say, “weaver’s shuttle,” implying the speed of the shuttle in a loom. That may or may not be correct. It may simply refer to the loom itself. If so, then the verse would read –

“My days receded from a loom.” The meaning would then be “My days receded faster than the speed of a loom.” Therefore, the words are describing what happened when Samson arose from his sleep. The loom was sitting on the ground, his hair was woven into the warp, and the peg was still in the loom. In rising, he pulled all of this up and out. The whole shebang fell apart from the force of his rising.

What is it that will bind you?
And where is it that the source of your strength lies?
How are you able such great things to do?
Won’t you tell me? Please apprise!

There must be something behind your great power
I would like to know what keeps you so strong
A person could get tired just observing you, hour by hour
And who could keep it up all day long?

I long for the strength you possess
Tell me your secret so I know it too
How I wish you’d confide, this I confess
Is this strength that the Lord has given to you?

II. He Has Told Me All His Heart (verses 15-22)

15 Then she said to him, “How can you say, ‘I love you,’ when your heart is not with me?

vatomer elav ekh tomar ahavtikh v’libkha ein iti – “And says, unto him, ‘How saying, “I love you,” and your heart not with me?’” This is not unlike what he has already faced. In Chapter 14, his Philistine wife accused him of hating, not loving, her. Delilah questions his love and notes that his heart isn’t geared toward her. How can he love her if he keeps telling her untruths…

15 (con’t) You have mocked me these three times, and have not told me where your great strength lies.

zeh shalosh p’amim hethalta bi v’lo higadta li bameh kokhakha gadol – “This three beats deceived in me, and not declared to me in what your strength, great.’” Like three beats on an anvil as it is being used to pound out metal, Samson has steadily refused to allow Delilah to be united to him. Instead, he has deceived her each time.

Three signifies Divine Perfection. Expanding on that, Bullinger says –

“The number three, therefore, must be taken as the number of Divine fulness. It signifies and represents the Holy Spirit as taking of the things of Christ and making them real and solid in our experience. It is only by the Spirit that we realise spiritual things. Without Him and His gracious operation, all is surface work: all is what a plane figure is to a solid.”

16 And it came to pass, when she pestered him daily with her words and pressed him, so that his soul was vexed to death, 

v’hi ki hetsiqah lo bidvarekha kal hayamim vatalatsehu vatiqtsar naphsho lamuth – “And is when compressed to him in her words all the days, and presses, and reaps his soul to death.” The words here confirm that the three instances so far were spread over a period of time. She continues with her incessant moaning about not being privileged enough to know his secret.

There is a word found only here in Scripture as well, alats. It signifies to urge or press, coming from a primitive root meaning to press. She compressed him with her words and she pressed him with her insinuations.

She kept nagging him while probably cooking him some pretty swell meals and telling him all the stories of her life. Each time she did something nice for him, she would remind him that he was not reciprocating. Also, the word qatsar is used. It signifies to curtail or shorten and is often used to indicate reaping.

It is the same word used to describe the Lord’s attitude towards Israel as they worked to be harmoniously in line with Him in Judges 10 –

“So they put away the foreign gods from among them and served the Lord. And His soul could no longer endure the misery of Israel.” Judges 10:16

There, it literally says, “And reaped His soul in toil Israel.” They ingratiated themselves to Him by repenting of their ways and serving Him. Eventually, His soul was reaped through their pleas.

The same tactic is used here by Delilah, finally bringing Samson to the point where he can’t stand it any longer, and a state of uxoriousness takes over. He was finally overcome so…

17 that he told her all his heart,

vayaged lah eth kal libo – “And declares to her all his heart.” In the Bible, the heart is not the seat of emotion. Rather, it is the seat of reasoning and understanding. He was so drained from her tactics that he reasoned she could be no threat at all to him.

Unlike the previous times when she had attempted to remove his source of strength, he must have thought, “This is a permanent change. I’ve opened my heart to her because she is so desirous to know, so she would never even contemplate really cutting my hair.”

Such a notion is unthinkable to him. But Calmet rightly states, “The weakness of Samson’s heart in the whole of this history, is yet more astonishing than the strength of his body.” And so, letting his seat of reasoning slip, he told her all he knew…

17 (con’t) and said to her, “No razor has ever come upon my head, for I have been a Nazirite to God from my mother’s womb.

vayomer lah morah lo alah al roshi ki n’zir elohim ani mibeten imi – “And says to her, ‘Razor not ascended upon my head, for Nazirite God, I, from womb my mother.’” Here is the second of three uses of morah, razor, in the Bible.

Two uses are in relation to Samson and one is at the announcement of the coming birth of Samuel. It is derived from mur, to change or exchange. The connection is that when one uses a razor, there is a change in appearance.

As for what changes in the use of a razor, it is the removal of hair. Hair in the Bible signifies awareness, but in particular it speaks of the awareness of sin. As sin comes through a violation of the law, it is the law itself that introduces and brings about the imputation of sin. Samson is about to give away this important information…

17 (con’t) If I am shaven, then my strength will leave me, and I shall become weak, and be like any other man.”

im gulakhti v’sar mimeni khokhi v’khalithi v’khayithi k’kal ha’adam – “If shaved, and departs from me my strength. And weakened, and became according to all the man.” His power is not in his hair. It is in the connection to God that is upon him. The hair is the sign of this covenant between the two. In cutting his hair, he will bear the appearance of all men, stained with sin. Thus, he will be “according to all the man [ha’adam].”

18 When Delilah saw that he had told her all his heart, she sent and called for the lords of the Philistines, saying, “Come up once more, for he has told me all his heart.”

vatere d’lilah ki higid lah eth kal libo vatishlakh vatiqra l’sarne p’lishtim l’mor alu ha’paam ki higid lah eth qal libo – “And sees, Delilah, that declared to her all his heart. And sends, and calls to lords Philistines to say, ‘Ascending the beat,’ (for declared to her all his heart).” It is apparent that she is absolutely certain he is telling the truth.

The third time he fooled her, it never mentioned those Philistine lords lying in wait. They may have been there, but the account doesn’t mention them, implying that she didn’t call them. However, Samson has brought God into his words, and his sincerity is otherwise evident.

Before she takes any action, however, she wants to be sure the money is there when Samson is subdued.

18 (con’t) So the lords of the Philistines came up to her and brought the money in their hand.

v’alu eleha sarne p’lishtim vayaalu ha’keseph b’yadam – “And ascend unto her, lords Philistines, and ascend the silver in their hand.” This is the eleven hundred per man of silver promised in verse 5. She waited for them to bring the money up first. With them at hand, along with the promised silver…

19 Then she lulled him to sleep on her knees,

It is an unnecessary paraphrase. The words are much simpler: vatyashnehu al birkeha – “And sleeps him upon her knees.” Using her as his personal pillow, Samson goes off to la la land. Once he was out, it then says…

19 (con’t) and called for a man and had him shave off the seven locks of his head.

Though this is possible, I think it is an unlikely translation: vatiqra laish vatgalakh eth sheva makhl’photh rosho – “And calls to the man, and shaves (fem. sing.) seven locks his head.” The question is, “Who is the man?” No additional person has been identified and yet it uses the definite article. It isn’t “a man,” but “the man.”

The meaning is one of three things. The first option, which I affirm but no translation or scholar agrees with, is that she called to Samson. He is both the nearest antecedent and subsequent in the account. Thus, she is determining if he is still awake, “Samson, oooh deary Samson, are you up?”

The text, not Delilah, calls him “the man.” Thus, it cannot be said that she has changed wording. Rather, it is how the narrative is preparing for a change in circumstances. He has repeatedly said that if his power was taken from him, he would be like any other man (ha’adam).

The text appears to be showing that he is a man, even if not like every other man, but that is about to change. Grasping the overall context makes the odd verbiage of this verse understandable. Therefore, after calling to him and getting no response, she shaves his head.

The same form of verb is used in the first clause, “And sleeps him” as is used here “and shaves him.” It is indisputable that she is the one who put him to sleep on her knees. It is she who calls to the man. It is she who will afflict him in the coming clause as well. It makes no sense to say that someone else shaves him.

For example, Lange agrees with the verb of her shaving. But he then has to wonder why a man is called. And so, he gives an excuse as to why he would be there –

“… ‘and she shaved.’ The piel [verb form] is not causative here; … Delilah calls on him, in order to have somebody near to defend her should Samson wake during the shearing process.” John Lange

In this, he has to insert something that is not in the text to make the wording make sense. To me, it only makes the narrative more complicated.

A second option, however, is that she may have called to a Philistine and made the scissor sign with her fingers, indicating the thought, “Bring me a pair of scissors.” From there, she shaved him. Seeing as she had a loom, why she wouldn’t have them there with her kind of kills that thought though.

Or she may have called to a Philistine, had him come, and she then caused him to shave Samson, even though Lange says the verb is not causative. This is, however, the prevalent view, and the Hebrew allows it, but it is not indisputable. It also requires scholars to conclude things that are not explicit.

In each previous instance, she did all of the work, and only then did the Philistines get called. Why she would leave this simpler task to one of them is hard to figure. It would also put their lives in jeopardy without knowing if it worked. And more, the next clause is clearly her, not another person, doing the action…

19 (con’t) Then she began to torment him, and his strength left him.

vatakhel l’anotho vayasar kokho mealav – “And begins (fem. sing.) to afflict him. And departs his strength from upon him.” It is referring to Delilah. She is the one to afflict him. Despite this, it is debated what “afflict him” means.

If it means that in each cut of his locks he was afflicted, then it is certainly she who is also the one to cut his locks. If it was after he was shaved, it could be that she started pinching him or slapping his face, egging him on.

I would go with the former. It is his hair by which the Spirit rested upon him. If his hair was cut, and then she afflicted him, and then the Lord departed from upon him, it means that there is a step in the process which is superfluous. However, if afflicting him is an explanation of her cutting his locks, then there is nothing superfluous. One thing is the consequence of the other.

20 And she said, “The Philistines are upon you, Samson!” So he awoke from his sleep, and said, “I will go out as before, at other times, and shake myself free!”

The NKJV is more of a paraphrase, but it gets the sense: vatomer p’lishtim alekha Shimshon vayiqats mishnato vayomer etse k’paam b’paam v’inaer – “And says, ‘Philistines upon you, Samson.’ And awakens from his sleep, and says, ‘Going out according to beat, in beat, and shake.’”

The words here tend to indicate that the afflicting mentioned in the previous verse was, in fact, the shaving. Otherwise, he would be awake from her afflictions and would not need to be called. But he was still deeply asleep. Only in calling him was he then roused. Then he proclaimed to himself that he would go out in the same manner as previously. Tragically, however…

20 (con’t) But he did not know that the Lord had departed from him.

v’hu lo yada ki Yehovah sar mealav – “And he not known that Yehovah departed from upon him.” In verse 17, he said, “If shaved, and departs from me my strength. And weakened, and became according to all the man.”

He has equated his hair to his strength. He noted that he was a Nazirite to God in that verse, but it is the presence of the Lord from which his strength was derived. In cutting his hair, the symbol of his consecration, he was no longer a Nazirite to God.

His strength had departed from him because the Lord had departed from upon him. Keil’s commentary includes this quote –

“The whole of Samson’s misfortune came upon him, therefore, because he attributed to himself some portion of what God did through him. God permitted him to lose his strength, that he might learn by experience how utterly powerless he was without the help of God. We have no better teachers than our own infirmities.” Berleb Bible

21 Then the Philistines took him and put out his eyes, and brought him down to Gaza. They bound him with bronze fetters, and he became a grinder in the prison.

vayokhazuhu p’lishtim vaynaqru eth enav vayoridu otho azzatah vayaasruhu bankhushtayim vayhi tokhen b’beith haasirim – “And grasp him, Philistines, and bore his eyes, and descend him Gaza-ward, and bind him in the bronzes, and is grinding in house the bonds.”

Each clause is an added embarrassment laid upon Samson. Before, the Philistines couldn’t touch him without harm. Now they grasp him without effort. Next, they bored out his eyes, taking away his ability to effectively fight against them ever again and also taking away the delights of his eyes, as he had customarily looked upon the form of women.

They took him toward Gaza, the very place he had symbolically defeated when he pulled up the doors of the gate of the city along with its gateposts, bar, and all. As we saw, he had proclaimed boldly and openly that he had arrived in Gaza. Now, he would be taken there as a captive.

Next, it says he was bound in the bronzes. The dual nature of the noun means that they were fetters made of two parts that joined together, or that he was bound in both legs, or both his hands and his feet were bound. Whichever is the intent, he was shackled in bronze, a metal weaker than iron, of which the Philistines possessed (1 Samuel 17:7 & 2 Samuel 12:31).

Further, grinding is a task accomplished in Scripture by women, captives, and slaves. It is a repetitive, menial, tedious task that was unfit for a regular workman. And more, his work was accomplished in the house of bonds, meaning confinement.

Where he once freely roamed and did according to his own will, he was now completely subjugated to a humiliating, degrading existence.

As for the name, Gaza is a feminine form coming from az, strong. It signifies Strong or Strong Place. Bronze in Scripture signifies judgment.

*22 (fin) However, the hair of his head began to grow again after it had been shaven.

The word “however” is more exciting and tends to get us thinking about what is coming. Despite this, the Hebrew simply says “and.” And yet, it bears the same powerful and hopeful effect: vayakhel sear rosho l’tsameakh kaasher gulakh – “And begins, hair his head, to sprout according to which shaven.”

The “and” is definitely used as an exciting introduction to what lies ahead. But more, it is supplemented with other words intended to excite. The first is tsamach, to sprout. It is not the same word as was used in Numbers 6 when referring to the Nazirite –

“All the days of the vow of his separation no razor shall come upon his head; until the days are fulfilled for which he separated himself to the Lord, he shall be holy. Then he shall let the locks of the hair of his head grow [gadal].” Numbers 6:5

The word tsamach is purposefully used to indicate that something is happening, which is “according to which shaven.” In other words, it didn’t take long for his hair to be cut off. It happened while he lay sleeping on Delilah’s knees.

But as quickly as his hair was removed from him in a time of sleep, so his hair began to sprout in a time of toil. The contrast is purposeful to elicit the imagination of the reader. Don’t expect the end of Samson’s life to be spent keeled over a grinding mill in a dirty Gazan prison.

With this hope-filled verse, we are finished for today. Samson had to learn the lesson that it is the Lord, not his own strength or effort, that allows him to win the battles of life. It’s a good lesson for each of us as well.

When we rely on ourselves, we get arrogant and cocky. And how easy that is. I had friends some years ago that were in desperate times. They posted things about Jesus on social media all the time. I thought their lives were focused on Him.

However, once the troubles were behind them, they got into self-promotion and openly bragged that they were creating their own empire. Jesus was never mentioned by them. It was a terribly sad testimony to their true values.

There was literally nothing we held in common any longer. Loving the Lord is not something to do just when things are hard. Rather, we should find happiness and closeness to Him in every situation and in all seasons of life.

Samson had to learn this in a costly way. I hope my old friends will reconsider and return to the Lord wholly and permanently. Life is short, but eternity is not. The rewards or losses that we face will be reflected in how we live our lives now. Hold fast to the Lord always. Amen.

Closing Verse: “I can do all things through Christ who strengthens me.” Philippians 4:13

Next Week: Judges 16:23-31 It’s super fun! It’s really swell! It’s even divine! (Samson, Judge of Israel, Part IX) (47th Judges Sermon)

The Lord has you exactly where He wants you. He has a good plan and purpose for you. It is He who judges His people according to their deeds. So, follow Him, live for Him, and trust Him, and He will do marvelous things for you and through you.

Samson, Judge of Israel, Part VIII

Then Delilah said to Samson
“Look, you have mocked me and told me lies
Now, please tell me
What you may be bound with, please apprise!

So he said to her
“If they bind me securely with new ropes, if that is the plan
That have never been used, then I shall become weak
And be like any other man

Therefore Delilah took new ropes and bound him with them
And said to him, “The Philistines are upon you, Samson!
And men were lying in wait, staying in the room
But he broke them off his arms like a thread (tee hee, still fun)

Delilah said to Samson, “Until now you have mocked me
———-and told me lies
Tell me what you may be bound with, I’m in a gloom
And he said to her
“If you weave the seven locks of my head into the web
———-of the loom

So she wove it tightly with the batten of the loom
And said to him, “The Philistines are upon you, Samson!
But he awoke from his sleep
And pulled out the batten and the web from the loom (so, so fun)

Then she said to him
“How can you say, ‘I love you,’ when your heart is not with me?
You have mocked me these three times, and have not told me
Where your great strength lies. How can this be?

And it came to pass, when she pestered him daily
With her words and pressed him, tearing him apart
So that his soul was vexed to death
That he told her all his heart

And said to her, “No razor has ever come upon my head
For I have been a Nazirite to God from my mother’s womb
If I am shaven, then my strength will leave me
And I shall become weak, and be like any other man
———-in the lunchroom

When Delilah saw that he had told her all his heart
She sent and called for the lords of the Philistines, saying
———- (as they had planned)
“Come up once more, for he has told me all his heart
So the lords of the Philistines came up to her and brought the
———-money in their hand

Then she lulled him to sleep on her knees
And called for a man and had him shave off
———-(the story is getting grim)
The seven locks of his head
Then she began to torment him, and his strength left him

And she said, “The Philistines are upon you, Samson!
So he awoke from his sleep, and said – yes, he started
“I will go out as before, at other times, and shake myself free!
But he did not know that the LORD from him had departed

Then the Philistines took him and put out his eyes
And brought him down to Gaza (bad times had arisen)
They bound him with bronze fetters
And he became a grinder in the prison

However, the hair of his head began to grow
Again after it had been shaven. Trouble lies ahead doncha know

Lord God, turn our hearts to be obedient to Your word
Give us wisdom to be ever faithful to You
May we carefully heed each thing we have heard
Yes, Lord God may our hearts be faithful and true

And we shall be content and satisfied in You alone
We will follow You as we sing our songs of praise
Hallelujah to You; to us Your path You have shown
Hallelujah we shall sing to You for all of our days

Hallelujah and Amen…

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10 Then Delilah said to Samson, “Look, you have mocked me and told me lies. Now, please tell me what you may be bound with.”

11 So he said to her, “If they bind me securely with new ropes that have never been used, then I shall become weak, and be like any other man.”

12 Therefore Delilah took new ropes and bound him with them, and said to him, “The Philistines are upon you, Samson!” And men were lying in wait, staying in the room. But he broke them off his arms like a thread.

13 Delilah said to Samson, “Until now you have mocked me and told me lies. Tell me what you may be bound with.”

And he said to her, “If you weave the seven locks of my head into the web of the loom”—

14 So she wove it tightly with the batten of the loom, and said to him, “The Philistines are upon you, Samson!” But he awoke from his sleep, and pulled out the batten and the web from the loom.

15 Then she said to him, “How can you say, ‘I love you,’ when your heart is not with me? You have mocked me these three times, and have not told me where your great strength lies.” 16 And it came to pass, when she pestered him daily with her words and pressed him, so that his soul was vexed to death, 17 that he told her all his heart, and said to her, “No razor has ever come upon my head, for I have been a Nazirite to God from my mother’s womb. If I am shaven, then my strength will leave me, and I shall become weak, and be like any other man.”

18 When Delilah saw that he had told her all his heart, she sent and called for the lords of the Philistines, saying, “Come up once more, for he has told me all his heart.” So the lords of the Philistines came up to her and brought the money in their hand. 19 Then she lulled him to sleep on her knees, and called for a man and had him shave off the seven locks of his head. Then she began to torment him, and his strength left him. 20 And she said, “The Philistines are upon you, Samson!” So he awoke from his sleep, and said, “I will go out as before, at other times, and shake myself free!” But he did not know that the Lord had departed from him.

21 Then the Philistines took him and put out his eyes, and brought him down to Gaza. They bound him with bronze fetters, and he became a grinder in the prison. 22 However, the hair of his head began to grow again after it had been shaven.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Matthew 2:3

Orchid.

Sunday, 4 August 2024

When Herod the king heard this, he was troubled, and all Jerusalem with him. Matthew 2:3

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen).

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“And Herod the king, having heard, he was agitated, and all Jerusalem with him” (CG).

The previous verse noted that the magicians had seen the star of the King of the Jews in the direction of the sunrising and they had come to worship Him. With that noted, Matthew now records, “And Herod the king.”

Herod was a power-hungry king who feared any challenge, real or imagined, to his reign. Of him, Charles Ellicott writes –

“The old king (the title had been given by the Roman Senate in B.C. 40) was drawing to the close of his long and blood-stained reign. Two years before he had put to death, on a charge of treason, his two sons by Mariamne, his best-loved wife, through sheer jealousy of the favour with which the people looked on them. At the time when this history opens, his eldest son, Antipater, was under condemnation.”

So fearful was he of any challenge to his throne that he had his own sons executed for simply being popular. Understanding his personality, Matthew next records, “having heard, he was agitated.”

Herod certainly questioned how magicians from the East could come looking for the King of the Jews but not be looking for him. He sat on the throne over the Jewish people! Because of this, Matthew notes that he was agitated.

The word is tarassó. HELPS Word Studies says it means to “put in motion (to agitate back-and-forth, shake to-and-fro); (figuratively) to set in motion what needs to remain still (at ease); to ‘trouble’ (‘agitate’), causing inner perplexity (emotional agitation) from getting too stirred up inside (‘upset’).”

One can see Herod standing there beside himself, distraught with the thought of a challenge to his throne. Certainly because of this, it next says, “and all Jerusalem with him.”

The word “all” is used in a comparative sense. An important point in Scripture is that not every “every” means “every,” and not all “all’s” mean “all.” There were certainly people sitting in local cafes that had no idea what was transpiring in the royal hall. There were servants tending to the homes of their masters who would have no idea about the coming of the magicians. In all, probably very few of the people in the city had an inkling about the report.

Rather, in this case, Jerusalem stands for the seat of power. Therefore, it is referring to those who were in the royal court with Herod. They would have certainly been agitated, knowing his proclivity for harming others, and they would be walking on eggshells at the thought of what he might do in this instance.

Life application: Herod was an Idumean by birth, meaning an Edomite. Idumean is simply the Greek form of the word. Of this people group, the Jewish historian Flavius Josephus says that about 129 BC John Hyrcanus –

“…subdued all the Idumeans; and permitted them to stay in that country, if they would circumcise their genitals, and make use of the laws of the Jews; and they were so desirous of living in the country of their forefathers, that they submitted to the use of circumcision, and of the rest of the Jewish ways of living; at which time therefore this befell them, that they were hereafter no other than Jews.” Antiquities, Book 13 Chapter 9 Section 1

What this means is that the Edomites were brought into the nation of Israel, becoming Jews. This is no different than an Arab or a Japanese person today converting to Judaism. They become a part of the Jewish people. Whether their origins are remembered and held against them by other supposedly pure-blooded Jews or not is irrelevant. They are now Jews.

The line of Herod was a part of this conversion, but the racial animosities obviously remained, and despite being a Jew, it is obvious from historical records that he was remembered for his ancestral heritage more than his acceptance into the Jewish culture.

In the Bible, there are references to Edom, Moab, Ammon, etc., that are contained in prophecies that extend even beyond our time. And yet, there is no nation of Edom, Moab, etc. What this means is that the Bible is using the lands, once inhabited by those people groups, as emblematic of the people in those lands today.

Thus, when a future prophecy refers to Philistia, it is speaking of the modern-day Gazans, not Philistines. In referring to Ammon, Edom, or Moab, it is generally speaking of the Arabs who occupy Jordan. In other words, the lands that were originally settled by these people retain those name designations in Scripture.

This is important to understand because the Edomites of the past are now incorporated into the Jews of today. When the Romans exiled the Jews, those Edomites (Idumeans) who had assimilated into the Jewish people were a part of that exile. There are no “Edomites” today in a real sense. The nation does not exist. Instead, only the lands where they were are considered Edom.

Remember this as you read the Bible. There is a baseline for what is presented. That baseline does not change unless the change is recorded in Scripture. But whatever the final designation in Scripture is, that is what is to be considered when analyzing the world today.

Understanding this, the biblical model which refers to Christians is one that is set and unchanging. Jesus came, fulfilled the law, and introduced the New Covenant. Entry into what God is doing now takes place through the baseline that has been set because of Jesus Christ.

Being “Jewish” is no longer what designates a person who is in a right standing with God. Jews may be in a right standing, or they might not be. But the standard that makes it so is by coming to God through Christ Jesus. This is what God is doing in the world. The pattern is set because the Bible is complete.

And for those who have come to Christ, there are no longer any distinctions that should separate us. Herod may have been considered an Edomite even though he was a Jewish convert. However, such designations are no longer to be looked down on as if one group is better than another.

A Japanese, a Kenyan, and a Jew all walked into a church…

When they got there, they were (and remain) on an equal footing before God because of faith in Jesus Christ –

“For you are all sons of God through faith in Christ Jesus. 27 For as many of you as were baptized into Christ have put on Christ. 28 There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is neither male nor female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus. 29 And if you are Christ’s, then you are Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise.” Galatian 3:26-29

Lord God, how grateful we are for what Christ has done for us. We are all one in Him through faith in His completed work. We are granted access to Your heavenly throne where You hear us regardless of who we once were. Thank You for the wonderful blessing of being Your child through simple faith in Him. Hallelujah and Amen.

 

Matthew 2:2

Orchid.

Saturday, 3 August 2024

saying, “Where is He who has been born King of the Jews? For we have seen His star in the East and have come to worship Him.” Matthew 2:2

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen).

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“saying, ‘Where is He having been born King of the Jews? For we saw His star in the sunrising, and we came to worship Him’” (CG).

In the previous verse, the magicians had come from the sunrisings to Jerusalem. Now, Matthew continues with the words, “saying, ‘Where is He?’”

The words of the magicians are in the form of a question, but they are also just as much an assertion. By stating, “Where is He,” they are proclaiming that they are certain that the person they are looking for exists. This is understood. The question isn’t, “Has He come?” but rather, “Where is He?” Understanding this, they continue with, “having been born?”

Again, it is an assertion. They do not ask, “Where is the King who has been coronated?” Nor do they ask, “Where is the King who has been appointed by Rome?” Instead, the question is about a birth. Therefore, something prompted them to accept that a divinely appointed birth had taken place for one who was to be “King of the Jews.”

The answer is to be found in Daniel 9:24-27 where a timeline of prophetic events was to take place –

“Seventy weeks are determined
For your people and for your holy city,
To finish the transgression,
To make an end of sins,
To make reconciliation for iniquity,
To bring in everlasting righteousness,
To seal up vision and prophecy,
And to anoint the Most Holy.
25 “Know therefore and understand,
That from the going forth of the command
To restore and build Jerusalem
Until Messiah the Prince,
There shall be seven weeks and sixty-two weeks;
The street shall be built again, and the wall,
Even in troublesome times.
26 “And after the sixty-two weeks
Messiah shall be cut off, but not for Himself;
And the people of the prince who is to come
Shall destroy the city and the sanctuary.
The end of it shall be with a flood,
And till the end of the war desolations are determined.
27 Then he shall confirm a covenant with many for one week;
But in the middle of the week
He shall bring an end to sacrifice and offering.
And on the wing of abominations shall be one who makes desolate,
Even until the consummation, which is determined,
Is poured out on the desolate.”

The words of Daniel may be confusing without understanding the greater context of the Bible, but they clearly and precisely state when the Messiah would come, what would happen to Him, and what would happen afterward. For example, it is understood from the words that the sanctuary, meaning the temple in Jerusalem, would be destroyed.

Of this expectation of the coming Messiah, Albert Barnes writes –

“This personage, they supposed would be a temporal prince, and they were expecting that he would deliver them from Roman bondage. It was natural that this expectation should spread into other countries. Many Jews at that time lived in Egypt, in Rome, and in Greece; many, also, had gone to Eastern countries, and in every place they carried their sacred writings, and diffused the expectation that some remarkable person was about to appear. Suetonius, a Roman historian, speaking of this rumor. says: ‘An ancient and settled persuasion prevailed throughout the East that the Fates had decreed some one to proceed from Judea who should attain universal empire.’ Tacitus, another Roman historian, says: ‘Many were persuaded that it was contained in the ancient books of their priests, that at that very time the East should prevail, and that some one should proceed from Judea and possess the dominion.’ Josephus also, and Philo, two Jewish historians, make mention of the same expectation. The fact that such a person was expected is clearly attested. Under this expectation these wise men came to do him homage, and inquired anxiously where he was born?”

The reason for paying homage to Him is next explained by them, “For we saw His star.” This “star” is referred to in the Book of Numbers –

“I see Him, but not now;
I behold Him, but not near;
A Star shall come out of Jacob;
A Scepter shall rise out of Israel,
And batter the brow of Moab,
And destroy all the sons of tumult.
18 “And Edom shall be a possession;
Seir also, his enemies, shall be a possession,
While Israel does valiantly.
19 Out of Jacob One shall have dominion,
And destroy the remains of the city.”  Numbers 24:17-19

The Jews, attempting to hide the fact that Jesus fit the biblical narrative, hid a significant period of time in the chronology of the Old Testament. By doing this, they then made the assertion that another person, Simon bar Kokhba, was the anticipated Messiah. His name means “Simon son of a Star.” They claimed he was the fulfillment of the Numbers prophecy.

However, he came after the destruction of the temple in Jerusalem. Thus, he could not be the Messiah as indicated in the Daniel timeline. As for the Numbers prophecy, it was understood that One would arise and subdue the surrounding nations. But in the greater context of Scripture, much more was understood about this coming One.

As for seeing His star, the word can mean literally seeing, as in a visible star, or it can mean to perceive, as in “the magicians perceived the star from a reading of sacred texts.” Thus, it is a seeing with the mind. This explanation of the word may help understand later verses. Or it may be that they have seen a literal event that alerted them to the coming of the Messiah. Understanding that, it next says, “in the sunrising.”

It is the same word used in the previous verse. It indicates “east,” but it means “rising of light.” This does not mean that they saw the star to their east but that they were east of Israel and saw the star rising from there, knowing that the heavenly sign prophesied for Israel had come to pass. Therefore, with this information clearly known by them, it next says, “and we came to worship Him.”

Of these words, Albert Barnes says, “This does not mean that they had come to pay him religious homage, or to adore him. They regarded him as the King of the Jews, but there is no evidence that they supposed that he was divine. They came to honor him as a Prince, or a king, not as God.”

Barnes’ words, though dogmatic, are not necessarily correct. Depending on the knowledge of the Hebrew Scriptures, one could clearly determine that this coming One was, in fact, divine. At a minimum, it would be understood He was divinely appointed by God. He had been anticipated since the time of the first man on earth. He was spoken of throughout the historical writings and prophets of the Jews, etc.

Therefore, whether mere obeisance or worship, these magicians had come to bow before this coming King.

As for the star that anticipated the coming of Christ, the number of theories concerning planetary alignments, the position of constellations, particular comets, and so forth go on and on. Everyone who has a theory dogmatically claims his presentation is correct. Those who hear one claim or another will hold fast to the one they find most convincing and dogmatically avow that they are right as to what is being referred to.

In the end, these things are not necessary to determine when Christ came. The years of Herod’s life and the prophecy of Daniel sufficiently tells us by what time Jesus had to be born and by what time He would be crucified. And more, the fact that these magicians saw a divinely appointed star tells us that it was there.

As such, determining the particular star that heralded in the coming of Jesus, whatever it was, is not necessary, even if it is fun to consider.

Life application: As noted, there are many theories about the star in the skies which point to the coming of Jesus. Some say it is a conjunction of Saturn and Jupiter, which took place in May to July and again in September of 7BC. Others say it was the rising of Sirius which occurred on the same day in four subsequent years from 5-2BC. Many other speculations have been set forth as well.

A video that has gotten jillions of social media views and sold innumerable CDs by Rick Larsen makes certain assertions about the star of Bethlehem. He goes on to cite details about the cosmic event at Christ’s cross as well. The problem with his analysis is that after all of his calculations and details, he assertively places Christ’s crucifixion at the time of a particular solar eclipse.

The problem with this is that it is impossible to have a solar eclipse at the time of the Passover. The moon is full at the Passover. Thus, it is on the other side of the earth when the sun is in the sky. With such an obvious error in his presentation, it then calls into question all of his other assertions as well. The house of cards comes crashing down.

It is best to not get caught up in such hype. If the Bible does not provide the particular details concerning things like this, it is because God is not interested in telling us about those things. Rather, He is directing our attention to Jesus, not a star that served a purpose in telling eastern magicians about the coming of Jesus.

Let us not get overly distracted from the biblical text. It is good to research extra-biblical history, which can confirm many aspects of the Bible, but when something is so unreasonably argued over, like the Star of Bethlehem, we have lost focus of the main Subject. Eyes to Jesus. In this, we will do well. The Bible records the facts, and they are sufficient for us to know that Christ has come according to the plan and purposes of God.

Lord God, before Jesus came, we were given the timeline to tell us that He would come at a certain time. As we can rely on Your word, we can also be certain that He is the Messiah. No other person can make the claim because the time for His coming is past. With that, we can read the New Testament and discover what He did and how it has changed all of human history. Thank You, O God, for the coming of Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.

 

Matthew 2:1

Red hibiscus.

Friday, 2 August 2024

Now after Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judea in the days of Herod the king, behold, wise men from the East came to Jerusalem, Matthew 2:1

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen)

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“And Jesus, having been born in Bethlehem Judea, in days Herod the king: Behold, magicians from sunrisings – they came unto Jerusalem” (CG).

Chapter 1 ended with the note that Joseph refrained from having physical relations with his wife, Mary, until she had brought forth Jesus. Now, the narrative continues in Chapter 2, beginning with, “And Jesus, having been born in Bethlehem Judea.”

The words are stated to confirm the prophecy of the Lord through Micah –

“But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah,
Though you are little among the thousands of Judah,
Yet out of you shall come forth to Me
The One to be Ruler in Israel,
Whose goings forth are from of old,
From everlasting.” Micah 5:2

Matthew will deal with this prophecy in a few verses, but this confirms another prophecy that had to be fulfilled concerning Israel’s true Messiah. Next, it says, “in days Herod the king.” He is known as Herod the Great. Of him, Albert Barnes says –

“Judea, where our Saviour was born, was a province of the Roman Empire. It was taken about 63 years before his birth by Pompey, and placed under tribute. Herod received his appointment from the Romans, and had reigned at the time of the birth of Jesus for 34 years. Though he was permitted to be called king, yet he was, in all respects, dependent on the Roman emperor. He was commonly called ‘Herod the Great’ because he had distinguished himself in the wars with Antigonus and his other enemies, and because he had evinced great talents in governing and defending his country, in repairing the temple, and in building and ornamenting the cities of his kingdom. He was, however, as much distinguished for his cruelty and his crimes as he was for his greatness.”

It was at this time that Matthew next records, “Behold, magicians.” The Greek word is magos, a magician, astrologer, wizard, etc. HELPS Word Studies says of them, “one of a sacred caste, originally Median, who seem to have conformed to the Persian religion while retaining some of their old beliefs.”

Various opinions have been given concerning who exactly these magicians were and where they came from. What is possibly the case is that they were from the area of Iran. It is to the east of Israel, and it is where the great empire that replaced the Babylonians was. Daniel and others were exiled to Babylon. However, Babylon was destroyed by the Medes and Persians. This is detailed in Daniel 5, which ends with –

“That very night Belshazzar, king of the Chaldeans, was slain. 31 And Darius the Mede received the kingdom, being about sixty-two years old.” Daniel 5:30, 31

When Babylon was destroyed, the new empire would have received all of the ancient writings of the Chaldeans. They also acquired their wise men, such as Daniel. This body of knowledge would have been incorporated into their empire, and it is possible that this included all of the Jewish prophetic writings.

It appears from Isaiah 44 that they possessed the book of Isaiah. If so, it may be that they had copies of all of the writings. The coming verses will show that there was an awareness of the book of Daniel and Numbers. Thus, it seems that all of the Jewish writings were maintained in the archives of this eastern empire.

Therefore, the ancient prophecy of a coming Messiah would be known to these magicians. The word magos is likely connected to the Aramaic name of the Rabmag [Great Mag] found in Jeremiah 39.

This would confirm that these people once were a part of the Chaldeans and were assimilated into the empire of the Medes and Persians. Because of their libraries and training, these men were alerted to the ancient prophecies of the Hebrew Scriptures. Of them, Matthew next notes that they were “from sunrisings.”

Most translations say, “from the east.” However, the word is anatolé, a rising of light. In this case, it signifies the rising of the sun. Further, it is plural. Thus, these magicians are “from sunrisings,” and thus east of Israel. Whoever they were and wherever they were from, it next notes that “they came unto Jerusalem.”

These men had traveled from outside of the land of Israel. They had a specific knowledge from prophecy concerning the coming of Christ, and they came to behold what they were certain of. As Jerusalem is the seat of government, they first came there to proclaim what they knew and to ask for further details. This will be seen as the verses continue.

Life application: One interpretation of who these men were that has arisen is that these Magi were Jewish Rabbis who had remained a part of the exile. This has become a point of boasting among Jewish believers in recent times, but it hardly seems likely.

These Magi will ask about the King of the Jews, not specifically the Messiah. It is unlikely Jews would ask about a king first and foremost. Likewise, they will ask where the King would be born. However, a Jewish rabbi would know where to look for such information, as is evidenced by the verses ahead.

But most notably, if these were Jews, the text would have said so. The problem with this type of analysis is the same as with much else that is ascribed to the Jewish people today. Since the return of Israel to the land and with the modern messianic movement, everything Jewish has become fashionable.

Many deceitful people have arisen because of this, profiting off of their heritage. Many of them do not hold to the grace of God in Christ, but to their traditions and to law observance, in part or in whole. What has been sound theology, and a proper interpretation of Scripture for millennia, has been upended by such unsound teaching. The Judaizers that Paul warned of have come back like an overflowing flood.

Be sure to not get caught up in the hype of genealogy, culture, or tradition. Hold fast to the word of God as it has been revealed. And that revelation is one of God’s grace being bestowed upon undeserved sinners, not man’s effort to reconcile himself through an obsolete law that only God in Christ could (and did) fulfill.

To return to what is fulfilled is to say to God, “I know you did Your best, but I will take it from here.” What a slap in the face of God, who has done it all for us. Let us never mar the grace of God in Christ. Jesus alone is to be our hope, and He alone is our place of refuge.

Lord God, may we hold fast to the grace of God in Christ, never trusting in our own merit. We have no standing before You without Jesus. Help us to recognize this and to exalt You for what You alone have done for us in the coming of our Lord. All hail the glorious and exalted name of JESUS! Amen.

 

Matthew 1:25

Pink hibiscus.

Thursday, 1 August 2024

and did not know her till she had brought forth her firstborn Son. And he called His name Jesus. Matthew 1:25

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen)

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“And he knew her not until that she brought forth the Son, her Firstborn. And he called His name JESUS” (CG).

In the previous verse, it said that after his visitation by the messenger, he thoroughly aroused from his sleep and did as the angel commanded him, taking to him his wife. Now, Matthew continues the narrative, saying, “And he knew her not.”

This is a biblical euphemism, meaning that he did not have intercourse with her. The first of many times this is mentioned in Scripture is in Genesis 4 –

“Now Adam knew Eve his wife, and she conceived and bore Cain, and said, ‘I have acquired a man from the Lord.’” Genesis 4:1

Joseph refrained from consummating his marriage to Mary until a certain point. However, at some point after that time, they would have come together as husband and wife. That is seen in the next words, “until that.”

The Greek says heós hu, until that. Thayer’s Greek Lexicon says of this concerning the word heós, “with the genitive of the neuter relative pronoun οὗ [hou] or ὅτου [hotou] it gets the force of a conjunction, until, till (the time when).” In other words, up until a certain point, Joseph did not know his wife intimately. However, that certainly changed after the time “she brought forth the Son.”

The birth of Jesus was untainted by any hint of sexual intercourse between Joseph and Mary. She was a virgin, and her virginity remained until the birth of her Son, “her Firstborn.”

The words are a standard designation. They do not imply she had other children. It simply calls out that this Child, regardless of whether He had siblings or not, was the Firstborn of Mary. As He is also God’s only begotten, Jesus is also the Firstborn of God –

“For to which of the angels did He ever say:
‘You are My Son,
Today I have begotten You’?
And again:
‘I will be to Him a Father,
And He shall be to Me a Son’?
But when He again brings the firstborn into the world, He says:
‘Let all the angels of God worship Him.’” Hebrews 1:5-6

Of this, the words of Exodus 4:22 should be reviewed –

“Then you shall say to Pharaoh, ‘Thus says the Lord: “Israel is My son, My firstborn.”’”

Israel, the nation, is said to be the Firstborn of the Lord. This means through adoption. God selected them to carry out His purposes, leading to the coming of the Messiah. However, Jesus is the Firstborn in the sense of being begotten.

A couple who could not have their own children might adopt a child who becomes their firstborn. However, later that condition could change, and they beget a child through the life-generative process. This is the difference between the two.

Next, and in accordance with the words of the messenger, Matthew notes, “And he called His name JESUS.”

It is Joseph who named the Child in accordance with the divine instructions. Mary was also told that His name was to be Jesus, but the text records that Joseph is the one who is credited with following through with what he was instructed. Mary, though the human mother of Jesus, is seen to otherwise portray a minor role in the events that take place in the gospel records.

Life application: Although the biblical record does not speak of any future intimacy between Joseph and Mary, the way that Matthew writes of Joseph’s keeping separate from Mary until a certain point is a strong indication that their refraining from intercourse was only temporary. For example, this is recorded in Genesis 38 –

“So Judah acknowledged them and said, ‘She has been more righteous than I, because I did not give her to Shelah my son.’ And he never knew her again.” Genesis 38:26

When something is set and final in this manner, the Bible generally says so to highlight the matter. Not only is there no such statement concerning Joseph and Mary, but exactly the opposite is the case. This is contrary to the aberrant teaching of Roman Catholicism, which dogmatically states that Mary was a perpetual virgin.

There is no biblical support for this. The teaching was only decided upon in the year 553, hundreds of years after anyone could have known whether this was the case or not. In other words, it was a decision based on vapor and nothing else.

But why would the church want to make this claim? It is the same reason for innumerable decisions in the Roman Catholic Church: to direct people’s attention away from Jesus. Contrary to Scripture alone, the RCC holds to the Bible plus the authority of the church. Contrary to Christ alone, the RCC holds to the mediation of Christ plus the intercessory ability of Mary, the Pope, etc. Contrary to faith alone, the RCC holds to faith plus works in the process of justification. Contrary to grace alone, the RCC teaches merit apart from the grace of God. Contrary to the glory of God alone, the RCC uses exalted titles for the dead (such as Mary) and the living (the living pope at any given time), etc.

There is nothing acceptable about the doctrines of the RCC. Everything taught is tainted with the machinations of man. Whether Joseph and Mary came together or not after the birth of Jesus is not specifically addressed in Scripture because it has no bearing on where our eyes should be directed, which is to Jesus. Let us not get caught up in strange teachings that misdirect us from this key doctrine.

Lord God, may we be faithful to hold to Scripture alone for our doctrine concerning You and the theology that we pursue. Keep us from those who would misdirect us and confuse us in our walk. Thank You for Your word which is sufficient to instruct us. And thank You for Jesus who is the central figure presented in Your word. Amen.

 

Matthew 1 (CG)

1 Scroll: Genealogy Jesus Christ, Son of David, Son of Abraham.

2 Abraham begot Isaac, and Isaac begot Jacob, and Jacob begot Judah and his brothers. 3 And Judah begot Perez and Zerah from Tamar, and Perez begot Hezron, and Hezron begot Ram. 4 And Ram begot Amminadab, and Amminadab begot Nahshon, and Nahshon begot Salmon. 5 And Salmon begot Boaz from Rahab, and Boaz begot Obed from Ruth, and Obed begot Jesse. 6 And Jesse begot David, the king.
And David, the king, begot Solomon from the of Uriah. 7 And Solomon begot Rehoboam, and Rehoboam begot Abijah, and Abijah begot Asa. 8 And Asa begot Jehoshaphat, and Jehoshaphat begot Joram, and Joram begot Uzziah. 9 And Uzziah begot Jotham, and Jotham begot Ahaz, and Ahaz begot Hezekiah. 10 And Hezekiah begot Manasseh, and Manasseh begot Amon, and Amon begot Josiah. 11 And Josiah begot Jeconiah and his brothers upon the Babylon deportation.

12 And after the Babylon deportation, Jeconiah begot Shealtiel, and Shealtiel begot Zerubbabel. 13 And Zerubbabel begot Abiud, and Abiud begot Eliakim, and Eliakim begot Azor. 14 And Azor begot Zadok, and Zadok begot Achim, and Achim begot Eliud. 15 And Eliud begot Eleazar, and Eleazar begot Matthan, and Matthan begot Jacob. 16 And Jacob begot Joseph, the husband of Mary, from whom birthed Jesus, being called the Christ.

17 Therefore, all the generations from Abraham until David, generations fourteen. And from David until the Babylon deportation, generations fourteen. And from the Babylon deportation until the Christ, generations fourteen.

18 And the birth of Jesus Christ was thus: For his mother Mary, having been betrothed to Joseph, rather before they came together, she was found – from Holy Spirit – having in womb. 19 And Joseph, her husband, being righteous and not willing to expose her to disgrace, intended to send her away secretly. 20 And him, having pondered these, behold a messenger of the Lord appeared to him in a dream, saying, “Joseph, son of David, you should not fear to receive Mary your wife, for that having been begotten in her – from Holy Spirit is. 21 And she will bring forth a son, and you will call His name JESUS. For He will save His people from their sins.”

22 And this all has come to pass that may be fulfilled that having been spoken by the Lord through the prophet, saying, 23 “Behold, the virgin will have in womb, and will bring forth a Son, and they will call His name Emmanouél,” which is being translated, “With Us: The God.”

24 And Joseph, having thoroughly aroused from the sleep, did as the messenger of the Lord commanded him, and received his wife. 25 And he knew her not until that she brought forth the Son, her Firstborn. And he called His name JESUS.