Judges 20:1-18 (No King in Israel, Part VII)

Artwork by Douglas Kallerson.

Judges 20:1-18
(No King in Israel, Part VII)

(Typed 8 Jul 2024) In the passage today, Benjamin will be presented with the choice to give up the sons of worthlessness that led to the Levite’s concubine being dismembered and sent throughout Israel. As you know, they were not willing to do so.

Israel cannot allow this to stand. Thus, preparations for war are made. As we have seen throughout Judges to this point, the physical trials and battles presented have typologically anticipated real spiritual events that have taken place or will take place.

The world is often at war, but the true war that all people face is a spiritual one. This then extends to families and family members, political parties and politicians, churches and congregants, and so forth.

Anyone who can’t see the spiritual implications of the moral wars we are facing right now simply doesn’t want to see them. The very existence of the United States is dependent on whether we will stand against the unholy tide of perversion being thrust upon us or not.

The same is true with denominations and churches. Many have completely capitulated to the moral perversion they were originally set up to fight against. Thus, they are Christian in name only with no actual connection to Christ Jesus.

If leaven is introduced into bread, it will spread throughout the whole lump. If sin is allowed into a Christian entity, the entire body will eventually yield to sin. Walk into a church in most major denominations, and you will see sin is either on the rise or has fully taken over. They are becoming or have become lifeless bodies without Christ and are set for a sad end.

Text Verse: “For what have I to do with judging those also who are outside? Do you not judge those who are inside? 13 But those who are outside God judges. Therefore ‘put away from yourselves the evil person.’” 1 Corinthians 5:12, 13

Paul warned the churches about what was coming. He did so concerning direct sin, such as in 1 Corinthians 5, and also about sin and wickedness in general as well. He warns against the inclinations of the heart. He explains the remedy for immorality and wickedness, and he implores his audience to hold fast to the word of God, never yielding to the temptations of this world.

And his words aren’t just “judgmental Paul being Paul.” Rather, he repeats and expands on what the Bible has warned against all along, including the words of Jesus. The unbalanced “Jesus of love without consequences” proclaimed in churches today is not found in Scripture.

Israel will prepare for war because the tribe of Benjamin is unprepared to purge wickedness from his own house. When Jesus returns for His church at the rapture, He will for those who have accepted Him by faith. When Jesus returns after that, it will be to purge wickedness from the world.

We all have choices to make. In the passage today, Benjamin will make a choice that will be costly. For now, let us get into it. Sobering lessons are to be found in His superior word. And so, let us turn to that precious word once again, and… May God speak to us through His word today, and may His glorious name ever be praised.

I. Machination and Foolishness (verses 1-11)

Chapter 19 ended with these words –

“When he entered his house he took a knife, laid hold of his concubine, and divided her into twelve pieces, limb by limb, and sent her throughout all the territory of Israel. 30 And so it was that all who saw it said, ‘No such deed has been done or seen from the day that the children of Israel came up from the land of Egypt until this day. Consider it, confer, and speak up!’” Judges 19:29, 30

With the terrible evidence of the misdeeds of Benjamin reported throughout Israel, the narrative of Chapter 20 begins with…

So all the children of Israel came out,

The NKJV jumbles the clauses: vayetse kal b’ne Yisrael vatiqahel ha’edah k’ish ekhad – “And come all sons Israel, and assemble the congregation according to man one.” The meaning here is that all of the men of the households, and in particular, the men of war have assembled, as will be seen in the coming verses.

Also, two words are used that have similar meanings. The first is qahal, to assemble. That is the verb form of the noun qahal, an assembly. The other is edah, a congregation. That is derived from yaad, to appoint.

The words are used almost synonymously in the Pentateuch, but there is a subtle difference that necessitates care in how the words are translated and considered. In this case, they have assembled as a congregation…

1 (con’t) from Dan to Beersheba,

l’midan v’ad b’er sheva– “to from Dan and until Beersheba.” This is the first of seven times this phrase is used in the Old Testament. It will be used twice in reverse in the Chronicles, saying, “from Beersheba to Dan.” It signifies the entirety of the land and people of Israel within the borders of Canaan. Dan is the northernmost point of reference, while Beersheba is the southernmost.

This may indicate that the migration of Dan, as recorded in Judges 18, may have already occurred chronologically, or it may mean that the author, who is probably Samuel, may have used it based on his time compiling the narrative. Either way, it is used to speak of Israel within Canaan in an all-encompassing way.

1 (con’t) as well as from the land of Gilead, and the congregation gathered together as one man before the Lord at Mizpah.

v’erets ha’gilad el Yehovah ha’mitspah – “and land the Gilead unto Yehovah the Mizpah.” The term land the Gilead is used in reference to the two-and-a-half tribes east of the Jordan. Thus, the assembled congregation now refers to the entirety of Israel, minus the tribe of Benjamin. They have united together unto the Lord at the Mizpah.

This is a different Mizpah than was seen in the Jephthah narrative in Judges 11. It is believed to be a location from which Jerusalem is visible. It is likely the same location ascribed to Judah in Joshua 15:38 and Benjamin in Joshua 18:26. Thus, it is a border city.

The meaning of “unto the Lord” is debated. Does it mean the ark was brought there? Does it refer to the use of the Urim and Thummim? Or is it simply that as a congregation, they are gathered, acknowledging the Lord as their Head?

Verse 27 will place the ark at Bethel, but this doesn’t mean it was not brought to the Mizpah for this gathering, but if it was, it would be a giant omission in the text. Regardless, these men have gathered to discuss what happened and to decide on what to do to rectify the situation.

Israel means He Strives With God. Dan means Judge. Beersheba means both Well of Seven and Well of Oath. The Gilead means The Perpetual Fountain. The Mizpah means The Watchtower.

And the leaders of all the people, all the tribes of Israel,

vayithyatsvu pinoth kal ha’am kol shivte Yisrael – “And station, corners all the people, all tribes Yisrael.” Here is a word being used in a new way, pinnah. It signifies a corner. As a corner provides strength, support, and stability to a wall or a side of something, so is the leader of a group of people. Thus, the word is used to describe Christ –

“The stone which the builders rejected
Has become the chief cornerstone [pinnah].
23 This was the Lord’s doing;
It is marvelous in our eyes.” Psalm 118:22, 23

These corner supports from all of Israel’s tribes stand to hear the details and render a decision concerning the matter at hand.

2 (con’t) presented themselves in the assembly of the people of God, four hundred thousand foot soldiers who drew the sword.

The way the sentence reads, the words are difficult because it seems like the corners are defined by the number being mentioned: biqhal am ha’elohim arba meoth eleph ish ragli sholeph kharev – “in assembly people the God: four hundreds thousand man afoot, drawing sword.”

The words say, “the God.” Thus, it refers to those who are in a right standing with God. This assembly has come together as the people of the God, meaning Yehovah, to prepare for war. The number defines the entire assembly, not the corners within the assembly.

“And station, corners all the people, all tribes Yisrael, in assembly people the God: four hundreds thousand man afoot, drawing sword.”

Although translations are all over the place, this appears to be the intent of the words. Otherwise, the “corners” would be referring to all four hundred thousand. If so, it would mean that each is the “corner” of his own home, which is unlikely. The only other option is to add words or rearrange things within the verse.

Of the number of men, Cambridge says, as if they were there filming the whole encounter, “The number 400,000 is obviously exaggerated.” Rather, a short study will show the number is perfectly in line with what would be expected at this time.

The number is derived from four and ten, four being the number of material completeness, the world number, and the city number. Ten signifies “Completeness of order, marking the entire round of anything… It implies that nothing is wanting; that the number and order are perfect; that the whole cycle is complete” (Bullinger).

(Now the children of Benjamin heard that the children of Israel had gone up to Mizpah.)

vayishmu b’ne Binyamin ki alu b’ne Yisrael ha’mitspah – “And hear, sons Benjamin, for arisen sons Israel the Mizpah.” Most scholars agree that this means Benjamin was summoned to the meeting but willfully avoided coming. If that was so, why wouldn’t the text simply say that?

Rather, it appears that they were purposefully not summoned because a decision had to be made, which would then be presented to them. The gathering of Israel is strategically positioned in a location on the border of Benjamin. As such, the note that Benjamin heard they had gone up to the Mizpah would be a result of the choice of the assembly’s location.

Benjamin means Son of the Right Hand. Whether they were invited to this gathering or not, once gathered, it next says…

3 (con’t) Then the children of Israel said, “Tell us, how did this wicked deed happen?”

vayomru b’ne Yisrael daberu eikhah nihy’tah ha’raah hazoth – “And say, sons Israel, ‘Speak how the wicked, the this?’” The address is in the plural, and so it either means the Levite and his servant (who isn’t mentioned) or something like, “Any of you who knows what’s going on, speak up.” Next, it says…

So the Levite, the husband of the woman who was murdered, answered and said, “My concubine and I went into Gibeah, which belongs to Benjamin, to spend the night.

vayaan ha’ish ha’Levi ish ha’ishah ha’nirtskhah vayomar ha’givatha asher l’binyamin bathi ani uphilagshi lalun – “And answers, the man, the Levite, husband the woman, the murdered, and says, ‘The Gibeah-ward which to Benjamin went, I and my concubine, to lodge.’” Saying “husband” must be inferred. It simply says, “man.”

However, in the previous chapter, it noted that he was the affinity of the old man in Bethlehem. Thus, it is a relationship through marriage. However, despite being a husband, she is clearly also called his concubine.

As noted in Chapter 19, the word is pilegesh. It is supposed by some to be a compound of the word palag, to split or divide, and nagash, to draw near or approach. If so, it would mean that the man divided his attention between his wife and his concubine. She is technically a wife but without the rights of a full wife.

Gibeah means Hill. It is etymologically connected to the word Gabbatha. Together they were traveling toward Gibeah from Bethlehem, intending to lodge there. Though unstated, the implication is that they did arrive and lodge. That is evidenced from the next words…

And the men of Gibeah rose against me, and surrounded the house at night because of me.

vayaqumu alay baale ha’givah vayasobu alay eth ha’bayith lay’lah – “And arise upon me, masters the Gibeah, and surround upon me the house night.” Without giving all the details of being taken in, tended to, enjoying the evening, and so forth, he goes directly to the evil of the event that was requested in verse 3.

The baale, masters or lords, of Gibeah arose upon him. The meaning is on account of him. They wanted to violate him. In using the term masters, he appears to be implying that it is the leaders of the city. If so, whether he means this literally or not isn’t said, but the implication is that they were either the ones who came against him or they were accountable as if it were so.

5 (con’t) They intended to kill me, but instead they ravished my concubine so that she died.

oti dimu laharog v’eth pilagshi inu vatamoth – “Me intended to kill, and my concubine abased, and died.” He doesn’t give all the facts, but the substance is essentially correct.

Though nothing was said of killing him, they wanted to know him carnally. He would have refused, and they would have either raped him and killed him or simply killed him. Anything less is unlikely. Instead of getting the chance, they took out their intentions on his concubine, leading to her death. Because of this…

So I took hold of my concubine, cut her in pieces, and sent her throughout all the territory of the inheritance of Israel,

Rather: vaokhez b’philagshi vaanatkheha vaashalkheha b’khal s’deh nakhalath Yisrael – “And grasp in my concubine, and divide her and send her in all field, inheritance Israel.”

The concubine was dead. As such, to alert all of Israel to what occurred, he divided her up and sent her out. In the previous chapter, it said g’vul, border. Now it says s’deh, field. All of the field, meaning the inheritance where Israel is, had received a tangible portion of what took place…

6 (con’t) because they committed lewdness and outrage in Israel.

ki asu zimah unvalah b’Yisrael – “for did machination and foolishness in Israel.” The word is zimah. Rather than lewdness, which may describe the act depending on the situation, it means a plan, especially a bad one. The word comes from zamam, to consider, purpose, devise, etc. As such, it is a machination.

In other words, this was with purposeful intent, not just some impulsive event in a moment of indiscretion. As such, a decision about what should be done in response is needed…

Look! All of you are children of Israel; give your advice and counsel here and now!”

hineh khulakhem b’ne Yisrael havu lakhem davar v’etsah halom – “Behold! All you sons Israel, give to you word and counsel hither.” The word “are” is inserted by many translations. Thus, it would give the sense of, “Because you are this, therefore do this.” But that is unnecessary. Rather, he is making an appeal, “Hey, you all, render a decision.” That seems apparent from the next verse…

So all the people arose as one man, saying,

vayaqam kal ha’am k’ish ekhad l’mor – “And arise all the people according to man one, to say,” The call was made for a unified decision. That is exactly what transpires…

8 (con’t) “None of us will go to his tent, nor will any turn back to his house;

lo nelekh ish l’aholo v’lo nasur ish l’beito – “Not walks man to his tent and not veers man to his house.” The entire congregation arises and speaks in unison. Tent and house are to be taken synonymously for one’s residence. It is a poetic way of saying that everyone felt the same, regardless of his profession, location, or abode. They will remain as they are until this matter is resolved…

but now this is the thing which we will do to Gibeah: We will go up against it by lot.

Despite translations which complicate these words in one way or another, the words are simple, direct, and emphatic: v’atah zeh ha’davar asher naaseh lagivah aleha b’goral – “And now, this the word which do to the Gibeah, “Upon her in lot!” The men of Gibeah have committed great wickedness and they must be held to account. This is perfectly understood and agreed upon.

Therefore, they will let the Lord decide who will engage the battle against them. Despite this being contextually obvious from the coming verses, some scholars imply that this is incompatible with going to Benjamin in verse 13 and telling them to deliver the inhabitants of Gibeah.

But the battle is not against Benjamin yet. It is only against Gibeah. The Lord, through the lot, will determine who is to go up against Gibeah if Benjamin refuses to give them up.

Others say that using the lot means “to divide its territory when conquered” (Ellicott, et al). This cannot be the meaning. By law, the inheritance of one tribe was never to be transferred from one tribe to another. Rather, this is simply a call to have the Lord determine who will come against the city for destruction.

Though under a different context, this is essentially what is referred to in Deuteronomy –

“If you hear someone in one of your cities, which the Lord your God gives you to dwell in, saying, 13 ‘Corrupt men have gone out from among you and enticed the inhabitants of their city, saying, “Let us go and serve other gods”’ —which you have not known— 14 then you shall inquire, search out, and ask diligently. And if it is indeed true and certain that such an abomination was committed among you, 15 you shall surely strike the inhabitants of that city with the edge of the sword, utterly destroying it, all that is in it and its livestock—with the edge of the sword. 16 And you shall gather all its plunder into the middle of the street, and completely burn with fire the city and all its plunder, for the Lord your God. It shall be a heap forever; it shall not be built again. 17 So none of the accursed things shall remain in your hand, that the Lord may turn from the fierceness of His anger and show you mercy, have compassion on you and multiply you, just as He swore to your fathers, 18 because you have listened to the voice of the Lord your God, to keep all His commandments which I command you today, to do what is right in the eyes of the Lord your God.” Deuteronomy 13:12-18

Though Gibeah is not under a total and permanent ban and will be reinhabited, the city is to be judged for its wickedness. The Lord determines who will be the executors of that judgment.

10 We will take ten men out of every hundred throughout all the tribes of Israel, a hundred out of every thousand, and a thousand out of every ten thousand,

v’laqakhnu asarah anashim lameah l’khol shivte Yisrael u-meah la’eleph v’eleph larvavah – “And took ten men to the hundred to all tribes Israel, and hundred to the thousand, and thousand to the myriad.” These words are given in anticipation of battle.

The people had gathered to decide what to do about a matter. They had not gathered to engage in warfare. Therefore, before taking that course of action, they had to have supplies. As such, the entire congregation would except for ten percent, meaning forty thousand, of them…

10 (con’t) to make provisions for the people, that when they come to Gibeah in Benjamin, they may repay all the vileness that they have done in Israel.”

laqakhath tsedah laam laasoth l’voam l’geva Binyamin k’khal hanvalah asher asah b’Yisrael – “To take provision to the people to do to their coming to Geba Benjamin according to all the foolishness which done in Israel.” The ten percent who are drawn off are to obtain provisions and provide them to whoever is chosen by lot to engage in the battle.

Provisions are especially needed if the city has to be besieged, something that could take an extended period. As for the name of the city, it is now spelled differently –

Gibeah – גִּבְעָה
Geba – גֶּבַע

The fifth letter, hey, is missing. However, the meaning of the name, Hill, remains unchanged. With the supplies gathered, it next says…

 11 So all the men of Israel were gathered against the city, united together as one man.

vayeaseph kal ish Yisrael el ha’ir k’ish ekhad khaverim – “And gathered all man Israel unto the city according to man one –comrades.” Only with the provisions for battle secured does it say this, as evidenced from verse 17, which again cites the number as four hundred thousand. True to their word, none returned home but stayed where they were, preparing for battle.

In these words is a new adjective, khaver. It signifies an associate, coming from the verb khavar, to be joined together. Using this word is intended to show that they are not just warriors ready for battle, but they are united in fraternal bonds over an issue that directly affects them all. Because these are fighting men, translating the word as comrades more appropriately conveys the sense.

One can get the feel of the word from Ezekiel 37 –

“As for you, son of man, take a stick for yourself and write on it: ‘For Judah and for the children of Israel, his companions [khaver].’ Then take another stick and write on it, ‘For Joseph, the stick of Ephraim, and for all the house of Israel, his companions [khaver].’ 17 Then join them one to another for yourself into one stick, and they will become one in your hand.
18 “And when the children of your people speak to you, saying, ‘Will you not show us what you mean by these?’— 19 say to them, ‘Thus says the Lord God: “Surely I will take the stick of Joseph, which is in the hand of Ephraim, and the tribes of Israel, his companions [khaver]; and I will join them with it, with the stick of Judah, and make them one stick, and they will be one in My hand.”’ 20 And the sticks on which you write will be in your hand before their eyes.” Ezekiel 37:16-20

None of us will return to his tent
Nor will any go back to his house
Until our energy is spent
This raging fire to douse

If we don’t quench it now
Things will get thoroughly out of hand
And so we must adamantly avow
That we will comply with the Lord’s demand

We must purge the sin from us
And live for the Lord all of our days
Let us walk in a manner pleasing to Jesus
And not let sin set our lives ablaze

II. Slinging the Stone (verses 12-18)

12 Then the tribes of Israel sent men through all the tribe of Benjamin, saying, “What is this wickedness that has occurred among you?

The word “Then” may not be correct: vayishlekhu shivte Yisrael anashim b’khal shivte Binyamin lemor mah haraah hazoth asher niyethah bakhem – “And sends, tribes Israel, men in all tribes Benjamin, to say, ‘What the evil, the this, which done in you?’”

It may be that these words were sent out when those who went out for supplies were sent out. Otherwise, it seems like there would be an unnecessary waste of time while people sat around waiting for a reply. Regardless, the offer of peace between the tribes is made in this manner.

As for the plural “tribes of Benjamin,” this is not without precedence. In Numbers 4:18, it says, “Do not cut off the tribe [shevet] of the families of the Kohathites from among the Levites.” The Kohathites were a family within the tribe of Levi, but they are called a tribe in that verse.

There are two general words for tribe, mateh and shevet. The meanings are very similar, but mateh looks more to the genealogical side of the tribe whereas shevet looks more to the political side. Thus, the use of shevet makes sense. The political entities within the overall tribe are inquired of.

13 Now therefore, deliver up the men, the perverted men who are in Gibeah,”

v’atah t’nu eth ha’anashim b’ne v’liyaal asher bagivah unmithem “And now, give the men, sons worthlessness, who in the Gibeah. And we will put them to death.” The petition acknowledges the sovereignty of Benjamin as a people and in relation to their tribal inheritance.

Thus, it is appropriate to go to all tribes within the tribe to make this appeal. The onus for relinquishing the worthless men of Gibeah falls on the entire tribe. The petition is made so…

13 (con’t) that we may put them to death and remove the evil from Israel!”

There is no article before “evil”: unvaarah raah miyisrael – “and we will consume evil from Israel.” A state of evil exists which cannot be tolerated. For the tribes of Benjamin to turn down the petition for its removal would be to take the side of evil. As such, it would be an acceptance of war against Israel in defense of the indefensible.

13 (con’t) But the children of Benjamin would not listen to the voice of their brethren, the children of Israel.

Rather: v’lo avu Binyamin lishmoa b’qol akhehem b’ne Yisrael – “And no willed, Benjamin, to hear in voice their brothers, sons Israel.” The word “sons” (of Benjamin) is inserted into the verbal reading of the Hebrew, but that is an unwarranted addition. The tribal name, Benjamin, stands for the tribes of Benjamin. They have collectively stood against Israel.

And more, it says that this was avah, willingly. There was a purposeful rejection of the offer of peace. Benjamin sided with evil and thus they have assumed the state of being evil. It is an intolerable state for Israel to accept. Benjamin knew this…

14 Instead, the children of Benjamin gathered together from their cities to Gibeah, to go to battle against the children of Israel.

vayeasphu v’ne vinyamin min hearim ha’givathah latseth lamilkhamah im b’ne Yisrael – “And gather, sons Benjamin, from the cities the Gibeah-ward to go to war with sons Israel.” The words are not intended to mean there were none who dwelt outside of cities. Rather, the cities stand for the area in which they exist, just as they do today. All of those in Benjamin who were able to fight came forward and headed toward Gibeah for battle.

15 And from their cities at that time the children of Benjamin numbered twenty-six thousand men who drew the sword,

vayithpaqdu v’ne vinyamin bayom ha’hu mehearim esrim v’shishah eleph ish sholeph kharev – “And visited, sons Benjamin, in the day, the it, from the cities twenty and six thousand man drawing sword.” The word paqad means to visit, but that has many connotations. In this case, it would be to number or muster.

The repetition of the phrase “from the cities,” is probably noted to highlight the close affiliation and affection with their brothers in the Gibeah. Cities are places where peoples and ideas coalesce and unite in thought, direction, and purpose. The other cities of Benjamin are united with their brothers in these ways.

As for the number 26,000, its basic units are two, ten, and thirteen. Ten has been explained. Two is the number of division or difference. As for thirteen, Bullinger says that “every occurrence of the number thirteen, and likewise of every multiple of it, stamps that with which it stands in connection with rebellion, apostacy, defection, corruption, disintegration, revolution, or some kindred idea.”

15 (con’t) besides the inhabitants of Gibeah, who numbered seven hundred select men.

The verb is reflexive: l’vad miyoshve hagivah hithpaqdu sh’va meoth ish bakhur – “to separation from dwellings the Gibeah – visited themselves seven hundred man, selected.” The meaning of l’vad, to separation, is besides or apart from. There are an additional seven hundred men from the Gibeah who appointed themselves to participate in the battle as well. Seven is the number of spiritual perfection.

The term bakhur, selected, signifies choice. Those of Gibeah, despite being sexual deviants, were apparently good in battle.

16 Among all this people were seven hundred select men who were left-handed; every one could sling a stone at a hair’s breadth and not miss.

mikol ha’am hazeh sh’vah meoth ish bakhur iter yad y’mino kal zeh qolea ba’even el hasaarah v’lo yakhati – “From all the people, the this, seven hundreds man, selected, shut hand his right. All this, slinging the stone unto the hair, and no miss.” Because the same number was used in the previous verse, many scholars and some translations unite the men of both verses, saying it is the same group.

This is convenient, but it hardly could be the case. It would then mean that every person from Gibeah was left-handed. But more, the Hebrew doesn’t bear it out. It says, “from all the people.” It would be a pointless thing to say this if it was intended to mean the entire seven hundred from Gibeah.

Rather, there are seven hundred select men from Gibeah and there are seven hundred select lefties from all of Benjamin. This means there are the 26k of the other cities in Benjamin who draw the sword. There are seven hundred from Gibeah added to the total who are choice men. From this total, there are seven hundred who are also capable of slinging the stone.

In this verse are a few words of note. The first is iter, an adjective meaning shut up, and thus impeded. It is used for the second and last time in Scripture. The other use described Ehud of Judges 3.

It either means each is 1) defective in his right hand, 2) lefthanded (this being an idiomatic expression), or 3) that he is ambidextrous. It is probably an idiom, but it may mean ambidextrous. It is unlikely that seven hundred men of Benjamin had defective right hands.

Therefore, it may be an ironic trait common in Benjamin, Son of the Right Hand, to have lefthanded or ambidextrous offspring. Or it may be that they purposefully worked to improve their left hands as a play on their name – “Hey, there is Lefty, the Son of the Right Hand.”

The next word is new, qala’. It signifies to sling. It also means to carve as if in a singular motion or into light forms. The third word, saarah, signifies a hair. It is derived from se’ar, hair, but this word speaks of it in and individual manner.

The meaning is clear. These men could sling lefthanded and hit a target as if it was a single hair. As hair in the Bible signifies an awareness, especially of sin, a single hair would most likely speak of acute awareness.

That is an interesting lead-in to the words v’lo yakhati, and no miss. The word khata, to miss, also means to sin, as in when one misses the mark. This is a common connotation of the word and it answers to the Greek hamartia which has the same dual meaning. It is “sin, forfeiture because missing the mark” (HELPS Word Studies).

17 Now besides Benjamin, the men of Israel numbered four hundred thousand men who drew the sword; all of these were men of war.

Again, as in verse 15, the verb is reflexive: v’ish Yisrael hithpaqdu l’bad mibinyamin arba meoth eleph ish sholeph kharev kal zeh ish milkhamah – “And man, Israel, visited themselves, to exception from Benjamin, four hundreds thousand man drawing sword. All this man war.” Apart from Benjamin, there were 400k of Israel who mustered themselves, all drawing the kherev, sword, like the 26k from Benjamin.

18 Then the children of Israel arose and went up to the house of God to inquire of God. They said, “Which of us shall go up first to battle against the children of Benjamin?”

Rather: vayaqumu vayaalu beith el vayishalu belohim vayomru b’ne Yisrael mi yaaleh lanu batkhilah lamilkhamah im b’ne vinyamin – “And arise and ascend Bethel, and ask in elohim. And say, sons Israel, ‘Who ascend, to us, in the beginning to the war with sons Benjamin?’” Some translations say “the house of God” instead of Bethel.

This is incorrect as there is no article to justify this. Rather, they went up to Bethel to inquire of God there. This is more certain because it says in verse 27 that the ark of the covenant was there in those days. It would be superfluous to say this if the ark was at the house of God in Shiloh, especially because Shiloh is never mentioned.

The people, whether a delegation or the entire army, went to Bethel and asked God who was to go up to the war. This explains the lot mentioned in verse 9. They would have someone cast the lot before the Lord in order to seek His will. In doing so, the divine response is given…

*18 (fin) The Lord said, “Judah first!”

vayomer Yehovah Yehuda batkhilah – “And says, Yehovah, ‘Judah in the beginning.’” The words form a pun. Judah means Praise. The Lord is saying that Praise is to go first. Nothing is said of victory or defeat. The people asked the question and the Lord gave His response.

That is the end of our verses today. We are left in suspense as to what lies ahead concerning the engagement which is sure to take place. But we can see that Benjamin has placed his tribal priority over his duty to the nation and the Lord.

This is something not uncommon in politics and the church. In politics, we are all aware of staunch conservatives who have a family member who turns out to be a morally questionable adult. Instead of holding firm to their convictions, they suddenly begin to support more liberal views on a particular issue.

In the church, people waffle on issues when they touch close to home or with people in their families, in their church, and so forth. Instead of standing up for what is morally right, they modify their doctrine. Entire church denominations have taken this path.

For most, it happens slowly and the individual or congregants simply go along with the subtle changes going on around them. Over time, however, the difference in the person, church, seminary, denomination, etc. is completely contrary to its beginning.

Each of us needs to be settled in our morals, sound in our doctrine, and unwilling to tolerate that which the Lord finds intolerable. Unless we do this, disaster lies ahead. For those who take the right stand, there may be problems as well.

When there is a battle ahead, people will usually not come out unscathed, but it is far better to suffer loss for the sake of the Lord than to suffer temporary supposed gain in this world and have to face the Lord on unhappy terms in eternity.

Israel took a stand in today’s passage and a battle against their own kin lies ahead, but that is far preferable than allowing the infection to fester. Let us remember this. The most unloving thing we can do is to tolerate sin in those we love.

When people in today’s world use catch phrases like “love wins,” they have no idea what they are talking about. The kind of love they are attempting to defend, like Benjamin and the Gibeonites, will only lead to a bad end.

But there is a remedy for the sin problem: Jesus. Without Him in the mix, things will not go well. But when He is properly included in every decision, life will be pleasing to God. Let us remember this and be people of faith who live out our faith faithfully.

Closing Verse: “Do not be deceived: ‘Evil company corrupts good habits.’ 34 Awake to righteousness, and do not sin; for some do not have the knowledge of God. I speak this to your shame.” 1 Corinthians 15:33, 34

Next Week: Judges 20:19-35 This story is so swell, ain’t it great? (No King in Israel, Part VIII) (55th Judges Sermon)

The Lord has you exactly where He wants you. He has a good plan and purpose for you. It is He who judges His people according to their deeds. So, follow Him, live for Him, and trust Him, and He will do marvelous things for you and through you.

(No King in Israel, Part VII)

So all the children of Israel came out
From Dan to Beersheba, as well as from the land of Gilead
And the congregation gathered together as one man
Before the LORD at Mizpah, because of the news so sad

And the leaders of all the people
All the tribes of Israel with one accord
Presented themselves in the assembly of the people of God
Four hundred thousand foot soldiers who drew the sword

(Now the children of Benjamin heard
That the children of Israel had up to Mizpah gone)
Then the children of Israel said
“Tell us, how did this wicked deed happen? What is going on?

So the Levite, the husband of the woman who was murdered
Answered and said about the plight
“My concubine and I went into Gibeah
Which belongs to Benjamin, to spend the night

And the men of Gibeah rose against me
And surrounded the house at night because of me
They intended to kill me
But instead they ravished my concubine so that she died, sadly

So I took hold of my concubine, cut her in pieces
And sent her throughout all the territory (so to you I tell)
Of the Israel’s inheritance
Because they committed lewdness and outrage in Israel

Look! All of you are children of Israel
Give your advice and counsel here and now – please tell!

So all the people arose as one man, saying
“None of us will go to his tent, so we are relaying

Nor will any turn back to his house
But now this is the thing (this is our plot)
Which we will do to Gibeah:
We will go up against it by lot

We will take ten men out of every hundred throughout
———-all the tribes of Israel
A hundred out of every thousand from ‘neath the steeple
And a thousand out of every ten thousand
To make provisions for the people

That when they come to Gibeah in Benjamin as well
They may repay all the vileness that they have done in Israel

So all the men of Israel were gathered according to the plan
Against the city, united together as one man

Then the tribes of Israel sent men
Through all the tribe of Benjamin, saying
“What is this wickedness that has occurred among you?
A price for this you will be paying

Now therefore, deliver up the men, the perverted men who
———-are in Gibeah
That we may put them to death and remove the evil from Israel!”
But the children of Benjamin would not listen
To the voice of their brethren, the children of Israel as they did tell

Instead, the children of Benjamin gathered together
From their cities to Gibeah
To go to battle against the children of Israel
Maybe shouting out a big oorah

And from their cities at that time
The children of Benjamin numbered twenty-six thousand men
Who drew the sword, besides the inhabitants of Gibeah
Who numbered seven hundred select men, that is seventy times ten

Among all this people were seven hundred select men
Who were left-handed, slinging like this…
Every one could sling a stone
At a hair’s breadth and not miss

Now besides Benjamin
The men of Israel numbered four hundred thousand men, a big
———-number for shor
Those who drew the sword
All of these were men of war

Then the children of Israel arose
And went up to the house of God to inquire of God to be versed
They said, “Which of us shall go up first to battle
Against the children of Benjamin?” The LORD said, “Judah first!”

Lord God, turn our hearts to be obedient to Your word
Give us wisdom to be ever faithful to You
May we carefully heed each thing we have heard
Yes, Lord God may our hearts be faithful and true

And we shall be content and satisfied in You alone
We will follow You as we sing our songs of praise
Hallelujah to You; to us Your path You have shown
Hallelujah we shall sing to You for all of our days

Hallelujah and Amen…

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

So all the children of Israel came out, from Dan to Beersheba, as well as from the land of Gilead, and the congregation gathered together as one man before the Lord at Mizpah. And the leaders of all the people, all the tribes of Israel, presented themselves in the assembly of the people of God, four hundred thousand foot soldiers who drew the sword. (Now the children of Benjamin heard that the children of Israel had gone up to Mizpah.)

Then the children of Israel said, “Tell us, how did this wicked deed happen?”

So the Levite, the husband of the woman who was murdered, answered and said, “My concubine and I went into Gibeah, which belongs to Benjamin, to spend the night. And the men of Gibeah rose against me, and surrounded the house at night because of me. They intended to kill me, but instead they ravished my concubine so that she died. So I took hold of my concubine, cut her in pieces, and sent her throughout all the territory of the inheritance of Israel, because they committed lewdness and outrage in Israel. Look! All of you are children of Israel; give your advice and counsel here and now!”

So all the people arose as one man, saying, “None of us will go to his tent, nor will any turn back to his house; but now this is the thing which we will do to Gibeah: We will go up against it by lot. 10 We will take ten men out of every hundred throughout all the tribes of Israel, a hundred out of every thousand, and a thousand out of every ten thousand, to make provisions for the people, that when they come to Gibeah in Benjamin, they may repay all the vileness that they have done in Israel.” 11 So all the men of Israel were gathered against the city, united together as one man.

12 Then the tribes of Israel sent men through all the tribe of Benjamin, saying, “What is this wickedness that has occurred among you? 13 Now therefore, deliver up the men, the perverted men who are in Gibeah, that we may put them to death and remove the evil from Israel!” But the children of Benjamin would not listen to the voice of their brethren, the children of Israel. 14 Instead, the children of Benjamin gathered together from their cities to Gibeah, to go to battle against the children of Israel. 15 And from their cities at that time the children of Benjamin numbered twenty-six thousand men who drew the sword, besides the inhabitants of Gibeah, who numbered seven hundred select men. 16 Among all this people were seven hundred select men who were left-handed; every one could sling a stone at a hair’s breadth and not miss. 17 Now besides Benjamin, the men of Israel numbered four hundred thousand men who drew the sword; all of these were men of war.

18 Then the children of Israel arose and went up to the house of God to inquire of God. They said, “Which of us shall go up first to battle against the children of Benjamin?”

The Lord said, “Judah first!”

 

Matthew 4:17

Flowers from the Tree of Sarasota, the Gold Tree.

Friday, 27 September 2024

From that time Jesus began to preach and to say, “Repent, for the kingdom of heaven is at hand.” Matthew 4:17

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen).

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“From then, Jesus, He began to proclaim and to say, ‘Reconsider! For it has neared – the kingdom of the heavens’” (CG).

The previous verse completed the citation from Isaiah concerning the coming Messiah who would appear in the land of Zebulun and the land of Naphtali. With that citation complete, it next says, “From then, Jesus, He began to proclaim and to say.”

The baptism of Jesus has been noted, His temptation in the desert area was explained, and then the imprisonment of John was noted, which was immediately followed by the note that Jesus departed to the Galilee, thus fulfilling Isaiah’s prophecy. Matthew’s account of the ministry in the area of Galilee now officially begins with this verse.

The narrative clearly and unambiguously shows that Jesus is the fulfillment of Isaiah’s messianic prophecy, just as was the prophecy concerning John from Isaiah that he would be the forerunner of the Messiah.

The logical step-by-step nature of how Matthew is presenting the unfolding of Israel’s history in relation to the coming of the Messiah is carefully laid out for us to see. With Jesus as the Messiah on full display, His message is next given in the words, “Reconsider! For it has neared – the kingdom of the heavens.”

It is a letter-for-letter repeat of John’s message in Matthew 3:2 –

3:1, 2 – And in those days, comes John the Baptist, proclaiming in the desolate of Judea, 2 and saying, “Reconsider! For it has neared – the kingdom of the heavens” (CG).

4:17 – From then, Jesus, He began to proclaim and to say, “Reconsider! For it has neared – the kingdom of the heavens” (CG).

Jesus is, at this time, noted as being like a herald. He is proclaiming a message of reconsideration to the people of Israel. As they were the Lord’s people, this must mean reconsidering their relationship with Him. This is unlike the later reconsideration when the gospel is preached to the Gentiles.

The Gentiles did not have a relationship with the Lord as noted, for example, in Ephesians 2:12 where Paul notes that they stand “without Christ, being aliens from the commonwealth of Israel and strangers from the covenants of promise, having no hope and without God in the world.”

As such, the reconsideration of the Gentiles which Paul mentions in (for example) Acts 17:30, concerns their idea about who God is, not so much their relationship with Him. Once they are presented with the gospel, they reconsider who God is and what He is like, turning to Him through faith in the Messiah.

Jesus, at this time, is proclaiming reconsideration to Israel who is still under the law. He is telling them that the kingdom of the heavens is at hand. John’s proclamation was to prepare Israel for the coming of the Messiah who would establish this kingdom. Jesus’ proclamation is that He is the One who would establish it.

Life application: There is a false teaching concerning the establishment of Christ’s coming that says Jesus came to renew the Mosaic Covenant. Thus, rather than translating verses like Jeremiah 31:31 and Hebrews 8:8, 13 as “new,” these false teachers say “renewed.” This is what is taught, for example, in the Hebrew Roots movement.

The word, in both Hebrew and Greek, means “new.” The word “renewed” is not a possible translation, nor can it even be inferred. There is a complete divide between the Law of Moses and the Covenant of Grace which comes through Jesus’ finished work.

This is because Jesus’ finished work… well, it finished something. What did it finish? It finished the task He was assigned, which was to be born under the law, live out the law without sinning, and then end the law because the law stands against us. It is not our friend but our enemy in the sense that it only condemns us. Without Jesus, the law can never bring about salvation. That is why Paul wrote this –

“For He Himself is our peace, who has made both one, and has broken down the middle wall of separation, 15 having abolished in His flesh the enmity, that is, the law of commandments contained in ordinances, so as to create in Himself one new man from the two, thus making peace, 16 and that He might reconcile them both [Jew and Gentile] to God in one body through the cross, thereby putting to death the enmity.” Ephesians 2:14-16

Jesus “abolished” the “law of commandments and ordinances.” It is speaking of the Law of Moses. It stood opposed to those who were under it. For those who believe in the completed work of the Messiah, salvation is realized. For those who claim that Jesus came to “renew” the Law of Moses, they have believed a false gospel and there will be no salvation.

Man simply cannot give up on himself. It is the sin of pride that says, “I am my own Savior.” These prideful men may make Jesus be a part of the process, but never all of it. This type of thinking ultimately comes back to self. Give up on self! If you are a part of this heretical sect, come to Jesus today. Be saved through His full, final, finished, and forever work. Come to the cross and lay yourself and your burdens down.

Glorious God, forgive us for always trying to make everything about ourselves. Even in salvation, we greedily claim a portion of the process, as if we have somehow merited grace. But grace cannot be earned. Help us to get this right. May we forever hail Jesus who alone has done it all. To Your glory, we pray. Amen.

 

Matthew 4:16

More orchids.

Thursday, 26 September 2024

The people who sat in darkness have seen a great light,
And upon those who sat in the region and shadow of death
Light has dawned.”
Matthew 4:16

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen).

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“The people sitting in darkness, it saw Light – great, and sitting in a country and death-shadow, Light – it arose upon them” (CG).

In the previous verse, Isaiah’s prophecy concerning the coming great Light began. That now continues with the words, “The people sitting in darkness.”

The words explain the situation described in the previous verse. The Assyrians had come in and conquered the land, removing the northern ten tribes for their faithless conduct before the Lord. In place of them, pagans from around the Assyrian empire were brought in. They worshiped all the gods of their homelands, bringing great spiritual darkness when they did.

Many of these false religions partly continued, being intermingled with the customs and religion of the Jews, as it said in 2 Kings 17:33, “They feared the Lord, yet served their own gods—according to the rituals of the nations from among whom they were carried away.”

This lack of properly worshiping the Lord continued throughout the years. And notice the use of the present participle, sitting. Those translations which render it as “sat” do a disservice to the intent. They were sitting and continued to sit in it.

The light of the worship of the Lord under the law did not permeate the darkness in which they sat. Something greater was needed to pull them out of the state of darkness in which they were stuck. But when Christ came, of this area of darkness, “it saw Light – great.”

It is referring to Jesus and His ministry. This is the area of His main focus for an extended period. And it wasn’t just to the Jews, even though that was the primary calling. An example of His bringing light to others is found in John 4 where Jesus was presented as the Messiah to the Samaritans in Sychar.

Throughout the region, there was only darkness. And this included the religion of the Jews in the synagogues. They had been taken over by the religious leaders who misdirected the people with their false, self-centered, teachings. These received the greatest rebukes from Jesus.

As He said to them, “Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you travel land and sea to win one proselyte, and when he is won, you make him twice as much a son of hell as yourselves.” Matthew 23:15

Thus, the words of Isaiah continue, referring to the masses of this region, “and sitting in a country.”

The people were sitting in darkness and the darkness is now equated to the country. The area is within the original borders of the land of Israel, and yet there was only darkness. Something greater than the law was needed to move them into a right relationship with the Lord, as the words of the prophecy next note, “and death-shadow.”

The Greek is two separate nouns: skia, a shadow, and thanatos, death. Taken together, they translate the single word found in the Hebrew of Isaiah, tsalmaveth – “death-shadow.” The death referred to carries a double connotation. It is the spiritual death that results in the physical death of humanity.

In other words, without the spiritual life of Christ, man is destined to die. This is what Jesus came to change. He came to give light and life to His people, bringing them out of the spiritual death in which they lived and from the physical death that all suffer because of it. In His coming, the words of the prophecy thus say, “Light – it arose upon them.”

The words are beautifully explained by John as he opened his gospel narrative –

“In Him was life, and the life was the light of men. And the light shines in the darkness, and the darkness did not comprehend it.
There was a man sent from God, whose name was John. This man came for a witness, to bear witness of the Light, that all through him might believe. He was not that Light, but was sent to bear witness of that Light. That was the true Light which gives light to every man coming into the world.” John 1:4-9

In Jesus’ appearing, the words of Isaiah are fulfilled. He is the Great Light that came into the world and who appeared in the spiritual dark lands noted by Isaiah.

Life application: In John 7, we read these words –

“Then the Pharisees answered them, ‘Are you also deceived? 48 Have any of the rulers or the Pharisees believed in Him? 49 But this crowd that does not know the law is accursed.’
50 Nicodemus (he who came to Jesus by night, being one of them) said to them, 51 ‘Does our law judge a man before it hears him and knows what he is doing?’
52 They answered and said to him, ‘Are you also from Galilee? Search and look, for no prophet has arisen out of Galilee.’” John 7:47-52

These religious leaders had the words of Isaiah right before them, and yet they refused to accept what he had written because it would not fit their presuppositions about Jesus, and they failed to check things out.

This is still the case today. Why are there some who follow the doctrines of Calvinism and some who completely reject Calvin’s main points? Why are there people who accept that you can lose your salvation while others teach salvation is eternal? Many believe in a rapture while others reject the notion as silly. And even among those who accept the premise of a rapture, there are disagreements on the timing of the event.

This is a teeny portion of various disagreements within Christianity over doctrine. In fact, it is an infinitesimally small portion of them. Why is this so?

There are several reasons. One is that people are arguing from different viewpoints about the source of what they believe. Some hold to Scripture alone, but they may hold to a single source text of the Hebrew or Greek or to a single English translation.

Some think that the church has been given ongoing authority to set doctrine while others accept that the Bible is the sole source of doctrine for believers. But the latter again goes back to “which source text or translation.”

Even if a standard is agreed on, if one fails to take the Bible in its proper context, there can be no agreement on how doctrine is presented. If Jesus speaking to Israel under the law is used to make a doctrinal point in the church, and if that conflicts with what Paul says in his epistles, then there will be a disagreement on a particular doctrine.

And, of course, there are those who simply pull doctrines out of nowhere and teach them as if they are biblically correct. These may be based on emotions, sensational events, or desires for power or money. In using those as the basis for instructing others who are uneducated in proper theology, people are captivated and brought into often disastrous situations.

We each must decide what standard we will accept as authoritative. As God has said His word is authoritative, that is the safest place to hang one’s hat. From there, each step of the way, we should consider our next step carefully while fixing our eyes on Jesus, whom the Bible says is “the author and finisher of our faith” (Hebrews 12:2).

If we do this, we should at least have our priorities right as we continue our walk before our God. Let us do this above all else as we seek His face in the Great Light of the face of Jesus Christ our Lord.

Heavenly Father, Hallelujah to You for having sent Jesus to lead the way out of the darkness of this world and into the magnificent light of Your glory. Thank You for what You have done for us. Hallelujah and Amen.

 

Matthew 4:15

Coconut with new sprout coming out of it. Soon it will be a huge palm.

Wednesday, 25 September 2024

“The land of Zebulun and the land of Naphtali,
By the way of the sea, beyond the Jordan,
Galilee of the Gentiles:
Matthew 4:15

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen).

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“Land Zebulun and land Naphtali,
Way of the sea, beyond the Jordan –
Galilee of the Gentiles” (CG).

The previous verse gave an introduction to Isaiah’s words, saying “That it might be fulfilled, the ‘having been spoken’ through Isaiah the prophet.” Now, the specific words of prophecy are cited by Matthew, beginning with, “Land Zebulun and land Naphtali.”

The words come from Isaiah 9, the first seven verses of which are filled with descriptions of the coming Messiah. Matthew’s citation is not directly from the Hebrew or the Greek. Rather, it appears that he was writing from memory and giving the substance of what he knew.

Isaiah’s words are directed to the area of two tribes that sat north in the land of Israel. Naphtali extended to the northern border of Canaan. Its eastern border rested along the Jordan and the Sea of Galilee. Zebulun’s border ran next to Naphtali in approximately its southwest area. Isaiah’s words are addressed to this particular area, next noting, “Way of the sea.”

The sea is speaking of the Sea of Galilee. There is a route that leads to these areas by going around the sea, but so close to the sea that it is considered a sea highway. The next words of Isaiah, “beyond the Jordan,” are usually ignored or completely misunderstood.

The word is peran. It means over, on the other side, beyond, etc. It answers to the Hebrew noun ever, the region across or beyond. Both give the sense of a location that is opposite to the point of reference. However, Naphtali and Zebulun are within the borders of Canaan. Therefore, it seems like the thought is erroneous.

Why would a prophecy about these two tribal inheritances be given as if from across the Jordan when Isaiah was clearly in Jerusalem on the west side of the Jordan? Because of this, the words are ignored at times. Some say that they are speaking of the two areas as a base for Jesus’ evangelism on the other side of the Jordan (something not indicated by the words of Isaiah). Others will note it means something like what Albert Barnes says –

“This does not mean to the east of Jordan, as the phrase sometimes denotes, but rather in the vicinity of the Jordan, or perhaps in the vicinity of the sources of the Jordan.”

Such a notion is incorrect. The word means the other side, beyond, etc., and it is used here as if from the area east of the Jordan. It does not mean “in the vicinity of.” The answer comes from looking at the fuller words of Isaiah in the surrounding context. Isaiah 8:1-10 refers to the invasion of Assyria. For example –

“Then I went to the prophetess, and she conceived and bore a son. Then the Lord said to me, ‘Call his name Maher-Shalal-Hash-Baz; for before the child shall have knowledge to cry “My father” and “My mother,” the riches of Damascus and the spoil of Samaria will be taken away before the king of Assyria.’” Isaiah 8:3, 4

The rest of Isaiah 8 will then describe the state of the people within the land, ending with the words, “Then they will look to the earth, and see trouble and darkness, gloom of anguish; and they will be driven into darkness.” It is from this springboard that the majestic words of hope come forth in Isaiah 9.

Therefore, the words “beyond the Jordan” refer to the area of the land of Israel’s northern kingdom, which included Zebulun and Naphtali, but they are spoken from the perspective of Assyria which is east of the Jordan. It is in this area that hundreds of years later, the Messiah would bring hope to a land that had been through so much anguish and darkness at the time of Isaiah.

It is a land that still languished spiritually at the time of the coming of Christ Jesus. Understanding the reference to Isaiah’s words clears up the otherwise seemingly incomprehensible words. From this springboard, Matthew continues with, “Galilee of the Gentiles.”

This area contained land given to the Gentile king of Tyre, Hiram as recorded in 1 Kings 9. It was later invaded by Assyria, and the people of the northern kingdom were taken into exile. From there, the Assyrians took Gentile people and moved them into the area as noted in 2 Kings 17:24, 25.

Because of problems within the land, one of the priests of Israel was sent back to instruct these new inhabitants how to live there properly (1 Kings 17:27, 28). From there, the account says –

“However every nation continued to make gods of its own, and put them in the shrines on the high places which the Samaritans had made, every nation in the cities where they dwelt. 30 The men of Babylon made Succoth Benoth, the men of Cuth made Nergal, the men of Hamath made Ashima, 31 and the Avites made Nibhaz and Tartak; and the Sepharvites burned their children in fire to Adrammelech and Anammelech, the gods of Sepharvaim. 32 So they feared the Lord, and from every class they appointed for themselves priests of the high places, who sacrificed for them in the shrines of the high places. 33 They feared the Lord, yet served their own gods—according to the rituals of the nations from among whom they were carried away.” 1 Kings 17:29-33

The pagan practices never really departed from the area and it always remained a place without the light of the Lord. This is why the Jews of Jesus’ time who lived in the north, and who would travel to Jerusalem, would avoid Samaria. It was a place that developed its own worship of the Lord with its own modified version of the writings of Moses known as the Samaritan Pentateuch.

It is to this land of spiritual gloom that Isaiah’s prophecy is directed.

Life application: Studying the Bible, contemplating its difficult passages, and keeping things in context can be fun. Be sure to study your Bible, carefully contemplate passages that are difficult, and consider the context of what is being said. If you do these things, you will have fun while rightly learning what the Bible is telling you.

How marvelous it is to learn the wonderful word You have given us, O God. Help us always to consider the context of what we are reading so that we don’t form erroneous conclusions about what is being said. Your word is far too important to mishandle it simply for the sake of convenience. Give us wisdom in its mysteries, O God. Amen.

 

Matthew 4:14

Pink Orchid.

Tuesday, 24 September 2024

that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by Isaiah the prophet, saying: Matthew 4:14

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen).

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

“That it might be fulfilled, the ‘having been spoken’ through Isaiah the prophet, saying,” (CG).

The previous verse noted that Jesus had disregarded Nazareth and had come to Capernaum at the seaside which is in the regions of Zebulun and Naphtali. With that having been explained, Matthew next records, “That it might be fulfilled.”

In other words, the movement of Jesus to Capernaum in the regions of these two tribes of Israel was actually seen to be a fulfillment of prophecy in Scripture. Concerning where the prophecy is, Matthew next begins to tell us with the words, “the ‘having been spoken’ through Isaiah the prophet, saying.”

Matthew says that something had been spoken through the prophet Isaiah that foretold this. As noted in the Matthew 2:23 commentary, Nazareth is a town located within Naphtali. However, some place it in the tribe of Zebulun. The ancient borders are not completely known.

It is rather certain that Capernaum was located in the territorial allotment of Naphtali. Between the two places He lived, the fulfillment of Isaiah’s words, as will next be described, is certainly realized in Jesus’ life and ministry.

Life application: There are many literary styles in Scripture. One of them that is really proof that God’s hand is behind the word is prophecy. Things are stated by Him and then they come to pass. Many prophecies have been fulfilled. Others are in the ongoing process of being fulfilled (such as God’s promises to keep Israel as a people). And yet others are still future to us now.

Because of the innumerable prophecies that have already been fulfilled, we can be sure of several things:

The word is reliable. God has spoken and what He says faithfully comes to pass. Thus, it proves that He is fully in charge of the future as it unfolds.

Jesus is the Messiah. God promised a Messiah. He has given prophecies in His word that tell of when He would come, what would be the situation with Israel at His coming (and afterward), what family He would descend from, what His birth would be like, the things the Messiah would do, etc. Only Jesus qualifies concerning these prophecies. Also, no person can ever fulfill them in the future based on the way God has arranged things.

Past performance assures us of future results. Because the word is so trustworthy in the fulfillment of prophecy, we can be certain that those things which have not yet been fulfilled will be as well. And this isn’t just true with exacting prophecies, but also of general and specific promises.

In the word, we are told that there will be a rapture and we can rest in that promise, being assured that it will come to pass. We are told that those in Christ who have died before us will be raised to eternal life. We should not worry one iota that it will not be realized. God has promised us eternal life in a state we cannot yet understand, one without pain, fear, or death. We should not fret that it might not happen.

God’s past performance is a reliable testimonial that His promises about the future for His people will be realized.

Do not fret, fear, or be uneasy about where life is taking you. Rest in the truth that God’s word will stand. Jesus has prevailed, and we will, too. Hold fast to this as the world around us continues to spin out of control. It really isn’t out of control at all. God is allowing man to take the course he chooses until the time when He will set things straight.

Lord God, we can stand firmly on Your word and have no fear or trepidation about what lies ahead. For sure, we shall trust You each step of the way because You have proven Yourself through Your word in the coming of our Savior, Jesus. We know that all You have said will come to pass. Thank You for our ability to trust and for the blessed assurance we possess. Amen.