Malachi 1:4-8 (Where is My Honor?)

Artwork by Douglas Kallerson.

Malachi 1:4-8
Where Is My Honor?

(Typed 19 Aug 2024) The clock didn’t work on sermon typing morning. Therefore, I didn’t get up until about 4:15. Because of this on a normal sermon typing day, I would be pretty late in getting finished – even more late than usual.

However, an analysis of the style of presentation of the Lord’s word in Malachi doesn’t require as much difficult contemplation as in the other books we have gone through. So, even for a regular sermon typing day, I was done quite early.

The prophetic words still bear the weight and authority of the word of the Lord. They are to be evaluated carefully, considered prayerfully, and contemplated in a manner that will lead us to a more perfect understanding of the nature of the Lord.

They reveal to us His covenant-keeping nature, His directive hand in human affairs, and His expectations for those who are His people (whether they actually are or simply claim to be).

In these verses, the Lord uses Esau, the people, and Edom, their land, as examples of His hand against those who are prideful and arrogant towards His decisions. But His own people who stand before Him are not exempt from His directive hand of attention, both in a positive and a negative way.

Text Verse: “For this reason many are weak and sick among you, and many sleep. 31 For if we would judge ourselves, we would not be judged. 32 But when we are judged, we are chastened by the Lord, that we may not be condemned with the world.” 1 Corinthians 11:30-32

The idea of the Lord’s chastening is found throughout Scripture. In Deuteronomy 8:5, He says to Israel, “You should know in your heart that as a man chastens his son, so the Lord your God chastens you.” The words are singular, “You, Israel.”

That premise remains true for them to this day. Israel is an adopted son to the Lord. A son is chastened when He does wrong, and Israel has done wrong continuously. Their greatest wrong was rejecting Christ Jesus when He came.

And yet, instead of destroying them as a nation, the Lord has chastened them for two millennia. This doesn’t mean that all in Israel have been saved. Rather, only those who have received Jesus have been saved. However, as a corporate body, they have continued.

Those in the church are now sons of God through adoption. When we stray, we will receive chastening in an attempt to correct our conduct. However, it should be taken as an axiom that not all in the church are saved. There is the true church of believers, among whom are many who have never believed.

As long as we process such thoughts properly, our doctrine on matters of salvation will be aligned with Scripture. We may assume that Israel gets some sort of exception to God’s plan of salvation through Christ, but that would be erroneous.

Or we might get the idea that because we are born into a Christian home, we, too, are Christians. Pay attention to what the Bible says. In failing to do so, an eternity of difference may be ahead for yourself or others.

Such truths as this are to be found in His superior word. And so, let us turn to that precious word once again, and… May God speak to us through His word today, and may His glorious name ever be praised.

I. The Territory of Wickedness (verses 4, 5)

Even though Edom has said,

The words at first appear to be gender confused: ki tomar edom – For says (fem. sg.) Edom.” The words are those of the land (Edom). Even if Edom the man is a masculine entity, the land (the inheritance of verse 3), which stands as the subject, is feminine as if she is a mother of the inhabitants. As such, it is as if the land is calling out on behalf of her people. Concerning Edom’s words…

4 (con’t) “We have been impoverished,
But we will return and build the desolate places,”

rushashnu v’nashuv v’nivneh khoravoth – “Demolished! And return, and build wastelands.” Here is a word found just twice in Scripture, rashash. It signifies to beat down and thus to demolish. Impoverished would be the result of the action, not the action itself.

As for their words, they are the response to the destruction of the land of Edom by the Lord –

3 “And Esau, I hate,
And set his mountains – a devastation.
And his inheritance to jackals wilderness.”

4 “For says Edom,
‘Demolished! And return, and build wastelands.”

The Lord states that He is ultimately the Force behind the destruction of Esau’s land. It was seen previously that the Lord gave the land of Seir to Esau and his descendants –

“And command the people, saying, ‘You are about to pass through the territory of your brethren, the descendants of Esau, who live in Seir; and they will be afraid of you. Therefore watch yourselves carefully. Do not meddle with them, for I will not give you any of their land, no, not so much as one footstep, because I have given Mount Seir to Esau as a possession. You shall buy food from them with money, that you may eat; and you shall also buy water from them with money, that you may drink.’” Deuteronomy 2:4-6

If the Lord gave, it was His right to dispense with it as He chose. Edom was devastated, and the people were exiled. This was the Lord’s doing. But as an act of defiance against His judgment, Edom proudly boasted, “Yeah, it’s demolished, but we will prevail! We will return to our land, and we will reestablish it from the wastelands that have arisen in place of our home.”

Because of this, the Lord continues with His own proclamation against their boastful words…

4 (con’t) Thus says the Lord of hosts:
“They may build, but I will throw down;

koh amar Y’hovah ts’vaoth hemah yivnu vaani eheros

“Thus said Yehovah Sabaoth:
‘They build, and I raze.’”

Here, the title Yehovah Sabaoth is introduced into the book of Micah. It will be used eight times in this chapter and twenty-four times in the book. It is derived from the verb tsava, to mass as an army or servants. Thus, Lord of Hosts expresses the idea well.

The words were in the singular, speaking of Edom as a single entity. Now, they go to the plural and refer to the people who comprise Edom.

Yehovah doesn’t dispute the fact that the people will return. In fact, the words presuppose it. They will build. Only something that is built can be razed. Edom had no prophecies of a permanent inheritance as Israel did. They had no prophecies that they had a future as a people for a set purpose, such as bringing forth the Messiah.

Yehovah had given the land to them. Now He had taken it away. Their attempts to regain and reestablish the land would be frustrated. The Pulpit Commentary notes –

“I will throw down. Edom never recovered its power; it became the prey of the Persians, the Nabatheans, the Jews under the Maccabees, the Macedonians, the Romans; and finally the Mohammedan conquest effected its utter ruin.”

The words here are similar to what transpired in the kingdom of Israel –

“The Lord sent a word against Jacob,
And it has fallen on Israel.
All the people will know—
Ephraim and the inhabitant of Samaria—
Who say in pride and arrogance of heart:
10 ‘The bricks have fallen down,
But we will rebuild with hewn stones;
The sycamores are cut down,
But we will replace them with cedars.’
11 Therefore the Lord shall set up
The adversaries of Rezin against him,
And spur his enemies on,
12 The Syrians before and the Philistines behind;
And they shall devour Israel with an open mouth.
For all this His anger is not turned away,
But His hand is stretched out still.” Isaiah 9:8-12

The Lord pronounced judgment against the northern kingdom of Israel. They were crushed and exiled according to the word of the Lord against their conduct. But in their arrogant pride, they claimed they would possess the land and build it. Without a word from the Lord for it to be so, it was not to come about.

To this day, there is the same ongoing problem in the land of Israel. The West Bank area is contested land. That will not change until the time the Lord determines it. Thousands of years later, the overpowering influence of the Lord’s decisions remains.

As for Edom, despite claiming they would rebuild, the Lord said He would also raze. As such…

4 (con’t) They shall be called the Territory of Wickedness,

The words continue in the plural: v’qaru lahem g’vul rishah – “And called to them Territory Wickedness.” In Numbers 20:23, it says, g’vul erets edom, “border land Edom.” A border defines what lies inside of it. In the case of the people’s efforts to be reestablished against the will of the Lord, they will be called g’vul rishah – “Territory Wickedness.”

The words are based upon the defiance of the people against the will of the Lord. It is an act of wickedness, and thus, the territory is defined by their act.

The short book of Obadiah was written as a prophecy against Edom. As Jacob was being destroyed for rebellion against the Lord, Edom rejoiced over it and assisted in the ruin of the people. But Edom was a brother to Jacob. This was a great offense to the Lord, and their misdeeds would be remembered by Him.

“For the day of the Lord upon all the nations is near;
As you have done, it shall be done to you;
Your reprisal shall return upon your own head.
16 For as you drank on My holy mountain,
So shall all the nations drink continually;
Yes, they shall drink, and swallow,
And they shall be as though they had never been.” Obadiah 1:15, 16

Therefore, the curse is pronounced against them…

4 (con’t) And the people against whom the Lord will have indignation forever.

v’haam asher zaam Y’hovah ad olam – “And ‘the people whom frothed Yehovah until vanishment.’” The word zaam signifies to foam at the mouth. Thus, one can easily get the sense. It is as if Yehovah’s mouth has frothed at them in anger and fury.

This anger was directed at those of Edom who presumed to stay and rebel against Him through their prideful resistance to His will. They were the object of His disfavor and raging anger. As a nation, they would never cease to be the object of His wrath. However, as individuals, this is not necessarily the case, nor can it be inferred.

This is the opposite of how many in the church consider Israel today. They accept the nation of Israel as a legitimate entity because God prophesied that they would be reestablished. However, they then equate this favor to all Jews, as if every one of them is accepted by God because they are in the land God promised them.

The idea is perverse. The abominations carried out within Israel by many today are like Sodom and Gomorrah. The Lord neither approves of them nor their actions. The Lord’s favor or enmity toward a national entity does not logically follow to all of its citizens.

As for Israel and the lesson they are being taught through Edom…

Your eyes shall see,

v’enekhem tirenah – “And your eyes see.” He is speaking to the people of Israel in the plural. They will see what the Lord has done to Edom, just as He prophesied. As such…

5 (con’t) And you shall say,
‘The Lord is magnified beyond the border of Israel.’

Rather: v’atem tomru yigdal Y’hovah me’al ligvul Yisrael

“And you say,
‘Magnified, Yehovah, from upon to border Israel.’”

The border of Edom is being contrasted with the border of Israel. The words “from upon to border” do not mean “beyond the border.” Rather, they are speaking of Israel’s state –

“And called to them Territory Wickedness.”
“Magnified, Yehovah, from upon to border Israel.”

While the land of Edom was frustrated in the peoples’ attempts to reestablish themselves in their land, having its name instead called Wickedness, Israel was reestablished, retaining its name and national identity. In this, Israel magnified Yehovah’s name because the contrast was so evident.

In other words, this is not merely a contest between people groups. A distinction is being set forth concerning who those people groups are directed by. This can be seen, for example, in 2 Chronicles 25 –

“Now it was so, after Amaziah came from the slaughter of the Edomites, that he brought the gods of the people of Seir, set them up to be his gods, and bowed down before them and burned incense to them. 15 Therefore the anger of the Lord was aroused against Amaziah, and He sent him a prophet who said to him, ‘Why have you sought the gods of the people, which could not rescue their own people from your hand?’” 2 Chronicles 25:14, 15

Amaziah had foolishly rejected the Lord through his actions. What good were Edom’s gods if they couldn’t prevail in battle against Israel?

The ultimate point of everything that Scripture details is the glorification of Yehovah Elohim, the Lord God. He is the Creator, the Establisher of Israel, and the only true God. Even if Edom and Israel appear to be the subjects of the discourse at times, it is ultimately the Lord, His power, and His directive hand that is being highlighted.

Though nothing explicit is stated here, it is still an implicit reference to Genesis, where the Lord God spoke the universe into existence and directed the line of humanity according to His purposes, such as calling Abraham, selecting Isaac, and choosing Jacob, who is Israel.

That same Directive Force is being highlighted well over a millennia later, and it returns us to the thought of Genesis 25, where Yehovah said to Rebekah that two nations were in her womb and that the two peoples would be separated from her body.

However, despite this promise of the Lord that Israel would see these things and magnify His name, that was not yet the case. That is seen in the words of the next verse…

What is this you have brought before Me?
What makes you think your offering is ok?
The “Jesus” you proclaim is one of apostasy
He is a defective “savior.” You have followed the wrong way

My Son is pure and holy. He is undefiled
In Him there is no blemish or defect
Through Him alone, I would have on you smiled
But through any other, you I will surely reject

Be sure the offering is right – Jesus!
Open the Bible and there He is on full display
When You get it right, you will get your A+
So call on Him, and believe the true gospel today!

II. The Table of the LORD Is Contemptible (verses 6-8)

“A son honors his father,
And a servant his master.

As with verse 2, Yehovah begins this section with another assertion. This will be followed by an objection from Israel which will then receive a rebuttal from Yehovah. However, this directed assertion is to the priests in particular. It begins with a statement of how things normally are.

ben y’khaved av v’eved adonav

“Son honors father,
And servant his master.”

In normal human conduct, a son treats his father with respect, complies with his wishes, does as he is directed, and so forth. The same is true with how a servant likewise is expected to treat his master.

The father is the one who raised the son, fed him, protected him, provided for his needs, etc. A servant is housed, fed, and his needs are tended to according to the hand of his master. These things are expected to result in honoring the father or master.

Yehovah had done these things for Israel since their inception. Despite this, there was not a reciprocation from them…

6 (con’t) If then I am the Father,
Where is My honor?

The words bear emphasis: v’im av ani ayeh kh’vodi

“And if Father, I –
Where My honor?”

The “if” is not a question. Even without a verb, the mood is conditional and yet adamant. “I am a father to you. As such, where is the honor I am to be given as is the case with any normal human conduct?”

The Father/son relationship between Yehovah and Israel was clearly set forth in His words to Pharaoh –

“Then you shall say to Pharaoh, ‘Thus says the Lord: “Israel is My son, My firstborn. 23 So I say to you, let My son go that he may serve Me. But if you refuse to let him go, indeed I will kill your son, your firstborn.”’” Exodus 4:22, 23

But this is not just Israel as a nation only. Rather, the idea of sonship extends to individuals –

“You are the children of the Lord your God; you shall not cut yourselves nor shave the front of your head for the dead. For you are a holy people to the Lord your God, and the Lord has chosen you to be a people for Himself, a special treasure above all the peoples who are on the face of the earth.” Deuteronomy 14:1, 2

As this is the case, the Lord wants to know why He is not treated with the respect due to a Father. And more…

6 (con’t) And if I am a Master,
Where is My reverence?

Not one out of the almost sixty versions I checked translates these words correctly: v’im adonim ani ayeh morai

“And if Lords, I –
Where My fear?”

The word Lords, adonim, is plural while the emphatic “I” is singular. This is the only time in Scripture this occurs when Yehovah refers to Himself. The job of translators is to translate, letting the chips fall where they may. This, unfortunately, is not always the case.

Not translating it in the plural does a disservice to the Lord who gave the word to the priests of Israel and to us. We are the recipients of the word. But as Sergio noted when I told him about this error, “It’s the herd mentality. I bet that’s why so many translators make the same mistakes.”

This cannot be speaking of the priests as lords of Israel. The same emphatic I that follows the previous clause eliminates any such attempt to finagle that scenario. The Pulpit Commentary considers this to be a majestic plural, like the word elohim. But there is nothing to suggest this and no precedent for it elsewhere. Rather, John Gill says –

“…the word is in the plural number, and may be understood of Jehovah, Father, Son, and Spirit; though the first Person [I] seems rather designed, who stands in this relation to Christ, as Mediator; to the angels, his ministering spirits; to the ministers of the Gospel, and to all the saints; and indeed to all men, and particularly to the Israelites; as appeared by the special laws and commands he enjoined them, and by his special government, protection, and care of them.”

It is hard to think of any better reason for this enigma, especially when Yehovah says this in Malachi 3:1 –

“‘Behold, I send My messenger,
And he will prepare the way before Me.
And the Lord, whom you seek,
Will suddenly come to His temple,
Even the Messenger of the covenant,
In whom you delight.
Behold, He is coming,’
Says the Lord of hosts.”

Obviously, this is looking back on what is presented with a knowledge of the coming of Christ, who is the Lord. But still, only five other times is ha’adon, the Lord, used. They are all in Isaiah, and they each clearly refer to the Lord God of Hosts, Yehovah Sabaoth. That is again seen right here in the next words…

6 (con’t) Says the Lord of hosts
To you priests who despise My name.

amar Y’hovah ts’vaoth lakhem ha’kohanim boze shemi – “Said Yehovah Sabaoth to you, the priests, disesteeming My name.” The assertion is specifically said to be from Yehovah Sabaoth, and it is directed at the priests of the Mosaic Covenant. The ultimate assertion is that they disesteem His name.

As the mediators between the people and Yehovah, what they do will be a reflection of how they consider Him. Therefore, the Lord finds their actions wholly inappropriate. No father deserved such treatment from a son, and no lord would allow it from a servant.

But with complete disrespect for their God, whom they were called to serve on behalf of the people, they ignorantly question Him with their objection…

6 (con’t) Yet you say, ‘In what way have we despised Your name?’

vaamartem bameh vazinu eth sh’mekha – “And said, ‘In what we disesteemed Your name?’” They ridiculously claim that they are completely unaware of their crimes against the Lord. And yet, they are the stewards of the word of the Lord and the administrators of the covenant as set forth in the word.

Their actions in the service of the Lord were inappropriate and they either knew it or they should have known it. Either way, the Lord, through Malachi, speaks His mind…

“You offer defiled food on My altar,

The words form the rebuttal to the objection, and yet they also form the next assertion that will be objected to: magishim al mizb’khi lekhem m’goal – “Approaching upon My altar bread defiled.” The word lekhem, bread, does not literally mean bread. At times, bread stands for any food, but to show a precedent for this –

“They shall be holy to their God and not profane the name of their God, because they present the offerings by fire to the LORD, the food [lekhem] of their God; so they shall be holy.” Leviticus 21:6

As for the word gaal, defiled, it is not used in the books of Moses regarding food. However, it is expressed in this manner in Daniel –

“But Daniel purposed in his heart that he would not defile [gaal] himself with the portion of the king’s delicacies, nor with the wine which he drank; therefore he requested of the chief of the eunuchs that he might not defile [gaal] himself.” Daniel 1:8

The thought here is not unlike that in the narrative of Cain and Abel –

“Now Abel was a keeper of sheep, but Cain was a tiller of the ground. And in the process of time it came to pass that Cain brought an offering of the fruit of the ground to the Lord. Abel also brought of the firstborn of his flock and of their fat. And the Lord respected Abel and his offering, but He did not respect Cain and his offering. And Cain was very angry, and his countenance fell.” Genesis 4:2-5

Hebrews 11 explicitly tells us that Abel’s offering was one of faith. It wasn’t the type of offering but the heart behind the offering that made it acceptable. In the case of the priests, their offerings may have been the right type, but it will be seen they are in the wrong condition.

Such actions by the priests indicated that their conduct was not of faith. If they believed the Lord would see, they would not offer as they did. Thus, an implicit reference to the priests’ conduct being like that of Cain’s is being highlighted.

As the Old Testament is closing out, the same attitude of the first recorded person to be born to Adam is reflected in the priests of Israel. Despite this, the priests object…

7 (con’t) But say, ‘In what way have we defiled You?’

vaamartem bameh gealnukha – “And said, ‘In what defiled You?’” The obvious connection of the defiling of the altar to the Lord must be highlighted –

“Approaching upon My altar bread defiled.”
“In what defiled You?”

To defile the altar with that which is defiled is to defile Yehovah, who receives those offerings from the altar. Such a comparative analogy is provided by Jesus –

“Fools and blind! For which is greater, the gift or the altar that sanctifies the gift? 20 Therefore he who swears by the altar, swears by it and by all things on it. 21 He who swears by the temple, swears by it and by Him who dwells in it. 22 And he who swears by heaven, swears by the throne of God and by Him who sits on it.” Matthew 23:19-22

The rebuttal to their objection is next provided…

7 (con’t) By saying,
‘The table of the Lord is contemptible.’

b’emarkhem shulkhan Y’hovah nibzeh hu – “In your saying, ‘Table, Yehovah – disesteemed it.’” It is an analogy of conduct being equated to words. The priests would never openly say this. They got their livelihood from the people’s offerings. If they were to say this, the people would simply give up on their offerings.

Rather, the actions of the priests speak louder than whatever words they uttered. As for the word table, it is used in Ezekiel in this manner –

“They shall enter My sanctuary, and they shall come near My table to minister to Me, and they shall keep My charge.” Ezekiel 44:16

It is as if the Lord descends to the altar to sit and feast among the people. However, the priests were defiling the offerings and calling His table contemptible through their actions. These things are next explained by Him…

And when you offer the blind as a sacrifice,
Is it not evil?

There is a strong emphasis in the words with the use of a paragoge which is then answered with an emphatic statement, not a question, from the Lord: v’khi tagishun iver lizboakh ein ra – “And when (surely) approach blind to sacrifice – ‘Not evil!’”

The paragoge highlights the attitude of the action. The priests willfully and purposefully give the blind as a sacrifice, something forbidden by the law –

 “All the firstborn males that come from your herd and your flock you shall sanctify to the Lord your God; you shall do no work with the firstborn of your herd, nor shear the firstborn of your flock. 20 You and your household shall eat it before the Lord your God year by year in the place which the Lord chooses. 21 But if there is a defect in it, if it is lame or blind or has any serious defect, you shall not sacrifice it to the Lord your God.” Deuteronomy 15:19-21

The priests were commanded to inspect the animals to ensure against the sacrifice of a defective animal. This could not be allowed because each sacrifice presented to the Lord was given in type of the all-perfect sacrifice of Jesus Christ, the unblemished offering of Himself to God.

This willful violation of the law is equated to a verbal exclamation from the priests, “Not evil!” It is the exact sentiment that brought about the exile of the people. Isaiah told them –

“Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil;
Who put darkness for light, and light for darkness;
Who put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!” Isaiah 5:20

These priests were purposefully violating the law they were to minister before the people. In accepting a defective sacrifice, the people saw this and had the thought instilled in them that Yehovah was not holy or to be treated with the absolute respect He deserved.

This attitude toward the Lord is reflected in the words, “Table Yehovah – disesteemed it!” It is the same word, bazah, that is used to describe Jesus in Isaiah 53 –

“He is despised [bazah] and rejected by men,
A Man of sorrows and acquainted with grief.
And we hid, as it were, our faces from Him;
He was despised [bazah], and we did not esteem Him.” Isaiah 53:3

The attitude of the people towards the Lord Jesus was the same as the attitude of the people towards the Lord’s table. Both were highlighted by the priests’ attitude toward him. Understanding that, it next says…

8 (con’t) And when you offer the lame and sick,
Is it not evil?

v’ki tagishu piseakh v’kholeh ein ra – “And when approach lame and rubbed – ‘Not evil!’” These were likewise forbidden to be presented to the Lord –

“And whoever offers a sacrifice of a peace offering to the Lord, to fulfill his vow, or a freewill offering from the cattle or the sheep, it must be perfect to be accepted; there shall be no defect in it. 22 Those that are blind or broken or maimed, or have an ulcer or eczema or scabs, you shall not offer to the Lord, nor make an offering by fire of them on the altar to the Lord. 23 Either a bull or a lamb that has any limb too long or too short you may offer as a freewill offering, but for a vow it shall not be accepted.
You shall not offer to the Lord what is bruised or crushed, or torn or cut; nor shall you make any offering of them in your land. 25 Nor from a foreigner’s hand shall you offer any of these as the bread of your God, because their corruption is in them, and defects are in them. They shall not be accepted on your behalf.” Leviticus 22:21-25

This was explicit within the law, but the priests didn’t want to lose out on their portion of the offerings. And so they compromised in order to benefit from what was defective.

Concerning the word kholeh, it is literally translated as “rubbed.” If something is rubbed, it will become worn. The idea is that which is weak, sick, or afflicted. Yehovah, Israel’s God, was offered such shameful offerings. And yet, He next says…

8 (con’t) Offer it then to your governor!

The word translated as “offer” here is a different word but with a similar meaning: haqrivehu na l’phekhathekha – “Near it, I pray, to your governor!” Depending on when Malachi was recorded, this could be referring to anyone from Nehemiah, as noted in Nehemiah 5:14, to Zerubbabel in Haggai 1:1. Or it could be someone else who was filling that position.

Israel had no king at this time, nor would they ever again, with the exception of Jesus, whom they rejected. To this day, Jesus is the King of Israel, though He is not the King in Israel. The pekhah, or governor, is a word of foreign origin. After the exile, it was probably used by the foreign rulers over Israel to designate the one who would govern the land on their behalf.

The point of Yehovah’s words to the priests is that this governor would be displeased to have a defective animal presented to him. That is clearly indicated in the next words, which beg a negative response…

*8 (fin) Would he be pleased with you?
Would he accept you favorably?”
Says the Lord of hosts.

hayirtskha o hayisa phanekha amar Y’hovah ts’vaoth

“‘He accept you or lift faces you?’
Said Yehovah Sabaoth.”

Obviously he would be displeased with such an offering. And yet, the priests were accepting defective offerings from the people and presenting them to God. The thinking is twisted and demented.

And this is just what our thinking is concerning God without knowing Him as He is. Man’s understanding of God has been so twisted and convoluted throughout the nations and over the millennia that apart from the Bible, there is almost no understanding of Him at all.

Things can be inferred about Him from the world around us. The creation will give anyone a general knowledge of Him if they simply apply their minds to what they see. But to know Him specifically apart from Scripture has been lost.

The stories of the past were handed down by Noah and his sons to their children. This can be inferred from the legends and tales that have been discovered in many societies. It can be inferred from Job’s understanding of the Lord as well.

However, that knowledge eventually corrupted to the point where God had to intervene in human affairs once again. In selecting Israel, He kept proper knowledge of Himself going. But even that was all but forgotten for a time, as will be evidenced in our closing verse.

An entire nation of people had almost completely forgotten the ways of the Lord. They had a system set up for the worship of Him, but that degraded into generalities. They had the words of the prophets, but they also were infected with false prophets.

Do you think that you can rely on churches to keep you on the right path? Do you think the word of a pastor or priest will keep you from straying? That will only be true if the church is teaching the truth or if the pastor is rightly dividing the word of God.

But you can’t really know those things without checking for yourself. Israel had a religion, religious leaders, and even prophets. And yet, they had completely lost the proper worship of the Lord until they came across a forgotten book.

Be sure not to let that happen to yourself and those you love. Be sure the Jesus you are following is the One the Bible proclaims. Read it daily, prayerfully, and with the intent of finding Him and holding fast to Him all your days. May it be so, to the glory of our supremely wonderful God. Amen.

Closing Verse: “Then Shaphan the scribe showed the king, saying, ‘Hilkiah the priest has given me a book.’ And Shaphan read it before the king.
11 Now it happened, when the king heard the words of the Book of the Law, that he tore his clothes. 12 Then the king commanded Hilkiah the priest, Ahikam the son of Shaphan, Achbor the son of Michaiah, Shaphan the scribe, and Asaiah a servant of the king, saying, 13 ‘Go, inquire of the Lord for me, for the people and for all Judah, concerning the words of this book that has been found; for great is the wrath of the Lord that is aroused against us, because our fathers have not obeyed the words of this book, to do according to all that is written concerning us.’” 2 Kings 22:10-13

Next Week: Malachi 1:9-14 Let us to the Lord sing! Give it a try… (For Great King, I) (3rd Malachi Sermon)

The Lord has you exactly where He wants you. He has a good plan and purpose for you. He has sent His Messenger to carry the good news to all people. Jesus! God promised, and God delivered. The time of the law has ended, and grace has come. Praise God for Jesus.

Malachi 1:4-8

4 “For says Edom,
‘Demolished! And return, and build wastelands.’”

“Thus said Yehovah Sabaoth:
‘They build, and I raze.
And called to them Territory Wickedness,
And “the people whom frothed Yehovah until vanishment.”
5 And your eyes see,
And you say,
‘Magnified, Yehovah, from upon to border Israel.””

6 “‘Son honors father,
And servant his master.
And if Father, I –
Where My honor?
And if Lords, I –
Where My fear?’
Said Yehovah Sabaoth to you, the priests, disesteeming My name.’
And said, ‘In what we disesteemed Your name?’
7 ‘Approaching upon My altar bread defiled.
And said, ‘In what defiled You?’
In your saying, ‘Table, Yehovah – disesteemed it.’
8 ‘And when (surely) approach blind to sacrifice – “Not evil!”
And when approach lame and rubbed – “Not evil!”
Near it, I pray, to your governor!
He accept you or lift faces you?’
Said Yehovah Sabaoth.”

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Even though Edom has said,
“We have been impoverished,
But we will return and build the desolate places,”

Thus says the Lord of hosts:

“They may build, but I will throw down;
They shall be called the Territory of Wickedness,
And the people against whom the Lord will have indignation forever.
Your eyes shall see,
And you shall say,
‘The Lord is magnified beyond the border of Israel.’

Polluted Offerings

“A son honors his father,
And a servant his master.
If then I am the Father,
Where is My honor?
And if I am a Master,
Where is My reverence?
Says the Lord of hosts
To you priests who despise My name.
Yet you say, ‘In what way have we despised Your name?’

“You offer defiled food on My altar,
But say,
‘In what way have we defiled You?’
By saying,
‘The table of the Lord is contemptible.’
And when you offer the blind as a sacrifice,
Is it not evil?
And when you offer the lame and sick,
Is it not evil?
Offer it then to your governor!
Would he be pleased with you?
Would he accept you favorably?”
Says the Lord of hosts.

 

 

 

Malachi 1:1-3 (Jacob and Esau)

Artwork by Douglas Kallerson.

Malachi 1:1-3
Jacob and Esau

(Typed 12 Aug 2024) Being a preacher, there is a lot of interaction with others about spiritual matters, especially so through emails because of the way this church is set up. There are many repeating questions that take a lot of care to properly and wisely respond to.

One of the common sentiments that comes up concerns whether God is mad at someone. Maybe He doesn’t love that person anymore, or worse, maybe God hates him because things have gone from bad to worse without any seeming reason why.

Reading the first few verses of Malachi may bolster that notion. God loves Jacob, but He hates Esau. Maybe this is just how God works, and He never really loved me. This is why it’s necessary to go through the Bible methodically and carefully.

If God loves Jacob (who is Israel), what kind of love is it when all they have faced is grief for the past two thousand years? Or maybe God loved Israel in the past but hates them now? Maybe He wants them destroyed, just like Edom. Lots of people claim that, even people in the church.

If so, then maybe God did love me, but now He hates me! It is all so hard to understand. What is God telling me with all of these terrible times I am facing? And how can I tell when the Bible is so big and confusing?

Text Verse: “Moab is My washpot;
Over Edom I will cast My shoe;
Over Philistia I will triumph.” Psalm 108:9

Malachi is a short book that makes many claims about how the Lord interacts with Israel and how Israel responds. But this is not unusual because He is the same unchanging Lord who dealt with Israel eons earlier.

There is nothing inconsistent in Him as He deals with people. And yet, He does deal with different people differently. Is that inconsistent, or is it simply His right to determine how things will turn out? There were people in Israel who lost sons, but the Lord returned some of them to life, for example, through Elijah and Elisha.

But He didn’t do this for everybody. Is that unfair, or is that the Lord’s prerogative? Jesus raised a widow’s son, Jairus’ daughter, and Lazarus. However, lots of other people in Israel died, and He didn’t raise them.

Someone may say, “My son was out boating, and he was killed when the boat ran into a mile-marker. Why did God allow this to happen?” Would it be fair if God said, “Nobody can ever go out and enjoy the water because someone might get hurt?”

In response, people would say, “Can’t we decide on our own what we do?” But when they do what they want to do, and someone gets hurt or dies, suddenly, it becomes God’s fault. We want our choice, whether smart or not, but we never expect that our choice will lead to disaster.

That is not a wise way of considering our lives. God allows us to choose things, even things that may cause us harm. We have to work, but the Tower of Siloam may fall down on those who are working in it. Or some really bad people may fly an airliner full of people into a building and cause it to fall.

People fly to various places. People go up elevators in buildings. Bad people live in a fallen world, and they intend harm to others. Engines malfunction, mistakes are made, and diseases are a deadly part of life on Earth.

Let us not question the goodness of God when we don’t have all the information available to us. Regardless of the tragedies that we face in our lives, the Bible is a book of hope that those things will someday be behind for those who have come to Jesus.

If you want to know if God is good or not, look to the cross. The answer shouts out to those who understand its significance.

It’s all to be found in His superior word. And so, let us turn to that precious word once again, and… May God speak to us through His word today, and may His glorious name ever be praised.

I. The Book of Malachi, an Introduction.

The book of Malachi is the thirty-ninth and final book of the standard Christian Bible’s Old Testament. In the Christian canon of the Old Testament, there are generally considered five major divisions: the Pentateuch, the Historical books, the Wisdom books, the Major Prophets, and the Minor Prophets. Malachi is the twelfth and final book of the Minor Prophets.

In the Jewish canon, there are three major sections: the Torah (the Pentateuch), the Nevi’im (the Prophets), and the Ketuvim (the Writings). Within the Prophets are two divisions, the Former Prophets and the Latter Prophets (also known as the Twelve). Malachi is the final book of the Nevi’im (the Prophets) in both categories.

Within the New Testament, a few divisions of the Hebrew Scriptures are given. One is found in Luke 24, the Law of Moses, the Prophets, and the Psalms –

“These are the words which I spoke to you while I was still with you, that all things must be fulfilled which were written in the Law of Moses and the Prophets and the Psalms concerning Me.” 45 And He opened their understanding, that they might comprehend the Scriptures.” Luke 24:44, 45

Malachi, being the thirty-ninth and last book of the Old Testament, closes out the writings of the law. An interesting parallel between punishment and the law is thus made. In Deuteronomy 25:1-3, it says –

“If there is a dispute between men, and they come to court, that the judges may judge them, and they justify the righteous and condemn the wicked, then it shall be, if the wicked man deserves to be beaten, that the judge will cause him to lie down and be beaten in his presence, according to his guilt, with a certain number of blows. Forty blows he may give him and no more, lest he should exceed this and beat him with many blows above these, and your brother be humiliated in your sight.” Deuteronomy 25:1-3

The Jewish practice was to never administer more than thirty-nine blows so that the law would never be violated. That is seen in 2 Corinthians 11:24, where Paul says, “From the Jews five times I received forty stripes minus one.”

As the law is a type of bondage because by law is the knowledge of sin (see John 8:33, Galatians 4:24, 25, etc.), the thirty-nine books of the law can be equated to a type of chastisement. Malachi completes this process. It is thus an exciting anticipation of the coming of the Messiah, who would take the burden of law off man and replace it with God’s grace.

As far as when the book was written, there is scholarly dispute, and no precise dating for the book is given. External evidence about the prophet, his ministry, or surrounding historical events is not available.

Despite that, the words of Malachi point to it being written in the same general timeframe as the books of Ezra and Nehemiah. For example, in Malachi 1:8, the word pekhah, governor, is used. Though it was used before the Babylonian exile, it is a word of Persian origin used in Ezra, Nehemiah, and Haggai when referring to those appointed over Judah. Malachi also uses it in this context.

Also, the Lord’s words through Malachi come at a time of temple worship. Therefore, the temple of Zerubbabel, which dates to 515 BC, had to be standing. His words rebuke the people for their failing conduct concerning the temple and its sacrifices. This is a strong clue that the temple had been standing for some time.

Additionally, the words focus on some of the same issues found in Ezra and Nehemiah. Although these are failings that permeated Israel throughout its history, when taken in light of the first two points, it shows that the post-exilic nation was facing these failings consistently during this period.

The Main Purpose: In the first verse of the book, Malachi is stated to be the word of the Lord through Malachi. In it, the people are warned of their need to turn back to the Lord before the advent of the promised Messiah. It is the final warning from the Lord before His coming.

After Malachi, there are approximately four hundred years of no recorded prophetic utterances from the Lord. This is known as the Intertestamental Period. The next word from the Lord would be to Zachariah, the father of John the Baptist. John would be the one to prepare the way for the coming of the Messiah, as prophesied in the final words from Malachi –

“Behold, I will send you Elijah the prophet
Before the coming of the great and dreadful day of the Lord.
And he will turn
The hearts of the fathers to the children,
And the hearts of the children to their fathers,
Lest I come and strike the earth with a curse.” Malachi 4:5, 6

The layout and form of the book is a prophetic oracle which is didactic in nature, teaching a lesson based on a disputation. There is an assertion, then an objection, and finally a rebuttal. The Bible Project provides the following details –

“The book is designed as a series of disputes or arguments. Most sections begin with God saying something or making a claim or an accusation. This is followed by Israel disagreeing or questioning God’s statement. Finally, God will respond and offer the last word. This pattern repeats itself six times. In the first three disputes (chs. 1-2), God exposes Israel’s corruption, while in the final three (ch. 3), he confronts their corruption. The overall impression you get from reading these disputes is that the exile didn’t fundamentally change anything in the people. Their hearts are as hard as ever.”

The author of the book is Malachi. However, the name is the possessive form of the word malakh, messenger. Thus, malakhi means My Messenger. It is argued by some, therefore, that this is a title and not a name.

This is especially so because the name is not used anywhere else in Scripture. However, the term malakhi, My messenger, is used in Exodus 23:23, 32:34; Isaiah 42:19; and Malachi 3:1. Because of this, it has been argued without evidence that the author is Ezra.

As Malachi is the 39th book of the Old Testament, it is worthwhile to determine its significance from a numerical standpoint. It is derived from 3 x 13. Of the number three, Bullinger says –

“The number three, therefore, must be taken as the number of Divine fulness. It signifies and represents the Holy Spirit as taking of the things of Christ and making them real and solid in our experience. It is only by the Spirit that we realise spiritual things. Without Him and His gracious operation, all is surface work: all is what a plane figure is to a solid.”

Of thirteen, Bullinger says, “every occurrence of the number thirteen, and likewise of every multiple of it, stamps that with which it stands in connection with rebellion, apostasy, defection, corruption, disintegration, revolution, or some kindred idea.”

The two numbers beautifully define the last, and thus summary, words of the Old Testament. The final book of the law completes the divine fulness of the period of law, a time exactingly marked with what defines the number thirteen.

As for the contents of Malachi, the book is comprised of 4 chapters totaling 55 verses. Malachi is cited in the New Testament gospels and by Peter and Paul. Jesus cites the words of Malachi in Matthew 11:10.

With this brief summary of the book complete, we can now begin to analyze it word by word, searching out what is on the mind of the Lord as He utters His final words to Israel before the time when His words begin to flow once again in the New Testament…

Predestined by the Lord, but what does that mean?
Is it all decided for us without a choice?
What truths from the Bible about it can we glean?
Are we on a set path without any voice?

What about the Edomite who joins to Israel?
Was he forced by God apart from his will?
And what about a person who receives Jesus? Do tell!
Does forcing one’s destiny give God a thrill?

Free to will or not, that is the question
And it is not impossible to discern which is true
To figure it out, I have a suggestion
Read your Bible (and in context!) is what you should do

II. And Esau, I Hate (verses 1-3)

The burden

masa – “A lifting” The noun masa is derived from the word nasa, to lift. Thus, it is a lifting. For that reason, most translations say burden, which figuratively describes the thing lifted, it being heavy or a burden.

Others translate this as an oracle or prophecy, as a word that is lifted up. This is a paraphrase of the thought. Smith’s Literal Translation says, “The lifting up of the word…” That verbally describes the matter, but – ironically – it is not literal.

Jerome says, “The word massa is never placed in the title, save when the vision is heavy and full of burden and toil.” Because of this, some scholars translate the word as a “sentence.” Lange adds to this thought and says –

“The connection in the first verse with word shows that it means something more, or it would have been superfluous. Eleven times in Isaiah …, in Ezekiel 12:10; Hab. 1:1; Zech. 9:1; 12:1, it is followed by a prophecy of a threatening nature.”

Though a sense of weight is certainly what is being conveyed, it does not necessarily mean something threatening, even if a warning is implied. For example, the introductory words of Proverbs 30 note “the lifting” of the words of Agur

Also, the introductory words of Proverbs 31 note a “lifting” of the words of King Lemuel. The word is used in 1 Chronicles 15 when referring to “the singing” of the Levites. It is a lifting to the Lord.

That this lifting is not necessarily to be taken as threatening will be especially noted a bit later. As for the word itself, this is the last use of masa in Scripture, as will be many of the uses of words in the book, simply because Malachi closes out the Old Testament canon.

Therefore, unless there is a particular reason to highlight a word, noting that it is the last use of it will not again be highlighted. This lifting now being noted is…

1 (con’t) of the word of the Lord

devar Y’hovah – “word Yehovah.” The fact that this is the word of Yehovah is immediately mentioned by the prophet. The davar, word, here signifies an utterance. It is the word of Yehovah. The first time the davar, word, of Yehovah is specifically noted in this manner is in Genesis 15:1 –

“After these things the word of the Lord [davar Y’hovah] came to Abram in a vision, saying, ‘Do not be afraid, Abram. I am your shield, your exceedingly great reward.’”

The Lord was personally intervening through His word to the chosen man of God, Abraham. It is to Abraham that the promise of blessing was made and it was to his descendants after him that this promise would continue. This was specifically through the son of promise, Isaac, then to his son Jacob, and then to the twelve tribes that descended from him.

This davar, word, of Yehovah to and through this covenant people is the first connection back to the book of Genesis. As for the divine name Yehovah, the first use of it was in Genesis 2:4 –

“This is the history of the heavens and the earth when they were created, in the day that the Lord God [Y’hovah elohim] made the earth and the heavens.”

This is the second connection of the book back to Genesis. The God, Yehovah, who formed the heavens and the earth, is the same God who is monitoring the redemptive narrative that is currently being expressed to and through a particular people in this book. It is the Creator God and Covenant Lord who is the Source of the words that are conveyed…

1 (con’t) to Israel

el Yisrael – “unto Israel.” The word of the Lord is given unto Israel. It does not say al Yisrael, (“upon Israel” meaning “against Israel”), as if they are such egregious offenders that they can immediately expect punishment for their ways. Instead, the words are direct but conciliatory while being mixed with warning.

Thus, the idea presented earlier, that this is a heavy burden of threatening, is not completely accurate. The words may be a burden, but they are words that are also mixed with an appeal for reason and watchful care.

As for the name, Israel is a line of people who descend from a man, Jacob, born of Isaac, and who was first called Israel in Genesis 32:28. It is the third connection to Genesis. From him came the twelve tribes of Israel, collectively known as Israel.

The name Israel is never applied to the church. Rather, a distinction is always made between the people of Israel and the Gentiles, including by Paul, the Apostle to the Gentiles.

And yet, there is a joining of the Gentiles into the commonwealth of Israel, meaning the common blessings promised to Israel, as noted in Ephesians 2:12. Understanding the difference is important because the words of Malachi are written to the nation of Israel under the Old (Mosaic) Covenant.

The Gentiles of the world were never under the Old Covenant. The Old Covenant is fulfilled and ended through the work of Christ (Ephesians 2:15, Colossians 2:14, and Hebrews 7:18, 8:13, and 10:9). As such, the words of Malachi, including verses constantly cited by pastors and preachers from Malachi 3:8-10 are not intended for the church.

The words of this book are given from the Lord…

1 (con’t) by Malachi.

b’yad malakhi – “in hand Malachi.” The words “in hand” mean that the Lord spoke through this person and he conveyed them under His authority as the Lord’s representative to the people of Israel. This is seen, for example, when the Lord spoke to Pharaoh b’yad Mosheh, “in hand Moses.”

This happens elsewhere, such as in Jeremiah 37:2, where it speaks of the words of the Lord, which He spoke b’yad yirm’yahu, “in hand Jeremiah.” Because of this, one would think that Malachi would be the name of the individual.

If not, it might be assumed that the Lord would say “His messenger” instead of “My messenger.” But there is a problem with this. There are no verbs in the verse. Without a verb to identify whether it is first person or third person, the matter cannot be sufficiently determined.

It simply says, “A lifting – word Yehovah unto Israel in hand Malachi.” Whether a name or a title, the lifting of the word of Yehovah begins with…

“I have loved you,” says the Lord.

As will be the case with much of the book of Malachi, the verbs are in the perfect aspect: ahavti etkhem amar Y’hovah – “‘I loved you,’ said Yehovah.” Of all the things the Lord could have begun with to start the final book of the Old Testament, it is a remarkable statement.

Yehovah is speaking to Israel. His words are an assertion. Beginning at some point, Israel was loved, has been loved, and is loved. The word ahev, love, comes from a primitive root signifying to have affection for. It is a claim that the doting attention of Yehovah has been upon Israel.

Also, as will be the case each time the prophet notes the word of the Lord, it is in the perfect aspect. The Lord “said.” In essence, “The Lord has spoken, and I am conveying to you what He said.”

Despite His assertion, an immediate objection from the object of His affection is presented…

2 (con’t) “Yet you say, ‘In what way have You loved us?’

v’amartem bamah ahavtanu – “And said, ‘In how loved us?’” One can see Israel, just like any of us when things aren’t going perfectly, questioning God’s love. Our spouse dies, and we question how God can love us. We lose our home, and we question how God can love us. We have an extremely bad day and we again question God’s love for us.

The people of Israel, swallowed up in self-misery over whatever is going on in their lives, question the Lord’s love for them. Although this is the Lord saying these things as if Israel were speaking, it is because He hears Israel moaning, and He returns their moaning back to them through the prophet.

But there had to be a basis for the people complaining that the Lord didn’t love them. First, one cannot love or hate unless he exists. To say that the Lord doesn’t love you implies that He exists.

Also, existence does not necessarily lead to ability. A rock exists, but it cannot love. Further, there must be an acknowledgment of some sort of connection between two entities for love to exist. My wife is Hideko. She loves me (well, most of the time). However, if I had never heard of her and she had never heard of me, I couldn’t say, “Hideko loves me.”

The Lord has established a baseline. He exists, Israel exists, both have the capacity to understand this, and both are aware of each other. He has claimed He loves Israel. Israel has heard this –

“The Lord did not set His love on you nor choose you because you were more in number than any other people, for you were the least of all peoples; but because the Lord loves you, and because He would keep the oath which He swore to your fathers, the Lord has brought you out with a mighty hand, and redeemed you from the house of bondage, from the hand of Pharaoh king of Egypt.” Deuteronomy 7:7, 8

Israel knew this and had heard it proclaimed. But that was not based upon a group of people suffering affliction under the hand of an oppressor. Such a situation had played out innumerable times elsewhere. Rather, that love already existed in the fathers. Later in Deuteronomy Moses refines what this means –

“The Lord delighted only in your fathers, to love them; and He chose their descendants after them, you above all peoples, as it is this day. 16 Therefore circumcise the foreskin of your heart, and be stiff-necked no longer. 17 For the Lord your God is God of gods and Lord of lords, the great God, mighty and awesome, who shows no partiality nor takes a bribe. 18 He administers justice for the fatherless and the widow, and loves the stranger, giving him food and clothing. 19 Therefore love the stranger, for you were strangers in the land of Egypt20 You shall fear the Lord your God; you shall serve Him, and to Him you shall hold fast, and take oaths in His name. 21 He is your praise, and He is your God, who has done for you these great and awesome things which your eyes have seen. 22 Your fathers went down to Egypt with seventy persons, and now the Lord your God has made you as the stars of heaven in multitude.” Deuteronomy 10:15-22

Thus, the words ahavti etkhem, I loved you, are another link back to Genesis. The Lord selected the fathers to love them. That attentive love continued on from one generation to the next, but only in a particular line, as evidenced by the next words…

2 (con’t) Was not Esau Jacob’s brother?”

halo akh esav l’yaaqov – “Not brother, Esau, to Jacob?” This begins Yehovah’s rebuttal to the objection. Esau is Jacob’s twin older brother. The record of their birth is found in Genesis 25 –

“Now Isaac pleaded with the Lord for his wife, because she was barren; and the Lord granted his plea, and Rebekah his wife conceived. 22 But the children struggled together within her; and she said, ‘If all is well, why am I like this?’ So she went to inquire of the Lord.
23 And the Lord said to her:
‘Two nations are in your womb,
Two peoples shall be separated from your body;
One people shall be stronger than the other,
And the older shall serve the younger.’

24 So when her days were fulfilled for her to give birth, indeed there were twins in her womb. 25 And the first came out red. He was like a hairy garment all over; so they called his name Esau. 26 Afterward his brother came out, and his hand took hold of Esau’s heel; so his name was called Jacob. Isaac was sixty years old when she bore them.” Genesis 25:21-26

The story of the twins was well known to Israel. It was a matter of historical record, and the two people groups continued to exist at the time of Malachi’s prophecy. Despite that, both nations were destroyed by the Babylonians. Yehovah is using Edom as a lesson for Israel to learn from. As it next says…

2 (con’t) Says the Lord.

n’um Y’hovah – “Utterance Yehovah.” The word n’um signifies an utterance. It is an authoritative spoken expression, often in the form of a prophecy. In the case of the Lord, it is an utterance that bears all of the weight and authority of Yehovah.

He is declaring that Esau was, in fact, Jacob’s brother in order to establish how Israel can know that He loves them. They both had the same grandfather, Abraham. They were conceived at the same time. And yet, even before they were born, Yehovah had selected and preferred Jacob above his older brother.

And more, the state of those two brothers, as realized in their descendants, was completely different. To continue making His argument in that respect, Yehovah, through His prophet, says…

2 (con’t) “Yet Jacob I have loved;

Rather: va’ohav et yaaqov – “And I love Jacob.’” The verb is imperfect. Yehovah loves and continues to love Jacob. Nothing has changed in this relationship, even if many evils had fallen or continued to fall upon them. These were, according to all of the prophetic writings, self-inflicted wounds.

And yet, despite all of their failures and resulting judgments, God still loved Israel, symbolized by Jacob, the man, the younger twin to Esau. On the other hand…

But Esau I have hated,

v’eth esav saneti – “And Esau, I hate.” The words are often twisted to mean something not intended. Esau here stands for the descendants of Esau. This does not mean that God hated Esau the twin of Jacob. That will become perfectly clear in the next clause.

The use of Jacob and Esau instead of Israel and Edom is intended to remind His audience of the fact that these two were brothers. One would think that they would both be treated in the same way, but that is not the case. Jacob was given the divine promise of the land of Canaan.

The Lord watched over them, established His covenant with them, brought them in, dwelt among them, etc. Esau did not receive this.

As for the word hate, Keil almost bizarrely says –

“The verbs אהב, to love, and שׂנא, to hate, must not be weakened down into loving more and loving less, to avoid the danger of falling into the doctrine of predestination. שׂנא, to hate, is the opposite of love. And this meaning must be retained here; only we must bear in mind, that with God anything arbitrary is inconceivable, and that no explanation is given here of the reasons which determined the actions of God.” Keil

The problems with this are several. First, the doctrine of predestination is stated by Paul to be a reality, being mentioned four times (Romans 8:29, 30, and Ephesians 1:5 & 1:11). How predestination is defined may be argued, but that it is a valid doctrine is evident from Paul’s writings.

Second, there is nothing arbitrary in degrees of love and hate. Examples of this permeate Scripture in both humans and in how God deals with the objects of His affection.

Third, it is also obvious from Scripture that God did not love every person in Israel, nor did He hate every person from Edom. And it is the nations, descending from these two, that are being addressed. Rather, as in English, there are varying degrees of what hate means. For example –“And she will yet again conceive and bear a son, and she will say that Jehovah heard that I am hated, and he will give to me this also; and she will call his name Simeon.” Genesis 29:33

The word hate is being used comparatively. This continues in the New Testament with verses like Luke 14:26. Such is the same with the descendants of Jacob and Esau. If he hated Esau and all of his descendants, this would not have been included in the Law of Moses –

“You shall not abhor an Edomite, for he is your brother. You shall not abhor an Egyptian, because you were an alien in his land. The children of the third generation born to them may enter the assembly of the Lord.” Deuteronomy 23:7, 8

If they were brought into the nation of Israel, they would be of Israel. If the Lord loves Israel, then He loves those who descend from Edom who are of Israel.

Finally, to completely support this notion, we can turn to what happened to the nation of Edom. The name Idumea is the Greek form of the word Edom. They continued to exist as a people long after the time of Malachi.

Of them, the Jewish historian Flavius Josephus says in about 129 BC John Hyrcanus –

“…subdued all the Idumeans; and permitted them to stay in that country, if they would circumcise their genitals, and make use of the laws of the Jews; and they were so desirous of living in the country of their forefathers, that they submitted to the use of circumcision, and of the rest of the Jewish ways of living; at which time therefore this befell them, that they were hereafter no other than Jews.” Antiquities, Book 13 Chapter 9 Section 1

What this means is that the Edomites were brought into the nation of Israel, becoming Jews. This is no different than an Arab or a Japanese person today converting to Judaism. They become a part of the Jewish people.

Whether their origins are remembered and held against them by other supposedly pure-blooded Jews or not is irrelevant. They are now Jews. For example, Herod was an Idumean, meaning an Edomite, and yet he ruled Israel. Though still remembered for his ancestral connection, just as a Russian Jew is today, He was a Jew, nonetheless.

This is a historically established fact. But what happened to the Jews after the rejection of Jesus? They were destroyed as a nation and exiled around the world. This would have included all those of Edom who were assimilated into the Jewish nation.

As such, those same people, supposedly hated by Yehovah, are a part of the people still loved by Him today. They have been returned to their ancestral land for the completion of the redemptive narrative.

When the Bible speaks of Edom (or Moab, Philistia, etc.) in yet-future prophecy, it is not referring to the actual descendants of these people but those who live in the lands now occupied by them. In other words, the Sunni Arabs fill those lands. As such, the future prophecies of Edom, for example, are speaking of them.

Unfortunately, this has almost entirely escaped the attention of prophecy buffs and most scholars. Therefore, a great deal of confusion concerning peoples and nations has resulted. A good way of getting this quickly and simply is found in Ezekiel 38 –

“Persia, Ethiopia, and Libya are with them, all of them with shield and helmet; Gomer and all its troops; the house of Togarmah from the far north and all its troops—many people are with you.” Ezekiel 38: 5, 6

&

“Sheba, Dedan, the merchants of Tarshish, and all their young lions will say to you, ‘Have you come to take plunder? Have you gathered your army to take booty, to carry away silver and gold, to take away livestock and goods, to take great plunder?” Ezekiel 38:13

The battle being described in Ezekiel 38 is future to us now. And yet, some of these nations exist while others do not. Persia is Iran. Gomer, Togarmah, Sheba, Dedan, and Tarshish no longer exist as nations, and yet the places still exist with different names.

Lastly, Ethiopia and Libya are identifiable with the general locations that existed eons ago. Most of these names go back to Genesis, showing that they were established by certain people groups which are still identifiable thousands of years later. Others are only identifiable by the location which was originally established by one people group or another.

Next to continue His thoughts concerning the descendants of Esau, Yehovah says…

*3 (fin) And laid waste his mountains and his heritage
For the jackals of the wilderness.”

vaasim eth harav sh’mamah v’eth nakhalato l’thanoth midbar

“And set his mountains – a devastation.
And his inheritance to jackals wilderness.”

Here we have another connection back to the book of Genesis. Esau was first identified with a particular location, Seir, as recorded in Genesis 32 –

“Then Jacob sent messengers before him to Esau his brother in the land of Seir, the country of Edom.” Genesis 32:3

Genesis 36 gives the genealogical record of Esau, who is Edom. Later, the Lord confirms Esau’s ownership of the land –

“And command the people, saying, ‘You are about to pass through the territory of your brethren, the descendants of Esau, who live in Seir; and they will be afraid of you. Therefore watch yourselves carefully. Do not meddle with them, for I will not give you any of their land, no, not so much as one footstep, because I have given Mount Seir to Esau as a possession. You shall buy food from them with money, that you may eat; and you shall also buy water from them with money, that you may drink.’” Deuteronomy 2:4-6

Despite having given Mount Seir, meaning the land of Edom, to Esau, the Lord has the right to end that. And yet, the land is still known to Him as Edom. To this day, despite being a part of the nation of Jordan, the Bible still refers to it as Edom in its future prophecies.

At the time of the descendants of Esau possessing it, however, the Lord noted that it was laid waste and was a place for the howling of the jackals. As for the tannah, here called a jackal, it is an unusual form of a word that is found only elsewhere in Lamentations 4:3.

Several older versions, such as the KJV, erroneously call these dragons, implying a reptile. This is incorrect. In Lamentations, it says that they offer their breasts to nurse their young. Reptiles do not have mammary glands and do not nurse their young.

The word is the feminine of tan, a jackal. As such, it is specifically referring to the female jackal. The reason for specifying the female is certainly the same as that in Lamentations, where the milk of the female jackal is contrasted to the painful thirst of the children of Israel during its siege.

Edom has no home. His land is given over to the female jackal who has it as a home to raise her young.

With that, the verses are done for the day. The words of the last Old Testament book make connections all the way back to the first book of the Bible. And more, they are intricately connected to so much else within Scripture.

The Bible is an intricate tapestry of information that deals with real events that have taken place in history. They center on a particular group of people in a particular land as it awaits the coming of their promised Messiah.

And yet, Scripture also deals with peoples and places at the furthest parts of the earth as they interact with the Creator of the universe through the coming of His Christ.

The Bible is not a word far out of reach. Rather it is intimate and interactive. But it will have no meaning or a very wrong sense for those who do not carefully read it and prayerfully contemplate it. We have entered into Malachi in order to see what it details.

May we carefully continue to look at every minute detail while at the same time considering it from a larger perspective as it interacts with all of the rest of the Bible. In doing so, it will help unlock truths found in Scripture that will then allow us to understand what it is God is telling us about His wonderful works among Israel and in the giving of His Son for all the people of the earth.

Closing Verse: “Egypt shall be a desolation,
And Edom a desolate wilderness,
Because of violence against the people of Judah,
For they have shed innocent blood in their land.
20 But Judah shall abide forever,
And Jerusalem from generation to generation.
21 For I will acquit them of the guilt of bloodshed, whom I had not acquitted;
For the Lord dwells in Zion.” Joel 3:19-21

Next Week: Malachi 1:4-8 If you don’t treat the Lord with respect, you will be a goner… (Where Is My Honor) (2nd Malachi Sermon)

The Lord has you exactly where He wants you. He has a good plan and purpose for you. It is He who judges His people according to their deeds. So, follow Him, live for Him, and trust Him, and He will do marvelous things for you and through you.

Malachi 1:1-3

A lifting – word Yehovah unto Israel in hand Malachi.

2 “‘I loved you,’ said Yehovah.
And said, ‘In how loved us?’
‘Not brother, Esau, to Jacob?’
Utterance Yehovah.
‘And I love Jacob.
3 And Esau, I hate,
And set his mountains – a devastation.
And his inheritance to jackals wilderness.’”

 

 

 

The burden of the word of the Lord to Israel by Malachi.
“I have loved you,” says the Lord.
“Yet you say, ‘In what way have You loved us?’
Was not Esau Jacob’s brother?”
Says the Lord.
“Yet Jacob I have loved;
But Esau I have hated,
And laid waste his mountains and his heritage
For the jackals of the wilderness.”

 

Judges 21:20-25 (No King in Israel, Part XI)

Artwork by Douglas Kallerson.

Judges 21:20-25
No King in Israel, Part XI

(Typed 5 August 2024) While typing the Judges sermons, Sergio was also going through Judges and Ruth. One morning, he messaged me with the Mr. Exploding Head emoji and some great insights he pulled out of his personal study –

Judges ends with:
– Mourning for Benjamin, no wives/descendants
– Plan for survival: marry daughters of Shilo
– Last verse: “There was no king in Israel”

Book of Ruth:
– Naomi mourns loss of husbands/descendants
– Plan for survival with Boaz; Ruth births Obed
– Last verse: “and to Obed was born Jesse, and to Jesse, David.” — KING DAVID!

It is a marvelous pattern that exists between the two, and it was a nice catch that I have not seen elsewhere presented. It provides another of several reasons why Ruth, despite occurring during the time of the Judges, is maintained as its own book, separate from and placed after Judges.

God is slowly and methodically presenting us with the developing theme of redemption in Israel as it applies beyond their borders, even encompassing the entire world. In the book of Judges, it says that there was no king in Israel but everyone did what was right in his own eyes.

It would not make sense to put Ruth within the pages of Judges for that reason. In Israel, during the time of the judges, there was no king. In Israel after Christ departed, there has been no king. But a king was anticipated in Judges, and a King is anticipated in Israel’s future.

Everything is going forward, but we can look back in order to see what lies ahead. It is amazing what God has done for us in the pages of Scripture.

Text Verse: “O Israel, you have sinned from the days of Gibeah;
There they stood.
The battle in Gibeah against the children of iniquity
Did not overtake them.” Hosea 10:9

Hurricane Debby arrived while I was typing this sermon on August 5. Despite not being a big hurricane, Sarasota received an inordinate amount of rain. Our backyard was flooded from the high tides and our garage was flooded from the precipitation.

And more, it rained and stormed so much from midnight on that I got almost no sleep at all. In the morning, sermon typing began. When I finished typing, the rains had stopped and the garage was still full of water. Some things are just more important than others.

Today, we will close out the book of Judges. I personally would not have imagined the amount of intricate detail contained in the book when we started. The dispensational model of history is on full display, the rapture is alluded to a few times, and the consummation of all things is clearly seen in several of the stories. God has taken real events and real people’s lives from thousands of years ago and revealed to us truths using human history.

Some of those pictures are future to us now, including those found in the final chapter of Judges. The subject matter is Israel, but the idea of Israel makes no sense without her Messiah, their King. Yes, there is currently no king in Israel, even if Israel has a King. That is destined to change some wonderful day.

What an astonishing and marvelous thing God has presented to us through these types and pictures! Such great things are to be found in His superior word. And so, let us turn to that precious word once again, and… May God speak to us through His word today, and may His glorious name ever be praised.

I. From the Whirlings (verses 20-25)

20 Therefore they instructed the children of Benjamin,

The written Hebrew does not correspond to the oral reading: vaysav eth b’ne vinyamin – “And commands [sg.], sons Benjamin.” The written has the word “command” as spoken by one, “he commands.” The oral has it as spoken by all, “they command.” There is usually no reason to deviate from the written unless there is confusion on the part of the Jewish scribes.

The surrounding verses are all in the plural, so they make this plural as well. However, verse 20:28 noted that Phinehas was at Bethel. He, as the high priest, could very well be the final word on the matter. It said in verse 21:2 that the people came up to Bethel. The next verses indicated the people petitioned the Lord.

As such, there was the implicit understanding that this was all being done with the guidance of the Lord. Thus, it was likely that either the Lord directly, or Phinehas on behalf of the Lord, gave this command.

20 (con’t) saying, “Go, lie in wait in the vineyards,

l’mor l’khu v’aravtem bak’ramiym – “to say, ‘Walk and lurk in the vineyards.’” The command was for these two hundred Benjamites to go to the area of Shiloh where the annual feast was and hide themselves in the vineyards. Whether this was a feast of Israel or a local feast only, these times of celebrations were when the vineyards were in full leaf. Thus, it would make it easy to hide without being noticed.

In Scripture, vineyards represent the cultural side of humanity. There are various vineyards that represent various cultures.

21 and watch; and just when the daughters of Shiloh come out to perform their dances,

There is a gender discord in the words. Also, as in verse 19, the name of the location is spelled without an “h” ending: urithem v’hineh im yetsu b’noth shilo lakhul bamkholoth – “And seen, and behold, if come [masc. pl.] daughters Shilo to whirl in the dances.” The word translated as “come” is masculine even though it refers to the dancing daughters.

The men hiding in the vineyards were to watch for women who whirled while dancing. The women were called the daughters of Shilo. This could mean they were only young women from that location, or if this was a pilgrim feast for the nation, it could extend to women from all over Israel who were staying there during the feast.

21 (con’t) then come out from the vineyards, and every man catch a wife for himself from the daughters of Shiloh; then go to the land of Benjamin.

Each of the verbs in this clause are in the perfect aspect: vitsathem min hakramim vakhataphtem lakhem ish ishto mibnoth shilo vahalakhtem erets Binyamin – “and came from the vineyards, and seized to them man, his wife, from daughters Shilo. And walked land Benjamin.” The women were out dancing without male supervision, totally unsuspecting that there were so many men lying in wait.

Because of this, it could not be thought that the men of Israel gave their daughters to the men of Benjamin. Thus, they would be released from any penalty of the oath. The general scholarly opinion is that this is deceitful and inappropriate.

However, if it was the Lord or Phineas who authorized this plan in the previous verse, that argument does not hold up. It is probably the reason why the singular was written in the first place. The verbs being in the perfect aspect make this a done deal.

Also, there is a new word to Scripture here, only found elsewhere in Psalm 10:9, khataph. It signifies to clutch, thus, to seize as a prisoner. The men were instructed to grab a girl and not let go. From there, they were to escape with her to the land of Benjamin…

22 Then it shall be, when their fathers or their brothers come to us to complain,

Again, there are gender discords in the words: vahayah ki yavou avotham o akhehem larov elenu – “And is when come their [masc. pl.] fathers, or their [masc. pl.] brothers, to contend unto us.” Nothing is noted about the complaints of the mothers. It would be natural that the men or brothers would complain as well as the mothers. The women had been taken away by the men of Benjamin. But that appears to be the only reason why they might complain, as is seen in the next words…

22 (con’t) that we will say to them, ‘Be kind to them for our sakes, because we did not take a wife for any of them in the war; for it is not as though you have given the women to them at this time, making yourselves guilty of your oath.’”

The words are very obscure and highly debated. Various manuscripts have modified them in an attempt to make sense. Also, depending on the reference, there appears to be another gender discord: v’amarnu alehem khanunu otham ki lo laqakhnu ish ishto bamilkhamah ki lo atem nathatem lahem kaeth tesamu – “and we said unto them, ‘Favor us, them [masc. pl.], for not we took man his wife in the war, for not you gave to them, according to the time trespassed.’”

The normal reading would be that the word “them” refers to the women, but it is again in the masculine, “Do us a favor concerning them.”

It could be referring to the men of Benjamin, but even then, the words remain complicated. Regardless, the complaint referred to is not that the daughters have been stolen away, and they miss them in the usual sense. The complaint is because the women have been given to Benjamin contrary to the oath, making the community guilty.

But this plan is not a violation of the vow for anyone whose daughter was seized. As such, there is no culpability on the part of the fathers or brothers. And yet, there has been a resolution to the dilemma of the wifeless men.

The words “according to the time trespassed” seem to mean that, at this time, there is no trespass on the part of these men of Israel. Having said that, the structure of the words is extremely unusual. So much so that Clarke leaves it up to the reader to decide what he prefers –

“It is an obscure sentence; and the reader, if not pleased with what is laid down, may endeavor to satisfy himself with others which he may find in different versions and commentators.” Adam Clarke

His words bear a sentiment I cannot agree with. We must work to determine meaning, not pick and choose.

23 And the children of Benjamin did so; they took enough wives for their number from those who danced, whom they caught.

vayaasu khen b’ne vinyamin vayisu nashim l’misparam min hamkhol’loth asher gazalu – “And do thus, sons Benjamin. And lift women, to their number, from the whirlings whom they plucked.” The words are somewhat poetically forceful. The women were lifted. This gives the sense of them being in a group where each man of Benjamin sees the one he likes and lifts her out as his own.

There would have been two hundred snatched away according to the number of those in Benjamin still needing wives. They were taken “from the whirlings,” meaning those who came out to dance. And they were, gazal, plucked, a word often used to indicate being kidnapped, robbed, or seized away.

23 (con’t) Then they went and returned to their inheritance, and they rebuilt the cities and dwelt in them.

vayelkhu vayashuvu el nakhalatam vayivnu eth hearim vayeshvu bahem – “And walk, and return unto their inheritance. And build the cities, and dwell in them.” It is a later description of what occurred, showing that this was compiled and recorded later, probably by Samuel. Benjamin retained his inheritance. As they grew in number, they would have expanded and continued to rebuild in the land given to them by the Lord.

24 So the children of Israel departed from there at that time, every man to his tribe and family; they went out from there, every man to his inheritance.

vayith’halkhu misham b’ne Yisrael baeth ha’hi ish l’shivto ul’mishpakhto vayesu misham ish l’nakhalatho – “And walk, from there, sons Israel in the time, the it. Man to his tribe and to his family. And go from there, man to his inheritance.” The words end the formal narrative. Benjamin was spared and rescued. The matter of wives for them was settled, so the people of Israel departed and headed home.

The repetition provides its own emphasis concerning the situation:

*And walk (dispersing), from there (Shiloh), sons Israel (all men of all tribes) in the time, the it. Man to his tribe (Judah, for example) and to his family (within the tribe).
*And go from there, man to his inheritance (the land granted by the Lord and which was then divided accordingly).

Saying that each man went to his inheritance is a way of indicating that the tribal inheritances remained intact. Despite almost losing one tribe, the nation remained according to the set design of the Lord. And this occurred, despite the fact that…

25 In those days there was no king in Israel;

The words are letter-for-letter identical to Judges 17:6: bayamim ha’hem ein melekh b’Yisrael – “In the days, the those, naught king in Israel.” Until there was a king, there was no king. To write that this was in the days when there was no king acknowledges that there was a king when the narrative is being presented.

The words imply that a king would rectify the situation. And this is just what the author (compiler or whatever) next presents…

*25 (fin) everyone did what was right in his own eyes.

ish ha’yashar b’enav yaaseh – “Man the straight in his eyes does.” As there was no king in Israel, everyone saw his own path as the straight one, and then took it. Thus ends Chapter 21 and the book of Judges.

Be strong and of good courage; I am with you
Fear not and be not dismayed
Others may depart, but I am faithful and true
It is I who have all your debts paid

I will bring you into the inheritance
And there I will place you forever
Of Me failing, there is not a chance
Nothing can the bond between us sever

Be strong and of good courage, trust in Me
Fear not and be not dismayed; I am with you
The word I have spoken, so shall it be
I am the Lord your God, faithful and true

II. Pictures of Christ

Verse 1 noted that Israel (He Strives With God) had sworn an oath at Mizpah (Watchtower) that no one would give his daughter to Benjamin as a wife. In Chapter 20, Benjamin pictured those with a messianic hope, even if it was wrongly directed. Mizpah signifies the Lord is watching over the process of what transpires.

To not give a daughter signifies to cut off such a person because there is no one to continue his name. No wife means no continuance. But with the war over, the people have realized that there are those who are of Israel but who have no chance of continuation. Therefore the nation made a great ululation before the God, meaning the true God.

In Verse 3, one tribe in Israel was visited, meaning it was judged. It tells us that messianic law observers will receive their judgment in the tribulation period. Most will be cut off. Israel had come against their false doctrine in Chapter 20, leaving only six hundred.

Six is the number of man, especially fallen man. Ten implies that nothing is wanting and the whole cycle is complete. In order to restore this tribe in Israel, two separate plans are devised. The first plan begins in verse 5, where it is asked who among the tribes did not come up to the battle against Benjamin. Anyone who didn’t had essentially aligned himself with Benjamin. Such were to be cut off.

Israel grieved for Benjamin because they had no future (verse 6). They had their inheritance, but without wives, there could be no continuance. Verse 7 also noted that they were a mere remnant from Benjamin.

To correct this, it was noted that no one had come up to Mizpah to the Lord from Jabesh Gilead. The meaning is Dry Perpetual Fountain. It was seen in Judges 11 that Gilead, without the article, speaks of Israel, the fountain.

To grasp the meaning, one must think of Israel as the means of providing the Fountain, regardless of whether individuals are included in its transmission or not (Ephesians 2:12). The Spirit is the Mode by which one is included.

Right now, Gentiles are brought into the commonwealth of Israel along with Jews. However, not all Jews nor all Gentiles receive it. Israel is Perpetual Fountain, not The Perpetual Fountain (meaning the Holy Spirit). The use or lack of use of the article tells us this.

Understanding this, Dry Perpetual Fountain would reflect those who have no means of providing the Fountain. There is no possible connection to the Spirit, and that individual is foreign to Israel. These are those who have rejected the Lord in the tribulation and took the mark of the beast. They are to be eliminated.

As such, verse 10 says that twelve thousand valiant men were sent to wipe them out. It is the number of perfection of government or governmental perfection. Ten implies that nothing is wanting, and the whole cycle is complete. It tells us that the millennial government is set and ready to be put in place. The thought is reflected in Matthew 25 –

“When the Son of Man comes in His glory, and all the holy angels with Him, then He will sit on the throne of His glory. 32 All the nations will be gathered before Him, and He will separate them one from another, as a shepherd divides his sheep from the goats.” Matthew 25:31, 32

Those who are to be killed will be slain with the mouth of the kherev, sword. That has consistently pictured the law given at Horeb. In this case, it is emblematic of Jesus, who fulfilled the law and whom they had rejected –

“And the rest were killed with the sword which proceeded from the mouth of Him who sat on the horse. And all the birds were filled with their flesh.” Revelation 19:21

Four hundred virgins are spared (40×10). It is derived in two ways, both of which match the tribulation and the beginning of the millennium –

“It is the product of 5 and 8, and points to the action of grace (5), leading to and ending in revival and renewal (8). This is certainly the case where forty relates to a period of evident probation. But where it relates to enlarged dominion, or to renewed or extended rule, then it does so in virtue of its factors 4 and 10, and in harmony with their signification.”

These virgins (implying purity) were brought to Shiloh (Tranquility) in the land of Canaan (Humbled). It signifies they have entered God’s rest, having been humbled before Him through the work of Christ.

With them at Shiloh, in verse 13, terms of peace were announced to Benjamin at the Rock of Rimmon. The Son of the Right Hand is accepted because of Christ and their new understanding of Him as the true Messiah. This is seen in the name Sela Rimmon – Lofty of the Mature Mind.

Verse 14 said these men came back and were given the women from Jabesh Gilead. That is explained in the words of Ezekiel 47 –

“‘Thus you shall divide this land among yourselves according to the tribes of Israel. 22 It shall be that you will divide it by lot as an inheritance for yourselves, and for the strangers who dwell among you and who bear children among you. They shall be to you as native-born among the children of Israel; they shall have an inheritance with you among the tribes of Israel. 23 And it shall be that in whatever tribe the stranger dwells, there you shall give him his inheritance,’ says the Lord God.” Ezekiel 47:21-23

Those of the Dry Fountain are brought into a permanent and right relationship with Israel with full rights in the land. Despite this there is a lack of two hundred women, the number of Insufficiency. The number is never stated, but it is implied. As such, the insufficiency applies to these men of Israel.

Despite the insufficiency, a plan was formed, which was in the form of an adamant assertion that there would be no lack in Israel, even if daughters could not be given to these men. They could not do so based on the oath noted in verse 18 that any who gave their daughter to Benjamin would be cursed.

As such, verse 19 noted the coming feast in Shilo. In that verse and twice more in 21, the location is given without the hay (h) ending. Like Geba in Chapter 20, the change in spelling has meaning.

Hay is the fifth letter of the Aleph Beth, the number of grace. It also is used when referring to a connection to the Spirit. Its meaning is Look, Reveal, and Breath. Each is something connected with the Spirit. As such, it is a confirming note that there will be people born in the millennium who do not originally have the Spirit. In any age, one receives the Spirit through faith. There are several verses in the Old Testament that confirm this.

After noting Shilo, the narrator then took the unusual step of explaining its location. Everything about the name Shilo, like its name having no hay (h), demonstrates a lack of connection to God, “which from north-ward to Bethel from ascension-ward, the sun, to highway – the ascending – from Bethel Shechem-ward, and from south to Lebonah.”

Northward, tsaphonah signifies Concealed, thus “Concealed to the House of God.”

Ascension-ward [mizrakhah, from zarakh, to arise] the sun [shemesh] signifies the time prior to Jesus’ coming, thus the time of the law –

“But to you who fear My name
The Sun [shemesh] of Righteousness shall arise [zarakh]
With healing in His wings.” Malachi 4:2

Shechem means the neck between the shoulders. Thus, it literally means Shoulder or Back. But that comes from shakam, to start or rise early, and so it gives the sense of (Having a Sense of) Responsibility, as in Personal Interest. As seen elsewhere, it speaks of the personal interest and responsibility of those under the law.

The south, negev, signifies Parched. It speaks of the time before the giving of the Spirit.

Lebonah means White or Frankincense (which is white), but the word laven has consistently been used in Scripture to describe works, as in man’s works, because bricks turn white when they are fired, but bricks are the work of men’s hands.

The entire verse speaks of being separate from the grace that is finally revealed to Israel at the end of the tribulation period.

The words “Walk and lurk in the vineyards” speak of cultures. As has been seen many times before in Scripture, vineyards represent the cultural side of humanity. There are various vineyards that represent various cultures. As the Jewish culture of today is a group of many cultures gathered together, the words could not be more appropriate.

In verse 21, the gender discord was noted. Such a gender discord, however, was first seen in verse 12. Speaking of the four hundred virgins, it said –

“And bring them [masc. pl.] unto the camp, Shiloh, which in land Canaan.”

Next, in verse 21, it said –

“And seen, and behold, if come [masc. pl.] daughters Shilo to whirl in the dances.”

When the women are seen, verse 21 said that every man was to seize a wife for himself from the vineyards and go to the land of Benjamin. The verbs were in the perfect aspect. It is a done deal when that takes place.

In verse 22, the highly complicated words contained another gender discord. In the Hebrew, the words are obscure and so there are many texts that have diverted from them –

‘Favor us, them [masc. pl.], for not we took man his wife in the war, for not you gave to them, according to the time trespassed.’”

If looked at from the perspective of the end times, they become clear. The daughters were not taken by these men during the time when they were warring against the Lord through false belief. Nor were they given by those who did believe. “According to the time trespassed” describes the state of the men before Christ appeared and cleared up their faulty doctrine.

The gender discords are speaking of people groups. In the Bible, people groups are always referred to in the masculine, such as goyim, Gentiles, or anashim, peoples. It explains why those gender discords are listed. They are referring to those bodies or groups whom they represent.

In the first four hundred women of verse 12, the men were given the daughters of Jabesh Gilead, Dry Fountain, and thus Gentiles, as noted in Ezekiel 47 cited earlier. In the two hundred additional women, they are obtaining daughters from those born in the millennium from the regathered peoples of Israel.

One can see the true believers in Israel saying, “We vow to not intermarry with anyone who is not a believer in the Lord Jesus. Those who followed false messiahs would be excluded from this covenant. But here, we are presented with ways in which those who make it through the millennium will be able to continue even if such vows were made.

Verse 23 noted that the two hundred Benjamites went, returned to their inheritance, rebuilt the cities, and dwelt in them. It is an appropriate statement in general for after the tribulation. There will be an inheritance for those who survive the ordeal, and they will rebuild and dwell in their cities.

Verse 24 likewise said that all of the children of Israel returned to their inheritances. The two descriptors said –

And walk (dispersing), from there (Shiloh), sons Israel (all men of all tribes) in the time, the it. Man to his tribe (Judah, for example) and to his family (within the tribe).

And go from there, man to his inheritance (the land granted by the Lord, which was then divided accordingly).

This provides the reason for the reexplanation of the tribal inheritances detailed in Ezekiel 48, which refers to the millennial dispensation.

Finally, verse 25 ended with the same thought that ended Judges 17:6, “In the days, the those, naught king in Israel. Man the straight in his eyes does.”

These two verses are bookends that anticipate the time when Israel would reject Jesus as their King even until the end of the tribulation period. That is clearly depicted in their own proclamation to Pilate on the day Christ was crucified –

“When Pilate therefore heard that saying, he brought Jesus out and sat down in the judgment seat in a place that is called The Pavement, but in Hebrew, Gabbatha. 14 Now it was the Preparation Day of the Passover, and about the sixth hour. And he said to the Jews, ‘Behold your King!’
15 But they cried out, “Away with Him, away with Him! Crucify Him!’
Pilate said to them, ‘Shall I crucify your King?’
The chief priests answered, ‘We have no king but Caesar!’
16 Then he delivered Him to them to be crucified. Then they took Jesus and led Him away.” John 19:13-16

During all this time, Israel has done whatever it wanted. They rejected Moses from the beginning, paying mere lip service to the word of the Lord given through him. Then they rejected the One that Moses clearly wrote about, both explicitly and implicitly.

Further, the Law of Moses continues on in the writings that follow his time of service. In Judges alone, there have been an incredible number of pictures of Jesus, His work, the redemptive plan He laid out, etc.

It would be presumptuous to assume that all of the pictures I have presented in Judges have been interpreted correctly, but it is clear from the overall context of the Bible what is being presented, that the details – even if some were wrongly interpreted – are swallowed up in the surety of the overall pictures.

Among the pictures have been wonderful insights into core doctrines of Scripture, such as the deity of Christ, salvation by grace alone, seeking justification through works of the law only separate us further from God, dispensationalism, and so forth.

Along with those, many other useful doctrines have been presented to clear up the muddy waters of bad theology. There were several references to the rapture that solidified the surety of that teaching. Further, the timing of the rapture, being pre-tribulation, is clarified.

The fact that Israel of the past is the same group of people we see in the world today is also confirmed, demonstrating to us that the church has not replaced it, but is an extension of it. Gentiles are grafted into the commonwealth of Israel, but they remain Gentiles just as Jews remain Jews.

These and so many other points of doctrine have been carefully detailed in these ancient, difficult, and picturesque stories that have excited the minds of believers for thousands of years. In the order of biblical books, Ruth comes next. That has already been analyzed, and so soon we will begin 1 Samuel.

First, though, we will take a short diversion and head to a new book (or two) for a few weeks to see what is detailed elsewhere. No matter where we are in the Bible, however, we are sure to come across interesting secrets, find hidden treasures, and above all, see the Person of Jesus Christ being presented to us in a vast array of ways.

Everything about this word is centered on Him and what He has done and continues to do for His people. Let us never fail to pick up the Bible daily and search out its marvelous contents, looking for Him as we do.

I look for you, my Precious Lord
But then again, I lose my sight.
And even though I might get lost
I know you never leave my side.

I look for you in my every-days,
In so many moments, so many times.
I know that You are always there,
Yet, I can’t see You with my eyes.

To hear You, Lord it’s not an easy task.
My ears might never hear your voice.
But I know, Lord, that You are here,
Right inside my very soul.

I look for You in Your Word.
I look for You in my heart,
And I know Jesus through the cross,
Through transformation of my life.

So help me, Lord, to comprehend;
that to see You, Lord
is to know your grace.
That to hear You, Lord
is to know Your Word,
and through the faith
Is to be Yours.

So help me Jesus
to hear your voice,
not with my ears
but with my soul.

Help me to see
not with my eyes
but with your Spirit
inside my heart.

Izabela Bednara

Closing Verse: “Then say to them, ‘Thus says the Lord God: Surely I will take the children of Israel from among the nations, wherever they have gone, and will gather them from every side and bring them into their own land; 22 and I will make them one nation in the land, on the mountains of Israel; and one king shall be king over them all; they shall no longer be two nations, nor shall they ever be divided into two kingdoms again.” Ezekiel 37:21, 22

Next Week: Malachi 1:1-3 What a picture the Lord did draw… (Jacob and Esau) (1st Malachi Sermon)

The Lord has you exactly where He wants you. He has a good plan and purpose for you. It is He who judges His people according to their deeds. So, follow Him, live for Him, and trust Him, and He will do marvelous things for you and through you.

No King in Israel, Part XI

Therefore they instructed the children of Benjamin, saying
“Go, lie in wait in the vineyards for your chances
And watch; and just when the daughters of Shiloh
Come out to perform their dances

Then come out from the vineyards
And every man catch a wife for himself (we know you’re all-in)
From the daughters of Shiloh
Then go to the land of Benjamin

Then it shall be, when their fathers or their brothers
Come to us to complain, that we will say to them, for shor
‘Be kind to them for our sakes
Because we did not take a wife for any of them in the war

For it is not as though you have given
The women to them at this time
Making yourselves guilty of your oath
Thus, things will be fine

And the children of Benjamin did so
They took enough wives for their number
From those who danced, whom they caught
They acted and did not slumber

Then they went and returned to their inheritance
And they rebuilt the cities and dwelt in them
———-living out their second chance

So the children of Israel departed from there at that time
Every man to his tribe and family
They went out from there
Every man to his inheritance and his own territory

In those days there was no king in Israel
Everyone did what was right in his own eyes
———-so the word does tell

Lord God, turn our hearts to be obedient to Your word
Give us wisdom to be ever faithful to You
May we carefully heed each thing we have heard
Yes, Lord God may our hearts be faithful and true

And Lord God, thank you for this wonderful book
Judges! What a marvel to have studied it
Into every detail possible we took a look
And to You our thanks and praise we now submit!

Hallelujah to Christ our Lord!
Hallelujah for Judges, a marvelous part of Your superior word!

Hallelujah and Amen!
Indeed, Hallelujah and Amen…

 

20 Therefore they instructed the children of Benjamin, saying, “Go, lie in wait in the vineyards, 21 and watch; and just when the daughters of Shiloh come out to perform their dances, then come out from the vineyards, and every man catch a wife for himself from the daughters of Shiloh; then go to the land of Benjamin. 22 Then it shall be, when their fathers or their brothers come to us to complain, that we will say to them, ‘Be kind to them for our sakes, because we did not take a wife for any of them in the war; for it is not as though you have given the women to them at this time, making yourselves guilty of your oath.’ ”

23 And the children of Benjamin did so; they took enough wives for their number from those who danced, whom they caught. Then they went and returned to their inheritance, and they rebuilt the cities and dwelt in them. 24 So the children of Israel departed from there at that time, every man to his tribe and family; they went out from there, every man to his inheritance.

25 In those days there was no king in Israel; everyone did what was right in his own eyes.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Judges 21:1-19 (No King In Israel, Part X)

Artwork by Douglas Kallerson

 

Judges 21:1-19
No King in Israel, Part X

(Typed 29 Jul 2024) The narrative in Judges 21 brings in a point of doctrine that seems to escape a surprisingly large portion of the church. It is such a critical point to understand, that in misunderstanding the precept, it has brought in some of the nuttiest thinking imaginable to various denominations, sects, and cults.

Benjamin has been reduced from a number of 26,700 fighting men, plus women, children, and the aged, to only 600 men. So, does the tribe of Benjamin still exist after the battle? It would be hard to find a single person who would say, “No, Benjamin no longer exists.”

Until those 600 died, Benjamin would still be a tribe. But what if the number was only 120? Would Benjamin still exist? Again, the answer is affirmative. But what if there were only 17, 8, or 2? The answer would remain the same. Even if only one man of Benjamin survived, the tribe would still be considered a tribe.

This is understood in the world today. A couple of times in my life, I have heard of someone thought to be the last remaining person of a particular tribe of people, like the Eskimos, for example. When that person dies, that particular tribe dies out. Until then, the tribe remains.

Text Verse: “…though I also might have confidence in the flesh. If anyone else thinks he may have confidence in the flesh, I more so: circumcised the eighth day, of the stock of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin, a Hebrew of the Hebrews; concerning the law, a Pharisee; concerning zeal, persecuting the church; concerning the righteousness which is in the law, blameless.” Philippians 3:4-6

The apostle Paul was of the tribe of Benjamin. So, applying the logic, did the tribe of Benjamin exist at the time of Paul? Obviously! Even if Paul was the only Benjamite left (which he wasn’t), the tribe would still exist until he died.

In Luke 2:36, a woman of Asher, Anna, the daughter of Phanuel, is named. Thus, Asher remained. In fact, after the exile of the ten northern tribes of Israel by Sennacherib, King of Assyria, members of almost every tribe in Israel are mentioned. In other words, even though the majority of the tribe was exiled and their land inheritance was lost, there were still people from those tribes residing in the southern area of Judah.

That fact continued on through the time of the apostles. In Acts 26:7, Paul said, “To this promise our twelve tribes, earnestly serving God night and day, hope to attain. For this hope’s sake, King Agrippa, I am accused by the Jews.” Likewise, the book of James is written to “the twelve tribes which are scattered abroad.”

Despite the exile, there were no “lost tribes.” And yet, denominations, sects, and cults within the supposed Christian church claim that they comprise the gathered lost tribes of Israel. This is true of British Israelism, the Worldwide Church of God, the Mormons, Jehovah’s Witnesses (in one respect), and others.

They all claim something that they are not, and they base it on a faulty understanding of Scripture. Benjamin did not die out at the time of Judges, despite what took place in Judges 20. And none of the tribes of Israel died out at the exile of the ten northern tribes.

They continued on through the time of Jesus and the apostles, and they are being regathered to the land of Israel today. A good life lesson for the church would be to stop co-opting things belonging to Israel to which it has no right.

If one wonders why there is so much disunity in the church today, it is because people fail to read the Bible, and even when they do, they take much of it out of its proper context. Do not do this! Great and reliable truths such as this are to be found in His superior word. And so, let us turn to that precious word once again, and… May God speak to us through His word today, and may His glorious name ever be praised.

I. What Shall We Do? (verses 1-7)

Chapter 20 ended with the total defeat of the army of Benjamin and the complete destruction of the tribe and all its people. The only exception was noted in the final verses, saying –

“But six hundred men turned and fled toward the wilderness to the rock of Rimmon, and they stayed at the rock of Rimmon for four months. 48 And the men of Israel turned back against the children of Benjamin, and struck them down with the edge of the sword—from every city, men and beasts, all who were found. They also set fire to all the cities they came to.” Judges 20:47, 48

With that remembered, we now enter into the contents of the final chapter of the book of Judges…

Now the men of Israel had sworn an oath at Mizpah, saying,

v’ish Yisrael nishba bamitspah l’mor – “And man, Israel, sworn in the Mizpah, to say.” In this chapter, it is apparent that there are two oaths that had previously been made by the congregation at Mizpah but which had not been recorded. These oaths form the underlying structure of what will be recorded throughout the chapter. The first of these two oaths is noted next…

1 (con’t) “None of us shall give his daughter to Benjamin as a wife.”

ish mimenu lo yiten bito l’binyamin l’ishah – “Man from us not gives his daughter to Benjamin to wife.” The oath was fortunately not one of kharem, the total devotion of the tribe to God. If that were the case, the six hundred at the Rock of Rimmon would have been hunted down and killed as well.

However, the people made an oath that Benjamin was cut off from marriage rights among the tribes of Israel, at least at this time. Of this practice, John Lange provides an explanation –

“They abrogated the connubium (the right of intermarriage) with the tribe. They determined to treat Benjamin as a heathen people, or as heathen nations, in the absence of special treaties (ἐπιγαμία [epigamia]), were accustomed to look upon each other. There were instances of heathen tribes who did not at all intermix. Such cases were found among Germanic tribes also, until Christianity had fully conquered them. It was the church that brought East-Goths and West-Goths, Anglo-Saxons and Britons, Franks and Romans, to look upon each other as tribes of one Israel. Very great, therefore, must have been the indignation of the collective Israel, when they thus, as it were, cast Benjamin out of their marriage covenant.”

The oath was made, and it could not be taken back. As such, it has left Israel with a problem because they had killed all of the women and children of Benjamin. This left these six hundred men without any ability to continue the existence of the tribe beyond themselves.

Israel means He Strives with God. The Mizpah means The Watchtower. Benjamin means Son of the Right Hand.

Then the people came to the house of God, and remained there before God till evening. They lifted up their voices and wept bitterly,

vayavo ha’am beith el vayeshvu sham ad ha’erev liphne ha’elohim vayisu qolam vayivku b’khi gadol – “And comes, the people, Bethel. And sit there until the evening to faces the God. And lift their voice and weep, ululation whopping.” Here, it says, “the people.” Thus, it is inclusive of soldiers, men, women, and children.

The people came out collectively to Bethel and spent the entire day there before the God, meaning the One True God, among those who are in a right relationship with Him. Of this, the meaning is that the ark was still there after the battle as it was in Judges 20:27. This time before the Lord was one of mourning and sadness.

First, the verb is bakah, to weep. That is enhanced by the next word, the noun b’khi, a weeping. Such a weeping, when it involves an entire congregation, has a lot of noise and emotion. Thus, the word ululation fits perfectly. It has a particular onomatopoetic quality that matches the Mideastern weeping expressed here: ululululululu. Along with this ululating, there are deep searchings of heart and questions to God…

and said, “O Lord God of Israel, why has this come to pass in Israel,

Rather: vayomru lamah Yehovah elohe Yisrael hay’thah zoth b’Yisrael – “And say, ‘Why, Yehovah God Israel, came this in Israel?’” Of these words, Adam Clarke incorrectly says –

“This was a very impertinent question. They knew well enough how it came to pass. It was right that the men of Gibeah should be punished, and it was right that they who vindicated them should share in that punishment; but they carried their revenge too far, they endeavored to exterminate both man and beast.” Adam Clarke

However, they did exactly as the law stipulated. They eradicated the evil from Israel. There was nothing unjust in their actions and there was nothing rude in the question. The Lord directed the battles, He oversaw the events, and He knew what the outcome would be. The question isn’t why the battle took place or came out as it did. Instead, the question involves national integrity…

3 (con’t) that today there should be one tribe missing in Israel?”

The words are a sloppy paraphrase: l’hipaqed hayom miYisrael sheveth ekhad – “To visit the day from Israel tribe one?” The word is paqad, to visit. It is one of the most widely applied words in the Bible and each instance has to be considered from the context to understand the word’s signification.

In this case, the visitation means in judgment leading to near eradication. It cannot mean “one tribe missing in Israel” because the one tribe still exists, even if in a completely degraded and seemingly hopeless, cut-off state. Benjamin was visited, and the concern is that he will check out of the tribal enumeration at some point in the future.

The triple repetition of the name Israel in this one verse stresses the matter in a unique and forceful way that reveals the utter astonishment and confusion in the minds of the people. They were a unified whole, being the twelve sons of Israel. But more than that, this unity was under the headship of the Lord.

The covenant cut with them, and the promises made to them were of a national nature, inclusive of all the tribes. If Benjamin were to be lost entirely, how would that affect the covenant promises and their national identity? This is what is on their minds.

The Lord had covenanted with the twelve tribes at Sinai in Exodus 24. Later in Leviticus 26, He affirmed that they would be kept as a people, noting that even in the distant future, He would be their God –

“But for their sake I will remember the covenant of their ancestors, whom I brought out of the land of Egypt in the sight of the nations, that I might be their God:
am the Lord.” Leviticus 26:45

The sorrow and confusion among the people would be great. How could the words of the covenant be true if Benjamin was set to perish? Therefore, the people come before the Lord in hope of a resolution…

So it was, on the next morning, that the people rose early and built an altar there, and offered burnt offerings and peace offerings.

vayhi mimakhorath vayashkimu ha’am vayivnu sham mizbeakh vayaalu oloth ushlamim – “And is, from morrow, and arose early the people, and build there altar, and ascend burnt offerings and peace offerings.” These words show, with all certainty, that the translation of some versions as house of God instead of Bethel is incorrect.

If Israel had appeared before the house of God in Shiloh, they would not need to build an altar. Rather, the ark had been brought to Bethel (meaning House of God) while the rest of the tabernacle remained at Shiloh. Therefore, the people built an altar according to the Law of the Altar found in Exodus 20:24-26.

Once it was built, then the offerings could be presented. The burnt offerings are those wholly burnt to Yehovah as a sign of complete submission or dedication to Him. The peace offerings had a sacred portion removed for the Lord according to the written law, and the rest was eaten by the people.

As such, the burnt offerings are for restoration from sin, and the peace offerings are a sign of renewed fellowship based on that restoration. After these were offered in the presence of the Lord, the second oath that had been made but was not previously recorded is detailed…

The children of Israel said, “Who is there among all the tribes of Israel who did not come up with the assembly to the Lord?”

vayomru b’ne Yisrael mi asher lo alah vaqahal mikal shivte Yisrael el Yehovah – “And say, sons Israel, ‘Who which not ascended in the assembly from all tribes Israel unto Yehovah.’” A head count was taken in order for Israel to fulfill an oath that was previously made. This timing of this assembly had to have been at the time of Judges 20:1-3. That is the only time that Mizpah is mentioned in the narrative until this chapter. But that is what is next referred to…

5 (con’t) For they had made a great oath concerning anyone who had not come up to the Lord at Mizpah, saying, “He shall surely be put to death.”

ki hashvuah ha’g’dolah hay’thah laasher lo alah el Yehovah hamitspah l’mor moth yumath – “For the oath, the whopping, made to which not ascended unto Yehovah the Mizpah to say, ‘Dying shall die.” When the assembly was called, it was a matter of national concern. Benjamin had to be dealt with. Any who did not come up would thus be considered as allying with Benjamin. Therefore, as was done to Benjamin was to be done to them.

That vow was put on hold while the matter of Benjamin was dealt with. One can see that verse 5 follows chronologically after verses 6 & 7, but it is placed here to reveal the genesis of the process that would lead to the restoration of the tribe of Benjamin. As such, verses 6 & 7 should be considered parenthetical. One can see this if verses 5 & 6 are reversed –

So it was, on the next morning, that the people rose early and built an altar there, and offered burnt offerings and peace offerings. And the children of Israel grieved for Benjamin their brother, and said, “One tribe is cut off from Israel today. What shall we do for wives for those who remain, seeing we have sworn by the Lord that we will not give them our daughters as wives?” The children of Israel said, “Who is there among all the tribes of Israel who did not come up with the assembly to the Lord?” For they had made a great oath concerning anyone who had not come up to the Lord at Mizpah, saying, “He shall surely be put to death.” And they said, “What one is there from the tribes of Israel who did not come up to Mizpah to the Lord?” And, in fact, no one had come to the camp from Jabesh Gilead to the assembly.

And the children of Israel grieved for Benjamin their brother,

vayinakhamu b’ne Yisrael el Binyamin akhiv – “And sigh, sons Israel, unto Benjamin his brother.” The word nakham is variously translated in this verse as repent, lament, grieve, felt sorry, etc. It comes from a primitive root signifying to sigh, as when one breathes heavily. One can see the people with their heads down, worn out from their ululating and simply sighing in anguish. It appears as if there is no hope for Benjamin, and thus, they continue with mournful words…

6 (con’t) and said, “One tribe is cut off from Israel today.

vayomru hayom shevet ekhad miYisrael – “And say, ‘Hewn, the day, tribe one from Israel.’” The words show that the earlier translation of the NKJV that the tribe was missing is incorrect. The tribe exists, but it is hewn away from Israel, cut off from any discernible future because of their weakened state and the oath concerning wives…

What shall we do for wives for those who remain, seeing we have sworn by the Lord that we will not give them our daughters as wives?”

mah naaseh lahem lanotarim l’nashim vaanakhnu nishbanu b’Yehovah l’bilti teth lahem mibnotenu l’nashim – “What do to them, to the remainings, to wives? And we sworn in Yehovah to exception give to them from our daughters to wives.” Benjamin exists, but only as “the remainings.” They are a shadowy remnant of the tribe. And with the oath sworn “in Yehovah,” those who gathered could not go back on their word. And more, this was “to exception.”

It was a united and universal proclamation that their daughters were not to be given to Benjamin as wives. However, as it is said, necessity is the mother of invention. There is a need, and a lightbulb of inspiration comes on in the minds of the people. It is where verse 5 logically follows chronologically –

“The children of Israel said, “Who is there among all the tribes of Israel who did not come up with the assembly to the Lord?” For they had made a great oath concerning anyone who had not come up to the Lord at Mizpah, saying, “He shall surely be put to death.”

Four hundred young virgins for six hundred men
It ain’t enough to give to all
So, you’ll need to plan again
Before you have that six hundred couple wedding ball

But it will come about for sure
Because there is no lack in the Lord’s plan
Trust in Him, He has the cure
To take care of every man

The Lord is faithful, and it will come to pass
And a good end will be the result
For every man, a lovely lass
Because His plan is without fault

II. Four Hundred Young Virgins (verses 8-14)

And they said, “What one is there from the tribes of Israel who did not come up to Mizpah to the Lord?” And, in fact, no one had come to the camp from Jabesh Gilead to the assembly.

vayomru mi ekhad mishivte Yisrael asher lo alah el Yehovah hamitspah v’hineh lo ba ish el hamakhaneh miyavesh gilad el haqahal – “And say, ‘Who one from tribes Israel, which no ascended unto Yehovah the Mizpah.’ And behold! No came man unto the camp from Jabesh Gilead unto the assembly.”

Two stones can be overturned at one time. The people have made an oath that anyone who didn’t come up to the assembly was to be put to death. However, this was not a kherem, or total devotion to the Lord. If it was, it would include the entire family along with all of their possessions. Rather, it was a call for the fighting men to assemble, as is evidenced in Judges 20.

And more, as these men didn’t come out, they did not participate in the oath concerning the giving of daughters. As such, they will relinquish their lives while implicitly giving their daughters.

The name Jabesh (Yavesh) comes from the verb yavesh, to be dry, dried up, or withered. It is used in the drying up of a river, land, bones, etc. It is also used of the withering of grass. Thus, Jabesh Gilead means something like Dry (Drying) Perpetual Fountain or Withered (Withering) Perpetual Fountain. Its location is east of the Jordan in the tribal allotment of Manasseh.

For when the people were counted, indeed, not one of the inhabitants of Jabesh Gilead was there.

vayithpaqed ha’am v’hineh ein sham ish miyovoshve yavesh gilad – “And visits the people. And Behold! Naught there man from inhabitings Jabesh Gilead.” To visit here means to review them for a full census as you would when counting an army. In this action, they found that, sure enough, Jabesh Gilead failed to come up and prepare for the battle against Benjamin.

As such, it is as if they had allied with Benjamin against Israel. This will become a part of the solution to the dilemma faced by the collective nation…

10 So the congregation sent out there twelve thousand of their most valiant men,

vayishl’khu sham ha’edah shnem asar eleph ish mibne hekhayil – “And send there, the congregation, two ten thousand man from sons the valor.” The Latin Vulgate says ten thousand. This was probably to avoid a difficulty based on the assumption that there were one thousand drawn off from each tribe.

If so, with Levi and Benjamin excluded, it would leave ten or eleven tribes depending on whether Joseph was reckoned as one or if Ephraim and Manasseh were counted separately. But nothing is said of a set number from each tribe. It appears that they simply mustered twelve thousand out of the whole for the battle ahead.

The number is derived from twelve, perfection of government or governmental perfection, and ten, completeness of order where the whole cycle is complete.

10 (con’t) and commanded them, saying, “Go and strike the inhabitants of Jabesh Gilead with the edge of the sword, including the women and children.

vaytsavu otham l’mor l’khu v’hikithem eth yoshve yavesh gilad l’pi kherev v’hanashim v’hataph – “And command them, to say, ‘Walk and struck inhabitings Jabesh Gilead to mouth sword, and the woman, and the children.’” There was to be a complete eradication of those in the city by the kherev, or sword. However, one exception is to be made, which is implicitly stated next…

11 And this is the thing that you shall do: You shall utterly destroy every male, and every woman who has known a man intimately.”

v’zeh hadavar asher taasu kal zakhar v’khal ishah yodaath mishkav zakhar takharimu – “And this the word which doing: All male and all woman knowing bed male – anathematize.” Because of what happened with Midian before entering Canaan, there was no need for the explicit command to retain the living females. This is the same generation that heard the words of Moses –

“And Moses said to them: ‘Have you kept all the women alive? 16 Look, these women caused the children of Israel, through the counsel of Balaam, to trespass against the Lord in the incident of Peor, and there was a plague among the congregation of the Lord. 17 Now therefore, kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman who has known a man intimately. 18 But keep alive for yourselves all the young girls who have not known a man intimately.’” Numbers 31:15-20

The kherem, or anathematized, of the inhabitants was similar to an offering to the Lord. The virgins are to be excepted so they can be presented as an offering to Benjamin, a tribe of the Lord’s people…

12 So they found among the inhabitants of Jabesh Gilead four hundred young virgins who had not known a man intimately;

vayimtsu miyovoshve yavesh gilad arba meoth naarah v’thulah asher lo yad’ah ish l’mishkav zakhar – “And find, from inhabitings Jabesh Gilead, four hundred damsel, virgin, who not known man to bed male.” The number of dead is unimportant to the narrative and so it is excluded. However, the number of virgins is significant and is thus given.

It is a derivative of four, the number of creation and the world (and city) number, and ten which was just explained. It is also a derivative of forty and ten. Forty is described by Bullinger –

“It is the product of 5 and 8, and points to the action of grace (5), leading to and ending in revival and renewal (8). This is certainly the case where forty relates to a period of evident probation. But where it relates to enlarged dominion, or to renewed or extended rule, then it does so in virtue of its factors 4 and 10, and in harmony with their signification.”

12 (con’t) and they brought them to the camp at Shiloh, which is in the land of Canaan.

If this is referring to the virgins, as seems natural, there is a gender discord because the pronoun is masculine: vayaviu otham el hamakhaneh Shiloh asher b’erets k’naan – “And bring them [masc. pl.] unto the camp, Shiloh, which in land Canaan.” That this is referring to the virgins is more definitively supported by the words of verse 22, which will be seen when we get there.

The main camp of Israel is in Shiloh. With the war ending, that is where Phineas and the ark would return. The girls would be brought there until they were given in marriage to one of the Benjamites.

Shiloh means Tranquility. Canaan signifies Humbled, Humiliated, or even Subdued.

13 Then the whole congregation sent word to the children of Benjamin who were at the rock of Rimmon, and announced peace to them.

vayishl’khu kal ha’edah vaydabru el b’ne vinyamin asher b’sela rimon vayiqr’u lahem shalom – “And send, all the congregation, and word unto sons Benjamin who in Sela Rimmon. And call to them, ‘Peace!’” This means that the representative elders of each tribe went as a delegation to meet Benjamin, or a messenger went, carrying the words of approval from all the elders.

The time of warfare is over and a guarantee of Shalom, Peace, is granted to the remnant of the tribe.

Rimmon means Pomegranate. But the pomegranate symbolizes harvest-ready fruit, so it can further mean Mature Mind or Harvest Ready. The type of rock is a sela, or craggy rock. That word comes from a root signifying to be lofty.

14 So Benjamin came back at that time, and they gave them the women whom they had saved alive of the women of Jabesh Gilead;

vayashav Binyamin baeth hahi vayitnu lahem hanashim asher khiyu minshei yavesh gilad – “And returns, Benjamin, in the time, the it. And give, to them, the women who lived from women Jabesh Gilead.” The offer of peace would not be considered a ruse. If Israel wanted four hundred from Benjamin dead, they would have simply sent the army and wiped them out.

Rather, it was understood as a binding offer of peace. As a bonus for the process of reconciliation, the damsels kept at Shiloh would be presented to the men. From this, it would be understood that a full state of harmony between the tribes was reestablished…

14 (con’t) and yet they had not found enough for them.

The words are intentionally sparse to highlight the lack: v’lo matsu lahem ken – “And not found to them thus.” Despite having obtained four hundred virgins, they realized they had not found enough wives for all six hundred of the men of Benjamin. As such, there is a lack that will leave two hundred unmarried, so there needs to be another way of obtaining wives for those still without. In the short term…

No tribe will be rubbed out of Israel
The Lord has covenanted with them forever
And of the faithfulness of the Lord, we can tell
Because He will never fail – no, not ever

The Lord’s promises are sure and true
They can be relied upon without any doubt
When they apply personally to me or you
Trust them, you are dealing with the Lord’s clout

When He says that you are saved
Why would you ever question it is so?
The road to glory He has paved
Through faith in Christ, that’s all you need to know

III. A Yearly Festival of the Lord (verses 15-19)

15 And the people grieved for Benjamin, because the Lord had made a void in the tribes of Israel.

Rather: v’haam nikham l’vinyamin ki asah Yehovah perets b’shivte Yisrael – “And the people sighed to Benjamin. For made, Yehovah, breach in tribes Israel.” One can see the people, once they realized that there were more men of Benjamin than available women they had gathered for them, looking in the eyes of the other two hundred, looking away, and sighing.

It is not so much a void in Israel, but a breach. It is as if a dam has cracked, and a certain amount of one of the tribes is being lost downstream. Even if the dam can be repaired, the lost water cannot be retrieved. This is the thought on the minds of the people.

16 Then the elders of the congregation said, “What shall we do for wives for those who remain, since the women of Benjamin have been destroyed?”

This is probably not a question at all, but an assertion: vayomru ziqne ha’edah mah naaseh lanotarim l’nashim ki nishm’dah mibinyamin ishah – “And say, elders the congregation, ‘What do to the remainings to wives, for destroyed from Benjamin women.’” There is a conundrum. It is apparent that they had promised wives to the men in their offer of peace. However, the supply did not meet the demand.

As such, they state where women can be obtained from and how it will be done. All the women of Benjamin were dead, and the virgins of Jabesh Gilead, the only group who did not show up as mandated, were insufficient. It appears impossible, but a solution is available…

17 And they said, “There must be an inheritance for the survivors of Benjamin, that a tribe may not be destroyed from Israel.

The words are difficult and widely debated: vayomru y’rushath p’leitah l’vinyamin v’lo yimakheh shevet miyisrael – “And say, ‘Possession deliverance to Benjamin. And not rubbed tribe from Israel.’” No matter how they are translated, they require insertions or an explanation to be understood.

The words could be as the NKJV indicates, an adamant assertion that there must be more women or the tribe will perish. But this would assume that they honestly believe the tribe could be lost over two hundred men lacking wives. That seems unlikely.

Ellicott and Keil tie the possession to the land itself, “i.e., the tribe-land of Benjamin shall remain an independent possession for the Benjaminites who have escaped the massacre, so that a tribe may not be destroyed out of Israel” (Keil). Thus, they needed to find wives for the men. But that has nothing to do with the context.

And more, the land was given by the Lord to Benjamin. The other tribes of Israel had no right to withhold it or grant it. Cambridge naturally says the text is corrupt, which is their default setting.

Rather than this being an adamant assertion that there must be more women or the tribe will perish, it seems more likely that this is an adamant assurance by the leaders that the tribe will not be rubbed out. “There will be women (a possession) for those of Benjamin who were delivered (a deliverance), and no tribe will be rubbed from Israel. Stop weeping!”

Lange agrees with this, and it makes the most sense based on simple logic, the progression of thought, and the minimally provided Hebrew. Understanding this, it next says…

18 However, we cannot give them wives from our daughters,

The conjunction is simply “and,” but “however” would rightly explain the thought based on the emphatic “we” that follows: v’anakhnu lo nukhal latheth lahem nashim mibnothnu – “And we, not able to give to them wives from our daughters.’”

The congregation has vowed that they will not give women to Benjamin. This was understood and cannot be violated. Anyone who gave a daughter to a Benjamite would face the consequences. This was said to confirm the oath and ensure the vow’s validity. The reason for it is again reiterated and expanded upon…

18 (con’t) for the children of Israel have sworn an oath, saying, ‘Cursed be the one who gives a wife to Benjamin.’”

ki nishbu v’ne Yisrael l’mor arur nothen ishah l’vinyamin – “For sworn, sons Israel, to say, ‘Cursed giving wife to Benjamin.” All in the congregation made an oath. The details were specific. Anyone giving a wife to Benjamin would be in violation of the oath, and a curse would be upon such a person. Despite this…

19 Then they said, “In fact, there is a yearly feast of the Lord in Shiloh,

The name of the location here and verse 21 is spelled without an “h” ending: vayomru hineh khag Yehovah b’shilo miyamim yamimah – “And say, “Behold! Feast Yehovah in Shilo from days, days-ward.” This confirms the thought that the previous words were an adamant assertion to alleviate the woes of those who were mourning. In other words, “Stop weeping! We have a plan, and here are the details. It is true that nobody can give away a daughter to Benjamin, but that is not necessary to repair this breach.”

The term “from days” is rightly paraphrased as “yearly.” There were three annual feasts. The next one was coming in the days ahead (days-ward), and a solution to the problem rested there. The ingenious cunning of the plan will be laid out with intricate detail…

*19 (fin) which is north of Bethel, on the east side of the highway that goes up from Bethel to Shechem, and south of Lebonah.”

asher mitsphonah l’beith el mizr’khah ha’shemesh limsilah ha’olah mibeith el sh’khmah u-minegev lilvonah – “which from north-ward to Bethel from ascension-ward, the sun, to highway – the ascending – from Bethel Shechem-ward, and from south to Lebonah.’” Of the words, Ellicott rightly says, “This elaborate description of the site of Shiloh, a place which is so often mentioned elsewhere without any addition, is extremely curious.”

Some scholars say the words are a gloss. Others say the elders were being very precise so that Benjamin would know exactly where Shiloh was, but that makes no sense at all. If this is where the annual pilgrim feasts were, everyone would know exactly where Shiloh was.

Instead, it appears that these words are an explanatory parenthesis by the author, not a description by the elders. The location of the Ark of the Covenant had changed by the time Samuel (if he is the chronicler) compiled the narrative. Therefore, he is describing, under inspiration, the layout of the land for the reader.

Tsaphonah means northward, coming from tsaphon, north. North is the hidden direction in the northern hemisphere, where the sun moves toward or away from it, depending on the time of year. Thus, the word signifies Concealed.

Mizrakhah signifies eastward, coming from zarakh, to rise or come forth.

Shechem means the neck between the shoulders. Thus, it literally means Shoulder or Back. But that comes from shakam, to start or rise early, so it gives the sense of (Having a Sense of) Responsibility, as in Personal Interest.

The south, negev, signifies Parched.

Lebonah is found only here in Scripture. It comes from the verb laven, to be white and to make bricks. Thus, it literally means White or Frankincense (which is white), but the word laven has consistently been used in Scripture to describe works, as in man’s works, because bricks turn white when they are fired, but bricks are the work of men’s hands.

That is the end of our review today. We covered a lot of verses and a great deal of information, but it is time to stop and finish both the chapter and the book of Judges next week. A key lesson that can be discovered in so many commentaries on verses like these is that the Bible is to be taken literally and in its proper context.

We are not to appropriate things from Scripture or apply them to ourselves if we do not know what the subject matter is dealing with.

Obviously, in typology, we may find useful applications in our lives. Despite this, in a clear reading of the Bible, we can easily see that the church has not replaced Israel, and those in the church are not “spiritual Israel” or the ten (supposedly) lost tribes of Israel.

And more, we need more than our subjective opinion that the text has been manipulated, added to, or is missing something. Unless there is objective evidence of this, we should never make such claims. Just because we don’t understand what is going on doesn’t mean the content is in question.

It may just mean we have no idea what is being conveyed for one of various reasons. Next week, we will go over the typology of the chapter. When we do, if the typology matches the narrative, then all of the commentaries that say the text is in question are wrong.

Rather, we should give the word the benefit of the doubt, trusting that it is reliable. Only with valid evidence that there is a question should we then search out that avenue. Let us hold fast to the word and cherish it as the most valuable treasure, because it is!

Closing Verse: “Bless God in the congregations,
The Lord, from the fountain of Israel.
27 There is little Benjamin, their leader,
The princes of Judah and their company,
The princes of Zebulun and the princes of Naphtali.” Psalm 68:26, 27

Next Week: Judges 21:20-25 What a great story it has been to tell, like a slice of heaven… (No King in Israel, Part XI) (58th and Final Judges Sermon)

The Lord has you exactly where He wants you. He has a good plan and purpose for you. It is He who judges His people according to their deeds. So, follow Him, live for Him, and trust Him, and He will do marvelous things for you and through you.

No King in Israel, Part X

Now the men of Israel
Had sworn an oath at Mizpah, saying during this time of strife
“None of us shall give his daughter
To Benjamin as a wife

Then the people came to the house of God
And remained before God till evening there
They lifted up their voices and wept bitterly
And said, “O LORD God of Israel” in their prayer

Why has this in Israel come to pass? Do tell
That today there should be one tribe missing in Israel?

So it was, on the next morning
That the people rose early to make their profferings
And built an altar there
And offered burnt offerings and peace offerings

The children of Israel said
“Who is there among all the tribes of Israel, speak the word
Who did not come up
With the assembly to the LORD?

For they had made a great oath concerning anyone
Who had not come up, speaking their shibboleth
To the LORD at Mizpah, saying
“He shall surely be put to death

And the children of Israel
Grieved for Benjamin their brother
And said, “One tribe is cut off from Israel today
As a son taken from his mother

What shall we do for wives
For those who remain, who kept their lives
Seeing we have sworn by the LORD
That we will not give them our daughters as wives?

And they said, “What one is there
From the tribes of Israel
Who did not come up to Mizpah to the LORD?
Speak up! Do tell!

And, in fact, no one had come (and they should be trembly!)
To the camp from Jabesh Gilead to the assembly

For when the people were counted during this affair
Indeed, not one of the inhabitants of Jabesh Gilead was there

So the congregation sent out there twelve thousand
Of their most valiant men, and commanded them, saying
“Go and strike the inhabitants of Jabesh Gilead
With the edge of the sword, including the women and children
———-so they were relaying

And this is the thing that you shall do:
You shall utterly destroy every male
And every woman who has known a man intimately
Yes, every such female

So they found among the inhabitants of Jabesh Gilead
Four hundred young virgins who had not known a man intimately
And they brought them to the camp at Shiloh
Which is in the land of Canaan, north of the Salt Sea

Then the whole congregation sent word
To the children of Benjamin
Who were at the rock of Rimmon
And announced peace to them

So Benjamin came back at that time
And they gave them the women whom they had saved alive
Of the women of Jabesh Gilead
And yet they had not found enough for them
———- (Still missing 40 x 5)

And the people grieved for Benjamin for a spell
Because the LORD had made a void in the tribes of Israel

Then the elders of the congregation said
“What shall we do for wives to be deployed
For those who remain
Since the women of Benjamin have been destroyed?

And they said
“There must be an inheritance, so we tell
For the survivors of Benjamin
That a tribe may not be destroyed from Israel

However, we cannot give them wives from our daughters
For the children of Israel (to their chagrin)
Have sworn an oath, saying
‘Cursed be the one who gives a wife to Benjamin

Then they said, “In fact, there is a yearly feast of the LORD
In Shiloh, which is north of Bethel, oorah!
On the east side of the highway that goes up
From Bethel to Shechem, and south of Lebonah

Lord God, turn our hearts to be obedient to Your word
Give us wisdom to be ever faithful to You
May we carefully heed each thing we have heard
Yes, Lord God may our hearts be faithful and true

And we shall be content and satisfied in You alone
We will follow You as we sing our songs of praise
Hallelujah to You; to us Your path You have shown
Hallelujah we shall sing to You for all of our days

Hallelujah and Amen…

 

 

 

 

Now the men of Israel had sworn an oath at Mizpah, saying, “None of us shall give his daughter to Benjamin as a wife.” Then the people came to the house of God, and remained there before God till evening. They lifted up their voices and wept bitterly, and said, “O Lord God of Israel, why has this come to pass in Israel, that today there should be one tribe missing in Israel?”

So it was, on the next morning, that the people rose early and built an altar there, and offered burnt offerings and peace offerings. The children of Israel said, “Who is there among all the tribes of Israel who did not come up with the assembly to the Lord?” For they had made a great oath concerning anyone who had not come up to the Lord at Mizpah, saying, “He shall surely be put to death.” And the children of Israel grieved for Benjamin their brother, and said, “One tribe is cut off from Israel today. What shall we do for wives for those who remain, seeing we have sworn by the Lord that we will not give them our daughters as wives?”

And they said, “What one is there from the tribes of Israel who did not come up to Mizpah to the Lord?” And, in fact, no one had come to the camp from Jabesh Gilead to the assembly. For when the people were counted, indeed, not one of the inhabitants of Jabesh Gilead was there. 10 So the congregation sent out there twelve thousand of their most valiant men, and commanded them, saying, “Go and strike the inhabitants of Jabesh Gilead with the edge of the sword, including the women and children. 11 And this is the thing that you shall do: You shall utterly destroy every male, and every woman who has known a man intimately.” 12 So they found among the inhabitants of Jabesh Gilead four hundred young virgins who had not known a man intimately; and they brought them to the camp at Shiloh, which is in the land of Canaan.

13 Then the whole congregation sent word to the children of Benjamin who were at the rock of Rimmon, and announced peace to them. 14 So Benjamin came back at that time, and they gave them the women whom they had saved alive of the women of Jabesh Gilead; and yet they had not found enough for them.

15 And the people grieved for Benjamin, because the Lord had made a void in the tribes of Israel.

16 Then the elders of the congregation said, “What shall we do for wives for those who remain, since the women of Benjamin have been destroyed?” 17 And they said, “There must be an inheritance for the survivors of Benjamin, that a tribe may not be destroyed from Israel. 18 However, we cannot give them wives from our daughters, for the children of Israel have sworn an oath, saying, ‘Cursed be the one who gives a wife to Benjamin.’ ” 19 Then they said, “In fact, there is a yearly feast of the Lord in Shiloh, which is north of Bethel, on the east side of the highway that goes up from Bethel to Shechem, and south of Lebonah.”

 

 

 

Judges 20:36-48 (No King in Israel, Part IX)

Artwork by Douglas Kallerson.

Judges 20:36-48
(No King in Israel, Part IX)

(Typed 22 Jul 2024) The 21st of July was a marvelous day, long and tiring, but all Sundays are. I start at 3:30 am, and there is something to do right through 6 pm. There is no such thing as a 20-minute break, except here at church before the sermon, and that usually involves me taking care of something or someone.

Needless to say, at 6:10 pm, I was quite happy to shut down the computer and say, “Time for a shower, dinner, and then I can sleep.” Unfortunately, at 6:12 pm, Hideko walked up and asked why there was a puddle under Grandpa’s car.

I had no idea what she was talking about, but when I walked out, I saw the whole driveway was flooded there. When I moved his car, the bricks were bulging up like Mr. Creosote. That meant digging up the driveway at 6:30 pm to try and stop an obviously huge water leak.

If I just left it alone, we’d have a one or two-thousand-dollar water bill and possibly no water for the entire night. I had work to do. No shower, no food, no sleep…

Text Verse: “O Israel, you have sinned from the days of Gibeah;
There they stood.
The battle in Gibeah against the children of iniquity
Did not overtake them.” Hosea 10:9

The battle of Gibeah will deal with works. That will be seen as we continue through the verses and explain the typology. There are some works we must do, such as fixing the water line. It could not be fixed Sunday night, so we had no water. I got a temporary fix on it Monday morning, interrupting sermon typing. But at least it got done.

The entire driveway, from the road to the house needed to be dug up to replace the copper line that was now over 50 years old and which needed to be replaced. Then the entire parking lot of paver bricks needed to be re-laid, but that would be contracted out.

It will be a lot of hard, hot, tiring work, and it will be expensive. But it is nothing compared to what Jesus did. He did all the work necessary for man to be saved. All of it. To say otherwise is to essentially slap God in the face.

We cannot earn our way to heaven, and we cannot outdo what Jesus has done. To attempt to do so will result in condemnation. People who think they are meriting God’s favor through the law are deluded. They have rejected Jesus and bear the spirit of antichrist.

Such truths as this are to be found in His superior word. And so, let us turn to that precious word once again, and… May God speak to us through His word today, and may His glorious name ever be praised.

I. The Rock of Rimmon (verses 36-48)

These verses reexplain the battle described in verses 30 to 35, providing more detail than previously.

36 So the children of Benjamin saw that they were defeated.

vayiru v’ne vinyamin ki nigaphu – “And see, sons Benjamin, that struck.” There are two possibilities as to who “they” is referring to. The first is Benjamin, seeing that they have been defeated before Israel based on verse 35, which said, “And strikes, Yehovah, Benjamin to faces Israel.”

The second, correct, view is that this is speaking of the men of Israel being struck before Benjamin as stated in verse 32, “And say, sons Benjamin, ‘Struck, they, to our faces according to in the first.’”

Israel feigned defeat as in the previous days of fighting. This has Benjamin confident. They are being lulled into a sense of their own overwhelming superiority to make a bad decision that will cost them the battle…

36 (con’) The men of Israel had given ground to the Benjamites, because they relied on the men in ambush whom they had set against Gibeah.

vayitnu ish Yisrael maqom l’vinyamin ki batkhu el ha’orev asher samu el hagivah – “And give man Israel place to Benjaman, for trusted unto the ambushing who set unto the Gibeah.” The men of Israel pretended that they were once again being beaten by Benjamin. As such, they retreated. This would draw Benjamin away from the city and expose it to those lying in ambush…

37 And the men in ambush quickly rushed upon Gibeah; the men in ambush spread out and struck the whole city with the edge of the sword.

v’ha’orev hekhishu vayiphsh’tu el hagivah vayimsokh ha’orev vayak eth kal ha’ir l’pi kharev – “And the ambushing hastened and deploy unto the Gibeah, and draws the ambushing and strikes all the city to mouth sword.” With Benjamin successfully drawn away from the city, the city is left in a state of nudity, as indicated in verse 33, which said, “and ambushing Israel gushes from his place from nudity Geba.” Those set in ambush rushed into the city.

Some think the word mashak, draw, means they drew a blast on the trumpet to alert all of those ambushing to take the city. The word was used like that in Joshua 6:5. This is incorrect. That would alert Benjamin of the attack.

Rather, the words “and draws the ambushing” mean that those set in the ambush extended themselves, being drawn out, in order to surround and attack the city. This is how the word was used in Judges 4:6, 7. Once the city was sufficiently surrounded, those with access would rush through the gates and begin the job of killing everyone inside with the mouth of the kherev (חרב), sword.

38 Now the appointed signal between the men of Israel and the men in ambush was that they would make a great cloud of smoke rise up from the city,

A paraphrase is needed. A direct translation is almost unintelligible. And more, the construction causes all kinds of speculation on what is being said: v’ha’moed hayah l’ish Yisrael im ha’orev herev [or kherev] l’haalotham masath he’ashan min ha’ir – “And the appointment was, to man Israel with the ambushing, increase [or sword] to their ascending, ascension the smoke from the city.”

The words, “And the appointment was, to man Israel with the ambushing” refer to what was preset by both parties, meaning the main force of Israel and those set in ambush. They agreed upon the sign. It is the next words, translated as “increase to their ascending,” that are so complicated – הֶ֕רֶב לְהַעֲלֹותָ֛ם.

The first word, herev, has several problems that are quite complicated. The word itself is spelled hay, resh, beith. It is believed to be from ravah, to be or become great. One opinion is that it is an apocopated (shortened by omitting one or more sounds at the end) form of an imperative, mixing the direct with the indirect.

Another opinion is that it is an apocopated infinitive. A third is that it is an incorrect repetition of the preceding word as they are similarly spelled –

הָאֹרֵ֑ב / הארב
הֶ֕רֶב / הרב

A third possibility is that it is simply a gloss (an annotation, a footnote, an explanation, a comment or commentary, etc.). A fourth possibility is that the spelling is actually kheth, resh, beith. The hay and the kheth are almost identical, ה or ח.

This would then change the meaning to “sword to their ascending.” This is supported by some Hebrew manuscripts and one Greek manuscript. Each explanation has its detractors and its own pros and cons.

39 whereupon the men of Israel would turn in battle.

vayahaphokh ish Yisrael bamilkhamah – “And turns, man Israel, in the war.” The forces of Israel, who had retreated as if they were beaten again by Benjamin, have seen the signal of the smoke ascending. With that, they turn in order to face those chasing them.

39 (con’t) Now Benjamin had begun to strike and kill about thirty of the men of Israel. For they said, “Surely they are defeated before us, as in the first battle.”

u-vinyamin hekhel l’hakoth khalalim b’ish Yisrael kishloshim ish ki amru akh nigoph nigaph hu l’phanenu kamilkhamah harishonah – “And Benjamin began to strike pierced in man Israel, according to thirty man. For said, ‘Surely, striking struck he to our faces according to the war the first.” This conveys new information, explaining how the defeat of Benjamin took place.

Benjamin was chasing Israel who was fleeing as if they were losing. While chasing them, thirty men of Israel fell. Benjamin thought things were going just as in the previous battles, which encouraged them to continue the chase, knowing they would be victorious.

Bullinger says, “THIRTY being 3 x 10, denotes in a higher degree the perfection of Divine order, as marking the right moment.”

40 But when the cloud began to rise from the city in a column of smoke, the Benjamites looked behind them, and there was the whole city going up in smoke to heaven.

v’hamaseth hekhelah laaloth min ha’ir amud ashan vayiphen Binyamin akaharav v’hineh alah kh’lil ha’ir ha’shamaymah – “And the ascension began to ascend from the city, column smoke. And turns, Benjamin, behind him. And behold! Ascended whole the city the heaven-ward.” The city was overrun. Once everyone inside was killed, Israel set it on fire. The smoke was the signal for the army of Israel, who is currently pretending to retreat from Benjamin.

With the city on fire, Benjamin saw it. The realization of their error would have completely horrified them. But more…

41 And when the men of Israel turned back, the men of Benjamin panicked, for they saw that disaster had come upon them.

v’ish Yisrael haphakh vayibahel ish Binyamin ki raah ki nag’ah alav ha’raah – “And man Israel turned. And shuddered man Benjamin, for saw that touched upon him the evil.” Benjamin is facing the entire army of Israel who has assumed the initiative. Gibeon is being consumed by fire, meaning Benjamin’s families and homes. They cannot retreat there, and Israel is coming full upon them. Thus, they shudder in fear of what they have to face…

42 Therefore they turned their backs before the men of Israel in the direction of the wilderness;

vayiphnu liphne ish Yisrael el derekh ha’midbar – “And turn to faces man Israel unto road the wilderness.” The men of Benjamin were facing Israel. Thus, they turned their faces away and fled on the road to the wilderness in an attempt to save themselves…

42 (con’t) but the battle overtook them, and whoever came out of the cities they destroyed in their midst.

Rather: v’ha’milkhamah hidbiqathu vaasher mehearim mashkhithim otho b’thokho – “And the war impinged him. And who from the cities, ruined (pl.) him in his midst.” Translations that make the singulars into plurals do so, trying to explain the difficulties, but they only make things worse.

The words “in his midst” are either referring to Benjamin or the wilderness (meaning “in its midst”). If it refers to the wilderness, then everything in between is a circumstantial clause. If it refers to Benjamin, then “who from the cities” would probably mean those of the cities of Benjamin who fled from the cities were destroyed along with the soldiers of Benjamin.

As there is more than one city of Benjamin, and because only Gibeah is said to be burned, the latter seems likely because it would then explain Chapter 21, where there are no women of Benjamin left.

The masculine “him” would be all-encompassing, speaking of the aged, the youth too young to fight, and the women. Anyone who fled the cities was killed along with the warriors of Benjamin.

43 They surrounded the Benjamites, chased them,

The words are obscure and complicated: kitru eth Binyamin hirdiphuhu m’nukhah – “Enclosed Benjamin. Pursued his rest.”

There is a new word, kathar. It signifies to enclose as if in surrounding or besieging. Benjamin is completely hemmed in. As for the word menukhah, it is a noun signifying rest or a resting place. It seems to mean that Benjamin has no place of rest. As soon as he thinks he can stop and rest, Israel is right there to destroy him.

Because of the complicated nature of the words, some translations just say “from Nukhah” which would be the name of a place meaning Rest.

43 (con’t) and easily trampled them down as far as the front of Gibeah toward the east.

hidrikhuhu ad nokhakh hagivah mimizrakh shamesh – “Tread him until front the Gibeah from ascension sun.” Israel chased Benjamin from the point where they had been pursued until they turned back, becoming the pursuers. This continued until they were just in front of the now burned-out city of Gibeah. This pursuit was from east to west. Of those in this pursuit…

44 And eighteen thousand men of Benjamin fell; all these were men of valor.

vayiplu mibinyamin shmoneh asar eleph ish eth kal eleh anshe khayil – “And falls, from Benjamin, eight ten thousand man. All these men valor.” The number 18 was explained in the previous sermon.

45 Then they turned and fled toward the wilderness to the rock of Rimmon;

vayiphnu vayanusu hamidbarah el selah ha’rimmon – “And turn, and flee the wilderness-ward, unto Rock the Rimmon.” This refers to the remaining men of Benjamin who have not yet been killed. Upon coming to the east side of Gibeah and realizing there was no haven left where they could retreat, they turned and fled in the direction of the wilderness as far as Rock the Rimmon.

The name Rimmon means Pomegranate. But the pomegranate symbolizes harvest-ready fruit, and so it can further mean Mature Mind or Harvest Ready. The type of rock is a sela, or craggy rock. That comes from a root signifying to be lofty.

45 (con’t) and they cut down five thousand of them on the highways. Then they pursued them relentlessly up to Gidom, and killed two thousand of them.

vayol’luhu bamsiloth khameshet alaphim ish vayadbiqu akharav ad gidom vayaku mimenu alpayim ish – “And he gleans in the highways five thousands man. And impinge after him until Gidom. And strike from him two thousand man.” The meaning of glean is that the army was already picked through like in a harvest. Anything left is then gleaned, or picked clean, one berry or stalk at a time.

Of those not killed on the way to Gibeah and who were in flight towards the wilderness, five thousand more were killed. Once in the area of Gidom, two thousand more were killed. The name Gidom is derived from the account. It signifies Cut Off or Exterminated, coming from gada, to hew down or cut off. Benjamin had been cut off at this location.

Five thousand is a multiple of five, grace, and ten, completeness of order where “nothing is wanting; that the number and order are perfect; that the whole cycle is complete” (Bullinger).

46 So all who fell of Benjamin that day were twenty-five thousand men who drew the sword; all these were men of valor.

vayhi khal ha’nophlim mibinyamin esrim vakhamishah eleph ish sholeph kherev bayom ha’hu eth kal eleh anshe khayil – “And is all the falling from Benjamin twenty and five thousand man drawing sword in the day, the it. All these men valor.” The number matches: 18+5+2 = 25. The number is a multiple of fives and ten. This is a record of only those killed on the third day of battle. The more precise number on this day was stated in verse 35, 25,100.

47 But six hundred men turned and fled toward the wilderness to the rock of Rimmon, and they stayed at the rock of Rimmon for four months.

vayiphnu vayanusu hamidbarah el sela ha’rimmon shesh meoth ish vayeshvu b’sela Rimmon arbaah khodashim – “And turn, and flee the wilderness-ward unto Rock the Rimmon six hundreds man. And sit in Rock Rimmon four months.” There are only six hundred male soldiers of Benjamin who survived. They fled as far as the rock, and that is where they remained.

The number is derived from six, the number of man, especially fallen man, and tens. Four is the number of material creation, the world number, and especially the city number.

The numbers now total 25,700 because of the number in verse 35. But Judges 20:15 said there were 26,700 total. Of course people complain about this, adjust the text, claim whoever recorded the narrative was a doof, etc. However, it is simple to explain. In the previous two battles, it would be unthinkable that tens of thousands of Israel died in each engagement, but none of Benjamin died.

As such, the additional 1000 are a rounded figure who certainly perished during those conflicts. There being less than one thousand on the two days, the numbers were not recorded to indicate the superlative nature of the rout of Israel by Benjamin.

48 And the men of Israel turned back against the children of Benjamin, and struck them down with the edge of the sword—from every city, men and beasts, all who were found.

Rather: v’ish Yisrael shavu el b’ne vinyamin vayakum l’pi kherev meir m’thom ad b’hemah ad kal hanimtsa – “And man Israel turned unto sons Benjamin, and struck them to mouth sword from city, completion until beast until all the found.” The words mean that the men of the army of Israel turned back to destroy any remaining survivors in Benjamin, killing them all. This was in every city, and it included every beast and every person that breathed. No memory of Benjamin beyond the six hundred at Rock the Rimmon remained.

*48 (fin) They also set fire to all the cities they came to.

gam kal hearim hanimtsaoth shilkhu ba’esh – “Also, all the cities, the found, sent in the fire.” With the people dead in each city, they then proceeded to burn them down. It speaks of utter destruction. With that, the narrative is complete.

Benjamin reaped the rewards of their wickedness, and Israel seemingly has a void in her tribes because of it. The final chapter of the book of Judges will detail how that void is dealt with. The entire narrative is a sad indictment of human sin and man’s failure to deal with it properly.

There is an inheritance that is coming to us
And it has already been granted: the deal is done
We have received the promise because of Jesus
It is based on His work alone – that of God’s own Son

There is no need to worry if we will enter glory
It is guaranteed because we believed what was told to us
We heard the word of faith, the gospel story
And we believed on the glorious name of Jesus

The inheritance is given to all who are sanctified
It has been granted because of what God has done
It has come through the blood of Jesus, He who died
And who rose again! In Him the victory is won

II. Explaining the Typology

The chapter is long and filled with an enormous amount of detail. To explain every verse in detail would take three full sermons. But we can get the picture through broad brushstrokes of what is being presented.

The first thing to remember is that the concubine of the Levite was divided and sent out to all Israel. She pictured the apostate church of the church age. She was violated by the Benjamites of Gibeah and died at the threshold of the house. It was a picture of her missing the rapture.

The Benjamites picture those with a false Jesus and a false gospel. They had super no bueno relations with the false church and eventually brought about her demise. The false church not raptured testifies to Israel.

Verse 1 noted that all of Israel, from Dan to Beersheba, came out to determine the matter. It speaks of the totality of Israel. If this is after the rapture, then it is inclusive of the tribulation period. If so, then Dan, Judge, represents the time of the rapture, something hinted at by James 5:9 where he says the Judge stands at the door.

Beersheba refers to the seven years of the tribulation initiated by the antichrist as was the case in the story of Genesis 26. This also includes those from the Gilead, The Perpetual Fountain, east of the Jordan. That represents the giving of the Spirit to Israel at the end of the tribulation.

The congregation has gathered at Mizpah, the Watchtower, to decide how to respond. The Lord is monitoring the events of Israel. The congregation includes the corners of the tribes, meaning the main supports, their leaders.

The number of those gathered is four hundred thousand. It is the world number and the number of completion where the whole cycle is complete. The totality of Israel in a final decision is thus the intent. Verse 3 noted that the sons of Benjamin heard about the gathering.

Benjamin represents the messianics of Israel. It is the ideology that a Messiah is coming. Those of Gibeah say that the Messiah is Jesus, but they believe in a false Jesus. Hence, they had relations with the false church. They are law observers who failed to trust in the grace of Christ. The cut-up concubine proves that the false church was not raptured, and these people, aligned with them, were not true believers as well.

In verse 8, the proposal is to destroy Gibeah, who has done these things. The agreement included casting the lot (verse 9) to decide who would go first. This shows that Israel does not have the Spirit to make decisions. Instead, they consult lots for guidance this way. Despite that, it does say the Lord responded. As it says in the Proverb, the Lord directs such things –

“The lot is cast into the lap,
But its every decision is from the Lord.” Proverbs 16:33

Verse 10 notes that Gibeah had done foolishness in Israel. They were morally corrupt. As noted, Gibeah is etymologically connected to the word Gabbatha. It has consistently pictured this. However, verse 10 and verse 33 record the name as Geba, not Gibeah.

Geba is missing the hay suffix. The letter is the fifth letter of the Aleph Beth, the number of grace. It also is used when referring to a connection to the Spirit. Its meaning is Look, Reveal, and Breath. Each is something connected with the Spirit. As such, it is a note that these people, though claiming the crucified Jesus, have claimed a false Jesus and have no connection to the Spirit.

Israel comes against this false doctrine, even if they don’t yet know what is right. In order to do so, they go to Benjamin telling them to give up the sons of worthlessness of Gibeah. Benjamin, the messianics, refuse.

To stop and explain, Israel is looking for a messiah. The problem is that whether they accept a false Jesus of works or another messiah, they are not looking for the true Messiah who has already come. This is the pickle that these people are in.

Thus, Benjamin, at this time, is reflective of the spirit of messiah, even if it is the false Messiah. The nation as a whole, whether messianic or not, is not looking for the Jesus of grace at this point. This story is given to show the resolution of that.

In their refusal, Benjamin musters 26000 soldiers. The meaning of the numbers indicates first a division, that of messianic thinking. Next, of rebellion, apostasy, defection, corruption, etc., that of doctrine. Also, completion of the whole cycle where the division and apostasy will end.

It also noted 700 choice men. These are mentioned separately in order to not mar the meaning of the number 26,000. Seven is spiritual perfection, ten is the completion of the cycle. It is a note that when the cycle is complete, spiritual perfection will be realized.

Out of this total number, there are noted 700 left-handed (actually shut up in the right hand) who could sling a stone at a hair and not miss. The description speaks of someone who is so law-observant that they never miss the mark in sinning. They weed out every sin. But it is still law-observance, and it fails to address inherited sin and the forgiveness of sin through Christ.

This is included to show that even the most meticulous messianic, who also observes every point of the law without fail, still stands opposed to grace and thus to the truth of God in Christ.

Verse 18 had the sons of Israel, meaning the soldiers, go to inquire of elohim, God in general, at Bethel (House of God). It is a general appeal to God that anyone, anywhere might do. Despite that, it says the Lord responded that Judah was to go first, meaning Praise is to go first. Unfortunately, one cannot praise God unless he praises Him through Jesus.

In going up, 22,000 of Israel died. There is division in their thinking, there is disorder, disorganization, and imperfection in their actions, and it carries through until the whole cycle is complete.

In their failure, they strengthen themselves. This is a note of self-trust. The Lord is not yet included in their every action. After this, they went up and wept before the Lord. Hooray, they are now acknowledging the Lord.

But it is the Lord in general, the same Lord they have consistently forsaken since Sinai, and the Lord they failed to recognize at His incarnation. The weeping is for their own loss, not for the Lord. They ask Him if they should go up against their brother again or not.

They acknowledge the brotherly affiliation, even if there is a point of strife between them. The answer from the Lord is to go up. No promises are made in the process. On this second day, 18,000 are killed. The number 18,000 is derived from two, nine, and ten, or three, six, and ten.

No matter which way eighteen is divided, there is the sense that man is not under the Lord but under transgression (2) and thus under judgment (9), and that it is for a divinely perfect period of time (3) where he remains fallen and destitute of God (6). That is seen in the words of Paul –

“But when the fullness of the time had come, God sent forth His Son, born of a woman, born under the law, to redeem those who were under the law, that we might receive the adoption as sons.” Galatians 4:4, 5

This state will be resolved when the whole cycle is complete (10). Verse 17 said, “all these drawing the sword.” The sword, kherev, has consistently pictured Mt. Horeb, the mount of the law. They were law observers who died under law. There is defeat from the messianics because of a failure to trust in Jesus.

Next, “all Israel” went up. The writing is on the wall. The messianics are wrong, but Israel under the law is just as wrong. And so they all go up to Bethel (House of God – think of the temple) and weep before the Lord, fasting till evening, and offering burnt offerings and peace offerings.

But this time, there is a new note. They inquire of the Lord, “And there, ark covenant the God in the days, the those.” This anticipates Israel acknowledging Jesus, the true Ark of the covenant of “the” God. The article always expresses those who are in a right relationship with Him or contrasts those who are not in a right relationship with Him. In this case, they now are.

It also noted the presence of Phinehas (Mouth of Judgement) the son of Eleazar (Whom God Helps), the son of Aaron (Very High). Each name anticipates Jesus, the true High Priest. He speaks the Judgment of God, He is the Help of God for His people –

“But I am poor and needy;
Make haste to me, O God!
You are my help [ezri] and my deliverer;
O Lord, do not delay.” Psalm 70:5

Jesus is the Son of the Most High (Luke 8:28). In finally consulting God through Him, the promise is made that God will deliver Benjamin into Israel’s hand. Verses 29-35 detailed the battle that would be conducted by setting an ambush.

Verse 31 had the unusual words “Gibeah-ward in the field.” The field is representative of the world (Matthew 13:38). The false doctrine of law observant messianics will be rooted out and wiped out.

Also, Israel arrayed in Baal Tamar, Lord of Righteousness, which pictures them standing on the merits of Christ and not their own righteousness. At that time, those ambushing are able to come against the nudity (the unprotected state) of Geba – the false belief in a Jesus inclusive of works, lacking grace and the Spirit.

From verse 36 through 46, the battle was reexplained in greater detail. Without going through every detail, verse 37 noted that all in the city were struck with the mouth of the sword. They died by the law observance they clung to.

Verse 38 had the unusual words, “And the appointment was, to man Israel with the ambushing, increase [or sword] to their ascending, ascension the smoke from the city.” As various texts read differently, it shows the confusion of the words. It would make no sense from the context to say a “sword” was ascending unless one understands that it is picturing the elimination of law observance.

Works of the law are completely burned up through acknowledging the grace of God in Christ. Only His works are sufficient to please God in the process of salvation. The ascension of the law in flames is what prompts Israel to turn and defeat the enemy.

Thirty of Israel were said to be struck down before this occurred. In other words, that moment was “the right moment,” marking “the perfection of Divine order.” The city that stood opposed to God was destroyed in fire.

Israel enclosed Benjamin and pursued his rest (verse 43). It is a nice touch. They were completely hemmed in and found no rest. Hebrews 4:3 says, “we who have believed do enter that rest.” Those who trust in self are not believers in the true Jesus. Rather, they follow a false Jesus.

Also, in verse 43, it noted they were trodden “until front the Gibeah from ascension sun [(mizrakh, from zarakh) sun (shemesh)].” It is a perfect description of Christ from His coming (zarakh) until His cross (represented by Gibeah) –

“But to you who fear My name
The Sun [shemesh] of Righteousness shall arise [zarakh]
With healing in His wings.” Malachi 4:2

Faith in the Messiah will destroy the doctrines of the false messianics. The number of those who fell in verse 44 is 18,000, a number which fits perfectly. In verse 45, those remaining soldiers of Benjamin fled toward Rock the Rimmon.

That signifies Lofty of the Mature Mind and will be fully explained in Chapter 21. On the way to Rock the Rimmon, it noted that 5,000 were gleaned. Five is the number of grace. One might think, “Where is grace in that?” But gleaning implies a thorough going over. In this case, some will be spared. So even if there is slaying, there is grace in the process.

From Rock the Rimmon, 2,000 were pursued to Gidom (Cut Off). It is the final number of the battle, and it signifies that this is the end of the destruction. The division and difference (2) are ended, and the whole cycle is complete (10).

In verse 46, the final tally for the third day is recorded, 25,000. Again, a number of grace mixed with completion. Despite the destruction, there is grace in the preservation at the end of the cycle. That is seen in the number noted in verse 47, six hundred.

These men will be used to re-establish the tribe of Benjamin in the next chapter. They are men who will enter into a new economy with a new direction. Despite that, verse 48 closes with a note that everyone and everything else of Benjamin and its cities was destroyed and burned in the fire.

It speaks of the complete removal of all the false messianic beliefs found in Israel. There is one Messiah, and He has come. And in His coming, He ended the law. Adherence to the law is no longer what God expects.

Rather, He wants His people to understand and accept the grace He has given in the coming of Jesus Christ. Nothing else will do and all else will be destroyed. This is what is being conveyed to us in Judges 20.

Yes, there is a real tribulation period coming on the world. It will involve real battles and a great loss of life on earth, but there is a spiritual battle that God is focusing on above all else. All worldly battles are simply an extension of failing to submit in the spiritual realm.

Out of curiosity, I counted the number of times that Israel is mentioned in this chapter. The total is 42. It is the number associated with the antichrist. Although this is speculation, it is reasonable to assume that God is giving us a hint.

Until Israel gets to the end of the tribulation period, they will still be under the law. Even those messianics who claim to know Jesus but still teach law observance are of the spirit of antichrist.

I have explained this before, but this is a good reminder: If you say you must do deeds of the law to be right with God, you are essentially denying the deity of Christ. If Christ is God, and if God fulfilled the law (in His humanity, meaning Jesus Christ), then to say that you must observe the law testifies that you do not believe Jesus is truly God.

It is the spirit of antichrist. How many ways God has shown us this is almost astonishing. And yet, more stories keep coming up with the exact same result in the typology. Judges is a book about judging. God judges us based on what we do. And the one thing He wants us to “do” is to believe in His Son. Nothing else will do.

Come to Jesus and be saved. Everything else leads to a bad end.

Closing Verse: “Then they said to Him, ‘What shall we do, that we may work the works of God?’
29 Jesus answered and said to them, ‘This is the work of God, that you believe in Him whom He sent.’” John 6:28, 29

Next Week: Judges 21:1-19 For Jay, this is uncharted territory, as he knows well – yes and amen… (No King in Israel, Part X) (57th Judges Sermon)

The Lord has you exactly where He wants you. He has a good plan and purpose for you. It is He who judges His people according to their deeds. So, follow Him, live for Him, and trust Him, and He will do marvelous things for you and through you.

(No King in Israel, Part IX)

So the children of Benjamin saw that they were defeated
The men of Israel had given ground to the Benjamites
Because they relied on the men in ambush
Whom they had set against Gibeah like noble knights

And the men in ambush quickly rushed upon Gibeah
The men in ambush spread out and struck
The whole city with the edge of the sword
Benjamin was out of luck

Now the appointed signal between the men of Israel
And the men in ambush was that they would make
A great cloud of smoke rise up from the city
Whereupon the men of Israel would turn in battle and
———-strong action they would take

Now Benjamin had begun to strike and kill
About thirty of the men of Israel
For they said, “Surely they are defeated before us
As in the first battle, so the signs seemed to tell

But when the cloud began to rise from the city
In a column of smoke, this was no joke
The Benjamites looked behind them
And there was the whole city going up to heaven in smoke

And when the men of Israel turned back
The men of Benjamin panicked, things were not swell
For they saw that disaster had come upon them
Therefore they turned their backs before the men of Israel

In the direction of the wilderness
But the battle overtook them, so it didst
And whoever came out of the cities
They destroyed in their midst

They surrounded the Benjamites, chased them, and easily
———-trampled them down
As far as the front of Gibeah toward the east
And eighteen thousand men of Benjamin fell
All these were men of valor from the greatest to the least

Then they turned and fled toward the wilderness
To the rock of RimmonAnd they cut down five thousand of them on the highways
Then they pursued them relentlessly up to Gidom

And killed two thousand of them
So all who fell of Benjamin that day
Were twenty-five thousand men who drew the sword
All these were men of valor, but with their lives they did pay

But six hundred men turned and fled
Toward the wilderness to the rock of Rimmon
And they stayed at the rock of Rimmon
For four months all alone

And the men of Israel turned back against the children of Benjamin
And struck them down with the edge of the sword
———-running them through
From every city, men and beasts, all who were found
They also set fire to all the cities they came to

Lord God, turn our hearts to be obedient to Your word
Give us wisdom to be ever faithful to You
May we carefully heed each thing we have heard
Yes, Lord God may our hearts be faithful and true

And we shall be content and satisfied in You alone
We will follow You as we sing our songs of praise
Hallelujah to You; to us Your path You have shown
Hallelujah we shall sing to You for all of our days

Hallelujah and Amen…

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

36 So the children of Benjamin saw that they were defeated. The men of Israel had given ground to the Benjamites, because they relied on the men in ambush whom they had set against Gibeah. 37 And the men in ambush quickly rushed upon Gibeah; the men in ambush spread out and struck the whole city with the edge of the sword. 38 Now the appointed signal between the men of Israel and the men in ambush was that they would make a great cloud of smoke rise up from the city, 39 whereupon the men of Israel would turn in battle. Now Benjamin had begun to strike and kill about thirty of the men of Israel. For they said, “Surely they are defeated before us, as in the first battle.” 40 But when the cloud began to rise from the city in a column of smoke, the Benjamites looked behind them, and there was the whole city going up in smoke to heaven. 41 And when the men of Israel turned back, the men of Benjamin panicked, for they saw that disaster had come upon them. 42 Therefore they turned their backs before the men of Israel in the direction of the wilderness; but the battle overtook them, and whoever came out of the cities they destroyed in their midst. 43 They surrounded the Benjamites, chased them, and easily trampled them down as far as the front of Gibeah toward the east. 44 And eighteen thousand men of Benjamin fell; all these were men of valor. 45 Then they turned and fled toward the wilderness to the rock of Rimmon; and they cut down five thousand of them on the highways. Then they pursued them relentlessly up to Gidom, and killed two thousand of them. 46 So all who fell of Benjamin that day were twenty-five thousand men who drew the sword; all these were men of valor.

47 But six hundred men turned and fled toward the wilderness to the rock of Rimmon, and they stayed at the rock of Rimmon for four months. 48 And the men of Israel turned back against the children of Benjamin, and struck them down with the edge of the sword—from every city, men and beasts, all who were found. They also set fire to all the cities they came to.