1 Samuel 9:1-18 (Saul – Select and Good, Part I)

Artwork by Douglas Kallerson

1 Samuel 9:1-18
Saul – Select and Good, Part I

(Typed 14 July 2025) While sermon typing, I find it fun to compare translations to see how they vary and how they have been copied or diverged from over time.

As is often the case, there are several anomalies found in the Hebrew of the verses today. When they arise, translators should do their best to make a translation that makes sense while, hopefully, reflecting the original as much as possible.

Translations often lean heavily on the work of previous translations. That can be seen when looking at a line of translations that spans many years. Four translations that I will often check were published in this order:

Coverdale Bible of 1535
Bishop’s Bible of 1568
Geneva Bible of 1587
King James Version of 1611

The Coverdale surely referred to previous Bibles that I don’t have access to. However, it is evident that the three others referred to the Coverdale in their translations, each making changes as they went.

From time to time, the earlier version will be correct, and for some inexplicable reason, a later translation will diverge from that. In the case of the Coverdale Bible, this happened several times just in these verses.

Text Verse: “But you must continue in the things which you have learned and been assured of, knowing from whom you have learned them, 15 and that from childhood you have known the Holy Scriptures, which are able to make you wise for salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus.” 1 Timothy 3:14,15

Translations generally get the feel for the overall content, even if they occasionally divert from a proper rendering of the original. I am currently reading a paraphrase, the Living Bible, given to me one day after my 15th birthday. And yet, it’s the first time I have read it.

That may be a good thing because a paraphrase is not a translation. Who knows how I would have developed if I had started reading the Bible with it? But despite being a paraphrase, it is fun to read, and it certainly gets across the sense of what is being conveyed.

However, to know exactly what the Lord is telling us, a paraphrase is not sufficient. Quite often, people will argue over a point of theology or doctrine from a particular translation, demanding that their view is correct, but the translation itself is completely rong.

This is why I love doing sermons directly from the Hebrew. My analysis may be wrong, but the translation is word-for-word from the original and it will thus have a much better chance of being correct.

As for the Coverdale Bible, there are at least two times in this passage that they were spot on in their translation, but later translations diverged from it. In one case, the Bishop’s and the Geneva followed the Coverdale, but the KJV sadly departed from it.

In one case, nobody followed the Coverdale even though it is exactly translated. The reason I mention this is to pique your interest in the word. Study it, compare translations, and think about what you discover. Let the word fill you with its wonder as you seek to be closer and closer to understanding exactly what God is telling us in this marvelous gift.

So much excitement is to be found in His superior word. And so, let us turn to that precious word once again, and… May God speak to us through His word today, and may His glorious name ever be praised.

I. The Jennies (verses 1-9)

There was a man of Benjamin

vayhi ish mibin yamin – “And it was, man from son right.” The written Hebrew is different than the oral tradition. It reads, “And it was, man from son right.” The words ben and yamin are separated. The oral reads, “And it was man from Benjamin.”

Based on the final clause of this verse, the written is to be preferred. The name Benjamin will, at times, be presented differently in the narrative. When it is, I will translate it as the Hebrew reads.

Benjamin means Son of the Right (hand). It can also mean Son of the South because the right in Scripture corresponds to the south, aligning with the direction in which the tabernacle/temple was situated in relation to the land.

1 (con’t) whose name was Kish the son of Abiel, the son of Zeror, the son of Bechorath, the son of Aphiah,

ushemo qish ben aviel ben tseror ben bekorath ben aphiah – “And his name Kish, son Abiel, son Zeror, son Bechorath, son Aphiah.” The listing here is not the same as the one found in Chronicles. For example, it says in this verse that Kish is the son of Abiel. In 1 Chronicles 8 & 9, it says that Kish is the son of Ner.

Such variances in genealogies are not uncommon, and they often reflect the intent of the chronicler as much as anything else. Names within genealogies may be left out for some reason. If so, then it could be that Saul is the son of Kish, the son of Ner, the son of Abiel.

It could be that Kish’s father had two names, Ner and Abiel. It could also be that Kish died and Ner, his brother, raised Saul after that. Such differences do not necessarily imply any contradiction or error in the text.

Kish could have several meanings. It could be Snaring, Ensnared, or Bird Catcher, coming from qush, to lay a snare. It may also mean Bow, coming from qesheth, a bow.

Abiel means Father of Strength, God is Father, or El (God) is My Father. Zeror means either Besieged or Bundle, coming from tsarar, to besiege or bind up, or Pebble (like Peter), coming from tsarar, to be sharp as in a flint rock. Bechorath means First Birth or First Born.

Aphiah is only found here in the Bible. It is derived from puakh, to blow with the breath or air. The word is not common and is usually used in connection with uttering lies or deceit, breathing out contempt or exasperation, etc. It thus means Exhale, Blowing, Utterer, etc.

Returning to Kish for the narrative, it again says…

1 (con’t) a Benjamite, a mighty man of power.

Rather: ben ish yemini gibor khayil – “son man right – powerful valor.” By placing the word “man” between “son” and “right,” it demands a translation of “son man right,” not Benjamin. He is described with the word khayil, which can mean wealth, strength, etc. Valor is a good catchall translation. Of Kish, it says…

And he had a choice and handsome son whose name was Saul.

velo hayah ven ushemo shaul bakhur vatov – “And to him, it was son, and his name Saul – select and good.” As is the usual custom in such listings, this person is the focus of the narrative. The same type of focus was seen in 1 Samuel 1:1, where Elkanah was introduced, his genealogy was given, and then the point of naming him was identified in verse 2 by naming Hannah and Peninnah.

Saul means Asked, as in Asked of or Asked for, coming from shaal, to ask. As with the name Horeb, the mountain where the law was received, and which is spelled the same as kherev, sword, Saul’s name is identical to Sheol, the pit or place of the dead. That should be remembered when evaluating the surrounding narrative.

The name Saul, Asked, is generally associated with a firstborn who was “asked” for. The thought is similar to the name of Samuel sh*mu*el (Asked from God) where the word shaal became a part of his name –

“And it will be to revolvings the days, and she will conceive, Hannah, and she will bear son, and she will call his name Samuel. ‘For from Yehovah I asked [shaal] him.’” 1 Samuel 1:20

The name Saul is the same as the name of Saul, who is Paul in the New Testament. Both are from the tribe of Benjamin. Selecting someone named Saul is certainly purposeful, forming a pun. In Chapter 8, it said –

“And he said, Samuel, all words Yehovah unto the people, the ‘askers [shaal] from him a king.’” 1 Samuel 8:10

The people asked for a king, and they are being given what they “asked” for. Of Saul…

2 (con’t)There was not a more handsome person than he among the children of Israel.

veein ish mibene Yisrael tov mimenu – “And not man from sons Israel good from him.” These words explain the “select and good” of the previous clause. Saul wasn’t just select and good. Rather, he was select and the goodest of the good, being gooder than the rest. So goodly, he was the best. And why?…

2 (con’t) From his shoulders upward he was taller than any of the people.

mishikhmo vamalah geboah mikal ha’am – “From his shoulders and upward higher from all the people.” The people asked for a king. The Lord is giving them what they asked for, and He is doing it in a manner that they would expect. An externally prime specimen will be designated to lead Israel’s armies.

Concerning his selection, background information is provided to help understand the man, the situation, and the time in which Israel exists…

Now the donkeys of Kish, Saul’s father, were lost.

vatovadnah ha’athonoth leqish avi shaul – “And they wandered, the jennies to Kish, father Saul.” The donkeys are specifically athon, female donkeys. In English, the word jenny is used to describe a female donkey. The word athon comes from the same root as ethan, perennial, ever-flowing, or permanent. The sense is that of the ever-patient nature of the animal, being docile.

3 (con’t) And Kish said to his son Saul, “Please take one of the servants with you, and arise, go and look for the donkeys.”

vayomer qish el shaul beno qakh na itekha eth akhad mehanearim vequm lekh baqesh eth ha’athonoth – “And he said, Kish unto Saul his son, ‘You must take, I pray, with you one from the servants, and you must arise, and you must walk, and you must seek the jennies.’” The JFB Commentary notes that this is not unusual, as donkeys were left to roam in the grazing season. If they roamed out of sight, someone would head out to find them.

That Kish had donkeys and servants speaks to some amount of wealth. Donkeys were not lowly animals at this time. They served many uses, and even princes and kings rode them. In Numbers 22, Balaam rode on one of these jennies. Because the donkeys are out of view, using imperative verbs signifies that to lose them permanently would mean a loss of valuable property. So the directive is given…

So he passed through the mountains of Ephraim and through the land of Shalisha, but they did not find them.

vayaavor behar ephrayim vayaavor beerets shalishah velo matsau – “And he traversed in Mount Ephraim, and he traversed in land Shalisha, and not they found.” Gibeah in Benjamin is where Saul started. Mount Ephraim extended that far to the south.

Saul heads somewhat northerly into the land of Shalisha. This is the only time it is mentioned in Scripture. It is derived from shalosh, three, or shalash, to do the third time. As such, it signifies Threeland, Three, Third, Triangular, etc. Therefore, it is likely a place where three valleys joined or three wadis met, or something similar.

Ephraim means Twice Fruitful and Ashes. In Scripture, a har, mountain, is a lot of something gathered. In typology, it is synonymous with a large but centralized group of people.

4 (con’t) Then they passed through the land of Shaalim, and they were not there.

vayaavru beerets shaalim vaayin – “And they traversed in land Shaalim, and naught.” Shaalim is also found only here in Scripture. It is derived from shual, a fox. It signifies Foxes or Place of Foxes.

The word shual comes from shoal, hollow hand, or handful, and the meaning extends to this. The connection is that foxes dig out a hollow to live in. In the gospels, Jesus said, “Foxes have holes and birds of the air have nests, but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay His head” (Matthew 8:20). In Luke, it says –

“On that very day some Pharisees came, saying to Him, ‘Get out and depart from here, for Herod wants to kill You.’
32 And He said to them, ‘Go, tell that fox, “Behold, I cast out demons and perform cures today and tomorrow, and the third day I shall be perfected.”’ 33 Nevertheless I must journey today, tomorrow, and the day following; for it cannot be that a prophet should perish outside of Jerusalem.” Luke 13:31-33

The significance of a fox is that of a hole digger, and thus, one who is there to trip others up.

4 (con’t) Then he passed through the land of the Benjamites, but they did not find them.

Rather: vayaavor beererts yemini velo matsau – “And he traversed in land Right, and not they found.” Whether this means Benjamin or not, it is not what is stated. Only the word yemini, right, is given. The Brenton Septuagint says Jamin, Smith’s says, “the Jaminite,” several ancient versions from the 1500s, Coverdale’s, the Bishop’s, and the Geneva, rightly transliterate as Iemini.

With the introduction of the KJV, the incorrect “Benjamite” was introduced, which has been repeated in all other modern translations except the New Heart English Bible, which says Jaminites. However, the word is singular, not plural.

When they had come to the land of Zuph,

The words are emphatic: hemah bau beerets tsuph – “They, they came in land Zuph.” This is probably the same land as the name of the man, Zuph, noted in 1 Samuel 1:1 –

“And was, man one, from the Ramathaim Zophim, from Mount Ephraim. And his name Elkanah, son Jeroham, son Elihu, son Tohu, son Zuph – Ephrathite.” 1 Samuel 1:1

In other words, the land is being identified with this man, from whom Samuel descended. Zuph comes from tsuph, dripping, and signifying the honeycomb. That comes from tsuph, to overflow. Thus, it means Honeycomb or Overflow.

5 (con’t) Saul said to his servant who was with him, “Come, let us return, lest my father cease caring about the donkeys and become worried about us.”

veshaul amar lenaaro asher imo lekha venashuvah pen yekhdal avi min haathonoth vedaag lanu – “and Saul, he said to his servant who with him ‘You must walk-ward, and let us return, lest he will cease, my father, from the jennies and he dreaded to us.’” Saul and his servant had been rambling the countryside long enough that he was concerned that his father might dread some calamity had befallen them.

Therefore, he says they should head toward home. A new word, daag, to be afraid, is introduced. All of its seven uses cumulatively give the notion of a sense of dread that one frets over.

And he said to him, “Look now, there is in this city a man of God,

vayomer lo hineh na ish elohim baiyr hazoth – “And he said to him, ‘Behold, I pray, man God in the city, the this.” They are in the land of Zuph, thus the unnamed city would be Ramah, Samuel’s residence as noted in 1 Samuel 7:17. Rather than identifying Samuel as Israel’s judge, the servant calls him a man of God…

6 (con’t) and he is an honorable man; all that he says surely comes to pass.

vehaish nikhbad kol asher yedaber bo yavo – “And the man being weighty: all that he will speak, coming, it will come.” The servant is the one who knows about Samuel and his abilities. Saul seemed to be completely unaware of him. As such, this reveals that in choosing him to be the leader of the nation, a complete novice concerning the political and spiritual state will be selected.

As the servant is aware of Samuel and his capabilities, he provides a reasonable suggestion…

6 (con’t) So let us go there; perhaps he can show us the way that we should go.”

atah nelakhah sham ulay yagid lanu eth darkenu asher halakhnu aleha – “Now, let us walk there. If not, he will cause to declare to us our way which we walked upon-ward.” He is making a logical assessment of the situation. If all that the man speaks comes to pass, then he may be able to direct them concerning the way they should go.

Then Saul said to his servant, “But look, if we go,

The NKJV, following the KJV, is incorrect. Saul agrees: vayomer shaul lenaaro vehineh nelekh – “And he said, Saul, to his servant, ‘And behold! We will walk.” Their going is not an if. It is decided. However, Saul is concerned about a matter of propriety when they get there…

7 (con’t) what shall we bring the man?

u-mah navi laish – “And what we will cause to bring to the man?” The man is a man of God. As such, he represents God concerning their request. Therefore, there is the implied necessity to follow through with the command of Exodus 34:20, which says, “And none shall appear before Me empty-handed.

7 (con’t) For the bread in our vessels is all gone, and there is no present to bring to the man of God. What do we have?”

ki halekhem azal mikelenu uteshurah ein lehavi leish ha’elohim mah itanu – “For the bread, it is vanished from our vessels, and presentation naught to cause to bring to man the God. What with us?” Saul introduces the word teshurah, a noun found only here. It is derived from shur, to travel about (i.e. as a harlot or a merchant).

Therefore, the idea is a welcoming or arrival gift. For a single word, “presentation” is close. Saul does not want to come before the man of God empty-handed, but they have eaten all their bread. He had nothing else of value to offer, so he asked the servant…

And the servant answered Saul again and said, “Look, I have here at hand one-fourth of a shekel of silver. I will give that to the man of God, to tell us our way.”

vayoseph hanaar laanoth eth shaul vayomer hineh nimtsa veyadi reva seqel kaseph venathati leish ha’elohim vehigid lanu eth darkenu – “And he caused to add, the servant, to answer Saul. And he said, ‘Behold! Being found in my hand fourth shekel silver. And I gave to man the God, and he will cause to declare to us our way.’”

The servant excitedly reveals what he has, calling Samuel “man the God.” Using the article is expressive. It refers to the one true God in relation to man. It is used to reveal those who are in a right relationship with Him, or to contrast those who are not in a right relationship with Him.

It is debated how one would determine a fourth of a shekel. Some think the piece of silver was divided into four corners by a cross. If it needed to be subdivided, it would be cut along the cross. Others think it was merely a set weight of silver.

As for the number, if there is a fourth, there is a whole comprised of four parts. Four is the number of creation and material completeness. Thus, it is the world number, and the “city” number. Silver signifies redemption.

Next, a parenthetical statement is presented…

(Formerly in Israel, when a man went to inquire of God, he spoke thus: “Come, let us go to the seer”; for he who is now called a prophet was formerly called a seer.)

lephanim beYisrael koh amar ha’ish belekhto lidrosh elohim lekhu venelekha ad ha’roeh ki lanavi hayom yiqare lephanim ha’roeh – (“To faces, in Israel, thus he spoke, the man in his walking to inquire God, ‘You must walk, and let us walk until the seer.’ For to the prophet, the day, he will be called to faces ‘the seer.’”) The word ro’eh, seer, is introduced. It is derived from ra’ah, to see. Thus, it signifies a seer.

Despite that, it is surprisingly first used in a statement referring to the past, noting the word had fallen out of use. It will only be seen in this sense five times in this chapter. It will be seen only one more time after that when referring to a vision in Isaiah 28.

Almost all scholars say the words of this verse are a gloss. But that seems unnecessary. Rather, it is a statement of fact. Samuel was called a navi, a prophet, in 1 Samuel 3 –

“And it will know, all Israel, from Dan and until Beer-Sheba, for being faithful, Samuel, to prophet to Yehovah.” 1 Samuel 3:20

The word prophet will be used to describe him and others as the narrative continues. And more, it is found in almost all books of the Old Testament, from Genesis on. Because of the rarity of the word ro’eh, seer, this parenthetical thought is given to explain why the word seer is used in this chapter regarding Samuel.

Understanding this parenthetical statement, the narrative will resume in a moment…

Looking for jennies without success

But finding much more as we go

Is the Lord with us? We don’t need to guess

Because we are His, it certainly is so

Vainly searching, they remain out of sight

Those jennies just can’t be found

But the Lord knows everything’s alright

As your feet plod along the ground

When you feel it’s time to head back

Because the goal is still out of sight

You find the Lord has had you on track

In the end, everything turns out alright

II. A Man of Benjamin

10 Then Saul said to his servant, “Well said; come, let us go.”

vayomer shaul lenaaro tov devarekha lekha nelekhah – “And he said, Saul, to his servant, ‘Good, your word! You must walk-ward! Let us walk!’” Saul’s excited demeanor is clearly seen in his three abrupt statements. He was worried about his father, but he was also worried about going home to his father without the jennies. Therefore, this seemed like a perfect resolution to the dilemma they were facing…

10 (con’t) So they went to the city where the man of God was.

vayelekhu el ha’iyr asher sham ish ha’elohim – “And they walked unto the city which there man the God.” The name of the city remains unstated. However, it is most likely Ramah, the home of Samuel. This can be deduced from the fact that the servant knew he would be in the city. More logical reasons lie ahead…

11 As they went up the hill to the city,

hemah olim bemaaleh ha’iyr – “They, ascending in ascent the city.” The city is elevated, making Ramah, Lofty or High Place, a suitable candidate for the location. While ascending…

11(con’t) they met some young women going out to draw water, and said to them, “Is the seer here?”

The words bear emphasis: vehemah matseu nearoth yotseoth lishov mayim vayomeru lahen hayesh bazeh ha’roeh – “and they, they found damsels coming out to draw waters. And they said to them, ‘Being in this the seer?’” As they ascended, they passed girls going down to a well or spring to get water.

Probably not wanting to climb the entire ascent for nothing, they stopped to ask if the seer was there. It is another indication that this is Ramah. The question would be pointless otherwise. They are asking for “the seer,” not “a seer.” The one they seek is identified with the location…

12 And they answered them and said, “Yes, there he is, just ahead of you.

vataanenah otham vatomarnah yesh hineh lephanekha – “And they answered them, and they said, ‘Being! Behold! To your faces.’” The meaning is that their faces were pointed in the right direction so they should continue. Samuel was before them, and they were not wasting their effort continuing the ascent. In fact, they need to get moving…

12 (con’t) Hurry now; for today he came to this city,

It doesn’t say “this city,” as if it were a city he was visiting. Rather: maher atah ki hayom ba la’iyr – “You must hurry now, for the day he came to the city.” It is a city he has returned to. This means that he either just returned from his annual circuit where he judged (1 Samuel 7:16, 17), or for whatever reason, he went to some other place and has now just returned. The reason for his return begins to be seen in the next words…

12 (con’t) because there is a sacrifice of the people today on the high place.

ki zevakh hayom laam babamah – “For sacrifice, the day, to the people in the height.” No reason for the sacrifice is stated. Some say it was a festival day, others the monthly New Moon. What seems likely, based on what will be said later, is that the sacrifice has been specifically called for the arrival of Saul.

The sacrifice would be made babamah, in the height. The city was on a high place, but there was a place even higher where sacrifices were made. This gives additional credence to it being Ramah, also called Ramathaim, Double Height, in 1 Samuel 1:1.

13 As soon as you come into the city, you will surely find him before he goes up to the high place to eat.

The words contain a paragoge: kevoakhem ha’iyr ken timtseun otho beterem yaaleh habamathah leekhol – “According to your coming the city, thus you will (surely) find him in ‘before he ascends to height-ward to eat.’” The paragoge, coming from the young ladies, probably sounded like, “For sure, you will find him…”

The words suggest that the girls knew Saul was coming, as if Samuel had told the city a guest would arrive and there would be a sacrifice upon his arrival. Samuel is waiting until he arrives. Once he did, Samuel would escort him to the height…

13 (con’t) For the people will not eat until he comes, because he must bless the sacrifice;

ki lo yokhal ha’am ad boo ki hu yevarekh ha’zevakh – “For not it will eat, the people, until he comes. For he will bless the sacrifice.” The sense that Samuel is waiting for Saul before he blesses the sacrifice continues. Otherwise, one would think he would have simply gone up when everyone else did.

13 (con’t) afterward those who are invited will eat.

akhare ken yokhelu haqeruim – “After thus they will eat, the called.” Only after Samuel ascends will those called eat. There is an order of propriety that has been set forth based on the sacrifice and Samuel’s required presence at it.

13 (con’t) Now therefore, go up, for about this time you will find him.”

The girls give an imperative and again use a paragoge: veatah alu ki otho khehayom timtseun otho – “And now, you must ascend. For it, according to the day, you will (surely) find him.” Everything about the girls’ words is urgent and demands that Saul and his servant rush…

14 So they went up to the city. As they were coming into the city, there was Samuel, coming out toward them on his way up to the high place.

Rather and emphatically: vayaalu ha’iyr hemah baim betokh ha’iyr vehineh shemuel yotse liqratham laaloth habamah – “And they ascended the city. They – coming in midst the city, and behold! Samuel coming out to encounter them to ascend to the height.” They ascended to the height of the city and entered it. As they came into its midst, meaning inside the gate, Samuel came out to meet them.

Everything about the encounter is based on the anticipation of Saul’s arrival. Samuel has been waiting for them. Only now would he, along with them, make the ascent to the height. Samuel means Asked from God.

15 Now the Lord had told Samuel in his ear the day before Saul came, saying,

The words of verses 15 and 16 are parenthetical: veYehovah galah eth ozen shemuel yom ekhad liphne vo shaul lemor – “(And Yehovah, he denuded ear Samuel, day one to faces coming Saul, to say…” The abrupt and precise nature of everything that has been described concerning Saul’s trek up the hill and into the city has been intentionally laid out based on these words.

Samuel was not at the city. The day before, the Lord told him that Saul would be coming to the city. It explains why he returned. It explains why a sacrifice was planned and people were waiting for him. It explains why the girls were aware of the situation and spoke to Saul and his servant with paragoges and an imperative. It also explains why it says Saul and his servant came to the city and entered its midst (meaning coming inside the gate).

The Lord uncovered the ear of Samuel, revealing to him who was coming, when he would arrive, and what to do…

16 “Tomorrow about this time I will send you a man from the land of Benjamin, and you shall anoint him commander over My people Israel,

kaeth makhar eshlakh elekha ish meerets Binyamin umeshakhto lenagid al ami Yisrael – “According to the time, tomorrow, I will send unto you man from land Benjamin. And you anointed him to commander upon My people, Israel.” One day earlier, Samuel was told that Saul would arrive at the city at that same time the following day.

The person would be a Benjamite (Son of the Right Hand). It is this person, known to Samuel in advance of his arrival, that he was to anoint as the nagid, commander, over Israel. Though he will be the king, the principal task of his kingship is to be a military figure.

This is the first use of the word in Scripture. It is derived from nagad, to declare. Therefore, it signifies that which is in front, as in a commander, a prince of the people, a noble, etc. It is a word used to describe the coming Messiah in Daniel 9:25 and the antichrist in Daniel 9:26.

16 (con’t) that he may save My people from the hand of the Philistines; for I have looked upon My people, because their cry has come to Me.”

vehoshia eth ami miyad pelishtim ki raithi eth ami ki baah tsaaqato elay – “And he caused to save My people from hand Philistines. For I saw My people. For it came, his shriek, unto Me.)” The Philistines, the Weakeners, are those who have afflicted Israel. Because of this, the people cried out to the Lord, desiring a king to lead them and break the chains of their enemies.

The Lord responded by selecting Saul, a nobody from the smallest tribe in Israel, to lead them. With the parenthesis ended, the narrative continues…

17 So when Samuel saw Saul, the Lord said to him, “There he is, the man of whom I spoke to you.

u-shemuel raah eth shaul veYehovah anahu hineh ha’ish asher amarti elekha – “And Samuel, he saw Saul. And Yehovah, He answered him, ‘Behold! The man whom I spoke unto you.” Removing the parenthetical verses, the harmony of the narrative can be seen –

14 And they ascended the city. They – coming in midst the city, and behold! Samuel coming out to encounter them to ascend to the height. … 17 And Samuel, he saw Saul. And Yehovah, He answered him, “Behold! The man whom I spoke unto you. This – he will enclose in My people.” 18 And he approached, Saul, Samuel in midst the gate. And he said, “You must cause to declare-ward, I pray, to me, where this – house the seer?”

The Lord spoke, and Samuel heard. This type of communication can only be guessed at, but it is clear that it happens immediately and without any preparation. It is also as clear as if it were spoken by someone standing next to him, even if only he heard it. The Lord directed Samuel to Saul, confirming his selection…

17 (con’t) This one shall reign over My people.”

Rather: zeh yatsor beami – “This – he will enclose in My people.’” The word atsar signifies to enclose. If there is a plague, the Lord can enclose the people, protecting them from it. If you want someone to stay for a meal instead of leaving, you will enclose them, keeping them around.

Saul is the one to enclose Israel, keeping the people safe from their enemies as he fights outward against them. Samuel is made aware of this as the Lord speaks in His ear. At the same time…

*18 (fin) Then Saul drew near to Samuel in the gate, and said, “Please tell me, where is the seer’s house?”

vayigash shaul eth shemuel betokh hashaar vayomer hagidah na li ey zeh beith ha’roeh – “And he approached, Saul, Samuel in midst the gate. And he said, ‘You must cause to declare-ward, I pray, to me, where this – house the seer?’” Samuel walked up to the gate where Saul and his servant entered. The meaning is that the timing was perfectly arranged so that as Saul entered the city, Samuel entered the gated area at the exact same time.

Saul, showing his complete naivete at the appearance of Samuel, whose hair had never been cut due to the vow Hannah made years earlier, asked him where the seer’s house was. He had no idea who Samuel was or what his function was. He is set, however, to find out.

This is where we will stop for the day. Hopefully, we’ll finish the chapter next week and have a suitable explanation for the given detail.

It is apparent from the verses we looked over that the Lord directed everything to come out as it did. The donkeys got lost, Saul and his servant looked in various places without finding them, they were out of bread and needed to get home, and yet, the servant who came with him knew about the seer and had enough to give him a presentation.

The Lord knew these things would take place. Meanwhile, Samuel was getting back to the city, ready for the meeting, and setting everything up for when it occurred. Saul had free will to do the things he did, and yet, God was able to have things turn out exactly as He determined.

This is also the case with each one of us. He looked into our hearts, knew the decision we would make for Him, and directed our lives to the point where we would do so. All the while before and since then, we have made our own choices, some of which were or continue to be beneficial or detrimental to us.

The best thing we can do as we walk in this life is keep the Lord on our minds, talk to Him frequently, and study His word diligently. In doing this, we will continue down the right path that He set before us. When we don’t, He will be there at the end to clean us up.

We will never be abandoned by Him, but we can stray from Him. Saul is being called to lead Israel. Eventually, he will stray, and a new direction under David will come about. But as we enter into Saul’s life, I feel confident that the Lord never abandoned him.

Let us learn the lessons of Saul’s life, good and bad, so that we can avoid the pitfalls and rejoice in the victories as we apply what we know about him to our own lives. More on Saul to come. Pay attention as we go!

Closing Verse: “The steps of a good man are ordered by the Lord,
And He delights in his way.” Psalm 37:23

Next Week: 1 Samuel 9:19-27 He is set to be king, that is understood, yes, it’s true… (Saul, Select and Good, Part II) (17th 1 Samuel Sermon)

The Lord has you exactly where He wants you. He has a good plan and purpose for you. He is the One who abases the haughty and exalts the humble. He regards the lowly, and the proud He knows from afar. So yield yourself to Him, trust Him, and believe His word. In this, He will do great things for you and through you.

1 Samuel 9:1-18 (CG)

9 And it was, man from son right. And his name Kish, son Abiel, son Zeror, son Bechorath, son Aphiah: son man right – powerful valor. 2 And to him, it was son, and his name Saul – select and good. And not man from sons Israel good from him. From his shoulders and upward higher from all the people.

3 And they wandered, the jennies to Kish, father Saul. And he said, Kish unto Saul his son, “You must take, I pray, with you one from the servants, and you must arise, and you must walk, and you must seek the jennies.” 4 And he traversed in Mount Ephraim, and he traversed in land Shalisha, and not they found. And they traversed in land Shaalim, and naught. And he traversed in land Right, and not they found.

5 They, they came in land Zuph, and Saul, he said to his servant who with him “You must walk-ward, and let us return, lest he will cease, my father, from the jennies and he dreaded to us.”

6 And he said to him, “Behold, I pray, man God in the city, the this. And the man being weighty: all that he will speak, coming, it will come. Now, let us walk there. If not, he will cause to declare to us our way which we walked upon-ward.”

7 And he said, Saul, to his servant, “And behold! We will walk. And what we will cause to bring to the man? For the bread, it is vanished from our vessels, and presentation naught to cause to bring to man the God. What with us?”

8 And he caused to add, the servant, to answer Saul. And he said, “Behold! Being found in my hand fourth shekel silver. And I gave to man the God, and he will cause to declare to us our way.”

9 (To faces, in Israel, thus he spoke, the man in his walking to inquire God, “You must walk, and let us walk until the seer.” For to the prophet, the day, he will be called to faces ‘the seer.’)

10 And he said, Saul, to his servant, “Good, your word! You must walk-ward! Let us walk!” And they walked unto the city which there man the God.

11 They, ascending in ascent the city, and they, they found damsels coming out to draw waters. And they said to them, “Being in this the seer?”

12 And they answered them, and they said, “Being! Behold! To your faces. You must hurry now, for the day he came to the city. For sacrifice, the day, to the people in the height. 13 According to your coming the city, thus you will (surely) find him in ‘before he ascends to height-ward to eat’. For not it will eat, the people, until he comes. For he will bless the sacrifice. After thus they will eat, the called. And now, you must ascend. For it, according to the day, you will (surely) find him.” 14 And they ascended the city. They – coming in midst the city, and behold! Samuel coming out to encounter them to ascend to the height.

15 (And Yehovah, he denuded ear Samuel, day one to faces coming Saul, to say, 16 “According to the time, tomorrow, I will send unto you man from land Benjamin. And you anointed him to commander upon My people, Israel. And he caused to save My people from hand Philistines. For I saw My people. For it came, his shriek, unto Me.”)

17 And Samuel, he saw Saul. And Yehovah, He answered him, “Behold! The man whom I spoke unto you. This – he will enclose in My people.” 18 And he approached, Saul, Samuel in midst the gate. And he said, “You must cause to declare-ward, I pray, to me, where this – house the seer?”

 

1 Samuel 9 (NKJV)

There was a man of Benjamin whose name was Kish the son of Abiel, the son of Zeror, the son of Bechorath, the son of Aphiah, a Benjamite, a mighty man of power. And he had a choice and handsome son whose name was Saul. There was not a more handsome person than he among the children of Israel. From his shoulders upward he was taller than any of the people.

Now the donkeys of Kish, Saul’s father, were lost. And Kish said to his son Saul, “Please take one of the servants with you, and arise, go and look for the donkeys.” So he passed through the mountains of Ephraim and through the land of Shalisha, but they did not find them. Then they passed through the land of Shaalim, and they were not there. Then he passed through the land of the Benjamites, but they did not find them.

When they had come to the land of Zuph, Saul said to his servant who was with him, “Come, let us return, lest my father cease caring about the donkeys and become worried about us.”

And he said to him, “Look now, there is in this city a man of God, and he is an honorable man; all that he says surely comes to pass. So let us go there; perhaps he can show us the way that we should go.”

Then Saul said to his servant, “But look, if we go, what shall we bring the man? For the bread in our vessels is all gone, and there is no present to bring to the man of God. What do we have?”

And the servant answered Saul again and said, “Look, I have here at hand one-fourth of a shekel of silver. I will give that to the man of God, to tell us our way.” (Formerly in Israel, when a man went to inquire of God, he spoke thus: “Come, let us go to the seer”; for he who is now called a prophet was formerly called a seer.)

10 Then Saul said to his servant, “Well said; come, let us go.” So they went to the city where the man of God was.

11 As they went up the hill to the city, they met some young women going out to draw water, and said to them, “Is the seer here?”

12 And they answered them and said, “Yes, there he is, just ahead of you. Hurry now; for today he came to this city, because there is a sacrifice of the people today on the high place. 13 As soon as you come into the city, you will surely find him before he goes up to the high place to eat. For the people will not eat until he comes, because he must bless the sacrifice; afterward those who are invited will eat. Now therefore, go up, for about this time you will find him.” 14 So they went up to the city. As they were coming into the city, there was Samuel, coming out toward them on his way up to the high place.

15 Now the Lord had told Samuel in his ear the day before Saul came, saying, 16 “Tomorrow about this time I will send you a man from the land of Benjamin, and you shall anoint him commander over My people Israel, that he may save My people from the hand of the Philistines; for I have looked upon My people, because their cry has come to Me.”

17 So when Samuel saw Saul, the Lord said to him, “There he is, the man of whom I spoke to you. This one shall reign over My people.” 18 Then Saul drew near to Samuel in the gate, and said, “Please tell me, where is the seer’s house?”

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1 Samuel 8:1-22 (Hear the Voice of the People)

Artwork by Doug Kallerson

1 Samuel 8:1-22
Hear the Voice of the People

(Typed 7 July 2025) Over the years, lots of friends and acquaintances have come by the house to ask advice about various things. Knowing I’m a preacher, when people are in difficult straits, they think I may have an answer or solution to their problems.

They come with life problems, family problems, money problems, divorce problems, and so much more. Because I’m a preacher, you would think they would have an inkling that I would talk to them from a biblical perspective. But their inkle meter is often broken.

They present their issue, I respond with what the Bible says or from a biblical perspective if the issue isn’t exactly presented in the Bible, and let them know that this is how the Lord would have them respond.

After all these years, I approximate that 95% (or more) of the people who came by leave without taking to heart what I told them. People are looking for an easy answer that solves their troubles and doesn’t require them to get closer to God. They are looking for a quick prayer, a quick fix, and then get back to life, doing whatever they had been doing.

Some amount of time later, they are still struggling with the same issue. Maybe the divorce has been settled and they are currently working on another marriage that they can end just as badly, or whatever.

Text Verse: O Lord, I know the way of man is not in himself;
It is not in man who walks to direct his own steps.” Jeremiah 10:23

We think that we direct our own steps in life, but we either follow the steps of the Lord, or sin within us directs our steps in another direction. None of us can truly direct our own path as we would like without adherence to Him or suffering consequences for not doing so.

The people of Israel, represented by their leaders, came to Israel’s judge, Samuel. They stated their desire for a new direction. However, it is the same old direction they’ve followed for hundreds of years, meaning rejecting the Lord and wanting to do things their own way.

Samuel spends careful time telling them what the results of their decision will be. It is an otherwise unstated plea for them to reconsider. But Israel, like most of those I have talked to over the years, doesn’t want to heed the word of the Lord.

The word is written down for us to consider and apply to our lives. But instead of going there, we as humans are usually looking for something or someone to lead us down an easy path of theological mediocrity. The Lord is there for us, and most want to pay lip service to Him while doing things their own way and according to their own desires.

Israel’s problem is reflective of the human condition in general. That is why the stories in the Bible resonate so well with us. But are we going to pay heed and apply what they tell us to our lives? The wise will. All others will continue down whatever path they think will be the quickest route to temporary supposed happiness.

Such lessons as this are to be found in His superior word. And so, let us turn to that precious word once again, and… May God speak to us through His word today, and may His glorious name ever be praised.

I. The Verdict of the King (verses 1-9)

Now it came to pass when Samuel was old

vayhi kaasher zaqen shemuel – “And it was according to which he was aged, Samuel.” The text gives no hint of Samuel’s age, just that he is aged. Despite this, commentaries give numerous suggestions on why he must be one age or another. But this isn’t the focus of the narrative and is irrelevant. It is rather focused on…

1 (con’t) that he made his sons judges over Israel.

vayasem eth banav shophetim leyisrael – “and he set his sons – judging to Israel.” As noted in the introduction to the book, Samuel is the last God-appointed judge of Israel. However, to assist him in his old age, he appointed his sons as judges while he retained overall authority.

It is because of this appointment that a new direction in the leadership and governmental structure of Israel will take place. As for his sons…

The name of his firstborn was Joel, and the name of his second, Abijah;

vayhi shem beno habekor yoel veshem mishnehu aviyah – “And it was, name his son the firstborn Joel, and name his second Abijah.” Although there are various possibilities for the meaning of Joel, surely the intent here is that it is derived from an abbreviated form of Yehovah and the word el, God. Thus, it means something like Yehovah is God.

This appears to be the intent because the name of the next son is Abijah, My Father is Yehovah, or Yehovah is Father. Samuel chose a name for each son that speaks of the character or nature of the Lord. In 1 Chronicles 6:28, Joel is listed as Vashni rather than Joel.

Various suggestions have been given concerning this. Some think it is a second name, as often occurs in Scripture. Some think his name dropped out, and the word vashni is a corruption of “and the second” when referring to Abijah. Some think it is a third son not mentioned in Samuel.

The name Vashni is not a regular Hebrew name. Jones’ Dictionary of Old Testament Names thinks it is derived from Arabic and indicates Gift of God, but using this logic, it would be more closely translated as Yehovah is Generous.

As for the sons’ positions…

2 (con’t) they were judges in Beersheba.

shophetim biveer shava – “judging in Beersheba.” Beersheba is the southernmost point in the land and quite distant from where Samuel is. Due to his age, he probably decided that they should judge from there so that he would not have to travel there if a need arose. Rather, he would tend to the needs of the northerly tribes. Beersheba means Well of Seven and Well of Oath.

But his sons did not walk in his ways;

Rather: velo halekhu vanav bedarko – “And not they walked, his sons, in his way.” The written Hebrew says, “in his way,” while the oral says, “in his ways.” Why they felt the singular should be amended is hard to figure. It is probably to align with the plural seen in verse 5.

It is true that the term “in his ways” is used at other times, usually referring to the ways of Yehovah, while “in his way” or a variation of it is less common, but the clear meaning is that Samuel had one way, one proper path, on which he walked. The sons had various ways that diverted from this. Those paths included…

3 (con’t) they turned aside after dishonest gain, took bribes, and perverted justice.

More precisely: vayitu akhare habatsa vayiqhu shokhad vayatu mishpat – “and they stretched after the plunder, and they took donation, and they caused to stretch verdict.” They didn’t just turn aside after dishonest gain. Instead, they stretched after betsa, plunder.

This gives the sense of reaching as far as they can anytime something caught their eye. They went out of their way to obtain it. Men like this were forbidden to be appointed to a position of integrity –

“Moreover you shall select from all the people able men, such as fear God, men of truth, hating covetousness [betsa]; and place such over them to be rulers of thousands, rulers of hundreds, rulers of fifties, and rulers of tens.” Exodus 18:21

The taking of donations (bribes) was expressly forbidden in the law on several occasions –

“You shall not pervert justice; you shall not show partiality, nor take a bribe, for a bribe blinds the eyes of the wise and twists the words of the righteous.” Deuteronomy 16:19

Lastly, stretching the verdict is a way of saying that they showed favoritism, stretching their judgment on behalf of one party for whatever reason suited them. This was also expressly forbidden in the law –

“Not you shall cause to stretch verdict, your destitute, in his dispute.” Exodus 23:6 (CG).

These sons saw the opportunities their positions afforded them and used them to take advantage of the people in various ways in order to enrich themselves in power, position, and wealth. It is because of this that the people desired a change…

Then all the elders of Israel gathered together and came to Samuel at Ramah,

vayithqabetsu kol ziqne Yisrael vayavou el shemuel ha’ramathah – “And they will gather themselves all aged Israel, and they came unto Samuel the Ramah-ward.” The elders of Israel were noted as far back as during the time in Egypt (Exodus 3:16). Under Moses, there was eventually a numbered set of men, seventy, from the elders (Numbers 11:16).

It isn’t known if that number is referred to here or if it is just a regular body of elders from each of the tribes. Whatever the composition is, they have gathered to Samuel at the main place where he judged, in Ramah, in order to secure a change in how the nation was to be led.

The Ramah means The Lofty Place.

In defense of their position, they set forth two arguments why it is necessary…

and said to him, “Look, you are old, and your sons do not walk in your ways.

vayomeru elav hineh atah zaqanta u-vanekha lo halekhu bidrakhekha – “And they said unto him, ‘Behold! You, you were aged, and your sons not they walked in your ways.” The first reason given is that Samuel is aged. In fact, the matter is stated emphatically. Even if true, it is an irrelevant statement. Whatever system is decided upon, any leader will get old.

The only way to get around that would be to set age limits on any future leader, an idea not entertained by the men. The second reason given is that his sons didn’t walk in the ways of Samuel. This could be handled in another way according to the law.

The Lord had set judges over the people for hundreds of years. In their times of need, they were appointed to deliver the people. In times of peace, they judged matters for the people. Although it will be made explicit later, even here it can be seen that this is not a rejection of Samuel but of the One who appointed him as judge. This is understood from the next words…

5 (con’t) Now make us a king to judge us like all the nations.”

atah simah lanu melekh leshaphetenu kekhal hagoyim – “Now set-ward to us king to judge us according to all the nations.’” The reason they want a king is that he will judge them. They are looking for a royal rule to assume the judicial governance of the people. The proposition is, once again, not based on reason. A king will get old like any other judge.

Not always, but having a king also normally implies a dynasty where sons rule in the place of their fathers. But this is what they say they are upset about with Samuel’s sons. They don’t judge fairly like Samuel does. If they think having a king will be any different, they aren’t paying attention to human nature.

Their true motive is exposed in the second half of their words, “according to all the nations.” It is what the Lord expected, in advance, concerning the desire of the people. In Deuteronomy 17, it says –

“When you come to the land which the Lord your God is giving you, and possess it and dwell in it, and say, ‘I will set a king over me like all the nations that are around me,’ 15 you shall surely set a king over you whom the Lord your God chooses; one from among your brethren you shall set as king over you; you may not set a foreigner over you, who is not your brother.” Deuteronomy 17:14, 15

Despite the Lord knowing this would be their desire, the words “according to all the nations” show a distinct rejection of the Lord. Israel was not like all the nations. Even hundreds of years later, the Lord informed them of this –

“What you have in your mind shall never be, when you say, ‘We will be like the Gentiles, like the families in other countries, serving wood and stone.’” Ezekiel 20:32

Asking for a king was an allowance, but it was not what the Lord intended. If it were, He would have suggested it. Instead, they are asking for this new direction. However, this doesn’t mean the event won’t fit the overall plans and intents of the Lord.

In asking for a king, the people will have to go through a learning process to meet the intended goal, the Lord has already determined. They will get what they ask for, but it will be a long and arduous journey as they discover the ramifications of their request.

It should be noted that the impetus for this request is based upon what will transpire in 1 Samuel 11 when Nahash the Ammonite comes against Jabesh Gilead. This can be discerned from what Samuel says to the people in 1 Samuel 12:12. There, it says that they requested a king at that time. As for the immediate result of the petition…

But the thing displeased Samuel when they said, “Give us a king to judge us.”

vayera hadavar beene shemuel kaasher ameru tenah lanu melekh leshaphetenu – “And it spoiled, the word, in eyes Samuel according to which they said, ‘Give-ward to us king to judge us.’” This would be upsetting for a multitude of reasons. The first is that they didn’t ask if the Lord would approve of the matter. Rather, they asked Samuel to give them a king to be set before them.

A second reason would be that this removes the Lord from the final decision concerning matters. The king may have a prophet and advisers to counsel him concerning what to do, but it is the king who decides if it will be done.

Third, this is an implicit indictment concerning the abilities of Samuel. His advanced age, implying an inability to adequately lead, has been referred to. His choice in appointing his sons is seen as a failure in the people’s eyes, and his status as a judicial leader who possessed no royal authority is implied to be a defective means of leadership by the people. But the people had asked…

6 (con’t) So Samuel prayed to the Lord.

vayithpalel shemuel el Yehovah – “And he will intercede himself, Samuel, unto Yehovah.” The people never asked for prayer, nor have they acknowledged the Lord in their words. However, Samuel knew that he could not just give the people a king without the Lord’s guidance. As such, he did what he knew was appropriate in this regard…

And the Lord said to Samuel, “Heed the voice of the people in all that they say to you;

vayomer Yehovah el shemuel shema beqol ha’am lekhol asher yomeru elekha – “And He said, Yehovah, unto Samuel, ‘Hear in voice the people to all which they will say unto you.’” The Lord, without any hesitation or additional qualification, tells Samuel to hear what the people have asked. The implication is “to hear and respond accordingly.” His next words clarify why Samuel should not be disturbed by the request…

7 (con’t) for they have not rejected you,

ki lo othekha maasu – “For not you they spurned.” Samuel was concerned that this had happened because of him. This is evident in the following three statements –

Moses: “Let me set upon me king according to all the nations.”
The elders: “Now set-ward to us king to judge us according to all the nations.’”
Samuel: “Give-ward to us king to judge us.”

In Deuteronomy, Moses spoke in the singular concerning Israel collectively (let me set). Using the same word, sum, to set, when the elders came to Samuel, they spoke as a group of elders over a group of people (set-ward to us). Samuel, knowing Moses allowed this, must have thought, “They think I am a failure. Therefore, they are asking me to natan, give, them a king according to Moses’ allowance.”

The Lord, however, corrects his thinking. In using Moses’ words, Israel is claiming authority from Moses, who spoke on behalf of the Lord. Samuel isn’t giving them anything. Israel is placing itself under a king. They are merely asking Samuel to be the one to appoint a king based on the decision they have already made. The implied meaning is…

7 (con’t) but they have rejected Me, that I should not reign over them.

ki othi maasu mimelokh alehem – “For Me they spurned from reigning upon them.” Samuel wasn’t the lawgiver. Moses was. And Moses’ authority ultimately stemmed from the authority of the Lord. Therefore, they are rejecting the authority of the Lord by asking for a king to rule over them.

The Lord did not tell them to appoint a king over themselves. Rather, He said that a king had to meet certain requirements. This decision, notes the Lord, is…

According to all the works which they have done since the day that I brought them up out of Egypt, even to this day

kekhal hamaasim asher asu miyom haalothi otham mimitsrayim vead hayom hazeh – “According to all the actions which they did from day I caused to ascend them from Egypt and until the day, the this.” Simply put, this means, “They have always been this way.” The Lord brought them out of Egypt. When He did, at the first stop in the wilderness after crossing the Red Sea, they were moaning against the Lord.

When they arrived at Sinai, no sooner had they been presented with the Ten Commandments than they turned around and fashioned the golden calf. The stubborn, rebellious attitude remained unchanged in them even until the day they came before Samuel to request a king.

8 (con’t) —with which they have forsaken Me and served other gods—so they are doing to you also.

vayaazvuni vayaavdu elohim akherim ken hemah osim gam lakh – “and they loosened Me and they served gods, others. Thus they doing also to you.” To loosen means to forsake, as in being bound together but letting go and walking away. Israel was called by the Lord. They accepted the call and were bound to Him, and yet, every chance they got to be with another, they left Him and followed other gods.

As such, the “doing also to you” isn’t referring to forsaking Samuel. Rather, they are forsaking the Lord by asking Samuel to set a king before them. Despite this, the Lord says…

Now therefore, heed their voice. However, you shall solemnly forewarn them,

veatah shema beqolam akh ki haed taid bahem – “And now, you must hear in their voice. Surely for causing to testify, you will cause to testify in them.” The NKJV adequately explains the intent. Samuel is to hearken unto their request. But before he does, he is to warn them, in advance, of the consequences of their decision…

9 (con’t) and show them the behavior of the king who will reign over them.”

vehigadta lahem mishpat ha’melekh asher yimlokh alehem – “and you caused to declare to them verdict the king who he will reign upon them.” The verdict of the king refers to the legal rights the king will claim as the sovereign over the people. In essence, his word would become the law of the land, and so the people needed to know what to expect once a king was selected.

We want a king! Someone to lead us
We want to be like everyone else
Having a king will be a giant plus
When we put the Lord on a shelf

We know what we want and what is right
Give it to us, so we say
Our lives are in such a plight
And we no longer want it to be this way

*

They will get what they think they desire
But it won’t really be that way
When they receive the Spirit’s fire
They will know their true King on that day

II. Israel’s Demotion (verses 10-22)

10 So Samuel told all the words of the Lord to the people who asked him for a king.

vayomer shemuel eth kal divre Yehovah el haam hashoalim meito melekh – “And he said, Samuel, all words Yehovah unto the people, the ‘askers from him a king.’” This refers not to what has been said, but what will be said. The Lord told Samuel what a king would expect from the people. Samuel will set forth the Lord’s words as a solemn warning before a king is named…

11 And he said, “This will be the behavior of the king who will reign over you:

vayomer zeh yihyeh mishpat ha’melekh asher yimlokh alekhem – “And he said, ‘This, it will be, verdict the king who he will reign upon you.’” This demonstrates that “the words of the Lord” of the previous verse were not referring to what was recorded in verses 7-9, but what will be said concerning the king –

v. 10 – “and you will cause to declare to them verdict the king who he will reign upon them.”
v. 11 – “This, it will be, verdict the king who he will reign upon you.”

Therefore, as a witness against the people when they adamantly push forward with their request, Samuel explains to them that…

11 (con’t) He will take your sons and appoint them for his own chariots and to be his horsemen, and some will run before his chariots.

Rather, it is singular: eth benekhem yiqakh vesam lo vemerkavto uvepharashav veratsu liphne merkavto – “Your sons he will take, and he set to him in his chariot and in his steeds, and they ran to faces his chariot.” Unlike the judges who lived in an unassuming manner, riding their own donkeys and dwelling among the people, the king would surround himself with pomp and separate himself from the people.

Instead of a donkey, he would have a chariot with steeds. And to tend to these things, he would take for himself a tribute from the people, some of their own sons. After they tended to his chariot and steeds, these sons would run before the chariot as a demonstration of his grand authority.

There is a bit of irony in the words. They said to Samuel, “set-ward to us king to judge us.” Once the king is set, he will then take their sons and set them “to him.” That thought continues next…

12 He will appoint captains over his thousands and captains over his fifties,

velasum lo sare alaphim vesare khamishim – “And to set to him commanders thousands and commanders fifties.” This is still referring to the king taking of the people’s sons for his own purposes, including placing them wherever he desired, such as in the military or in the general labor force. The latter is seen, for example, in 1 Kings 4:7 –

“And Solomon had twelve governors over all Israel, who provided food for the king and his household; each one made provision for one month of the year.”

The meaning is that instead of having one’s sons at home to assist in the farming, they would be taken as labor for the king’s harvest, or for the king’s battles, as seen in the next words…

12 (con’t) will set some to plow his ground and reap his harvest, and some to make his weapons of war and equipment for his chariots.

velakharosh kharisho veliqtsor qetsiro velaasoth kele mikhamto u-khele rikhbo – “and to plow his ploughing, and to reap his harvest, and to make implements his battle, and implements his chariot.” The king would tend to his own needs at the expense of the sons of his people. Whoever suited his eye for meeting his desired purposes would be involuntarily enlisted to do so. And more…

13 He will take your daughters to be perfumers, cooks, and bakers.

veeth benotekhem yiqakh leraqakhoth u-letabakhoth u-leophoth – “And your daughters he will take to perfumers, and to cooks, and to bakers.” The lesser jobs, not requiring the strength of a man, would not be left to his household. Rather, he would also select daughters from the people, making them serve the royal house.

In this clause is a word found only here in Scripture, tabakhah, a female cook. It comes from the noun tabakh, a butcher, cook, or bodyguard. That is derived from the verb tabakh, to slaughter (animals or men).

Further, not only will the king conscript sons and daughters…

14 And he will take the best of your fields, your vineyards, and your olive groves, and give them to his servants.

veeth sedothekhem veeth karmekhem vezetekhem hatovim yiqakh venathan leavadav – “And your fields and your vineyards and your olives – the good, he will take and he gave to his servants.” The words indicate an utter disregard for the rights and rules established under the law concerning personal property.

The kings of the surrounding nations exercised such forceful confiscations, and the kings of Israel were sure to follow suit, taking what they desired from those who could not refuse. And more…

15 He will take a tenth of your grain and your vintage, and give it to his officers and servants.

vezarekhem vekarmekhem yasor venathan lesarisav velaavadav – “And your seed and your vineyards he will tithe, and he gave to his eunuchs and to his servants.” The Lord mandated tithing from the people. For two of those years, that tithe was eaten by the people in a celebration before the Lord. On the third year, the tithe was to be given entirely to the care of the priests, Levites, and poor.

However, a king would exact a tithe from everything the people produced. It would be an ongoing compulsory tax which, if spent properly, would be suitable to run the nation, protect its citizens, and bring prosperity to all. But instead, this would most likely be squandered by enriching those the king desired to favor. Also…

16 And he will take your male servants, your female servants, your finest young men, and your donkeys, and put them to his work.

veeth avdekhem veeth shiphkhothekhem veeth bakhurekhem hatovim veeth khamorekhem yiqakh veasah limlakhto – “And your servants and your maidservants and your selected – the good, and your donkeys, he will take, and he made to his deputyship.” The Greek reads cattle instead of selected, there being one letter difference between the two in the Hebrew. This seems unnecessary even if possible and convenient.

The Hebrew marks off the first three categories with the words “the good.” It makes no sense to assume that the king would take good cattle and not also define the donkeys as such. Rather, referring to three categories of people all designated as “the good” seems appropriate.

All of these would be taken for the king’s service in whatever manner they were best suited. Further…

17 He will take a tenth of your sheep.

tsonekhem yasor – “Your flock he will tithe.” The word tson is derived from an unused root signifying to migrate. Thus, it refers to flocks such as sheep and goats. A tithe of these would be taken from the people along with everything else. Every aspect of their agricultural existence would be subject to the king’s grasping hand.

17 (con’t) And you will be his servants.

The words are emphatic: veatem tihyu lo laavadim – “and you, you will be to him to servants.” The meaning is that the king’s hand would be so heavy on the people that they would spend their time and effort serving the king.

The reason for the emphasis is seen in the “what should have been” nature of the words of the Lord –

“For My servants, they, whom I caused to bring them from land Egypt. Not they will be sold as servant” Leviticus 25:42 (CG).

The people were the servants of the Lord, but through choosing a king, they would sell themselves to be his servants. Therefore…

18 And you will cry out in that day because of your king whom you have chosen for yourselves, and the Lord will not hear you in that day.”

Rather, the Lord will hear, but He will shut His ears to the noise: u-zeaqtem bayom ha’hu mil’liphne malkekhem asher bekhartem lakhem velo yaaneh Yehovah etkhem bayom ha’hu – “And you shrieked in the day, the it, from to faces your king whom you selected to you, and no He will answer, Yehovah, you in the day, the it.”

The meaning of the phrase “from to faces your king” is “from before your king.” It is a way of saying, “You will cry out to Yehovah as you groan before your king (whom you selected for yourselves, by the way ), and Yehovah will not answer.” It is the old “You made your bed, now lie in it” thought. And yet, after all this…

19 Nevertheless the people refused to obey the voice of Samuel;

vaymaanu ha’am lishmoa beqol shemuel – “And they refused, the people, to hear in voice Samuel.” People think the grass is always greener elsewhere, and yet, when presented with evidence that it really isn’t so, they refuse to heed the warning. This is what is going on here.

Whether the elders retired and debated, presented the options and explanations to the people at a national assembly, or simply responded to Samuel immediately isn’t stated. The warning is immediately followed by their refusal to highlight the impetuous nature of the people.

19 (con’t) and they said, “No, but we will have a king over us,

vayomeru lo ki im melekh yihyeh alenu – “And they said, ‘No! For lo! King, he will be upon us!’” The sad part of their response is that they already had a king. They lived under a benevolent monarchy, as witnessed by the words of Exodus 19 –

“Now therefore, if you will indeed obey My voice and keep My covenant, then you shall be a special treasure to Me above all people; for all the earth is Mine. And you shall be to Me a kingdom of priests and a holy nation.’ These are the words which you shall speak to the children of Israel.” Exodus 19:5, 6

A kingdom implies having a king. Israel failed to recognize this. Their desire was…

20 that we also may be like all the nations,

The words are emphatic: vehayinu gam anakhnu kekhal ha’goyim – “And we became, also we, according to all the nations.” What a great idea! Let’s take a demotion and impose immense burdens upon ourselves in the process –

“Also today the Lord has proclaimed you to be His special people, just as He promised you, that you should keep all His commandments, 19 and that He will set you high above all nations which He has made, in praise, in name, and in honor, and that you may be a holy people to the Lord your God, just as He has spoken.” Deuteronomy 26:18, 19

The Lord told them that they would be high above the nations. Instead, they want to be just like all the other nations. Israel wanted to trade the kingdom of the all-powerful, all-gracious Yehovah for one run by an arm of flesh extending from a person who would tend to himself and his own needs before all else. Smart move, folks!

20 (con’t) and that our king may judge us and go out before us and fight our battles.”

ushephatanu malkenu veyatsa lephanenu venilkham eth milkhamotenu – “And he judged us, our king, and he went to our faces and he battled our battles.” The Lord has already done these things for them. He judged them through His appointed designees. He also fought their battles for them and said that He would continue to do so –

“When you go out to battle against your enemies, and see horses and chariots and people more numerous than you, do not be afraid of them; for the Lord your God is with you, who brought you up from the land of Egypt. So it shall be, when you are on the verge of battle, that the priest shall approach and speak to the people. And he shall say to them, ‘Hear, O Israel: Today you are on the verge of battle with your enemies. Do not let your heart faint, do not be afraid, and do not tremble or be terrified because of them; for the Lord your God is He who goes with you, to fight for you against your enemies, to save you.’” Deuteronomy 20:1-4

21 And Samuel heard all the words of the people, and he repeated them in the hearing of the Lord.

vahyishma shemuel eth kal divre ha’am vedaberem beazene Yehovah – “And he heard, Samuel, all words the people, and he spoke them in ears Yehovah.” Whether they believed that Samuel spoke to the Lord or not, all they could focus on was that they were not content with the state of things.

Samuel spoke to the Lord what was already known to Him. But this was a necessary process to work through so that every t was crossed and every i was dotted. With his words to the Lord complete…

22 So the Lord said to Samuel, “Heed their voice, and make them a king.”

vayomer Yehovah el shemuel shema beqolam vehimlakhta lahem melekh – “And He said, Yehovah unto Samuel, ‘Hear in their voice and you caused to reign to them king.’” This is now the third time the Lord has told Samuel to hear their voice –

v.7 – “And He said, Yehovah, unto Samuel, ‘Hear in voice the people to all which they will say unto you. For not you they spurned. For Me they spurned from reigning upon them.’”

v.9 – “And now, you must hear in their voice. Surely for causing to testify, you will cause to testify in them, and you will cause to declare to them verdict the king who he will reign upon them.”

The matter has been officially decided. What must next take place is for a king to be selected. Therefore…

*22 (fin) And Samuel said to the men of Israel, “Every man go to his city.”

vayomer shemuel el anshe Yisrael lekhu ish leiro – “And he said, Samuel unto men Israel, ‘You must walk, man to his city.’” Saying this immediately subdues any thought of the people hastily choosing a king and having Samuel appoint him over the nation.

With the elders there, it would seem like a great idea to choose one from among themselves or one of their children. It may be that someone would stand up and volunteer, stating his qualifications and looking for a movement of others to support his effort.

In dismissing the people, Samuel is exercising his authority before any such thing could take place.

Having looked over the verses, we can step back and see that the direction of the narrative changes from here. Thus, there is little room for typology in the chapter. The first few verses do give a snapshot of things at the end of the age.

Samuel, Asked from God and signifying the state of grace, is aged. It is a good representation of the end of the church age. His two sons are mentioned, Yehovah is God, and My Father is Yehovah. They are judging in Beersheba. That has been seen to be typologically representative of the tribulation.

The names’ meanings are what would be expected of the tribulation, where Israel will have temple worship once again. Hence, the names are connected to Yehovah. It is a claim that He, not Jesus, is the end of God’s revelation of Himself.

However, Israel, not satisfied with these sons judging, comes to Samuel the Ramah-ward, meaning toward the Lofty Place. As seen in earlier sermons, it is anticipatory of the Lofty Place where believers are placed in Christ, but these sons are not placed there as they are not sons of grace.

This is the typology to be gleaned from the passage. After that, the verses focus on the people’s wanting a king until the end of the chapter.

A broad brushstroke of the history of Israel in relation to the law has been presented based on stories from the final years of the time of the judges. This chapter has been provided as part of a transition into a new era of Israel’s history.

From there, more typological hints of what God is doing in redemptive history can be presented in the ongoing history of Israel. Therefore, Chapter 8 of 1 Samuel begins to provide this necessary link between the two.

And more, it is a chapter that shows us how important it is for the Lord’s people to make themselves intimately familiar with God’s word. If the people knew what the word said and accepted it as God’s word, they would know they already lived under the authority of a King.

They would know that He was with them, judging them through His appointed leaders, and fighting their battles for them. But they may not have even known these things because they didn’t know His word.

It is easy for us to find fault in them for this, but considering that very few copies of the written oracles of God existed at this time, we should rather consider our own position before the Lord. We live in a time where the word is available to almost every person on the planet.

Not only can we get our own hard copy of it for the price of a cup of coffee (or less!), but we can easily access more than fifty versions of it in a mere moment through an internet search. We can study it in our native language, in the original languages, etc.

We don’t need to point our fingers at Israel. The Bible already does that for us. But is it pointing at us, too? Are we being responsible with the greatest of all gifts by storing up the knowledge of it in our minds?

When we face life’s big decisions, are we suitably aware of what the word says to use it to guide what we do? Let us consider this. In coming forward to ask for a king, Israel failed to do so. Let us learn from this and not follow suit as we live our lives before the Lord.

Closing Verse: “But He knows the way that I take;
When He has tested me, I shall come forth as gold.
11 My foot has held fast to His steps;
I have kept His way and not turned aside.
12 I have not departed from the commandment of His lips;
I have treasured the words of His mouth
More than my necessary food.” Job 23:10-12

Next Week: 1 Samuel 9:1-18 He had it all, that was understood… (Saul – Select and Good, Part I) (16th 1 Samuel sermon)

The Lord has you exactly where He wants you. He has a good plan and purpose for you. He is the One who abases the haughty and exalts the humble. He regards the lowly, and the proud He knows from afar. So yield yourself to Him, trust Him, and believe His word. In this, He will do great things for you and through you.

1 Samuel 8 (CG)

And it was according to which he was aged, Samuel, and he set his sons – judging to Israel. 2 And it was, name his son the firstborn, Joel, and name his second Abijah – judging in Beersheba.

3 And not they walked, his sons, in his way, and they stretched after the plunder, and they took donation, and they caused to stretch verdict. 4 And they will gather themselves all aged Israel, and they came unto Samuel the Ramah-ward. 5 And they said unto him, “Behold! You, you were aged, and your sons not they walked in your ways. Now set-ward to us king to judge us according to all the nations.”

6 And it spoiled, the word, in eyes Samuel according to which they said, “Give-ward to us king to judge us.” And he will intercede himself, Samuel, unto Yehovah. 7 And He said, Yehovah, unto Samuel, “Hear in voice the people to all which they will say unto you. For not you they spurned. For Me they spurned from reigning upon them. 8 According to all the actions which they did from day I caused to ascend them from Egypt and until the day, the this, and they loosened Me and they served gods, others. Thus they doing also to you. 9 And now, you must hear in their voice. Surely for causing to testify, you will cause to testify in them, and you will cause to declare to them verdict the king who he will reign upon them.”

10 And he said, Samuel, all words Yehovah unto the people, the ‘askers from him a king.’ 11 And he said, “This, it will be, verdict the king who he will reign upon you: Your sons he will take, and he will set to him in his chariot and in his steeds, and they will run to faces his chariot. 12 And to set to him commanders thousands and commanders fifties, and to plow his ploughing, and to reap his harvest, and to make implements his battle, and implements his chariot. 13 And your daughters he will take to perfumers, and to cooks, and to bakers. 14 And your fields and your vineyards and your olives – the good, he will take and he will give to his servants. 15 And your seed and your vineyards he will tithe, and he will give to his eunuchs and to his servants. 16 And your servants and your maidservants and your selected – the good, and your donkeys, he will take, and he will make to his deputyship. 17 Your flock he will tithe, and you, you will be to him to servants. 18 And you will shriek in the day, the it, from to faces your king whom you selected to you, and no He will answer, Yehovah, you in the day, the it.”

19 And they refused, the people, to hear in voice Samuel. And they said, “No! For lo! King, he will be upon us! 20 And we will be, also we, according to all the nations. And he will judge us, our king, and he will go to our faces and he will battle our battles.”

21 And he heard, Samuel, all words the people, and he spoke them in ears Yehovah. 22 And He said, Yehovah unto Samuel, “Hear in their voice and you will cause to reign to them king.”

And he said, Samuel unto men Israel, “You must walk, man to his city.”

 

1 Samuel 8 (NKJV)

8 Now it came to pass when Samuel was old that he made his sons judges over Israel. The name of his firstborn was Joel, and the name of his second, Abijah; they were judges in Beersheba. But his sons did not walk in his ways; they turned aside after dishonest gain, took bribes, and perverted justice.

Then all the elders of Israel gathered together and came to Samuel at Ramah, and said to him, “Look, you are old, and your sons do not walk in your ways. Now make us a king to judge us like all the nations.”

But the thing displeased Samuel when they said, “Give us a king to judge us.” So Samuel prayed to the Lord. And the Lord said to Samuel, “Heed the voice of the people in all that they say to you; for they have not rejected you, but they have rejected Me, that I should not reign over them. According to all the works which they have done since the day that I brought them up out of Egypt, even to this day—with which they have forsaken Me and served other gods—so they are doing to you also. Now therefore, heed their voice. However, you shall solemnly forewarn them, and show them the behavior of the king who will reign over them.”

10 So Samuel told all the words of the Lord to the people who asked him for a king. 11 And he said, “This will be the behavior of the king who will reign over you: He will take your sons and appoint them for his own chariots and to be his horsemen, and some will run before his chariots. 12 He will appoint captains over his thousands and captains over his fifties, will set some to plow his ground and reap his harvest, and some to make his weapons of war and equipment for his chariots. 13 He will take your daughters to be perfumers, cooks, and bakers. 14 And he will take the best of your fields, your vineyards, and your olive groves, and give them to his servants. 15 He will take a tenth of your grain and your vintage, and give it to his officers and servants. 16 And he will take your male servants, your female servants, your finest young men, and your donkeys, and put them to his work. 17 He will take a tenth of your sheep. And you will be his servants. 18 And you will cry out in that day because of your king whom you have chosen for yourselves, and the Lord will not hear you in that day.”

19 Nevertheless the people refused to obey the voice of Samuel; and they said, “No, but we will have a king over us, 20 that we also may be like all the nations, and that our king may judge us and go out before us and fight our battles.”

21 And Samuel heard all the words of the people, and he repeated them in the hearing of the Lord. 22 So the Lord said to Samuel, “Heed their voice, and make them a king.”

And Samuel said to the men of Israel, “Every man go to his city.”

 

 

1 Samuel 7:10-17 (The Stone of the Helper, Part II)

Artwork by Douglas Kallerson

 

1 Samuel 7:10-17
(The Stone of the Helper, Part II)

 

(Typed 30 July 2025) The verses in this sermon will complete an amazing journey, taking us typologically through dispensations of God’s redemptive plan. They convey truths that are presented logically so that things can be highlighted.

Some details are confusing unless laid out meticulously, but once they are, they resolve all kinds of difficulties that have arisen in the minds of scholars.

The way this is done is similar to many other passages in Scripture. For example, Genesis 1 gave a synopsis of the order of creation. However, there also needed to be a more detailed explanation so that we could understand why things are the way they are.

To do this, God gave us details of the sixth day of creation in Genesis 2, which flows logically into Genesis 3. Similarly, the narrative from the ending of 1 Samuel 3 through the end of 1 Samuel 7 somewhat follows this pattern, but it is a little more complicated.

Once you see how everything is presented, though, you will have a better understanding of why it was presented this way. It is orderly, fills in many necessary details, and allows us to see into the future concerning what God is doing.

Text Verse: “Let your conduct be without covetousness; be content with such things as you have. For He Himself has said, ‘I will never leave you nor forsake you.’ So we may boldly say:
‘The Lord is my helper;
I will not fear.
What can man do to me?’” Hebrews 13:5, 6

The Hebrew words even ha’ezer mean Stone the Helper. The word even, stone, is used to describe the Lord at times, such as Genesis 49:24, where He is called the Stone of Israel. The Lord is called our Help or Helper in both testaments of the Bible.

One is a concrete image, the Stone. If someone asks you to describe the Lord in your life, you might say, “He is my Stone of Permanency.” People would understand that you mean an immovable stone.

The other is less concrete. If you ask someone to close his eyes and think of the Lord as his Helper, he might think of Him reaching down and grabbing him as he was drowning or boosting him over a wall he couldn’t quite scale. That, however, describes His actions, rather than an image of who He is.

Both types of thinking are helpful in grasping who the Lord is, because at times, understanding who He is relies on knowing what He does, what His thought process is like, or what His innate attributes are. He Helps. He is like a Stone. He is immortal. Each of these is a different aspect of how God is portrayed in the Bible.

Pay attention to these things. Revel in what you contemplate. And hold fast to such truths. As you go through life, you will need to consider the various presentations of God based on whatever situation you may be in or in how you are called to present Him for others to understand.

Such great truths as these are to be found in His superior word. And so, let us turn to that precious word once again, and… May God speak to us through His word today, and may His glorious name ever be praised.

I. Stone the Helper (verses 10-12)

10 Now as Samuel was offering up the burnt offering, the Philistines drew near to battle against Israel.

vayhi shemuel maaleh ha’olah u-phelishtim nigeshu lamilkhamah beyisrael – “And it was, Samuel causing to ascend the burnt offering, and Philistines they were approached to the battle in Israel.” This verse explains and expands upon what was said in the previous verse –

“And he took, Samuel, lamb – milk, one. And he caused to ascend burnt offering, whole, to Yehovah. And he shrieked, Samuel, unto Yehovah for Israel. And He answered him, Yehovah.” 1 Samuel 7:9

While the Philistines were approaching, Samuel offered the lamb and called out to the Lord for deliverance. Yehovah responded. That is explained in the next words…

10 (con’t) But the Lord thundered with a loud thunder upon the Philistines that day,

vayarem Yehovah beqol gadol bayom ha’hu al pelishtim – “And He caused to tumble, Yehovah, in voice great in the day, the it, upon Philistines.” This is the same word introduced in 1 Samuel 1:6 when Peninnah would vex Hannah, mocking her because of her barren womb. It signifies to tumble, meaning to violently agitate.

Likewise, it was used again in Hannah’s prayer, pretty much describing what is happening in this verse –

Yehovah:
They will sink – He causing to grapple upon Him.
In the heavens – may He cause to tumble [raam].
Yehovah:
He will judge extremity earth,
And He will give strength to His King,
And may He cause to rise horn His Messiah.” 1 Samuel 2:10

Saying He thundered assumes that He did this actively, like with a storm or other elements to confuse the Philistines. It may be that this occurred through the heat of battle. However the Lord tumbled the Philistines, His actions were effective…

10 (con’t) and so confused them that they were overcome before Israel.

vayhumem vayinagephu lipne Yisrael – “And He confused them, and they were smitten to faces Israel.” The word hamam is used. It has been seen at other times during great battles or events. It is derived from hum, to make an uproar. Thus, it is an onomatopoetic word referring to the loud hum of battle.

In this case, it is the Philistines who are confused and disorganized through the resounding voice, the hamam, of the Lord. Because of the great confusion of the Philistines, Israel seized the initiative…

11 And the men of Israel went out of Mizpah and pursued the Philistines,

vayetseu anshe Yisrael min ha’mitspah vayirdephu eth pelishtim – “And they went, men Israel, from the Mizpah, and they pursued Philistines.” Israel saw that the line of the Philistines had been broken. Therefore, leaving The Watchtower, they chased after them. As they did…

11 (con’t) and drove them back as far as below Beth Car.

vayakum ad mitakhath leveith kar – “And they struck them until from under to Beth Car.” This is the only mention of Beth Car in Scripture. Its location is unknown, but saying “from under to Beth Car” seems to indicate that it was on a hill above the path of flight used by the Philistines.

The meaning of the name is debated. The word kar has various meanings, including a type of domesticated animal, like a lamb, a battering ram, a pasture, or even a camel’s saddle. It is derived from the verb karar, to dance, but more specifically to twirl, found only in 2 Samuel 6.

Each of the meanings of kar gives the sense of accumulation, as in something circular that amasses as the circle is formed. The name is thus variously defined as House of a Lamb, House of Battering Rams, etc. Abarim goes to the source verb and says House of Accumulation. More simply, it could mean House of Twirling, as in forming a circular motion.

Because of the rout, it next says…

12 Then Samuel took a stone and set it up between Mizpah and Shen,

vayiqakh shemuel even akhath vayasem ben ha’mitspah u-ven ha’shen – “And he took, Samuel, stone one, and he put between the Mizpah and between the Shen.” Samuel set up a commemorative stone because of the events that took place. The location is between The Watchtower and The Shen, a place only mentioned here. Shen is identical to shen, a tooth. Thus, it literally means The Tooth.

The word shen is derived from shanan, to whet or sharpen. Intransitively, it means to pierce. In Deuteronomy 6:7, it is used to indicate the inculcation of instruction, as in “teach diligently,” but that is more of a paraphrase.

The idea in that verse of Deuteronomy is inculcating the commands into the children, but by using this word, it includes the idea of sharpness. It is as if the process of instilling the commands is so personal that the parent is cutting into the child and inscribing them into his heart and mind.

To get the sense, the word is used in Psalm 73:21 –

When my heart was embittered,
And I was pierced [shanan] within. Psalm 73:21 (NAS)

This was the responsibility of the parents, inscribing the commands of the law in the children. Paul uses a similar thought in Ephesians –

“And you, fathers, do not provoke your children to wrath, but bring them up in the training and admonition of the Lord.” Ephesians 6:4

This place, The Shen, was probably a pointed rock that stood out prominently like a tooth. As for the stone Samuel set up…

12 (con’t) and called its name Ebenezer, saying, “Thus far the Lord has helped us.”

There is an article which defines the stone: vayiqra eth shemah even ha’azer vayomar ad henah azaranu Yehovah – “and he called its name Stone the Helper. And he said, ‘Until hither He helped us, Yehovah.’” The stone is named Ezer, Helper. This is where it is named, but it was referred to in verse 4:1, anticipating this event –

“And he went out, Israel, to encounter Philistines to the battle. And they inclined upon the stone, the Ezer.” 1 Samuel 4:1

The use of two articles, the stone, the Ezer, shows that it was named previously. Samuel named it here in Chapter 7, but as it is referred to in Chapter 4, it shows that the narrative there was an insert. If you recall, the first words of Chapter 4 merged with the words of verse 7:3.

As an example, there is the story of Joseph being sold off to Egypt by his brothers in Genesis 37. Then the story of Judah and Tamar comprises Genesis 38. The narrative then returns to the life of Joseph in Egypt in Genesis 39.

Information needs to be inserted somewhere to explain events as they occur and which bear on redemptive history. Israel rejected the Lord after Jesus completed His work. The information about that and about what happened until the time Israel will accept Jesus in the future has been inserted between the opening clause of 4:1 until 7:3.

At verse 7:3, the narrative about Israel interacting with Samuel resumed. This will be explained more fully as the verses are evaluated. For now…

A twirling has taken place
It is recorded in a book
In it, you will find God’s face
Open it up and take a look

A story was compiled for us
Leading us from one point and back again
The word is about our Lord Jesus
He is the Redeemer, the Savior of men

Be sure to see how it is laid out
Look into it and see what has been amassed
The details will make you whoop and shout
Yes, its contents are an amazing blast

II. And He Judged Israel (verses 13-17)

13 So the Philistines were subdued, and they did not come anymore into the territory of Israel.

vayikaneu ha’pelishtim velo yasephu od labo bigvul Yisrael – “And they were humbled, Philistines, and not they added again to come in border Israel.” As noted in 1 Samuel 4:1, it is possible that this statement aligns with Judges 13:1 –

“Again the children of Israel did evil in the sight of the Lord, and the Lord delivered them into the hand of the Philistines for forty years.”

The narrative of Samson went through Judges 16. After his time, the Philistines continued to come into the borders of Israel until this point of Samuel’s time of judging. The statement is given as a fact. The Philistines were humbled, and after this, they no longer came across Israel’s border.

These words are not contradictory to what is next said, nor of verse 15…

13 (con’t) And the hand of the Lord was against the Philistines all the days of Samuel.

vatehi yad Yehovah ba’pelishtim kol yeme shemuel – “And it was, hand Yehovah, in the Philistines all days Samuel.” The “days Samuel” are interpreted by some scholars as the time of his judging Israel until the time when Saul became king. This is incorrect.

Verse 7:15 will say that Samuel judged Israel for his entire life. That would be inclusive of the time after Saul was anointed. There continued to be engagements with the Philistines during Saul’s time and into the time of David.

The words don’t mean that there were no battles with the Philistines. Rather, the Lord was against the Philistines all the days of Samuel, including when they warred against Israel. Embraced in this…

14 Then the cities which the Philistines had taken from Israel were restored to Israel, from Ekron to Gath;

vatashovenah hearim asher laqekhu phelishtim meeth Yisrael leYisrael meeqron vead gath veeth gevulan – “And they returned, the cities – which they took, Philistines, from Israel – to Israel, from Ekron and until Gath and their border.” This does not mean that Ekron and Gath were returned to Israel.

The word “from” appears to mean that there were cities in Israel that had been taken by the Philistines. These cities, up to the borders of Ekron and Gath, were restored to Israel.

Ekron comes from aqar, to pluck up or uproot. But that is from the same as eqer, an offshoot or descendant. Hence, the name could mean either Offshoot or Uprooted. Gath means Winepress.

The restoration of the cities and land next continues to be explained…

14 (con’t) and Israel recovered its territory from the hands of the Philistines.

hitsil Yisrael miyad pelishtim – “He caused to snatch, Israel, from hand Philistines.” Israel was able to reacquire all that was lost to the Philistines as they continued pushing back the Philistines to the borders of Ekron and Gath.

14 (con’t) Also there was peace between Israel and the Amorites.

vayhi shalom ben Yisrael u’ven ha’emori – “And it was peace between Israel and between the Amorite.” The Amorite is only mentioned in this verse in 1 Samuel. At times, like the word Canaanite, it is a general term for the inhabitants of the land. That is probably the intent here. A similar use was seen in Judges 6:10.

Though the statement may indicate that this peace resulted from the Amorites seeing the defeat of the Philistines and not wanting to be subdued in a similar manner, it may simply be a way of saying that not only were the Philistines no longer a threat, but there was no threat from the other inhabitants as well.

The latter seems likely because nothing has been said about them since Judges 11. Therefore, the statement would essentially mean, “Israel found peace throughout all its territory.”

Amorite means Renown.

15 And Samuel judged Israel all the days of his life.

vayishpot shemuel eth Yisrael kol yeme khaiyav – “And he judged, Samuel, Israel all days his livings.” This is a clear indication that even though Saul will be anointed and reign as king, Samuel will continue to judge Israel. This included judging Saul, as will be seen in his future interactions with him.

Therefore, it can be assumed that until the death of Samuel, the king held a military authority while Samuel continued as the highest judicial authority. He also served as prophet and even conducted mediatorial duties. Only after his death would these offices be separately and more precisely defined.

16 He went from year to year on a circuit to Bethel, Gilgal, and Mizpah,

v’halakh mide shanah beshanah vesavav beith el vehagilgal veha’mitspah – “And he walked from day year in year, and he revolved – Bethel and the Gilgal and the Mizpah.” The NKJV appears to be a proper paraphrase of the intent of the Hebrew. Each year at a set time, Samuel would head out on a circuit to each of these locations in order to judge the people.

Bethel means House of God. It is certain that this location is the city known as Bethel in the territory of Benjamin, the same spot which was visited by Jacob as he fled from Esau. There is no reason to assume it is referring to the place where the ark was, which would make it the “house of God” rather than Bethel.

Gilgal is from the same as gilgal, wheel. It signifies a circle, generally of stones. There are many such circles still in Israel today. There are three locations with this name in the Bible, but it is likely this is the spot referred to in Joshua, where Israel first set up camp after crossing the Jordan.

The name literally means The Wheel or The Rolling Away, but due to the Lord’s proclamation in Joshua 5, it metaphorically and typologically means The Liberty –

“Then the Lord said to Joshua, ‘This day I have rolled away the reproach of Egypt from you.’ Therefore the name of the place is called Gilgal to this day.” Joshua 5:9

As seen earlier, the Mizpah means The Watchtower. This is likely the Mizpah located in the land of Benjamin as well.

From year to year, Samuel would go to these three places on a circuit…

16 (con’t) and judged Israel in all those places.

veshaphat eth Yisrael eth kal hameqomoth ha’eleh – “And he judged Israel all the spots, the these.” The locations were suitable for people to easily come and receive his judgments. They are, however, located in a more southerly area of the land of Israel. Thus, his judging was rather localized, as was the case with the other judges.

17 But he always returned to Ramah, for his home was there.

utheshuvato ha’ramathah ki sham beito – “And his recurrence the Ramah-ward. For there his house.” In the first clause, there is a new word, teshuvah. It signifies a recurrence. This can be either in location or time. In Job 21, it even signifies the repetition of responses in a conversation.

In this case, it means that after going to judge each town in his circuit, he would head home toward Ramah, the place where his house was. This was where his father was from, also called Ramathaim Zophim in 1 Samuel 1:1.

The Ramah means The Height or The Lofty Place. As with the other three locations…

17 (con’t) There he judged Israel,

vesham shaphat eth Yisrael – “And there, he judged Israel.” As such, Samuel judged Israel in four locations, but mainly from his home in Ramah. Also…

*17 (fin) and there he built an altar to the Lord.

vayiven sham mizbeakh leYehovah – “And he built there altar to Yehovah.” At some point, Shiloh stopped being the place where the tabernacle was located. It could be that when the Philistines took the ark, Shiloh fell into disuse.

It doesn’t seem likely that it was destroyed by the Philistines because that is where Eli and his family were. Nothing is said of the Philistines destroying it. Whatever the case was with the tabernacle, the ark rested in Kiriath Jearim.

Despite the lack of information, we have this note concerning Samuel building an altar. This would have been constructed according to the law of the altar given in Exodus 20 –

“Then the Lord said to Moses, ‘Thus you shall say to the children of Israel: “You have seen that I have talked with you from heaven. 23 You shall not make anything to be with Me—gods of silver or gods of gold you shall not make for yourselves. 24 An altar of earth you shall make for Me, and you shall sacrifice on it your burnt offerings and your peace offerings, your sheep and your oxen. In every place where I record My name I will come to you, and I will bless you. 25 And if you make Me an altar of stone, you shall not build it of hewn stone; for if you use your tool on it, you have profaned it. 26 Nor shall you go up by steps to My altar, that your nakedness may not be exposed on it.”’” Exodus 20:22-26

With the verses complete, we can now look at why the Lord included the details of this chapter…

The time is yet ahead
When they shall know their Lord
No longer in their sins, dead
This is revealed in the word

Their history has been troubled
Because they didn’t know the Lord
At times, their punishment was doubled
Because they failed to heed the word

But a time lies ahead for Israel
When this will be forever ended
What a glorious story to tell
When their relationship with the Lord is mended

III. Pictures of Christ

Chapter 6 detailed the catastrophe of what occurred at Beth Shemesh, where the people looked into the Ark, and the Lord struck fifty thousand and seventy men of the people. That was explained as pointing to the period of time when Israel would suffer the punishment of “looking at the law” without the atoning blood of Christ.

In other words, Israel rejected the lesson of the Weakeners that was provided in the previous account, assumed that they were acceptable to God through the Law of Moses, and rejected the atonement that only Jesus can provide.

The ark was typologically given to prefigure Jesus. He is the One who embodies the law. The blood sprinkled on the mercy seat, anticipating His shed blood, is what protects believers from the consequences of law violation

Because of what happened, messengers were sent to Kirjath Jearim, telling them to come down and take it with them. It formed a picture of Jesus having been rejected by Israel. The picture is that of the church being offered Christ as its Head.

Chapter 7 began with the men of Kirjath Jearim taking the ark. It signifies the acceptance of Jesus’ work by the church. The ark was taken to the house of Abinadab in the hill. Abinadab, Father of Liberality, is a reference to the willing and generous nature of the Father to share the work of His Son with all –

“For the Scripture says, ‘Whoever believes on Him will not be put to shame.’ 12 For there is no distinction between Jew and Greek, for the same Lord over all is rich to all who call upon Him. 13 For ‘whoever calls on the name of the Lord shall be saved.’” Romans 10:11-13

Saying Abinadab’s house was “in the hill” is a way of tying this generosity to Christ’s cross. The word givah, hill, is identical to givah, Gibeah. Both are etymologically connected to Gabbatha. It was used many times in Judges as a typological representation of Christ’s work, culminating in His judgment and cross.

The liberality of this extends to the liberality of what results from accepting it –

“Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who has blessed us with every spiritual blessing in the heavenly places in Christ, just as He chose us in Him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before Him in love, having predestined us to adoption as sons by Jesus Christ to Himself, according to the good pleasure of His will, to the praise of the glory of His grace, by which He made us accepted in the Beloved.” Ephesians 1:3-6

Verse 1 continued with the words, “And Eleazar, his son, they will consecrate to guard Ark Yehovah.” Eleazar means Whom God Helps. In the final Judges 20 sermon, a person with the same name pictured Jesus the High Priest. The symbolism remains the same here. It is exactingly reflected in the words of Hebrews –

“As He also says in another place:
‘You are a priest forever
According to the order of Melchizedek’;
who, in the days of His flesh, when He had offered up prayers and supplications, with vehement cries and tears to Him who was able to save Him from death, and was heard because of His godly fear, though He was a Son, yet He learned obedience by the things which He suffered. And having been perfected, He became the author of eternal salvation to all who obey Him, 10 called by God as High Priest “according to the order of Melchizedek.” Hebrews 5:6-10

Verse 2 said that the days the ark was there increased. It is a way of saying, “a long time.” That is a great description of the church age while Israel remains under punishment and without the Lord.

The noted time period, twenty years, wasn’t the time the ark was at this location, but the time that “groaned, all house Israel, after Yehovah.” It was during this period that the state of Israel was described by the Pulpit Commentary.

They were merely commenting on what those twenty years would have been like, but listen to their words again and think of the state of Israel for the past two thousand years. What they say could not better describe Israel’s situation –

“The words dwell wearily upon the length of this mournful period, during which Israel was in a state of subjection to the Philistines, with its national life crushed to the ground, and its strength wasted by unjust exactions and misrule. For though the Philistines gave up the ark, there was no restoration of the national worship, nor did they abandon the political fruits of their victory at Eben-ezer. But quietly and calmly Samuel was labouring to put all things right. It was the principle of the theocracy that Jehovah punished his subjects for their sins by withdrawing his protection, and that on their repentance he took again his place at their head as their king, and delivered them.” Pulpit Commentary

The spiritual meaning of twenty in the Bible is expectancy. It is an exact description of Israel’s past two thousand years. They have held fast to the idea of the coming Messiah this whole time, not realizing they missed Him when He came. And so, they remain lamenting after the Lord until this day.

The narrative completely changed direction in verse 3. But to understand the flow of the book, we have to go back and revisit the end of Chapter 3, where I promised to explain how it all fits together.

The narrative of Eli ended in Chapter 3 with verse 18. From there, three points of fact about Samuel were introduced. After that, Chapter 4 began with a single clause about Samuel and then went back to the narrative beginning with the ark being captured. That goes from 4:1b until 7:2. As such, the words form a long parenthetical insert, ending with the church age (verses 7:1, 2).

The church age ends with the rapture. It is at that time that the narrative that began in 3:19 resumes. 3:19-21 provided information about Samuel, which takes place after the church age –

Points of fact concerning Samuel:
3:19 And he will grow, Samuel. And Yehovah, He was with him. And not he caused to fall from all His words, ground-ward. 20 And it will know, all Israel, from Dan and until Beer-Sheba, for being faithful, Samuel, to prophet to Yehovah. 21 And He will cause to add, Yehovah, to be seen in Shiloh. For He was denuded, Yehovah, unto Samuel in Shilo in word Yehovah.

The meaning is that Samuel, Asked from God and signifying the seed of grace (Christ and those in Him), will eventually be recognized by all of Israel. The words from Dan to Beersheba speak of the totality of Israel, just as in Judges 20.

Because this comes after the rapture, it is inclusive of the tribulation period. Dan represents the time of and after the rapture, something hinted at by James 5:9, where he says the Judge stands at the door. Beersheba refers to the seven years of the tribulation initiated by the antichrist, as was the case in the story of Genesis 26 and Judges 20.

During this period, Yehovah “will cause to add” to be seen in Shiloh (Tranquility), meaning the state of those who have come to Christ. This is because the Lord revealed (denuded) Himself unto the seed of grace in Shilo (the time before the giving of the Spirit, indicated by the missing letter hey (h) on Shiloh during the tribulation. That is what the state of being under the law is: a time lacking grace.

It is at that time that the words of 7:3 resume the narrative. The details of 4:1b to 7:2 had to be stated somewhere. Looking at it in this manner exactingly resolves all of the seeming conflicts and contradictions referred to by scholars throughout the centuries.

Verse 7:3, after reintroducing Samuel, then went on to say, “If in all your heart you returning unto Yehovah, you must cause to turn aside gods the foreign from your midst, and the Ashtaroth. And you must cause to erect your heart unto Yehovah. And you must serve Him to His separation. And may He cause to snatch away, you, from hand Philistines.”

According to the dispensational model, this is just what is expected to happen at the end of the tribulation. Remember the meaning of Ashtaroth! One Law. Israel is being told to have no other gods (something they have a lot of now) and to remove the ONE LAW!

Jesus fulfilled the law. It is not what God wants for Israel. Rejecting Jesus and sticking to Moses is exactly what caused all of their troubles for the past two millennia. Instead, they are collectively told to “erect your heart unto Yehovah. And you must serve Him to His separation.” It is Jesus Christ, plus nothing, to whom they are to direct their hearts!

In doing that, Israel will be saved from the hand of the Weakeners. Verse 4 said this is just what they did. In verse 5, they were told to gather at the Mizpah. As in Judges, Mizpah signifies that the Lord is watching over the process of what transpires.

There, Israel gathered and poured out water before the Lord and fasted. It is the national contrition referred to, particularly in the book of Zechariah where the people will acknowledge their sin before the Lord.

“And I will pour on the house of David and on the inhabitants of Jerusalem the Spirit of grace and supplication; then they will look on Me whom they pierced. Yes, they will mourn for Him as one mourns for his only son, and grieve for Him as one grieves for a firstborn. 11 In that day there shall be a great mourning in Jerusalem, like the mourning at Hadad Rimmon in the plain of Megiddo.” Zechariah 12:10, 11

Verse 6 ended with the words that Samuel judged the sons of Israel in the Mizpah. It is also just what will occur at this time according to the dispensational model. Naturally, there will be an upheaval at this time when the Weakeners, those who refuse to come to Christ and insist on law observance, will come against those who have received Christ. That is reflected in verses 7 and 8.

Because of this, it says that Samuel took a lamb – milk one, and offered it. This type of lamb is noted only here and in Isaiah 65:25. It signifies one that is spotted. The word comes from tala, to patch or cover with pieces. That word was used six times in Genesis 30 when referring to the spotting of Jacob’s flocks.

That was a picture of the growth of the church based on Paul’s epistles, which detail the work of Christ. This is the same thought here. Paul’s letters will be accepted by Israel, and his words will be returned in their hearts as an offering to God. The fact that it is a milking lamb signifies acceptance of the milk of the word as well.

In accepting the full revelation of the word, last week’s sermon ended with, “And He answered him, Yehovah.” The Lord will accept those who accept Him. Because of this, verse 10 began the verses today noting that Yehovah caused to tumble upon the Philistines, the Weakeners.

The meaning is that this unsound doctrine is rejected by the Lord and will be overthrown. Israel then chased after them and drove them back to Beth Car, House of Twirling. It signifies a circular motion while accumulating. It is the same symbolism as the agalah, the cart, of Chapter 6. It refers to the circular nature of the Bible.

As it turned in redemptive history, it accumulated, book after book, until it returned to its beginning. The idea is “The detailed record, from paradise to paradise.”

With this victory, it next said in verse 12, “And he took, Samuel, stone one, and he put between the Mizpah and between the Shen.” The meaning of Shen is Tooth, but that is derived from shanan, to whet or sharpen. Intransitively, it means to pierce.

It is a noun, thus indicating to sharpen, to pierce, and to inculcate through instruction. All three thoughts coalesce in one verse in Scripture when referring to… Scripture –

“For the word of God is living and powerful, and sharper than any two-edged sword, piercing even to the division of soul and spirit, and of joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart.” Hebrews 4:12

Understanding this, verse 12 continued with Samuel calling the stone Stone the Helper, saying, “Until hither He helped us, Yehovah.” A truer statement could not be said of Israel at the end of the tribulation period. From beginning to end, He has been their Stone, the Helper, even when they failed to recognize it.

Verse 13 noted that the Philistines (Weakeners) did not come again into the border of Israel. Adam Clarke, who almost wholly dismisses typology as a biblical doctrine, commented on this verse. Despite not believing in any future typological pictures, his words perfectly match the state of Israel at that time –

“They came no more into the coast of Israel – Perhaps a more signal victory was never gained by Israel; the Lord had brought them low, almost to extermination; and now, by his miraculous interference, he lifts them completely up, and humbles to the dust their proud oppressors. God often suffers nations and individuals to be brought to the lowest extremity, that he may show his mercy and goodness by suddenly rescuing them from destruction, when all human help has most evidently failed.” Adam Clarke

For Israel, it is the end of the nightmare of law observance being shoved down their throat since its fulfillment by Christ. The Lord will stand against it as long as the seed of Grace, pictured by Samuel, continues.

Verse 14 noted the returned cities from Ekron to Gath. Ekron means Uprooted and Offshoot. It is a double entendre. Those who remain under law observance will be uprooted, but those who acknowledge Christ alone will have their sins uprooted. They will be the offshoot of their response to the law or the Lord.

Gath signifies Winepress. It refers to the judgment at the end of the tribulation period. All that belongs to Israel on that day, as promised in the prophets, will once again be restored to them in preparation for the millennium. Verse 14 also mentioned peace between Israel and the Amorite, Renown.

As seen in Judges 1, the name can be used positively about believers or negatively about nonbelievers. In this case, it is referring to those who have their renown because of Christ. All believers will be in a state of peace at that time.

Verse 16 noted that Samuel judged Israel all the days of his life, going from Bethel (House of God) to the Gilgal (The Liberty) to the Mizpah (The Watchtower). It is reflective of the all-encompassing work of Christ from heaven, in freedom from law, and with the supervision of God over His people.

Verse 17 finished with the note concerning Samuel returning Ramah-ward where his house is. From there, he judged Israel, and it is where he built an altar.

The Ramah is The Height (meaning The Lofty Place). As in previous sermons, it signifies the position the Lord places believers because of their faith in Him. Building an altar there is a picture of the Lord Jesus in His humanity.

To understand the significance, you are encouraged to go back and watch the Exodus 20:18-26 sermon entitled “The Earthen Altar” –big fun for you tonight. It is an exceptionally fitting end to the chapter, highlighting the humanity of the Lord Jesus who took on the sin of the world to redeem fallen man. Israel will finally understand this someday and call out to Him for salvation.

With these verses complete, a snapshot of Israel’s history, which also typologically concerns the relationship of the Lord and the church during this dispensation, has been presented. These chapters have set forth propositions that need to be understood. They have set forth truths which are to be believed. And they have repeatedly revealed the problem with law and our need for grace.

From here, 1 Samuel will develop in dispensational theology. It was necessary that these points be presented for a fuller and more complete understanding of what God is doing in redemptive history. There has been enough overlap with other such accounts to ensure we know the accuracy of what has been presented.

And yet, there has been enough new information to continue to instruct us on what God is doing and why. Above all, the message of Jesus’ work and His fulfillment of the law is on prominent display. Please learn the lesson of law versus grace.

One will lead to alienation, the other to salvation. Hold fast to the grace of God which is found in Jesus Christ our Lord. This is what will bring you to a state of harmony with God once again.

Closing Verse: “We then, as workers together with Him also plead with you not to receive the grace of God in vain. For He says:
‘In an acceptable time I have heard you,
And in the day of salvation I have helped you.’
Behold, now is the accepted time; behold, now is the day of salvation.” 2 Corinthians 6:1, 2

Next Week: 1 Samuel 8:1-22 Until it is done, we will from verse to verse leaple… (Hear the Voice of the People) (15th 1 Samuel Sermon)

The Lord has you exactly where He wants you. He has a good plan and purpose for you. He is the One who abases the haughty and exalts the humble. He regards the lowly, and the proud He knows from afar. So yield yourself to Him, trust Him, and believe His word. In this, He will do great things for you and through you.

1 Samuel 7:10-17 (CG)

10 And it was, Samuel causing to ascend the burnt offering, and Philistines they were approached to the battle in Israel. And He caused to tumble, Yehovah, in voice great in the day, the it, upon Philistines. And He confused them, and they were smitten to faces Israel. 11 And they went, men Israel, from the Mizpah, and they pursued Philistines. And they struck them until from under to Beth Car. 12 And he took, Samuel, stone one, and he put between the Mizpah and between the Shen, and he called its name Stone the Helper. And he said, “Until hither He helped us, Yehovah.”

13 And they were humbled, Philistines, and not they added again to come in border Israel. And it was, hand Yehovah, in the Philistines all days Samuel. 14 And they returned, the cities – which they took, Philistines, from Israel – to Israel, from Ekron and until Gath and their border. He caused to snatch, Israel, from hand Philistines. And it was peace between Israel and between the Amorite.

15 And he judged, Samuel, Israel all days his livings. 16 And he walked from day year in year, and he revolved – Bethel and the Gilgal and the Mizpah. And he judged Israel all the spots, the these. 17 And his recurrence the Ramah-ward. For there his house. And there, he judged Israel. And he built there altar to Yehovah.

 

1 Samuel 7:10-17 (NKJV)

10 Now as Samuel was offering up the burnt offering, the Philistines drew near to battle against Israel. But the Lord thundered with a loud thunder upon the Philistines that day, and so confused them that they were overcome before Israel. 11 And the men of Israel went out of Mizpah and pursued the Philistines, and drove them back as far as below Beth Car. 12 Then Samuel took a stone and set it up between Mizpah and Shen, and called its name Ebenezer, saying, “Thus far the Lord has helped us.”

13 So the Philistines were subdued, and they did not come anymore into the territory of Israel. And the hand of the Lord was against the Philistines all the days of Samuel. 14 Then the cities which the Philistines had taken from Israel were restored to Israel, from Ekron to Gath; and Israel recovered its territory from the hands of the Philistines. Also there was peace between Israel and the Amorites.

15 And Samuel judged Israel all the days of his life. 16 He went from year to year on a circuit to Bethel, Gilgal, and Mizpah, and judged Israel in all those places. 17 But he always returned to Ramah, for his home was there. There he judged Israel, and there he built an altar to the Lord.

 

1 Samuel 7:1-9 (The Stone of the Helper, Part I)

Artwork by Douglas Kallerson

1 Samuel 7:1-9
The Stone of the Helper, Part I

(Typed 23 July 2025) In the account today, there are things that don’t seem to make sense to scholars. In fact, some find them completely inexplicable. Because of this, a multitude of explanations have arisen to try to make sense of what is being said.

John Lange gives a lengthy commentary on the matter, citing other scholars and explaining their views. His commentary is long and complicated, and I will explain it as simply as possible.

What he writes is worth reading, but his conclusions are incorrect. The other scholars he cites know there is a problem with the information as given, and they come up with various explanations, which are also incorrect. I am assuming that what I propose is correct.

If that is the case, what would be the reason that these great scholars have not figured out how to reconcile the narrative, which is obviously confusing and which doesn’t logically flow as it is presented in the narrative?

Text Verse: “Behold, we heard of it in Ephrathah;
We found it in the fields of the woods.
Let us go into His tabernacle;
Let us worship at His footstool.
Arise, O Lord, to Your resting place,
You and the ark of Your strength.” Psalm 132:6-8

The words of the text verse refer to the ark. The psalm saying, “We found it in the fields of the woods” is a reference to where it is now in the Samuel narrative, Kirjath Jearim. The psalmist was remembering the time when David had the ark moved from there.

The reason the scholars cannot figure out why the text is the way it is and how to reconcile its peculiarities is that they are not looking for Jesus. None of their analyses attempts to fit Him into the picture. Instead, they are looking at the account as literal history (which it is) and attempting to analyze it solely from that perspective.

But as I have said many times, there are innumerable things that happened in Israel that are not recorded. Despite all of the history that occurred there, God chose only a few stories, and the word doesn’t tell us why this story was chosen while that one wasn’t.

Wait. Yes, it does. Luke 24:27 says concerning Jesus, “And beginning at Moses and all the Prophets, He expounded to them in all the Scriptures the things concerning Himself.” Jesus, in John 5:39, says, “You search the Scriptures, for in them you think you have eternal life; and these are they which testify of Me.” Paul, speaking of the account of Sarah and Hagar said, “which things are symbolic” (Galatians 4:24).

God selected real events before and during Israel’s history so that we could understand Jesus, future history in relation to Jesus, etc. Unless we stand back and look at these stories as typological representations, we will not be able to understand why the text is often so complicated.

This is why translators often change what the text is saying. Most don’t do so with malicious intent, but they feel that what is literally stated is incomprehensible. Only when thinking about what is going on from a greater perspective, meaning what God is telling us about Jesus and what is going on in redemptive history, will we find that what was seemingly incomprehensible is actually reasonable.

In Chapters 3 and 4, I made some assumptions about what is presented here in Chapter 7. At the time, it was guesswork because I had not evaluated what was said here. Were my suppositions correct? You can decide after hearing the explanation of Chapter 7.

That starts in just seconds. Great things are to be found in His superior word. And so, let us turn to that precious word once again, and… May God speak to us through His word today, and may His glorious name ever be praised.

I. And They Served Yehovah (verses 1-4)

Then the men of Kirjath Jearim came and took the ark of the Lord,

vayavou anshe qiryath yearim vayaalu eth aron Yehovah – “And they came, men Kirjath Jearim, and they caused to ascend Ark Yehovah.” Kirjath Jearim was mentioned in the previous chapter. After the people of Beth Shemesh looked into the ark, the Lord struck them greatly. Because of that, Chapter 6 closes out saying –

“And the men of Beth Shemesh said, ‘Who is able to stand before this holy Lord God? And to whom shall it go up from us?’ 21 So they sent messengers to the inhabitants of Kirjath Jearim, saying, ‘The Philistines have brought back the ark of the Lord; come down and take it up with you.’” 1 Samuel 6:20, 21

The narrative continues as the men who were summoned from Kirjath Jearim come and accept the Ark of Yehovah as petitioned. As noted, Kirjath Jearim means City of Forests or City of Honeycombs. With the ark in their possession, it next says…

1 (con’t) and brought it into the house of Abinadab on the hill,

vayaviu otho el beith avinadav bagivah – “And they caused to bring it unto house Abinadab in the hill.” The glaring omission of what tribe Abinadab belonged to is purposeful. Scholars insist he must have been from the tribe of Levi, or it “would be a gross violation of the Law” (Barnes, et al.).

It is irrelevant what tribe he belonged to. Not naming his tribe is purposeful. Abinadab comes from av, father, and nadav, willing, as in “willing to share,” generous, etc. As such, it means something like My Father is Generous, Father of Liberality, etc.

As for the location of the house, it says bagivah. The meaning is either “in the hill” or “in the Gibeah.” The latter was proposed by the Coverdale Bible of 1535. One Catholic version also uses that.

Either way, the word givah, hill, is etymologically connected to Gabbatha. It was typologically used in this manner on several occasions in the book of Judges. With the ark brought to this house in this location, it next says…

1 (con’t) and consecrated Eleazar his son to keep the ark of the Lord.

veeth Eleazar beno qideshu lishmor eth aron Yehovah – “And Eleazar, his son, they will consecrate to guard Ark Yehovah.”  Bucking against most others, the JFB Commentary says, “He was not a Levite, and was therefore only set apart or appointed to be keeper of the place.”

They may be right, but as noted above, what tribe they belonged to is purposefully left out of the narrative. All it says is that this son of Abinadab was consecrated to guard the ark. Eleazer means Whom God Helps.

So it was that the ark remained in Kirjath Jearim a long time;

The expression is unusual: vayhi miyom sheveth ha’aron beqiryath yearim vayirbu ha’yamim – “And it was from day dwelling the ark in Kirjath Jearim, and they increased – the days.” The ark was taken from Israel’s open possession, and the days it was gone were purposefully increased, each being added with no known time when the cycle would end.

Of this time, and without making any typological connections to its significance, the Pulpit Commentary says the following –

“The words dwell wearily upon the length of this mournful period, during which Israel was in a state of subjection to the Philistines, with its national life crushed to the ground, and its strength wasted by unjust exactions and misrule. For though the Philistines gave up the ark, there was no restoration of the national worship, nor did they abandon the political fruits of their victory at Eben-ezer. But quietly and calmly Samuel was labouring to put all things right. It was the principle of the theocracy that Jehovah punished his subjects for their sins by withdrawing his protection, and that on their repentance he took again his place at their head as their king, and delivered them.” Pulpit Commentary

Despite not making any typological connections, their words exactingly reflect the typological future being hinted at. As for the ark’s stay at this location…

2 (con’t) it was there twenty years.

The NKJV inserts the word “there” without italicizing it. The word does not belong. Further, the subject is not the ark but the number of days. The verb is masculine plural, corresponding to the word “days”: vayihyu esrim shanah “And they were twenty years.”

This clause does not describe the amount of time the ark is at the house of Abinadab. This is proven from 2 Samuel 6 when David has it brought from there to take it to Jerusalem. Rather, the words anticipate the next clause. However, the ark will be mentioned again in 1 Samuel 14:18 –

“And Saul said to Ahijah, “Bring the ark of God here” (for at that time the ark of God was with the children of Israel).”

Despite this, 2 Samuel 6 notes that the ark was still at the house of Abinadab until the time of David.

As for the number twenty, Bullinger says –

“TWENTY is the double of ten, and may in some cases signify its concentrated meaning. But its significance seems rather to be connected with the fact that it is one short of twenty-one, 21 – 1 = 20; that is to say, if 21 is the three-fold 7, and signifies Divine (3) completion as regards spiritual perfection (7), then twenty, being one short of 21, it would signify what Dr. Milo Mahan calls expectancy.” E. W. Bullinger

During this twenty-year period of expectancy, it next says…

2 (con’t) And all the house of Israel lamented after the Lord.

Again, the verb is masculine plural: vayinahu kal beith Yisrael akhare Yehovah – “And they were groaned, all house Israel, after Yehovah.” The word nahal is introduced. It is a rare word signifying to groan or bewail. The days that multiplied and became years were a point of bewailing to the house of Israel.

And now, we come to a pivotal point in the narrative that was noted in Chapter 3…

Then Samuel spoke to all the house of Israel,

“Then” is a time marker not stated or implied in the words: vayomer shemuel el kal beith Yisrael – “And he said, Samuel unto all house Israel.” The words don’t logically follow in thought after the previous verse. A scholar named Otto Thenius understood this and stated there is a gap between the two verses. Despite this, Keil and Lange disagree. They say the five-fold repetition of the word “and” distinctly connects them.

I have no idea what Thenius’ solution to or analysis of the gap is, but in Chapter 3, I suggested that the final three verses were not given as a chronological marker that occurs before the events of Chapters 4-6. Rather, they were simply points of fact –

1) Samuel grew and the Lord was with him, and He caused none of his words to fall groundward, 2) All Israel, from Dan to Beersheba, knew that Samuel had been established a prophet of the Lord, and 3) Yehovah appeared again in Shiloh and he was denuded (made fully known) unto Samuel “in Shilo in word Yehovah.”

Dropping the “h” in Shiloh was purposeful and instructive, telling us that typology is being conveyed. It is our job to figure out why such changes are made. I also noted that the opening clause of Chapter 4 actually belongs chronologically after the events of Chapters 4 through 6, which were a parenthetical insert –

Points of fact concerning Samuel:
3:19 “And he will grow, Samuel. And Yehovah, He was with him. And not he caused to fall from all His words, ground-ward. 20 And it will know, all Israel, from Dan and until Beer-Sheba, for being faithful, Samuel, to prophet to Yehovah. 21 And He will cause to add, Yehovah, to be seen in Shiloh. For He was denuded, Yehovah, unto Samuel in Shilo in word Yehovah.”

Narrative of Samuel’s interaction with Israel:
4:1 “And it is, word Samuel, to all Israel. (…) 7:3 And he said, Samuel, unto all house Israel, to say, “If in all your heart you returning unto Yehovah, you must cause to turn aside gods the foreign from your midst, and the Ashtoreth. And you must cause to erect your heart unto Yehovah. And you must serve Him to His separation. And may He cause to snatch away, you, from hand Philistines.”

Though confusing, this is similar to what occurred in the book of Judges. This parenthesis explains the abrupt change between verses 2 and 3 here, and why Keil and Lange are incorrect. The consecutive “and” is perfectly explained by adjoining the first clause of verse 4:1 with this narrative in verse 7:3.

We are being shown information that belongs to one dispensation or another that has to be inserted somewhere. The way the narrative is laid out is precise and purposeful, even if it is a bit complicated.

Remembering that Samuel thus far has pictured the Seed of Grace, (he is the son of Hannah, Grace), the entire picture, as it is laid out, makes complete sense. Samuel, the Seed of Grace, speaks to Israel…

3 (con’t) saying, “If you return to the Lord with all your hearts, 

lemor im bekhal levavkhem atem shavim el Yehovah – “to say, ‘If in all your heart you returning unto Yehovah.” The words imply that Israel is not right with the Lord. They have no relationship with Him, and are instead following other gods.

As such, things are not going well for them. That will be seen as the verse continues. In order to correct that, Samuel is calling for them to return their hearts to Yehovah and act in accord with the change…

3 (con’t) then put away the foreign gods and the Ashtoreths from among you,

Rather: hasiru eth elohe ha’nekhar mitokh’khem veha’ashtaroth – “you must cause to turn aside gods the foreign from your midst, and the Ashtaroth.” The people were following various gods, not the One true God. These gods are defined by the word nekhar, signifying foreign or strange.

Also noted is the Ashtaroth. It is a proper noun. The word Ashtaroth (not Ashtoreths) is plural. However, the reason why it is considered singular as a name is, as Abarim explains, “to reflect an intense veneration of one.”

The etymology of the name is rather complicated, but Abarim defines it as Unity of Instruction or One Law. Samuel continues, saying…

3 (con’t) and prepare your hearts for the Lord, and serve Him only;

vehakhinu levavkhem el Yehovah veivduhu levado – “And you must cause to erect your heart unto Yehovah. And you must serve Him to His separation.” One cannot serve the Lord and other gods. This is similar to what is seen in Paul’s words in Acts –

“…testifying to Jews, and also to Greeks, repentance toward God and faith toward our Lord Jesus Christ.” Acts 20:21

The meaning of “repentance toward God” is reconsidering who God is. Samuel is saying, “Give up on the other gods and the Ashtaroth and establish their (pl.) national heart (heart is singular) unto Yehovah…

3 (con’t) and He will deliver you from the hand of the Philistines.”

Rather, the verb is a jussive: veyatsel ethkhem miyad pelishtim – “And may He cause to snatch away, you, from hand Philistines.” It is not saying that the Lord will do it. Instead, it is a petition from Samuel, stated in a softened but authoritative manner for Him to do it.

Philistines means Weakeners.

With Samuel’s words stated to Israel, there is a response…

So the children of Israel put away the Baals and the Ashtoreths,

vayasiru bene Yisrael eth habealim veeth ha’ashtaroth – “And they caused to turn aside, sons Israel, the Baals and the Ashtaroth.” The foreign gods of the previous verse are now called ha’bealim, the Baals. The word signifies a lord or master. Thus, it is an identification with foreign gods, accepting them as lords or masters over them.

Just as Samuel instructed, the people did. They reconsidered what they were doing and mentally turned from it, giving up on the false lords and the Ashtaroth…

4 (con’t) and served the Lord only.

vayaavdu eth Yehovah levado – And they served Yehovah to His separation.” The words “to His separation” mean to Him alone. All other gods and allegiances are separated and thus excluded.

The Philistines want to get you
They want to possess your very soul
There is nothing they won’t do
To wield over you total control

This is what they want, nothing less
And they will do it by weakening your will
If they get it, your life will be a mess
For you, it will be a sad, bitter pill

Eyes on Jesus! Fix them on Him alone
Don’t let the Philistines ruin your soul
If they weasel in, your joy will be blown
And your life will spin out of control

II. In the Mizpah (verses 5-9)

And Samuel said, “Gather all Israel to Mizpah, and I will pray to the Lord for you.”

vayomer shemuel qivtsu eth kal Yisrael ha’mishpathah veethpalel baadkhem el Yehovah – “And he said, Samuel, ‘You must gather all Israel the Mizpah-ward, and I will intercede myself for you unto Yehovah.’” Samuel calls a national gathering of the people.

It is possible that he called only the elders who stand as representatives of their clans. Or it could be that the entire congregation came together as at the time of a pilgrim feast. Either way, the point is that the people were to gather and Samuel would be among them and intercede for them.

The Mizpah means The Watchtower.

In response to Samuel’s petition…

So they gathered together at Mizpah,

vayiqavetsu ha’mitspathah – “And they were gathered the Mizpah-ward.” If this is a literal watchtower and not merely a location, it would then explain why it says Mizpah-ward. You can only fit so many people into an edifice. The people would be gathered toward that location, assembling in the general area. Once they were in the area of the Mizpah, they…

6 (con’t) drew water, and poured it out before the Lord.

vayishavu mayim vayishpekhu liphne Yehovah – “and they drew waters, and they poured to faces Yehovah.” Without an explanation of the intent of this ritual, which is not found elsewhere, only speculation can be made as to its significance. However, the upcoming clauses give a hint of the matter.

Water has various meanings in Scripture, including life, death (when poured out, as in the dissolution of life), cleansing, judgment, the Spirit, etc.

An ancient paraphrase says, “They poured out their heart like water in penitence before the Lord.” This is probably much of the intent. In Lamentations, it says –

“Arise, cry out in the night,
At the beginning of the watches;
Pour out your heart like water before the face of the Lord.
Lift your hands toward Him
For the life of your young children,
Who faint from hunger at the head of every street.” Lamentations 2:19

Lamentations ties the state of the heart when it is poured out to water. In the next clause, lifting of hands is a sign of petition “for the life of your young children.”

As such, the pouring of the heart like water would be a sign of contrition and penitence to include seeking spiritual cleansing. The water was drawn and then poured out…

6 (con’t) And they fasted that day,

vayatsumu bayom ha’hu – “and they fasted in the day, the it.” The word tsum signifies to not eat, and thus to fast. It comes from a primitive root signifying “to cover over.” As such, it is as if the people covered their mouths to purposefully not eat.

For all we know, it could mean they actually covered their mouths as an open display of their fast. Fasting signifies denial and mourning. The only other time it has been seen so far was in Judges 20 –

“Then all the children of Israel, that is, all the people, went up and came to the house of God and wept. They sat there before the Lord and fasted that day until evening; and they offered burnt offerings and peace offerings before the Lord.” Judges 20:26

Based on this state of contrition, which probably included mourning as in Judges, it can be assumed that drawing and pouring out the water is likewise a sign of mourning and contrition. This seems even more likely when considering the next words…

6 (con’t) and said there, “We have sinned against the Lord.”

vayomeru sham khatanu leYehovah – “And they said there, ‘We have sinned to Yehovah.’” Their words are an acknowledgement of their sin against the Lord. As such, pouring the water and fasting are connected to that.

Both water and food are necessary to sustain oneself. And so, one might say, “I have laid my very existence before You. It is an existence that, like water, will disappear in the dust of the earth without Your intervention. And as a man without food, I will perish. I have sinned against you, and I acknowledge that.”

6 (con’t) And Samuel judged the children of Israel at Mizpah.

vaayishpot shemuel eth bene Yisrael ba’mitspah – “And he judged, Samuel, sons Israel in the Mizpah.” The verb is imperfect. Therefore, it doesn’t mean he became a judge at this time. Nor does it mean that he judged Israel at this time or only at this time.

Rather, as will be seen in verse 15, where the verb is imperfect, it means that Samuel conducted his judging at the Mizpah. This is supplemented by his judging at Bethel and Gilgal, as to be noted in verse 16. He called the assembly there, and from that time on, it became a place where he judged the people.

Now when the Philistines heard that the children of Israel had gathered together at Mizpah,

The word “when” gives a false sense of the intent: vayishmeu phelishtim ki hitqabetsu vene Yisrael ha’mitspatah – “And they heard, Philistines, for they gathered themselves, sons Israel the Mizpah-ward.” The words are a statement of fact. The Philistines heard that Israel had gathered.

At this time, Israel was under the authority of the Philistines. Therefore, it is likely that they assumed the gathering was for the purpose of revolting against Philistine rule. If for this or some other reason, the gathering of the people elicited a response…

7 (con’t) the lords of the Philistines went up against Israel.

vayaalu sarne phelishtim el Yisrael – “And they ascended, axles Philistines, unto Israel.” This doesn’t mean only the leaders of the Philistines. It means that they mustered the people under them as a fighting force, joining with the other leaders and those they mustered. Because of the sizable force set to wage war…

7 (con’t) And when the children of Israel heard of it, they were afraid of the Philistines.

vayishmeu bene Yisrael vayiru mipene phelishtim – “And they heard, sons Israel, and they feared from faces Philistines.” The people had not come prepared for battle. They were called by Samuel for a public assembly. This doesn’t mean they weren’t armed, as will be seen in verse 10. However, it was not something they expected when they were called to gather.

Even if their intent was to fight the Philistines, seeing that all five of their enclaves were coming would mean they had a sizeable force to engage. Therefore, the people were afraid.

So the children of Israel said to Samuel, “Do not cease to cry out to the Lord our God for us,

vayomeru vene Yisrael el shemuel al takharesh mimenu mizeoq el Yehovah elohenu – “And they said, sons Israel unto Samuel, ‘Not may you cause to be silent from us from shrieking unto Yehovah our God.” The NKJV is a suitable paraphrase. They want Samuel to purposefully and continuously call out to the Lord on their behalf. If they have to engage in battle, they desire his constant intercession.

This is a much different attitude than the time they faced the Philistines in Chapter 4, where the people treated the ark as a talisman for victory. The ark is not in sight. Rather, they are trusting that the Lord will respond because of Samuel’s petition, regardless of its location…

8 (con’t) that He may save us from the hand of the Philistines.”

veyoshienu miyad pelishtim – “And He will cause to save us from hand Philistines.” In verse 3, Samuel told the people to put away the hindrances to serving the Lord, erect their heart toward Him, and serve Him only. In doing this, Samuel said, “And may He cause to snatch away, you, from hand Philistines.”

As noted then, it wasn’t a claim that He would save them from their hands. Being a jussive, it was a petition stated in a softened, authoritative manner. Because of that, the people have asked Samuel to cry out to the Lord for a hopeful response to his previous words. To begin that process, it next says…

And Samuel took a suckling lamb

vayiqakh shemuel teleh khalav ekhad – “And he took, Samuel, lamb – milk, one.” A particular lamb, taleh, is introduced here. It will only be seen again in Isaiah 65:25, where it says that the wolf and the lamb shall feed together. It is derived from tala, to patch or cover with pieces. The idea is probably a lamb born with mottled colors.

This root occurs eight times. Six are in the account of Jacob having spotted animals which are contrasted to Laban’s flocks. Once it is seen in Joshua 9 concerning patched sandals which made those who wore them look like they had traveled a long time, when in fact they were from just down the road.

The last use is in Ezekiel 16, where the people took their fine garments given to them by the Lord and mottled them on high places, playing the harlot with other gods. What appears to be the case, then, is that there is a contrast in the lives of the people as they turned to Him, and Samuel is using this lamb to indicate that to the Lord.

They had foreign gods and the Astaroth, but now they sought only the Lord through contrition and Samuel’s intercession.

Adding the word “milk” signifies it was a young lamb, still drinking its mother’s milk. That would mean a lamb up to about four months old. However, Leviticus says –

“When a bull or a sheep or a goat is born, it shall be seven days with its mother; and from the eighth day and thereafter it shall be accepted as an offering made by fire to the Lord.” Leviticus 22:27

Having procured this young lamb, it next says…

9 (con’t) and offered it as a whole burnt offering to the Lord.

vayaaleh olah kalil leYehovah – “And he caused to ascend burnt offering, whole, to Yehovah.” Samuel is not of the priestly line, but he has interceded to the Lord for the people. That is an intercessory function generally conducted by priests.

However, in 1 Kings 8, Solomon prayed to the Lord at the dedication of the temple. This and other such examples appear to indicate that praying in such a manner extended beyond a priestly duty alone.

Samuel is also making an offering to the Lord, something designated for priests to do. However, both Gideon and Manoah were also instructed to offer a sacrifice to the Lord. As such, it appears Samuel, as Israel’s judge, has been given dispensation to do so as well.

It is possible, but otherwise unstated, that he directed a priest to perform the offering, something that would still be credited to him. Regardless of that, it next says…

9 (con’t) Then Samuel cried out to the Lord for Israel,

vayizaq shemuel el Yehovah bead Yisrael – “And he shrieked, Samuel, unto Yehovah for Israel.” With the offering made, Samuel then complied with the request of the people from verse 8, where they petitioned him to continuously cry out to the Lord for them. Having cried out, it next says…

*9 (fin) and the Lord answered him.

vayaanehu Yehovah – “And He answered him, Yehovah.” The people’s actions mingled with the acknowledgment of their sins, combined with Samuel’s offering and shrieks to the Lord, have brought the Lord’s attention and response to the situation.

This is where we will end the verses today, anticipating interesting things as the narrative continues. If you have been considering what has been explained and the meanings of various things in relation to the Lord and future events, you may have an idea of what the narrative is pointing to.

If not, consider it until next week, and the Lord willing, we’ll find a resolution concerning everything as the Lord has laid it out in His word.

Remember that these stories are in here for a reason that extends beyond just a literal historical account of Israel’s history and their interactions with the Lord. Jesus, Paul, and the other New Testament authors said as much.

Through His word, God is providing information for us to consider, understand His will and actions, and for us to act upon at times as well. When you read the Bible, you are mentally interacting with God through His word.

Therefore, take advantage of this wonderful tool of instruction each day. You will be renewed, and God will certainly be pleased with you. May it guide your steps and comfort your souls always.

Paul, in our closing verse, will give us instruction concerning our lives as we walk before the Lord. The way that we will be able to comply with what he says is by reading and heeding the word.

Closing Verse: “I beseech you therefore, brethren, by the mercies of God, that you present your bodies a living sacrifice, holy, acceptable to God, which is your reasonable service. And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.” Romans 12:1, 2

Next Week: 1 Samuel 7:10-17 With the Lord, it will go well, it is true… (The Stone of the Helper, Part II) (14th 1 Samuel Sermon)

The Lord has you exactly where He wants you. He has a good plan and purpose for you. He is the One who abases the haughty and exalts the humble. He regards the lowly, and the proud He knows from afar. So yield yourself to Him, trust Him, and believe His word. In this, He will do great things for you and through you.

1 Samuel 7:1-9 (CG)

1 And they came, men Kirjath Jearim, and they caused to ascend Ark Yehovah. And they caused to bring it unto house Abinadab in the hill. And Eleazar, his son, they will consecrate to guard Ark Yehovah.

2 And it was from day dwelling the ark in Kirjath Jearim, and they increased the days. And they were twenty years. And they were groaned, all house Israel, after Yehovah.’’

———————
The main narrative resumes from 1 Samuel 4:1

3 And he said, Samuel, unto all house Israel, to say, “If in all your heart you returning unto Yehovah, you must cause to turn aside gods the foreign from your midst, and the Ashtaroth. And you must cause to erect your heart unto Yehovah. And you must serve Him to His separation. And may He cause to snatch away, you, from hand Philistines.” 4 And they caused to turn aside, sons Israel, the Baals and the Ashtaroth. And they served Yehovah to His separation.

5 And he said, Samuel, “You must gather all Israel the Mizpah-ward, and I will intercede myself for you unto Yehovah.” 6 And they were gathered the Mizpah-ward, and they drew waters, and they poured to faces Yehovah, and they fasted in the day, the it. And they said there, “We have sinned to Yehovah.” And he judged, Samuel, sons Israel in the Mizpah.

7 And they heard, Philistines, for they gathered themselves, sons Israel the Mizpah-ward. And they ascended, axles Philistines, unto Israel. And they heard, sons Israel, and they feared from faces Philistines. 8 And they said, sons Israel unto Samuel, “Not may you cause to be silent from us from shrieking unto Yehovah our God. And He will cause to save us from hand Philistines.”

9 And he took, Samuel, lamb – milk, one. And he caused to ascend burnt offering, whole, to Yehovah. And he shrieked, Samuel, unto Yehovah for Israel. And He answered him, Yehovah.

 

1 Samuel 7:1-9 (NKJV)

1 Then the men of Kirjath Jearim came and took the ark of the Lord, and brought it into the house of Abinadab on the hill, and consecrated Eleazar his son to keep the ark of the Lord.

So it was that the ark remained in Kirjath Jearim a long time; it was there twenty years. And all the house of Israel lamented after the Lord.

Then Samuel spoke to all the house of Israel, saying, “If you return to the Lord with all your hearts, then put away the foreign gods and the Ashtoreths from among you, and prepare your hearts for the Lord, and serve Him only; and He will deliver you from the hand of the Philistines.” So the children of Israel put away the Baals and the Ashtoreths, and served the Lord only.

And Samuel said, “Gather all Israel to Mizpah, and I will pray to the Lord for you.” So they gathered together at Mizpah, drew water, and poured it out before the Lord. And they fasted that day, and said there, “We have sinned against the Lord.” And Samuel judged the children of Israel at Mizpah.

Now when the Philistines heard that the children of Israel had gathered together at Mizpah, the lords of the Philistines went up against Israel. And when the children of Israel heard of it, they were afraid of the Philistines. So the children of Israel said to Samuel, “Do not cease to cry out to the Lord our God for us, that He may save us from the hand of the Philistines.”

And Samuel took a suckling lamb and offered it as a whole burnt offering to the Lord. Then Samuel cried out to the Lord for Israel, and the Lord answered him.

 

Freedom in the Balance – Charlie Kirk’s Life and Sacrifice

Artwork by Douglas Kallerson

Freedom in the Balance – Charlie Kirk’s Life and Sacrifice

As sad as what happened on Wednesday is for those who love freedom in its many areas of our lives: religion, political leanings, public discourse, employment choices, etc., it would be a mistake to assume that what took place in the assassination of Charlie Kirk was the silencing of a voice.

Rather, his voice will be multiplied through the event in many ways. His proclamation of Christian principles, combined with reasonable, moral, political conservatism, will come, once again, to the forefront of the American public. How the public embraces it is the big question.

We tend to become fickle rather quickly. In World War II, we used our intelligence and resources to develop a weapon that was capable of ending the war and saving, what is believed to be, millions of lives.

In a short span of time, those who second-guess every choice or who disapproved of the way the action was taken infiltrated the media, condemning the nation while continuing to enjoy the benefits that are derived from it.

After the attack on 11 September 2001, the nation flew flags everywhere. Wherever you were, little flags adorned cars in the streets, and people stood in unity against what happened. No sooner had we as a nation met the enemy, engaging those who attacked us, than the usual voices were raised about how terrible we were for doing so.

After the horror of 911, Pat Tillman of the Arizona Cardinals was impelled to leave his beloved and lucrative game to join the US Army. He served honorably in Iraq and Afghanistan, but was killed by friendly fire in 2004. Morally deficient voices on the left openly applauded his death as if he were the enemy.

Just 24 years after the Islamic attack, New York City is facing its greatest crisis ever with the prospect of electing a communist as its mayor. He openly rejects the core principles of our nation, arrogantly rejects the law set in place to protect its citizens, and ludicrously denies that he is one of the privileged he claims to be opposed to.

How quickly we forget the efforts of those who brought us to where we are at any given time! Instead, we accept the lies of those who intend real harm to our society, assuming that because they are in positions of power or influence, they should be trusted.

Rather, they eloquently project their own wickedness on others in an effort to hide who they really are. We need clarity of thought to see through what they are doing, something lacking in the masses who are busily engaged in work, family, and living their daily lives.

Charlie Kirk possessed this clarity and, without malicious words or demeaning conduct, he clearly stated what is right, moral, and proper. This cost him his life, but it will cause others to speak out more boldly, offering an alternative to the unbelievably vile hatred and evil-speak of those on the left.

Of those rabid voices, thousands upon thousands of gleeful social media posts rejoicing in Charlie’s assassination have filled the internet. The democrats in the US Congress actively booed the call for, and then tried to kill, a moment of silence to remember Kirk’s life and death.

The legacy media openly reveled in his execution on numerous occasions, claiming that Charlie’s “violent rhetoric” brought about his murder – just desserts for spewing so-called “hatred.”

Two of hundreds of vile news articles will give you a sense of this, and who is behind it in this nation:

Survey Finds ONE IN THREE College Students Think Some Level of Violence is Acceptable to Stop Campus Speech They Don’t Like

Young Woman Who Witnessed Charlie Kirk’s Assassination Says Liberals in the Crowd Were CHEERING After He Was Shot

How did we come to the point in this nation where this type of vile conduct has come about? Each year or so, for many years, I have revisited the words of Florida US Congressman Syd Herlong’s extension of remarks read into the proceedings of the US House of Representatives on 10 January 1963 entitled Current Communist Goals.

In his remarks, he cited 45 points by which the communists planned to overthrow the government of the United States. Rather than a shooting war they could not win, they understood the vacillating nature of the American public and set forth a long-term agenda to obliterate the fundamental underpinnings of our nation.

A majority of those goals have been realized. Several of them were overcome by events on the world stage. Rather than reading the list, a mere four of them will explain to you what the impetus behind Charlie Kirk’s assassination was –

  1. Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers’ associations. Put the party line in textbooks.

 

  1. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as “normal, natural, and healthy.”

 

  1. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with “social’ religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity which does not need a “religious crutch.”

 

  1. Eliminate prayer or any phase of religious expression in the schools on the ground that it violates the principle of “separation of church and state.”

 

A fifth point was steadily pursued, and it was successfully realized in the past 20 years, becoming a major part of this political assassination –

 

  1. Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States.

 

Charlie Kirk was first and foremost a Christian. However, if he were just sitting in the pews on Sunday morning, no attention would have been focused on him. Sunday morning Christians are not the problem, and they can be dealt with easily enough when full communism has taken over the nation.

Directives to kneel, followed by an inexpensive bullet to the back of the head, will take care of such people if they refuse to recant. This has occurred millions of times in communist countries. Anyone who thinks this won’t happen here does not understand the nature of the spiritual and political battle being waged.

Along with being a Christian, Charlie Kirk was as much of an educator as he was anything else. He may not have been in a classroom teaching, but he was actively engaged in debating the religious, moral, and civil conduct of the people of this nation.

Innumerable times during the previous democrat administrations, conservative personalities who were scheduled to speak at colleges and universities have been shouted down, riots have taken place, sit-in protests have been held – all to keep these conservatives from being able to engage in public discourse.

The democrat party applauded the “bravery” of these miscreants while the wholly-infiltrated administrations, the DoJ, and the FBI did nothing to stop these violations of the rights of those conservative speakers. With a new administration completely set against this communist agenda in place, and with high fines and penalties for such conduct, universities have been forced to allow these voices to speak.

Unfortunately, the educational system has so brainwashed the youth of this nation, that they now feel their only remaining recourse is to climb on top of a building, point a gun at the head of the lover of freedom, honor, morality, and dignity, and pull the trigger, thus silencing the voice who simply wants to debate the moral ramifications of people’s decisions.

Charlie Kirk’s educational aspect focuses on just that, meaning the morality and civil dignity of humans. But standing against “homosexuality, degeneracy, and promiscuity as ‘normal, natural, and healthy’” cannot be tolerated in a society racing towards a supposed communist utopia.

Those who think this way don’t realize that right after the Christians, it is those who practice homosexuality, degeneracy, and promiscuity who will be the next ordered to kneel as the brave new society spends another five cents on each bullet used to eliminate them. Useful idiots, as Vladimir Lenin called them.

These communist points for taking over the nation were exactly what Charlie Kirk spoke against. And yet, being 31 years old, he probably wasn’t even aware of Syd Herlong’s extension of remarks. He probably died without realizing the magnitude of the forces set against what he stood for.

Of all of Syd’s points, the most important of them was number 27, “Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with ‘social’ religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity, which does not need a ‘religious crutch.’”

This is something Alexis de Tocqueville carefully warned America about in his study Democracy in America. He stated that religion “should be considered the first” of the nation’s “political institutions,” urging the necessity for Americans to “maintain Christianity…at all cost.”

Whether Charlie Kirk knew of Tocqueville’s writings or not, he understood this as an absolute necessity for the nation to survive. Unfortunately, “religion” under the umbrella of Christianity does not necessarily mean moral, biblical, God-honoring religion.

This is what the communists understood. And so they have taken full advantage of infiltrating first the seminaries and then the churches of the nation. During the sixties, the infection of this agenda slowly crept into America’s schools. By the time of the Vietnam War, the left had so taken over the minds of many young people that they were unwilling to identify with the nation at all.

Many headed north to avoid the draft. But many of them found a way of avoiding the draft while still benefiting from life in the United States. By entering the seminary, they were exempt from the draft. And so, an entire generation of ideologically perverse people was being led by professors who never cared at all about the cause of Jesus Christ.

What does one do when he graduates from seminary? He becomes a pastor, preacher, or priest. The churches who pay well belong to the larger denominations. Free housing, congregants who idolize their spiritual leader, susceptible sheep willing to listen without checking, and a steady paycheck. The recipe for disaster was set.

Since the 1970s, all large denominations have been partly or completely overtaken by these moral minuscules. Many denominations are Christian in name only. Their message is one of presenting “homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as ‘normal, natural, and healthy.’”

If you don’t believe it, drive by any church in the modern “mainstream denominations. The chances are high that along with an American flag (well, often not even that) there will be a “pride” flag, a trans flag, BLM flags, etc.

Every un-American, anti-God value that can be snuck into Sunday’s sermon is introduced. Adherence to biblical values is non-existent, and the name of Jesus Christ is blasphemed as the person in the pulpit, wholly unqualified to be there, by the way, preaches “tolerance” as if it is an all-inclusive virtue. Charlie Kirk’s assassination, and ten thousand other abominations against faithful Christians, say otherwise.

Jesus, citing Isaiah, said of the foes of rightness at His time –

“These people draw near to Me with their mouth,
And honor Me with their lips,
But their heart is far from Me.” Mark 15:8

This is what we see in modern, mainstream, denominations. In undermining the Bible, Christianity itself is undermined. The worship of Jesus Christ is no longer the preeminent factor of going to church. Rather, social justice and progressive liberalism have replaced that. Their day of judgment will not be pleasant. Again, as Isaiah said –

“Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil;
Who put darkness for light, and light for darkness;
Who put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!” Isaiah 5:20

A disastrous day lies ahead for these people.

Though it is unlikely that those on the left will ever cede an inch, it does not mean that faithful Christians should give up. It is our responsibility to continue to press forward. And more, it is a sacred obligation.

Jesus didn’t get to Calvary and call down twelve legions of angels to save Himself. The eternal destiny of all of humanity was on the line. That truth has not changed to this day. Though the act is accomplished, the path is clear, and access is available, unless it is proclaimed, no change will take place in the human heart.

Christians cannot sit idly by and remain silent. Having said that, there are others who will peevishly stand down from speaking out. It is sad but true. The opportunists of the world will be vocal until the time of persecution comes. When it does, they will fade into the background, never having really believed in, or maybe cherished, what they espoused.

For such, their supposedly deep moral convictions come down to safety, a reasonable stream of income, a position of power or influence, or a combination of any or all of these. Remove the true inspiration for their “moral stand,” and they will quickly bolt from it.

In politics, Dick Cheney is a great example. He was supposedly a sound, moral, Republican who would never have tolerated what the left pushed on the American public… well, until his younger daughter came out as a lesbian. Then his true moral soundness began to be revealed.

When his older daughter participated in one of the greatest attempts at overthrowing our government in the history of this nation, he fully revealed where he stood in his moral thinking. Is allegiance to family members where our morals are derived from?

Congress is elected for a reason. We vote for our representatives and senators based on what they say. Unfortunately for those on the right, what they have said and what they then did have almost always been completely at odds.

This is obviously true with most presidential candidates as well. They move to the center, lie as much as possible concerning what type of a president they will be, and they then immediately begin to reveal their true colors when they enter into office.

The greatest deceiver of them all was the one who, though untruthful in everything he said, mostly just avoided talking about his agenda. The things he said on the campaign trail were platitudes intended to lull the public into thinking he was the right guy for the job.

In fact, if you listen to his speeches, yes he lied, but he did it in a way that could be excused as typical political jargon. But this Satan of the political realm was elected, taking his oath of office (and I gag at even saying that) on 20 January 2009.

The son of a dyed-in-the-wool communist, and one who spent his life pursuing the communist agenda, took care of the things that were partially accomplished or wholly left undone as detailed in Syd Herlong’s list. He pursued them with reckless abandon.

Probably never in the history of the world, to include Sodom and Gomorrah or ancient Greece, were the forces of perversion and moral turpitude opened up in a society as they were under him. The power of the presidency was brought to bear against the foundational principles of the nation he swore to defend.

To him, the constitution was a “living organism” that meant whatever he decided. It was at this time that the true character of the democrat party began to be seen. A political party had, in fact, been captured – communism had taken it over. Unfortunately for them, the American public had had enough and chose a different path in 2016.

However, because of the pen of Barack Obama, the government itself had become so infested with those who swore allegiance to the cause he espoused, that it was not difficult to completely hamper the progress of the then-sitting president, Donald Trump.

An entire agenda of fabricating evidence against him was enacted from the Obama White House before he departed. The highest form of treason our nation could experience was realized. From that steppingstone, the power of the democrat-led Congress continuously stymied President Trump’s ability to enact any meaningful change in this nation.

In just four years, and with the ability to sway the next election through deception on a scale never before imagined, Obama would, once again, be in power. With the ability of big tech, and a CDC so sold out to the democrat party that its employees openly wept the day Donald Trump was elected, a plan was devised.

I need not tell you what it was. We all lived through it. Billions of people were utterly deceived over an event that changed the course of world politics and defined just how far governments could go to restrict the rights of their citizens. A global test case on how to control the masses.

The inevitable loss of the presidency for Donald Trump followed, and the lawfare began. Any other person in history would have signed the document, surrendered to the golf course, and kept his mouth shut until he died. But Donald Trump is not a normal person.

He is sold out to the American dream. All you need to do is go back and watch the innumerable videos of his younger years, and you will understand the man. He has his piece of the pie, but he wants it for everyone in this nation.

And so, while Barack Obama was enjoying his third term as president, presiding over a person that Donald Trump called braindead during the 2020 elections (so obvious it was even then), Trump was fighting off the power of the entire US government that was directed against him.

In case after case, he was vindicated. During this period, the left was certain of two things: 1) Joe Biden could not last a second term, nor could he win a second term, and 2) Kamala Harris was as sold out to the Obama agenda as anyone on the planet.

The gamble was made, the cards were laid down, and Joe Biden put his pen to a few of the only pardons that bore his actual signature out of the 4,245 that bear his name. He then submitted his removal from the ballot and frittered away his final days in office while Barack Obama prepared for his fourth term in office.

Donald Trump, however, spurred the masses on, telling them that they needed to come out in such numbers that even cheating couldn’t win. And he did. He won. The left underestimated his ability to stir the people, and they way overestimated the abilities of the wholly inept Kamala Harris.

When Obama walked into the Capitol Rotunda on Inauguration Day 2025, he whispered words to George W. Bush that were supposedly secret, but … well, there are lip readers at every such event. He said to Bush, “How do we stop this?” Bush laughed and knew that things were going to change. If you doubt this, go watch the video.

And there is a change in how President Trump has dealt with his second term, isn’t there? With a Republican House and Senate, the left can do pretty much zero to stop the tide of good news that has spread across our government for these past nine months.

And, as I noted before, congress is elected for a reason. Many on the right have frittered away the years, getting rich while squandering our heritage. They would be doing that right now, but the overwhelming tide of President Trump’s abilities have forced them to finally align with the values of those who voted for them.

At the same time, those on the left – every single one of them with the surprising exception of John Fetterman – have proven several things. There is not a single stand that they hold to –, moral, judicial, civil, or political – that is in line with the founding principles of this nation. They have fully revealed what they believe, what they want, and what is necessary to attain their goals.

Stopping here for a moment, one might say, “What is a pastor doing giving a political speech from the pulpit while discussing the assassination of the chief executive officer of Turning Point USA? If you think this is a political speech, you have not been paying attention.

Christianity is a religion, the one true religion, BTW. It stems from God, who ordained Jesus Christ to go to the cross before the foundation of the world. From there, the message has gone throughout the world. But the world is divided by people groups, cultures, and nations.

These were ordained by God, and they exist by His will. Daniel 2:21 says that God removes kings and raises up kings. God has ordained that we live in a world of this design. We as people cannot disassociate our religion from our existence within a society, which includes civil, judicial, and moral precepts.

Alexis de Tocqueville understood this. Many past presidents understood this. And Charlie Kirk understood this. He was fully aware of the fact that he was a target for assassination. It was made known to him again and again. But he knew that his voice in speaking out was more important than whatever would happen to him. In his life, he was the Lord’s. In his death, he is the Lord’s.

As for President Trump, I personally question if he is truly saved or not. Recent comments tell me that if he is, he is theologically confused about his state of salvation. That is easy enough to correct if someone would just sit down with him for fifteen minutes with the intent of smoothing that issue out for him.

Regardless of his personal state, he fully understands that the Christian message is the binding tie between the nation and its citizens. In nine months, he has done more to restore the Christian message and the Christian faith within the government than anyone in generations, maybe since our founding as a nation.

Our ability to freely exercise our faith was under such heavy attack since the inauguration of Barack Obama that, were it not for the Supreme Court of the United States, preaching from the full counsel of Scripture would no longer be tolerated in this nation.

Hence, there has been a continuous call over the past four years, even within the administration, to either dismantle or pack the Supreme Court. That was a step that the left realized may lead to their own termination at the rising up of Christians, and so it didn’t happen. But we are one election away from facing exactly that.

How does God raise up kings and establish nations? He does it through people. That was clearly evidenced in the writing of Thomas Jefferson and signed by a group of men on August 2, 1776, at the Pennsylvania State House, now known as Independence Hall.

Brave men, mostly led by Christians, either from the pulpit or from soap boxes, have spurred the nation to act time and again during periods of war or national crisis. Today, we are in a national crisis, but the forces of evil are not found attacking from without. They are attacking from within.

Donald Trump understands this. Charlie Kirk understood it, and his stand cost him his life. His wife will not see him again this side of glory, and his children have been bereft of their father because he understood and acted.

And he understood it exactly as I just explained it. We as Christians cannot separate our faith from the environment in which we live. When that happens, the results are evident from a mountain of past nations that have done just that.

The people either hide from the inevitable persecution they will face, give up on their faith because there is no one willing to stand and defend it, or they nobly and resolutely get on their knees and await their execution, something that has happened hundreds of thousands of times in Africa in recent years.

It has happened throughout the world, in fact. The great purge of Christians among peoples and nations, and even within the church itself, is a testament to our need to never give up in the face of iniquity. Just minutes before he was shot, Charlie Kirk was handing out MAGA hats.

As much of a political movement as it is, MAGA in the United States today is the only thing that has spared Christianity from the machinations of Barack Hussein Obama and those allied with him. Their idea of democracy is to remove the rights of those they disagree with so that their idea of democracy can exist.

If you don’t believe this, you haven’t been reading the quotes of people on the left, including politicians and media personnel, over the past four days. The execution of Charlie Kirk has been a cry for more. What was Rolling Stone’s Response to this? People Are Losing Their Jobs for Criticizing Slain ‘Free Speech’ Advocate Charlie Kirk.

The only people losing their jobs are those who either don’t have the right to say what they say while in their particular job, such as members of the US military, or those who work for people who will not tolerate threats against other human beings, finding them incompatible with the values of whatever entity the individual works for.

Charlie Kirk had nothing to do with this. Their own inability to realize that what they are peddling is not acceptable is what caused those people to lose their jobs. This is evident from the subtitle to their article, “Journalists, publicists, and college faculty have been fired after calling the right-wing influencer a divisive figure and making light of his assassination.”

A company, news media, or school cannot promote such speech without paying dearly for it. But this is how the left thinks because they have been steeped in communist ideology for over sixty years now.

Whether you agree with my words today or not, Charlie Kirk died because he believed in the agenda of Donald Trump. And the reason he believed in it is because Donald Trump is the only man to have the intestinal fortitude to do what he has done.

If you are to believe Scripture, then you must avow that God raised up Donald Trump for a time such as this. Charlie Kirk understood, he accepted God’s hand in the process, and he joined it to secure a safer, more promising future for Christians in this nation.

His death may have exactly the opposite effect. Only time will tell how the left will respond to the momentum of President Trump’s push to restore our nation. And it may be that the US House or both bodies will be lost in the next election.

If so, the nation will come to a screeching halt as innumerable, bogus counts for impeachment are brought to bear against the president once again. No wonder he is working feverishly to control and restore the electoral process that has been so stunningly manipulated by the left, even since the time of John Kennedy’s win over Richard Nixon.

Chicago’s dead were raised to vote democrat in that election. That has increased to a nationwide phenomenon, which was multiplied to an astonishing number in 2020, something not repeatable in 2024 because the receipts were in. But unless the voter rolls are secured, it will inevitably happen again.

In 1 Timothy 1, Paul says –

“But we know that the law is good if one uses it lawfully, knowing this: that the law is not made for a righteous person, but for the lawless and insubordinate, for the ungodly and for sinners, for the unholy and profane, for murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers, for manslayers, 10 for fornicators, for sodomites, for kidnappers, for liars, for perjurers, and if there is any other thing that is contrary to sound doctrine.” 1 Timothy 1:8-10

Think about what Paul says. The law is not made for a righteous person. The law, any law, is given to secure the unrighteous, ungodly, profane, murderers, and so forth. This is just why the left has been so blatant in ignoring the laws of the United States over the past four years and why they continue to do so today.

What Joe Biden did concerning immigration was unlawful. What the sanctuary cities have done and are doing is unlawful. What DAs and prosecutors are doing in liberal cities is unlawful. What schools are doing with our own children in these same cities is unlawful.

These things are not just ignoring what is commonly held as good or moral. They are violations of existing laws. In ignoring the laws, they are attempting to absolve themselves of the responsibility for their murders, thefts, ungodliness, and so forth.

However, this is the reason for government. It is intended to enforce the laws that exist. Donald Trump is not violating anyone’s rights by rounding up illegal aliens. Rather, he is enforcing the law. It is the same law that was broken by the previous administration, and which nobody on the left even thought about condemning.

Why? Because in agreeing with the agenda, they solidify power, prepare to assume total control, and then rid themselves of those who disagree with them. One five-cent solution at a time until they have cast off their foe. And in casting them off, they no longer have the accusing finger of the Creator pointing at them from the pulpit each Sunday.

Well, at least the pulpits that are willing to steel themselves against the onslaught of wickedness, perversion, and assassination coming against them. Charlie Kirk was a man of principle. His principle was in conformity with the morally proper ideology of Donald Trump in relation to the running of this nation.

If you want to know why Charlie Kirk died, it is because they missed twice with President Trump. Charlie Kirk had the freedom to engage in public discourse because decisions to change the moral direction of this nation came down from the top of our government. By now, the left would have eliminated Charlie’s ability to meet as he did this past week.

And the top of our government, whether you like it or not, was directed by God in accord with His sovereign rule over the nations. On July 13, 2024, President Donald Trump survived an assassination attempt while speaking at an open-air campaign rally near Butler, Pennsylvania.

We can certainly glean two things from that event. First, that God wanted him alive for His purposes. Second, every time Donald Trump looks in the mirror or scratches his right ear, he is reminded of that fact. Charlie Kirk’s time is over. But his memory will be long in being forgotten.

Donald Trump’s time continues, and with the resolve of the sacrifice of Charlie Kirk to bolster him, he will continue to press on in securing the freedoms we possess as Christians and as citizens of this nation. May God protect and bless him, and may God bless and protect this nation according to how we honor Him.

That is a scary petition when we were so close to having lost our right to do so because of those who hate Him, despise His word, and revile the name of His Son, the name which is above every name, and the name to which all knees will bow – Jesus Christ our Lord.

Amen.