Judges 3:24-31 (Ehud, Judge of Israel, Part II)

Artwork by Douglas Kallerson.

Judges 3:24-31
Ehud, Judge of Israel, Part II

Many years ago, I heard that there are so many laws in the federal government of the United States that all one has to do is exist here to be guilty of breaking one law or another. The system is set up for its citizens to fail. For those who consider not playing along with whoever is in power, that may actually be used against you.

If that was forty years ago, considering how many laws have been passed since then, just imagine how many laws we are breaking at any given moment without even realizing it in the present time.

And that is only federal laws. We have state and local laws bearing down on us as well. But this is not supposed to be the case with the giving of law. Those who naturally do what is right should not be subject to laws that make them guilty when they are not doing anything wrong.

Paul takes the time to explain this to Timothy, and his words reveal to us reasons for which law should be given…

Text Verse: “But we know that the law is good if one uses it lawfully, knowing this: that the law is not made for a righteous person, but for the lawless and insubordinate, for the ungodly and for sinners, for the unholy and profane, for murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers, for manslayers, 10 for fornicators, for sodomites, for kidnappers, for liars, for perjurers, and if there is any other thing that is contrary to sound doctrine, 11 according to the glorious gospel of the blessed God which was committed to my trust.” 1 Timothy 1:8-11

Establishing laws against such things as Paul presents here is sound and reasonable. In the Bible, the giving of the law has several purposes, some of which we will see as we analyze things today.

The problem with God giving us law, however, is not in the law itself or with Him. Rather, the problem rests within us. Adam was given a law, but he had no experiential knowledge of what the consequences of violating that law would be. He was told what they would be, but without that experiential knowledge, he could not understand what he was told.

This was not because of a defect in Adam. Rather, Adam’s lack of knowledge was simply a limitation that he was expected to deal with after being told what not to do. He didn’t obey, and sin entered the world.

The law stands as an enemy against us when we do not comply with it. That is just how it is. Unfortunately, being in a land where you wake up guilty before the law means that you are an enemy of the lawgiver at all times. This is how it is in the United States, and it is how the world is before God.

Because of sin, which resulted from failing to observe the law, the whole world stands guilty already. That is our default position, and without someone to remove that guilt, along with the burden of the law, we will remain forever condemned. Enter Jesus.

It’s all to be found in His superior word. And so, let us turn to that precious word once again, and… May God speak to us through His word today, and may His glorious name ever be praised.

I. And Ehud Escaped (verses 24-31)

24 When he had gone out,

Rather, it simply and emphatically says: v’hu yatsa – “And HE went out.” Ehud had gone through the porch (the misdronah) in the previous verse, shutting the doors of the loft behind him and locking them. With his safe exit from the main building, it next says…

24 (con’t) Eglon’s servants came to look, and to their surprise,

The words are sequentially stated: va’avadav bau vayiru v’hineh – “and his servants come in, and look, and behold…” Taken together with the previous clause, the sequential nature is more prominent,
And HE went out, and his servants come in, and look, and behold…” Each “and” is given to elicit excitement at the unfolding events, the next of which is what the servants saw…

24 (con’t) the doors of the upper room were locked.

dalthoth ha’aliyah neuloth – “doors the loft locked.” It appears from this that the servants must have known that Ehud had left. Otherwise, they wouldn’t be surprised. But knowing he was gone, they come up to attend to the king, and the door is locked. Therefore, being locked from the inside, they think it must have been Eglon who locked it. This would not be uncommon based on the next words…

24 (con’t) So they said, “He is probably attending to his needs in the cool chamber.”

The words again bear emphasis: vayomeru akh mesik hu eth raglav ba’khadar hamqerah – “And they said, “Only, covering HE feet in chamber the coolness.” It is a euphemism used for the first of two times in Scripture. There are two suggested meanings.

The first is a later interpretation, meaning to take a nap. One lays down and covers his feet when sleeping. Hence, when Ruth went to Boaz at the threshing floor, she uncovered his feet.

The second, and more likely meaning, is clothes covering the feet while relieving oneself. Usually, the bare or sandaled feet are uncovered, and the rest of the body is covered, but at this time, the opposite is true.

An example of this is found in the story of King Saul. It is unlikely, although possible, that Saul went into a cave in 1 Samuel 24 to take a nap. Rather, he surely went in for privacy while relieving himself –

“So he came to the sheepfolds by the road, where there was a cave; and Saul went in to attend to his needs. (David and his men were staying in the recesses of the cave.)” 1 Samuel 24:3

As for the word kheder, or chamber, it signifies an inner chamber. In this case, as there is a main room for conducting Eglon’s normal affairs, and there is an inner chamber for conducting his discreet affairs. Today, we would simply say, “He is in the john.”

25 So they waited till they were embarrassed, and still he had not opened the doors of the upper room.

vayakhilu ad bovosh v’hineh enenu poteakh dalthoth ha’aliyah – “And whirled until ashamed, and behold, not he opened doors the loft.” The word khul signifies to whirl, dance, or writhe. The sense is that the servants are waiting there and, as people do, shaking their heads, shuffling their feet, and flailing their arms in a “What the heck?” manner.

At one point, they can no longer be considered blameless for tarrying. And yet, at some point, they cannot be considered blameless for barging in while the king is tending to business. And so they annoyingly stood around whirling, unable to decide when the right moment to act would be…

25 (con’t) Therefore they took the key and opened them.

vayiq’khu eth ha’maphteakh – “And took the opener.” It is a word found only here and in Isaiah 22:22, maphteakh. It comes from pathakh, to open. Thus it is the opener, the key. Ellicott notes, “The ancient key was simply a bar of wood, hooked at the end, which passed through a hole in the door and caught the bolt inside.” Finally deciding that action was necessary, they got the spare key and opened the door…

25 (con’t) And there was their master, fallen dead on the floor.

The words are short and abrupt: v’hineh adonehem nophel artsah meth – “And behold, their lord fallen earthward, died.” Eglon had seen better days…

26 But Ehud had escaped while they delayed, and passed beyond the stone images and escaped to Seirah.

v’ehud nimlath ad hithmahmhem v’hu avar eth ha’pesilim vayimalet hasiratha – “And Ehud escaped until their tarrying, and passed through the carved images, and escaped the Seirah-ward.” The servants tarried, allowing Ehud to escape. He took the route through the carved images, making his escape in the direction of the Seirah.

Seirah (Heb: Seirath) is found only here. It is derived from a general root שער (s’r) and “appears to primarily express intense negative emotion or the experience of violence. Curiously, it also yields words that have to do with hair” (Abarim).

Though associated with various words, the connotation of hair fits the context. Thus, it means Rough, Hairy, Bristly, or Goat (because of the goat’s bristly hair). As has been explained many times in previous sermons, hair in the Bible signifies an awareness, especially an awareness of sin.

27 And it happened, when he arrived, that he blew the trumpet in the mountains of Ephraim,

v’hi b’vovoto vayitqa ba’shophar b’har ephrayim – “And it was in his coming, and blew in the shophar in Mount Ephraim.” What may be the case is that the Seirath of the previous verse could be a wooded or brambly area, giving the appearance of hair. Whether a general location or a city, upon his coming to the area, he gave a blast on the shophar in Mount Ephraim to call the people to gather.

This was a signal that was probably preplanned, just as was the making of the special sword to nix Eglon. At the blowing of the shophar, the people came.

As always, a mount (har) is a lot of something gathered. It is synonymous with a large but centralized group of people. Ephraim means Twice Fruitful with a secondary meaning of Ashes.

27 (con’t) and the children of Israel went down with him from the mountains; and he led them.

vayerdu imo bene Yisrael min ha’har v’hu liphnehem – “And descended with him sons Israel from the mount, and he to their faces [meaning before them].” The Israelites followed Ehud as they descended the mount…

28 Then he said to them, “Follow me, for the Lord has delivered your enemies the Moabites into your hand.”

The plural is mixed with the singular concerning the foe: vayomer alehem ridpu akharay ki nathan Yehovah eth oyvekhem eth moav b’yedkhem – “And said to them, ‘Pursue after me, for gave Yehovah your enemies, Moab, in your hand.”

One can see the excitement Ehud must have felt, “Pursue after me!” He is challenging them to keep up as they rushed toward the battle ahead. He had tasted the blood of Eglon, and he was ready to meet every lesser foe that he encountered. But he gives the credit for the already-won battle to the Lord – “Yehovah gave … into your hand…”

28 (con’t) So they went down after him, seized the fords of the Jordan leading to Moab, and did not allow anyone to cross over.

v’yerdu akharav vayilkdu eth mabroth ha’yarden l’moav v’lo natnu ish la’avor – “And descended after him, and seized fords the Jordan to Moab and no gave man to pass over.” The meaning is that, despite Moab being east of the Jordan, there were Moabite warriors stationed west of the Jordan.

In their advancing, Israel took advantage of the situation and seized the fords of the river so that none of the Moabites could retreat into their land. John Lange thinks that Eglon was the king over only the western area of Moab. Or it could be that he was king over all of it but chose to reside in the fair area west of the Jordan. Either way…

29 And at that time they killed about ten thousand men of Moab,

vayaku eth moav ba’eth ha’hi ka’asereth alapim ish – “And struck Moab in the time, the it, according to ten thousand men.” There is no reason to assume the number is off by much, as in “about.” As these were warriors of Moab, they would be stationed according to units across the Jordan, probably rotating on a regular basis.

Therefore, there were probably just ten thousand, according to a standard calculation, like any military force. Ten thousand is simply a derivative of ten. Therefore, if the number has typological significance, it would be based on that.

Bullinger says of it, “Completeness of order, marking the entire round of anything, is, therefore, the ever-present signification of the number ten. It implies that nothing is wanting; that the number and order are perfect; that the whole cycle is complete.”

These men were…

29 (con’t) all stout men of valor; not a man escaped.

kal shamen v’kal ish khayil v’lo nimlath ish – “All fat, and all man valor, and no escaped man.” Of this, Ellicott astonishingly says, “…the word being the same as that used in Judges 3:17 to describe the fatness of Eglon.” It’s only a few verses earlier, and yet he didn’t check to confirm this.

It’s a good lesson that I have had to learn myself. Never trust anything you read, even from the greatest of scholars, until you have checked it out for yourself.

As for the word in verse 3:17, bari, or fat, it ultimately comes from a word meaning “to feed.”  In this verse, it is the adjective shamen, coming from the verb shamen, to grow fat, and certainly signifying robust. They were well-fed and brave fighters, and yet they all perished at the hand of Israel. Despite it being a different word, Stanley is close to the intent of the verbiage, saying –

“The narrative ends, as it had begun, with its half-humorous allusion to the well-fed carcases of those who, corpulent like their chief, lay dead along the shore of the river.” Arthur Stanley

Other than calling them corpulent, the idea is correct. Eglon was overfed, and his men were well fed, all from the labors of Israel. And yet, Israel defeated them while probably in a state of lacking their own bread…

30 So Moab was subdued that day under the hand of Israel.

vatikana moav ba’yom ha’hu takhat yad Yisrael – “And humbled Moab in the day, the it, under hand Israel.” This does not mean that Moab became subject to Israel. Otherwise, it would be indicated, such as in 2 Samuel –

“Then he defeated Moab. Forcing them down to the ground, he measured them off with a line. With two lines he measured off those to be put to death, and with one full line those to be kept alive. So the Moabites became David’s servants, and brought tribute.” 2 Samuel 8:2

It simply means that they were humbled and licked their wounds in their own land. Understanding this, it next says…

30 (con’t) And the land had rest for eighty years.

va’tishqot ha’arets shmonim shanah – “And reposed the land eighty years.” The word shaqat comes from an unused root meaning to repose. Late Hebrew gives the idea of sinking down. One can think of lying in a hammock and looking around without fear, maybe slumbering a bit in the process.

This does not necessarily mean that all of Israel was in this state but the area where the judge ruled. As was noted in the introductory comments to Judges, there must be overlap in the times of various judges based on the number of years stated by Paul in Acts 13:20.

As for the duration, eighty is the product of eight and ten. Eight, or shmoneh, comes from shamen, the verb just described – “to grow fat.” Thus, it is the superabundant number and the number of new beginnings. The meaning of ten has already been described.

With this state of ease noted, it next says…

31 After him was Shamgar the son of Anath,

v’akharav hayah Shamgar ben Anath – “And after him, was Shamgar, son Anath.” The derivation of the name Shamgar is uncertain. However, some see it as a reversal of the name of Moses’ son Gershom. If so, then it would be from the words sham (there) or shem (name) and (stranger). Hence, There a Stranger or Named/Called a Stranger.

Shamgar is also mentioned in Judges 5:6 –

“In the days of Shamgar, son of Anath,
In the days of Jael,
The highways were deserted,
And the travelers walked along the byways.”

He is noted as the son of Anath. That name comes from anah, a word having four distinct meanings: to answer or respond; be occupied with; to afflict, oppress, or humble; or to sing. Thus, it can mean Answer, Business, Affliction, or Singing. The typology here points to Affliction. Of him, it says…

31 (con’t) who killed six hundred men of the Philistines with an ox goad;

vayak eth plishtim shesh meoth ish b’malmad ha’baqar – “And struck Philistines – six hundred man – in goad the ox.” The word malmad is found only here. It comes from lamad, to teach or learn. The idea is that when one goads an ox, he will learn from it.

The ox, or baqar comes from the verb baqar, to inquire or seek. The connection is that as the ox is used for plowing, the ground is opened up, revealing what is beneath.

Barnes describes the ox goad saying, “An instrument of wood about eight feet long, armed with an iron spike or point at one end, with which to spur the ox at plow, and with an iron scraper at the other end with which to detach the earth from the plowshare when it became encumbered with it.”

The idea of teaching a bull or heifer is seen elsewhere, such as –

“Ephraim is a trained [lamad] heifer
That loves to thresh grain;
But I harnessed her fair neck,
I will make Ephraim pull a plow.
Judah shall plow;
Jacob shall break his clods.” Hosea 10:11

There are varying degrees of skepticism in regard to the claim concerning Shamgar’s success, such as that he didn’t do it alone, but with others in a battle. However, being the leader, it was all credited to him. Such an explanation is hard to justify when we just got done with an account that explicitly included the efforts of others.

There is nothing to say that he did this in one battle. Note what it says in 2 Samuel 23:8 –

“These are the names of the mighty men whom David had: Josheb-Basshebeth the Tachmonite, chief among the captains. He was called Adino the Eznite, because he had killed eight hundred men at one time.”

First, this guy was a captain, implying that he had men under him. Also, it says that he killed eight hundred at one time.

This may be the case with Shamgar, or it may be that he singlehandedly killed six hundred in a series of encounters with the Philistines. Of the number, it is derived from six and ten.

Bullinger defines six, saying, “…it has to do with man; it is the number of imperfection; the human number; the number of MAN as destitute of God, without God, without Christ.” Simply stated, it speaks of fallen man. Again, the meaning of ten was noted earlier.

The name Philistine comes from palash, signifying to roll in the dust as an act of mourning. It can take on several meanings, including Grievers, Burrowers, or Weakeners.

*31 (fin) and he also delivered Israel.

There is an emphasis in the words: vayosha gam hu eth Yisrael – “And saved – also he – Israel.” This emphasis seems to indicate that it was around the same time as Ehud. While Ehud was delivering those on the eastern side of the land, it appears Shamgar was delivering on the western side.

What is this intriguing passage telling us? Why do you suppose the Lord has given such minute detail about things that are almost embarrassing for us to read and consider? Let’s find out.

A place where atonement is made
Where sins are covered and taken away
What a glorious, marvelous trade
When through grace we were cleansed. Oh, what a day!

The law is satisfied, and we have atonement
The guilt of our deeds is taken away
What Christ has done, such a marvelous event
We are free from our guilt. Oh, what a day!

Thank You, O God, for Jesus Christ our Lord
He accomplished it all; our guilt is taken away
Through Him, the victory is scored
Truly, what a marvelous, glorious day!

II. Pictures of Christ

The focus of the passage is Israel doing the evil in the eyes of Yehovah. Because of that, the Lord placed them under subjection to Eglon, king of Moab. Evil comes about from violating God’s law. Eglon, Heifer-like, stands as a type of violation of the law.

The first noted transgression of the law is found in Exodus 32 when Aaron made the golden calf, the egel. Thus, it stands as representative of all future violations of the law, as typified by Eglon (transgression of the law) king of From Father (the power of the devil) –

“You are of your father the devil, and the desires of your father you want to do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and does not stand in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaks a lie, he speaks from his own resources, for he is a liar and the father of it.” John 8:44

That power is strengthened against Israel “because they had done evil in the sight of the Lord” (verse 12). To bolster his strength, Eglon (transgression of the law) gathered A People and The People Who Wring Off. It signifies those without and those within who are attempting to overthrow God’s purposes, meaning those without the law of Moses and those who abuse the law of Moses.

Together, they went and struck Israel and took possession of City the Palms, meaning City the Upright Ones. The purpose of the law, to bring about righteousness, is taken over by transgressions of the law. In other words, it is showing us that by law is the knowledge of sin, but that law cannot justify anyone (Romans 3:20).

Instead, Israel served Eglon (transgression of the law) eighteen years. No matter which way eighteen is divided, there is the sense that man is not under the Lord but under transgression (2) and thus under judgment (9), and that it is for a divinely perfect period of time (3) where he remains fallen and destitute of God (6).

That is seen in the words of Paul –

“But when the fullness of the time had come, God sent forth His Son, born of a woman, born under the law, to redeem those who were under the law, that we might receive the adoption as sons.” Galatians 4:4, 5

However, in their state of subjection, represented by the words “when the children of Israel cried out to the Lord,” He raised up a Deliverer for them. Ehud anticipates Christ. He is described as “Ehud son Gera, son the right, man bound hand right.”

Depending on the root, Ehud means either One Who Praises or United. Either can point to the Lord. He praises God, for example, in Psalm 22:25. He is united to God in the incarnation. Because of this, there is no need to be dogmatic about which root the name came from.

Son of Gera, among other things, means Son of Sojourning. A son in Scripture often simply indicates one who has a particular attribute. A son of a fool is a fool. Jesus came and sojourned among us. Thus, He is a Son of Sojourning.

Benjamite, or benhay’mini, Son of the Right, is an exact description of Jesus in Luke 22:69. As it says –

“Hereafter the Son of Man will sit on the right hand of the power of God.”

Saying he is bound in his right hand would signify His state in the incarnation where He set aside His power and authority, signified by the right hand –

“Let this mind be in you which was also in Christ Jesus, who, being in the form of God, did not consider it robbery to be equal with God, but made Himself of no reputation, taking the form of a bondservant, and coming in the likeness of men.” Philippians 2:5-7

It is Ehud by whom Israel sent an offering (minkhah) in his hand to Eglon, king of Moab. It points to Jesus. He is the true offering –

“Sacrifice and offering [minkhah] You did not desire;
My ears You have opened.
Burnt offering and sin offering You did not require.
Then I said, ‘Behold, I come;
In the scroll of the book it is written of me.
I delight to do Your will, O my God,
And Your law is within my heart.’” Psalm 40:6-8

Think of it! He is “bound in His right hand,” meaning Christ in His incarnation. And it is in his hand (meaning Ehud’s left and weaker hand) that the minkhah is presented. It points to Christ in His lowly state. And so, what does he do? “And made to him, Ehud, sword.”

As has been seen many times, the word sword, kherev, is a picture of the law given at Horeb. They are spelled the same in the Hebrew – חרב. And, to confirm the symbolism, this is said to be a two-edged sword, another description of the word of God –

“For the word of God is living and powerful, and sharper than any two-edged sword, piercing even to the division of soul and spirit, and of joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart.” Hebrews 4:12

Why the unique word gomed, the length of the sword, was provided is hard to say. My best guess would be that it shows the closeness and intimacy of Christ with the law. Next, it was noted that it was girded on his thigh. That is anticipated in the Psalms when referring to the coming Messiah –

“Gird Your sword upon Your thigh, O Mighty One,
With Your glory and Your majesty.” Psalm 45:3

Next, it noted that Ehud brought the tribute (minkhah) to Eglon, king of Moab. That symbolism has already been explained. It then noted his extremely corpulent nature.

As Eglon represents transgression of the law, the symbolism becomes perfectly obvious. Transgression abounds in a superlative way because of law. It literally feeds (bari) off of the law. That is stated by Paul in Romans 7 and Galatians 3.

Noting that Ehud sent those who brought the tribute away, accompanied by the emphatic “And HE – turned back” is a way of saying that Christ alone would accomplish what was necessary to end transgressions of the law. This turning was “from the carved images which by the Gilgal.”

It is hard to be dogmatic about what this is saying, but the Gilgal has repeatedly signified “the Liberty.” Therefore, it seems that it is indicating the closeness of idolatry to finding the Liberty. It is almost an impossible task that only Christ could accomplish. He turned back from the entourage with his secret message for the king.

In bringing it, the attendants were excused. It is a faceoff between the two alone, Christ, and the power of transgression of the law. Ehud approached; Jesus approached. The message is from God: Eglon arose from his throne; transgression of the law arose from its position of power.

No sooner did Eglon arise than Ehud reached with his left (covered) hand. The left hand pictures Christ in His humanity covering His deity. He took the sword, the law, from the right thigh, the side of strength and power, and the base upon which He stands (the thigh), and thrust it into Eglon’s belly.

The belly is what feeds the body as food is processed. The entire sword, the full and complete law, went into Eglon (transgression of the law). In other words, it is a picture of the complete atonement of transgressions of the law. It represents the full, final, finished, and forever satisfaction of the law through Christ’s work. The sword went in, the fat covered it over, and he did not draw the sword out of the belly. It is finished.

Next, the highly complicated words of verses 22 and 23 were stated. The actual meaning of those words is obscure, and several possibilities were given. They can be summed up with the thought, “The sword came out of Eglon’s parshdonah. Meanwhile, Ehud went out of Eglon’s misdronah.”

The law came out of “transgression of the law” in a way that it was distinct and in the place where it divides, destroying its ability to do so. Meanwhile, Jesus came out of the arrangement of “transgression of the law,” meaning living under the law with the possibility of violating it as Adam did. Even if we don’t know what the Hebrew literally says, we can know what it typologically represents.

From there, the doors of the loft were closed and locked, and it emphatically said, “and HE went out.” It speaks of the total victory of Christ over the power of the law.

Despite that, and as evidenced by the servants going to the room, waiting for Eglon to come out, and finally going in to discover him dead on the floor, this doesn’t mean that the law cannot still hold sway over others who have not come to Christ.

Hence, it said that Ehud escaped and passed through the carved images, signifying Christ’s total victory over them, and escaped to the Seirath, the Hairy. It signifies Christ making the awareness of sin (hair signifies an awareness, especially an awareness of sin) available to all.

In his arrival, Ehud blew the trumpet in Mount Ephraim to gather the people. Saying this was in the mount (har) points to the effect of His work, the mountain being synonymous with a large but centralized group of people. It refers to the uniting of all believers as one in Christ.

Noting the name Ephraim adds further meaning. Ephraim means Twice Fruitful. It signifies that Christ’s work has produced fruit in the conversion of both Jews and Gentiles. The secondary meaning of Ashes speaks of the price He paid to make this possible which was the afflictions He endured.

Being gathered, Ehud (Jesus) implored those with him to pursue after him because Yehovah gave their enemies, Moab, into their hand. God in Christ has given power over the law, the enemies From Father, into our hand through the work of Jesus.

It next said that Israel went down and seized the fords of the Jordan (Christ, the Descender), leading to Moab (From Father). None could cross over. There is the law, and there is grace, and there is no crossing between the two –

“And I testify again to every man who becomes circumcised that he is a debtor to keep the whole law.” Galatians 5:3

Finally, verse 29 noted that ten thousand men of Moab were struck, and not one escaped. “It implies that nothing is wanting; that the number and order are perfect; that the whole cycle is complete” (Bullinger). For those who come to God through the grace found in Christ, every single foe (the entire law, without exception) is defeated.

The use of the word bari in relation to Eglon and shamen in relation to the soldiers, both translated as fat, is purposeful. A point is being made: transgression of the law feeds on the law as its source of sustenance, as in Romans 3:20. However, transgressions of the law increase guilt before God, as in Romans 3:19.

From there, it then said that Moab, From Father was humbled under the hand of Israel. The law which allows the devil to have power was humbled, and Christ the Lord is exalted.

The final note of there being eighty years is a nice touch. As eight is derived from the same word as fat (shamen), it speaks of the superabundant nature (8) of the victory and that the entire cycle is complete in what Christ has done (10).

With the exploits of Ehud complete, the narrative turned to Shamgar the son of Anath. He is a quick picture of Christ – There a Stranger, Son of Affliction. Both look to Christ, a Stranger come to dwell among us, and One who identifies with Affliction.

Killing the Philistines, the Weakeners, with an ox goad, looks to the victory that comes from pursuing the knowledge of Christ, which is, obtained through the word that tells us of Him. The ox, as noted, comes from a root signifying to inquire or seek. The goad comes from a root signifying to teach.

Thus, the Philistines, those who weaken others spiritually, are destroyed through diligent search and proper instruction. Noting that six hundred were struck reveals fallen man (6) with the whole cycle being complete and nothing is wanting (10).

We have been given the word of instruction. It is available to those who inquire of it, and it is fully capable of eliminating the power of those who would attempt to weaken them.

The last words of the chapter said, “And saved – also he – Israel.” As noted then, it seems to mean that he was a judge at the same time as Ehud. Christ destroyed transgression of the law by using the law, He continues to separate those who rely on the law for their justification, and He has saved Israel through the instruction that He has provided in His word.

Chapter 3 of Judges has continued the typological pictures of Christ and the magnificent things He has done for us. Eglon, transgression of law, isn’t something ethereal that we can only hypothesize about. It is exactly what Paul describes in Romans, Galatians, and elsewhere.

By law is the knowledge of sin, and by law, man becomes guilty before God. In giving more law, more transgression occurs. But all of what He has done has been a lesson for us, if we are willing to pay heed. He has used a real group of people with serious issues of rebellion to show us exactly what is wrong with us.

The story of Israel is simply a microcosm of the greater story of humanity. God is using them to tell us what is wrong, how He will fix it, and how desperately we need Him to do so. Pay heed to the lesson of the law. It keeps being reintroduced, story after story, to get us to wake up.

Jesus. We need Jesus. Without Him, there is no hope. With Him, there is absolute hope with no uncertainty at all. This is what we are again shown in this wonderful passage from God’s Superior Word.

Closing Verse: “Now we know that whatever the law says, it says to those who are under the law, that every mouth may be stopped, and all the world may become guilty before God.” Romans 3:19

Next Week: Judges 4:1-16 Hoorah! A great story to tell – until it is done… (Deborah, Judge of Israel, Part I) (11th Judges Sermon)

The Lord has you exactly where He wants you. He has a good plan and purpose for you. It is He who judges His people according to their deeds. So, follow Him, live for Him, and trust Him, and He will do marvelous things for you and through you.

Ehud, Judge of Israel, Part II

When he had gone out
Eglon’s servants came to look, and to their surprise, as
———-the account reads
The doors of the upper room were locked. So they said
“He is probably in the cool chamber attending to his needs”

So they waited till they were embarrassed
And still he had not opened the doors of the upper room
Therefore they took the key and opened them
And there was their master, fallen dead on the floor
———-a scene of doom

But Ehud had escaped while they delayed, oorah!
And passed beyond the stone images and escaped to Seirah

And it happened, when he arrived
That he blew the trumpet in the mountains of Ephraim
And the children of Israel went down with him from the mountains
And he led them, a great day it would seem

Then he said to them, “Follow me
For the LORD has delivered your enemies the Moabites into
———-your hand
So they went down after him, seized the fords of the Jordan
———-leading to Moab
And did not allow anyone to cross over, so it was planned

And at that time they killed about ten thousand men of Moab
All stout men of valor; not a man escaped (hooray and cheers!)
So Moab was subdued that day under the hand of Israel
And the land had rest for eighty years

After him was Shamgar the son of Anath
Who had a great story to tell
He killed six hundred men of the Philistines with an ox goad
And he also delivered Israel

Lord God, turn our hearts to be obedient to Your word
Give us wisdom to be ever faithful to You
May we carefully heed each thing we have heard
Yes, Lord God may our hearts be faithful and true

And we shall be content and satisfied in You alone
We will follow You as we sing our songs of praise
Hallelujah to You; to us Your path You have shown
Hallelujah we shall sing to You for all of our days

Hallelujah and Amen…

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

24 When he had gone out, Eglon’s servants came to look, and to their surprise, the doors of the upper room were locked. So they said, “He is probably attending to his needs in the cool chamber.” 25 So they waited till they were embarrassed, and still he had not opened the doors of the upper room. Therefore they took the key and opened them. And there was their master, fallen dead on the floor.

26 But Ehud had escaped while they delayed, and passed beyond the stone images and escaped to Seirah. 27 And it happened, when he arrived, that he blew the trumpet in the mountains of Ephraim, and the children of Israel went down with him from the mountains; and he led them. 28 Then he said to them, “Follow me, for the Lord has delivered your enemies the Moabites into your hand.” So they went down after him, seized the fords of the Jordan leading to Moab, and did not allow anyone to cross over. 29 And at that time they killed about ten thousand men of Moab, all stout men of valor; not a man escaped. 30 So Moab was subdued that day under the hand of Israel. And the land had rest for eighty years.

31 After him was Shamgar the son of Anath, who killed six hundred men of the Philistines with an ox goad; and he also delivered Israel.

 

Acts 21:27

Lincoln Memorial.

Sunday, 5 November 2023 

Now when the seven days were almost ended, the Jews from Asia, seeing him in the temple, stirred up the whole crowd and laid hands on him, Acts 21:27

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen)

You can also read this commentary, with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

The previous verse saw Paul being purified according to the temple rites and announcing the expiration of the days of purification. Continuing the narrative, it next says, “Now when the seven days were almost ended.”

This makes it certain that the seven-day duration of the previous verse began with Paul’s purification and that the offering would be made at the end of that period. From verse 24:11, in relation to the timeline of events, it appears that the details of this occurred about the fifth day. There, it says, “because you may ascertain that it is no more than twelve days since I went up to Jerusalem to worship.” It is right about this time, as these seven days were almost complete, that it then notes, “the Jews from Asia.”

At that time, Jews from Asia, meaning Jews who had been in the same locations that Paul had evangelized – and who had probably stirred things up against him previously – saw him in the temple. As it is the time of a pilgrim feast, it was a time when many Jews came to Jerusalem to meet old friends, share in cultural fellowship, and – above all – worship the Lord as instructed in the law. Of these Asian Jews in relation to Paul, it next says, “seeing him in the temple.”

Paul was still in the time of purification. Therefore, it was natural that he would be in the temple. It is because of this, and their unwillingness to determine the facts, that they will accost him. It is ironic that the very place where he was under rites of purification was to be the place which they accused him of defiling.

Instead of perceiving the truth of the matter, they simply relied on their memories of his past actions in Asia and began the attack. As it next says, they “stirred up the whole crowd.”

The verb indicates pouring things together so that they are mixed. Hence, they were confusing the situation in the minds of the people. It is a term found among medical writings of the time and which Luke would have probably used often in his own work. One can think of a doctor pouring various liquids together to form a particular medicine.

As the verb is imperfect, it means that they began to stir up the crowd, and they continued to stir it up, getting the multitudes into a mass hysteria over Paul. Because of the crowd and the confusion that was brought upon them, it next says the crowd “laid hands on him.”

The meaning is that they were ready to commit physical harm against him at any moment. Once again, Paul has found himself in a dangerous situation from the agitations of his own people. It was, as he says in 2 Corinthians 11:26, “in perils of my own countrymen.” The message of the gospel was rejected by the nation. But hatred for that message came into its strongest focus because it is a message available to the Gentiles.

The idea of Jesus’ incarnation and sacrificial death for the sins of Israel could only mean that Israel was a nation of sinners. But more, it meant that the Law of Moses was incapable of correcting this situation. This notion was unconscionable to them. But more, that the same sacrifice of Jesus extended to Gentiles, who were not even a part of what God had been doing (or so they thought), was inexcusable to them. Paul was the herald of this message, and they wanted him eradicated because of it.

Life application: At the outbreak of hostilities between Israel and Gaza in October 2023, a Jewish “rabbi,” Chaim Richman, was being interviewed and said to the interviewer, “You guys are worshiping one Jew, that’s a mistake. You should be worshiping every single one of us because we all die for your sins every single day. And that’s exactly what’s going on here. We’re all God’s firstborn and we’re dying for your sins right now.”

This is the attitude of the Jewish people that attacked Paul, and it has permeated their society to this day. They cannot accept that it is they who need forgiveness of sin, not only individually but as a nation.

Until one comes to Christ, whether Jew or Gentile, there is a mental disconnect between one’s state as a sinner and the infinite holiness of God. This is why people grade themselves on a bell curve when asked why they should be allowed to go to heaven. A common answer is, “Well, I’m not as bad as…” or “Well, I’m a good guy.”

Such evaluations make oneself the acceptable standard of goodness, a standard that sets the bar for God’s decision. This is what Chaim Richman has done in relation to Israel. He has openly avowed that Israel is the standard of God’s holiness, that they alone have met it, and they are, therefore, to be worshiped as a people. All others are to be subject to them, not because of who God is in relation to them, but who they are in relation to God.

Rather, there can be only one standard of holiness: God alone. The incarnation of Jesus Christ means that Jesus is God come in human form. He, therefore, is the standard – the bar – by which all men will be judged. One will stand in relation to Him and be condemned or saved, and the only way to be saved is by faith that He is the offering for the sin of man.

This is the message of the Bible. We must come to God through Jesus, and when we do so, God’s infinite perfection – His righteousness, holiness, etc. – is imputed to us. Without this, we are condemned already. Let us hail God, who has brought us back to Himself through Jesus!

Glorious God Almighty! Praises to You forever and ever because of what You have done. You are worthy of all our honor and praise simply because You are our Creator. How much more should we glorify You because You are our Redeemer! Thank You for Jesus Christ, who has made this possible. Praises to You, O God. Amen.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acts 21:26

Washington Monument: Nice photo.

Saturday, 4 November 2023

Then Paul took the men, and the next day, having been purified with them, entered the temple to announce the expiration of the days of purification, at which time an offering should be made for each one of them. Acts 21:26

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen).

You can also read this commentary, with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

The Greek is more literally translated as, “Then Paul, having taken the men on the following day – having been purified with them – entered into the temple, declaring the fulfillment of the days of the purification, until which was offered the offering for each one of them” (CG).

In the previous verse, James repeated the requirements expected of Gentiles concerning their walk before the Lord. Now, in contrast to that, the hoped-for completion of the rites of the Nazirite previously discussed for the four men who had taken such a vow is noted. Paul included himself in these rites, thus identifying with them. That is noted, beginning with, “Then Paul, having taken the men on the following day.”

The word “them” is referring to the four men described by James in verse 23. Paul took the advice of James and the other elders and took these men on the very next day, “having been purified with them.”

Fully complying with James’ advice, he took the men and went through the mandatory rites of purification with them. This was in accordance with the law, and the period would be seven days. When those days were met, an offering was to be made for each individual. That is stated in the next words, saying he “entered into the temple, declaring the fulfillment of the days of the purification.”

Of this, Charles Ellicott says, “The process lasted, as the next verse shows, for seven days, which were probably reckoned from the completion of the thirty days, or other term, of the vow itself. St. Paul, having made himself the representative of the Nazarite company, had to give, in their name, the formal notice to the priests, who were to be ready for the sacrifices when the seven days had expired. Seven days was, it will be noted, the ordinary period for the more solemn purifications (Exodus 29:37; Leviticus 12:2; Leviticus 13:6; Numbers 12:14; Numbers 19:14, et al.).”

Ellicott may be correct. There is nothing in the rites of the Nazirite to specify a seven-day period being required. However, if Paul was to be the representative for these men, a seven-day period might have been expected for purification purposes. No matter what, this was obviously a custom expected by the priests. Therefore, it next says, “until which was offered the offering for each one of them.”

The words “until which” could have various meanings. The Pulpit commentary says –

“Meyer makes ‘until’ depend upon ‘the fulfillment of the days,’ so as to define that fulfillment as not taking place till the offering was offered. Wieseler makes ‘until’ depend upon ‘he entered into the temple,’ with the idea supplied, ‘and remained there,’ or ‘came there daily;’ supposing that it was the custom for Nazarites to finish up their time of separation by passing the last seven days, or at least being present daily, in ‘the court of the women, where was the apartment appropriated to the Nazarites.’”

What seems logical based on the previous words, “having taken the men on the following day,” is that the rest of the days are future, not past. If it was past, it seems likely that Luke’s words would have been more precise concerning those seven days. Therefore, in these words, it is probably that Paul is declaring that the rites of purification had been administered, he was representing the four men, and after the necessary interval, he would make the offering for them.

Life application: The book of Hebrews says –

“For the law, having a shadow of the good things to come, and not the very image of the things, can never with these same sacrifices, which they offer continually year by year, make those who approach perfect. For then would they not have ceased to be offered? For the worshipers, once purified, would have had no more consciousness of sins. But in those sacrifices there is a reminder of sins every year. For it is not possible that the blood of bulls and goats could take away sins.” Hebrews 10:1-4

The point of those words is that the rites and rituals of the temple were only outward, fleshly ordinances, a term used in Hebrews 9:10. They actually didn’t cleanse anything but were external rites that could never change the true nature of a person, making him permanently acceptable to God.

However, Christ, because of His complete cleansing of those who come to Him, makes us wholly and eternally acceptable to God. This is reflected in the words –

“‘This is the covenant that I will make with them after those days, says the Lord: I will put My laws into their hearts, and in their minds I will write them,’ 17 then He adds, ‘Their sins and their lawless deeds I will remember no more.’ 18 Now where there is remission of these, there is no longer an offering for sin.” Hebrews 10:16-18

In saying, “there is no longer an offering for sin,” it means that Christ’s work is a one-time and for all-time cleansing. No other offering for sin is acceptable, nor is it needed. As this is so, then why would anyone want to go back to the external, temporary, and futile rites and rituals of the Mosaic Covenant?

Jesus Christ purifies those who come to Him once and forever! Rejoice in that and be confident in your salvation and eternal cleansing. Take time today to read Hebrews 10:1-25. Think about what is being said there. Hold fast to faith in Christ as your hope. It is the sweet spot in what God offers to the people of the world.

Heavenly Father, it is beyond imagination to think about what You have done through the giving of Jesus. You have brought us back to Yourself, completely and perfectly, through His sacrificial offering. We rejoice in You and thank You. Praises be to You forever and ever! Amen.

 

 

 

 

 

Acts 21:25

Lincoln Memorial

Friday, 3 November 2023

“But concerning the Gentiles who believe, we have written and decided that they should observe no such thing, except that they should keep themselves from things offered to idols, from blood, from things strangled, and from sexual immorality.” Acts 21:25

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen).

You can also read this commentary, with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

Paul was just told that he should consider going with four men who were completing their vows and to participate in their purification rites according to the law, also paying their expenses. That was intended to show all who saw that the things they heard about him were untrue and that he also walked in an orderly manner and kept the law.

With that remembered, James once again upholds the edict of the Jerusalem council. By doing so, he is determined that the Gentiles are to be considered acceptable to the Jews in the church regardless of their nature. Therefore, he begins with, “But concerning the Gentiles who believe.”

James has set a line between the Jews and Gentiles. The Jews are doing their thing, but what they were doing was not to be imposed on the Gentiles. The thing the Jews were doing is what he just said, they “kept the law.” On the other hand, he says, “we have written and decided.”

This refers to the formal edict published by the Jerusalem Council based upon the judgment rendered there. That explicitly said “that they should observe no such thing, except…”

In other words, they were not bound to any restriction, law, precept, custom, or tradition of the Jewish nation, nor to the Law of Moses. They were given complete freedom to live out their lives in the manner of their culture, laws, customs, traditions, diets, holidays, etc. All of this was to be without any question of impropriety in the minds of the Jewish believers.

However, the word “except” is given to introduce four points agreed on by the council that the Gentiles should avoid. And even those four things were not given as laws, but as hoped-for recommendations as evidenced by the words of their letter which said, “If you keep yourselves from these, you will do well” (Acts 15:29).

James next repeats the four recommended prohibitions, beginning with “that they should keep themselves from things offered to idols.” The word “should” is not in the original, even if it is implied. It more literally says, “to watch themselves from that sacrificed to idols” (SLT).

In Acts 15, it was clear that this doesn’t merely mean practicing idolatry, but abstaining from anything that is connected to the service of idols, such as partaking in sacrifices and offerings, etc. James does not go into the depth of the Law of Moses concerning this. Rather, it is a general statement set forth as a guideline for right living among believers. His words distance the decision of the council from the weight of the law in his words.

He next says, “from blood.” The words form a general statement concerning a matter that is carefully detailed in the law. It is stated many times and in exacting ways concerning what was to be done with the blood. James’ decision completely separates the matter from the Law of Moses. But its main intent was surely to have the people consider why they were drinking blood in the first place. Several reasons were surely behind the decision.

One is that drinking blood was, and even today in some cultures is, intended to assimilate the power of the one whose blood was being drunk into the person drinking. Another reason is related to idolatry, where the blood of an animal that was sacrificed was consumed by the offeror as a way of fellowshipping with their god or gods.

Also, the shedding of blood has almost universally been considered a means of atoning for sin. This is seen in cultures around the world. But Christ’s blood is the only effectual sacrifice for the atonement of sin. This then is an object lesson concerning the nature of Christ’s sacrifice as much as anything else.

James next says, “from things strangled.” The Greek simply reads “and strangled.” The Greek word is pniktos, and this is its last use in Scripture. It signifies something killed without letting the blood out. Vincent’s Word Studies extends the thought to animals killed in snares. This is an inference, but it is probably the case.

The laws within the Law of Moses are detailed and explicit on how to treat the blood of animals sacrificed or simply slaughtered for meat. James, once again, gives a general statement concerning the matter, completely distancing the decision from the Law of Moses. With that, he finishes the thought with, “and from sexual immorality.”

The word in Greek is porneia. It signifies “selling off (surrendering) of sexual purity, promiscuity of any (every) type” (HELPS Word Studies). Quite often, it is associated with idolatry. James gives this general word, never mentioning the very strict laws associated with such things as set forth in the law of Moses. As such, it was another clear indication that the Law of Moses had no bearing on the decision.

In Acts 15, James said, “to abstain from things polluted by idols, from sexual immorality, from things strangled, and from blood.”

In Acts 21, he says, “except that they should keep themselves from things offered to idols, from blood, from things strangled, and from sexual immorality.”

His words, though being in a different order, are essentially the same. These were the only restrictions placed upon the Gentiles, and they are clearly only recommended prohibitions.

Life application: The words of James, repeated from Acts 15, are not words of law. If they were, then the Gentiles would be under their own set law, and grace would be excluded. But Paul, the apostle to the Gentiles, has clearly indicated this is not the case in his epistles. These are recommendations given for a set purpose, which is to not cause conflict between the Jews that believe and the believing Gentiles they would encounter.

The Jews eventually stopped observing the Law of Moses as well, it being impossible to observe without a standing temple. Even if believing Jews continue to observe various aspects of the law as cultural customs, they are not under the Law of Moses any longer. That is made explicit in the book of Hebrews.

It was during the time that the temple was standing, a time when observing the law was culturally mandatory, that believing Jews continued to observe Moses. Paul includes himself when he confirms this in Romans –

“For sin shall not have dominion over you, for you are not under law but under grace. 15 What then? Shall we sin because we are not under law but under grace? Certainly not!” Romans 6:14, 15

The law is not grace. But believers are under grace, not law. Therefore, even if Paul observed Moses for set purposes that have been seen in Acts and in his epistles, he also did not observe Moses for set purposes as well. He did these things to win people to Christ. Do not let anyone steal you from the proper path. Your salvation is not dependent on what you do or do not do. It is dependent on your faith in what Christ has done, nothing else.

Glorious Lord God, today we rejoice in You and in Your goodness toward us through the giving of Your Son for our sins. He has freed us from the bonds of the law and set us on a path of grace. May we be all the more willing to please You in our walk of faith and holiness because of this wonderful blessing that rests upon us! Amen.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acts 21:24

Some Memorial, Washington DC.

Thursday, 2 November 2023

“Take them and be purified with them, and pay their expenses so that they may shave their heads, and that all may know that those things of which they were informed concerning you are nothing, but that you yourself also walk orderly and keep the law. Acts 21:24

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen).

You can also read this commentary, with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible”on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

A more literal rendering of the Greek is, “Having taken these, be purified with them and spend upon them so that they will shave the head. And all will know that which they have been informed about you is nothing, but you yourself walk also, keeping the law” (CG).

Paul was just told about four men who had taken a vow. Now, to help Paul’s image before the people, ensuring that they could not make unfounded claims against him, it next says, “Having taken these.”

It is referring to the four men just mentioned. Their way of helping Paul is to include others who were not in question concerning their keeping of the law. Paul was to take them and “be purified with them.”

In being purified with those who were being purified after a vow, it was as if Paul had included himself in the vow vicariously. There is nothing in the law that specifically allowed this, but there was nothing to preclude it as well.

By including himself in the vow, it would increase the number (and thus the cost) of the sacrificial offerings required. The priests would certainly have no problem with this. More than just being purified and identifying himself with these men, the words of James continue, saying, “and spend upon them so that they will shave the head.”

This is just what the law required. First, the offerings were made, and then the head was shaved –

“Then the priest shall bring them before the Lord and offer his sin offering and his burnt offering; 17 and he shall offer the ram as a sacrifice of a peace offering to the Lord, with the basket of unleavened bread; the priest shall also offer its grain offering and its drink offering. 18 Then the Nazirite shall shave his consecrated head at the door of the tabernacle of meeting, and shall take the hair from his consecrated head and put it on the fire which is under the sacrifice of the peace offering.” Numbers 6:16-18

James has suggested this for obvious reasons. If Paul were to join in the purification and also pay the expenses of the others, then it would be apparent that the charges against him were false and that he was, in fact, a law-abiding Jew.

It would be impossible to claim otherwise because he is accomplishing these things prior to any public accusations. The four men and the accompanying priest would be open witnesses to the fact. As this is so, James states it, saying, “And all will know that which they have been informed about you is nothing.”

This was not a minor point of the law that people might do out of cultural identification. Nor was it something so obviously required that even a non-observant Jew would still be sure to follow, such as not eating pork or keeping the Sabbath.

Rather, the Nazirite vow was a voluntary imposition upon oneself. It would be unthinkable that someone would lay this burden upon himself unless he truly respected the law and saw the benefit in assuming this burden. Therefore, James continues, “but you yourself walk also, keeping the law.”

The idea of walking is the conduct of one’s life. For example, one can walk contrary to the law, or one can walk in accord with the law. Therefore, to participate in the vows and sacrifices of these men was a way of ensuring people knew Paul was walking in step with Moses.

Of this verse, James Kypke (quoted by Meyer) says, “It was a received thing among the Jews, and was reckoned an act of eminent piety, for a rich man to undertake to bear, on behalf of poor Nazarites, the expense of those sacrifices which they had to offer when they shaved their heads at the expiration of their vow.”

Further, Vincent’s Word Studies says, “‘For a week, then, St. Paul, if he accepted the advice of James and the presbyters, would have to live with four paupers in the chamber of the temple which was set apart for this purpose; and then to pay for sixteen sacrificial animals and the accompanying meat-offerings’ (Farrar, ‘Life and Work of Paul’).  He must also stand among the Nazarites during the offering of the sacrifices, and look on while their heads were shaved, and while they took their hair to burn it under the caldron of the peace-offerings, ‘and while the priest took four sodden shoulders of rams, and four unleavened cakes out of the four baskets, and four unleavened wafers anointed with oils and put them on the hands of the Nazarites, and waved them for a wave-offering before the Lord’” (Farrar).

Life application: Walking, as noted above, indicates the way and manner of one’s life. If you believe you must walk according to Moses in order to be pleasing to God, then you are walking contrary to the gospel of Jesus, which says that Christ died for your sins.

Sin is imputed through infractions of the law. Christ never sinned under the law. Further, He gave His life up as the Substitute for our sins. To attempt to merit God’s favor by law observance means you are attempting to do so apart from Christ’s already accomplished work. As such, you have set yourself against Christ as if you are racing. Be advised that Christ has already won this race. Your attempts at meriting righteousness apart from Him means that you will be disqualified.

Rather, learn what it means to walk in Christ. From the book of Ephesians, Paul gives numerous thoughts on how we are to walk properly –

“For we are His workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand that we should walk in them.” Ephesians 2:10

“I, therefore, the prisoner of the Lord, beseech you to walk worthy of the calling with which you were called, with all lowliness and gentleness, with longsuffering, bearing with one another in love, endeavoring to keep the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace.” Ephesians 4:1-3

“This I say, therefore, and testify in the Lord, that you should no longer walk as [f]the rest of the Gentiles walk, in the futility of their mind.” Ephesians 4:17

“Therefore be imitators of God as dear children. And walk in love, as Christ also has loved us and given Himself for us, an offering and a sacrifice to God for a sweet-smelling aroma.” Ephesians 5:1, 2

“For you were once darkness, but now you are light in the Lord. Walk as children of light (for the fruit of the Spirit is in all goodness, righteousness, and truth), 10 finding out what is acceptable to the Lord.” Ephesians 5:8-10

“See then that you walk circumspectly, not as fools but as wise, 16 redeeming the time, because the days are evil.” Ephesians 5:15, 16

These and many other charges are provided by Paul in his epistles. Never does he instruct his reader to be a law observer. Instead of self, walk in Christ and honor Him because of what He has done.

Lord God, may our walk in this life be pleasing to You by following in the footsteps of Jesus, who has accomplished all things necessary to reconcile us to You. Our walk is one of thankfulness and holiness in Christ. May we walk faithfully all our days, honoring Jesus and glorifying You through Him. Amen.