Judges 9:22-45 (Abimelech, King of Shechem, Part III)

Judges 9:22-45
Abimelech, King of Shechem, Part III

(Typed 22 January 2024) In our verses today, Charles Ellicott comments on the change of verbiage in verse 22 from earlier verses, saying, “Had reigned.—The verb is here sûr, not malak, as in Judges 9:6; but whether the change of word is meant to be significant we cannot say.”

The change in the verb is significant and meaningful. I was surprised to read that Ellicott seems unsure because he often argues over the morphology of individual words, noting the significance of various changes in them.

Because God is the author of Scripture, every single detail of it has meaning. This includes things we might not normally look at, such as how many times things are mentioned, variant spellings, and so forth. There is always some hidden treat that we can discover if we look closely enough and contemplate what is being presented.

There is also a point where we must move on and continue our journey through Scripture. As for the various words that are used and if they are relevant, Solomon gives us a thought to consider –

Text Verse: “Every word of God is pure;
He is a shield to those who put their trust in Him.
Do not add to His words,
Lest He rebuke you, and you be found a liar.” Proverbs 30:5, 6

The word translated as pure is tsaraph. It means to smelt, refine, and test. The Lord, in His infinite wisdom, has given us a word that indicates His word is as if it has gone through the refiner’s fire and is thus pure.

It is exquisitely placed before us as the most precious jewel, completely unblemished and perfectly sculpted for us to contemplate. The finest gems are inlaid in the most precious metals that have been refined to absolute purity.

Consider this as you read the word. What you are reading is communication from the absolutely perfect Creator to us. Despite it being transmitted through fallible man, God has cared for His word sufficiently to ensure that what we have is just what we need.

We have more verses to get through than usual today. Many of them are not at all complicated. The author simply provides the needed background in the story so that we can see where the narrative trekked to reach the conclusion.

For today, please just enjoy the verses and don’t get overwhelmed with all the info. This is the word of God and we should revel in it as the verses unfold. For sure, He will be pleased with us when we are pleased with what He has given to us.

Great things are to be found in His superior word. And so, let us turn to that precious word once again, and… May God speak to us through His word today, and may His glorious name ever be praised.

I. Who Is Abimelech and Who Is Shechem? (verses 22-29)

The previous passage detailed Abimelech’s plot to reign as king over the people. He convinced them to reject the seventy sons of Jerubbaal and anoint him king. The people agreed, had the seventy sons killed, and made Abimelech king.

From there, Jotham gave his parable of the trees and what would come upon the people because of what they had done. He ended the parable with a question as to the propriety of their actions. If they were acceptable and good, then that is one thing –

“But if not, let fire come from Abimelech and devour the men of Shechem and Beth Millo; and let fire come from the men of Shechem and from Beth Millo and devour Abimelech!” Judges 9:20

Jotham then ran away and fled, going to Beer to dwell, away from the face of Abimelech. The narrative next turns to the time of Abimelech’s rule…

22 After Abimelech had reigned

vayasar avimelekh – “And wrestles, Abimelech.” Here is a word found only in this verse and in Hosea 12:4, sur. It comes from a primitive root meaning vanquish. By implication, it signifies to rule. Thus, causatively, it means to crown. Hence, it means “to make princes.”

It is connected with the word sarah, to persist, exert power, etc. Strong’s adds in the thought, “have power (as a prince).” That word is only found twice in Scripture as well. The first is in Genesis 32:28 –

And He said, “Your name shall no longer be called Jacob, but Israel; for you have struggled [sarah] with God and with men, and have prevailed.”

The second use of both of these words is found in Hosea 12 –

“The Lord also brings a charge against Judah,
And will punish Jacob according to his ways;
According to his deeds He will recompense him.
He took his brother by the heel in the womb,
And in his strength he struggled [sarah] with God.
Yes, he struggled [sur] with the Angel and prevailed;
He wept, and sought favor from Him.
He found Him in Bethel,
And there He spoke to us—
That is, the Lord God of hosts.
The Lord is His memorable name.” Hosea 12:2-5

Based on the meaning of this word, some define the name Israel as Prince of God. However, the context of Genesis 32 is clear. It is based on the thought of struggling with God. Therefore, it means He Strives with God.

This can be striving with God, for God, or it can be striving with God, against God. Either way, Israel strives with God. In the case of Abimelech (My Father is King), he is wrestling with the people and he is striving against God. I translated it as wrestles to separate his time from that of a king or a military leader. At this time, it is said…

22 (con’t) over Israel three years,

al Yisrael shalosh shanim – “over Israel three years.” Despite the localized nature of Abimelech’s reign in the area of Shechem, the text clearly identifies Abimelech as wrestling over Israel. Thus, that is the intent to be drawn, nothing less.

The unusual word used to define this period seems to almost indicate a form of “tyrannical despotism” (Keil). He was kinged by Shechem in verse 9:6. However, his time over Israel is neither a reign (malakh) as a king nor rule (mashal) as a military leader. Rather, it is as one who struggles with the people.

As for the number three, Bullinger says it signifies Divine Perfection. Further, he says, “…the number three points us to what is real, essential, perfect, substantial, complete, and Divine.” It was after these three years of his wrestling over Israel that…

23 God sent a spirit of ill will between Abimelech and the men of Shechem;

vayishlakh elohim ruakh raah ben avimelekh u-ben baale sh’khem– “And sends, elohim, spirit evil between Abimelech and between masters Shechem.” There is no contentment or harmony between them. God uses this to cause this evil spirit to arise between them.

These words are used to describe the actions found in the rest of the chapter. They are an initial summary which will be carefully fleshed out, revealing how Israel will cast off this unholy rule and explaining the demise of Abimelech.

As previously seen, the name Shechem means (Having a Sense of) Responsibility. Also, note that the term baale, masters, is used in this passage. It is as if the men are being identified as being aligned with baal in contrast to the house of Jerubbaal. As for the evil spirit, it was sent…

23 (con’t) and the men of Shechem dealt treacherously with Abimelech,

vayivg’du baale sh’khem ba’avimelekh – “And deals covertly masters Shechem in Abimelech.” Though nobody translates it as I have, the word is bagad. It comes from a primitive root meaning to cover. Therefore, it signifies to deal deceitfully, treacherously, etc.

As such, it gives the sense of acting covertly. In this, one can think of CIA covert ops overthrowing a leader to attain their goals. Thus are the men of Shechem dealing with Abimelech. This was so…

24 that the crime done to the seventy sons of Jerubbaal might be settled

Rather, the words are short and abrupt: la’vo khamas shivim b’ne yerubaal – “To go violence seventy sons, Jerubbaal.” The word bo means to come in or out, to come, to go in or out, or to go. In this case, it is probably signifying to go out.

Violence had been done against the sons of Jerubbaal and it needed to be expunged from Israel. This is the process that will accomplish just that, according to the evil spirit sent from elohim. Jerubbaal means Let Baal Strive.

As a side note to the matter, the word khamas is used here. It is the Hebrew word closely associated with the Arabic name used concerning the miscreants in Gaza, Hamas. In Arabic, it signifies enthusiasm, but in Hebrew it means violence. The Hebrew perfectly describes them in our modern world. As for this process from elohim, its purpose continues, saying…

24 (con’t) and their blood be laid on Abimelech their brother, who killed them,

v’damam la’sum al avimelekh akhikhem asher harag otham – “and their blood to set upon Abimelech who killed them.” This is the stated purpose of the evil spirit from elohim. First, it is to rightfully avenge what had happened to the seventy sons of Jerubbaal.

They were given as sons to Jerubbaal by the Lord, and yet Abimelech had killed them all in order to reign in Israel. This could not be allowed to stand. And more, because Abimelech was supported by the men of Shechem, the purpose extends to those who supported what he had done…

24 (con’t) and on the men of Shechem, who aided him in the killing of his brothers.

The words are more expressive: v’al baale sh’khem asher hizqu eth yadav la’harog eth ekhav – “and upon masters Shechem who strengthened his hand to killing his brothers.” It wasn’t just that they aided him through verbal approval. Rather, they financially supported him, throwing their allegiance behind what he would do, thus strengthening his hand.

Of this process by which elohim sent an evil spirit between them, Keil says, “‘An evil spirit’ is not merely ‘an evil disposition,’ but an evil demon, which produced discord and strife.” There is no reason to assume this. Instead, John Lange says, “for the undeviating law by which sin punishes itself, is grounded in the very nature of the Deity.”

This seems far more likely. Wickedness tends to produce its own destruction. Because Abimelech was a wicked man with wicked intentions, and because those who strengthened his hand did so with evil intent, there was sure to be no harmony between them.

The pattern has repeated itself throughout human history. Because treachery was the basis of their actions, the general rule of self-implosion was almost inevitable. Therefore…

25 And the men of Shechem set men in ambush against him on the tops of the mountains,

vayasimu lo baale sh’khem m’arvim al rashe he’harim – “And sets to him, masters Shechem, ambushing upon tops the mountains.” This begins the explanation of how the evil spirit arose between Abimelech and the people. There is a lack of peace within the land.

As for the words “to him,” although this could mean they were after Abimelech personally, it doesn’t necessarily have to mean that. Rather it could signify ambushes against his authority. He is disadvantaged by the events that occur.

John Lange takes it as meaning that their ambushes are intended to make the people think it is Abimelech ordering the crimes. This would be an explanation of the covert ops mentioned in verse 23, being an attempt to make him look even worse than he is. Whichever way, this is seen in the next words…

25 (con’t) and they robbed all who passed by them along that way;

Rather: vayigzlu eth kal asher yeavor alehem ba’derekh – “And seizes all passing upon them in the way.” The word is gazal, to tear away, seize, rob, etc. It comes from a primitive root signifying to pluck off. As such, it may mean rob, but it also may mean to seize a person by force, which is how the Peshitta translates it.

In Judges 21, it will be used to describe the seizing of young maidens who are carried away to be the brides of the remnant of Benjamin. Whether the people are robbed or seized as plunder, it is something that would affect the reign of Abimelech, hence…

25 (con’t) and it was told Abimelech.

vayugad la’avimelekh – “And declares to Abimelech.” The word nagad means to make conspicuous. If he is a king, good or bad, he couldn’t stand by and have his people robbed, thus depriving him of money he could tax. And he couldn’t have his people being seized, thus depriving him of his subjects. One can see the play on words from verse 23 and this verse –

“And dealt covertly [bagad] masters Shechem in Abimelech.”
“And declared [nagad] to Abimelech.”

26 Now Gaal the son of Ebed came with his brothers and went over to Shechem;

va’yavo gaal ben eved v’ekhav vayaavru biskhem – “And goes, Gaal son Ebed and his brothers, and crosses over in Shechem.” Without any prior introduction, Gaal, son of Ebed, appears in the narrative.

The name is derived from the noun gaal, to loathe or abhor. Thus, it means Loathing, Abhorrence, etc. Ebed means Slave or Servant. Not much can be deduced about him and it is unknown from the text if he is an Israelite or a Canaanite.

This person is said to have crossed over in Shechem. The word might imply that he was on the other side of the Jordan, but not necessarily. It can mean to pass through, pass by, etc. He was somewhere and came through Shechem…

26 (con’t) and the men of Shechem put their confidence in him.

vayivtkhu bo baale sh’khem – “and trusts in him masters Shechem.” Those who had at first put their hand in with Abimelech have now put their trust in Gaal. Therefore…

27 So they went out into the fields, and gathered grapes from their vineyards and trod them, and made merry.

Both sentences of the verse are filled with imperfect verbs: vayetsu ha’sadeh vayivtsru eth karmehem vayidr’ku vayaasu hilulim – “And goes out the field, and clips their vineyards, and treads, and makes praises.” Here is the second and last use of hillul, praises, in Scripture. The first use was –

“And in the year, the fourth, shall be all his fruit holy, praises to Yehovah” Leviticus 19:24 (CG).

The idea in Leviticus is that the fruit would be offered as praises to Yehovah. Likewise, these men who are now aligned with Gaal have clipped their vines, brought in the fruit to the winepress, trodden it, and are using it to offer praises.

They have rejected Abimelech and have aligned with Gaal. The praises are either to him directly, or to their god in praise of granting them Gaal as their leader. If the latter, that would be seen in the next words…

27 (con’t) And they went into the house of their god, and ate and drank, and cursed Abimelech.

vayavou beith elohehem vayokhlu vayishtu vayqalu eth avimelekh – “and goes in house their god, and eats, and drinks, and trivializes Abimelech.” The word qalal comes from a primitive root signifying to make light. Thus, they have trivialized Abimelech, making him small in their eyes.

Whoever is the object of their praise, be it Gaal directly or Baal-Berith who has provided the new leadership, they have traded any praises of Abimelech for reviling. This is explained in the next words…

28 Then Gaal the son of Ebed said, “Who is Abimelech,

vayomer gaal ben eved mi avimelekh – “And says, Gaal son Ebed, ‘Who Abimelech?’” The words are stated contemptuously as if Abimelech was a nobody. They are not unlike the words of Nabal concerning David –

“Then Nabal answered David’s servants, and said, ‘Who is David, and who is the son of Jesse? There are many servants nowadays who break away each one from his master. 11 Shall I then take my bread and my water and my meat that I have killed for my shearers, and give it to men when I do not know where they are from?’” 1 Samuel 25:10, 11

28 (con’t) and who is Shechem, that we should serve him?

u-mi sh’khem ki naavdenu – “And who Shechem, that we serve him?” The words are curious, no doubt. Some take it to mean that Shechem is being used synonymously for Abimelech’s rule. But a who is a person, not a thing. The answer appears to be found in the next clauses…

28 (con’t) Is he not the son of Jerubbaal,

halo ben yerubaal – “Not son Jerubbaal?” Gaal continues his contemptuous words. There is the noted Jerubbaal, and then there is his son. “It’s not the son who accomplished the victory for Israel. It was Jerubbaal! What are we doing serving this guy?”

28 (con’t) and is not Zebul his officer?

u-zevul p’qido – “and Zebul his overseer?” Again, a name is introduced without any previous introduction or reason. The name Zebul comes from the verb zevul, to dwell. It is connected to the noun zaval, habitation. Thus, it means something like Habitation. He is mentioned six times in the narrative and nowhere else.

28 (con’t) Serve the men of Hamor the father of Shechem; but why should we serve him?

The designation now goes from baale, masters, to anshe, men: ivdu eth anshe khamor avi sh’khem u-madua naavdenu anakhnu – “Serve men Hamor, father Shechem! And why we serve him – we?” Gaal has called Abimelech the son of Jerubbaal. Now, he mentions Hamor, the father of Shechem.

What he seems to be doing is saying, “Why would we serve the son when we can serve the father?” It would explain the words about serving Shechem in the first clause. In other words, it would be like someone in the Civil War saying, “Who is Davis (the leader) and who is Richmond (the place)? Serve Lincoln (the leader) and Washington (the place)!”

Even though Richmond isn’t the son of Washington, you can see that he is going from the lesser to the greater. As for Hamor, it is identical to khamor, donkey, but that is derived from khamar, to be red. The name means Donkey, but that is because the donkey, and thus the name, literally means Red One.

The last words of the verse, “And why we serve him – we?” form a phrase filled with contempt. “Here is this nobody. He’s just a son of the great Jerubbaal. What are people like us (WE!) doing serving him?” As such…

29 If only this people were under my authority!

u-mi yiten eth ha’am ha’zeh b’yadi– “And who gives the people, the this, in my hand?” In verse 2, Abimelech spurred the people of Shechem to make him the ruler. Now, Gaal is doing something similar.

The people of Shechem had strengthened Abimelech’s hand. Now that the evil spirit from elohim was fomenting strife between them, Gaal is calling for them to be placed under his authority. This appears to be the reason why Zebul was introduced. He is the overseer of the city. Therefore, if Gaal was placed over the city…

29 (con’t) Then I would remove Abimelech.”

The verb is cohortative: v’asirah eth avimelekh – “And I remove Abimelech.” With the people of Shechem under his authority, he promises, as if it is an imperative, to remove Abimelech from being over them. It is implied that the people agreed to this because it says…

29 (con’t) So he said to Abimelech, “Increase your army and come out!”

vayomer la’avimelekh rabeh tsvaakha vatseah – “And says to Abimelech, ‘Multiply your army and come out!’” The words “And says to Abimelech” could mean one of a couple things. Gaal may have said it indirectly through a messenger. But what seems likely is that the words were not really to Abimelech. Instead, they are uttered as a boastful or drunken person might. Abimelech yelled out for any and all to hear.

No matter what, his words are in the form of an imperative. “Get yourself ready. War is coming, so come out!”

Power and control will mean nothing on the day
When we must stand before the judgment of God
No person will be able to say
I am worthy, so give me the approval nod

What is it for a man to gain the whole world
But to then lose his soul?
When the deeds of our lives are unfurled
What will be found upon our scroll?

Love the Lord your God, yes, love Him always
He alone is worthy to receive such as this
Give to Him the glory He is do for all your days
In this, you will find joy and eternal bliss

II. Where Indeed Is Your Mouth Now? (verses 30-45)

30 When Zebul, the ruler of the city, heard the words of Gaal the son of Ebed, his anger was aroused.

vayishma zevul sar ha’ir eth divre gaal ben aved vayikhar apo – “And hears Zebul, governor the city, words Gaal son Ebed, and burns his nostril.” Again, there are various possibilities concerning these words. It could be that Zebul was there with the men as they partied and trivialized Abimelech.

If so, it was only fun until Gaal challenged his position as the head of the city, at which time he took personal offense. Or it could be that the words made their way to Zebul from someone who heard them firsthand. Either way, once he heard the words, he was severely torqued off, as if smoke fumed out of his nostrils…

31 And he sent messengers to Abimelech secretly,

It is a complicated clause: vayishlakh malakhim el avimelekh b’tarmah – “And sends messengers unto Abimelech in deceit.” A new word is introduced here, tormah. It will be seen six times, always meaning deceit or deception.

However, that meaning is unsuitable here, unless the deceit is that he agreed to the words of Gaal as he spoke them. If so, then the deceit is not against Abimelech, but Gaal. If not, it may be that it is a proper noun, “in Tarmah.” If this is the case, then the name of the location where Abimelech was would be Deception.

31 (con’t) saying, “Take note! Gaal the son of Ebed and his brothers have come to Shechem;

l’mor hineh gaal ben eved v’ekhav baim sh’khemah – “to say, ‘Behold, Gaal son Ebed, and his brothers coming Shechem-ward.’” The words seem to imply that Abimelech already knew who Gaal was. Zebul is warning that Gaal and his brothers had come unto Shechem. Then, upon their arrival…

31 (con’t) and here they are, fortifying the city against you.

v’hinam tsarim eth ha’ir alekha – “And behold, adversarying the city against you.” The word is tsur, to confine, bind, besiege, etc. It comes from a primitive root meaning to cramp. As such, it is normally translated with the idea of a city being besieged by cramping the people inside.

In this case, the action is outward from the city against Abimelech. Thus, I have coined a new word and say they are adversarying the city. This would then be in line with Exodus 23:22 –

“But if you indeed obey His voice and do all that I speak, then I will be an enemy to your enemies and an adversary [tsar] to your adversaries [tsar].”

Whether this is a valid thought or not, the point is that the city is being prepared, either the people representing the city, or the city itself…

32 Now therefore, get up by night, you and the people who are with you, and lie in wait in the field.

His words are emphatic: v’atah qum laylah atah v’ha’am asher itakh v’erov ba’sadeh – “And now arise, night, you and the people who with you, and lie in wait in the field.” It is the same word translated as ambush in verse 25. This time, however, it is not merely setting up an ambush, but they are also lying in wait to attack.

The curious thing is that Zebul is directing Abimelech, his superior, to do this. It is contrary to the propriety of the situation for him to do so without some further explanation as to why. However, none is provided. Despite that, he continues with his minute directions…

33 And it shall be, as soon as the sun is up in the morning, that you shall rise early and rush upon the city;

v’hayah ba’boqer kizroakh ha’shemesh tashkim uphashatta al ha’ir – “And is, in the morning, according to rising the sun, rising early and deployed upon the city.” As seen, this is not simply an ambush. Rather, the people lie in wait. Some will charge the city at the rising of the sun while others will be set for an ambush when needed.

Of these words, John Gill says, “For being with his forces advanced near to it by a march in the night, he would be able by sunrising to attack the city before the inhabitants were up to defend it, and so surprise them.”

That completely dismisses the next words and logic itself. If the people were not up yet, the gates would be shut and bolted. Instead of an attack, it would be a besieging attack. Some posted guards may be speared or shot, but from that point on, it would be a battle against a barricaded city. That isn’t what Zebul next says…

33 (con’t) and when he and the people who are with him come out against you, you may then do to them as you find opportunity.”

v’hineh hu v’ha’am asher ito yotsim elekha v’asitha lo ka’asher timtsa yadekha – “And behold, he, and the people who with him coming out towards you. And do to him according to which finding your hand.” Zebul is confident that the rush upon the city would elicit a response. The people in the city would come out to battle against them.

34 So Abimelech and all the people who were with him rose by night, and lay in wait against Shechem in four companies.

vayaqum avimelekh v’kal ha’am asher imo laylah v’erervu al sh’khem arbaah rashim – “And arises, Abimelech, and all the people who with him, night, and lies in wait upon Shechem, four heads.” Just as instructed, so Abimelech did. With him were enough people to be divided under four heads. Thus, there is to be both a frontal assault and ambushes against those who come out.

The number four “is the number of things that have a beginning, of things that are made, of material things, and matter itself. It is the number of material completeness. Hence it is the world number, and especially the ‘city’ number” (Bullinger).

35 When Gaal the son of Ebed went out and stood in the entrance to the city gate,

vayetse gaal ben eved vayaamod pethakh shaar ha’ir – “And goes out, Gaal son Ebed, and stands opening gate the city.” The gate of the city is where judging takes place, business is transacted, and so forth. He has come here, probably thinking that he should be the one to lead the city, even though Zebul possessed that right.

However, once Gaal was there, indicating that the gates of the city had been opened for the day…

35 (con’t) Abimelech and the people who were with him rose from lying in wait.

vayaqum avimelekh v’ha’am asher ito min ha’marav – “and arises, Abimelech, and the people with him from the lying in wait.” With the gates open, and with Gaal standing in them, indicating someone was there to conduct business, it was then time for Abimelech to initiate the proposed action…

36 And when Gaal saw the people, he said to Zebul, “Look, people are coming down from the tops of the mountains!”

vayar gaal eth ha’am vayomer el zevul hineh am yored merashe he’harim – “And sees, Gaal, the people, and says unto Zebul, ‘Behold, people descending from heads the mountains.’” Gaal was standing at the gate looking out. There is no reason at all for him to suspect an attack. This is simply a person looking at the skyline as anyone would do early in the morning at the gate of the city.

However, his eyes catch the movement of Abimelech and his men. Despite this, Zebul treats Gaal with the same contempt as Gaal had directed toward him…

36 (con’t) But Zebul said to him, “You see the shadows of the mountains as if they were men.”

vayomer elav zevul eth tsel he’harim atah roeh ka’anashim – “And says unto him, Zebul, ‘Shadow the mountains you see, according to men.’” Zebul mockingly jests at Gaal as if he were an uneducated doof. It is obvious that they are people, but Zebul is clearly having fun with the moment. On the other hand…

37 So Gaal spoke again and said, “See, people are coming down from the center of the land,

vayoseph od gaal l’daber vayomer hineh am yordim me’im tabur ha’arets – “And adds again, Gaal, to speak, and says, ‘Behold, people, descenders, from with center the land.” Here is a new and rare word, tabur, translated as center.

It is from an unused root meaning to pile up. Thus, it signifies accumulated. By implication, then, it is a navel or a summit. As such, it is the middle. It will only be seen again in Ezekiel 38 –

“You will say, ‘I will go up against a land of unwalled villages; I will go to a peaceful people, who dwell safely, all of them dwelling without walls, and having neither bars nor gates’— 12 to take plunder and to take booty, to stretch out your hand against the waste places that are again inhabited, and against a people gathered from the nations, who have acquired livestock and goods, who dwell in the midst [tabbur] of the land.’: Ezekiel 38:11, 12

Gaal is now certain of what he sees and proclaims it again…

37 (con’t) and another company is coming from the Diviners’ Terebinth Tree.”

v’rosh ekhad ba mi’derekh elon m’onim – “and head one coming from way Oak Soothsayers’.” Seeing that there is a rush upon the city from the center, the natural thing to do is scan the entire visible panorama. In doing so, he sees a second group coming from an area known as Soothsayers’ Oak. It was probably a giant spreading oak that people thought was suitable for practicing divination or witchcraft.

38 Then Zebul said to him, “Where indeed is your mouth now, with which you said, ‘Who is Abimelech, that we should serve him?’

vayomer elav zevul ayeh epho pikha asher tomar mi avimelekh ki naavdenu – “And says unto him, Zebul, ‘Where here your mouth which you said, “Who Abimelech that we serve him?”’” It is a derogatory interrogatory: “Where’s your big mouth now? It’s time to put up or shut up. You questioned Abimelech’s authority. Well, here’s your chance to do something about it.”

38 (con’t) Are not these the people whom you despised? Go out, if you will, and fight with them now.”

halo zeh ha’am asher maastah bo tse na atah v’hilakhem bo – “Not this the people who you rejected in him? Go out, I pray, now, and fight in him.” The meaning is that when he rejected Abimelech, he rejected those who are now with him.

Therefore, stating it as an imperative, Zebul tells Gaal to go out to fight Abimelech and those with him. And more, he adds in the taunting, na, or I pray. It is a jab like, “Well, if you’re man enough.” It leaves little room for Gaal to do anything but go.

39 So Gaal went out, leading the men of Shechem, and fought with Abimelech.

The words return to baale, masters, once again: vayetse gaal liphne baale sh’khem vayilakhem ba’avimelekh – “And goes out, Gaal, to faces masters Shechem, and fights in Abimelech.” With little choice except to face total disgrace, Gaal went out before the masters of Shechem to face his fate…

40 And Abimelech chased him, and he fled from him; and many fell wounded, to the very entrance of the gate.

The words are exciting as the imperfect verbs come rolling forth: vayirdphehu avimelekh vayanas mipanav vayiphlu khalalim rabim ad petakh ha’shaar – “And pursues him, Abimelech, and flees from his face, and falls pierced many, unto entrance the gate.” It is a total rout of the forces of Gaal. His people retreated and were cut down all the way to the entrance of the city itself. With that job tidied up, it next says…

41 Then Abimelech dwelt at Arumah, and Zebul drove out Gaal and his brothers,

vayeshev avimelekh barumah vaygaresh zevul eth gaal v’eth ekhav – “And dwells Abimelech in the Arumah, and dispossesses, Zebul, Gaal and his brothers.” The name Arumah is found only here. It comes from rum, to be high. Thus, it means Height or Elevated, or even Exalted. If the latter, it can be positive or negative. For example, speaking of the antichrist, Daniel 11 says –

“Then the king shall do according to his own will: he shall exalt [rum] and magnify himself above every god, shall speak blasphemies against the God of gods, and shall prosper till the wrath has been accomplished; for what has been determined shall be done.” Daniel 11:36

By stopping at the gate of Shechem, it is apparent that Abimelech left the matter of the city and Gaal to Zebul the city manager. From there Zebul took appropriate action to eject Gaal…

41 (con’t) so that they would not dwell in Shechem.

mi’sheveth bishkhem – “from dwelling in Shechem.” Gaal is expelled from the city, and that seems like the end of the matter. However, it is the masters of Shechem that rebelled against Abimelech. Thus, any remaining would have to be dealt with. Therefore…

42 And it came about on the next day that the people went out into the field, and they told Abimelech.

v’hi mimakorath vayetse ha’am ha’sadeh vayagidu la’avimelekh – “And is from morrow, and goes out the people the field, and declares to Abimelech.” With Abimelech gone from the gates of Shechem, and with Gaal and his brothers expelled from the city, the people went back to the field as people need to do.

However, they were the ones who had allied with Gaal and against Abimelech. As soon as they are seen in the field, on the very next day, he sets forth to act…

43 So he took his people, divided them into three companies, and lay in wait in the field.

vayiqakh et ha’am vayekhetsem lishloshah rashim vayeerov ba’sadeh – “And takes the people, and divides them to three heads, and lays in wait in the field.” This time, the division of his people is under three heads. Bullinger notes that “the number three points us to what is real, essential, perfect, substantial, complete, and Divine.” In other words, Divine Perfection. With his companies arrayed…

43 (con’t) And he looked, and there were the people, coming out of the city; and he rose against them and attacked them.

vayar v’hineh ha’am yotse min ha’ir vayaqam alehem vayakem – “And sees, and behold, the people going from the city. And arises against them, and strikes them.” Again, as before, Abimelech was able to destroy those left in the city. This time, it would have been easier because they were completely unsuspecting.

44 Then Abimelech and the company that was with him rushed forward and stood at the entrance of the gate of the city;

Rather than then, it says and. This explains what was just said: va’avimelekh v’kharashim asher imo pashtu vayaamdu petakh shaar ha’ir – “And Abimelech, and the companies that with him deploys and stands entrance gate the city.” There was a rush towards the gate. This would keep any from retreating inside, and it would allow them to keep the entrance open if those inside tried to shut the gates.

44 (con’t) and the other two companies rushed upon all who were in the fields and killed them.

ushne kharashim pashtu al kal asher ba’sadeh va’yakum – “And two companies deployed upon all who in the field, and strikes them.” With the city secured, one company remained with Abimelech. The other two deployed into the field and struck all who were there.

45 So Abimelech fought against the city all that day; he took the city and killed the people who were in it;

va’avimelekh nilkham ba’ir kol hayom ha’hu vayilkod eth ha’ir v’eth ha’am asher bah – “And Abimelech fought in the city, all the day, the it. And captures the city and the people in her killed.” By securing the gate, they were able to gain access into the city, seize it, and kill everyone in it in one day. With that complete…

*45 (fin) and he demolished the city and sowed it with salt.

vayitots eth ha’ir vayizraeha melakh – “And tears down the city, and sow her, salt.” By salting the city, it means that he considers the city irretrievably destroyed, no longer to be useful. And that, in perpetuity. Shechem, (Having a Sense of) Responsibility was to no longer be considered as such.

Biblically, salt is a sign of covenant faithfulness, incorruptibility, and perpetuity.

With that, we will close today. It was a lot of verses and information to take in. We will complete the passage and explain it in the next sermon. For now, we can look to the actions of Abimelech and know that this is the fate of those who conspire and kill.

Eventually, the very thing done to obtain power is what often leads to the demise of the doer. It is as if the divine hand of justice reaches down and fills their lives with the trouble they have brought upon others.

It isn’t always this way. But even those who have lived like this and died in peace still have to face the Judge of all mankind. How much better it would be for people to let go of such things and exalt the Lord by coming to Jesus!

In doing so, people can at least expect a joyous reunion with God when their day to stand before Him comes. Let us consider this and place Christ Jesus in the appropriate place in our lives. All of the power, money, and fame in the world ultimately means nothing when our days are through.

Live for the Lord! It will make an eternal difference in how things go for our souls.

Closing Verse: “I will bless the Lord at all times;
His praise shall continually be in my mouth.
My soul shall make its boast in the Lord;
The humble shall hear of it and be glad.
Oh, magnify the Lord with me,
And let us exalt His name together.” Psalm 34:1-3

Next Week: Judges 9:22-45 He’s headed to heck. That’s his trek’m, this is for shore… (Abimelech, King of Shechem, Part IV) (30th Judges sermon)

The Lord has you exactly where He wants you. He has a good plan and purpose for you. It is He who judges His people according to their deeds. So, follow Him, live for Him, and trust Him, and He will do marvelous things for you and through you.

Abimelech, King of Shechem, Part III

After Abimelech had reigned over Israel three years
God sent a spirit of ill will, like when getting a bad check
Between Abimelech and the men of Shechem
And the men of Shechem dealt treacherously with Abimelech

That the crime done to the seventy sons of Jerubbaal
Might be settled and their blood be laid on their brother Abimelech
Who killed them, and on the men of Shechem
Who aided him in the killing of his brothers, chopping at the neck

And the men of Shechem set men in ambush
Against him on the tops of the mountains, each a roughneck
And they robbed all who passed by them along that way
And it was told Abimelech

Now Gaal the son of Ebed came
With his brothers and went over to Shechem
And the men of Shechem
Put their confidence in him

So they went out into the fields, and gathered grapes
From their vineyards and trod them, and made merry
And they went into the house of their god
And ate and drank, and cursed Abimelech with words pretty scary

Then Gaal the son of Ebed said
“Who is Abimelech, and who is Shechem, that him we
———-should serve? Please observe…
Is he not the son of Jerubbaal, and is not Zebul his officer?
Serve the men of Hamor the father of Shechem; but him, why
———-should we serve?

If only this people were under my authority!
Then I would remove Abimelech, no doubt!
So he said to Abimelech
“Increase your army and come out!”

When Zebul, the ruler of the city (where he was housed)
Heard the words of Gaal the son of Ebed, his anger was aroused

And he sent messengers to Abimelech secretly, saying
“Take note! Gaal the son of Ebed and his brothers (yes, it is true)
Have come to Shechem; and here they are
Fortifying the city against you

Now therefore, get up by night, you and the people who
———-are with you
And lie in wait in the field; this you are to do

And it shall be, as soon as the sun is up in the morning
That you shall rise early and rush upon the city
And when he and the people who are with him come out
———-against you
You may then do to them as you find opportu-nity

So Abimelech and all the people
Who were with him rose by night
And lay in wait against Shechem
In four companies, hiding out of sight

When Gaal the son of Ebed went out
And stood in the entrance to the city gate
Abimelech and the people who were with him
Rose from lying in wait

And when Gaal saw the people, he said to Zebul
“Look, people are coming down from the tops of the mountains!
———-fer sher
But Zebul said to him
“You see the shadows of the mountains as if they men were

So Gaal spoke again and said
“See, people are coming down, take a look and see
From the center of the land, and another company is coming
From the Diviners’ Terebinth Tree

Then Zebul said to him, “Where indeed is your mouth now
With which you said, ‘Who is Abimelech? Really… wow!
That we should serve him?’ Are not these the people
———-whom you despised?
Go out, if you will, and fight with them now

So Gaal went out, what the heck
Leading the men of Shechem, and fought with Abimelech

And Abimelech chased him, and he fled from him
———-he wouldn’t wait
And many fell wounded, to the very entrance of the gate

Then Abimelech dwelt at Arumah, and Zebul drove out Gaal
———-and his brothers too
So that they would not dwell in Shechem, something they
———-wouldn’t do

And it came about on the next day (but still night in Quebec)
That the people went out into the field, and they told Abimelech

So he took his people, divided them into three companies
And lay in wait in the field, waiting to react
And he looked, and there were the people, coming out of the city
And he rose against them and them he attacked

Then Abimelech and the company that was with him
Rushed forward and stood at the entrance of the gate of the city
And the other two companies rushed upon all
Who were in the fields and killed them, showing no pity

So Abimelech fought against the city all that day
He took the city and killed the people who were in it
And he demolished the city and sowed it with salt
A brutal guy indeed, we must admit

Lord God, turn our hearts to be obedient to Your word
Give us wisdom to be ever faithful to You
May we carefully heed each thing we have heard
Yes, Lord God may our hearts be faithful and true

And we shall be content and satisfied in You alone
We will follow You as we sing our songs of praise
Hallelujah to You; to us Your path You have shown
Hallelujah we shall sing to You for all of our days

Hallelujah and Amen…

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

22 After Abimelech had reigned over Israel three years, 23 God sent a spirit of ill will between Abimelech and the men of Shechem; and the men of Shechem dealt treacherously with Abimelech, 24 that the crime done to the seventy sons of Jerubbaal might be settled and their blood be laid on Abimelech their brother, who killed them, and on the men of Shechem, who aided him in the killing of his brothers. 25 And the men of Shechem set men in ambush against him on the tops of the mountains, and they robbed all who passed by them along that way; and it was told Abimelech.

26 Now Gaal the son of Ebed came with his brothers and went over to Shechem; and the men of Shechem put their confidence in him. 27 So they went out into the fields, and gathered grapes from their vineyards and trod them, and made merry. And they went into the house of their god, and ate and drank, and cursed Abimelech. 28 Then Gaal the son of Ebed said, “Who is Abimelech, and who is Shechem, that we should serve him? Is he not the son of Jerubbaal, and is not Zebul his officer? Serve the men of Hamor the father of Shechem; but why should we serve him? 29 If only this people were under my authority! Then I would remove Abimelech.” So he said to Abimelech, “Increase your army and come out!”

30 When Zebul, the ruler of the city, heard the words of Gaal the son of Ebed, his anger was aroused. 31 And he sent messengers to Abimelech secretly, saying, “Take note! Gaal the son of Ebed and his brothers have come to Shechem; and here they are, fortifying the city against you. 32 Now therefore, get up by night, you and the people who are with you, and lie in wait in the field. 33 And it shall be, as soon as the sun is up in the morning, that you shall rise early and rush upon the city; and when he and the people who are with him come out against you, you may then do to them as you find opportunity.”

34 So Abimelech and all the people who were with him rose by night, and lay in wait against Shechem in four companies. 35 When Gaal the son of Ebed went out and stood in the entrance to the city gate, Abimelech and the people who were with him rose from lying in wait. 36 And when Gaal saw the people, he said to Zebul, “Look, people are coming down from the tops of the mountains!”

But Zebul said to him, “You see the shadows of the mountains as if they were men.”

37 So Gaal spoke again and said, “See, people are coming down from the center of the land, and another company is coming from the Diviners’ Terebinth Tree.”

38 Then Zebul said to him, “Where indeed is your mouth now, with which you said, ‘Who is Abimelech, that we should serve him?’ Are not these the people whom you despised? Go out, if you will, and fight with them now.”

39 So Gaal went out, leading the men of Shechem, and fought with Abimelech. 40 And Abimelech chased him, and he fled from him; and many fell wounded, to the very entrance of the gate. 41 Then Abimelech dwelt at Arumah, and Zebul drove out Gaal and his brothers, so that they would not dwell in Shechem.

42 And it came about on the next day that the people went out into the field, and they told Abimelech. 43 So he took his people, divided them into three companies, and lay in wait in the field. And he looked, and there were the people, coming out of the city; and he rose against them and attacked them. 44 Then Abimelech and the company that was with him rushed forward and stood at the entrance of the gate of the city; and the other two companies rushed upon all who were in the fields and killed them. 45 So Abimelech fought against the city all that day; he took the city and killed the people who were in it; and he demolished the city and sowed it with salt.

 

 

Acts 26:22

Wisconsin Senate.

Sunday, 7 April 2024

“Therefore, having obtained help from God, to this day I stand, witnessing both to small and great, saying no other things than those which the prophets and Moses said would come— Acts 26:22

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen).

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

More literally, the words read, “Having obtained, therefore, help from God unto this day, I have stood, witnessing to small and great, saying nothing except what both the prophets and Moses spoke is coming to be” (CG).

Paul just noted that talking about what the Lord expects is the reason why the Jews seized him and tried to kill him. Now, he explains why he has been rescued from this, saying, “Having obtained, therefore, help from God unto this day.”

Despite the Jews trying to kill him, he has been rescued from them because God has been on his side. If this is so, then it means – by default – that God has not been on the side of the Jews. They had wronged him, but more, they were conducting their lives wrongly before God.

As for the word translated as “help,” it is epikouria. It is found only here in Scripture. It gives the idea of external help, but of one of greater ability or power to one of lesser ability or power. In this case, it is divine assistance being from God. Paul says that because of this external help, “I have stood.”

This isn’t speaking of his standing in the court but of his ability to continue with the task to which he was called. It is the same metaphor he uses numerous times elsewhere, such as –

“Put on the whole armor of God, that you may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil. 12 For we do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this age, against spiritual hosts of wickedness in the heavenly places. 13 Therefore take up the whole armor of God, that you may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand.” Ephesians 6:11-13

Paul was firm and unwavering in his proclamation, standing because God was with him and, as he says, “witnessing to both small and great.”

These words show that Paul saw no distinction in any man after receiving his commission. To Christ, and therefore to him now, there was no Jew, Gentile, king, servant, male, female, wealthy, or poor, or any other distinction that would preclude him from sharing the gospel. Barnes states it this way –

“He passed by none because they were poor; and he was not deterred by the fear of the rich and the great from making known their sins and calling them to repentance. What an admirable illustration of the proper duties of a minister of the gospel!”

As for his witnessing, he next notes that he was “saying nothing except what both the prophets and Moses spoke is coming to be.”

This final clause shows Paul’s understanding that the doctrine of the Messiah was fully testified to in the Old Testament. Christ’s life, work, atoning death, etc. were all carefully detailed, starting from Moses and continuing through the prophets.

All of what Christ would come and do was carefully laid out in their writings. As such, Paul was simply testifying to what those written witnesses testified to. He used their own words for the message he proclaimed. All that Christ was set to do, and all that He did, was spoken of in advance. Because of this, Paul’s testimony was not his at all but God’s. He was speaking as God’s ambassador, something he explicitly states in his own writings, such as –

“Now then, we are ambassadors for Christ, as though God were pleading through us: we implore you on Christ’s behalf, be reconciled to God. 21 For He made Him who knew no sin to be sin for us, that we might become the righteousness of God in Him.” 2 Corinthians 5:20, 21

Life application: If you are speaking accurately concerning the faith as it is recorded in Scripture, how can you not be bold in your proclamation? If you really believe that the Bible is the word of God, and if you are conveying the message of the Bible properly, you are simply explaining what God has already proclaimed. So why should you be distressed, peevish, concerned, etc. about what you are saying?

If someone takes offense at your words, they are taking offense at God’s word. There is no need to be belligerent in your approach, but there is also no shame in being imprisoned for your stand. God is right here with us. Therefore, He is right there with you in such an instance.

Just be sure that what you are saying is properly stated and in accord with His intent. And the only way to know that is not to listen to your preacher or teacher, accepting his words at face value. Rather, you must know the word well enough to accept or dismiss what you are being taught. Otherwise, you are not really proclaiming the truth of God’s word. In other words, “READ AND KNOW YOUR BIBLE.”

Glorious Lord God, people in many churches are taught erroneous doctrine, but they accept what they hear without checking. That is a sad testimony to their time in church. It is also a sad testimony to their willingness to know You properly. May we not be led astray in such ways. Rather, may we be willing to check what we are taught and hold fast only to that which matches what Your word states. Help us in this, O God. Amen.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acts 26:21

Looking up to Capitol dome, Wisconsin.

Saturday, 6 April 2024

“For these reasons the Jews seized me in the temple and tried to kill me. Acts 26:21

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen).

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

A more literal translation is, “Because of these, the Jews, me – having seized – being in the temple, endeavored to kill” (CG).

To understand what Paul says in this verse, reviewing the previous two verses will help –

“Therefore, King Agrippa, I was not disobedient to the heavenly vision, 20 but declared first to those in Damascus and in Jerusalem, and throughout all the region of Judea, and then to the Gentiles, that they should repent, turn to God, and do works befitting repentance.”

Remembering that, Paul next says, “Because of these.”

Because of Paul’s obedience to the heavenly vision in declaring to the Jews and then to the Gentiles that they should repent (meaning reconsider), turn to God, and do works befitting their reconsideration, he says, “the Jews, me – having seized.”

The truth is that the other apostles were still in Jerusalem and were telling the Jews throughout Israel to do the same things. However, they were not under the same scrutiny or threat that Paul was. Rather, the main brunt of the Jews’ animosity towards him was his going to the Gentiles. That is perfectly evidenced in his speech in Acts 22 –

“Then He said to me, ‘Depart, for I will send you far from here to the Gentiles.’
22 And they listened to him until this word, and then they raised their voices and said, ‘Away with such a fellow from the earth, for he is not fit to live!’” Acts 22:21, 22

As with so many Jews to this day, there is a hatred of the notion that anyone but them is right with God. It is almost as if they feel God owes them salvation because of who they are. Paul understood that this was not at all the case. Everyone needs Jesus, and without Him, no person can be saved. As for the Jews having seized him, he continues, saying, “being in the temple.”

That was specifically noted in Acts 21. He was there to announce the expiration of his days of purification when he was to make an offering. While there, he was accused by the Jews who cried out –

“Men of Israel, help! This is the man who teaches all men everywhere against the people, the law, and this place; and furthermore he also brought Greeks into the temple and has defiled this holy place.” Acts 21:28

It was at that time that Paul notes that it was him they “endeavored to kill.” That is specifically recorded in Acts 21:36 where they were crying out, “Away with him.” The meaning is that they wanted the world to be rid of him. Only the intervention of the Roman guards saved Paul from being beaten to death or torn to pieces by the rabid crowd.

In these words, is a verb found nowhere else in Scripture, peiraomai, meaning to try, attempt, endeavor, etc. It is from the noun peira, an attempt, trial, experiment, etc. It was because of the attempt of the Jews to kill Paul, something they had no legal right to do, that the Roman soldiers acted.

There are two distinct supposed sins that Paul was guilty of in the minds of the Jews. It is these that led to their desire to kill him. One was that he preached to the Gentiles. How dare he attempt to elevate them to the same level as the sacred people Israel!

The second and more direct issue was that he preached Jesus. They could not come to allow themselves to believe that a Nazarene who wasn’t a great and mighty defender of their cause was the Messiah. They had rejected Him, and they wanted nothing more to do with him.

As noted, however, the other apostles were still in Jerusalem and were living out their lives. Paul visited them while in Jerusalem. However, they were tolerated, though probably mocked by those who rejected Jesus. They may have taken abuse in other ways, but nothing is written concerning the utter opposition to their message that is said have come against Paul.

As for the Greek verb translated as “kill” in this verse, it is diacheirizomai. It is only used two times in the New Testament. The other time is in Acts 5:30 when describing the killing of Jesus. It is not without coincidence that these are the only two uses of this word. They killed Him and they wanted to kill His messenger.

Life application: The message of Jesus is one that offends. It has offended the Jews for two thousand years. It has offended kings, governors, presidents, and other world leaders. It has offended religious leaders from innumerable other religions. It offends those who are morally offensive in their being. And so forth. They killed Jesus, they tried to kill Paul, they have killed faithful believers all along. Even now, once Christian nations are becoming increasingly hostile to the message of Jesus.

Because of this, it is not unlikely that if a bad actor gets enough power, he and those under his authority will try to kill their own citizens who hold fast to their faith in Christ Jesus. Think of it! The only possible way that man can be reconciled to God is not only rejected by many, but it is the reason for the killing of those who cling to Him.

Stand fast in your faith as so many have in the past. Don’t let the woes of this life weaken or shake the precious treasure of faith that you possess. Jesus will be there waiting for you if you are called to make the ultimate sacrifice for your faith.

Lord God, what an increasingly trying and difficult world we live in for believers. Help us to remain faithful to our faith in You. May we be willing to take whatever trials come our way with grace and acceptance. May we not waffle in or walk away from our faith. Help us in this, O God. Amen.

 

 

 

 

Acts 26:20

LIBERTY. Wisconsin State Capitol.

Friday, 5 April 2024

“but declared first to those in Damascus and in Jerusalem, and throughout all the region of Judea, and then to the Gentiles, that they should repent, turn to God, and do works befitting repentance. Acts 26:20

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen).

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

More literally, it reads, “but those in Damascus first and Jerusalem, and to all the region of Judea, and the Gentiles – I declared to reconsider and turn to God, practicing works worthy of reconsideration” (CG).

In the previous verse, Paul said to Agrippa that he was not disobedient to the heavenly vision. Having said that, he continues with a list of those he preached to and what his message was, saying, “but those in Damascus first.”

This is just what is recorded in Acts 9 –

“So when he had received food, he was strengthened. Then Saul spent some days with the disciples at Damascus.
20 Immediately he preached the Christ in the synagogues, that He is the Son of God.” Acts 9:19, 20

From there, Paul next says, “and Jerusalem.” This is the next recorded location in Acts 9 that Paul went to after leaving Damascus. That is seen in Acts 9:26 with the words “And when Saul had come to Jerusalem.” From there, Paul next notes, “and to all the region of Judea.”

These words may not be chronological. In Galatians 1, he says –

“Afterward I went into the regions of Syria and Cilicia. 22 And I was unknown by face to the churches of Judea which were in Christ. 23 But they were hearing only, ‘He who formerly persecuted us now preaches the faith which he once tried to destroy.’ 24 And they glorified God in me.” Galatians 1:21-24

There are two separate clauses in the words, “(but those in Damascus first and Jerusalem), (and to all the region of Judea, and the Gentiles).” This then alleviates any supposed contradiction with Galatians 1:22 if it is not chronological.

However, as Jerusalem is within the area of Judea, his statement now may be included in Acts 9:28 where it says, “So he was with them at Jerusalem, coming in and going out.” If Paul went around the area outside of Jerusalem, then this would qualify. Or his words could include in later trips through the area when returning from missionary journeys. Whatever the intent, he next says, “and the Gentiles.”

These words encompass the majority of Paul’s time recorded in Acts. It is also the substance of almost all of his epistles. First and foremost, Paul is the apostle to the Gentiles. This is explicitly stated in Romans 11:13, Galatians 2:8, 1 Timothy 2:7, and 2 Timothy 1:11.

Of these locations, Paul next describes what he did when at each, saying, “I declared to reconsider and turn to God.”

The word is metanoeó, usually translated as “repent.” However, the word repent is no longer used in that way by most people. Today, people think of the word repent as being akin to “turn from sin” or some such thing. That is not at all what the word means. It signifies “to change the mind.” For a single word that carries the meaning, “reconsider” gets the point across.

Paul told those who he addressed, both Jew and Gentile to reconsider, meaning about their thinking concerning God and their relationship with Him. When they have so reconsidered this, meaning coming to Jesus who is God’s Messiah and path to salvation, they should then be “practicing works worthy of reconsideration.”

Here, Paul uses the noun form of the verb just used, metanoia. It means “a change of mind.” After reconsidering what one believes about God, one should then demonstrate his reconsideration by doing things that are worthy of what he has reconsidered. Those things are explained by Paul in his epistles.

Paul’s explanation to King Agrippa shows that he did exactly as the divine vision had instructed. If the vision was true, then he could not have done anything wrong and worthy of persecution, except by those who would reject the very mandates of God given in the vision. Which is exactly what the Jews did.

Life application: The verb translated as “declared” is in the imperfect tense (meaning it was an ongoing thing) and, unlike many translations, it comes after, not before, the list of those who Paul declared to. As you can see, it is located just prior to the word “reconsider.” This sums up his long and continuous activity of declaring his message.

Paul’s use of the word “reconsider” should be evaluated further. What does he mean? Is he saying that a work is involved in his gospel? Based on his consistent message in the epistles, the answer is obviously, “No.”

The word is defined by James Strong as, “change my mind, change the inner man (particularly with reference to acceptance of the will of God), repent.” HELPS Word Studies agrees, saying, “properly, ‘think differently after,’ ‘after a change of mind’; to repent (literally, ‘think differently afterwards’).”

The idea of this as making some sort of active change in one’s life is not at all what this is speaking of. It is a mental assertion that one is out of favor with God, and after hearing the message of the gospel, he will change his thinking about the path that he is on.

For a person who has heard of Jesus and rejected Him, it is to change his mind about Him being God’s path to salvation. For someone who has never heard of Jesus, his reconsideration is from whatever idea he had about God and a relationship with Him to acceptance of Christ and yielding to His will.

The obvious question is, “How can one yield to His will until after he has been told what His will is?” If His will is for us to have faith, turning to Christ from another belief, then salvation must precede any works. Yielding to His will for salvation requires hearing a salvation message and responding to it. Faith comes by hearing and hearing by the word of God.

Paul’s statement that man is saved by grace through faith must stand. If this is so, then the words “practicing works worthy of reconsideration” are logically placed last in this thought. From there, the next logical question is, “What if he doesn’t do works befitting of reconsideration? Does this mean he could then become ‘unsaved?’”

If salvation is a gift and if the sealing of the Holy Spirit is a guarantee, then those things cannot be conditional upon performance. Rather, they are conditional upon knowledge, which comes through proper instruction concerning the gospel.

As for “practicing works worthy of reconsideration,” that can only then be accomplished by 1) knowledge, and 2) willingness to do what is expected. It is unreasonable to assume that anyone who had no discipleship would do what the Bible expects of him. How could he?

Further, every person who has received Christ is on a different level than every other person. This is why we have Bible studies, commentaries, etc. It is to learn doctrine. If we never do this, then we will never mature and do the works that Paul says we need to do, but this logically cannot bear on our salvation. Instead, it must fall into some other category of the workings of God. And it does, Paul explains that in 1 Corinthians 3:9-15 and 2 Corinthians 5:9-11.

Understanding this, if anyone ever tells you that you can’t be saved because you haven’t done this or that (Sabbath observance, baptism, eating the wrong foods, being circumcised, etc.), tell them to get out of whatever cult they are in. You are saved by grace through faith. Only after that, comes the practicing of deeds worthy of the change in you that took place. Those things are up to you as you work out your own salvation through faith.

Lord God, help us to carefully consider the meanings of words in Your word as they were originally intended to be understood. Over time, the meanings of our words may change, but the intent of the original word does not. So, help us to pay heed as we consider various translations and to discover why there are differences. When we find out which is correct, may we faithfully consider what You are saying from that proper context. Amen.

 

 

 

 

Acts 26:19

Neat architecture. Wisconsin Capitol.

Thursday, 4 April 2024

“Therefore, King Agrippa, I was not disobedient to the heavenly vision, Acts 26:19

Note: You can listen to today’s commentary courtesy of our friends at “Bible in Ten” podcast. (Click Here to listen).

You can also read this commentary, scrolling with music, courtesy of our friends at “Discern the Bible” on YouTube. (Click Here to listen), or at Rumble (Click Here to listen).

Paul just finished repeating the words of Jesus that he had received during the vision. With that, he next says, “Therefore, King Agrippa.”

Paul once again specifically addresses Agrippa as he did in verse 13. The word translated as “Therefore,” hothen, is derived from two words signifying “where” and “then.” The older English translations of “Wherefore” or “Whereupon” give a good sense of the intent. The meaning Paul is conveying is that he received this vision, and from that, he made his decision, saying, “I was not disobedient to the heavenly vision.”

It is an astonishing set of words to be considered. Paul uses the verb ginomai, to become or come into being. The tense of the verb, being aorist, gives the sense of “I did not become disobedient.”

As Ellicott notes, “The language of the Apostle is significant in its bearing on the relations of God’s grace and man’s freedom. Even here, with the ‘vessel of election’ (Acts 9:15) ‘constrained’ by the love of Christ (2 Corinthians 5:14), there was the possibility of disobedience. There was an act of will in passing from the previous state of rebellion to that of obedience.”

It is another testimony to the doctrine of free will in man. Paul’s choice of words clearly signifies that he could have, in fact, been disobedient to the vision. However, his choice was to comply with what he had been told. In essence, his words can be turned around to say, “How could anyone find fault in me for being obedient to such a message!”

It is reflective of the words of Isaiah 6 –

“Also I heard the voice of the Lord, saying:
‘Whom shall I send,
And who will go for Us?’
Then I said, ‘Here am I! Send me.’” Isaiah 6:8

The doctrine of free will in man is seen time and again in such callings. Moses and Jonah are great examples of this. Jeremiah is as well.

As for the word translated as “vision,” it is optasia. It refers to an actual vision as opposed to a dream or some other non-specific vision. It is used in Luke 1:22 and is frequent in the Greek translation of the book of Daniel.

Life application: The words of Paul in this verse confirm the doctrine known as synergism. It signifies that man has his part in the conversion process. However, that, in turn, does not mean that man has any part in the salvation process. These are two separate things that some try to shove into one box in an attempt to justify the incorrect doctrine of monergism.

Monergism teaches that man has no part in the conversion process and that God alone converts a person. For example, the idea of being born again from a monergistic teaching says that God chooses a person, God regenerates that person, allowing him to believe (he is born again), and from there, he believes and is saved. The teaching is utter rubbish.

Rather, the conversion process is based on the salvation process. Jesus did everything necessary for man to be saved, minus nothing. However, with that process complete, His work must then be appropriated by those who hear. They can mock, oppose, or blaspheme what they hear (see Acts 18:6), a free-will choice. They can contemplate and check out what they hear (as in Acts 17:20), a free-will choice. They can simply hear and believe (think of Cornelius in Acts 10), a free-will choice. Etc.

With the salvation process complete, man is hopefully provided the chance to believe in what He has done. This is why we share the gospel, send out missionaries, etc. Faith comes by hearing and hearing comes by the word of God. If the doctrine of monergism was correct, none of this would be necessary. In fact, it would be a pointless waste of time. God’s will cannot be thwarted. But the process must be carried out –

“But, beloved, do not forget this one thing, that with the Lord one day is as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day. The Lord is not slack concerning His promise, as some count slackness, but is longsuffering toward us, not willing that any should perish but that all should come to repentance.” 2 Peter 3:8, 9

God truly wants all to change their minds about Him. But He does not change it for them. Rather, He asks those who believe the message to get about the business of sharing the gospel. Only through that avenue will others be saved. So, get about sharing the gospel.

Heavenly Father, help us to take Your word in its proper light. When we are presented with a doctrine that is incorrect, may You help us to identify it, contemplate why it is so, and then turn from it to that which is correct. We are asking for Your guiding hand to be with us so that we will be properly trained followers of You. Amen.