Leviticus 8:14-36 (The Consecration of the Aaronic Priesthood, Part II)

Leviticus 8:14-36
The Consecration of the Aaronic Priesthood, Part II

The minute and detailed instructions for building the sanctuary were followed up by the careful and precisely recorded construction of it. This was to ensure that everything the Lord had commanded was followed through with, exactly as He specified. The reason this was so important is because in the book of Hebrews we are told that the earthly things were copies and shadows of the heavenly things.

The same is true with the minute and detailed instructions for the ordination of Aaron and his sons. They were given in Exodus, and now in Leviticus we are being given the careful and precisely recorded adherence to what was previously laid out. Again, each detail points to Christ, and so in order to protect the typology, everything is being detailed for a second time.

God guarded these pictures of His Son so that when He arrived, there would be no doubt that He was the fulfillment of them. And yet, because of the laziness of the church, how few ever take the time to look into these things? Thousands of years of meticulous work safeguarding them is pretty much ignored by the church Christ came to establish.

We are too busy claiming prosperity and infighting over minutiae to bother with such wonderful pictures of what God has done for us in Christ. But… for those who are willing to carefully and methodically follow page by page through this treasure we call the Bible, there is an endless stream of wonder and excitement.

Claiming prosperity in Jesus’ name is only as effective as your next trip to the hospital or loss of job. When those things come about, it suddenly dawns on you that the preacher’s words were a complete waste of time. And fighting with others in the church over silly little pet peeves results in the same headaches and heartbreaks that you will find at work or at home. In the end, nobody gains from such things. How much better to stick to proper doctrine and close and personal fellowship with those who bear Christ’s name.

Text Verse: “Sacrifice and offering You did not desire;
My ears You have opened.
Burnt offering and sin offering You did not require.
Then I said, “Behold, I come;
In the scroll of the book it is written of me.
I delight to do Your will, O my God,
And Your law is within my heart.” Isaiah 40:6-8

The scroll of the book is simply filled with Christ. The words Isaiah penned about the coming Messiah are proven true every time we come to another passage and search Him out. He is there, calling out to us to find Him. And yet, at the same time, everything we read about is literally true.

The Lord used real people, in real circumstances, to give us these wonderful tastes of what lay ahead when He would come and reveal Himself to us. And further, from these types and pictures came moral lessons that show us how only the Anti-type can truly satisfy our souls.

With a law mediated by fallible men, there can only be a fallible hope. But when the infallible Man arrived, He brought with Him a perfect and unsullied hope. As we finish up the ordination of Aaron today, let’s remember that.

Everything God is showing leads us to a better hope where we can come to God in full confidence that our prayers are heard, our offerings are accepted, and our Mediator will perfectly fulfill His duties for us. Keep this in mind. It’s all to be found in His superior word. And so let’s turn to that precious word once again and… May God speak to us through His word today and may His glorious name ever be praised.

I. The Bull for the Sin Offering (verses 14-17)

14 And he brought the bull for the sin offering.

This bull was first ordered in Exodus 29:3 when the Lord gave the instructions to Moses concerning this ordination. It was then mentioned in verse 2 of this chapter. The bull, which pictures Christ, is now brought forward to be the sin offering for the priests.

14 (con’t) Then Aaron and his sons laid their hands on the head of the bull for the sin offering,

In this act, which we have seen for other sacrifices already, the bull takes on the curse which they deserve for their sins and it is transferred to it. The par, or bull, comes from the word parar which carries the meaning of defeat, or make void, although it can be variously translated.

The picture of Christ is that He defeated the devil, making void that which the devil had wrought. Thus, Christ can be the Mediator between God and man. For Aaron and his sons, with their symbolic transfer of their sins to the bull, the animal is accursed, and it must die. Thus we have what is known as a vicarious substitute.

In type, the bull is Christ who knew no sin, but was made sin for Aaron and his sons so that they might be righteous before God. The sin is symbolically removed from the one and transferred to the other. It is life for life, and therefore…

15 and Moses killed it.

It is Moses who kills the bull, not Aaron. He is acting as the priest pro-tempore during the ordination, but he is also a man born under sin. This shows us the fallibility and temporary nature of the Aaronic priesthood. In type, we see only a shadow of the New covenant where the perfect Christ voluntarily gave His own perfect life. Thus, He is the Mediator of a better covenant.

15  (con’t) Then he took the blood, and put some on the horns of the altar all around with his finger, and purified the altar.

This was directed in Exodus 29:12. Once the bull was bled out, it would be a confirmation of the death of the animal for “the life is in the blood” according to Leviticus 17:11. With this proof of the death of the substitute, then some of its blood was to be put on the horns of the altar with his finger.

The horns, or qarnoth, of the altar are the place of mercy and safe refuge. Further, horns are a symbol of strength. For the blood to be placed on them signified the granting of mercy and the allowance of safety from the wrath which had been transferred to the bull. As there are four horns pointing toward the four corners of the earth, it further symbolizes the power of the act to fully save and cleanse the sinner. David understood this when he wrote these words –

“I will love You, O Lord, my strength.
The Lord is my rock and my fortress and my deliverer;
My God, my strength, in whom I will trust;
My shield and the horn of my salvation, my stronghold.” Psalm 18:1, 2

Another point is that Moses is specifically told to apply the blood with his finger. The word etsbah, or finger, comes from another word, tsebah, which indicates dyed material and thus one gets the idea of grasping something. Therefore, the finger is that which accomplishes a task.

The creation is said to be the work of the Lord’s fingers in the 8th Psalm. Thus in this verse, the mercy, the refuge, and the remission of the sins is granted by God, but it is accomplished by the work of the mediator’s fingers. In the type we look forward to the Anti-type where the Lord is the Purifier. However, the blood is not only applied to the altar to expiate the sins of Aaron and his sons, but it is also to purify the altar itself. This is explained in Hebrews 9 –

And according to the law almost all things are purified with blood, and without shedding of blood there is no remission.” Hebrews 9:22

15  (con’t) And he poured the blood at the base of the altar, and consecrated it, to make atonement for it.

The altar has already been consecrated by the sprinkling with anointing oil in verse 11. However, atonement still needed to be made for it because it was made by sinful hands. An inanimate object is not free from such defilement, and atonement was needed for it.

With the blood of the bull, the altar is now sanctified so that atonement can be made with it. This is only a shadow of Christ then. Unlike the altar which needed to be sanctified, Christ, the true Altar, sanctified Himself so that our lives as gifts to God might be acceptable to Him –

“As You sent Me into the world, I also have sent them into the world. 19 And for their sakes I sanctify Myself, that they also may be sanctified by the truth.” John 17:18, 19

As astonishing as it may seem, everything has pointed to Christ. The altar points to Christ, the anointing oil pointed to Christ, the bull points to Christ, the shed blood points to Christ, Aaron is typical of Christ. Every detail, has – and continues to – point to Him. Each provides another aspect of His Person and His work.

16 Then he took all the fat that was on the entrails, the fatty lobe attached to the liver, and the two kidneys with their fat, and Moses burned them on the altar.

This was explained to Moses in Exodus 29:16. The symbolism of these fat parts has been explained in other offerings, but each points to Christ. They represent the abundance of the very deepest parts of Christ the Man. Fat is the abundance and health of life. The fat on the entrails represents the inner purity of Christ. The fatty lobe on the liver represents His emotions and feelings, and the two kidneys with their fat signify His mind and reasoning.

These were offered to the Lord by fire, burning as if incense as the word denotes, because they symbolize Christ’s most intimate aspects. They are the very substance of who He is, and are thus returned to the Lord by fire.

17 But the bull, its hide, its flesh, and its offal, he burned with fire outside the camp,

The rest of the animal was taken outside the camp and burned with fire. Normally, unless the blood of the animal for a sin offering was sprinkled inside the holy place, the animal would be eaten by the priests. But, even though the bull’s blood was not taken there, nothing of it was to remain, and none of it was to be eaten. Moses was not a legally consecrated priest, and the animal was under a curse because of the sins of Aaron and his sons. Thus to eat it would be symbolic of them re-taking the sin into themselves.

Instead, it was to be returned to the old order of things where sin remained. In its place, those for whom the animal died would be reckoned under the new order of things. They would be new men with a symbolic new nature, cleansed from their defilement.

17 (cont) as the Lord had commanded Moses.

The words are given to show complete obedience to the word of the Lord which was given to Moses on Mount Sinai for this ordination process. Every detail points to Christ, and so in order to show that the typology was adhered to, these words are now given.

The bull is slain, his blood poured out
The proof of the death is evident in the bowl of blood
But for that bull, don’t shed a tear or pout
Sin is atoned for by the crimson flood

There! On the cross of Calvary hangs a Man
For the sins of mankind, was shed His blood
We ask, “Can it truly atone for sin?” God says, “Yes, it can!”
And so we plunge ourselves ‘neath that crimson flood

And through His death, our High Priest He came to be
When He went behind the veil and presented His blood
He did this because of God’s love – for you and for me
And so let us tell the world of the marvelous crimson flood

II. The Ram for the Burnt Offering (Verses 18-21)

18 Then he brought the ram as the burnt offering.

Of the two rams for the ordination, one was selected as a burnt offering. This first one is now brought forward by Moses.

18 (cont) And Aaron and his sons laid their hands on the head of the ram,

This was instructed in Exodus 29:15. As seen before, the placing of hands on the head of an animal for a burnt offering is not for confession of sin, but as a way of surrendering oneself wholly and completely to the Lord. Only after the atonement and purification can a person be considered as an acceptable offering to the Lord. In this, they are dedicating themselves as if being living sacrifices.

19 and Moses killed it. 

Verse 19 was instructed in Exodus 29:16. The Hebrew does not say “Moses.” Rather, it says “he killed it.” But, Exodus 29 specifically says Moses was to perform the task. Further, the next clause names Moses specifically. Therefore, like the bull of the sin offering, it is he who kills the ram, not Aaron. He is fulfilling the job of priest pro-temp ore during the ordination until it is over. Once complete, the tasks will, from that time on, belong to the line of Aaron alone.

19 (cont) Then he sprinkled the blood all around on the altar.

Here it says “…and splashed Moses the blood.” The blood is not sprinkled, but cast forth upon the altar. It is symbolic of the complete and voluntary surrender of the priests to die while yet living. When we look at what has transpired so far, we see a logical order. The bull was sacrificed for sin. This is then followed by the ram which is in picture a complete surrender of the priests’ will to God. This follows with Paul’s words of Romans 6:7-11 –

For he who has died has been freed from sin. Now if we died with Christ, we believe that we shall also live with Him, knowing that Christ, having been raised from the dead, dies no more. Death no longer has dominion over Him. 10 For the death that He died, He died to sin once for all; but the life that He lives, He lives to God. 11 Likewise you also, reckon yourselves to be dead indeed to sin, but alive to God in Christ Jesus our Lord.”

This ram then symbolizes what Paul calls in Romans a “living sacrifice” to God. It sounds contradictory – a living sacrifice – but it is pictured here in the death of this ram for the on-going consecration of Aaron and his sons.

20 And he cut the ram into pieces; and Moses burned the head, the pieces, and the fat.

This was instructed in Exodus 29:17. The dividing of the animal is to ensure that it will fully burn and nothing of it would be left. If it was not so divided, its legs would hang over the side and smolder, but not be consumed.

21 Then he washed the entrails and the legs in water.

The inner parts of the animal are washed in order to reflect the inner purity of Christ, in Whom there is no defilement. The legs are washed because they are the part of the animal which picks up worldly defilement as it walks. As Christ was without any such worldly defilement, the washing is done in anticipation of His perfect life, given over wholly to God. Each step is meticulously ordered and then performed in anticipation of Christ to come.

21 (con’t) And Moses burned the whole ram on the altar. It was a burnt sacrifice for a sweet aroma, an offering made by fire to the Lord, as the Lord had commanded Moses.

The entire ram was burnt right there on the altar. The expiation of sin is not needed as that was accomplished by the bull. Because of this, the animal is considered an acceptable substitute to be offered to the Lord on behalf of those it replaced. Such a burnt offering, without any associated defilement, represented Christ’s perfect self-sacrifice. For this reason, it was entirely acceptable to God.

The word for “burn” is qatar. It is the same word which is used time and again to point to Christ. It signifies making something fragrant through fire. The entire animal was such an offering. In picture, the ram here signifies the whollyacceptable offering of Christ to God on behalf of Aaron and his sons. In the bull, He was seen as the sin offering which was burned outside the camp.

But in the ram, He is seen as the whole and complete perfection of every good deed, offered to God on the brazen altar. As the ram is given on behalf of the priests, it means that the execution of their tasks will be pleasing to God because of what the offering pictures; Christ’s work. In reality, what the priests do as they minister, is accepted because of the work of Another; because of Christ.

A sweet smelling aroma to the Lord
An offering made of our lives and our work
We shall be obedient to Him and to His word
No duty that is proper shall we set aside or shirk

As Christ our Lord gave Himself for us
We should also walk in love and so be a suitable offering
|Let us endeavor to follow our Lord Jesus
And act in emulation of His eternal proffering

Offering ourselves and our bodies as a living sacrifice
People living out our lives holy and acceptable to God
Because for our sins, Christ Jesus paid the price
And now it is our duty to be circumspect in this life we trod

III. The Second Ram (verses 22-29)

22 And he brought the second ram, the ram of consecration.

The Hebrew says, “…the ram, the second.” This is then followed up with the words el ha’millium, the “ram [of] the consecration,” because in the acts associated with it, this portion of the consecration of Aaron and his sons will be complete.

The word millu, or consecration, comes from the word male, or “to fill.” Thus, we can call this “the ram of the filling.” If you can see it, there is now another picture of the work of Christ. For Aaron and His sons, there is first the atonement for sins, then the giving of the life over to God, and then the filling of the Spirit.

Although these three occur simultaneously in the believer, they are logically ordered in each of these three offerings. The consecration of Aaron and his sons is what occurs in each person who comes to Christ, pictured in each aspect of this rite of ordination.

22 (con’t) Then Aaron and his sons laid their hands on the head of the ram,

This ram is essentially a peace, or fellowship, offering, but because it is a part of the consecration, there is more to it than a normal peace offering. The laying of the hands on the head of the bull was for the transfer of sin. The laying on of hands for the first ram was as an offering of the individual wholly to the service of God. The laying of hands on this animal was to signify the receiving of the authority to serve. Each offering is logically noted, in order, to show the process of acceptable service to God.

23 and Moses killed it. 

Again, Moses is not named in this clause, only in the next. But, it is Moses who accomplishes the task, and because it is Moses, the temporary nature of the Aaronic priesthood is once again highlighted. A fallen man cannot institute an infallible priesthood.

23 (con’t) Also he took some of its blood and put it on the tip of Aaron’s right ear, on the thumb of his right hand, and on the big toe of his right foot.

The returning of the blood to Aaron signifies his acceptance as high priest and the granting of his authority as such. The blood symbolizes life. The shed blood thus symbolizes death. He now symbolically dies to self and henceforward is to live for God.

That each point of application is on the right side has meaning in and of itself. The right is the side of strength, blessing, authority, honor, judgment (in salvation), wisdom, cleansing, etc. Applying the blood to the right includes in some measure, each of these.

First, blood is applied to the tenuk, or lobe of the ear. This signifies obedience in the sense of spiritual hearing. He was to heed the Divine voice which would speak to him either through the law or though God’s prophets. He was to be consecrated to this hearing of the word, in the sense of applying it to his life.

Following this, it was to be applied to the bohen, or thumb, of the right hand. This word comes from a root which means “thick.” Therefore, it is the thick part of the hand, and thus the thumb. The fingers symbolize human activity. Here, the thumb represents the whole hand. His hand, thus meaning his spiritual activity, was to be set apart to God, to holiness, and to only that which was sanctified. He was to be a high priest ready to not only hear the Divine voice, but to respond to it through his daily activity.

Finally, the blood was to be applied to the bohen, or big toe, of his foot. It is the same word as thumb. As the big toe is the thick appendage, it received the application of blood as representative of the whole foot. It symbolized that he was to walk only in paths of holiness, directing his steps toward God in the race set before him.

This verse, with the three principle points of application, is explained by Paul in many different passages, but it is well summed up by him in Colossians 1 –

For this reason we also, since the day we heard it, do not cease to pray for you, and to ask that you may be filled with the knowledge of His will in all wisdom and spiritual understanding; (ear) 10 that you may walk worthy of the Lord, fully pleasing Him, (toe) being fruitful in every good work (thumb) and increasing in the knowledge of God; 11 strengthened with all might, according to His glorious power, for all patience and longsuffering with joy; 12 giving thanks to the Father who has qualified us to be partakers of the inheritance of the saints in the light.” Colossians 1:9-12

In the application of the blood to these three extremities, there is the sense that his entire life was to be enclosed in the service of God. From head to toe and from hand to foot, he was sanctified as an acceptable high priest. However, there is the truth that even with this application, he still couldn’t hear, understand, serve, or walk in a truly proper manner. And, as the blood did nothing but symbolize something else, it only looked forward in type and shadow.

As Aaron only pictured the true High Priest, Christ, then this is only a foreshadowing of the One who literally fulfilled these ancient images. The history of the Aaronic priesthood is one filled with fallible men who often made disastrous decisions. Christ, though, came as the more excellent priest with a more excellent ministry which is established on better promises.

24 Then he brought Aaron’s sons. And Moses put some of the blood on the tips of their right ears, on the thumbs of their right hands, and on the big toes of their right feet.

The same procedures which picture the same things, were next followed for the sons. As Aaron pictures Christ, the High Priest, these sons of Aaron picture us, who follow Christ in the priestly duties of the church age.

24 (con’t)And Moses sprinkled the blood all around on the altar.

All of the rest of the blood was scattered around the altar. The reason here is twofold. The first is an indication of the willingness of these men to perform their priestly duties, and the second is the acceptance of that willingness by God. They have had their sins atoned for, they have offered themselves up wholly to God, and now there is a joint acceptance of the duties.

25 Then he took the fat and the fat tail, all the fat that was on the entrails, the fatty lobe attached to the liver, the two kidneys and their fat, and the right thigh;

These special parts of the animal, which signify Christ’s most intimate aspects, meaning the very substance of who He is, are gathered together. Along with this is the shoq, or thigh. It comes from a word meaning “abundant.” Thus it is the abundant area of meat on an appendage. As it is the right thigh, it signifies the honorable side. In all, that which is abundant and most honorable is what is being seen here. But there is more to gather…

26 and from the basket of unleavened bread that was before the Lord he took one unleavened cake, a cake of bread anointed with oil, and one wafer,

The three types of bread were minutely described in Exodus 29. Every detail of them pointed to Christ in an amazing fashion. If you don’t remember that sermon, there is today’s afternoon assignment for you. These also are gathered up…

26 (con’t) and put them on the fat and on the right thigh;

All of the items mentioned in verses 24 & 25 are piled up on top of the right thigh. Unless one understood the symbolism, it would seem like a rather curious pile of meat, fat, and bread. But in short, it points to the abundance of Christ, the most intimate aspects of Christ, and the work of Christ, including His death on the cross.

27 and he put all these in Aaron’s hands and in his sons’ hands, and waved them as a wave offering before the Lord.

What is more accurate would be, “…and he put all these on the hands of Aaron and on the hands of his sons.” The reason why is because of the type of ritual to be performed. Aaron and his sons were to open their hands and Moses would then put everything on their open hands. After that, they were to be waved as an offering.

The word is tenuphah, or “wave offering.” It comes from nuph, which means to wave, or to move to and fro. What would happen is that Moses would put his hands under theirs, and then make a waving motion together with them towards the four corners of the heavens, thus indicating that they were being offered to the omnipresent God. This literal filling of the hand is symbolic of the filling of the Spirit. This comes from the Person and work of Christ which is reflected in the various things piled up in their hands.

What Moses is doing here is transferring his pro-tempore duties to Aaron. His muscular energy is causing them to perform their first priestly act. It is symbolic of the transfer of all of these aspects to the life of the believer. In Him, God accounts these things to us because of what He has done. In turn we offer them back to God…

28 Then Moses took them from their hands and burned them on the altar, on the burnt offering. They were consecration offerings for a sweet aroma. That was an offering made by fire to the Lord.

The items, waved by the strength of Moses, were then taken back by him as if Aaron and his sons were still common people making an offering to God. They are being endowed with priestly authority, but they are not yet fully installed. Until the completion of the rite, Moses would continue acting as a priest.

The wave offering being returned to the Lord as a burnt offering, and as a sweet aroma, was to signify the complete submission of themselves to the Lord. As each thing in their hands only symbolizes Christ, then the true and eternal priesthood, which these things foreshadow, are embodied in Him.

His work was found acceptable and through it, He obtained a more perfect priesthood and ministry than could ever have been obtained by mere fallible, fallen men and by the blood of bulls and goats. At Aaron’s ordination, God looked ahead to the ministry of Christ and He smelled a sweet savor only because of what it pictured, not because of the animal and bread burning there on the altar.

29 And Moses took the breast and waved it as a wave offering before the Lord. It was Moses’ part of the ram of consecration, as the Lord had commanded Moses.

The word “breast” is khazeh. It comes from khazah which means “to see” because it is the part that is most seen when looking at the front of the animal. That, in turn, comes from a root which indicates to gaze at, and to mentally perceive, such as a vision.

This particular part of the animal has a special significance, picturing Christ who is the Source of all mental perception and divine vision. It was to now be waved before the Lord. In the future, it will belong to Aaron and his sons, but for now, because Moses is the acting priest, it was assigned to him as his portion.

Accepted and ready to perform our tasks for the Lord
We gladly give ourselves for this wonderful duty
Sanctified and ready for service according to His word
Robed in garments of glory and of beauty

The sacrifice has been made, and we stand ready
The offering in our hands is waved before the Lord
With the Mediators’ hands below, our hands are steady
We are sanctified for service according to His word

We come before You, our great God
We offer our lives in Your service now and always
Grant us that we will be worthy in this life we trod
Never faltering throughout all of our days

IV. Seven Days He Shall Consecrate You (Verses 30-36)

30 Then Moses took some of the anointing oil and some of the blood which was on the altar, and sprinkled it on Aaron, on his garments, on his sons, and on the garments of his sons with him; and he consecrated Aaron, his garments, his sons, and the garments of his sons with him.

The wording is very distinct, u-min ha’dam asher al ha’mizbeakh – “and from the blood that is on the altar.” Despite what scholars say, this is not blood kept from before the blood was splashed and held for this purpose. Instead, Moses takes ram’s blood that had already been splashed on the altar. The amount isn’t what is important. Rather the fact that it had been splashed on the altar is what is.

There is a specific process here: 1) Slaughter; 2) Splash on the altar; 3) Take blood from the altar to use in sprinkling. It is a confirmation that not only had the blood of the ordination ram been applied to both priest and altar, but that it was then accepted by God and returned to them along with the anointing oil.

In picture, it is truly their “Pentecost moment.” They had been received as acceptable and they were symbolically endowed with that acceptance. No great amount of blood was necessary. In fact, if it was a heavy amount, it would literally stain the garments.

The word “sprinkle” here is correct. It is nazah. It indicates sprinkling for purification, cleansing, atonement, expiation, etc. In this case, it is for the sanctification of Aaron, his sons, and their garments. Only a small amount would be needed to symbolically confirm their consecration and acceptance for duty. This is reflected by Paul’s words of Romans 15 –

Nevertheless, brethren, I have written more boldly to you on some points, as reminding you, because of the grace given to me by God, 16 that I might be a minister of Jesus Christ to the Gentiles, ministering the gospel of God, that the offering of the Gentiles might be acceptable, sanctified by the Holy Spirit.” Romans 15:15, 16

It is the offering which is considered acceptable which is sanctified by the Holy Spirit.

31 And Moses said to Aaron and his sons, “Boil the flesh at the door of the tabernacle of meeting, and eat it there with the bread that is in the basket of consecration offerings, as I commanded, saying, ‘Aaron and his sons shall eat it.’

The designated parts of the ram, along with the remainder of the three types of bread taken from the basket, were to be eaten by the door of the tent of meeting. As each of those types of bread individually pictured Christ, as did the ram, the meal is symbolically a partaking of His body. As He said in John, “My flesh is food indeed” (6:55), and “I am the Bread of life” (6:35).

The sharing of it between the Lord and Aaron and his sons is intended to solidify the bond between them. Christ, being He who unites the heavenly and the earthly as One. All during the week of ordination, they were being spiritually prepared for their lifelong duties as priests to the Lord.

32 What remains of the flesh and of the bread you shall burn with fire.

This is the same rule as the Passover. It was not to be eaten on the following day. As there were seven days of ordination, it would be inappropriate to accumulate leftovers from one day to the next. Food which had gone through the night was susceptible to corruption. This would be unacceptable to consume when considering God’s holy and incorruptible nature.

Further, it was exclusively to be eaten by the priests. If not, it was to be returned to the Lord by fire, not passed on to another. If another ate of it, it would diminish the entire ordination process because they were not so ordained. It would be, in essence, mixing the holy with the profane.

And finally, if something which was devoted to a sacred use was given to someone else, they could then use it as an object of superstitious worship, as if a talisman. Like the Passover which pictured Christ so well, no such thing was to happen to the holy food of the consecration which also pictures Him in every detail.

33 And you shall not go outside the door of the tabernacle of meeting for seven days, until the days of your consecration are ended.

This translation implies that they are to be inside the holy place. This is incorrect. They are to station themselves in the courtyard where the sacrifices are made for seven days, and not leave that area. Each day, the same sacrificial ceremonies were to be repeated, but they did not enter the Holy Place to perform priestly duties as they were not yet installed. Those would have been performed by Moses during this period.

What is also obvious is that this is speaking of the conduct of their regular lives. There are obvious reasons why they would have to leave the area, reasons we’re all aware of. After those things were tended to, they were to return to their watch in the courtyard.

33 (con’t) For seven days he shall consecrate you.

The words are an idiom. Literally, it says, “For seven days he will fill your hand.” The filling of the hand is the consecration. The time period is that which indicates spiritual perfection. The “he” here could be Moses speaking of himself in the third person, because he is the one who does the duties, or it could be referring to the Lord as the Provider. It is unsure which is being referred to.

34 As he has done this day, so the Lord has commanded to do, to make atonement for you.

These words should probably be passive. Instead of “As he has done,” they should say, “As has been done.” It shows that the entire process which was accomplished on the first day was to be followed through for each day of the ordination. In being atoned for during all seven days, they were considered fully consecrated to then perform the holy duties of the priesthood. Furthermore, the altar was also atoned for during this seven-day period. Only when the seventh day of atonement was accomplished would it be considered most holy. From that time on, the sacrifices upon it would be restricted to only the ordained priests.

35 Therefore you shall stay at the door of the tabernacle of meeting day and night for seven days, and keep the charge of the Lord, so that you may not die; for so I have been commanded.”

The words concerning “day and night” were not specifically stated before in Exodus 29. However, it is now made explicit that this is what is commanded. The word used to describe their time there is mishmereth. It indicates to keep watch, or to guard. Thus, it is the watch of the Lord. They were to carefully guard the instructions they had been given. Should they fail, death would be the result.

As this is a time of probation, they were expected to follow through with the commands precisely. If they could not, then neither could they be relied upon to perform the more vital functions which they would be responsible for when the altar and various offerings were deemed as most holy. And if they failed to properly perform those most holy duties, then their lives would be forfeit. Such disastrous results will be seen in just two chapters.

*36 So Aaron and his sons did all the things that the Lord had commanded by the hand of Moses.

The obedience of Aaron and his sons is highlighted, just as Moses’ obedience has been highlighted over the past many chapters. The ordination process is activated, and with the turn of a page, we will truly enter into the time of the Aaronic priesthood, a priesthood that would last from about 1445BC until 70AD when the temple in Jerusalem was destroyed by the Romans. But, Daniel 9 tells us that there will be another temple, and the priesthood will be reactivated. This is an unfortunate step which must come to pass, despite the fact that the priesthood was annulled in the coming of Christ.

The Aaronic priesthood came without an oath, and with certainty of its eventual end. It was performed by sinful men who needed to first sacrifice for themselves before they could sacrifice for those who came to them for mediation. On the other hand, the priesthood of Christ came with an oath, it is an eternal priesthood, and it is performed by the sinless Son of God who sacrificed Himself in order to forever purify those that come to God through Him.

There is an infinite difference between the two. It is one that allows all men to draw near to God in a close and personal way. The lesson of the Bible is that all men must come to God through a mediator. With the coming of Christ, we are shown that He is the one and only Mediator God accepts. All of these types and shadows were given to show us this truth.

Christ is the full and final fulfillment of them all. If you’re looking for a close and personal relationship with God, call on Christ, and He will lead you past the altar, through the door, and even through the veil to the very throne of God. And it is all available through simple faith.

Closing Verse: “For such a High Priest was fitting for us, who is holy, harmless, undefiled, separate from sinners, and has become higher than the heavens; 27 who does not need daily, as those high priests, to offer up sacrifices, first for His own sins and then for the people’s, for this He did once for all when He offered up Himself. 28 For the law appoints as high priests men who have weakness, but the word of the oath, which came after the law, appoints the Son who has been perfected forever.” Hebrews 7:26-28

Next Week: Leviticus 9:1-24 Cool things are ahead, it is true… (The Glory of the Lord Will Appear to You) (13th Leviticus Sermon)

The Lord has you exactly where He wants you. He has a good plan and purpose for you. Even if you have a lifetime of sin heaped up behind you, He can wash it away and purify you completely and wholly. So follow Him and trust Him and He will do marvelous things for you and through you.

The Consecration of the Aaronic Priesthood

And he brought the bull for the sin offering
Then Aaron and his sons laid their hands
On the head of the bull for the sin offering
And Moses killed it, according to the Lord’s plans

Then he took the blood
And put some on the horns of the altar all around with his finger
And purified the altar
In his duties, he did not linger

And he poured the blood at the base of the altar, as the Lord did submit
And consecrated it, to make atonement for it

Then he took all the fat that was on the entrails
The fatty lobe attached to the liver too
And the two kidneys with their fat
And Moses burned them on the altar, as instructed to do 

But the bull, its hide, its flesh, and its offal
He burned outside the camp with fire
As the Lord had commanded Moses
There outside was the burning pyre

And he brought the bull for the sin offering
Then Aaron and his sons laid their hands
On the head of the bull for the sin offering
And Moses killed it, according to the Lord’s plans

Then he took the blood
And put some on the horns
——–Of the altar all around with his finger
And purified the altar
Again, not letting his duties linger

And he poured the blood at the base of the altar
And consecrated it, to make atonement for it In this duty, he did not falter
Then he took all the fat that was on the entrails

The fatty lobe attached to the liver as well
And the two kidneys with their fat
And Moses burned them on the altar, as the Lord to him did tell

But the bull, its hide, its flesh, and its offal
He burned with fire outside the camp
As the Lord had commanded Moses
Surely in his duties, he got the approval stamp

Then he brought the ram as the burnt offering
And Aaron and his sons laid their hands on the head
Of the ram, and Moses killed it
Then he sprinkled the blood all around on the altar as the Lord said

And he cut the ram into pieces
And Moses burned the head, the pieces, and the fat too
Then he washed the entrails and the legs in water
And Moses burned the whole ram on the altar, as instructed to do

It was a burnt sacrifice for a sweet aroma
An offering made by fire to the Lord
As the Lord had commanded Moses
Yes, according to His word

And he brought the second ram, the ram of consecration
Then Aaron and his sons laid their hands
On the head of the ram, and Moses killed it
According to the Lord’s preset plans

Also he took some of its blood
And put it on the tip of Aaron’s right ear, there he did it put
On the thumb of his right hand
And on the big toe of his right foot 

Then he brought Aaron’s sons
And Moses put some of the blood, as was meet
On the tips of their right ears, on the thumbs of their right hands
And on the big toes of their right feet

And Moses sprinkled the blood all around on the altar
In this task he was careful and did not falter

Then he took the fat and the fat tail
All the fat that was on the entrails, so he did do
The fatty lobe attached to the liver
The two kidneys and their fat, and the right thigh too

And from the basket of unleavened bread
That was before the Lord he took one unleavened cake
A cake of bread anointed with oil, and one wafer
And put them on the fat and on the right thigh; a pile he did make

And he put all these in Aaron’s hands
And in his sons’ hands as well
And waved them as a wave offering before the Lord
As the Lord to him did tell 

Then Moses took them from their hands
And burned them on the altar, on the burnt offering
——-as per His word
They were consecration offerings for a sweet aroma
That was an offering made by fire to the Lord 

And Moses took the breast and waved it
As a wave offering before the Lord that day
It was Moses’ part of the ram of consecration
As the Lord had commanded Moses, as the Lord did say

Then Moses took some of the anointing oil
And some of the blood which was on the altar too
And sprinkled it on Aaron, on his garments, on his sons
And on the garments of his sons with him, so he did do

And he consecrated Aaron, his garments, his sons as well
And the garments of his sons with him, as the Lord to him did tell

And Moses said to Aaron and his sons
Boil the flesh at the tabernacle of meeting’s door
And eat it there with the bread
That is in the basket of consecration offerings, for sure

As I commanded, saying; yes as I did submit
Aaron and his sons shall eat it

What remains of the flesh and of the bread
You shall burn with fire, just as the Lord has said

And you shall not go outside the door
Of the tabernacle of meeting for seven days
Until the days of your consecration are ended
For seven days he shall consecrate you, marvelous are His ways 

As he has done this day
So the Lord has commanded to do
And what is the reason for this rite?
To make atonement for you 

Therefore you shall stay at the door of the tabernacle of meeting
Day and night for seven days, by and by
And keep the charge of the Lord
For so I have been commanded, so that you may not die

So Aaron and his sons did all the things, we understand
That the Lord had commanded by Moses’ hand

How amazing! Every detail gives us precious insights to delight
Things that provide our souls with surety
That through Christ’s work, all things have been made right
And that our future is secure, a Divine guarantee

Thank You, O God for these marvelous hints of Jesus
Written so long ago, and yet as new as the day before our eyes
They are an anchor for the expectant souls of each of us
As we wait upon His return; He our splendid Prize

And because of Him we shall for all eternity give You our praise
Yes, we shall hail You O God because of Jesus for eternal days

Hallelujah and Amen…

Leviticus 8:1-13 (The Consecration of the Aaronic Priesthood, Part I)

Leviticus 8:1-13
The Consecration of the Aaronic Priesthood, Part I

From time to time, people ask me about my credentials, usually about what denomination I am. I have no set answer for that. I usually say something like, I’m a Bible preacher. However, that just tells what I do, it doesn’t tell what brought me to this point.

I met the Lord in 2001. For the first two or so years after that, I read the Bible cover to cover about once a week. I never counted, but I read it at my store, and I was there about 70 hours a week. So unless someone walked in, that’s what I was doing. When I got home, I’d keep reading it. After I closed the store and went back into Wastewater, I kept reading it.

I also started answering Bible questions on the beach. You learn a lot more doing that, than you do just reading. When you’re put on the spot and look dumb, you determine not to do it again. Eventually, the county took over our wastewater plant, and I had no time for government employment.

And so I asked the preacher of the church I was at about what I needed to do in order to get ordained. He told me to get a Bible-college degree and he would ordain me. I did, and he didn’t. It wasn’t really his fault, but the story goes back to my beard. We’ll leave it at that.

After that, I called the pastor of Grace Baptist Church and he told me to come on over to Grace, let the congregation get to know me for a year, and then he and the deacons would determine if I was ordainable. I went, I was, and they did. After my year of probation, they held a pastor/deacon interrogation, going over the major points of theology, asking anything they wished on Bibliology, Theology Proper (including trinitarianism), Christology, Pneumatology, Angelology, Anthropology, Harmartiology, Soteriology, Ecclesiology, and Eschatology. After that, I had to preach a sermon or two in front of the church. And then… the congregation voted on the matter. Apparently, the beard wasn’t an issue there. They approved it, and I was ordained on 24 January 2010. That’s it in a nutshell. Well, I did wear a suit, a tie, shoes, and a beard on the day I was ordained.

Text Verse: “Let Your priests be clothed with righteousness,
And let Your saints shout for joy.” Psalm 132:9

We have already gone through all of the advanced details for the ordination of Aaron and his sons. Those sermons though had to be taken along with everything else concerning the sanctuary and all of its implements. Everything is tied together, and they form a united whole.

Even in today’s sermon, we cannot escape going back and picking out some of the details from the past. It’s simply not possible without missing a ton of the symbolism of what lies ahead for us. The verses in this chapter lack much of the detail that was given. Even though we will go back to form a broad brushstroke of Christ and His work, we will leave far more out than we will include.

There is just enough added so that you can be reminded that everything about this ordination process is, in type and picture, looking forward to Christ. The details are logical, orderly, and they add in some new information as well. More than anything, the order of what is stated, and the dignity of how everything is accomplished, is what we are to focus on today.

The Lord had called, and now the calling was being acted upon. Time and again in this chapter, the words “as the Lord commanded” are stated. There is a set procedure which He laid out, and that set procedure will be followed carefully. The importance of this is because of the typology. In order for the type to reflect the Anti-type, everything had to be exact.

Now, as we look back on these things, we can clearly see Christ revealed in them. In turn, we are given the surety that our hopes are placed in the right basket. The word we have been given is sure, the hope that we possess is well-grounded, and therefore the things which are promised to us, but are yet future, are certain to come to pass.

It’s all to be found in His… wait a minute! Just so you know, Aaron did have a beard as was the custom for all men in Israel. That too is to be found in His superior word, and so let’s turn to that precious word once again and… May God speak to us through His word today and may His glorious name ever be praised.

I. A Gathering at the Door of the Tent of Meeting (verses 1-5)

And the Lord spoke to Moses, saying:

This is the customary set of words which indicate that a new train of thought is being introduced. In this case, it introduces a section which will last all the way through until verse 10:8. Until then, the ordination of Aaron and his sons will be highlighted in detail.

This ordination process follows directly from the instructions given to Moses concerning the making of the priestly garments in Exodus 28, and the instructions given for the ordination process in Exodus 29. And then, some instructions for what should be done in the official duties of the priest were given in Exodus 30. What was instructed then will be complied with now. At least this is so up to a point. In chapter 10, there will be a deviation from the instructions, and that deviation will result in death.

What is interesting, is that the ordination process that we will now see was directed to be accomplished in Exodus 40 as that book closed out. However, before actually accomplishing it, the Lord first explained the different types of sacrifices that would be handled by the priests. This is what we have seen for the past seven chapters. Only now, after giving those minute instructions, are the priests ready to be installed in their special priestly office.

It would make no sense to ordain priests for the office, and only then explain to them the procedures for the various sacrifices that they needed to perform. Everything is precise, logical, and perfectly laid out. Each step leads to the next, just as one would expect from an instruction manual for putting together a complicated piece of machinery.

“Take Aaron and his sons with him,

These words once again confirm what has already been seen earlier in Exodus. Aaron was not chosen by Moses because they were brothers, but rather Aaron was chosen by the Lord, and the Lord is now directing the ordination of the one he previously chose. It is intended to negate any feelings of favoritism by the other Israelites. Unfortunately, it is something that won’t actually occur until the Lord has to defend His choice at the expense of the lives of those who rebel against His decision.

2 (con’t) and the garments, the anointing oil, a bull as the sin offering, two rams, and a basket of unleavened bread;

The description for the garments was given in Exodus 28; those for the anointing oil in Exodus 30, and the requirement for the bull, the rams, and the bread was given in Exodus 29. In the Hebrew, several definite articles are used to indicate that these things are to comply with what was stated in those chapters. These things were minutely described, and so what was described is now expected to be brought forth. The words are very precise because the typology of Christ is not to be deviated from.

and gather all the congregation together at the door of the tabernacle of meeting.”

The words here indicate at least the elders of the assembly who represented their tribes. This is explicitly noted in 9:1. The elders of Israel represented the children of Israel. The size of the courtyard would not allow even a small portion of the people to meet in this location, and so their designated representatives would be witnesses. Any others who could fit in probably did, and it is only speculation, but possible, that others went up on the surrounding hillsides to witness the marvelous spectacle.

The “door” being specified is intended to prefigure Christ. There is the altar where the sacrifices will be made, there is the laver where the water for the washing will come from, but the door alone is specified. Jesus said, “I am the Door.” He is the door to the tent of meeting, or the spot where communion with God takes place. The wording is carefully given to show us what is on God’s mind. Even 1500 years before the coming of Christ, the ordination is shouting out what God would do through Him.

So Moses did as the Lord commanded him.

The Bible is replete with words like this. For Moses, it is a phrase commonly spoken of him. He was commanded by the Lord to follow certain procedures, and the Bible then notes his obedience to those commands. The same Bible exists today, and the question is, “Would the words recorded about you say the same thing, or would they say that you failed to do as the word of God spoke?”

When Moses did fail to do as instructed, it cost him dearly. That is coming up in the book of Numbers, and to this day his error is recorded for us to, hopefully, learn from. Your life is being recorded as well, and at some point, you will have to stand before the Lord and give an account for your actions. It is hoped that you won’t be ashamed at the time of your trial.

4 (con’t) And the congregation was gathered together at the door of the tabernacle of meeting.

It is a public consecration, and this for a couple of reasons. The first has already been explained, which is to show that Aaron was not simply selected by Moses because he was Moses’ brother, but rather it was because the Lord had selected him.

Secondly, because it was public, the people would then be, through their witnessing of the consecration, agreeing to the mediation of Aaron and his sons on their behalf. However many could fit into the courtyard would do so, and as the consecration went on for an entire week, people could come and go, allowing many to witness this national rite of ordination.

And Moses said to the congregation, “This is what the Lord commanded to be done.”

His words here sum up all of what he was presented while on Mount Sinai concerning the ordination process. He presented this to the people as the command of the Lord. As a congregation, they are now summoned together to perform that same word of the Lord which He had commanded.

Beautiful garments, so rich and glorious
To adorn the high priest of Israel
But they only point to our Lord victorious
In every detail there is a story to tell

In them we see His beauty, His splendor and glory
In them we see His work accomplished on behalf of us
Yes, in every detail there is a marvelous story
About the coming Christ; our Lord Jesus

And they tell yet more; that of which He does even now
They tell of His work interceding to the Father for us
For to Him God did all high priestly duties endow
Yes, He stands before His Father, our great Lord Jesus

II. The Consecration – Clothing and Anointing (verses 6-13)

Then Moses brought Aaron and his sons and washed them with water.

As part of the ordination process, Moses is to wash Aaron and his sons with water. This implies an entire washing of their bodies. At this strategic place, just between where the people were allowed to come, and the entrance to the place where the Lord dwelt, they were to be prepared for being acceptable to enter His presence.

The people being witnesses of this part of the process was intended to show them that they remained unclean and unacceptable to enter where their King was. Only those chosen and properly prepared could do so. After this full washing of their bodies, the laver will be used differently. This was seen in Exodus 30 –

“Then the Lord spoke to Moses, saying: 18 “You shall also make a laver of bronze, with its base also of bronze, for washing. You shall put it between the tabernacle of meeting and the altar. And you shall put water in it, 19 for Aaron and his sons shall wash their hands and their feet in water from it. 20 When they go into the tabernacle of meeting, or when they come near the altar to minister, to burn an offering made by fire to the Lord, they shall wash with water, lest they die. 21 So they shall wash their hands and their feet, lest they die. And it shall be a statute forever to them—to him and his descendants throughout their generations.” Exodus 30:17-21

Each step, in both ordination and in daily duties, they are being progressively instructed in the holiness of God and the need to be pure and undefiled as they approach Him on behalf of the people. This washing pictures the total cleansing of the priests. In Aaron’s case, as the high priest, it symbolizes Christ’s perfect purity as our High Priest. It points to His baptism before He entered into His public service in order to fulfill all righteousness. For the sons of Aaron, it pictures those who follow Christ and are purified by His work. This is seen in John 13 where Christ said this –

He who is bathed needs only to wash his feet, but is completely clean; and you are clean, but not all of you.” John 13:10

John uses two different words there. One signifies a full bathing, the second indicates a lesser washing. Through Christ’s work, we are completely cleaned. We stand justified and free of guilt. However, we also continue to go through a process of sanctification where we need to be purified from time to time.

This is pictured in the priest’s need to wash their hands and their feet as they ministered to the Lord. These external washings signify the universal corruption of man and our need for external purification. The water pictures the spiritual regeneration which occurs when we are set apart by Christ.

Only after the washing was accomplished were the garments then put on them. In the case of Aaron, his garments are emblematic of the divine work of Christ. He will next have seven articles placed upon Him – a tunic, a sash, a robe, an ephod, a breastplate, and a turban. Each represents an aspect of Christ’s work. Together, they form a picture of Christ, the Prophet, Priest, and King who is completely distinct and set apart from all others.

In the case of Aaron and his sons though, the cleansing now gives clear symbolic significance. It is to demonstrate, in type and shadow, that cleansing from sin must precede being clothed in righteousness and the anointing of the Spirit. Without being first cleansed, no person can draw near to God or be shown His favor through the sealing of the Spirit.

And he put the tunic on him,

The kethoneth, or tunic was first mentioned in Exodus 28:4, where it was called a “skillfully woven tunic.” It was mentioned again in Exodus 28:39 where it was said to be made of fine linen thread. An unusual Hebrew word, shabats, was used to describe it. That word means that it was made of a checkered weaving pattern, thus indicating something set or fixed. Flavius Josephus said that it was, “a tunic circumscribing or closely encompassing the body, and having tight sleeves for the arms.”

This garment pictures Christ’s righteousness which is checkered into His being. It is set and unchanging. As it is the garment closest to the body of Aaron, it is typical of Christ’s righteousness that literally adorns Him; it being an essential part of His very nature. As it will protrude out on both of his arms and from under his robe, it is a symbol of the always-evident righteousness of Christ. Even during His last moments before the crucifixion, Pilate proclaimed this aspect of Him –

I have found no fault in this Man.” Luke 23:14

7 (con’t) girded him with the sash,

This avnet, or girdle, was also mentioned in the same two verses of Exodus 24. It is a belt or a sash that is worn at the waist and was said to be made of “woven work.” Later, in Exodus 39, it was said to be “of fine woven linen with blue, purple, and scarlet thread, made by a weaver.” What is unusual is that it was probably not visible at all as it would be under the other garments. And yet, the instructions were specific concerning its weaving. This hidden sash is reflective of Christ’s divine majesty as is seen in Psalm 93 –

The Lord reigns, He is clothed with majesty;
The Lord is clothed,
He has girded Himself with strength.
Surely the world is established, so that it cannot be moved.” Psalm 93:1

7 (con’t) clothed him with the robe,

The meil, or robe, is a type of tunic which would reach from neck all the way down to somewhere around the knees; some believe even as far as to the feet. It was thought to be a completely seamless garment as can be inferred from Exodus 39:22 –

“He made the robe of the ephod of woven work, all of blue.”

The term “woven work” implies a seamless garment. However, Flavius Josephus explicitly documents this fact in his commentary on the priestly garments. He says that “the coat did not consist of two parts, nor was it sewed upon the shoulder, nor on the side, but was one long piece of woven work.” This robe is further described in Exodus 28 with these words –

There shall be an opening for his head in the middle of it; it shall have a woven binding all around its opening, like the opening in a coat of mail, so that it does not tear.” Exodus 28:31

It would have a hole for the head to go through and it had no sleeves. Therefore, the top portion of it would be mostly covered by the ephod and the breastplate which go over it. However, the lower part was fully visible. The plain blue would be a beautiful contrast to the variegated ephod and the gleaming breastplate.

This blue signifies the law, especially in adherence to it. In a type of Christ, this blue robe signifies that Christ Jesus is the embodiment of the law. In Exodus 28, it was described with a word, kalil, translated as “all,” as in “all of blue.” That comes from the verb kalal, which means to complete or make perfect. Thus the robe was entirely made of only this blue. It is indicative of Christ who perfectly fulfilled the law, completing it on our behalf. He is literally “robed” in the completion of the law. Also, as the robe was seamless, it points to John’s words about Jesus on the cross –

Then the soldiers, when they had crucified Jesus, took His garments and made four parts, to each soldier a part, and also the tunic. Now the tunic was without seam, woven from the top in one piece.” John 19:23

Shortly after this occurred, John records Jesus’ dying words, “It is finished.” The robe which Aaron is being clothed in now in Leviticus was merely a picture of Christ embodying the law, fulfilling it, and finishing it for us. However, before He died, something else was recorded about Christ’s tunic. Despite dividing His other garments, the value of His tunic led them to say –

Let us not tear it, but cast lots for it, whose it shall be,” John 19:24

In contrast to this, in Matthew 26:65, the high priest of Israel tore his clothes during Jesus’ trial. This was in direct violation of the Law of Moses. In Leviticus 21 it says –

He who is the high priest among his brethren, on whose head the anointing oil was poured and who is consecrated to wear the garments, shall not uncover his head nor tear his clothes;” Leviticus 21:10

In the treatment of these two garments, there is seen an ending of the old order of things. The Law of Moses was ended in Christ’s work and the New Covenant was established in His blood. The note of keeping the high priest’s robe from tearing was given as a contrasting picture of the true High Priest’s garment not being torn.

But, the recording of the high priest tearing his garment signifies the ending of that priesthood. That Christ’s garment wasn’t torn, and yet His body was, signifies the introduction of the New. In describing this robe in Exodus, a very rare word, takharah, was used to describe the hem around the neck. The word comes from the verb kharah, which means “to burn with anger.” In this, the symbolism is obvious; the anger of the Lord at the sin of man is what was on display there at the cross. The penalty for that sin was the tearing of Christ’s body, the true robe of humanity.

7 (con’t) and put the ephod on him;

The materials for the ephod were described in Exodus 28:5-8 –

They shall take the gold, blue, purple, and scarlet thread, and the fine linen, and they shall make the ephod of gold, blue, purple, and scarlet thread, and fine woven linen, artistically worked. It shall have two shoulder straps joined at its two edges, and so it shall be joined together. And the intricately woven band of the ephod, which is on it, shall be of the same workmanship, made of gold, blue, purple, and scarlet thread, and fine woven linen.”

The ephod is a sleeveless garment, like a waistcoat. It was made of the same colors as the veil of the tabernacle, but with the addition of gold thread added into it. The colors used in it indicate divinity/royalty for the gold, the law for the blue; royalty for the purple – which is a combination of blue and red; war, blood, and judgment for the red; and righteousness for the woven linen.

This ephod will bear the breastplate which will next be placed over it, just as the Ark bore the Mercy Seat. Though the Ark was described first, it is the Mercy Seat which crowns the Ark. The Ark embodies the law, thus the Old Covenant, while the Mercy Seat pictures the satisfaction of the law through the shedding of blood.

The same is true with the ephod and the breastplate. On the ephod will be two stones with the names of the children of Israel engraved on them. Thus it signifies the high priest’s role to bear the sufferings and labors of his people. On the breastplate will be twelve stones which will be engraved with the names of the children of Israel. This then signifies that the high priest sympathizes with his people as an intercessor before God. In both, the work of Christ is seen. First He bore our burdens, and then He became our intercessor. This is the reason for the order of each description. Marvelous wisdom is seen even in the order of how each thing is described to Moses.

7 (con’t) and he girded him with the intricately woven band of the ephod, and with it tied the ephod on him.

This is the last time that the kheshev, or “band,” is to be seen in Scripture. It has only been used in connection with the ephod. It is the band or belt which would keep the two lower parts of the ephod held close to the body. This particular band was made with the same materials as the ephod itself.

It is believed to have been sewn onto the ephod at one point, and then it could be wrapped around the body and secured by strings, or a button or some other way. Its use is seen at the time of the ordination of Aaron here in Leviticus 8.

The idea of this band pictures “readiness for service.” Despite being the high priest, Aaron was to be a servant of the people, mediating for them. Being girded and ready for service is a theme seen numerous times in the Bible, and it was something which Christ Himself did not draw away from, but rather embraced. We read about His being girded to serve in John 13 –

Jesus, knowing that the Father had given all things into His hands, and that He had come from God and was going to God, rose from supper and laid aside His garments, took a towel and girded Himself. After that, He poured water into a basin and began to wash the disciples’ feet, and to wipe them with the towel with which He was girded.” John 13:3-5

The gold which was woven into this belt anticipated the divine intervention of Christ for us. This is seen in Revelation 1:13 –

“…and in the midst of the seven lampstands One like the Son of Man, clothed with a garment down to the feet and girded about the chest with a golden band.

Aaron, wearing this ephod and band, was a type of Christ. The particular materials in them symbolize the services which Christ now renders to us as our human/divine Mediator. Though ascended to heaven, the book of Hebrews says that He is there in the presence of God making intercession for us.

Then he put the breastplate on him,

The instructions for the, khoshen, or breastplate are found in Exodus 28:15-30. Its full name is the breastplate of judgment. It took an entire sermon to describe the marvelous things which are seen in that particular item, and so if you want to know the symbolism, or if you have forgotten it, you will need to take the afternoon off from sports and watch it. There you will see such marvelous pictures of Christ that you simply won’t believe it.

8 (con’t) and he put the Urim and the Thummim in the breastplate.

The Urim and Thummim are described in Exodus 28:30. They are two of the most enigmatic items to be seen in all of the things associated with the sanctuary and the rites which accompany it. Urim is the plural of the word uwr, or “fire.” It means “lights.” Thummim is the plural of the word tom, or “integrity.” It means “perfections” or “that which is blameless or innocent.” Together, they are literally translated “Lights and Perfections.”

Interestingly, it was Moses who deposited the tablets of the Testimony into the Ark of the Covenant, and it is also Moses who places the Urim and Thummim into the breastplate for Aaron. Moses, or “He who draws out,” is the one who puts the items in. A direct tie is being made between the Ark and its two stone tablets and the breastplate and these two stones. What the Urim and Thummim actually did, what they were, or how they were used is unknown. But we do know that they were used for inquiring of God. This is seen, for example, in Ezra 2:62, 63 –

These sought their listing among those who were registered by genealogy, but they were not found; therefore they were excluded from the priesthood as defiled. 63 And the governor said to them that they should not eat of the most holy things till a priest could consult with the Urim and Thummim.”

Both the stone tablets and the Urim and Thummin gave forth the word of the Lord. And both the Ark and the Breastplate were containers for that word. In both cases, Moses was the one who placed the stones into their containers.

As I said, Urim means “Lights.” Numerous times in the Bible, the law of the Lord, the word of the Lord, or the judgments of the Lord are said to be light. I’ll cite three examples of this –

For the commandment is a lamp,
And the law a light;
Reproofs of instruction are the way of life.” Proverbs 6:23

Listen to Me, My people;
And give ear to Me, O My nation:
For law will proceed from Me,
And I will make My justice rest
As a light of the peoples.” Isaiah 51:4

Your word is a lamp to my feet
And a light to my path.” Psalm 119:105

Next, Thummim comes from the word tom. This corresponds to the adjective tamim or “perfections,” and thus being blameless. This is seen in the following two verses –

As for God, His way is perfect;
The word of the Lord is proven;
He is a shield to all who trust in Him.” Psalm 18:30

The law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul;
The testimony of the Lord is sure, making wise the simple.” Psalm 19:7

In these, and other examples, we can find that the law of the Lord is what is pictured in the Urim and Thummim. And so it has the same meaning as the tablets within the Ark. Christ fulfilled the law and it was secreted away under the mercy seat. He thus embodies the law and His blood covers the sins of the law for His people.

In placing the Urim and Thummin within the Breastplate of Judgment, it signifies that our faith in His work is what justifies us. If we need to consult God, we do it through Christ. Matthew Henry gives a splendid analogy of these things –

Now, Christ is our Oracle. By him God, in these last days, makes known himself and his mind to us, … He is the true Light, the faithful Witness, the Truth itself, and from him we receive the Spirit of Truth, who leads into all truth.” Matthew Henry

The truly amazing thing about this is that such minute detail was given for things that were to remain completely unseen, and yet they perfectly describe what Christ has done for us. In Christ, we are safe, we are secure, and we are so forever.

And he put the turban on his head.

The mitsnepheth, or turban, was also made of the fine woven linen like the tunic which was first put on Aaron. It again reflects Christ’s absolute righteousness. It is what crowns Him and it defines His very character. Together, this tunic and turban symbolize Christ’s pure and unsullied life and authority.

9 (con’t) Also on the turban, on its front, he put the golden plate, the holy crown,

This golden plate, here called “the holy crown,” was described in Exodus 28 with these words –

You shall also make a plate of pure gold and engrave on it, like the engraving of a signet:

HOLINESS TO THE LORD.

37 And you shall put it on a blue cord, that it may be on the turban; it shall be on the front of the turban. 38 So it shall be on Aaron’s forehead, that Aaron may bear the iniquity of the holy things which the children of Israel hallow in all their holy gifts; and it shall always be on his forehead, that they may be accepted before the Lord.” Exodus 28:36-38

The word translated as “plate” is tsiyts. It signifies a flower or a blossom. Along with that, a new descriptor is given here in Leviticus with the words nezer ha’kodesh, or “crown the holy.” The word nezer, being introduced here, signifies something set apart. It is this golden plate, placed on his forehead, which is the identifying mark of his separation from all others. It pictures the royal kingship of Christ. Unlike Israel which had offices of king and priest which were not to be intermingled, Christ is the fulfillment of them both. This is explicitly stated by the prophet Zechariah concerning the coming Messiah –

“Take the silver and gold, make an elaborate crown, and set it on the head of Joshua the son of Jehozadak, the high priest. 12 Then speak to him, saying, ‘Thus says the Lord of hosts, saying:

Behold, the Man whose name is the BRANCH!
From His place He shall branch out,
And He shall build the temple of the Lord;
13 Yes, He shall build the temple of the Lord.
He shall bear the glory,
And shall sit and rule on His throne;
So He shall be a priest on His throne,
And the counsel of peace shall be between them both.'” Zechariah 6:11-13

The special word used to describe this plate, tsiyts, speaks of Christ’s Human and Divine natures. The pure gold represents His pure divinity, but that it is a flower speaks of His humanity. This is seen where the same word speaks of the fading glory of man –

“The voice said, ‘Cry out!’
And he said, ‘What shall I cry?’

‘All flesh is grass,
And all its loveliness is like the flower of the field.'” Isaiah 40:6

Unlike fallen man though, Christ is the unfading flower who stepped out of heaven to restore us to that same beautiful state.

The engraving of HOLINESS TO THE LORD on this plate signifies the perfection of Christ. It is He who is the true Mediator for God’s people. It is He who makes our offerings acceptable to God once again, and it is He who restores us – fully and completely – to our heavenly Father.

That there were two words on the engraving also signifies His Divine/Human nature – qodesh Yehovah. The 8 letters signify the new beginnings which are found in Christ Jesus. In fact, the name JESUS in Greek, IESOUS, is numerically equal to 888. Thus He is the ultimate example of the New Beginning for fallen man.

The blue cord which tied the plate to the turban signifies the law as fulfilled which ties the divine Lord to His intercessory role as our high priest. It is He who is the bridge between the infinite Father and finite us.

The specific naming of the placement of the plate on the forehead of the high priest is to show both the place of conscience and of identification. The duality is seen in that He is first conscious of those He ministers for, meaning us. And He is also conscious of His rightful place before His Father.

Secondly, it reveals His priestly identity presented before us and which comes from His Father. It is He who bore our iniquities at the cross, and it is He who still makes our sin-filled lives acceptable as HOLINESS TO THE LORD. Only through Him can we be considered acceptable to God. This is actually realized on the very last page of the Bible with these marvelous words –

And there shall be no more curse, but the throne of God and of the Lamb shall be in it, and His servants shall serve Him. They shall see His face, and His name shall be on their foreheads.” Revelation 22:3, 4

It is this nezer ha’kodesh, or Holy Crown, which in typology is seen to be Christ who is the King/Priest who is set apart by God from among the sons of men.

9 (con’t) as the Lord had commanded Moses.

The clothing of Aaron as the high priest is now complete. In order to show that it was done in accord with the word of the Lord, this clause is now stated. What was commanded has been performed.

10 Also Moses took the anointing oil, and anointed the tabernacle and all that was in it, and consecrated them.

After the clothing of the high priest, but before his personal anointing, the tabernacle is next anointed. The word for “anoint” is mashakh, which means to anoint by smearing. This is the first time that the mishkan, or tabernacle, is mentioned in the book of Leviticus. Until this point, the structure has been called ohel moed, or “tent of meeting.” Now the specific tabernacle, which is under the external tent, is mentioned by name.

The anointing oil is described in Exodus 30:22-38, every minute detail of which points to Christ. Those verses also took an entire sermon to explain. Again, if you didn’t see that sermon, or if you don’t remember its details, you can catch up on it this afternoon. In short, it signifies the presence of the Spirit, in and through the work of Christ. But such a brief explanation does disservice to the majesty of what is seen in the details. You really should check them out. It is this marvelous presence of the Spirit, symbolized by the anointing oil, that is used to anoint the tabernacle and all of the furniture contained within it.

11 He sprinkled some of it on the altar seven times,

This is speaking of the brazen altar where the sacrifices were to be burned. The golden altar of incense, being within the tabernacle, was already anointed. Now, a seven-fold nazah, or sprinkling of the oil is made on the brazen altar. This seven-fold sprinkling has never been noted before in any of the instructions. It is a special procedure that thus signifies the presence of the seven-fold Spirit of the Lord as is seen in Isaiah 11 –

There shall come forth a Rod from the stem of Jesse,
And a Branch shall grow out of his roots.
The Spirit of the Lord shall rest upon Him,
The Spirit of wisdom and understanding,
The Spirit of counsel and might,
The Spirit of knowledge and of the fear of the Lord.” Isaiah 11:1, 2

This altar is being distinguished by this special seven-fold sprinkling. It is the number of spiritual perfection, and so the sprinkling forms a connection between the offeror and the One to whom the offerings are made. They form a covenantal bond between both which is only a shadow of the bond that now exists between God and His people because of the sacrifice of Christ.

11 (con’t) anointed the altar and all its utensils, and the laver and its base, to consecrate them. 

A different word is now used, returning again to mashakh, or smear, of verse 10. The utensils of the altar, as well as the laver and its base, are all anointed in the same manner as the tabernacle and everything in it. As before, the anointing of these items signifies the presence of the Spirit in what each item pictures.

In this verse, we can see the extremely high importance placed upon the altar. It is the only item which received the seven-fold sprinkling of the oil. And when the blood of a sacrifice is carried into the holy or most holy place and sprinkled seven times, it is because the animal first died at the north side of this altar.

This particular and special sprinkling points directly to the work of Christ who is the only true, final, and complete Sacrifice for the sins of man. It is what brings about full atonement and peace with God, and thus it is what provides access to the Spirit of God. The details of this Brazen Altar, which will help you to understand the significance of this seven-fold sprinkling, are found in Exodus 27:1-8, be sure to watch that sermon this afternoon as well.

12 And he poured some of the anointing oil on Aaron’s head and anointed him, to consecrate him.

Only after the anointing of the items meant for ministry to the Lord is the high priest who ministers to the Lord then anointed. The anointing oil is poured out onto his head in order to mashakh, or anoint, him. It is the basis for the word mashiakh, or “messiah.” This was to, as it says, “consecrate him.” The word means to set apart. He is the one who is set apart from his brethren by the anointing. Thus, in type, he prefigures Christ the Messiah who was spoken of by Isaiah –

The Spirit of the Lord God is upon Me,
Because the Lord has anointed Me
To preach good tidings to the poor;
He has sent Me to heal the brokenhearted,
To proclaim liberty to the captives,
And the opening of the prison to those who are bound;” Isaiah 61:1

*13 Then Moses brought Aaron’s sons and put tunics on them, girded them with sashes, and put hats on them, as the Lord had commanded Moses.

Our verses today end with these words. The instructions for these tunics, sashes, and hats was given in Exodus 28:40 –

For Aaron’s sons you shall make tunics, and you shall make sashes for them. And you shall make hats for them, for glory and beauty.”

The tunics and the sashes for Aaron’s sons were to be white. There was nothing else noticeable about them. The instructions are simple and without any special detail. The verb for making the tunics was asah instead of shabats which identified Aaron’s tunic. The garments of the sons were simple, plain pristine white, and yet they were distinct from all people around them.

The word for “hat” is migbaoth. This is the last of just four times it is seen in Scripture, and it is used only in reference to these caps for the sons of Aaron. It is from the same root as gibah or “hills” and gabia or “cups.” Hence, they are caps which fit the head.

It might seem remarkable that plain white garments would be described as “for glory and for beauty,” but white symbolizes righteousness. At times in the Bible, Christ’s garments, or those of angels, are said to be white. The glory and the beauty then is reflective of that which is of God – His righteousness.

These white tunics, sashes, and hats picture those who are in Christ, adorned with His righteousness because of His work. It is He who has brought many sons to glory through His work.

The hats, as I said, are the special word migbaoth. which is from the same root as gibah or “hills,” and gabia or “cups.” Both words are tied directly to the Aramaic word Gabbatha, the place where Christ was judged before Pilate. The symbolism is beautiful. The sons of Aaron are types of the sons of God and priests of the Lord Jesus who are granted that status as the helmet of salvation upon their head because of the judgment rendered on Him at Gabbatha.

The statement that the garments of the sons of Aaron were “for glory and for beauty” was the same statement made for the making of the garments of Aaron. In other words, because of the work of Christ, His priests now bear the same glory and beauty as He before the Father. Think of it! Imagine what we have been granted!

As we are at the end of our verses today, I’d like to take just a final moment to explain again, as I do each week, why all of this detail is important to you. If you have never called on Jesus, these things may not make sense, but they are all looking forward for a reason.

Closing Verse: When Pilate therefore heard that saying, he brought Jesus out and sat down in the judgment seat in a place that is called The Pavement, but in Hebrew, Gabbatha. 14 Now it was the Preparation Day of the Passover, and about the sixth hour. And he said to the Jews, “Behold your King!” John 19:13, 14

Next Week: Leviticus 8:14-36 In these, there is great stuff for you… (The Consecration of the Aaronic Priesthood, Part II) (12th Leviticus Sermon)

The Lord has you exactly where He wants you. He has a good plan and purpose for you. Even if you have a lifetime of sin heaped up behind you, He can wash it away and purify you completely and wholly. So follow Him and trust Him and He will do marvelous things for you and through you.

The Consecration of the Aaronic Priesthood

And the Lord spoke to Moses, saying
These are the words He was relaying

Take Aaron and his sons with him
And the garments, the anointing oil too
A bull as the sin offering
Two rams, and a basket of unleavened bread; so you shall do 

And gather all the congregation together for sure
At the tabernacle of meeting’s door

So Moses did as the Lord commanded him
And the congregation was gathered together as one
At the door of the tabernacle of meeting
And Moses said to the congregation
——–“This is what the Lord commanded to be done”

Then Moses brought Aaron and his sons
And washed them with water; yes, he washed these ones

And he put the tunic on him, girded him with the sash
Clothed him with the robe, and put on him the ephod
And he girded him with the intricately woven band of the ephod
And with it tied the ephod on him, as he was previously showed

Then he put the breastplate on him, as the Lord did state
And he put the Urim and the Thummim in the breastplate 

And he put the turban on his head
Also on the front of the turban too
He put the golden plate, the holy crown
As the Lord had commanded Moses to do

Also Moses took the anointing oil
And anointed the tabernacle and all that was in it
And consecrated them
As the Lord to him did submit

He sprinkled some of it on the altar seven times
Anointed the altar and all its utensils as well
And the laver and its base, to consecrate them
As the Lord to him did tell

And he poured some of the anointing oil, as the Lord did state
On Aaron’s head and anointed him; him to consecrate

Then Moses brought Aaron’s sons
And put tunics on them, girded them with sashes
And put hats on them, as the Lord had commanded Moses
He crossed all T’s, dotted all I’s, and didn’t miss any dashes

How amazing! Every detail gives us precious insights to delight
Things that provide our souls with surety
That through Christ’s work, all things have been made right
And that our future is secure, a Divine guarantee

Thank You, O God for these marvelous hints of Jesus
Written so long ago, and yet as new as the day before our eyes
They are an anchor for the expectant souls of each of us
As we wait upon His return; He our splendid prize

And because of Him we shall for all eternity give You our praise
Yes, we shall hail You O God because of Jesus for eternal days

Hallelujah and Amen…

Leviticus 7:22-38 (The Mediator’s Duties, Part III)

Leviticus 7:22-38
The Mediator’s Duties, Part III

This is now our tenth Leviticus sermon, and it completes the rules and regulations for the laws concerning the sacrificial offerings. What may have seemed confusing in many of the verses when we started have all actually come together to form a harmonious and logical set of instructions for the people to abide by, and for the priests to effectively administrate in their duties.

There is enough information available so that error should be avoided, but there is not so much detail that the people would be bogged down with a never-ending stream of rules and regulations. What is needed for those verses which leave some things unstated is a dose of common sense in order to fill in the blanks.

Unfortunately, common sense is often lacking in the world, and so by the time of Jesus, the leaders of Israel had added in rule upon rule and precept upon precept. Instead of just following the spirit and intent of the law, there was a great burden laid upon the people if they wanted to be considered righteous in the eyes of the leaders.

At least the law, which was already impossible to fully obey, offered the people grace and mercy in several important ways. But even with these allowances, the law could never perfect anyone. We have seen this time and again in the various offerings which have been detailed for us. If the people could have been perfected, then the offerings would have ceased in the perfection of the people. Such never happened.

But then came Jesus. He didn’t need to be perfected because He was already perfect. These types and shadows were meant to lead the people to Him, and in Him they were fulfilled. Now, through Him, something so, so much better is available to us…

Text Verse: “But now He has obtained a more excellent ministry, inasmuch as He is also Mediator of a better covenant, which was established on better promises.” Hebrews 8:6

The mediator’s duties have been carefully laid out and explained. We’ve already seen some of the things which were granted to them for the conduct of their duties. Today, we will see some more of the benefits they received because of the accomplishment of them.

The Lord granted the priests particular parts of the offerings for their maintenance. As they had no inheritance of their own, the Lord was their inheritance, and thus they shared in the Lord’s portion. Today, the same is true. Those who minister to the Lord generally receive their livelihood from their service in the ministry.

Unfortunately, and not to start the sermon on a bad note, the priests of Israel took advantage of the offerings that they received. This was noted even before the time of the Kings. In 1 Samuel 2, the sons of Eli the high priest are noted as doing this. In this, it says that the sin of the young men was very great before the Lord.

Even worse, in the next chapter the Lord said, “I have sworn to the house of Eli that the iniquity of Eli’s house shall not be atoned for by sacrifice or offering forever.” What a sad commentary on those who should have been the preeminent example of holiness to the people of Israel.

Thank God that our High Priest is the perfect High Priest who we can trust completely, rely on with full confidence, and look to for help in our time of need. And for those who minister under him, let us pray that they will do their very best to do so with integrity and honesty at all times.

Our lives are short, and eternity ain’t. Let us not squander the future by filling ourselves up now with greediness and a self-serving attitude. Let us look to Jesus and allow Him to be our one and only Mediator, and our true Peace-offering to God, an offering which continues to be prefigured in the final verses of Chapter 7, along with some other important details concerning the Law of Moses, all of which ultimately point to Christ. It’s all to be found in His superior word. And so let’s turn to that precious word once again and… May God speak to us through His word today and may His glorious name ever be praised.

I. The Fat and the Blood (verses 22-27)

22 And the Lord spoke to Moses, saying,

As normal, these words introduce a new section of thought for Moses to write and then relay to the people. However, this section and the next are still a continuation of the law of the peace offering. What will be explained to him now builds upon the single verse found in Leviticus 3:17 –

This shall be a perpetual statute throughout your generations in all your dwellings: you shall eat neither fat nor blood.”

Now, a more detailed explanation of that will be given. The peace offering is the only one of these offerings that is at least partly consumed by the offeror. Therefore, there must be prohibitions stated and defined at this time in order to ensure that the offering would not become defiled and thus rejected by the Lord.

23 “Speak to the children of Israel, saying: ‘You shall not eat any fat, of ox or sheep or goat.

Moses is told to instruct the children of Israel concerning the eating of fat. What is understood, but which could be easily misunderstood without examining the entire passage, is that this is speaking of the fat already detailed in the offerings, each of which pointed clearly to the working of Christ. It is for this reason that the particular fat is specified. In other words, the prohibition is not speaking of all fat, but just the particular fat of the offerings. The eating of other fat is not forbidden.

This begins to be further defined right in this verse with the words, “of ox or sheep or goat.” These are the three types of animals which were acceptable as offerings to the Lord, and so the particular fat of these types of animals which was offered on the altar is what is specified. It means that even when such an animal was not offered as a sacrifice, this particular fat was still not to be eaten by the people.

If it belonged to the altar of the Lord in a sacrifice, then it was not to be eaten at any time or any other place as a personal meal. Any fat which was separated from the flesh in this way was forbidden, but other fat which is of the animal was not forbidden. Again, the entire context needs to be understood in order to see this. These things are known by other passages where non-sacrificial animals are mentioned, but the fat is not –

 However, you may slaughter and eat meat within all your gates, whatever your heart desires, according to the blessing of the Lord your God which He has given you; the unclean and the clean may eat of it, of the gazelle and the deer alike. 16 Only you shall not eat the blood; you shall pour it on the earth like water.” Deuteronomy 12:15, 16

Further, the other fat which is in these three animals is not included in this mandate. Deuteronomy 32 shows that the fat of sacrificial animals was eaten, meaning other than the special part reserved for the Lord –

He made him ride in the heights of the earth,
That he might eat the produce of the fields;
He made him draw honey from the rock,
And oil from the flinty rock;
14 Curds from the cattle, and milk of the flock,
With fat of lambs;
And rams of the breed of Bashan, and goats,
With the choicest wheat;
And you drank wine, the blood of the grapes.” Deuteronomy 32:13,14

As always, if we can simply remember that the Lord is highlighting and foreshadowing the work of Christ in these verses, they will continue to make sense. Why would He care about the fat in this way unless He was ultimately showing us the work of the Lord in it? He has no nose, He doesn’t need to eat, and the same type of fat is found in other animals in which the prohibition does not exist. But because Christ is seen in the offerings, the minute care and attention is given.

24 And the fat of an animal that dies naturally, and the fat of what is torn by wild beasts, may be used in any other way; but you shall by no means eat it.

This verse seems superfluous at first. The meat of an animal that died naturally was forbidden to be eaten. This will later be seen in Leviticus 22 –

Whatever dies naturally or is torn by beasts he shall not eat, to defile himself with it: I am the Lord.” Leviticus 22:8

However, despite this being a law, it was understood that it could happen. And so a provision for someone who ate such meat was given as well. This is seen in Leviticus 17:15 –

And every person who eats what died naturally or what was torn by beastswhether he is a native of your own country or a stranger, he shall both wash his clothes and bathe in water, and be unclean until evening. Then he shall be clean.”

Understanding this, the prohibition of this verse makes complete sense. Even if a person were to eat the meat of one of these three types of animal that died naturally, or one that died because it was torn by beasts, the particular fat which would otherwise belong to the altar of the Lord was still forbidden.

However, the prohibition only extended to consumption. The fat could be used for making soap, candles, medicine, lubricant, or whatever else fat can be used for, but it was not to be eaten. That which pictures Christ belongs to God alone, and it is forbidden for man to participate in it through consumption.

Nothing is said anywhere of the fat of birds as nothing is mentioned concerning that in relation to offerings. Again, only those things which prefigure Christ are relative to what is being mentioned here.

25 For whoever eats the fat of the animal of which men offer an offering made by fire to the Lord, the person who eats it shall be cut off from his people.

This verse is obviously referring to the type of animal, not only the fat of those which are offered. If the animal was offered, the fat would have been handled by the priest in the manner prescribed by the rites given to the priests. Thus, the verse would be superfluous to state again. But, in saying this now, it defines what fat is acceptable, what fat is not acceptable, and in what type of animal the categories of fat are defined.

Anything not defined here would then, by default, be acceptable to eat. The verses are stated logically in order for there to be no mistake. But this is only true as far as all of the verses are taken as a whole and in context.

26 Moreover you shall not eat any blood in any of your dwellings, whether of bird or beast.

This prohibition goes back to Genesis 9 –

And the fear of you and the dread of you shall be on every beast of the earth, on every bird of the air, on all that move on the earth, and on all the fish of the sea. They are given into your hand. Every moving thing that lives shall be food for you. I have given you all things, even as the green herbs. But you shall not eat flesh with its life, that is, its blood. Surely for your lifeblood I will demand a reckoning; from the hand of every beast I will require it, and from the hand of man. From the hand of every man’s brother I will require the life of man. Genesis 9:2-5

The life is in the blood, and therefore it is what the Lord used for atonement of the people. This is made explicit in Leviticus 17 –

For the life of the flesh is in the blood, and I have given it to you upon the altar to make atonement for your souls; for it is the blood that makes atonement for the soul.’ 12 Therefore I said to the children of Israel, ‘No one among you shall eat blood, nor shall any stranger who dwells among you eat blood.’ Exodus 17:11, 12

In this verse now, it is explicitly forbidding any blood, not just that of the sacrificial animals where the fat was prohibited. Whether the creature was legally prescribed as a sacrifice or not, consuming its blood is forbidden.

Having noted that, it specifically states only bird and beast. There are clean fish which could be eaten by the Israelites, and nothing is specifically said about this concerning them. According to the law, there are also certain insects which could be eaten, locusts for example. In Matthew 3:4, it is said of John the baptist that his food was locusts and wild honey. The law speaks of neither the fish nor the insects specifically.

However, the prohibition against eating blood stands, and therefore it must be assumed that the consumption of fish blood must fall under this prohibition. However, it would be unrealistic to assume that someone was purposefully eating a locust in order to consume its blood. And to attempt to bleed out a locust would be an exercise in futility. Simple common sense, and a right heart-attitude towards the spirit of the law must be considered.

From this, the New Testament continues with the prohibition during the early church. In Acts 15, which contains the decree of the Jerusalem counsel, the warning against consuming blood is repeated. However, it is an admonition, not a command –

For it seemed good to the Holy Spirit, and to us, to lay upon you no greater burden than these necessary things: 29 that you abstain from things offered to idols, from blood, from things strangled, and from sexual immorality. If you keep yourselves from these, you will do well.” Acts 15:28, 29

There are several reasons for issuing this at the time, and the prohibition is repeated in Acts 21:25. However, the prohibition is not repeated by Paul, the apostle to the Gentiles in his prescriptive letters. At the same time, the issue of food sacrificed to idols which is also mentioned in both Acts 15 and Acts 21 is clarified by Paul, showing that it is a matter of conscience, but that there is actually nothing wrong with the meat itself.

As Paul never mentions the matter of blood, it must be inferred then that no penalty for consuming blood in this dispensation can be brought against a believer. The earlier warning in Acts was given until the Holy Spirit had issued God’s full counsel through the hands of the apostle. Now that it is received, we can see the reason for those earlier warnings which were given in Acts.

27 Whoever eats any blood, that person shall be cut off from his people.’”

There are an amazing number of commentaries from ancient sources on this prohibition. Some state that this only concerned the blood by which the animal was animated while living. In other words, one couldn’t eat the blood which was bled out of a living animal, nor could one eat the limb of an animal that was taken off while it was alive and its blood was still pulsing through it. And on and on the commentaries go. They build one precept upon another, and confuse the plain reading of the verse.

When an animal was killed, it was to be slaughtered by cutting its neck. From there, the blood would come forth until the animal was drained of blood. Once that occurred, the meat would be considered free of blood. The prohibition stands that the blood was not to be eaten. The life is in the blood, and the blood was to be removed from the animal before it was eaten. It is a simple, straight-forward command. If it was not followed, the person was to be expelled from the community of Israel.

The life is in the blood, and you are not to eat the blood
I have given that as atonement for you
Purge it from yourselves, like a crimson flood
This is what I command you to do

In the shedding of the blood, the life is at its end
But if you consume the blood, what does that say of you?
With what will the fracture between us now mend?
Stop and consider my words; stop and think them through

From the guilty to the innocent the transfer is made
And then the blood of the innocent is shed; away ebbs the life
And in the act, there is a sin-debt paid
And in that same act, comes an ending of the strife

Thank God for atonement through an innocent Substitute
On that day when to Him my sin God did impute

And to me was granted His perfect righteousness
And so to God through Him, my soul shall ever bless

II. The Lord’s Portion (verses 28-38)

28 Then the Lord spoke to Moses, saying,

Another new thought, still contained under the overall category of the peace-offering, is once again introduced. This section will specifically deal with the Lord’s portion of the peace-offering, which is inclusive of the portion which is given to Aaron and his sons. As they are his designated representatives, and as the high-priest is the mediator between the people and the Lord, the portion which goes to Aaron and his sons should rightfully be termed and considered as falling under the Lord’s portion.

29 “Speak to the children of Israel, saying: ‘He who offers the sacrifice of his peace offering to the Lord shall bring his offering to the Lord from the sacrifice of his peace offering.

When reading this, it might seem like the sacrifice is actually made somewhere else, but then the parts which are burned on the altar – and the parts which belong to the priest alone – were then carried to the sanctuary where they were handed to the priest. That would not be a correct assumption.

Instead, in the instructions for the peace-offering in verses 11-14 of this chapter mention things which are to accompany the sacrifice itself. These, along with the sacrifice, were to be brought to the Lord. The entire offering, animal and accompanying cakes of bread, is one actual offering. They were to be brought forth at one time, and the animal was to be slaughtered at the tent of meeting, not at the residence of the offeror.

As most of the animal is actually to be eaten by the offeror, it may have been considered more expedient to only bring the parts of the animal which were to be offered to the Lord, and not the whole thing. But this is incorrect. The law regards the entire offering as being offered to the Lord, and therefore, the entire offering is brought before Him. This becomes clearer with the next words…

30 His own hands shall bring the offerings made by fire to the Lord.

The one making the offering was required to bring the animal and the accompanying cakes with his own hands. This could not be delegated to a servant or a friend. It would thus show that the offering is personal, it is voluntary, and that the offeror was happily joining together with the Lord in a feast. To delegate this to another would completely negate the personal nature of the offering.

30 (con’t) The fat with the breast he shall bring, that the breast may be waved as a wave offering before the Lord.

The word translated as “breast” is khazeh. It comes from khazah which means “to see” because it is the part that is most seen when looking at the front of the animal. That, in turn, comes from a root which indicates to gaze at, and to mentally perceive, as in a vision.

This particular part of the animal, along with the fat, was to now be waved before the Lord as a tenuphah, or “wave offering.” It comes from nuph, which means to wave or move to and fro. By making a waving motion, the breast would thus be “before” or “in the face of” the Lord. It was an acknowledgment of the omnipresence of His vision. Although from extra-biblical writings, Charles Ellicott describes how this offering was conducted at the time of Christ when it was brought by the offeror to the temple in Jerusalem –

The manner in which this rite was performed in the time of Christ was as follows:—The offerer killed the sacrifice, and the priest sprinkled the blood. The victim was then flayed, and the officiating priest took out the inwards, cut the flesh into pieces, and separated the breast and the right shoulder. Whereupon he laid the fat first upon the owner’s hands, then the breast, then the shoulder above it; the two kidneys and the caul of the liver above them again, and the bread above the whole, put his own hand under that of the offerer, and waved it all before the Lord. Hereupon the priest salted the inwards, and burned them upon the altar. The breast and right shoulder, as well as the bread waved before the Lord, were eaten by him and his brother priests, whilst the remainder of the flesh and the rest of the bread were eaten by the owner and his friends. If two persons brought a peace offering in partnership, one of them waved for both; and if a woman brought it, the waving was performed by the officiating priest, since women were not allowed to wave except in the offering of jealousy and of a Nazarite.”

31 And the priest shall burn the fat on the altar,

The fat alone was to be burnt, as if the smoke of incense, upon the alter to the Lord. As we have already seen several times, this is that part which reflects the inner qualities of Christ which are offered to the Lord as a sweet-smelling savor.

31 (con’t) but the breast shall be Aaron’s and his sons’.

This most prominent part which signifies vision or perceiving a thing was reserved for the priests who are the mediators of the covenant.

32 Also the right thigh you shall give to the priest as a heave offering from the sacrifices of your peace offerings.

Along with the breast, the right thigh was also designated as the priest’s portion. The shoq, or thigh, actually can mean the thigh, shoulder, hip, leg. It comes from a word meaning “overflow,” and thus “abundant.” Thus it is the abundant area of meat on an appendage.

As it is the right thigh, it signifies the honorable side. But further, the thigh reflects the power and strength of the animal. In all, that which is abundant, powerful, and most honorable is what is being seen here. As you might have noticed, the breast was offered as a tenuphah, or wave offering, whereas the right thigh is offered as a terumah, or a heave offering. As explained before, and which you certainly remember perfectly, the terumah comes from the word rum which means to be high, or exalted. 

Thus one can see the idea of something being offered up, like an oblation. The breast which indicates seeing and vision, and thus the acquisition of wisdom, is waved in acknowledgment of God’s omnipresence, and the right thigh which indicates strength and honor is lifted in acknowledgment of God’s omnipotence.

Both then speak of Christ’s mediatorial abilities which are acknowledged in the waving and heaving of the different parts. He is the wisdom and power of God for His people, and from whom all knowledge and strength is derived. The pictures are perfectly seen in the offerings and how they are presented.

33 He among the sons of Aaron, who offers the blood of the peace offering and the fat, shall have the right thigh for his part.

Whichever priest was the one who handled the blood of the offering was given this right thigh as his part. The word for “part” here is manah. It is a noun from a verb which means “to number,” or “to count.” Thus it is an assigned portion. This honorable part of the offering, which was first heaved up to the Lord, is reckoned to him for having conducted the rite of the offering before the Lord.

34 For the breast of the wave offering and the thigh of the heave offering I have taken from the children of Israel, from the sacrifices of their peace offerings, and I have given them to Aaron the priest and to his sons from the children of Israel by a statute forever.’”

The term l’khaq olam, or “a statute forever,” signifies “to the vanishing point.” It is a term which indicates until the end of the covenant. Whenever the covenant is fulfilled, it is no longer in effect. But something must fulfill it. And so if we look at this verse with a prophetic and pictorial view in relation to Christ, we could make a statement of what is being said here and apply it to Christ.

A sacrifice is being made as a peace-offering, and a portion of it belongs to the high priest and his sons.

The breast, ultimately representing wisdom, and the right thigh, ultimately representing strength, honor, and power, are given to the priest from the children of Israel. The whole verse points to Christ who came from the children of Israel, and who is – according to 1 Corinthians 1:24 the wisdom and power of God. He who possesses these qualities is our High Priest before God.

In fulfillment of the Old Covenant, He continues the picture in the New. And so l’khaq olam, or “a statute forever” simply moves this statement in picture to Christ in reality. Who would ever think this while reading through the verses in a cursory manner, and yet when taken word by word, the Person of Jesus Christ literally shouts out from these ancient words compiled by Moses as the Lord spoke them to him.

35 This is the consecrated portion for Aaron and his sons, from the offerings made by fire to the Lord,

The words in Hebrew here are variously translated, and so they should be explained. Translations say, “the portion,” the “rightful share,” “that which is consecrated to,” “the anointing,” “the consecrated portion,” “the allotment,” “the anointing portion,” “the share,” and so on. The Hebrew word is mishkhah, which means “ointment,” or “to be anointed.”

The cognate word in Aramaic and Assyrian carries the sense of “to measure.” And so the verse could be translated either as anointing or portion without doing harm to the words in Hebrew, and at the same time they would then include a play on the other sense of the word. The translation by the NKJV of “consecrated portion” gives a very good sense of the intent behind the words.

It is the anointing of the Aaronic priesthood that allows the portion to be received by the priests. It is consecrated to them alone from the offerings made by fire to the Lord. This is then explained in the second half of the verse…

35 (con’t) on the day when Moses presented them to minister to the Lord as priests.

The name of Moses is inserted here; it is not in the original. The Hebrew simply reads, “…in the day brought near them to serve as priests to Yehovah.” Moses did present them, but the Lord called them to be presented. The Hebrew words leave out the nominative. It is a statement of action which does not specifically mention the one doing the action.

36 The Lord commanded this to be given to them by the children of Israel, on the day that He anointed them, by a statute forever throughout their generations.

This verse sums up the requirement from beginning to end. On the day of their anointing, until the day that the priesthood would be annulled in Christ, the requirement stood. In this, the Lord was providing for the priests of Israel, while at the same time, he was giving prophetic pictures of Christ to come who would be the fulfillment of what the generations of priests only prefigured.

37 This is the law of the burnt offering, the grain offering, the sin offering, the trespass offering, the consecrations, and the sacrifice of the peace offering,

This verse is truly to be an overall statement of pretty much everything seen thus far in Leviticus. However, the order of the sacrifices is different between those first described earlier in Leviticus and those of the supplemental laws for conducting them which were given after that.

Therefore, this verse more significantly forms a concluding statement to that which was described since verse 6:8. All of those verses reflect the order of the offerings as described here with the exception of “the consecrations.” This includes those things which were described in Exodus concerning the consecration of Aaron and his sons, and it also includes the duties of Aaron which were described in verses 6:19-22.

As a point of theology which actually bears on the New Testament, these consecrations come from the Hebrew noun millu, meaning setting or installing. That in turn comes from the verb male which means “to fill.”

When we speak in the New Testament of being “filled with the Spirit,” we are in essence being consecrated to act. When Paul says to “be filled with the Spirit” such as in Ephesians 5:18, it is in the passive voice. What that means is that we are not actively, but passively, filled with the Spirit. Because we receive the Spirit when we receive Christ, we will never get more of the Spirit. We have all we will ever receive, in His fullness, the moment we call on Him.

However, the Spirit can get more of us. This is the passive filling which Paul speaks of, and this is why Charismatics and Pentecostals are so hugely wrong in their theology. As a married man, I will never get more married, but my wife can get more of me as I yield to her. As a believer in Christ, I will never get more of the Spirit, but He can fill me as I yield to Him.

When we say, male oti, or “fill me,” it must be based on our yielding which comes through praise of God, prayer to God, participation with the people of God, proffering thanks to God, and pondering God’s word. It does not come through pounding on drums, prancing about in church, playing as if super religious, or pontificating about one’s spiritual prowess. We have the Spirit, let Him have us. In Christ, the Lord has consecrated us, and so let us consecrate ourselves so that we can then be consecrated to act.

38 which the Lord commanded Moses on Mount Sinai,

It is not “on” Mount Sinai, but rather “at” Mount Sinai. This was explained in Leviticus 1:1 with the words, “Now the Lord called to Moses, and spoke to him from the tent of meeting, saying…” Moses was in the Tent of Meeting, receiving his instructions from the mouth of the Lord who dwelt between the cherubim.

Mount Sinai is the same place as Mount Horeb, but the name Sinai is used because it is given in anticipation of the cross of Christ. Sinai means, “Bush of the Thorn,” and the name of the location is given in connection with the redemptive workings of God in Christ which look forward to the cross. As all of these offerings look forward to His sacrifice, the name Sinai is specifically given in this final verse of the long section which concerns the details of the offerings.

*38 (fin) on the day when He commanded the children of Israel to offer their offerings to the Lord in the Wilderness of Sinai.

Again, in the final clause of the chapter, the name Sinai is used. This time it says b’midbar sinai, or “In the wilderness of Sinai.” The word midbar means desert, but it comes from davar, meaning word. The connection between the two is that cattle are driven in an open place by the word of the one driving them.

The Lord is commanding the children of Israel concerning these many offerings made to Him as they are driven to the cross of Christ. They are in a dry and barren land, but the water of the word is what is intended to lead them to the abundance which overflows from Him. The Lord doesn’t waste words. When He says something like this, it is intended to give us a picture of something else. And so it does. This final thought of the chapter is intended to get us to realize that everything we have looked at is meant to drive us to the Lord who has fulfilled each and every type and picture we have seen in these past seven chapters.

Although there will be more sacrifices detailed in the pages ahead, and although there will be a ton of other rules and statutes to govern the lives of the people, right now at the end of these many offerings, it is a great time for us to stop… and think about how blessed we are to not have to live under these requirements.

Isn’t that so? Every time I read through the law, and especially the book of Leviticus, I find myself thanking the Lord that I am on the other side of the cross. We don’t have to travel to Jerusalem to fellowship with the Lord, we don’t have to bring an offering in order to do so, and we don’t have to worry if we have checked off every detail in the long list of details to ensure all was done properly. Jesus has done it all for us. Everything we’ve look at has been intended to lead us directly to Jesus and His fulfillment of it all. Thank God for Jesus Christ who has done exactly that.

But Matthew Henry, commenting on the last three verses of this chapter, says something we should take to heart –

Solemn acts of religious worship are not things which we may do or not do at our pleasure; it is at our peril if we omit them. An observance of the laws of Christ cannot be less necessary than of the laws of Moses.”

Because of Christ doing it all for us, we should be more willing, not less, to be obedient to what He has commanded us. He has given us the great commission. He has written through the hand of Paul a long and impressive list of things we are to do, or not do. And He has spoken openly to the seven churches in the book of Revelation. Let us not be slack in doing what we should be doing for the Lord Jesus.

And above all, He asks us to come to Him. That is the first step of obedience for the lost soul. Until we come to Him and receive Him, we cannot be pleasing to God. And so as I do each week, allow me to tell you what you need to know in order to be saved…

Closing Verse: “But the Scripture has confined all under sin, that the promise by faith in Jesus Christ might be given to those who believe. 23 But before faith came, we were kept under guard by the law, kept for the faith which would afterward be revealed. 24 Therefore the law was our tutor to bring us to Christ, that we might be justified by faith. 25 But after faith has come, we are no longer under a tutor.” Galatians 3:22-25

Next Week: Leviticus 8:1-13 Oh me, Oh my, it will be fun!… (The Consecration of the Aaronic Priesthood, Part I) (11th Leviticus sermon)

The Lord has you exactly where He wants you. He has a good plan and purpose for you. Even if you have a lifetime of sin heaped up behind you, He can wash it away and purify you completely and wholly. So follow Him and trust Him and He will do marvelous things for you and through you.

The Mediator’s Duties

And the Lord spoke to Moses, saying
These are the words He was then relaying

Speak to the children of Israel, saying:
You shall not eat any fat, of ox or sheep or goat
And the fat of an animal that dies naturally
And the fat of what is torn by wild beasts, please take careful note

It may be used in any other way
But you shall by no means eat it, so to you I say

For whoever eats the fat of the animal
Of which men offer an offering made by fire to the Lord
The person who eats it shall be cut off from his people
So shall it be according to this word

Moreover you shall not eat any blood
In any of your dwellings, whether of bird or beast
Whoever eats any blood, that person
Shall be cut off from his people; from the greatest to the least

Then the Lord spoke to Moses, saying
These are the words He was then relaying

Speak to the children of Israel, saying:
He who offers the sacrifice of his peace offering to the Lord
Shall bring his offering to the Lord
From the sacrifice of his peace offering, according to My word

His own hands shall bring the offerings
Made by fire to the Lord, as you now have heard
The fat with the breast he shall bring
That the breast may be waved as a wave offering before the Lord 

And the priest shall burn the fat on the altar
But the breast shall be Aaron’s and his sons, they are the priest’s things
Also the right thigh you shall give to the priest
As a heave offering from the sacrifices of your peace offerings 

He among the sons of Aaron
Who offers the blood of the peace offering and the fat also
Shall have the right thigh for his part
To him it shall go 

For the breast of the wave offering
And the thigh of the heave offering too
I have taken from the children of Israel
From the sacrifices of their peace offerings, as I instruct you

And I have given them to Aaron the priest
And to his sons from the children of Israel
By a statute forever
These instructions to you I now tell

This is the consecrated portion for Aaron and his sons
From the offerings made by fire to the Lord
On the day when Moses presented them to minister
To the Lord as priests, according to His word 

The Lord commanded this to be given to them
By the children of Israel, chosen from among the nations
On the day that He anointed them
By a statute forever throughout their generations

This is the law of the burnt offering, the grain offering
The sin offering, the trespass offering too
The consecrations, and the sacrifice of the peace offering
The law which the priests were instructed to do 

Which the Lord commanded Moses on Mount Sinai
On the day when He commanded the children of Israel
To offer their offerings to the Lord in the Wilderness of Sinai
These instructions He thus to them did tell

Peace with God, full and complete
Has come to us through the blood of Jesus
In Him, there is fellowship so sweet
Marvelous things He has done for us

And so, O Lord, to You we give our heartfelt praise
And to You, O God, we shall sing out for all of our days

Hallelujah and Amen…

Leviticus 7:1-21 (The Mediator’s Duties, Part II)

Leviticus 7:1-21
The Mediator’s Duties, Part II

So far, we’ve gone through the Mediator’s Duties concerning three offerings, the burnt, grain, and sin offerings. There are two more to look over, the trespass, and the peace. These offerings each had special significance to Israel, and they each pointed to a different aspect of their spiritual lives.

The final offering, that of the shelem, or peace-offering, is divided in this section into three separate types. One of them is the thanksgiving offering. It is an offering which means more than just your daily giving of thanks, but it is an offering which comes from a heart which is overwhelming with thanks for something wonderful that has happened in the life of the person.

This is certain, because it involved travel to the place of sacrifice, a sacrifice which had value, and it also required other things to accompany it. In other words, it’s not the kind of thing you do every day, but it is something that you do when the Lord has truly made your day.

Not too long ago, the quarterly budget was read for the church, and I did the calculation wrong at first. Paul, being a numbers guy caught my error and said, you undervalued this part by fifty percent. I thought, “That can’t be. We’re a church of twenty some people, and an extended audience who would otherwise be unknown to us unless they purposefully made themselves known in one way or another.

And on top of that, despite knowing that we cannot function without the Lord’s gracious hand tending to our needs, no call has ever been made to solicit help for our budget. When Paul showed me the correction, I couldn’t believe it, and immediately my mind went to both gratitude and a desire to share that gratitude.

Our needs had been met and exceeded, something for which I will always be filled with thanks, even if tomorrow I return to my old employment. And in gratitude, I thought about how to share this with our missionaries. It doesn’t matter what was done, something was, in fact done. The Lord had blessed the church with abundance, and those dependent on the church would share in that. Such is the idea of a thanksgiving offering. Such should be the idea of thanksgiving for each of us.

Text Verse: “Oh come, let us sing to the Lord!
Let us shout joyfully to the Rock of our salvation.
Let us come before His presence with thanksgiving;
Let us shout joyfully to Him with psalms.
For the Lord is the great God,
And the great King above all gods.” Psalm 95:1-3

Words cannot describe how truly thankful I am to each person who has helped bring this ministry to the point that it is at. I cannot express it other than to wish for a thousand-fold return on all who have helped it to become established.

And so, how much more am I unable to express my thought to the Lord who has, in fact, established us. It is His church, and as long as He feels we are exalting Him and His word, may we continue. And should we fail to do that, may He determine to not let us take an aberrant path which would lead to a stain upon His name.

Instead, I would pray that He would simply stop the flow of blessing, and send us to another place where He will again be exalted. In the end, all true thanksgiving belongs to Him and to Him alone. May we each carry this in our hearts as a reminder that every good and perfect gift is from above, and comes down from the Father of lights. Let us be thankful to this great God who leads, and will lead, His people faithfully through to a glorious end. Such truth is to be found in His superior word. And so let’s turn to that precious word once again and… May God speak to us through His word today and may His glorious name ever be praised.

I. The Law of the Trespass Offering (verses 1-10)

There are two offerings left which require explanation for Aaron and his sons to properly carry them out. They are the Trespass Offering, and the Peace Offering.

This then takes us back to verses 6:8 and 6:9 which said, “Then the Lord spoke to Moses, saying, “Command Aaron and his sons, saying…” Since that time, there has been no new introduction by the Lord, and so everything we will see up until verse 21 is contained within these instructions for them to know their responsibilities.

Likewise this is the law of the trespass offering

There is no “likewise” in the Hebrew here. It simply says v’zot torat ha’asham – “and this the law the guilt (offering).” The directions simply move from the previous type of offering to this new one. The directions here are for Aaron and his sons, meaning the priests, to supplement those already given in 5:1-13. They are intended for their guidance in the performance of their duties.

The asham is a guilt or trespass offering which is brought by a person who has violated some precept as was laid out already. The congregation has been explained what infractions require such an offering, now the priests are being instructed on how to handle it.

1 (con’t) (it is most holy):

qodesh qadashim hu – “holy of holies it.” These words are identical to the ending of verse 6:25 as pertained to the sin offering. The two offerings are extremely similar, but there are a few small differences. The sin-offerings dealt with sins for various groups. There was one for the high-priest, being the spiritual head of the people. There was one for the whole congregation. There was one for a ruler of the people. And finally, there was one for the individual members of the congregation.

The trespass offering deals with specific instances of sins which are committed and identified. They are of a type which is of less magnitude than those of the sin offerings. In the committing of these sins, there must be an offering for atonement to come about. The person presents their offerings, and then the priest conducts his duties. Everything is being carefully and minutely detailed because everything ultimately points the Person and work of Christ. He came to fulfill the law, and the specificity is given to point to His accomplishing just that.

In the place where they kill the burnt offering they shall kill the trespass offering.

The place where the burnt-offering was slaughtered is identified in Leviticus 1:11 –

He shall kill it on the north side of the altar before the Lord; and the priests, Aaron’s sons, shall sprinkle its blood all around on the altar.”

As we have seen, different terminology is used to describe this same place of slaughter, but the north side of the altar is the explicitly named location.

2 (con’t) And its blood he shall sprinkle all around on the altar.

As seen several times already, the word used here means to scatter or cast, not sprinkle. The blood is collected in a bowl, and it is cast upon the sides of the altar. The specificity is necessary to understand the greater pictures which are being made, and so it is important to identify what is being done, when, and why.

As for this trespass, or guilt-offering, the procedures differ from the sin offering here because in the sin offering, and depending on who had committed the sin, the blood was either sprinkled before the Lord and applied to the altar of incense, or it was applied to the horns of the brazen altar, and then for both, the rest of it was poured out at its base. Here, it is cast upon the sides of the altar.

And he shall offer from it all its fat.

Fat in the Bible signifies abundance. It is also considered the richest or choicest part. All associations speak of the Person and work of Christ, in whom is the abundance of God’s blessing, and He being the Source of all true riches, and also being the choicest and fairest as the Son of God.

3 (con’t) The fat tail

Here the alyah, or “fat tail” is mentioned for the third of just five times. It is the rump or tail which was found on sheep and rams, and which is very large. This is specified, because in the trespass offering, the animal must always be a ram. Though described already, it is good that it be re-explained so that you remember what is was. It is described by Jamieson-Faucett-Brown –

There is, in Eastern countries, a species of sheep the tails of which are not less than four feet and a half in length. These tails are of a substance between fat and marrow. A sheep of this kind weighs sixty or seventy English pounds weight, of which the tail usually weighs fifteen pounds and upwards.” JFB

When an animal was offered as a trespass offering, this especially marvelous part was reserved for the Lord alone, and was not to be eaten by the priests. This being the most magnificent example of richness and abundance, it is in type a picture of Christ who is certainly the very essence of God’s richness and abundance. Along with this fat tail, we continue with the following…

3 (con’t) and the fat that covers the entrails,

As fat signifies abundance and the choicest and richest part, the fat around the entrails signifies that quality in the inner being. The word translated as “entrails” is qerev, which signifies the midst or inward part. It is emblematic of the inward abundance and richness of Christ. It is His inward qualities that are presented as an acceptable offering to God.

the two kidneys and the fat that is on them by the flanks,

Translations vary on these words to say either, “both kidneys with the fat on them near the loins” (NIV), or “and the two kidneys and the fat that is on them and that which is on the flanks” (Jubilee). What is probable is that the latter is correct. There are two individual types of fat being described. That on the kidneys, and that which is on the flanks.

Both kidneys with their attached fat were to be removed. The kidney’s position within the body makes them almost inaccessible. When an animal is cut up, they are the last organs which are reached. Because of this, the kidneys symbolize the hidden parts of man, and thus the mind. In picture, the mind of Christ is returned to God through His sacrifice. His work was acceptable, and therefore, God was pleased with His perfect mind as an offering.

The term al ha’kesalim, or “by the flanks,” indicates the loin which is the seat of the leaf fat. The word is then elsewhere translated as both “confidence” and “foolish.” The difference is in how it is applied. It can indicate the place where one puts their hope. This is seen, for example, in Psalm 78 –

That the generation to come might know them,
The children 
who would be born,
That they may arise and declare them to their children,
That they may set their hope in God,
And not forget the works of God,
But keep His commandments;” Psalm 78:6, 7

It can also indicate that which is foolish –

This is the way of those who are foolish,
And of their posterity who approve their sayings. 
Selah
14 Like sheep they are laid in the grave;
Death shall feed on them;
The upright shall have dominion over them in the morning;
And their beauty shall be consumed in the grave, far from their dwelling.”

Psalm 49:13, 14

The inward parts of a man are what identify him as either dependent on God, or who acts independently of Him, and thus foolishly. The fat which is identified here looks to Christ who remained faithfully dependent on the Father. This is seen of Christ in Hebrews 5:7, 8 –

“…who, in the days of His flesh, when He had offered up prayers and supplications, with vehement cries and tears to Him who was able to save Him from death, and was heard because of His godly fear, though He was a Son, yet He learned obedience by the things which He suffered.”

4 (con’t) and the fatty lobe attached to the liver above the kidneys, he shall remove;

The yothereth, or lobe above the liver, was mentioned several times in Chapter 3. This also was also to be removed from the animal. The liver signifies the seat of emotions and feeling. It is used synonymously with disposition and character. The fat attached to it is thus representative of the entire liver. In Lamentations, Jeremiah says (Jubilee Bible)

“My eyes fail with tears; my bowels are troubled; my liver is poured upon the earth, for the destruction of the daughter of my people because the children and the sucklings faint in the streets of the city.” Lamentations 2:11

This part of the animal, symbolizing the disposition and character of Christ which is wholly acceptable as an offering to God, was likewise to be removed for burning.

and the priest shall burn them on the altar as an offering made by fire to the Lord.

All of these items from the animal, and each of which represents some aspect of Christ, was to be burnt on the altar. Again, as we have seen, the word for “burn” signifies that of incense, and thus a sweet-smelling smoke sacrifice. They together are typical of His final and complete offering, being a sweet-smelling savor to God on our behalf. He bore the divine wrath in place of His people.

5 (con’t) It is a trespass offering.

An offense was committed, and these parts of the animal were selected to make atonement for the offense because in them are realized the superior qualities of the perfect Christ. In their burning, symbolic of His perfect execution in place of our failings, God is well pleased to receive them as an offering of the finest incense. Having satisfied the wrath of God for the committed offense, the rest of the animal was, like the sin offering, granted to the priests as is next noted…

Every male among the priests may eat it.

All of the males were allowed to partake. It could not be passed on to wives or daughters of the priests. However, we will see in verse 20 that there are restrictions even on the priests concerning their ability to participate in the eating of this offering.

6 (con’t) It shall be eaten in a holy place.

In order to ensure that no violations of who could eat this might occur, this is now specified. By mandating that it be eaten in a holy place, it excluded anyone unclean, because an unclean person was not allowed into a holy place during the time of their uncleanness. Also, only males could enter such a place. The restriction kept the offering from being taken to anywhere other than a holy place where an unauthorized person could then eat of it.

6 (con’t) It is most holy.

qodesh qadashim hu – “holy of holies it.” This is identical to the words in verse 1. It is stated again to stress that this offering was to be treated with exceptional care and there was to be no deviation from how it was to be handled.

The trespass offering is like the sin offering; there is one law for them both:

ka’khatat ka’asham – “as the sin-offering, as the trespass-offering.” The rules of the sin offering concerning this precept are found in 6:27, 28. Therefore, anything omitted in the guidelines for one must then be supplied from the directions of the other. Between the two, a full picture of what was expected is seen. Because of the same procedures here, these parts of the service then have the same meaning. In other words, every trespass is considered a sin.

7 (con’t) the priest who makes atonement with it shall have it.

One must remember when considering what occurs here, there is a guilty party, there is an offering which transfers that guilt, and there is the priest who conducts the process for atonement. In type, Christ fulfills two of those roles. He is both the offering, and He is the offeror. In essence, He partakes of the benefits of the offering of Himself to God. It is His to do with as he pleases, but as we saw, any male of the priests could participate. What is being seen here is that the offering of Christ belongs to Christ, but He can – and He certainly does – share of Himself to those He calls as priests.

And the priest who offers anyone’s burnt offering, that priest shall have for himself the skin of the burnt offering which he has offered.

The wording here is clear that the skin of the burnt-offering belonged to the officiating priest as did the flesh of the animal. However, it was understood that the flesh could also be shared with the other male priests. Though this could also be the case with the skins, it is not stated as such, and so at least in type, the skin belonged to the priest who officiated, and to him alone to do with as he wished. This then takes us back to the first time that owr, or skin, is used in the Bible. It is found in Genesis 3:21 –

Also for Adam and his wife the Lord God made tunics of skin, and clothed them.”

In this verse, we see that something died in order to cover over the nakedness of these two fallen beings. The owr, or skin, comes from the word ur, which means to be exposed, or bare. The priest possesses that which covers nakedness. As it was the Lord who made the tunics of skin, and then covered Adam and His wife, so it is the Lord who covers us.

He is the offering and the priest. The skin of the offering which makes atonement, typical of Christ, is that which belongs to the officiating priest, also typical of Christ. It is his alone to do what he wishes with it. And thus, it is Christ alone who possesses the correct covering of the atonement, which is Himself.

As always, each thought comes down to Christ and His work for those who come to Him. He is the One who can, and does, cover us from our naked and exposed state before God. He is the atonement, and He is the one who will transform us to His likeness in the twinkling of an eye.

Also every grain offering that is baked in the oven and all that is prepared in the covered pan, or in a pan, shall be the priest’s who offers it.

There was a portion of these offerings which was removed, and which was presented on the altar to the Lord. After that, the rest of the prepared grain-offerings, which were outlined in 2:4 – 2:10, belonged solely to the officiating priest.

10 Every grain offering, whether mixed with oil or dry, shall belong to all the sons of Aaron, to one as much as the other.

The other grain offerings, which were not prepared, belonged to all the sons of Aaron. These are noted in verses 2:1, 2:15, and 5:11. As they were grain which had not been prepared, they became common property of the priests. The terms here will show us the pictures we need to see.

The word for “mixed” is balal. It give the sense of confusion, as when the Lord confused the languages of the people in Genesis 11. The grain becomes mixed or confused with the oil. The other word, dry, is new in Scripture, kharev. It is connected to the more common verb, kharav, which gives the idea of being desolate, dried up, or decayed. It in turn comes from a root which indicates to be parched through drought.

Here then we have symbolism which is similar to the hide and the flesh of the animal. The flesh belonged to the priest, but could be shared with other priests as is specifically noted. But the skin belonged to the priest alone, without any note of it being shared.

The same thing happens here. The prepared offering, that which had a change in its appearance, belonged to the priest, just as the skinning of the animal changed its appearance. The flesh could be shared with the other priest, just as the unprepared grain offerings were to be shared.

The flesh speaks of that which is earthly. The oil and grain mixture looks to that which is confused. The dry grain looks to that which is parched. All are states of fallen man, and all belong to the priests. It is their duty to prepare them. And, it is the duty of the priesthood of believers to prepare the world’s people for Christ. However, that which is prepared, or which has been transformed belongs to the officiating priest, typical of Christ, who alone can and does make the transformation complete in fallen man.

The offering is most holy to make atonement for you
It is a trespass offering meant to restore, covering your sin
This is what is expected, and so you shall follow through
It will keep you from being done in

In the rite which I have ordained to be completed
Follow the details carefully, they speak of My Son
In adhering to My word, you shall not be unseated
As My attending priest, ensure each step is properly done

And for both, layman and priest, to you this I say
There is a reward for following carefully through
Be obedient to my word, tending to each precept along the way
And in due time, I will send my Son who will make all things new

II. The Law of the Peace Offering (verses 11-21)

11 ‘This is the law of the sacrifice of peace offerings which he shall offer to the Lord:

In Hebrew, the sentence begins with “And.” It is a continuation of the same line of thought, but with a new type of offering for the priest’s instruction, which is now added to what was given in Chapter 3. There are three individual types of peace offerings to be explained. One is for thanksgiving, one is for the fulfillment of a vow, and one is as a free-will offering.

The “he” in this verse is not speaking of the priest, but of the one to offer. Therefore, it can be translated as one, anyone, or even in the passive, such as “which shall be offered.” This is true with the coming verses as well.

12 If he offers it for a thanksgiving,

Surprising maybe, but this is the first time that todah, or “thanksgiving,” is mentioned in Scripture. The word comes from yadah, which means praise, but it gives the sense of throwing or casting. One can see that in thanksgiving, there is a casting out of praise to the Lord.

Such an offering would be brought to the Lord to acknowledge some special mercy or favor which had been received, such as deliverance from an illness or from captivity, or something similar. One would naturally be so grateful that they would go further than just praising God with their lips. Instead, they would want to make an outward demonstration of their gratitude.

12 (con’t) then he shall offer, with the sacrifice of thanksgiving,

The “sacrifice of thanksgiving” is that which was mentioned in Chapter 3. It being an animal of the herd or flock.

12 (con’t) unleavened cakes mixed with oil, unleavened wafers anointed with oil, or cakes of blended flour mixed with oil.

Each of these has been previously seen, and each made a marvelous picture of Christ. If you want to review, the unleavened cakes mixed with oil, and the unleavened wafers anointed with oil are first described in Exodus 29. The cakes of blended flour mixed with oil are closely described to those in Leviticus 2. Re-reading or re-watching those sermons will keep you from watching too much TV, and so it is highly recommended.

It should be noted that no specific amount of these things are provided. Thus it is totally up to the giver as to how thankful he is, and how much he will thus give in appreciation for the favor he has been so blessed with.

13 Besides the cakes, as his offering he shall offer leavened bread with the sacrifice of thanksgiving of his peace offering.

In addition to the three types of cakes mentioned already, he was to bring leavened, yes leavened bread, with the sacrifice. This is one of only two times that leaven was to be brought forth as an offering. The other time is during the feast of Shavuot, or Pentecost, which is detailed in Leviticus 23. One must ask, “Why would leaven, which pictures sin, be brought forward as an offering?” The answer is that as a peace-offering of thanksgiving, it is acknowledging that the Lord has accepted his offering despite his sin. The Lord will not turn away an offering of thanks, even from a fallen, sin-filled man. This offering is noted in Amos 4 as being inclusive of leaven –

Offer a sacrifice of thanksgiving with leaven,
Proclaim 
and announce the freewill offerings;
For this you love,
You children of Israel!”
Says the Lord God. Amos 4:5

The Lord states these words, however, as a rebuke. Their offerings were as sinful as they were sin-filled. They were made as external shows, but there was no sincerity or truth behind their giving.

14 And from it he shall offer one cake from each offering as a heave offering to the Lord.

These cakes, including the one with leaven, were to be lifted as a terumah, or heave offering to the Lord. However, none of these were to be burnt on the altar. It would be completely against the grain of Scripture to think that an offering which included something typical of sin would be so offered to the Lord. Christ was wholly sinless. This is an offering to the Lord, not of Himself, but of the grateful state of one towards Him.

14 (con’t) It shall belong to the priest who sprinkles the blood of the peace offering.

This is speaking of the heave offering of one of each of the cakes. From there, it is implied then, and it stated in Jewish tradition, that the remainder of the cakes were returned to the offeror.

15 ‘The flesh of the sacrifice of his peace offering for thanksgiving shall be eaten the same day it is offered. He shall not leave any of it until morning.

This prohibition is similar to that of the Passover Lamb in Exodus 12, and of the Manna in Exodus 16. Both of these were types of Christ, and so it is reasonable to assume that this third prohibition points to Him as well. This is especially so because the other two types of peace-offerings are less stringent in this regard.

What seems probable, is that the thanksgiving is for something which has been accomplished, such as deliverance from affliction of some sort. God delivered or provided, and so it wouldn’t be appropriate for an acknowledgment of it to be dragged out.

To consume the offering over more than one day would be to do just that, thus one would be benefiting off of the Lord’s deliverance instead of being grateful for it. If there was too much for one person to eat it, he should then share the offering with others, such as is explicitly prescribed in Deuteronomy 12. To not do so would not be showing the thanks that the offering implied. And to not share Christ, follows in the same self-centered way. Who is saved, truly grateful for that salvation, and yet unwilling to share what they have been given in Christ! This then is a theme fully developed by the author of Hebrews –

Therefore by Him let us continually offer the sacrifice of praise to God, that is, the fruit of our lips, giving thanks to His name. 16 But do not forget to do good and to share, for with such sacrifices God is well pleased.” Hebrews 13:15, 16

16 But if the sacrifice of his offering is a vow or a voluntary offering,

The difference between these two is that a neder, or vow, is something promised. It is in anticipation of its fulfillment, some benefit is expected concerning peace between the Lord and the offeror. On the other hand, a nedevah, or voluntary offering, is simply the tribute of a heart-filled rejoicing in peace with the Lord.

An example of the first would be the vows made by the sailors who were with Jonah. They were delivered by Him and so they made sacrifices, but they also made vows, intending to continue the relationship with Him and they were thus in anticipation of a right standing before Him; peace with Him being their future hope.

The voluntary offering, however, is not specifically one of thanksgiving, but rather of simple gratitude. This is seen in the 119th Psalm where it says –

Accept, I pray, the freewill offerings of my mouth, O Lord,

And teach me Your judgments.” Psalm 119:108

16 (con’t) it shall be eaten the same day that he offers his sacrifice; but on the next day the remainder of it also may be eaten;

Unlike the thanksgiving offering, either of these could be eaten on the second day as well. One would not tread on the Lord’s kindness by allowing either of these to be eaten over a second day. In fact, both of these are more personal than a thanksgiving offering which should rightly be shared.

A person may travel to the tabernacle in order to make such a vow, and have a desire to slowly meditate on the offering, or carefully petition the Lord through the offering. And so a second day is allowed for it to be eaten.

17 the remainder of the flesh of the sacrifice on the third day must be burned with fire.

An offering which was held to the third day would be susceptible to corruption. Also, it might be that instead of obedience to the precept, it would be used for some type of superstitious fulfillment, or if the attending priest, he might be saving up the offering against a shortcoming in the offerings that might come later. If so, then it would show a lack of trust in the Lord’s provision.

And finally, this prohibition certainly looks forward to Christ who was resurrected on the third day, and who saw no corruption. As this is a peace offering which is shared in by both the Lord and the offeror, it would be wholly unsuited to that typology.

18 And if any of the flesh of the sacrifice of his peace offering is eaten at all on the third day, it shall not be accepted, nor shall it be imputed to him; it shall be an abomination to him who offers it, and the person who eats of it shall bear guilt.

In this, there is a rare word which is introduced into Scripture, pigul, translated here as “abomination.” It is seen just four times, and it gives the idea of a foul thing, or refuse. It comes from a root meaning “to stink.” Thus it is figuratively used as something ceremonially unclean. The word “abomination” is used by most translations, but another word is often translated that way, and so it confuses the meaning of the word. Something more specific like “putrid thing” would more fully convey the idea. There is death which has turned to stink.

Nothing of the peace-offering was to be consumed on the third day, and if it was, the offering would no longer be accepted by the Lord, and there would be no credit imputed to the offerer. For a person to make such an offering, and then to be so stingy as to allow it to start to rot, would show that the offering was more important to him than the purpose of the offering. For this reason, it then says that the person who did eat of it would bear guilt. This is to be considered a most serious matter and a warning would have been clearly given when the offering was made.

19 ‘The flesh that touches any unclean thing shall not be eaten. It shall be burned with fire.

What this means is that if the flesh of the offering touched an unclean person, or anything that was considered unclean, such as an unclean animal, bowl, garment, or whatever else the law deemed as unclean, that flesh was not to be eaten. Instead it was to be burned. It was not even to be cast to unclean dogs because it was part of an offering which had been made to the Lord. It is a picture of the judgment seat of Christ burning up our unacceptable deeds.

19 (con’t) And as for the clean flesh, all who are clean may eat of it.

Any flesh of the animal which was not defiled by uncleanness could be eaten, but it could only be eaten by someone who was clean. If there was a person with leprosy, you could not give it to him as a gesture of kindness. To do so would mix the holy with the profane, and it would be an offense to God who sanctified the offering. The offering itself would then become defiled.

20 But the person who eats the flesh of the sacrifice of the peace offering that belongs to the Lord, while he is unclean, that person shall be cut off from his people.

This must be speaking of someone who is knowingly unclean. Leviticus 5:2 has already shown that a person can be unclean without knowing it. If so, then they would need to make amends for this as an infraction against the Lord. However, if someone knowingly ate of the sacrifice of a peace offering while unclean, they were to be excommunicated from the people of Israel. At times, being “cut off” can mean the death penalty, but this is probably not the case here.

Although, that still may very well be the case due to the severe nature of the infraction. As this is an offering shared by both the Lord and the person, to allow defilement into the process would be to dishonor Him. This is what Paul speaks of in 1 Corinthians 11 concerning the Lord’s Supper, to which this offering corresponds.

*21 Moreover the person who touches any unclean thing, such as human uncleanness, an unclean animal, or any abominable unclean thing, and who eats the flesh of the sacrifice of the peace offering that belongs to the Lord, that person shall be cut off from his people.’”

The passage ends on this stern note. It is especially poignant when considering that this offering was one stemming from the free-will of a person. However, the Lord looks at intent of the heart, and if the intent of the heart was to defile his offerings, then there would be severe consequences for it.

The various types of uncleanness mentioned here will be further explained in the chapters ahead. One however is introduced here and which is translated as “abominable unclean thing.” It is the word sheqets, and will be seen 11 times in the Old Testament. It is later used to describe any seafood without fins and scales. It is also used to describe unclean birds, winged insects with four legs, swarming things, creeping things, and the like.

If someone had contact with any such thing – or any of the other prohibited things – and then sat down to eat of the meal – that person was to be cut off from his people. Again, this probably meant that they were to be separated from Israel. However, it is not beyond the possibility that it meant they were to be put to death.

We’ve just gone through some of the most complicated verses yet in Scripture concerning details of things which are almost completely foreign to us. Further, the offerings of these past two sermons have already been detailed once, and now they have had more details added into them. To try to remember everything seen so far, and then to also try to remember everything associated with them, would take a brain the size of Manhattan, maybe bigger.

The point of going through these ancient words is, as always, to see our desperate need for something greater than the law. To imagine the yoke of the law being brought down our shoulders, and then to assume that we could live up to it, is either the height of arrogance, or the height of stupidity. It’s a coin toss which is more certain, probably it would land on the edge and shout out, “Stupid, arrogant fool!”

In each offering, Christ is on prominent display, calling out for us to put our burdens behind us, trust in His completion of these things, and to rest in that fully and forever finished work. This is what makes it so very sad when we are faced with someone who is attempting to be justified before God by this law, in part or in whole, when it is already fulfilled and nullified through Jesus.

Dare we reject such a great offer and go back to that which could never save? I dare say, “We dare not.” I dare you to say otherwise! It is a self-condemning act. Let us trust in Christ, let us rest in Christ, and let us praise God because of Christ. He is our Burnt-offering; He is our Grain-offering; He is our Sin-offering; He is our Trespass-offering; and He is our Peace-offering.

And more, He is our Sabbath Rest, He is our Circumcision, and our Heavenly meal. Let us put away works of the law and be pleased to find our home in the safe recesses of His heart. He loves us so much that He did all necessary to restore us to our heavenly Father. Praise be to God because of Jesus Christ our Lord.

Closing Verse:  “For He Himself is our peace, who has made both one, and has broken down the middle wall of separation, 15 having abolished in His flesh the enmity, that is, the law of commandments contained in ordinances, so as to create in Himself one new man from the two, thus making peace, 16 and that He might reconcile them both to God in one body through the cross, thereby putting to death the enmity. 17 And He came and preached peace to you who were afar off and to those who were near. 18 For through Him we both have access by one Spirit to the Father.” Ephesians 2:14-18

Next Week: Leviticus 7:22-38 It will be an interesting sermon, just you wait and see… (The Mediator’s Duties, Part III) (10th Leviticus Sermon)

The Lord has you exactly where He wants you. He has a good plan and purpose for you. Even if you have a lifetime of sin heaped up behind you, He can wash it away and purify you completely and wholly. So follow Him and trust Him and He will do marvelous things for you and through you.

The Mediator’s Duties

Likewise this is the law of the trespass offering
Most holy is this proffering

In the place where they kill the burnt offering
They shall kill the trespass offering as well
And its blood he shall sprinkle all around on the altar
As to you I do now tell

And he shall offer from it all its fat
The fat tail and the fat that covers the entrails too
The two kidneys and the fat that is on them by the flanks
As I am now instructing you

And the fatty lobe attached to the liver above the kidneys
He shall remove; and the priest shall burn them on the altar
As an offering made by fire to the Lord
It is a trespass offering, and so in this he shall not halter

Every male among the priests may eat it
It shall be eaten in a holy place
It is most holy as I to you submit

The trespass offering is like the sin offering
There is one law for them both, you see
The priest who makes atonement with it shall have it
This is how it shall be

And the priest who offers anyone’s burnt offering
That priest shall have for himself the skin
Of the burnt offering which he has offered
This is an allowance intended for him

Also every grain offering that is baked
In the oven and all that is prepared in the covered pan
Or in a pan, shall be the priest’s who offers it
It shall belong to this man 

Every grain offering, whether mixed with oil or dry
Shall belong to all the sons of Aaron
To one as much as the other, so they shall comply

This is the law of the sacrifice of peace offerings
Which he shall offer to the Lord
So shall be these profferings

If he offers it for a thanksgiving, then he shall offer
With the sacrifice of thanksgiving, unleavened cakes with oil mixed
Unleavened wafers anointed with oil
Or cakes of blended flour mixed with oil, so it shall be fixed

Besides the cakes, as his offering he shall offer leavened bread
With the sacrifice of thanksgiving of his peace offering
As to you I have specifically said

And from it he shall offer one cake
From each offering as a heave offering to the Lord
It shall belong to the priest who sprinkles the blood
Of the peace offering according to this word

The flesh of the sacrifice
Of his peace offering for thanksgiving
Shall be eaten the same day it is offered
He shall not leave any of it until morning 

But if the sacrifice of his offering is a vow or a voluntary offering
It shall be eaten the same day that he offers his sacrifice
But on the next day the remainder of it also may be eaten
These directions are concise

The remainder of the flesh
Of the sacrifice on the third day
Must be burned with fire
Be careful to follow what I to you now say

And if any of the flesh of the sacrifice
Of his peace offering is eaten at all on the third day
It shall not be accepted, nor shall it be imputed to him
So you shall be obedient in this way

It shall be an abomination to him who offers it
And the person who eats of it shall bear guilt
So to you I now submit

The flesh that touches any unclean thing shall not be eaten
It shall be burned with fire
And as for the clean flesh
All who are clean may eat of it, if they so desire

But the person who eats the flesh of the sacrifice
Of the peace offering that belongs to the Lord
While he is unclean, that person shall be cut off
From his people, according to My word 

Moreover the person who touches any unclean thing
Such as human uncleanness, an unclean animal as well
Or any abominable unclean thing
Pay heed as I continue to tell

And who eats the flesh of the sacrifice
Of the peace offering that belongs to the Lord
That person shall be cut off from his people
So shall it be according to My word

Peace with God, full and complete
Has come to us through the blood of Jesus
In Him, there is fellowship so sweet
Marvelous things He has done for us

And so, O Lord, to You we give our heartfelt praise
And to You, O God, we shall sing out for all of our days

Hallelujah and Amen…

Leviticus 6:1-30 (The Mediator’s Duties, Part I)

Leviticus 6:1-30

The Mediator’s Duties, Part I

The book of Leviticus gives lots and lots (and lots) of rules for the priests to follow. And when speaking of the duties of the high priest, it will often note that the same duties will devolve to the next high priest who is anointed to assume the duties of the previous high priest.

What is implied there is that the high priest was limited to a certain term which was due to end at his death. As this is the case, then it tells us that the high priest was not immune from death, nor would he ever be capable of being immune from it. If it was possible, then the Bible would have said as much.

But in speaking of the ordination and carrying on of the duties of the high priest by another generation, the implication is that death was a certainty. As the Bible clearly shows from its first pages that death is the result of sin, then we can easily deduce that the law could not cure the sin problem.

If the law is the super duper thing that Israel, even Israel of today, seems to think it is, then the law would be able to take care of the whole “I’m destined to die” thing. But nobody ever talks about being exempt from death because of the law.

Christians, on the other hand, talk about it all the time. While at the same time as expecting our end because of inevitable death, Christians also have the hope of actually never tasting death. If that is available to Christians, and it is, then that means that the sin-generated death problem is already fixed. The plan just has not yet been fully put into place.

Text Verse: “Also there were many priests, because they were prevented by death from continuing. 24 But He, because He continues forever, has an unchangeable priesthood. 25 Therefore He is also able to save to the uttermost those who come to God through Him, since He always lives to make intercession for them.” Hebrews 7:23-25

God did something marvelous in Christ Jesus. He fixed the death problem for us, by having Someone die who could not stay dead. Think about that for a moment. When someone offered a sacrifice for sin in Israel, the priest would eat of that person’s sacrifice because he was bearing the sin of that person as the mediator between him and God.

However, when a priest sacrificed for himself, he could not eat of the sacrifice because it would be as if he was taking his sin back upon himself again. But in Christ, we have a High Priest who is always alive. He died for our sin, but not His own. There was no sin that could come back to Him. And so for us, there is now no sin that can come back to us as well.

The sinless One is there mediating for His people, bearing their sins, but not facing death because of His own sins. The law which stood opposed to us was nailed to His cross. It died with Him, and so now we can live to God through Christ. It really is an amazing thing which God has done.

As we go through the many verses today, think about the symbolism as it looks forward to Christ. Some of it will be explained, some of it will be reexplained, and some of it should be well known enough to you already where it doesn’t need to be explained, but it is all about Jesus, and it is all to be found in His superior word. And so let’s turn to that precious word once again and… May God speak to us through His word today and may His glorious name ever be praised.

I. A Trespass Against the Lord (verses 1-7)

And the Lord spoke to Moses, saying:

These words were last seen in verse 5:14. They are brought in now to signify a new train of thought is being introduced. The previous section dealt with things holy to the Lord; this now deals with offenses against one’s neighbor. Something you should know is that the division of the Hebrew Bible is different than how we divide it. Charles Ellicott explains this for us and it is well worth remembering –

It is repeatedly stated, in some of our best commentaries, that Leviticus 6:1-7 form part of Leviticus 5 in the Hebrew Bible, and that our translators unfortunately adopted the division of the Septuagint, instead of following the Hebrew. Nothing can be more erroneous than this statement. The Hebrew Scriptures in manuscript have no division into chapters at all. The text is divided into sections, of which there are no less than 669 in the Pentateuch. The book of Leviticus has ninety-eight of these sections, while in our Authorised Version it has only twenty-seven chapters. The divisions into chapters, now to be found in the Hebrew Bibles, were adopted in the fourteenth century by the Jews from the Christians for polemical purposes, and the figures attached to each verse are of a still later period.”

In other words, the Jews of the 14th century illogically divided the Scriptures as a means of attacking the divisions of the Christian Bible, but the Christian Bible follows the divisions of the Greek translation of the Old Testament which predates even Christ’s coming. The words of this first verse of chapter 6 show us that this is an entirely separate thought from that of verse 5:14, and therefore, the new chapter division is appropriate.

“If a person sins and commits a trespass against the Lord 

The same word, maal, which was introduced into the Bible in verse 5:15 is used here again. It indicates committing a trespass, or dealing treacherously. In both verses, it is called a trespass against the Lord, even though this offense is against a neighbor.

The idea is that when someone defrauds or steals from a neighbor, it subverts social life. As the social life of the Israelites is established by God in His law over them, then to act against a neighbor is an insult to God. Thus, the sin is against the Lord, even if it is the neighbor who has been violated.

2 (con’t) by lying to his neighbor about what was delivered to him for safekeeping, or about a pledge, or about a robbery, or if he has extorted from his neighbor,

The word for “lying” here is kakhash. It has only been used once so far, in Genesis 18:15 when Sarah denied that she laughed when the Lord said she would bear a child. It is a lie of denial or deception. This lying is said to be to the person’s amith, or neighbor. This is a new word in Scripture which will be found only in Leviticus with one exception which is Zechariah 13:7. It gives the sense of an associate or a companion.

Each of the things which involve lying to the neighbor are based on rare Hebrew words, or words which are now introduced for the first time, or even the only time. The words then, like those of any judicial instruction, are specific and precise. When one listens to a court proceeding, they may hear words which they have never heard before, but the law carries the need for precision which is often meant to explain the regular evil-doing of man in a way which intimately describes the actions he is involved in.

What is being relayed in this verse concerns the normal way things were done in Israel. If a person was going on a journey perhaps, they would need their things taken care of while gone. Suppose they had animals which needed to be tended to. They would be given over as a piqadon, or a deposit. The intent was that the thing would be kept safe for the individual.

The next example might be something precious which needed to be kept. The term is bitsumet yad, or a security (in) hand. This would be something small and precious, like money or jewelry. It would be handed to another for safekeeping. This is an offense which has already been explained, at least in part, in Exodus 22 –

If a man delivers to his neighbor money or articles to keep, and it is stolen out of the man’s house, if the thief is found, he shall pay double. If the thief is not found, then the master of the house shall be brought to the judges to see whether he has put his hand into his neighbor’s goods.” Exodus 22:7, 8

The third example is of a gazel, or robbery. It is something taken by violence. And the final example is that of ashaq. This is extortion or taking through oppression. Each of these was wrongdoing against one’s neighbor, but it is an offense within society, and thus offensive to God.

or if he has found what was lost and lies concerning it,

This is a fifth thing which falls under the same major category, finding something which was lost by another and lying concerning it. Exodus 23:4 specifically speaks of an enemy’s ox going astray which is found by someone. Even in such a circumstance, they were to acknowledge that which they found and return it to its rightful owner. Thus the enemy of Exodus 23:4 must be considered as the amith, or neighbor, of this verse for sake of the law.

3 (con’t) and swears falsely—in any one of these things that a man may do in which he sins:

The swearing falsely here covers all of the previous five categories. One may lie about a deposit, a pledge in hand, about robbery, extortion, or finding something which didn’t belong to him. Each of the categories against another man unites in the one idea of it being sin against God.

The question we should stop and ask ourselves at this point is, “Have we ever done any such thing?” Even if the answer is, “No,” we have probably thought of doing one or more of them many times. The law is intended to bring out of us a sense of the state of wrongdoing that exists deep in the human heart.

then it shall be, because he has sinned and is guilty, that he shall restore what he has stolen, or the thing which he has extorted, or what was delivered to him for safekeeping, or the lost thing which he found,

The idea here is that the person willingly admits his guilt through a sense of remorse or a nagging conscience. It is not to include being caught and being convicted without a confession. This is certain because of the penalty which is imposed in the next verse. For someone who is guilty without confession, the penalty has already been established in earlier Exodus verses, one of which I cited a minute ago. For this, the first thing he is to do is to restore the thing which was involved in the offense.

or all that about which he has sworn falsely. He shall restore its full value, add one-fifth more to it, and give it to whomever it belongs, on the day of his trespass offering.

The person who was defrauded is to receive the restoration and accept one-fifth of the value added to it by the offender. What is implied, is that it is to be accepted. There is nothing stating that he has either a right to deny it or to request more. The matter is to be considered as settled. If one looks at it from this viewpoint, it is as much a protection for the one who is trying to make right, as it is for the person who was defrauded in the first place.

From here, he is then to also give his trespass offering. The two were to occur one immediately after the other. The restitution to the aggrieved party was not considered sufficient for the offense. A trespass offering was required as well. It was to be a sign of sorrow for his transgression against another, against society, and against God. The penalty of this offering, and its accompanying ritual are the same as for the offenses noted in chapter 5 as is seen next…

And he shall bring his trespass offering to the Lord, a ram without blemish from the flock, with your valuation, as a trespass offering, to the priest.

The difference between this trespass and one directly against the Lord is that the one who is offended receives the additional one-fifth value for the wrong done toward him. Whereas in an offense against the holy things of the Lord, the one-fifth value was given to the priest. Other than that, the same ram is required as before.

So the priest shall make atonement for him before the Lord, and he shall be forgiven for any one of these things that he may have done in which he trespasses.”

This verse corresponds to 5:16. In both instances, the priest makes atonement for the offender, and he is forgiven for the wrong he has done. Again as in the previous chapter, the entire process looks ahead to the work of Christ for all of these same offenses which we have committed against our fellow man, our society, and our God. In the end, our offenses are ultimately offenses against Him.

I defrauded my neighbor, but have taken it to heart
I did him wrong, when I should have been upright
Now it is time I make a new start
A new day now ends the anxious, sleepless night

No more will I swear falsely, I will pay for what I have done
And to the Lord I will offer a ram to set things right
Against Him I have sinned; He the offended One
But my offering will end this miserable plight

My High Priest will make atonement for me
I will be made right because of my Lord
I am trusting in Jesus to once and forever set me free
I have faith in the truth of His marvelous word

II. The Law of the Burnt Offering (verses 8-13)

Then the Lord spoke to Moses, saying,

Again, after just a few verses, an entirely new section is introduced which will include the laws for the burnt, grain, sin, trespass, and peace offerings which have all been laid out already. One might wonder why these are detailed now instead of in those chapters.

The reason is that up to now, the details showed the people the circumstances which necessitated bringing an offering, and how it was to be done. Now the directions are given for how the priests are to actually conduct their duties on behalf of the people.

Many scholars claim that this is where the chapter should actually begin, and that verses 1-7 should belong to chapter 5, but there is no reason to conclude this. Verses 1-7 were their own section. Their placement here is therefore not at all uncalled for. The divisions are logical and orderly as they are compiled in the Christian canon.

“Command Aaron and his sons, saying,

The directions from the Lord now are to be relayed as a commandment to Aaron and his sons. The intent is that until the next major section, everything that will be spoken is a responsibility of theirs. This section will take us all the way to verse 7:21 when the children of Israel are again the addressees.

9 (con’t) ‘This is the law of the burnt offering:

The term, “This is the law of” will be seen at the beginning of each section right through verse 7:21, all of which are spoken to Aaron and his sons. After that, instructions will be spoken again to the children of Israel. Each section is a part of the larger set of instructions which the Lord is giving.

9 (con’t) The burnt offering shall be on the hearth upon the altar all night until morning, and the fire of the altar shall be kept burning on it.

This first type of offering, the burnt-offering, is the one detailed in Exodus 29. It is the daily lamb offerings which were offered in the morning and then in the afternoon at a time known as “between the evenings.” They were to be offered every day without fail, and they pointed in a marvelous way to the work of Christ on the day of His cross. If you missed that sermon, or if you have forgotten it, it’s time for you to brush up by re-viewing it once again.

The last sacrifice upon the altar each day was one of the lambs of this burnt-offering, and the first offering upon the altar each next day was, again, to be this daily lamb offering. It was to be kept burning all night, right up until morning, and then the next offering was to be made. The fire was never to go out, but was to be kept burning perpetually. The reason for this is that the fire was sanctified by the Lord at the consecration of the altar. After that, the same fire, sanctified by Him, was to consume all sacrifices from then on out. This will be seen in just a few more chapters –

Then the glory of the Lord appeared to all the people, 24 and fire came out from before the Lord and consumed the burnt offering and the fat on the altar. When all the people saw it, they shouted and fell on their faces.” Leviticus 9:23, 24

This then is a picture of the eternal fire of the Lord, consuming the sin of man. Either it is done on behalf of man by Christ, or it is done to man in the Lake of Fire. Either way, sin will be judged, and the fire is that from the Lord Himself.

10 And the priest shall put on his linen garment, and his linen trousers he shall put on his body, and take up the ashes of the burnt offering which the fire has consumed on the altar, and he shall put them beside the altar.

The specificity for the priest to put on his linen garments is not unnecessary. The ashes were a part of the holy offering of the daily sacrifices. Therefore, the person doing the labor of removing the ashes was to be attired properly for the task. The linen garment he is to wear is described by a new word in Scripture, mad. It would be a full length robe. The “trousers” are undergarments which come from a word which gives the sense of “hiding.”

The linen they are made of in Hebrew is bad. It is probably from the word badad, or “shoots.” Thus one gets the idea of divided fibers that are woven together. The nakedness of the priests was to be covered in order to reflect purity and holiness instead of indecency. A sense of the holiness of the duties was to be reflected in the wearing of this attire. In these garments, he was to gather up the ashes of the burnt-offering, and then place them by the altar.

11 Then he shall take off his garments, put on other garments, and carry the ashes outside the camp to a clean place.

The holy garments were to be worn in the sanctuary and for holy duties. However, he was not to go outside the sanctuary with them. And so after gathering the ashes of the fat, he was to change into common garments where he would then carry them outside of the camp to a place which was not defiled in any way. No carcasses, dung, or any other thing which caused defilement was to be found in the place where the ashes of the fat were disposed of.

12 And the fire on the altar shall be kept burning on it;

These words are given as a stern warning that while the ashes were being removed, the priest was to ensure that the fire would not be quenched during the process. He was not to knock the still-burning pieces of the offering which were the fuel for the fire and thus cause the fire to go out. And then to stress this it says…

12 (con’t) it shall not be put out.

The word for “shall be put out” is a new word in Scripture, kabah. It means to extinguish. The same thought is restated in a new way. The fire was not to go out, but was to be kept burning always.

12 (con’t) And the priest shall burn wood on it every morning, and lay the burnt offering in order on it; and he shall burn on it the fat of the peace offerings.

The fire that was left from the previous night was to be rekindled with wood each morning in preparation for the morning offering. When that lamb was sacrificed, it was then laid on the wood in its regular order as prescribed, and any time peace offerings were offered, the fat of those, as previously detailed, was to also be burnt on it. The fire then was to be continuously fueled by the fire provided by the congregation, and by the sacrifices of these daily offerings. And then, once again, the strict warning is given…

13 A fire shall always be burning on the altar; it shall never go out.

There is no exception. When the altar was moved, the fire was to be kept burning. From day to day and year to year, the same fire that was first sanctified by the Lord was to burn. It is His fire of judgment, and only His fire. No strange fire was to be introduced, because only the Lord’s judgment upon sin is acceptable.

The repetition is intended to show us this truth. All judgment is of the Lord. His judgment upon our sin in Christ is eternally effective, or His judgment upon man’s sin will be eternally applied. This is seen in Isaiah 66 where the same word, kabah, which was in both verse 11 and 13 is seen there –

And they shall go forth and look
Upon the corpses of the men
Who have transgressed against Me.
For their worm does not die,
And their fire is not quenched.
They shall be an abhorrence to all flesh.” Isaiah 66:24

A lamb precious and pure is given
For to my God I desire to provide my very best
He has brought me to the place of abundant livin’
And to please Him is my heart-filled quest

How good and pleasant it is to offer the lamb
I pray that He is pleased with the condition of my heart
I love my Lord God, the great I AM
And so to Him this precious lamb I do impart

May the Lord accept this offering in my place
And look with favor upon me as I go my way
May the Lord turn to me His glorious shining face
And may He bless my steps each and every day

III. The Law of the Grain Offering (verses 14-23)

14 ‘This is the law of the grain offering: The sons of Aaron shall offer it on the altar before the Lord.

The directions here are a close repeat of Leviticus 2:1-3, but with some additions as well. The Hebrew says that the grain-offering was to be offered before the Lord and before the altar, not “on the altar” as the NKJV reads. Further, conducting this duty was limited to the sons of Aaron, meaning any of the descendants of him from that point on who were ordained to be priests.

15 He shall take from it his handful of the fine flour of the grain offering, with its oil, and all the frankincense which is on the grain offering, and shall burn it on the altar for a sweet aroma, as a memorial to the Lord.

These words are a close repeat of Leviticus 2:2, all of the symbolism as we saw points to Christ. The fine flour, the oil, the frankincense, all of it is given as anticipatory pictures of the coming work of Christ. It is He and His work which is ultimately the true sweet aroma and memorial to the Lord.

16 And the remainder of it Aaron and his sons shall eat; with unleavened bread it shall be eaten in a holy place; in the court of the tabernacle of meeting they shall eat it.

The word “with” does not belong here. The remainder of the grain-offering was not to be eaten “with” unleavened bread. Rather, it was to be eaten “as” unleavened bread. If your Bible says “with,” make a note. The grain-offering was to be made into unleavened cakes and then eaten in a holy place. Only males could eat this as it was deemed as a most holy offering. However, any male who ceremonially defiled could not partake of this offering.

17 It shall not be baked with leaven.

This shows that the word “with” in the previous verse is incorrect. The remainder of the offering was not to be baked with leaven. It was to be eaten as unleavened bread. The reason is…

17 (con’t) I have given it as their portion of My offerings made by fire; it is most holy, like the sin offering and the trespass offering.

Notice the use of the first person. The Lord claims this offering as His, but He gave it to the priests as their portion. Thus it is considered qodesh qadashim, or holy of holies. As leaven pictures sin, there was to be no leaven mixed with this most holy offering.

18 All the males among the children of Aaron may eat it. It shall be a statute forever in your generations concerning the offerings made by fire to the Lord.

The words are specific and exclude any female, and they also exclude anyone outside of the priesthood of Aaron and his sons from partaking of this offering. This was to be a statute forever according to the time of the continuance of the covenant. The term, “forever” simply means “to the vanishing point.” It does not mean eternally. In Christ, the law is ended, and the prohibitions no longer apply. However, as there are seven years left for Israel under the Old Covenant according to Daniel 9, then this prohibition will be in effect during those final seven years.

18 (con’t) Everyone who touches them must be holy.’”

There are two views on this. The first is that only someone who was holy, or set apart, could touch these offerings. The second is that if someone touched them, they became holy. If the latter is true, and which seems to be the case, it means that any common person who touched them would become devoted to the Lord. As they had no right to the priestly privileges, it would mean a life filled with inconvenience because of their transgression.

19 And the Lord spoke to Moses, saying,

This introduces a new section within “the laws of” which began in verse 9, and they continue the laws of the grain offering, but the instructions are solely for the anointed priest concerning the grain offerings which apply to him, not to those of the general congregation.

20 This is the offering of Aaron and his sons, which they shall offer to the Lord, beginning on the day when he is anointed:

The wording here needs a moment of explanation. Aaron was anointed, and the ordination process took seven days to complete. During that time, this offering wasn’t made. It only took effect upon the completion of his ordination, and from that time forwards. The term “on the day” then is speaking of the time-frame of the ordination. Upon the completion of that time-frame, the offerings were to be made day by day.

20 (con’t) one-tenth of an ephah of fine flour as a daily grain offering, half of it in the morning and half of it at night.

One-tenth of an ephah is an omer, or as much as a person would eat in a single day. This was to be offered each day as a grain-offering to the Lord, and it was to be divided into one portion in the morning, and the second in the evening. The term here for “night” is not the same as the time of day that the lamb was sacrificed. This word means precisely, “in the evening.”

21 It shall be made in a pan with oil. When it is mixed, you shall bring it in. The baked pieces of the grain offering you shall offer for a sweet aroma to the Lord.

The wording here is very precise, and it was solely the responsibility of the high priest to accomplish this task each day. He was to use a flat pan, like a griddle, mix it with oil, and bake the pieces before offering them to the Lord on the altar. Jewish tradition says he made six pieces in the morning and six at night, being the same number as the bread of the Presence, but this is not included as part of Scripture.

The word for “mixed” here is rabak. It is found just three times in Scripture, and all three are pertaining to this same process. It gives the sense of soaking bread in oil for the purpose of frying it.

22 The priest from among his sons, who is anointed in his place, shall offer it. It is a statute forever to the Lord.

The meaning here is that this duty each day rested solely with the high priest. Whoever succeeded him would then assume this particular duty. This is the meaning of “who is anointed in his place.” There was but one anointed priest at at time. Nothing is said about what was done if the high priest was sick or incapacitated. And this verse does not seem to give the high priest any chance of going on vacation, even for a weekend.

The duty was his, it was done twice a day, and it was done by him until he was succeeded by a new high priest. This was to continue on as long as the law remained in effect. As Christ is the fulfillment of this practice, and the Initiator of the New Covenant, the words “forever to the Lord” point to Him having accomplished this now, once and forever.

22 (con’t) It shall be wholly burned.

The other grain-offerings brought by the people had a memorial handful taken out and presented to the Lord on the altar. After that, the rest belonged to the priests for their use. On the other hand, this offering had to be kalil taqetar, or wholly burned (as incense). The reason for this is that it would be unseemly to make an offering to the Lord and then partake in it. And, as he was the highest official, the offering could not be passed down to a lower station from Him. It was solely the property of the Lord, and it was to be wholly burnt up as an aroma to Him.

This offering which is not a bloody offering was not intended for expiation of sin, but was rather a type of the fruits of sanctification. Again, it looks forward to Christ. As the daily sacrificed lamb was a type of His cross as a perfect sin-offering, this is a type of His perfect life, lived wholly to God.

23 For every grain offering for the priest shall be wholly burned. It shall not be eaten.”

Again, the prohibition is repeated as a type of emphasis. The grain-offering of the priest belonged to the Lord, not to the priest. In picture, it is the priest living for the Lord, not for himself. As he is a type of Christ, it is emblematic of Christ living for God and not for Himself. He yielded His life to the Father, being literally saturated in the Holy Spirit, just as this bread was saturated in oil. This is what is seen in this daily grain-offering of the high-priest.

What will it take to please the Lord; how much work will do?
When will my deeds be enough?
I think I have satisfied Him through and through
But then I ponder about my life… all the bad stuff

And then I see that the bad outweighs the good
And so I do a bit more hoping it will be enough
But the nagging sensation makes it understood
That doing wrong makes the good disappear like a puff

And then I heard that He had done it all for me
Jesus’ works were perfect; God deemed it enough
Like frankincense, His life was accepted. How can it be?
His works are sufficient to cover all of my bad stuff

IV. The Law of the Sin Offering (verses 24-30)

24 Also the Lord spoke to Moses, saying,

The word “also” here is inappropriate. It is the exact same words as have been seen at the beginning of each section. It should simply read, “And the Lord spoke to Moses, saying,” just as it has each time. However, though it is a new direction from the Lord, it still continues the same major section which began in verses 8 and 9 which are commandments directly to Aaron and his sons. This section expands on the instructions given in Leviticus 4.

25 “Speak to Aaron and to his sons, saying, ‘This is the law of the sin offering: In the place where the burnt offering is killed, the sin offering shall be killed before the Lord. It is most holy.

The place where the burnt-offering is killed is specified in Leviticus 1:3 as being at the door of the tent of meeting, but this properly means, at the altar, and specifically on its north side (1:11). It is the sacrifice at the altar which allows entry through the door. The two are linked together as one. A sin offering is considered one which falls into the class of most holy offerings. As Albert Barnes notes about this term being applied here –

The flesh of the victim, which represented the sinner for whom atonement was now made, was to be solemnly, and most exclusively, appropriated by those who were appointed to mediate between the sinner and the Lord. The far-reaching symbolism of the act met its perfect fulfillment in the One Mediator who took our nature upon Himself.” Albert Barnes

26 The priest who offers it for sin shall eat it.

The symbolism here is that the priest thus bore the sin of the person that brought the offering. This is explicitly stated in Leviticus 10:17. Thus, it looks forward to Christ bearing the sin of His people. In practical day to day life, it also was a means of providing for the priests who had no inheritance of their own. Unfortunately, this symbolism of the priests bearing the sin of the people was abused by them when they went on to revel in their own sins. This is seen in Hosea 4 –

The more they increased,
The more they sinned against Me;
I will change their glory into shame.
They eat up the sin of My people;
They set their heart on their iniquity.
And it shall be: like people, like priest.
So I will punish them for their ways,
And reward them for their deeds.” Hosea 4:7-9

26 (con’t) In a holy place it shall be eaten, in the court of the tabernacle of meeting.

The court is everything outside of the tent itself, but within the hangings which surrounded the tent, forming the courtyard. The priests would have a place set apart where they would gather and eat their meals within this courtyard.

27 Everyone who touches its flesh must be holy. 

The same terminology is used here as before. Either the person touching the flesh must be holy, or the person who touches the flesh will become holy, meaning devoted to the Lord. Scholars punch it out over which is correct, but the latter does seem to be more likely. This seems even more so because of what is next said about the blood.

27 (con’t) And when its blood is sprinkled on any garment, you shall wash that on which it was sprinkled, in a holy place.

Any blood which was inadvertently sprinkled on any garment needed to be washed off, there in a holy place designated for such things. This was done to show the high and precious value of the blood of the sacrifice which was not to be taken into any profane place, or among anything common or unclean. The blood of the sin-offering is typical of the precious blood of Christ which is to be treated with the highest respect and regard for what it signifies in the life of the believer.

28 But the earthen vessel in which it is boiled shall be broken.

The kheres, or earthen vessel, is introduced here. It is any pot or potsherd made of earthenware. If such a vessel was used for boiling the sacrifices, it was to be broken, because it could absorb the fat of the offering into it. Later in Leviticus, the exact opposite will necessitate the breaking of earthen vessels. If they touch anything defiled, they were to likewise be broken.

In the Bible earthenware jars are used at times to symbolize people and the Lord is the Potter. The lesson should not go unlearned. The holy is not to be mixed with the profane, and we, as earthen jars, are to be filled with that which is holy. After that, we are to keep ourselves from being mixed with that which is profane.

28 (con’t) And if it is boiled in a bronze pot, it shall be both scoured and rinsed in water.

A pot of bronze would not be subject to soaking up defilement, and so it would need to be scoured and then rinsed to purify it. Both words, scour and rinse, are introduced here. One gives the sense of polishing, the other gives the sense of overflowing with water in order to cleanse. As bronze signifies judgment in Scripture, there is a picture of sin being judged and cleansed away. In such a case, the bowl could be reused. Such was not the case with a vessel of clay.

The typology is impressive, and it shows that the Lord has our sanctification and holy living on His mind, even with the vessels used in the sacrificial rites and customs.

29 All the males among the priests may eat it. It is most holy.

The meat of the sin-offering was allowed to be eaten not only by the officiating priest, but by any of the priests, and any of their male children. Despite the high honor of this for the priests, the New Testament says that believers in Christ have an even higher honor in that we have an altar from which those who served at the tabernacle have no right to eat. We have partaken of what these types and shadows only prefigure in the Person and work of Christ.

*30 But no sin offering from which any of the blood is brought into the tabernacle of meeting, to make atonement in the holy place, shall be eaten. It shall be burned in the fire.

This takes us back to the sin offerings for the high priest, or of the congregation as a whole, which were seen in Leviticus 4, and which will be seen for the sin offering of the Day of Atonement rites of Leviticus 16. Any such sin offering had its blood brought into the holy place of the tent of meeting. There atonement was made by sprinkling seven times, and upon the horns of the altar of incense before the Lord. Such an animal was not to be eaten by the priests as it would then symbolize the sin returning to the one who needed atonement in the first place.

Again as we keep seeing, the verses show us of the fallible nature of the law. Not because the law was with fault, but because man is with fault, and the law is above man’s ability to to meet its requirements. The symbolism keeps showing us this.

Each step of the process shows the fallible nature of the common people, and the fallible nature of the priestly class as well. Anyone who has to sacrifice for himself is in need of that sacrifice. And any sacrifice that cannot be partaken of by the offeror implies that what has occurred with that sacrifice becomes beyond the holiness of the that same offeror.

In order for perfection to be realized under the law, there must be One who is already perfect. Thus He would need no sacrifices for His own sins, and He could then fulfill the law in this capacity. In fulfilling the law, then He could give His life in exchange for the sins committed under the law, not as an offering for Himself, but as an offering for others.

And as sin under the law brings death, but because He had no sin of His own, then death could not hold Him. One receives wages for what He has earned. If He did not earn the wages of death, then death could not be a final payment for His works. The state of death must release Him. And in His release, our release would also be realized because He had died in exchange for our sins. If you just think each step through to its logical conclusion, it is more than amazing… it is perfect. What God has done in and through Jesus Christ is absolutely perfect.

And it is ours to be received by a mere act of faith. This is the most marvelous part of the entire deal. The work is done and it is fully effective to complete the task of reconciliation for us, and all God asks for is simple faith. “I believe that what You have done is all-sufficient for what I need. I receive it by faith.” In that act, you are set on a new path, and are freed from the constraints of the law which could save no one.

I would hope that you are seeing this more and more with each new passage we look at. God has been doing something absolutely marvelous in the stream of human existence, all leading up to the glory which was revealed in Christ Jesus. And now that is leading up to a new glory which lies ahead for those who have received this marvelous offer. Call on Christ, and be reconciled to God today through His shed blood.

Closing Verse:  “But now the righteousness of God apart from the law is revealed, being witnessed by the Law and the Prophets, 22 even the righteousness of God, through faith in Jesus Christ, to all and on all who believe. For there is no difference; 23 for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, 24 being justified freely by His grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus, 25 whom God set forth as a propitiation by His blood, through faith, to demonstrate His righteousness, because in His forbearance God had passed over the sins that were previously committed, 26 to demonstrate at the present time His righteousness, that He might be just and the justifier of the one who has faith in Jesus.” Romans 3:21-26

Next Week: Leviticus 7:1-21 More things for the priests to do… (The Mediator’s Duties, Part II) (9th Leviticus Sermon)

The Lord has you exactly where He wants you. He has a good plan and purpose for you. Even if you have a lifetime of sin heaped up behind you, He can wash it away and purify you completely and wholly. So follow Him and trust Him and He will do marvelous things for you and through you.

The Mediator’s Duties

And the Lord spoke to Moses, saying
These are the words he was relaying

If a person sins and commits a trespass against the Lord
By lying to his neighbor about what was delivered to him
For safekeeping, or about a pledge, or about a robbery
Or if he has extorted from his neighbor; an action quite grim

Or if he has found what was lost
And lies concerning it, and swears falsely
In any one of these things that a man may do in which he sins
Then it shall be, because he has sinned and is guilty

That he shall restore what he has stolen
Or the thing which he has extorted
Or what was delivered to him for safekeeping
Or the lost thing which he found, when it went unreported 

Or all that about which he has sworn falsely
He shall restore its full value, add one-fifth more to it
And give it to whomever it belongs
On the day of his trespass offering, as to you I submit

And he shall bring his trespass offering to the Lord
A ram without blemish from the flock, with your valuation
As a trespass offering, to the priest
Such is the set determination

So the priest shall make atonement for him before the Lord
And he shall be forgiven for any one of these things
That he may have done in which he trespasses
When upon himself guilt he brings

Then the Lord spoke to Moses, saying
This he next began relaying

Command Aaron and his sons, saying
This is the law of the burnt offering, as I to you submit
The burnt offering shall be on the hearth upon the altar all night
Until morning, and the fire of the altar shall be kept burning on it

And the priest shall put on his linen garment
He shall do this thing
And his linen trousers he shall put on his body
And take up the ashes of the burnt offering

Which the fire has consumed on the altar
And he shall put them beside the altar; in this he shall not falter

Then he shall take off his garments
Put on other garments; yes the others he shall replace
And carry the ashes
Outside the camp to a clean place

And the fire on the altar shall be kept burning on it
It shall not be put out, so to you I submit
And the priest shall burn wood on it every morning
And lay the burnt offering in order on it

And he shall burn on it the fat of the peace offerings, no doubt
A fire shall always be burning on the altar; it shall never go out

This is the law of the grain offering; according to this word
The sons of Aaron shall offer it on the altar before the Lord

He shall take from it his handful of the fine flour of the grain offering
With its oil, and all the frankincense which is on the grain offering
And shall burn it on the altar for a sweet aroma
As a memorial to the Lord, so shall be this proffering

And the remainder of it Aaron and his sons shall eat
With unleavened bread it shall be eaten in a holy place
In the court of the tabernacle of meeting they shall eat it
It shall not be baked with leaven; such shall be the case

I have given it as their portion of My offerings made by fire
It is most holy, like the sin offering and the trespass offering too
All the males among the children of Aaron may eat it
Follow now as I am instructing you

It shall be a statute forever in your generations
Concerning the offerings made by fire to the Lord
Everyone who touches them must be holy
So shall it be according to this word

And the Lord spoke to Moses, saying
These words the Lord began relaying

This is the offering of Aaron and his sons
Which they shall offer to the Lord
Beginning on the day when he is anointed
On that day according to My word

One-tenth of an ephah of fine flour as a daily grain offering
Half of it in the morning and half of it at night shall be this proffering

It shall be made in a pan with oil
When it is mixed, in it you shall bring
The baked pieces of the grain offering you shall offer
For a sweet aroma to the Lord, such is this offering

The priest from among his sons
Who is anointed in his place, shall offer it
It is a statute forever to the Lord
It shall be wholly burned, as I to you submit

For every grain offering for the priest shall be wholly burned
It shall not be eaten: follow these instructions you have learned

Also the Lord spoke to Moses, saying
These continued words He was relaying

Speak to Aaron and to his sons, saying
This is the law of the sin offering; according to this word
In the place where the burnt offering is killed
The sin offering shall be killed before the Lord

It is most holy
This is how it is to be

The priest who offers it for sin shall eat it
In a holy place it shall be eaten, so shall it be
In the court of the tabernacle of meeting
Everyone who touches its flesh must be holy

And when its blood is sprinkled on any garment
You shall wash that on which it was sprinkled, in a holy place
But the earthen vessel in which it is boiled shall be broken
Such instructions shall be the case

And if it is boiled in a bronze pot
It shall be both scoured and rinsed in water, so shall it be
All the males among the priests may eat it
It is most holy 

But no sin offering from which any of the blood
Is brought into the tabernacle of meeting
To make atonement in the holy place, shall be eaten
It shall be burned in the fire, of them there shall be no eating

Lord God, in ourselves we are not acceptable to You
But You have made a way for it to come about
Through the offering of Your Son who is faithful and true
We can approach You without fear or doubt

We now can come home to You once again
We are reconciled through what Christ alone has done
May we be willing to share this marvel with all men
That God has given us new life through His Son

Praises to God who has done this most marvelous thing for us!
All praises to God, through our glorious Lord Jesus!

Hallelujah and Amen