Numbers 8:1-26 (Acceptable to Serve)

Numbers 8:1-26
Acceptable to Serve

Today’s passage speaks of the purification of the Levites, readying them for service. There are several things they were required to do, and we will go through them as we go along. However, if you noticed, they were all externals. Sprinkling of water, shaving of hair, and washing of clothes. We’ll see how these point to spiritual truths, but it is obvious, even before we start, that none of those things could make a person pure in the truest sense.

Monks of all religions do things like this. Muslims wash themselves in certain ways before praying. In fact, you’d be hard pressed to find any religion that doesn’t perform some type of external ritual that doesn’t really do anything to change the person internally. Were it not for the truths which point to Christ, it almost seems like it’s all just an outward show without any real significance.

We’re told later, in Hebrews, that the sacrifices of the Old Covenant didn’t actually do what they were intended to do. After all, it is not possible that the blood of bulls and goats could take away sins. But the people were not left without warnings that the externals needed to be met with internal conviction.

Further, as the Bible goes on, it is explicitly stated that things like circumcision of the body needed to be matched by circumcision of the heart. That is found as early as Deuteronomy 10. Eventually, the prophets started to really call out that things like rote sacrifices without holy living were useless, and even an abomination to the Lord. Were those things written just for Israel? Or are they written for us as well?

Text Verse: “All Scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness, 17 that the man of God may be complete, thoroughly equipped for every good work.” 2 Timothy 3:16, 17

Paul says that “All Scripture” is given to us as he then describes. But what was he writing about? There was no New Testament at that time. The only New Testament consisted of the letters of the apostles that had been written, but other than Peter elevating Paul’s letters to the same level of authority as the rest of Scripture, the only Scripture that actually existed at the time is the body of writings we now call the Old Testament.

Numerous times the New Testament says, “It is written,” or something comparable to that, when speaking of the Old Testament. Everything found there was to lead us to understand how we are to conduct ourselves now. That includes the idea of purification and holiness as is outlined there.

If we go through the motions of living an externally pious life, but don’t match that up with a life that is morally pleasing to the Lord, we are far worse off than a person who lives a rather rugged life, but who desperately loves the Lord and mourns when he falls short. The difference between King David and the high priest Caiaphas is obvious.

The Levites were purified for service, and that service continued on for 1500 years, but during that time, they fell into the same error as everyone else. If you don’t believe it, take time to read Ezekiel 44. What we need to do is to constantly evaluate ourselves in relation to that internal call for holiness that the Lord has given us. And we need to not assume that because someone is behind a pulpit, or wears a fancy set of garments, that they are holy. As soon as you start idolizing such a person, they will let you down.

Keep all things in their proper perspective, hold fast to what is sound, and understand that things, like we will see today, do nothing in making a person holy unless they have an internal change to accompany the rite through which they pass. In fact, as we read and look into these verses, keep reminding yourself that some of the same people who are being set apart for the ministry will be rebelling against Moses and Aaron, and thus against the Lord within the span of just a few weeks. Remember these things as we go on. It’s all to be found in His superior word. And so let’s turn to that precious word once again and… May God speak to us through His word today and may His glorious name ever be praised.

I. Arrangement of the Lamps (verses 1-4)

And the Lord spoke to Moses, saying:

The census has been conducted, the camp has been laid out, the offerings have been presented, and now a new direction is forthcoming as evidenced by these words of verse 1. When the words of this section were actually spoken is unknown.

It could even be at the same time as verse 7:1 which spoke of the day when Moses had finished setting up the tabernacle and had anointed it and everything in it. However, the placement of the words here has purpose. The gift offerings of the tribes have been made for the priest’s use, and what follows will be the actual purification and dedication of the Levites. In between these two events, the Lord places the instructions concerning Aaron’s duties in relation to the menorah…

“Speak to Aaron, and say to him, ‘When you arrange the lamps,

Moses is told to speak to Aaron. It is he who is to arrange the lamps. Aaron is the high priest, and the high priest was to be a type of Christ to come. The description for making the menorah is found in Exodus 25. The instructions for its care are found in Exodus 27. The first lighting of it was accomplished by Moses in Exodus 40:25. It could be that these instructions now were given to Moses prior to that. Or maybe they came later. Either way, the instruction that Aaron was to tend the lamps has already been given, but now come these directions concerning the lamp’s arrangement. As this is so, one must ask, “Why place it here?”

An obvious answer would be that the camp is only now laid out in the shape of the cross. Thus it would be a reference to the light having been in the world, but that it was only seen for what it was at a specific time. If so, then that is what John is referring to concerning the Light, meaning Christ, coming into the world in John 1. The light had always shone in the darkness, but there is a time when the light came forth for all to see. Christ Jesus is our High Priest, and His work of illumination to even the darkest parts is being pictured by the instructions now presented to Aaron.

(con’t) the seven lamps shall give light in front of the lampstand.’”

b’ha-alotekha eth hanerot – the words say, “In causing the lamps to rise.” The meaning is that when the lamps are lit and the light shines, then they are to shine el mul pene ha’menorah yairu shivat hanerot – over-against face the menorah shall shine seven the lamps. The Hebrew is complicated and translations vary.

Exodus specified that the menorah was to be on the south side of the tabernacle, across from the table of showbread. Further, they were to give light in front of it, meaning towards the north. These instructions are not just a repetition, but they are more specific in how they are to be arranged. They are to cast light towards the north where the table of showbread was.

However, being in the south, it would illuminate from east to west as well as to the north. But facing the north where the table was, there would be no darkness there, it would be fully illuminated. Christ is the Bread of life. It is through His death that we partake of Him. Thus, the layout of the camp as a cross, showing how Christ died, is the sign. The menorah, lighting up the north then pictures the seven-fold illumination of Christ, meaning the seven Spirits of God, shining even in the darkest places, even to death itself, and which the darkness cannot overcome, as stated in John 1:5.

And Aaron did so; he arranged the lamps to face toward the front of the lampstand, as the Lord commanded Moses.

Some scholars say that this actually goes back to the initial lighting and care of the lamp in Exodus 40. However, Aaron was not yet ordained to conduct those duties. It was Moses who originally lit them. After his ordination, Aaron assumed this responsibility. But again, regardless as to when Moses instructed Aaron, this is noted now because of the logical progression of thought which has been seen in the layout of the camp, the purification of it, the acceptance of the offerings, and so on. Each step, whether chronological or not, is purposeful as to where it is placed in the narrative. Aaron, as the high priest, is typical of Christ who performs all of these things.

Now this workmanship of the lampstand was hammered gold; from its shaft to its flowers it was hammered work. According to the pattern which the Lord had shown Moses, so he made the lampstand.

The details of this were given in Exodus 25. The pictures of Christ which it reveals are many. The repetition of what has already been stated there is to remind us of that, and to consider it in light of what Israel represents. They were to be a light to the world. They are being prepared for their journey to the land of promise. Almost everything is set. And so now, prior to the purification of the Levites – those who minister between the high priest and the people – the description of the menorah is once again given. The light of Christ, given by God’s High Priest, is to illuminate even the darkest places. It is reflective of what is quoted by Paul and Barnabas in Acts 13:47 –

“I have set you as a light to the Gentiles,
That you should be for salvation to the ends of the earth.”Acts 13:47

The purest of gold, fit for a King
Was used to make a seven-branch lampstand
Seeing its beauty makes my heart sing
The workmanship marvelous; stunning and grand

Every detail is so beautiful, each knob and flower
The glistening of the branches as they catch the light
It shines in the dark for hour after hour
Illuminating the holy place throughout the night

The glory of God is seen in each detail
Every branch speaks out a marvelous story
And in what it pictures, nothing will fail
As the Lord reveals to us His unending glory

II. The Purification of the Levites (verses 5-26)

Then the Lord spoke to Moses, saying:

With the matter of verses 1-4 established, the narrative returns to the Levites. In Chapters 3-5, they were called, their genealogies were recorded, they were dedicated in place of the first born, they were counted, and they had their duties assigned. Now they are to be purified and ordained for their service. There is a difference here and in that of Leviticus 8. The priests were consecrated for their service. Here, the Levites are purified, but they are not consecrated.

If we were to look at the reason for this following the previous passage about the menorah, it is to show that Christ is the One who is the Light, and through Him, the Spirit of God is given, just as the job of lighting the lamp belonged to Aaron. However, the Levites are given to accomplish the other, non-priestly duties. This is similar to how ministers in the church stand before the Lord and are to do those duties as He commands them in His word.

“Take the Levites from among the children of Israel and cleanse them ceremonially.

In Exodus 29:1, the term used was qadash, or consecrate, the priests. Here the word taher, or purify, is used of the Levites. The law of the firstborn being dedicated to the Lord was traded for the calling of the Levites to be so dedicated.

Thus you shall do to them to cleanse them: Sprinkle water of purification on them, and let them shave all their body, and let them wash their clothes, and so make themselves clean.

There are three things which were to be accomplished in the purification of the Levites. The first is to sprinkle the me khatat, or “sin water,” on them. The speculation on what this water is, or where it comes from is long and detailed. It is probably not the me nidah khatat, or water of separation, described in Numbers 19. That water was specifically intended to purify the sin of those who had been defiled by a dead body. This water symbolically purifies the Levites from sin, and so it was probably taken from the bronze laver. But this is also only speculation. As the Bible doesn’t explain its source, we cannot be dogmatic about it.

Secondly, the Levites were to “shave all their body.” They were to use a razor over kal basar, or “all the flesh.” Hair in the Bible signifies awareness. Also, the flesh is that which is opposed to the spirit. As this is a cleansing from sin, it is symbolic of removing all awareness of sin from oneself in order to live in the Spirit.

And thirdly, they were to wash their clothes. It is an external act, signifying purification. These rites picture the work of Christ. One example of this is recorded in the book of Hebrews where it says –

“…let us draw near with a true heart in full assurance of faith, having our hearts sprinkled from an evil conscience and our bodies washed with pure water. 23 Let us hold fast the confession of our hope without wavering, for He who promised is faithful.” Hebrews 10:22, 23

The washing of the garments is an emblem of the internal conversion of a person. It symbolizes a sinless nature because of the work of Christ. On the last page of the Bible we read –

“Blessed are those who wash their robes, that they may have the right to the tree of life and may go through the gates into the city.” Revelation 22:14

This symbolic purification of the Levites will be more perfectly realized in the millennial reign when there will again be offerings in Judah and Jerusalem. This more perfect purification is prophesied in Malachi 3 –

But who can endure the day of His coming?
And who can stand when He appears?
For He 
is like a refiner’s fire
And like launderers’ soap.
He will sit as a refiner and a purifier of silver;
He will purify the sons of Levi,
And purge them as gold and silver,
That they may offer to the Lord
An offering in righteousness.
“Then the offering of Judah and Jerusalem
Will be pleasant to the Lord,
As in the days of old,
As in former years.”
Malachi 3:2-4

Then let them take a young bull with its grain offering of fine flour mixed with oil, and you shall take another young bull as a sin offering.

This is the same offering that was required for various sacrifices in Leviticus, a par ben baqar, or “bull, son of oxen.” Par comes from parar, meaning to defeat. Baqar means to inquire or seek out. It pictures Christ who defeated the devil, seeking out those He would redeem. Along with that was to be a grain offering of fine flour mixed with oil. This pictures the purity of Christ being completely filled with the Spirit. These would be for a burnt offering. A second young bull would be brought forward for a sin offering. It is the same sin offering required for the whole congregation in Leviticus 4:14. As the Levites stand in the stead of the firstborn, and as the firstborn represents the family, the same sin offering is made as for that of sin by the whole congregation.

And you shall bring the Levites before the tabernacle of meeting, and you shall gather together the whole congregation of the children of Israel.

It would be impossible for 22300 Levites to stand within the confines of the sanctuary. The size of the sanctuary is about 1250 square yards. Five people per square yard, which would be hugely cramped, would be 6250 people. And that doesn’t even take into consideration the tent of meeting or any other articles in the courtyard. At best, you could get maybe 1000 in there, and that would still be cramped. It would further be impossible for all 2-3 million of the people to gather at the area immediately in front of it. Therefore, it must be assumed that all of the Levites are standing outside of the sanctuary with their leaders representing them inside, and the leaders of the tribes of Israel also standing in there as the representatives of the whole congregation. From there…

10 So you shall bring the Levites before the Lord, and the children of Israel shall lay their hands on the Levites;

With those designated to represent the others, there is then the laying on of the hands. In this act, the representatives of the people are symbolically transferring the congregation’s obligation of dedicating their firstborn to the Levites. From this time on, the Levites would be so dedicated to the service of the Lord. They are given over wholly to the priests as the people’s representatives. They are, in essence, a living sacrifice to the Lord.

11 and Aaron shall offer the Levites before the Lord like a wave offering from the children of Israel, that they may perform the work of the Lord.

Obviously, Aaron didn’t pick up the Levites and wave them, and based on the numbers, it is obvious this was not done to every Levite individually. As there are 1440 minutes in a day, if you were to wave 5 in a minute, it would take over 3 days, night and day without bathroom breaks, to do them all. What most likely happened, is that he pointed at those representing the whole, and then he made the motion that would be made in a wave offering. The waving is “before,” or “in the face of,” the Lord. It was an acknowledgment of the omnipresence of His vision. In this waving, the Levites are symbolically shaken loose from the congregation, and henceforth devoted to the service of the Lord, under Aaron.

12 Then the Levites shall lay their hands on the heads of the young bulls, and you shall offer one as a sin offering and the other as a burnt offering to the Lord, to make atonement for the Levites.

Now, with the Levites detached from the congregation, and attached to the service of the Lord, their first act is to offer their offerings for atonement. This is accomplished now by their own laying on of hands. The sin offering acknowledges and pleads for atonement of their sin, making them acceptable for service. The burnt offering pictures the giving of their lives and their abilities wholly over to the Lord. By going verse by verse, the logical and orderly procession of thoughts becomes clear. One thing needs to be done before the next, and one thing then follows after another.

13 “And you shall stand the Levites before Aaron and his sons, and then offer them like a wave offering to the Lord.

This is not a second waving, but it describes more fully what is occurring. The Levites are first stood before Aaron and his sons when they are offered to the Lord. In other words, they are being separated from the people, taken in place of the firstborn, and offered to the Lord, but as servants to the priesthood. The lessor in position is stood before the greater. The reason for all of this is…

14 Thus you shall separate the Levites from among the children of Israel, and the Levites shall be Mine.

The whole purpose of the rite is that of separation and attachment. The Levites are to be separated from the greater body of the congregation, and they are to be attached to the Lord. If one were to translate this verse using the meaning of Levi, which is “Attached,” its intent actually comes through – “Thus you shall separate the Attached from among the children of Israel, and the Attached shall be Mine; they shall be attached to Me.”

15 After that the Levites shall go in to service the tabernacle of meeting.

In saying, “go in to serve the tent of meeting,” it means for the service of the tent of meeting. The Levites were not authorized to go into either the holy place or the most holy place, but were to remain in the courtyard and assist the priests as needed. They were also responsible for taking down, and setting up, the entire sanctuary, including the tent of meeting and tabernacle. And, they were designated to carry the most holy objects once they were covered by the priests.

15 (con’t) So you shall cleanse them and offer them like a wave offering.

The words are to be taken in the past tense. In other words, they are to do their service after they have been cleansed and waved.

16 For they are wholly given to Me from among the children of Israel; I have taken them for Myself instead of all who open the womb, the firstborn of all the children of Israel.

If the whole purpose of the rites is explained in verse 14, the explanation for that is given in this verse. The firstborn was claimed by the Lord in Exodus 13:2, and the exchange for the Levites was stated in Numbers 3:12. The emphatic words of verse 3:9, netunim netunim hemah lo, or “given, given to him” (meaning Aaron) are repeated here as netumin netunim hemah li, or “given, given wholly to Me.” The claim on the firstborn is released for the males of Israel, and an absolute claim on the Levites is now enacted by the Lord. That is further explained with…

17 For all the firstborn among the children of Israel are Mine, both man and beast; on the day that I struck all the firstborn in the land of Egypt I sanctified them to Myself.

The words here are exceedingly similar to Numbers 3:13. The Lord is repeating that the firstborn of both man and beast were claimed by Him. The plague upon the firstborn came upon Egypt. The only thing that saved the firstborn was the sign of the blood. Because the Lord spared them, they were claimed as His from that time on. The firstborn of Levi was then exchanged for the firstborn of Israel, both man and beast.

However, the firstborn of Levi was a permanent release. The firstborn of the beasts was a one time release to level the playing field. After that initial granting of the exchange of firstborn animals, each new firstborn was still to be offered to the Lord. What will happen to the firstborn of the animals is first explained Numbers 18, and then that is further defined in Deuteronomy, but in short, they were to be redeemed, if a man or an unclean animal. Or, they were to be set apart as holy if a clean animal. When set apart as holy, they were to be eaten by the people at their annual feasts. Yes, like the first and second-year tithes, the people ate their firstborn clean animals in celebration to the Lord.

18 I have taken the Levites instead of all the firstborn of the children of Israel.

He has given up the claim on the firstborn, and made a permanent claim on the Levites. However, as noted in the previous verse, the firstborn of Israel would still need to be redeemed. That was by payment of five shekels of silver, because all firstborn were considered holy to the Lord.

19 And I have given the Levites as a gift to Aaron and his sons from among the children of Israel,

The words, “as a gift,” are not right. It is a plural verb. It should say something like, “And I have given the Levites – assignments to Aaron and to his sons…” He has made a claim on them, and they are His. However, He has given them to Aaron and his sons for assisting in their work.

This is similar to the land of Israel, of which the Lord says “the land is Mine” (Leviticus 25:23, etc). It is His. However, He gave it to Israel for use. It is not a gift, as if they have a right to do whatever they want with it. When they are obedient, they may live there and use it. When they are not, they may not live there or use it. Similarly, the duties of the Levites are for assistance of the priesthood and the people, but they are ultimately for the Lord.

19 (con’t) to do the work for the children of Israel in the tabernacle of meeting,

This means that they are to do the work instead of the children of Israel. Without having called the Levites to service, the duties they would do would have gone to the people, especially the firstborn of each family. In calling the Levites to service, the people would no longer be under this obligation. And there was a benefit to this…

19 (con’t) and to make atonement for the children of Israel, 

The idea of atonement here is not of sacrificial offerings. That was the priests’ duty. Rather, the type of atonement being spoken of here is the turning away of wrath in the performance of one’s duties. It is seen in a marvelous parallel passage later in Numbers –

“‘“Then the Lord spoke to Moses, saying: 11 “Phinehas the son of Eleazar, the son of Aaron the priest, has turned back My wrath from the children of Israel, because he was zealous with My zeal among them, so that I did not consume the children of Israel in My zeal. 12 Therefore say, ‘Behold, I give to him My covenant of peace; 13 and it shall be to him and his descendants after him a covenant of an everlasting priesthood, because he was zealous for his God, and made atonement for the children of Israel.”’”

Phinehas defended the honor of the Lord when he ran a spear through a man and a woman who were doing what they shouldn’t be doing. In that, he turned back the wrath of the Lord, covering over that which was not right. The Levites were authorized to come near the sanctuary and assist the priest. No other person could come near unless they came with an offering. The Levites thus turned back the wrath of the Lord in the sense that they performed services which would incur wrath for any non-authorized commoner. This continues to be explained with…

19 (con’t) that there be no plague among the children of Israel when the children of Israel come near the sanctuary.”

This word used here, negeph, or plague, is only used seven times in the Bible and all are in relation to the people of Israel. The first was in relation to the blood of the lamb saving the firstborn. The second was in relation to the redemption money for the firstborn. Now it is used in relation to the Levites in place of the firstborn. They had replaced them and are considered purified for the tasks of service. If the people approached unlawfully or incorrectly, the plague would result. The final time negeph is used is in Isaiah 8 where it is ascribed directly to the Lord in relation to the people of Israel –

“He will be as a sanctuary,
But a stone of stumbling and a rock of offense
To both the houses of Israel,
As a trap and a snare to the inhabitants of Jerusalem.” Isaiah 8:14

That verse from Isaiah is then used by Paul when speaking of Christ in Romans 9, and by Peter – also speaking of Christ – in 1 Peter 2. In essence, Christ became the very plague upon Israel that the blood of the lamb, the ransom money, and the Levite was to protect them from. In their rejection of Him, they rejected what these types and shadows only pictured. It is a terrible mistake to underestimate and thus reject God’s provision in Christ.

If you have noticed, the term “children of Israel” has been used five times in this single verse. Five, being the number of grace, is surely used here to show that what God has done in the selection and appointment of the Levites is intended as an act of grace among the people. Its very intent is to atone for them and spare them from inevitable plague.

20 Thus Moses and Aaron and all the congregation of the children of Israel did to the Levites; according to all that the Lord commanded Moses concerning the Levites, so the children of Israel did to them.

Moses and Aaron performed what they were told to perform, but the children of Israel likewise did what they were asked to do. Again, this certainly must mean the leaders of the tribes. The impossibility of the entire congregation gathering in front of the tent of meeting, and all of the Levites being inside the sanctuary for ordination, necessitates that certain designated representatives were chosen as emblematic of the whole. Understanding this, what was said to be done was, in fact, accomplished.

21 And the Levites purified themselves and washed their clothes;

This was in accord with verses 6 & 7. As instructed, so they did. The symbolism was explained there and with all of the information you’ve gotten in the subsequent verses up till now, it is best that you go home and reread the entire sermon. In this, the parts that have leaked out will return in clarity as to why they were specified.

21 (con’t) then Aaron presented them like a wave offering before the Lord,

This is in obedience to verses 11 and 13. As instructed, so it was accomplished.

21 (con’t) and Aaron made atonement for them to cleanse them.

This is in accord with verse 12. As instructed, so Aaron performed. It is rather amazing to think that after all of the details concerning the Levites so far in the book of Numbers, and especially in several chapters which dealt almost solely with them, that they still needed atonement apart from the regular atonement of the people. It should tell all of us that we may be the most qualified people in the world, we may be of the most noble lineage of all, we may perform rituals of purification greater than anyone else on the planet, and yet without atonement, we are wholly unacceptable to enter into the presence and service of the Lord. However, for the Levites these things are now all completed, and so something new begins…

22 After that the Levites went in to do their work in the tabernacle of meeting before Aaron and his sons; 

Again as before, the Levites could not enter the tent of meeting. However, the brazen altar, of which they would assist at, is directly connected to the tabernacle. The performance of their duties there would be considered as part of the duties of the tent of meeting. Further, they were assigned to the duties of taking it down, transporting it, and then putting it up again. From this time on, they are now set apart to the Lord and for the service of the priesthood.

22 (con’t) as the Lord commanded Moses concerning the Levites, so they did to them.

This is a standard note of obedience. Directives are given, the action is taken, and then a note of completion of the work, as it was commanded, is then provided. It is given time and again to show that nothing required of the Lord was allowed to fall. As John Gill says, [he] “exactly observed every punctilio of it and complied with it.” A+ for Moses.

23 Then the Lord spoke to Moses, saying,

Now a supplementary, but new, section is introduced. It is supplementary to that concerning the Levites, but it is new in what it specifies concerning the ages authorized to serve and what they could do in that service.

24 “This is what pertains to the Levites: From twenty-five years old and above one may enter to perform service in the work of the tabernacle of meeting;

This verse does cause a perceived conflict with verse 4:3 which said, “from thirty years old and above, even to fifty years old, all who enter the service to do the work in the tabernacle of meeting.” However, there is no conflict between the two. First, the census was for the set purpose of determining the tsava, or hosts, prepared for war. In other words, those who would perform the function of the honor guard of the Lord. Secondly, they were tasked with the melakah, or work of the tent of meeting. That would certainly include the honor of the movement of the sanctuary.

Here in this verse, those 25 and above would enter into the tsavah ba’avodah, or ‘warfare in the service” of the tent of meeting. What is probably being said then is that this pertains to the time when Israel arrives in Canaan. It was actually anticipated to be in less than a couple of months. Until they arrived, the census was for those who were to perform functions including the transport of the sanctuary. Once in Canaan, that would only happen under rare circumstances. In such a case, those twenty-five and above could serve in the lighter service duties until thirty when they would join into the full labors required of Levites.

Later in 1 Chronicles, David will assign Levites for service at the temple at twenty years of age. That was probably because the Levites were spread out throughout Israel, and there was a need for more Levites to assist with the increasing wealth and numbers of people in the kingdom. The age assigned by David continued from that point on, and even after the exile. Sergio while looking at the numbers of these three instances noted that they form a numeric chiasm –

Start at age 30 = serve 20 (4:3)

Start at age 25 = serve 25 (8:24)

Start at age 20 = serve 30 (1 Chronicles 23:24)

25 and at the age of fifty years they must cease performing this work, and shall work no more.

Regardless of the age of starting the duties, the service of the Levites was to end at fifty. There are commentaries, some from Jewish sources, that state that this meant only in the service concerning breaking down, moving, and putting back up the tent of meeting. This doesn’t agree with that. It clearly says that they are to turn from serving in the tsavah, or Lord’s guard, and they were to no longer to serve. Regardless of what Israel actually did, the law is clear – work until fifty and then cease performing work any longer. However…

*26 (fin) They may minister with their brethren in the tabernacle of meeting, to attend to needs, but they themselves shall do no work. Thus you shall do to the Levites regarding their duties.”

Here is a clear distinction between the heavy work of the service and the mishmeret, or charge of the tent of meeting. They could perform the watch of the Lord, ensuring all went well and ministering in this capacity with their brothers, but they were to no longer perform any of the heavier, burdensome tasks.

EW Bullinger defines the number fifty as that of “deliverance and rest following on as the result of the perfect consummation of time.” That suits quite well with the concept of Levites retiring at that age. As I explained in a previous sermon, everything relating to the temple and the service, including the temple itself, the sacrificial system at the temple, the duties within the temple, the person of Moses and all he did, Aaron the High Priest and His sons, and also the Levites, all of it pictures the Person and work of Christ. As standing in place of the firstborn, the Levites performed the functions of the firstborn, just as Christ does in reality.

In the New Testament, the term “firstborn” is used nine times. Seven of those are in relation to Christ in one way or another. In this capacity, Christ is the One who performs all of the duties that would have been accomplished by the Levites who were taken in place of the firstborn.

It is true that in some ways, they tended to things between the people and the priests in somewhat of a fashion as a minister does today, and scholars often point that fact out. But even those duties are given as gifts of ministry by the Lord. Our ability to accomplish those things is only because He has enabled us to do so.

In the end, and despite the complexity of passages like today’s, if we just keep telling ourselves that what we are seeing here is merely a snapshot of how God tends to us through Christ, it all makes much more sense. But it also should alert us to the fact that God is holy and He expects us to be holy. The Levites were set apart to, as we saw, make atonement for the children of Israel, that there be no plague among them. God is holy. To fail in treating Him as such, consequences were sure to come. The people could go so far, but no further. The Levites could go so far and no further. The priests below Aaron could go so far and no further. And even Aaron was limited in his duties. Holiness is something we must be on guard to maintain.

As Hebrews 12:14 says, “Pursue peace with all people, and holiness, without which no one will see the Lord.” Verses like that shouldn’t scare you though. The Lord calls us to holiness because He has made us holy. We are holy because of Christ, and therefore we will see the Lord. However, it is our responsibility to pursue that which we possess. To squander that is to squander the joy we can possess in this life as we live in the presence of God, and in anticipation of a more perfect life in the presence of God.

In your calling, whatever it is, do it in love always, in peace towards all, and with a sense of holiness that you are the Lord’s, and He has called you to such. In this, you will prosper in the work of your hands, and in the walk set before you.

Closing Verse: Bless the Lord, O house of Israel!
Bless the Lord, O house of Aaron!
20 Bless the Lord, O house of Levi!
You who fear the Lord, bless the Lord!
21 Blessed be the Lord out of Zion,
Who dwells in Jerusalem!
Praise the Lord! Psalm 135:19-21

Next Week: Numbers 9:1-14 If you miss it the first time, there are provisions for you as a holdover… (The Lord’s Passover) (16th Numbers Sermon)

The Lord has you exactly where He wants you. He has a good plan and purpose for you. It may seem at times as if you are lost in a desert, wandering aimlessly. But the Lord is there, carefully leading you to the Land of Promise. So follow Him and trust Him and He will do marvelous things for you and through you.

Acceptable to Serve

And the Lord spoke to Moses, saying:
These are the words He was then relaying

“Speak to Aaron, and say to him
‘When you arrange the lamps, so you shall do
The seven lamps shall give light
In front of the lampstand, as I am instructing you

And Aaron did so
He arranged the lamps to face
Toward the front of the lampstand
As the Lord commanded Moses, in that very place 

Now this workmanship of the lampstand was hammered gold
From its shaft to its flowers it was hammered work
According to the pattern which the Lord had shown Moses
So he made the lampstand; no detail did he shirk

Then the Lord spoke to Moses, saying:
“Take the Levites from among the children of Israel
And cleanse them ceremonially
Do these as to you I now tell 

Thus you shall do to them to cleanse them:
Sprinkle on
them water of purification, so I mean
And let them shave all their body
And let them wash their clothes, and so make themselves clean 

Then let them take a young bull
So you shall do this thing
With its grain offering of fine flour mixed with oil
And you shall take another young bull as a sin offering 

And you shall bring the Levites
Before the tabernacle of meeting, so to you I tell
And you shall gather together the whole congregation
Of the children of Israel 

So you shall bring the Levites before the Lord
And the children of Israel shall lay their hands on the Levites
———-according to My word

And Aaron shall offer the Levites before the Lord
Like a wave offering from the children of Israel
That they may perform the work of the Lord
Do this things as to you I now tell 

Then the Levites shall lay their hands on the heads of the young bulls
And you shall offer one as a sin offering
And the other as a burnt offering to the Lord
To make atonement for the Levites, so you shall do this thing

“And you shall stand the Levites
According to this word
Before Aaron and his sons
And then offer them like a wave offering to the Lord 

Thus you shall separate the Levites
From among the children of Israel
And the Levites shall be Mine
To tend to their duties in this sanctuary in which I dwell 

After that the Levites shall go in
To service the tabernacle of meeting
So you shall cleanse them and offer them like a wave offering
These tasks I have assigned you shall be completing

For they are wholly given to Me
From among the children of Israel as to you I now tell
I have taken them for Myself instead of all who open the womb
The firstborn of all the children of Israel
(These four lines were left out of the spoken sermon by accident)

For all the firstborn among the children of Israel are Mine
Both man and beast, as to you I have described
On the day that I struck all the firstborn in the land of Egypt
I them to Myself sanctified 

I have taken the Levites, this group of personnel
Instead of all the firstborn of the children of Israel

And I have given the Levites as a gift
To Aaron and his sons from among the children of Israel
To do the work for the children of Israel in the tabernacle of meeting
And to make atonement for the children of Israel; so to you I tell 

That there be no plague among the children of Israel
———-such shall not be
When the children of Israel come near the sanctuary

Thus Moses and Aaron and all the congregation
Of the children of Israel did to the Levites, as the Lord bid
According to all that the Lord commanded Moses
Concerning the Levites, so the children of Israel to them did 

And the Levites purified themselves
And washed their clothes, through and through
Then Aaron presented them like a wave offering before the Lord
And Aaron made atonement for them to cleanse them
———-as he was told to do 

After that the Levites went in to do their work
In the tabernacle of meeting before Aaron and his sons, so they did
As the Lord commanded Moses concerning the Levites
So they did to them, according to what the Lord to them bid

Then the Lord spoke to Moses, saying
These words He was then relaying

“This is what pertains to the Levites:
From twenty-five years old and above, as directed by Me
One may enter to perform service
In the work of the tabernacle of meeting, so shall it be

And at the age of fifty years
They must cease this work from performing
And shall work no more
To this directive they shall be conforming

They may minister with their brethren
In the tabernacle of meeting, to attend to needs as to you I say
But they themselves shall do no work
Thus you shall do to the Levites regarding their duties
———-as I instruct you today

Lord God, we are even now in a wilderness
And we are wanting to be led by You
Without You to direct, our lives would be a mess
And so be our guide, O God; You who are faithful and true

We long for the water in this barren land
May it flow forth from the Rock, our souls to satisfy
Give us this refreshing, spiritual hand
And may we take it, and to our lives daily it apply

And we shall be content and satisfied in You alone
We will follow You as we sing our songs of praise
Hallelujah to You; to us Your path You have shown
Hallelujah we shall sing to you for all of our days

Hallelujah and Amen…

Numbers 7:10-89 (The Dedication of the Altar)

Numbers 7:10-89
The Dedication of the Altar

I’m going to be as honest as I can about today’s verses in two ways. The first is that when I get to this particular set of verses, specifically verses 12-83, I only read the whole set of verses 12-17, and then only the first and last verse of the other eleven sets of verses, just as I have done for you today. Funny thing, my mom said to me that she does the exact same thing when she gets here. The reason we do this is that they are seemingly identical, word for word, all the way through with the exception of the names. I have a tight schedule, and repetition leads to time use, and time use leads to getting backed up in other areas.

Yes, I kind of feel guilty about skipping over the repetition, but repetition leads to time use, and time use leads to getting backed up in other areas. Now that we are sufficiently backed up because of my repetition, I’ll move on by saying that not all repetition is tedious, and I will occasionally have someone say to me that they enjoy repetition in sermons and Bible studies. It helps things to sink in because they are repeated. I don’t disagree with that at all, and things seem to sink in better when they are repeated.

In the case of these repetitive verses in this chapter, they aren’t placed here for that reason. Rather than highlighting their similarities, they are actually given for quite the opposite reason. If you can make it all the way to verse 89, which will be in about 3 hours and 45 minutes, I will finish that verse and then explain the reason for it to you…

Text Verse: “As I urged you when I went into Macedonia—remain in Ephesus that you may charge some that they teach no other doctrine, nor give heed to fables and endless genealogies, which cause disputes rather than godly edification which is in faith.” 1 Timothy 1:3, 4

The second way I need to be honest about today’s sermon is that much of the final analysis of the sermon, after the verses are finished, actually came from the brain of Sergio Voitenko. Had he not looked into these some years ago, I have no idea what my final comments would have been like. Probably, I would have told you that the Bible was giving us a lesson on the beneficial use of repetition. If you need me to say that again, just holler out.

But he did analyze it, and then he went to the Jewish commentaries on this to see what they had to say. I am not a fan of Jewish commentaries in many respects, because they don’t stick to the Bible, and they often devolve into endless genealogies, just as Paul said about them. In the case of their conclusions here, they stuck to Scripture. In fact, they mirror much of what Christians say about Messiah. As Sergio noted in his thoughts, “…what a shame – some rabbis get so close to Jesus but [are] yet so blind. [C]an’t imagine what it would be like when they realize one day what they’ve missed out on for 2000 years.” As far as minute detail of the coming verses, John Lange says the following –

We have thus a sample of sacred, divine book-keeping, whose separate lesson is that God is careful in all dealings with His people down to details and minutiæ. And this revelation is so comforting that we must not grudge the large space allowed to these entries, and wish that they were replaced by records that would clear up many things in this part of Scripture that are now very obscure.”

On that, he is right in that this is a sample of sacred, divine book-keeping. However, the minutiae actually clear up the seemingly obscure. Stay attentive as we go. And one final way I need to be honest – the sermon won’t take 3 hours and 45 minutes. At best it will be 3 hours and 30 minutes. Great things lie ahead in His superior word. And so let’s turn to that precious word once again and… May God speak to us through His word today and may His glorious name ever be praised.

I. The Offerings of the Dedication (verses 10-89)

10 Now the leaders offered the dedication offering 

These words initiate the details of the recording of the dedication of the altar. What follows will be the longest set of repetitions in Scripture. The same words appear to be used twelve times in the same manner, with the exception of the names of the tribe making the offering, and the leader in the tribe who makes the offering. Each day’s offering which follows consists of six verses which almost identically repeat.

The question is, “Why would the Lord repeat the same words twelve times over seventy-two verses? On the surface, it appears to be wholly unnecessary, even to the point of being overly tedious to the mind. Is God simply wasting words that could have been reduced to something like, “The same offering was presented by each tribe over the subsequent eleven days.”?

One thing is for sure, no later writer of the account would have ever thought of compiling it in the matter in which it is written. Thus, it stands as a testimony to the fact that Moses is the author, and he recorded it as it occurred, and exactly as the Lord determined. If we get nothing else out of this today, we should remember that fact. This account fully substantiates that Moses recorded what is presented.

Here, at the start of verse 10, it says, va’yaqrivu ha’nesiim eth khanukat – “and the princes brought near the dedication.” The word for “dedication” is a new one in Scripture which will be seen eight times, but four of them will be in this chapter. It is a word almost all people are familiar with, khanukah. Today it is used when speaking of the festival of Hanukkah which stems from the dedication of the temple by the Maccabees during the intertestamental period. The festival is noted in John 10:22 as something observed even when Jesus came. Now in Numbers, there is a dedication which is brought near…

10 (con’t) for the altar

The Hebrew says, ha’mizbeakh – “the altar.” The altar is dedicated by these offerings. The offerings are brought forth by each tribe for this purpose. Thus, each day is a dedication of the altar by the tribe bringing forth its offering. This will be expressed in verse 84. It is the thing spoken of which is dedicated, not the offering itself. Here, and in 2 Chronicles 7, it is the altar which is spoken of. In Nehemiah 12, it is the wall that is referred to. And Psalm 30 speaks of the dedication of the house of David.

There is a question as to whether the term “for the altar” is speaking of both the brazen altar and the altar of incense. The reason why is because incense is one of the ingredients presented. That doesn’t seem to be a necessary conclusion. Frankincense is presented with offerings on the brazen altar as is noted in Leviticus. Further, the special incense for the golden altar was to be made for, and used only by, the priests. There is no reason to assume that the incense presented here is for anything except the brazen altar. The dedication is speaking only of the brazen altar…

10 (con’t) when it was anointed;

Here it says, b’yom hi-masakh – “in the day it was anointed.” As we have seen before, this doesn’t mean literally on the day of the anointing, but in the time of its anointing. The anointing occurred in Leviticus 8 in a ceremony which lasted seven days. The presentation here is one which takes twelve days. And so the offering of dedication is during the time-frame of the altar’s anointing.

10 (con’t) so the leaders offered their offering before the altar.

The leaders represent the people under them, and they thus represent the individual tribes, twelve of them. The offerings are made for their tribes, and they are offered in exactly the same order as the listing of the tribes around the sanctuary as is detailed in Numbers 2 and again in Numbers 10. As they encamped, and as they will head out in procession, so each also presents an offering.

11 For the Lord said to Moses, “They shall offer their offering, one leader each day, for the dedication of the altar.”

As is often the case, the Hebrew reads much more elegantly – “And said Yehovah unto Moses, ‘One prince a day — one prince a day — are they to bring near their offering for the dedication of the altar.’” The offerings were to be made, but what should be the order? Should they be by birth order? Should they be all in one day? In what manner were they to come near? The Lord determined what was to be done, and then He passed that on to Moses. It is as the tribes are laid out according to the cross, and as the sun lights the sky during the spring of the year, from east to south to west to north, so the offering of each leader is to be made. And they are to be one day at a time. It is a royal procession to bring an offering before the King of the universe.

12 And the one who offered his offering on the first day was Nahshon the son of Amminadab, from the tribe of Judah.

Starting with Judah, the fourth born to Jacob, but from whom would come Messiah, the first offering is made. Other than these three names, Nahshon, Amminadab, and Judah, we won’t repeat the meaning of the three names of each offering as they have been listed already in two previous sermons. Nahshon means “Serpent Person.” Amminadab means “People of the Prince.” Judah means “Praise,” In selecting Judah first, we have a picture for us to always remember, “Praise is to go first before the Lord.”

13 His offering was one silver platter, the weight of which was one hundred and thirty shekels, 

The translation is lacking. It says, v’qarebano – “And his offering.” Things like this are placed into the word of God for a reason. To leave them out leaves the studious reader with a lack of understanding concerning what is being relayed. The offering presented is first to be a qaarat keseph, or “dish silver.” The word qearah, or dish, is used 17 times and only in Exodus and Numbers. It comes from a word which means to tear, or cut out. Thus it is something hollowed out like a shallow bowl. Silver pictures redemption. The weight is given as one hundred and thirty shekels. As this is silver, it was not used in the tabernacle, as only gold vessels were used there. This one, in the future, would probably be used at the brazen altar for mixing grain offerings.

13 (con’t) and one silver bowl of seventy shekels,

Next is a mizraq, or bowl. This comes from the word zaraq, meaning “to scatter,” and so it would be a deeper bowl than the first presented. This one is to be a bit more than half the size of the previous dish; seventy shekels. This one would probably have been used in the future for receiving the blood of sacrificial animals and then splashing it upon the sides of the altar. The weight of each of these vessels was to be…

13 (con’t) according to the shekel of the sanctuary,

The shekel of the sanctuary is described five times in the Bible as being the weight of twenty gerahs. A gerah is a set standard, like a grain in our modern weights. Of these bowls…

13 (con’t) both of them full of fine flour mixed with oil as a grain offering;

Both bowls were to be filled with soleth belulah ba’shemen – “fine flour mixed with oil.” The flour, or soleth, comes from an unused root meaning “to strip.” Thus it is fine flour. Into that is mixed oil so that it becomes one mixture. That mixture was brought as a grain offering. These picture Christ as has been seen in previous sermons. As they are in silver, it points to the human aspect of Jesus working out our redemption in His humanity. Next…

14 one gold pan of ten shekels, full of incense;

The word here is kaph. It means “hand.” Thus it is a pan or cup, but being only ten shekels, it would be dinky. In it was to be incense. The gold points to the deity of Christ; the incense to His intercessory role in His divine nature. Also…

15 one young bull, one ram, and one male lamb in its first year,

The par, or “bull” comes from the word parar, to defeat. The ayil, or ram, is from the same as ul, or mighty. And the kebes, or lamb is from an unused root meaning, “to dominate.” The lamb is in its first year indicating innocence. Each of these points to the work of Christ, as has been seen in previous sermons. It is Christ who defeats the devil through His might, and who remained innocent and free of sin, pictured in these animals. These then are offered up…

15 (con’t) as a burnt offering;

The burnt offering is one which is burnt up completely. It pictures a life dedicated wholly to God. The symbolism then is that these are offered on behalf of the people who have dedicated their lives in this way, but the offerings picture Christ who makes that possible.

16 one kid of the goats as a sin offering;

This is a seir izzim, or shaggy goat. The word sayir means hairy. The word izzim means goat, coming from the word azaz, or prevail. It is the same as the two goats presented on the Day of Atonement in Leviticus 16:5. It is presented because hair in the Bible denotes awareness. In this case, it is an awareness of sin. The first time this word, sayir, or “hairy” was used was when speaking of Esau who is called a hairy man. He pictured fallen Adam who became aware of sin through his disobedience of the Lord’s command. Paul says in Romans 8:3 that “Christ came in the likeness of sinful flesh, on account of sin.” In doing this, “he condemned sin in the flesh.” He prevailed over it. This is the purpose of presenting a hairy goat. It pictures Christ who came in this manner. This then acknowledges the sin of the people, but that the animal (picturing Christ) is given to take their place.

17 and for the sacrifice of peace offerings: two oxen, five rams, five male goats, and five male lambs in their first year.

Also is a peace offering which consists of two baqar, or oxen. That comes from a verb signifying “to seek out.” Also, five ayil, or rams, signifying strength. Further, five atud, or male goats. These atudim have never been mentioned before in the sacrificial system. The word comes from athod which signifies “destined” as in “ready to become.” Along with them are to be five kebes, or lambs, of the first year. They again signify “to dominate.”

As these are peace offerings, they picture seeking out peace with God through Christ, resting in His strength, destined to be what God expects of us in Christ, and looking to dominate over the flesh through the power of Christ. To understand the significance of the offerings themselves, meaning the burnt, sin, and peace offerings, took sermon after sermon in Leviticus. Time prohibits repeating all of that here, and so a review of those Leviticus sermons is necessary to grasp all that these short verses now encompass.

17 (con’t) This was the offering of Nahshon the son of Amminadab.

This concludes the offering of the first day as given by Nahshon.

18-23 On the second day Nethanel the son of Zuar, leader of Issachar, presented an offering. … This was the offering of Nethanel the son of Zuar.

The second day sees the offering of the second tribe, which is also the second tribe under Judah’s standard to the east.

24-29 On the third day Eliab the son of Helon, leader of the children of Zebulun, presented an offering. … This was the offering of Eliab the son of Helon.

The third day sees the offering of the third tribe, which is also the third tribe under Judah’s standard to the east.

30-35 On the fourth day Elizur the son of Shedeur, leader of the children of Reuben, presented an offering. … This was the offering of Elizur the son of Shedeur.

The fourth day sees the offering of the fourth tribe, which is also the first tribe under Reuben’s standard to the south.

36-41 On the fifth day Shelumiel the son of Zurishaddai, leader of the children of Simeon, presented an offering. … This was the offering of Shelumiel the son of Zurishaddai.

The fifth day sees the offering of the fifth tribe, which is also the second tribe under Reuben’s standard to the south.

42-47 On the sixth day Eliasaph the son of Deuel, leader of the children of Gad, presented an offering. … This was the offering of Eliasaph the son of Deuel.

The sixth day sees the offering of the sixth tribe, which is also the third tribe under Reuben’s standard to the south.

48-53 On the seventh day Elishama the son of Ammihud, leader of the children of Ephraim, presented an offering. … This was the offering of Elishama the son of Ammihud.

The seventh day sees the offering of the seventh tribe, which is also the first tribe under Ephraim’s standard to the west. As the seventh day is noted here, it should be considered that whether this was a Sabbath or not, eventually there would be at least one, or even two presentations which occurred on a Sabbath. If so, it may be considered acceptable as it occurred in conjunction with the established religion. However, it may be that there was no offering at all made on a Sabbath, and the counting of days skips over the Sabbath. Thus, the term “on the XXth day” speaks of the day of the offerings, not the subsequent day in time. As the people were told to rest on the Sabbath, this may be the case, but as we saw in the previous sermon, it very well may not be.

54-59 On the eighth day Gamaliel the son of Pedahzur, leader of the children of Manasseh, presented an offering. … This was the offering of Gamaliel the son of Pedahzur.

The eighth day sees the offering of the eighth tribe, which is also the second tribe under Ephraim’s standard to the west.

60-65 On the ninth day Abidan the son of Gideoni, leader of the children of Benjamin, presented an offering. … This was the offering of Abidan the son of Gideoni.

The ninth day sees the offering of the ninth tribe, which is also the third tribe under Ephraim’s standard to the west.

66-71 On the tenth day Ahiezer the son of Ammishaddai, leader of the children of Dan, presented an offering. … This was the offering of Ahiezer the son of Ammishaddai.

The tenth day sees the offering of the tenth tribe, which is also the first tribe under Dan’s standard to the north.

72-77 On the eleventh day Pagiel the son of Ocran, leader of the children of Asher, presented an offering. … This was the offering of Pagiel the son of Ocran.

The eleventh day sees the offering of the eleventh tribe, which is also the second tribe under Dan’s standard to the north.

78-83 On the twelfth day Ahira the son of Enan, leader of the children of Naphtali, presented an offering. … This was the offering of Ahira the son of Enan.

The twelfth day sees the offering of the twelfth tribe, which is also the third tribe under Dan’s standard to the north.

84 This was the dedication offering for the altar from the leaders of Israel,

The Hebrew says zot khanukat ha’mizbeakh – “this dedication the altar.” The altar is dedicated through the twelve offerings from each tribe, tribe by tribe.

84 (con’t) when it was anointed:

It again reads, “in the day” it was anointed. Thus, this is speaking of the entire period of the offering as being in relation to the day in which the altar was anointed.

84 (con’t) twelve silver platters, twelve silver bowls, and twelve gold pans.

The dedication spoken of in the first clause is now explained by this and the following verses. What was presented is what brings about the dedication of the altar. One of each item here was presented by each tribe.

85 Each silver platter weighed one hundred and thirty shekels and each bowl seventy shekels. 

The combined weight of the silver platters is 1560 shekels. The combined weight of the silver bowls is 840 shekels.

85 (con’t) All the silver of the vessels weighed two thousand four hundred shekels, according to the shekel of the sanctuary.

The combined weight of the silver is given. This according to the sanctuary shekel which is twenty gerahs to the shekel.

86 The twelve gold pans full of incense weighed ten shekels apiece, according to the shekel of the sanctuary; all the gold of the pans weighed one hundred and twenty shekels.

Interestingly, the weight of the gold in gerahs, which is twenty gerahs to the shekel, is the same number as shekels of silver. There are 2400 shekels of silver and 120 shekels of gold which equals 2400 gerahs. 2400 is 12 x 200. Not to read too much into that, but the number 12 is that of governmental perfection, and the number 200 is the number of insufficiency. As this is for the dedication of the altar, it appears to point to the insufficiency of this Old Testament sacrificial system to accomplish what it is designed for. Thus, it is an implicit reference to the need for a New Covenant led by Christ and structured around His twelve apostles.

87 All the oxen for the burnt offering were twelve young bulls, the rams twelve, the male lambs in their first year twelve, with their grain offering, and the kids of the goats as a sin offering twelve.

The totals for the burnt and sin offerings are given, one of each animal for each tribe. The grain offerings are only now mentioned, but it is understood from the laws given in Leviticus that these would accompany the sacrifices. All of these together, the burnt, grain, and sin offerings were given in anticipation of Christ to come. In themselves, they could accomplish nothing except to picture what He would do. This is explicitly stated in the book of Hebrews.

88 And all the oxen for the sacrifice of peace offerings were twenty-four bulls, the rams sixty, the male goats sixty, and the lambs in their first year sixty.

The combined totals of each animal for the peace offerings are given here. Those combined then total 204 animals. And then combining these with the burnt and sin offerings equals a total number of animals offered at 252 over a period of 12 days, 36 as whole burnt offerings, and 216 were partially burned and the rest eaten according to the laws given for the sin and peace offerings.

88 (con’t) This was the dedication offering for the altar after it was anointed.

The word akhar, or after, confirms what has already been deduced. The term b’yom, or “in the day” of the anointing of the altar, which has already been used, is speaking of the entire duration of the dedication. The entire process of the dedication is counted as the day of the altar’s anointing. With this, the altar is now dedicated to serve in the capacity for which it was built.

Through the offering presented by each leader, the people have, tribe by tribe, symbolically offered themselves to God through Christ; they have had their sins symbolically atoned for through Christ; and they have symbolically partaken of the body of Christ. Now, everything in Leviticus concerning the sacrifices to be conducted at this altar, and all of which point to the coming Messiah, can now be performed and accepted because of this time of dedication.

89 Now when Moses went into the tabernacle of meeting to speak with Him,

To close out this long and very complicated chapter, we have a verse that seemingly has nothing to do with anything, but actually, this isn’t so. The first verse of Chapter 7 said, “Now it came to pass, when Moses had finished setting up the tabernacle, that he anointed it and consecrated it and all its furnishings, and the altar and all its utensils; so he anointed them and consecrated them.” That took us all the way back to Exodus 40:17 when the tabernacle was said to have been set up.

Since then, the entire sacrificial system has been outlined, and numerous laws have been given. Also, the priests have been consecrated and the Levites were then set apart for service to the priests. Here in this chapter the people have consecrated the altar and offered themselves, tribe by tribe, in anticipation of the coming Christ. Now, to close out all of that, we come to this verse.

We understand in this how Moses received his word from the Lord. It says that he would go into the tent of meeting to speak with Him. What is understood is that “Him” is Yehovah who has been speaking out His word to Moses. This is confirmed back in Exodus 25 at the giving of the directions for the construction of the Ark –

You shall put the mercy seat on top of the ark, and in the ark you shall put the Testimony that I will give you. 22 And there I will meet with you, and I will speak with you from above the mercy seat, from between the two cherubim which are on the ark of the Testimony, about everything which I will give you in commandment to the children of Israel.” Exodus 25:21, 22

That is now revealed to actually be the case. When Moses went in, it says…

89 (con’t) he heard the voice of One speaking to him

The verb here is in a particular form where it expresses the reflexive voice where the subject of the verb is both performing and receiving the verbal action. Maybe better stated, this should say, “…he heard the voice conversing with him” (Pulpit). It is debated if Moses stood outside of the veil, or if he alone was allowed inside the veil, apart from the special Day of Atonement allowances. In Exodus 33:11, it says that “the Lord spoke to Moses face to face, as a man speaks to his friend.” This means that they had open and free discussion, not literally necessarily seeing one another’s face. However, in Numbers 12:8, it also says that Moses “sees the form of the Lord.” That implies a physical manifestation of the Lord, presumably the eternal Christ in His incarnate form. Either way, the voice was audible. And it both spoke to and responded to Moses. As God doesn’t have parts, and as a voice requires something to make the voice resonate, it is at least a foreshadowing of the incarnation where God would literally speak with a mouth through the Person of Jesus. For now, though, the mouth of the Lord would speak…

*89 (fin) from above the mercy seat that was on the ark of the Testimony, from between the two cherubim; thus He spoke to him.

The eternal Word of God, Yehovah, who is the Lord Jesus, would converse with Moses from above the mercy seat that was on the Ark. As the mercy seat points to the place of Christ’s atoning death, and as the ark of the Testimony points to Christ, the fulfillment and thus embodiment, of the law, it is appropriate that this verse is placed here. It is after the offering of the tribes for the dedication of the altar, which points to the sacrificial work of Christ which Christ would accomplish, that we are told how He spoke to Moses.

The name Moses means, “He who draws out.” Moses went in to draw out from the Lord, that which needed to be expressed to the people and the Lord would be there, conversing with him. From the spot which pictures His fulfillment of the covenant, He would speak out the words of the covenant which anticipated His coming in order to fulfill it. It is a rather remarkable thing to consider.

An offering to God; an offering for peace
One which signifies fellowship so sweet
It stems from our daily trod, and in Christ it shall never cease
Because in Him our fellowship is complete

Cleanse us in our inward parts; lead us in Your peace
May we join together with You, O precious Lord
Purify our minds and hearts; may this joy never cease
Through Christ, may we always be in one accord

Thank You for the cross from whence atonement came
Upon that offering, we can now add an offering of peace
Together they point to the same great Name
Both look to Jesus where joyous fellowship will never, never cease

II. Why So Many Repetitive Verses?

It has always been a curiosity why the Lord didn’t just say what the offerings were for the first day, and then say that the leader of each subsequent tribe made similar offerings over the next eleven days. The tally at the end would have clarified that well enough. But He didn’t do this. And so being curious as to why, our friend Sergio put these verses into the computer and looked for any differences. There actually are some.

First, the only tribe that doesn’t use the term nasiy, or “prince,” is that of Judah. All the others say, “On the XXth day XX the son of XX, leader (nasiy) of the children of XX, presented an offering. In verse 12, however, it says of Judah, “And the one who offered his offering on the first day was Nahshon the son of Amminadab, from the tribe of Judah.”

Secondly, verse 13 is identical to all the other eleven corresponding verses, but with one exception. It contains the letter vav at the beginning of the verse, translated as “And,” – “And His offering…” The other eleven simply begin with, “His offering was…” It would make more sense to say “And” at the beginning of the last eleven, not only say it during the first, but this is how it is.

And then thirdly, the exact same offerings are used, letter for letter, in all of the other verses, with two exceptions. In verse 17, and in verse 23, the word atudim, or “male goats” is spelled ayin-tav-vav-dalet-yod-mem. However, in the other ten, it is spelled without the letter vav. Those are the only differences in all 72 verses – the word nasiy, and three vav’s.

The reason for the exacting repetition of these 72 verses is clear. The Lord had these variations which needed to be highlighted. The way to accomplish this was to write every section, verse, word, and letter identically, with those changes as well. In doing this, the changes would then be seen as purposeful.


The first change, the leaving off of the term nasiy, or “prince,” is though Nahshon is the prince of Judah, he was not named specifically as prince because from this tribe would come its true nasiy, or Prince. This is actually referred to in 1 Chronicles 5 –

For Judah prevailed above his brethren, and of him came he that is the prince…” JPS Tanakh 1977

Though that was speaking immediately about David, it is referring prophetically to Messiah, the seed of David. Hence, the term nasiy, or prince, is left off here in anticipation of Christ.

The second variation, that of the vav, or “And,” beginning verse 13 is explained by the lack of the term “prince” in verse 12. The “and” there acknowledges that an offering was made by Nahshon, who though the leader, was not acknowledged as such. The vav is the sixth number of the aleph-bet. Six is the number of man. Nahshon made his offering, but the title being left off looked forward to the greater Man who would lead the tribe and the congregation.

Even the ancient rabbis understood the vav points to Messiah. Although their commentaries are not the Bible, in this case, they are, like any other scholars’ comments, based on the Bible. In the Midrash Rabbah of Numbers, they looked at the vav as an anticipation of six righteous men who would come from Judah. Nahshon is the grandfather of Boaz, and Boaz is the grandfather of David. Thus David, who anticipates the coming Messiah, is sixth from Nahshon. Along with him, the sages list the four other righteous men listed in the Bible – Daniel, Hananiah, Mishael, and Azariah. They say the sixth to come would be Messiah. It is he who is the greater David. The way that they determine this is the same way we determine that Christ is the Lord; from Isaiah 11. There, the seven spirits of the Lord are named, but the first is the Spirit of the Lord. After that, six spirits would rest upon the Man, Messiah the Lord –

There shall come forth a Rod from the stem of Jesse,
And a Branch shall grow out of his roots.
The Spirit of the Lord shall rest upon Him,
The Spirit of wisdom and understanding,
The Spirit of counsel and might,
The Spirit of knowledge and of the fear of the Lord.?
Isaiah 11:1, 2

The third variation, that of the two vav’s in the atudim, or male goats, of Judah and Issachar point to the Person of Messiah as well. As I said, the word comes from athod which signifies “destined” as in ready to become. The first of the two uses is in the male goat offering of Judah, which means Praise. The vav signifies Messiah destined to be the Praise of God for and among His people.

This explains the extra vav of the offering of Judah, which seems obvious because Messiah comes from Judah. But, it doesn’t explain the extra vav of Issachar’s offering. In this, we need to look at the meaning of the name of Issachar. It means, “He is wages.” Thus, unlike the other ten tribes that have no vav, we see here that the Messiah was giving us a clue as to His mission. He is destined to be the payment which brings us peace with God, as seen in this peace offering which is made upon this very altar being dedicated.

There is no need for the vav in any other tribe’s offering, because these two sum up the role of Messiah as is intended here. He is the Praise of God which brings peace to man, and He is the payment which brings peace with God, represented by the altar where these sacrifices are made. It looks to the cross of Calvary. It was a long set of verses to go through to make the point, but the point is made.

If nothing else from this very long passage, which we even cut short in both its reading and its analysis because of the repetition, I would hope that you have learned that nothing is superfluous in God’s word. That which seems to make no sense, makes all kinds of sense when it is studied. Reading isn’t study, but it is what you should do every day with this precious word. The study is what you should do with those who have the time to prepare the study. Here, that’s my job. And in our time together, you can combine what you know from reading, with that which you learned from the study. In putting them together, you have a much fuller and more beautifully laid out picture of Christ. In the end, it is all about Him.

Closing Verse: “Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who has blessed us with every spiritual blessing in the heavenly places in Christ, just as He chose us in Him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before Him in love, having predestined us to adoption as sons by Jesus Christ to Himself, according to the good pleasure of His will, to the praise of the glory of His grace, by which He made us accepted in the Beloved.” Ephesians 1:3-6

Next Week: Numbers 8:1-26 Don’t be anxious. Don’t lose your nerve… (Acceptable to Serve) (15th Numbers Sermon)

The Lord has you exactly where He wants you. He has a good plan and purpose for you. It may seem at times as if you are lost in a desert, wandering aimlessly. But the Lord is there, carefully leading you to the Land of Promise. So follow Him and trust Him and He will do marvelous things for you and through you.

An Offering for the Altar

Now the leaders offered the dedication offering
For the altar when it was anointed
So the leaders offered their offering before the altar
They did this as they were so appointed 

For the Lord said to Moses, “They shall offer their offering
One leader each day, for the dedication of the altar
———-such shall be their proffering

And the one who offered his offering on the first day
Was Nahshon the son of Amminadab, from the tribe of Judah
———-as the record does say 

His offering was one silver platter
The weight of which was shekels one hundred and thirty
And one silver bowl of seventy shekels
According to the shekel of the sanctuary

Both of them full of fine flour mixed with oil as a grain offering
One gold pan of ten shekels, full of incense as well
One young bull, one ram, and one male lamb in its first year
———-as a burnt offering
One kid of the goats as a sin offering, as the account does tell 

And for the sacrifice of peace offerings
Two oxen, five rams, five male goats, not grown in a lab
And five male lambs in their first year
This was the offering of Nahshon the son of Amminadab

On the second day Nethanel the son of Zuar
Leader of Issachar
Presented an offering the same as before
This was the offering of Nethanel the son of Zuar

On the third day Eliab the son of Helon
Leader of the children of Zebulun
Presented an offering the same as before
This was the offering of Eliab the son of Helon

On the fourth day Elizur the son of Shedeur
Leader of the children of Reuben, for sure
Presented an offering the same as before
This was the offering of Elizur the son of Shedeur

On the fifth day Shelumiel the son of Zurishaddai
Leader of the children of Simeon, by and by
Presented an offering the same as before
This was the offering of Shelumiel the son of Zurishaddai

On the sixth day Eliasaph the son of Deuel
Leader of the children of Gad, as the account does tell
Presented an offering the same as before
This was the offering of Eliasaph the son of Deuel

On the seventh day Elishama the son of Ammihud
Leader of the children of Ephraim, so it is understood
Presented an offering the same as before
This was the offering of Elishama the son of Ammihud

On the eighth day Gamaliel the son of Pedahzur
Leader of the children of Manasseh, for sure
Presented an offering the same as before
This was the offering of Gamaliel the son of Pedahzur

On the ninth day Abidan the son of Gideoni
Leader of the children of Benjamin, as we see
Presented an offering the same as before
This was the offering of Abidan the son of Gideoni

On the tenth day Ahiezer the son of Ammishaddai
Leader of the children of Dan, by and by
Presented an offering the same as before
This was the offering of Ahiezer the son of Ammishaddai

On the eleventh day Pagiel the son of Ocran
Leader of the children of Asher, as stated hereon
Presented an offering the same as before
This was the offering of Pagiel the son of Ocran

On the twelfth day Ahira the son of Enan
Leader of the children of Naphtali
———-by the Lord his name was drawn
Presented an offering the same as before
This was the offering of Ahira the son of Enan

This was the dedication offering
For the altar from the leaders of Israel
When it was anointed
Twelve silver platters, twelve silver bowls
———-and twelve gold pans as the record does tell

Each silver platter weighed one hundred and thirty shekels
And each bowl shekels seventy
All the silver of the vessels weighed
———-two thousand four hundred shekels
According to the shekel of the sanctuary

The twelve gold pans full of incense weighed ten shekels apiece
According to the shekel of the sanctuary
All the gold of the pans weighed
Shekels one hundred and twenty 

All the oxen for the burnt offering were twelve young bulls
The rams twelve, the male lambs in their first year twelve, as well
With their grain offering
And the kids of the goats as a sin offering twelve
———-as the record does tell

And all the oxen for the sacrifice of peace offerings
were twenty-four bulls, the rams sixty, the male goats sixty
———-all as duly appointed
And the lambs in their first year sixty
This was the dedication offering for the altar after it was anointed

Now when Moses went into the tabernacle of meeting
To speak with Him, the voice of One speaking to him he heard
From above the mercy seat that was on the ark of the Testimony
From between the two cherubim; thus He spoke to him
———-thus He conveyed His word

Lord God, we are even now in a wilderness
And we are wanting to be led by You
Without You to direct, our lives would be a mess
And so be our guide, O God; You who are faithful and true

We long for the water in this barren land
May it flow forth from the Rock, our souls to satisfy
Give us this refreshing, spiritual hand
And may we take it, and to our lives daily it apply

And we shall be content and satisfied in You alone
We will follow You as we sing our songs of praise
Hallelujah to You; to us Your path You have shown
Hallelujah we shall sing to you for all of our days

Hallelujah and Amen…

Numbers 7:1-9 (An Offering for the Levites)

Numbers 7:1-9
An Offering for the Levites

There is actually very little left to accomplish before Israel sets out for the land of Canaan. They have spent almost a year in the Wilderness, and bout 330 days at Sinai. Within the next 20 days, they are scheduled to leave, and with an anticipated travel time of mere weeks, they should be standing on the bank of the Jordan River, ready to enter into their promised inheritance.

To help the Levites in what should be a most arduous trek through rough terrain, preparations have been made by the people, and they will be given as an offering to them. This is the subject of today’s verses. After that, there will be more offerings made, and then in just a very short time after that, the people will be departing.

In all, Chapter 7 is probably the most repetitive and difficult passage in all of the five books of Moses, and indeed, the whole Bible. Several times, I have heard people say, I tried reading the Bible, but eventually gave up. For those that said “when” they gave up, Leviticus or Numbers is at the top of the list. For Numbers, my guess is that Numbers 7 was probably the clincher.

People love Genesis, they enjoy much of Exodus, struggle through Leviticus hoping for another narrative like Genesis, and get to Numbers… and lose all hope. They turn a few pages scanning for something that will be interesting, their eyes alight on these 89 verses, and they carefully and quietly close the book, promising themselves they will read more later, and they never come back. It’s a shame, after Numbers 7, it’s all uphill once again!

Text Verse: “My soul faints for Your salvation,
But I hope in Your word.
82 My eyes fail from searching Your word,
Saying, “When will You comfort me?”
83 For I have become like a wineskin in smoke,
Yet I do not forget Your statutes.” Psalm 119:81-83

Actually, in God’s word, there are no low spots. Everything is a mountaintop when it is taken in its proper perspective. If we just keep looking for how things point to Jesus, the routine or repetitive verses don’t seem so bad. We may not understand why they are there, but we know they are there for a good reason. Before we finish today, we’ll have a better idea about these nine verses, including some interesting things along the way.

We will also revisit the ending of our verses from last week, tying them in with the purpose of the carts that are mentioned in our passage today. The reason for carts is to carry things along on the journey. The purpose of a journey is to carry us to a chosen location. The chosen location is because it is our goal.

Along the way, there may be difficult times, flat tires, cheating car mechanics (if such a thing is actually possible), and other difficulties. But when we are protected on the journey, there is no need to fret or worry. The carts make the burden light, the things that we do carry are because they are precious to us, and the safety of being protected makes the trip a content and happy one. This is the intended idea of the progression of thought so far, whether you have seen it or not. Today, you’ll get a glimpse of that. More will be seen as we head out.

Oh, and just as we need food and provision along the way, please don’t forget that all this time, and all of the time ahead, they are daily going out and gathering manna. Nothing is missing in the trek to the Land of Promise and nothing is missing in our walk to glory. Be assured of this. It’s all to be found in His superior word. And so let’s turn to that precious word once again and… May God speak to us through His word today and may His glorious name ever be praised.

I. In That Day (verses 1-3)

Now it came to pass,

The Hebrew reads, vayhi b’yom – “And it came to pass in the day.” Because of the words, and what is next stated, some scholars look at this as a contradiction within the text itself. That contradiction is supposedly evidenced by the next words…

1 (con’t) when Moses had finished setting up the tabernacle,

The date which Moses accomplished this is recorded in Exodus –

And it came to pass in the first month of the second year, on the first day of the month, that the tabernacle was raised up.” Exodus 40:17

However, the narrative of Numbers has thus far been recorded from a month later than that. Numbers 1:1 said –

Now the Lord spoke to Moses in the Wilderness of Sinai, in the tabernacle of meeting, on the first day of the second month, in the second year after they had come out of the land of Egypt, saying:” 

Thus, liberal scholars are happy to find an error of contradiction in God’s word, chiding the ignorant editor of the narrative for being so stupid as to record such an obvious error. In this, they only show their own inept ability to perceive what is being said. In verse 10 of this chapter, the exact same phrase, b’yom, or “in the day,” is also used. That verse will read –

And the princes presented the dedication-gift of the altar on the day that it was anointed; and the princes presented their offering before the altar..” (DARBY)

All of the offerings to come are stated as being “in the day that it was anointed,” and yet the offerings will be presented over a period of twelve days. Thus, the term b’yom, or “in that day,” is inclusive of the entire period of the narrative, from Exodus 40, even up to now, more than a month later. The term b’yom then is a Hebraism meaning, “at that time.” It has been used this way to speak of indeterminate intervals of time, such as during and after the creation of man in Genesis 2:4, and of an entire period of a person’s life, such as in Genesis 35:3. No contradiction exists, except in the confused minds of liberal scholars who are willing to spend more time trying to undermine the word of God than they are in actually trying to learn it.

What is being said here is that the tabernacle is set up, but it is not yet fully set up. That process is ongoing, and it will continue until all of its implements, including those to be offered in the verses of this chapter, are included in its completion. That is certain based on the next words…

1 (con’t) that he anointed it and consecrated it and all its furnishings, and the altar and all its utensils; so he anointed them and consecrated them.

The anointing of these items was accomplished at the erection of the tabernacle, but it is said here to include not only its furnishings and the altar, but also “all its utensils.” These utensils include the offerings which are to be made by the individual tribes in the verses ahead, and over a twelve-day period.

An actual timeline is difficult to pin down, but some things are known for certain. There is a fifty-day period from the erection of the tabernacle in Exodus 40:17 and the departure of the people from Sinai which will be on the twentieth day of the second month according to Numbers 10:11. The tabernacle was anointed in Leviticus 8:10, and the ordination of Aaron and his sons lasted eight days (Leviticus 9:1). During this time, there was also a Passover celebration.

Therefore, what is to be detailed concerning the offerings of the tribes probably occurred during the time of the writing of Leviticus. The twelve daily offerings would not take more than an hour or so, and the rest of the day, Moses would probably be in the tent of meeting, receiving the laws we have already gone through in Leviticus from the Lord. This would explain the words of the very last verse of Chapter 7 –

Now when Moses went into the tabernacle of meeting to speak with Him, he heard the voice of One speaking to him from above the mercy seat that was on the ark of the Testimony, from between the two cherubim; thus He spoke to him.” Numbers 7:89

Adam Clarke rather boldly states that “the proper place of this account is immediately after the tenth chapter of Leviticus.” That is the chapter which recorded the death of Aaron’s two sons, and then which detailed the prescribed conduct for the priests. In this, we can see that the book of Leviticus was partially received and recorded during the events of the book of Numbers, as was stated in our introduction to Leviticus, a sermon presented to you on March 26, 2017.

These things are assured concerning the term b’yom, or “in the day,” because the tabernacle is one portion of the greater whole. What was the purpose of the tabernacle? It was to be the dwelling place of the Lord. But what use is that unless it is inclusive of the people – fully numbered and arranged around it – for whose sake it was fashioned and erected in the first place.

In other words, all of what we are reading is for a purpose. It is so that the Lord may dwell among His people. The census of them, their arrangement, the calling of the Levites, the duties of the priests – all of this and more – is one united act in regards to the account before us. Thus, the term b’yom, or “in the day,” carries the full significance of everything that is recorded, from the day of the tabernacle’s erection, until the day that these things are complete. But what is the actual importance of this? It is because, as we have seen, everything – even to the minutest detail – has been given as a picture of Christ. God incarnate came to dwell among His people. “In the day” then includes every aspect of what God has done, and is doing, in order for that to literally come about in the future. For those looking forward to the true dwelling of God with men, “in the day” is speaking of right now. Until the final detail is complete, we are “in the day.”

The finality of that day carries two major parts to it, the first is the millennial reign of Christ. The prophets speak of that day numerous times. The term “in the day” is used by Isaiah again and again and again in this manner. The second part is the eternal state which will continue on forever. It is where God will dwell with men in the fullest and most complete sense. Until then, the people of God are being numbered, arranged, and their offerings are being made in preparation for what God has determined since before a single atom came into existence.

Then the leaders of Israel, the heads of their fathers’ houses, who were the leaders of the tribes and over those who were numbered, made an offering.

The Hebrew is completely the opposite in order of all English translations. It begins, not ends, with the words “And made an offering.” Only after that does it specify who made the offering. Again these words confirm to us the general, rather than specific, timing of the events which comprise b’yom, or “in the day.” Here “the leaders of Israel” are those who have already been named as such in Chapter 1 verses 5-16. This becomes even clearer with the words, “over those who were numbered.” Not only is this after the selection of the tribal leaders, but it is after the census of the men in each tribe.

All of this is then after that naming and its subsequent census. And so, the writing of at least Leviticus 11 through Numbers 6, actually comes after that date. Numbers 7, comprising the twelve offerings over twelve days, certainly runs in a contemporary manner with the writing of those chapters.

If these offerings were started on the day after the census, which would have been an incredibly full day, the twelve offerings would end on the 13th of the second month. As the 14th of the second month will be designated as a special, second, Passover according to verse 9:11, this appears to be the correct timing of these events – from the 2nd through the 13th day of the second month. We cannot be dogmatic about this, but this seems to be a perfectly arranged time to accomplish what lies ahead.

It would mean that these offerings were presented without regard to the Sabbath. If so, then the presentation would probably have been made in connection with the morning offering by the priests, who ministered regardless of a Sabbath day. Again, we can’t be dogmatic about this, but it does appear from the account that the twelve offerings came on twelve consecutive days.

And so what is probably the case is that the offerings we will see were brought forward each morning, one tribe a day. After that, Moses would go into the Tent of Meeting and receive more of the law from the Lord. The amount of theological information received and then passed on by Moses in these few short days has, as we have found out, been enough for people to study for 3500 years.

And yet, even today a new insight will arise from time to time concerning what is recorded here. How many have been found and recorded within the last year alone is unknown, but it is of no small amount. How much is left hidden for the future is likewise unknown, but it is certain that it is enough for numerous scholars to dedicate their lives to, and to rejoice in the amazing details to be drawn out which are hidden in picture, in prophecy, and in verse, word, and letter. Moses probably didn’t even have an inkling that what he sat and wrote out from the mouth of the Lord was so rich, so filled with pictures of Messiah, and so instructive for the lives of God’s people. It truly is almost impossible to imagine the level of wisdom which passed between Creator and his humble servant in those marvelous moments where they spoke face to face and issued forth for the people of Israel, and even for us today, the words which are so cherished by a few, and yet so unhappily ignored by so many. Thus it is with the word of God – the incomprehensible, glorious, and eternally relevant WORD OF GOD.

And they brought their offering

As you saw, most of the previous verse is parenthetical. It now resumes with the main thought. It is the leaders over the numbered men who accomplish this, bringing their offering…

(con’t) before the Lord,

The words liphne Yehovah, or “before the Lord,” will be explained at the end of verse 3 as “before the tabernacle.” They came forward from their tribes, walking a rather vast distance through the Levite’s encampment, in order to come to the spot for the presentation of their offering. There in front of the beautifully ornamented screen of the gate which was woven of blue, purple, and scarlet thread, and of fine woven linen, they presented their gifts to the Levites. These consisted of…

(con’t) six covered carts

shes eglot tsav. What the words actually mean is highly debated. The Greek translation of them doesn’t help much. Many ideas have been put forth, two-wheeled carts, four-wheeled wagons, and litters – meaning something not borne on wheels, but between the two oxen, one in front and one behind. The idea with this is that the rough terrain would make wheels impractical. However, the weight of these items makes litters equally impractical.

The word agalah, is translated as a cart, or wagon, elsewhere. It comes from the same word as egel, or calf. Both are derived from agol, meaning “circular.” The idea is that a calf in its youth will twirl about in a circular manner, enjoying life as it prances in the fields. Thus, these agalah are round-wheeled vehicles. Whether they are carts or wagons is unknown. We will stick with wagons for consistency, and because wagons – having four wheels – would be a smoother, more stately ride. It makes a nicer mental image.

The second word, tsav, is from a root meaning “to establish.” It then probably refers to a covering which is fixed to the wagon. Most translations say “covered,” or they just ignore the word altogether, hoping nobody notices.

(con’t) and twelve oxen,

The oxen are certainly for pulling wheeled vehicles, not carrying the items of the tabernacle. It is simply unreasonable to expect that the fabrics, wood, and metal pieces, which were of such great weight, would be carried on litters by so few oxen.

(con’t) a cart for every two of the leaders,

Despite what most commentaries state about the nature of these gifts being voluntary. The word for “offering” in this verse is qorban. It is simply an offering brought near, whether voluntarily or not. For example, the sin offering of Leviticus 4 is a qorban. Though willingly offered, it was still a required offering for atonement of sins. What is probable, is that these were built along with the tabernacle, and the Lord expected it as an offering. The same word is again used for the offerings which are coming in the verses ahead in this chapter. The reason why their construction wasn’t mentioned in Exodus is simple. It is because they have nothing to do with the pictures of Christ which everything described by the Lord concerning the sanctuary did. When the Lord specified certain materials, measurements, weights, and the like, it was always to give us a picture of Christ. These carts, other than their number, have no details about their construction which point to Him.

The carts, if in fact built specifically for this service, as I submit is the case, they were built by the people and presented by leaders of two tribes each. As two leaders came forward to present them, it is probable that they were not merely common wagons, but were rather beautifully made and ornamented. It would be an honor to come forth with a second tribal leader and present such a beautiful piece of craftsmanship.

(con’t) and for each one an ox;

Twelve oxen, one representing each of the tribes, and thus two oxen for each wagon, were also brought forth. Six, being the number of man, the six wagons are the logical number to be brought forth for carrying the articles of the sanctuary which point, in every detail, to Christ the Man. The twelve oxen point to the number of governmental perfection. The twelve oxen, represent the twelve tribes of Israel. As the oxen draw along – in picture – the coming Messiah, so Israel pressed forward through time, bringing forth to the world the coming Messiah.

(con’t) and they presented them before the tabernacle.

The words liphne ha’mishkan, or “before the tabernacle,” explain the term, liphne Yehovah, or “before the Lord.” They are used synonymously. To be presented before the tabernacle implies that they are thus presented before the Lord. What is amazing about the scene which is unfolding here is that these people have been at the foot of Sinai for over three hundred days. During that time, a great deal has happened, both good and bad. However, for much of the time, the tabernacle has been prepared. The materials were gathered, the people were selected for its construction, it was made, and it was finally set up. Now, almost as soon as it has been set up, it is time to break it down and depart. Within less than three weeks, that will occur.

In that day, all will be right – right as rain
In that day, all things will be made new
There is coming a time when there will be no more pain
In that day it will come from our Savior, Faithful and True

In that day, we shall know even as we are known
The day is coming when these things shall come to pass
In that day, to us God’s glory will be shown
As we stand before the sea, clear as the clearest glass

That day is coming for the redeemed of the Lord
In that day all will be as it was meant to be
Everything that was marred and corrupted will be restored
In that day we shall see Jesus smiling upon us so tenderly

In that day. Oh what a day it will be!

II. The Offering for the Levites (verses 4-9)

Then the Lord spoke to Moses, saying,

The translation is not correct. It says v’yomer Yehovah el Moshe lemor. The word is amar, or said, not daber, or spoke. The Hebrew words carry somewhat the same meaning, but “said” is used here because the task requires a partnership and people working together. It may seem like trifling, but there is no such thing when attempting to discern what the Lord is relaying to us. And so we rightly say now that “the Lord said to Moses, saying…”

“Accept these from them,

The Targum of Palestine inserts the thought that Moses would not originally accept the wagons because he doubted if they would be acceptable for use in conveying the tabernacle. That makes no sense at all. It is obvious that the items were to be conveyed on wagons, with the exception of the most holy things, each of which was built with rods for transport.

Further, the Lord would not wait until mere days before the departure to suddenly decide that wagons were needed, as if He forgot such an important detail. Rather, this entire offering was one prepared for the purpose, and in advance of this day. The edifice is standing, the priests have been ordained, and it is now the appropriate time to make the offering. Moses, as the leader, is accepting them from their hands in order to then present them to those who will use them. There is a dignity and a formality to the offering, not a haphazard and dubious state of events taking place.

(con’t) that they may be used in doing the work of the tabernacle of meeting;

Another incorrect translation. Twice already, in 7:1 and 7:3, the term mishkan, or tabernacle, has been used. Now a different term, ohel moed, or tent of meeting, is used. It completely destroys the movement of thought to translate the two words both as “tabernacle.” The symbolism is all but lost when this happens.

To help in understanding this, we could use another example and equate the mishkan with the oval office within the White House. The tent of meeting would then be equated to the White House. In verse 1, Moses finished setting up the oval office, and in verse 3, the offering is presented before the oval office, meaning where the president actually is. However, here, these things are to be used in the work of the White House. This is the importance of ensuring individual words are translated individually here.

(con’t) and you shall give them to the Levites, 

Moses is the leader of the congregation, and so on behalf of the Levites, he formally receives the offerings. This is no different than his inspection of the completion of the work in the construction of the sanctuary. At the end of the people’s laborious work, we read this in Exodus 39 –

According to all that the Lord had commanded Moses, so the children of Israel did all the work. 43 Then Moses looked over all the work, and indeed they had done it; as the Lord had commanded, just so they had done it. And Moses blessed them.” Exodus 39:42, 43

Nothing is said about him inspecting the wagons. As there was no picture of Christ in their construction, other than the number of them, all that mattered was that they were capable of bearing the loads. Therefore, Moses accepted them for the Levites, maybe with a thumbs up, a pat on the back, and a “Job well-done guys.” Once they were accepted for the Levites, he was to pass them on…

(con’t) to every man according to his service.”

This clause will continue to be explained, but it means that according to the need, based on weight and bulk, the carts would be portioned out. As there are three divisions of Levites, one would think that maybe they would go 2x2x2. But such is not the case. There were some extremely heavy objects that would need to be transported, and most of those went to one tribe…

So Moses took the carts and the oxen, and gave them to the Levites.

Just as the Lord said to Moses, so Moses complies with His words. He received the carts and the oxen in the same manner as a leader would receive an offering of assistance from a foreign country for one of his provinces that was in need, and then he would take what was offered, and formally present it to those needy souls. Everything about the ceremony here bears an air of dignity and formality. From the hands of their brother Israelites, and through their great leader, the Levites are then presented with the wagons as follows…

Two carts and four oxen he gave to the sons of Gershon, according to their service;

As you perfectly remember, because we went through it in detail, the Gershonite’s service was recorded in Numbers 4. There it said –

They shall carry the curtains of the tabernacle and the tabernacle of meeting with its covering, the covering of badger skins that is on it, the screen for the door of the tabernacle of meeting, 26 the screen for the door of the gate of the court, the hangings of the court which are around the tabernacle and altar, and their cords, all the furnishings for their service and all that is made for these things: so shall they serve.” Numbers 4:25, 26

These things were heavy and bulky. Layer upon layer of tent material would be carefully piled up between these two carts. Being covered, they would be kept safe from the elements. While hanging in the open, the rain wouldn’t affect them, but if it were to rain on them while piled up, mold would quickly be a problem. Plus, the immense amount of dust raised by the vast multitudes of people in march makes having them covered much better as well.

In total, it was an immense amount of skins and fabrics by the time all the packing was completed. Commentaries which claim this was cumbersome, but not very heavy, have missed the reality of the matter. They were heavy, but not heavy in comparison to those items which were transported by those in the next verse…

and four carts and eight oxen he gave to the sons of Merari, according to their service,

Double the amount of carts and oxen went to Merari. Assuredly you also remember the list of items they were tasked with, but in case someone nodded off during those important verses – which certainly seems unlikely – here is what they said –

And this is what they must carry as all their service for the tabernacle of meeting: the boards of the tabernacle, its bars, its pillars, its sockets, 32 and the pillars around the court with their sockets, pegs, and cords, with all their furnishings and all their service; and you shall assign to each man by name the items he must carry. 33 This is the service of the families of the sons of Merari…” Numbers 4:31-33

The weight of each socket is unknown, but supposing each was forty pounds, the combined weight of just those would be over 4000 pounds. That, along with the boards, bars, pillars, pegs, cords, and so on, would be an immense amount of weight. The oxen would earn their feed on their way from destination to destination, as they trudged through the dry, barren, rocky, inhospitable land.

(con’t) under the authority of Ithamar the son of Aaron the priest.

These words are repeated from verse 4:28, after the service of Gershon was noted, and then 4:33 after that of Merari was noted. The thoughts are combined into one statement for both tribes. Ithamar was the youngest of Aaron and still a teenager, but he was given this great duty to supervise, just as he was given the duty of overseeing the inventory of the materials for the Tabernacle of the Testimony in Exodus 38:21, which was also for the service of the Levites. The name Ithamar means “Island of Palms” or “Land of Palms.” The tamar, or palm, is a symbol of uprightness. Thus the Levities under the supervision of Ithamar are considered an island of upright people who are administering a service before the Lord.

But to the sons of Kohath he gave none, because theirs was the service of the holy things,

Kohath, as you remember perfectly from Chapter 4, carried all of the holy things recorded in verses 5-15 – from the Ark with its coverings, to the brazen altar and everything in between. It was a great deal of things to carry, and some of them were rather heavy. But they were deemed most holy, and were never to be placed on a cart. Just as the king of Israel was carried upon a palanquin as seen in the Song of Solomon, so these items, representing the true and great King of Israel, were to be given this same respect and honor.

Correct translations of this verse say “holy things,” “sacred objects,” or “holy objects.” The word is ha’qodesh, or “the holy.” It is speaking specifically of these most holy items. Some translations say “the service of the sanctuary.” That would be incorrect. The “sanctuary” is the entire compound in which the Tent of Meeting and Tabernacle reside, inclusive of its exterior borders, known in Exodus 25:8 as the miqdash. The Kohathites didn’t carry the whole sanctuary, but only these particular holy objects, as is seen in our final words of the day…

*(fin) which they carried on their shoulders.

Though these items were heavy, they were carried on poles sufficiently long enough for the appropriate number of men to carry them. Further, there would be many Kohathites on the journey, and they could easily call to one another to come and provide relief as needed. Like geese moving in and out of the front of the formation to get relief at times, so these men could easily move in and out of the duty without even breaking a stride. In the end, the honor of carrying these most sacred objects would far outweigh the burden which temporarily weighed them down.

As we are slowly having Christ revealed to us, now is a wonderful time to see a comparison to Him as King of Israel from the Song of Solomon. Before going there, we need to remember the last portion of our previous sermon. It was the pronouncement of the birkat kohanim, or the Priestly Prayer. As I noted then, it was composed of sixty letters. In the song of Solomon, we read the following. As you listen, think of the tribes of Israel on their march towards the Land of Promise…

Who is this coming out of the wilderness
Like pillars of smoke,
Perfumed with myrrh and frankincense,
With all the merchant’s fragrant powders?
Behold, it is Solomon’s couch,
With sixty valiant men around it,
Of the valiant of Israel.
They all hold swords,
Being expert in war.
Every man has his sword on his thigh
Because of fear in the night.” Song of Solomon 3:6-8

The words are written in the feminine, but it is noted that the form may more rightly be taken as neuter, because there is no specific neuter form in Hebrew. Thus, the question, in accord with the surrounding words, is asking, “Who is this group of people coming out of the wilderness?”

Solomon was in type a picture looking forward to Christ, but the words about him also look back in remarkable similarity to the people of Israel conducting their King, Yehovah. “Who is this coming out of the wilderness?” The word “wilderness” is midbar, the same name as the Hebrew book of Numbers, b’midbar, or “in the wilderness.” Israel is soon to be on a trek out of the wilderness.

Like pillars of smoke” looks to the cloud, a picture of Christ, which will go forth with Israel throughout their journeys and out of the wilderness. “Perfumed with myrrh and frankincense,” reflects two of the ingredients found in either the holy oil and/or in the holy incense each picturing Christ. The “merchant’s fragrant powders” are the other ingredients selected by the Lord, each picturing Christ in one manner or another.

Solomon’s couch,” is the resting place of the Lord, the Ark of the Covenant, where shalem, or peace (and also where the name Solomon is derived from) is granted. The sixty gibborim, or mighty ones, would be the sixty letters of the Priestly Prayer resting upon the people as they were blessed by Aaron. The words of the prayer would be as swords of protection for the milkhamah, or battle against the Lord’s enemies. The “fear in the night” is that terror which comes about in the night and which the Lord and His prayer of protection would keep them from.

The symbolism looks back to Israel, being led out of the wilderness to the Land of Promise, protected by the Lord, Yehovah. The symbolism also looks forward to Christ, leading His people through the wilderness of their lives, guiding us by His Spirit, until we are brought into the eternal presence of the Father. The multitudes of Israel, forming an immense cross in the wilderness when encamped, were a living picture of a spiritual reality of all of God’s redeemed.

We are safely in Christ because of His cross, and we are tenderly guided by His Spirit. We are enveloped in His fragrance, protected by the blessing of His name, and are on our way to the Land of Promise where our King of Peace will forever protect us from the harm of spiritual darkness. Fear in the night? It shall never be so. The High Priest has pronounced His blessing upon us. Who shall fear in the night?

Closing Verse: So we may boldly say:
The Lord is my helper;
I will not fear.
What can man do to me?” Hebrews 13:6

Next Week: Numbers 7:10-89 This is one hugely long passage, but your attention shall not falter… (An Offering for the Altar) (14th Numbers Sermon)

The Lord has you exactly where He wants you. He has a good plan and purpose for you. It may seem at times as if you are lost in a desert, wandering aimlessly. But the Lord is there, carefully leading you to the Land of Promise. So follow Him and trust Him and He will do marvelous things for you and through you.

An Offering for the Levites

Now it came to pass
When Moses had finished setting up the tabernacle
That he anointed it and consecrated it and all its furnishings
———-and the altar and all its utensils
So he anointed them and consecrated them; these jobs he did tackle

Then the leaders of Israel, the heads of their fathers’ houses
Who were the leaders of the tribes, as we know
And over those who were numbered
Made an offering, and here is how it did go

And they brought their offering before the Lord
Six covered carts and twelve oxen
—-a cart for every two of the leaders, so their job they could tackle
And for each one an ox
And they presented them before the tabernacle

Then the Lord spoke to Moses, saying
These words to them He was then relaying

Accept these from them
That they may be used in doing the work
———-of the tabernacle of meeting, you see
And you shall give them to the Levites
To every man according to his service, so shall it be

So Moses took the carts and the oxen too
And gave them to the Levites, as he was instructed to do 

Two carts and four oxen he gave to the sons of Gershon
———-according to their service
And four carts and eight oxen he gave to the sons of Merari
———-according to their service too
Under the authority of Ithamar the son of Aaron the priest
As the Lord instructed Moses to do

But to the sons of Kohath he gave none
Because theirs was the service of the holy things
Which they carried on their shoulders
Mostly by poles, slipped through appropriate rings

Lord God, we are even now in a wilderness
And we are wanting to be led by You
Without You to direct, our lives would be a mess
And so be our guide, O God; You who are faithful and true

We long for the water in this barren land
May it flow forth from the Rock, our souls to satisfy
Give us this refreshing, spiritual hand
And may we take it, and to our lives daily it apply

And we shall be content and satisfied in You alone
We will follow You as we sing our songs of praise
Hallelujah to You; to us Your path You have shown
Hallelujah we shall sing to you for all of our days

Hallelujah and Amen…

Numbers 6:22-27 (The Priestly Blessing)

Numbers 6:22-27
The Priestly Blessing

There’s a Jewish guy who is also a very militant atheist that lives on the Upper West Side of NYC. And yet, he sent his son, Morris, to Trinity School. Despite its denominational roots it’s a great school which has become completely secular, so he didn’t mind. After a month, Morris came home and said casually, “By the way, Dad, I learned what Trinity means! It means ‘The Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost.’” The father could barely control his rage. He seized Morris by the shoulders and declared, “Morris, I’m going to tell you something, and I want you to remember it. Forget this Trinity business. There is only one God… and we don’t believe in Him!”

One way that people deny the doctrine of the Trinity is to say that the word “Trinity” is never used in Scripture. That is a theological football bat. There are lots of things that are taught in Scripture which are not specifically named there. The term “original sin” is never used, but it is clearly taught. The word “rapture” is not used, but the doctrine is perfectly explained by Paul.

Because the Trinity is revealed in the Bible, it has been studied, contemplated, and taught since the time of the apostles, and later by the Church Fathers. Tertullian, who lived during the second and third centuries, was an African apologist and theologian. He wrote a great deal in defense of Christianity, including on the doctrine of the Trinity –

We define that there are two, the Father and the Son, and three with the Holy Spirit, and this number is made by the pattern of salvation… [which] brings about unity in trinity, interrelating the three, the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. They are three, not in dignity, but in degree, not in substance but in form, not in power but in kind. They are of one substance and power, because there is one God from whom these degrees, forms and kinds devolve in the name of Father, Son and Holy Spirit.” Tertullian

After Tertullian, countless other scholars have added their thoughts to the ever-expanding body of knowledge dealing with this hugely complex doctrine. Some have been less than adequate, some have been downright wrong, and so we need to be careful to sort through commentaries and not just cut and paste whatever anyone says without really considering it. When speaking of the Trinity, heresy is just a simple misstep away.

Text Verse: “Holy, holy, holy is the Lord of hosts;
The whole earth is full of His glory!” Isaiah 6:3

This verse is known as the Tres Hagion which is Scripture’s great proclamation of the splendor of God. It alludes to a fullness in God that is hard to mistake. It is from this verse which is derived the beloved hymn written by Reginald Heber –

Holy, holy, holy! Lord God Almighty!
Early in the morning our song shall rise to Thee;
Holy, holy, holy, merciful and mighty!
God in Three Persons, blessed Trinity.

True Christians are Trinitarian monotheists. This may seem, on the surface, contradictory. And indeed, cults – such as the Jehovah’s Witnesses – misunderstand the concept of the Trinity to such a point that what they claim mainstream Christians believe is actually a triad within a godhead, not a Trinity within the Godhead. But this is certainly not the case. The difference between a triad and the Trinity is the difference between the finite and the infinite.

We believe in one God and only one God. We believe this because the Bible proclaims it. But we believe there is a fullness to this God which is represented in the Trinitarian model. Why do we believe this? Because it is what the Bible teaches. Including in a rather unusual way in the sermon verses of Numbers 6. As the Bible is the rule and guide of our faith, we would be ignorant at best, and found false teachers as well, should we deny what this book proclaims. But this doesn’t mean it’s an easy concept to understand. Men have been struggling with it since it was revealed. John Wesley stated – “Bring me a worm that can comprehend a man, and then I will show you a man that can comprehend the Triune God.”

Today, we will look for that worm, because – at least in a limited way – we can comprehend the Triune God. We can comprehend His nature, and we can know that what we so comprehend is correct. Why? Because it is in accord with His superior word. And so let’s turn to that precious word once again and… May God speak to us through His word today and may His glorious name ever be praised.

I. The Monotheistic God

Malik Jabbar says –

All of the monotheistic religions, which primarily include Islam, Christianity and Judaism are mythological representations of the natural environment. The ancients fashioned their spiritual concepts as mythical copies of natural phenomena, the environment and its interactions. They pictured the sun as the ruler of the universe, the life giver, the conqueror of darkness and cold, the scorcher with its intense fire, the compassionate with its soothing heat. When the sun triumphantly appeared on the eastern horizon at the dawning of the day, the whole universe (from our earthly perspective) was seen bowing in submission to the greatest of all lights. All the stars and planets of the higher and lower heavens were vanquished without trace at the dawning of the great sun god. This physical reality is the true seminal generator of our religious rituals in reference to an omnipotent conquering god, evolved from the customs of the ancients.”

What Jabbar says here is incoherent at best. If man were to make a religion based on natural phenomena, it would be a rare occurrence for him to be a monotheist. The sun would be one of many gods, and this is what has occurred as religion has devolved throughout the ages. In the 19th Psalm David skips over the created god Jabbar proclaims and exalts the God who created the very sun who was supposedly the object of reverence in his confused analysis.

The heavens declare the glory of God;
And the firmament shows His handiwork.

In them He has set a tabernacle for the sun.” Psalm 19:1 & 4

David understood that the Creator is above, not subservient to or part of, His creation. In modern times though, liberal theologians have twisted the evolution of religion, turning it completely upside down. It’s evident from the historical record in the worship of God by man that the most ancient belief is that of monotheism. From that point, worship has devolved into polytheism, animism, etc., not the other way around. The noted Assyriologist Stephen Langdon records –

The history of Sumerian religion, which was the most powerful cultural influence in the ancient world, could be traced by means of pictographic inscriptions almost to the earliest religious concepts of man. The evidence points unmistakably to an original monotheism, the inscriptions and literary remains of the oldest Semitic peoples also indicate a primitive monotheism, and the totemistic origin of Hebrew and other Semitic religions is now entirely discredited.”

The region of Sumeria, which Langdon cites, is where many of the early Bible figures found their homes. And it is the record of these early people which are included in the pages of the Bible as breathed out by the One true God. From the first page of the Bible to its last, the existence of only One true God is proclaimed.

Man speaking to God – For You are great, and do wondrous things; You alone are God. Psalm 86:10

God speaking to man – For thus says the LORD, Who created the heavens, Who is God, Who formed the earth and made it, Who has established it, Who did not create it in vain, Who formed it to be inhabited: “I am the LORD, and there is no other. Isaiah 45:18

In the book of Isaiah alone, this claim is directly made almost a dozen times. Yes, there is one God. Reason and intellect tell us this and the Bible fully supports what we can know simply by thinking things through in a rational manner. However, how could a being that didn’t understand fellowship create anything beyond Himself containing fellowship? Rather, he’d be completely contained within himself and without fellowship. The Principle of Analogy states that “The cause of being cannot produce what it does not possess.” Because of this, the fact that we’re social beings confirms a plurality within a single essence such as the Trinity.

II. The Trinity

Despite the Bible proclaiming only one God, one of the most important tenants of true Christianity is the concept of the Trinity. It is clearly presented throughout the Bible, but it was a mystery long hidden at God’s prerogative. It wasn’t until Christ that the mystery of this profound secret was finally and truly revealed: 

Now to Him who is able to establish you according to my gospel and the preaching of Jesus Christ, according to the revelation of the mystery kept secret since the world began but now made manifest, and by the prophetic Scriptures made known to all nations, according to the commandment of the everlasting God, for obedience to the faith—to God, alone wise, be glory through Jesus Christ forever. Amen.” Romans 16:25-27

The doctrine of the Trinity as understood by Christianity states that God has a threefold person-hood and yet they together are one God – three Persons in one Essence. The term “persons” comes from St. Augustine who agreed that it wasn’t the best of terms but, as he said, “rather than being silent on the subject…” This Trinity as revealed through Scripture is God the Father, God the Son, & God the Holy Spirit.

In the Bible, at one time or another, the pronoun “He” is used to describe each separate part of this eternal Godhead demonstrating an individual “Person” and yet this Person has all of the qualities of God – He is the Creator, He is eternal, He reads our hearts and minds, etc. All of these attributes are attributed at one time or another to the Father, to the Son, and to the Holy Spirit. Either the Bible is filled with confusion, or each of these is God. When Jesus uttered the Great Commission to His apostles, he said –

Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit.” Matthew 28:19, 20

In the Greek, the word “name” is onoma. It is a singular noun, meaning each of these entities combines into one essence. It would be good to ask, “Is this completely unique to the New Testament or can we find a parallel in the Old?” The answer is “Yes, we can.” The Sh’ma, or “Hear” of Deuteronomy 6:4 gives us an example –

Sh’ma Yisrael Yehovah Elohaynu Yehovah Echad
Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God, the LORD is One!

In these words, it says, “The LORD is One.” A cluster of grapes is one; the people Israel are one people, Adam and Eve were called besar echad, or “one flesh.” These are made up of individual parts and yet are termed “one.” The word echad used in the Sh’ma enables this interpretation. Another word signifying one and only one – yachid was not used. We can rightly assume that the Creator knows Hebrew better than we do! However, the term echad was used in this most important of statements. 

Throughout the ages, since the establishment of the church, people have used tangible concepts to try to explain this Trinity, such as water being steam, liquid, or solid. Or, a circle divided into three equal parts, etc. Or maybe an egg which has a shell, a yolk, and a white part. However, none of these accurately portrays the concept correctly, and if used will lead to heresy. 

So we should ask, “Is it that there is no proper analogy?” Has God left us with a concept but no way to properly explain it? No. A concept has been provided, and it’s visible everywhere you look and is beautifully explained by Dr. Nathan Wood in the book The Secret of the Universe.

He explains that the universe is made of a trinity of Space, Time, and Matter. All of them exist, all of them exist everywhere and at all times, and yet they are not the same. Furthermore, each of these is a trinity itself. Space is comprised of Length, Breadth, and Height. Time is expressed in Past, Present, and Future. And matter consists of Energy in Motion producing Phenomena. The universe itself is a trinity of trinities!

Further, we can make the assertion and equate Space with the Father – unseen and yet omnipresent; matter with the Son – visible, tangible, understandable; and Time with the Spirit – which is unseen and yet it is a medium in which we move and gain understanding. Taking this concept, Time, Dr. Wood breaks it down in an understandable way. After doing this, he changes only four words and thereby beautifully explains the mystery of the Trinity –

The Future is the source. The Future is unseen, unknown, except as it continually embodies itself and makes itself visible in the Present. The Present is what we see, and hear, and know. It is ceaselessly embodying the Future, day by day, hour by hour, moment by moment. It is perpetually revealing the Future, hitherto invisible.

The Future is logically first, but not chronologically. For the Present exists as long as Time exists, and was in the absolute beginning of Time. The Present has existed as long as Time has existed. Time acts through and in the Present. It makes itself visible only in the Present. The Future acts, and reveals itself through the Present. It is through the Present that Time, that the Future, enters into union with human life. Time and humanity meet and unite in the Present. It is in the Present that Time, that the Future, becomes a part of human life, and so is born and lives and dies in human life.

The Past, in turn, comes from the Present. We cannot say that it embodies the Present. On the contrary Time in issuing from the Present into the Past becomes invisible again. The Past does not embody the Present. Rather it proceeds silently, endlessly, invisibly from it.

But the Present is not the source of the Past which proceeds from it. The Future is the source of both the Present and the Past. The Past issues in endless, invisible procession from the Present, but, back of that, from the Future out of which the Present comes.

The Past issues, it proceeds, from the Future, through the Present.

The Present therefore comes out from the invisible Future. The Present perpetually and ever-newly embodies the Future in visible, audible, livable form; and returns again into invisible Time in the Past. The Past acts invisibly.  It continually influences us with regard to the Present. It casts light upon the Present. That is its great function. It helps us to live in the Present which we know, and with reference to the Future which we expect to see.

Now, substitutes 4 words. God replaces Time. Father replaces Future. Son replaces Present. Spirit replaces Past.

The Father is the source. The Father is unseen, unknown, except as He continually embodies Himself and makes Himself visible in the Son. The Son is what we see, and hear, and know. He is ceaselessly embodying the Father, day by day, hour by hour, moment by moment. He is perpetually revealing the Father, hitherto invisible.

The Father is logically first, but not chronologically. For the Son exists as long as God exists, and was in the absolute beginning of God. The Son has existed as long as God has existed. God acts through and in the Son. The Father makes Himself visible only in the Son. The Father acts, and reveals Himself through the Son. It is through the Son that God, that the Father, enters into union with human life, and so is born and lives and dies in human life. God and humanity meet and unite in the Son. It is in the Son that God, that the Father, becomes a part of human life, and so is born and lives and dies in human life.

The Spirit, in turn, comes from the Son. We cannot say that it embodies the Son. On the contrary, the Spirit in issuing from the Son into the Spirit becomes invisible again. The Spirit does not embody the Son. Rather it proceeds silently, endlessly, invisibly from Him.

But the Son is not the source of the Spirit who proceeds from Him. The Father is the source of both the Son and the Spirit. The Spirit issues in endless, invisible procession from the Son, but back of that, from the Father out of whom the Son comes.

The Spirit issues, He proceeds, from the Father, through the Son.

The Son, therefore, comes out from the invisible Father. The Son perpetually and ever-newly embodies the Father in visible, audible, livable form; and returns again into invisible God in the Spirit.  The Spirit acts invisibly. It continually influences us with regard to the Son. It casts light upon the Son. That is His great function. He helps us to live in the Son which we know, and with reference to the Father which we expect to see.

This is what has been evident since creation in the physical universe and to which God’s word, the Bible, faithfully testifies to in the nature of the Godhead, such as –

Then God said, ‘Let Us make man in Our image, according to Our likeness…’” Genesis 1:26

In the first chapter of Scripture the terms “us” and “our” are used by the Creator reflecting His triune nature. And again, in Isaiah:

Also I heard the voice of the Lord, saying:
“Whom shall I send,
And who will go for Us?”
Then I said, “Here am I! Send me.” Isaiah 6:8

Zechariah 12 places the members of the Trinity together in one passage –

And I will pour on the house of David and on the inhabitants of Jerusalem the Spirit of grace and supplication; then they will look on Me whom they pierced. Yes, they will mourn for Him as one mourns for his only son, and grieve for Him as one grieves for a firstborn.” Zechariah 12:10

These words in Zechariah are so obvious in what they proclaim, that the Jehovah’s Witnesses, in their tragically flawed translation of the Bible, use a margin note, rather than the text itself, when translating this verse. They won’t even touch this verse because it destroys all of their already incoherent theology. The Gospel of John, time and again, reflects the relationship between the Father and the Son as well as the Spirit –

Philip said to Him, “Lord, show us the Father, and it is sufficient for us.” Jesus said to him, “Have I been with you so long, and yet you have not known Me, Philip? He who has seen Me has seen the Father; so how can you say, ‘Show us the Father’?  John 14:8, 9

Paul shows he clearly understood God’s triune nature. He alludes to it several times in his epistles, such as –

The grace of the Lord Jesus Christ, and the love of God, and the communion of the Holy Spirit be with you all. Amen.” 2 Corinthians 13:14

These are just a couple of innumerable verses which either implicitly, or explicitly, reveal a Godhead.

III. God the Father

God the Father is clearly acknowledged by all Christians as well as most cults and sects who use the Bible as their reference. An unfortunate exception, of course, has come out of modern liberal denominations and translations of the Bible which have purposed a gender-neutral God and a gender-neutral Bible. Regardless of this nonsense, the texts as received from God for our Bible are in the masculine, and for that reason, we adopt political correctness in this matter at our own peril. God’s word stands though. Concerning God the Father we read –

But the hour is coming, and now is, when the true worshipers will worship the Father in spirit and truth; for the Father is seeking such to worship Him. 24 God is Spirit, and those who worship Him must worship in spirit and truth.” John 4:23, 24

Not that anyone has seen the Father, except He who is from God; He has seen the Father. John 6:46

These verses perfectly match the description Dr. Wood made concerning the nature of the Father within the Trinity.

IV. God the Son

In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God. All things were made through Him, and without Him nothing was made that was made. In Him was life, and the life was the light of men. And the light shines in the darkness, and the darkness did not comprehend it.” John 1:1-5

John couldn’t have been any clearer about the nature of the Word and His eternal relationship in God. It never ceases to amaze me how people can twist something so clear and so precise in order to deny the truth of the very words John so carefully penned. In his first epistle, he follows the exact same pattern concerning the Word. These verses, along with everything else John writes is so absolutely grounded in the deity of Jesus that it is inexcusable to misunderstand or deny what he is saying, such as –

That which was from the beginning, which we have heard, which we have seen with our eyes, which we have looked upon, and our hands have handled, concerning the Word of life— the life was manifested, and we have seen, and bear witness, and declare to you that eternal life which was with the Father and was manifested to us—…” 1 John 1:1, 2

Later in Revelation, John quotes Jesus’ own words, His own claim to deity –

I am the Alpha and the Omega, the Beginning and the End, the First and the Last.” Revelation 22:13

To be a fair evaluator of God’s word, I want you to be careful about the next verse I give. The Greek used here is often cited as proof that Jesus claimed to be God –

Most assuredly, I say to you, before Abraham was, I AM.” John 8:58

How many of you have heard that the words there translated as “I AM” prove Jesus was claiming to be God? The Greek words are ego eimi. However, going to the very next chapter, the same words, with the same parsing, are used by the man Jesus healed –

Therefore the neighbors and those who previously had seen that he was blind said, ‘Is not this he who sat and begged?’ Some said, ‘This is he.’ Others said, ‘He is like him.’ He said, ‘I am he.’” John 9:8, 9

In this verse, the man states ego eimi just as Jesus did. This person clearly wasn’t claiming to be God, so we need to be careful to understand the context, not simply the words used. The claim of deity is evident from the construct of the verse – “Before Abraham was.” Further, He spoke Hebrew or Aramaic, not Greek. The words he used would have been understood as a claim to being Yehovah. He was making a claim to eternality and to deity. How do we know this?

Then they took up stones to throw at Him;” John 8:59

The fact that they picked up stones to throw at Him testifies that He had claimed to be deity while speaking in Hebrew or Aramaic – He was being accused of blasphemy, for which stoning was the penalty. John 10 leaves no doubt about the nature of the Son –

“‘I and My Father are one.’ 31 Then the Jews took up stones again to stone Him.” John 10:30, 31

In these words, both what Jesus said and the people’s reaction again assure us that Jesus was claiming to be deity. Next, Luke had no doubt of Christ’s deity. Listen to how carefully he worded the following, which is a pattern throughout his writings:

“‘Return to your own house, and tell what great things God has done for you.’ And he went his way and proclaimed throughout the whole city what great things Jesus had done for him.” Luke 8:39

Either Luke was making a point for us to read and understand, or he was an incompetent blasphemer. There’s simply no other way to take the words. Paul completely supports the deity and Godhood of Jesus Christ with –

He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For by Him all things were created that are in heaven and that are on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or principalities or powers. All things were created through Him and for Him. And He is before all things, and in Him all things consist.” Colossians 1:15-17

The writer of Hebrews makes exactly the same claim as Paul –

The Son is the radiance of God’s glory and the exact representation of His being, sustaining all things by His powerful word.” Hebrews 1:3

It is incomprehensible to think that a created being could somehow “sustain all things.” Not only is this the case, but the Principle of Contingency disallows it. An attempt to deny the principle will instead actually validate it. A contingent, or created being, cannot create or sustain anything else because it is already contingent.

No matter what else, the deity of Jesus Christ is not only fully supportable by the Bible, but it is the only logical and reasonable conclusion we can come to, if we believe the Bible. It is through Jesus that the eternal God reveals Himself to us. And it is the Holy Spirit who will, if we allow Him, teach us proper doctrine concerning the nature of God.

V. God the Holy Spirit

That which is born of the flesh is flesh, and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit. Do not marvel that I said to you, ‘You must be born again.’ The wind blows where it wishes, and you hear the sound of it, but cannot tell where it comes from and where it goes. So is everyone who is born of the Spirit.” John 3:6-8

In the Bible, the work of “begetting” sons is the job of the Father, but it is also the work of the Spirit. To attribute this to the Spirit, were it not the case, would be blasphemous.

The Jehovah’s Witnesses naturally deny the deity of the Holy Spirit. They call Him an “active force” – whatever that means. They have to make up a term for the Spirit which is completely unbiblical in order to diminish His proper role as the third member of the Godhead. But the Spirit is the One who searches the Godhead and reveals to us God’s workings –

For what man knows the things of a man except the spirit of the man which is in him? Even so no one knows the things of God except the Spirit of God.” 1 Corinthians 2:11

In 2 Corinthians, Paul, after talking about Christ (the Lord) does a changeup and says in practically in the same breath…

Now the Lord is the Spirit; and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty.” 2 Corinthians 3:17

Either Paul is theologically confused, or He is as clear as a crystal in his claim – Christ is the Lord, the Spirit is the Lord, and the Spirit is the “Spirit of the Lord.” Surely we praise our Creator – Father, Son, and Holy Spirit! Scripture, in both Testaments, leaves no doubt about the Triune nature of God

A blessing upon the people of God
A blessing of His name resting on them in peace
No matter where on this earth shall their feet trod
His blessing is upon them, and it will never cease

The name of the Lord is their protection and life
The name of the Lord is their anchor and stay
In the name of the Lord is the ending of strife
When placed upon the people, peace leads the way

May Your precious and holy name rest upon us
May the glory of Christ be ours to protect us from harm
We look to the Lord, our precious Lord Jesus
His name reveals to us God’s tenderly caring arm

VI. The Aaronic Blessing (verses 22-27)

Because our sermon text today is the High Priestly blessing of Numbers 6, you might have been wondering why we would first go through a short evaluation on the nature of the Trinity. The reason is that within this blessing, like within the Sh’ma we read earlier, there is an implicit hint of the Trinity. But this hint is more forceful than in that of the Sh’ma, as we will see…

22 And the Lord spoke to Moses, saying:

To close out Chapter 6, the Lord conveys a most magnificent set of words to the people of Israel. It is unsure when these words were spoken to Moses, but they have been placed here as a logical progression of thought concerning the camp and the armies of Israel. The Lord speaks first through Moses and then through Aaron, as is seen with the words…

23 “Speak to Aaron and his sons, saying,

The words are the Lord’s but they are intended for speaking by Aaron and his sons. Thus they are known as the Aaronic blessing, following after Aaron, the first high priest; or as the birkat kohanim, the Priestly Blessing, following after the line of priests to whom they were addressed. Both names are acceptable because it is to both Aaron and his sons that they are so instructed…

23 (con’t) ‘This is the way you shall bless the children of Israel. Say to them:

So far in Numbers, the armies of the Lord have been drawn up, their encampments have been identified. The priests and Levites have been given their charge and have been assigned their stations around the sanctuary. The camp has been purified from those who are unclean. The matter of confession and restitution has been addressed. The law of jealousy was dealt with, and the law of the Nazirite has been explained.

The people are now a united whole, laid out according to the Lord’s design. They will soon be ready to depart for Canaan. These details of organized life so far, and the departure which is soon at hand, are now to be accentuated and graced by the following, most memorable, verses. In the Hebrew, the main blessing consists of three verses of fifteen words of sixty letters. The verses are divided into double clauses with each clause referring to Yehovah, the LORD, in a petition that He bestow the stated blessing upon Israel.

It is a blessing that sustained them for 1500 years until the time of Christ. And, it is a blessing which still gives them hope and assurance since that day. Though they missed the significance of who Jesus is, they still have a hope in the Lord, even if misdirected at this time, because of what the words proclaim. Someday, their hope in the Lord, Yehovah, will be united with their understanding of who He is. It is this Lord who now speaks out the simple and yet life-sustaining words of blessing…

24 “The Lord bless you and keep you;

y’berekhekha Yehovah
v’yshmerekha – In the Hebrew, the name Yehovah is spelled YHVH, as it always is. The accent to the name is written out with its accompanying vowel points which indicate the pronunciation and formative aspect of the name beyond the basic letters.

The words here, and throughout the blessing, are in the singular, kha instead of khem. Though Israel is a group of people, they are still one people. The many are blessed individually, and the individuals are thus collectively blessed.

The Lord bless you” is a petition to bestow upon Israel all blessing – both spiritual and temporal. It is a call to such blessing in a continuous outpouring of God’s grace and mercy upon this chosen, but undeserving, people.

The word translated as “and keep you” clarifies, and more fully explains, the words, “The Lord bless you.” In blessing the people, they can anticipate being kept – both physically and spiritually – for good and from evil. Though curses have been assured already for disobedience, the blessing now is one which would keep them, even in their disobedience. To be kept is an ongoing fountain of support and relief. It is not a one-time, but an all-time, continuous outpouring of God’s sustaining hand upon His people.

Remember, this is a cumulative blessing upon Israel the people. Has the blessing failed? No. They have been blessed, and they have been kept. Even in times of experiencing the curses of the law, the words have remained faithfully true to them.

25 The Lord make His face shine upon you,
And be gracious to you;

ya’er Yehovah panav eleyekha
vi’khoonekha – The name Yehovah here is again spelled YHVH, but this time, the vowel points which indicate the pronunciation and formative aspect of the name beyond the basic letters are different than previously.

The blessing of the first two clauses of verse 24 is now elevated in the continuation of it in verse 25. “The Lord make His face shine upon you” is a way of saying that the very light of Yehovah, His infinitely bright countenance, should radiate upon Israel. The face of the Lord reflects who He is. His personality, His demeanor, and His eternality are all tied into the thought of His face. When these shine upon the people, they will receive the abundance of who He is in a ceaseless, endless, procession of His divine attributes.

The face of the Lord can be turned away from the people in rejection, or it can be turned toward them in wrath. The blessing asks for neither, though either may come. But it does ask that the radiance and goodness of Yehovah be directed to them. In the simplest form, for the face of the Lord to shine upon them is for Him to smile upon them as a father would to his children. Only goodness and mercy are anticipated in the blessing.

The words of the clause, “and be gracious to you,” simply heighten the thought of the first clause. The Lord’s shining and radiant face is directed toward the people, and in His light they find grace. Though life for them is a vast wilderness of unknown duration, direction, and expectation, with the grace of the Lord upon them, they will find their way into safe places of rest and comfort. This is for both their physical existence and for their spiritual walk. The cool waters of life will come flowing into the parched soul when the Lord is gracious to them as a people.

As this is a cumulative blessing upon the people, has the blessing failed? No. The Lord’s face has shone upon them, and it continues to do so. And the Lord has been exceedingly gracious to them, granting them what they have not deserved for 3500 years.


26 The Lord lift up His countenance upon you,
And give you peace.”’

y’sha Yehovah panav eleyekha
v’yasem lekha shalomThe name Yehovah is again spelled YHVH, and for the third time, the vowel points are different than before. It is abundantly clear from this that there are three distinct and individual persons in one Yehovah – a Trinity. The Hebrew clearly indicates this.

The words, “The Lord lift up His countenance upon you,” are a third elevation of the intensity of the blessing. They indicate a rising up of the refulgency of the Lord’s face over Israel in abundance of grace, kindness, love, and attention. He has gone from shining His face upon them to having it radiate over them, blotting out any darkness as His glory overwhelms everything else. He is on Israel’s side, and no foe can bring them harm or shame apart from His allowances. Wounds may come, but they will only be self-inflicted. The Lord has shone upon them, and they are secure because of that.

And the blessing closes out with, “And give you peace.” The word is shalom. This is more than a blessing for calm or quiet, but is a state of wholeness and completion in all ways. The lifting up of the Lord’s countenance finds its intended fulfillment in the peace of His people. They stand safe, secure, and in perfect harmony with the world around them, and with their ambitions, their desires, and their needs. And they find perfect harmony in their spiritual state as well. They have peace with God and are in contentment with themselves and their neighbors. This is what the Lord commands for Aaron and his sons to bless the people with – words of light, life, love, and peace.

*27 “So they shall put My name on the children of Israel, and I will bless them.”

It is interesting that the Lord has given the responsibility of blessing the people to Aaron and his sons, and yet He retains the accomplishment and fulfillment of the blessing for Himself – So they shall put My name / and I will bless them. There is the audibly spoken name of the Lord which is pronounced upon Israel, and there is in return the conveyance of an unseen reality which rests upon them.

To fully understand what it means to have the name of the Lord placed upon Israel, it would be good to understand the meaning behind the name. The sermon on Exodus 3:13-15, entitled I AM THAT I AM, would be a logical place for you to go in order to more fully understand the magnificence of what is being proclaimed here in Numbers.

As I’ve already told you, the divine name is given three times, and it is pointed differently each time. Though the points did not exist in the original Hebrew, there is a reason that they were so pointed by the Masoretes. To them, the three instances are considered a mystery, but in Christ and in the New Testament, the mystery is revealed. They together are revealed in verses such as Matthew 28:19, 2 Corinthians 13:14, and elsewhere.

In Christ, it is no leap to go from a threefold repetition of the divine name in Numbers, to an understanding of the three Persons in the Trinity. Such is the nature of God, and how God reveals Himself. If you struggle with the doctrine of the Trinity, that’s OK, everyone does – even the finest scholars. What you should not struggle with is your faith in the Trinity. We don’t have to understand a thing in order to believe in it. I don’t understand my wife, but I believe in her. What is important is to accept God’s word despite our lack of complete understanding. His word proclaims there is a Trinity within the Godhead, and so we are asked to accept that.

And included in that is the subject of Jesus Christ, the second Member of the Trinity. It is through faith in Him that we are reconciled to this triune God. It is this same triune God who instructed through Moses that Aaron and his sons should proclaim to the people of Israel –

y’berekhekha Yehovah
v’yshmerekha
ya’er Yehovah panav eleyekha
vi’khoonekha
y’sha Yehovah panav eleyekha
v’yasem lekha shalom

The Lord bless you and keep you;
25 The Lord make His face shine upon you,
And be gracious to you;
26 The Lord lift up His countenance upon you,
And give you peace.”

Our Closing Verse: today may not be in your Bible, or it may be there and footnoted. It’s true that many ancient manuscripts don’t contain this verse, which has become known as the Johanine Comma, but it does date back to the time of Cyprian who lived in the 3rd Century and it survives in his treatise against the heretics who denied the Trinity – For there are three that bear witness in heaven: the Father, the Word, and the Holy Spirit; and these three are one.” 1 John 5:7

Next Week: Numbers 7:1-9 Twelve days it took to accomplish these rites… (An Offering for the Levites) (13th Numbers Sermon)

The Lord has you exactly where He wants you. He has a good plan and purpose for you. It may seem at times as if you are lost in a desert, wandering aimlessly. But the Lord is there, carefully leading you to the Land of Promise. So follow Him and trust Him and He will do marvelous things for you and through you.

The Priestly Blessing

And the Lord spoke to Moses, saying
Memorable words he was then relaying

Speak to Aaron and his sons, saying the words I now tell
This is the way you shall bless the children of Israel

Say to them:
The Lord bless you and keep you;
The Lord make His face shine upon you,
And be gracious to you;
The Lord lift up His countenance upon you,
And give you peace.” ’

So they shall put My name on the children of Israel
And I will bless them as to you I now tell

Lord God, we are even now in a wilderness
And we are wanting to be led by You
Without You to direct, our lives would be a mess
And so be our guide, O God; You who are faithful and true

We long for the water in this barren land
May it flow forth from the Rock, our souls to satisfy
Give us this refreshing, spiritual hand
And may we take it, and to our lives daily it apply

And we shall be content and satisfied in You alone
We will follow You as we sing our songs of praise
Hallelujah to You; to us Your path You have shown
Hallelujah we shall sing to you for all of our days

Hallelujah and Amen…

Numbers 6:1-21

Numbers 6:1-21
The Vow of the Nazirite

Two separate and distinct subjects are detailed in the 27 verses of Chapter 6 – separation and blessing. And yet, they are also united in thought. The first deals with separation to God through the Nazirite vow. The second deals with the separation of the people, Israel, from among the people of the world through a unique and peculiar blessing.

Separation and division is a logical part of the way God works. The Lord separated the nations of the world according to His design. Israel is separated from the world’s people. Levi is separated from among Israel. The priests are separated from their brothers in the tribe of Levi. Nazirites are separated for special service. And so on.

It is too often, and with a total lack of clarity, that we see separation as a bad thing. The people of the world have looked at the Jews as abhorrent because they have kept themselves separate from the nations. That was seen in the words of Haman in Esther, and it has been seen among the people of the world ever since.

The church is divided in ten thousand ways, and yet, it has been a force not for evil, but for good. Though there is one true invisible church, if there were but one true and visible church, the people would follow its path no matter how abhorrent it was. That has actually been seen in major denominations time and time again. It was also seen in the Old Testament system in Israel. It is the division within the church which has maintained the integrity of the church. Like the motto for the United States, the true church is E Pluribus Unum – “Out of many, one.”

Text Verse: “‘“I raised up some of your sons as prophets,
And some of your young men as Nazirites.
Is it not so, O you children of Israel?”
Says the Lord.
12 “But you gave the Nazirites wine to drink,
And commanded the prophets saying,
‘Do not prophesy!”’” Amos 2:11, 12

Like the world, which is trying to break down borders, unite as one, and remove all obstacles to complete control, there are those who are attempting to do the same in the church. The World Council of Churches is one such example. There is a fundamental problem with this, both on a national level and on a spiritual, church-related level.

With such breaking down of barriers, there will inevitably be a top-down control of all others. It is the inescapable outcome of removing set divisions. Those who resist these changes are the ones who will be reckoned as wrongdoers. Israel will never give up her Jewishness. True churches will never yield to an apostate body.

Division is good and it serves a purpose. And although the Lord is not divided in the sense of goals or purpose, there is a distinction between the members of the Godhead. This is the mystery of the Trinity – One God; three persons. Along with the separation of the Nazirites to the Lord, Chapter 27 gives us a taste of the unique nature of God Himself.

Unfortunately, we will only be able to complete the first section of the chapter today, that of the Nazirite vow. It was an important part of the life of Israel; but, unfortunately, the people abused the guidelines, caused their Nazirites to break their vows, and that surely brought on them a curse.

The separation of the people, Israel, and the separation of the Nazirites within the people during their time of vow, were intended to highlight the holiness of God. But God also remained separate from them because of their fallen nature. The law was born of an imperfect priesthood filled with fallible men. God allowed these things in order to bring about the coming of His Son to fulfill this very same law and bring about a new type of separation, and a new type of oneness which comes with a more perfect blessing.

This is the marvel of what God has done. He has brought forth a Branch of Righteousness – and a perfect, pure, and undefiled Vine – out of a system administered through fallible people. Today we will see the first half of this chapter’s equation – that of separation. Next week, we will see the second half – that of blessing. In these you will learn a great deal about the working of God, both for Israel and in Christ. It’s all to be found in His superior word. And so let’s turn to that precious word once again and… May God speak to us through His word today and may His glorious name ever be praised.

I. The Vow of the Nazirite (verses 1-12)

Then the Lord spoke to Moses, saying,

Maintaining purity of the camp, and sanctity among the people, was highlighted in Chapter 5. There was the command to move all defiled people out of the camp. Then there was the idea of confession and restitution concerning guilt. After that came the law of the bitter water, the holy polygraph, for possibly unfaithful wives. Each of these held to the idea of maintaining both physical and spiritual purity.

Moses is now directed in a unique aspect of Israelite life, that of a particular type of vow of consecration to the Lord. This is not a command, but rather an instruction for those who so make the vow. Though not a command to perform the rite, it includes commands for the performance of it. This is seen with the next words…

2 “Speak to the children of Israel, and say to them:

What is submitted to Moses by the Lord is for the people of Israel. It is something which is limited to them alone, and not intended for any who have not joined to the people. Thus, no stranger or foreigner among them can be included in what is now presented.

2 (con’t) ‘When either a man or woman 

This is actually a rather remarkable allowance. Almost all matters of law and society are directed specifically to males. Further, it is a stark contrast to the law of the bitter water which was just seen in Chapter 5. That was a law directed for the benefit of the males when a spirit of jealousy came upon them.

However, what is now to be presented is actually highlighted and receives a special dignity because it is available to both man and woman. The only time this would not come into effect for a woman is if her father or husband, under whose authority she was, negated the vow. However, other than that, it is something a woman could participate in. This begins to be seen with the next words…

2 (con’t) consecrates an offering

Here, the verb pala, or “wonder,” is translated as “consecrates.” It was translated as “miracle” in relation to God’s workings in Egypt. The idea is that as a wonder, or miracle, is something out of the normal, so a vow is something out of the normal. It is above and beyond what is considered regular. Even today, when someone does something above and beyond, we will proclaim, “Well, isn’t that wonderful.” This carries the idea being conveyed.

2 (con’t) to take the vow of a Nazirite, 

The word is nazir. It is not the same as a Nazarene, meaning someone from Nazareth. What will be presented is not a marker of identification with the Lord Jesus in any way, shape, or form. Though He is separated to God in a unique way, it will be seen that it is not as a Nazirite mentioned here. We know this based on the restrictions to be imposed upon them, none of which applied to Him. Rather, the word comes from the verb nazar, or “to separate.” Thus it signifies separation or consecration.

It was used to describe Joseph who was separated, or distinguished, above his brothers. Joseph was a type of Christ, but he was not a Nazirite. And so the word goes so far, but no further. It was also used concerning the untrimmed vines during the sabbath year observances in Israel. Being untrimmed, they would have a special appearance reflecting their consecrated status. As I said, it is true that Christ was separated among His brothers, like Joseph, but the intent of the Nazirite vow which is explained here has nothing to do with the life and conduct of Christ.

It needs to be noted that though this is a voluntary separation, there are instances where, by divine revelation, some people were devoted to the Lord throughout their lives. This was the case with Samson and John the Baptist. Further, Samuel was devoted by his mother as well.

2 (con’t) to separate himself to the Lord,

l’hazzir l’Yehovah – “to separate to Yehovah.” The meaning of the nazir finds its explanation in these words where the verb nazar is used. The person is consecrated to the Lord. Thus the nazir is one who is consecrated.

he shall separate himself from wine and similar drink;

mi’yayin v’shakhar – “from wine and blinko drink.” A Nazirite was to be wholly kept from drinks containing alcohol, be they wine, or be they something of a higher potency. In this, we see a stricter demand on the individual than even the priests. They were only forbidden from drinking during their times of service in the tent of meeting. In this, we also see a standard which was not imposed on Jesus who both made and drank wine. Thus we can see that the term Nazarene in Matthew 2:23 is not referring to Nazirites, in Numbers. However, the separation goes further…

(con’t) he shall drink neither vinegar made from wine nor vinegar made from similar drink;

Here is a new word, khomets, or vinegar. It comes from khamets, or the verb meaning “to leaven,” and thus it signifies “to ferment.” The Nazirite is prohibited from vinegar made from either wine or blinko drink. Fermentation is a type of corruption, and thus the symbolism is that of purity and incorruption.

(con’t) neither shall he drink any grape juice, nor eat fresh grapes or raisins.

Here is a word found only this once in the Bible, mishrah, or liquor. It is from a word which gives the sense of loosening, and thus it is steeped juice. It is a liquor made from anavim, or grapes. The Nazirite is forbidden from any such drink. Along with this he or she is not to eat any grapes, period – either fresh or dried. And to ensure that there is no confusion, the words continue…

All the days of his separation he shall eat nothing that is produced by the grapevine, from seed to skin.

Two more unique words are found here. The first is khartsanim, or seed. It is from kharats, meaning to point sharply, as if in wounding someone. Thus it signifies the sharp bitter taste which comes from the seed. The second is zag, or skin. It is that which encloses the grape, and thus its skin. One must wonder on these prohibitions. The avoidance of all sorts of intoxicating drinks makes sense, but to be kept from grapes or even the products of grapes seems to have no meaning. However, the vine produces grapes, and grapes produce an effect. Deuteronomy 32 speaks of all three – the gephen, or vine; the enav, or grape; and yayin, or wine, in relation to the people of Israel –

For they are a nation void of counsel,
Nor is there any understanding in them.
29 Oh, that they were wise, that they understood this,
That they would consider their latter end!
30 How could one chase a thousand,
And two put ten thousand to flight,
Unless their Rock had sold them,
And the Lord had surrendered them?
31 For their rock is not like our Rock,
Even our enemies themselves being judges.
32 For their vine is of the vine of Sodom
And of the fields of Gomorrah;
Their grapes are grapes of gall,
Their clusters are bitter.
33 Their wine is the poison of serpents,
And the cruel venom of cobras.” Deuteronomy 32:28-33

The effect of the vine, grape, and wine can be positive or negative. As the Nazirite is dedicated solely to the Lord, the true Vine as He says in John 12:1, during their consecration, they are to be freed from any such external influence. We are not told what the fruit of the knowledge of good and evil in the Garden of Eden was, but the effects of the fruit of the vine would place it as a good candidate.

Christ’s first miraculous sign was to make wine, resulting in good. Mystery Babylon has a cup filled with the wine of her fornication; a cup of evil. Following the symbolism of the vine, the grape, and wine throughout the Bible – from Genesis to Revelation – it becomes clear why this strong prohibition was made. The Nazirite is dedicated to the Lord, and thus the only effect for him is to be that which the Lord Himself determines. As a side note concerning this. Samson’s mother was given this same prohibition during her pregnancy. That is found in Judges 13:7 –

Now drink no wine or similar drink, nor eat anything unclean, for the child shall be a Nazirite to God from the womb to the day of his death.’”

The consecration was not for her, but for her son. Thus, we have another of the numerous verses in Scripture which indicate that from conception itself, humanity of the child in the womb is indicated. The child is reckoned as a person from that moment.

‘All the days of the vow of his separation no razor shall come upon his head;

Here is a new and frightening word for people like me, the taar, or razor. It is also a sheath for a knife. Thus, it is that which makes bare or is bare. The Nazirite was to never use a razor upon his head. This was to be the case…

(con’t) until the days are fulfilled for which he separated himself to the Lord, he shall be holy.

The hair on the head was to be a marker of distinction, indicating the Nazirite’s separation to the Lord. In this, he was considered qadosh, or holy.

(con’t) Then he shall let the locks of the hair of his head grow.

A new and rare word is found here – pera, or locks. It is the hair of the head which is expected to grow just as the vine of the Sabbath year was to be left untended, unkempt, and uncut. This lengthy, unwieldy hair was to be that marker of holiness and separation to the Lord. And there is a reason for this which is tied up in the word sear, or hair.

In the Bible, hair signifies an awareness. The hairy goat used as the sin offering is a sair. It was given as an awareness of sin committed. Esau was born hairy while Jacob, the son of promise, was smooth-skinned. The difference in their physical makeup was a picture of their spiritual heritage. But in order to receive the blessing, Jacob needed to emulate his hairy older brother. That was a picture of Jesus. The sinless Son of God took on the form of Adam in order to retrieve the blessing for us that he had lost. Here, the Nazirite’s hair was a reminder of the vow of separation to the Lord – his awareness of that fact.

All the days that he separates himself to the Lord he shall not go near a dead body.

This is now a third marker of the separation. The Nazirite was never, under any circumstances, to be near a dead body. To do so would render him or her unclean according to Levitical law. This prohibition would include entering a room where a corpse was, attending a funeral, and so on. Death is the final result of sin. Because of this, the one separated to the Lord was not to be defiled by the sin consequences of human death. The Nazirite was deemed as holy, but the unholiness of being near death would defile.

He shall not make himself unclean even for his father or his mother, for his brother or his sister, when they die,

The prohibition here raises the separation of the Nazirite at least to the level of the high priest. He was also instructed to not go near any dead body, including his mother or father. The Nazirite is told this, but even further, the prohibition extends to both brother and sister. The strictness of the prohibition concerning drinking was greater than the priests, the priests were not restricted from the produce of the vine at all times, and only the high priest was restricted from being near a dead body. The separation of the Nazirite is therefore much more specific than even the priests.

(con’t) because his separation to God is on his head.

The hair is considered as a crown of separation. It is literally that which marks the separation, just as Samson’s hair is what separated him to the Lord. When the hair was cut, he no longer possessed the power which came with the hair.

All the days of his separation he shall be holy to the Lord.

The three markers of his separation – prohibition from alcoholic drinks and anything from the vine; the hair of the head; and being kept from defilement because of a dead person – all look to an unfallen life which was seen in paradise. The source of the knowledge of good and evil was kept away from, there was no awareness of wrongdoing, and there was no death. The Nazirite is wholly dedicated to the Lord.

Thus, in the fullest sense, these physical aspects of the Nazirite spiritually reflect one who is in Christ positionally. We are not under law – the source of the knowledge of sin (Romans 3:20); we are not imputed sin (2 Corinthians 5:19); and we are granted eternal life (a jillion verses).

‘And if anyone dies very suddenly beside him,

Here are two new words, one the source of the other – befeta pithom, or “very suddenly.” The idea here is that there was absolutely no way to avoid being near the death. Despite this…

(con’t) and he defiles his consecrated head,

Even by accidental nearness, the head of his consecration has become defiled. As this is so…

(con’t) then he shall shave his head on the day of his cleansing; on the seventh day he shall shave it.

Numbers 19 gives the details for purification from defilement by death. A seven-day period involves ritual purification. When that is complete, the offender must shave his head. Even though this was unintentional, he is still an offender against the holiness of God. Therefore purification and atonement is required…

10 Then on the eighth day he shall bring two turtledoves or two young pigeons to the priest, to the door of the tabernacle of meeting;

The number eight is the number of new beginnings. Thus, it is on this day that the once-defiled Nazirite will again start the process of fulfilling the vow. The offering is actually brought to the brazen altar, but the brazen altar and the door of the tent of meeting are intricately connected in Scripture. It is through the sacrifice that access to God is restored.

And so, by bringing the offering to the altar, it is an acknowledgment of this. The reason for this particular offering, and its significance, is detailed in Leviticus 15. To spur you on to a biblically productive and spiritually healthy afternoon, you are implored to go back and watch or read that sermon once again.

11 and the priest shall offer one as a sin offering and the other as a burnt offering, and make atonement for him, because he sinned in regard to the corpse;

These offerings are typical of the sacrifice of Christ, and they are given in anticipation of His coming. Through them atonement is made for him, as it says, “because he sinned in regard to the corpse.” The lesson is that sin transfers and defiles that which is holy, but holiness does not transfer the other way. It is a lesson described in Haggai 2 –

Thus says the Lord of hosts: ‘Now, ask the priests concerning the law, saying, 12 “If one carries holy meat in the fold of his garment, and with the edge he touches bread or stew, wine or oil, or any food, will it become holy?” ’ ”
Then the priests answered and said, “No.”
13 And Haggai said, “If one who is unclean because of a dead body touches any of these, will it be unclean?”
So the priests answered and said, “It shall be unclean.” Haggai 2:11-13

The lesson is learned here, it is repeated elsewhere, and it should be remembered by us. Though we who are in Christ are not imputed our transgression as violations of law leading to death, we still carry defilement with us when we participate in that which is unclean. We are asked to separate ourselves from such things.

11 (con’t) and he shall sanctify his head that same day.

This means that he will once again begin to grow his hair during a renewed separation to the Lord. His hair shall remain uncut, and his actions shall be as prescribed already for the Nazirite.

12 He shall consecrate to the Lord the days of his separation, and bring a male lamb in its first year as a trespass offering; but the former days shall be lost, because his separation was defiled.

Not only was atonement necessary for the sin committed, but a guilt offering is necessary as a type of payment for the days which have been lost, thus leading to a delay in the completion of the vow. The guilt offering is in acknowledgment of that.

Holy to the Lord, set apart to Him alone
With a marker of separation on his head for all to see
In this marker, his special distinction is shown
For all the days of the vow, this is how it is to be

Who would dare interfere with the vow this one has made?
Who would cause him to violate his holiness?
Should we be the cause of such an unholy trade?
Should we his holiness purposely suppress?

If such is so with a vow made by man towards his God
How much more should we be holy when we are are in Christ the Lord?
Shouldn’t we ever conduct our lives with purity in this life we trod?
And faithfully abide in Christ, being obedient to His word?

II. The Law of the Nazirite (verses 13-21)

13 ‘Now this is the law of the Nazirite: When the days of his separation are fulfilled, he shall be brought to the door of the tabernacle of meeting.

The Nazirite vows were always considered as specific time periods by which a person was dedicated. Those who were dedicated as Nazirites from birth are not of this category. Their entire lives were given to the Lord. For those who simply made a vow of consecration, when that time ended, they were to be brought before the door of the tent of meeting, meaning to the brazen altar.

14 And he shall present his offering to the Lord: one male lamb in its first year without blemish as a burnt offering, one ewe lamb in its first year without blemish as a sin offering,

For the ending of the successfully completed consecration, instead of two turtledoves or two young pigeons, lambs are brought forth for the burnt and sin offerings. The requirement for a sin-offering shows that even a person who was dedicated as a Nazirite was not without shortcomings which required such an offering. As a fallen son of Adam, original sin existed, and surely the conduct of the Nazirite’s life, even under consecration, reflected that.

Due to the small size of the sin-offering, and the fact that it is named after the burnt-offering, it is an indication that any sin of the Nazirite was inconsequential in comparison to the faithfulness of the separation. However, the offering is still needed. It is an obvious picture that even the most faithful souls, who have carried out their lives in Christ in the highest manner of integrity to the Lord, still stand in need of the perfection of Christ to carry us through to the end.

14 (con’t) one ram without blemish as a peace offering,

The ram of this peace offering is contrasted to the lamb of the guilt offering of verse 12. The guilt of loss of days there is now overcome by the victory of fulfilled days here. Instead of guilt, there is peace. The days of separation are accomplished without either his failure to meet them, or the Lord intervening and causing them to fail, such as in a sudden death occurring near him. Thus, the peace offering acknowledges this between the two.

15 a basket of unleavened bread, cakes of fine flour mixed with oil, unleavened wafers anointed with oil, and their grain offering with their drink offerings.

In this, along with the previous verses, we see that five of the ordinary offerings are made by the Nazirite – a burnt offering, a sin offering, a peace offering, a grain offering, and a drink offering. It is almost a festival of offerings acknowledging the accomplishment before the Lord. Unfortunately, it would take an entire sermon, or more, to show how all of these various offerings so marvelously point to the work of Christ, but that is why we went through the book of Leviticus. For any who either missed that, or who have forgotten what was taught there, they are available at the touch of your fingers to the keyboard of your internet-connected device in written, video, and audio formats. Such is the convenience we have provided for you at the Superior Word.

16 ‘Then the priest shall bring them before the Lord and offer his sin offering and his burnt offering;

Despite being named second in verse 14, the sin-offering is actually presented first. With the sin atoned for, the burnt-offering is then presented afterward. Both beautifully picture the Person and work of Christ.

17 and he shall offer the ram as a sacrifice of a peace offering to the Lord, with the basket of unleavened bread; the priest shall also offer its grain offering and its drink offering.

After the sin and burnt offerings come the peace offering which is offered with the unleavened bread. Then the priest offers the grain and drink offerings as prescribed. Again, every word of each offering points to Christ in one way and then another. No detail of these offerings is without its fulfillment in Him. To understand what these offerings reveal is to look directly at what Jesus did in one great act of offering Himself for us and to God.

18 Then the Nazirite shall shave his consecrated head at the door of the tabernacle of meeting, and shall take the hair from his consecrated head and put it on the fire which is under the sacrifice of the peace offering.

The hair reflected his uniting to the Lord in his separation. Now that this separation has come to its fulfillment, he is to shave it off and then put it not with the sacrifice of peace offering, but under it. Thus, it is not a sacrifice as so many scholars state. What seems to be the idea here is that the hair is returned to God through the fire as rightly belonging to Him.

It is an acknowledgment that the hair is as a picture of life in the Lord. If He wanted to, he could have caused the Nazirite to be defiled at any time by a death near him. Even if unintentional, the Nazirite would have to redo the vow until it was complete. Thus the hair of separation itself is as a crown of reward. It being cast back to the Lord then is comparable to the twenty-four elders in Revelation 4:10 casting their crowns before the throne and saying –

You are worthy, O Lord,
To receive glory and honor and power.” Revelation 4:11

Though the Nazirite completed his time, it was because of the Lord that he could even do so. The reward and glory belong to Him. The offering between the two is Christ, who is our Peace (Romans 5:1).

19 ‘And the priest shall take the boiled shoulder of the ram, one unleavened cake from the basket, and one unleavened wafer, and put them upon the hands of the Nazirite after he has shaved his consecrated hair,

The peace offering is a meal of the one who makes the offering, and in which a portion is taken out of it for the priest who represents the Lord. Two things are different about this peace offering than that described in Leviticus 7. First, in Leviticus 7:13, leavened bread was offered with the sacrifice of the peace offering. That showed that the Lord accepted the offeror, despite his sin. That is not considered in this offering.

The Nazirite has lived a life separated to God, and he has offered a sin offering for any infraction that may have arisen. There is no need to include leavened bread now. Secondly, in Leviticus 7:34, the breast and the thigh of a peace offering were the Lord’s portion. Here, the boiled shoulder of the ram is added to that. Thus, it signifies that the Lord has accepted a fuller offering from the Nazirite because he more fully gave of himself to the Lord. As an understandable idiom, he put his shoulder into the work.

20 and the priest shall wave them as a wave offering before the Lord; they are holy for the priest, together with the breast of the wave offering and the thigh of the heave offering.

Though the priests received the Lord’s sacred portion as their own, they were first waved before the Lord. This was accomplished by the priest placing his hands under those of the Nazirite. The idea of the wave offering is that it is first symbolically offered to the Lord. It is waved back and forth, up and down, and side by side. It is then received back by the priest as the Lord’s designated representative. The heave offering is the same. It is raised to the Lord first, just as Christ was raised on the cross. After that, it is received back by the priest. A full explanation of these things is found in Leviticus.

20 (con’t) After that the Nazirite may drink wine.’

With the vow and separation of the Nazirite being complete, his only dilemma now is whether it will be Merlot or Cabernet.

21 “This is the law of the Nazirite who vows to the Lord the offering for his separation, and besides that, whatever else his hand is able to provide;

What this means is that the Nazirite was obligated to the offerings which have just been stated. They came as a part of the vow itself and they were mandatory. However, the Nazirite could also add to those offerings with whatever his status and wealth could find sufficiency to give.

21 (con’t) according to the vow which he takes, so he must do according to the law of his separation.”

What this final clause means is that he is under full obligation to the requirements of the Nazirite. His vow was not considered acceptable or complete without the completion of the offerings which were required. This, along with any other vows to God, were expected to be performed. That is why Solomon said this –

When you make a vow to God, do not delay to pay it;
For He has no pleasure in fools.
Pay what you have vowed—
Better not to vow than to vow and not pay.” Ecclesiastes 5:4, 5

For a person to vow such as in the case of a Nazirite (or indeed any such noble vow), he would appear holy and exceptional to the people of Israel. However, if he failed to fulfill the responsibility of the offerings that went with this perceived laudable conduct, he would only be a fool in the eyes of the Lord. This is the law of the Nazirite. In the end, it is a custom and a system which in its core pointed to the more glorious separation of God’s people because of Christ Jesus. Every detail of the rite and custom finds its true fulfillment in Him.

As seen in our text verse, Israel purposely caused their Nazirites to stumble by giving them wine to drink. What is sad about this, is that the vow was then annulled, and any time spent was wasted. When the Nazirite went to offer his offerings, they may have been accepted by the priest, but they were not accepted by the Lord.

That in itself stands as a lesson to us. Though in Christ we are not imputed sin, we still have rewards and losses being stored up in our lives and daily actions. There are times where we are drawn away to sin by others. There are times we fail to act in faith. There are also times that we actively act in disobedience. Our lives will be evaluated, and such things as are not acceptable will be burned up.

We will suffer loss because of it. And so, like the Nazirite, we should endeavor to be guided by the Lord alone, we should endeavor to stay away from external influences which misdirect us from the sure and sound path on which we walk, and we should fix our eyes on Jesus – the Author and Finisher of our faith. In doing this our lives will remain acceptable, we will be free from defilement, and we shall receive the welcome words, “Well done” for the lives we live here in these fallen bodies. Better, greater things lie ahead, and so let us strive to pursue better, greater things now in anticipation of that.

Closing Verse: “Therefore

Come out from among them
And be separate, says the Lord.
Do not touch what is unclean,
And I will receive you.’
18 ‘I will be a Father to you,
And you shall be My sons and daughters,
Says the Lord Almighty.’” Numbers 23:8, 9

Next Week: Numbers 6:22-27 Does the Lord wish the best for His people? Surely there is no need for guessing… (The High Priestly Blessing) (12th Numbers Sermon)

The Lord has you exactly where He wants you. He has a good plan and purpose for you. It may seem at times as if you are lost in a desert, wandering aimlessly. But the Lord is there, carefully leading you to the Land of Promise. So follow Him and trust Him and He will do marvelous things for you and through you.

The Vow of the Nazirite

Then the Lord spoke to Moses, saying
These are the words He was then relaying

Speak to the children of Israel, and say to them:
When either a man or woman, according to this word
Consecrates an offering to take the vow of a Nazirite
To separate himself to the Lord

He shall separate himself from wine and similar drink
He shall drink neither vinegar made from wine
———-nor vinegar made from similar drink too
Neither shall he drink any grape juice
Nor eat fresh grapes or raisins; such things he shall not do

All the days of his separation therein
He shall eat nothing that is produced by the grapevine
———-from seed to skin

All the days of the vow of his separation
No razor shall come upon his head; thus it shall be so
Until the days are fulfilled for which
———-he separated himself to the Lord, he shall be holy
Then he shall let the locks of the hair of his head grow 

All the days that he separates himself to the Lord
He shall not go near a dead body according to My word

He shall not make himself unclean
Even for his father or his mother, so I have now said
For his brother or his sister, when they die
Because his separation to God is on his head 

All the days of his separation he shall be holy to the Lord
Thus shall it be according to My word

And if anyone dies very suddenly beside him
And he defiles his consecrated head, as to you I submit
Then he shall shave his head on the day of his cleansing
On the seventh day he shall shave it

Then on the eighth day he shall bring
Two turtledoves or two young pigeons to the priest
To the door of the tabernacle of meeting
———-so shall he do this thing 

And the priest shall offer one as a sin offering
And the other as a burnt offering, as to you I say
And make atonement for him
———-because he sinned in regard to the corpse
And he shall sanctify his head that same day 

He shall consecrate to the Lord the days of his separation
And bring a male lamb in its first year as a trespass offering
But the former days shall be lost
Because his separation was defiled by the occurrence of this thing

Now this is the law of the Nazirite:
And so to the people these words you shall be repeating
When the days of his separation are fulfilled
He shall be brought to the door of the tabernacle of meeting 

And he shall present his offering to the Lord:
One male lamb in its first year without blemish as a burnt offering
———-so he shall do
One ewe lamb in its first year without blemish as a sin offering
One ram without blemish as a peace offering too

A basket of unleavened bread
Cakes of fine flour mixed with oil also
Unleavened wafers anointed with oil
And their grain offering with their drink offerings; it shall be so

Then the priest shall bring them before the Lord
And offer his sin offering and his burnt offering as I have said
And he shall offer the ram as a sacrifice
———-of a peace offering to the Lord
With the basket of unleavened bread

The priest shall also offer its grain offering and its drink offering
Such shall be the required proffering

Then the Nazirite shall shave his consecrated head
At the door of the tabernacle of meeting, so he shall do this thing
And shall take the hair from his consecrated head
And put it on the fire which is under
———-the sacrifice of the peace offering

And the priest shall take the boiled shoulder of the ram
One unleavened cake from the basket
———-and one unleavened wafer too
And put them upon the hands of the Nazirite
After he has shaved his consecrated hair, so he shall do

And the priest shall wave them as a wave offering before the Lord
They are holy for the priest as I say to you
Together with the breast of the wave offering
And the thigh of the heave offering too

After that the Nazirite may drink wine
He is no longer restricted from the fruit of the vine

This is the law of the Nazirite among the nation
Who vows to the Lord the offering for his separation

And besides that
Whatever else his hand is able to provide, according to his station
According to the vow which he takes
|So he must do according to the law of his separation

Lord God, we are even now in a wilderness
And we are wanting to be led by You
Without You to direct, our lives would be a mess
And so be our guide, O God; You who are faithful and true

We long for the water in this barren land
May it flow forth from the Rock, our souls to satisfy
Give us this refreshing, spiritual hand
And may we take it, and to our lives daily it apply

And we shall be content and satisfied in You alone
We will follow You as we sing our songs of praise
Hallelujah to You; to us Your path You have shown
Hallelujah we shall sing to you for all of our days

Hallelujah and Amen…